S-1

Credit Suisse

BofA Merrill Lynch

J.P. Morgan

Guggenheim Securities

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after the effective date of this registration statement.

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box: ¨

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of earlier effective registration statement for the same offering: ¨

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering: ¨

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering: ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

The registrant is an “emerging growth company,” as defined in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act. This registration statement complies with the requirements that apply to an issuer that is an emerging growth company.

The registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until this Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

Diamond Resorts International, Inc. (“Diamond International”), the registrant whose name appears on the cover page of this registration statement, is a newly-formed Delaware corporation. Shares of common stock of Diamond International are being offered by the prospectus that forms a part of this registration statement. Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC (“Diamond LLC”) is a Nevada limited liability company. Diamond International was formed solely for the purpose of reorganizing the organizational structure of Diamond LLC in order for the registrant to be a corporation rather than a limited liability company. In connection with, and immediately prior to the completion of, this offering, each member of Diamond LLC will contribute all of its equity interests in Diamond LLC to Diamond International in return for shares of common stock of Diamond International. Diamond LLC will then be merged with and into Diamond International. See “Organizational Structure—Reorganization Transactions” in the prospectus that forms a part of this registration statement for additional information. The consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial data included in this prospectus are of Diamond LLC and its consolidated subsidiaries and do not give effect to the corporate reorganization.

The information in this preliminary prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This preliminary prospectus is not an offer to sell, and we are not soliciting an offer to buy, these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.

We are offering shares of our common stock and the selling stockholders identified in this prospectus are offering an additional shares of our common stock. We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of shares being sold by the selling stockholders.

Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our common stock. We anticipate that the estimated initial public offering price of our common stock will be between $ and $ per share. We intend to list our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “DRII.”

The underwriters have an option to purchase a maximum of additional shares from certain selling stockholders to cover over-allotment of shares.

We are an “emerging growth company” under federal securities laws and are subject to reduced public company disclosure standards. See “Prospectus Summary—Implications of Being an Emerging Growth Company.”

Investing in our common stock involves risks. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 22.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

[Pictures of the interior and exterior of selected resort properties; list of managed and branded resorts and affiliated resorts, hotels and cruises included in our resort network]

You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus and in any free writing prospectus filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Neither we, the selling stockholders nor the underwriters have authorized anyone to provide you with information that is different from that contained in this prospectus or any free-writing prospectus prepared by us or on our behalf. We do not, and the selling stockholders and the underwriters do not, take any responsibility for, and can provide no assurances as to, the reliability of any information that others provide to you. We and the selling stockholders are offering to sell, and seeking offers to buy, shares of our common stock only in jurisdictions where offers and sales are permitted. The information contained in this prospectus is accurate only as of the date of this prospectus, regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or of any sale of our common stock.

Until , 2013 (25 days after the commencement of this offering), all dealers that buy, sell or trade shares of our common stock, whether or not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This delivery requirement is in addition to the obligation of dealers to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters and with respect to their unsold allotments or subscriptions.

No action is being taken in any jurisdiction outside the United States to permit a public offering of our securities or possession or distribution of this prospectus in that jurisdiction. Persons who come into possession of this prospectus in jurisdictions outside the United States are required to inform themselves about, and to observe, any restrictions as to the offering and the distribution of this prospectus applicable to those jurisdictions.

Certain market, industry and similar data included in this prospectus have been obtained from third-party sources that we believe to be reliable, including the ARDA International Foundation, or the AIF. Our market estimates are calculated by using independent industry publications and other publicly available information in conjunction with our assumptions about our markets. We have not independently verified any market, industry or similar data presented in this prospectus. Such data involves risks and uncertainties and are subject to change based on various factors, including those discussed under the headings “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors.”

Diamond Resorts International^®, Diamond Resorts^®, THE Club^®, The Meaning of Yes^® and our other registered or common law trademarks, service marks or trade names appearing in this prospectus are property of the Company. This prospectus also refers to brand names, trademarks or service marks of other companies. All brand trademarks, service marks or trade names cited in this prospectus are the property of their respective holders.

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

The following summary highlights selected information contained elsewhere in this prospectus but does not contain all of the information that you should consider in making your investment decision. Before investing in our common stock, you should carefully read this entire prospectus, including our consolidated financial statements and the related notes and the information set forth under the heading “Risk Factors” included elsewhere in this prospectus. Some of the statements in this prospectus constitute forward-looking statements. See “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”

Diamond Resorts International, Inc. (“Diamond International”) is a newly-formed Delaware corporation that has not, to date, conducted any activities other than those incident to our formation and the preparation of the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part. Diamond International was formed solely for the purpose of changing the organizational structure of Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC (“Diamond LLC”) from a limited liability company to a corporation. In connection with, and immediately prior to the completion of, this offering, each member of Diamond LLC will contribute all of its equity interests in Diamond LLC to Diamond International in return for shares of common stock of Diamond International. Following this contribution, Diamond LLC will be merged with and into Diamond International. See “Organizational Structure—Reorganization Transactions” in this prospectus for additional information concerning these reorganization transactions, which we refer to as the “Reorganization Transactions.” Except where the context otherwise requires or where otherwise indicated, (1) references in this prospectus to “the Company,” “we,” “us” and “our,” refer to Diamond International and its subsidiaries, including Diamond Resorts Corporation, after giving effect to the Reorganization Transactions, (2) our consolidated financial statements and other historical financial data included in this prospectus are those of Diamond LLC and its subsidiaries and do not give effect to the Reorganization Transactions and (3) references in this prospectus to our management include the management made available to us by Hospitality Management and Consulting Service, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company that is beneficially owned by Stephen J. Cloobeck, our founder and Chairman, pursuant to the HM&C Agreement described herein.

Throughout this prospectus, we use the term “Adjusted EBITDA.” See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Indebtedness—Senior Secured Notes” for information concerning our Adjusted EBITDA.

In this prospectus, when we present “LTM” financial or operating data, including such data on a pro forma basis, we are presenting such data for the 12-month period ended March 31, 2013, calculated by adding such data for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 to the corresponding amount for the year ended December 31, 2012, and then subtracting the corresponding amount for the quarter ended March 31, 2012.

Company Overview

We offer a vacation ownership program whereby members acquire vacation ownership interests, or VOIs, in the form of points. Members receive an annual allotment of points depending on the number of points purchased, and they can use these points to stay at any of the destinations within our network of resort properties, including both Diamond Resorts-branded properties as well as affiliated resorts, hotels and cruises. Unlike a traditional weeks-based vacation ownership product that is linked to a specific resort and week during the year, our points-based system permits our members to maintain flexibility relating to the location, season and duration of their vacation.

A core tenet of our management philosophy is delivering consistent quality and personalized services to each of our members, and we strive to infuse hospitality and service excellence into every aspect of our business and each member’s vacation experience. To that end, we are committed to The Meaning of Yes^®, a set of Diamond values designed to ensure that each of our members and guests receives a consistent, “high touch” hospitality experience through our efforts to respond to the desires of our members and guests. Our service-oriented culture is highly effective in building a strong brand name and fostering long-term relationships with our members, resulting in additional sales to our existing member base.

Our business consists of two segments: (1) hospitality and management services and (2) sales and financing of VOIs.

•

Hospitality and Management Services. We are fundamentally a hospitality company that manages a worldwide network of resort properties and provides services to a broad member base. We manage our branded resort properties, as well as seven multi-resort trusts, or Collections, each of which holds ownership interests in a group of resort properties within a geographic region. For example, the U.S. Collection includes interests in 36 resorts located throughout the continental United States. Our management contracts automatically renew, and the management fees we receive are based on a cost-plus structure. As the manager of our branded resorts, we operate the front desks, furnish housekeeping, maintenance and human resources services and operate amenities such as golf courses, food and beverage venues and retail shops. We also provide an online reservation system, a customer service contact center, rental services, billing services, account collections, accounting and treasury functions and communications and information technology services. In addition, a key component of our business is THE Club, through which we operate a proprietary reservation system that enables our members to use their points to stay at any of the resorts in our network. THE Club also offers our members a wide range of other benefits, such as the opportunity to purchase various products and services (such as consumer electronics, home appliances and insurance products) from third parties at discounted prices, for which we earn commissions. Annual fees paid by our members cover the operating costs of our managed resorts (including an allocation of a substantial portion of our overhead related to the provision of our management services), our management fees and, in the case of THE Club members, dues for membership in THE Club.

•

Sales and Financing of VOIs. As part of our hospitality and management services, we typically enter into agreements with our managed resorts and the Collections under which we reacquire VOIs from members who fail to pay their annual maintenance fees or other assessments, serving as the principal source of our VOI inventory that we sell. We sell VOIs principally through presentations, which we refer to as “tours,” at our 50 sales centers, substantially all of which are located at our managed resorts. We generate sales prospects by utilizing a variety of marketing programs, including presentations at our managed resorts targeted at existing members and current guests who stay on a per-night or per-week basis, overnight mini-vacation packages, targeted mailings, telemarketing, gift certificates and various destination-specific marketing efforts. As part of our sales efforts, and to generate interest income and other fees, we also provide loans to qualified VOI purchasers.

The charts below show the contribution that each segment of our business made to our LTM total revenue and net income (with the percentages in the charts below representing the relative contributions of these two segments).

Recent Developments

Island One Acquisition

We expect to enter into an agreement to acquire all of the equity interests of Island One, Inc. and Crescent One, LLC (together, the “Island One Companies”). Upon the closing of this acquisition, which is subject to the execution of the definitive agreement, the closing of this offering and other customary closing conditions, we will acquire management contracts, unsold VOIs and a portfolio of consumer loans, adding nine additional managed resorts in Florida to our resort network and more than 25,000 owner-families to our ownership base (the “Island One Acquisition”). The purchase price for the Island One Acquisition is based upon, among other things, the initial public offering price of this offering and will be paid entirely by issuing shares of common stock to the existing owner of the Island One Companies (the “Island One Equityholder”). Assuming an initial public offering price of $ per share (the midpoint of the price range on the cover of this prospectus), we will issue an aggregate of shares of our common stock to the Island One Equityholder upon the closing of the Island One Acquisition.

PMR Service Companies Acquisition

On June 12, 2013, we entered into an agreement to acquire assets from Monarch Owner Services, LLC, Resort Services Group, LLC and Monarch Grand Vacations Management, LLC (collectively, the “PMR Service Companies”), each of which provides various management services to the resorts and the Collection added to our network through our acquisition of assets of Pacific Monarch Resorts, Inc. in May 2012 (the “PMR Service Companies Acquisition”). Upon the closing of the PMR Service Companies Acquisition, which is subject to the closing of this offering and other customary closing conditions, we will acquire various agreements and assets, including management agreements for such resorts and Collection from which we would receive management fees. The purchase price for the PMR Service Companies Acquisition is based upon, among other things, the initial public offering price of this offering and will be paid entirely in cash. Assuming an initial public offering price of $ per share (the midpoint of the price range on the cover of this prospectus), the purchase price for the PMR Service Companies Acquisition will be approximately $ million payable upon the closing of the PMR Service Companies Acquisition.

See “Business—Our Recent and Proposed Strategic Acquisitions” for additional information regarding each of these proposed acquisitions.

Our Resort Network

The following table summarizes the broad global footprint of our resort network:


Managed and Branded Resorts			Affiliated Resorts, Hotels and Cruises			Affiliated Resorts, Hotels and Cruises (Cont.)
North America			North America			Asia and Australia
Arizona	10		Arizona		6	Australia		6
California	2		California		18	China (including Hong Kong)		12
Colorado	1		Colorado		1	Indonesia		2
Florida	5		Canada		3	India		3
Hawaii	2		Florida		7	Japan		7
Indiana	1		Hawaii		11	Malaysia		7
Missouri	1		Idaho		1	Singapore		1
Nevada	4		Kansas		1	Thailand		8
New Mexico	1		Louisiana		1	*Subtotal*		46
Tennessee	1		Massachusetts		4
Utah	1		Maryland		1	Europe and Africa
Virginia	2		Michigan		1	Bulgaria		1
*Subtotal*	31		Nevada		3	England		21
			New Hampshire		2	Norway		1
Mexico and Caribbean			North Carolina	3		Austria	4
Baja California	1		Ohio		2	Germany		1
Sonora	1		Oregon		2	Italy		2
St. Maarten	2		Pennsylvania		1	Kenya		1
*Subtotal*	4		South Carolina		7	Portugal		6
Europe			Tennessee		3	Scotland		3
Europe			Texas	2		South Africa	6
Austria	1		Utah		1	Wales		1
England	12		Virginia		1	*Subtotal*		47
France	4		Washington		5
Greece	5		Wisconsin		2
Italy	1		Wyoming		1	Cruise Itineraries
Ireland	3		*Subtotal*		90	Caribbean		1
Malta	1					Alaska		1
Portugal	1		Mexico, Caribbean, Central and South America			Mediterranean		1
Scotland	1		Mexico, Caribbean, Central and South America			Balkan Capitals		1
Spain	16		Brazil		1	*Subtotal*		4
*Subtotal*	45		Bahamas		1
			Costa Rica		1
			Dominican Republic		3
			Jamaica		1
			Mexico		20
			St Maarten		1

Total Managed and Branded Resorts	80	*	*Subtotal*		28	Total Affiliated Resorts, Hotels and Cruises		215

*	Upon the closing of the Island One Acquisition, which is subject to the execution of the definitive agreement, the consummation of this offering and other customary closing conditions, we will add nine additional managed resorts in Florida to our resort network.

Competitive Strengths

Our competitive strengths include:

A substantial portion of the revenue from our hospitality and management services business converts directly to Adjusted EBITDA. Our management contracts with our managed resorts and the Collections automatically renew, and under these contracts we receive management fees generally ranging from 10% to 15% of the other costs of operating the applicable resort or Collection (with an average based upon the total management fee revenue of 14.6%). The covered costs paid by our managed resorts and the Collections include both the direct resort operating costs and an allocation of a substantial portion of our overhead related to this part of our business. Accordingly, our management fee revenue results in a comparable amount of Adjusted EBITDA. Generally, our revenue from management contracts increases to the extent that (1) operating costs at our managed resorts and the Collections rise and, consequently, our management fees increase proportionately under our cost-plus management contracts, (2) we add services under our management contracts or (3) we acquire or enter into contracts to manage resorts not previously managed by us.

The principal elements of our business typically provide us with significant financial visibility.

•

Management fees from our cost-plus management contracts. All anticipated operating costs of each of our managed resorts and Collections, including our management fees and costs pertaining to the specific managed resort or Collection, such as costs associated with the maintenance and operations of the resort, are included in the annual budgets of these resorts and Collections. These annual budgets are determined by the board of directors of the HOA or Collection, as applicable, and are typically finalized before the end of the prior year. As a result, a substantial majority of our management fees are collected by January of the applicable year as part of the annual maintenance fees billed to VOI owners. Unlike typical management agreements for traditional hotel properties, our management fees are not affected by average daily rates or occupancy rates at our managed resorts. In addition, while our management contracts may be subject to non-renewal or termination, no resort or Collection has terminated or elected not to renew any of our management contracts during the past five years.

•

Recurring fees earned by operating THE Club. Dues payments for THE Club are billed and collected together with the annual maintenance fees billed to our members who are also members of THE Club. Members of THE Club are not permitted to make reservations or access THE Club’s services and benefits if they are not current in payment of these dues.

•

VOI sales. Our VOI sales revenue is primarily a function of three factors: the number of tours we conduct, our closing percentage (which represents the percentage of VOI sales closed relative to the total number of sales presentations at our sales centers) and the sales price per transaction. We generally have a high degree of near-term visibility as to each of these factors. Before the beginning of a year, we can predict with a high degree of confidence the number of tours we will conduct that year, and we believe that we can tailor our sales and marketing efforts to effectively influence our closing percentage and average transaction size in order to calibrate our VOI sales levels over the course of the year.

•

Financing of VOI sales. We target the level of our consumer financing activity in response to capital market conditions. We accomplish this by offering sales programs that either encourage or discourage our customers to finance their VOI purchases with us, without compromising our underwriting standards. As of March 31, 2013, the weighted average FICO score (based upon loan balance) for our borrowers across our existing loan portfolio was 706, and the weighted average FICO score for our borrowers on loans originated since October 2008 was 759. The default rate on our consumer loan portfolio was 6.6% for 2012, and ranged from 6.6% to 9.9% on an annual basis from 2009 through 2012.

Our capital-efficient business model requires limited investment in working capital and capital expenditures.

•

Limited working capital required. Our hospitality and management services business consumes limited working capital because a substantial portion of the funds we receive under our management contracts is collected by January of each year and released to us as services are provided. Moreover, all resort-level maintenance and improvements are paid for by the owners of VOIs, with our financial obligation generally limited to our pro rata share of the VOIs we hold as inventory.

•

Limited investment capital required. We do not believe that we will need to build resort properties or acquire real estate in the foreseeable future to support our anticipated VOI sales levels; however, in certain geographic areas, we may from time to time acquire additional VOI inventory through open market purchases or other means. Although the volume of points or intervals that we recover could fluctuate in the future for various reasons, we have consistently reacquired approximately 3.0% to 4.0% of our total outstanding VOIs from defaulted owners on an annual basis. This provides us with a relatively low-cost, consistent stream of VOI inventory that we can resell. Furthermore, other than the planned completion of a portion of a resort we now manage following our recently completed transaction with Pacific Monarch Resorts, Inc., we have not undertaken any major development projects in the last several years, nor are any such projects planned. In each of our recent strategic transactions, we have acquired an on-going business, consisting of management contracts, unsold VOI inventory and an existing owner base, which has generated immediate cash flow for us.

•

Access to financing. The liquidity to support our provision of financing to our customers for VOI purchases is provided through conduit, loan sale and securitization financing and, as a result, also consumes limited working capital.

Our scalable VOI sales and marketing platform has considerable operating leverage and drives increases in Adjusted EBITDA. We have built a robust and versatile sales and marketing platform. This platform enables us to take actions that directly impact the three factors that primarily determine our VOI sales revenue: the number of tours we conduct, our closing percentage and the sales price per transaction. Our objective is to consistently monitor and adjust these three factors to reach an optimum level of VOI sales based on our available VOI inventory. With our scalable sales platform in place, we do not foresee the need to build new sales centers or significantly increase the size of our sales team. Accordingly, we believe our VOI sales business has considerable operating leverage and the ability to drive increases in Adjusted EBITDA.

Our high level of customer satisfaction results in significant sales of additional VOIs to our members. We believe our efforts to introduce hospitality, service excellence and quality into each member’s vacation experience have resulted in a high degree of customer satisfaction, driving significant sales of additional VOIs to our members. The percentage of VOI sales made to our existing members purchasing additional points for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2011 and 2012 was 59%, 66% and 72%, respectively.

Our accomplished management team positions us for continued growth. We are led by an experienced management team that has delivered strong operating results through disciplined execution. Our founder and Chairman, Stephen J. Cloobeck, who provides strategic oversight and direction for our hospitality services, including the services provided to our managed resorts, has over 25 years of experience in the hospitality and vacation ownership industry and in the development, management, operation, marketing and sales of real estate properties. Our President and Chief Executive Officer, David F. Palmer, has over 20 years of management and finance experience, and our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, C. Alan Bentley, has over 30 years focused on business management, strategic planning and complex financing transactions. Messrs. Cloobeck and Palmer, as well as other members of our management team, have substantial equity interests in the Company that will closely align their economic interests with those of our other stockholders. Our management team has

taken a number of significant steps to refine our strategic focus, build our brand recognition and streamline our operations, including (1) maximizing revenue from our hospitality and management services business, which rose from $99.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 to $153.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, (2) implementing a focus throughout our business on service and hospitality and (3) adding resorts to our network and owners to our owner base through complementary strategic acquisitions.

Growth Strategies

Our growth strategies are as follows:

Continue to grow our hospitality and management services business. We expect our hospitality and management services revenue will continue to grow as rising operating expenses at our managed resorts result in higher revenues under our cost-plus management contracts. We intend to generate additional growth in our hospitality and management services business by (1) increasing membership in THE Club, (2) adding service and activity offerings for members of THE Club and (3) expanding opportunities for our members to purchase third party products and services.

•

Increase membership in THE Club. Purchasers of our points are, in almost all cases, automatically enrolled in THE Club. In addition, we regularly reacquire previously sold VOIs from defaulted owners, including legacy owners of non-points-based VOIs (intervals). Because all intervals that we reacquire are then sold by us in the form of points, we expect that membership in THE Club will grow organically as intervals are reacquired and resold in the form of points to new members. We also encourage interval owners at our managed resorts to join THE Club, and we have instituted special offers and promotional programs to target for membership in THE Club the ownership bases at resorts that we now manage as a result of our recent strategic acquisitions.

•

Broaden hospitality service and activity offerings. We intend to continue to make membership in THE Club more attractive to our members by expanding the number and variety of offered services and activities, such as airfare, cruises, excursions, golf outings, entertainment, theme park tickets and luggage and travel protection. These hospitality-focused enhancements may allow us to increase the annual dues paid by members of THE Club and should also generate commission revenue for us.

•

Expand offers of third party products and services to our members. We intend to expand the opportunities we offer our members to purchase products and services (such as consumer electronics, home appliances and insurance products) from third parties at discounted prices. We receive a commission based on the sales revenue from those transactions, without incurring costs associated with these products and services.

Continue to leverage our scalable sales and marketing platform to increase VOI sales revenue. We intend to continue to take advantage of the operating leverage in our sales and marketing platform. We will focus not only on potential new customers but also on our existing membership base, and expect that through these efforts and our continuing commitment to ensuring high member satisfaction, a significant percentage of our VOI sales will continue to be made to our existing members. We also intend to target the ownership bases at resorts that we now manage as a result of our recent strategic acquisitions to encourage these prospective customers to purchase our VOIs. While we anticipate that the bulk of our future VOI sales will be made through our traditional selling methods, we are seeking to more fully integrate the VOI sales experience into our hospitality and management services. For example, at some of our managed resorts, we have begun to offer an enhanced mini-vacation package in which a group of members or prospective customers who have purchased such a package are invited to dine together, along with our sales team members, and to attend a show or other local attraction as a group over a two-day period. At the end of the stay, our sales team provides an in-depth explanation of our points-based VOI system and the value proposition it offers. We have found that, by creatively engaging with potential purchasers and infusing hospitality into the sales process, we improve potential purchasers’ overall experience and level of satisfaction and, as a result, are able to increase the likelihood that they will buy our VOIs and increase the average transaction size.

Pursue additional revenue opportunities consistent with our capital-efficient business model. We believe that we can achieve growth without pursuing revenue opportunities beyond those already inherent in our core business model. However, to the extent consistent with our capital-efficient business model, we intend to:

•

Selectively pursue strategic transactions. We intend to pursue acquisitions of ongoing businesses, including management contracts and VOI inventory, on an opportunistic basis where the economic terms are favorable and we can achieve substantial synergies and cost savings. In the second quarter of 2013, we entered into an agreement with respect to the PMR Service Companies Acquisition. In addition, we expect to enter into an agreement with respect to the Island One Acquisition. The Island One Acquisition is intended to be, and future acquisitions may be, similar in structure to the four transactions we have completed since August 2010, including that with Pacific Monarch Resorts, Inc., in which we added nine locations to our network of available resorts, four management contracts, new members to our owner base and additional VOI inventory that we may sell to existing members and potential customers. Additionally, we may purchase or otherwise obtain additional management contracts, including from hospitality companies facing financial distress, and acquire VOI inventory at resorts that we do not currently manage.

•

Prudently expand our geographic footprint. We believe that there are significant opportunities to expand our business into new geographic markets in which we currently may have affiliations, but do not manage resorts or market or sell our VOIs. We believe that certain countries in Asia and Central and South America are particularly attractive potential new markets for us because of the substantial increases in spending on travel and leisure activities forecasted for their consumers. To the extent that we can maintain our high quality standards and strong brand reputation, we are selectively exploring acquisitions of ongoing resort businesses in these markets and may also pursue co-branding opportunities, joint ventures or other strategic alliances with existing local or regional hospitality companies. For example, in early 2013, we entered into a memorandum of understanding for a joint venture arrangement with Dorsett Hospitality International, a large hotel developer, owner and operator in Asia, pursuant to which we have added properties operated by Dorsett and its affiliated companies in China (including Hong Kong), Japan, Malaysia and Singapore to our network of affiliated resorts and hotels and have agreed to jointly market and sell vacation ownership products to potential customers in Asia. We believe that expansion of our geographic footprint will produce revenue from consumers in the markets into which we enter and also make our resort network more attractive to existing and prospective members worldwide.

•

Broaden our business-to-business services. We have developed a broad set of business systems, skills and practices that we believe we can profitably offer on a fee-for-service basis to other companies in the hospitality and vacation ownership industry. For example, we have entered into fee-for-service agreements with resort operators and hospitality companies pursuant to which we provide them with resort management services, VOI sales and marketing services and inventory rental services. These types of arrangements are highly profitable for us because we are not required to invest any significant capital. In the future, in situations where we can leverage our unique expertise, skills and infrastructure, we intend to expand our provision of business-to-business services on an a-la-carte basis or as a suite of services, to third party resort developers and operators and other hospitality companies.

Risks Related to Our Business

Notwithstanding our competitive strengths and growth strategies described above, we face a number of challenges and risks in our business, including those described in “Risk Factors” beginning on page 22 of this prospectus. Risks relating to our business include, among others:

•

we have incurred net losses in the past and may incur net losses in the future

•

adverse changes to, or interruptions in, relationships with our affiliates and other third parties may occur, including the expiration, termination or renegotiation of our hospitality management contracts or the

failure of the managers of our affiliated resorts to ensure that those properties meet our customers’ expectations;

•

unfavorable general economic conditions could adversely affect our business, and deterioration in conditions in the United States and globally could result in decreased demand for VOIs and our ability to obtain future financing;

•

our revenues are highly dependent on the travel industry and declines in or disruptions to the travel industry may adversely affect us;

•

our future success depends on our ability to market VOIs successfully and efficiently, and our business may be adversely affected if we are unable to maintain an optimal inventory of VOIs for sales to customers;

•

our current international operations and potential international growth are subject to risks not generally applicable to our domestic operations, including risks related to difficult economic conditions in Europe, compliance with foreign laws and regulations, challenges associated with expansion into developing markets in which we have limited experience, and fluctuations in foreign currency rates;

•

the vacation ownership industry in which we operate is highly competitive, and we may not be able to compete effectively;

•

our substantial level of indebtedness and the terms of our debt covenants could adversely affect us, and we may incur additional indebtedness in the future;

•

we have recently experienced some modest declines in THE Club membership and may experience declines in THE Club or may not be able to grow THE Club membership in the future;

•

our business plan historically has depended on our ability to sell, securitize or borrow against the consumer loans that we generate, and our liquidity, financial condition and results of operations would be adversely impacted if we are unable to do so in the future;

•

we are subject to extensive regulation relating to the marketing and sale of vacation interests and collection of customer loans; and

•

either or both of the Probable Acquisitions may not occur concurrently with the closing of this offering or at all.

Company History and Organizational Structure

Diamond Resorts International, Inc. was incorporated as a Delaware corporation on January 11, 2013 to effect the Reorganization Transactions and this offering. After the completion of this offering, Diamond International will be a holding company, and its principal asset will be direct and indirect ownership of equity interests in its subsidiaries, including Diamond Resorts Corporation, a Maryland corporation, which is the operating subsidiary that has historically conducted the business described in this prospectus.

Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, was formed in April 2007 to effect the acquisition of Sunterra Corporation by an investor group led by Stephen J. Cloobeck, our founder and Chairman. In connection with the acquisition, Sunterra Corporation, which was incorporated as a Maryland corporation on May 26, 1996 under the name KGK Resorts, Inc., was renamed Diamond Resorts Corporation. As of the date of this prospectus, Diamond LLC is the sole equityholder of Diamond Resorts Holdings, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, which in turn is the sole shareholder of Diamond Resorts Corporation.

Reorganization Transactions

In connection with the offering, we will enter into the Reorganization Transactions. Immediately prior to, and in connection with, the closing of this offering, the following steps will be taken to effect the Reorganization Transactions:

•

Diamond International will file an amended and restated certificate of incorporation, which will authorize shares of common stock having the terms described in “Description of Capital Stock;”

•

(i) the holders of Class A common units of Diamond LLC will contribute all of their Class A common units in Diamond LLC to Diamond International in return for an aggregate of shares of common stock of Diamond International, and (ii) the holders of Class B common units of Diamond LLC will contribute all of their Class B common units in Diamond LLC to Diamond International in return for an aggregate of shares of common stock of Diamond International; and

•

after consummation of the steps above, Diamond Resorts Holdings, LLC will be merged with and into Diamond LLC, with Diamond LLC being the surviving entity, and Diamond LLC will be merged with and into Diamond International, with Diamond International being the surviving entity.

Effect of this Offering

As part of this offering, will sell shares of our common stock. We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock in this offering by the selling stockholders.

Assuming an initial public offering price of $ per share, which is the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus, after deducting the underwriters’ discounts and commissions and the estimated offering expenses, upon completion of the Reorganization Transactions and this offering, the common stock of Diamond International will be held as follows:

•

our public stockholders will hold approximately % of the outstanding common stock of Diamond International (or % if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full); and

•

our current equityholders, together with the Island One Equityholder, will collectively hold approximately % of the outstanding common stock of Diamond International (or % if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full).

Implications of Being an Emerging Growth Company

As a company with less than $1 billion in revenue during our last fiscal year, we qualify as an “emerging growth company” as defined in the Jumpstart our Business Startups Act of 2012, which we refer to as the “JOBS Act.” As an “emerging growth company,” we may take advantage of specified reduced reporting and other burdens that are otherwise applicable generally to public companies. These exceptions include:

•

reduced disclosure about our executive compensation arrangements and no requirement to include a compensation discussion and analysis;

•

no requirement to hold nonbinding advisory shareholder votes on executive compensation or golden parachute arrangements; and

•

an exemption from the auditor attestation requirement in the assessment of our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

We intend to take advantage of some, but not all, of the exemptions available to emerging growth companies until such time that we are no longer an emerging growth company. We will remain an “emerging growth company” until the earliest of (1) the last day of the fiscal year in which we have total annual gross revenues of $1 billion or more; (2) the last day of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the date of our initial public offering; (3) the date on which we have issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt during the prior three year period; and (4) the date on which we are deemed to be a “large accelerated filer.” We have taken advantage of reduced reporting requirements in this prospectus. Accordingly, the information contained herein may be different than the information you receive from other public companies in which you hold stock.

Management Agreement with Hospitality Management and Consulting Service, LLC

Messrs. Cloobeck, Palmer and Bentley, and approximately 40 other officers and employees, are not employed or directly compensated by us, but are rather employed and compensated by Hospitality Management and Consulting Service, LLC, or HM&C, a company beneficially owned by Mr. Cloobeck, our founder and Chairman. Pursuant to a services agreement that we entered into with HM&C effective as of December 31, 2010 (as amended and restated effective as of December 31, 2012, the “HM&C Agreement”), HM&C provides certain services to us, including the services of Messrs. Cloobeck, Palmer and Bentley. For more information regarding our agreement with HM&C, see “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions.”

Our Corporate Information

Diamond Resorts International, Inc. is a Delaware corporation and our principal executive offices are located at 10600 West Charleston Boulevard, Las Vegas, Nevada 89135. Our telephone number is (702) 684-8000. Our website address is www.diamondresorts.com. The information contained on or accessible through our website is not part of this prospectus or the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, and potential investors should not rely on such information in making a decision to purchase our common stock in this offering.

The Offering

Common stock offered by us in this offering

Common stock offered by the selling stockholders in this offering

Total

Common stock to be outstanding after this offering and the closing of the Island One Acquisition

shares (based on an assumed initial public offering price of $ per share (the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus)).

The number of shares of common stock which we expect to issue in the Island One Acquisition and, accordingly, the number of shares of common stock which we expect to be outstanding after this offering are subject to change based upon, among other things, the initial public offering price per share, as discussed under “Organizational Structure—Island One Acquisition.”

Over-allotment option

Certain selling stockholders have granted to the underwriters an option to purchase up to additional shares of common stock at the initial public offering price (less underwriting discounts and commissions) to cover over-allotments, if any, for a period of 30 days from the date of this prospectus.

Use of proceeds

We expect the net proceeds that we will receive from this offering will be approximately $ million based on an assumed initial public offering price of $ per share (the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus), after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.

The indenture governing our 12% senior secured notes due 2018 (“Senior Secured Notes”) requires us, no later than 30 days following the closing of this offering, to offer to repurchase the maximum principal amount of our Senior Secured Notes that may be purchased with 25% of the net cash proceeds we receive in this offering, at a price equal to 112% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of purchase.

We expect to use the net proceeds to us from this offering for the following purposes and in the following amounts: (1) up to approximately $ million (representing 25% of the net cash proceeds we receive in this offering) to purchase Senior Secured Notes from holders who accept our offer to repurchase Senior Secured Notes at a price equal to 112% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of purchase (although we cannot determine the extent to which (if at all) holders

of Senior Secured Notes will accept our repurchase offer); (2) approximately $ million to repay the outstanding principal amount, accrued and unpaid interest and exit fees under the PMR Acquisition Loan (as described in this prospectus); (3) approximately $ million to repay the outstanding principal amount, accrued and unpaid interest and exit fees under the Tempus Acquisition Loan (as described in this prospectus) and (4) approximately $ million to pay the purchase price to the PMR Service Companies, based on an assumed initial public offering price of $ per share (the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus). See “Use of Proceeds” for a discussion of the impact that different initial public offering prices would have on the purchase price payable in the PMR Service Companies Acquisition.

We intend to use any remaining net proceeds to us from this offering for working capital and other general corporate purposes, which may include the redemption of a portion of our outstanding Senior Secured Notes that remain outstanding after completion of the repurchase offer described above, pursuant to the terms of the indenture governing the Senior Secured Notes.

We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock by the selling stockholders in this offering.

Proposed NYSE symbol

“DRII”

Directed Share Program

The underwriters have reserved a portion of the shares of our common stock offered in this prospectus for sale to employees, directors, personnel provided to us by HM&C and other persons associated with us. See “Underwriting (Conflicts of Interest)” for more information.

Risk factors

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 22 for a discussion of some of the factors you should carefully consider before deciding to invest in shares of our common stock.

Conflicts of Interest

holders of those notes. Because Guggenheim Securities, LLC is an underwriter and its affiliates will beneficially own more than 10% of our common stock after giving effect to the Reorganization Transactions and will receive more than 5% of the net proceeds of this offering, Guggenheim Securities, LLC is deemed to have a “conflict of interest” under the applicable provisions of Rule 5121 (“Rule 5121”) of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. Accordingly, this offering is being made in compliance with the requirements of Rule 5121. In accordance with that rule, the appointment of a “qualified independent underwriter” is not required in connection with this offering because the underwriter primarily responsible for managing this public offering does not have a “conflict of interest” under Rule 5121, is not an affiliate of any underwriter that does have a “conflict of interest” under Rule 5121 and meets the requirements of paragraph (f)(12)(E) of Rule 5121. Guggenheim Securities, LLC will not make sales to any account over which it exercises discretionary authority without the specific written approval of the account holder. See “Underwriting (Conflicts of Interest).”

Unless otherwise indicated, the number of shares of common stock outstanding after this offering as presented in this prospectus excludes:

•

up to shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options, with an exercise price equal to the initial public offering price, that we intend to issue on the date of this prospectus under our incentive compensation plan to our executive officers, various management personnel and our non-officer directors, including individuals that hold Class B common units of Diamond LLC; and

•

shares of common stock reserved for issuance in connection with future grants of equity under the Diamond Resorts International, Inc. 2013 Incentive Compensation Plan and the Diamond Resorts International, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

Except as otherwise noted, the information in this prospectus assumes:

•

the filing of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and the effectiveness of our amended and restated bylaws in connection with this offering;

•

the consummation of the Reorganization Transactions;

•

an initial public offering price of $ per share of common stock (the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover of this prospectus);

•

the closing of the Island One Acquisition and the issuance of an aggregate of shares of common stock to the Island One Equityholder; and

•

the underwriters do not exercise their over-allotment option.

Summary Historical Consolidated and Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial and Operating Data

Set forth below is summary historical consolidated and unaudited pro forma consolidated financial and operating data of Diamond LLC at the dates and for the periods indicated. Diamond International is a recently formed holding company which has not engaged in any business or other activities other than those incident to its formation and the preparation of the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part. Accordingly, all of our financial and other information herein relating to periods prior to the completion of the Reorganization Transactions is that of Diamond LLC and its subsidiaries. The summary historical consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2010, December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2012 and summary historical consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2012 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. The summary historical consolidated statement of operations data for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2013 and the summary historical consolidated balance sheet data as of March 31, 2013 have been derived from our unaudited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. The LTM summary historical consolidated statement of operations data have been derived from our audited consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2012 and our unaudited consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2013, in each case included elsewhere in this prospectus. Our unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a basis consistent with our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. In the opinion of management, our unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the results of operations and financial position of Diamond LLC and its subsidiaries for such periods and at such date. The historical results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

On May 21, 2012, we acquired from Pacific Monarch Resorts, Inc. and its affiliates certain real estate and timeshare related assets for approximately $51.6 million in cash, plus the assumption of specified liabilities related to the acquired assets (the “PMR Acquisition”), which added nine locations to our resort network, four management contracts and VOI inventory.

Also, we entered into an asset purchase agreement on June 12, 2013, pursuant to which we have agreed to consummate the PMR Service Companies Acquisition, subject to the closing of this offering and other customary closing conditions. We also expect to enter into a transaction agreement, pursuant to which we will agree to consummate the Island One Acquisition, subject to the closing of this offering and other customary closing conditions. Both of these proposed acquisitions are considered “probable” and, accordingly, are reflected in the summary unaudited pro forma consolidated financial and operating data set forth below. We sometimes refer to the Island One Acquisition and the PMR Service Companies Acquisition in this prospectus as the “Probable Acquisitions.”

The summary unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of operations data for the year ended December 31, 2012, for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and for the 12 months ended March 31, 2013 (LTM), and the summary unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet data as of March 31, 2013, are derived from the unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements set forth under “Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information.” The summary unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of operations data for the year ended December 31, 2012 and for the 12 months ended March 31, 2013 (LTM) give effect to the PMR Acquisition (including the financing transactions related to the PMR Acquisition), the Probable Acquisitions and this offering (including the application of the net proceeds thereof assuming (i) an initial public offering price of $ per share (the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus), (ii) no holders of the Senior Secured Notes accept our offer to repurchase Senior Secured Notes and (iii) we do not use any net proceeds to redeem any Senior Secured Notes), as if each had occurred as of January 1, 2012. The summary unaudited pro forma consolidated financial data as of, and for the three months ended, March 31, 2013 give effect to the

Probable Acquisitions and this offering (including the application of the net proceeds thereof assuming (i) an initial public offering price of $ per share (the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus), (ii) no holders of the Senior Secured Notes accept our offer to repurchase Senior Secured Notes and (iii) we do not use any net proceeds to redeem any Senior Secured Notes), as if each had occurred as of January 1, 2012 in the case of statement of operations data, or as of March 31, 2013 in the case of balance sheet data. The summary unaudited pro forma consolidated financial data also reflect that, pursuant to the Reorganization Transactions, Diamond International will become the ultimate parent and issuer of the common stock in this offering; however, there are no adjustments to the historical financial information as a result of the Reorganization Transactions.

The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial data are included for informational purposes only and do not purport to represent what our actual financial position or results of operations would have been had the transactions referenced above occurred on the dates indicated. In addition, the pro forma adjustments described herein are based on available information and upon assumptions that our management believes are reasonable in order to reflect, on a pro forma basis, the impact of the above transactions on our historical consolidated financial data. The unaudited pro forma financial data also do not purport to represent, and may not be indicative of, our results of operations for any future period or our financial position as of any future date. The unaudited pro forma combined condensed statements of operations do not include adjustments for (i) any revenue or cost saving synergies that may be achievable subsequent to the completion of the Probable Acquisitions or the costs that may be incurred to achieve those synergies or (ii) any prospective revenue or cost saving synergies that may be achieved since the completion of the PMR Acquisition, or the costs that may be incurred to achieve those prospective synergies, in addition to those reflected in the historical financial information. The information presented below should be read in conjunction with “Use of Proceeds,” “Capitalization,” “Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information,” “Selected Historical Consolidated Financial and Operating Data,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the respective consolidated financial statements of Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC and its subsidiaries, Pacific Monarch Resorts, Inc. (Debtor-in-Possession), the Island One Companies and the PMR Service Companies included elsewhere in this prospectus.


	Historical																		Company Pro Forma
	Year Ended December 31,									Three Months Ended March 31,									Year Ended December 31, 2012	Three Months Ended March 31, 2013	LTM
	2010			2011			2012			2012			2013			LTM			Year Ended December 31, 2012	Three Months Ended March 31, 2013	LTM
										(unaudited)						(unaudited)			(unaudited)		(unaudited)
	($ in thousands, except per share data and as noted)
Statement of Operations Data:
Total revenues	$	370,825		$	391,021		$	523,668		$	108,950		$	153,452		$	568,170		$	$	$
Total costs and expenses		391,258			390,235			524,335			117,550			150,741			557,526

(Loss) income before provision (benefit) for income taxes and discontinued operations		(20,433	)		786			(667	)		(8,600	)		2,711			10,644
(Benefit) provision for income taxes		(1,274	)		(9,517	)		(14,310	)		975			438			(14,847	)

Net (loss) income	$	(19,159	)	$	10,303		$	13,643		$	(9,575	)	$	2,273		$	25,491		$	$	$

Net income (loss) per share
Basic		—			—			—			—			—			—
Diluted		—			—			—			—			—			—
Weighted average common shares outstanding
Basic		—			—			—			—			—			—
Diluted		—			—			—			—			—			—
Other Financial Data (Unaudited):
Capital expenditures	$	5,553		$	6,276		$	14,335		$	1,885		$	2,524		$	14,974
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities		66,001			9,292			24,600			20,701			10,338			14,237
Investing activities		(37,399	)		(109,800	)		(69,338	)		(1,666	)		(2,524	)		(70,196	)
Financing activities		(18,271	)		93,035			45,540			(20,978	)		(2,131	)		64,387
Operating Data:
Branded resorts(1)		70			71			79			71			80			80
Affiliated resorts(1)		109			144			180			144			211			211
Cruise itineraries(1)		—			4			4			4			4			4

Total destinations		179			219			263			219			295			295

Total number of tours(2)		130,801			146,261			180,981			34,942			44,499			190,538
Closing percentage(3)		17.4	%		14.4	%		14.8	%		14.5	%		13.9	%		14.6	%
Total number of VOI sale transactions(4)		22,719			21,093			26,734			5,057			6,169			27,846
Average VOI sale price per transaction(5)	$	9,526		$	10,490		$	12,510		$	12,060		$	15,565		$	13,269
Volume per guest(6)	$	1,655		$	1,513		$	1,848		$	1,745		$	2,158		$	1,939


	Historical				Company Pro Forma
	As of December 31, 2012		As of March 31, 2013		As of March 31, 2013 (unaudited)(7)
	As of December 31, 2012		As of March 31, 2013		As of March 31, 2013 (unaudited)(7)
	(unaudited)
	($ in thousands)
Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	21,061	$	26,204	$
Mortgages and contracts receivable, net		312,932		320,967
Unsold Vacation Interests, net		315,867		300,488
Total assets		993,008		1,053,803
Senior secured notes, net of unamortized original issue discount		416,491		416,747
Securitization notes and conduit facilities, net		256,302		278,928
Notes payable		137,906		137,545
Total liabilities		1,091,607		1,152,861

(1)	As of the end of each period.

(2)	Represents the number of sales presentations at our sales centers during the period presented.

(3)	Represents the percentage of VOI sales closed relative to the total number of sales presentations at our sales centers during the period presented.

(4)	Represents the number of VOI sales transactions during the period presented.

(5)	Represents the average purchase price (not in thousands) of VOIs sold during the period presented.

(6)	Represents VOI sales (not in thousands) divided by the total number of tours during the period presented.

(7)	Assuming our offer to repurchase our Senior Secured Notes was accepted in full, our cash and cash equivalents would be $ , our total assets would be $ , our senior secured notes, net of unamortized original issue discount, would be $ , and our total liabilities would be $ .

Liquidity and Indebtedness

Historically, our business has depended on the availability of credit to finance the consumer loans we have provided to our customers for the purchase of their VOIs. Specifically, we have entered into conduit and loan sale facilities to provide us with such financing, and we have also relied upon our ability to sell receivables in the securitization market in order to generate liquidity and create capacity on these facilities.

In August 2010, we issued the Senior Secured Notes, the proceeds of which were used primarily to repay all of the outstanding indebtedness under our then-existing revolving line of credit and first and second lien facilities. Additionally, our special purpose subsidiaries enter into financing arrangements and incur indebtedness to finance our strategic acquisitions. As of March 31, 2013, our outstanding indebtedness consisted primarily of indebtedness under the Senior Secured Notes and our conduit and loan sale facilities, indebtedness incurred in our securitization transactions and indebtedness incurred in connection with the consummation of strategic acquisitions: the ILX Acquisition, the Tempus Resorts Acquisition, the PMR Acquisition and the Aegean Blue Acquisition (each as defined in this prospectus). See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Indebtedness” for additional information regarding our indebtedness outstanding as of March 31, 2013.

Our indebtedness is subject to the terms of our debt-related agreements, including covenants which limit our ability to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness or liens, pay dividends, sell our assets, enter into business combination transactions or enter into transactions with our affiliates. Some of the covenants included within our debt-related agreements are determined by reference to Adjusted EBITDA. In particular, the indenture governing the Senior Secured Notes (the “Notes Indenture”) includes covenants (specifically, covenants limiting

our ability to incur indebtedness or liens and covenants requiring us to offer to repurchase the Senior Secured Notes with excess cash flow) that are determined by reference to Adjusted EBITDA for Diamond LLC and its restricted subsidiaries, and financial covenants governing the Conduit Facility are (and we expect that financial covenants governing our new Revolving Credit Facility (defined in this prospectus) that we intend to enter into in connection with the consummation of this offering will be) determined by reference to measures calculated in a manner similar to the calculation of Adjusted EBITDA pursuant to the terms of the Notes Indenture.

Set forth in the table below is Adjusted EBITDA for Diamond LLC and its restricted subsidiaries, as calculated in accordance with, and for purposes of covenants contained in, the Notes Indenture, reconciled to our net cash provided by operating activities. LTM Adjusted EBITDA is presented because the covenants in the Notes Indenture restricting the incurrence of indebtedness and liens are based upon Adjusted EBITDA for Diamond LLC and its restricted subsidiaries for the four most recently ended fiscal quarters.

Adjusted EBITDA is a non-U.S. GAAP financial measure and should not be considered in isolation, or as an alternative to net cash provided by operating activities or any other measure of liquidity, or as an alternative to net income (loss), operating income (loss) or any other measure of financial performance, in any such case calculated and presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations— Liquidity and Capital Resources—Indebtedness—Senior Secured Notes” for a description of the covenants governing the Senior Secured Notes and additional information regarding our Adjusted EBITDA.


	Historical
	Year Ended December 31,									Three Months Ended March 31,
	2010			2011			2012			2012			2013			LTM
										(unaudited)			(unaudited)			(unaudited)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	66,001		$	9,292		$	24,600		$	20,701		$	10,338		$	14,237
Income tax expense		(1,274	)		(9,517	)		(14,310	)		975			438			(14,847	)
Provision for uncollectible Vacation Interest revenues(a)		(12,655	)		(16,562	)		(25,457	)		(4,115	)		(6,672	)		(28,014	)
Amortization of capitalized financing costs and original issue discounts(a)		(2,521	)		(6,138	)		(6,293	)		(1,506	)		(1,874	)		(6,661	)
Stock-based compensation(a)		—			—			(3,321	)		—			—			(3,321	)
Deferred income taxes(b)		377			8,567			13,010			—			—			13,010
(Loss) gain on foreign currency(c)		(42	)		72			(113	)		29			(61	)		(203	)
Gain on mortgage purchase(a)		191			196			27			11			—			16
Unrealized gain on derivative instruments(d)		314			79			—			—			—			—
Gain on insurance settlement(e)		—			3,535			—			—			2,203			2,203
Corporate Interest Expense(f)		48,959			63,386			77,422			17,011			20,764			81,175
Change in operating assets and liabilities excluding acquisitions(g)		(53,391	)		15,325			12,183			(21,272	)		5,852			39,307
Vacation interests cost of sales(h)		39,730			(9,695	)		32,150			8,231			17,846			41,765

Adjusted EBITDA— Consolidated		85,689			58,540			109,898			20,065			48,834			138,667
Less: Adjusted EBITDA—Unrestricted Subsidiaries(i)		(6,534	)		(12,349	)		8,957			509			7,974			16,422
Plus: Intercompany elimination(j)		—			3,203			19,058			2,905			6,751			22,904

Adjusted EBITDA—Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC and Restricted Subsidiaries	$	92,223		$	74,092		$	119,999		$	22,461		$	47,611		$	145,149

(a)	Represents non-cash charge or gain.

(b)	Represents the deferred income tax liability arising from the difference between the treatment for financial reporting purposes as compared to income tax return purposes, related to the intangible assets acquired in connection with the PMR Acquisition and the Tempus Resorts Acquisition.

(c)	Represents net realized (losses) gains on foreign exchange transactions settled at (unfavorable) favorable exchange rates and unrealized (losses) gains resulting from the (devaluation) appreciation of foreign currency-denominated assets and liabilities.

(d)	Represents the effects of the changes in mark-to-market valuations of derivative liabilities.

(e)	Represents insurance settlements to be received in future periods in connection with property damage claims or reimbursement of defense costs related to litigation.

(f)	Represents corporate interest expense; does not include interest expense related to non-recourse indebtedness incurred by our special-purpose subsidiaries that is secured by our VOI consumer loans.

(g)	Represents the net change in operating assets and liabilities excluding acquisitions, as computed directly from the statements of cash flows. Vacation Interest cost of sales is included in the net changes in unsold Vacation Interests, net as presented in the statements of cash flows.

(h)

We record Vacation Interest cost of sales using the relative sales value method in accordance with ASC 978, which requires us to make significant estimates which are subject to significant uncertainty. In determining the appropriate amount of costs using the relative sales value method, we rely on complex, multi-year financial models that incorporate a variety of estimated inputs. These models are reviewed on a regular basis, and the relevant estimates used in the models are revised based upon historical results and management’s new estimates.

(i)	Represents the Adjusted EBITDA of unrestricted subsidiaries as defined in, and calculated in accordance with, the Notes Indenture.

(j)

Represents the elimination of revenues and expenses related to agreements entered into between the Company’s restricted and unrestricted subsidiaries. The agreements include service agreements for sales and marketing management, resort management, reservation services and portfolio management, whereby certain restricted subsidiaries operate these functions on behalf of the unrestricted subsidiaries for a fee. In addition to these service agreements, the Company has also entered into intercompany sales agreements, whereby certain restricted subsidiaries purchase unsold Vacation Interests from unrestricted subsidiaries.

Preliminary Operating Data

Based on currently available information, in the two months ended May 31, 2013, the most recently completed two months for which the following operating data is available:

•

we conducted 35,641 sales presentations, or tours, at our sales centers, an increase of 8,741 tours, or 32.5%, from 26,900 tours in the two months ended May 31, 2012;

•

our closing percentage, which represents the percentage of VOI sales closed relative to the total number of sales presentations at our sales centers during each of the two months ended May 31, 2013 and 2012, was 13.8%;

•

we closed a total of 4,935 VOI sales transactions, an increase of 1,230 VOI sales transactions closed, or 33.2%, from a total of 3,705 VOI sales transactions closed in the two months ended May 31, 2012;

•

our average VOI sale price per transaction, which represents the average purchase price of VOIs sold, was $16,218, an increase of $3,645, or 29.0%, from our average VOI sale price per transaction of $12,573 in the two months ended May 31, 2012; and

•

our volume per guest, which represents VOI sales divided by the total number of tours, was $2,246, an increase of $514, or 29.7%, from our average volume per guest of $1,732 in the two months ended May 31, 2012.

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the following risk factors, as well as the other information in this prospectus, including our financial statements, before deciding whether to invest in shares of our common stock. The occurrence of any of the adverse developments described in the following risk factors could materially and adversely harm our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects. In that case, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose part or all of your investment.

We have incurred net losses in the past and may not experience positive net income in the future.

We have incurred net losses in the past and we may incur net losses in the future. As of March 31, 2013, our accumulated deficit was $235.2 million. Excluding a non-recurring gain on bargain purchase from business combination of $14.3 million and $20.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012, our net losses for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2011 and 2012 were $19.2 million, $4.0 million and $7.0 million, respectively. Any failure by us to obtain or sustain profitability, or to continue our revenue growth, could cause the price of our common stock to decline significantly.

We derive a substantial portion of our revenue through contracts with HOAs to manage resort properties and with the Collections. The expiration, termination or renegotiation of these management contracts could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

We are party to management contracts relating to 80 properties and the seven Collections, under which we receive fees for providing management services. During the years ended December 31, 2010, 2011 and 2012 and the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2013, we earned management fees under these contracts of $48.1 million, $57.0 million, $68.3 million, $15.7 million and $18.5 million respectively, representing approximately 13.0%, 14.6%, 13.0%, 14.4% and 12.1% of our total consolidated revenue for such periods, respectively, and our hospitality and management services business accounts for a significantly greater percentage of our Adjusted EBITDA than of our total consolidated revenue. Each of the Diamond Resorts-branded resorts, other than certain resorts in our European Collection, is typically operated through a homeowners’ association, or HOA, and each of the Collections is typically operated through a Collection association. Each of the HOAs and Collection associations is administered by a board of directors. The boards of directors of the HOAs and Collection associations are responsible for authorizing these management contracts, and negotiate and enforce the terms of these agreements as fiduciaries of their respective resort properties and Collections. Furthermore, some state regulations impose limitations on the amount of fees that we may charge the HOAs and Collections for our hospitality management services and the terms of our management contracts. Our management contracts generally have three to five year terms and are automatically renewable, but provide for early termination rights in certain circumstances. Any of these management contracts may expire at the end of its then-current term (following notice by a party of non-renewal) or be terminated, or the contract terms may be renegotiated in a manner adverse to us. In addition, our growth strategy contemplates leveraging these existing management contracts to add services provided to our members under our management contracts and increase the management fees to cover those new services. There are no guarantees that this strategy will be successful. We believe there are limits to how much we can increase management fees before the HOAs and Collections are unwilling or unable to pay such increased fees, and, if such fees are perceived as being too high by prospective customers, our VOI sales may be adversely affected.

Our growth strategy also contemplates our acquisition of, and entry into, new management contracts. We face significant competition to secure new contracts and may be unsuccessful in doing so on favorable terms, if at all.

Unfavorable general economic conditions have adversely affected our business, and potential deterioration in conditions in the United States and globally could result in decreased demand for VOIs and our ability to obtain future financing.

There have been periods, including from 2008 through 2010, in which our business has been materially adversely affected by unfavorable general economic conditions, including effects of weak domestic and world economies resulting, in part, from the instability of global financial markets and regional economies caused by the European debt crisis, high unemployment, a decrease in discretionary spending, a decline in housing and real estate values, limited availability of financing and geopolitical conflicts. The ARDA International Foundation, or AIF, has reported that aggregate U.S. VOI sales declined $0.9 billion, or 8.5%, to $9.7 billion in 2008 from $10.6 billion in 2007, and aggregate U.S. VOI sales then declined $3.4 billion, or 35.0%, to $6.3 billion in 2009. Economic conditions in the United States and around the world continue to be challenging. See “—Our international operations are subject to risks not generally applicable to our domestic operations, including risks related to difficult economic conditions in Europe.” Additional volatility and disruption in worldwide capital and credit markets and any declines in economic conditions in the United States (including in states particularly hard-hit by the recent economic downturn, such as California, Arizona and Florida), Europe and in other parts of the world could adversely impact our business and results of operations, particularly if the availability of financing for us or for our customers is limited, or if general economic conditions adversely affect our customers’ ability to pay amounts owed under our loans to them or for maintenance fees or assessments. If the HOAs and Collection associations are unable to collect maintenance fees or assessments from our customers, not only would our management fee revenue be adversely affected, but the resorts we manage could fall into disrepair and fail to comply with the quality standards associated with the Diamond brand, which could decrease customer satisfaction, tarnish our reputation and impair our ability to sell our VOIs.

Our revenues are highly dependent on the travel industry and declines in or disruptions to the travel industry, such as those caused by adverse economic conditions, terrorism, man-made disasters and acts of God, may adversely affect us.

A substantial amount of our VOI sales activities occur at the managed resort locations in our network, and the volume of our sales correlates directly with the number of prospective customers who visit these resorts each year. The number of visitors to these resorts depends upon a variety of factors, some of which are out of our control, such as weather conditions and travel patterns generally and the potential impact of natural disasters and crises, such as the ongoing drug cartel-related violence in certain regions of Mexico. For example, the eruption of the Eyjafjallajôkull volcano in Iceland in May 2010 and the corresponding travel disruptions caused a decline in visitors to European resorts. Actual or threatened war, terrorist activity, political unrest or civil strife and other geopolitical uncertainty could have a similar effect. In addition, any increased concern about terrorist acts directed against the United States and foreign citizens, transportation facilities and assets, and travelers’ fears of exposure to contagious diseases may reduce the number of tourists willing to fly or travel in the future, particularly if new significant terrorist attacks or disease outbreaks occur or are threatened.

More generally, the travel industry has been hurt by various events occurring over the last several years, including the effects of weak domestic and global economies. A sustained downturn in travel patterns, including as a result of increases in travel expenses such as higher airfares or gasoline prices, could cause a reduction in the number of potential customers who visit the managed resorts in our network. If we experience a substantial decline in visitors to these resorts, our VOI sales would likely decline. In addition, income and other taxes for some U.S. residents increased in the beginning of 2013, which may reduce the funds that such individuals have available to spend on travel and leisure, including purchasing our VOIs.

Our future success depends on our ability to market VOIs successfully and efficiently, including sales of additional points to our existing ownership base.

We compete for customers with hotel and resort properties and with other vacation ownership resorts and other vacation options such as cruises. The identification of sales prospects and leads, and the marketing of our

products to those leads, are essential to our success. We have incurred and will continue to incur significant expenses associated with marketing programs in advance of closing sales to the leads that we identify. If our lead identification and marketing efforts do not yield enough leads or we are unable to successfully convert sales leads to a sufficient number of sales, we may be unable to recover the expense of our marketing programs. Recently, we have increased our focus on new and relatively unproven hospitality-focused marketing methods, such as enhanced mini-vacation packages focused on small groups of potential customers. To date, such efforts have been on a fairly limited basis, but we intend to expand them significantly in the near term. These marketing methods are more expensive and require a greater commitment of resources than traditional marketing activities, and there can be no assurance that they will be successful on a larger scale.

In addition, a significant portion of our sales are additional points purchased by existing members, and our results of operations depend in part on our ability to continue making sales to our ownership base. Our recent rate of sales of additional points to existing owners may not be sustainable in future periods.

Our business may be adversely affected if we are unable to maintain an optimal level of points or intervals in inventory for sales to customers.

Our ability to maintain an optimal level of points or intervals in inventory for sale to customers is dependent on a number of factors, including fluctuations in our sales levels and the amount of inventory recovered through consumer loan and association fee defaults.

If we experience a significant decline in our inventory of points available for sale, we may be required to expend more capital to acquire inventory.

We have entered into inventory recovery agreements with substantially all of the HOAs for our managed resorts in North America, together with similar arrangements with all of the Collections and a majority of our European managed resorts. Pursuant to these agreements and arrangements, we are required to recapture VOIs either in the form of points or intervals, and bring them into our inventory for sale to customers. During each of the past two years, approximately 3.0% to 4.0% of the outstanding points or intervals were recovered by us pursuant to these agreements. However, the volume of points or intervals recovered by us could decline in the future for a variety of reasons, including as a result of termination or non-renewal of our inventory recovery agreements. For example, if the economy improves, our members may be less likely to fail to pay their annual fees or default on their consumer loans. In addition, if a viable VOI resale market were to develop in the future, our members may choose to resell their interests to third parties. Further, in the event applicable state law makes it more difficult to recover points or intervals, it could extend the time required to consummate a recovery or otherwise make it more difficult to consummate such recoveries. An increased level of VOI sales would also reduce our inventory available for sale. If our inventory available for sale were to decline significantly, we may need to make significant capital expenditures to replenish our inventory by purchasing points or intervals or building new resorts or additional rooms at existing resorts. Alternatively, we would need to substantially reduce the volume of our VOI sales.

If the volume of our inventory of points held by us were to significantly increase, our carrying costs with respect to that inventory would increase.

If VOI sales levels do not keep pace with inventory recovery levels, the volume of our inventory of points or intervals may become higher than desired. Also, if the amount of customer defaults increases, we may be required to repurchase more VOI inventory than desired pursuant to our inventory recovery agreements. Our recent acquisitions of assets from ILX Resorts Incorporated, Tempus Resorts International, Ltd., Pacific Monarch Resorts, Inc. and Aegean Blue Holdings Plc., all completed since August 2010, have provided us with additional VOI inventory, and potential future acquisitions may include additional inventory. Additionally, as part of some of our recent acquisitions, we have incurred additional obligations to repurchase defaulted inventory (either by taking back defaulted consumer loans or repurchasing the inventory that collateralizes such loans). We incur

carrying costs associated with our VOI inventory, as we are obligated to pay annual maintenance fees and assessments on any VOIs held in inventory, and higher-than-desired VOI inventory levels would result in increases in these carrying costs. If our inventory available for sale were to increase significantly, we may need to sell some of this excess inventory at significantly discounted prices. In addition, the inventory recovery agreements we enter into with the HOAs and Collections are subject to annual renewal, and as a result, we may not always repurchase VOI inventory from customers in default. If we do not repurchase such inventory, the annual maintenance fees and assessments are allocated among the remaining non-defaulting owners of units in the HOA and the Collection, increasing the amounts paid by each of those owners (including us, to the extent we hold units in inventory). This increases the risk that owners of such other units may be unwilling or unable to pay such increased fees and may default as well. The increased per-unit costs could also make units in the HOA and the Collection less attractive to prospective purchasers.

To the extent our rental proceeds from VOI inventory may decline, our vacation interest carrying costs will increase.

Under our inventory recovery agreements, we are required to pay maintenance and assessment fees to the HOAs and Collections, including any past due amounts, for any VOIs that we have recovered. We are also obligated to pay to the HOAs and Collections cleaning fees for room stays incurred by our guests who stay with us on a per-night or per-week basis. See “Business—Recovery of VOIs.” In order to offset these expenses, we rent the available units. In 2011 and 2012 and the first three months of 2013, our net vacation interest carrying costs, consisting of carrying costs related to the VOIs that we owned in each of these periods, less amounts generated from rental of these VOIs in each of these periods, was $41.3 million, $36.4 million and $8.2 million, respectively. Our ability to rent units is subject to a variety of risks common to the hospitality industry, including competition from large and well-established hotels, changes in the number and occupancy and room rates for hotel rooms, seasonality and changes in the desirability of geographic regions of the resorts in our network. Because our rental operations are relatively small, we are at a disadvantage compared to large and well-established hotel and resort chains which focus on the rental market, have more experience in, and greater resources devoted to, such market, and can offer rental customers additional benefits such as loyalty points related to rentals and a significantly larger pool of potentially available rental options.

We utilize external exchange program affiliations as important sources of sales prospects and leads, and any failure to maintain such affiliations could reduce these prospects.

We have an affiliation agreement for an external exchange program with Interval International, which complements our own internal vacation ownership exchange program, THE Club. As a result of this affiliation, members of THE Club generally may use their points to reserve the use of a vacation accommodation at more than 2,700 resorts worldwide that participate in Interval International. In addition, interval owners at our managed resorts may join either Interval International or RCI, as their HOA constitutions dictate. Such interval owners may then deposit their deeded intervals in exchange for an alternative vacation destination. When our points and intervals are exchanged through Interval International or RCI, this inventory is made available to owners from other resorts, who are potential customers for our VOI sales. If we do not maintain our external exchange program affiliations, the number of individuals exchanging interests through these programs to stay at our managed resorts may decline substantially.

We are dependent on the managers of our affiliated resorts to ensure that those properties meet our customers’ expectations.

The members of THE Club have access to 211 affiliated resorts and hotels and four cruise itineraries in our network. We do not manage, own or operate these resorts, hotels and cruises, and we have limited ability to control their management and operations. If the managers of a significant number of those properties were to fail to maintain them in a manner consistent with our standards of quality, we may be subject to customer complaints and our reputation and brand could be damaged. In addition, our affiliation agreements with these resorts may

expire, be terminated or not be renewed, or may be renegotiated in a manner adverse to us, and we may be unable to enter into new agreements that provide members of THE Club with equivalent access to additional resorts.

There is not currently an active, organized or liquid resale market for VOIs, and resales of VOIs generally are made at sales prices substantially below their original customer purchase prices. These factors may make the initial purchase of a VOI less attractive to potential buyers who are concerned about their ability to resell their VOI. Also, buyers who seek to resell their VOIs compete with our own VOI sales efforts. If the secondary market for VOIs were to become more organized and liquid, the resulting availability of resale VOIs (particularly where the VOIs are available for sale at lower prices than ours) could adversely affect our sales and our sales prices. Furthermore, the volume of VOI inventory that we recapture each year may decline if a viable secondary market develops.

We are subject to certain risks associated with our management of resort properties.

Through our management of resorts and ownership of VOIs, we are subject to certain risks related to the physical condition and operation of the managed resort properties in our network, including:

Some of these risks may be more significant in connection with the properties for which we recently acquired management agreements, particularly those management agreements which were acquired from operators in financial distress. For additional risks related to our acquired businesses, see “—Our strategic transactions may not be successful and may divert our management’s attention and consume significant resources.” If an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occurs as a result of any of the foregoing, we or the HOAs or Collections may be subject to significant costs. If an HOA or Collection is subject to any such loss, we will also be responsible for a portion of such loss to the extent of our ownership of VOIs in the resort or Collection, and any substantial assessments charged by the HOAs or Collections as a result of any of these items could cause customer dissatisfaction and harm our business and reputation. For example, in October 2011, the HOA of one of our managed resorts levied a $65.8 million water intrusion assessment to the owner-families of that resort, of which we owe $9.7 million. This assessment is payable in annual installments over five years, and we remitted the first two installment payments by their due dates. See “Business—Legal Proceedings.” For any resorts in which we own common areas, we are directly subject to the risks set forth above.

Additionally, a number of U.S. federal, state and local laws, including the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 and the Americans with Disabilities Act, impose requirements related to access to and use by disabled persons of a variety of public accommodations and facilities. A determination that our managed resorts are subject to, and that they are not in compliance with, these accessibility laws could result in a judicial order requiring compliance, imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants. If an HOA at one of our managed resorts was required to make significant improvements as a result of non-compliance with these accessibility laws, assessments might be needed to fund such improvements, which additional costs may cause our VOI owners to default on their consumer loans from us or cease making required HOA maintenance fee or assessment payments. Also, to the extent that we hold interests in a particular resort (directly or indirectly

through our interests in a Collection), we would be responsible for our pro rata share of the costs of such improvements. In addition, any new legislation may impose further burdens or restrictions on property owners with respect to access by disabled persons.

The resort properties that we manage are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment, natural resources and worker health and safety, including laws and regulations governing and creating liability relating to the management, storage and disposal of hazardous substances and other regulated materials and the cleanup of contaminated sites. The resorts are also subject to various environmental laws and regulations that govern certain aspects of their ongoing operations. These laws and regulations control such things as the nature and volume of wastewater discharges, quality of water supply and waste management practices. To the extent that we hold interests in a particular resort (directly or indirectly through our interests in a Collection), we would be responsible for our pro rata share of losses sustained by such resort as a result of a violation of any such laws and regulations.

Our international operations are subject to risks not generally applicable to our domestic operations, including risks related to difficult economic conditions in Europe.

We manage resorts in 12 countries and have sales and marketing operations in 12 countries. Our operations in foreign countries are subject to a number of particular risks, including:

In addition, Europe and certain European Union countries in particular, including France, Greece (where we recently added five resorts to our network of managed resorts pursuant to the Aegean Blue Acquisition described elsewhere in this prospectus), Ireland, Italy, Portugal and Spain, are experiencing high levels of unemployment, low rates of growth and other difficult economic conditions. These conditions could have a negative effect on the global economy as a whole and could have a negative effect on our managed resorts and sales and marketing operations located in Europe. If these conditions continue (particularly if they worsen even further), potential European customers for our VOIs and resort interests in Europe may have less disposable income available to spend on vacation ownership products, and may have additional difficulty obtaining financing.

The marketing and sale of our points-based VOIs and our other operations in Europe are also subject to national regulation and legislation. Directive 2008/122/EC of the European Parliament (the “Directive”) regulates vacation ownership activities within the European Union (which includes the majority of the European countries in which we conduct our operations). The Directive required transposition into domestic legislation by

the members of the European community no later than February 23, 2011 and replaced the previous regulatory framework introduced by EC Directive 94/47/EC. Most of our purchasers in Europe are residents of the United Kingdom, where the Directive has been implemented under The Timeshare, Holiday Products, Resale and Exchange Contracts Regulations 2010. The Directive has been implemented in all the other member states in which we operate, as well as in Norway (which, although not a member of the European community, is a member of the European Economic Area). The Directive (1) requires delivery of specified disclosure (some of which must be provided in a specific format); (2) requires a “cooling off” rescission period of 14 calendar days; and (3) prohibits any advance payments in any member states.

Our international business operations are also subject to various anti-corruption laws and regulations, including restrictions imposed by the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”). The FCPA and similar anti-corruption laws in other jurisdictions generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to government officials for the purpose of obtaining or generating business. We cannot provide assurance that our internal controls and procedures will always protect us from the reckless or criminal acts that may be committed by our employees or third parties with whom we work. If we are found to be liable for violations of the FCPA or similar anti-corruption laws in international jurisdictions, criminal or civil penalties could be imposed on us.

We are exploring growth opportunities in new international markets in which we have limited experience, including developing markets in Asia and Latin America, which are challenging.

We are exploring growth opportunities in geographic markets such as Asia (including China) and Latin America. We currently have affiliation agreements in place with a few resorts in Asia and Latin America, and may explore additional co-branding opportunities with existing resorts, joint ventures or other strategic alliances with local or regional operators in those markets. For example, in early 2013 we entered into a memorandum of understanding for a joint venture arrangement with Dorsett Hospitality International, a large hotel developer, owner and operator in Asia, pursuant to which we have added properties operated by Dorsett and its affiliated companies in China (including Hong Kong), Japan, Malaysia and Singapore to our network of affiliated resorts and hotels and have agreed to jointly market and sell vacation ownership products to potential customers in Asia. Alternatively, we may expand our footprint in such markets by pursuing acquisitions, similar to those we have completed recently, where we would acquire resort businesses consisting of management contracts, unsold VOI inventory and an existing membership base. In the event that we expand into new international markets, we will have only limited experience in marketing and selling our products and services in those markets. Expansion into new and developing international markets is challenging, requires significant management attention and financial resources and may require us to attract, retain and manage local offices or personnel in such markets. It also requires us to tailor our services and marketing to local markets and adapt to local cultures, languages, regulations and standards. To the extent we are unable to adapt, or to the extent that we are unable to find suitable acquisition targets or potential affiliates in such markets or to the extent that any such acquisition or existing or future relationships with affiliates in such markets are not as beneficial to us as we expect, our expansion may not be successful. In some of these markets, including China, the concept of vacation ownership is relatively novel. As a result, in these markets there is limited infrastructure and government support for the vacation ownership industry, and the industry may lack sufficient mechanisms for consumer protection. There is also currently not a large supply of vacation ownership products and resorts in those markets, which may limit opportunities and increase competition for those limited opportunities.

In addition, many countries in Asia and Latin America are emerging markets and are subject to greater political, economic, legal and social risks than more developed markets, including risks relating to:

There are also risks related to entering into joint ventures or strategic alliances with local or regional operators, including the possibility that these operators might become bankrupt or fail to otherwise meet their obligations to us. These operators may also have economic or other business interests or goals which are inconsistent with our business interests or goals and may be in a position to take actions contrary to our policies or objectives. Disputes between us and our partners may result in litigation or arbitration that would increase our expenses and prevent our officers and directors from focusing their time and effort on our business. In addition, we may in some circumstances be liable for the actions of our partners. Furthermore, if we do enter into joint ventures or other affiliations with local or regional operators and a significant number of such operators fail to maintain their properties or provide services in a manner consistent with our standards of quality, we may be subject to customer complaints and our reputation and brand could be damaged. To the extent we expand into new international markets, our exposure to the risks described above in “—Our international operations are subject to risks not generally applicable to our domestic operations, including risks related to difficult economic conditions in Europe” will also increase.

Our industry is highly competitive and we may not be able to compete effectively.

The vacation ownership industry is highly competitive. We compete with various high profile and well-established operators, some of which have substantially greater liquidity and financial resources than we do. Some of these operators also have substantially greater experience and familiarity with emerging international markets, such as Latin America and Asia, in which we intend to explore opportunities. Many of the world’s most recognized lodging, hospitality and entertainment companies develop and sell VOIs in resort properties. Major companies that now operate or are developing or planning to develop vacation ownership resorts directly or through subsidiaries include Four Seasons Resorts, Hilton Hotels Corporation, Hyatt Corporation, Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation, Starwood Hotels and Resorts Worldwide, Inc., The Walt Disney Company, Wyndham Worldwide Corporation and Bluegreen Corporation. We also compete with numerous other smaller owners and operators of vacation ownership resorts, as well as alternative lodging companies, such as Home Away and Airbnb, which operate websites that market available furnished, privately-owned residential properties in locations throughout the world, including homes and condominiums, that can be rented on a nightly, weekly or monthly basis. Additionally, due to the recent economic climate, many competitors have had difficulty maintaining their highly-leveraged, development-focused business models and have begun to increase their focus on sales of VOIs and provision of management services. Furthermore, a number of our competitors, including companies with well-known brand names in the hospitality industry, have adopted strategies and product offerings comparable to ours, such as by offering points-based VOI systems, thereby reducing our competitive advantage. Our competitors could also seek to compete against us based on the pricing terms of our current hospitality management contracts or in our efforts to expand our fee based income streams by pursuing new management contracts for resorts that are not currently part of our network. We may not be able to compete successfully for customers, and increased competition could result in price reductions and reduced margins, as well as adversely affect our efforts to maintain and increase our market share.

Our substantial level of indebtedness could adversely affect us, and we may incur additional indebtedness in the future.

As of March 31, 2013, on a pro forma basis, giving effect to this offering and our anticipated use of proceeds (assuming no holders of the Senior Secured Notes accept our offer to repurchase Senior Secured Notes

and assuming that we do not use any net proceeds to us from this offering to redeem any Senior Secured Notes (as described in “Use of Proceeds”)), we had total principal indebtedness of $849.4 million (excluding original issue discounts, payments in transit and 10% participation interest), which includes $425.0 million of the outstanding balance under the Senior Secured Notes, $417.8 million of non-recourse indebtedness in securitization notes and borrowings of our subsidiaries and $6.6 million of other recourse indebtedness.

Our substantial indebtedness has important consequences, including the following:

Our ability to make scheduled payments or to refinance our debt obligations depends on our future financial and operating performance, which is subject to prevailing economic and competitive conditions and to certain financial, business, regulatory and other factors beyond our control. In addition, each of our subsidiaries is a distinct legal entity and, under certain circumstances, may be subject to legal and contractual restrictions that could complicate or impede our ability to obtain cash from our subsidiaries. As a result, we may not be able to maintain a level of cash flow from operating activities sufficient to permit us to pay the principal, premium, if any, and interest on the Senior Secured Notes and our other indebtedness. If we are unable to fund our debt service obligations, we may be forced to reduce or delay capital expenditures, sell assets, seek additional capital or seek to restructure or refinance our indebtedness. These alternative measures may not be successful and may not permit us to meet our scheduled debt service obligations.

Furthermore, we may incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future. If new debt or other liabilities are added to our current debt levels, the related risks that we and our subsidiaries now face, as described above, could intensify.

The terms of our debt covenants could limit how we conduct our business and our ability to raise additional funds.

The indenture that governs the Senior Secured Notes (the “Notes Indenture”) and the agreements governing other debt obligations contain, and the agreements that govern our future indebtedness may contain, covenants that restrict our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries to:

As a result of these covenants, we could be limited in the manner in which we conduct our business, and we may be unable to engage in favorable business activities or finance future operations or capital needs.

Our business plan historically has depended on our ability to sell, securitize or borrow against the consumer loans that we generate, and our liquidity, financial condition and results of operations would be adversely impacted if we are unable to do so in the future.

We generally offer financing of up to 90% of the purchase price to qualified customers who purchase VOIs through our U.S. and Mexican sales centers, and a significant portion of customers choose to take advantage of this opportunity. For example, from October 1, 2011 through December 31, 2012, we financed approximately 69.3% of the total amount of our VOI sales. Our ability to borrow against or sell our consumer loans has been an important element of our continued liquidity, and our inability to do so in the future could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and cash flow. Furthermore, our ability to generate sales of VOIs to customers who require or desire financing may be impaired to the extent we are unable to borrow against such loans on acceptable terms.

In the past, we have sold or securitized a substantial portion of the consumer loans we originated from our customers. If we are unable to continue to participate in securitization transactions or generate liquidity and create capacity on our conduit facilities and the Quorum Facility, as defined below (collectively, the “Funding Facilities”), on acceptable terms, our liquidity and cash flows will be materially and adversely affected. Moreover, if we cannot offer financing to our customers who purchase VOIs through our U.S. and Mexican sales centers, our sales will be adversely affected.

Additionally, we have historically relied on conduit and, more recently, loan sale financing facilities to provide working capital for our operations. Both conduit and loan sale financings are asset-backed commercial finance facilities either secured by, or funded through the sale of, our consumer loans. The initial maturities of our consumer loans are typically 10 years, as compared to the 364-day term of a typical conduit facility, which provides us with greater liquidity. Our conduit facility entered into on November 3, 2008 (as amended and extended, the “Conduit Facility”) presently has a 24-month term that expires on April 10, 2015 and is annually renewable for 364-day terms at the election of the lenders. Our loan sale facility with Quorum Federal Credit Union (“Quorum”) that became effective on April 30, 2010 (as amended and restated, the “Quorum Facility”) has a three-year funding term which may be extended by Quorum for additional one-year periods. If we are unable to extend or refinance our existing conduit or loan sale facilities by securitizing our consumer loan receivables or entering into new conduit or loan sale facilities, our ability to access sufficient working capital to fund our operations may be materially adversely affected and we may be required to curtail our sales, marketing and consumer finance operations. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources” for additional information.

At the present time, we do not have a revolving line of credit in place to provide short-term liquidity for our operations. To the extent that our conduit facility, loan sale facility and operating cash flow are not sufficient to meet our working capital requirements, our ability to sustain our existing operations will be impaired.

We may be unable to raise additional capital we need to grow our business.

We may need to raise additional capital to expand our operations and pursue our growth strategies, including potential acquisitions of complementary businesses, and to respond to competitive pressures or unanticipated working capital requirements. We have relied upon affiliates of, or funds managed or advised by,

Guggenheim Partners, LLC, which is an affiliate of the Guggenheim Investor described in this prospectus, Wellington Management Company, LLP, including some of the Wellington Management Investors described in this prospectus, and Silver Rock Financial LLC, which is an affiliate of the Silver Rock Investors described in this prospectus, to provide debt financing for our recent acquisitions. However, these entities may not provide such financing in the future, and we may not otherwise be able to obtain additional debt or equity financing on favorable terms, if at all, which could impair our growth and adversely affect our existing operations. If we raise additional equity financing, our stockholders may experience significant dilution of their ownership interests, and the per share value of our common stock could decline.

Our credit underwriting standards may prove to be inadequate, and we could incur substantial losses if the customers we finance default on their obligations. In addition, we rely on three third-party lenders to provide financing to purchasers of our VOIs in Europe, and the loss of these customer financing sources could harm our business.

We generally offer financing of up to 90% of the purchase price to qualified purchasers of VOIs sold through our U.S. and Mexican sales centers. There is no assurance that the credit underwriting system we utilize as part of our domestic consumer finance activities will result in acceptable default rates or otherwise ensure the continued performance of our consumer loan portfolio. The default rate on our consumer loan portfolio was 6.6% for 2012, and ranged from 6.6% to 9.9% on an annual basis from 2009 through 2012. As of March 31, 2013, approximately 6.0% of our VOI consumer loans that we held, or which third parties held under sales transactions, and that were not in default (which we define as having occurred upon the earlier of (i) the initiation of cancellation or foreclosure proceedings or (ii) the customer’s account becoming over 180 days delinquent) were more than 30 days past due. Although in many cases we may have personal recourse against a buyer for the unpaid purchase price, certain states have laws that limit our ability to recover personal judgments against customers who have defaulted on their loans. Even where permitted, attempting to recover a personal judgment may not be advisable due to the associated legal costs and the potential adverse publicity. Historically, we have generally not pursued personal recourse against our customers, even when available. If we are unable to collect the defaulted amount due, we traditionally have foreclosed on the customer’s VOI or terminated the underlying contract and remarketed the recovered VOI. Irrespective of our remedy in the event of a default, we cannot recover the often significant marketing, selling and administrative costs associated with the original sale, and we will have to incur a portion of such costs again to resell the VOI. See “—The resale market for VOIs could adversely affect our business” for additional risks related to the resale of VOIs.

Currently, portions of our consumer loan portfolio are concentrated in certain geographic regions within the United States. As of March 31, 2013, our loans to California, Arizona, New York, and Florida residents constituted 25.8%, 9.3%, 5.2% and 5.1% of our consumer loan portfolio, respectively. No other state or foreign country concentration accounted for in excess of 5.0% of our consumer loan portfolio. Some of these states have been particularly hard-hit by the recent economic downturn, for example, the real estate market in Florida continues to experience the highest rate of foreclosure filings in the United States, and unemployment rates in California remain high. Any further deterioration of the economic condition and financial well-being of the regions in which we have significant loan concentration, such as California, Arizona, Florida or New York, could adversely affect our consumer loan portfolio.

We could incur material losses if there is a significant increase in the delinquency rate applicable to our portfolio of consumer loans. An increased level of delinquencies could result from changes in economic or market conditions, increases in interest rates, adverse employment conditions and other factors beyond our control. Increased delinquencies could also result from our inability to evaluate accurately the credit worthiness of the customers to whom we extend financing. If default rates for our borrowers were to increase, we may be required to increase our provision for loan losses. In addition, increased delinquency rates may cause buyers of, or lenders whose loans are secured by, our consumer loans to reduce the amount of availability under our conduit or loan sale facilities, or to increase the interest costs associated with such facilities. In such an event, our cost of financing would increase, and we may not be able to secure financing on terms acceptable to us, if at all.

Under the terms of our securitization facilities, we may be required, under certain circumstances, to repurchase or replace loans if we breach any of the representations and warranties we made at the time we sold the receivables. Moreover, under the terms of our securitization facilities, in the event of defaults by customers in excess of stated thresholds, we may be required to pay substantially all of our cash flow from our retained interest in the underlying receivable portfolios sold to the parties who purchased the receivables from us.

Finally, we rely on three third-party lenders to provide consumer financing for sales of our VOIs in Europe. If these lenders discontinue providing such financing, or materially change the terms of such financing, we would be required to find an alternative means of financing for our customers in Europe. If we failed to find another lender, our VOI sales in Europe may decline.

Changes in interest rates may increase our borrowing costs and otherwise adversely affect our business.

We rely on the securitization markets to provide liquidity for our consumer finance operations. Increases in interest rates, changes in the financial markets and other factors could increase the costs of our securitization financings, prevent us from accessing the securitization markets and otherwise reduce our ability to obtain the funds required for our consumer financing operations. To the extent interest rates increase and to the extent legally permitted, we may be required to increase the rates we charge our customers to finance their purchases of VOIs. Our business and results of operations are dependent on the ability of our customers to finance their purchase of VOIs, and in the United States we believe we are currently the only generally available lending source to directly finance the sales of our VOIs. Limitations on our ability to provide financing to our customers at acceptable rates, or increases in the cost of such financing, could reduce our sales of VOIs.

Changes in United States tax and other laws and regulations may adversely affect our business.

In response to the recent economic crisis and the recession, as well as the current political environment in the United States following the 2012 elections, we anticipate that the United States government will continue to review tax and other revenue raising laws, regulations and policies. The United States government may also choose to impose new restrictions, costs or prohibitions on our current business practices and some of our potential customers. Specifically, the United States government may revise tax laws, regulations or official interpretations in ways that could have a significant adverse effect on our business, including modifications that could reduce the profits that we can effectively realize from our international operations, or that could require costly changes to those operations, or the way in which they are structured. For example, the effective tax rates for most U.S. companies reflect the fact that income earned and reinvested outside the United States is generally taxed at local rates, which are often much lower than U.S. tax rates. If changes in tax laws, regulations or interpretations significantly increase the tax rates on non-U.S. income, our effective tax rate could increase and our profits could be reduced. If such increases resulted from our status as a U.S. company, those changes could place us at a disadvantage to our non-U.S. competitors if those competitors remain subject to lower local tax rates.

Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, including as a result of the ongoing European debt crisis, may affect our reported results of operations.

In addition to our operations in the United States, we conduct operations in international markets from which we receive, at least in part, revenues in foreign currencies. For example, we receive Euros and British Pound Sterling in connection with our European managed resorts and European VOI sales and Mexican Pesos in connection with our operations in Mexico. Because our financial results are reported in U.S. dollars, fluctuations in the value of the Euro and British Pound Sterling against the U.S. dollar have had and will continue to have an effect, which may be significant, on our reported financial results. The ongoing European debt crisis, coupled with the policy actions taken by European central banks to support their financial system, have caused exchange rates to remain volatile. Concerns persist regarding the ability of European countries to continue to service their sovereign debt obligations, the overall stability of the Euro and the suitability of the Euro as a single currency

given the diverse economic and political circumstances in individual Euro zone countries, or, in more extreme circumstances, the possible dissolution of the Euro currency entirely. A decline in the value of any of the foreign currencies in which we receive revenues, including the Euro, British Pound Sterling or Mexican Peso, against the U.S. dollar will tend to reduce our reported revenues and expenses, while an increase in the value of any such foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar will tend to increase our reported revenues and expenses. Variations in exchange rates can significantly affect the comparability of our financial results between financial periods.

We are also exploring international expansion opportunities in markets such as Asia and Latin America, including pursuing acquisitions in those geographic areas, or seeking out co-branding opportunities, joint ventures or other strategic alliances with local or regional operators in those markets. Any such international expansion would result in increased foreign exchange risk, as described above, as the revenue received from such expansion would primarily be in non-U.S. currency.

We are subject to extensive regulation relating to the marketing and sale of vacation interests and the servicing and collection of customer loans.

Our marketing and sale of VOIs and our other operations are subject to extensive regulation by the federal government and state timeshare laws and, in some cases, by the foreign jurisdictions where our VOIs are located, marketed and sold. Federal legislation that is or may be applicable to the sale, marketing and financing of our VOIs includes but is not limited to the Federal Trade Commission Act, the Fair Housing Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Truth-in-Lending Act and Regulation Z, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act and Regulation C, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and Regulation B, the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, the Deceptive Mail Prevention and Enforcement Act, Section 501 of the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980, the Bank Secrecy Act, the USA Patriot Act and the Civil Rights Acts of 1964, 1968 and 1991.

In addition, the majority of states and jurisdictions where the managed resorts in our network are located extensively regulate the creation and management of vacation ownership properties, the marketing and sale of VOIs, the escrow of purchaser funds and other property prior to the completion of construction and closing, the content and use of advertising materials and promotional offers, the delivery of an offering memorandum describing the sale of VOIs and the creation and operation of exchange programs and multi-site vacation interest plan reservation systems. For example, certain state regulations applicable to the vacation ownership industry impose limitations on the amount of fees that we may charge the HOAs and Collections for hospitality management services. Many other states and certain foreign jurisdictions have adopted similar legislation and regulations affecting the marketing and sale of VOIs to persons located in those jurisdictions. In addition, the laws of most states in which we sell VOIs grant the purchaser of an interest the right to rescind a purchase contract during the specified rescission period provided by law.

The Collections are required to register pursuant to applicable statutory requirements for the sale of VOI plans in an increasing number of jurisdictions. For example, certain of our subsidiaries are required to register pursuant to the Florida Vacation Plan and Timesharing Act. Such registrations, or any formal exemption determinations for the Collections, confirm the substantial compliance with the filing and disclosure requirements of the respective timeshare statutes by the applicable Collection. They do not constitute the endorsement of the creation, sale, promotion or operation of the Collections by the regulatory body, nor relieve us or our affiliates of any duty or responsibility under other statutes or any other applicable laws. Registration under a respective timeshare act is not a guarantee or assurance of compliance with applicable law nor an assurance or guarantee of how any judicial body may interpret the Collections’ compliance with such laws. A determination that specific provisions or operations of the Collections do not comply with relevant timeshare acts or applicable law may have a material adverse effect on us, the trustees of the Collections, the Collection associations or the related consumer loans. Such noncompliance could also adversely affect the operation of the

Collections or the sale of points within the existing format of the Collections, which would likely increase costs of operations or the risk of losses resulting from defaulted consumer loans.

Furthermore, most states have other laws that apply to our activities, including real estate licensure laws, travel sales licensure laws, advertising laws, anti-fraud laws, telemarketing laws, prize, gift and sweepstakes laws and labor laws. In addition, we are required to monitor “do not call,” or DNC, lists for every state into which we make telemarketing calls, as well as the federal DNC list, and are required to drop from our call lists the phone numbers of any individuals who are registered with such lists. Enforcement of the federal DNC provisions began in the fall of 2003, and the rule provides for fines of up to $16,000 per violation. We also maintain an internal DNC list as required by law. Our master DNC list is comprised of our internal list, the federal DNC list and the applicable state DNC lists.

In addition to government regulation relating to the marketing and sales of VOIs, our servicing and collection of consumer loans is subject to regulation by the federal government and the states in which such activities are conducted. These regulations may include the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Fair Debt Collections Practice Act, the Electronic Funds Transfer Act and Regulation B, the Right to Financial Privacy Act, the Florida Consumer Collection Practices Act, the Nevada Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and similar legislation in other states.

From time to time, potential buyers of VOIs assert claims with applicable regulatory agencies against our vacation interest salespersons for unlawful sales practices. These claims could have adverse implications for us that could result in negative public relations, potential litigation and regulatory sanctions.

Prior to October 2008, a portion of our sales in the United States were made through independent sales agents who provided services to us under independent contractor agreements. From October 2008 to April 2011, we sold VOIs in the United States solely through our employees, with the exception of two locations, where we conducted sales through a contractual relationship with a third-party operator. The contract with the third party operator was terminated in April 2011 and we currently sell VOIs in the United States solely through our employees. In Europe, we currently sell VOIs through employees and independent distributors. In December 2008, we converted a large number of sales agents in Spain, the United Kingdom, Portugal and France from independent contractors to employees. We did not withhold payroll taxes from the amounts paid to any of the aforementioned independent contractors or sales agents while such individuals served as independent contractors. In the event the federal, state or local taxing authorities in the United States or in foreign jurisdictions were to successfully classify such independent contractors or sales agents as our employees, rather than as independent contractors, we could be liable for back payroll taxes, termination indemnities and potential claims related to employee benefits, as required by local law.

A number of U.S. federal, state and local laws, including the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 and the Americans with Disabilities Act, impose requirements related to access to and use by disabled persons of a variety of public accommodations and facilities. A determination that we are subject to and that we are not in compliance with these accessibility laws could result in a judicial order requiring compliance, imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants. If an HOA at a resort was required to make significant improvements as a result of non-compliance with these accessibility laws, assessments might be needed to fund such improvements, which additional costs might cause owners of VOIs to default on their loans or cease making required HOA assessment payments. In addition, the HOA under these circumstances may pursue the resort developer to recover the cost of any corrective measures. Any new legislation may impose further burdens or restrictions on property owners with respect to access by disabled persons. To the extent that we hold interests in a particular resort (directly or indirectly through our interests in a Collection), we would be responsible for our pro rata share of the costs of improvements resulting from non-compliance with accessibility laws.

vacation ownership activities within the European Union (which includes the majority of the European countries in which we conduct our operations). The Directive required transposition into domestic legislation by the members of the European Union no later than February 23, 2011 and replaced the previous regulatory framework introduced by EC Directive 94/47/EC. Most of our purchasers in Europe are residents of the United Kingdom, where the Directive has been implemented under The Timeshare, Holiday Products, Resale and Exchange Contracts Regulations 2010. The Directive (i) requires delivery of specified disclosure (some of which must be provided in a specified format); (ii) requires a “cooling off” rescission period of 14 calendar days; and (iii) prohibits any advance payments in all member states. Other United Kingdom laws which are applicable to us include the Consumer Credit Act 1974 as amended by the Consumer Credit Act 2006, the Consumer Credit (Disclosure of Information) Regulations 2010, the Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulations 2010 (as amended), the Misrepresentation Act 1967, the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977, the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 (as amended), the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008, the Data Protection Act 1998 and the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC) Regulations 2003, the Equality Act 2010, the Employment Rights Act 1996, the Environmental Protection Act 1990, the Clean Air Act 1993, the Companies Act 2006 and the Trade Descriptions Act 1968. All of the countries in which we operate have consumer and other laws that regulate our activities in those countries.

Depending on the provisions of applicable law and the specific facts and circumstances involved, violations of these laws, policies or principles may limit our ability to collect all or part of the principal or interest due on our consumer loans, may entitle certain customers to refund of amounts previously paid and could subject us to penalties, damages and administrative sanctions, and may also impair our ability to commence cancellation and forfeiture proceedings on our VOIs.

We are a party to certain litigation matters and are subject to additional litigation risk.

From time to time, we or our subsidiaries are subject to certain legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business, including claims or proceedings relating to our VOI sales, consumer finance business and hospitality and management services operations. For example, one of our subsidiaries, FLRX, Inc., or FLRX, is a defendant in a lawsuit originally filed in July 2003, alleging the breach of certain contractual terms relating to the obligations under a stock purchase agreement for the acquisition of FLRX in 1998, as well as certain violations under applicable consumer protection acts. A judgment of $30.0 million plus post-judgment interest at a rate of 12% per annum and attorney’s fees of approximately $1.5 million plus accrued interest was entered against FLRX in January 2010 as a result of this lawsuit. In April 2012, after plaintiffs were unable to recover this judgment from FLRX, they filed suit against Diamond LLC and Diamond Resorts Corporation, alleging that these entities manipulated the corporate form of FLRX and caused fraudulent transfers of assets from FLRX to these entities, and attempting to hold those entities liable for the judgment entered against FLRX. Additional information regarding the FLRX litigation and other litigation involving us or our subsidiaries is described under “Business—Legal Proceedings.” An adverse outcome in any of the litigation described above or any other litigation involving us or any of our affiliates could negatively impact our business, reputation and financial condition.

Failure to maintain the security of personally identifiable information could adversely affect us.

In connection with our business, we collect and retain significant volumes of personally identifiable information, including credit card numbers of our customers and other personally identifiable information of our customers and employees. Our customers and employees expect that we will adequately protect their personal information, and the regulatory environment surrounding information security and privacy is increasingly demanding, both in the United States and other jurisdictions in which we operate. A significant theft, loss or fraudulent use of customer or employee information could adversely impact our reputation and could result in significant costs, fines and litigation.

Our reputation and financial condition may be harmed by system failures and computer viruses.

We maintain a proprietary hospitality management and sales system, as well as a reservation system related to our internal vacation ownership exchange program, THE Club. The performance and reliability of these systems and our technology is critical to our reputation and ability to attract, retain and service our customers. Any system error or failure may significantly delay response times or even cause our systems to fail, resulting in the unavailability of our services. Any disruption in our ability to provide the use of our reservation system to the purchasers of our VOIs, including as a result of software or hardware issues related to the reservation system, could result in customer dissatisfaction and harm our reputation and business. In addition, a significant portion of our reservations are made through THE Club’s online reservation system as opposed to over the phone, and our costs are significantly lower in connection with bookings through the online reservation system. As a result, if our online reservation system is unavailable for any reason, our costs will increase. Further, without the benefits of that reservation system, the marketability of our VOIs may decline, and our members may choose to withhold payments or default on their VOI loans. Our systems and operations are vulnerable to interruption or malfunction due to certain events beyond our control, including natural disasters, such as earthquakes, fire and flood, power loss, telecommunication failures, break-ins, sabotage, computer viruses, intentional acts of vandalism and similar events. Any interruption, delay or system failure could result in financial losses, customer claims and litigation and damage to our reputation.

Our intellectual property rights are valuable, and our failure to protect those rights could adversely affect our business.

Our intellectual property rights, including existing and future trademarks, trade secrets and copyrights, are and will continue to be valuable and important assets of our business. We believe that our proprietary technology, as well as our other technologies and business practices, are competitive advantages and that any duplication by competitors would harm our business. The measures we have taken to protect our intellectual property may not be sufficient or effective. Additionally, intellectual property laws and contractual restrictions may not prevent misappropriation of our intellectual property or deter others from developing similar technologies. Finally, even if we are able to successfully protect our intellectual property, others may develop technologies that are similar or superior to our technology.

We are required to make a number of significant judgments in applying our accounting policies, and our use of different estimates and assumptions in the application of these policies could result in material changes to our reported financial condition and results of operations. In addition, changes in accounting standards or their interpretation could significantly impact our reported results of operations.

Our accounting policies are critical to the manner in which we present our results of operations and financial condition. Many of these policies, including with respect to the recognition of revenue and determination of vacation interest cost of sales under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 978, “Real Estate-Time-Sharing Activities (“ASC 978”),” are highly complex and involve many subjective assumptions, estimates and judgments. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates.” We are required to review these estimates regularly and revise them when necessary. Our actual results of operations vary from period to period based on revisions to these estimates. In addition, the regulatory bodies that establish accounting and reporting standards, including the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), the Financial Accounting Standards Board and the American Institute of CPAs, periodically revise or issue new financial accounting and reporting standards that govern the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. Changes to these standards or their interpretation could significantly impact our reported results in future periods.

We are dependent upon HM&C and its personnel to provide services to us through the HM&C Agreement, and we may not find suitable replacements if this agreement is terminated or if any such personnel ceases to be employed by HM&C.

Our executive officers and approximately 40 officers and employees are not employed or directly compensated by us, but are instead employed and compensated by HM&C, a company beneficially owned by Mr. Cloobeck, our founder and Chairman. Pursuant to the HM&C Agreement, HM&C provides certain services to us, including the services of Messrs. Cloobeck, Palmer and Bentley. We depend on HM&C to ensure that the services of these individuals are and will remain available to us. Our success will depend upon the efforts, experience and skills of the personnel made available to us by HM&C, and, except for Messrs. Cloobeck and Palmer, we do not have the right to require HM&C to dedicate any specific personnel exclusively to us. Under the HM&C Agreement, we are required to make certain payments to HM&C that are reviewed and approved by the board of directors of Diamond Resorts Corporation. However, we do not have the right to allocate the aggregate payments we make to HM&C among individual HM&C employees. As a result, we are unable to ensure that each of the HM&C personnel made available to us is appropriately compensated, and we may face difficulties in establishing appropriate incentive compensation and retention arrangements for the benefit of HM&C’s personnel. In addition, under the HM&C Agreement, HM&C is entitled to terminate the employment of its employees at any time and for any reason. The departure of any of the key personnel of HM&C could have a material adverse effect on our performance.

The HM&C Agreement has an initial term that is set to expire on December 31, 2015, and thereafter automatically renews for successive annual periods unless terminated by us or HM&C. However, the HM&C Agreement will automatically terminate if (i) Mr. Cloobeck no longer serves as the Chairman (or similar position) of Diamond Resorts Corporation or (ii) Diamond Resorts Corporation undergoes a change of control (as defined in the HM&C Agreement), and each party is also entitled to terminate the agreement upon a material breach by or insolvency of the non-terminating party. If the HM&C Agreement is terminated and we are unable to replace the services provided to us by HM&C, we may not be able to execute our business plan.

In addition, upon any termination of the HM&C Agreement, the executive officers and other professionals covered thereby would be free to work for our competitors or to otherwise compete with us.

The HM&C Agreement was not negotiated on an arm’s-length basis and may not be as favorable to us if it had been negotiated with unaffiliated third parties.

The HM&C Agreement was negotiated between related parties, and its terms, including the fees payable to HM&C, may not be as favorable to us if it had been negotiated with unaffiliated third parties. The terms of the HM&C Agreement may not reflect our best interest and may be overly favorable to HM&C, including with respect to the substantial payments that may become payable to HM&C under the HM&C Agreement. Further, we may choose not to enforce, or to enforce less vigorously, our rights under the HM&C Agreement because of our desire to maintain our ongoing relationships with HM&C.

Our directors and executive officers may have interests that could conflict with those of our stockholders.

In addition to the services agreement with HM&C discussed above, there are a number of other relationships and transactions between our company and entities associated with our executive officers and directors. These relationships and transactions, and the financial interests of our executive officers and directors in the entities party to these relationships and transactions, may create, or may create the appearance of, conflicts of interest, when these executive officers and directors are faced with decisions involving those other entities. For additional information regarding such potential conflicts of interest, see “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions.”

Either or both of the proposed Island One Acquisition and PMR Service Companies Acquisition may not occur concurrently with the closing of this offering or at all.

The consummation of each of the Island One Acquisition and the PMR Service Companies Acquisition is subject to risks and uncertainties, including the risk that the Island One Companies and/or the PMR Service Companies do not fulfill their obligations to us under the applicable acquisition agreement or that the closing conditions under the applicable acquisition agreement are not otherwise satisfied. Furthermore, we have not yet entered into an acquisition agreement with respect to the Island One Acquisition, and there can be no certainty that we will do so. Accordingly, there can be no assurances that the consummation of either or both of the Probable Acquisitions will occur concurrently with the consummation of this offering, or at all. Furthermore, the closing of this offering is not subject to, or conditioned upon, the consummation of either of the Probable Acquisitions, and neither of the Probable Acquisitions is subject to, or conditioned upon the consummation of, the other Probable Acquisition. If there are significant delays in consummating either or both of the Probable Acquisitions, or if either or both of the Probable Acquisitions fail to occur at all, we will not realize some or all of the expected benefits of such acquisition(s), which could negatively affect our future business and operating results.

Additionally, if this offering is consummated and we fail to consummate the PMR Service Companies Acquisition, then the portion of the net proceeds expected to be used in the PMR Service Companies Acquisition will instead be available for general corporate purposes. See “—Risks Related to This Offering—We have broad discretion in the use of a portion of the net proceeds that we will receive from this offering and may use them in a manner in which our stockholders would not consider appropriate.”

Our strategic transactions may not be successful and may divert our management’s attention and consume significant resources.

We intend to continue our strategy of selectively pursuing complementary strategic transactions. We may also purchase management contracts, including from resort operators facing financial distress, and purchase VOI inventory at resorts that we do not manage, with the goal of acquiring sufficient VOI ownership at such a resort to become the manager of that resort. The successful execution of this strategy will depend on our ability to identify and enter into the agreements necessary to take advantage of these potential opportunities, and to obtain any necessary financing. We may not be able to do so successfully. In addition, our management may be required to devote substantial time and resources to pursue these opportunities, which may impact their ability to manage our operations effectively.

Acquisitions involve numerous additional risks, including: (1) difficulty in integrating the operations and personnel of an acquired business; (2) potential disruption of our ongoing business and the distraction of management from our day-to-day operations; (3) difficulty entering markets in which we have limited or no prior experience and in which competitors have a stronger market position; (4) difficulty maintaining the quality of services that we have historically provided across new acquisitions; (5) potential legal and financial responsibility for liabilities of acquired businesses; (6) overpayment for the acquired company or assets; (7) increased expenses associated with completing an acquisition and amortizing any acquired intangible assets; and (8) challenges in implementing uniform standards, controls, procedures and policies throughout an acquired business. We may face some or all of these risks in connection with our proposed acquisition of the Island One Companies in the Island One Acquisition and our proposed acquisition of assets in the PMR Service Companies Acquisition, as discussed in further detail under “Business—Our Recent and Proposed Strategic Acquisitions.”

Some of our recent acquisitions, including the PMR Acquisition, have focused on acquiring management contracts and related businesses of operators in financial distress or in bankruptcy at the time of such acquisition. We may continue to pursue similar acquisitions. As a result, we are subject to additional risks, including risks and uncertainties associated with bankruptcy proceedings, the risk that such properties will be in disrepair and require significant investment in order to bring them up to our quality standards, potential exposure to adverse developments in the receivable portfolios that we acquire or agree to manage and limitations on our ability to finance such transactions. We cannot assure you that our growth strategy will be successful, and our failure to manage and successfully integrate acquired businesses could harm our business.

We also intend to expand our business-to-business services provided to resorts in our affiliated resort networks. We cannot assure you that our attempts to expand business-to-business services will be successful, and our failure to expand such services could harm our business and our relationships with those affiliated resorts.

The concentration of our capital stock ownership with our current equityholders upon the completion of this offering, together with the Director Designation Agreement and the Stockholders Agreement, will limit your ability to influence corporate matters, including the ability to influence the outcome of director elections and other matters requiring stockholder approval.

Following this offering, our current equityholders will together hold approximately % of our outstanding common stock (or % if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full). Of the shares of common stock held by our current equityholders, entities controlled by our founder and Chairman, Stephen J. Cloobeck, will hold approximately % of our outstanding common stock following this offering (or % if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full). In connection with the Reorganization Transactions, certain of our current equityholders that collectively will hold approximately % of our outstanding common stock following this offering (or % if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full) will enter into a stockholders agreement (the “Stockholders Agreement”), pursuant to which such current equityholders will agree, subject to the terms of the Stockholders Agreement, in any election of members of our Board of Directors, to vote their shares of our common stock in favor of our Chief Executive Officer, as well as individuals designated by an entity controlled by our founder and Chairman and an affiliate of Guggenheim Partners, LLC, pursuant to a director designation agreement (the “Director Designation Agreement”) among us and our current equityholders party to the Stockholders Agreement. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Director Designation Agreement and Stockholders Agreement” for additional information regarding the Director Designation Agreement and the Stockholders Agreement. Each of the percentages above is calculated based on an assumed initial public offering price of $ per share (the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus). The number of shares of common stock which we expect to issue in the Island One Acquisition and, accordingly, the number of shares of common stock which we expect to be outstanding after this offering, are subject to change based upon the initial public offering price per share, as discussed under “Organizational Structure—Island One Acquisition.”

As a result of their collective ownership of a majority of our outstanding capital stock, as well as the Director Designation Agreement and the Stockholders Agreement, our current equityholders will be able to exercise control over all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors, amendment of our certificate of incorporation and approval of significant corporate transactions. This control could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control of our company or changes in management and will make the approval of certain transactions impossible without the support of our current equityholders.

Following this offering, we will be a “controlled company” within the meaning of NYSE rules and, as a result, will qualify for, and intend to rely on, exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements applicable to non-controlled companies.

Upon the closing of this offering and the Reorganization Transactions, as a result of the concentration of our capital stock ownership with our current equityholders, as well as the Director Designation Agreement and the Stockholders Agreement, our current equityholders will constitute a group that beneficially owns a majority of our outstanding common stock (our only class of voting capital stock). As a result, we will be a “controlled company” within the meaning of NYSE corporate governance standards. Under the rules of the NYSE, a company of which more than 50% of the outstanding voting power is held by an individual, group or another company is a “controlled company” and may elect not to comply with certain stock exchange corporate governance requirements, including:

Following this offering, we intend to utilize these exemptions. As a result, we will not have a majority of independent directors nor will our nominating/corporate governance and compensation functions be decided solely by committees consisting solely of independent directors. See “Management.” Accordingly, you will not have the same protections as a stockholder of a company that is subject to all of the NYSE corporate governance requirements.

We are an “emerging growth company” and will be able to avail ourselves of reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies, which could make our common stock less attractive to investors.

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or the JOBS Act. We have in this prospectus taken advantage of, and we plan in future filings with the SEC to continue to take advantage of, certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to public companies that are not “emerging growth companies,” including not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of certain golden parachute payments. As a result, our stockholders may not have access to certain information they may deem important. We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive because we may rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our stock price may be more volatile. We may take advantage of these reporting exemptions until we are no longer an “emerging growth company.” We will remain an “emerging growth company” for up to five years, although we will cease being an emerging growth company upon the earliest to occur of: (1) the last day of the fiscal year in which we have total annual gross revenues of $1 billion or more; (2) the date on which we have issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt during the prior three year period; and (3) the last day of the fiscal year in which the market value of our common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of June 30 of such year.

If we fail to maintain proper and effective internal controls, our ability to produce accurate and timely financial statements could be impaired, which could harm our operating results, our ability to operate our business and our reputation.

Prior to July 2011, we did not file reports with the SEC. Since our subsidiary, Diamond Resorts Corporation, became subject to the public reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), we were required to enhance our internal control environment to align our procedures with those required of a SEC reporting company. As a SEC reporting company, we are required to, among other things, maintain a system of effective internal control over financial reporting, which requires annual management and, once we no longer qualify as an emerging growth company, independent registered public accounting firm assessments of the effectiveness of our internal controls. Ensuring that we have adequate internal financial and accounting controls and procedures in place so that we can produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis is a costly and time-consuming effort that needs to be re-evaluated frequently. Over the past two years, we have dedicated a significant amount of time and resources to implement our internal financial and accounting controls and procedures, and have had to retain additional finance and accounting personnel with the skill sets that we need as a SEC reporting company. Substantial work may continue to be required, to implement, document, assess, test and remediate our system of internal controls. We may also need to retain additional finance and accounting personnel in the future.

Section 404(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires annual management assessments of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, starting with the annual report on Form 10-K that we filed with the SEC on April 1, 2013, covering the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012. However, for as long as we remain an “emerging growth company” as defined in the JOBS Act, we intend to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not “emerging growth companies” including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

If our internal controls over financial reporting are not effective, if we are not able to issue our financial statements in a timely manner or if we are not able to obtain the required audit or review of our financial statements by our independent registered public accounting firm in a timely manner, we will not be able to comply with the periodic reporting requirements of the SEC and the listing requirements of the NYSE. If these events occur, our common stock listing on the NYSE could be suspended or terminated and our stock price could materially suffer. In addition, we or members of our management could be subject to investigation and sanction by the SEC and other regulatory authorities and to stockholder lawsuits, which could impose significant additional costs on us and divert management attention.

Provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and under Delaware law may prevent or frustrate attempts by our stockholders to change our management and hinder efforts to acquire a controlling interest in us.

Provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws may discourage, delay or prevent a merger, acquisition or other change in control that stockholders may consider favorable, including transactions in which you might otherwise receive a premium for your shares. These provisions may also prevent or frustrate attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our management. These include provisions that:

The affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds of our shares of capital stock entitled to vote is necessary to amend or repeal the above provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation. In addition, absent approval of our Board of Directors, our amended and restated bylaws may only be amended or repealed by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds of our shares of capital stock entitled to vote. This means that the above provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, and our amended and restated bylaws, cannot at this time be amended or repealed without the consent of the current equityholders.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation designates the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware as the sole and exclusive forum for some litigation that may be initiated by our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternate forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the sole and exclusive forum for (1) any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf, (2) any action asserting a claim of breach of fiduciary duty owed by any director or officer to us or our stockholders or creditors, (3) any action asserting a claim against us or any director or officer pursuant to the Delaware General Corporation Law, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or our amended and restated bylaws or (4) any action asserting a claim against us or any director or officer governed by the internal affairs doctrine. Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in shares of our capital stock shall be deemed to have notice of

and to have consented to the provisions described above. This forum selection provision may limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a judicial forum that they find favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers, employees or other stockholders.

We have broad discretion in the use of a portion of the net proceeds that we will receive from this offering and may use them in a manner in which our stockholders would not consider appropriate.

Our management will have broad discretion in the application of the net proceeds that we will receive from this offering. Our stockholders may not agree with the manner in which our management chooses to allocate and spend these funds. The failure by our management to apply these funds effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business. Pending their use, we may invest these funds in a manner that does not produce income or that loses value.

Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our common stock. We cannot assure you that an active trading market for our common stock will develop or be sustained after this offering. If an active market does not develop, you may have difficulty selling any shares of our common stock that you purchased in this offering. The initial public offering price for our common stock will be determined by negotiations between the representatives of the underwriters and us. The initial public offering price may not correspond to the price at which our common stock will trade in the public market subsequent to this offering.

Our stock price may be volatile or may decline regardless of our operating performance, and you may lose part or all of your investment.

After this offering, the market price for our common stock is likely to be volatile, in part because our shares have not been traded publicly, and such volatility may be exacerbated by our relatively small public float. In addition, the market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly in response to a number of factors, most of which we cannot control, including:

The stock markets in general have often experienced volatility that has sometimes been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of particular companies. These broad market fluctuations may cause the trading price of our common stock to decline. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class-action litigation has often been brought against that company. We may become involved in this type of litigation in the future. Litigation of this type may be expensive to defend and may divert our management's attention and resources from the operation of our business.

If you purchase shares of our common stock in this offering, you will suffer immediate and substantial dilution of your investment and may suffer dilution in the future.

The offering price of our common stock is substantially higher than the net tangible book value per share of our common stock, which on a pro forma basis was per share of our common stock as of March 31, 2013. As a result, you will incur immediate and substantial dilution in net tangible book value when you buy our common stock in this offering. This means that you will pay a higher price per share than the book value of our total tangible assets, less our total liabilities, divided by the number of shares of common stock outstanding. In addition, you may also experience additional dilution if options or other rights to purchase our common stock that are outstanding or that we may issue in the future are exercised or converted or we issue additional shares of our common stock at prices lower than our net tangible book value at such time. See “Dilution.”

Future sales of common stock, or the perception in the public markets that these sales may occur, may depress our stock price.

The market price of our common stock could decline significantly as a result of sales of a large number of shares of our common stock in the market after this offering. These sales, or the perception that these sales might occur, could depress the market price of our common stock. These sales, or the possibility that these sales may occur, also might make it more difficult for us to sell equity securities in the future at a time and at a price that we deem appropriate.

Upon the consummation of this offering, we will have outstanding shares of common stock (assuming an initial public public offering price of $ per share, the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus). The number of shares of common stock which we expect to issue in the Island One Acquisition and, accordingly, the number of shares of common stock which we expect to be outstanding after this offering, are subject to change based upon the initial public offering price per share, as discussed under “Organizational Structure—Island One Acquisition.” The shares of common stock offered in this offering will be freely tradable without restriction under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), except for any shares of common stock that may be held or acquired by our directors, executive officers and other affiliates, the sale of which will be restricted under the Securities Act. If our current equityholders sell substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market, or if the public perceives that such sales could occur, there could be an adverse impact on the market price of our common stock, even if there is no relationship between such sales and the performance of our business.

In connection with this offering, we, our directors and executive officers, the selling stockholders and certain other holders of our outstanding common stock and options have each agreed to certain lock-up restrictions. We and they and their permitted transferees will not be permitted to sell any shares of our common stock for 180 days after the date of this prospectus, except as discussed in “Shares Eligible for Future Sale,” without the prior consent of Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC. Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC may, in its sole discretion, release all or any portion of the shares of our common stock from the restrictions in any of the lock-up agreements described above. See “Underwriting (Conflicts of Interest).”

Also in the future, we may issue shares of our common stock in connection with investments or acquisitions. The number of shares of our common stock issued in connection with an investment or acquisition could be material.

We have not paid cash dividends and do not expect to pay dividends in the future, which means that you may not be able to realize the value of our shares except through sale.

We currently do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our capital stock in the foreseeable future. We currently expect to retain earnings to finance the development and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying dividends on our common stock at any time in the foreseeable future. Our Board of Directors will decide whether to pay dividends on our common stock from time to time in the exercise of its business judgment. Because we do not anticipate paying dividends in the future, the only opportunity to realize the value of our common stock will likely be through an appreciation in value and a sale of those shares. There is no guarantee that shares of our common stock will appreciate in value or even maintain the price at which our stockholders have purchased their shares.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or publish unfavorable research about our business, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our common stock will be influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts publish about us or our business. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of our company or fails to publish reports on us regularly, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause the stock price of our common stock or trading volume to decline. Moreover, if our operating results do not meet the expectations of the investor community, one or more of the analysts who cover our company may change their recommendations regarding our company, and our stock price could decline.

This prospectus contains forward-looking statements. These statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. We have tried to identify forward-looking statements in this prospectus by using words such as “anticipates,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans” and “believes,” and similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “should,” “would,” “may” and “could.” These forward-looking statements include, among others, statements relating to our future financial performance, our business prospects and strategy, anticipated financial position, liquidity and capital needs and other similar matters. These forward-looking statements are based on management’s current expectations and assumptions about future events, which are inherently subject to uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict.

Our actual results may differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, the forward-looking statements included in this prospectus as a result of various factors, including, among others:

Accordingly, you should read this prospectus completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect.

Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this prospectus. Except as expressly required under federal securities laws and the rules and regulations of the SEC, we do not have any obligation, and do not undertake, to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances arising after the date of this prospectus, whether as a result of new information or future events or otherwise. You should not place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements included in this prospectus or that may be made elsewhere from time to time by us, or on our behalf. All forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified by these cautionary statements.

Diamond International was incorporated as a Delaware corporation on January 11, 2013 to effect the Reorganization Transactions and this offering. After the completion of this offering, Diamond International will be a holding company, and its principal asset will be direct and indirect ownership of equity interests in its subsidiaries, including Diamond Resorts Corporation, which is the operating subsidiary that has historically conducted the business described in this prospectus. To date, Diamond International has not engaged in any business or other activities other than those incident to its formation and the preparation of the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part. Following the completion of the Reorganization Transactions and this offering, we expect to continue to conduct our business through our operating subsidiaries, including Diamond Resorts Corporation.

Diamond LLC was formed in April 2007 to effect the acquisition of Sunterra Corporation by an investor group led by Stephen J. Cloobeck, our founder and Chairman. In connection with the acquisition, Sunterra Corporation, which was incorporated as a Maryland corporation on May 26, 1996 under the name KGK Resorts, Inc., was renamed Diamond Resorts Corporation.

As of the date of this prospectus, Diamond LLC is the sole equityholder of Diamond Resorts Holdings, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, which in turn is the sole shareholder of Diamond Resorts Corporation. However, an affiliate of Guggenheim Partners, LLC holds warrants to purchase an aggregate of 0.394% of the outstanding common stock of Diamond Resorts Corporation, and another institutional investor holds warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1.045% of the outstanding common stock of Diamond Resorts Corporation, in each case at a nominal exercise price.

Certain individuals and entities currently have an economic interest in Diamond LLC as a result of their ownership of units of Cloobeck Diamond Parent, LLC and will redeem their units of Cloobeck Diamond Parent, LLC in exchange for Class A common units of Diamond LLC (with the Class A common units of Diamond LLC being further distributed to the ultimate beneficial owners of one such entity) prior to the consummation of this offering. For purposes of this prospectus, such individuals and entities (including the subsequent distributees) are collectively referred to as the “CDP Investors.”

For purposes of this prospectus, the Executive Investors and DRP Friends are collectively referred to as the “Management Investors;” the Guggenheim Investor, the Silver Rock Investors and the Wellington Management Investors are collectively referred to as the “Existing Institutional Investors;” and the CDP Investors, the Management Investors and the Existing Institutional Investors are collectively referred to as the “Existing Equityholders.”

The following diagram summarizes our organizational structure prior to the Reorganization Transactions:

In connection with the closing of this offering, we will consummate the Reorganization Transactions. Immediately prior to, and in connection with, the closing of this offering, the following steps will be taken to effect the Reorganization Transactions:

Following the Reorganization Transactions, Diamond International will own 100% of the outstanding common stock of Diamond Resorts Corporation. However, an affiliate of Guggenheim Partners, LLC will hold warrants to purchase an aggregate of 0.394% of the outstanding common stock of Diamond Resorts Corporation, and another institutional investor will hold warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1.045% of the outstanding common stock of Diamond Resorts Corporation, in each case at a nominal exercise price. The shares of common stock of Diamond International issued to the former holders of Class A and Class B Common Units of Diamond LLC in the Reorganization Transactions will not be registered under the Securities Act or the securities laws of any state. These shares will be offered, sold and issued in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering, and Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder, and the exemption from state securities law registration requirements provided by Section 18(b)(4)(D) of the Securities Act.

We expect to enter into a transaction agreement, pursuant to which we will agree to purchase from the Island One Equityholder, upon the closing of this offering and subject to other customary closing conditions, all of the equity interests in the Island One Companies. The purchase price for the Island One Acquisition is based upon, among other things, the initial public offering price of this offering and will be paid entirely in shares of our common stock. Assuming an initial public offering price of $ per share (the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus), we will issue to the Island One Equityholder an aggregate of shares of our common stock at the closing of the Island One Acquisition. For illustrative purposes only, set forth below are the number of shares of common stock to be issued to the Island One Equityholder based on the high end and low end of the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus. The actual number of shares that will be issued to the Island One Equityholder will be based on the actual initial public offering price per share in this offering without any cap or collar of any kind. If the initial public offering price were $ per share (the high end of the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus), we would issue shares of our common stock to the Island One Equityholder at the closing of the Island One Acquisition, and, as a result, we would have shares of common stock outstanding after this offering. If the initial public offering price were $ per share (the low end of the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus), we would issue shares of our common stock to the Island One Equityholder at the closing of the Island One Acquisition, and, as a result, we would have shares of common stock outstanding after this offering.

As part of this offering, will sell shares of our common stock. We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock in this offering by the selling stockholders.

Assuming an initial public offering price of $ per share, which is the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus, after deducting the underwriters’ discounts and commissions and the estimated offering expenses, upon completion of the Reorganization Transactions, the Island One Acquisition and this offering, common stock in Diamond International will be held as follows:

The following diagram depicts our organizational structure after giving effect to the Reorganization Transactions, the Island One Acquisition and this offering, assuming an initial public offering price of $ per share (the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus):

We estimate that our net proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock by us in this offering will be approximately $ million, based on an assumed initial public offering price of $ per share (the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus), and after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares of common stock by the selling stockholders.

As described in more detail below, we expect to use the net proceeds to us from this offering for the following purposes and in the following amounts:

We may also use up to approximately $ million (representing 25% of the net cash proceeds we receive in this offering) to purchase Senior Secured Notes from holders who accept our offer to repurchase Senior Secured Notes at a price equal to 112% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of purchase.

We intend to use any remaining net proceeds to us from this offering for working capital and other general corporate purposes, which may include the redemption of a portion of our Senior Secured Notes that remain outstanding after completion of the repurchase offer described above. If the opportunity arises, we may use a portion of any remaining net proceeds to us from this offering to expand into new geographic markets or enter into strategic transactions in a manner consistent with our acquisition strategy and capital-efficient business model.

Each $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price of $ per share would increase (decrease) the amount of proceeds that we will receive from this offering by $ million, assuming the number of shares offered by us, which is set forth on the cover of this prospectus, remains the same, and after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.

To fund the PMR Acquisition, DPM Acquisition, LLC, one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, entered into the PMR Acquisition Loan with Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC, as administrative agent for the lenders, which include affiliates of, or funds managed or advised by, Guggenheim Partners, LLC, which is an affiliate of the Guggenheim Investor, Wellington Management Company, LLP, including some of the Wellington Management Investors, and Silver Rock Financial LLC, which is an affiliate of the Silver Rock Investors. The PMR Acquisition Loan is collateralized by substantially all of the assets of DPM Acquisition, LLC. The PMR Acquisition Loan was initially in an aggregate outstanding principal amount of $71.3 million (consisting of a $61.3 million term loan and a $10.0 million revolving loan). The PMR Acquisition Loan bears interest at a rate of 18.0% per annum (of which an amount equal to not less than 10.0% per annum is paid in cash on a quarterly basis and the remaining accrued amount may be paid, at our election, in cash or in kind by adding the applicable accrued amount to principal), and matures on May 21, 2016. On September 28, 2012, we terminated the revolving loan and transferred the then-outstanding balance under the revolving loan to the term loan. We are required to pay an exit fee equal to up to $6.1 million in connection with the repayment of the PMR Acquisition Loan. We intend to use approximately $ million of the net proceeds to us from this offering to repay the outstanding principal amount, accrued and unpaid interest and exit fees under the PMR Acquisition Loan.

To fund the Tempus Resorts Acquisition, Tempus Acquisition, LLC, one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, entered into the Tempus Acquisition Loan with Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC, as administrative agent for the lenders, which include affiliates of, or funds managed or advised by, Guggenheim Partners, LLC, which is an affiliate of the Guggenheim Investor, and Silver Rock Financial LLC, which is an affiliate of the Silver Rock Investors. The Tempus Acquisition Loan is collateralized by all assets of Tempus Acquisition, LLC. The Tempus Acquisition Loan was initially in an aggregate principal amount of $41.1 million (consisting of $35.6 million in two term loans and a $5.5 million revolving loan). The Tempus Acquisition Loan bears interest at a rate of 18.0% per annum (of which an amount equal to not less than 10.0% per annum is paid in cash on a quarterly basis and the remaining accrued amount may be paid, at our election, in cash or in kind by adding the applicable accrued amount to principal), and matures on June 30, 2015. On September 28, 2012, we terminated the revolving loan and transferred the then-outstanding balance under the revolving loan to the term loans. On October 4, 2012, we further amended the Tempus Acquisition Loan to provide an additional $6.6 million of borrowings under the term loans to fund the Aegean Blue Acquisition. The Tempus Acquisition Loan was further amended on November 20, 2012 and December 21, 2012 to increase the term loans by $2.5 million and $5.0 million, respectively. Some of the Wellington Management Investors became lenders under this credit facility in connection with a December 2012 amendment to the Tempus Acquisition Loan. We are required to pay an exit fee equal to up to $3.6 million in connection with the repayment of the Tempus Acquisition Loan. We intend to use approximately $ million of the net proceeds to us from this offering to repay the outstanding principal amount, accrued and unpaid interest and exit fees under the Tempus Acquisition Loan.

On June 12, 2013, we entered into an asset purchase agreement with each of the PMR Service Companies and the owner of such entities, pursuant to which we have agreed to purchase, upon the closing of this offering and subject to other customary closing conditions, resort management agreements, accounting services agreements, billing and collection services agreements and other assets of the PMR Service Companies. The purchase price for the PMR Service Companies Acquisition is based upon, among other things, the initial public offering price of this offering and will be paid entirely in cash. Assuming an initial public offering price of $ per share (the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus), we will pay to the PMR Service Companies, at the closing of the PMR Service Companies Acquisition, an aggregate cash purchase price of $ . For illustrative purposes only, set forth below are the aggregate cash purchase prices to be paid to the PMR Service Companies based on the high end and low end of the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus. The actual cash purchase price that will be paid to the PMR Service Companies will be based on the actual initial public offering price per share in this offering without any cap or collar of any kind. If the initial public offering price were $ per share (the high end of the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus), we would pay an aggregate cash purchase price of $ to the PMR Service Companies, or if the initial public offering price were $ per share (the low end of the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus), we would pay an aggregate cash purchase price of $ to the PMR Service Companies. See “Business—Our Recent and Proposed Strategic Acquisitions” below for additional information regarding the PMR Service Companies Acquisition, including the calculation of the purchase price in the PMR Service Companies Acquisition.

The Senior Secured Notes bear interest at the rate of 12% per annum and will mature on August 15, 2018. We are required, within 30 days of the closing of this offering, to make an offer to each holder of Senior Secured Notes to purchase a portion of our Senior Secured Notes as described below at a price equal to 112% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of purchase. The Notes Indenture requires us to offer to repurchase the maximum principal amount of Senior Secured Notes that may be purchased on the terms described above with 25% of the net cash proceeds we receive in this offering. As of the date of this prospectus, we cannot determine the extent to which (if at all) holders of Senior Secured Notes will accept our repurchase offer.

The Notes Indenture also provides that at any time on or prior to August 15, 2013, we may redeem up to an aggregate of 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the Senior Secured Notes at a redemption price equal to 112% of the principal amount of the Senior Secured Notes redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption, with the net cash proceeds we receive in this offering, provided that at least 65% in aggregate principal amount of the Senior Secured Notes originally issued remains outstanding immediately after the occurrence of such redemption and (ii) such redemption occurs within 90 days of the date of the closing of this offering. As of the date of this prospectus, we have not made any determination as to whether or not we will exercise this right of redemption.

Depending upon the extent to which holders of Senior Secured Notes accept our offer to repurchase Senior Secured Notes and the purchase price that we are required to pay in the PMR Service Companies Acquisition, in each case as described above, we may have up to $ million in remaining net proceeds to us from this offering, after giving effect to the other uses of proceeds described above (assuming (1) an initial public offering price of $ per share (the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover of this prospectus), (2) no holders of the Senior Secured Notes accept our offer to repurchase Senior Secured Notes, and (3) that we do not use any net proceeds to us from this offering to redeem any Senior Secured Notes. We intend to use any remaining net proceeds to us from this offering for working capital and other general corporate purposes, which may include the redemption of a portion of our Senior Secured Notes that remain outstanding after completion of the repurchase offer described above.

We cannot, however, specify with certainty the particular uses for the remaining net proceeds we will have upon completion of this offering and, at the date hereof, cannot accurately predict the amounts that we may spend for any particular purpose. Our management team will have broad discretion in determining the uses of such portion of the net proceeds to us of this offering. The amounts of our actual expenditures will be influenced by a variety of factors, including the timing and extent of our expansion opportunities, the amount of cash used by our operations and the occurrence of unforeseen opportunities and events. Pending the use of those funds, we intend to invest them in short-term, investment-grade, interest-bearing instruments.

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock and currently do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our capital stock in the foreseeable future. We intend to retain any earnings to finance the development and expansion of our business. Any future determination to declare cash dividends will be made at the discretion of our Board of Directors, subject to applicable laws, and will depend on our financial condition, results of operations, contractual restrictions, capital requirements, general business conditions and other then-existing factors that our Board of Directors may deem relevant. The Notes Indenture governing the Senior Secured Notes also restricts our ability to pay dividends.

The following table sets forth our cash and cash equivalents and our capitalization as of March 31, 2013 on:

The pro forma information below is illustrative only and is based upon an assumed initial public offering price of $ per share (the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus). Our cash, cash equivalents, additional paid-in capital, total stockholders’ equity and total capitalization following the completion of this offering will be based on the actual initial public offering price (in part because the number of shares we expect to issue in the Island One Acquisition and the cash purchase price in the PMR Service Companies Acquisition will be impacted by such price) and other terms of this offering determined at pricing, as well as the extent to which we repurchase or redeem our Senior Secured Notes. You should read this table together with “Use of Proceeds,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.

If you invest in our common stock, your investment will be diluted immediately to the extent of the difference between the public offering price per share of our common stock and the pro forma net tangible book value per share of our common stock after this offering. The net tangible book value of Diamond LLC as of March 31, 2013, which represents Diamond LLC’s total tangible assets less its total liabilities as of such date, was approximately $ million. Our pro forma net tangible book value per share as of March 31, 2013, which represents Diamond LLC’s net tangible book value as of such date divided by the number of shares of our common stock outstanding as of such date, giving effect to the Reorganization Transactions described under “Organizational Structure—Reorganization Transactions,” was $ . After giving effect to our sale of shares of common stock in this offering at an assumed initial public offering price of $ per share (the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus), and after deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us, but prior to giving effect to either of the Island One Acquisition or the PMR Service Companies Acquisition, our pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value as of March 31, 2013 would have been $ million, or $ per share of common stock. This represents an immediate increase in net tangible book value of $ per share to existing stockholders and an immediate dilution in net tangible book value of $ per share to investors purchasing common stock in this offering. Dilution per share to new investors is determined by subtracting pro forma net tangible book value per share after this offering from the assumed initial public offering price per share paid by a new investor. The following unaudited table illustrates the per share dilution:

Each $1.00 increase or decrease in the assumed initial public offering price of $ per share (the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus), would increase or decrease our Post-Offering Pro Forma Net Tangible Book Value by $ , assuming the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover of this prospectus, remains the same and after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses payable by us.

After giving effect to each of the items described above and each of (1) the consummation of the Island One Acquisition and our issuance of an aggregate of shares of common stock with an aggregate value of $ million (assuming an initial public offering price of $ per share, the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover of this prospectus), representing the purchase price in the Island One Acquisition; and (2) the consummation of the PMR Service Companies Acquisition and the application of a portion of the net proceeds from this offering to pay the cash purchase price of $ (assuming an initial public offering price of $ per share, the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover of this prospectus) in the PMR Service Companies Acquisition, our pro forma as further adjusted net tangible book value as of March 31, 2013 would have been $ million or $ per share of common stock. This represents an immediate increase in net tangible book value of $ per share to existing stockholders and an immediate dilution in net tangible book value of $ per share to investors purchasing common stock in this offering. The following unaudited table illustrates the per share dilution:

The actual number of shares of common stock that we would issue at the closing of the Island One Acquisition, and the actual cash purchase that we would pay at the closing of the PMR Service Companies Acquisition, will increase or decrease based upon the actual initial public offering price per share. See “Organizational Structure—Island One Acquisition” for a discussion of the impact that different initial public offering prices have on the number of shares of common stock we expect to issue in the Island One Acquisition and “Use of Proceeds” for a discussion of the impact that different initial public offering prices have on the purchase price payable in the PMR Service Companies Acquisition.

The following unaudited table summarizes, on the same pro forma basis as of March 31, 2013, the total number of shares of common stock purchased from us, the total consideration paid to us and the average price per share paid by the Existing Equityholders, by new investors purchasing shares in this offering and by the Island One Equityholder (amounts in thousands, except percentages and per share data), after giving effect to the sale by us and the selling stockholders of shares of our common stock in this offering at an assumed initial public offering price of $ per share (the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus), before deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses payable by us:

A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price of $ per share (the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus), would increase (decrease) total consideration paid by new investors by $ million, assuming the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover of this prospectus, remains the same and after deducting the underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses payable to us.

If the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full, the number of shares of common stock held by the Existing Equityholders will be reduced to shares, or % of the total shares of common stock outstanding after this offering, and the number of shares of common stock held by new investors participating in this offering will be further increased to shares, or % of the total shares of common stock outstanding after this offering.

The following unaudited pro forma combined condensed financial data for the year ended December 31, 2012, as of, and for the three months ended, March 31, 2013 and for the three months ended March 31, 2012 are based upon (1) the respective consolidated financial statements of Diamond LLC and its subsidiaries, the Island One Companies and the PMR Service Companies for the year ended December 31, 2012, as of, and for the three months ended, March 31, 2013 and for the three months ended March 31, 2012, in each case included elsewhere in this prospectus, and (2) the consolidated financial statements of Pacific Monarch Resorts, Inc. (Debtor-in-Possession) for the three months ended March 31, 2012 included elsewhere in this prospectus. The financial information for Pacific Monarch Resorts, Inc., the Island One Companies and the PMR Service Companies under the caption “Historical” reflect adjustments to align the presentation of the financial information of Pacific Monarch Resorts, Inc., the Island One Companies and the PMR Service Companies with that of Diamond LLC. The unaudited pro forma combined condensed balance sheet data as of March 31, 2013 give effect to the Probable Acquisitions, this offering and the application of net proceeds thereof (assuming no holders of the Senior Secured Notes accept our offer to repurchase Senior Secured Notes and assuming that we do not use any net proceeds to us from this offering to redeem any Senior Secured Notes) as if they had each occurred as of March 31, 2013. The unaudited pro forma combined condensed statement of operations data for the year ended December 31, 2012 and for the three months ended March 31, 2012 give effect to the PMR Acquisition (and all financing transactions related to the PMR Acquisition), the Probable Acquisitions, this offering and the application of net proceeds thereof (assuming no holders of the Senior Secured Notes accept our offer to repurchase Senior Secured Notes and assuming we do not use any net proceeds to us from this offering to redeem any Senior Secured Notes) as if they had each occurred as of January 1, 2012. The unaudited pro forma combined condensed statement of operations data for the three months ended March 31, 2013 give effect to the Probable Acquisitions, this offering and the application of net proceeds thereof (assuming no holders of the Senior Secured Notes accept our offer to repurchase Senior Secured Notes and assuming we do not use any net proceeds to us from this offering to redeem any Senior Secured Notes) as if they had each occurred as of January 1, 2012. The pro forma financial statements that give effect to this offering and the application of net proceeds thereof also reflect that, pursuant to the Reorganization Transactions, Diamond International will become the ultimate parent and issuer of the common stock in this offering; however, there are no adjustments to the historical financial information as a result of the Reorganization Transactions.

The purchase price for the Island One Acquisition is expected to be paid entirely in shares of our common stock, and the purchase price for the PMR Service Companies Acquisition will be paid entirely in cash. The number of shares that we expect to issue to the Island One Equityholder in the Island One Acquisition, and the cash purchase price that will be paid to the PMR Service Companies in the PMR Service Companies Acquisition, in each case will be based on the actual initial public offering price per share in this offering without any cap or collar of any kind. For illustrative purposes only, set forth below are (1) the number of shares of common stock we expect to issue to the Island One Equityholder, and (2) the aggregate cash purchase price to be paid to the PMR Service Companies, in each case based on the high end and low end of the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus. If the initial public offering price were $ per share (the high end of the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus), we would (a) issue shares of our common stock to the Island One Equityholder at the closing of the Island One Acquisition, and (b) pay an aggregate cash purchase price of $ to the PMR Service Companies at the closing of the PMR Service Companies Acquisition. If the initial public offering price were $ per share (the low end of the price range set forth on the cover of

this prospectus), we would (x) issue shares of our common stock to the Island One Equityholder at the closing of the Island One Acquisition, and (y) pay an aggregate cash purchase price of $ to the PMR Service Companies at the closing of the PMR Service Companies Acquisition. Solely for purposes of the following unaudited pro forma combined condensed financial data, we have assumed a purchase price for each of the Probable Acquisitions (which, in the case of the Island One Acquisition, represents an assumed value of an assumed number of shares we expect to issue in that transaction). The actual purchase price for each of the Probable Acquisitions may be different than the assumed purchase price reflected in the accompanying pro forma combined condensed financial data, and those differences may be material. See “Business—Our Recent and Proposed Strategic Acquisitions” below for additional information regarding the calculation of the purchase price in each of the Island One Acquisition and the PMR Service Companies Acquisition.

With respect to the preliminary fair value and other adjustments related to each of the Probable Acquisitions, the unaudited pro forma combined condensed financial information have been prepared using the purchase method in accordance with ASC 805—”Business Combinations” (ASC 805), as if each of the Probable Acquisitions had been completed as of January 1, 2012 for the purposes of the unaudited pro forma combined condensed statements of operations, and as of March 31, 2013 for the purposes of the unaudited pro forma combined condensed balance sheet. In accordance with ASC 805, the purchase price is required to be allocated to the underlying tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their respective fair market values as of the date of the applicable Probable Acquisition. If the purchase price exceeds the fair value of the assets acquired, net of liabilities assumed, the excess will be recognized as goodwill. Alternatively, if the fair value of the assets acquired, net of liabilities assumed, exceeds the purchase price, the difference will be recorded as a gain on bargain purchase. The allocation of the purchase price as reflected in the unaudited pro forma combined condensed financial information is based upon management’s internally developed estimates of the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as if each of the Probable Acquisitions had been completed as of the above dates. This allocation of the purchase price depends upon certain estimates and assumptions, all of which are preliminary and have been made solely for the purpose of developing the unaudited pro forma combined condensed financial information. We will commence the appraisals necessary to assess the fair values of the tangible and intangible assets acquired and the liabilities assumed and the related allocation of the purchase price upon the closing of the Probable Acquisitions. The final purchase price allocations will be based upon the fair values as of the actual closing date of the Probable Acquisitions, at which time the final allocation of the purchase price will be determined. The final purchase price allocation may be different than the estimated allocation reflected in the accompanying pro forma combined condensed financial data, and those differences may be material.

The unaudited pro forma combined condensed statements of operations do not include adjustments for (i) any revenue or cost saving synergies that may be achievable subsequent to the completion of the Probable Acquisitions or the costs that may be incurred to achieve those synergies or (ii) any prospective revenue or cost saving synergies that may be achieved, or the costs that may be incurred to achieve those prospective synergies, in addition to those reflected in the historical financial information, since the completion of the PMR Acquisition.

The following unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of operations should be read in conjunction with “Use of Proceeds,” “Capitalization,” “Selected Historical Consolidated Financial and Operating Data,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the respective consolidated financial statements of Diamond LLC and its subsidiaries, Pacific Monarch Resorts, Inc. (Debtor-in-Possession), the Island One Companies and the PMR Service Companies, in each case included elsewhere in this prospectus.

Set forth below is selected historical consolidated financial and operating data of Diamond LLC at the dates and for the periods indicated. The selected historical consolidated statement of operations data for years ended December 31, 2010, December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2012, and the selected historical consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2012 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. The selected historical consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2009 and the selected historical consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2008, December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2010 have been derived from our audited consolidated statement of operations for the years ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2009 and our audited consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2008, December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2010 which are not included in this prospectus. The selected historical consolidated statement of operations data for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2013 and the selected historical balance sheet data as of March 31, 2013 have been derived from our unaudited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial data reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the results of operations and financial position of Diamond LLC and its subsidiaries for such periods and at such date. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected in any future period, and our results of operations for the interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year.

The selected historical consolidated financial and operating data set forth below should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.

The selected historical financial data does not give pro forma effect to the consummation of the Reorganization Transactions, the Probable Acquisitions or any other transaction.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with our financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. The historical consolidated financial information discussed below reflects the historical results of operations of Diamond LLC and its subsidiaries, and, except as indicated, the discussion below does not give effect to the Reorganization Transactions. The statements in this discussion regarding market conditions and outlook, our expectations regarding our future performance, liquidity and capital resources and other non-historical statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including the risks and uncertainties described under “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors.” Our actual results may differ materially from those contained in or implied by any forward-looking statements.

We are a global leader in the hospitality and vacation ownership industry, with an ownership base of more than 490,000 owner-families, or members, and a worldwide network of 295 vacation destinations located in 32 countries throughout the continental United States, Hawaii, Canada, Mexico, the Caribbean, Central America, South America, Europe, Asia, Australia and Africa. Our resort network includes 80 Diamond Resorts-branded properties with a total of 9,404 units, which we manage, and affiliated resorts and four cruise itineraries, which we do not manage and do not carry our brand, but are a part of our network and are available for our members to use as vacation destinations. For financial reporting purposes, our business consists of two segments: Hospitality and Management Services, which is composed of our hospitality and management services operations, including our operations related to the management of our resort properties, the Collections and THE Club, and Vacation Interest Sales and Financing, which is composed of our marketing and sales of VOIs and the consumer financing of purchases of VOIs.

We are led by an experienced management team that has delivered strong operating results through disciplined execution. Our management team has taken a number of significant steps to refine our strategic focus, build our brand recognition and streamline our operations, including (1) maximizing revenue from our hospitality and management services business, (2) implementing a focus throughout our business on service and hospitality and (3) adding resorts to our network through complementary strategic acquisitions. Management has also implemented growth strategies to increase our revenues while remaining consistent with our capital-efficient business model. A key strategy has been the acquisition of complementary resorts and associated management contracts using special-purpose subsidiaries financed on a non-recourse basis.

For financial reporting purposes, we present our results of operations and financial condition in two business segments. The first business segment is Hospitality and Management Services, which includes our operations related to the management of resort properties and the Collections, revenue from our operation of THE Club and the provision of other services. The second business segment, Vacation Interest Sales and Financing, includes our operations relating to the marketing and sales of our VOIs, as well as our consumer financing activities related to such sales. While certain line items reflected on our statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss) fall completely into one of these business segments, other line items relate to revenues or expenses which are applicable to both segments. For line items that are applicable to both segments, revenues or expenses are allocated by management as described under “Key Revenue and Expense Items,” which involves significant estimates. Certain expense items (principally corporate interest expense and depreciation and amortization) are not, in management’s view, allocable to either of these business segments as they apply to the entire Company. In addition, general and administrative expenses are not allocated to either of our business segments because historically management has not allocated these expenses (which excludes Hospitality and Management Services related overhead that is allocated to the HOAs and Collections) for purposes of evaluating our different operational divisions. Accordingly, these expenses are presented under Corporate and Other.

Management believes that it is impracticable to allocate specific assets and liabilities related to each business segment. In addition, management does not review balance sheets by business segment as part of its evaluation of operating segment performances. Consequently, no balance sheet segment reports have been presented.

We also operate our business in two geographic areas, which are described below in “Information Regarding Geographic Areas of Operation.”

Management and member services revenue includes resort management fees charged to the HOAs and Collections, as well as revenues from our operation of THE Club. These revenues are recorded and recognized as follows:

All of these revenues are allocated to our Hospitality and Management Services business segment.

Vacation Interest sales revenue, net, is comprised of Vacation Interest sales, net of a provision for uncollectible Vacation Interest sales revenue. Vacation interest sales consist of revenue from the sale of points, which can be utilized for vacations at any of the resorts in our network for varying lengths of stay, net of an amount equal to the expense associated with certain sales incentives. A variety of sales incentives are routinely provided as sales tools. Sales centers have predetermined budgets for sales incentives and manage the use of incentives accordingly. A provision for uncollectible Vacation Interest sales revenue is recorded upon completion of each financed sale. The provision is calculated based on historical default experience associated with the customer’s FICO score. Additionally, we analyze our allowance for loan and contract losses quarterly and make adjustments based on current trends in consumer loan delinquencies and defaults and other criteria, if necessary. Since late 2007, we have sold VOIs primarily in the form of points. All of our Vacation Interest sales revenue, net, is allocated to our Vacation Interest Sales and Financing business segment.

Our interest revenue consists primarily of interest earned on consumer loans. Interest earned on consumer loans is accrued based on the contractual provisions of the loan documents. Interest accruals on consumer loans are suspended at the earliest of (i) a default in the consumer’s first payment on the loan; (ii) the initiation of cancellation or foreclosure proceedings; or (iii) the customer’s account becoming over 180 days delinquent. If payments are received while a consumer loan is considered delinquent, interest is recognized on a cash basis. Interest accrual resumes once a customer has made six timely payments on the loan. All interest revenue is allocated to our Vacation Interest Sales and Financing business segment, with the exception of interest revenue earned on bank account balances, which is reported in Corporate and Other.

Other revenue includes (i) collection fees paid by owners when they bring their accounts current after collection efforts have been made by us on behalf of the HOAs and Collections; (ii) closing costs paid by purchasers on sales of VOIs; (iii) revenue associated with certain sales incentives given to customers as motivation to purchase a VOI (in an amount equal to the expense associated with such sales incentives), which is recorded upon recognition of the related VOI sales revenue; and (iv) late/impound fees assessed on consumer loans. Revenues associated with item (i) above are allocated to our Hospitality and Management Services business segment, and revenues associated with items (ii), (iii) and (iv) above are allocated to our Vacation Interest Sales and Financing business segment.

Currently, substantially all direct expenses related to the provision of services to the HOAs (other than for our St. Maarten resorts, for which we provide services traditionally administered by an HOA) and the Collections are recovered through our management agreements, and consequently are not recorded as expenses. We pass

through to the HOAs and the Collections certain overhead charges incurred to operate the resorts. In accordance with guidance included in ASC 605-45, “Revenue Recognition—Principal Agent Considerations,” reimbursements from the HOAs and the Collections relating to pass-through costs are recorded net of the related expenses. These expenses are allocated to our Hospitality and Management Services business segment.

Expenses associated with our operation of THE Club include costs incurred for the third-party call center, annual membership fees paid to a third-party exchange company on behalf of each member of THE Club and administrative expenses. These expenses are allocated to our Hospitality and Management Services business segment.

Management and member services expenses also include costs incurred under the sales and marketing management fee-for-service arrangement with a third party. These expenses are allocated to our Hospitality and Management Services business segment.

With respect to our St. Maarten resorts, we record expenses associated with housekeeping, front desk, maintenance, landscaping and other similar activities, which are recovered by the maintenance fees recorded in consolidated resort operations revenue. In addition, for our properties located in St. Maarten, we also bill the owners for capital project assessments to repair and replace the amenities of these resorts, as well as assessments to reserve the out-of-pocket deductibles for hurricanes and other natural disasters. These assessments are deferred until the refurbishment activity occurs, at which time the amounts collected are recognized as consolidated resort operations revenue with offsetting expense recorded under consolidated resort operations expense. Our expense associated with the St. Maarten properties has historically constituted a majority of our Consolidated Resort Operations expense. Furthermore, consolidated resort operations expense includes the costs related to food and beverage operations at certain resorts whose restaurants we manage directly. Similarly, the expenses of operating the golf courses, spas and retail and gift shops are included in consolidated resort operations expense. These expenses are allocated to our Hospitality and Management Services business segment.

At the time we record Vacation Interest sales revenue, we record the related Vacation Interest cost of sales. See “—Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates—Vacation Interest Cost of Sales” for further explanation of the determination of this expense. All of these costs are allocated to our Vacation Interest Sales and Financing business segment.

Advertising, sales and marketing costs are expensed as incurred, except for costs directly related to VOI sales that are not eligible for revenue recognition under ASC 978, as described under “— Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates — Vacation Interest Sales Revenue Recognition,” which are deferred along with related revenue until the buyer’s commitment requirements are satisfied. Advertising, sales and marketing costs are allocated to our Vacation Interest Sales and Financing business segment.

We are responsible for paying annual maintenance fees and reserves to the HOAs and the Collections on our unsold VOIs. Vacation interest carrying cost, net, includes amounts paid for delinquent maintenance fees related to VOIs acquired pursuant to our inventory recovery agreements, except for amounts that are capitalized to unsold Vacation Interests, net.

To offset our Vacation Interest carrying cost, we rent VOIs controlled by us to third parties on a short-term basis. We also generate revenue on sales of one-week rentals and mini-vacations, which allow prospective owners to sample a resort property. This revenue and the associated expenses are deferred until the vacation is

used by the customer or the expiration date, whichever is earlier. Revenue from resort rentals, one-week rentals and mini-vacations is recognized as a reduction to Vacation Interest carrying cost, with the exception of our European sampler product and a U.S. fixed-term product, both of which are three years in duration and are treated as Vacation Interest sales revenue. Vacation interest carrying cost, net, is allocated to our Vacation Interest Sales and Financing business segment.

Loan portfolio expense includes payroll and administrative costs of our finance operations and credit card processing fees. These costs are expensed as incurred with the exception of contract receivable origination costs, which are capitalized and amortized over the term of the related contracts receivable as an adjustment to interest revenue using the effective interest method in accordance with guidelines issued under ASC 310, “Receivables.” These expenses are allocated to our Vacation Interest Sales and Financing business segment.

Other operating expenses include credit card fees incurred by us when customers remit down payments associated with a VOI purchase in the form of credit cards and also include certain sales incentives given to customers as motivation to purchase a VOI and are expensed as the related Vacation Interest sales revenue is recognized. These expenses are allocated to our Vacation Interest Sales and Financing business segment.

General and administrative expense includes payroll and benefits, legal, audit and other professional services, costs related to mergers and acquisitions, travel costs, system-related costs and corporate facility expense. These expenses are not allocated to our business segments, but rather are reported under Corporate and Other.

We record depreciation expense in connection with depreciable property and equipment we purchased or acquired, including buildings and leasehold improvements, furniture and office equipment, land improvements and computer software and equipment. In addition, we record amortization expense on intangible assets with a finite life that we acquired, including management contracts, member relationships, distributor relationships and others. Depreciation and amortization expense is not allocated to our business segments, but rather is reported in Corporate and Other.

Interest expense related to corporate-level indebtedness is reported in Corporate and Other. Interest expense related to our securitizations and consumer loan financings is allocated to our Vacation Interest Sales and Financing business segment.

We have expanded our business in part through the acquisition of assets by wholly-owned special purpose subsidiaries, including the ILX Acquisition, the Tempus Resorts Acquisition, the PMR Acquisition and the Aegean Blue Acquisition. These transactions were structured such that we now hold the acquired assets, and have assumed certain related liabilities, through special-purpose subsidiaries. The respective lenders to each special purpose subsidiary have recourse only to such entity and thus the specific assets that were acquired in each transaction. However, such indebtedness is included in our consolidated balance sheets. We may pursue other transactions that could use similar special-purpose entities in similar structures, and these entities may also be required to be consolidated on our financial statements. As a result, our recent consolidated financial statements reflect substantially higher levels of debt and interest expense than our historical consolidated financial statements.

In comparing our results of operations between two periods, we sometimes refer to “same-store” results. When referring to same-store results of our Hospitality and Management Services segment, we are referring to the results relating to management contracts with resorts in effect during the entirety of the two applicable periods. When referring to same-store results of our Vacation Interest Sales and Financing segment, we are referring to the results relating to sales centers open during all of both of the applicable periods.

Comparison of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013 to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012

Total revenues increased $44.6 million, or 40.8%, to $153.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from $108.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. Total revenues in our Hospitality and Management Services segment increased $7.0 million, or 19.1%, to $43.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from $36.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012, due to higher management and member services revenue, consolidated resort operations revenue and other revenue. Total revenues in our Vacation Interest Sales and Financing segment increased $37.5 million, or 52.0%, to $109.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from $71.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The increase was attributable primarily to the increase in Vacation Interest, net and other revenue. Corporate and Other revenues increased $0.1 million, or 20.7%, to $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012.

Management and Member Services. Total management and member services revenue, which is recorded in our Hospitality and Management Services segment, increased $4.3 million, or 15.8%, to $31.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from $27.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. Management fees increased as a result of the addition of the managed properties from the PMR Acquisition and increases in operating costs at the resort level, which generated higher management fee revenue on a same-store basis under 71 of our cost-plus management agreements. We also experienced higher club revenues due to increased membership dues, higher collection rate and higher member count in THE Club in the three months ended March 31, 2013 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2012. THE Club had a total of 166,023 and 151,764 members as of March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Consolidated Resort Operations. Consolidated resort operations revenue, which is recorded in our Hospitality and Management Services segment, increased $0.1 million, or 1.0%, to $8.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from $8.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012.

Vacation Interest, Net. Vacation Interest, net, in our Vacation Interest Sales and Financing segment increased $37.1 million, or 68.0%, to $91.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from $54.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The increase in Vacation Interest, net was attributable to a $39.7 million increase in Vacation Interest sales revenue, partially offset by an $2.6 million increase in our provision for uncollectible Vacation Interest sales revenue.

The $39.7 million increase in Vacation Interest sales revenue was generated by sales growth on a same-store basis from 37 sales centers and the revenue contribution from our sales centers acquired pursuant to the PMR Acquisition during the three months ended March 31, 2013 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2012. Our total number of tours increased to 44,499 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from 34,942 for the three months ended March 31, 2012, primarily due to an increase in the number of tours generated on a same-store basis resulting from the expansion of our lead-generation and marketing programs, as well as the addition of tour flow from the sales centers acquired pursuant to the PMR Acquisition. We closed a total of 6,169 VOI sales transactions during the three months ended March 31, 2013, compared to 5,057 transactions during the three months ended March 31, 2012. Our closing percentage (which represents the percentage of VOI sales closed relative to the total number of sales presentations at our sales centers during the period presented) decreased to 13.9% for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from 14.5% for the three months ended March 31, 2012. This decrease in closing percentage was due to a higher percentage of tours presented to prospective new customers (which have a lower closing percentage than tours presented to existing customers) during the three months ended March 31, 2013 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2012. VOI sales price per transaction increased to $15,565 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from $12,060 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 due to a change in our selling strategy that focuses on selling larger point packages and the impact of sales and marketing initiatives implemented in furtherance of this strategy.

Sales incentives decreased $0.9 million, or 84.5%, to $0.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from $1.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. As a percentage of gross Vacation Interest

sales revenue, sales incentives were 0.2% for the three months ended March 31, 2013, compared to 1.9% for the three months ended March 31, 2012. Commencing with the three months ended March 31, 2013, as we now have adequate data regarding historical usage of our sales incentives provided under a program implemented in December 2011, the amount we record as sales incentives in each reporting period is reduced by an estimate of the amount of such sales incentives that we do not expect customers to redeem and, accordingly, the amount of such estimate is included in our Vacation Interest sales revenue. In addition, for the three months ended March 31, 2013, the amount we recorded as sales incentives was also reduced (and our Vacation Interest sales revenue was increased) by $2.4 million relating to the expiration, and expected future expiration, of sales incentives we provided to customers prior to such period. Excluding the $2.4 million reduction, sales incentives as a percentage of gross Vacation Interest sales revenue were 2.6% for the three months ended March 31, 2013, compared to 1.9% for the three months ended March 31, 2012.

Provision for uncollectible Vacation Interest sales revenue increased $2.6 million, or 62.1%, to $6.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from $4.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012, primarily due to the increase in Vacation Interest sales revenue. Provision for uncollectible Vacation Interest sales revenue as a percentage of Vacation Interest sales revenue decreased slightly to 6.8% in the three months ended March 31, 2013 from 7.0% in the three months ended March 31, 2012.

Interest Revenue. Interest revenue decreased $0.4 million, or 2.9%, to $13.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from $13.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The $0.4 million decrease resulted from a $0.5 million decrease related to our Vacation Interest Sales and Financing segment, partially offset by a $0.1 million increase related to Corporate and Other. $0.9 million of the decrease in the Vacation Interest Sales and Financing segment was attributable to changes in the weighted average interest rate on our mortgage and contracts receivable portfolio, partially offset by a $0.4 million increase resulting from increases in outstanding loan balances in this portfolio.

Other Revenue. Other revenue increased $3.4 million, or 69.6%, to $8.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from $4.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012.

Other revenue in our Hospitality and Management Services segment increased $2.6 million, or 295.7%, to $3.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from $0.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. This increase was primarily attributable to $2.2 million in insurance proceeds receivables recorded related to settlement agreements reached during the three months ended March 31, 2013. One agreement calls for us to receive $1.7 million in insurance proceeds related to property damage at one of our managed resorts and a second agreement calls for us to receive $0.5 million in insurance proceeds related to the reimbursement of defense costs incurred in connection with a litigation case filed in April 2012 in the State of Washington as disclosed in “Business—Legal Proceedings.”

Other revenue in our Vacation Interest Sales and Financing segment increased $0.8 million, or 20.0%, to $4.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from $4.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. We recorded higher closing fee revenue resulting from the increase in the number of VOI transactions closed. The increase in closing fee revenue was partially offset by a reduction in non-cash incentives, which decreased $1.0 million to a credit of $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from $0.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The credit for the three months ended March 31, 2013 was primarily due to a reduction of sales incentives resulting from the expiration, and expected future expiration, of sales incentives we provided to customers prior to such period.

Total costs and expenses increased $33.2 million, or 28.2%, to $150.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from $117.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012.

Management and Member Services Expense. Management and member services expense, which is recorded in our Hospitality and Management Services segment, increased $1.5 million, or 18.2%, to $9.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from $8.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. This increase was primarily due to higher operating expense associated with higher member count in THE Club. Management and member services expense as a percentage of management and member services revenue increased slightly to 31.0% for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from 30.3% for the three months ended March 31, 2012.

Consolidated Resort Operations Expense. Consolidated Resort Operations Expense, which is recorded in our Hospitality and Management Services segment, increased $0.6 million, or 9.0%, to $7.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from $7.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. Consolidated resort operations expense as a percentage of consolidated resort operations revenue increased 6.6% to 89.6% for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from 83.0% for the three months ended March 31, 2012. This increase was primarily due to the higher operating expense at our properties located in St. Maarten, where we provide services traditionally administered by an HOA.

Vacation Interest Cost of Sales. Vacation Interest cost of sales related to our Vacation Interest Sales and Financing segment increased $9.6 million, or 116.8%, to $17.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from $8.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. Of this increase, $5.6 million was due to an increase in Vacation Interest sales for the three months ended March 31, 2013 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2012. The remaining $4.0 million was primarily due to changes in our estimated average cost of inventory in connection with the relative sales value method. There was an increase of 0.1% in our estimated average cost of inventory at March 31, 2013 as compared to the preceding quarter and a decrease of 1.0% in our estimated average cost of inventory at March 31, 2012 as compared to the preceding quarter. Vacation Interest cost of sales as a percentage of Vacation Interest sales revenue was 18.1% for the three months ended March 31, 2013 compared to 14.0% for the three months ended March 31, 2012. See “Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates - Vacation Interest Cost of Sales” for additional information regarding the relative sales value method.

Advertising, Sales and Marketing. Advertising, sales and marketing costs, which is recorded in our Vacation Interest Sales and Financing segment, increased $15.6 million, or 44.6%, to $50.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from $34.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012, primarily due to the increase in the Vacation Interest sales revenue during the three months ended March 31, 2013 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2012. As a percentage of Vacation Interest sales revenue, advertising, sales and marketing costs were 51.2% for the three months ended March 31, 2013, compared to 59.3% for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The decrease of such costs as a percentage of Vacation Interest sales revenue was primarily due to improved absorption of fixed costs through increased sales efficiencies, as well as an increase in Vacation interest sales revenue resulting from the increase in VOI sales price per transaction and the expiration, and expected future expiration, of sales incentives we provided to customers prior to the three months ended March 31, 2013. Excluding the increase in Vacation Interest sales revenue resulting from the expiration and expected future expiration of sales incentives provided to customers in periods prior to the three months ended March 31, 2013, as discussed above, advertising, sales and marketing costs as a percentage of Vacation Interest sales revenue, were 52.5% for the three months ended March 31, 2013, compared to 59.3% for the three months ended March 31, 2012.

Vacation Interest Carrying Cost, Net. Net Vacation Interest carrying cost, which is recorded in our Vacation Interest Sales and Financing segment, decreased $1.1 million, or 11.2%, to $8.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from $9.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. This decrease was primarily due to an increase in rental revenue and sampler revenue, which reduced carrying costs. The increase in rental revenue was due to additional available room nights related to VOIs acquired in the PMR Acquisition as well as more occupied room nights and higher average daily rate related to our other VOI inventory. The increase in sampler revenue was due to increases in the number of sampler packages sold and in the average sampler

package price. The above increase in revenue was partially offset by an increase in maintenance fees related to inventory acquired in the PMR Acquisition and in delinquent maintenance fees paid related to VOIs acquired pursuant to our inventory recovery agreements. In addition, we recorded higher operating expenses as a result of higher rental activity.

Loan Portfolio Expense. Loan portfolio expense increased $0.1 million, or 6.6%, to $2.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from $2.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012.

Other Operating Expense. Other operating expense related to our Vacation Interest Sales and Financing segment decreased $0.8 million, to $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from $1.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. Non-cash incentives decreased $1.0 million to a credit of $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from $0.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The credit for the three months ended March 31, 2013 was primarily due to a reduction of sales incentives resulting from the expiration, and expected future expiration, of sales incentives we provided to customers prior to such period.

General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense, which is recorded under Corporate and Other, increased $2.0 million, or 9.8%, to $22.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from $20.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. This increase was primarily attributable to increased payroll expense to support operations acquired in connection with the PMR Acquisition. This increase was partially offset by an increase in the allocation of our expenses to the HOAs and the Collections we manage for the three months ended March 31, 2013 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2012.

Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization, which is recorded under Corporate and Other, increased $2.5 million, or 64.4%, to $6.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from $3.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. This increase was primarily attributable to the addition of depreciable and amortizable assets in connection with the PMR Acquisition and the Aegean Blue Acquisition and the expansion of our global headquarters.

Interest Expense. Interest expense, which is recorded in Corporate and Other and the Vacation Interest Sales and Financing segment, increased $2.9 million, or 13.3%, to $24.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from $21.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. Cash and paid-in-kind interest, exit fee accruals and debt issuance cost amortization in connection with the PMR Acquisition Loan were $3.3 million higher for the three months ended March 31, 2013 than for the three months ended March 31, 2012.

Impairments and Other Write-offs. Impairments and other write-offs, which are recorded under Corporate and Other, were $0.1 million and a credit of $0.01 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Gain on Disposal of Assets. Gain on disposal of assets, which is recorded under Corporate and Other, was $0.1 million for each of the three months ended March 31, 2013 and the three months ended March 31, 2012.

Gain on Bargain Purchase from Business Combinations. Gain on bargain purchase from business combinations, which is recorded under Corporate and Other, was zero for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 due to an adjustment recorded in connection with the Tempus Resorts Acquisition.

Income Taxes. Provision for income taxes, which is recorded under Corporate and Other, decreased $0.6 million, or 55.1%, to $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from $1.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The decrease was primarily attributable to a provision for alternative minimum tax recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to no such provision recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2013.

Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2012 to the Year Ended December 31, 2011

Total revenues increased $132.7 million, or 33.9%, to $523.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 from $391.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. Total revenues in our Hospitality and Management Services segment increased $16.0 million, or 11.7%, to $153.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 from $137.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, due to higher management and member services revenue, consolidated resort operations revenue and other revenue. Total revenues in our Vacation Interest Sales and Financing segment increased $118.0 million, or 47.1%, to $368.9 million for the year ended December 31,

2012 from $250.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase was attributable primarily to the increase in Vacation Interest, net and other revenue. Corporate and Other revenues decreased $1.5 million, or 50%, to $1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 from $2.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Management and Member Services. Total management and member services revenue, which is recorded in our Hospitality and Management Services segment, increased $15.6 million, or 15.7%, to $114.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 from $99.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. Management fees increased as a result of increases in operating costs at the resort level, which generated higher same-store management fee revenue under 68 of our cost-plus management agreements, and the addition of the managed properties from the Tempus Resorts Acquisition, the PMR Acquisition, the Aegean Blue Acquisition and two other management contracts entered into since April 1, 2011. We also experienced higher club revenues due to increased membership dues, higher collection rate and higher member count in THE Club in the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to the year ended December 31, 2011. THE Club had a total of 170,073 and 158,580 members at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Furthermore, we entered into a sales and marketing management fee-for-service arrangement with a third-party resort operator, which began to generate commission and management fee revenue towards the end of the second quarter of 2011.

Consolidated Resort Operations. Consolidated resort operations revenue, which is recorded in our Hospitality and Management Services segment, increased $3.9 million, or 12.9%, to $33.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 from $29.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase was primarily due to the addition of resort-level operations in the Tempus Resorts Acquisition. We also earned higher revenue at certain food and beverage operations.

Vacation Interest, Net. Vacation Interest, net, in our Vacation Interest Sales and Financing segment increased $98.3 million, or 50.5%, to $293.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 from $194.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase in Vacation Interest, net was attributable to a $107.2 million increase in Vacation Interest sales revenue, partially offset by an $8.9 million increase in our provision for uncollectible Vacation Interest sales revenue.

The $107.2 million increase in Vacation Interest sales revenue was generated by sales growth on a same-store basis from 33 sales centers and the revenue contribution from our ILX, Tempus and PMR sales centers during the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to the year ended December 31, 2011. Our total number of tours increased to 180,981 for the year ended December 31, 2012 from 146,260 for the year ended December 31, 2011, primarily due to an increase in the number of tours generated on a same-store basis resulting from the expansion of our lead-generation and marketing programs, as well as the addition of tour flow from the ILX, Tempus and PMR sales centers. We closed a total of 26,734 VOI sales transactions during the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to 21,093 transactions during the year ended December 31, 2011. Our closing percentage (which represents the percentage of VOI sales closed relative to the total number of sales presentations at our sales centers during the period presented) increased to 14.8% for the year ended December 31, 2012 from 14.4% for the year ended December 31, 2011. VOI sales price per transaction increased to $12,510 for the year ended December 31, 2012 from $10,490 for the year ended December 31, 2011 due to our focus on selling larger point packages, our implementation of a new pricing strategy and our discontinuation of a cash purchase discount in the fourth quarter of 2011.

As a percentage of gross Vacation Interest sales revenue, sales incentives were 2.9% for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to 1.6% for the year ended December 31, 2011. This increase was due to a new sales program we implemented in 2012 that offers VOI purchasers a specified number of points that can be used for airline tickets and/or room stays at their discretion.

Provision for uncollectible Vacation Interest sales revenue increased $8.9 million, or 53.7%, to $25.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 from $16.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. This

increase was mainly due to higher provision resulting from the increase in Vacation Interest sales revenue and the increase in the percentage of financed VOI sales. Provision for uncollectible Vacation Interest sales revenue as a percentage of Vacation Interest sales revenue increased slightly to 8.0% in the year ended December 31, 2012 from 7.8% in the ended December 31, 2011.

Interest Revenue. Interest revenue increased $5.9 million, or 12.5%, to $53.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 from $47.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. Of the $5.9 million, $7.3 million was related to our Vacation Interest Sales and Financing segment and $(1.4) million related to Corporate and Other. $7.7 million of the increase in the Vacation Interest Sales and Financing segment was attributable to increases in outstanding loan balances in this portfolio, including as a result of the portfolios acquired as part of the Tempus Resorts Acquisition and the PMR Acquisition, partially offset by a $0.4 million decrease resulting from changes in the weighted average interest rate on our mortgage and contracts receivable portfolio. The decrease in Corporate and Other was primarily due to the interest earned on an income tax refund recorded in our European operations during the year ended December 31, 2011.

Other Revenue. Other revenue increased $8.9 million, or 45.0%, to $28.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 from $19.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Other revenue in our Hospitality and Management Services segment decreased $3.5 million, or 43.1%, to $4.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 from $8.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. This decrease was due to our recording $5.1 million in insurance recovery proceeds received during the quarter ended March 31, 2011. This decrease in other revenue was partially offset by an increase in collection fees received in connection with enhanced collection efforts on delinquent maintenance fees.

Other revenue in our Vacation Interest Sales and Financing segment increased $12.4 million, or 105.8%, to $24.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 from $11.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. This increase was primarily attributable to higher closing fee revenue resulting from the increase in the number of VOI transactions closed and a higher closing fee we charged to purchasers of Vacation Interests. In addition, we recorded higher non-cash incentives. As a percentage of Vacation Interest sales revenue, non-cash incentives were 2.0% for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to 0.6% for the year ended December 31, 2011. This increase was due to a new sales program we implemented in 2012 that offers VOI purchasers a specified number of points that can be used for airline tickets and/or room stays at their discretion.

Total costs and expenses increased $134.1 million, or 34.4%, to $524.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 from $390.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. Excluding gains on bargain purchase from business combinations recorded in both periods (as discussed below), total costs and expenses increased $140.3 million, or 34.7%, to $544.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 from $404.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Management and Member Services Expense. Management and member services expense, which is recorded in our Hospitality and Management Services segment, increased $8.2 million, or 30.2%, to $35.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 from $27.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. Management and member services expense as a percentage of management and member services revenue increased to 30.7% for the year ended December 31, 2012 from 27.3% for the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase was primarily due to the expenses related to a sales and marketing management fee-for-service arrangement with a third-party resort operator, which began in the second quarter of 2011, and a decrease in the allocation of certain resort management expenses to the HOAs and the Collections we manage. Although there was an increase in the allocation of our total expenses to these HOAs and Collections during the year ended December 31, 2012, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2011, a lower percentage of the expenses was related to resort management expense. In addition, we incurred higher costs associated with an outsourced

customer service call center operations to accommodate higher call volumes resulting from the owners added to our network through the Tempus Resorts Acquisition and the PMR Acquisition.

Consolidated Resort Operations Expense. Consolidated Resort Operations Expense, which is recorded in our Hospitality and Management Services segment, increased $2.5 million, or 9.1%, to $30.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 from $27.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. Consolidated resort operations expense as a percentage of consolidated resort operations revenue decreased 3.1% to 89.8% for the year ended December 31, 2012 from 92.9% for the year ended December 31, 2011. This decrease was primarily due to the addition of Tempus resort-level operations, which generated a higher profit margin than our other consolidated resort operations.

Vacation Interest Cost of Sales. Vacation Interest cost of sales related to our Vacation Interest Sales and Financing segment increased $41.9 million to $32.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 from a credit of $9.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Of the $41.9 million increase in Vacation Interest cost of sales, approximately $11.3 million was due to an increase in Vacation Interest sales for the year ended December 31, 2012. The remainder of this increase was due to changes in estimates in connection with the relative sales value method, with (i) approximately $4.2 million estimated to be attributable to a decrease of 1.7% in the estimated projected sales price per point at December 31, 2012 compared to the prior year and (ii) the rest being due primarily to the amounts by which changes in estimates in connection with the relative sales value method impacted our Vacation Interest cost of sales for the year ended December 31, 2011 in excess of the amounts by which such changes in estimates also impacted our Vacation Interest cost of sales for the year ended December 31, 2012, as described below.

Approximately $10.9 million of the increase is estimated to be attributable to our acquisition of low cost inventory, which resulted in a decrease in the estimated Vacation Interest average inventory cost per point and an increase in estimated inventory sales volume. We acquire low cost inventory through inventory recovery agreements, which are entered into annually, and loan defaults. During 2011, there was an increase in the projected number of points to be sold related to new inventory estimated to be acquired pursuant to these inventory recovery agreements, and we entered into additional inventory recovery agreements with three Collections and with one HOA. We also acquired more inventory from loan defaults attributable to an increase in the size of our loan portfolio in the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to the year ended December 31, 2010.

Approximately $5.5 million of the increase is estimated to be attributable to an increase in estimated projected sales price per point in 2011. In particular, in September 2010, we increased the retail price at which we sold points, and in December 2010, we discontinued an incentive program whereby purchasers of points were provided with additional points at no charge. Together these changes resulted in an increase in projected sales price per point.

Approximately $5.8 million of the increase is estimated to be attributable to the Tempus Resorts Acquisition consummated in July 2011, which resulted in an increase in estimated total VOI inventory available for sale, an increase in estimated total revenue over the life of the project and a decrease in estimated average inventory cost. We purchased VOI inventory of Tempus Resorts International, Ltd. and recorded this inventory at fair market value (an amount less than the value of our average inventory). This was due in large part to the fact that we acquired a significant amount of VOI inventory at resorts primarily located in Florida, which is a market with a relatively high supply of inventory as compared to demand within the vacation ownership industry.

Approximately $5.0 million of the increase is estimated to be attributable to our deeding of inventory in Las Vegas, Nevada into the Diamond Resorts Hawaii Collection. We had previously determined to sell this inventory out of the Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection. Although there was no net change in points to be issued resulting from our determination to sell this inventory out of the Diamond Resorts Hawaii Collection rather than the

Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection, given that points in the Diamond Resorts Hawaii Collection have a higher relative weighted-average retail price per point, this determination increased the estimated revenue associated with the inventory subsequently deeded into the Diamond Resorts Hawaii Collection.

Approximately $8.3 million of the increase is estimated to be attributable to our 2011 change in estimate associated with using a weighted average point value per Collection rather than a calculated point per interval specific to each resort. An additional approximately $4.6 million of the increase is estimated to be attributable to a combination of our deeding of inventory into the Diamond Resorts Hawaii Collection (as described above) and this change in estimate of the point value per interval. We hold intervals that will be deeded into the various Collections so that they are available for use by the members of such Collection. Accordingly, we are required to make estimates as to the point values per interval and which Collection the intervals will be deeded into. This change in estimate associated with using a weighted average point value per Collection, rather than a calculated point per interval specific to a resort, was largely driven by a change in our current and anticipated business acquisition activity. Prior to 2010, other than VOI inventory recovery pursuant to inventory recovery agreements and loan defaults, we were not engaged in acquisitions of large blocks of VOIs, resorts or Collections. However, commencing with the ILX Acquisition consummated in 2010 and based upon anticipated acquisition activity in 2011 and future years, we acquired and expected to make acquisitions of these large blocks of VOIs, resorts and Collections as a meaningful part of our business. We determined that our prior use of estimates based upon a calculated point per interval specific to a resort was less meaningful due to this recent and anticipated future acquisition activity, particularly given that critical estimates used in the relative sales value method apply across all resorts within any single Collection.

The above increases were partially offset by a $14.4 million reduction in Vacation Interest cost of sales for the year ended December 31, 2012, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2011 estimated to be attributable to our acquisition of low cost inventory, which resulted in a decrease in the estimated Vacation Interest average inventory cost per point and an increase in estimated inventory sales volume. We acquire low cost inventory through inventory recovery agreements, which are entered into annually, and loan defaults. During 2012, there was an increase in the projected number of points to be sold related to new inventory estimated to be acquired pursuant to these inventory recovery agreements, and we entered into two new agreements for inventory recovery. We also acquired more inventory from loan defaults, which was attributable to an increase in the size of our loan portfolio in 2012 compared to 2011.

The above increases were also partially offset with a $0.8 million reduction in Vacation Interest cost of sales for the year ended December 31, 2012, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2011 estimated to be attributable to the PMR Acquisition consummated in May 2012, which resulted in an increase in estimated total VOI inventory available for sale and an increase in estimated total revenue over the life of the project.

Vacation Interest cost of sales as a percentage of Vacation Interest sales revenue was 10.1% for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to a credit of 4.6% for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Advertising, Sales and Marketing. Advertising, sales and marketing costs, which is recorded in our Vacation Interest Sales and Financing segment, increased $49.7 million, or 38.6%, to $178.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 from $128.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, primarily due to sales growth on a same-store basis and the sales activity generated by our ILX, Tempus and PMR sales centers during the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to the year ended December 31, 2011. As a percentage of Vacation Interest sales revenue, advertising, sales and marketing costs were 56.0% for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to 60.9% for the year ended December 31, 2011. The decrease of such costs as a percentage of Vacation Interest sales revenue was primarily due to improved absorption of fixed costs through increased sales efficiencies.

Vacation Interest Carrying Cost, Net. Net Vacation Interest carrying cost, which is recorded in our Vacation Interest Sales and Financing segment, decreased $4.9 million, or 12%, to $36.4 million for the year

ended December 31, 2012 from $41.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. This decrease was primarily due to a $9.7 million water intrusion assessment levied by the HOA of one of our managed resorts recorded during the year ended December 31, 2011 and an increase in rental revenue mainly as a result of the Tempus Resorts Acquisition, the PMR Acquisition and more occupied room nights on a same-store basis. The above decrease was partially offset by an increase in maintenance fees related to inventory acquired in the Tempus Resorts Acquisition and the PMR Acquisition and a higher level of inventory owned by us due to maintenance fee and loan defaults. In accordance with ASC 978, rental revenue is recorded as a reduction to the vacation interest carrying cost.

Loan Portfolio Expense. Loan portfolio expense increased $0.8 million, or 9.6%, to $9.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 from $8.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. This increase was mainly attributable to costs associated with a new call center that we acquired in connection with the Tempus Resorts Acquisition and costs related to the PMR Acquisition. Loan portfolio expense is allocated to both the Vacation Interest Sales and Financing segment and the Hospitality and Management Services segment.

Other Operating Expense. Other operating expense in our Vacation Interest Sales and Financing segment increased $5.1 million, or 150.3%, to $8.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 from $3.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. This increase was due to higher non-cash incentives due to a new sales program we implemented in 2012 that offers VOI purchasers a specified number of points that can be used for airline tickets and/or room stays at their discretion. As a percentage of Vacation Interest sales revenue, non-cash incentives were 2.0% for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to 0.6% for the year ended December 31, 2011.

General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense, which is recorded under Corporate and other, increased $18.6 million, or 23.1%, to $99.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 from $80.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. This increase was partially attributable to increased payroll, legal and professional fees and travel expense related to the integration of the PMR Acquisition, a $5.0 million termination payment accrual in connection with the Tempus Resorts Acquisition and a $3.3 million stock-based compensation expense recorded related to the fair value of certain equity securities issued in the year ended December 31, 2012. These increases were partially offset by an increase in the allocation of our total expenses to the HOAs and the Collections we manage for the year ended December 31, 2012 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2011. A higher percentage of the expenses related to general and administrative activities were included in the total costs allocated to these HOAs and the Collections during this same period. See also “Management and Member Services Expense” above for additional information.

Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization, which is recorded under Corporate and other, increased $4.9 million, or 35.0%, to $18.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 from $14.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. This increase was primarily attributable to the addition of depreciable and amortizable assets in the Tempus Resorts Acquisition and the PMR Acquisition.

Interest Expense. Interest expense, which is recorded in Corporate and other and the Vacation Interest Sales and Financing segment, increased $14.2 million, or 17.3%, to $96.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 from $82.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. Cash and paid-in-kind interest, exit fee accruals and debt issuance cost amortization in connection with the Tempus Acquisition Loan and PMR Acquisition Loan were $12.8 million higher for the year ended December 31, 2012 than for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Impairments and Other Write-offs. Impairments and other write-offs, which is recorded under Corporate and other, decreased $0.6 million, or 35.8%, to $1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 from $1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The impairments in the year ended December 31, 2012 were primarily attributable to the write down of a European resort held for sale to its net realizable value based on an accepted offer and the write down of intangible assets associated with an unprofitable European golf course operation. The impairments in the year ended December 31, 2011 were primarily related to the sale of one of our European resorts during that year and certain information technology projects that were no longer viable.

Gain on Disposal of Assets. Gain on disposal of assets, which is recorded under Corporate and other, decreased $0.1 million, or 14.5%, to $0.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 from $0.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Gain on Bargain Purchase from Business Combinations. Gain on bargain purchase from business combinations, which is recorded under Corporate and other, was $20.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 due to the PMR Acquisition and $14.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 in connection with the Tempus Resorts Acquisition. The fair value of the assets acquired net of the liabilities assumed in the PMR Acquisition and the Tempus Resorts Acquisition exceeded the purchase price due to the fact that the assets were purchased as part of distressed sales pursuant to Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings.

Income Taxes. Benefit for income taxes, which is recorded under Corporate and other, increased $4.8 million, or 50.4%. to $14.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 from $9.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase was primarily attributable to benefit for income taxes related to the permanent difference between the treatment of gain on bargain purchase from business combination in connection with the PMR Acquisition for financial reporting purposes as compared to income tax return purposes.

Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2011 to the Year Ended December 31, 2010

Total revenues increased $20.2 million, or 5.4%, to $391.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $370.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. Total revenues in our Hospitality and Management Services segment increased $19.6 million, or 16.6%, to $137.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $117.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, primarily due to higher management and member services revenue and consolidated resort operations revenue. Total revenues in our Vacation Interest Sales and Financing segment decreased $2.0 million, or 0.8%, to $250.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $252.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. The decrease was mostly attributable to the decline

in Vacation Interest, net, partially offset by higher interest revenue. Corporate and Other revenues increased $2.7 million, or 1,524.3%, to $2.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Management and Member Services. Total management and member services revenue, which is recorded in our Hospitality and Management Services segment, increased $13.1 million, or 15.2%, to $99.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $86.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. Management fees increased as a result of increases in operating costs at the resort level, which generated higher management fee revenue under our cost-plus management agreements, and the addition of the managed properties from the ILX Acquisition and the Tempus Resorts Acquisition. On a same-store basis from 59 management contracts, total management and member services revenue was $89.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $86.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. The acquisition of managed properties from the ILX Acquisition and the Tempus Resorts Acquisition resulted in a $6.7 million increase in management fee revenue. We also experienced higher club revenues due to a higher member count in THE Club as well as increased membership dues in the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to the year ended December 31, 2010. THE Club had a total of 158,580 and 148,298 members at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Furthermore, we entered into a sales and marketing management fee-for-service arrangement with a third party resort operator, which began to generate commission and management fee revenue during the second quarter of 2011.

Consolidated Resort Operations. Consolidated resort operations revenue, which is recorded in our Hospitality and Management Services segment, increased $3.4 million, or 12.6%, to $29.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $26.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. The increase was primarily due to the addition of the ILX and the Tempus resort-level operations and increased maintenance fee revenue in our St. Maarten resorts.

Vacation Interest, Net. Vacation Interest, net, in our Vacation Interest Sales and Financing segment decreased $7.3 million or 3.6%, to $194.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $202.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. The decrease in Vacation Interest, net was attributable to a $3.4 million decrease in Vacation Interest sales revenue, and a $3.9 million increase in our provision for uncollectible Vacation Interest sales revenue.

The $3.4 million decline in Vacation Interest sales revenue was primarily due to a $6.4 million decline in our recognition of sales revenue pursuant to ASC 978 in the year ended December 31, 2011, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2010. This decline was primarily due to the cumulative impact of a refinement in the treatment of closing costs in the buyer’s commitment model utilized in calculating sales revenue to more precisely calculate buyer’s commitment within the model. Previously, all closing costs were added to the buyer’s commitment calculation regardless of whether the buyer financed them or paid in cash. Financed closing costs are no longer included in the buyer’s commitment calculation. Management has determined that the refinement did not have a material impact on any of the prior periods. In addition, there was an increase in financed sales due to the discontinuation of incentives for cash VOI purchasers which increased the amount of Vacation Interest sales revenue deferred during the year ended December 31, 2011.

The above decrease was partially offset by an increase in Vacation Interest sales revenue primarily due to the revenue contribution from our ILX sales centers, which commenced in March 2011, and our Tempus sales center, which commenced in July 2011. We generated $19.8 million in Vacation Interest sales revenue at the Tempus and ILX sales centers during the year ended December 31, 2011. This increase was partially offset by a $17.0 million decrease on a same-store basis from 34 sales centers, to $198.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $215.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. Our total number of tours increased to 146,261 for the year ended December 31, 2011 from 130,801 for the year ended December 31, 2010 primarily as a result of the rebuilding of our tour pipeline. We closed a total of 21,093 VOI sales transactions during the year ended December 31, 2011, compared to 22,719 transactions during the year ended December 31, 2010. Our closing percentage (which represents the percentage of VOI sales closed relative to the

total number of sales presentations at our sales centers during the period presented) decreased to 14.4% in the year ended December 31, 2011 from 17.4% in the year ended December 31, 2010. These decreases were due to management’s decisions in the third quarter of 2011 to focus on increasing the average VOI sales per transaction and increasing efforts to close sales to new customers (rather than existing owner-families), both of which were expected to reduce our closing percentage. We believe these strategies will result in an increase of Vacation Interest sales revenue in the long run. Our average VOI sales price per transaction increased to $10,490 for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $9,526 for the year ended December 31, 2010 due to the focus of selling larger point packages, an increase in our pricing model and the discontinuation of the cash purchase discount.

As a percentage of gross Vacation Interest sales revenue, sales incentives were 1.6% for the year ended December 31, 2011, compared to 1.8% for the year ended December 31, 2010. This decrease was primarily due to a reduction of certain sales incentives given in our European operations.

Provision for uncollectible Vacation Interest sales revenue increased $3.9 million, or 30.9%, to $16.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $12.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. As the percentage of financed VOI sales increased during the year ended December 31, 2011, there was a corresponding increase in anticipated loan defaults and, accordingly, the provision for uncollectible Vacation Interest sales revenue increased. Provision for uncollectible Vacation Interest sales revenue as a percentage of Vacation Interest sales revenue increased to 7.8% in the year ended December 31, 2011 from 5.9% in the year ended December 31, 2010.

Interest Revenue. Interest revenue increased $8.0 million, or 20.2%, to $47.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $39.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. Of the $8.0 million, $5.2 million was related to our Vacation Interest Sales and Financing segment and $2.8 million related to Corporate and Other. $1.7 million of the increase related to our Vacation Interest Sales and Financing segment resulted from changes in the weighted average interest rate on our mortgage and contracts receivable portfolio and the remainder was attributable to increases in outstanding loan balances in this portfolio, including as a result of the portfolios acquired as part of the ILX Acquisition and the Tempus Resorts Acquisition. The increase in Corporate and Other was primarily due to interest earned on an income tax refund recorded in our European operations during the year ended December 31, 2011.

Other Revenue. Other revenue increased $3.2 million, or 18.9%, to $19.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $16.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Other revenue in our Hospitality and Management Services segment increased $3.1 million, or 62.6%, to $8.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $5.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. This increase was due to our recording $5.1 million in insurance proceeds received during the quarter ended March 31, 2011, related to the replacement of assets that were destroyed due to a severe flood in 2008 at one of our managed resorts. This increase was partially offset by the reduction in collection fees due to the number of members bringing their delinquent accounts current.

Other revenue in our Vacation Interest Sales and Financing segment was $11.7 million for both the year ended December 31, 2011 and the year ended December 31, 2010.

Total costs and expenses decreased $1.1 million, or 0.3%, to $390.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $391.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. Excluding gain on bargain purchase from business combination (as discussed below), total costs and expenses increased $13.3 million, or 3.4%, to $404.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $391.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Management and Member Services Expense. Management and member services expense, which is recorded in our Hospitality and Management Services segment, increased $4.7 million, or 20.9%, to $27.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $22.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. Management and member services expense as a percentage of management and member services revenue increased 1.3 percentage points to 27.3% for the year ended December 31, 2011 from 26.0% for the year ended December 31, 2010. The increase was primarily due to the expenses related to the sales and marketing management fee-for-service arrangement with a third-party resort operator, which began in the second quarter of 2011, partially offset by an increase in the allocation of certain resort management expenses to the HOAs and the Collections that we manage, which reduced our management and member services expense.

Consolidated Resort Operations Expense. Consolidated Resort Operations expense, which is recorded in our Hospitality and Management Services segment, increased $3.8 million, or 15.9%, to $27.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $24.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. Consolidated resort operations expense as a percentage of consolidated resort operations revenue increased 2.6 percentage points to 92.9% for the year ended December 31, 2011 from 90.3% for the year ended December 31, 2010. This increase was primarily due to the addition of ILX and Tempus resort-level operations and increased resort operations expense at our St. Maarten operations.

Vacation Interest Cost of Sales. Vacation Interest cost of sales related to our Vacation Interest Sales and Financing segment decreased $49.4 million, or 124.4%, to $(9.7) million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $39.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Approximately $13.6 million of the $49.4 million reduction in Vacation Interest cost of sales for the year ended December 31, 2011, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2010, is estimated to be attributable to our acquisition of low cost inventory, which resulted in a decrease in the estimated Vacation Interest average inventory cost per point and an increase in estimated inventory sales volume. We acquire low cost inventory through inventory recovery agreements, which are entered into annually, and loan defaults. During 2011, there was an increase in the projected number of points to be sold related to new inventory estimated to be acquired pursuant to these inventory recovery agreements, and we entered into additional inventory recovery agreements with three Collections and with one HOA. We also acquired more inventory from loan defaults attributable to an increase in the size of our loan portfolio in the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to the year ended December 31, 2010.

Approximately $7.1 million of the $49.4 million reduction in Vacation Interest cost of sales for the year ended December 31, 2011, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2010, is estimated to be attributable to an increase in estimated projected sales price per point. In particular, in September 2010, we increased the retail price at which we sold points, and in December 2010, we discontinued an incentive program whereby purchasers of points were provided with additional points at no charge. Together these changes resulted in an increase in projected sales price per point.

Approximately $7.4 million of the $49.4 million reduction in Vacation Interest cost of sales for the year ended December 31, 2011, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2010, is estimated to be attributable to the Tempus Resorts Acquisition consummated in July 2011, which resulted in an increase in estimated total VOI inventory available for sale, an increase in estimated total revenue over the life of the project and a decrease in estimated average inventory cost. We purchased VOI inventory of Tempus Resorts International, Ltd. and recorded this inventory at fair market value (an amount less than the value of our average inventory). This was due in large part to the fact that we acquired a significant amount of VOI inventory at resorts primarily located in Florida, which is a market with a relatively high supply of inventory as compared to demand within the vacation ownership industry.

Approximately $5.5 million of the $49.4 million reduction in Vacation Interest cost of sales for the year ended December 31, 2011, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2010, is estimated to be attributable to

our deeding of inventory in Las Vegas, Nevada into the Diamond Resorts Hawaii Collection. We had previously determined to sell this inventory out of the Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection. Although there was no net change in points to be issued resulting from our determination to sell this inventory out of the Diamond Resorts Hawaii Collection rather than the Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection, given that points in the Diamond Resorts Hawaii Collection have a higher relative weighted-average retail price per point, this determination increased the estimated revenue associated with the inventory subsequently deeded into the Diamond Resorts Hawaii Collection.

Approximately $9.3 million of the $49.4 million reduction in Vacation Interest cost of sales for the year ended December 31, 2011, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2010, is estimated to be attributable to our change in estimate associated with using a weighted average point value per Collection rather than a calculated point per interval specific to each resort. An additional approximately $5.3 million of the $49.4 million reduction in Vacation Interest cost of sales for the year ended December 31, 2011, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2010, is estimated to be attributable to a combination of our deeding of inventory into the Diamond Resorts Hawaii Collection (as described above) and this change in estimate of the point value per interval. We hold intervals that will be deeded into the various Collections so that they are available for use by the members of such Collection. Accordingly, we are required to make estimates as to the point values per interval and which Collection the intervals will be deeded into. This change in estimate associated with using a weighted average point value per Collection, rather than a calculated point per interval specific to a resort, was largely driven by a change in our current and anticipated business acquisition activity. Prior to 2010, other than VOI inventory recovery pursuant to inventory recovery agreements and loan defaults, we were not engaged in acquisitions of large blocks of VOIs, resorts or Collections. However, commencing with the ILX Acquisition consummated in 2010 and based upon anticipated acquisition activity in 2011 and future years, we acquired and expected to make acquisitions of these large blocks of VOIs, resorts and Collections as a meaningful part of our business. We determined that our prior use of estimates based upon a calculated point per interval specific to a resort was less meaningful due to this recent and anticipated future acquisition activity, and in particular given that critical estimates used in the relative sales value method apply across all resorts within any single Collection.

Vacation Interest cost of sales as a percentage of Vacation Interest sales revenue was (4.6)% for the year ended December 31, 2011, compared to 18.5% for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Advertising, Sales and Marketing. Advertising, sales and marketing costs, which is recorded in our Vacation Interest Sales and Financing segment, increased $14.7 million, or 12.9%, to $128.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $114.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. As a percentage of Vacation Interest sales revenue, advertising, sales and marketing costs were 60.9% for the year ended December 31, 2011, compared to 53.1% for the year ended December 31, 2010. The increase of such costs as a percentage of Vacation Interest sales revenue was due primarily to higher support personnel costs, direct marketing costs incurred to generate additional tour flow and build a pipeline for future tour flow and revisions to sales commission and other compensation structures.

Vacation Interest Carrying Cost, Net. Net Vacation Interest carrying cost, which is recorded in our Vacation Interest Sales and Financing segment, increased $11.5 million, or 38.6%, to $41.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $29.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, primarily due to an increase in maintenance fees related to inventory acquired in the ILX Acquisition and the Tempus Resorts Acquisition, a higher level of inventory owned by us due to maintenance fee and loan defaults on a same-store basis and a $9.7 million expense related to our share, based on VOIs held in inventory, of a water intrusion assessment levied by one of our managed resorts. The above increases were partially offset by an increase in rental revenue and sampler revenue, which reduced carrying costs. The increase in rental revenue was primarily due to the ILX Acquisition and the Tempus Resorts Acquisition and more occupied room nights on a same-store basis. The increase in sampler revenue was due to increases in packages sold and in the average package price.

Loan Portfolio Expense. Loan portfolio expense increased $0.1 million, or 0.6%, to $8.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $8.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. Loan portfolio expense is allocated to both the Vacation Interest Sales and Financing segment and the Hospitality and Management Services segment.

Other Operating Expense. Other operating expense in our Vacation Interest Sales and Financing segment increased $0.2 million, or 7.3%, to $3.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $3.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. This increase was due to higher non-cash incentives. As a percentage of Vacation Interest sales revenue, non-cash incentives were 0.6% for both of the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.

General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense, which is recorded under Corporate and other, increased $12.5 million, or 18.4%, to $80.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $67.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. This increase was partially attributable to increased payroll, legal and professional fees and travel expense related to the Tempus Resorts Acquisition and the PMR Acquisition in the year ended December 31, 2011. In addition, we incurred higher payroll and related expense and legal and professional fees associated with enhancements in internal controls and preparations for our becoming subject to SEC reporting obligations and an increase in employee severance expense.

These increases were partially offset by an increase in allocations of certain hospitality-related corporate general and administrative expenses to the HOAs and the Collections that we manage, thereby reducing our corporate-level general and administrative expense.

Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization, which is recorded under Corporate and other, increased $2.1 million, or 17.0%, to $14.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $11.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. This increase was primarily attributable to the depreciation and amortization associated with the ILX and Tempus assets acquired in August 2010 and July 2011, respectively, partially offset by a reduction in the amortization of the intangible assets acquired in connection with the Sunterra Corporation acquisition. We recorded significantly higher amortization expense associated with these assets in earlier years in accordance with the accelerated amortization schedule established at the time of the Sunterra Corporation acquisition.

Interest Expense. Interest expense, which is recorded in Corporate and other and the Vacation Interest Sales and Financing segment, increased $14.8 million, or 22.1%, to $82.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $67.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. Non-cash interest expense was higher for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to the year ended December 31, 2010. Higher debt issuance cost amortization and original issue discount amortization for the year ended December 31, 2011, resulting primarily from the issuance of the Senior Secured Notes in August 2010, the DROT 2011 Notes (as defined below under “Liquidity and Capital Resources”) in April 2011 and additional loans incurred in connection with the Tempus Resorts Acquisition in July 2011, was partially offset by the elimination of paid-in-kind interest on our second lien facility due to the extinguishment of that facility. After removing these non-cash interest items, interest expense totaled $74.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, and $61.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. This increase was primarily related to higher interest rates on the outstanding debt balances resulting from our issuance of the Senior Secured Notes and loans issued in connection with the ILX Acquisition in August 2010 and the Tempus Resorts Acquisition in July 2011 as compared to the first and second lien term facilities.

Loss on Extinguishment of Debt. Loss on extinguishment of debt, which is recorded under Corporate and other, was $0 for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $1.1 million the year ended December 31, 2010. On August 13, 2010, we completed our offering of the Senior Secured Notes. The proceeds from the Senior Secured Notes were used primarily to repay all of the outstanding indebtedness under our existing revolving line of credit and first and second lien facilities.

Impairments and Other Write-offs. Impairments and other write-offs, which is recorded under Corporate and other, decreased $1.7 million, or 52.8%, to $1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $3.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. The impairments in the year ended December 31, 2011 were primarily related to the sale of one of our European resorts during that year and certain information technology projects that were no longer viable. The impairments in the year ended December 31, 2010 were mainly due to the write-down of a receivable related to an HOA management contract that we terminated and the write-down of resorts in our European operations to their estimated net realizable value.

Gain on Disposal of Assets. Gain on disposal of assets, which is recorded under Corporate and other, decreased $1.2 million, or 63.2%, to $0.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $1.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. During the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, we recognized a gain resulting from the sale of certain units at one of our managed resorts. This decrease was primarily due to fewer units disposed of during the year ended December 31, 2011 than the year ended December 31, 2010 at one of our European resorts.

Gain on Bargain Purchase from Business Combination. Gain on bargain purchase from business combination, which is recorded under Corporate and other, was $14.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 as the fair value of the assets acquired in the Tempus Resorts Acquisition, net of the liabilities assumed, exceeded the purchase price. The assets were purchased as part of a distressed sale as Tempus Resorts International Ltd. had filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings in November 2010.

Income Taxes. Benefit for income taxes, which is recorded under Corporate and other, increased $8.2 million, or 647.0% to $9.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. The increase was primarily attributable to benefit for income taxes related to the permanent difference between the treatment of gain on bargain purchase from business combination in connection with the Tempus Resorts Acquisition for financial reporting purposes as compared to income tax return purposes.

Historically, our business has depended on the availability of credit to finance the consumer loans we have provided to our customers for the purchase of their VOIs. Typically, these loans have required a minimum cash down payment of 10% of the purchase price at the time of sale. However, selling, marketing and administrative expenses attributable to VOI sales are primarily cash expenses and often exceed the buyer’s minimum down payment requirement. Accordingly, the availability of financing facilities for the sale or pledge of these receivables to generate liquidity is a critical factor in our ability to meet our short- and long-term cash needs. We have historically relied upon our ability to sell receivables in the securitization market in order to generate liquidity and create capacity on our Funding Facilities.

Additionally, the terms of the consumer loans we seek to finance are generally longer than the Funding Facilities through which we seek to finance such loans. While the term of our consumer loans is typically ten years, our Funding Facilities typically have a term of less than three years. Although we seek to refinance conduit borrowings in the term securitization markets, we generally access the term securitization markets on an annual basis, and rely on our conduit facilities to provide incremental liquidity between securitization transactions. Thus, we are required to refinance our conduit facilities every one to two years in order to provide adequate liquidity for our consumer finance business.

We completed a $182.0 million securitization in October 2009 that was composed of A and BBB+ rated notes backed by vacation ownership loans. The proceeds of the securitization were used to pay down our conduit facilities.

On April 30, 2010, we entered into agreements with Quorum and completed the $40.0 million Quorum Facility to sell eligible consumer loans and in-transit loans to Quorum. On April 27, 2012, the Quorum Facility

agreement was amended to increase the aggregate minimum committed amount of the Quorum Facility to $60.0 million. The Quorum Facility agreement was further amended and restated effective as of December 31, 2012 to increase the aggregate minimum committed amount of the facility to $80.0 million and to extend the term of the agreement to December 31, 2015; provided that Quorum may further extend the term for additional one-year periods by written notice.

On April 27, 2011, we completed a second securitization transaction and issued the Diamond Resorts Owner Trust (“DROT”) 2011 Notes with a face value of $64.5 million (the “DROT 2011 Notes”).

On October 14, 2011, we amended and restated the Conduit Facility Agreement that was originally entered into on November 3, 2008 to extend the maturity date of the facility to April 12, 2013. The amendment provided for a $75.0 million, 18-month facility that was annually renewable for 364-day periods at the election of the lenders. The advance rates on loans receivable in the portfolio were limited to 75% of the face value of the eligible loans. On April 11, 2013, we entered into another amended and restated Conduit Facility that extended the maturity date of the facility to April 10, 2015. That amended and restated Conduit Facility provides for a $125.0 million, 24-month facility that is annually renewable for 364-day periods at the election of the lenders, bears interest at either LIBOR or the commercial paper rate (each having a floor of 0.50%) plus 3.25% and has a non-use fee of 0.75%. The overall advance rate on loans receivable in the portfolio is limited to 85% of the aggregate face value of the eligible loans.

On January 23, 2013, we completed a third securitization transaction, issuing DROT 2013-1 Class A and B Notes with a face value of $93.6 million (the “DROT 2013 Notes”). The proceeds were used to pay off the then-outstanding principal balance, accrued interest and fees associated with the Conduit Facility and to pay certain expenses incurred in connection with the issuance of the DROT 2013 Notes.

Although we completed these securitization and Funding Facilities transactions, we may not be successful in completing similar transactions in the future. If we are unable to continue to participate in securitization transactions or renew and/or replace our Funding Facilities on acceptable terms, our liquidity and cash flows would be materially and adversely affected.

We require access to the capital markets in order to fund our operations and may, in the implementation of our growth strategy, become more reliant on third-party financing. There can be no assurances that any such financing will be available to allow us to implement our growth strategy and sustain and improve our results of operations. As of March 31, 2013, the funding availability under the Quorum Facility and the Conduit Facility was $24.3 million and $51.4 million, respectively.

We spent $0.4 million and $0.3 million related to open market and bulk VOI inventory purchases during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Construction of inventory during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 was $0.5 million and 0.2 million, respectively, primarily related to construction of a 15-unit addition to our Italian property.

We used cash of $22.6 million and $18.7 million during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, for acquisitions of VOI inventory pursuant to inventory recovery agreements and in open market and bulk VOI inventory purchases, for capitalized legal, title and trust fees and for the construction of VOI inventory. Of these total cash amounts (which do not reflect our acquisition of inventory in the PMR Acquisition and the Tempus Resorts Acquisition), $2.1 million and $1.7 million during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, were used for the construction of VOI inventory, primarily related to construction of a 15-unit addition to our Italian property.

In addition, we had increases in unsold Vacation Interest, net that did not have an impact on our working capital during the respective periods. Specifically, we capitalized $16.1 million and $4.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, related to inventory recovery agreements in the U.S., offset by

an equal increase in due to related parties, net; cash will be used in future periods to settle these amounts. In addition, we transferred $14.1 million and $1.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, from due from related parties, net to unsold Vacation Interest, net as a result of our recovery of VOI inventory pursuant to inventory recovery arrangements in Europe; cash was used in prior periods when these amounts were recorded to due from related parties, net. Furthermore, we transferred $3.4 million and $5.3 million from mortgages and contracts receivable, net to unsold Vacation Interest, net for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, as a result of our recovery of underlying VOI inventory due to loan defaults.

We used cash of $1.9 million and $2.8 million during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, for acquisitions of VOI inventory pursuant to inventory recovery agreements and in open market and bulk VOI inventory purchases, for capitalized legal, title and trust fees and for the construction of VOI inventory. Of these total cash amounts, $0.5 million and $0.2 million during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, were used for the construction of VOI inventory, primarily related to construction of a 15-unit addition to our Italian property.

In addition, we had increases in unsold Vacation Interest, net that did not have an impact on our working capital during the respective periods. Specifically, we transferred $0.5 million and $0.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, from due from related parties, net to unsold Vacation Interest, net as a result of our recovery of VOI inventory pursuant to inventory recovery arrangements in Europe; cash was used in prior periods when these amounts were originally recorded to due from related parties, net. We also capitalized $1.4 million for accrued open market and bulk purchases for the three months ended March 31, 2013, offset by an equal increase in accrued liabilities; cash will be used in future periods to settle these amounts. Furthermore, we transferred $0.7 million and $3.2 million from mortgages and contracts receivable, net to unsold Vacation Interest, net for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, as a result of our recovery of underlying VOI inventory due to loan defaults.

We had $26.2 million, $21.1 million and $19.9 million in cash and cash equivalents as of March 31, 2013, December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. Our primary sources of liquidity have historically come from cash from operations and borrowings. We believe there will be sufficient existing cash resources and cash flow from operations, in addition to refinancing activities, to meet the anticipated debt maturities and other cash requirements for the next twelve months. If cash flows from operations are less than expected, we would need to curtail our sales and marketing operations or raise additional capital.

In October 2011, we were levied a $9.7 million water intrusion assessment related to the intervals and points equivalent that we own at a resort that we manage to cover the costs required to repair water intrusion damage. The water intrusion assessment was recorded as Vacation Interest carrying cost during the quarter ended December 31, 2011. This assessment is payable in annual installments over the five-year period beginning in January 2012, and we remitted the first two installment payments by their due dates. We expect to fund any future installment payments from operating cash flows.

On July 21, 2011, Diamond LLC consummated a recapitalization transaction pursuant to which it sold 280.89 common units to certain institutional accredited investors in exchange for $136.5 million. Diamond LLC paid approximately $4.5 million in fees in conjunction with the recapitalization transactions. Diamond LLC used $108.7 million of the proceeds and issued 26.56 common units to redeem all of the issued and outstanding preferred units (including accrued and unpaid priority returns). In addition, Diamond LLC paid $16.4 million to Cloobeck Diamond Parent, LLC, a related party of Diamond LLC, to redeem 34.74 common units previously held by Cloobeck Diamond Parent, LLC. Immediately after the transaction above, Cloobeck Diamond Parent, LLC owned approximately 54.3% of the issued and outstanding common units with the remainder owned by various institutional investors. Diamond LLC also purchased warrants that are exercisable into approximately 3.3% of common stock of Diamond Resorts Corporation for approximately $6.4 million in cash.

During the three months ended March 31, 2013, net cash provided by operating activities was $10.3 million and was the result of net income of $2.3 million and non-cash revenues and expenses totaling $13.9 million, partially offset by other changes in operating assets and liabilities that resulted in a net credit of $5.9 million. The significant non-cash revenues and expenses included (i) $6.7 million in the provision for uncollectible Vacation Interest sales revenue, (ii) $1.9 million in amortization of capitalized financing costs and original issue discounts, (iii) $6.3 million in depreciation and amortization, (iv) $1.2 million in amortization of capitalized loan origination costs and portfolio discounts (net of premiums), (v) $0.1 million in impairments and other write-offs and (vi) $0.1 million loss on foreign currency exchange, offset by (a) $0.1 million in gain from disposal of assets and (b) $2.2 million in gain from insurance settlement recognized in connection with the insurance proceeds we expect to receive related to property damage at one of our managed resorts and litigation disclosed in “Business—Legal Proceedings.”

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, net cash provided by operating activities was $20.7 million and was the result of a net loss of $9.6 million, non-cash revenues and expenses totaling $9.0 million and other changes in operating assets and liabilities of $21.3 million. The significant non-cash revenues and expenses included (i) $4.1 million in the provision for uncollectible Vacation Interest sales revenue, (ii) $1.5 million in amortization of capitalized financing costs and original issue discounts and (iii) $3.8 million in depreciation and amortization, offset by (a) $0.1 million in gain from disposal of assets, (b) $0.2 million in amortization of capitalized loan origination costs and portfolio discounts (net of premiums) and (c) $0.1 million in gain on bargain purchase from business combination related to the Tempus Resorts Acquisition.

During the year ended December 31, 2012, net cash provided by operating activities was $24.6 million and was the result of net income of $13.6 million and non-cash revenues and expenses totaling $23.1 million, partially offset by other changes in operating assets and liabilities of $12.2 million. The significant non-cash revenues and expenses included (i) $25.5 million in the provision for uncollectible Vacation Interest sales revenue, (ii) $6.3 million in amortization of capitalized financing costs and original issue discounts, (iii) $18.9 million in depreciation and amortization, (iv) $2.3 million in amortization of capitalized loan origination costs and portfolio discounts (net of premiums), (v) $3.3 million in stock-based compensation related to the issuance of certain equity securities and (vi) $1.0 million in impairments and other write-offs, offset by (vii) $0.6 million in gain from disposal of assets, (viii) $20.6 million in gain on bargain purchase from business combinations, and (ix) $13.0 million in reduction of deferred income tax liability related to the PMR Acquisition.

During the year ended December 31, 2011, net cash provided by operating activities was $9.3 million and was the result of net income of $10.3 million, non-cash revenues and expenses totaling $14.3 million and other changes in operating assets and liabilities of a $15.3 million credit. The significant non-cash revenues and expenses included (i) $16.6 million in the provision for uncollectible Vacation Interest sales revenue, (ii) $6.1 million in amortization of capitalized financing costs and original issue discounts, (iii) $3.6 million in amortization of capitalized loan origination costs and portfolio discounts (net of premiums), (iv) $14.0 million in depreciation and amortization, and (v) $1.6 million in impairment of assets, offset by (vi) $3.5 million of insurance proceeds received related to the replacement of assets that were destroyed due to a severe flood in 2008 at one of our resorts, which represents proceeds received in prior years but recognized as revenue in the year ended December 31, 2011, (vii) $0.7 million in gain from disposal of assets, (viii) $8.6 million in reduction of deferred income tax liability related to the Tempus Resorts Acquisition, and (ix) $14.3 million in gain on bargain purchase from business combination related to the Tempus Resorts Acquisition.

During the year ended December 31, 2010, net cash provided by operating activities was $66.0 million and was the result of a net loss of $19.2 million, non-cash revenues and expenses totaling $31.8 million and other changes in operating assets and liabilities of $53.4 million. The significant non-cash revenues and expenses include (i) $12.7 million in the provision for uncollectible Vacation Interest sales revenue, (ii) $2.5 million in

amortization of capitalized financing costs and original issue discounts, (iii) $3.0 million in amortization of capitalized loan origination costs and portfolio discounts, (iv) $11.9 million in depreciation and amortization, (v) $1.1 million loss on extinguishment of debt, (vi) $3.3 million in impairment of assets, offset by (vii) $1.9 million in gain on disposal of assets, (viii) $0.4 million reduction of deferred income tax liability, (ix) $0.2 million gain on mortgage repurchase and (x) $0.3 million in unrealized gain on derivative instruments.

During the year ended December 31, 2009, net cash provided by operating activities was $87.8 million and was the result of a net loss of $21.0 million, non-cash revenues and expenses of $40.7 million and other changes in operating assets and liabilities of $68.1 million. The significant non-cash expenses include (i) $14.2 million in provision for uncollectible Vacation Interest sales revenue, (ii) $2.0 million in amortization of capitalized financing costs and original issue discounts, (iii) $3.2 million in amortization of capitalized deferred loan and contract origination costs, (iv) $13.4 million in depreciation and amortization, (v) $10.9 million in loss on extinguishment of debt, (vi) $1.1 million in impairments and other write-offs, offset by (vii) $0.3 million in gain on mortgage repurchase and (viii) $3.9 million in unrealized gain on derivative instruments.

During the three months ended March 31, 2013, net cash used in investing activities was $2.5 million, which was all attributable to cash used to purchase property and equipment. A majority of the cash purchase was associated with information technology related projects and equipment.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, net cash used in investing activities was $1.7 million, comprised of $1.9 million used to purchase property and equipment, including $1.1 million for the replacement of assets that were destroyed due to a severe flood in 2008 for which insurance proceeds were received, offset by $0.2 million in proceeds from the sale of assets in our European operations.

During the year ended December 31, 2012, net cash used in investing activities was $69.3 million, comprised of (i) $14.3 million used to purchase furniture, fixtures, computer software and equipment, (ii) $51.6 million used in connection with the PMR Acquisition, and (iii) $4.5 million used in connection with the Aegean Blue Acquisition (net of $2.1 million of cash acquired), offset by (iv) $1.1 million in proceeds from the sale of assets in our European operations. In addition to the $51.6 million cash consideration paid in the PMR Acquisition, we assumed $1.7 million of liabilities in that transaction. The fair value of the acquired assets was $87.0 million based on a valuation report, resulting in a gain on bargain purchase of $20.7 million and a deferred tax liability of $13.0 million stemming from the difference between the treatment for financial reporting purposes as compared to income tax return purposes related to the intangible assets acquired. In addition to the $4.5 million of cash consideration paid in the Aegean Blue Acquisition, we assumed $12.2 million of liabilities in that transaction. The fair value of the assets acquired was $16.7 million based on a valuation report prepared internally, resulting in a gain on bargain purchase of $0.1 million.

During the year ended December 31, 2011, net cash used in investing activities was $109.8 million, comprised of (i) $6.3 million used to purchase furniture, fixtures, computer software and equipment, including $1.1 million for the replacement of assets that were destroyed due to a severe flood in 2008 for which insurance proceeds were received, (ii) $102.4 million used in connection with the Tempus Resorts Acquisition (net of $2.5 million of cash acquired) and (iii) $3.5 million issuance of the Tempus Note Receivable described below, offset by (iv) $2.4 million in proceeds from the sale of assets in our European operations. In addition to the $104.9 million cash consideration paid in the Tempus Resorts Acquisition, we assumed $8.5 million of liabilities in that transaction. The fair value of the acquired assets was $136.3 million based on a valuation report, resulting in a gain on bargain purchase of $14.3 million and a deferred tax liability of $8.6 million stemming from the difference between treatment for financial reporting purposes as compared to income tax return purposes related to the intangible assets acquired.

During the year ended December 31, 2010, net cash used in investing activities was $37.4 million, comprised of (i) $5.6 million used to purchase furniture, fixtures, computer software and equipment, (ii) $30.7

million used in connection with the ILX Acquisition and (iii) $3.0 million issuance of the Tempus Note Receivable described below, offset by (iv) $1.9 million in proceeds from the sale of assets in our European operations. In addition to the $30.7 million cash consideration paid in the ILX Acquisition, we assumed $4.2 million of liabilities in that transaction. The fair value of the acquired assets was $34.9 million based on a valuation report.

During the three months ended March 31, 2013, net cash used by financing activities was $2.1 million. Cash provided by financing activities consisted of (i) $127.7 million from the issuance of debt under our securitization notes and Funding Facilities, and (ii) $1.3 million from issuance of notes payable. These amounts were offset by cash used in financing activities consisting of (a) $105.2 million in repayments on our securitization notes and Funding Facilities, (b) $9.8 million in repayments on notes payable, (c) a $14.2 million increase in cash in escrow and restricted cash and (d) $2.0 million of debt issuance costs.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, net cash used in financing activities was $21.0 million. Cash provided by financing activities consisted of (i) $30.6 million from the issuance of debt under our securitization notes and Funding Facilities and (ii) $0.1 million from issuance of notes payable. These amounts were partially offset by cash used by financing activities consisting of (a) $35.8 million on our securitization notes and Funding Facilities, (b) $7.1 million on notes payable, (c) $8.8 million increase in cash in escrow and restricted cash and (d) $0.02 million of debt issuance costs.

During the year ended December 31, 2012, net cash provided by financing activities was $45.5 million. Cash provided by financing activities consisted of (i) $119.8 million from the issuance of debt under our securitization notes and Funding Facilities and (ii) $80.7 million from issuance of notes payable. These amounts were offset by cash used in financing activities consisting of (i) $114.7 million in repayments on our securitizations and Funding Facilities, (ii) $31.3 million in repayments on notes payable, (iii) a $6.4 million increase in cash in escrow and restricted cash and (iv) $2.6 million of debt issuance costs.

During the year ended December 31, 2011, net cash provided by financing activities was $93.0 million. Cash provided by financing activities consisted of (i) $206.8 million from the issuance of debt under our securitization notes and conduit facility, (ii) $48.2 million in notes payable and (iii) $146.7 million in equity investment received from new investors. These amounts were offset by cash used in financing activities consisting of (i) $138.9 million on our securitizations and conduit facility, (ii) $16.9 million on notes payable, (iii) $5.5 million of debt issuance costs, (iv) $16.6 million to purchase a portion of our outstanding stock warrants, including from affiliates of Guggenheim Partners, LLC (“Guggenheim”), (v) $16.4 million to repurchase a portion of common units, (vi) $108.7 million to redeem all previously-issued preferred units, (vii) $4.6 million in costs related to preferred and common units issued and (viii) a $1.0 million increase in cash in escrow and restricted cash.

During the year ended December 31, 2010, net cash used in financing activities was $18.3 million. Cash used in financing activities consisted of net payments of (i) $90.2 million on our securitizations and our Conduit Facility, (ii) $397.6 million on our first and second lien facilities, (iii) $8.2 million on notes payable, (iv) $19.1 million of debt issuance costs, (v) $75.0 million to repurchase equity previously held by another minority institutional investor, (vi) $2.9 million in payments related to the 2010 equity recapitalization and (vii) $0.1 million in payments for a derivative asset. These amounts were offset by cash generated from financing activities of (i) $414.4 million from our issuance of the Senior Secured Notes, (ii) $54.1 million from the issuance of debt under our securitization notes and conduit facility, (iii) $20.8 million from issuance of other notes payable, (iv) $75.0 million in equity investment received from the Guggenheim Investor and (v) $10.5 million due to a decrease in cash in escrow and restricted cash.

The following table presents selected information on our Indebtedness as of December 31, 2012 and March 31, 2013 (dollars in thousands):

On August 13, 2010, we completed the issuance of $425.0 million of principal amount of Senior Secured Notes. The Senior Secured Notes carry an interest rate of 12.0% and were issued with an original issue discount of 2.5%, or $10.6 million. Interest payments are due in arrears on February 15 and August 15 of each year, commencing February 15, 2011. The proceeds from the Senior Secured Notes were used primarily to repay all of

the outstanding indebtedness under our then-existing revolving line of credit and first and second lien facilities. The Senior Secured Notes mature in August 2018 and may be redeemed by us at any time pursuant to the terms of the Senior Secured Notes. If we redeem, in whole or in part, the Senior Secured Notes prior to August 2014, the redemption price will be the face value of the Senior Secured Notes plus accrued and unpaid interest and an applicable premium. If we redeem all or part of the Senior Secured Notes on or after August 2014, the redemption price will be 106% of the face value of the Senior Secured Notes, subject to decreases over the next two years, plus accrued and unpaid interest.

The Notes Indenture contains covenants that limit our ability to: (i) incur additional indebtedness or issue certain preferred shares; (ii) create liens; (iii) pay dividends or make other equity distributions; (iv) purchase or redeem capital stock or subordinated debt; (v) make certain investments; (vi) sell assets; (vii) consolidate, merge, sell or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of our assets; and (viii) engage in transactions with affiliates. As of March 31, 2013, we were in compliance with the above covenants.

Covenants limiting our ability to incur indebtedness or liens and covenants requiring us to offer to repurchase the Senior Secured Notes are determined by reference to Adjusted EBITDA for Diamond LLC and its restricted subsidiaries. Our restricted subsidiaries are all of the subsidiaries of Diamond LLC, other than certain subsidiaries that we have designated as unrestricted subsidiaries in accordance with the Notes Indenture. As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, our unrestricted subsidiaries included our special purpose subsidiaries formed for the purpose of acquiring assets and assuming related liabilities in connection with strategic acquisitions (including ILX Acquisition Inc. and its subsidiaries; Tempus Acquisition, LLC and its subsidiaries; DPM Acquisition, LLC and its subsidiaries; and Aegean Blue Holdings Plc and its subsidiaries), as well as FLRX Inc. (which currently conducts no operations and has no material assets other than an indirect interest in two undeveloped real estate parcels in Mexico) and its subsidiaries. Neither Diamond LLC nor any of its restricted subsidiaries has assumed or guaranteed the indebtedness of any of our unrestricted subsidiaries. See “Commitments and Contingencies—FLRX Litigation” for further detail regarding FLRX Inc. and “Use of Special-Purpose Subsidiaries” for a description of our use of special purpose subsidiaries.

We believe there will be sufficient existing cash resources and cash flow from operations to meet anticipated debt maturities and other cash requirements for the next 12 months. However, if we and our restricted

subsidiaries are unable to incur additional indebtedness or liens, or if we are required to offer to repurchase Senior Secured Notes, and we do not have sufficient cash flows from operations, we may need to curtail our sales and marketing operations or raise additional capital.

Adjusted EBITDA for Diamond LLC and its restricted subsidiaries is derived from our consolidated Adjusted EBITDA, which we calculate in accordance with the Notes Indenture as our net income (loss), plus: (i) corporate interest expense; (ii) provision (benefit) for income taxes; (iii) depreciation and amortization; (iv) Vacation Interest cost of sales; (v) loss on extinguishment of debt; (vi) impairments and other non-cash write-offs; (vii) loss on the disposal of assets; (viii) amortization of loan origination costs; and (ix) amortization of net portfolio premiums; less (a) deferred revenue recognized outside the ordinary course of business; (b) gain on the disposal of assets; (c) gain on bargain purchase from business combination; and (d) amortization of net portfolio discounts. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-U.S. GAAP financial measure and should not be considered in isolation, or as an alternative to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities or any other measure of liquidity, or as an alternative to net income (loss), operating income (loss) or any other measure of financial performance, in any such case calculated and presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Provided below is additional information regarding the calculation of Adjusted EBITDA for purposes of the Notes Indenture.

Corporate interest expense is added back because interest expense is a function of outstanding indebtedness, not operations, and can be dependent on a company’s capital structure, debt levels and credit ratings. Accordingly, corporate interest expense can vary greatly from company to company and across periods for the same company. However, in calculating Adjusted EBITDA, interest expense related to lines of credit secured by the mortgages and contracts receivable generated in the normal course of selling Vacation Interests is not added back to Net Income because this borrowing is necessary to support our Vacation Interest sales business.

Loss on extinguishment of debt includes the effect of write-offs of capitalized debt issuance costs and substantial modifications of the terms of our indebtedness. While the amounts booked by us with respect to these events include both cash and non-cash items, the entire amounts are related to financing events, and not our ongoing operations. Accordingly, these amounts are treated similarly to corporate interest expense and are added back to Net Income in our Adjusted EBITDA calculation.

Deferred revenue recognized outside the ordinary course of business is excluded from our Adjusted EBITDA calculation, as it represents deferred revenue recognized in a period different than when the sales of units to which such revenue relates were consummated. Specifically, we recognized deferred sales revenue during the year ended December 31, 2009 upon the completion of the construction of certain units sold prior to our acquisition of Sunterra Corporation in April 2007.

Vacation Interest cost of sales is excluded from our Adjusted EBITDA calculation because the method by which we are required to record Vacation Interest cost of sales pursuant to ASC 978 (a method designed for companies that, unlike us, engage in significant timeshare development activity) includes various projections and estimates, which are subject to significant uncertainty. Because of the cumulative “true-up” adjustment required by this method, as discussed below, this method can cause major swings in our reported operating income.

Pursuant to ASC 978, if we review our projections and determine that our estimated Vacation Interest cost of sales was higher (or lower) than our actual Vacation Interest cost of sales for the prior life of the project (which, for us, goes back to our acquisition of Sunterra Corporation in 2007), we apply the higher (or lower) Vacation Interest cost of sales retroactively. In such a case, our Vacation Interest cost of sales for the current period will be increased (or reduced) by the entire aggregate amount by which we underestimated (or overestimated) Vacation Interest cost of sales over such period (reflecting a cumulative adjustment extending back to the beginning of the current period). For additional information regarding how we record Vacation Interest Cost of sales, see “Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates—Vacation Interest Cost of Sales.”

Vacation Interest sales revenue does not accrue until collectibility is reasonably assured, and is not subject to cumulative adjustments similar to those required in determining Vacation Interest cost of sales pursuant to

ASC 978. As a result, Vacation Interest sales revenue is included in the calculation of Adjusted EBITDA, even though Vacation Interest cost of sales is excluded from such calculation.

In addition to covenants contained in the Notes Indenture, financial covenants governing the Conduit Facility are (and we expect that financial covenants governing our new Revolving Credit Facility (defined below) that we intend to enter into in connection with the consummation of this offering will be) determined by reference to measures calculated in a manner similar to the calculation of Adjusted EBITDA. Further, Adjusted EBITDA is not only used for purposes of determining compliance with covenants in our debt-related agreements, but our management also uses our consolidated Adjusted EBITDA: (i) for planning purposes, including the preparation of our annual operating budget; (ii) to allocate resources to enhance the financial performance of our business; (iii) to evaluate the effectiveness of our business strategies and (iv) as a factor for determining compensation for personnel who are not provided to us by HM&C.

However, Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool because, among other things:

We encourage investors and securities analysts to review our U.S. GAAP consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus, and investors and securities analysts should not rely solely or primarily on Adjusted EBITDA or any other single financial measure to evaluate our liquidity or financial performance.

The following tables present Adjusted EBITDA for Diamond LLC and its restricted subsidiaries, as calculated in accordance with, and for purposes of covenants contained in, the Notes Indenture, reconciled to each of (1) our net cash provided by operating activities and (2) our net income (loss). The tables below present this reconciliation on an actual basis for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2011 and 2012, for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2013 and for the 12 months ended March 31, 2013 (LTM). LTM Adjusted EBITDA is presented because, as discussed above, the covenants in the Notes Indenture restricting the incurrence of indebtedness and liens are based upon Adjusted EBITDA for Diamond LLC and its restricted subsidiaries for the four most recently ended fiscal quarters.

On April 26, 2007, we entered into our first lien facility and second lien facility. Our first lien facility included a $250.0 million term loan and a $25.0 million revolving line of credit, with maturity dates of April 26, 2012 and April 26, 2011, respectively, and was secured by our capital and assets. The second lien facility, which was secured by the same assets as our first lien facility but on a second lien basis, had a maturity date of April 26, 2013.

On August 13, 2010, we used the net proceeds from our sale of the outstanding Senior Secured Notes and other general-purpose funds to repay the $395.7 million of then-outstanding indebtedness under our revolving line of credit and first and second lien facilities.

Conduit Facility, 2009 Securitization, 2011 Securitization and 2013 Securitization

On November 3, 2008, we entered into agreements for our Conduit Facility, pursuant to which we issued secured VOI receivable-backed variable funding notes designated Diamond Resorts Issuer 2008 LLC Variable Funding Notes in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $215.4 million, which was decreased to $200.0 million, $73.4 million and $64.6 million on March 27, 2009, October 15, 2009 and August 31, 2010, respectively. On October 14, 2011, we entered into an amended and restated Conduit Facility agreement that extended the maturity date of the facility to April 12, 2013. On April 11, 2013, we entered into another amended and restated Conduit Facility that extended the maturity date of the facility to April 10, 2015. That amended and restated Conduit Facility provides for a $125.0 million, 24-month facility that is annually renewable for 364-day periods at the election of the lenders, bears interest at either LIBOR or the commercial paper rate (each having a floor of 0.50%) plus 3.25%, and has a non-use fee of 0.75%. The overall advance rate on loans receivable in the portfolio is limited to 85% of the aggregate face value of the eligible loans.

The Conduit Facility is subject to covenants including the maintenance of specific financial ratios. The financial ratio covenants consist of a minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio of at least 1.5 to 1.0 as of the measurement date and a maximum consolidated leverage ratio not to exceed 5.0 to 1.0 on each measurement date. The consolidated interest coverage ratio is calculated by dividing Consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the credit agreement) by Consolidated Interest Expense (as defined in the credit agreement), both as measured on a trailing 12-month basis preceding the measurement date. As of March 31, 2013, our interest coverage ratio was 2.95x. The consolidated leverage ratio is calculated by dividing Total Funded Debt (as defined in the credit agreement) minus unrestricted cash and cash equivalents as of the measurement date by Consolidated EBITDA as measured on a trailing 12-month basis preceding the measurement date. As of March 31, 2013, our leverage ratio was 2.84x. Covenants in the Conduit Facility also include limitations on liquidity. The total liquidity covenant stipulates that our aggregate unrestricted cash and cash equivalents as of the measurement date must exceed $10.0 million through December 31, 2010 and must exceed $15.0 million as of the measurement dates from January 1, 2011 through the Commitment Expiration Date. As of March 31, 2013, our unrestricted cash and cash equivalents under the non-special-purpose subsidiaries was $19.5 million. As of March 31, 2013, we were in compliance with all of these covenants.

On October 15, 2009, we completed our 2009 securitization transaction and issued two consumer loan backed notes designated as the DROT 2009 Class A Notes and the DROT 2009 Class B Notes (together, the “DROT 2009 Notes”). The DROT 2009 Class A Notes carry an interest rate of 9.3% and had an initial face value of $169.2 million. The DROT 2009 Class B Notes carry an interest rate of 12.0% and had an initial face value of $12.8 million. The DROT 2009 Notes have a maturity date of March 20, 2026. The net proceeds received were $181.1 million compared to the $182.0 million face value and we recorded the $0.9 million difference as an original issue discount on the securitization notes payable. Also on October 15, 2009, we used the proceeds from the DROT 2009 Notes to pay down the $148.9 million outstanding principal balance under our Conduit Facility, along with requisite accrued interest and fees associated with both conduit facilities.

On April 27, 2011, we completed a securitization transaction and issued the DROT 2011 Notes, with a face value of $64.5 million. The DROT 2011 Notes mature on March 20, 2023 and carry an interest rate of 4.0%. The net proceeds were used to pay off in full the $36.4 million outstanding principal balance under our Conduit Facility, to pay down approximately $7.0 million of the Quorum Facility, to pay requisite accrued interest and fees associated with both facilities, and to pay certain expenses incurred in connection with the issuance of the DROT 2011 Notes, including the funding of a reserve account required thereby.

On January 23, 2013, we completed a securitization transaction and issued the DROT 2013 Notes, with a face value of $93.6 million. The DROT 2013 Notes mature on January 20, 2025 and carry a weighted average interest rate of 2.0%. The net proceeds were used to pay off the outstanding principal balance under our Conduit Facility and to pay expenses incurred in connection with the issuance of the DROT 2013 Notes, including the funding of a reserve account required thereby.

Our subsidiary, DRI Quorum 2010 LLC (“DRI Quorum”), entered into a Loan Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “LSSA”), dated as of April 30, 2010 with Quorum, as purchaser. The LSSA and related documents provide for an aggregate minimum $40.0 million loan sale facility and joint marketing venture where DRI Quorum may sell eligible consumer loans and in-transit loans to Quorum on a non-recourse, permanent basis, provided that the underlying consumer obligor is a Quorum credit union member. The joint marketing venture has a minimum term of two years and the LSSA provides for a purchase period of two years. The purchase price payment and the program purchase fee are each determined at the time that the loan is sold to Quorum. To the extent excess funds remain after payment of the sold loans at Quorum’s purchase price, such excess funds are required to be remitted to us as a deferred purchase price payment. The LSSA was amended on April 27, 2012 to increase the aggregate minimum committed amount of the Quorum Facility to $60.0 million. The LSSA was further amended and restated effective as of December 31, 2012 to increase the aggregate minimum committed amount of the Quorum Facility to $80.0 million and to extend the term of the agreement to December 31, 2015, provided that Quorum may further extend the term for additional one-year periods by written notice. Through March 31, 2013, the weighted average purchase price payment was 89.7% of the obligor loan amount, and the weighted average program purchase fee was 6.1%.

On August 31, 2010, we completed the ILX Acquisition through our wholly-owned subsidiary, ILX Acquisition, Inc. (“ILXA”). In connection with the ILX Acquisition, ILXA entered into an Inventory Loan and Security Agreement (“ILXA Inventory Loan”) and a Receivables Loan and Security Agreement (“ILXA Receivables Loan”) with Textron Financial Corporation. The ILXA Inventory Loan is a non-revolving credit facility in the maximum principal amount of $23.0 million with an interest rate of 7.5%. The ILXA Receivables Loan is a receivables facility with an initial principal amount of $11.9 million with an interest rate of 10.0% and is collateralized by mortgages and contracts receivable of ILXA. Both loans mature on August 31, 2015. The proceeds from these loans were used to fund the ILX Acquisition. ILXA and each of its wholly-owned subsidiaries are special-purpose subsidiaries.

On November 23, 2010, Tempus Acquisition, LLC, one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, entered into a Credit and Security Agreement with an affiliate of Guggenheim, as the lender, and Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC, as administrative agent. The Credit and Security Agreement was a revolving loan facility with a maximum principal amount of $8.0 million, the proceeds of which were used exclusively for the following purposes: (i) to provide Tempus Acquisition, LLC with funds to lend to Tempus Resorts International, Ltd. and certain of its subsidiaries, pursuant to a debtor-in-possession financing order entered by the United States

Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida (“DIP Financing” or “Tempus Note Receivable”), for general working capital purposes and other lawful purposes as permitted under the agreements governing the DIP Financing; and (ii) to provide $1.5 million for the “Deposit,” as defined and provided in the Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Assets to purchase certain assets of Tempus Resorts International, Ltd. and its subsidiaries. The term of the Credit and Security Agreement ended on July 1, 2011, when the Tempus Note Receivable was discharged in connection with the Tempus Resorts Acquisition.

On July 1, 2011, we completed the Tempus Resorts Acquisition through Mystic Dunes, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Tempus Acquisition, LLC. In order to fund the Tempus Resorts Acquisition, Tempus Acquisition, LLC, entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC, as administrative agent for lenders, which include affiliates of, or funds managed or advised by, Guggenheim Partners, LLC, which is an affiliate of the Guggenheim Investor, and Silver Rock Financial LLC, which is an affiliate of the Silver Rock Investors (the “Tempus Acquisition Loan”). The Tempus Acquisition Loan is collateralized by all assets of Tempus Acquisition, LLC. The Tempus Acquisition Loan was initially in an aggregate principal amount of $41.1 million (which included a $5.5 million revolving loan). The Tempus Acquisition Loan bears interest at a rate of 18.0% (of which an amount equal to not less than 10.0% per annum is paid in cash on a quarterly basis and the remaining accrued amount may be paid, at our election, in cash or in kind by adding the applicable accrued amount to principal), and matures on June 30, 2015. In addition, Tempus Acquisition, LLC paid a 2.0% closing fee based on the initial Tempus Acquisition Loan balance as of July 1, 2011 and is also required to make an exit fee payment for up to 10% of the initial Tempus Acquisition Loan balance upon the final payment-in-full of the outstanding balance under the loan. Tempus Acquisition, LLC is required to make principal prepayments equal to (i) on a monthly basis, 40% of the aggregate interval purchase price received by Mystic Dunes, LLC in the prior month, (ii) within one business day of receipt, net participation proceeds payments less amounts attributable to interest paid, generated by Tempus Acquisition, LLC’s acquisition of a participating interest in the Tempus Receivables Loan, (iii) 100% of excess cash flow from the Tempus Resorts Acquisition and the Aegean Blue Acquisition, commencing with the quarter ending December 31, 2012 and (iv) $0.3 million, payable monthly, commencing in January 2013. Within 30 days after the end of each calendar year commencing with calendar year 2012, Tempus Acquisition, LLC is also required to make an additional prepayment in an amount equal to the difference between the aggregate principal prepayments paid in the calendar year and $5.0 million, such that a minimum of $5.0 million in aggregate annual principal reductions have been made. On September 28, 2012, Tempus Acquisition, LLC amended the Loan and Security Agreement to terminate the revolving loan and transfer the then-outstanding balance under the revolving loan to the term loans. On October 4, 2012, Tempus Acquisition, LLC further amended the Loan and Security Agreement to provide an additional $6.6 million borrowing under the term loans to fund the Aegean Blue Acquisition. The Tempus Acquisition Loan was further amended on November 20, 2012 and December 21, 2012 to increase the term loans by $2.5 million and $5.0 million, respectively, to pay separation payments to principals of the Mystic Dunes resorts, and to fund guaranties and indemnities required to be paid to Mystic Dunes, LLC’s HOAs. Some of the Wellington Management Investors became lenders under this credit facility in connection with a December 2012 amendment to the Tempus Acquisition Loan.

An aggregate of $7.5 million of the Tempus Acquisition Loan was used by Tempus Acquisition, LLC to purchase a 10% participating interest in the Tempus Receivables Loan and the remaining proceeds were loaned to Mystic Dunes, LLC pursuant to a Loan and Security Agreement having payment terms identical to the Tempus Acquisition Loan (the “Mystic Dunes Loan”). The Mystic Dunes Loan is collateralized by all assets of Mystic Dunes, LLC. The proceeds of the Mystic Dunes Loan were used to pay off certain existing indebtedness and closing costs associated with the Tempus Resorts Acquisition.

the principal and accrued interest balances on the Tempus Receivables Loan. In addition, Mystic Dunes Receivables, LLC is required to make additional principal payments in the event the aging status of the receivables in the underlying portfolio does not meet certain requirements. During the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, Mystic Dunes, LLC made additional principal payments of $0.3 million and $0.1 million, respectively, pursuant to this requirement. The Tempus Receivables Loan bears interest at a rate that is the higher of (i) one-month LIBOR plus 7.0% or (ii) 10%, adjusted monthly, and matures on July 1, 2015. Furthermore, we are obligated to pay Resort Finance America, LLC an initial defaulted timeshare loans release fee over 36 months from August 2011 through June 2014. The fee was recorded at fair value as of July 1, 2011 using a discount rate of 10%.

Another subsidiary of Mystic Dunes, LLC entered into an Amended and Restated Inventory Loan and Security Agreement with Textron Financial Corporation (the “Tempus Inventory Loan”) in the maximum amount of $4.3 million, collateralized by certain VOI inventory acquired in the Tempus Resorts Acquisition. The Tempus Inventory Loan bears interest at a rate equal to the three-month LIBOR (with a floor of 2.0%) plus 5.5% and matures on June 30, 2016, subject to extension to June 30, 2018. Hereinafter, the Tempus Acquisition Loan, the Mystic Dunes Loan, the Tempus Receivables Loan and the Tempus Inventory Loan are sometimes collectively referred to herein as the “Tempus Loans.”

Tempus Acquisition, LLC, Mystic Dunes, LLC and each of its wholly-owned subsidiaries are special-purpose subsidiaries.

On May 21, 2012, DPM Acquisition, LLC, one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries (“DPMA”), completed the PMR Acquisition whereby it acquired assets pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement, among DPMA and Pacific Monarch Resorts, Inc., Vacation Interval Realty, Inc., Vacation Marketing Group, Inc., MGV Cabo, LLC, Desarrollo Cabo Azul, S. de R.L. de C.V., and Operadora MGVM S. de R.L. de C.V. Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, DPMA acquired certain resort management agreements, unsold VOIs and the rights to recover and resell such interests, a portion of the seller’s consumer loans portfolio and certain real property and other assets for approximately $51.6 million in cash, plus the assumption of specified liabilities related to the acquired assets.

In order to fund the PMR Acquisition, on May 21, 2012, DPMA entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC, as administrative agent for lenders, which include affiliates of, or funds managed or advised by, Guggenheim Partners, LLC, which is an affiliate of the Guggenheim Investor, Wellington Management Company, LLP, including some of the Wellington Management Investors, and Silver Rock Financial LLC, which is an affiliate of the Silver Rock Investors (the “PMR Acquisition Loan”). The PMR Acquisition Loan is collateralized by substantially all of the assets of DPMA. The PMR Acquisition Loan was initially in an aggregate principal amount of $71.3 million (consisting of a $61.3 million term loan and a $10.0 million revolving loan). The PMR Acquisition Loan bears interest at a rate of 18.0% (of which an amount equal to not less than 10.0% per annum is paid in cash on a quarterly basis and the remaining accrued amount may be paid, at our election, in cash or in kind by adding the applicable accrued amount to principal), and matures on May 21, 2016.

The PMR Acquisition Loan provides that, (1) DPMA is required to pay quarterly (a) to the administrative agent, for its own account, an administration fee, and (b) to Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC, for the benefit of lenders with commitments to make revolving loans thereunder, an unused line fee based upon each such lender’s commitment to provide revolving loans and the then outstanding principal amount of such lender’s revolving loan, (2) DPMA shall make certain mandatory monthly and quarterly prepayments of amounts borrowed under the PMR Acquisition Loan, and (3) on the maturity date for the term loan, if not paid earlier in accordance therewith, DPMA is required to pay an exit fee of up to 10.0% of the initial loan amount. On the

closing date for the PMR Acquisition, pursuant to the PMR Acquisition Loan, DPMA paid a closing fee of approximately $2.1 million to the administrative agent and certain lenders party thereto. The proceeds of the PMR Acquisition Loan were used to fund the purchase price for the PMR Acquisition and associated closing costs.

On September 28, 2012, DPMA amended the Loan and Security Agreement to terminate the revolving loan and transfer the then-outstanding balance under the revolving loan to the term loan.

On May 21, 2012, DPMA also entered into an Inventory Loan and Security Agreement (the “DPM Inventory Loan”) with RFA PMR LoanCo, LLC. The DPM Inventory Loan will provide debt financing for a portion of the purchase price of the defaulted receivables to be purchased by DPMA pursuant to a collateral recovery and repurchase agreement entered into between DPMA and an affiliate of RFA PMR LoanCo, LLC in connection with the PMR Acquisition. The interest rate is a variable rate equal to the sum of LIBOR plus 6.0% per annum; provided that LIBOR is never less than 2.0% nor greater than 4.0% per annum.

DPMA and each of its wholly-owned subsidiaries are special-purpose subsidiaries.

In connection with the consummation of this offering, we expect to enter into a $25 million revolving credit facility with Credit Suisse, , , and (the “Revolving Credit Facility”). We expect that the Revolving Credit Facility will provide that, subject to customary borrowing conditions, we may, from time to time prior to , 2017 borrow, repay and re-borrow loans in an aggregate amount outstanding at any time of up to $25 million, and borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility are expected to bear interest at a rate equal to %.

We finance premiums on certain insurance policies under unsecured notes. One of the unsecured notes matured in February 2013 and carried an interest rate of 3.1% per annum. The other unsecured note is scheduled to mature in September 2013 and carries an interest rate of 3.2% per annum. In addition, we purchased certain software licenses during the year ended December 31, 2012 with monthly interest-free payments due for the next two years, and this obligation was recorded at fair value using a discount rate of 5.7%.

Except with respect to the Senior Secured Notes, a substantial amount of our indebtedness is non-recourse, including the DROT 2011 Notes, the DROT 2009 Notes, the Conduit Facility, the Quorum Facility, the ILXA Receivables Loan, the ILXA Inventory Loan, the Tempus Loans and the PMR Acquisition Loan. Our securitizations represent debt that is securitized through bankruptcy-remote special purpose entities, the creditors of which have no recourse to Diamond International for principal and interest. The funds received from the obligors of our consumer loans are directly used to pay the principal and interest due on the securitization notes. Over the next twelve months, we expect that our cash flows from operations and the borrowings under the Funding Facilities will be available to cover the interest payments due under the Senior Secured Notes and fund our operating expenses and other obligations.

Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including the growth of our consumer financing activities and the expansion of our hospitality management operations. Our ability to secure short-term and long-term financing in the future will depend on a variety of factors, including our future profitability, the performance of our consumer loan receivable portfolio, our relative levels of debt and equity and the overall condition of the credit and securitization markets. If we are unable to secure short-term and long-term financing

in the future, our liquidity and cash flows would be materially and adversely affected and we may be required to curtail our sales and marketing operations.

As of March 31, 2013, we had available approximately $235.1 million of unused federal net operating loss carry-forwards, $205.2 million of unused state net operating loss carry-forwards, and $129.6 million of foreign net operating loss carry-forwards with expiration dates from 2017 through 2029 (except for certain foreign net operating loss carry-forwards that do not expire) that may be applied against future taxable income, subject to certain limitations.

Even with these limitations, $104.7 million of federal net operating loss is currently available for use, and an additional $13.5 million becomes available for use each year, subject to a remaining limitation of $58.1 million. Similarly, use of the state net operating loss carry-forward is also available. Although our future cash tax liabilities cannot be entirely eliminated through the application of these net operating loss carry-forwards due to a 90% statutorily imposed limitation applicable to a portion of our alternative minimum tax net operating loss carry-forwards, we believe that the availability of these net operating loss carry-forwards to offset future taxable income will result in minimal cash tax obligations in future periods.

From time to time, we or our subsidiaries are subject to certain legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business.

FLRX is a defendant in a lawsuit originally filed in July 2003, alleging the breach of certain contractual terms relating to the obligations under a stock purchase agreement for the acquisition of FLRX in 1998, as well as certain violations under applicable consumer protection acts. FLRX currently conducts no operations and has no material assets other than an indirect interest in two undeveloped real estate parcels in Mexico. In January 2010, following a jury trial, a Washington state court entered a judgment against FLRX, awarded plaintiffs damages of $30.0 million plus post-judgment interest at a rate of 12% per annum and attorney’s fees of approximately $1.5 million plus accrued interest, and ordered specific performance of certain ongoing contractual obligations pursuant to the breach of contract claim.

FLRX appealed the verdict. On November 14, 2011, we received notice that the Court of Appeals for the State of Washington affirmed the lower court decision upholding the judgment against FLRX. On February 27, 2012, FLRX filed a petition for review with the State Supreme Court. On June 6, 2012, the petition was denied. Any liability in this matter is not covered by insurance. Neither Diamond Resorts Corporation nor any of its other subsidiaries is party to this lawsuit. Sunterra Corporation was originally named as a defendant in this matter, but it was later dismissed from the case. It is possible that FLRX may at some point determine to file for protection under the Federal Bankruptcy Code.

In April 2012, the plaintiffs in the FLRX case filed a lawsuit in King County Superior Court in the State of Washington against Diamond LLC and Diamond Resorts Corporation. The complaint, which alleges two claims for alter ego and fraudulent conveyance, seeks to hold Diamond LLC and Diamond Resorts Corporation liable for the judgment entered against FLRX. Plaintiffs claim that the defendants manipulated the corporate form of FLRX and caused fraudulent transfers of assets from FLRX.

On May 18, 2012, the case was removed to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington, Case No. 2:12-cv-00870. On August 29, 2012, Diamond Resorts Corporation filed an answer to the complaint, denying all material allegations therein and raising various affirmative defenses. On September 24, 2012, the

court entered an order dismissing Diamond LLC. The court has set the case for trial on December 3, 2013. The parties are currently engaged in written discovery. We intend to vigorously defend against these claims.

Although we believe that we will not have any material liability when these matters are ultimately resolved, there can be no assurance that this will be the case. As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had an estimated litigation accrual of $1.1 million in accrued liabilities, as reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, which represents the write-down of FLRX’s investment in subsidiaries to $0. Legal fees associated with these cases are expensed as incurred.

The following table presents obligations and commitments to make future payments under contracts and under contingent commitments as of December 31, 2012 (in thousands):

As of each of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements (as defined in Item 303(a)(4) of Regulation S-K).

Inflation and changing prices have not had a material impact on our revenues, income (loss) from operations, and net income (loss) during any of our three most recent fiscal years. However, to the extent inflationary trends affect short-term interest rates, a portion of our debt service costs, as well as the rates we charge on our consumer loans, may be affected.

Historically, we have been exposed to interest rate risk through our variable rate indebtedness, including our first and second lien facilities, lines of credit and Funding Facilities discussed above, which we have attempted to manage through the use of derivative financial instruments. For example, we are required to hedge 90% of the outstanding note balance under our Conduit Facility. We do not hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes and do not enter into derivative transactions that would be considered speculative positions. At March 31, 2013, our derivative financial instruments consisted of six interest rate cap agreements, which did not qualify for hedge accounting. Interest differentials resulting from these agreements are recorded on an accrual basis as an adjustment to interest expense. To manage exposure to counterparty credit risk in interest rate swap

and cap agreements, we enter into agreements with highly-rated institutions that can be expected to fully perform under the terms of such agreements.

To the extent we assume variable rate indebtedness in the future, any increase in interest rates beyond amounts covered under any corresponding derivative financial instruments, particularly if sustained, could have an adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows and financial position. We cannot assure that any hedging transactions we enter into will adequately mitigate the adverse effects of interest rate increases or that counterparties under these agreements will honor their obligations.

Additionally, we derive net interest income from our consumer financing activities to the extent the interest rates we charge our customers who finance their purchases of VOIs exceed the variable interest rates we pay to our lenders. Because our mortgages and contracts receivable generally bear interest at fixed rates, future increases in interest rates may result in a decline in our net interest income.

As of March 31, 2013, 8.3% of our borrowings, or $69.0 million, bore interest at variable rates. As of December 31, 2012, 15.2% of our long-term debt, or $123.2 million, bore interest at variable rates. However, most of our variable-rate borrowings require a minimal interest rate floor when LIBOR is below certain levels. Assuming the level of variable-rate borrowings outstanding at March 31, 2013 and assuming a one percentage point increase in the 2013 average interest rate payable on these borrowings, it was estimated that our 2013 interest expense would have increased, and our net income would have decreased, by $0.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013. Assuming the level of variable-rate borrowings outstanding at December 31, 2012 and assuming a one percentage point increase in the 2012 average interest rate payable on these borrowings, it was estimated that our 2012 interest expense would have increased, and our net income would have decreased, by $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2012.

In addition to our operations throughout the United States, we conduct operations in international markets from which we receive, at least in part, revenues in foreign currencies. For example, we receive Euros and British Pounds Sterling in connection with operations in our European managed resorts and European VOI sales and Mexican Pesos in connection with our operations in Mexico. Because our financial results are reported in U.S. dollars, fluctuations in the value of the Euro and British Pound Sterling against the U.S. dollar have had and will continue to have an effect, which may be significant, on our reported financial results. A decline in the value of any of the foreign currencies in which we receive revenues, including the Euro, British Pound Sterling or Mexican Peso, against the U.S. dollar will tend to reduce our reported revenues and expenses, while an increase in the value of any such foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar will tend to increase our reported revenues and expenses. Variations in exchange rates can significantly affect the comparability of our financial results between financial periods. For additional information on the potential impact of exchange rate fluctuations on our financial results, see “Risk Factors— Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, including as a result of the ongoing European debt crisis, may affect our reported results of operations.”

We currently conduct our Hospitality and Management Services and Vacation Interest Sales and Financing operations in two geographic areas: North America and Europe. Our North America operations include our branded resorts in the continental United States, Hawaii, Mexico and the Caribbean, and our Europe operations include our branded resorts in England, Scotland, Ireland, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Austria, Malta, France and Greece. The following table reflects our total revenue and assets by geographic area for the periods presented (in thousands):

The discussion of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and assumptions, including those related to revenue, bad debts and income taxes. These estimates are based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. The results of our analysis form the basis for making assumptions about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions, and the impact of such differences may be material to our consolidated financial statements.

Critical accounting policies are those policies that, in management’s view, are most important in the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations. The methods, estimates and judgments that we use in applying our accounting policies have a significant impact on the results that we report in our financial statements. These critical accounting policies require us to make difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates regarding matters that are inherently uncertain. Those critical accounting policies and estimates that require the most significant judgment are discussed further below.

With respect to our recognition of revenue from VOI sales, we follow the guidelines included in ASC 978, “Real Estate-Time-Sharing Activities.” Under ASC 978, Vacation Interest sales revenue is divided into separate components that include the revenue earned on the sale of the VOI and the revenue earned on the sales incentive given to the customer as motivation to purchase the VOI. Each component is treated as a separate transaction but both are recorded in Vacation Interest sales line of our statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss). In order to recognize revenue on the sale of VOIs, ASC 978 requires a demonstration of a buyer’s commitment (generally a cash payment of 10% of the purchase price plus the value of any sales incentives provided). A buyer’s down payment and subsequent mortgage payments are adequate to demonstrate a commitment to pay for the VOI once 10% of the purchase price plus the value of the incentives provided to consummate a VOI transaction has been covered. We recognize sales of VOIs on an accrual basis after (i) a binding sales contract has been executed; (ii) the buyer has adequately demonstrated a commitment to pay for the VOI; (iii) the rescission period required under applicable law has expired; (iv) collectibility of the receivable representing the remainder of the sales price is reasonably assured; and (v) we have completed substantially all of our obligations with respect to any development related to the real estate sold (i.e., construction has been substantially completed and certain minimum project sales levels have been met). If the buyer’s commitment has not met ASC 978 guidelines, the VOI sales revenue and related Vacation Interest cost of sales and direct selling costs are deferred and recognized under the installment method until the buyer’s commitment is satisfied, at which time the remaining amount of the sale is recognized. The net deferred revenue is recorded as a reduction to mortgages and contracts receivable on our balance sheet. Under ASC 978, the provision for uncollectible Vacation Interest sales revenue is recorded as a reduction of Vacation Interest sales revenue.

We record Vacation Interest cost of sales using the relative sales value method in accordance with ASC 978. This method, which was originally designed for developers of timeshare resorts, requires us to make a number of projections and estimates which are subject to significant uncertainty. In order to determine the amounts that must be expensed for each dollar of vacation interest sales with respect to a particular project, we are required to prepare a forecast of sales and certain costs for the entire project’s life cycle. These forecasts require us to estimate, among other things, the costs to acquire (or, if applicable, build) additional VOIs, the total revenues expected to be earned on the project (including estimations of sales price per point and the aggregate number of points to be sold), the proper provision for uncollectible Vacation Interest sales revenue and sales incentives, and the projected future cost

and volume of recoveries of VOIs. Then, these costs as a percentage of vacation interest sales revenue are determined and that percentage is applied retroactively to all prior sales and is applied to sales within the current period and future periods with respect to a particular project. These projections are reviewed on a regular basis, and the relevant estimates used in the projections are revised (if necessary) based upon historical results and management’s new estimates. We require a seasoning of pricing strategy changes before such changes fully affect the projection, which generally occurs over a six-month period. If any estimates are revised, we are required to adjust our Vacation Interest cost of sales using the revised estimates, and the entire adjustment required to correct Vacation Interest cost of sales over the life of the project to date is taken in the period in which the estimates are revised. Accordingly, small changes in any of the numerous estimates in the model can have a significant financial statement impact, both positively and negatively, because of the retroactive adjustment required by ASC 978. See “Unsold Vacation Interests, net” for further detail, and see “Liquidity and Capital Resources — Indebtedness — Senior Secured Notes — Senior Secured Notes Covenants” for a discussion of the potential effects of such retroactive adjustments.

Mortgages and Contracts Receivable and Allowance for Loan and Contract Losses

We account for mortgages (for the financing of previously sold intervals) and contracts receivable (for the financing of points) under ASC 310, “Receivables.”

Mortgages and contracts receivable that we originate or acquire are recorded net of (i) deferred loan and contract costs, (ii) the discount or premium on the acquired mortgage pool and (iii) the related allowance for loan and contract losses. Loan and contract origination costs incurred in connection with providing financing for VOIs are capitalized and amortized over the term of the related mortgages or contracts receivable as an adjustment to interest revenue using the effective interest method. Because we currently sell VOIs only in the form of points, we are not currently originating any new mortgages. We record a sales provision for estimated mortgage and contracts receivable losses as a reduction to Vacation Interest sales revenue. This provision is calculated as projected gross losses for originated mortgages and contracts receivable, taking into account estimated VOI recoveries. If actual mortgage and contracts receivable losses differ materially from these estimates, our future results of operations may be adversely impacted.

We apply our historical default percentages based on credit scores of the individual customers to our mortgage and contracts receivable population and evaluate other factors such as economic conditions, industry trends, defaults and past due agings to analyze the adequacy of the allowance. Any adjustments to the allowance for mortgage and contracts receivable loss are recorded within Vacation Interest sales revenue.

We charge off mortgages and contracts receivable upon the earliest of (i) the initiation of cancellation or foreclosure proceedings or (ii) the customer’s account becoming over 180 days delinquent. Once a customer has made six timely payments following the event leading to the charge off, the charge off is reversed. A default in a customer’s initial payment results in a rescission of the sale. All collection and foreclosure costs are expensed as incurred.

The mortgages and contracts receivable we acquired on April 27, 2007 in connection with the Sunterra Corporation acquisition, on August 31, 2010 in connection with the ILX Acquisition, on July 1, 2011 in connection with the Tempus Resorts Acquisition, on May 21, 2012 in connection with the PMR Acquisition and on October 5, 2012 in connection with the Aegean Blue Acquisition are each accounted for separately as an acquired pool of loans. Any discount or premium associated with each pool of loans is amortized using an amortization method that approximates the effective interest method.

Unsold VOIs are valued at the lower of cost or fair market value. The cost of unsold VOIs includes acquisition costs, hard and soft construction costs (which are comprised of architectural and engineering costs

incurred during construction), the cost incurred to recover inventory and other carrying costs (including interest, real estate taxes and other costs incurred during the construction period). The costs capitalized for recovered intervals differ based on a variety of factors, including the method of recovery and the timing of the original sale or loan origination. Costs are expensed to Vacation Interest cost of sales under the relative sales value method described above. In accordance with ASC 978, under the relative sales value method, cost of sales is calculated as a percentage of Vacation Interest sales revenue using a cost-of-sales percentage ratio of total estimated development costs to total estimated Vacation Interest sales revenue, including estimated future revenue and incorporating factors such as changes in prices and the recovery of VOIs (generally as a result of maintenance fee and contracts receivable defaults). In accordance with ASC 978-340-25, the selling, marketing and administrative costs associated with any sale, whether the original sale or subsequent resale of recovered inventory, are expensed as incurred.

In accordance with ASC 978, on a quarterly basis, we recalculate the total estimated Vacation Interest sales revenue and total estimated costs. The effects of changes in these estimates are accounted for as a current period adjustment so that the balance sheet at the end of the period of change and the accounting in subsequent periods are as they would have been if the revised estimates had been the original estimates. These adjustments can be material.

We are subject to income taxes in the United States (including federal and state) and numerous foreign jurisdictions in which we operate. We record income taxes under the asset and liability method, whereby deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, and attributable to operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards. Accounting standards regarding income taxes require a reduction of the carrying amounts of deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance, if based on the available evidence, it is more likely than not that such assets will not be realized. Accordingly, the need to establish valuation allowances for deferred tax assets is assessed periodically based on a more-likely-than-not realization threshold. This assessment considers, among other matters, the nature, frequency and severity of current and cumulative losses, forecasts of future profitability, the duration of statutory carry-forward periods, our experience with operating loss and tax credit carry forwards not expiring unused, and tax planning alternatives.

We recorded a deferred tax asset as a result of net operating losses incurred (the use of which for tax purposes may be subject to limitations), and as part of our financial reporting process, we must assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets can be recovered. During this process, certain relevant criteria are evaluated, including the existence of deferred tax liabilities against which deferred tax assets can be applied, and taxable income in future years. Unless recovery is more likely than not, a reserve in the form of a valuation allowance is established as an offset to the deferred tax asset. As a result of uncertainties regarding our ability to generate sufficient taxable income to utilize our net operating loss carry forwards, we maintain a valuation allowance against the balance of our deferred tax assets.

Accounting standards regarding uncertainty in income taxes provide a two-step approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount which is more than 50% likely, based solely on the technical merits, of being sustained on examinations. We consider many factors when evaluating and estimating our tax positions and tax benefits, which may require periodic adjustments and which may not accurately anticipate actual outcomes.

In February 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“ASU 2013-02”). This update requires presentation of reclassifications from accumulated other comprehensive income to net income either on the face of the income statement or in a single footnote, but does not require any new information to be disclosed. For SEC reporting companies, this update is effective for the interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2012. We have adopted ASU 2013-02 as of our interim period ending March 31, 2013. The adoption of this update has not had any impact on our financial statements as we have not had any reclassifications from accumulated other comprehensive income to net income.

Under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies. However, we have made an irrevocable election not to take advantage of this extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act as allowed by Section 107(b)(1) of the JOBS Act.

The vacation ownership industry enables individuals and families to purchase vacation ownership interests, or VOIs, which facilitate shared ownership and use of fully-furnished vacation accommodations at a particular resort or network of resorts. VOI ownership distinguishes itself from other vacation options by integrating aspects of traditional property ownership and the flexibility afforded by pay-per-day resorts or hotels. As compared to pay-per-day resorts or hotels, VOI ownership typically offers consumers more space and home-like features such as a full kitchen and one or more bedrooms. Further, room rates and availability at pay-per-day resorts and hotels are subject to periodic change, while much of the cost of a VOI is generally fixed at the time of purchase. Relative to traditional property ownership, VOI ownership affords consumers greater convenience and variety of vacation experiences and requires significantly less up-front capital, while still offering common area amenities such as swimming pools, playgrounds, restaurants and gift shops. Consequently, for many vacationers, VOI ownership is an attractive alternative to traditional property ownership and pay-per-day resorts and hotels.

Typically, a vacation ownership resort is operated through an organization sometimes referred to as a homeowners association, or HOA, which is administered by a board of directors elected by the owners of VOIs at the resort. The HOA is responsible for ensuring that the resort is adequately maintained and operated. To fund the ongoing operating costs of the resort, each VOI holder is required to pay its pro rata share of the expenses to operate and maintain the resort, including any management fees payable to a company to manage and oversee the day-to-day operation of the resort. These management fees are often payable to the management companies annually in advance. If a VOI owner fails to pay its maintenance fee, that owner will be in default, which may ultimately result in a forfeiture of that owner’s VOI to the HOA and a consequent ratable increase in the expense-sharing obligations of the non-defaulted VOI owners.

The management and maintenance of a resort in which VOIs are sold is generally provided either by the developer of the resort or outsourced to a management company, but, in either case, many developers often regard the management services provided as ancillary to the primary activities of property development and VOI sales. Historically, certain real estate developers have created and offered VOI products in connection with their investments in purpose-built vacation ownership properties or converted hotel or condominium buildings. These developers have frequently used substantial project-specific debt financing to construct or convert vacation ownership properties. The sales and marketing efforts of these developers have typically focused on selling out the intervals in the development, so that the developer can repay its indebtedness, realize a profit from the interval sales and proceed to a new development project.

As the vacation ownership industry evolved, some in the industry recognized the potential benefits of a more integrated approach, where the developer’s resort management operations complement its sales and marketing efforts. In addition, the types of product offerings have also expanded over time, moving from fixed- or floating-week intervals which provide the right to use the same property each year or in alternate years, to points-based memberships in multi-resort vacation networks, which offer a more flexible vacation experience. In addition to these resort systems, developers of all sizes typically may also affiliate with vacation ownership exchange companies in order to give customers the ability to exchange their rights to use the developer’s resorts for the right to access a broader network of resorts. According to the AIF, a trade association representing the vacation ownership and resort development industries, the percentage of resort networks offering points-based products has been rising in recent years, and, due to the flexibility of these types of products, the AIF believes that this trend will continue in the near future as companies that have traditionally offered only weekly intervals expand their product offerings.

Growth in the vacation ownership industry has been achieved through expansion of existing resort companies as well as the entry of well-known lodging and entertainment companies, including Disney, Four Seasons, Hilton, Hyatt, Marriott, Starwood and Wyndham, which have developed larger purpose-built resorts and added vacation ownership developments to their existing pay-per-day resorts and hotels. The industry’s growth can also be attributed to increased market acceptance of vacation ownership resorts, enhanced consumer

protection laws and the evolution from a product offering a specific week-long stay at a single resort to multi-resort, often points-based, vacation networks, which offer a more flexible vacation experience.

According to the AIF, as of December 31, 2012, the U.S. vacation ownership community was comprised of approximately 1,551 resorts, representing approximately 189,222 units and an estimated 8.3 million vacation ownership week equivalents. As reported by the AIF and reflected in the graph below, VOI sales during 2009 through 2011 were down significantly from levels prior to the economic downturn that started in 2008, which the AIF attributes largely to the fact that several of the larger VOI developers intentionally slowed their sales efforts through increased credit score requirements and larger down payment requirements in the face of an overall tighter credit environment. However, according to the AIF, VOI sales in the U.S. increased by 1.6% from 2010 to 2011, and by 6.2% from 2011 to 2012, and this trend of increasing VOI sales continued to accelerate in the first three months of 2013, which showed a 7.5% increase as compared to the same period in 2012.

Source: Historical timeshare industry research conducted by Ragatz Associates and American Economic Group, as of December 31, 2012.

We expect the U.S. vacation ownership industry to continue to grow over the long term due to favorable demographics, more positive consumer attitudes and the low penetration of vacation ownership in North America. According to the AIF’s bi-annual 2012 Shared Vacation Ownership Owners Report (the “Owners Report”), based upon a survey of U.S. VOI owners, the median household income of VOI owners was $74,000 in 2012, 89% of VOI owners own their primary residence and 58% have a college degree. The Owners Report indicated that 83% of VOI owners rate their overall ownership experience as good to excellent and that the top four reasons for purchasing a VOI are resort location, saving money on future vacations, overall flexibility and quality of the accommodations. According to the Owners Report, less than 8% of U.S. households own a VOI. We believe this relatively low penetration rate of vacation ownership suggests the presence of a large base of potential customers.

The European vacation ownership industry is also significant. According to the AIF, in 2010, the European vacation ownership community was comprised of approximately 1,345 resorts, representing approximately 87,832 units. In addition, we believe that rapidly-growing international markets, such as Asia and Central and South America, present significant opportunities for expansion of the vacation ownership industry due to the substantial increases in spending on travel and leisure activities forecasted for consumers in those markets.

As the vacation ownership industry continues to mature, we believe that keys to success for a company in this industry include:

We believe that competition in the vacation ownership industry is based primarily on the quality of the hospitality services and overall experience provided to customers, the number and location of vacation ownership resorts in the network, trust in the brand and the availability of program benefits, such as VOI exchange programs.

Hospitality and Management Services. We manage 80 Diamond Resorts-branded resort properties, which are located in the continental United States, Hawaii, Mexico, the Caribbean and Europe, as well as the Collections. As the manager of these branded resorts and the Collections, we provide rental services, billing services, account collections, accounting and treasury functions and communications and information technology services. In addition, for branded resorts we also provide an online reservation system and customer service contact center, operate the front desks, furnish housekeeping, maintenance and human resources services and operate amenities such as golf courses, food and beverage venues and retail shops.

As an integral part of our hospitality and management services, we have entered into inventory recovery agreements with substantially all of the HOAs for our managed resorts in North America, together with similar arrangements with all of the Collections and a majority of our European managed resorts, whereby we recover VOIs from members who fail to pay their annual maintenance fee or assessments due to, among other things, death or divorce or other life-cycle events or lifestyle changes. Because the cost of operating the resorts that we manage is spread across our member base, by recovering VOIs from members who have failed to pay their annual maintenance fee or assessments, we reduce bad debt expense at the HOA and Collection level (which is a component of the management fees billed to members by each resort’s HOA or Collection association), supporting the financial well-being of those HOAs and Collections.

HOAs. Each of the Diamond Resorts-branded resorts, other than certain resorts in our European Collection, is typically operated through an HOA, which is administered by a board of directors. Directors are elected by the owners of intervals at the resort (which may include one or more of the Collections) and may also include representatives appointed by us as the developer of the resort. As a result, we are entitled to voting rights with respect to directors of a given HOA by virtue of (i) our ownership of intervals at the related resort, (ii) our control of the Collections that hold intervals at the resort and/or (iii) our status as the developer of the resort. The board

of directors of each HOA hires a management company to provide the services described above, which in the case of all Diamond Resorts-branded resorts, is us. We serve as the HOA for two resorts in St. Maarten and earn maintenance fees and incur operating expenses at these two resorts.

Our management fees with respect to a resort are based on a cost-plus structure and are calculated based on the direct and indirect costs (including an allocation of a substantial portion of our overhead related to the provision of management services) incurred by the HOA of the applicable resort. Under our current resort management agreements, we receive management fees generally ranging from 10% to 15% of the other costs of operating the applicable resort (with an average based upon the total management fee revenue of approximately 14.6%). Unlike typical commercial lodging management contracts, our management fees are not impacted by changes in a resort’s ADR or occupancy level. Instead, the HOA for each resort engages in an annual budgeting process in which the board of directors of the HOA estimates the costs the HOA will incur for the coming year. In evaluating the anticipated costs of the HOA, the board of directors of the HOA considers the operational needs of the resort, the services and amenities that will be provided at or to the applicable resort and other costs of the HOA, some of which are impacted significantly by the location, size and type of the resort. Included in the anticipated operating costs of each HOA are our management fees. The board of directors of the HOA discusses the various considerations and approves the annual budget, which determines the annual maintenance fees charged to each owner. One of the management services we provide to the HOA is the billing and collection of annual maintenance fees on the HOA’s behalf. Annual maintenance fees for a given year are generally billed during the previous November, due by January and deposited in a segregated or restricted account we manage on behalf of the HOA. As a result, a substantial majority of our fees for February through December of each year are collected from owners in advance. Funds are released to us from these accounts on a monthly basis for the payment of management fees as we provide our management services.

Our HOA management contracts typically have initial terms of three to five years, with automatic one-year renewals. These contracts can generally only be terminated by the HOA upon a vote of the owners (which may include one or more of the Collections) prior to each renewal period, other than in some limited circumstances involving cause. No HOA has terminated any of our management contracts during the past five years. We generally have the right to terminate our HOA management contracts at any time upon notice to the HOA but have terminated only one immaterial HOA management contract during the past five years.

Each of the Collections is operated through a Collection association, which is administered by a board of directors. With the exception of PVC, which allows the developer to appoint the board of directors until 90% of all membership interests are sold, directors are elected by the points holders within the applicable Collection. We own a significant number of points in each of the Collections, which we hold as inventory. The board of directors of each Collection hires a company to provide management services to the Collection, which in each case is us.

As with our HOA management contracts, management fees charged to the Collections in the U.S. are based on a cost-plus structure and are calculated based on the direct and indirect costs (including an allocation of a substantial portion of our overhead related to the provision of our management services) incurred by the Collection. Under our current Collection management agreements, we receive management fees of 15% of the other costs of the applicable Collection (except with respect to our management agreement with MGVC, under which we receive a management fee of 10% of the cost of MGVC). Our management fees are included in the budgets prepared by each Collection association, which determines the annual maintenance fee charged to each owner. One of the management services we provide to the Collections is the billing and collection of annual maintenance fees on the Collection’s behalf. Annual maintenance fees for a given year are generally billed during the previous November, due by January and deposited in a segregated or restricted account we maintain on behalf of each Collection. As a result, a substantial majority of our fees for February through December of each year are collected from owners in advance. Funds are released to us from these accounts on a monthly basis for the payment of management fees as we provide our management services.

Apart from the management contract for the European Collection, our Collection management contracts generally have initial terms of three to five years, with automatic three to five year renewals, and can generally only be terminated by the Collection upon a vote of the Collection’s members prior to each renewal period, other than in some limited circumstances involving cause. In the case of the resorts we manage that are part of the European Collection, generally the management agreements have either indefinite terms or long remaining terms (i.e., over 40 years) and can only be terminated for an uncured breach by the manager or a winding up of the European Collection. No Collection has terminated or elected not to renew any of our management contracts during the past five years. Apart from the management contract for the European Collection, we generally have the right to terminate our Collection management contracts at any time upon notice to the Collection. The management contract for the European Collection has an indefinite term, can only be terminated by the European Collection for an uncured breach by the manager or a winding up of the European Collection, and may not be terminated by the manager.

THE Club. Another key component of our hospitality and management services business is THE Club, through which we operate a proprietary reservation system that enables our members to use their points to stay at any of our branded or affiliated resorts. THE Club also offers our members a wide range of other benefits, such as the opportunity to purchase various products and services (such as consumer electronics, home appliances and insurance products) from third parties at discounted prices, for which we earn commissions. Dues payments for THE Club are billed and collected together with the annual maintenance fees billed to our members who are also members of THE Club. See “—Our Flexible Points-Based Vacation Ownership System and THE Club—THE Club” for additional information regarding THE Club.

Sales and Financing of VOIs. We market and sell VOIs that provide access to our network of 80 Diamond Resorts-branded and 211 affiliated resorts and hotels and four cruise itineraries. Since late 2007, we have marketed and sold VOIs primarily in the form of points.

The VOI inventory that we reacquire pursuant to our inventory recovery agreements provides us with a low-cost, recurring supply of VOIs that we can sell to our current and prospective members. Our VOI inventory is also supplemented by VOIs recovered from members who default on their consumer loans, as well as inventory purchased in recent acquisitions. See Note 21—Business Combinations of our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus for discussion of these acquisitions.

We capitalized amounts in unsold Vacation Interests, net, in the case of North America, and reclassified amounts from due from related parties, net to unsold Vacation Interest, net, in the case of Europe, related to our inventory recovery agreements and arrangements as well as consumer loan defaults of approximately $16.8 million, $25.7 million and $48.1 million during 2010, 2011 and 2012, respectively. These amounts are inclusive of capitalized legal costs of $3.2 million, $2.2 million and $2.2 million, respectively. See Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus for discussions on unsold Vacation Interests.

We acquired VOI inventory in connection with our recent strategic acquisitions. Specifically, we acquired $10.1 million and $23.1 million of additional VOI inventory in the ILX Acquisition in 2010 and the Tempus Resorts Acquisition in 2011, respectively. In 2012, we acquired $30.4 million of inventory in the PMR Acquisition and $3.5 million in the Aegean Blue Acquisition. As of December 31, 2010, 2011 and 2012, we had VOI inventory with a value of approximately $190.6 million, $256.8 million and $315.9 million, respectively.

We have 50 sales centers across the globe, 44 of which are located at branded and managed resorts, two of which are located at affiliated resorts and four of which are located off-site. We currently employ an in-house sales and marketing team at 38 of these locations and also maintain agency agreements with independent sales organizations at 12 locations. A relatively small portion of our sales, principally sales of additional points to existing members, are effected through our call centers. Our sales representatives utilize a variety of marketing programs to generate prospects for our sales efforts, including presentations at resorts targeted to current members and guests, overnight mini-vacation packages, targeted mailing, telemarketing, gift certificates and various destination-specific local marketing efforts. Additionally, we offer incentive premiums in the form of tickets to local attractions and activities, hotel stays, gift certificates or free meals to guests and other potential customers to encourage attendance at sales presentations. We also offer volume discounts for purchasers of a large number of points.

We close our VOI sales primarily through tours. These tours occur at sales centers and include a tour of the resort properties, as well as an in-depth explanation of our points-based VOI system and the value proposition it offers our members. Our tours are designed to provide guests with an in-depth overview of our company and our resort network, as well as a customized presentation to explain how our products and services can meet their vacationing needs.

Our sales force is highly trained in a consultative sales approach designed to ensure that we meet customers’ needs on an individual basis. We manage our sales representatives’ consistency of presentation and professionalism using a variety of sales tools and technology. The sales representatives are principally compensated on a variable basis determined by performance, subject to a base compensation amount.

We employ innovative programs and techniques designed to infuse hospitality into our sales and marketing efforts. For example, we have begun to offer an enhanced mini-vacation package at some of our managed resorts

at which our members or prospective customers who have purchased such a package are invited to dine together, along with our sales team members, and to attend a show or other local attraction as a group over a two-day period. At the end of the stay, our sales team provides an in-depth explanation of our points-based VOI system and the value proposition it offers our members. We have found that, by creatively engaging with potential purchasers and infusing hospitality into the sales process, we improve potential purchasers’ overall experience and level of satisfaction and, as a result, are able to increase the likelihood that they will buy our VOIs and increase the average transaction size.

We also seek to provide one-on-one in-unit presentations of the benefits of our points-based VOI system to interested customers at resorts who otherwise may not desire to enter one of our sales centers. In limited trials, we have found that customers who participate in these in-unit presentations sign up for tours and subsequently purchase VOIs at a greater rate than customers who are not provided with an in-unit presentation. By focusing on sales and marketing methods that do not rely exclusively on increased tour flow, we believe that we can improve our closing percentage and increase the average VOI sales price per transaction, without significant increases in fixed sales and marketing costs associated with our sales centers.

In addition, we have an initiative in which select members and guests receive “high-touch” services such as a special welcome package, resort orientation and concierge services, as part of a pre-scheduled in-person sales presentation. Results from these enhanced programs and initiatives have been positive.

Although the principal goal of our marketing activities is the sale of points, in order to generate additional revenue and offset the carrying cost of our VOI inventory, we use a portion of the points and intervals which we own to offer accommodations to consumers on a per-night or per-week basis, similar to hotels. We generate these stays through direct consumer marketing, travel agents, websites and vacation package wholesalers. We believe that these operations, in addition to generating supplemental revenue, provide us with a good source of potential customers for the purchase of points.

We provide loans to eligible customers who purchase VOIs through our U.S. and Mexican sales centers and choose to finance their purchase. These loans are collateralized by the underlying VOI, generally bear interest at a fixed rate, have a typical term of 10 years and are generally made available to consumers who make a down payment within established credit guidelines. Our minimum required down payment is 10%. Since late 2008, our average cash down payment has been 18.3% and the average initial equity contribution for new VOI purchases by existing owners (which take into account the value of VOIs already held by purchasers and pledged to secure a new consumer loan) has been 30.7%, which has resulted in an average combined cash and equity contribution of 49.0% for these new VOI purchases. As of March 31, 2013, our loan portfolio (including loans we have transferred to special purpose subsidiaries in connection with conduit, loan sale and securitization transactions) was comprised of approximately 57,000 loans (which includes loans that have been written off for financial reporting purposes due to payment defaults and delinquencies but which we continue to administer), with an outstanding aggregate loan balance of approximately $529 million. Approximately 40,500 of these consumer loans were loans under which the customer was not in default, and the average balance of such loans was approximately $9,400. Customers were in default (which we define as having occurred upon the earlier of (i) the initiation of cancellation or foreclosure proceedings or (ii) the customer’s account becoming over 180 days delinquent) under approximately 16,500 of these loans, and the average balance of such loans was approximately $9,100. The weighted-average interest rate for all of these loans outstanding as of March 31, 2013 was approximately 15.91%, which includes a weighted-average interest rate for loans in default of approximately 16.57%. As of March 31, 2013, approximately 7.68% of our approximately 490,000 owner-families had a loan outstanding with us.

We underwrite each loan application to assess the prospective buyer’s ability to pay through the credit evaluation score methodology developed by FICO based on credit files compiled and maintained by Experian (for U.S. residents) and Equifax (for Canadian residents). In underwriting each loan, we review the completed credit application and the credit bureau report and/or the applicant’s performance history with us, including any

delinquency on existing loans with us, and consider in specified circumstances, among other factors, whether the applicant has been involved in bankruptcy proceedings within the previous 12 months and any judgments or liens, including civil judgments and tax liens, against the applicant. As of March 31, 2013, the weighted average FICO score (based upon loan balance) for our borrowers across our existing loan portfolio was 706, and the weighted average FICO score for our borrowers on loans we originated since late 2008 was 759.

Our consumer finance servicing division includes underwriting, collection and servicing of our consumer loan portfolio. Loan collections and delinquencies are managed by utilizing current technology to minimize account delinquencies and maximize cash flow. We generally sell or securitize a substantial portion of the consumer loans we generate from our customers through conduit and securitization financings. We also act as servicer for consumer loan portfolios, including those sold or securitized through conduit or securitization financings, for which we receive a fee.

Through arrangements with three financial institutions in the United Kingdom, we broker financing for qualified customers who purchase points through our European sales centers.

We take measures to adjust the percentage of the sales of our VOIs that we finance based on prevailing economic conditions. For example, during the 12 month period prior to October 2008, we financed approximately 67.0% of the total amount of our VOI sales. In response to the dramatic contraction of conduit and securitization financing during the economic downturn that began in late 2008, we implemented a strategy to increase the cash sales of VOIs, which included offering discounts for purchases paid in cash and raising the interest rates applicable to financed purchases. As a result of these changes, the percentage of the total amount of our VOI sales we financed from October 2008 through September 2011 was approximately 34.6%. In October 2011, in response to some stabilization in the consumer markets and improved securitization and conduit markets, we eliminated incentives for cash VOI purchases and took other actions to generate more financed sales of VOIs. From October 1, 2011 through December 31, 2012, we financed approximately 69.3% of the total amount of our VOI sales.

The principal elements of our business typically provide us with significant financial visibility.

Our capital-efficient business model requires limited investment in working capital and capital expenditures.

number of tours we conduct, our closing percentage and the sales price per transaction. Our objective is to consistently monitor and adjust these three factors to reach an optimum level of VOI sales based on our available VOI inventory. With our scalable sales platform in place, we do not foresee the need to build new sales centers or significantly increase the size of our sales team. Accordingly, we believe our VOI sales business has considerable operating leverage and the ability to drive increases in Adjusted EBITDA.

Our customers are typically families seeking a flexible vacation experience. A majority of our new customers stay at one of the resorts in our network, either by reserving a unit on a per-night or per-week basis, exchanging points through an external exchange service, or purchasing a mini-vacation package, prior to purchasing a VOI. We have also generated significant additional sales to our existing members who wish to purchase additional points and thereby increase their vacation options within our network.

A majority of our customers are baby boomers, between 45 and 65 years old. The baby boomer generation is the single largest population segment in the U.S. and Europe and is our target market. With the premium resorts in our network, we believe we are well-positioned to target an affluent subsection of the baby boomer population.

On August 31, 2010, acquired from ILX Resorts Incorporated and its affiliates (collectively, “ILX”) certain resort management agreements, unsold VOIs and the rights to recover and resell such interests, portfolio of consumer loans and certain real property and other assets (the “ILX Acquisition”), which added ten additional resorts to our resort network. On July 1, 2011, we acquired from Tempus Resorts International, Ltd. and its subsidiaries certain management agreements, unsold VOIs and the rights to recover and resell such interests, the seller’s consumer loan portfolio and certain real property and other assets (the “Tempus Resorts Acquisition”), which added two resorts to our resort network. On May 21, 2012, in connection with the PMR Acquisition, we acquired from Pacific Monarch Resorts, Inc. and its affiliates four management contracts, unsold VOIs and the rights to recover and resell such interests, a portfolio of consumer loans and certain real property and other assets, which added nine locations to our resort network. On October 5, 2012, we acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of Aegean Blue Holdings Plc, thereby acquiring management contracts, unsold VOIs and the rights to recover and resell such interests and certain other assets (the “Aegean Blue Acquisition”), which added five resorts located on the Greek Islands of Rhodes and Crete to our resort network. These transactions were effected through special purpose subsidiaries, and funded by financial partners on a non-recourse basis. We believe that this transaction structure enables us to obtain substantial benefits from these acquisitions, without subjecting our historical business or our capital structure to the full risks associated with acquisitions and related leverage.

Diamond Resorts Corporation and Diamond LLC expect to enter into a transaction agreement with the Island One Companies and the Island One Equityholder to acquire all of the equity interests in the Island One Companies. Upon the closing of the Island One Acquisition, we will acquire management contracts, unsold VOIs, a portfolio of consumer loans and other assets owned by the Island One Companies, adding nine additional managed resorts to our resort network and more than 25,000 owner-families to our ownership base. The Island One Companies operated a vacation ownership, hospitality and resort management business that emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy in July 2011. Since their emergence, we have provided sales and marketing services and HOA management oversight services to Island One, Inc., and on May 8, 2013, we entered into definitive documents to operate the business of the Island One Companies prior to the closing of the Island One Acquisition.

We expect that pursuant to the terms of the transaction agreement, the purchase price for the Island One Companies will be based upon a formula derived from, among other things, (a) Adjusted EBITDA for the Island One Companies for the year ended December 31, 2012, calculated in a manner comparable to the calculation of our consolidated Adjusted EBITDA presented in this prospectus, but excluding specified non-recurring items and payments relating to the Island One Acquisition, and (b) a multiple derived from such factors as our valuation (based upon our initial public offering price) and our consolidated Adjusted EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2012, calculated in a manner consistent with the calculation of our consolidated Adjusted EBITDA presented in this prospectus. Assuming an initial public offering price of $ per share (the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus), we will issue to the Island One Equityholder an aggregate of shares of our common stock at the closing of the Island One Acquisition. For illustrative purposes only, set forth below are the number of shares of common stock to be issued to the Island One Equityholder based on the high end and low end of the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus. The actual number of shares that will be issued to the Island One Equityholder will be based on the actual initial public offering price per share in this offering without any cap or collar of any kind. If the initial public offering price were $ per share (the high end of the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus), we would issue shares of common stock to the Island One Equityholder at the closing of the Island One Acquisition, and, as a result, we would have shares of common stock outstanding after this offering, or, if the initial public offering price were $ per share (the low end of the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus), we would issue shares of common stock to the Island One Equityholder at the closing of the Island One Acquisition, and, as a result, we would have shares of common stock outstanding after this offering.

On June 12, 2013, we entered into an asset purchase agreement with each of the PMR Service Companies and the owner of such entities. In connection with the closing of the PMR Acquisition in May 2012, we entered into various agreements (the “PMR Service Companies Agreements”) with the PMR Service Companies and the owner of such entities. The PMR Service Companies and the owner of such entities provided management, collection and reservation services for certain of the resorts owned by Pacific Monarch Resorts, Inc. and certain of its affiliates prior to their bankruptcy filing. Pursuant to the PMR Service Companies Agreements, we agreed that the PMR Service Companies and the owner of such entities would continue to provide such services to the resorts and the Collection added to our network by the PMR Acquisition, subject to our oversight, following the consummation of the PMR Acquisition. Pursuant to the asset purchase agreement, we have agreed to purchase, upon the closing of this offering and subject to other customary closing conditions, resort management agreements for such resorts and Collection from which we will receive management fees, as well as accounting services agreements, billing and collection services agreements and other assets of the PMR Service Companies.

Pursuant to the terms of the asset purchase agreement, the purchase price for the PMR Service Companies’ assets is based upon a formula derived from, among other things, an agreed-upon adjusted EBITDA amount for the PMR Service Companies for the 12-month period ended March 31, 2013, and a multiple derived from such factors as our total enterprise value (based upon our initial public offering price) and our consolidated Adjusted EBITDA for the 12-month period ended March 31, 2013, calculated in a manner consistent with the calculation of our consolidated Adjusted EBITDA presented in this prospectus. Assuming an initial public offering price of $ per share (the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus), we will pay to the PMR Service Companies, at the closing of the PMR Service Companies Acquisition, an aggregate cash purchase price of $ . For illustrative purposes only, set forth below are the aggregate cash purchase prices to be paid to the PMR Service Companies based on the high end and low end of the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus. The actual cash purchase price that will be paid to the PMR Service Companies will be based on the actual initial public offering price per share in this offering without any cap or collar of any kind. If the initial public offering price were $ per share (the high end of the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus), we would pay an aggregate cash purchase price of $ to the PMR Service Companies, or if the initial public offering price were $ per share (the low end of the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus), we would pay to the PMR Service Companies an aggregate cash purchase price of $ .

Our resort network currently consists of 295 vacation destinations, which includes 80 Diamond Resorts-branded properties with a total of 9,404 units, which we manage, and 211 affiliated resorts and hotels and four cruise itineraries, which we do not manage and which do not carry our brand name but are a part of our network and, consequently, are available for our members to use as vacation destinations. Through our management of Diamond Resorts-branded resorts, we provide guests with a consistent and high quality suite of services and amenities, and, pursuant to our management agreements, we have oversight and management responsibility over the staff at each location. Of these Diamond Resorts-branded resorts, 38 have food and beverage operations, 41 have a gift shop, pro shop or convenience store, and 20 have a golf course, leisure center or spa. Most of these amenities are operated by third parties pursuant to leases, licenses or similar agreements. Revenue from these operations is included in Consolidated Resort Operations Revenue in our consolidated statements of operations, together with revenues from services that we provide for our properties located in St. Maarten which are traditionally administered by an HOA (which have historically constituted a majority of such revenue). For a further discussion of our Consolidated Resort Operations Revenue, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Key Revenue and Expense Items—Consolidated Resort Operations Revenue.”

Affiliated resorts are resorts with which we have contractual arrangements to use a certain number of vacation intervals or units either in exchange for our providing similar usage of intervals or units at our managed resorts or for a maintenance or rental fee. These resorts are made available to members of THE Club through affiliation agreements. In the vast majority of cases, our affiliated resorts provide us with access to their vacation intervals or units in exchange for our providing similar usage of intervals or units at our managed resorts, and no fees are paid by us in connection with these exchanges. However, in a very limited number of circumstances, we receive access to vacation intervals or units at our affiliated resorts through two other types of arrangements. In the first of these types of arrangements, we pay an upfront fee to an affiliated resort for access to a specified number of vacation intervals or units, and we incorporate this upfront fee into our calculation for annual dues to be paid by members of THE Club. In the second of these types of arrangements, a holder of our points or intervals who desires to stay at an affiliated resort for a particular time period deposits points with us and, in exchange, we pay our affiliated resort the funds required in order to allow such holder access to the desired unit for the desired time period.

We identify and select affiliated resorts based on a variety of factors, including location, amenities and preferences of our members. We have established standards of quality that we require each of our affiliates to meet, including with respect to the maintenance of their properties and level of guest services. In general, our affiliate agreements allow for termination by us upon 30 days’ notice to the affiliate, although some of our affiliate agreements cannot be terminated until a specified future date. Further, our affiliate agreements permit us to terminate our relationship with an affiliate if it fails to meet our standards. In any event, none of our affiliate agreements requires us to make any payments in connection with terminating the agreement. In addition to our affiliate agreements, we own, through one or more of the Collections, intervals at a few of our affiliated resorts.

Our network of resorts includes a wide variety of locations and geographic diversity, including beach, mountain, ski and major city locations, as well as locations near major theme parks and historical sites. The accommodations at these resorts are fully furnished and typically include kitchen and dining facilities, a living room and a combination of bedroom types including studios and one-, two- and three-bedroom units with multiple bathrooms. Resort amenities are appropriate for the type of resort and may include an indoor and/or outdoor swimming pool, hot tub, children’s pool, fitness center, golf course, children’s play area and/or tennis courts. Further, substantially all of our Diamond Resorts-branded resorts in Europe and some of our Diamond Resorts-branded resorts in North America include onsite food and beverage operations, the majority of which are operated by third party vendors.

Purchasers of points acquire memberships in one of the seven Collections. Legal title to the real estate underlying the points is held by the trustees or the associations for the Collections, and, accordingly, such purchasers do not have direct ownership interests in the underlying real estate. Other than unsold intervals which we maintain in inventory, various common areas and amenities at certain resorts and a small number of units in European resorts, we do not hold any legal title to the resort properties in our resort network.

The following is a list, by geographic location, of our branded and managed resorts, with a brief description and the number of units at each such branded and managed resort, together with a list of our affiliated resorts:


Resort	Location	Units

Rancho Mañana Resort	Cave Creek, Arizona		38
Set in the high desert of Arizona, Rancho Mañana Resort provides guests with breathtaking mountain views. The secluded retreat features spacious two bedroom accommodations, each with a gourmet kitchen, two full master suites and an elegant western décor. Guests can relax poolside or play golf at the adjacent championship Rancho Mañana Golf Club. Nearby amenities include shops, restaurants, galleries, and sporting activities and cultural events in Phoenix.

Kohl’s Ranch Lodge	Payson, Arizona		66
Located on the banks of Tonto Creek in the largest Ponderosa Pine Forest in the world, Kohl’s Ranch Lodge is historically famous for its western hospitality. Situated at the base of the Mogollon Rim in the area that author Zane Grey made famous with his popular adventures of the Old West, the friendly and casual atmosphere of Kohl’s Ranch Lodge makes each stay an inviting experience where guests can enjoy a classic stay in Arizona’s back country.

PVC at The Roundhouse	Pinetop, Arizona		20
Nestled in eastern Arizona’s White Mountains where Pinetop-Lakeside’s motto is “Celebrate the Seasons” and where guests can enjoy year-round adventures. The log-sided mountain homes at this resort feature fireplaces, jetted spas, large fully equipped kitchens, covered porches and private yards and are a perfect getaway for family cabin fun. After a day of outdoor play, guests can look forward to a relaxing master suite spa retreat.

Scottsdale Links Resort	Scottsdale, Arizona		218
This 218 unit resort with one-, two- and three-bedroom accommodations is located between the TPC Desert Golf Course and the McDowell Mountains in Scottsdale, within easy reach of Phoenix. With a spa, fitness center, outdoor heated pool and spacious units, this resort is ideal for families making it a base for exploring the area.

Scottsdale Villa Mirage	Scottsdale, Arizona		154
Located 25 minutes from the Phoenix airport, this 154 unit resort has a heated outdoor pool, children’s pool, whirlpools, tennis courts, playground, fitness center and games room to provide for guests and families of all ages.


Resort	Location	Units

Bell Rock Inn and Suites	Sedona, Arizona		85
Framed by extraordinary views along the Red Rock Scenic Byway, with its sandstone formations and rich red landscape of Arizona’s backcountry, this resort is set amid the natural beauty of Sedona and provides easy access to the sights, sounds and wonder of the Coconino National Forest. In addition to a laid-back and friendly ambience, the resort offers a poolside barbeque and in-suite fireplaces.

Los Abrigados Resort & Spa	Sedona, Arizona		193
Nestled against the banks of the famous Oak Creek in Sedona, Arizona, and resting upon twenty-two acres filled with winding walkways, cascading fountains and shady nooks in the foothills of Arizona’s Red Rock Country, this resort is within walking distance to many restaurants, galleries, shops and hiking trails. From the scenic and quaint Oak Creek to the stunning red rock formations and new age energy of Sedona, Los Abrigados Resort & Spa provides a comfortable, quiet and relaxing selection of accommodation styles with easy access to many outdoor adventures and activities.

The Ridge on Sedona Golf Resort	Sedona, Arizona		174
Situated 15 minutes away from Sedona town center, The Ridge on Sedona Golf Resort has 174 units surrounding five whirlpools and pools with a fitness center, games room and clubhouse.

Sedona Summit	Sedona, Arizona		278
Sedona Summit is located four miles from Sedona town center, and within easy reach of Grand Canyon National Park. The 278 units are spread across 39 two-story buildings with six pools and whirlpools located throughout the resort complex.

Varsity Club of America — Tucson	Tucson, Arizona		60
This resort provides all-suite guest accommodations with convenient proximity to the University of Arizona and a number of golf courses, including a variety of luxurious municipal and championship style courses. Tucson affords travelers an oasis under the Sonoran Sun. Affectionately known as Old Pueblo, Tucson is built upon a deep Native American, Spanish, Mexican and Old West foundation, and the Varsity Club of America-Tucson affords a relaxing getaway whether traveling for business, game day, family and friends, or just a little down time.


Resort	Location	Units

Marquis Villa Resort	Palm Springs, California		98
Located in the heart of Palm Springs, California with a spectacular mountain setting at the base of the beautiful San Jacinto Mountains, Marquis Villas Resort provides oversized accommodations with fully equipped kitchens and private patios or balconies.

Lake Tahoe Vacation Resort	South Lake Tahoe, California		181
Located on the edge of Lake Tahoe, America’s largest alpine lake and only a mile away from the Heavenly Mountain Resort base lodge, Lake Tahoe Vacation Resort is ideally placed for a winter skiing vacation as well as for summer activities such as hiking, horseback riding and water sports. The resort has 181 units with both indoor and outdoor pools and hot tubs, fitness center and game room.

The Historic Crags Lodge	Estes Park, Colorado		33
Nestled quietly on the north shoulder of Prospect Mountain, The Historic Crags Lodge offers breathtaking and majestic views of the Continental Divide to the west and a bird’s eye view of downtown Estes Park to the east. The Historic Crags Lodge is everything you would imagine from a quiet Colorado mountain retreat. The Historic Crags Lodge is set high amid the mountain pines of the Colorado Rockies and boasts comfortable guest suites complete with dining and group services suitable for families, couples, weddings and conferences, all within easy access of the Estes Park Aerial Tramway and the spectacular Rocky Mountain National Park.

Daytona Beach Regency	Daytona Beach, Florida		86
This resort is situated on beachfront of the world famous Daytona Beach. Close to the Speedway attractions, it provides 86, one- and two-bedroom units, indoor and outdoor pools with slides and hot tubs, poolside bar, fitness center, volleyball courts and games room.

Polynesian Isles	Kissimmee, Florida		130
This resort offers beautiful accommodations just minutes from the epicenter of Orlando theme parks, shopping and dining experiences. Nearby attractions and activities also include backcountry horseback riding adventures, the Kennedy Space Center and the famed Daytona Beach. True to its South Pacific heritage, this resort features tropical splendor that surrounds the pools, spas, tennis, shuffleboard courts and putting greens.

Grand Beach	Orlando, Florida		192
Located minutes from Florida’s Walt Disney World, SeaWorld and Universal Studios, this 192 unit resort is located on the edge of Lake Bryan. All units contain three bedrooms, three bathrooms and fully-equipped kitchens, which provide spacious family accommodations, as well as an outdoor pool, whirlpool, children’s pool, playground, game room and fitness center.


Resort	Location	Units

Grande Villas	Orlando, Florida		251
This resort provides distinctive and perfectly situated accommodations for a family vacation. The Grande Villas include comfortable accommodations with private screened patios or balconies, fully equipped kitchens, two outdoor swimming pools, spa pools, children’s pool, playground and mini golf. Nearby amenities include Walt Disney World, Universal Studios and SeaWorld.

Mystic Dunes Resort & Golf Club	Orlando, Florida		716
Built on one of the highest elevations in the area, Mystic Dunes Resort & Golf Club is nestled on over 600 acres of rolling hills, lush Florida nature preserves and beautiful tropical landscape. The vacation condo-sized villas, as well as a wide array of resort amenities and services, make Mystic Dunes Resort & Golf Club one of the best family vacation and golf resorts in Orlando.

The Point at Poipu	Kauai, Hawaii		214
Located on the island of Kauai, this resort offers 214 units with lush garden or ocean views across Shipwreck Beach to every suite. The resort has an outdoor beach entry pool as well as a children’s pool, hot tub, fitness center, spa and sauna.

Ka’anapali Beach Club	Maui, Hawaii		412
With 412 units in a 12 story building, Ka’anapali Beach Club is located on the beach front of Maui’s famous North Shore. The resort has a newly opened restaurant and pool bar and newly refurbished pools, as well as a fitness center, spa, sauna, hair salon and gift shop.

Varsity Club of America — South Bend	Mishawaka, Indiana		86
Located in Mishawaka, Indiana, this all-suite hotel offers unique and convenient accommodations in the heart of a college town. With its close proximity and easy access to the University of Notre Dame, the Varsity Club of America — South Bend provides comfortable guest suites, indoor and outdoor swimming pools, a spacious indoor billiards parlor and plenty of outdoor barbeque grills for game days and family fun. The South Bend/Mishawaka area boasts a variety of enriching and entertaining attractions from outdoor recreation and sports to museums, nightlife and shopping.

The Suites at Fall Creek	Branson, Missouri		214
This resort offers 214 units, many with lake views over Lake Taneycomo. Ten minutes away from Branson town center, the resort is ideally located to explore this destination, while providing a selection of amenities onsite, including a fitness center, basketball courts, boating, fishing, indoor and outdoor pools, hot tubs, mini golf, playground, shuffle board and tennis courts.


Resort	Location	Units

Cancun Resort	Las Vegas, Nevada		441
This is a Las Vegas, Nevada resort offering spacious and very comfortably appointed villas and penthouse suites, situated south of the heart pounding, non-stop excitement and glamour of the fabulous Las Vegas Strip. A towering Mayan Pyramid with a cascading waterfall, four enormous waterslides, a grand swimming pool and poolside café and a full range of spa services are just a few of the many amenities.

Desert Paradise Resort	Las Vegas, Nevada		141
This Las Vegas resort is tucked away from the Las Vegas Strip and provides a good base to explore the area. The resort has 141 units across two-story buildings, all with balconies or terraces. It also has two central pool areas equipped with hot tubs and children’s pools, as well as barbeque areas and a fitness center.

Polo Towers Suites	Las Vegas, Nevada		308
This resort is located in the heart of the Las Vegas Strip and shares facilities with Polo Towers Villas. With 308 units, the resort offers a new and comprehensive fitness center, and two outdoor pool areas including a roof top pool.

Polo Towers Villas	Las Vegas, Nevada		203
This resort has 203 units and shares facilities with Polo Towers Suites, including a new fitness center, outdoor pools and spa.

Villas de Santa Fe	Santa Fe, New Mexico		105
This resort is situated in Santa Fe, halfway between Taos and Albuquerque. With 105 one- and two-bedroom units, the resort offers a base to explore the surrounding area, which is rich in culture, as well as providing a heated outdoor pool and hot tub, fitness center, game room and clubhouse.

Bent Creek Golf Village	Gatlinburg, Tennessee		47
A combination of 47 one- and two- bedroom units and cabins situated amid a Gary Player golf course make up Bent Creek Golf Village. Located 11 miles away from the center of Gatlinburg and the Great Smoky Mountains National Park, this resort offers indoor and outdoor heated pools, fitness center, games room, and volleyball and basketball courts.

Cedar Breaks Lodge and Spa	Brian Head, Utah		159
This resort in Brian Head, Utah is a year-round, family-oriented destination, located an easy three-hour drive from Las Vegas. With outdoor recreational activities for visitors of all ages and abilities, Brian Head activities include skiing and snowboarding during the winter and mountain biking, hiking, fishing and more in the warmer months. Amenities include two on-site restaurants serving classic American cuisine, as well as the Cedar Breaks Bar & Grill. Additional perks include snow ski check and storage and an on-site convenience store, as well as an indoor heated pool, sauna, steam room and hot tubs.


Resort	Location	Units

Greensprings Vacation Resort	Williamsburg, Virginia		147
Offering 147, two- and four- bedroom units this resort is ideally placed to explore the historical town of Colonial Williamsburg as well as the area’s theme parks. The resort is equipped with indoor and outdoor pools, hot tubs, a fitness center, playgrounds, sauna and tennis, volleyball and basketball courts.

The Historic Powhatan Resort	Williamsburg, Virginia		443
Amid 256 acres of woodland and located a short drive from Colonial Williamsburg and the area’s theme parks, this resort offers one-, two- and three-bedroom accommodations totaling 443 units. Amenities include indoor and outdoor pools and hot tubs, two restaurants open for breakfast, lunch and dinner and a gift shop.

Cabo Azul Resort	Baja California, Mexico		140
Gleaming white-sand beaches and the unsurpassed allure of the Sea of Cortez make the Cabo Azul Resort & Spa a terrific destination. With a truly fresh look and feel, this resort is a true masterpiece on 12 oceanfront acres in San Jose del Cabo. This resort features a tri-level infinity-edge swimming pool, swim-up bars and an on-site Mexican cuisine restaurant. Additional amenities include a full service spa, a state of the art fitness center and a stunning five-story, open air wedding chapel.

Sea of Cortez Beach Club	Sonora, Mexico		30
The Sea of Cortez, with its laid back seaside havens dotted along the coast, provides a soothing escape in any season. Oceanfront, the Sea of Cortez Beach Club offers luxurious suites with private patios or balconies. Water sport excitement abounds with spectacular diving and snorkeling adventures, calm open sea kayaking, or deep sea fishing, or taking it slow with a relaxing poolside escape, whale and dolphin sightings or long and lazy beach strolls.

Royal Palm Beach Resort	Cole Bay, St. Maarten		140
Located on the Dutch side of the island, all 140 of the one-, two- and three-bedroom units at this resort face the beach and have balconies or terraces. Facilities at the resort include a restaurant, swimming pool and poolside bar, gym and beauty salon.

Flamingo Beach Resort	Simpson Bay, St. Maarten		208
Located on the Dutch side of St. Maarten, this resort is situated on a private beachfront with 208 studio and one-bedroom units. The resort offers a restaurant and snack bar, as well as an outdoor pool and tennis courts.

North America, Mexico and Caribbean Subtotal			6,411


Resort	Location	Units

The Alpine Club	Schladming, Austria		68
Overlooking the town of Schladming, this resort is located amidst stunning scenery one hour from Salzburg, Austria and two and a half hours from Munich, Germany. With accommodation choices across 68 units, The Alpine Club also offers a sauna and solarium, tennis, badminton and game room.

Alvechurch Marina *	Alvechurch, England		2
With three-, four- and six-berth canal boats based at this marina in Worcestershire, there are many round trip routes through the Black Country that can be followed. As a unique way to see the English countryside, visits to Birmingham city center, Worcester Cathedral, historic houses and theme parks can also be incorporated into a vacation itinerary.

Anderton Marina *	Cheshire, England		3
Anderton Marina is based on the Trent and Mersey canals and has three boats available. From this location, routes include a journey to the old city of Chester as well as Middlewich.

Gayton Marina *	Cheshire, England		3
Four- and six-berth canal boats are available to navigate through Warwick to Warwick Castle or the university city of Chester. Whichever route is taken, these boats provide the easiest access to the rolling English countryside in the midlands.

Woodford Bridge Country Club	Devon, England		103
Originally an old coaching inn from the 15th century, this resort in Devon has 103 units, the majority of which have either a terrace or balcony. With a heated indoor pool and whirlpool and a restaurant and bar onsite, this resort offers a base to explore the Devonshire countryside including Dartmoor and Exmoor, which are short drives away, along with the well known Eden Project.

Blackwater Meadow Marina *	Ellesmere, England		2
This marina is located in Shropshire in the heart of the English countryside and has one four-berth and one six-berth canal boat based there. Numerous itineraries include visits to Wales and Chirk Castle, and navigating across Chirk Viaduct standing over 70 feet above the ground.

Broome Park Golf and Country Club	Kent, England		14
The resort is located on the grounds of a Grade I listed manor house in the county of Kent and is 15 minutes from the historic city of Canterbury, famous for its cathedral and historic buildings. With 14 two-bedroom lodges, this resort offers an 18-hole golf course onsite, as well as a restaurant and bar in the mansion house. Other resort amenities include a newly constructed gym, indoor pool, solarium, sauna and squash courts, as well as tennis courts and croquet. The resort is 10 minutes away from the coast and the cliffs of Dover and provides easy access to the Eurostar train.


Resort	Location	Units

Pine Lake Resort	Lancashire, England		125
Based on the edge of the Lake District and the Lune Valley, this resort is surrounded by superb English countryside and based around a lake. The resort is made up of 125 Scandinavian style two-bedroom lodges and a selection of studio apartments with a central reception building that includes a restaurant, bar, and entertainment and meeting rooms, along with a separate indoor heated pool and whirlpool.

Thurnham Hall	Lancaster, England		50
With 50 accommodation choices located either in the 12th century mansion house or in buildings within the 30 acre grounds, this resort offers a large indoor swimming pool and state of the art fitness center. The restaurant is located in the old mansion house along with a member’s lounge and a restored chapel house providing huge fireplaces and original exposed stone walls.

Thurnham Hall Tarnbrook	Lancaster, England		10
This building is located within the grounds of Thurnham Hall and shares the amenities there. It is a newly built building with 10 spacious two-bedroom apartments.

Cromer Country Club	Norfolk, England		74
This resort has 74 units, all with balconies or terraces that provide views over the gardens and woodlands. This resort is less than one mile from the sea and marina in Cromer, and includes an indoor heated pool and whirlpool, gym, spa, sauna, steam room, badminton courts and game room.

Wychnor Park Country Club	Staffordshire, England		44
This resort is situated within the 55 acre estate of Wychnor Park, which dates from the time of Queen Anne in the 17th century. The main mansion house is a grade II listed building and houses some of the 44 units that are available, most of which have a terrace or balcony. The resort has a restaurant and member lounge bar, as well as a heated indoor pool, sauna, solarium and spa.

Worcester Marina *	Worcester, England		2
Based at the southern end of the Worcester Birmingham canal, two four- and six-berth canal boats are available for itineraries that include Worcester Cathedral, the Royal Worcester Porcelain factory and the home of Shakespeare: Stratford-upon-Avon.

Le Manoir des Deux Amants	Connelles, France		35
Set amid the stunning landscaped parkland in the heart of the Normandy countryside, the resort is one and a half hours from Paris and 100 kilometers from Le Havre. The resort offers 35 units situated on the banks of the famous River Seine and includes an onsite restaurant, leisure center and indoor swimming pool.

Le Résidence Normande	Connelles, France		14
This resort has 14 units and is situated next to Le Manoir des Deux Amants and shares its facilities.


Resort	Location	Units

Le Club Mougins	Mougins, France		55
Located 10 minutes from the beautiful beaches of Cannes and a half hour from Nice on the French Riviera, this resort has 55 units and a restaurant and bar and lounge onsite, as well as an outdoor pool, gymnasium and sauna.

Royal Regency	Paris, France		48
Located 20 minutes from the center of Paris on the Metro Line, this resort is ideally suited to exploring this beautiful European city.

Grand Leoniki Resort	Crete, Greece		40
Grand Leoniki, is a sister resort to Leoniki Residence Resort, and is situated across the road from the beach at Rethymnon on the highly demanded island of Crete. Guests enjoy the exclusive use of the squash court, gym, indoor and outdoor pools and jacuzzi as well as being able to use the health club and saunas. The resort also has an onsite Greek restaurant.

Leoniki Residence Resort	Crete, Greece		99
This resort is a sister resort to Grand Leoniki Resort, and is located a short walk away from the beach at Rethymnon. It has the same two impressive outdoor swimming pools, a poolside bar and fitness facilities, as well as a full service traditional Greek onsite restaurant.

Village Heights Golf Resort	Crete, Greece		199
Village Heights Resort overlooks Hersonissos on the north eastern coastline of Crete. The accommodations are built in traditional “Greek Village” style and set in beautifully landscaped gardens, and command breathtaking views to the coast, Hersonissos and its pretty harbour. The resort boasts three swimming pool areas, including a superb infinity style pool as well as a full service on site spa/health Club, with sauna and jacuzzis, gym and aerobics, and massage therapy and its own indoor hydrotherapy pool. In addition, Village Heights has two restaurants – one a-la-carte – and pool bar/restaurants for informal lunches and snacks and an onsite gift shop. There is also an 18 hole PGA designed golf course right next door.

Sun Beach Holiday Club	Rhodes, Greece		66
Located in Ialyssos, on the Greek island of Rhodes, this is a seafront resort that is well equipped with gymnasium, tennis courts, water polo, swimming, windsurfing and volleyball. There are two restaurants to choose from or alternatively a short distance away is Rhodes Town, where a variety of evening entertainment and dining experiences can be found. This is also a very historic island – Rhodes Old Town is a designated UNESCO World Heritage Site that boasts the Palace of the Grand Masters – a fabulous medieval castle complete with its medieval walls.


Resort	Location	Units

The Village Holiday Club	Crete, Greece		32
Located in the charming village of Koutouloufari, the Village Holiday Club has an authentic Greek Village atmosphere and is within easy walking distance of the local restaurants, shops and bars. Built into a hill, the resort offers an exclusive pool with bar amenities, and many accommodations have large balconies offering a panoramic view of the lush gardens and views over the Bay of Hersonissos.

East Clare Golf Village	Bodyke, Ireland		51
With 51 two-bedroom units, this recently constructed resort is located next to East Clare Golf course in County Clare, Ireland, approximately one hour outside of Shannon. The resort provides a great base to explore the neighboring countryside and tourist attractions of Bunnratty Castle and the Cliffs of Moher.

Dangan Lodge Cottages	Ennis, Ireland		6
Converted from an original farmhouse and associated farm buildings, this small resort of six units provides unusual, but traditional, Irish accommodations with exposed stone walls, solid fuel stoves and inglenook fireplaces.

Fisherman’s Lodge	Scarriff, Ireland		6
Located on the edge of the shores of Lough Derg in County Clare, the largest lake in Ireland, this resort is made up of six split level open plan studio units with spiral staircases to the upper floor.

Palazzo Catalani	Soriano, Italy		19
This resort is a hideaway in the Italian countryside. Located in the medieval village of Soriano nel Cimino, this 17th century building perched on the top of a hill and now housing 19 units was once the mansion of a nobleman. The onsite restaurant specializes in Italian cuisine and features a bar and lounge.

Diamond Suites on Malta	St. Julians, Malta		46
Located within the luxury five-star InterContinental Malta Hotel, this resort offers 46 accommodation choices, most with balconies or terraces. The resort is situated in St. Georges Bay in St. Julians and is less than five miles from the capital of Valletta.

Vilar Do Golf	Loulé, Portugal		61
Located on the southern coast of Portugal, this resort has 61 one- and two-bedroom units situated around a golf course, all with balconies or terraces. Located two kilometers from the beach in the Algarve, the resort amenities include indoor and outdoor pools, gymnasium, sauna, badminton, basketball, volleyball, game room and onsite restaurant, as well as a poolside bar and grill.


Resort	Location	Units

The Kenmore Club	Perthshire, Scotland		58
With 58 cottage style units located on the shores of Loch Tay, this is a special resort at the heart of the Scottish highlands with easy access to explore the local whisky distilleries. The resort is located a 90-minute drive from Dundee and less than two hours from the historic city of Edinburgh.

Los Amigos Beach Club	Costa del Sol, Spain		141
This resort has 141 units and is situated 300 meters from the beach. It is a short drive to the beautiful cities of Malaga, Marbella, Granada and Seville. Amenities include two outdoor and one indoor swimming pools, tennis courts and mini-golf, as well as two restaurants onsite, a supermarket and a gift shop.

Royal Oasis Club at Benal Beach	Costa del Sol, Spain		40
Built around one of the largest privately owned outdoor swimming pool complexes in Europe, this resort includes 40 units and is located 200 meters from the beach. In addition, the resort has an indoor swimming pool, fitness center and sauna.

Royal Oasis Club at Pueblo Quinta	Costa del Sol, Spain		52
This resort is situated in lush gardens and contrasts with the hotel blocks of the Costa del Sol, with 52 one- and two-bedroom units, many of which have balconies or terraces. This resort also offers a central outdoor pool, indoor pool, gym and onsite restaurant.

Sahara Sunset	Costa del Sol, Spain		150
Styled with Moorish architecture, this resort offers 150 units, all with a balcony or terrace. With a feature landscaped outdoor pool, this resort also features an additional outdoor pool, an indoor pool, an onsite restaurant, and newly constructed gym, sauna, spa and steam room.

Cala Blanca	Gran Canaria, Spain		93
Situated on Gran Canaria in the Canary Islands this resort provides 93, one- and two-bedroom units. Built on a beautiful hillside, every room has a sea view and a sunny balcony or terrace. The resort is located 10 minutes away from Puerto de Mogan (known as Canarian Little Venice) and includes an outdoor pool and pool bar and grill, as well as an onsite restaurant.

Club del Carmen	Lanzarote, Spain		66
Located on Puerto del Carmen, this resort is perfectly situated two minutes from the beaches of Playa Grande and Playa Chica. With 66 units, this resort offers an outdoor pool and poolside bar, extensive sun terraces and rooftop deck and onsite restaurant.


Resort	Location	Units

Jardines del Sol	Lanzarote, Spain		53
Situated on the southern tip of Lanzarote near Playa Blanca, this resort has been built in the style of a Spanish pueblo blanco or white village. Offering 53 two-bedroom bungalows, this resort also provides an onsite restaurant and outdoor pool.

Garden Lago	Majorca, Spain		82
Situated at the north of the island of Majorca, this resort offers 82 accommodation choices in two- and three-bedroom units. It is located one kilometer from the beach and includes an outdoor pool and whirlpool, gymnasium and sauna, and onsite restaurant, as well as many amenities nearby.

White Sands Beach Club	Menorca, Spain		77
This resort has 77 units on a beachfront location built up into the hillside situated on the island of Menorca. With a central infinity edge pool and convenient snack bar restaurant onsite, this destination is a relaxing place to vacation and is available 44 weeks of the year.

White Sands Country Club	Menorca, Spain		40
Built in a traditional Spanish style, this resort has 40 units, all with balconies or terraces many of which surround a central pool area. This resort is available 42 weeks of the year.

Royal Sunset Beach Club	Tenerife, Spain		126
Located conveniently close to Playa de las Americas’ abundant shops, restaurants and nightlife, this resort has a range of facilities situated in sub-tropical gardens and a beautifully landscaped outdoor pool. This resort has 126 units and a private clubhouse with a bar, lounge, restaurant, gymnasium, squash courts and sauna.

Royal Tenerife Country Club	Tenerife, Spain		77
Set amid the greens of the challenging Golf del Sur course, with a focal point of a central landscaped swimming pool and the beach six kilometers away, the resort includes 77 one- and two-bedroom units, tennis courts, gym, restaurant and supermarket.

Santa Barbara Golf & Ocean Club	Tenerife, Spain		279
This resort exhibits Moorish inspired architecture and includes 279 units, most of which have a sea view. The resort amenities include a central pool and whirlpool, two onsite restaurants, a poolside bar and grill, gymnasium, sauna, spa and solarium.

The following is a list and brief description of each managed resort that we expect to add to our resort network upon the consummation of the Island One Acquisition, subject to certain conditions:


Resort	Location	Units

Barefoot’n Resort	Kissimmee, Florida		42
This resort, which offers one-bedroom accommodations, is located in Kissimmee, Florida, within easy access of Walt Disney World^® Resort, Universal Orlando^® Resort and SeaWorld^® Orlando. The resort is equipped with an outdoor swimming pool, children’s pool, playground, and barbeque and picnic areas. The resort is accredited in the Florida Department of Environmental Protection’s (DEP) Florida Green Lodging program, which designates lodging facilities that commit to conserving and protecting Florida’s natural resources.

Bryan’s Spanish Cove	Orlando, Florida		44
This resort, which is located directly on the waterfront of Lake Bryan in Orlando, offers two-bedroom, two-bathroom accommodations. The resort is accredited in the Florida Department of Environmental Protection’s (DEP) Florida Green Lodging program.

Charter Club Resort of Naples Bay	Naples, Florida		33
Located in southwest Florida along the Paradise Coast on Naples Bay, this small resort is comprised of 11 three-story buildings, with spacious two-bedroom, two-bathroom accommodations, each with a private lanai. Situated on one of the marine inlets typical of Naples, the resort also has a heated pool and separate children’s pool with a Tiki Hut grill bar.

The Cove on Ormond Beach - North Tower	Ormond Beach, Florida		54
Located directly on the beach in Ormond Beach, Florida, this resort features an activity pool with a two-story tube slide, hot tub, barbecue and picnic area. It also has 150 feet of private beach and is situated for easy access to Daytona restaurants, shops and golf facilities.


Resort	Location	Units

The Cove on Ormond Beach – South Tower	Ormond Beach, Florida		64
This resort shares the facilities, such as the activity pool and private beach front, with the North Tower and also offers studio and one- and two-bedroom accommodations.

Crescent Resort on South Beach	Miami Beach, Florida		27
This is a boutique resort situated in the heart of Miami’s South Beach neighborhood, in the center of the SoBe Historic District, with easy access to the beach front. It was built in 1938, and was designed with a facade that resembles a fine steam ship with all of its port holes in classic Art Deco style, with neon lighting at night. The Art Deco style continues in the resort’s one- and two-bedroom accommodations.

Liki Tiki Village Resort	Winter Garden, Florida		608
Situated in 64 landscaped acres in Winter Garden, Florida, this resort offers the Liki Tiki Lagoon Water Adventure, a 1.5 acre, 220,000-gallon water park with a gently rolling wave pool, five water slides, an erupting water volcano, a waterfall, a toddler’s area, spouting tiki heads and a dancing fountain. This large resort has studio and one-, two- and three-bedroom accommodations. The resort is accredited in the Florida Department of Environmental Protection’s (DEP) Florida Green Lodging program.

The following is a list by geographic location of our affiliated resorts, hotels and cruise itineraries, which we do not manage and which do not carry our brand, but are a part of our resort network:


Resort		Location
London Bridge Resort		Lake Havasu City, Arizona
The Roundhouse Resort		Pinetop, Arizona
Scottsdale Camelback		Scottsdale, Arizona
Sedona Springs Resort		Sedona, Arizona
Villas at Poco Diablo		Sedona, Arizona
Villas of Sedona		Sedona, Arizona
Grand Pacific Resorts - Mountain Retreat		Arnold, California
San Luis Bay Inn		Avila Beach, California
Riviera Shores Resort***		Capistrano Beach, California
Riviera Beach & Spa Resort***		Capistrano Beach, California
Grand Pacific at Carlsbad Seapointe Resort		Carlsbad, California
Grand Pacific at Carlsbad Inn Beach Resort		Carlsbad, California
RVC’s Cimarron Golf Resort		Cathedral City, California
Grand Pacific at Coronado Beach Resort		Coronado, California
Grand Pacific at RiverPointe Napa Valley		Napa, California
Grand Pacific at Squaw Valley		Olympic Valley, California
Grand Pacific Palisades Resort and Hotel		Palisades, California
Desert Isle of Palm Springs***		Palm Springs, California
Oasis Resort		Palm Springs, California
Palm Canyon Resort		Palm Springs, California
Riviera Oaks Resort & Racquet Club***		Ramona, California
Lodge at Lake Tahoe		South Lake Tahoe, California
Tahoe Beach and Ski Club		South Lake Tahoe, California
Tahoe Seasons Resort***		South Lake Tahoe, California
GeoHolidays Heights at Lac Morency		St Hippolyte, Quebec, Canada
Clock Tower		Whistler, BA, Canada
RVC at Whiski Jack		Whistler, BA, Canada
The Village at Steamboat Springs		Steamboat Springs, Colorado
Coconut Mallory Resort and Marina		Key West, Florida
Westgate at South Beach		Miami Beach, Florida
Coconut Palms Beach Resort		New Smyrna Beach, Florida
Ocean Beach Club		New Smyrna Beach, Florida
Ocean Sands Beach Club		New Smyrna Beach, Florida
Sea Villas		New Smyrna Beach, Florida
Cypress Pointe Resort		Orlando, Florida
Sea Mountain		Big Island, Hawaii
Sea Village		Big Island, Hawaii
Grand Pacific at Alii Kai Resort		Kauai, Hawaii
Kapaa Shore		Kauai, Hawaii
Pono Kai		Kauai, Hawaii


Resort		Location
RVC at Kona Reef		Kona, Hawaii
Fairway Villa		Maui, Hawaii
Ka’anapali Shores		Maui, Hawaii
Papakea Resort		Maui, Hawaii
Valley Isle		Maui, Hawaii
Royal Kuhio		Oahu, Hawaii
Elkhorn Resort		Ketchum, Idaho
Great Wolf Lodge Kansas City		Kansas City, Kansas
Frenchmen Orleans Resort***		New Orleans, Louisiana
Rangeley Lake Resort		Rangeley, Maine
Coconut Malorie		Ocean City, Maryland
Edgewater Beach Resort		Dennis Port, Massachusetts
Beachside Village Resort		Falmouth, Massachusetts
Cove at Yarmouth		Yarmouth, Massachusetts
Great Wolf Lodge Traverse City		Traverse City, Michigan
The Carriage House		Las Vegas, Nevada
Kingsbury of Tahoe		Stateline, Nevada
The Ridge Pointe		Stateline, Nevada
Village of Loon Mountain		Lincoln, New Hampshire
The Valley Inn at Waterville Valley		Waterville Valley, New Hampshire
Peppertree Atlantic Beach		Atlantic Beach, North Carolina
Blue Ridge Village		Banner Elk, North Carolina
Great Wolf Lodge Charlotte-Concord		Concord, North Carolina
Great Wolf Lodge Cincinnati-Mason		Mason, Ohio
Great Wolf Lodge Sandusky		Sandusky, Ohio
Embarcadero		Newport, Oregon
The Pines at Sunriver		Sunriver, Oregon
Great Wolf Lodge Pocono Mountains		Poconos Mountains, Pennsylvania
Church Street Inn***		Charleston, South Carolina
Island Links Resort		Hilton Head Island, South Carolina
Main Street Inn & Spa		Hilton Head Island, South Carolina
Royal Dunes		Hilton Head Island, South Carolina
Ellington at Wachesaw Plantation		Murrells Inlet, South Carolina
Dunes Village Resort		Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
Peppertree Ocean Club		Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
Gatlinburg Town Square		Gatlinburg, Tennessee
Gatlinburg Town Village		Gatlinburg, Tennessee
Mountain Meadows		Pigeon Forge, Tennessee
Great Wolf Lodge Grapevine		Grapevine, Texas
Villas on Lake at Lake Conroe		Montgomery, Texas
RVC’s The Miners Club		Park City, Utah
Great Wolf Lodge Williamsburg		Williamsburg, Virginia


Resort		Location
Paradise Harbour Club***		Nassau, Bahamas
Grand Palladium Imbassaí Resort & Spa		Nr Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
GeoHolidays at Pueblo Real		Quepos, Costa Rica
The Residence Suites at Lifestyle Holidays Vacation Resort		Puerto Plata, Dominican Republic
Presidential Suites by Lifestyle at Lifestyle Holidays Vacation Resort		Puerto Plata, Dominican Republic
Grand Palladium Punta Cana Resort & Spa		Punta Cana, Dominican Republic
Grand Palladium Jamaica Resort and Spa		Lucea, Jamaica
Cabo Villas Beach Resort		Cabo San Lucas, Mexico
El Dorado Royale		Cancun, Mexico
Laguna Suites Golf and Spa		Cancun, Mexico
Ocean Spa Hotel		Cancun, Mexico
RVC’s Club Regina Cancun		Cancun, Mexico
Sunset Lagoon Resort		Cancun, Mexico
Sunset Royal Beach Resort		Cancun, Mexico


Resort		Location
RVC’s Villa Vera Puerto Isla Mujeres		Isla Mujeres, Mexico
RVC’s Club Regina Los Cabos		Los Cabos, Mexico
El Cid el Moro Beach		Mazatlan, Mexico
El Cid Marina Beach		Mazatlan, Mexico
RVC’s Las Cupulas Oaxaca		Oaxaca, Mexico
RVC’s Villa Vera Oaxaca		Oaxaca, Mexico
Hacienda Tres Rios Resort, Spa and Nature Park		Playa del Carmen, Mexico
Grand Palladium Vallarta Resort & Spa		Puerto Vallarta, Mexico
RVC’s Club Regina Puerto Vallarta		Puerto Vallarta, Mexico
El Dorado Seaside		Riviera Maya, Mexico
Grand Palladium Kantenah Resort and Spa		Riviera Maya, Mexico
Grand Palladium Riviera Resort and Spa		Riviera Maya, Mexico
RVC’s Villa Vera Puerto Mio Zihuatanejo		Zihuatenajo, Mexico
The Atrium Resort		Simpson Bay, St Maarten


Resort		Location
Beach House Seaside Resort		Coolangatta, Australia
Tamarind Sands		New South Wales, Australia
Vacation Village Resort		Port Macquarie, Australia
Tiki Village International Resort		Surfer’s Paradise, Australia
Bellbrae Country Club		Victoria, Australia
Mt Martha Valley Resort		Victoria, Australia
Dorsett Grand Chengdu		Chengdu, China
Cosmo Hotel Mongkok		Hong Kong, China
Cosmopolitan Hotel Hong Kong		Hong Kong, China
Cosmo Hotel Hong Kong		Hong Kong, China
Dorsett Kwun Tong, Hong Kong		Hong Kong, China
Lan Kwai Fong Hotel		Hong Kong, China
The Mercer		Hong Kong, China
Silka Far East, Hong Kong		Hong Kong, China
Silka Seaview, Hong Kong		Hong Kong, China
Silka West Kowloon Hotel		Hong Kong, China
Dorsett Shanghai		Shanghai, China
Dorsett Wuhan		Wuhan, China
Royal Goan Beach Club at MonteRio		Bardez, India
Royal Goan Beach Club at Royal Palms		Benaulin, India
Royal Goan Beach Club at Haathi Mahal		Salcette, India
Royal Bali Beach Club at Candidasa		Bali, Indonesia
Royal Bali Beach Club at Jimbaran Bay		Bali, Indonesia


Resort		Location
Imaiso Hotel and Hot Springs		Kawazu, Japan
Nanzanso Hotel and Hot Springs		Nagaoka, Japan
Hotel Agora Regency Sakai		Osaka, Japan
Hotel Agora Osaka Moriguchi		Osaka, Japan
Oncri Hotel and Hot Springs		Saga City, Japan
Nojiriko Hotel EL Bosco		Shinano-Machi, Japan
Agora Place Asakusa		Toyko, Japan
Silka Johor Bahru		Johor Bahru, Malaysia
Damas Suites & Residences		Kuala Lumpur Malaysia
Dorsett Regency Kuala Lumpur		Kuala Lumpur Malaysia
Regalia Residence		Kuala Lumpur Malaysia
Silka Maytower Hotel & Serviced Residences		Kuala Lumpur Malaysia
Dorsett Grand Labuan		Lubuan, Malaysia
Dorsett Grand Subang		Subang Jaya, Malaysia
Royal Bella Vista Country Club at Chiang Mai		Chiang Mai, Thailand
Absolute at Q Signature Samui Spa and Resort		Koh Samui, Thailand
Absolute Bangla Suites		Patong, Thailand
Absolute at Nirvana Place		Pattaya, Thailand
MTC at View Talay Holidays		Pattaya, Thailand
Absolute Nakalay Beach Resort		Phuket, Thailand
Absolute Sea Pearl Beach Resort		Phuket, Thailand
Royal Lighthouse Villas at Boat Lagoon		Phuket, Thailand
Dorsett Singapore		Singapore

Our Points-Based System. Our customers become members of our vacation ownership system by purchasing points, which act as an annual currency that is exchangeable for occupancy rights in accommodations at the branded and affiliated resorts in our network. In 2012, the average cost to purchase points equivalent to an annual one-week vacation at one of the resorts in our network was $20,915. Purchasers of points do not acquire a direct ownership interest in the resort properties in our network. Rather, our customers acquire a membership in one of the seven Collections. Legal title to the interests in our resort properties in a Collection is held by the trustee or the association for that Collection for the benefit of the members and, with respect to resorts in which interests are not wholly owned by a Collection, by unaffiliated third parties that also hold interests in the applicable resort.

The principal advantage of our points-based system is the flexibility it gives to members with respect to the use of their points versus the use of traditional intervals. With traditional intervals, an owner has the “fixed” use of a

specific accommodation type for a one-week time period at a specific resort or has the “floating” use of a specific type of accommodation for a week to be selected for a particular season at that same resort. An owner may alter his or her vacation usage by exchanging the interval through an external VOI exchange program with which the resort is affiliated, such as Interval International or RCI, for which a fee is charged by the exchange company. Unlike interval owners, holders can redeem their points for one or more vacation stays in any of the resorts included in our network (subject to membership type limitations, availability and having the number of points required in their account) without having to use an external exchange company and without having to pay any exchange transaction fees. Because points function as currency within our network, our members have flexibility to choose the location, season, duration and size of accommodation for their vacation based on their annual points allocations, limited only by the range of accommodations within our network and subject to availability. Our members may also “save” their points from prior years and “borrow” points from future years for additional flexibility with respect to reserving vacations at peak times, in larger accommodations or for longer periods of time.

We evaluate and allocate a points value for each of the resorts in our network. Points values are determined by unit type for each resort and are based on season, demand, location, amenities and facilities. Every year, we make a points directory available to our customers, which allows them to allocate their available points and select dates and locations for stays at resorts within our network, subject to certain rules and restrictions. For example, customers are subject to forfeiture of points if they cancel reservations within certain time periods prior to their scheduled arrival. Customers must also save unused points for use in the subsequent year within a specified deadline each year or else such points will no longer be valid for use. Unlike owners of traditional deeded intervals, owners of our points may book stays of varying durations at the resorts in our network and may purchase additional points to increase their vacation options within our network.

We maintain a dedicated call center for customers to make reservations and also offer a comprehensive online booking service which members can use to reserve stays at the resorts in our network, manage their purchased points and pay fees. We also manage an in-house concierge service for our top loyalty tier members, offering services 24/7 globally.

In January 2013, our European subsidiary introduced a new product (the “European Term Product”) available to purchasers in Europe. Purchasers of the European Term Product receive an allocation of points which represents an assignment of a specific week or weeks in a specific unit (without specific occupancy rights), at one of our European resort properties, as well as use rights to any of the resort properties within our European Collection, for a period of 15 years. At the end of the 15-year period, the unit will be sold and the net proceeds will be distributed to the then current owners of the unit, which may, or may not, include us. The current trustee of the European Collection also provides trust services relating to the European Term Product. The owners of the European Term Product pay annual maintenance fees at substantially the same rate as owners of points in our European Collection. The majority of VOI sales in Europe for the first quarter of 2013 have been in the European Term Product, and a large majority of the sales of the European Term Product have been to existing owners of points in the European Collection.

THE Club. THE Club operates as an internal VOI exchange program that enables its members to use their points or points equivalent in the case of intervals at resorts within our resort network, subject to certain rules and restrictions. Purchasers of points are automatically enrolled in THE Club, except for purchasers in Florida who must affirmatively elect to join THE Club. Generally, members of THE Club do not have the right to terminate their membership in THE Club. However, due to regulatory requirements, purchasers of points in Arizona, California, Florida and Hawaii may terminate their membership in THE Club under specified circumstances. To date, only a minimal number of new purchasers of points in Arizona, California, Florida and Hawaii have opted out of THE Club. Following the ILX Acquisition and the PMR Acquisition, we also offered the existing members of PVC and MGVC the option to opt out of membership in THE Club.

In addition to the internal exchange program, THE Club offers a global array of other member benefits, discounts, offers and promotions that allow members to exchange points for a wide variety of products and travel

services, including airfare, cruises and excursions. Most members of THE Club, irrespective of ownership of points or intervals, have access to an external VOI exchange program for vacation stays at resorts outside of THE Club resort network if they desire, as the annual membership fee generally also includes annual membership in the Interval International external exchange program. In certain circumstances, we offer a limited version of THE Club for a lower fee for certain of our members. Exchanges through the Interval International external exchange program typically require payment of an additional exchange fee. Following the ILX Acquisition and the PMR Acquisition, we offered all members of PVC and MGVC the opportunity to purchase a limited membership in THE Club, which entitled them to use their points at a range of selected resorts in our system. Persons who took advantage of this purchase opportunity are included in our membership statistics for THE Club.

In addition to annual dues associated with THE Club, we have typically earned revenue associated with customer conversions into THE Club, which involve the payment of a one-time fee by interval owners who wish to retain their intervals but also participate in THE Club. We also earn reservation protection plan revenue, which is an optional fee paid by customers when making a reservation to protect their points should they need to cancel their reservation, and through our provision of travel-related services and other affinity programs. Expenses associated with our operation of THE Club include costs incurred for the third-party call center, annual membership fees paid to a third-party exchange company and administrative expenses.

Purchasers of points acquire interests in one of the seven Collections that hold the real estate underlying the VOIs that we sell. These VOIs represent beneficial right-to-use interests in a trust or similar arrangement. We have entered into a trust agreement with each trustee, which holds legal title to the deeded fee simple real estate interests or, in some cases, leasehold real estate interests, for the benefit of the respective Collection’s association members in accordance with the applicable agreements. The trust agreements establish points as the currency to be used by members for the use and occupancy of accommodations held by the trust. We use the same trustee for each of the U.S., California and Hawaii Collections. The trustee is an institution independent of us and has trust powers. Parallel trust agreements for the resorts in Europe are in place with another independent trustee. For PVC and MGVC, there is no separate trustee. The trusts generally have members’ associations, which are organizations of persons who own membership points in the applicable Collection, that are managed by a board of directors. The associations act as agents for all of the members in collecting assessments and paying taxes, utility costs and other costs incurred by the trust on behalf of members. Generally, the term of each trust, except the European trusts, is perpetual and may only be terminated with a unanimous vote of the board of directors and approval by a significant majority of the voting power of members. The European trusts, including customer use rights, expire in approximately 40 years.

In accordance with the trust agreements, the boards of these trusts have entered into management agreements with us pursuant to which the board’s management powers are delegated to us. The management agreements generally have three-year terms and automatically renew for additional three-year terms unless terminated by the applicable members’ association. Through THE Club, members may use their points for accommodations at any of the 80 resorts that are within any of the seven Collections, at any of our 211 affiliated resorts and hotels or on four cruise itineraries. Members of a particular Collection have the ability to make reservations at resorts within that Collection before those resorts are open for bookings by members of other Collections.

Title to the VOIs included in our U.S. Collection, California Collection, and Hawaii Collection has been transferred into the applicable trust in perpetuity. Title to the U.S. and Mexican VOIs included in PVC and MGVC is vested in the applicable Collection association for the benefit of its members. For each of the Collections, pursuant to the applicable trust and related agreements, we have the right to hold as inventory for sale a significant number of unsold points in the Collections. Further, in North America, we hold title (via subsidiary resort developer entities) to certain intervals which have not yet been transferred to a Collection. When these intervals are transferred to a Collection, we will receive an allocation of points. The majority of the common areas for resorts located in North America are owned by the related HOA. At certain locations, we own

commercial space which we utilize for sales centers as well as other guest services, such as a gift shop, mini-market or a food and beverage facility. The amount of such commercial space represents an insignificant portion of our total facilities and no such space is used for any significant retail or commercial operations.

Legal title to substantially all of our managed resorts in our European Collection is generally held in one or more land-holding trusts which have an independent trustee for our benefit and the benefit of our interval owners, as applicable. A substantial portion of our beneficial interest in these resorts is held by the trusts for the benefit of the European Collection points owners. The trusts hold title in various ways, including as owner of a freehold interest, as the tenant under long term leases and through other contractual arrangements at various resorts. For the most part, the leases and other contractual arrangements, as well as the use rights of our interval owners, have terms that expire beginning in 2054, at which point we generally regain full use and ownership of the underlying resorts. In addition, we hold leasehold interests in five of our Diamond Resorts-branded European resorts. We lease units for the exclusive use of the European Collection at two of these resorts under long-term leases expiring in 2054 and 2055. Additionally, THE Club leases three other resorts in Europe for its own use under an arrangement that expires in 2018, with two five-year renewal periods at our option. The European Collection has a Board of Directors elected by a majority vote of the members of the European Collection. The Board of Directors of the European Collection is responsible for endorsing the pro rata allocation of the individual resort budgets that have been approved by their respective governing bodies. Legal title to all of the resorts included in the Mediterranean Collection (which were acquired in connection with the Aegean Blue Acquisition) is vested with third party owners and is leased under long-term lease agreements to us. These long-term leases have termination dates substantially contemporaneous with the termination of the use rights of the members of the Mediterranean Collection.

Each Collection member is required to pay to the respective Collection a share of the overall cost of that Collection’s operations, which includes that Collection’s share of the costs of maintaining and operating the component resort units within that Collection. A specific resort property may have units that are included in more than one Collection, or have a combination of units owned by a Collection and by individual interval owners. To the extent that an entire resort property is not held completely within a specific Collection, each Collection pays only the portion of operating costs attributable to its interval ownership in that resort. Each Collection member’s annual maintenance fee is composed of a base fee and a per point fee based on the number of points owned by the member. The annual maintenance fee is intended to cover all applicable operating costs of the resort properties and other services, including reception, housekeeping, maintenance and repairs, real estate taxes, insurance, rental expense, accounting, legal, human resources, information technology and funding of replacement and refurbishment reserves for the underlying resorts. The annual maintenance fee for a holder of points equivalent to one week at one of the resorts in our network generally ranges between $1,365 and $1,824 per year, with the average being $1,540. Assessments may be billed if insufficient operating funds are available or if planned capital improvements exceed the amount of replacement and refurbishment reserves available. If the member does not pay annual maintenance fees or any assessment, the member’s use rights may be suspended, and the Collection may enforce its lien and recover the member’s points, subject to the rights of the member’s lender, if any. Additionally, annual fees for THE Club are collected together with the member’s annual maintenance fee.

In addition to points, we historically marketed and sold intervals. We generally discontinued selling intervals in October 2007. We believe that points offer our members greater choice and flexibility in planning their vacations as compared to intervals. From an operational perspective, our points-based structure enables us to efficiently manage our inventory and sales centers by selling points-based access to our global network from any sales location, rather than being limited to selling intervals at a specific resort. In addition, the recovery of points-based inventory from our members is easier than the recovery of interval-based products, which are typically governed by local real estate foreclosure laws that can significantly lengthen recovery periods and increase the cost of recovery.

An interval typically entitles the owner to use a fully-furnished vacation accommodation for a one-week period, generally during each year or in alternate years, usually in perpetuity. Typically, the owner holds either a fee simple ownership interest in a specific vacation accommodation or an undivided fee simple ownership interest in an entire resort. An interval owner has the right to stay only at the specific resort from which the interval owner has purchased the interval. However, many of our interval owners are also members of THE Club and thereby are entitled to stay at any resort in our network.

Each interval owner is required to pay an annual maintenance fee to the related HOA to cover the owner’s share of the cost of maintaining the property. The annual maintenance fee is intended to cover the owner’s share of all operating costs of the resort and other related services, including reception, housekeeping, maintenance and repairs, real estate taxes, insurance, rental expense, accounting, legal, human resources and information technology. In addition, the annual maintenance fee includes an amount for the funding of replacement and refurbishment reserves for the related resort to provide for future improvements when necessary. Assessments may be billed if insufficient operating funds are available or if planned capital improvements exceed the amount of replacement and refurbishment reserves available. Annual maintenance fees for interval owners generally average between $700 and $1,500 per year for a one-week interval, with the average being $960. If the owner does not pay the annual maintenance fees or any assessment, the owner’s use rights may be suspended, and the HOA may enforce its lien on the owner’s intervals, subject to the rights of the owner’s lender, if any. See “—Recovery of VOIs.” The amount of an interval owner’s annual maintenance fees and assessments is determined on a pro rata basis consistent with such person’s ownership interest in the resort. For purposes of this allocation, each of the Collections is assessed annual maintenance fees and assessments based on the intervals held by such Collection.

We have programs in place to encourage and facilitate owners of our intervals to convert their intervals to points and join THE Club. As of March 31, 2013, approximately 131,600 owner-families owned intervals but were not members of THE Club.

The following diagram depicts the relationship among our points owners, THE Club, the HOAs and the Collections:

In the ordinary course of our business, we recover VOIs from our members as a result of (i) failures by our members to pay their annual maintenance fee or any assessment, which failures may be due to, among other things, death or divorce or other life-cycle events or lifestyle changes and (ii) defaults on our members’ consumer loans for the purchase of their VOIs. With respect to consumer loan defaults, we are able to exercise our rights as a secured lender to foreclose upon the VOI subject to our lien. From time to time, we also recover VOIs from members prior to default on their consumer loans, maintenance fees or assessments.

With respect to members who fail to pay their annual maintenance fee or any assessment, we have entered into inventory recovery agreements with substantially all of the HOAs for our managed resorts in North America, together with similar arrangements with all of the Collections and a majority of our European managed resorts. Each agreement provides that in the event that a member fails to pay these amounts, we have the option to enforce the rights of the HOA or Collection with respect to the subject VOI, which includes preventing members from using their points or intervals and, if the delinquency continues, recovering the property in the name of the HOA or Collection. Our rights to recover VOIs for failure to pay annual maintenance fees or assessments are subject to any prior security interest encumbering such VOI, including any interest we hold as a lender on a consumer loan. We are responsible for payment of certain fees, ranging from 65% to 100% of the annual maintenance fees relating to the defaulted intervals or points. Depending upon whether the VOI in default is intervals or points, recovery is effected through a foreclosure proceeding or by contract termination. The recovery of points is more efficient than the recovery of intervals, because the recovery of intervals is governed by local real estate foreclosure laws that significantly lengthen recovery periods and increase the cost of recovery.

Under the terms of our inventory recovery agreements, we are granted full use of the inventory recovered as a result of delinquent annual maintenance fees or assessments for rental and marketing purposes, and we are under no obligation to commence recovery proceedings. Generally, when we recover intervals, we pay from approximately one to three years worth of annual maintenance fees on such intervals. Upon recovery, the HOA or Collection transfers title to the VOI to us, and we are responsible for all annual maintenance fees and assessments thereafter. We have oral agreements with most of our European HOAs that provide us similar rights with respect to recovering delinquent VOIs. After recovery, VOIs are returned to our inventory and become available for sale. Although we recover inventory in the form of intervals as well as points, all inventory recovered is sold in the form of points. Recovered intervals are transferred to one of the Collections and become part of our points-based system.

As of March 31, 2013, the approximate percentage of VOI owners in the United States that were delinquent on the payment of annual maintenance fees or assessments was 10.08% relating to 2012 dues, 7.32% relating to 2011 dues, 4.82% relating to 2010 dues and 3.38% relating to 2009 dues. Between January 2009 and December 2012, we have experienced a default rate on our financed sales ranging from 6.6% and 9.9% (as measured on a three month rolling average annualized). VOIs recovered through the default process are added to our existing inventory and resold at full retail value. Although the volume of points or intervals that we recover could fluctuate in the future for various reasons, we have recovered in the ordinary course of our business approximately 3.0% to 4.0% of our outstanding VOIs in each of the past two years. Recovered VOI inventory may be sold by us in the form of points to new customers or existing members.

In our Hospitality and Management Services segment, our competition includes pure real estate and hospitality management companies, as well as the VOI companies that conduct hotel management operations, some of which are noted below. Our competitors may seek to compete against us based on the pricing terms of our current hospitality management contracts. Our competitors may also compete against us in our efforts to expand our fee-based income streams by pursuing new management contracts for resorts that are not currently part of our network.

In our Vacation Interest Sales and Financing business, we compete for prospects, sales leads and sales personnel from established, highly visible vacation ownership resort operators, as well as a fragmented array of smaller operators and owners. In marketing and selling VOIs, we compete against the vacation ownership divisions of several established hospitality companies. These companies include Bluegreen Corporation, Disney (Disney Vacation Club), Four Seasons Resorts and Hotels, Hilton (Hilton Grand Vacations), Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation (which operates the Marriott Vacation Club, the Ritz-Carlton Destination Club, the Ritz-Carlton Residences and the Grand Residence Club by Marriott), Starwood (Starwood Vacation Ownership) and Wyndham Worldwide (which operates Fairfield Resorts and Trendwest Resorts). In addition, in certain markets, we compete with many established companies focused primarily on vacation ownership, and it is possible that other potential competitors may develop properties near our current resort locations and thus compete with us in the future. We also compete with other vacation options such as cruises, as well as alternative lodging companies such as Home Away and Airbnb, which operate websites that market available furnished, privately-owned residential properties in locations throughout the world, including homes and condominiums, that can be rented on a nightly, weekly or monthly basis. We believe that the vacation ownership industry will continue to consolidate in the future. In our rental of VOIs, we compete not only with all of the foregoing companies, but also with traditional hospitality providers such as hotels and resorts. In our consumer financing business, we compete with numerous subsets of financial institutions, including mortgage companies, credit card issuers and other providers of direct-to-consumer financing. These services permit purchasers to utilize a home equity line of credit, mortgage, credit card or other instrument to finance their purchase.

Our marketing and sale of VOIs and other operations are subject to extensive regulation by the federal government and state timeshare laws and, in some cases, by the foreign jurisdictions where our VOIs are located, marketed and sold. Federal legislation that is or may be applicable to the sale, marketing and financing of VOIs includes, but is not limited to, the Federal Trade Commission Act, the Fair Housing Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Truth-in-Lending Act and Regulation Z, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act and Regulation C, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and Regulation B, the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, the Deceptive Mail Prevention and Enforcement Act, Section 501 of the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980, the Bank Secrecy Act, the USA Patriot Act and the Civil Rights Acts of 1964, 1968 and 1991.

In addition, the majority of states and jurisdictions where the resorts in our network are located extensively regulate the creation and management of vacation ownership resorts, the marketing and sale of VOIs, the escrow of purchaser funds and other property prior to the completion of construction and closing, the content and use of advertising materials and promotional offers, the delivery of an offering memorandum describing the sale of VOIs and the creation and operation of exchange programs and multi-site vacation interest plan reservation systems. Many other states and certain foreign jurisdictions have adopted similar legislation and regulations affecting the marketing and sale of VOIs to persons located in those jurisdictions. In addition, the laws of most states in which we sell VOIs grant the purchaser of the interest the right to rescind a purchase contract during the specified rescission period provided by law. Rescission periods vary by jurisdiction in which we operate, but typically are five to 15 days from the date of sale.

The Collections are required to register pursuant to applicable statutory requirements for the sale of VOI plans in an increasing number of jurisdictions. For example, our subsidiary that serves as the developer of the U.S. Collection is required to register pursuant to the Florida Vacation Plan and Timesharing Act. Such registrations, or any formal exemption determinations, for the Collections confirm the substantial compliance with the filing and disclosure requirements of the respective timeshare statutes by the applicable Collection. They do not constitute the endorsement of the creation, sale, promotion or operation of the Collections by the regulatory body, nor relieve us or our affiliates of any duty or responsibility under other statutes or any other applicable laws. Registration under a respective timeshare act is not a guarantee or assurance of compliance with applicable law nor an assurance or guarantee of how any judicial body may interpret the Collections’ compliance therewith.

Furthermore, most states have other laws that apply to our activities, including real estate licensure laws, travel sales licensure laws, advertising laws, anti-fraud laws, telemarketing laws, prize, gift and sweepstakes laws and labor laws. In addition, we subscribe to “do not call,” or DNC, lists for every state into which we make telemarketing calls, as well as the federal DNC list. Enforcement of the federal DNC provisions began in the fall of 2003, and the rule provides for fines of up to $16,000 per violation. We also maintain an internal DNC list as required by law. Our master DNC list is comprised of our internal list, the federal DNC list and the applicable state DNC lists.

Certain state and local laws may also impose liability on property developers with respect to construction defects discovered by future owners of such property. Under these laws, future owners of VOIs may recover amounts in connection with repairs made to a resort as a consequence of defects arising out of the development of the property.

In addition, from time to time, potential buyers of VOIs assert claims with applicable regulatory agencies against VOI salespersons for unlawful sales practices.

A number of U.S. federal, state and local laws, including the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 and the Americans with Disabilities Act, impose requirements related to access to and use by disabled persons of a variety of public accommodations and facilities. A determination that we are subject to and that we are not in compliance with these accessibility laws could result in a judicial order requiring compliance, imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants. If an HOA at a resort was required to make significant improvements as a result of non-compliance with these accessibility laws, assessments might be needed to fund such improvements, which additional costs might cause owners of VOIs to default on their mortgages or cease making required HOA assessment payments. In addition, the HOA under these circumstances may pursue the resort developer to recover the cost of any corrective measures. Any new legislation may impose further burdens or restrictions on property owners with respect to access by disabled persons. To the extent that we hold interests in a particular resort (directly or indirectly through our interests in a Collection), we would be responsible for our pro rata share of the costs of improvements resulting from non-compliance with accessibility laws.

Prior to October 2008, a portion of our other sales in the United States were made through independent sales agents who provided services to us under independent contractor agreements. From October 2008 to April 2011, we sold VOIs in the United States solely through our employees, with the exception of two locations, where we conducted sales through a contractual relationship with a third-party operator. The contract with the third-party operator was terminated in April 2011, and we currently sell VOIs in the United States solely through our employees.

In Europe, we currently sell VOIs through employees and independent distributors. In December 2008, we converted a large number of sales agents in Spain, the United Kingdom, Portugal and France from independent contractors to employees. We did not withhold payroll taxes from the amounts paid to such persons during the time they were independent contractors.

The marketing and sale of our points-based VOIs and our other operations in Europe are subject to national regulation and legislation. Directive 2008/122/EC of the European Parliament (the “Directive”) regulates vacation ownership activities within the European Union (which includes the majority of the European countries in which we conduct our operations). The Directive required transposition into domestic legislation by the members of the European Union no later than February 23, 2011 and replaced the previous regulatory framework introduced by EC Directive 94/47/EC. Most of our purchasers in Europe are residents of the United Kingdom, where the Directive has been implemented under The Timeshare, Holiday Products, Resale and Exchange Contracts Regulations 2010. The Directive has been or will shortly be implemented in all other member states, as well as in Norway, which, although not a member of the European Union, is a member of the European Economic Area. The Directive (i) requires delivery of specified disclosure (some of which must be provided in a specified format); (ii) requires a “cooling off” rescission period of 14 calendar days; and (iii) prohibits any advance payments in all member states.

Prior to February 23, 2011, vacation ownership activities within the European community were governed by the European Timeshare Directive of 1994 (94/47/EC) (or the 1994 Directive).

Other United Kingdom laws which are applicable to us include the Consumer Credit Act 1974 as amended by the Consumer Credit Act 2006, the Consumer Credit (Disclosure of Information) Regulations 2010, the Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulations 2010 (as amended), the Misrepresentation Act 1967, the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977, the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 (as amended), the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008, the Data Protection Act 1998 and the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC) Regulations 2003, the Equality Act 2010, the Employment Rights Act 1996, the Environmental Protection Act 1990, the Clean Air Act 1993, the Companies Act 2006 and the Trade Descriptions Act 1968. The Timeshare, Holiday Products, Resale and Exchange Contracts Regulation 2010 has

an extra-territorial effect when United Kingdom residents purchase VOIs in accommodations located in other European Economic Area states. All of the countries in which we operate have consumer and other laws that regulate our activities in those countries.

We believe that we are in compliance with all applicable governmental regulations, except where non-compliance would not reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on us.

Historically, our fiscal quarter ended September 30 has produced the strongest operating results because this period coincides with the typical summer seasonality of the vacation ownership industry and the greater number of families vacationing. Our fiscal quarter ended March 31 has historically produced the weakest operating results primarily due to the effects of reduced leisure travel. Generally, a greater number of vacationers at the resorts in our network results in higher tour flow through our sales centers and increased VOI sales.

We generally carry commercial general liability insurance. With respect to resort locations that we manage and for corporate offices, we and the HOAs carry manuscript all-risk property insurance policies with fire, flood, windstorm and earthquake coverage as well as additional coverage for business interruption arising from insured perils. Further, we carry pollution insurance on all Diamond Resorts-branded resort and administrative locations, which covers multiple perils, including exposure to Legionnaire’s Disease. We believe that the insurance policy specifications, insured limits and deductibles are similar to those carried by other resort owners and operators. There are certain types of losses, such as losses arising from acts of war or terrorism, that are not generally insured because they are either uninsurable or not economically insurable.

We own and control a number of trade secrets, trademarks, service marks, trade names, copyrights and other intellectual property rights, including Diamond Resorts International^®, THE Club^®, Polo Towers & Design^®, Relaxation . . . simplified^®, Diamond Resorts^®, DRIVEN^SM and The Meaning of Yes^®, which, in the aggregate, are of material importance to our business. We are licensed to use technology and other intellectual property rights owned and controlled by others, and we license other companies to use technology and other intellectual property rights owned and controlled by us. In addition, we have developed certain proprietary software applications that provide functionality to manage lead acquisition, marketing, tours, gifting, sales, contracts, member profiles, maintenance fee billing, property management, inventory management, yield management and reservations.

The resort properties that we manage are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment, natural resources and worker health and safety, including laws and regulations governing and creating liability relating to the management, storage and disposal of hazardous substances and other regulated materials and the cleanup of contaminated sites. The resorts are also subject to various environmental laws and regulations that govern certain aspects of their ongoing operations. These laws and regulations control such things as the nature and volume of wastewater discharges, quality of water supply and waste management practices. The costs of complying with these requirements are generally covered by the HOAs that operate the affected resort property, and the majority of the HOAs maintain insurance policies to insure against such costs and potential environmental liabilities. To the extent that we hold interests in a particular resort (directly or indirectly through our interests in a Collection), we would be responsible for our pro rata share of losses sustained by such resort as a result of a violation of any such laws and regulations.

As of March 31, 2013, we had approximately 5,854 full and part-time employees. Our employees are not represented by a labor union, with the exception of 153 employees in St. Maarten and 277 employees in Hawaii. Certain of our employees in Europe are also represented by unions. We are not aware of any union organizational efforts with respect to our employees at any other locations.

Diamond Resorts Corporation, formerly Sunterra Corporation, was incorporated under the name KGK Resorts, Inc. in May 1996, completed an initial public offering in August 1996 and became known as Sunterra Corporation in 1998. Sunterra Corporation sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in May 2000 as a result of defaults on its senior unsecured notes and its secured credit facilities. Sunterra Corporation fulfilled the conditions to the effectiveness of its plan of reorganization and emerged from Chapter 11 in July 2002.

In 2006, Sunterra Corporation’s common stock was delisted from The NASDAQ Stock Market as a result of, among other things, the resignation of Sunterra Corporation’s auditors and the withdrawal of their certification of Sunterra Corporation’s financial statements. In addition, Sunterra Corporation became subject to an SEC civil investigation and was named as defendant in two securities class action lawsuits. The SEC investigation was concluded without further action, and both lawsuits were settled.

In April 2007, Diamond LLC, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, acquired Sunterra Corporation by merger. Sunterra Corporation’s existing equity was canceled and it became a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of Diamond LLC. The Diamond management team assumed leadership of the Company in connection with the merger. In addition, Sunterra Corporation changed its name to Diamond Resorts Corporation.

Immediately prior to, and in connection with, this offering, we will enter into the Reorganization Transactions. In anticipation of the Reorganization Transactions, Diamond International was formed. In the Reorganization Transactions, (1) the holders of Class A common units of Diamond LLC will contribute all of their Class A common units in Diamond LLC to Diamond International in return for an aggregate of shares of common stock of Diamond International and (2) the holders of Class B common units of Diamond LLC will contribute all of their Class B common units in Diamond LLC to Diamond International in return for an aggregate of shares of common stock of Diamond International. Following the Reorganization Transactions and this offering, Diamond International will be a holding company, and its principal asset will be direct and indirect ownership of equity interests in its subsidiaries, including Diamond Resorts Corporation, which is the operating subsidiary that has historically conducted the business described in this prospectus. To date, Diamond International has not engaged in any business or other activities other than those incident to its formation and the preparation of the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part. Following the completion of the Reorganization Transactions and this offering, we expect to continue to conduct our business through our operating subsidiaries, including Diamond Resorts Corporation.

Except for unsold VOI inventory, we generally do not have any ownership interest in the resorts in our network other than the ownership of various common areas and amenities at certain resorts and a small number of units in European resorts. We believe our properties are in generally good physical condition with the need for only routine repairs and maintenance and periodic capital improvements. In addition, we lease certain properties in North America and Europe that are utilized in our administrative and sales and marketing functions. These leases include:

We also own certain real estate, the majority of which is held for sale or future development, including 2.1 acres of vacant land located on the Costa del Sol, Spain, 5.0 acres of vacant land located in Mazatlan, Mexico, 1.2 acres of vacant land located in Puerto Vallarta, Mexico, 2.8 acres of vacant land located in Scottsdale, Arizona, 19.4 acres of vacant land located in Orlando, Florida and 1.8 acres of vacant land located in Kona, Hawaii.

From time to time, we or our subsidiaries are subject to certain legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business.

One of our subsidiaries, FLRX, Inc., is a defendant in a lawsuit originally filed in July 2003, alleging the breach of certain contractual terms relating to the obligations under a stock purchase agreement for the acquisition of FLRX in 1998, as well as certain violations under applicable consumer protection acts. FLRX currently conducts no operations and has no material assets other than an indirect interest in two undeveloped real estate parcels in Mexico. In January 2010, following a jury trial, a Washington state court entered a judgment against FLRX, awarded plaintiffs damages of $30.0 million plus post-judgment interest at a rate of 12% per annum and attorney’s fees of approximately $1.5 million plus accrued interest, and ordered specific performance of certain ongoing contractual obligations pursuant to the breach of contract claim.

On May 18, 2012, the case was removed to the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Case No. 2:12-cv-00870. On August 29, 2012, Diamond Resorts Corporation filed an answer to the complaint, denying all material allegations therein and raising various affirmative defenses. On September 24, 2012, the court entered an order dismissing Diamond LLC. The court has set the case for trial on December 3, 2013. The parties are currently engaged in written discovery. We intend to vigorously defend against these claims.

Although we believe that we will not have any material liability when these matters are ultimately resolved, there can be no assurance that this will be the case. As of March 31, 2013, we had an estimated litigation accrual of $1.1 million in accrued liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet, which represents the write-down of our investment in the FLRX subsidiaries to $0. Legal fees associated with these cases are expensed as incurred.

In December 2004 and January 2005, two separate cases were filed in the Joint Court of Justice of the Netherlands Antilles against AKGI St Maarten NV, or AKGI, one of our subsidiaries, challenging AKGI’s title to seven whole ownership units at the Royal Palm Resort, and alleging the breach of certain agreements that existed prior to AKGI’s acquisition of the resort. AKGI purchased the resort at auction in 1995. Each claimant alleges that, between 1989 and 1991, he purchased certain units from the prior owner of Royal Palm Resort, and that he holds in perpetuity, legal title to, or a leasehold interest in, these respective units and is entitled to a refund of the purchase price and an annual 12% return on the purchase price (which totaled $1.2 million in one case and $1.3 million in the other case). Due to the nature of the AKGI purchase and the underlying St. Maarten laws, we believe that the obligations to the claimants would only be enforceable if the agreement between the claimant and AKGI’s predecessor was either a timeshare agreement or a lease agreement. AKGI has answered that the claimants’ agreements were, in fact, investment contracts, and are therefore not enforceable under St. Maarten law. In February 2011, the case that was pending in the highest and final court of appeal was dismissed as to all claims, with our having no obligations, financial or otherwise, to claimant. The other case is currently pending in the intermediate court of appeal. A lien has been placed on AKGI’s interest in the Royal Palm Resort while the remaining action is pending.

In October 2011, the HOA of one of our managed resorts in Hawaii levied a $65.8 million water intrusion assessment to the owners of that resort, of which $9.7 million was assessed to us. The proceeds of this assessment are being used to repair the water intrusion damage at the resort. In April 2012, we were named as a defendant in a putative class action pending in the District Court for the District of Hawaii. The action, brought by five deeded owners and members of one of the Collections managed by us, alleges breaches of fiduciary duty and unfair and deceptive trade practices against us and certain of our officers and employees and seeks, among other things, to invalidate the water intrusion assessment and enjoin the water intrusion project. In November, 2012, we reached an agreement with the named plaintiffs and their counsel to settle the litigation in full, which settlement agreement was approved by the court in May 2013. We do not expect the settlement to have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

The following table contains information with respect each person who currently serves as a director or executive officer of Diamond International. Mr. Cloobeck, our founder and Chairman, and our three executive officers are not employed or compensated directly by us, but are rather employed and compensated by HM&C, a company beneficially owned by Mr. Cloobeck. Pursuant to the HM&C Agreement, HM&C provides certain services to us, including the services of Mr. Cloobeck, our three executive officers and approximately 40 other officers and employees. For additional information regarding the HM&C Agreement, see “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions.”

The descriptions below include each such person’s service as a member of the board of managers or executive officer of Diamond LLC:

Stephen J. Cloobeck has served as Chairman of the board of managers of Diamond LLC since April 2007, and has served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Diamond International since its inception. Mr. Cloobeck provides strategic oversight and direction for our hospitality services, including services provided to our managed resorts. From April 2007 through December 2012, Mr. Cloobeck also served as Chief Executive Officer of Diamond LLC. Mr. Cloobeck has over 25 years of experience in the vacation ownership industry, and the development, construction, management, operations, marketing and sales of real estate properties, including vacation ownership resorts, hotels, retail shopping centers, office and apartment buildings. Mr. Cloobeck coordinated the development of the Polo Towers Resort and spearheaded the design of Marriott’s Grand Chateau vacation ownership resort, through Diamond Resorts, LLC, a group of affiliated companies, that was founded in 1999. Mr. Cloobeck is a member of the American Resort Development Association (ARDA) and is active in a wide range of community affairs on the local, state and national levels. In September 2010, Mr. Cloobeck was appointed by the United States Secretary of Commerce Gary Locke as a Director to the Corporation for Travel Promotion for the United States and was elected Chairman of the Board in October 2010. Mr. Cloobeck was also a member of the Board of Directors for the Nevada Cancer Institute from 2003 to 2010, serving as Chairman of the Board for the last year that he was on the Board. In addition, Mr. Cloobeck has worked with many charities and civic organizations, including the Prostate Cancer Foundation, Kids Charities.org, the Police Athletic League, Boy Scouts of America, Inner City Games, the Alzheimer’s Association, the Andre Agassi Charitable Foundation, and Autism Speaks, and is a founder of the Brent Shapiro Foundation for Drug Awareness. Mr. Cloobeck received a B.A. in Psychobiology from Brandeis University.

Our board of directors believes that Mr. Cloobeck, as our founder and the former Chief Executive Officer of Diamond LLC, should serve as a director because of Mr. Cloobeck’s unique understanding of the opportunities and challenges that we face and his in-depth knowledge about our business, including our customers, operations, key business drivers and long-term growth strategies, derived from his 25 years of experience in the vacation ownership industry and his service as our founder and former Chief Executive Officer.

David F. Palmer has served as President of Diamond LLC, and as a member of its board of managers, since September 2010. Mr. Palmer was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Diamond LLC effective as of January 1, 2013. Mr. Palmer has served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Diamond International, and as a member of the Board of Directors of Diamond International since its inception. Mr. Palmer served as Chief Financial Officer of Diamond LLC from April 2007 through December 2012. Mr. Palmer has over 20 years of experience as a private equity/financial professional. Mr. Palmer served as a managing director of Trivergance, LLC, which he co-founded with Lowell D. Kraff, from its formation in June 2006 to July 2010. From September 2002 to December 2006, he served as a member of Onyx Capital Ventures, LLC, a private equity firm and minority business enterprise that specialized in investing in middle-market minority business enterprises. From 1996 to 2002, he was a principal of Vision Capital Partners, LLC, and was a founder of Velocity Capital, LLC. Both merchant banking partnerships focused on early stage venture capital and private equity investments. From 1989 to 1999, Mr. Palmer served as vice president of corporate development for Farley Industries, Inc., a diversified holding company with interests in the automotive, industrial and apparel industries. From 2003 to 2006, Mr. Palmer served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of CiDRA Corporation, an industrial and optical services provider to the oilsands, minerals processing and pulp and paper industries. Mr. Palmer received an A.B. in Physical Chemistry from Hamilton College and an M.B.A. from the J.L. Kellogg Graduate School of Management at Northwestern University.

Our board of directors believes that Mr. Palmer should serve as a director because of his significant executive experience, his financial and investment expertise and his extensive knowledge of our business and operations, which he has acquired through his service as our Chief Executive Officer and former Chief Financial Officer.

C. Alan Bentley has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Diamond LLC since January 1, 2013. Mr. Bentley has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Diamond International since its inception. In addition, since September 2008, Mr. Bentley has served in various officer capacities, including as Executive Vice President, and as a director, of certain subsidiaries of Diamond LLC. Mr. Bentley is also a partner at Mackinac Partners, LLC, a financial advisory firm, which has provided services to Diamond LLC since April 2007. Mr. Bentley has over 30 years of broad-based business experience with extensive expertise in the areas of corporate restructuring, business management and strategic planning, complex financing transactions, capital formation, mergers and acquisitions, and financial and SEC reporting. Prior to joining Mackinac Partners, LLC, Mr. Bentley was a managing director at KPMG LLP and a senior manager at Arthur Andersen & Co. In addition, Mr Bentley previously served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Swifty Serve Corporation and Pic N’ Save, Inc. Mr. Bentley received a B.S. in Accounting from Western Kentucky University. He is a Certified Public Accountant and a member of the Board of Directors of the Resort Development Organization, an industry trade group in Europe.

Howard S. Lanznar, who joined Diamond LLC in September 2012, is its Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer, and he has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer of Diamond International since its inception. Prior to joining Diamond LLC, Mr. Lanznar was a partner of Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP for over twenty years, previously serving as Chair of that firm’s National Corporate Practice, and he remains a partner in that firm. He has also served as general counsel of Fruit of the Loom, Inc., an international apparel company. Preceding his legal career, he worked in marketing management for the Procter & Gamble Company. Mr. Lanznar received a B.A. in Philosophy from Amherst College where he was elected to Phi Beta Kappa, and a law degree from the University of Chicago Law School, where he was a member of The University of Chicago Law Review.

Lowell D. Kraff has served as a member of the board of managers of Diamond LLC since April 2007, and has served on the Board of Directors of Diamond International since its inception. He was appointed Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors of Diamond International on March 21, 2013. Mr. Kraff has spent his career in the private equity, merchant banking and investment banking fields. He has been a principal equity investor for over 15 years, participating in leveraged buyouts, growth equity and early stage venture capital transactions. Mr. Kraff co-founded Trivergance, LLC with Mr. Palmer in June 2006, and has served as a managing member since its formation. From July 2001 to June 2006, Mr. Kraff was a founding principal of Connecting Capital & Partners, LLC, a merchant banking company organized to make principal investments in alternative assets and provide limited strategic investment banking advice. From June 1996 to July 2001, Mr. Kraff also served as a founding principal of Vision Capital Partners, LLC. At Vision Capital, Mr. Kraff and his partners sourced proprietary deals and invested in several early stage and growth capital opportunities. He currently is a member of the Board of Directors of Luumena, a transactional marketing services firm. Mr. Kraff received a B.S. from The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania and an M.B.A. from the University of Chicago.

Our board of directors believes that Mr. Kraff should serve as a director because of his financial and investment expertise and his extensive knowledge of our business and operations, which he has acquired through his service as a member of the board of managers of Diamond LLC. His experience in the private equity and investment banking industry adds investment management and analysis experience, which is useful to our board of directors when reviewing potential acquisitions, joint ventures and other strategic transactions.

B. Scott Minerd has served as a member of the board of managers of Diamond LLC since August 2010, and has served on the Board of Directors of Diamond International since its inception. Mr. Minerd joined Guggenheim Partners in 1998. In his current role as Global Chief Investment Officer of Guggenheim Investment Management, LLC, Mr. Minerd guides Guggenheim’s investment strategies and oversees client accounts across a broad range of fixed-income and equity securities. Mr. Minerd is also a managing partner of Guggenheim Partners, LLC. Pursuant to the Fifth Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of Diamond LLC, dated as of October 15, 2012, Guggenheim Partners, LLC has appointed Mr. Minerd to the board of managers of Diamond LLC. He was formerly a Managing Director with Credit Suisse First Boston in charge of trading and risk management for the Fixed Income Credit Trading Group. In this position, he was responsible for the corporate bond, preferred stock, money markets, U.S. government agency and sovereign debt, derivatives securities, structured debt and interest rate swaps trading business units. Prior to that, Mr. Minerd served as Morgan Stanley’s London-based European Capital Markets Products Trading and Risk Manager responsible for Eurobonds, Euro-MTNs, domestic European bonds, FRNs, derivative securities and money market products in 12 European currencies and Asian markets. Mr. Minerd has also held capital markets positions with Merrill Lynch and Continental Bank and was a Certified Public Accountant for Price Waterhouse. Mr. Minerd is currently working with the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) advising on research and analysis of private sector infrastructure investment. Mr. Minerd holds a B.S. degree in Economics from The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, and has completed graduate work at the University of Chicago Graduate School of Business and The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.

Our board of directors believes that Mr. Minerd should serve as a director because of his financial and investment expertise, experience in capital markets and his extensive knowledge of our business and operations, which he has acquired through his service as a member of the board of managers of Diamond LLC. As a managing partner of one of the world’s most prominent financial services firms, Mr. Minerd also contributes general expertise in investment evaluation and management, enhancement of balance sheet and financial strength, entrepreneurialism, management of credit and credit agreements and management of banking and investment banking relationships.

Zachary D. Warren has served as a member of the board of managers of Diamond LLC since June 2010, and has served on the Board of Directors of Diamond International since its inception. Mr. Warren joined Guggenheim Partners, LLC in April 2004, where he has participated in numerous financings and currently serves as a senior managing director. Pursuant to the Fifth Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of Diamond

LLC, dated as of October 15, 2012, Guggenheim Partners, LLC has appointed Mr. Warren to the board of managers of Diamond LLC. Mr. Warren has over 15 years of experience in the equity and corporate debt markets, with a focus on making direct debt investments in middle-market companies. Mr. Warren received a B.A. in Economics from the College of William and Mary and an M.B.A. from the Anderson School at UCLA.

Our board of directors believes that Mr. Warren should serve as a director because of his financial and investment expertise, experience in the equity and corporate debt markets and his extensive knowledge of our business and operations, which he has acquired through his service as a member of the board of managers of Diamond LLC. As a senior managing director of one of the world’s most prominent financial services firms, Mr. Warren also contributes general expertise in investment evaluation and management, enhancement of balance sheet and financial strength, entrepreneurialism, management of credit and credit agreements and management of banking and investment banking relationships.

Pursuant to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws, which will be effective upon completion of this offering, our Board of Directors will be divided into three classes following the completion of this offering, with staggered three-year terms. Upon the expiration of the term of a class of directors, a director in that class will be elected for a three-year term at the annual meeting of stockholders in the year in which their term expires. The classes will be composed as follows:

Any additional directorships resulting from an increase in the number of directors will be distributed among the three classes so that, as nearly as possible, each class will consist of one-third of our directors. This classification of our Board of Directors may have the effect of delaying or preventing changes in control of our company.

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that is applicable to all of our directors, officers and employees. In addition, we have adopted a separate Code of Ethics for Principal and Senior Financial Officers that is applicable to our chief executive officer, our chief financial officer, our chief accounting officer and any other senior financial officers. The full text of these documents will be posted on our website at www.diamondresorts.com (which is not a part of this prospectus).

We intend to avail ourselves of the “controlled company” exception under the corporate governance rules of the NYSE. Under NYSE rules, a company of which more than 50% of the outstanding voting power is held by an individual, group or another company is a “controlled company” and may elect not to comply with certain corporate governance standards. After completion of this offering, as a result of the concentration of the ownership of our common stock among the Existing Equityholders who will be party to the Stockholders Agreement to be entered into in connection with the Reorganization Transactions, such Existing Equityholders will constitute a group that beneficially owns a majority of our outstanding common stock (our only class of voting capital stock) and, as a result, we will be a “controlled company.” As a “controlled company,” we will elect to not have a majority of “independent directors” on our board, and we will not be required to have a

compensation committee composed entirely of “independent directors” as defined under the rules of the NYSE, nor will compensation for our executives and selection of our director nominees be determined by a majority of “independent directors” as defined under the rules of the NYSE. The “controlled company” exception does not modify the independence requirements for our audit committee.

Upon completion of this offering, the Board of Directors of Diamond International will have an audit committee. We expect that the initial members of our audit committee will be , and , each of whom will be an independent director within the meaning of the applicable rules of the SEC and the NYSE, and under Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act for the purpose of audit committee membership. The audit committee of Diamond International will oversee a broad range of issues surrounding our accounting and financial reporting processes and audits of our financial statements, including by (1) assisting our Board of Directors in monitoring the integrity of our financial statements, our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, our independent auditor’s qualifications and independence and the performance of our internal audit function and independent auditors; and (2) appointing, compensating, retaining and overseeing the work of any independent registered public accounting firm engaged for the purpose of performing any audits, reviews or attest services. We expect that will be our audit committee chair and will be an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the SEC rules implementing Section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The audit committee will operate pursuant to a written charter, the full text of which will be posted on our website at www.diamondresorts.com (which is not a part of this prospectus).

Upon completion of this offering, the Board of Directors of Diamond International will have a compensation committee. We expect that the initial members of our compensation committee will be , and , and we expect that will be the chair of the compensation committee. Because we will be a “controlled company,” we will not be required to have a compensation committee consisting solely of “independent directors,” as defined under the rules of the NYSE; however, we expect that each member of our compensation committee will be an “independent director” under the rules of the NYSE, a “non-employee director” as defined in Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act and an “outside director” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code. Our compensation committee will be responsible for a range of issues regarding compensation, including (1) reviewing and approving payments to be made by us under the HM&C Agreement; (2) negotiating and (if appropriate) recommending that our Board of Directors approve any amendment or renewal of the HM&C Agreement; and (3) overseeing the administration of our incentive compensation plans. Our compensation committee will not be responsible for (a) evaluating the individual performance of any of our officers or employees; (b) determining (or recommending to our Board of Directors) the compensation to be paid to any of our individual officers or employees, or to members of our Board of Directors who are not officers of Diamond International or the Chairman or Vice Chairman of our Board of Directors; or (c) determining (or recommending to our Board of Directors) the compensation to be paid by HM&C to any employee of HM&C who provides services to us pursuant to the HM&C Agreement. The compensation committee will operate pursuant to a written charter, the full text of which will be posted on our website at www.diamondresorts.com (which is not a part of this prospectus).

Prior to the consummation of this offering, we intend to enter into indemnification agreements with each of our directors and executive officers. These agreements will require us to indemnify these individuals to the fullest extent permitted under Delaware law against liabilities that may arise by reason of their service to us, and to advance expenses incurred as a result of any proceeding as to which they could be indemnified. We also intend to enter into indemnification agreements with our future directors and executive officers. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be extended to directors, officers or persons

controlling us pursuant to the foregoing, we have been informed that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by us of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered in the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, we will, unless in the opinion of our counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and we will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

Neither of Stephen J. Cloobeck and David F. Palmer, our only two executive officers during 2012 (the “Named Executive Officers”), received direct remuneration from Diamond LLC for services provided to us in 2011 and 2012. Rather, HM&C, an entity that is beneficially owned by Mr. Cloobeck, received an annual management fee pursuant to the HM&C Agreement described below. The Named Executive Officers were compensated pursuant to a services agreement with HM&C. Upon the consummation of the Reorganization Transactions and this offering, the executive officers of Diamond LLC will become executive officers of Diamond International, and we expect that the HM&C Agreement will remain in effect following the consummation of this offering.

Pursuant to the HM&C Agreement, HM&C provides two categories of management services to Diamond Resorts Corporation: (1) executive and strategic oversight of the services we provide to HOAs and the Collections through our hospitality and management services operations, for the benefit of us and of the HOAs and the Collections, or HOA Management Services; and (2) executive, corporate and strategic oversight of our operations and certain other administrative services. HM&C provides us with services of Mr. Cloobeck, our three executive officers and approximately 40 other officers and employees (including Sheldon Cloobeck, the father of Mr. Cloobeck), each of whom devotes his or her full business time and attention to Diamond Resorts Corporation. Pursuant to the HM&C Agreement, HM&C is entitled to receive (1) an annual management fee for providing HOA Management Services; (2) an annual management fee for providing corporate management services; (3) an annual incentive payment based on performance metrics determined by the board of directors of Diamond Resorts Corporation, subject to certain minimum amounts set forth in the HM&C Agreement; and (4) reimbursement of HM&C’s expenses incurred in connection with the activities provided under the HM&C Agreement. For the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012, we incurred approximately $16.9 million and $17.9 million, respectively, in management fees, incentive payments and expense reimbursements in connection with the HM&C Agreement. These payments are reviewed and approved on an annual basis and may be increased as agreed to by the board of directors of Diamond Resorts Corporation. However, the board of directors of Diamond Resorts Corporation does not have authority to allocate the aggregate annual fees and incentive payments paid to HM&C to Mr. Cloobeck, our three executive officers or other officers and employees furnished by HM&C.

Pursuant to the HM&C Agreement, we also provide various perquisites to certain employees of HM&C, on HM&C’s behalf, including personal use of company aircraft and private medical and health insurance costs and premiums. For each of the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012, the total value of these perquisites (representing, in the case of personal use of company aircraft, the aggregate incremental cost to us for travel on company aircraft not related to company business, calculated by multiplying the hourly variable cost rate for the aircraft used by the hours used) provided by us to HM&C employees on behalf of HM&C was approximately $0.3 million. For additional information regarding the HM&C Agreement, see “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions” below.

Diamond LLC does not maintain any employment agreements with its executive officers nor does Diamond LLC provide any change of control or similar benefits to its executive officers. Diamond LLC has not adopted any retirement, pension, profit sharing, stock option or other similar programs for the benefit of its executive officers or members of its board of managers.

Members of the board of managers of Diamond LLC receive no compensation from us for their services as members of the board or for attendance at board meetings, except that during the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012, Diamond LLC provided Mr. Kraff, a non-executive member of the board of managers of Diamond

LLC, with personal use of company aircraft. For each of the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012, the total value of Mr. Kraff’s personal use of company aircraft (representing the aggregate incremental cost to us for Mr. Kraff’s travel on company aircraft not related to company business, calculated by multiplying the hourly variable cost rate for the aircraft used by the hours used) was approximately $0.1 million.

Each member of the Board of Directors of Diamond International who is not an officer or employee of the Company or the Chairman or Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors is entitled to receive an annual retainer of $75,000 and annual equity compensation with a value of $75,000 for his or her service as a member of the Board of Directors. In addition, the Chairman of the Audit Committee is entitled to receive an additional annual retainer of $20,000 and each other member of the Audit Committee is entitled to receive an additional annual retainer of $10,000. Commencing upon the consummation of this offering, in accordance with the Non-Officer Director Share Accumulation Program pursuant to the 2013 Incentive Compensation Plan (as described in further detail below), each member of the Board of Directors of Diamond International who is not an officer or employee of Diamond International or the Chairman or Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors of Diamond International will be entitled to elect to utilize all or a portion of his annual retainer fee to acquire shares of our common stock.

Members of the board of managers of Diamond LLC and the Board of Directors of Diamond International are reimbursed for expenses incurred in connection with attendance at board meetings.

We anticipate that prior to the consummation of this offering, the Diamond Resorts International, Inc. 2013 Incentive Compensation Plan will be adopted by our Board of Directors. The purposes of the plan will be to attract and retain qualified persons upon whom, in large measure, our sustained progress, growth and profitability depend, to motivate such persons to achieve long-term company goals and to more closely align such persons’ interests with those of our other stockholders by providing them with a proprietary interest in our growth and performance. Our employees, directors, consultants and advisors (including certain employees of HM&C who provide services to us) will be eligible to participate in the plan. The plan will provide for awards of up to an aggregate of shares of our common stock to participants in the plan.

Set forth below is a summary of the expected terms of the plan, which is qualified in its entirety by the full text of the plan, a copy of which will be filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.

The plan will be administered by a committee consisting of independent members of our Board of Directors, or the committee, which will interpret the plan and will have broad discretion to select the eligible persons to whom awards will be granted, as well as the type, size and terms and conditions of each award, including the exercise price of stock options, the number of shares subject to awards and the expiration date of, and the vesting schedule or other restrictions applicable to, awards. The committee may establish, amend, suspend or waive any rules relating to the plan, and make any other determination or take any other action that may be necessary or advisable for the administration of the plan. Except as otherwise expressly provided in the plan, all determinations, designations, interpretations and other decisions of the committee will be final, conclusive and binding. While the committee will have the general authority to administer the plan and the awards to be granted thereunder, our executive officers may be delegated certain authority to grant specific awards.

The plan will provide that in any calendar year, no grantee may be granted awards for options or SARs with respect to an aggregate of more than shares of our common stock or restricted stock, deferred stock, restricted stock units or performance units (or any other award, other than options or SARS, that is determined by reference to the value of shares of our common stock or appreciation in the value of such shares) with respect to the aggregate of more than shares of our common stock. No grantee may be granted cash awards under the plan that would have a payout of more than $ in any year or a maximum payout during any applicable performance period of more than $ .

Options. Options may be granted by the committee and may be either non-qualified options or incentive stock options. Options will be subject to the terms and conditions, including vesting conditions, set by the committee (and incentive stock options will be subject to further statutory restrictions that are set forth in the plan). The exercise price for all stock options granted under the plan will be determined by the committee, except that no stock options can be granted with an exercise price that is less than 100% of the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. Further, stockholders who own greater than 10% of our voting stock will not be granted incentive stock options that have an exercise price less than 110% of the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. The term of all stock options granted under the plan will be determined by the committee, but may not exceed 10 years (five years for incentive stock options granted to stockholders who own greater than 10% of our voting stock). No incentive stock option may be granted to an optionee, which, when combined with all other incentive stock options becoming exercisable in any calendar year that are held by that optionee, would have an aggregate grant date fair market value in excess of $100,000. In the event an optionee is awarded $100,000 in incentive stock options in any calendar year, any incentive stock options in excess of $100,000 granted during the same year will be treated as non-qualified stock options. Each stock option will be exercisable at such time and pursuant to such terms and conditions as determined by the committee in the applicable stock option agreement. Each option will give the grantee the right to receive a number of shares of our common stock upon exercise of the option and payment of the exercise price. The exercise price may be paid by cash (including cash obtained through a broker selling the share acquired on exercise (i.e., a so-called “cashless exercise”) or, if approved by the committee, shares of our common stock or restricted common stock.

Stock Appreciation Rights, or SARs. All SARs may be granted on a stand-alone basis or in conjunction with stock options granted under the plan. A SAR granted under the plan will entitle its holder to receive, at the time of exercise, an amount per SAR equal to the excess of the fair market value (at the date of exercise) of a share of our common stock over a specified price, known as the strike price, fixed by the committee, which will not be less than 100% of the fair market value of our common stock on the grant date of the SAR. Payment may be made in cash, shares of our common stock, or other property, in any combination as determined by the committee.

Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units. Restricted stock is our common stock that is forfeitable until the restrictions lapse. Restricted stock units are rights granted as an award to receive shares of our common stock, conditioned upon the satisfaction of restrictions imposed by the committee. The committee will determine the restrictions for each award and the purchase price in the case of restricted stock, if any. Restrictions on the restricted stock and restricted stock units may include time-based restrictions, the achievement of specific

performance goals, the occurrence of a specific event, restrictions under applicable laws or pursuant to a regulatory entity with authority over the Company, or a combination of the foregoing. Vesting of restricted stock and restricted stock units will be conditioned upon the grantee’s continued employment. Grantees will have voting and dividend rights in respect of shares of restricted stock held by them. Grantees will not have voting rights in restricted stock units. If the performance goals are not achieved or the restrictions do not lapse within the time period provided in the award agreement, the grantee will forfeit his or her restricted stock and/or restricted stock units.

Deferred Stock. Deferred stock is the right to receive shares of our common stock at the end of a specified deferral period. The committee will determine the number of shares and terms and conditions for each deferred stock award, and whether such deferred stock will be acquired upon the lapse of restrictions on restricted stock units. Grantees will not have voting rights in deferred stock, but grantees’ deferred stock may be credited with dividend equivalents to the extent dividends are paid or distributions made during the deferral period.

Performance Units. Performance units are any grant of (1) a bonus consisting of cash or other property the amount and value of which, and/or the receipt of which, is conditioned upon the achievement of certain performance goals specified by the committee, or (2) a unit valued by reference to a designated amount of property. Performance units may be paid in cash, shares of our common stock, restricted stock or restricted stock units. The committee will determine the number and terms of all performance units, including the performance goals and performance period during which such goals must be met. If the performance goals are not attained during the performance period specified in the award agreement, the grantee will forfeit all of his or her performance units.

Annual Cash Incentive Awards. The plan will include annual cash incentive awards. The committee will determine the amounts and terms of all annual cash incentive awards, including performance goals, which may be weighted for different factors and measures. The committee will designate individuals eligible for annual cash incentive awards within the first 90 days of the year for which the annual cash incentive award will apply, with certain exceptions, and will certify attainment of performance goals within 90 days following the end of each year. In addition, the committee will establish the threshold, target and maximum annual cash incentive award opportunities for each grantee.

The objective performance criteria for awards (other than stock options and SARs) granted under the plan that will be designed to qualify for the performance-based exception from the tax deductibility limitations of Section 162(m) of the Code, and are to be based on one or more of the following measures:

Unless provided otherwise in an award agreement, a grantee’s awards will become vested, the relevant restrictions will lapse and the relevant performance goals will be deemed to be met at maximum levels upon the involuntary termination of such grantee’s employment or service without cause during the 24-month period following the occurrence of a change in control of Diamond International. In addition, the committee may, in order to maintain a grantee’s rights in the event of any change in control of Diamond International, (1) make any adjustments to an outstanding award to reflect such change in control or (2) cause the acquiring or surviving entity to assume or substitute rights with respect to an outstanding award. Furthermore, the committee may cancel any outstanding unexercised options or SARs (whether or not vested) that have an exercise price or strike price, as applicable, that is greater than the fair market value of a share of our common stock as of the date of the change in control. Under the plan, the committee will also have the ability to cash out any options or SARs (whether or not vested) that have an exercise price or strike price, as applicable, that is less than the fair market value of a share of our common stock as of the date of the change in control. If the committee determines that such an award should be cashed out, the grantee will receive the lesser of the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the date of the change in control or the price paid per share in the transaction that constitutes the change in control.

For purposes of the plan, a “change in control” occurs (1) when any corporation, person or other entity, including a group, becomes the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of more than 50% of the outstanding securities of Diamond International; (2) upon the consolidation or merger of Diamond International or upon any sale, lease, exchange or other transfer of more than 65% of the assets of Diamond International, provided that following such a transaction the members of the Board of Directors of Diamond International prior to such transaction no longer constitute a majority of the board surviving after such transaction; (3) when Diamond International is liquidated; and (4) if, within any 12-month period, persons who were members of the Board of Directors of Diamond International immediately prior to such 12-month period, together with persons who were first elected as directors (other than as a result of any settlement of a proxy consent solicitation contest or any action take not to avoid such a contest) during such 12-month period by or upon the recommendation of persons who were members of the board immediately prior to such 12-month period and who constituted a majority of the board at the time of such election, cease to constitute a majority of the board. With respect to any award which would be considered deferred compensation subject to Section 409A of the Code, a similar, but Section 409A compliant, definition of “change in control” applies.

With respect to stock options and SARs granted pursuant to an award agreement, unless the applicable award agreement provides otherwise, in the event of a grantee’s termination of employment or service due to disability or death, such grantee’s stock options or SARs (to the extent exercisable at the time of such termination) will remain exercisable until one year after such termination (but not beyond the end of the original terms of such stock options or SARs) and thereafter will be cancelled and forfeited to us. In the event of a grantee’s termination of employment or service without cause or due to good reason following a change in control, such grantee’s stock options or SARs (to the extent exercisable at the time of such termination) will remain exercisable until 90 days after such termination (but not beyond the end of the original terms of such stock options or SARs) and thereafter will be cancelled and forfeited to us. In the event of a grantee’s voluntary

termination of employment (for any reason other than due to disability, death or good reason following a change in control)), such grantee’s stock options or SARs (to the extent exercisable at the time of such termination) will remain exercisable until 30 days after such termination (but not beyond the end of the original terms of such stock options or SARs) and thereafter will be cancelled and forfeited to us. In the event of a grantee’s termination of employment or service for cause, such grantee’s outstanding stock options or SARs will immediately be cancelled and forfeited to us.

Unless the applicable award agreement provides otherwise, (1) with respect to restricted stock, and restricted stock units, (1) in the event of a grantee’s termination of employment or service without cause, (a) one-third of the shares subject to such grantee’s restricted stock award or one-third of such grantee’s restricted stock units will become vested if such termination occurs after the first anniversary of the grant date and (b) two-thirds of the shares subject to such grantee’s restricted stock award or two-thirds of such grantee’s restricted stock units shall become vested if such termination occurs after the second anniversary of the grant date; (2) in the event of a grantee’s termination of employment or service because of death or disability, all of the grantee’s restricted stock or restricted stock units will become immediately vested; and (3) in the event of a grantee’s termination of employment or service for any reason other than those described in clauses (1) or (2), all of the grantee’s restricted stock or restricted stock units that are unvested will immediately be cancelled and forfeited to us.

Unless the plan is earlier terminated by our Board of Directors, the plan will automatically terminate on , 2023. Awards granted before the termination of the plan may extend beyond that date in accordance with their terms. The committee is permitted to amend the plan or the terms and conditions of outstanding awards, including to extend the exercise period and accelerate the vesting schedule of such awards, but no such action may adversely affect the rights of any participant with respect to outstanding awards without the applicable grantee’s written consent and no such action or amendment may violate rules under Section 409A of the Code regarding the form and timing of payment of deferred compensation. In addition, with the exception of certain adjustments to awards, (1) the terms of any outstanding stock option or SAR may not be amended to reduce its exercise price, and (2) no stock option or SAR may be canceled in exchange for cash or other awards, or for stock options or SARs with an exercise price less than the exercise price of the cancelled stock option or SAR, unless approved by our stockholders. Stockholder approval of any amendment to the plan will be obtained if required to comply with applicable law or the rules of the NYSE.

Unless otherwise determined by the committee, awards granted under the plan will not be transferable except by will or the laws of descent and distribution. The committee will have sole discretion to permit the transfer of an award to certain family members specified in the plan.

In the event a stock dividend, stock split, reorganization, recapitalization, spin-off, or other similar event affects shares of our common stock such that the committee determines an adjustment to be appropriate to prevent dilution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available under the plan, the committee will (among other actions and subject to certain exceptions) adjust the number and type of shares available under the plan, the number and type of shares subject to outstanding awards and the exercise price of outstanding stock options and other awards.

Pursuant to the plan, commencing upon the consummation of this offering, we will adopt the Non-Officer Director Share Accumulation Program, pursuant to which each member of the Board of Directors of Diamond International who is not an officer or employee of Diamond International, or the Chairman or Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors of Diamond International, will be entitled to elect to utilize all or a portion of his annual

retainer fee to acquire shares of our common stock. For purposes of this program, the number of shares issued using all or a portion of the annual retainer fee of an eligible director of Diamond International will be based on the fair market value of our common stock on the date the annual retainer fee would have otherwise been paid to such eligible director.

In connection with the consummation of this offering, we intend to grant pursuant to the plan stock options exercisable for up to shares of our common stock, each with a per share exercise price equal to the initial public offering price, to our executive officers, non-executive management personnel and our non-officer directors for services rendered (or to be rendered) to us, including options exercisable for up to shares of our common stock to be issued to holders of Class B common units of Diamond LLC, in part to maintain the incentive value intended when we originally issued the Class B common units to these individuals and to provide an incentive for such individuals to continue providing services to us. In connection with the consummation of this offering, we also intend to grant pursuant to the plan shares of restricted stock to certain of our non-executive management personnel.

We intend to file a registration statement on Form S-8 covering the shares of our common stock reserved for issuance under the plan.

We anticipate that prior to the consummation of this offering, the Diamond Resorts International, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or ESPP, will be adopted by our Board of Directors. The ESPP will authorize the issuance of up to an aggregate of shares of our common stock to our eligible employees. Subject to certain exclusions, employees will be eligible to participate if we or one of our subsidiaries employ them for at least 20 hours per week on a continuous basis. The plan will be administered by our plan committee.

The ESPP, which is intended to qualify under Section 423 of the Code, will be implemented through a series of offering periods. The ESPP generally will provide for three-month offering periods beginning on February 15, May 15, August 15 and November 15 of each calendar year, or as otherwise determined by our plan committee. The plan committee will have the ability to change the duration and/or frequency of offer periods under the ESPP and will determine the first offer period under the ESPP, which is expected to begin on or after , 2013.

At the end of each quarter, an automatic purchase will be made for participants. Eligible employees may purchase our common stock through payroll deductions, which in any event must be at least 1% but may not exceed 10% of an employee’s compensation subject to plan maximums. Such purchases will be made at a price equal to 95% of the fair market value (i.e., closing price) of a share of our common stock on the last day of the offer period. Employees may be prohibited from selling the shares of common stock they purchase under the ESPP for a period of time as may be set forth by the committee prior to the first day of an offering period.

Under the ESPP, no employee will be granted an option to purchase our common stock under the ESPP if immediately after the grant the employee would own common stock, including any outstanding options to purchase common stock, equaling 5% or more of the total voting power or value of all classes of our stock. In addition, the ESPP provides that no employee will be granted an option to purchase stock if the option would permit the employee to purchase common stock under all of our employee stock purchase plans in an amount that exceeds $25,000 of the fair market value of such stock for each calendar year in which the option is outstanding.

For each employee, his or her participation will end automatically upon termination of employment with the company. In addition, employees may end their participation in the ESPP at any time. In the event of a merger or consolidation of us with and into another person or the sale of transfer of all or substantially all of our assets, the plan committee may, in its sole discretion, elect to accelerate any rights to purchase stock under the ESPP and/or terminate such rights; provided, however, any change must also comply with applicable laws.

Our board of directors will have the authority to amend or terminate the ESPP, except that, subject to certain exceptions described in the ESPP, no such action may adversely affect any outstanding rights to purchase stock under the ESPP. We intend to file a registration statement on Form S-8 covering the shares of our common stock reserved for issuance under the ESPP.

Diamond LLC does not have, and did not have at any point in 2012, a standing compensation committee or any committee performing similar functions. The board of managers of Diamond LLC determined not to directly compensate its executive officers or members of its board of managers. Accordingly, there were no deliberations concerning executive officer compensation in 2012.

The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock, as of , 2013, after giving effect to the Reorganization Transactions, by the following individuals or groups:

The number of shares of common stock outstanding and percentage of beneficial ownership before this offering are based on the number of shares to be issued and outstanding prior to this offering after giving effect to the Reorganization Transactions. See “Organizational Structure—Reorganization Transactions.” The number of shares of common stock and percentage of beneficial ownership after this offering set forth below are based on the number of shares of common stock to be outstanding immediately after this offering and assumes an initial public offering price of $ per share (the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus). The number of shares of common stock which we expect to issue in the Island One Acquisition and, accordingly, the number of shares of common stock which we expect to be outstanding after this offering and the beneficial ownership percentages set forth below, are subject to change based upon the initial public offering price per share, as discussed under “Organizational Structure—Island One Acquisition.”

We have determined beneficial ownership in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC. These rules generally provide that a person is the beneficial owner of securities if such person has or shares the power to vote or direct the voting thereof, or to dispose or direct the disposition thereof or has the right to acquire such powers within 60 days. Shares of common stock subject to options that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of , 2013 are deemed to be outstanding and beneficially owned by the person holding the options. Shares issuable pursuant to stock options or warrants are deemed outstanding for computing the percentage ownership of the person holding such options or warrants, but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Except as indicated by the footnotes below, we believe, based on the information furnished to us, that the persons and entities named in the table below will have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock that they will beneficially own, subject to applicable community property laws.

All of the shares offered by the selling stockholders will be issued to them in connection with the Reorganization Transactions. For additional information with respect to the selling stockholders and their relationship with us please see “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions” and “Organizational Structure—Reorganization Transactions.”

Immediately prior to, and in connection with, the consummation of this offering, we will consummate the reorganization transactions described under “Reorganization Transactions.”

Pursuant to the HM&C Agreement, HM&C provides two categories of management services to Diamond Resorts Corporation: (1) executive and strategic oversight of the services we provide to HOAs and the Collections through our hospitality and management services operations, for the benefit of us and of the HOAs and the Collections, or HOA Management Services; and (2) executive, corporate and strategic oversight of our operations and certain other administrative services. HM&C provides us with services of Mr. Cloobeck, our three executive officers and approximately 40 other officers and employees (including Sheldon Cloobeck, the father of Mr. Cloobeck), each of whom devotes his or her full business time and attention to Diamond Resorts Corporation. Pursuant to the HM&C Agreement, HM&C is entitled to receive (1) an annual management fee for providing HOA Management Services; (2) an annual management fee for providing corporate management services; (3) an annual incentive payment based on performance metrics determined by the board of directors of Diamond Resorts Corporation, subject to certain minimum amounts set forth in the HM&C Agreement, and (4) reimbursement of HM&C’s expenses incurred in connection with the activities provided under the HM&C Agreement. The HM&C Agreement also provides for the payment of additional fees to HM&C as and when agreed by Diamond Resorts Corporation and HM&C in the event HM&C provides certain additional services to us for the benefit of HOAs or in connection with any acquisitions, financing transactions or other significant transactions undertaken by Diamond Resorts Corporation or its subsidiaries. For the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012, we incurred approximately $16.9 million and $17.9 million, respectively, in management fees, incentive payments and expense reimbursements in connection with the HM&C Agreement. These payments are reviewed and approved on an annual basis and may be increased as agreed to by the board of directors of Diamond Resorts Corporation. However, the board of directors of Diamond Resorts Corporation does not have authority to allocate the aggregate annual fees and incentive payments paid to HM&C to Mr. Cloobeck, our three executive officers or other officers and employees furnished by HM&C.

Pursuant to the HM&C Agreement, we also provide various perquisites to certain employees of HM&C, on HM&C’s behalf, including personal use of company aircraft and private medical and health insurance costs and premiums. For the year ended December 31, 2012, the total value of these perquisites (representing, in the case of personal use of company aircraft, the aggregate incremental cost to us for travel on company aircraft not related to company business, calculated by multiplying the hourly variable cost rate for the aircraft used by the hours used) provided by us to HM&C employees on behalf of HM&C was approximately $0.3 million. If HM&C elects to provide its employees with employee benefits (in lieu of us providing such benefits) we are required to reimburse HM&C for the cost of providing these benefits. In addition, if HM&C terminates the employment of any of its employees following the termination of the HM&C Agreement, we are required to pay the premiums for continued health coverage under COBRA for each terminated employee.

Under the HM&C Agreement, HM&C is entitled to terminate the employment of any of its employees at any time and for any reason. In the event HM&C terminates the employment of our President and Chief Executive Officer, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer or Executive Vice President, Global Human Resources, whether during the term, or immediately following the termination, of the HM&C Agreement, we are required to pay any severance payments payable to the terminated employees under the severance agreements then maintained by HM&C (provided they are no more favorable than any severance arrangements provided by Diamond Resorts Corporation). The aggregate amount of these potential severance payments payable by us as of December 31, 2012 was approximately $6.5 million.

The HM&C Agreement has a term that is currently set to expire on December 31, 2015, and thereafter automatically renews for successive annual periods unless terminated by us or HM&C. However, the HM&C Agreement will automatically terminate if (i) Mr. Cloobeck no longer serves as the Chairman (or similar position) of Diamond Resorts Corporation or (ii) Diamond Resorts Corporation undergoes a change of control (as defined in the HM&C Agreement), and each party is also entitled to terminate the agreement upon a material breach by or insolvency of the non-terminating party. Upon termination of the HM&C Agreement, HM&C will be entitled to all compensation, disbursements and payments which have been earned by HM&C through the date of termination (including any prorated portions of the respective annual management fees relating to HM&C’s provision of the HOA management services and the corporate management services, the annual incentive payment and reimbursement of operating expenses). Other than these obligations, there is no fee generated by, or otherwise payable due to, the termination of the HM&C Agreement.

HM&C provides, and in the future may provide, services to other companies, including companies controlled by Mr. Cloobeck, provided, however, that (i) HM&C is obligated to provide to us the full business time and attention of Messrs. Cloobeck and Palmer and any other employees who are or may in the future be employed by HM&C, (ii) HM&C is prohibited from competing with us during the term of the HM&C Agreement, and (iii) HM&C is prohibited from providing services to our direct competitors during the term of the HM&C Agreement. In the event that HM&C provides material services to other companies in the future, current or future employees of HM&C may devote substantial time and attention to these other companies (provided they comply with the restrictions described in the prior sentence), as well as to us. However, HM&C has not advised us that HM&C currently has any such plans. Under the HM&C Agreement, we are also generally required to indemnify HM&C for all losses, liabilities and expenses relating to any action taken or inaction not taken in good faith by HM&C on our behalf under the HM&C Agreement.

In January 2012, we entered into an Aircraft Lease Agreement with N702DR, LLC, a limited liability company of which Mr. Cloobeck, who is the Chairman of the board of managers of Diamond LLC and the Board of Directors of Diamond International, and who will continue to serve as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Diamond International upon the consummation of the Reorganization Transactions and this offering, is a beneficial owner and a controlling party. Pursuant to this lease agreement, we lease an aircraft from N702DR, LLC and paid N702DR, LLC approximately $2.4 million pursuant to this lease agreement for the year ended December 31, 2012.

In December 2011, in connection with the issuance of our Senior Secured Notes, Mr. Cloobeck and Cloobeck Companies, LLC, a limited liability company of which Mr. Cloobeck is a beneficial owner and controlling party, entered into a guaranty in favor of one of our subsidiaries for the benefit of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, the trustee for the holders of our Senior Secured Notes. Pursuant to this guaranty, Mr. Cloobeck and Cloobeck Companies, LLC jointly and severally guarantee the obligations of our subsidiary in connection with the Senior Secured Notes, including the obligation to make principal, premium and interest payments on our Senior Secured Notes when due. The combined liability of Mr. Cloobeck and Cloobeck Companies, LLC pursuant to this guaranty is limited to an aggregate of $66 million, and the guaranty automatically terminates on December 20, 2013, unless extended by Mr. Cloobeck in his sole and absolute discretion.

In December 2007, in connection with our lease of an aircraft from Banc of America Leasing & Capital, LLC, Mr. Cloobeck entered into a guaranty in favor of Banc of America Leasing & Capital, LLC. Pursuant to this guaranty, Mr. Cloobeck guarantees our lease payments and any related indebtedness to Banc of America Leasing & Capital, LLC in connection with this aircraft lease. We paid Banc of America Leasing & Capital, LLC approximately $1.2 million pursuant to this lease agreement for the year ended December 31, 2012. We did not compensate Mr. Cloobeck for providing these guaranties.

In June 2009, we entered into an Engagement Agreement for Individual Independent Contractor with Praesumo Partners, LLC, a limited liability company of which Mr. Kraff, who is currently a member of the board of managers of Diamond LLC and the Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors of Diamond International, and who will continue to serve as the Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors of Diamond International upon the consummation of the Reorganization Transactions and this offering, is a beneficial owner and a controlling party. Pursuant to this engagement agreement, Praesumo provides Mr. Kraff as an independent contractor to us to provide, among other things, acquisition, development and finance consulting services. In September 2012, the agreement was renewed for an additional one-year term, expiring August 31, 2013. In consideration of these services provided pursuant to this agreement, we paid to Praesumo Partners, LLC, in the aggregate, approximately $1.8 million in fees and expense reimbursements during the year ended December 31, 2012. This amount does not include certain travel-related costs paid directly by us.

Mr. Kraff is also a beneficial owner of Luumena, LLC and Technogistics, LLC. Luumena, LLC provides us with digital media services. Technogistics, LLC provides us with direct marketing services. We paid Luumena, LLC approximately $0.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2012. We paid Technogistics, LLC approximately $1.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2012.

Mr. Kraff is also a beneficial owner of Trivergance Business Resources, LLC. Commencing on January 1, 2013, Trivergance Business Resources, LLC began providing promotional, product placement, marketing, public relations and branding services to us, including the development of a new consumer marketing website.

Messrs. Warren and Minerd, who are currently members of the board of managers of Diamond LLC and members of the Board of Directors of Diamond International, and who will continue to serve as members of the Board of Directors of Diamond International upon the consummation of the Reorganization Transactions and this offering, are principals of Guggenheim Partners, LLC, or Guggenheim. Pursuant to the Fifth Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of Diamond LLC, dated as of October 15, 2012, Guggenheim Partners, LLC has the right to appoint two members to the board of managers of Diamond LLC, subject to certain security ownership thresholds, and, prior to the consummation of the Reorganization Transactions and this offering, Messrs. Warren and Minerd have served as members of the board of managers of Diamond LLC as the appointees of Guggenheim Partners, LLC. See also “—Director Designation Agreement and Stockholders Agreement” below.

In connection with the amendment and restatement of our Conduit Facility on April 11, 2013, an affiliate of Guggenheim became a commercial paper conduit for the Conduit Facility. Also, another affiliate of Guggenheim is currently an investor in our DROT 2009 Notes and DROT 2011 Notes.

In connection with the Tempus Resorts Acquisition, Tempus Acquisition, LLC, one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, entered into a Credit and Security Agreement, dated November 23, 2010, with an affiliate of the Guggenheim Investor, as the lender, and Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC, as administrative agent. This loan was a revolving facility with a maximum principal amount of $8 million, with an interest rate of 10%. This loan was repaid on July 1, 2011 in connection with the consummation of the Tempus Resorts Acquisition. During 2011, Tempus Acquisition, LLC made an aggregate $0.2 million in interest payments and an aggregate $6.5 million in principal payments on the loan.

On July 1, 2011, we completed the acquisition of certain assets of Tempus Resorts International, Ltd. and certain of its subsidiaries through Mystic Dunes, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Tempus Acquisition, LLC. In order to fund this acquisition, Tempus Acquisition, LLC entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC, an affiliate of Guggenheim, as administrative agent for lenders, which include affiliates of, or funds managed or advised by, Guggenheim Partners, LLC, which is an affiliate of the Guggenheim Investor, and Silver Rock Financial LLC, which is an affiliate of the Silver Rock Investors. The Tempus Acquisition Loan is collateralized by all assets of Tempus Acquisition, LLC. The Tempus Acquisition Loan was initially in an aggregate amount of $41.1 million (which includes a $5.5 million revolving loan). The Tempus Acquisition Loan bears interest at a rate of 18.0% (of which 10.0% is paid currently and the remaining may be paid in cash or accrued and added to the principal amount of the loan), and matures on June 30, 2015. In addition, Tempus Acquisition, LLC paid a 2.0% closing fee based on the initial loan balance as of July 1, 2011 and is also required to pay an exit fee of up to 10% of the initial loan balance as of July 1, 2011 upon the final payment-in-full of the outstanding balance under the loan. Tempus Acquisition, LLC is required to make principal prepayments equal to (i) on a monthly basis, 40% of the aggregate interval purchase price received by Mystic Dunes, LLC in the prior month, (ii) within one business day of receipt, net participation proceeds payments less amounts attributable to interest paid, generated by Tempus Acquisition, LLC’s acquisition of a participating interest in the Tempus Receivables Loan, (iii) 100% of excess cash flow from the Tempus Resorts Acquisition and the Aegean Blue Acquisition, commencing with the quarter ending December 31, 2012 and (iv) $0.3 million, payable monthly, commencing in January 2013. Within 30 days after the end of each calendar year commencing with calendar year 2012, Tempus Acquisition, LLC is also required to make an additional prepayment in an amount equal to the difference between the aggregate principal prepayments paid in the calendar year and $5.0 million, such that a minimum of $5.0 million in aggregate annual principal reductions have been made. On September 28, 2012, Tempus Acquisition, LLC amended the Loan and Security Agreement to terminate the revolving loan and transfer the then-outstanding balance under the revolving loan to the term loans. On October 4, 2012, Tempus Acquisition, LLC further amended the Loan and Security Agreement to provide an additional $6.6 million borrowing under the term loans to fund the Aegean Blue Acquisition. The Tempus Acquisition Loan was further amended on November 20, 2012 and December 21, 2012 to increase the term loans by $2.5 million and $5.0 million, respectively, to pay separation payments to principals of the Mystic Dunes resorts, and to fund guaranties and indemnities required to be paid to Mystic Dunes LLC’s HOAs. Some of the Wellington Management Investors became lenders under this credit facility in connection with a December 2012 amendment to the Tempus Acquisition Loan. During 2012, Tempus Acquisition, LLC made an aggregate of approximately $4.2 million in interest payments and approximately $9.3 million in principal payments on the Tempus Acquisition Loan. We intend to use approximately $ million of the net proceeds to us from this offering to repay all amounts owed under the Tempus Acquisition Loan.

On May 21, 2012, we completed the acquisition of certain assets of Pacific Monarch Resorts, Inc. and certain of its affiliates through DPM Acquisition, LLC, one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries. In order to fund this acquisition, DPM Acquisition, LLC entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC, an affiliate of Guggenheim, as administrative agent for lenders, which include affiliates of, or funds managed or advised by, Guggenheim Partners, LLC, which is an affiliate of the Guggenheim Investor, Wellington Management Company, LLP, including some of the Wellington Management Investors, and Silver Rock Financial LLC, which is an affiliate of the Silver Rock Investors. The PMR Acquisition Loan is collateralized by substantially all of the assets of DPM Acquisition, LLC. The PMR Acquisition Loan was initially in an aggregate principal amount of $71.3 million (consisting of a $61.3 million term loan and a

$10.0 million revolving loan). The PMR Acquisition Loan bears interest at a rate of 18.0% (of which an amount equal to not less than 10.0% is paid currently and the remaining accrued amount may be paid, at DPM Acquisition, LLC’s election, in cash or accrued and added to the principal amount of the applicable term or revolving loan), and matures on May 21, 2016. The agreement provides that (1) DPM Acquisition, LLC is required to pay quarterly (a) to Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC, as administrative agent, for its own account, an administration fee, and (b) to Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC, as administrative agent, for the benefit of lenders with commitments to make revolving loans thereunder, an unused line fee based upon each such lender’s commitment to provide revolving loans and the then outstanding principal amount of such lender’s

revolving loan, (2) DPM Acquisition, LLC will make certain mandatory monthly and quarterly prepayments of amounts borrowed under the PMR Acquisition Loan, and (3) on the maturity date for the term loan, if not paid earlier in accordance therewith, DPM Acquisition, LLC is required to pay an exit fee of up to 10.0% of the initial loan amount. On May 21, 2012, pursuant to the PMR Acquisition Loan, DPM Acquisition, LLC paid a closing fee of approximately $2.1 million to Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC, as administrative agent, and certain lenders party thereto. On September 28, 2012, DPM Acquisition, LLC amended the Loan and Security Agreement to terminate the revolving loan and transfer the then-outstanding balance under the revolving loan to the term loan. During 2012, DPM Acquisition, LLC made an aggregate of approximately $3.9 million in interest payments and approximately $5.0 million in principal payments on the PMR Acquisition Loan. We intend to use approximately $ million of the net proceeds to us from this offering to repay all amounts owed under the Tempus Acquisition Loan.

In connection with the funding of the Tempus Acquisition Loan pursuant to the Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2011, among Tempus Acquisition, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Diamond LLC, the lenders party thereto and Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC, which was entered into in connection with the Tempus Resorts Acquisition, Diamond LLC issued a warrant (the “Tempus Warrant”) to Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC, as administrative agent, for the benefit of the lenders, pursuant to a Warrant Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2011, between Diamond LLC and Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC. The Tempus Warrant vests and becomes exercisable, subject to the provisions of the Tempus Warrant described below, upon the sixty-first day (the “Tempus Warrant Exercise Date”) following, among other things, this offering. Following the consummation of this offering, the Tempus Warrant would become exercisable on the Tempus Warrant Exercise Date as to an aggregate percentage of the fully-diluted outstanding common equity of Diamond LLC equal to the quotient of (1) the dollar amount by which the actual total repayments of principal on the Tempus Acquisition Loan from the date of the Tempus Warrant through the day immediately preceding the Tempus Warrant Exercise Date is less than a certain benchmark amount (the “Tempus Benchmark Amount”) as determined pursuant to the terms of the Tempus Warrant (which Tempus Benchmark Amount will not exceed $6,075,000, provided that the offering is consummated on or prior to June 30, 2013), divided by (2) the fair market value of the common equity of Diamond LLC as determined pursuant to the terms of the Tempus Warrant. The purchase price for each common unit of Diamond LLC purchasable upon exercise of the Tempus Warrant is $0.0001 per common unit. During the 60-day period following the consummation of this offering, Diamond LLC has the option to purchase the Tempus Warrant from the holder for a cash payment equal to the Tempus Benchmark Amount, less any cash payments made on the Tempus Acquisition Loan from the date of the Tempus Warrant through the date of the consummation of this offering. Because we intend to use approximately $ million of the net proceeds to us from this offering to repay all amounts owed under the Tempus Acquisition Loan, the Tempus Benchmark Amount will be zero, and we will repurchase the Tempus Warrant for no consideration pursuant to the terms of the Tempus Warrant.

In connection with the funding of the PMR Acquisition Loan pursuant to the Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of May 21, 2012, among DPM Acquisition, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Diamond LLC, the lenders party thereto and Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC, which was entered into in connection with the PMR Acquisition, Diamond LLC issued a warrant (the “PMR Warrant”) to Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC, as administrative agent, for the benefit of the lenders, pursuant to a Warrant Agreement, dated as of May 21, 2012, between Diamond LLC and Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC. The PMR Warrant vests and becomes exercisable, subject to the provisions of the PMR Warrant described below, upon the sixty-first day (the “PMR Warrant Exercise Date”) following, among other things, this offering. Following the consummation of this offering, the PMR Warrant would become exercisable on the PMR Warrant Exercise Date as to an aggregate percentage of the fully-diluted outstanding common equity of Diamond LLC equal to the quotient of (1) the dollar amount by which the actual total repayments of principal on the PMR Acquisition Loan from the date of the PMR Warrant through the day immediately preceding the PMR Warrant Exercise Date is less than a certain benchmark amount (the “PMR Benchmark Amount”) as determined pursuant to the terms of the PMR Warrant (which PMR Benchmark Amount will not exceed $15,525,000, provided that the offering is consummated on or prior to December 31, 2014), divided by (2) the fair market value of the common equity of Diamond LLC as

determined pursuant to the terms of the PMR Warrant. The purchase price for each common unit of Diamond LLC purchasable upon exercise of the PMR Warrant is $0.0001 per common unit. During the 60-day period following the consummation of this offering, Diamond LLC has the option to purchase the PMR Warrant from the holder for a cash payment equal to the PMR Benchmark Amount, less any cash payments made on the PMR Acquisition Loan from the date of the PMR Warrant through the date of the consummation of this offering. Because we intend to use approximately $ million of the net proceeds to us from this offering to repay all amounts owed under the PMR Acquisition Loan, the Tempus Benchmark Amount will be zero, and we will repurchase the PMR Warrant for no consideration pursuant to the terms of the PMR Warrant.

Certain investment advisory clients of Wellington Management Company, LLP, which are also Wellington Management Investors, are lenders under each of the Tempus Acquisition Loan and the PMR Acquisition Loan, as described above under “—Guggenheim Relationship.”

Mr. Bentley, who is currently the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Diamond LLC and Diamond International and, upon completion of the Reorganization Transactions and this offering, will continue to be Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Diamond International, is also a partner of Mackinac Partners, LLC, a financial advisory firm that provides consulting services to us. The services provided by Mackinac Partners, LLC to Diamond LLC include advisory services relating to mergers and acquisitions, capital formation and corporate finance, litigation support, interim management services relating to our European subsidiary, and restructuring of certain subsidiaries. In addition to these services, which Mackinac Partners, LLC provides at hourly rates, Mackinac Partners, LLC also provides to us strategic advisory services of one of its managing partners at a rate of $66,667 per month. For the year ended December 31, 2012, we paid a total of approximately $5.0 million in fees and expense reimbursements to Mackinac Partners, LLC for a variety of consulting services provided to us.

In connection with the July 2011 investment in Diamond LLC by the Wellington Management Investors, Diamond LLC agreed to issue options to Messrs. Cloobeck, Palmer and Kraff to mitigate the dilutive effect of this investment on Messrs. Cloobeck, Palmer and Kraff, in their respective capacities as indirect equityholders in Diamond LLC. In part to enable Diamond LLC to fulfill this obligation, in October 2012, Diamond LLC established the Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2012 Plan”), which authorized awards of Class B common units of Diamond LLC (each of which will be contributed to Diamond International by the holder in exchange for shares of our common stock in connection with the Reorganization Transactions) to participants in the 2012 Plan. In October 2012, Diamond LLC issued Class B common units of Diamond LLC under the 2012 Plan as follows: 3.165 Class B common units to Mr. Cloobeck, 29.630 Class B common units to Mr. Palmer and 33.458 Class B common units to Mr. Kraff in full satisfaction of Diamond LLC’s agreement to issue options to these individuals as described above. These Class B common units were 100% vested as of the grant date.

In October 2012, Diamond LLC also issued Class B common units of Diamond LLC pursuant to the 2012 Plan to Messrs. Bentley and Lanznar and certain other participants in the 2012 Plan. Messrs. Bentley and Lanznar were each issued 15.0 Class B common units. The Class B common units were 100% vested as of the grant date; however, because these Class B units are tied to service to Diamond LLC, they are subject to forfeiture if the grantee’s employment with Diamond LLC is terminated for cause (as defined in the applicable grant agreements) and are subject to repurchase by Diamond LLC (at its option) if the grantee’s employment with Diamond LLC is terminated for any reason other than termination by Diamond LLC for cause. Under the award agreements, these Class B units are not entitled to any distributions nor do they have any fair value unless and until the cumulative amount distributed to holders of Diamond LLC common units other than these Class B common units is at least equal to a specified amount.

Howard S. Lanznar, who is currently the Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer of Diamond LLC and Diamond International, and will continue to serve as Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer of Diamond International, is a partner of the law firm of Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP. Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP rendered legal services to Diamond LLC and its subsidiaries in 2012 and continues to serve as our counsel (including in connection with this offering). Diamond LLC and its subsidiaries paid aggregate fees of approximately $4.0 million to Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP during 2012.

Diamond LLC is party to a Second Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of July 21, 2011, relating to the common units of Diamond LLC (as well as shares of common stock of a successor to Diamond LLC into which such common units are converted in connection with an initial public offering) held by Cloobeck Diamond Parent, LLC, 1818 Partners, LLC, the Guggenheim Investor, the Wellington Management Investors and the Silver Rock Investors.

Under the Registration Rights Agreement, the Existing Equityholders party thereto have certain registration rights with respect to shares of common stock of Diamond International issued to such Existing Equityholders in exchange for the common units of Diamond LLC contributed by such Existing Equityholders in connection with the Reorganization Transactions. After consummation of this offering, any of the Existing Equityholders party to the Registration Rights Agreement that continues to hold shares of common stock of Diamond International will continue to have registration rights under the Registration Rights Agreement with respect to such shares.

Demand Registration Rights. The Registration Agreement provides that after consummation of this offering, (1) the Guggenheim Investor (subject to certain minimum thresholds for ownership of common stock of Diamond International), (2) the Wellington Management Investors (subject to certain minimum thresholds for ownership of common stock of Diamond International) or (3) the holders of a majority of the registrable securities (as defined in the Registration Rights Agreement) held by the Guggenheim Investor, the Wellington Management Investors and the Silver Rock Investors (collectively, the “Demand Right Investors”), may require that we register all or part of their shares, subject to certain conditions set forth in the Registration Rights Agreement. Upon receipt of a demand registration request, we will give notice to all other holders of registrable securities and will use our best efforts to effect the registration of all registrable securities requested to be registered pursuant to the demand registration and all other registrable securities requested to be registered by other holders of registrable securities in written notices delivered to us within 30 days of the demand notice. We will not be obligated to effect more than three demand registrations requested by the Demand Right Investors, other than short form registrations requested by the Demand Right Investors, for which we must accept an unlimited number of demand registration requests, subject to applicable minimum thresholds. We must pay all expenses in connection with these demand registrations. If a demand registration is an underwritten offering and the managing underwriters determine that the number of shares of common stock requested to be included in such registration is too high, we may cut back the number of shares to be included in the offering pursuant to these demand registration rights.

Piggyback Registration Rights. Under the Registration Rights Agreement, whenever we propose to register any shares of common stock of Diamond International under the Securities Act for our own account or for the account of any holder of such shares (other than (1) pursuant to a demand registration described above or (2) pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-4 or S-8 or any similar or successor form and other than in connection with a registration the primary purpose of which is to register debt securities (i.e., in connection with a so-called “equity kicker”)), we will give prompt written notice to all holders of registrable securities of our intention to effect such a registration and will use our best efforts to effect the registration of all registrable securities requested to be registered in written notices delivered to us within 30 days of the demand notice. We

must pay all expenses in connection with these piggyback registrations. If the managing underwriters in an underwritten primary registration determine that the number of shares of common stock requested to be included in such registration is too high, we may cut back the number of shares to be included in the offering pursuant to these piggyback registration rights.

Holdback Agreement. Under the Registration Rights Agreement, we and the holders of registrable securities are prohibited from effecting any sale or distribution of our equity securities during the seven days prior to and the 180-day period beginning on the effective date of this offering (except as part of this offering) unless the underwriters managing this offering otherwise agree (which agreement shall be equally applicable to all holders of registrable securities). Furthermore, the rights of each of the Existing Equityholders and each of our directors and executive officers to sell their shares of common stock will be subject to the terms of a lock-up agreement they will enter into with the underwriters for this offering. See “Shares Eligible for Future Sale” and “Underwriting (Conflicts of Interest).”

In connection with the Reorganization Transactions, we and certain of our Existing Equityholders that collectively will hold approximately % of our outstanding common stock following this offering (or % if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full) will enter into the Director Designation Agreement. Pursuant to the Director Designation Agreement, subject to its fiduciary duties, our Board of Directors will agree to take the following actions:

The Director Designation Agreement will also provide that the Existing Equityholders party thereto will be subject to a standstill provision following the consummation of our initial public offering, providing that none of such Existing Equityholders will, among other things:

Additionally, in connection with the Reorganization Transactions, the Existing Equityholders party to the Director Designation Agreement will enter into the Stockholders Agreement, pursuant to which each of them will

agree to cause the shares of our common stock held by it to be voted, in person or by proxy at any meeting of our stockholders called for such purpose, for the nominees of our Board of Directors designated as described above and for all other persons nominated by our Board of Directors for election thereto. An irrevocable proxy will be granted to Cloobeck Diamond Parent, LLC to vote the shares of our common stock held by the parties to the Stockholders Agreement in the manner described above. The Stockholders Agreement will cover an aggregate of shares of our common stock, representing approximately % of our outstanding common stock after this offering. Accordingly, until such time as the Existing Equityholders party to the Stockholders Agreement, in the aggregate, control the voting of less than a majority of our outstanding common stock, the individuals nominated by our Board of Directors, including those designated pursuant to the Director Designation Agreement, will be assured to be elected to our Board of Directors.

Each of the Director Designation Agreement and the Stockholders Agreement, and the rights and obligations of the parties thereunder, will terminate when the Existing Equityholders party thereto no longer own an aggregate of at least 20% of our outstanding common stock.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, which will be in effect upon the consummation of this offering, limits the liability of our directors to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. Prior to the consummation of this offering, we intend to enter into indemnification agreements with our directors and executive officers. We also expect to maintain directors and officers liability insurance. For further information, see “Management—Director and Officer Indemnification Agreements.”

Diamond LLC currently has a written policy regarding review and approval of related party transactions. Pursuant to this policy, a related party transaction is a transaction in which Diamond LLC or any of its subsidiaries was, is or will be a participant and the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and in which any related party had, has or will have a direct or indirect interest. For purposes of the policy, a related party means the following:

Under the policy, in the event that a related party transaction is identified prior to being consummated or amended, the transaction must be submitted to the audit committee of Diamond LLC, or, if not practicable, to the chair of the audit committee, for approval.

Following the consummation of the Reorganization Transactions and this offering, Diamond International will have in place a written policy regarding review and approval of related party transactions, which will contain policies and procedures substantially similar to those set forth above.

The following summary describes the material provisions of our capital stock, but it is not complete and is qualified in its entirety by our organizational documents. We urge you to read our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws, which are included as Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2 to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.

Upon the consummation of this offering, our authorized capital stock will consist of shares, of which are designated common stock with a par value of $0.01 per share and of which are designated as preferred stock with a par value of $0.01 per share.

Upon completion of this offering, assuming an initial public offering price of $ per share (the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus, shares of common stock will be issued and outstanding (and shares of common stock will be issued and outstanding if the underwriters fully exercise their option to purchase additional shares), and no shares of preferred stock will be issued and outstanding. The number of shares of common stock which we expect to issue in the Island One Acquisition and, accordingly, the number of shares of common stock which we expect to be outstanding after this offering, are subject to change based upon the initial public offering price per share, as discussed under “Organizational Structure—Island One Acquisition.”

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws contain provisions that are intended to enhance the likelihood of continuity and stability in the composition of our Board of Directors and which may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a future takeover or change in control of our company. These include provisions that classify our Board of Directors, limit stockholders’ ability to remove directors, provide advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals and nominations, prohibit stockholders from acting by written consent or calling special meetings and allow our Board of Directors to designate the terms of and issue new series of preferred stock without stockholder approval.

Voting Rights. The holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders. Holders of our common stock will not have cumulative voting rights in the election of directors. In general, directors standing for election at an annual meeting of stockholders will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast in the election of directors at the annual meeting, either in person or represented by properly authorized proxy.

Dividends. The holders of our common stock are entitled to receive ratably such dividends as may be declared by our Board of Directors out of funds legally available therefor.

Other Rights. In the event of a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of us, holders of our common stock are entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining after payment of liabilities and the liquidation preference, if any, of any then outstanding preferred stock. Holders of our common stock are not entitled to preemptive rights and have no subscription, redemption or conversion privileges. All outstanding shares of common stock are, and all shares of common stock issued by us in the offering will be, fully paid and nonassessable. The rights, preferences and privileges of holders of common stock are subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of shares of any series of preferred stock which our Board of Directors may designate and that we issue in the future.

Our Board of Directors is authorized to issue shares of preferred stock in one or more series, with such designations, preferences and relative participating, optional or other special rights, qualifications, limitations or restrictions as determined by our Board of Directors, without any further vote or action by our stockholders. We

believe that the Board of Directors’ authority to set the terms of, and our ability to issue, preferred stock will provide flexibility in connection with possible financing transactions in the future. The issuance of preferred stock, however, could adversely affect the voting power of holders of common stock and the likelihood that such holders will receive dividend payments or payments upon a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the company.

We are party to a Registration Agreement with certain of the Existing Equityholders, pursuant to which such Existing Equityholders have certain registration rights with respect to our common stock. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Registration Rights Agreement.”

In connection with the Reorganization Transactions, certain of our current equityholders that collectively will hold approximately % of our outstanding common stock following this offering (or % if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full) will enter into the Stockholders Agreement, pursuant to which such current equityholders will agree, subject to the terms of the Stockholders Agreement, in any election of members of our Board of Directors, to vote their shares of our common stock in favor of our Chief Executive Officer, as well as individuals designated by an entity controlled by our founder and Chairman and an affiliate of Guggenheim Partners, LLC, pursuant to the Director Designation Agreement. The Director Designation Agreement will also provide that the Existing Equityholders party thereto will be subject to certain standstill provisions following the consummation of our initial public offering preventing the Existing Equityholders from taking certain actions with respect to us, subject to the terms set forth in the Director Designation Agreement. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions – Director Designation Agreement and Stockholders Agreement.”

We will be subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, an anti-takeover statute that provides that if a person acquires 15% or more of the voting stock of a Delaware corporation, such person becomes an “interested stockholder” and may not engage in certain “business combinations” with the corporation for a period of three years from the time such person acquired 15% or more of the corporation’s voting stock, unless (1) the board of directors approves the acquisition of stock or the merger transaction before the time that the person becomes an interested stockholder, (2) the interested stockholder owns at least 85% of the outstanding voting stock of the corporation at the time the merger transaction commences (excluding voting stock owned by directors who are also officers and certain employee stock plans) or (3) the merger transaction is approved by the board of directors and by the affirmative vote at a meeting, not by written consent, of stockholders of two-thirds of the holders of the outstanding voting stock that is not owned by the interested stockholder. The applicability of this provision to us would be expected to have an anti-takeover effect with respect to transactions not approved in advance by our Board of Directors, including discouraging attempts that might result in a premium over the market price for your shares.

Anti-Takeover Effects of Our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, Our Amended and Restated Bylaws and Delaware Law

Authorized but Unissued Shares. The authorized but unissued shares of our common stock and our preferred stock will be available for future issuance without any further vote or action by our stockholders. These additional shares may be utilized for a variety of corporate purposes, including future public offerings to raise additional capital, corporate acquisitions and employee benefit plans. The existence of authorized but unissued shares of our common stock and our preferred stock could render more difficult or discourage an attempt to obtain control over us by means of a tender offer or merger or otherwise.

Stockholder Action by Written Consent. Delaware law provides that, unless otherwise stated in a corporation’s certificate of incorporation, the stockholders may act by written consent without a meeting. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that any action required or permitted to be taken by our stockholders at an annual meeting or special meeting of the stockholders may only be taken at an annual or special meeting before which it is properly brought, and not by written consent without a meeting.

Special Meeting of Stockholders and Advance Notice Requirements for Stockholder Proposals. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws provide that, except as otherwise required by law, special meetings of the stockholders can only be called by (a) our chairman of the Board of Directors, (b) our chief executive officer or (c) a majority of the Board of Directors through a special resolution. Our amended and restated bylaws also include advance notice procedures and requirements for stockholder proposals to be brought before an annual meeting of the stockholders, including the nomination of directors. Stockholders at an annual meeting may only consider the proposals specified in the notice of meeting or brought before the meeting by or at the direction of the Board of Directors, or by a stockholder of record on the record date for the meeting, who is entitled to vote at the meeting and who has delivered a timely written notice in proper form to our secretary, of the stockholder’s intention to bring such business before the meeting. These provisions could have the effect of delaying until the next stockholder meeting any stockholder actions, even if they are favored by the holders of a majority of our outstanding voting securities.

Number, Election and Removal of the Board of Directors. Upon the closing of the offering, our Board of Directors will consist of seven directors, divided into three classes (two classes of two directors and one class of three directors). Our certificate of incorporation authorizes a board of directors consisting of at least , but no more than , members, with the number of directors to be fixed from time to time by our Board of Directors. Any additional directorships resulting from an increase in the number of directors will be distributed among the three classes so that, as nearly as possible, each class shall consist of one-third of the directors. At each annual meeting of stockholders, a class of directors will be elected for a three-year term to succeed the directors of the same class whose terms are then expiring. As a result, a portion of our Board of Directors will be elected each year. The division of our Board of Directors into three classes with staggered terms may delay or prevent a change of our management or a change in control of our company. Between stockholder meetings, directors may be removed by our stockholders only for cause, and the Board of Directors may appoint new directors to fill vacancies or newly created directorships. These provisions may deter a stockholder from removing incumbent directors and from simultaneously gaining control of the Board of Directors by filling the resulting vacancies with its own nominees. Consequently, the existence of these provisions may have the effect of deterring hostile takeovers.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the exclusive forum for (1) any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf, (2) any action asserting a claim of breach of fiduciary duty owed by any director or officer to us or our stockholders or creditors, (3) any action asserting a claim against us or any director or officer pursuant to the Delaware General Corporation Law, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or our amended and restated bylaws or (4) any action asserting a claim against us or any director or officer governed by the internal affairs doctrine. Although we believe this provision benefits us by providing increased consistency in the application of Delaware law in the types of lawsuits to which it applies, the provision may have the effect of discouraging lawsuits against our directors and officers.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, which will be in effect upon the consummation of this offering, limits the liability of our directors to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. The effect of these provisions is to eliminate our rights and those of our stockholders, through stockholders’ derivative suits on behalf of our company, to recover monetary damages from a director for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, including breaches resulting from grossly negligent behavior. However, exculpation does not apply to any director if the director acted in bad faith, knowingly or intentionally violated the law, authorized illegal dividends or redemptions or derived an improper benefit from his or her actions as a director. In addition, our amended and restated bylaws, which will be in effect upon the consummation of this offering, provide that we will indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. Prior to the consummation of this offering, we intend to enter into indemnification agreements with our directors and executive officers. These agreements will require us to indemnify these individuals to the fullest extent permitted under Delaware law against liabilities that may arise by reason of their service to us, and to advance expenses incurred as a result of any proceeding against them as to which they could be indemnified. We also expect to maintain directors and officers liability insurance.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be extended to directors, officers or controlling persons, we have been informed that in the opinion of the SEC, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by us of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, we will, unless in the opinion of our counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and we will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company and its telephone number is (800) 509-5586.

Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our common stock, and we cannot assure you that a liquid trading market for our common stock will develop or be sustained after this offering. The sale of a substantial amount of our common stock in the public market after this offering could adversely affect the prevailing market price of our common stock. Furthermore, because the shares of our common stock outstanding prior to the consummation of this offering will be subject to the contractual and legal restrictions on resale described below, a substantial amount of common stock could be sold in the public market after these restrictions lapse, which could adversely affect the prevailing market price of our common stock and our ability to raise equity capital in the future.

Upon completion of this offering, we expect to have outstanding shares ( shares if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full) of common stock. Of these shares, all of the shares of common stock sold in this offering will be freely tradable without restriction or further registration under the Securities Act, unless the shares are purchased by “affiliates” as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act. Any shares purchased by an affiliate may not be resold except pursuant to an effective registration statement or an applicable exemption from registration, including the exemption provided by Rule 144 under the Securities Act. The remaining shares ( shares if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full) of common stock outstanding after this offering will be “restricted securities” as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act. These restricted securities may be sold in the public market only if they are registered or if they qualify for an exemption from registration under Rule 144 under the Securities Act.

As a result of the lock-up agreements described below and the holding period requirement of Rule 144, and subject to the other provisions of Rule 144 described below, an additional restricted shares will be available for sale in the public market (or restricted shares if the underwriters’ over-allotment option is exercised in full), commencing six months after the consummation of this offering.

The numbers of shares of common stock referenced above are based on an assumed initial public offering price of $ per share (the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus). The number of shares of common stock which we expect to issue in the Island One Acquisition and, accordingly, the number of shares of common stock which we expect to be outstanding after this offering, are subject to change based upon the initial public offering price per share, as discussed under “Organizational Structure—Island One Acquisition.”

Our officers, directors, the Island One Equityholder and the principal stockholders have each agreed that, subject to certain exceptions, they will not offer, sell, contract to sell, pledge or otherwise dispose of, directly or indirectly, any shares of our common stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for any shares of our common stock, enter into a transaction that would have the same effect, or enter into any swap, hedge or other arrangement that transfers, in whole or in part, any of the economic consequences of ownership of our common stock, whether any of these transactions are to be settled by delivery of our common stock or other securities, in cash or otherwise, or publicly disclose the intention to make any offer, sale, pledge or disposition, or to enter into any transaction, swap, hedge or other arrangement, without, in each case, the prior written consent of Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC for a period of 180 days after the date of this prospectus. However, in the event we cease to be an emerging growth company (as defined in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act), and either (1) during the last 17 days of the initial 180-day lock-up period, we release earnings results or material news or a material event relating to us occurs or (2) prior to the expiration of the initial lock-up period, we announce that we will release earnings results during the 16-day period beginning on the last day of the initial lock-up period, then, in each case, the lock-up period will be extended until the expiration of the 18-day period beginning on the date of release of the earnings results or the occurrence of the material news or material event, as applicable, unless Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC waives, in writing, such extension.

Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, in its sole discretion, may release the common stock and other securities subject to the lock-up agreements described above in whole or in part at any time. When determining whether or not to release the common stock and other securities from lock-up agreements, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC will consider, among other factors, the holder’s reasons for requesting the release and the number of shares of common stock or other securities for which the release is being requested.

In general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect, beginning 90 days after the date of this prospectus, (1) a person who is not our affiliate and has not been our affiliate for the previous three months, and who beneficially owns shares of our common stock that constitute restricted securities, may sell all such shares once at least six months have passed since the shares were last acquired from us or one of our affiliates; and (2) an affiliate or a person who has been our affiliate within the previous 90 days, and who beneficially owns shares of our common stock, may sell within any three-month period a number of shares (in the case of shares that constitute “restricted securities,” once at least six months have passed since the shares were last acquired from us or one of our other affiliates) that does not exceed the greater of:

Sales of shares of common stock under Rule 144 may also be subject to the availability of current public information about us. Sales under Rule 144 by affiliates or persons who have been affiliates within the previous 90 days are also subject to manner of sale provisions and notice requirements.

Under certain circumstances, the holders of securities are entitled to “tack” the holding period of securities exchanged for the currently held securities onto the holding period of the currently held securities (i.e., the Rule 144 holding period will be deemed to have commenced on the date the original securities were acquired). With respect to our stockholders, it is likely that certain of such stockholders would not be permitted to “tack” the holding period of our common stock and for those stockholders the holding period would commence on the date of the consummation of the Reorganization Transactions.

We intend to file a registration statement on Form S-8 under the Securities Act covering shares of common stock issuable under the Diamond Resorts International, Inc. 2013 Incentive Compensation Plan and the Diamond Resorts International, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, including pursuant to the stock options to be issued contemporaneously with the consummation of this offering. This registration statement is expected to be filed as soon as practicable after the date of this prospectus. Shares issued upon the exercise of stock options after the effective date of the applicable Form S-8 registration statement will be eligible for resale in the public market without restriction, subject to the Rule 144 limitations applicable to affiliates and the lock-up agreements described above.

The following discussion is a general summary of the material U.S. federal income tax considerations with respect to your acquisition, ownership and disposition of our common stock, and applies if you (1) purchase our common stock in this offering, (2) will hold the common stock as a capital asset and (3) are a “Non-U.S. Holder.” You are a Non-U.S. Holder if, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, you are a beneficial owner of shares of our common stock and are neither a partnership or other entity classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes nor:

The discussion below assumes that a Non-U.S. Holder’s investment in our common stock is not effectively connected with a trade or business conducted in the United States by a Non-U.S. holder or, if a tax treaty applies to the Non-U.S. Holder, that its investment is not attributable to a United States permanent establishment maintained by the Non-U.S. Holder.

This summary does not address all of the U.S. federal income tax considerations that may be relevant to you in the light of your particular circumstances or if you are a beneficial owner subject to special treatment under U.S. federal income tax laws (such as if you are a controlled foreign corporation, passive foreign investment company, company that accumulates earnings to avoid U.S. federal income tax, foreign tax-exempt organization, bank, financial institution, broker or dealer in securities, insurance company, regulated investment company, real estate investment trust, person who holds our common stock as part of a hedging or conversion transaction or as part of a short-sale or straddle, U.S. expatriate, former long-term permanent resident of the United States or partnership or other pass-through entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes). This summary does not discuss non-income taxes (except, to a limited extent below, U.S. federal estate tax), any aspect of the U.S. federal alternative minimum tax or state, local or non-U.S. taxation. This summary is based on current provisions of the Code, Treasury regulations, judicial opinions, published positions of the Internal Revenue Service, which we refer to as the IRS, and all other applicable authorities. All these authorities are subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect.

We urge prospective investors to consult their own tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal, state, local and non-U.S. income and other tax considerations of acquiring, holding and disposing of shares of our common stock.

Although we do not anticipate that we will make any distributions on our common stock in the foreseeable future, to the extent we make distributions on our common stock out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits, such distributions will be treated as ordinary dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Dividends paid to Non-U.S. Holders will be subject to U.S. withholding tax at a rate of 30% of the gross amount of the dividend, unless you are eligible for a reduced rate of withholding tax under an applicable income tax treaty and you properly provide us with an IRS Form W-8BEN, or successor form, claiming an exemption from or reduction in withholding under the applicable income tax treaty. Special certification and other requirements may apply if you hold shares of our common stock through certain foreign intermediaries. Distributions in excess of

our current or accumulated earnings and profits will be treated as a non-taxable return of capital up to your adjusted tax basis in your shares of our common stock. To the extent that such distributions exceed the adjusted tax basis of your shares, they will give rise to a U.S. tax liability only if you otherwise would be subject to tax on any gain from the sale or disposition of your shares, as described below. If it cannot be determined at the time a distribution is made whether the distribution will exceed our current and accumulated earnings and profits, then the distribution will be subject to withholding at the rate applicable to ordinary dividends. However, you may seek a refund of these amounts from the IRS if it is subsequently determined that the distribution did, in fact, exceed our current and accumulated earnings and profits.

Subject to the discussion of backup withholding below, you generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on any gain realized upon the sale or other disposition of your shares of our common stock unless:

If you are described in the first bullet point above, you generally will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at a rate of 30% on the gain realized, although the gain may be offset by certain U.S. source capital losses realized during the same taxable year. Non-U.S. Holders should consult any applicable income tax or other treaties that may provide for different rules.

We must report annually to the IRS and to you the amount of any dividends we pay to you and the amount of tax withheld. Dividends or proceeds from the disposition of stock that are paid to you may be subject to information reporting and backup withholding unless you provide proper certification of your status as a Non-U.S. Holder or an IRS Form W-8BEN or you provide other certification establishing that you qualify for an exemption (an “exempt recipient”) and neither we nor our paying agent has actual knowledge (or reason to know) that you are a United States person. You generally may obtain a refund of any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules that exceed your U.S. income tax liability by filing a refund claim with the IRS.

In general, backup withholding and information reporting will not apply to the payment of proceeds from the disposition of our common stock through the non-U.S. office of a broker, except that in the case of a broker that is a United States person or has certain specified relationships or connections with the United States, information reporting will apply unless the broker has documentary evidence in its files that you are not a United States person and the broker does not have actual knowledge (or reason to know) that you are a United States person and certain other conditions are satisfied, or you otherwise establish an exemption. Backup withholding will apply if the sale is subject to information reporting and the broker has actual knowledge that you are a United States person.

You should consult your own tax advisors regarding the application of the information reporting and backup withholding rules to you.

U.S. tax legislation (“FATCA”) enacted in 2010 and subsequent regulations provide that a 30% withholding tax will be imposed on distributions (for payments made after December 31, 2013) and the gross proceeds from a sale of shares (for sales made after December 31, 2016) to a foreign entity if such entity fails to satisfy certain new disclosure and reporting rules. In general, these new disclosure and reporting rules require that (i) in the case of a foreign financial entity, the entity identify and provide information in respect of financial accounts held (directly or indirectly) by U.S. persons and U.S.-owned foreign entities, and (ii) in the case of a non-financial foreign entity, the entity identify and provide information in respect of substantial U.S. owners of such entity. An intergovernmental agreement between the United States and an applicable foreign country may modify these requirements. In the event of noncompliance with the revised requirements, withholding at a rate of 30% on distributions in respect of, and gross proceeds from the sale of, our shares held by or through such foreign entities would be imposed. You should consult with your own tax advisors regarding the application of these rules to your investment in our common stock.

Shares of our common stock owned or treated as owned by an individual who is not a citizen or resident (as defined for U.S. federal estate tax purposes) of the United States at the time of his or her death will be included in the individual’s gross estate for U.S. federal estate tax purposes and therefore may be subject to U.S. federal estate tax unless an applicable tax treaty provides otherwise.

The preceding discussion of U.S. federal income and estate tax considerations is for general information only. It is not tax advice. Each prospective investor should consult their own tax advisor regarding the particular U.S. federal, state, local and non-U.S. tax consequences of purchasing, holding and disposing of our common stock, including the consequences of any proposed change in applicable laws.

Under the terms and subject to the conditions contained in an underwriting agreement dated , 2013, we and the selling stockholders have agreed to sell to the underwriters named below, for whom Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC is acting as representative (the “Representative”), the following respective numbers of shares of common stock:

The underwriting agreement provides that the underwriters are obligated to purchase all the shares of common stock in the offering if any are purchased, other than those shares covered by the option described below. The underwriting agreement also provides that, if an underwriter defaults, the purchase commitments of non-defaulting underwriters may be increased or the offering may be terminated.

We and the selling stockholders have granted to the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase on a pro rata basis up to additional shares from certain selling stockholders at the initial public offering price less the underwriting discounts and commissions. The option may be exercised only to cover any over-allotments of common stock.

The underwriters propose to offer the shares of common stock initially at the public offering price on the cover of this prospectus and to selling group members at that price less a selling concession of $ per share. The underwriters and selling group members may allow a discount of $ per share on sales to other brokers or dealers. After the initial public offering the representatives may change the public offering price and concession and discount to brokers and dealers.

The following table summarizes the compensation and estimated expenses we and the selling stockholders will pay:

We have agreed to reimburse the underwriters for $ of their fees and expenses in connection with this offering, and we have agreed to offer the Representative the opportunity to act as the lead underwriter or other similar role, as applicable, of any financing used to refinance our Senior Secured Notes that takes place on or prior to December 31, 2014. The representative has informed us that it does not expect sales to accounts over which the underwriters have discretionary authority to exceed 5% of the shares of common stock being offered.

We have agreed that we will not offer, sell, contract to sell, pledge or otherwise dispose of, directly or indirectly, or file with the SEC a registration statement under the Securities Act relating to, any shares of our common stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for any shares of our common stock, or publicly disclose the intention to make any offer, sale, pledge, disposition or filing, without the prior written consent of Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC for a period of 180 days after the date of this prospectus. However, in the event we cease to be an emerging growth company (as defined in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act) and either (1) during the last 17 days of the “lock-up” period, we release earnings results or material news or a material event relating to us occurs or (2) prior to the expiration of the “lock-up” period, we announce that we will release earnings results during the 16-day period beginning on the last day of the “lock-up” period, then in either case the expiration of the “lock-up” will be extended until the expiration of the 18-day period beginning on the date of the release of the earnings results or the occurrence of the material news or event, as applicable, unless Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC waives, in writing, such an extension.

Our officers and directors and principal stockholders have agreed that they will not offer, sell, contract to sell, pledge or otherwise dispose of, directly or indirectly, any shares of our common stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for any shares of our common stock, enter into a transaction that would have the same effect, or enter into any swap, hedge or other arrangement that transfers, in whole or in part, any of the economic consequences of ownership of our common stock, whether any of these transactions are to be settled by delivery of our common stock or other securities, in cash or otherwise, or publicly disclose the intention to make any offer, sale, pledge or disposition, or to enter into any transaction, swap, hedge or other arrangement, without, in each case, the prior written consent of Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC for a period of 180 days after the date of this prospectus. However, in the event we cease to be an emerging growth company (as defined in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act) and either (1) during the last 17 days of the “lock-up” period, we release earnings results or material news or a material event relating to us occurs or (2) prior to the expiration of the “lock-up” period, we announce that we will release earnings results during the 16-day period beginning on the last day of the “lock-up” period, then in either case the expiration of the “lock-up” will be extended until the expiration of the 18-day period beginning on the date of the release of the earnings results or the occurrence of the material news or event, as applicable, unless Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC waives, in writing, such an extension.

The underwriters have reserved for sale at the initial public offering price up to shares of the common stock for employees, directors, personnel provided to us by HM&C and other persons associated with us who have expressed an interest in purchasing common stock in the offering. The number of shares available for sale to the general public in this offering will be reduced to the extent these persons purchase the reserved shares. Any reserved shares not so purchased will be offered by the underwriters to the general public on the same terms as the other shares.

We and the selling stockholders have agreed to indemnify the underwriters against liabilities under the Securities Act, or contribute to payments that the underwriters may be required to make in that respect.

We have applied to list the shares of our common stock on NYSE under the symbol “DRII.”

Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our common stock. The initial public offering price for our common stock will be determined by negotiation between us and the underwriters. The principal factors to be considered in determining the initial public offering price include the following:

We cannot assure you that the initial public offering price will correspond to the price at which our common stock will trade in the public market subsequent to this offering or that an active trading market will develop and continue after this offering.

In connection with the offering the underwriters may engage in stabilizing transactions, over-allotment transactions, syndicate covering transactions and penalty bids in accordance with Regulation M under the Exchange Act.

These stabilizing transactions, syndicate covering transactions and penalty bids may have the effect of raising or maintaining the market price of our common stock or preventing or retarding a decline in the market price of the common stock. As a result the price of our common stock may be higher than the price that might otherwise exist in the open market. These transactions may be effected on the NYSE or otherwise and, if commenced, may be discontinued at any time.

A prospectus in electronic format may be made available on the web sites maintained by one or more of the underwriters, or selling group members, if any, participating in this offering, and one or more of the underwriters participating in this offering may distribute prospectuses electronically. The representative may agree to allocate

a number of shares to underwriters and selling group members for sale to their online brokerage account holders. Internet distributions will be allocated by the underwriters and selling group members that will make internet distributions on the same basis as other allocations.

One or more affiliates of Guggenheim Securities, LLC will beneficially own more than 10% of our common stock after giving effect to the Reorganization Transactions. Furthermore, as described under “Use of Proceeds,” we expect to use approximately $ million of the net proceeds we receive from this offering to repay the PMR Acquisition Loan in full and approximately $ million of the net proceeds we receive from this offering to repay the Tempus Acquisition Loan in full. Affiliates of Guggenheim Securities, LLC are lenders under the PMR Acquisition Loan and the Tempus Acquisition Loan and will receive their pro rata share of these repayments. Additionally, we expect to offer to repurchase approximately $ million of our Senior Secured Notes, and affiliates of Guggenheim Securities, LLC currently are among the holders of those notes. Because Guggenheim Securities, LLC is an underwriter and its affiliates will beneficially own more than 10% of our common stock after giving effect to the Reorganization Transactions and will receive more than 5% of the net proceeds of this offering, Guggenheim Securities, LLC is deemed to have a “conflict of interest” under the applicable provisions of Rule 5121 of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. Accordingly, this offering is being made in compliance with the requirements of Rule 5121. In accordance with that rule, the appointment of a “qualified independent underwriter” is not required in connection with this offering because the underwriter primarily responsible for managing this public offering does not have a “conflict of interest” under Rule 5121, is not an affiliate of any underwriter that does have a “conflict of interest” under Rule 5121 and meets the requirements of paragraph (f)(12)(E) of Rule 5121. Guggenheim Securities, LLC will not make sales to any account over which it exercises discretionary authority without the specific written approval of the account holder.

The underwriters and their respective affiliates are full service financial institutions engaged in various activities, which may include securities trading, commercial and investment banking, financial advisory, investment management, investment research, principal investment hedging, financing and brokerage activities. Certain of the underwriters and their respective affiliates have from time to time performed, and may in the future perform, various financial advisory, commercial banking and investment banking services for us and for our affiliates in the ordinary course of business for which they have received and would receive customary compensation. In particular, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC acted as a structuring agent and bookrunner in our 2009, 2011 and 2013 consumer loan securitizations and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Guggenheim Securities LLC acted as initial purchasers in our 2010 offering of 12% Senior Secured Notes due 2018. Additionally, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC arranged one of our conduit facilities in 2008, arranged amendments to one of our conduit facilities in 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2013 and is expected to be the administrative agent and a lender under our Revolving Credit Facility.

In the ordinary course of their various business activities, the underwriters and their respective affiliates may make or hold a broad array of investments and actively trade debt and equity securities (or related derivative securities) and financial instruments (including bank loans) for their own account and for the accounts of their customers, and such investments and securities activities may involve securities and/or instruments of the issuer. If the underwriters or their respective affiliates have a lending relationship with us, certain of those underwriters or their affiliates routinely hedge, and certain other of those underwriters or their affiliates may hedge, their exposure to us consistent with their customary risk management policies. Typically, the underwriters and their respective affiliates would hedge such exposure by entering into transactions which consist of either the purchase of credit default swaps or the creation of short positions in our securities. The underwriters and their respective affiliates may also make investment recommendations and/or publish or express independent research views in respect of such securities or instruments and may at any time hold, or recommend to clients that they acquire, long and/or short positions in such securities and instruments.

In relation to each Member State of the European Economic Area which has implemented the Prospectus Directive (each such state being referred to herein as a Relevant Member State), each underwriter has represented and agreed that with effect from and including the date on which the Prospectus Directive is implemented in that Relevant Member State (each such date being referred to herein as a Relevant Implementation Date) it has not made and will not make an offer of shares to the public in that Relevant Member State prior to the publication of a prospectus in relation to the shares which has been approved by the competent authority in that Relevant Member State or, where appropriate, approved in another Relevant Member State and notified to the competent authority in that Relevant Member State, all in accordance with the Prospectus Directive, except that it may, with effect from and including the Relevant Implementation Date, make an offer of shares to the public in that Relevant Member State at any time:

For the purposes of this provision, the expression an “offer of shares to the public” in relation to any shares in any Relevant Member State means the communication in any form and by any means of sufficient information on the terms of the offer and the shares to be offered so as to enable an investor to decide to purchase or subscribe the shares, as the same may be varied in that Relevant Member State by any measure implementing the Prospectus Directive in that Relevant Member State and the expression “Prospectus Directive” means Directive 2003/71/EC (and amendments thereto, including the 2010 PD Amending Directive, to the extent implemented in the Relevant Member State) and includes any relevant implementing measure in each Relevant Member State. The expression 2010 PD Amending Directive means Directive 2010/73/EU.

Neither this prospectus nor any other offering material relating to the shares described in this prospectus has been submitted to the clearance procedures of the Autorité des Marchés Financiers or of the competent authority of another member state of the European Economic Area and notified to the Autorité des Marchés Financiers.

The shares have not been offered or sold and will not be offered or sold, directly or indirectly, to the public in France. Neither this prospectus nor any other offering material relating to the shares has been or will be:

The shares may be resold directly or indirectly, only in compliance with articles L.411-1, L.411-2, L.412-1 and L.621-8 through L.621-8-3 of the French Code monétaire et financier.

The shares may not be offered or sold by means of any document other than (i) in circumstances which do not constitute an offer to the public within the meaning of the Companies Ordinance (Cap.32, Laws of Hong Kong), or (ii) to “professional investors” within the meaning of the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap.571, Laws of Hong Kong) and any rules made thereunder, or (iii) in other circumstances which do not result in the document being a “prospectus” within the meaning of the Companies Ordinance (Cap.32, Laws of Hong Kong), and no advertisement, invitation or document relating to the shares may be issued or may be in the possession of any person for the purpose of issue (in each case whether in Hong Kong or elsewhere), which is directed at, or the contents of which are likely to be accessed or read by, the public in Hong Kong (except if permitted to do so under the laws of Hong Kong) other than with respect to shares which are or are intended to be disposed of only to persons outside Hong Kong or only to “professional investors” within the meaning of the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571, Laws of Hong Kong) and any rules made thereunder.

This prospectus has not been registered as a prospectus with the Monetary Authority of Singapore. Accordingly, this prospectus and any other document or material in connection with the offer or sale, or invitation for subscription or purchase, of the shares may not be circulated or distributed, nor may the shares be offered or sold, or be made the subject of an invitation for subscription or purchase, whether directly or indirectly, to persons in Singapore other than (i) to an institutional investor under Section 274 of the Securities and Futures Act, Chapter 289 of Singapore, or the SFA, (ii) to a relevant person, or any person pursuant to Section 275(1A), and in accordance with the conditions, specified in Section 275 of the SFA or (iii) otherwise pursuant to, and in accordance with the conditions of, any other applicable provision of the SFA.

Where the shares are subscribed or purchased under Section 275 by a relevant person which is: (a) a corporation (which is not an accredited investor) the sole business of which is to hold investments and the entire share capital of which is owned by one or more individuals, each of whom is an accredited investor; or (b) a trust (where the trustee is not an accredited investor) whose sole purpose is to hold investments and each beneficiary is an accredited investor, shares, debentures and units of shares and debentures of that corporation or the beneficiaries’ rights and interest in that trust shall not be transferable for 6 months after that corporation or that trust has acquired the shares under Section 275 except: (1) to an institutional investor under Section 274 of the SFA or to a relevant person, or any person pursuant to Section 275(1A), and in accordance with the conditions, specified in Section 275 of the SFA; (2) where no consideration is given for the transfer; or (3) by operation of law.

The securities have not been and will not be registered under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law of Japan. The shares have not been offered or sold and will not be offered or sold, directly or indirectly, in Japan or to, or for the benefit of, any resident of Japan (which term as used herein means any person resident in Japan, including any corporation or other entity organized under the laws of Japan), or to others for re-offering or resale, directly or indirectly, in Japan or to a resident of Japan, except pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of, and otherwise in compliance with, the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law and any other applicable laws, regulations and ministerial guidelines of Japan.

The shares may not be publicly offered in Switzerland and will not be listed on the SIX Swiss Exchange (“SIX”) or on any other stock exchange or regulated trading facility in Switzerland. This document has been prepared without regard to the disclosure standards for issuance prospectuses under art. 652a or art. 1156 of the Swiss Code of Obligations or the disclosure standards for listing prospectuses under art. 27 ff. of the SIX Listing Rules or the listing rules of any other stock exchange or regulated trading facility in Switzerland. Neither this document nor any other offering or marketing material relating to the shares or the offering may be publicly distributed or otherwise made publicly available in Switzerland.

Neither this document nor any other offering or marketing material relating to the offering, the Company, the shares have been or will be filed with or approved by any Swiss regulatory authority. In particular, this document will not be filed with, and the offer of shares will not be supervised by, the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA (FINMA), and the offer of shares has not been and will not be authorized under the Swiss Federal Act on Collective Investment Schemes (“CISA”). The investor protection afforded to acquirers of interests in collective investment schemes under the CISA does not extend to acquirers of shares.

This prospectus relates to an “Exempt Offer” (as such term is defined in the Offered Securities Rules of the Dubai Financial Services Authority (“DFSA”)) in accordance with the Offered Securities Rules of the DFSA. This prospectus is intended for distribution only to persons of a type specified in the Offered Securities Rules of the DFSA. It must not be delivered to, or relied on by, any other person. The DFSA has no responsibility for reviewing or verifying any documents in connection with Exempt Offers. The DFSA has not approved this prospectus nor taken steps to verify the information set forth herein and has no responsibility for the prospectus. The shares to which this prospectus relates may be illiquid and/or subject to restrictions on their resale. Prospective purchasers of the shares offered should conduct their own due diligence on the shares. If you do not understand the contents of this prospectus you should consult an authorized financial advisor.

The validity of the shares of common stock offered hereby will be passed upon for us by our counsel, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Chicago, Illinois. Howard S. Lanznar, a partner of Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, is the Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer of each of Diamond LLC and Diamond International. The underwriters have been represented by Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP, New York, New York, in connection with this offering.

The consolidated financial statements of Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2011 and 2012, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012, the consolidated financial statements of Pacific Monarch Resorts, Inc. (Debtor-in-Possession) as of December 31, 2010 and 2011, and for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2011, and the combined financial statements of Resort Services Group, LLC, Monarch Grand Vacations Management, LLC, Monarch Owner Services, LLC and Monarch Owner Services, Inc. as of December 31, 2011 and 2012, and for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2012, included in this prospectus have been so included in reliance on the reports of BDO USA, LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, appearing elsewhere herein, given on the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.

The consolidated financial statements of Island One, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2011 and 2012, for the year ended December 31, 2012 and for the period from the date operations commenced (May 27, 2011) through December 31, 2011, included in this prospectus have been so included in reliance on the reports of Cross, Fernandez & Riley, LLP, independent certified public accountants, appearing elsewhere herein, given on the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.

We have filed with the SEC, a registration statement on Form S-1 under the Securities Act relating to the common stock to be sold in this offering. This prospectus does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration statement or the exhibits that are part of the registration statement. If we have made references in this prospectus to any contracts, agreements or other documents and also filed any of those contracts, agreements or other documents as exhibits to the registration statement, you should read the relevant exhibit for a more complete understanding of the document or the matter involved.

You may read, without charge, and copy, at prescribed rates, all or any portion of the registration statement or any reports, statements or other information in the files at the public reference room at the SEC’s principal office at 100 F Street NE, Washington, D.C., 20549. You may request copies of these documents, for a copying fee, by writing to the SEC. You may call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the operation of its public reference room. Our filings, including the registration statement, are also available to you on the Internet website maintained by the SEC at http://www.sec.gov.

We file annual, quarterly and current reports and other information with the SEC and after this offering we will also file proxy statements with the SEC. You may request copies of these documents, for a copying fee, by writing to the SEC. These reports, proxy statements and other information are also available to you on the Internet website of the SEC referred to above and our website www.diamondresorts.com (which is not part of this prospectus). However, these reports and other information so filed with the SEC do not constitute part of this prospectus, and purchasers of our common stock should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus and in any free writing prospectus filed with the SEC.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Diamond Resorts Corporation (“DRC”) is the issuer of the 12.0% senior secured notes due 2018 (“Senior Secured Notes”) and is the Registrant. All financial information in this report is of Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC (“DRP”), the parent of DRC and the parent guarantor under the Senior Secured Notes. DRP is a Nevada limited liability company created on March 28, 2007. DRP, together with its wholly-owned subsidiaries, is hereafter referred to as “Diamond Resorts” or the “Company.” On April 26, 2007, a third-party investor contributed $62.4 million cash and Cloobeck Diamond Parent, LLC (“CDP”), the Company’s majority equityholder, contributed $7.1 million of net assets based on historical book values in exchange for common and preferred units. The third-party investor was issued common and preferred units with a liquidation preference as well as a priority return of 17.0% per annum, compounded quarterly, payable upon certain events. The preferred units did not provide to the holder any participation or conversion rights. The common and preferred members’ liability is limited to their respective capital contributions. The capitalization of the Company occurred on April 27, 2007 simultaneously with the acquisition of and merger with Sunterra Corporation (“Sunterra” or the “Predecessor Company”) and cancellation of Sunterra’s outstanding common stock for $16.00 per share (“the Merger”). In July 2011, DRP completed an equity recapitalization transaction, pursuant to which it repurchased all of its preferred units and issued and redeemed common units in a series of private placement transactions.

The Company operates in the hospitality and vacation ownership industry, with an ownership base of more than 490,000 owner-families, or members, and a worldwide network of 295 destinations located in 32 countries throughout the continental United States (“U.S.”), Hawaii, Canada, Mexico, the Caribbean, Central America, South America, Europe, Asia, Australia and Africa. The Company’s resort network includes 80 Diamond Resorts branded properties that are managed by the Company. In addition, the Company’s network includes 211 affiliated resorts and hotels and four cruise itineraries, which do not carry the Company’s brand and are not managed by the Company, but are a part of the Company’s network and are available for its members to use as vacation destinations. As referenced in these financial statements, Diamond Resorts International^® and THE Club^® are trademarks of the Company.

The Company’s operations consist of two interrelated businesses: (i) hospitality and management services; and (ii) marketing and sales of Vacation Ownership Interests (“VOIs” or “Vacation Interests”) and consumer financing for purchasers of the Company’s VOIs.

Hospitality and Management Services. The Company manages 80 branded resort properties, which are located in the continental U.S., Hawaii, Mexico, the Caribbean and Europe, as well as the seven multi-resort trusts (the “Collections”). As the manager of the Company’s branded resorts and the Collections, it provides rental services, billing services, account collections, accounting and treasury functions, and communications and information technology services. In addition, for branded resorts, the Company provides an online reservation system and customer service contact center, operates the front desks, furnishes housekeeping, maintenance and human resources services and operates amenities such as golf courses, food and beverage venues and retail shops.

As an integral part of the Company’s hospitality and management services, it has entered into inventory recovery agreements with substantially all of the homeowners associations (“HOAs”) for its managed resorts in North America, together with similar arrangements with all of the Collections and a majority of the European managed resorts, whereby it recovers VOIs from members who fail to pay their annual maintenance fee or assessments due to, among other things, death or divorce or other life-cycle events or lifestyle changes. Because the cost of operating the managed resorts is spread across the Company’s member base, by recovering VOIs from members who have failed to pay their annual maintenance fee or assessments, the Company reduces bad debt

expense at the HOA and Collection level (which is a component of the management fees billed to members by each resort’s HOA or Collection association), supporting the financial well-being of those HOAs and Collections and providing the Company with additional VOIs for future sales.

HOAs. Each of the Diamond Resorts-branded resorts, other than certain resorts in the European Collection, is typically operated through an HOA, which is administered by a board of directors. Directors are elected by the owners of intervals at the resort (which may include one or more of the Collections) and may also include representatives appointed by the Company as the developer of the resort. As a result, the Company is entitled to voting rights with respect to directors of a given HOA by virtue of (i) its ownership of intervals at the related resort, (ii) its control of the Collections that hold intervals at the resort and/or (iii) its status as the developer of the resort. The board of directors of each HOA hires a management company to provide the services described above, which in the case of all Diamond Resorts-branded resorts, is the Company. The Company functions as an HOA for two resorts in St. Maarten and collects maintenance fees and pays operating expenses at these two resorts.

The management fees earned by the Company with respect to a resort are based on a cost-plus structure and are calculated based on the direct and indirect costs (including an allocation of a substantial portion of the Company’s overhead related to the provision of management services) incurred by the HOA of the applicable resort. Under the current resort management agreements, the Company receives management fees generally ranging from 10.0% to 15.0% of the other costs of operating the applicable resort. Unlike typical commercial lodging management contracts, the management fees earned by the Company are not impacted by changes in a resort’s average daily rate or occupancy level. Instead, the board of directors of the HOA for each resort engages in an annual budgeting process in which the board of directors of the HOA estimates the costs the HOA will incur for the coming year. In evaluating the anticipated costs of the HOA, the board of directors of the HOA considers the operational needs of the resort, the services and amenities that will be provided at or to the applicable resort and other costs of the HOA, some of which are impacted significantly by the location of the resort, size and type of the resort. Included in the anticipated operating costs of each HOA are its management fees, which generally range from 10.0% to 15.0% of the other anticipated operating costs of the HOA. The board of directors of each HOA discusses the various considerations and approves the annual budget, which determines the annual maintenance fees charged to each owner. One of the management services the Company provides to the HOA is the billing and collection of annual maintenance fees on the HOA’s behalf. Annual maintenance fees for a given year are generally billed during the previous November, due by January and deposited in a segregated or restricted account that the Company manages on behalf of the HOA. As a result, a substantial majority of the fees for February through December of each year are collected from owners in advance. Funds are released to the Company from these accounts on a monthly basis for the payment of management fees as it provides management services.

The Company’s HOA management contracts typically have initial terms of three to five years, with automatic one-year renewals. These contracts can generally only be terminated by the HOA upon a vote of the owners (which may include one or more of the Collections) prior to each renewal period, other than in some limited circumstances involving cause. In the case of the resorts the Company manages that are part of the European Collection (as defined below), generally the management agreements have either indefinite terms or long remaining terms (i.e., over 40 years) and can only be terminated for an uncured breach by the manager or a winding up of the European Collection. No HOA has terminated or elected not to renew any of the Company’s management contracts during the past five years. The Company generally has the right to terminate its HOA management contracts at any time upon notice to the HOA but has terminated only one immaterial HOA management contract during the past five years.

Each of the Collections is operated through a Collection association, which is administered by a board of directors. With the exception of PVC, which allows the developer to appoint the board of directors until 90.0% of all membership interests are sold, directors are elected by the points holders within the applicable Collection. The Company owns a significant number of points in each of the Collections, which it holds as inventory. The board of directors of each Collection hires a company to provide management services to the Collection, which in each case is the Company.

As with the Company’s HOA management contracts, management fees charged to the Collections in the U.S. are based on a cost-plus structure and are calculated based on the direct and indirect costs (including an allocation of the Company’s overhead related to the provision of management services) incurred by the Collection. Under the Company’s current Collection management agreements, it receives management fees of 15.0% of the costs of the applicable Collection (except with respect to the management agreement with MGVC, under which the Company receives a management fee of 10.0% of the costs of MGVC). The management fees are included in the budgets prepared by each Collection association, which determines the annual maintenance fee charged to each owner. One of the management services the Company provides to the Collections is the billing and collection of annual maintenance fees on the Collection’s behalf. Annual maintenance fees for a given year are generally billed during the previous November, due by January and deposited in a segregated or restricted account that the Company maintains on behalf of each Collection. As a result, a substantial majority of the fees for February through December of each year are collected from owners in advance. Funds are released to the Company from these accounts on a monthly basis for the payment of management fees as it provides the management services.

Apart from the management contract for the European Collection, the Company’s Collection management contracts generally have initial terms of three to five years, with automatic one to five year renewals and can generally only be terminated by the Collection upon a vote of the Collection’s members prior to each renewal period, other than in some limited circumstances involving cause. No Collection has terminated any of the Company’s management contracts during the past five years. Apart from the management contract for the European Collection, the Company generally has the right to terminate its Collection management contracts at any time upon notice to the Collection. The management contract for the European Collection has an indefinite term, can only be terminated by the European Collection for an uncured breach by the manager or a winding up of the European Collection, and may not be terminated by the manager.

points to stay at any of the Company’s branded and affiliated resorts. THE Club also offers its members a wide range of other benefits, such as the opportunity to purchase various products and services (such as consumer electronics, home appliances and insurance products) from third parties at discounted prices, for which the Company earns commissions. Dues payments for THE Club are billed and collected together with the annual maintenance fees billed to the Company’s members who are also members of THE Club.

Sales and Financing of VOIs. The Company markets and sells VOIs that provide access to its network of 80 Diamond Resorts-branded and 211 affiliated resorts and hotels and four cruise itineraries. Since late 2007, the Company has marketed and sold VOIs primarily in the form of points.

The VOI inventory that the Company reacquires pursuant to its inventory recovery agreements provides a low-cost, recurring supply of VOIs that it can sell to its current and prospective members. The VOI inventory is also supplemented by VOIs recovered from members who default on their consumer loans and by inventory acquired through recent strategic transactions.

The Company closes its VOI sales primarily through sales presentations referred to as tours. These tours occur at sales centers and include a tour of the resort properties, as well as an in-depth explanation of the points-based VOI system and the value proposition it offers the Company’s members. The tours are designed to provide guests with an in-depth overview of the company and its resort network, as well as a customized presentation to explain how the Company’s products and services can meet their vacationing needs.

The Company underwrites each loan application to assess the prospective buyer’s ability to pay through the credit evaluation score methodology developed by the Fair Isaac Corporation (“FICO”) based on credit files compiled and maintained by Experian (for U.S. residents) and Equifax (for Canadian residents). In underwriting each loan, the Company reviews a completed credit application and the credit bureau report and/or the applicant’s performance history with the Company, including any delinquency on existing loans with the Company, and considers in specified circumstances, among other factors, whether the applicant has been involved in bankruptcy proceedings within the previous 12 months and any judgments or liens, including civil judgments and tax liens, against the applicant.

The Company’s consumer finance servicing division includes underwriting, collection and servicing of its consumer loan portfolio. Loan collections and delinquencies are managed by utilizing current technology to minimize account delinquencies and maximize cash flow. The Company generally sells or securitizes a substantial portion of the consumer loans it generates from its customers through conduit and securitization financings. The Company also acts as servicer for consumer loan portfolios, including those sold or securitized through conduit or securitization financings, for which it receives a fee.

Through arrangements with three financial institutions in the United Kingdom, the Company brokers financing for qualified customers who purchase points through its European sales centers.

The following is a list of entities included in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements:

Some of the above entities, which include corporations, limited liability companies and partnerships, have several subsidiaries.

On August 31, 2010, the Company acquired from ILX Resorts Incorporated and its affiliates (collectively, “ILX”) certain resort management agreements, unsold VOIs and the rights to recover and resell such interests, a portfolio of consumer loans and certain real property and other assets (the “ILX Acquisition”) through its wholly-owned subsidiary ILXA for an aggregate cash purchase price of $30.7 million. In addition, ILXA assumed $4.0 million in liabilities as part of the purchase price. The ILX Acquisition added ten additional resorts to the Company’s resort network. The ILX Acquisition was financed through the ILXA Inventory Loan and the ILXA Receivables Loan. See Note 15—Borrowings for definitions and further detail on these borrowings.

On July 1, 2011, the Company acquired from Tempus Resorts International, Ltd. and its subsidiaries certain management agreements, unsold VOIs and the rights to recover and resell such interests, the seller’s consumer loan portfolio and certain real property and other assets (the “Tempus Resorts Acquisition”) through Mystic Dunes, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Tempus Acquisition, LLC, for an aggregate cash purchase price of $104.9 million. The Tempus Resorts Acquisition added two resorts to the Company’s owner resort network. In order to fund the Tempus Resorts Acquisition, Tempus Acquisition, LLC entered into the Tempus Acquisition Loan, Tempus Receivables Loan and the Tempus Inventory Loan. See Note 15—Borrowings for definitions and further detail on these borrowings.

On May 21, 2012, the Company completed the acquisition of certain assets of Pacific Monarch Resorts, Inc. and certain of its affiliates (the “PMR Acquisition”) through DPMA, a wholly-owned special-purpose subsidiary

of the Company, whereby DPMA acquired four management contracts, unsold VOIs and the rights to recover and resell such interests, a portfolio of consumer loans and certain real property and other assets for approximately $51.6 million in cash, plus the assumption of specified liabilities related to the acquired assets. The PMR Acquisition added nine locations to the Company’s resort network. In order to fund the PMR Acquisition, DPMA entered into the PMR Acquisition Loan, which is collateralized by substantially all of the assets of DPMA. See Note 15—Borrowings for definitions and further detail on this borrowing.

On October 5, 2012, the Company completed the acquisition of all of the issued and outstanding shares of Aegean Blue Holdings, Plc (the “Aegean Blue Acquisition”) through Diamond Resorts AB Acquisition Ltd, a wholly-owned special-purpose subsidiary of Diamond Resorts (Group Holdings) Plc. Pursuant to the Aegean Blue Acquisition, AB Acquisition Company, Ltd acquired certain management contracts, unsold VOIs and the rights to recover and resell such interests and certain other assets for approximately $6.5 million in cash, amounts that may become payable pursuant to an earn-out clause (which the Company recorded as a contingent liability) and the Company’s assumption of specified liabilities related to the acquired assets. The Aegean Blue Acquisition added five resorts located on the Greek Islands of Rhodes and Crete to the Company’s resort network. Tempus Acquisition LLC borrowed $6.6 million under the term loan portion of Tempus Acquisition Loan to fund the Aegean Blue Acquisition. See Note 15—Borrowings for definitions and further detail on this borrowing.

On January 29, 2013, DRC and Diamond Resorts Holdings, LLC entered into a memorandum of understanding with Island One, Inc. (“Island One”), Crescent One, LLC (“Crescent”) and the holder of their respective equity interests. Island One and Crescent operate a vacation ownership, hospitality and resort management business that emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy in July 2011. Since their emergence, the Company has provided sales and marketing services and HOA management oversight services to Island One. Pursuant to the memorandum of understanding, the Company has agreed to enter into definitive documents to (i) operate the business of Island One and Crescent prior to the closing of the potential acquisition transaction, and (ii) upon a change of control of the Company or other specified transaction, and subject to other terms and conditions in the definitive documents, purchase all of the equity interests in Island One and Crescent, thereby acquiring management contracts, unsold VOIs, a portfolio of consumer loans and other assets owned by Island One and Crescent, which would add nine additional resorts to the Company’s resort network.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC and its subsidiaries, have been prepared in accordance with accounting policies described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted, although the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to ensure the information presented is not misleading. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included and are of a normal and recurring nature. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements should be reviewed in conjunction with the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2013.

The Company recorded a $0.5 million reclassification between loan portfolio expense and other operating expense for the three months ended March 31, 2012 in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) in order to more closely align credit card expense with the placement of the corresponding revenue.

Significant accounting policies are those policies that, in management’s view, are most important in the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. The methods, estimates and judgments that the Company uses in applying its accounting policies have a significant impact on the results that it reports in the financial statements. Some of these critical accounting policies require the Company to make difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates regarding matters that are inherently uncertain. Those critical accounting policies and estimates that require the most significant judgment are discussed further below.

Principles of Consolidation—The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include all subsidiaries of the Company. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated from the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.

Use of Estimates—The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates and assumptions, including those related to revenue, bad debts and income taxes. These estimates are based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that management believes are reasonable under the circumstances. The results of the Company’s analysis form the basis for making assumptions about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions, and the impact of such differences may be material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Significant estimates were used by the Company to estimate the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the ILX Acquisition, the Tempus Resorts Acquisition, the PMR Acquisition and the Aegean Blue Acquisition during the periods presented. These estimates included projections of future cash flows derived from sales of VOIs, mortgages and contracts receivable, member relationship lists, management services revenue and rental income. Additionally, the Company made significant estimates of costs associated with such projected revenues including but not limited to loan defaults, recoveries and discount rates. The Company also made significant estimates which include: (i) allowance for loan and contract losses and provision for uncollectible Vacation Interest sales revenue; (ii) estimated useful lives of property and equipment; (iii) estimated useful lives of intangible assets acquired; (iv) estimated costs to build or acquire any additional Vacation Interests, estimated total revenues expected to be earned on a project, related estimated provision for uncollectible Vacation Interest sales revenue and sales incentives, estimated projected future cost and volume of recoveries of VOIs, estimated sales price per point and estimated number of points sold used to allocate certain unsold Vacation Interests to Vacation Interest cost of sales under the relative sales value method; and (v) the valuation allowance recorded against deferred tax assets. It is at least reasonably possible that a material change in one or more of these estimates may occur in the near term and that such change may materially affect actual results.

Vacation Interest sales, net of provision consists of the following for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands):

See Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies set forth in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 for further detail on the Company’s significant accounting policies.

There have been no new accounting pronouncements issued that affect the Company since the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 was filed with the SEC.

Credit Risk—The Company is exposed to on-balance sheet credit risk related to its mortgages and contracts receivable. The Company offers financing to the buyers of VOIs at the Company’s resorts. The Company bears the risk of defaults on promissory notes delivered to it by buyers of VOIs. If a buyer of VOIs defaults, the Company generally attempts to resell such VOIs by exercise of a power of sale. The associated marketing, selling, and administrative costs from the original sale are not recovered, and such costs must be incurred again to resell the VOIs. Although in many cases the Company may have recourse against a buyer of VOIs for the unpaid price, certain states have laws that limit the Company’s ability to recover personal judgments against customers who have defaulted on their loans. Accordingly, the Company has generally not pursued this remedy.

The Company maintains cash, cash equivalents, cash in escrow, and restricted cash with various financial institutions. These financial institutions are located throughout Europe, North America and the Caribbean. A significant portion of the unrestricted cash is maintained with a select few banks and is, accordingly, subject to credit risk. Periodic evaluations of the relative credit standing of financial institutions maintaining the deposits are performed to evaluate and mitigate, if necessary, any credit risk.

Availability of Funding Sources—The Company has historically funded mortgages and contracts receivable and unsold Vacation Interests with borrowings through its financing facilities, sales of mortgages and contracts receivable and internally generated funds. Borrowings are in turn repaid with the proceeds received by the Company from repayments of such mortgages and contracts receivable. To the extent that the Company is not successful in maintaining or replacing existing financings, it would have to curtail its sales and marketing operations or sell assets, thereby resulting in a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.

Geographic Concentration—Currently, portions of the Company’s consumer loan portfolio are concentrated in certain geographic regions within the U.S. As of March 31, 2013, the Company’s loans to California, Arizona, New York and Florida residents constituted 25.8%, 9.3%, 5.2% and 5.1%, respectively, of the consumer loan portfolio. The deterioration of the economic condition and financial well-being of the regions in which the Company has significant loan concentrations such as California, Arizona, New York or Florida, could adversely affect its consumer loan portfolio, business and results of operations. No other state or foreign country concentration accounted for in excess of 5.0% of the portfolio. The credit risk inherent in such concentrations is dependent upon regional and general economic stability, which affects property values and the financial well-being of the borrowers.

Interest Rate Risk—Since the Company’s indebtedness bears interest at variable rates, any increase in interest rates beyond amounts covered under the Company’s interest rate cap agreements, particularly if sustained, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows and financial position.

The Company derives net interest income from its financing activities because the interest rates it charges its customers who finance the purchase of their VOIs exceed the interest rates the Company pays to its lenders. Since the Company’s customer receivables generally bear interest at fixed rates, increases in interest rates will erode the spread in interest rates that the Company has historically obtained.

In July 2010, the Company entered into an interest rate cap agreement (“2010 Cap Agreement”) to manage its exposure to interest rate increases. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company entered into a

series of interest rate cap agreements to further limit its exposure to interest rate increases (collectively, “2012 Cap Agreements”). The following table presents certain information regarding the 2010 Cap Agreement and the 2012 Cap Agreements:

As of March 31, 2013, the fair value of these derivative assets was calculated to be $0 based on valuation reports provided by counterparties.

As of March 31, 2013, the Company had $23.6 million outstanding under its 2008 Conduit Facility (see Note 15—Borrowings for the definition of the 2008 Conduit Facility). This outstanding balance was covered by the 2010 Cap Agreement. See Note 18—Fair Value Measurements for further details.

Cash in escrow and restricted cash as of the dates presented below consisted of the following (in thousands):

Note 5—Mortgages and Contracts Receivable and Allowance for Loan and Contract Losses

The Company provides financing to purchasers of VOIs at North American sales centers that are collateralized by their VOIs. Eligibility for this financing is determined based on the customers’ FICO credit scores. As of March 31, 2013, the mortgages and contracts receivable bore interest at fixed rates between 0.0% and 21.5%. The term of the mortgages and contracts receivable are from one year to fifteen years and may be prepaid at any time without penalty. The weighted average interest rate of outstanding mortgages and contracts receivable was 15.7% as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

The Company charges off mortgages and contracts receivable upon the earliest of (i) the initiation of cancellation or foreclosure proceedings; or (ii) the customer’s account becoming over 180 days delinquent. Once a customer has made six timely payments following the event leading to the charge-off, the charge-off is reversed. A default in a customer’s initial payment results in a rescission of the sale. All collection and foreclosure costs are expensed as incurred. Mortgages and contracts receivable between 90 and 180 days past due as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were 2.8% and 2.6% respectively, of gross mortgages and contracts receivable.

costs incurred in connection with providing financing for VOIs are capitalized and amortized over the estimated life of the mortgages or contracts receivable based on historical prepayments as a decrease to interest revenue using the effective interest method. Amortization of deferred loan and contract origination costs charged to interest revenue was $1.2 million and $0.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The Company recorded a $3.3 million discount on the mortgage pool acquired on April 27, 2007 in connection with the Merger, which discount is being amortized over the life of the related acquired mortgage pool. As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the net unamortized discount on this acquired mortgage pool was $0.3 million and $0.3 million, respectively. No amortization was recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2013. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, amortization of $0.04 million was recorded as an increase to interest revenue.

The Company recorded a $0.8 million premium on the purchased Mystic Dunes mortgage pool that was part of the Tempus Resorts Acquisition and is being amortized over the life of the related acquired mortgage pool. As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the net unamortized premium was $0.4 million and $0.5 million, respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2013, amortization of $0.05 million was recorded as a decrease to interest revenue. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, amortization of $0.9 million was recorded as an increase to interest revenue.

The Company recorded a $0.1 million premium on May 21, 2012 on the purchased Pacific Monarch Resorts mortgage pool and is being amortized over the life of the related acquired mortgage pool. As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the net unamortized premium was $0.1 million. During the three months ended March 31, 2013 and March 31, 2012, no amortization was recorded as a decrease to interest revenue.

Mortgages and contracts receivable, net as of the dates presented below consisted of the following (in thousands):

As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, $347.8 million and $340.4 million, respectively, of the gross amount of mortgages and contracts receivable were collateralized against the Company’s various debt instruments included in “Securitization notes and Funding Facilities” caption in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. See Note 15—Borrowings for further detail.

Deferred profit on Vacation Interest transactions represents the revenues less the related direct costs (sales commissions, sales incentives, cost of sales and allowance for loan losses) related to sales that do not qualify for revenue recognition under the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 978, “Real Estate-Time-Sharing Activities (“ASC 978”).” See Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies set forth in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 for description of revenue recognition criteria.

Inventory value of defaulted mortgages that were previously contributed and acquired represents the inventory underlying mortgages that have defaulted. Upon recovery of the inventory, the value is transferred to unsold Vacation Interest, net.

Activity in the allowance for loan and contract losses associated with mortgages and contracts receivable as of the dates presented below consisted of the following (in thousands):

The provision for uncollectible Vacation Interest sales revenue in the table above showing activity in the allowance for loan and contract losses associated with mortgages and contracts receivable is exclusive of ASC 978 adjustments related to deferred revenue, as well as adjustments for the rescission period required under applicable law. The ASC 978 adjustments increased the provision for uncollectible Vacation Interest sales revenue by $0.5 million and $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The adjustments for the rescission period decreased the provision for uncollectible Vacation Interest sales revenue by $0.3 million and $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

A summary of credit quality as of the dates presented below is as follows (in thousands):

FICO credit scores were updated as of March 31, 2013 for all mortgages and contracts receivable.

Amounts due from related parties, net and due to related parties, net consist primarily of transactions with HOAs or Collections for which the Company acts as the management company. Due from related parties, net transactions include management fees for the Company’s role as the management company, certain expenses reimbursed by HOAs and Collections, and the allocation of a portion of the Company’s Vacation Interest carrying costs, management and member services, consolidated resort operations, loan portfolio and general and administrative expenses according to a pre-determined schedule approved by the board of directors at each HOA and Collection. Due to related parties, net transactions include (i) the amounts due to HOAs under inventory recovery agreements the Company enters into regularly with certain HOAs and similar agreements with the Collections pursuant to which the Company recaptures VOIs, either in the form of vacation points or vacation intervals, and brings them into the Company’s inventory for sale to customers; (ii) the maintenance fee and assessment fee liability owed to HOAs for intervals or to the Collections for points owned by the Company (this liability is recorded on January 1 of each year for the entire amount of annual maintenance and assessment fees and is relieved throughout the year by the payments remitted to the HOAs and the Collections; these maintenance and assessment fees are also recorded as prepaid expenses and other assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet and amortized ratably over the year); (iii) cleaning fees owed to the HOAs and Collections for room stays incurred by the Company’s customers; (iv) subsidy liabilities according to a developer guarantee at a resort; in addition, the Company carries subsidy liabilities owed to certain HOAs to fund the negative cash flows at these HOAs according to certain subsidy agreements which have been terminated; and (v) miscellaneous transactions with other non-HOA related parties.

Amounts due from related parties and due to related parties, some of which are due on demand, carry no interest. Due to the fact that the right of offset exists between the Company and the HOAs and the Collections, the Company evaluates amounts due to and from each HOA and Collection at each reporting period to present the balances as either a net due to or a net due from related parties for each HOA and Collection in accordance with the requirements of ASC 210, “Balance Sheet—Offsetting.”

Due from related parties, net as of the dates presented below consisted of the following (in thousands):

Due to related parties, net as of the dates presented below consisted of the following (in thousands):

Two members of the board of managers of DRP, Messrs. Zachary Warren and Scott Minerd, are principals of Guggenheim Partners, LLC (“Guggenheim”), an affiliate of the DRP Holdco, LLC (the “Guggenheim

Investor”), a 21.1% investor in the Company. Pursuant to the Fifth Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of DRP, dated as of October 15, 2012, Guggenheim Partners, LLC has the right to appoint two members to the board of managers of DRP, subject to certain security ownership thresholds, and Messrs. Warren and Minerd have served as members of the board of managers of DRP as the appointees of Guggenheim Partners, LLC.

In connection with the amendment and restatement of the Company’s 2008 Conduit Facility on April 11, 2013, an affiliate of Guggenheim became a commercial paper conduit for the 2008 Conduit Facility. Also, another affiliate of Guggenheim is currently an investor in the Company’s DROT 2009 Notes and DROT 2011 Notes. See Note 15—Borrowings for the definition of and more detail regarding these borrowings.

On July 1, 2011, the Company completed the Tempus Resorts Acquisition. In order to fund this acquisition, Tempus Acquisition, LLC entered into the Tempus Acquisition Loan with Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC. See Note 15—Borrowings for the definition of and more detail on the Tempus Acquisition Loan. During the three months ended March 31, 2013, Tempus Acquisition, LLC made an aggregate of approximately $1.2 million in interest payments and approximately $2.6 million in principal payments on the Tempus Acquisition Loan. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, Tempus Acquisition, LLC made an aggregate of approximately $1.1 million in interest payments and $1.4 million in principal payments on the Tempus Acquisition Loan.

On May 21, 2012, the Company completed the PMR Acquisition. In order to fund this acquisition, DPMA entered into the PMR Acquisition Loan with Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC. See Note 15—Borrowings for the definition of and more detail on the PMR Acquisition Loan. During the three months ended March 31, 2013, DPMA made an aggregate of approximately $1.5 million in interest payments and approximately $2.2 million in principal payments on the PMR Acquisition Loan.

Other receivables, net as of the dates presented below consisted of the following (in thousands):

The nature of selected balances included in prepaid expenses and other assets, net includes:

Unamortized maintenance fees—prepaid annual maintenance fees billed by the HOAs and the Collections managed by the Company on unsold Vacation Interests owned by the Company, which are charged to expense ratably over the year.

Deferred commissions—commissions paid to sales agents related to deferred mini-vacations and sampler program revenue, which are charged to advertising, sales and marketing expense as the associated revenue is recognized. Sampler programs allow purchasers to utilize vacation points during a trial period.

Prepaid member benefits and affinity programs—usage rights of THE Club members exchanged for a variety of products and travel services, including airfare, cruises and excursions, amortized ratably over the year.

Vacation Interest purchases in transit—open market purchases of vacation points from prior owners for which the titles have not been officially transferred to the Company. These Vacation Interest purchases in transit are reclassified to unsold Vacation Interest, net, upon successful transfer of title.

Prepaid maintenance fees—prepaid annual maintenance fees billed by the HOAs at the resorts not managed by the Company on unsold Vacation Interests owned by the Company, which are charged to expense ratably over the year.

Prepaid rent—portion of rent paid in advance and charged to expense in accordance with lease agreements.

Prepaid expenses and other assets, net as of the dates presented below consisted of the following (in thousands):

With the exception of Vacation Interest purchases in transit and assets to be disposed (not actively marketed), prepaid expenses are expensed as the underlying assets are utilized or amortized. Debt issuance costs incurred in connection with obtaining funding for the Company have been capitalized and are being amortized over the lives of the related funding agreements as a component of interest expense using a method which approximates the effective interest method. Amortization of capitalized debt issuance costs included in interest expense was $1.5 million and $1.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. See Note 15—Borrowings for more detail.

Debt issuance costs, net of amortization recorded as of March 31, 2013 were comprised of $12.8 million related to the Senior Secured Notes, $2.9 million related to the Diamond Resorts Owners Trust Series 2009-1 Class A and Class B Notes, $2.1 million related to the PMR Acquisition Loan, $2.0 million related to the Diamond Resorts Owners Trust Series 2013-1 Class A and Class B Notes, $1.4 million related to the Diamond Resorts Owners Trust Series 2011-1 Notes, $1.1 million related to the Tempus Acquisition Loan, $0.2 million related to the ILXA loans and $0.1 million related to the Tempus Inventory Loan.

Debt issuance costs, net of amortization recorded as of December 31, 2012 were comprised of $13.2 million related to the Senior Secured Notes, $3.3 million related to the Diamond Resorts Owners Trust Series 2009-1 Class A and Class B Notes, $2.3 million related to the PMR Acquisition Loan, $1.5 million related to the Diamond

Resorts Owners Trust Series 2011-1 Notes, $1.2 million related to the Tempus Acquisition Loan, $0.3 million related to the 2008 Conduit Facility, $0.3 million related to the ILXA loans, and $0.1 million related to the Tempus Inventory Loan. See Note 15—Borrowings for definition of and more detail on the Company’s borrowings.

Unsold Vacation Interests, net as of the dates presented below consisted of the following (in thousands):

Activity related to unsold Vacation Interests, net for the periods presented below consisted of the following (in thousands):

See Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies set forth in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 for discussions on unsold Vacation Interests.

In connection with the ILX Acquisition, the Tempus Resorts Acquisition, the PMR Acquisition and the Aegean Blue Acquisition, the Company acquired $10.1 million, $23.1 million, $30.4 million and $3.5 million in unsold Vacation Interest.

Property and equipment, net as of the dates presented below consisted of the following (in thousands):

Depreciation expense related to property and equipment was $2.4 million and $1.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Property and equipment are recorded at either cost for assets purchased or constructed, or fair value in the case of assets acquired through business combinations. The costs of improvements that extend the useful life of property and equipment are capitalized when incurred. These capitalized costs may include structural costs, equipment, fixtures and floor and wall coverings. All repair and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.

Buildings and leasehold improvements are depreciated using the straight-line method over the lesser of the estimated useful lives, which range from four to forty years, or the remainder of the lease terms. Furniture, office equipment, computer software and computer equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, which range from three to seven years.

Intangible assets, net as of March 31, 2013 consisted of the following (in thousands):

Intangible assets, net as of December 31, 2012 consisted of the following (in thousands):

Amortization expense for management contracts is recognized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives ranging from five to twenty-five years. Amortization expense for management contracts was $2.2 million and $1.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Amortization expense for member relationships, distributor relationships and other is amortized over the period of time that the relationships are expected to produce cash flows. Amortization expense for member relationships, distributor relationships and other intangibles was $1.6 million and $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Membership relationships and distributor relationships have estimated useful lives ranging from three to thirty years. However, the Company expects to generate significantly more cash flows during the earlier years of the relationships than the later years. Consequently, amortization expenses on these relationships decrease significantly over the lives of the relationships.

The estimated aggregate amortization expense for intangible assets is expected to be $13.3 million, $12.0 million, $8.5 million, $7.4 million and $6.5 million for the twelve months ending March 31, 2014 through 2018, respectively.

qualify for recognition as a completed sale, generally within one year of the balance sheet date. During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company made the decision to sell certain resorts and certain units in its European operations. A portion of the units was sold by March 31, 2013.

The $4.9 million balance in assets held for sale as of March 31, 2013 consisted of the points equivalent of unsold units and resorts that are either held for sale or pending the consummation of sale. As of March 31, 2013, the Company was a party to sales contracts entered into during 2012 and 2011 for approximately $1.3 million and $3.4 million, respectively, of units that were classified as held for sale. The proceeds will be paid over several years and the Company will retain title to the properties until the full amounts due under the sales contracts are received. According to guidance included in ASC 360, “Property, Plant, and Equipment,” the sales shall not be considered consummated until all consideration has been exchanged. Consequently, the assets pending consummation of sale will continue to be included in assets held for sale until all proceeds are received.

The Company records estimated amounts for certain accrued liabilities at each period end. Accrued liabilities are obligations to transfer assets or provide services to other entities in the future as a result of past transactions or events. The nature of selected balances included in accrued liabilities of the Company includes:

Accrued marketing expenses—expenses for travel vouchers and certificates used as sales incentives to buyers as well as attraction tickets as tour incentives. Such vouchers and certificates will be paid for in the future based on actual redemption.

Accrued exchange company fees—estimated liability owed to Interval International for annual dues related to exchange services provided to the Company.

Accrued operating lease liabilities—difference between straight-line operating lease expenses and cash payments associated with any equipment, furniture, or facilities leases classified as operating leases.

Deposits on pending sale of assets—deposits that the Company has received in connection with the pending sales of certain assets in its European operations. The sale of these assets has not been consummated due to the fact that not all consideration has been exchanged. These deposits are, therefore, accounted for using the deposit method in accordance with ASC 360, “Property, Plant and Equipment.” See Note 12—Assets Held for Sale for further detail.

Accrued call center costs—expenses associated with the outsourced customer service call center operations.

Accrued contingent litigation liabilities—estimated settlement costs for existing litigation cases.

Accrued liabilities as of the dates presented below consisted of the following (in thousands):

The Company records deferred revenues for payments received or billed but not earned for various activities.

Deferred mini-vacations and sampler programs revenue—sold but unused trial VOIs. This revenue is recognized when the purchaser completes a stay at one of the Company’s resorts or the trial period expires, whichever is earlier. Such revenue is recorded as a reduction to Vacation Interest carrying cost in accordance with ASC 978, with the exception of the Company’s European sampler product and a U.S. fixed-term product, both of which are three years in duration and, as such, are treated as Vacation Interest sales revenue.

THE Club deferred revenue—THE Club annual membership fees billed to members (offset by an estimated uncollectible amount) and amortized ratably over a one-year period and optional reservation protection fees recognized over an approximate life of the member’s reservation, which is generally six months on average.

Deferred maintenance and reserve fee revenue—maintenance fees billed as of January first of each year and earned ratably over the year for the two resorts in St. Maarten where the Company functions as the HOA. In addition, the owners are billed for capital project assessments to repair and replace the amenities or to reserve the out-of-pocket deductibles for hurricanes and other natural disasters. These assessments are deferred until the refurbishment activity occurs, at which time the amounts collected are recognized as consolidated resort operations revenue, with an equal amount recognized as consolidated resort operations expense.

Accrued guest deposits—amounts received from guests for future rentals recognized as revenue when earned.

Deferred revenue from an exchange company—unearned portion of a $5.0 million payment that the Company received in 2008 as consideration for granting the exclusive rights to Interval International to provide call center services and exchange services to the Company. In accordance with ASC 605-50, “Revenue Recognition—Customer Payments and Incentives,” the $5.0 million will be recognized over the 10-year term of the agreements as a reduction of the costs incurred for the services provided by Interval International.

Deferred revenues as of the dates presented below consisted of the following (in thousands):

redemption price will be the face value of the Senior Secured Notes plus accrued and unpaid interest and an applicable premium. If the Company redeems all or part of the Senior Secured Notes on or after August 2014, the redemption price will be 106% of the face value of the Senior Secured Notes, subject to decreases over the next two years.

Conduit Facilities, 2009 Securitization, 2011 Securitization, and 2013 Securitization. On November 3, 2008, the Company entered into agreements for its 2008 conduit facility (“2008 Conduit Facility”), pursuant to which it issued secured VOI receivable-backed variable funding notes designated as Diamond Resorts Issuer 2008 LLC Variable Funding Notes in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $215.4 million, which was decreased to $200.0 million, $73.4 million and $64.6 million on March 27, 2009, October 15, 2009 and August 31, 2010, respectively. On October 14, 2011, the Company entered into an amended and restated 2008 Conduit Facility agreement that extended the maturity date of the facility to April 12, 2013. The amendment provided for a $75.0 million, 18-month facility that was annually renewable for 364-day periods at the election of the lenders, bore interest at either LIBOR or the commercial paper rate (having a floor of 0.50%) plus 4.0%, and had a non-use fee of 0.75%. The advance rates on loans receivable in the portfolio were limited to 75% of the face value of the eligible loans. On April 11, 2013, the Company entered into another amended and restated 2008 Conduit Facility agreement that extended the maturity date of the facility to April 10, 2015. That amended and restated 2008 Conduit Facility provides for a $125.0 million, 24-month facility that is annually renewable for 364-day periods at the election of the lenders, bears interest at either LIBOR or the commercial paper rate (each having a floor of 0.50%) plus 3.25%, and has a non-use fee of 0.75%. The overall advance rate on loans receivable in the portfolio is limited to 85% of the aggregate face value of the eligible loans.

On October 15, 2009, the Company completed the 2009 securitization transaction and issued two consumer loan backed notes designated as the Diamond Resorts Owner Trust (“DROT”) 2009 Class A Notes and the DROT Series 2009 Class B Notes, (together, the “DROT 2009 Notes”). The DROT 2009 Class A Notes carry an interest rate of 9.3% and had an initial face value of $169.2 million. The DROT 2009 Class B Notes carry an interest rate of 12.0% and had an initial face value of $12.8 million. The DROT 2009 Notes have a maturity date of March 20, 2026. The net proceeds received were $181.1 million compared to the $182.0 million face value and the Company recorded the $0.9 million difference as an original issue discount on the securitization notes payable. Also on October 15, 2009, the Company used the proceeds from the DROT 2009 Notes to pay down the $148.9 million then-outstanding principal balance under its 2008 Conduit Facility, along with requisite accrued interest and fees associated with both conduit facilities.

On April 27, 2011, the Company completed a securitization transaction and issued the DROT 2011 Notes with a face value of $64.5 million (“DROT 2011 Notes”). The DROT 2011 Notes mature on March 20, 2023 and carry an interest rate of 4.0%. The net proceeds were used to pay off in full the $36.4 million then-outstanding principal balance under the 2008 Conduit Facility, to pay down approximately $7.0 million of the Quorum Facility (see definition below), to pay requisite accrued interest and fees associated with both facilities, and to pay certain expenses incurred in connection with the issuance of the DROT 2011 Notes, including the funding of a reserve account required thereby.

On January 23, 2013, the Company completed a securitization transaction and issued the DROT 2013 Notes with a face value of $93.6 million (“DROT 2013 Notes”). The DROT 2013 Notes mature on January 20, 2025 and carry a weighted average interest rate of 2.0%. The net proceeds were used to pay off the then-outstanding principal balance under the 2008 Conduit Facility and to pay expenses incurred in connection with the issuance of the DROT 2013 Notes, including the funding of a reserve account required thereby.

underlying consumer obligor is a Quorum credit union member. The joint marketing venture has a minimum term of two years, and the LSSA provides for a purchase period of two years. The purchase price payment and the program purchase fee are each determined at the time that the loan is sold to Quorum. To the extent excess funds remain after payment of the sold loans at Quorum’s purchase price, such excess funds are required to be remitted to the Company as a deferred purchase price payment. This transaction did not qualify as a loan sale under U.S. GAAP. The LSSA was amended on April 27, 2012 to increase the aggregate minimum committed amount of the Quorum Facility to $60.0 million. The LSSA was further amended and restated effective as of December 31, 2012 to increase the aggregate minimum committed amount to $80.0 million and to extend the term of the agreement to December 31, 2015; provided that Quorum may further extend the term for additional one-year periods by written notice. As of March 31, 2013, the weighted average purchase price payment was 89.7% of the obligor loan amount and the weighted average program purchase fee was 6.1%.

ILXA Receivables Loan and Inventory Loan. On August 31, 2010, the Company completed the ILX Acquisition through its wholly-owned subsidiary, ILXA. In connection with the ILX Acquisition, ILXA entered into an Inventory Loan and Security Agreement (“ILXA Inventory Loan”) and a Receivables Loan and Security Agreement (“ILXA Receivables Loan”) with Textron Financial Corporation. The ILXA Inventory Loan is a non-revolving credit facility in the maximum principal amount of $23.0 million with an interest rate of 7.5%. The ILXA Receivables Loan is a receivables facility with an initial principal amount of $11.9 million with an interest rate of 10.0% and is collateralized by mortgages and contracts receivable of ILXA. Both loans mature on August 31, 2015. ILXA and each of its wholly-owned subsidiaries are special-purpose subsidiaries.

Tempus Acquisition Loan and Tempus Resorts Acquisition Financing. On July 1, 2011, the Company completed the Tempus Resorts Acquisition through Mystic Dunes, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Tempus Acquisition, LLC. In order to fund the Tempus Resorts Acquisition, Tempus Acquisition, LLC entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC, as administrative agent for lenders, which include affiliates of, or funds managed or advised by, Guggenheim, which is an affiliate of the Guggenheim Investor, and Silver Rock Financial LLC, which is an affiliate of an investor in the Company (the “Tempus Acquisition Loan”). The Tempus Acquisition Loan is collateralized by all assets of Tempus Acquisition, LLC. The Tempus Acquisition Loan was initially in an aggregate principal amount of $41.1 million (which included a $5.5 million revolving loan). The Tempus Acquisition Loan bears interest at a rate of 18.0% (of which an amount equal to not less than 10.0% per annum is paid in cash on a quarterly basis and the remaining accrued amount may be paid, at Tempus Acquisition, LLC’s election, in cash or in kind by adding the applicable accrued amount to principal), and matures on June 30, 2015. In addition, Tempus Acquisition, LLC paid a 2.0% closing fee based on the initial Tempus Acquisition Loan balance as of July 1, 2011 and is also required to make an exit fee payment for up to 10% of the initial Tempus Acquisition Loan balance upon the final payment-in-full of the outstanding balance under the loan. Tempus Acquisition, LLC is required to make principal prepayments equal to (i) on a monthly basis, 40% of the aggregate interval purchase price received by Mystic Dunes, LLC in the prior month, (ii) within one business day of receipt, net participation proceeds payments less amounts attributable to interest paid, generated by Tempus Acquisition, LLC’s acquisition of a participating interest in the Tempus Receivables Loan, (iii) 100% of excess cash flow from the Tempus Resorts Acquisition and the Aegean Blue Acquisition, commencing with the quarter ending December 31, 2012, and (iv) $0.3 million, payable monthly, commencing in January 2013. Within 30 days after the end of each calendar year commencing with calendar year 2012, Tempus Acquisition, LLC is also required to make an additional prepayment in an amount equal to the difference between the aggregate principal prepayments paid in the calendar year and $5.0 million, such that a minimum of $5.0 million in aggregate annual principal reductions have been made. On September 28, 2012, Tempus Acquisition, LLC amended the Loan and Security Agreement to terminate the revolving loan and transfer the then-outstanding balance under the revolving loan to the term loans. On October 4, 2012, Tempus Acquisition, LLC further amended the Loan and Security Agreement to provide an additional $6.6 million borrowing under the term loans to fund the Aegean Blue Acquisition. The Tempus Acquisition Loan was further amended on November 20, 2012 and December 31, 2012 to increase the term loans by $2.5 million and $5.0 million respectively, to pay separation payments to principals of the Mystic Dunes resorts, and to fund guaranties and indemnities required to be paid to Mystic Dunes, LLC’s HOAs. Some

of the investment advisory clients of Wellington Management Company, LLP (“Wellington Management Investors”) also became lenders under this credit facility in connection with the December 2012 amendment to the Tempus Acquisition Loan.

An aggregate of $7.5 million of the Tempus Acquisition Loan was used by Tempus Acquisition, LLC to purchase a 10% participating interest in the Tempus Receivables Loan, and the remaining proceeds were loaned to Mystic Dunes, LLC pursuant to a Loan and Security Agreement having payment terms identical to the Tempus Acquisition Loan (the “Mystic Dunes Loan”). The Mystic Dunes Loan is collateralized by all assets of Mystic Dunes, LLC. The proceeds of the Mystic Dunes Loan were used to pay off certain existing indebtedness and closing costs associated with the Tempus Resorts Acquisition.

Additionally, Mystic Dunes Receivables, LLC, a subsidiary of Mystic Dunes, LLC, entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with Resort Finance America, LLC (the “Tempus Receivables Loan”). The Tempus Receivables Loan is a receivables credit facility in the amount of $74.5 million, collateralized by mortgages and contracts receivable acquired in the Tempus Resorts Acquisition. All cash flows received from customer payments, including principal, interest and miscellaneous fees (net of contractual servicing costs) are used to pay the principal and accrued interest balances on the Tempus Receivables Loan. In addition, Mystic Dunes Receivables, LLC is required to make additional principal payments in the event the aging status of the receivables in the underlying portfolio does not meet certain requirements. During the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, Mystic Dunes, LLC made additional principal payments of $0.3 million and $0.1 million, respectively, pursuant to this requirement. The Tempus Receivables Loan bears interest at a rate that is the higher of (i) one-month LIBOR plus 7.0% or (ii) 10%, adjusted monthly, and matures on July 1, 2015. Furthermore, the Company is obligated to pay Resort Finance America, LLC an initial defaulted timeshare loans release fee over 36 months from August 2011 through July 2014 (“Notes Payable—RFA fees”). The fee was recorded at fair value as of July 1, 2011 using a discount rate of 10.0%.

Tempus Acquisition, LLC, Mystic Dunes, LLC and each of their respective wholly-owned subsidiaries are special-purpose subsidiaries.

PMR Acquisition Loan and Inventory Loan. On May 21, 2012, DPMA completed the PMR Acquisition whereby it acquired assets pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement, among DPMA and Pacific Monarch Resorts, Inc., Vacation Interval Realty, Inc., Vacation Marketing Group, Inc., MGV Cabo, LLC, Desarrollo Cabo Azul, S. de R.L. de C.V., and Operadora MGVM S. de R.L. de C.V. Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, DPMA acquired four resort management agreements, unsold VOIs and the rights to recover and resell such interests, a portion of the seller’s consumer loans portfolio and certain real property and other assets, for approximately $51.6 million in cash, plus the assumption of specified liabilities related to the acquired assets.

$10.0 million revolving loan). The PMR Acquisition Loan bears interest at a rate of 18.0% (of which an amount equal to not less than 10.0% per annum is paid in cash on a quarterly basis and the remaining accrued amount may be paid, at DPMA’s election, in cash or in kind by adding the applicable accrued amount to principal), and matures on May 21, 2016.

The PMR Acquisition Loan provides that, (i) DPMA is required to pay quarterly (a) to the administrative agent, for its own account, an administration fee, and (b) to Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC, for the benefit of lenders with commitments to make revolving loans thereunder, an unused line fee based upon each such lender’s commitment to provide revolving loans and the then outstanding principal amount of such lender’s revolving loan, (ii) DPMA is required to make certain mandatory monthly and quarterly prepayments of amounts borrowed under the PMR Acquisition Loan, and (iii) on the maturity date for the term loan, if not paid earlier in accordance therewith, DPMA is required to pay an exit fee of up to 10.0% of the initial loan amount. On the closing date for the PMR Acquisition, pursuant to the PMR Acquisition Loan, DPMA paid a closing fee of approximately $2.1 million to the administrative agent and certain lenders party thereto. The proceeds of the PMR Acquisition Loan were used to fund the purchase price for the PMR Acquisition and the associated closing costs.

On September 28, 2012, DPMA amended the Loan and Security Agreement to terminate the revolving loan and transfer the then-outstanding balance under the revolving loan to the term loan.

On May 21, 2012, DPMA also entered into an Inventory Loan and Security Agreement (the “DPM Inventory Loan”) with RFA PMR LoanCo, LLC. The DPM Inventory Loan provides debt financing for a portion of the purchase price of the defaulted receivables to be purchased by DPMA pursuant to a collateral recovery and repurchase agreement entered into between DPMA and an affiliate of RFA PMR LoanCo, LLC in connection with the PMR Acquisition. The interest rate is a variable rate equal to the sum of LIBOR plus 6.0% per annum, provided that LIBOR is never less than 2.0% or greater than 4.0% per annum.

DPMA and each of its wholly-owned subsidiaries are special-purpose subsidiaries.

Other Notes Payable. The Company finances premiums on certain insurance policies under unsecured notes. These unsecured notes will mature in September 2013 and December 2013, and each carries an interest rate of 3.2% per annum. In addition, the Company purchased certain software licenses during the year ended December 31, 2012 with monthly interest-free payments due for the next two years and this obligation was recorded at fair value using a discount rate of 5.7%.

The following table presents selected information on the Company’s borrowings as of the dates presented below (dollars in thousands):

All of the Company’s borrowing under the Senior Secured Notes, securitization notes, and 2008 Conduit Facility contain various restrictions and limitations that may affect the Company’s business and affairs. These include, but are not limited to, restrictions and limitations relating to its ability to incur indebtedness and other obligations, to make investments and acquisitions and to pay dividends. The Company is also required to maintain certain financial ratios and comply with other financial and performance covenants. The failure of the Company to comply with any of these provisions, or to pay its obligations, could result in foreclosure by the lenders of their security interests in the Company’s assets, and could otherwise have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Company was in compliance with all financial covenants as of March 31, 2013.

Historically, the Company has depended on the availability of credit to finance the consumer loans that it provides to its customers for the purchase of their VOIs. Typically, these loans require a minimum cash down payment of 10% of the purchase price at the time of sale. However, selling, marketing and administrative expenses attributable to VOI sales are primarily cash expenses and often exceed the buyer’s minimum down payment requirement. Accordingly, the availability of financing facilities for the sale or pledge of these receivables to generate liquidity is a critical factor in the Company’s ability to meet its short-term and long-term cash needs. The Company has historically relied upon its ability to sell receivables in the securitization market in order to generate liquidity and create capacity on its conduit facilities and Quorum Facility (together referred to as “Funding Facilities”).

The income tax provision for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 was determined based on pre-tax book income (loss) (adjusted for book-tax differences) for those periods. However, because the Company includes U.S. entities not taxed at the corporate level, non-U.S. disregarded entities, differences in tax rates between the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions, full valuation allowances on its foreign and domestic net operating losses and other deferred tax assets, and foreign currency and rate change adjustments in calculating its income tax provision, the Company’s estimated effective tax rate, for the periods presented, differs significantly from the federal statutory rate of 35%.

The Company conducts a significant portion of its operations from leased facilities, which include regional and global administrative facilities as well as off-premise booths and tour centers near active sales centers. The longest of these obligations extends into 2019. Many of these agreements have renewal options, subject to adjustments for inflation. In most cases, the Company expects that in the normal course of business, such leases will be renewed or replaced by other leases. Typically, these leases call for a minimum lease payment that increases over the life of the agreement by a fixed percentage or an amount based upon the change in a designated index. All of the facilities lease agreements are classified as operating leases.

In addition, the Company leases office and other equipment under both long-term and short-term lease arrangements, which are generally classified as operating leases.

The Company has entered into various purchase obligations relating to sales center remodeling, property amenity improvement and corporate office expansion projects. The total remaining commitment was $2.1 million as of March 31, 2013.

From time to time, the Company or its subsidiaries are subject to certain legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business.

One of the Company’s subsidiaries, FLRX, Inc. (“FLRX”), is a defendant in a lawsuit originally filed in July 2003, alleging the breach of certain contractual terms relating to the obligations under a stock purchase agreement for the acquisition of FLRX in 1998, as well as certain violations under applicable consumer protection acts. FLRX currently conducts no operations and has no material assets other than an indirect interest in two undeveloped real estate parcels in Mexico. In January 2010, following a jury trial, a Washington state court entered a judgment against FLRX, awarded plaintiffs damages of $30.0 million plus post-judgment interest at a rate of 12% per annum and attorney’s fees of approximately $1.5 million plus accrued interest, and ordered specific performance of certain ongoing contractual obligations pursuant to the breach of contract claim.

FLRX appealed the verdict. On November 14, 2011, the Company received notice that the Court of Appeals for the State of Washington affirmed the lower court decision upholding the judgment against FLRX. On February 27, 2012, FLRX filed a petition for review with the State Supreme Court. On June 6, 2012, the petition was denied. Any liability in this matter is not covered by insurance. Neither DRC nor any of its other subsidiaries is party to this lawsuit. Sunterra was originally named as a defendant in this matter, but it was later dismissed from the case. It is possible that FLRX may at some point determine to file for protection under the Federal Bankruptcy Code.

In April 2012, the plaintiffs in the FLRX case filed a lawsuit in King County Superior Court in the State of Washington against DRP and DRC. The complaint, which alleges two claims for alter ego and fraudulent conveyance, seeks to hold DRP and DRC liable for the judgment entered against FLRX. Plaintiffs claim that the defendants manipulated the corporate form of FLRX and caused fraudulent transfers of assets from FLRX.

On May 18, 2012, the case was removed to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington, Case No. 2:12-cv-00870. On August 29, 2012, DRC filed an answer to the complaint, denying all material allegations therein and raising various affirmative defenses. On September 24, 2012, the court entered an order dismissing DRP. The court has set the case for trial on December 3, 2013. The parties are currently engaged in written discovery. The Company intends to vigorously defend against these claims.

Although the Company believes that it will not have any material liability when these matters are ultimately resolved, there can be no assurance that this will be the case. As of March 31, 2013, the Company had an estimated litigation accrual of $1.1 million in accrued liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet, which represents the write-down of FLRX’s investment in subsidiaries to $0. Legal fees associated with these cases are expensed as incurred.

In December 2004 and January 2005, two separate cases were filed in the Joint Court of Justice of the Netherlands Antilles against AKGI St. Maarten NV (“AKGI”), one of the Company’s subsidiaries, challenging AKGI’s title to seven whole ownership units at the Royal Palm Resort, and alleging the breach of certain agreements that existed prior to AKGI’s acquisition of the resort. AKGI purchased the resort at auction in 1995. Each claimant alleges that, between 1989 and 1991, he purchased certain units from the prior owner of Royal Palm Resort, and that he holds in perpetuity, legal title to, or a leasehold interest in, these respective units and is entitled to a refund of the purchase price and an annual 12% return on the purchase price (which totaled $1.2 million in one case and $1.3 million in the other case). Due to the nature of the AKGI purchase and the underlying St. Maarten laws, the Company believes that the obligations to the claimants would only be enforceable if the agreement between the claimant and AKGI’s predecessor was either a timeshare agreement or

a lease agreement. AKGI has answered that the claimants’ agreements were, in fact, investment contracts, and are therefore not enforceable under St. Maarten law. In February 2011, the case that was pending in the highest and final court of appeal was dismissed as to all claims, with the Company having no obligations, financial or otherwise, to claimant. The other case is currently pending in the intermediate court of appeal. A lien has been placed on AKGI’s interest in the Royal Palm Resort while the remaining action is pending.

In October 2011, the HOA of one of the Company’s managed resorts in Hawaii levied a $65.8 million water intrusion assessment to the owners of that resort, of which $9.7 million was assessed to the Company. During the quarter ended December 31, 2011, the Company’s portion of the water intrusion assessment was recorded as Vacation Interest carrying cost, net in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) with a corresponding increase to due to related parties, net in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. The proceeds of this assessment are being used to repair the water intrusion damage at the resort. In April 2012, the Company was named as a defendant in a putative class action pending in the District Court for the District of Hawaii. The action, brought by five deeded owners and members of one of the Collections managed by the Company, alleges breaches of fiduciary duty and unfair and deceptive trade practices against us and certain of the Company’s officers and employees and seeks, among other things, to invalidate the water intrusion assessment and enjoin the water intrusion project. In November, 2012, the Company reached an agreement with the named plaintiffs and their counsel to settle the litigation in full. The settlement is subject to court approval. The Company does not expect the settlement to have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations.

ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements (“ASC 820”), defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value are classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:

As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company’s derivative instruments were the 2010 Cap Agreement and the 2012 Cap Agreements, which had fair values of $0 based on valuation reports provided by counterparties. The 2010 Cap Agreement and the 2012 Cap Agreements were classified as Level 3, based on the fact that the credit risk data used for the valuation is not directly observable and cannot be corroborated by observable market data. The Company’s assessment of the significant inputs to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. See Note 3—Concentrations of Risk for further detail on these cap agreements.

As of March 31, 2013, mortgages and contracts receivable had a balance of $321.0 million, net of allowance. The allowance for loan and contract losses against the mortgages and contracts receivable is derived using a static pool analysis to develop historical default percentages based on FICO scores to apply to the mortgage and contract population. The Company evaluates other factors such as economic conditions, industry trends and past due aging reports in order to determine the adjustments needed to true up the allowance which adjusts the carrying value of mortgages and contracts receivable to management’s best estimate of collectibility.

As a result, the Company believes that the carrying value of the mortgages and contracts receivable approximated its fair value at March 31, 2013. These financial assets were classified as Level 3 as there is little market data available.

The borrowings under the Senior Secured Notes were classified as Level 2 as of March 31, 2013 based on a quoted price of 110.0 on a restricted bond market as they were not actively traded on the open market.

As of March 31, 2013, the Company’s 2008 Conduit Facility, DROT 2009 Notes, DROT 2011 Notes and DROT 2013 Notes were classified as Level 2. The Company believes the fair value of the 2008 Conduit Facility approximated its carrying value due to the fact that it was recently amended and, therefore, measured using other significant observable inputs including the current refinancing activities. The fair value of the DROT 2009 Notes, DROT 2011 Notes and DROT 2013 Notes, which the Company believes approximated similar instruments in active markets, was determined with the assistance of an investment banking firm.

As of March 31, 2013, the Quorum Facility, the ILXA Receivables Loan, the ILXA Inventory Loan, the Tempus Acquisition Loan, the Tempus Receivables Loan, the Tempus Inventory Loan, the PMR Acquisition Loan and the DPM Inventory Loan were classified as Level 2 based on an internal analysis performed by the Company utilizing the discounted cash flow model and the quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active.

As of March 31, 2013, the Company believes the fair value of the borrowings under Notes Payable—RFA fees approximated its carrying value, as the carrying value represents the net present value of all future payments using an imputed interest rate of 10%.

As of March 31, 2013, the fair value of all other debt instruments was not calculated, based on the fact that they were either due within one year or were immaterial.

As of December 31, 2012, mortgages and contracts receivable had a balance of $312.9 million, net of allowance. The allowance for loan and contract losses against the mortgages and contracts receivable is derived using a static pool analysis to develop historical default percentages based on FICO scores to apply to the mortgage and contract population. The Company evaluates other factors such as economic conditions, industry trends and past due aging reports in order to determine the adjustments needed to true up the allowance, which adjust the carrying value of mortgages and contracts receivable to management’s best estimate of collectibility. As a result, the Company believes that the carrying value of the mortgages and contracts receivable approximated its fair value at December 31, 2012. These financial assets are classified as Level 3 as there is little market data available.

The borrowings under the Senior Secured Notes were classified as Level 2 as of December 31, 2012 based on a quoted price of 109.0 on a restricted bond market, as they were not actively traded on the open market.

As of December 31, 2012, the Company’s 2008 Conduit Facility, DROT 2009 Notes and DROT 2011 Notes were classified as Level 2. The Company believes the fair value of the 2008 Conduit Facility approximated its carrying value due to the fact that it was recently amended and was, therefore, measured using other significant observable inputs including the current refinancing activities. The fair value of the DROT 2009 Notes and DROT 2011 Notes, which the Company believes approximated similar instruments in active markets, was determined with the assistance of an investment banking firm.

As of December 31, 2012, the Quorum Facility, the ILXA Receivables Loan, the ILXA Inventory Loan, the Tempus Acquisition Loan, the Tempus Receivables Loan, the Tempus Inventory Loan, the PMR Acquisition Loan and the DPM Inventory Loan were classified as Level 2 based on an internal analysis performed by the Company utilizing the discounted cash flow model and the quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active.

As of December 31, 2012, the Company believes the fair value of the borrowings under Notes Payable—RFA fees approximated its carrying value as the carrying value represents the net present value of all future payments using an imputed interest rate of 10.0%.

As of December 31, 2012, the fair value of all other debt instruments was not calculated, based on the fact that they were either due within one year or were immaterial.

In accordance with ASC 820, the Company also applied the provisions of fair value measurement to various non-recurring measurements for the Company’s financial and non-financial assets and liabilities and recorded the impairment charges. The Company’s non-financial assets consist of property and equipment, which are recorded at cost, net of depreciation unless impaired, and assets held for sale, which are recorded at the lower of cost or their estimated fair value less costs to sell.

The carrying values and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments as of March 31, 2013 were as follows (dollars in thousands):

The carrying values and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments as of December 31, 2012 were as follows (dollars in thousands):

Acquisition, DRP issued a warrant (the “Tempus Warrant”) to Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC, as administrative agent, for the benefit of the lenders, pursuant to a Warrant Agreement, between DRP and Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC. The Tempus Warrant vests and becomes exercisable, subject to the provisions of the Tempus Warrant described below, upon the sixty-first day (the “Tempus Warrant Exercise Date”) following, among other things, an initial underwritten public offering of the common stock of DRC or of any successor corporation of DRP (“DRP Successor”), a payment default by Tempus Acquisition, LLC (after expiration of applicable grace and care periods) under the Tempus Acquisition Loan, or a sale of DRP or DRC (a “Tempus Warrant Triggering Event”). Following a Tempus Warrant Triggering Event, the Tempus Warrant would become exercisable on the Tempus Warrant Exercise Date as to an aggregate percentage of the fully-diluted outstanding common equity of DRP equal to the quotient of (i) the dollar amount by which the actual total repayments of principal on the Tempus Acquisition Loan from the date of the Tempus Warrant through the day immediately preceding the Tempus Warrant Exercise Date is less than a certain benchmark amount (the “Tempus Benchmark Amount”) as determined pursuant to the terms of the Tempus Warrant, divided by (ii) the fair market value of the common equity of DRP as determined pursuant to the terms of the Tempus Warrant. The purchase price for each common unit of DRP issuable upon exercise of the Tempus Warrant is $0.0001 per common unit. During the 60-day period following a Tempus Warrant Triggering Event, DRP or the DRP Successor, as applicable, has the option to purchase the Tempus Warrant from the holder for a cash payment equal to the Tempus Benchmark Amount, less any cash payments made on the Tempus Acquisition Loan from the date of the Tempus Warrant through the date of such Tempus Warrant Triggering Event. The Company determined that the Tempus Warrant had a nominal value as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

In connection with the funding of the PMR Acquisition Loan pursuant to the Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of May 21, 2012, among DPMA, the lenders party thereto and Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC, which was entered into in connection with the PMR Acquisition, DRP issued a warrant (the “PMR Warrant”) to Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC, as administrative agent, for the benefit of the lenders, pursuant to a Warrant Agreement, between DRP and Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC. The PMR Warrant vests and becomes exercisable, subject to the provisions of the PMR Warrant described below, upon the sixty-first day (the “PMR Warrant Exercise Date”) following, among other things, an initial underwritten public offering of the common stock of DRC or of any DRP Successor, a payment default by DPMA (after expiration of applicable grace and care periods) under the PMR Acquisition Loan, or a sale of DRP or DRC (a “PMR Warrant Triggering Event”). Following a PMR Warrant Triggering Event, the PMR Warrant would become exercisable on the PMR Warrant Exercise Date as to an aggregate percentage of the fully-diluted outstanding common equity of DRP equal to the quotient of (i) the dollar amount by which the actual total repayments of principal on the PMR Acquisition Loan from the date of the PMR Warrant through the day immediately preceding the PMR Warrant Exercise Date is less than a certain benchmark amount (the “PMR Benchmark Amount”) as determined pursuant to the terms of the PMR Warrant, divided by (ii) the fair market value of the common equity of DRP as determined pursuant to the terms of the PMR Warrant. The purchase price for each common unit of DRP issuable upon exercise of the PMR Warrant is $0.0001 per common unit. During the 60-day period following a PMR Warrant Triggering Event, DRP or the DRP Successor, as applicable, has the option to purchase the PMR Warrant from the holder for a cash payment equal to the PMR Benchmark Amount, less any cash payments made on the PMR Acquisition Loan from the date of the PMR Warrant through the date of such PMR Warrant Triggering Event. The Company determined that the PMR Warrant had a nominal value as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

On October 15, 2012, the Company established the Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2012 Plan”), which authorized awards of 112.2 restricted Class B common units (“BCUs”) to participants in the 2012 Plan. The BCUs represent a fractional part of the interest in the profits, losses and distributions, but not the capital, of DRP and are non-voting and subject to certain restrictive covenants.

On the same date in October 2012, to mitigate the dilutive effect of the July 2011 recapitalization transaction on Messrs. Cloobeck, Palmer and Kraff, DRP issued 66.3 BCUs under the 2012 Plan to Messrs. Cloobeck, Palmer and Kraff for no cash consideration. These BCUs were 100% vested as of the issuance date. Also on that date, DRP granted BCUs pursuant to the 2012 Plan to Messrs. Bentley and Lanznar and two other participants in the 2012 Plan for no cash consideration, in connection with their provision of services to DRP. These BCUs were also 100% vested on the grant date; however, because these BCUs are tied to service to DRP, they are subject to forfeiture if the grantee’s employment with DRP is terminated for cause and subject to repurchase by DRP (at its option) if the grantee’s employment with DRP is terminated for any reason other than termination by DRP for cause. The BCUs are not entitled to any distributions nor do they have any fair value unless and until the cumulative amount distributed to holders of DRP common units other than BCUs is at least equal to a specified amount.

The Company presents its results of operations in two segments: (i) Hospitality and Management Services, which includes operations related to the management of resort properties and the Collections, revenue from its operation of THE Club and the provision of other services; and (ii) Vacation Interest Sales and Financing, which includes operations relating to the marketing and sales of Vacation Interests, as well as the consumer financing activities related to such sales. While certain line items reflected on the statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss) fall completely into one of these business segments, other line items relate to revenues or expenses which are applicable to more than one segment. For line items that are applicable to more than one segment, revenues or expenses are allocated by management, which involves significant estimates. Certain expense items (principally corporate interest expense and depreciation and amortization) are not, in management’s view, allocable to either of these business segments as they apply to the entire Company. In addition, general and administrative expenses are not allocated to either of these business segments because, historically, management has not allocated these expenses for purposes of evaluating the Company’s different operational divisions. Accordingly, these expenses are presented under Corporate and Other.

Management believes that it is impracticable to allocate specific assets and liabilities related to each business segment. In addition, management does not review balance sheets by business segment as part of their evaluation of operating segment performances. Consequently, no balance sheet segment reports have been presented.

Information about the Company’s operations in different business segments for the periods presented below is as follows:

Note 21—Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements—Guarantor and Non-guarantor

The following condensed consolidating financial statements present, on a supplemental basis, the financial position, results of operations, and statements of cash flow for (i) those subsidiaries of the Company which have been designated “Non-guarantor Subsidiaries” for purposes of the indenture governing the Senior Secured Notes; and (ii) the Company and all of its other subsidiaries. Please see Exhibit 21.1 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 for a list of the Company’s guarantor subsidiaries. The Company’s non-guarantor subsidiaries include its European subsidiaries, special-purpose subsidiaries and a wholly-owned captive insurance entity. For purposes of the indenture governing the Senior Secured Notes, the financial position, results of operations, and statements of cash flows of the Company’s non-guarantor subsidiaries are excluded from the Company’s financial results to determine whether the Company is in compliance with the financial covenants governing the Senior Secured Notes. Accordingly, management believes that the following presentation is helpful to readers of this quarterly report.

The Company conducts its Hospitality and Management Services and Vacation Interest Sales and Financing operations in two geographic areas: North America and Europe. The Company’s North America operations include the Company’s branded resorts in the continental U.S., Hawaii, Mexico, Canada and the Caribbean, and the Company’s Europe operations include the Company’s branded resorts in England, Scotland, Ireland, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Austria, Malta, France and Greece. The following table reflects total revenue and assets by geographic area for the periods ended on, or as of, the dates presented below (in thousands):

On April 11, 2013, the Company entered into another amended and restated 2008 Conduit Facility agreement that extended the maturity date of the facility to April 10, 2015. See Note 15—Borrowings for further detail on this amendment to the 2008 Conduit Facility.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC and Subsidiaries (“the Company”) as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), changes in member capital (deficit), and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (U.S.). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Diamond Resorts Corporation (“DRC”) is the issuer of the 12.0% senior secured notes due 2018 (“Senior Secured Notes”) and is the Registrant. All financial information in this report is of Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC (“DRP”), the parent of DRC and the parent guarantor under the Senior Secured Notes. DRP is a Nevada limited liability company created on March 28, 2007. DRP, together with its wholly-owned subsidiaries, is hereafter referred to as “Diamond Resorts” or the “Company.” On April 26, 2007, a third-party investor contributed $62.4 million cash and Cloobeck Diamond Parent, LLC (“CDP”), the Company’s majority equityholder, contributed $7.1 million of net assets based on historical book values in exchange for common and preferred units. The third-party investor was issued common and preferred units with a liquidation preference as well as a priority return of 17% per annum, compounded quarterly, payable upon certain events. The preferred units did not provide to the holder any participation or conversion rights. The common and preferred members’ liability is limited to their respective capital contributions. The capitalization of the Company occurred on April 27, 2007 simultaneously with the acquisition of and merger with Sunterra Corporation (“Sunterra” or the “Predecessor Company”) and cancellation of Sunterra’s outstanding common stock for $16.00 per share (“the Merger”).

In July 2011, DRP completed an equity recapitalization transaction, pursuant to which it repurchased all of its preferred units and issued and redeemed common units in a series of private placement transactions. See Note 20—Common and Preferred Units and Stock-Based Compensation for further details.

The Company operates in the hospitality and vacation ownership industry, with an ownership base of more than 490,000 owner-families, or members, and a worldwide network of 263 destinations located in 28 countries throughout the continental United States (“U.S.”), Hawaii, Canada, Mexico, the Caribbean, Central America, South America, Europe, Asia, Australia and Africa. The Company’s resort network includes 79 Diamond Resorts branded properties with a total of 9,274 units, which are managed by the Company. In addition, the Company’s network includes 180 affiliated resorts and hotels and four cruise itineraries, which do not carry the Company’s brand and are not managed by the Company, but are a part of the Company’s network and are available for its members to use as vacation destinations. As referenced in these financial statements, Diamond Resorts International^® and THE Club^® are trademarks of the Company.

Hospitality and Management Services. The Company manages 79 branded resort properties, which are located in the continental U.S., Hawaii, Mexico, the Caribbean and Europe, as well as the seven multi-resort trusts (the “Collections”). As the manager of the Company’s branded resorts and the Collections, it provides rental services, billing services, account collections, accounting and treasury functions, and communications and information technology services. In addition, for branded resorts, the Company provides an online reservation system and customer service contact center, operates the front desks, furnishes housekeeping, maintenance and human resources services and operates amenities such as golf courses, food and beverage venues and retail shops.

assessments due to, among other things, death or divorce or other life-cycle events or lifestyle changes. Because the cost of operating the managed resorts is spread across the Company’s member base, by recovering VOIs from members who have failed to pay their annual maintenance fee or assessments, the Company reduces bad debt expense at the HOA and Collection level (which is a component of the management fees billed to members by each resort’s HOA or Collection association), supporting the financial well-being of those HOAs and Collections.

HOAs. Each of the Diamond Resorts-branded resorts, other than certain resorts in the European Collection, is typically operated through an HOA, which is administered by a board of directors. Directors are elected by the owners of intervals at the resort (which may include one or more of the Collections) and may also include representatives appointed by the Company as the developer of the resort. As a result, the Company is entitled to voting rights with respect to directors of a given HOA by virtue of (i) its ownership of intervals at the related resort, (ii) its control of the Collections that hold intervals at the resort and/or (iii) its status as the developer of the resort. The board of directors of each HOA hires a management company to provide the services described above, which in the case of all Diamond Resorts-branded resorts, is the Company. The Company serves as the HOA for two resorts in St. Maarten and earns maintenance fees and incurs operating expenses at these two resorts.

The management fees earned by the Company with respect to a resort are based on a cost-plus structure and are calculated based on the direct and indirect costs (including an allocation of a substantial portion of the Company’s overhead related to the provision of management services) incurred by the HOA of the applicable resort. Under the current resort management agreements, the Company receives management fees generally ranging from 10% to 15% of the other costs of operating the applicable resort (with an average based upon the total management fee revenue of 14.6%). Unlike typical commercial lodging management contracts, the management fees earned by the Company are not impacted by changes in a resort’s average daily rate or occupancy level. Instead, the board of directors of the HOA for each resort engages in an annual budgeting process in which the board of directors of the HOA estimates the costs the HOA will incur for the coming year. In evaluating the anticipated costs of the HOA, the board of directors of the HOA considers the operational needs of the resort, the services and amenities that will be provided at or to the applicable resort and other costs of the HOA, some of which are impacted significantly by the location of the resort, size and type of the resort. Included in the anticipated operating costs of each HOA are its management fees, which generally range from 10% to 15% of the other anticipated operating costs of the HOA. The board of directors of each HOA discusses the various considerations and approves the annual budget, which determine the annual maintenance fees charged to each owner. One of the management services the Company provides to the HOA is the billing and collection of annual maintenance fees on the HOA’s behalf. Annual maintenance fees for a given year are generally billed during the previous November, due by January and deposited in a segregated or restricted account that the Company manages on behalf of the HOA. As a result, a substantial majority of the fees for February through December of each year are collected from owners in advance. Funds are released to the Company from these accounts on a monthly basis for the payment of management fees as it provides management services.

Each of the Collections is operated through a Collection association, which is administered by a board of directors. With the exception of PVC, which allows the developer to appoint the board of directors until 90% of all membership interests are sold, directors are elected by the points holders within the applicable Collection. The Company owns a significant number of points in each of the Collections, which it holds as inventory. The board of directors of each Collection hires a company to provide management services to the Collection, which in each case is the Company.

As with the Company’s HOA management contracts, management fees charged to the Collections in the U.S. are based on a cost-plus structure and are calculated based on the direct and indirect costs (including an allocation of the Company’s overhead related to the provision of management services) incurred by the Collection. Under the Company’s current Collection management agreements, it receives management fees of 15.0% of the costs of the applicable Collection (except with respect to the management agreement with MGVC, under which the Company receives a management fee of 10.0% of the cost of MGVC). The management fees are included in the budgets prepared by each Collection association, which determines the annual maintenance fee charged to each owner. One of the management services the Company provides to the Collections is the billing and collection of annual maintenance fees on the Collection’s behalf. Annual maintenance fees for a given year are generally billed during the previous November, due by January and deposited in a segregated or restricted account that the Company maintains on behalf of each Collection. As a result, a substantial majority of the fees for February through December of each year are collected from owners in advance. Funds are released to the Company from these accounts on a monthly basis for the payment of management fees as it provides the management services.

period, other than in some limited circumstances involving cause. No Collection has terminated any of the Company’s management contracts during the past five years. Apart from the management contract for the European Collection, the Company generally has the right to terminate its Collection management contracts at any time upon notice to the Collection. The management contract for the European Collection has an indefinite term, can only be terminated by the European Collection for an uncured breach by the manager or a winding up of the European Collection, and may not be terminated by the manager.

THE Club. Another key component of the Company’s hospitality and management services business is THE Club, through which the Company operates a proprietary reservation system that enables its members to use their points to stay at any of the Company’s branded and affiliated resorts. THE Club also offers its members a wide range of other benefits, such as the opportunity to purchase various products and services (such as consumer electronics, home appliances and insurance products) from third parties at discounted prices, for which the Company earns commissions. Dues payments for THE Club are billed and collected together with the annual maintenance fees billed to the Company’s members who are also members of THE Club.

Sales and Financing of VOIs. The Company markets and sells VOIs that provide access to its network of 79 Diamond Resorts-branded and 180 affiliated resorts and hotels and four cruise itineraries. Since late 2007, the Company has marketed and sold VOIs primarily in the form of points.

The Company has 50 sales centers across the globe, 44 of which are located at branded and managed resorts, two of which are located at affiliated resorts and four of which are located off-site. With respect to the Company’s 50 sales centers, it currently employs an in-house sales and marketing team at 38 locations and also maintains agency agreements with independent sales organizations at 12 locations.

The Company closes its VOI sales primarily through tours. These tours occur at sales centers and include a tour of the resort properties, as well as an in-depth explanation of the points-based VOI system and the value proposition it offers the Company’s members. The tours are designed to provide guests with an in-depth overview of the company and its resort network, as well as a customized presentation to explain how the Company’s products and services can meet their vacationing needs.

The Company provides loans to eligible customers who purchase VOIs through its U.S. and Mexican sales centers and choose to finance their purchase. These loans are collateralized by the underlying VOI, generally bear interest at a fixed rate, have a typical term of 10 years and are generally made available to consumers who make a down payment within established credit guidelines. The Company’s minimum required down payment is 10%. Since late 2008, the Company’s average cash down payment has been 18.3% and the average initial equity contribution for new VOI purchases by existing owners (which take into account the value of VOIs already held by purchasers and pledged to secure a new consumer loan) has been 30.7%, which has resulted in an average combined cash and equity contribution of 49.0% for these new VOI purchases. As of December 31, 2012, the Company’s loan portfolio (including loans transferred to special-purpose subsidiaries in connection with conduit, loan sale and securitization transactions) was comprised of approximately 56,000 loans (which includes loans that have been written off for financial reporting purposes due to payment defaults and delinquencies but which the Company continues to administer), with an outstanding aggregate loan balance of approximately $513.0 million. Approximately 41,000 of these consumer loans are loans under which the consumer was not in

default, and the average balance of such loans was approximately $9,200. Customers were in default (which we define as having occurred upon the earlier of (i) the initiation of cancellation or foreclosure proceedings or (ii) the customer’s account becoming over 180 days delinquent) under approximately 15,000 of these loans, and the average balance of such loans was approximately $9,100. The weighted-average interest rate for all outstanding loans is approximately 15.90%, which includes a weighted average interest rate for loans in default of approximately 16.6%. As of December 31, 2012, approximately 8.35% of the Company’s approximately 490,000 owner-families had a loan outstanding with the Company.

Through arrangements with three financial institutions in the United Kingdom, the Company brokers financing for qualified customers who purchase points through its European sales centers.

The Company takes measures to adjust the percentage of the sales of its VOIs that it finances based on prevailing economic conditions. For example, during the 12 month period prior to October 2008, the Company financed approximately 67.0% of the total amount of its VOI sales. In response to the dramatic contraction of conduit and securitization financing during the economic downturn that began in late 2008, management implemented a strategy to increase the cash sales of VOIs, which included offering discounts for purchases paid in cash and raising the interest rates applicable to financed purchases. As a result of these changes, from October 2008 through September 2011, the Company financed approximately 34.6% of its total VOI sales. In October 2011, in response to some stabilization in the consumer markets and improved securitization and conduit markets, the Company eliminated incentives for cash VOI purchases and took other actions to generate more financed sales of VOIs. From October 1, 2011 through December 31, 2012, the Company financed approximately 69.3% of the total amount of its VOI sales.

The following is a list of entities included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements:

Some of the above entities, which include corporations, limited liability companies and partnerships, have several subsidiaries.

On August 31, 2010, the Company acquired a majority of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of ILX Resorts Incorporated (the “ILX Acquisition”) through its wholly-owned subsidiary, ILX Acquisition, Inc. (“ILXA”).

On July 1, 2011, the Company completed the acquisition of certain assets of Tempus Resorts International, Ltd. and certain of its subsidiaries (the “Tempus Resorts Acquisition”) through Mystic Dunes, LLC, a wholly-owned special-purpose subsidiary of Tempus Acquisition, LLC.

See Note 21—Business Combinations for further details on these acquisitions.

The Company recorded a $1.0 million reclassification between due from related parties, net and due to related parties, net in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2011 as compared to the amounts reported in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 in order to conform to the changes made to the related party netting process in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 210, “Balance Sheet—Offsetting.”

In addition, the Company recorded reclassifications between loan portfolio expense and other operating expense of $2.1 million and $2.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) in order to more closely align credit card expense with the placement of the corresponding revenue.

Principles of Consolidation—The accompanying consolidated financial statements include all subsidiaries of the Company. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated from the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Use of Estimates—The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates and assumptions, including those related to revenue, bad debts and income taxes. These estimates are based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that management believe are reasonable under the circumstances. The results of the Company’s analysis form the basis for making assumptions about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions, and the impact of such differences may be material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Significant estimates were used by the Company to estimate the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the ILX Acquisition, the Tempus Resorts Acquisition, the PMR Acquisition and the Aegean Blue Acquisition during the periods presented. These estimates included projections of future cash flows derived from sales of VOIs, mortgages and contracts receivable, member relationship lists, management services revenue and rental income. Additionally, the Company made significant estimates of costs associated with such projected revenues including but not limited to loan defaults, recoveries and discount rates. The Company also made significant estimates which include: (i) allowance for loan and contract losses and provision for uncollectible Vacation Interest sales revenue; (ii) useful lives of property and equipment; (iii) estimated useful lives of intangible assets acquired; (iv) estimated costs to build or acquire any additional Vacation Interests, estimated total revenues expected to be earned on a project, related estimated provision for uncollectible Vacation Interest sales revenue and sales incentives, estimated projected future cost and volume of recoveries of VOIs, estimated sales price per point and estimated number of points sold used to allocate certain unsold Vacation Interests to Vacation Interest cost of sales under the relative sales value method; and (v) the valuation allowance recorded against deferred tax assets. It is at least reasonably possible that a material change in one or more of these estimates may occur in the near term and that such change may materially affect actual results.

The Company records Vacation Interest cost of sales using the relative sales value method in accordance with ASC 978, which requires the Company to make significant estimates which are subject to significant uncertainty. In 2011, the Company revised its estimated number of points to be sold under the relative sales value method using a weighted average point value per Collection rather than a calculated point per interval specific to each resort. This change in estimate resulted in an increase of $9.3 million to our net income during the year ended December 31, 2011.

Management and Member Services Revenue Recognition—Management and member services revenue includes resort management fees charged to HOAs and Collections that hold the Company’s and other members’

VOIs, as well as revenues from the Company’s operation of THE Club. These revenues are recorded and recognized as follows:

All of these revenues are allocated to the Hospitality and Management Services business segment.

Consolidated Resort Operations Revenue Recognition—Consolidated resort operations revenue consists of the following:

All of these revenues are allocated to the Hospitality and Management Services business segment.

Vacation Interest Sales Revenue Recognition—With respect to the Company’s recognition of revenue from Vacation Interest sales, the Company follows the guidelines included in ASC 978, “Real Estate-Time-Sharing Activities” (“ASC 978”). Under ASC 978, Vacation Interest sales revenue is divided into separate components that include the revenue earned on the sale of the VOI and the revenue earned on the sales incentive given to the customer as motivation to purchase the VOI. Each component is treated as a separate transaction but both are recorded in Vacation Interest sales line of the Company’s statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss). In order to recognize revenue on the sale of VOIs, ASC 978 requires a demonstration of a buyer’s commitment (generally a minimum cash payment of 10% of the purchase price plus the value of any sales incentives provided). A buyer’s down payment and subsequent mortgage payments are adequate to demonstrate a commitment to pay for the VOI once 10% of the purchase price plus the value of the incentives provided to consummate a VOI transaction has been covered. The Company recognizes sales of VOIs on an accrual basis after (i) a binding sales contract has been executed; (ii) the buyer has adequately demonstrated a commitment to pay for the VOI; (iii) the rescission period required under applicable law has expired; (iv) collectibility of the receivable representing the remainder of the sales price is reasonably assured; and (v) the Company has completed substantially all of its obligations with respect to any development related to the real estate sold (i.e., construction has been substantially completed and certain minimum project sales levels have been met). If the buyer’s commitment has not met ASC 978 guidelines, the Vacation Interest sales revenue and related Vacation Interest cost of sales and direct selling costs are deferred and recognized under the installment method until the buyer’s commitment is satisfied, at which time the remaining amount of the sale is recognized. The net deferred revenue is included in mortgages and contracts receivable on the Company’s balance sheet. Under ASC 978, the provision for uncollectible Vacation Interest sales revenue is recorded as a reduction of Vacation Interest sales revenue.

Vacation Interest Sales Revenue, Net—Vacation Interest sales revenue, net, is comprised of Vacation Interest sales, net of a provision for uncollectible Vacation Interest sales revenue. Vacation interest sales consist of revenue from the sale of points, which can be utilized for vacations at any of the resorts in the Company’s network for varying lengths of stay, net of the expense associated with certain sales incentives. A variety of sales incentives are routinely provided as sales tools. Sales centers have predetermined budgets for sales incentives and manage the use of incentives accordingly. A provision for uncollectible Vacation Interest sales revenue is recorded upon completion of each financed sale. The provision is calculated based on historical default experience associated with the customer’s FICO score. Additionally, the Company analyzes its allowance for loan and contract losses quarterly and make adjustments based on current trends in consumer loan delinquencies and defaults and other criteria, if necessary. Since late 2007, the Company has sold VOIs primarily in the form of points. All of the Company’s Vacation Interest sales revenue, net, is allocated to the Vacation Interest Sales and Financing business segment.

Vacation Interest sales, net of provision consists of the following for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, (in thousands):

Interest Revenue—The Company’s interest revenue consists primarily of interest earned on consumer loans. Interest earned on consumer loans is accrued based on the contractual provisions of the loan documents. Interest accruals on consumer loans are suspended at the earliest of (i) default in the consumer’s first payment on the

loan; (ii) the initiation of cancellation or foreclosure proceedings; or (iii) the customer’s account becoming over 180 days delinquent. If payments are received while a consumer loan is considered delinquent, interest is recognized on a cash basis. Interest accrual resumes once a customer has made six timely payments on the loan. All interest revenue is allocated to the Vacation Interest Sales and Financing business segment, with the exception of interest revenue earned on bank account balances, which is reported in Corporate and Other.

Other Revenue—Other revenue includes (i) collection fees paid by owners when they bring their accounts current after collection efforts have been made by us on behalf of HOAs and Collections; (ii) closing costs paid by purchasers on sales of VOIs; (iii) revenue associated with certain sales incentives given to customers as motivation to purchase a VOI, which is recorded upon recognition of the related VOI sales revenue; and (iv) late/impound fees assessed on consumer loans. Revenues associated with item (i) above are allocated to the Company’s Hospitality and Management Services business segment, and revenues associated with items (ii), (iii) and (iv) above are allocated to the Company’s Vacation Interest Sales and Financing business segment.

Management and Member Services Expenses—Currently, substantially all direct expenses related to the provision of services to the HOAs (other than for the Company’s St. Maarten resorts, for which the Company provides services traditionally administered by an HOA) and the Collections are recovered through the Company’s management agreements and, consequently, are not recorded as expenses. The Company passes through to the HOAs and the Collections certain overhead charges incurred to operate the resorts. In accordance with guidance included in ASC 605-45, “Revenue Recognition—Principal Agent Considerations,” reimbursements from the HOAs and the Collections relating to pass-through costs are recorded net of the related expenses. These expenses are allocated to the Hospitality and Management Services business segment.

Expenses associated with the Company’s operation of THE Club include costs incurred for the third-party call center, annual membership fees paid to Interval International on behalf of each member of THE CLUB and administrative expenses. These expenses are allocated to the Hospitality and Management Services business segment.

Management and member services expenses also include costs incurred under the sales and marketing management fee-for-service arrangement with a third party. These expenses are allocated to the Hospitality and Management Services business segment.

Consolidated Resort Operations Expenses—With respect to the St. Maarten resorts, the Company records expenses associated with housekeeping, front desk, maintenance, landscaping and other similar activities, which are recovered by the maintenance fees recorded in consolidated resort operations revenue. In addition, for the two properties located in St. Maarten, the Company also bills the owners for capital project assessments to repair and replace the amenities of these resorts, as well as assessments to reserve the out-of-pocket deductibles for hurricanes and other natural disasters. These assessments are deferred until the refurbishment activity occurs, at which time the amounts collected are recognized as consolidated resort operations revenue with offsetting expense recorded under consolidated resort operations expense. The Company’s expense associated with the St. Maarten properties has historically constituted a majority of the Company’s Consolidated Resort operations expense. Furthermore, consolidated resort operations expense includes the costs related to food and beverage operations at certain resorts whose restaurants the Company manages directly. Similarly, the expenses of operating the golf courses, spas and retail and gift shops are included in consolidated resort operations expense. These expenses are allocated to the Hospitality and Management Services business segment.

Vacation Interest Cost of Sales—At the time the Company records Vacation Interest sales revenue, it records the related Vacation Interest cost of sales. The Company records Vacation Interest cost of sales using the

relative sales value method in accordance with ASC 978. This method, which was designed originally for developers of timeshare resorts, requires the Company to make a number of projections and estimates which are subject to significant uncertainty. In order to determine the amount that must be expensed for each dollar of Vacation Interest sales with respect to a particular project, the Company is required to prepare a forecast of sales and certain costs for the entire project’s life cycle. These forecasts require the Company to estimate, among other things, the costs acquire (or if applicable, build) additional VOIs, the total revenues expected to be earned on the project (including estimations of sales price per point and the aggregate number of points to be sold), the proper provision for uncollectible Vacation Interest sales revenue and sales incentives, and the projected future cost and volume of recoveries of VOIs. Then, these costs as a percentage of Vacation Interest sales are determined and that percentage is applied retroactively to all prior sales and is applied to sales within the current period and future periods. These projections are reviewed on a regular basis, and the relevant estimates used in the projections are revised (if necessary) based upon historical results and management’s new estimates. The Company requires a seasoning of pricing strategy changes before such changes fully affect the projection, which generally occurs over a six-month period. If any estimates are revised, the Company is required to adjust its Vacation Interest cost of sales using the revised estimates, and the entire adjustment required to correct Vacation Interest cost of sales over the life of the project to date is taken in the period in which the estimates are revised. Accordingly, small changes in any of the numerous estimates in the model can have a significant financial statement impact, both positively and negatively, because of the retroactive adjustment required by ASC 978. See “Unsold Vacation Interests, net” below for further detail.

Advertising, Sales and Marketing Costs—Advertising, sales and marketing costs are expensed as incurred, except for costs directly related to VOI that are not eligible for revenue recognition under ASC 978, as described in “- Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates—Vacation Interest Sales Revenue Recognition,” which are deferred along with related revenue until the buyer’s commitment requirements are satisfied. Advertising, sales and marketing costs are allocated to the Vacation Interest Sales and Financing business segment. Advertising expense recognized was $5.5 million, $4.5 million and $1.9 million and for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Vacation Interest Carrying Cost, Net—The Company is responsible for paying annual maintenance fees, assessments, and reserves on the Company’s unsold Vacation Interests to the HOAs and the Collections. Vacation Interest carrying cost, net, includes amounts paid for delinquent maintenance fees related to VOIs acquired pursuant to the Company’s inventory recovery agreements, except for amounts that are capitalized to unsold Vacation Interests, net.

To offset the Company’s Vacation Interest carrying cost, the Company rents VOIs controlled by the Company to third parties on a short-term basis. The Company also generates revenue on sales of one-week rentals and mini-vacations, which allow prospective owners to sample a resort property. This revenue and the associated expenses are deferred until the vacation is used by the customer or the expiration date, whichever is earlier. Revenue from resort rentals, one-week rentals and mini-vacations is recognized as a reduction to Vacation Interest carrying cost in accordance with ASC 978, with the exception of the Company’s European sampler product and a U.S. fixed-term product, both of which are three years in duration and are treated as Vacation Interest sales revenue. Vacation interest carrying cost, net, is allocated to the Vacation Interest Sales and Financing business segment.

Loan Portfolio Expenses—Loan portfolio expenses include payroll and administrative costs of the finance operations and credit card processing fees. These costs are expensed as incurred with the exception of contract receivable origination costs, which are capitalized and amortized over the term of the related contracts receivable as an adjustment to interest revenue using the effective interest method in accordance with guidelines issued under ASC 310, “Receivables” (“ASC 310”).

Other Operating Expenses—Other operating expenses include credit card fees incurred by the Company when customers remit down payments associated with a VOI purchase in the form of credit cards and also include certain sales incentives given to customers as motivation to purchase a VOI and are expensed as the related Vacation Interest sales revenue is recognized. These expenses are allocated to the Company’s Vacation Interest Sales and Financing business segment.

General and Administrative Expenses—General and administrative expenses include payroll and benefits, legal, audit and other professional services, costs related to mergers and acquisitions, travel costs, system-related costs and corporate facility expense incurred. These expenses are not allocated to the Company’s business segments, but rather are reported under Corporate and Other.

Depreciation and Amortization—The Company records depreciation expense in connection with depreciable property and equipment it purchased or acquired, including buildings and leasehold improvements, furniture and office equipment, land improvements and computer software and equipment. In addition, the Company records amortization expense intangible assets with a finite life acquired by the Company, including management contracts, member relationships, distributor relationships and others. Depreciation and amortization expense is not allocated to the Company’s business segments, but rather is reported in Corporate and Other.

Interest Expense—Interest expense related to corporate-level indebtedness is reported in Corporate and Other. Interest expense related to the Company’s securitizations and consumer loan financings is allocated to the Vacation Interest Sales and Financing business segment.

Income Taxes—The Company is subject to income taxes in the U.S. (including federal and state) and numerous foreign jurisdictions in which the Company operates. The Company records income taxes under the asset and liability method, whereby deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis, and attributable to operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. Accounting standards regarding income taxes require a reduction of the carrying amounts of deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance if, based on the available evidence, it is more likely than not that such assets will not be realized. Accordingly, the need to establish valuation allowances for deferred tax assets is assessed periodically based on a more-likely-than-not realization threshold. This assessment considers, among other matters, the nature, frequency and severity of current and cumulative losses, forecasts of future profitability, the duration of statutory carry forward periods, the Company’s experience with operating loss and tax credit carry forwards not expiring unused, and tax planning alternatives.

The Company recorded a deferred tax asset as a result of net operating losses incurred (the use of which for tax purposes may be subject to limitations), and as part of its financial reporting process, the Company must assess the likelihood that its deferred tax assets can be recovered. During this process, certain relevant criteria are evaluated, including the existence of deferred tax liabilities against which deferred tax assets can be applied, and taxable income in future years. Unless recovery is more likely than not, a reserve in the form of a valuation allowance is established as an offset to the deferred tax asset. As a result of uncertainties regarding the Company’s ability to generate sufficient taxable income to utilize its net operating loss carry-forwards, the Company maintains a valuation allowance against the balance of its deferred tax assets.

examinations. The Company considers many factors when evaluating and estimating the Company’s tax positions and tax benefits, which may require periodic adjustments and which may not accurately anticipate actual outcomes.

Cash and Cash Equivalents—Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash, money market funds, and all highly-liquid investments purchased with an original maturity date of three months or less.

Cash in Escrow and Restricted Cash—Cash in escrow consists of deposits received on sales of VOIs that are held in escrow until the legal rescission period has expired. Restricted cash consists primarily of reserve cash held for the benefit of the secured note holders and cash collections on certain mortgages receivable that secure collateralized notes. See Note 15—Borrowings. Additionally, in its capacity as resort manager, the Company collects cash on overnight rental operations on behalf of owners and HOAs, which are captioned “Rental trust” in Note 4—Cash in Escrow and Restricted Cash.

Mortgages and Contracts Receivable and Allowance for Loan and Contract Losses—The Company accounts for mortgages (for the past financing of intervals) and contracts receivable (for the financing of points) under ASC 310.

Mortgages and contracts receivable that the Company originates or acquires are recorded net of (i) deferred loan and contract costs, (ii) the discount or premium on the acquired mortgage pool and (iii) the related allowance for loan and contract losses. Loan and contract origination costs incurred in connection with providing financing for VOIs are capitalized and amortized over the term of the related mortgages or contracts receivable as an adjustment to interest revenue using the effective interest method. Because the Company sells VOIs only in the form of points, the Company currently originates contracts receivables, instead of mortgage receivables. The Company records a sales provision for estimated contracts receivable losses as a reduction to Vacation Interest sales revenue. This provision is calculated as projected gross losses for originated contracts receivable, taking into account estimated VOI recoveries. If actual mortgage and contracts receivable losses differ materially from these estimates, the Company’s future results of operations may be adversely impacted.

The Company applies its historical default percentages based on credit scores of the individual customers to its mortgage and contracts receivable population and evaluates other factors such as economic conditions, industry trends, defaults and past due agings to analyze the adequacy of the allowance. Any adjustments to the allowance for mortgage and contracts receivable loss are recorded within Vacation Interest sales revenue.

The Company charges off mortgages and contracts receivable upon the earliest of (i) the initiation of cancellation or foreclosure proceedings; or (ii) the customer’s account becoming over 180 days delinquent. Once a customer has made six timely payments following the event leading to the charge off, the charge off is reversed. A default in a customer’s initial payment results in a rescission of the sale. All collection and foreclosure costs are expensed as incurred.

The mortgages acquired on August 31, 2010 in connection with the ILX Acquisition, on July 1, 2011 in connection with the Tempus Resorts Acquisition, on May 21, 2012 in connection with the PMR Acquisition and on October 5, 2012 in connection with the Aegean Blue Acquisition are each accounted for separately as an acquired pool of loans. Any discount or premium associated with each pool of loans is amortized using an amortization method that approximates the effective interest method.

Due from Related Parties, Net and Due to Related Parties, Net—Amounts due from related parties, net, and due to related parties, net consist primarily of transactions with HOAs at properties at which the Company acts as the management company or Collections that hold the real estate underlying the VOIs that the Company sells. See Note 6—Transactions with Related Parties for further detail. Due to the fact that the right of offset exists

between the Company and the HOAs and the Collections, the Company evaluates amounts due to and from each HOA and Collection at each reporting period to present the balances as either a net due to or a net due from related parties in accordance with the requirements of ASC 210, “Balance Sheet—Offsetting.”

Assets Held for Sale—Assets held for sale are recorded at the lower of cost or their estimated fair value less costs to sell and are not subject to depreciation. Sale of the assets classified as such is probable, and transfer of the assets is expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale, within one year of the balance sheet date.

Unsold Vacation Interests, Net—Unsold VOIs are valued at the lower of cost or fair market value. The cost of unsold VOIs includes acquisition costs, hard and soft construction costs (which are comprised of architectural and engineering costs incurred during construction), the cost incurred to recover inventory and other carrying costs (including interest, real estate taxes and other costs incurred during the construction period). Costs are expensed to Vacation Interest cost of sales under the relative sales value method. In accordance with ASC 978, under the relative sales value method, cost of sales is calculated as a percentage of Vacation Interest sales revenue using a cost-of-sales percentage ratio of total estimated development costs to total estimated Vacation Interest sales revenue, including estimated future revenue and incorporating factors such as changes in prices and the recovery of VOIs (generally as a result of maintenance fee and contracts receivable defaults). In accordance with ASC 978, the selling, marketing and administrative costs associated with any sale, whether the original sale or subsequent resale of recovered inventory, are expensed as incurred.

In accordance with ASC 978, on a quarterly basis, the Company recalculates the total estimated Vacation Interest sales revenue and total estimated costs. The effects of changes in these estimates are accounted for as a current period adjustment so that the balance sheet at the end of the period of change and the accounting in subsequent periods are as they would have been if the revised estimates had been the original estimates. These adjustments can be material.

In North America, the Company capitalizes all maintenance fees and assessments paid to the HOAs and the Collections related to the inventory recovery agreements into unsold Vacation Interests, net for the first two years of a member’s maintenance fee delinquency or in the case of entering into a new interval recovery relationship with an HOA or Collection whether pursuant to an acquisition or otherwise. Following this two-year period, all assessments and maintenance fees paid under these agreements are expensed in Vacation Interest carrying cost, net. No entry is recorded upon the recovery of the delinquent inventory.

In Europe, the Company enters into inventory recovery arrangements similar to those in North America with the majority of the HOAs and the European Collection; however, they are informal in nature. Accordingly, the Company capitalizes all maintenance fees and assessments paid to the HOAs and the European Collection related to the inventory recovery arrangements into due from related parties-net for the first two years of a member’s maintenance fee delinquency. Following this two-year period, all assessments and maintenance fees paid under these arrangements are expensed in Vacation Interest carrying cost, net. Once the delinquent inventory is recovered, the Company reclassifies the amounts capitalized in due from related parties, net to unsold Vacation Interests, net.

Foreign Currency Translation—Assets and liabilities in foreign locations are translated into U.S. dollars using rates of exchange in effect at the end of the reporting period. Income and expense accounts are translated into U.S. dollars using average rates of exchange. The net gain or loss is shown as a translation adjustment and is included in other comprehensive income (loss) in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss). Holding gains and losses from foreign currency transactions are also included in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss).

Other Comprehensive Income—Other comprehensive income includes all changes in member capital (net assets) from non-owner sources such as foreign currency translation adjustments. The Company accounts for other comprehensive income in accordance with ASC 220, “Comprehensive Income.”

Under the Jumpstart our Business Startups Act of 2012 (“JOBS Act”), emerging growth companies can delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies. However, the Company is hereby making an irrevocable election not to take advantage of this extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act as allowed by Section 107(b)(1) of the JOBS Act.

In February 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“ASU 2013-02”). This update requires presentation of reclassifications from accumulated other comprehensive income by component to net income either on the face of the income statement or in a single footnote, but does not require any new information to be disclosed. For SEC reporting companies, this update is effective for the interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The Company has adopted ASU 2013-2 as of the Company’s interim period ending March 31, 2013. The adoption of this update has not had any impact on the Company’s financial statements as the Company has not had any reclassifications from accumulated other comprehensive income to net income.

Geographic Concentration—Currently, portions of the Company’s consumer loan portfolio are concentrated in certain geographic regions within the U.S. As of December 31, 2012, the Company’s loans to California, Arizona, Florida and New York residents constituted 21.5%, 8.6%, 6.5% and 5.2%, respectively, of the consumer loan

portfolio. The deterioration of the economic condition and financial well-being of the regions in which the Company has significant loan concentrations such as California, Arizona, New York or Florida, could adversely affect its consumer loan portfolio, business and results of operations. No other state or foreign country concentration accounted for in excess of 5.0% of the portfolio. The credit risk inherent in such concentrations is dependent upon regional and general economic stability, which affects property values and the financial well-being of the borrowers.

In July 2010, the Company entered into an interest rate cap agreement (“2010 Cap Agreement”) to manage its exposure to interest rate increases. The 2010 Cap Agreement terminates on July 20, 2013 and bears a strike rate of 5.5% and a one-month LIBOR based on a notional amount of $30.0 million.

During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company entered into a series of interest rate cap agreements to further limit its exposure to interest rate increases (collectively, “2012 Cap Agreements”). The following table presents certain information regarding the 2012 Cap Agreements:

As of December 31, 2012, the fair value of these derivative assets was calculated to be $0 based on the discounted cash flow model.

As of December 31, 2012, the Company had $75.0 million outstanding under its 2008 Conduit Facility (see Note 15—Borrowings for the definition of the 2008 Conduit Facility). This outstanding balance was covered by the 2010 Cap Agreement and the 2012 Cap Agreements. See Note 19—Fair Value Measurements for further details.

Cash in escrow and restricted cash consisted of the following as of December 31 (in thousands):

In connection with the ILX Acquisition, the Tempus Resorts Acquisition, the PMR Acquisition and the Aegean Blue Acquisition, the Company acquired $0.1 million, $2.9 million, zero and $1.9 million in cash in escrow and restricted cash. See Note 21—Business Combinations for further details on these acquisitions.

Note 5—Mortgages and Contracts Receivable and Allowance for Loan and Contract Losses

The Company provides financing to purchasers of VOIs at North American sales centers that are collateralized by their VOIs. Eligibility for this financing is determined based on the customers’ FICO credit scores. As of December 31, 2012, the mortgages and contracts receivable bore interest at fixed rates between 0.0% and 21.5%. The term of the mortgages and contracts receivable are from one year to fifteen years and may be prepaid at any time without penalty. The weighted average interest rate of outstanding mortgages and contracts receivable was 15.7% and 15.9% as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

The Company charges off mortgages and contracts receivable upon the earliest of (i) the initiation of cancellation or foreclosure proceedings; or (ii) the customer’s account becoming over 180 days delinquent. Once a customer has made six timely payments following the event leading to the charge off, the charge off is reversed. A default in a customer’s initial payment results in a rescission of the sale. All collection and foreclosure costs are expensed as incurred. Mortgages and contracts receivable between 90 and 180 days past due as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 were 2.6% and 3.9%, respectively, of gross mortgages and contracts receivable.

Mortgages and contracts receivable originated by the Company are recorded net of deferred loan and contract origination costs, and the related allowance for loan and contract losses. Loan and contract origination costs incurred in connection with providing financing for VOIs are capitalized and amortized over the estimated life of the mortgages or contracts receivable based on historical prepayments as a decrease to interest revenue using the effective interest method. Amortization of deferred loan and contract origination costs charged to interest revenue was $3.3 million, $2.8 million and $3.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

The Company recorded a $3.3 million discount on the mortgage pool acquired on April 27, 2007 in connection with the Merger, which discount is being amortized over the life of the related acquired mortgage pool. As of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the net unamortized discount on this acquired mortgage pool was $0.3 million and $0.5 million, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, amortization of $0.2 million, $0.3 million and $0.4 million, respectively, was recorded as an increase to interest revenue.

The Company recorded a $0.8 million premium on the purchased Mystic Dunes mortgage pool that was part of the Tempus Resorts Acquisition and is being amortized over the life of the related acquired mortgage pool. As of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the net unamortized premium was $0.5 million and $6.4 million, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, amortization of $0.2 million and $1.1 million respectively, was recorded as a decrease to interest revenue.

The Company recorded a $0.1 million premium on May 21, 2012 on the purchased Pacific Monarch Resorts mortgage pool and is being amortized over the life of the related acquired mortgage pool. As of December 31, 2012, the net unamortized premium was $0.1 million. During the year ended December 31, 2012, amortization of $0.04 million was recorded as a decrease to interest revenue.

Mortgages and contracts receivable, net consisted of the following as of December 31 (in thousands):

As of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, $340.4 million and $333.0 million, respectively, of the gross amount of mortgages and contracts receivable were collateralized against the Company’s various debt instruments included in “Securitization notes and Funding Facilities” caption in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. See Note 15—Borrowings for further detail.

The following reflects the contractual principal maturities of originated and acquired mortgages and contracts receivable as of December 31 (in thousands):

Activity in the allowance for loan and contract losses associated with mortgages and contracts receivable for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 is as follows (in thousands):

The provision for uncollectible Vacation Interest sales revenue in the table above showing activity in the allowance for loan and contract losses associated with mortgages and contracts receivable is exclusive of ASC 978 adjustments related to deferred revenue, as well as adjustments for the rescission period required under applicable law. The ASC 978 adjustments decreased the provision for uncollectible Vacation Interest sales revenue by $0.6 million and $0.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The adjustments for the rescission period decreased the provision for uncollectible Vacation Interest sales revenue by $0.4 million and $0.02 million for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

A summary of credit quality as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 is as follows (in thousands):

FICO credit scores were updated as of December 31, 2012 for all mortgages and contracts receivables with the exception of those acquired through the PMR Acquisition.

Amounts due from related parties, net and due to related parties, net consist primarily of transactions with HOAs or Collections for which the Company acts as the management company. Due from related parties, net transactions include management fees for the Company’s role as the management company, certain expenses reimbursed by HOAs and Collections, and the allocation of a portion of the Company’s Vacation Interest carrying costs, management and member services, consolidated resort operations, loan portfolio and general and administrative expenses according to a pre-determined schedule approved by the board of directors at each HOA and Collection. Due to related parties, net transactions include (i) the amounts due to HOAs under inventory recovery agreements the Company enters into regularly with certain HOAs and similar agreements with the Collections pursuant to which the Company recaptures VOIs, either in the form of vacation points or vacation intervals, and brings them into the Company’s inventory for sale to customers; (ii) the maintenance fee and assessment fee liability owed to HOAs for intervals or to the Collections for points owned by the Company (this liability is recorded on January 1 of each year for the entire amount of annual maintenance and assessment fees and is relieved throughout the year by the payments remitted to the HOAs and the Collections; these maintenance and assessment fees are also recorded as prepaid expenses and other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and amortized ratably over the year); (iii) cleaning fees owed to the HOAs and Collections for room stays incurred by the Company’s customers; (iv) subsidy liabilities according to a developer guarantee at a resort; in addition, the Company carries subsidy liabilities owed to certain HOAs to fund the negative cash flows at these HOAs according to certain subsidy agreements which have been terminated; and (v) miscellaneous transactions with other non-HOA related parties.

Due from related parties, net consisted of the following as of December 31 (in thousands):

In connection with the PMR Acquisition completed in May 2012, the Company acquired $2.1 million in amounts due from HOAs for management fee, rental commission, collection services, and various other services provided based on an appraisal. See Note 21—Business Combinations for further details on this acquisition.

Due to related parties, net consisted of the following as of December 31 (in thousands):

In connection with the Tempus Resorts Acquisition and the Aegean Blue Acquisition, the Company assumed $2.7 million and $0.6 million in amounts due to HOAs. See Note 21—Business Combinations for further details on this acquisition.

The Company entered into inventory recovery agreements with substantially all HOAs for its managed resorts in North America and similar arrangements with all of the Collections and a majority of its European managed resorts, pursuant to which it recaptures VOIs, either in the form of points or intervals, and brings them into its inventory for sale to customers. Under these agreements, the Company is required to pay maintenance and assessment fees to the HOAs and Collections, including any past due amounts, for any VOIs that it has recovered. These agreements automatically renew for additional one-year terms unless expressly terminated by either party in advance of the agreement expiration period. These agreements were renewed for 2012, 2011 and 2010. Such agreements contain provisions for the Company to utilize the VOIs associated with such maintenance fees and to reclaim such VOIs in the future. Each agreement provides for an initial June 30 settlement date and adjustments thereafter. The Company has renewed these agreements for 2013.

Included within the amounts reported as management and member services revenue are revenues from resort management services provided to the HOAs, which totaled $37.9 million, $33.2 million and $28.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. See Note 1—Background, Business and Basis of Presentation above for detail of these services performed.

Also included within the amount reported as management and member services revenue are revenues earned from managing the Collections. These amounts total $30.3 million, $23.8 million and $19.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Two members of the board of managers of DRP, Messrs. Zachary Warren and Scott Minerd, are principals of Guggenheim Partners, LLC, an affiliate of the DRP Holdco, LLC (the “Guggenheim Investor”), a 21.1% investor in the Company. Pursuant to the Fifth Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of DRP, dated as of October 15, 2012, Guggenheim Partners, LLC has the right to appoint two members to the board of managers of DRP, subject to certain security ownership thresholds, and Messrs. Warren and Minerd have served as members of the board of managers of DRP as the appointees of Guggenheim Partners, LLC.

Also, an affiliate of Guggenheim Partners, LLC is currently an investor in the Company’s DROT 2009 Notes and DROT 2011 Notes. See Note 15—Borrowings for the definition of and more detail regarding the DROT 2009 Notes and DROT 2011 Notes.

In connection with the Tempus Resorts Acquisition, Tempus Acquisition, LLC, entered into a Credit and Security Agreement, dated November 23, 2010, with an affiliate of the Guggenheim Investor, as the lender, and Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC, also an affiliate of the Guggenheim Investor, as administrative agent. This loan was a revolving facility with a maximum principal amount of $8.0 million, with an interest rate of 10%. This loan was repaid on July 1, 2011 in connection with the consummation of the Tempus Resorts Acquisition. During the years ended December 31, 2011, Tempus Acquisition, LLC made an aggregate $0.2 million in interest payments and an aggregate $6.5 million in principal payments on the loan.

On July 1, 2011, the Company completed the Tempus Resorts Acquisition. In order to fund this acquisition, Tempus Acquisition, LLC entered into the Tempus Acquisition Loan with Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC. See Note 15—Borrowings for the definition of and more detail on the Tempus Acquisition Loan. During the year ended December 31, 2012, Tempus Acquisition, LLC made an aggregate of approximately $4.2 million in interest payments and approximately $9.3 million in principal payments on the Tempus Acquisition Loan. During the year ended December 31, 2011, Tempus Acquisition, LLC made an aggregate of approximately $2.0 million in interest payments and $0 in principal payments on the Tempus Acquisition Loan.

On May 21, 2012, the Company completed the PMR Acquisition. In order to fund this acquisition, DPMA entered into the PMR Acquisition Loan with Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC. See Note 15—Borrowings for the definition of and more detail on the PMR Acquisition Loan. During the year ended December 31, 2012, DPMA made an aggregate of approximately $3.9 million in interest payments and approximately $5.0 million in principal payments on the PMR Acquisition Loan.

Other receivables, net consisted of the following as of December 31 (in thousands):

In connection with the Tempus Resorts Acquisition completed in July 2011, the Company acquired $2.2 million in other receivables mainly associated with the mortgage/contracts interest receivable and miscellaneous receivables. In connection with the PMR Acquisition completed in May 2012, the Company acquired $2.9 million in other receivables, of which $2.6 million was related to mini-vacation and sampler programs based on an appraisal. In connection with the Aegean Blue Acquisition completed in October 2012, the Company acquired $0.1 million in miscellaneous receivables based on a preliminary appraisal. See Note 21—Business Combinations for further details on these acquisitions.

In addition, the Company submitted a $2.2 million refund claim to the Mexican tax authority to recover certain value-added taxes paid in connection with the PMR Acquisition, which is included in the tax refund receivable line above.

The nature of selected balances included in prepaid expenses and other assets, net includes:

Prepaid and maintenance fees—prepaid annual maintenance fees billed by the HOAs at the resorts not managed by the Company on unsold Vacation Interests owned by the Company, which are charged to expense ratably over the year.

Prepaid rent—portion of rent paid in advance and charged to expense in accordance with lease agreements.

Prepaid expenses and other assets, net consisted of the following as of December 31 (in thousands):

With the exception of Vacation Interest purchases in transit and assets to be disposed (not actively marketed), prepaid expenses are expensed as the underlying assets are utilized or amortized. Debt issuance costs incurred in connection with obtaining funding for the Company have been capitalized and are being amortized over the lives of the related funding agreements as a component of interest expense using a method which approximates the effective interest method. Amortization of capitalized debt issuance costs included in interest expense was $5.0 million, $5.0 million and $2.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. See Note 15—Borrowings for more detail.

Class A and Class B Notes, $2.3 million related to the PMR Acquisition Loan, $1.5 million related to the Diamond Resorts Owners Trust Series 2011-1 Notes, $1.2 million related to the Tempus Acquisition Loan, $0.3 million related to the 2008 Conduit Facility, $0.3 million related to the ILXA Receivables Loan and the ILXA Inventory Loan, and $0.1 million related to the Tempus Inventory Loan. See Note 15—Borrowings for definition of and more detail on the Company’s borrowings.

Debt issuance costs, net of amortization recorded as of December 31, 2011 were comprised of $14.7 million related to the Senior Secured Notes, $4.8 million related to the Diamond Resorts Owners Trust Series 2009-1 Class A and Class B Notes, $1.9 million related to the Diamond Resorts Owners Trust Series 2011-1 Notes, $1.4 million related to the Tempus Acquisition Loan, $1.2 million related to the 2008 Conduit Facility, $0.5 million related to the ILXA loans, $0.1 million related to the Quorum Facility, and $0.1 million related to the Tempus Inventory Loan.

In connection with the ILX Acquisition, the Tempus Resorts Acquisition, the PMR Acquisition and the Aegean Blue Acquisition, the Company acquired $0.3 million, $1.3 million, $0.3 million and $0.9 million in prepaid expenses and other assets. See Note 21—Business Combinations for further details on these acquisitions.

Unsold Vacation Interests, net consisted of the following as of December 31 (in thousands):

Activity related to unsold Vacation Interests, net for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 is as follows (in thousands):

See Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for discussions on unsold Vacation Interests.

Property and equipment, net consisted of the following as of December 31 (in thousands):

Depreciation expense related to property and equipment was $8.4 million, $7.4 million and $7.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

In connection with the ILX Acquisition, the Tempus Resorts Acquisition, the PMR Acquisition and the Aegean Blue Acquisition, the Company acquired $7.4 million, $15.6 million, $0.7 million and $0.4 million in furniture, office and computer equipment, and leasehold improvements based on the respective appraisals. See Note 21—Business Combinations for further details.

Intangible assets, net consisted of the following as of December 31, 2012 (in thousands):

Intangible assets, net consisted of the following as of December 31, 2011 (in thousands):

In connection with the ILX Acquisition completed in August 2010, the Company recorded $8.8 million of intangible assets based on the final appraisal.

In connection with the Tempus Resorts Acquisition completed in July 2011, the Company recorded $28.8 million of intangible assets based on the final appraisal.

In connection with the PMR Acquisition completed in May 2012, the Company recorded $48.9 million of intangible assets based on an appraisal.

In connection with the Aegean Blue Acquisition completed in October 2012, the Company recorded $5.9 million of intangible assets based on a preliminary appraisal. See Note 21—Business Combinations for further details on these acquisitions.

Amortization expense for management contracts is recognized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives ranging from five to twenty-five years. Amortization expense for management contracts was $6.9 million, $4.7 million and $3.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Amortization expense for member relationships, distributor relationships and other is amortized over the period of time that the relationships are expected to produce cash flows. Amortization expense for member relationships, distributor relationships and other intangibles was $3.6 million, $1.9 million and $2.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Membership relationships and distributor relationships have estimated useful lives ranging from three to thirty years. However, the Company expects to generate significantly more cash flows during the earlier years of the relationships than the later years. Consequently, amortization expenses on these relationships decrease significantly over the lives of the relationships.

The estimated aggregate amortization expense for intangible assets is expected to be $13.3 million, $12.7 million, $10.0 million, $7.6 million and $6.8 million for the years ending December 31, 2013 through 2017, respectively.

Assets held for sale are recorded at the lower of cost or their estimated fair value less cost to sell and are not subject to depreciation. Sale of the assets classified as such is probable, and transfer of the assets is expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale, generally within one year of the balance sheet date. During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company made the decision to sell certain resorts and certain units in its European operations. A portion of the units were sold by December 31, 2012. During the year ended December 31, 2012, approximately $1.4 million was transferred from assets held for sale to intangibles and unsold Vacation Interests, net as the pending sales on these assets were canceled and they are not expected to be sold within one year of the balance sheet date.

The $5.2 million balance in assets held for sale as of December 31, 2012 consisted of the points equivalent of unsold units and resorts that are either held for sale or pending the consummation of sale. As of December 31,

2012, the Company was a party to sales contracts entered into during 2012 and 2011 for approximately $1.4 million and $3.4 million, respectively, of units that are classified as held for sale. The proceeds will be paid over several years and the Company will retain title to the properties until the full amounts due under the sales contracts are received. According to guidance included in ASC 360, “Property, Plant, and Equipment,” the sales shall not be considered consummated until all consideration has been exchanged. Consequently, the assets pending consummation of sale will continue to be included in assets held for sale until all proceeds are received.

Accrued call center costs—expenses associated with the outsourced customer service call center operations.

Accrued exchange company fees—estimated liability owed to Interval International for annual dues.

Accrued contingent litigation liabilities—estimated settlement costs for existing litigation cases.

Accrued liabilities consisted of the following as of December 31 (in thousands):

In connection with the ILX Acquisition, the Tempus Resorts Acquisition, the PMR Acquisition and the Aegean Blue Acquisition, the Company assumed $4.0 million, $1.2 million, $1.7 million and $8.8 million in Accrued Liabilities. See Note 21—Business Combinations for further details on these acquisitions.

The Company records deferred revenues for payments received or billed but not earned for various activities.

Deferred maintenance and reserve fee revenue—maintenance fees billed as of January first of each year and earned ratably over the year in the Company’s capacity as the HOA for the two resorts in St. Maarten. In addition, the HOA will periodically bill the owners for capital project assessments to repair and replace the amenities or to reserve the out-of-pocket deductibles for hurricanes and other natural disasters. These assessments are deferred until the refurbishment activity occurs, at which time the amounts collected are recognized as consolidated resort operations revenue, with an equal amount recognized as consolidated resort operations expense.

Accrued guest deposits—amounts received from guests for future rentals recognized as revenue when earned.

In connection with the Tempus Resorts Acquisition and the Aegean Blue Acquisition, the Company assumed $1.6 million and $0.4 million, respectively, in Deferred Revenue. See Note 21—Business Combinations for further details on this acquisition.

Senior Secured Notes. On August 13, 2010, the Company completed the issuance of $425.0 million of principal amount of Senior Secured Notes. The Senior Secured Notes carry an interest rate of 12.0% and were issued with an original issue discount of 2.5%, or $10.6 million. Interest payments are due in arrears on February 15 and August 15 of each year, commencing February 15, 2011. The Senior Secured Notes mature in August 2018 and may be redeemed by the Company at any time pursuant to the terms of the Senior Secured Notes. If the Company redeems, in whole or in part, the Senior Secured Notes prior to August 2014, the redemption price will be the face value of the Senior Secured Notes plus accrued and unpaid interest and an applicable premium. If the Company redeems all or part of the Senior Secured Notes on or after August 2014, the redemption price will be 106% of the face value of the Senior Secured Notes, subject to decreases over the next two years.

On October 15, 2009, the Company completed the 2009 securitization transaction and issued two consumer loan backed notes designated as the Diamond Resorts Owner Trust (“DROT”) 2009 Class A Notes and the DROT 2009 Class B Notes (together the “DROT 2009 Notes”). The DROT 2009 Class A Notes carry an interest rate of 9.3% and had an initial face value of $169.2 million. The DROT 2009 Class B Notes carry an interest rate of 12.0% and had an initial face value of $12.8 million. The DROT 2009 Notes have a maturity date of March 20, 2026. The net proceeds received were $181.1 million compared to the $182.0 million face value and the Company recorded the $0.9 million difference as an original issue discount on the securitization notes payable. Also on October 15, 2009, the Company used the proceeds from the DROT 2009 Notes to pay down the $148.9 million outstanding principal balance under its 2008 Conduit Facility, along with requisite accrued interest and fees associated with both conduit facilities.

On April 27, 2011, the Company completed a securitization transaction and issued the DROT 2011 Notes with a face value of $64.5 million (“DROT 2011 Notes”). The DROT 2011 Notes mature on March 20, 2023 and carry an interest rate of 4.0%. The net proceeds were used to pay off in full the $36.4 million outstanding principal balance under the 2008 Conduit Facility, to pay down approximately $7.0 million of the Quorum Facility (see definition below), to pay requisite accrued interest and fees associated with both facilities, and to pay certain expenses incurred in connection with the issuance of the DROT 2011 Notes, including the funding of a reserve account required thereby.

and carry a weighted average interest rate of 2.0%. The net proceeds were used to pay off the outstanding principal balance under the 2008 Conduit Facility and to pay expenses incurred in connection with the issuance of the DROT 2013 Notes, including the funding of a reserve account required thereby.

Quorum Facility. The Company’s subsidiary, DRI Quorum, entered into a Loan Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “LSSA”), dated as of April 30, 2010 (as amended and restated, the “Quorum Facility”) with Quorum Federal Credit Union (“Quorum”) as purchaser. The LSSA and related documents provide for an aggregate minimum $40.0 million loan sale facility and joint marketing venture where DRI Quorum may sell eligible consumer loans and in-transit loans to Quorum on a non-recourse, permanent basis, provided that the underlying consumer obligor is a Quorum credit union member. The joint marketing venture has a minimum term of two years and the LSSA provides for a purchase period of two years. The purchase price payment and the program purchase fee are each determined at the time that the loan is sold to Quorum. To the extent excess funds remain after payment of the sold loans at Quorum’s purchase price, such excess funds are required to be remitted to the Company as a deferred purchase price payment. This transaction did not qualify as a loan sale under U.S. GAAP. The LSSA was amended on April 27, 2012 to increase the aggregate minimum committed amount of to $60.0 million. The LSSA was further amended and restated effective as of December 31, 2012 to increase the aggregate minimum committed amount to $80.0 million and to extend the term of the agreement to December 31, 2015, provided that Quorum may further extend the term for additional one-year periods by written notice. As of December 31, 2012, the weighted average purchase price payment was 89.6% of the obligor loan amount and the weighted average program purchase fee was 6.3%.

Tempus Acquisition Loan and Tempus Resorts Acquisition Financing. On November 23, 2010, Tempus Acquisition, LLC, one of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries, entered into a Credit and Security Agreement with an affiliate of the Guggenheim Investor, as the lender, and Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC, as administrative agent. Both the lender and the administrative agent are related parties of the Company. The Credit and Security Agreement was a revolving loan facility with a maximum principal amount of $8.0 million the proceeds of which were used exclusively for the following purposes: (i) to provide Tempus Acquisition, LLC with funds to lend to Tempus Resorts International, Ltd. and certain of its subsidiaries, pursuant to a debtor-in-possession financing order entered by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida (“DIP Financing” or “Tempus Note Receivable”), for general working capital purposes and other lawful purposes as permitted under the agreements governing the DIP Financing; and (ii) to provide $1.5 million for the “Deposit,” as defined and provided in the Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Assets to purchase certain assets of Tempus Resorts International, Ltd. and its subsidiaries. The term of Credit and Security Agreement ended on July 1, 2011, when the Tempus Note Receivable was discharged in connection with the Tempus Resorts Acquisition.

On July 1, 2011,the Company completed the Tempus Resorts Acquisition through Mystic Dunes, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Tempus Acquisition, LLC. In order to fund the Tempus Resorts Acquisition, Tempus Acquisition, LLC, entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with Guggenheim Corporate Funding,

LLC, as administrative agent for lenders, which include affiliates of, or funds managed or advised by, Guggenheim Partners, LLC, which is an affiliate of the Guggenheim Investor, and Silver Rock Financial LLC, which is an affiliate of the Silver Rock Investors (the “Tempus Acquisition Loan”). The Tempus Acquisition Loan is collateralized by all assets of Tempus Acquisition, LLC. The Tempus Acquisition Loan was initially in an aggregate principal amount of $41.1 million (which included a $5.5 million revolving loan). The Tempus Acquisition Loan bears interest at a rate of 18.0% (of which an amount equal to not less than 10.0% per annum is paid in cash on a quarterly basis and the remaining accrued amount may be paid, at Tempus Acquisition, LLC’s election, in cash or in kind by adding the applicable accrued amount to principal), and matures on June 30, 2015. In addition, Tempus Acquisition, LLC paid a 2.0% closing fee based on the initial Tempus Acquisition Loan balance as of July 1, 2011 and is also required to make an exit fee payment for up to 10% of the initial Tempus Acquisition Loan balance upon the final payment-in-full of the outstanding balance under the loan. Tempus Acquisition, LLC is required to make principal prepayments equal to (i) on a monthly basis, 40% of the aggregate interval purchase price received by Mystic Dunes, LLC in the prior month, (ii) within one business day of receipt, net participation proceeds payments less amounts attributable to interest paid, generated by Tempus Acquisition, LLC’s acquisition of a participating interest in the Tempus Receivables Loan, (iii) 100% of excess cash flow from the Tempus Resorts Acquisition and the Aegean Blue Acquisition, commencing with the quarter ending December 31, 2012 and (iv) $0.3 million, payable monthly, commencing in January 2013. Within 30 days after the end of each calendar year commencing with calendar year 2012, Tempus Acquisition, LLC is also required to make an additional prepayment in an amount equal to the difference between the aggregate principal prepayments paid in the calendar year and $5.0 million, such that a minimum of $5.0 million in aggregate annual principal reductions have been made. On September 28, 2012, Tempus Acquisition, LLC amended the Loan and Security Agreement to terminate the revolving loan and transfer the then-outstanding balance under the revolving loan to the term loans. On October 4, 2012, Tempus Acquisition, LLC further amended the Loan and Security Agreement to provide an additional $6.6 million borrowing under the term loans to fund the Aegean Blue Acquisition. The Tempus Acquisition Loan was further amended on November 20, 2012 and December 31, 2012 to increase the term loans by $2.5 million and $5.0 million respectively, to pay separation payments to principals of the Mystic Dunes resorts, and to fund guaranties and indemnities required to be paid to Mystic Dunes, LLC’s HOAs. Some of the investment advisory clients of Wellington Management Company, LLP (“Wellington Management Investors”) also became lenders under this credit facility in connection with a December 2012 amendment to the Tempus Acquisition Loan.

Additionally, Mystic Dunes Receivables, LLC, a subsidiary of Mystic Dunes, LLC entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with Resort Finance America, LLC (the “Tempus Receivables Loan”). The Tempus Receivables Loan is a receivables credit facility in the amount of $74.5 million, collateralized by mortgages and contracts receivable acquired in the Tempus Resorts Acquisition. All cash flows received from customer payments, including principal, interest and miscellaneous fees (net of contractual servicing costs) are used to pay the principal and accrued interest balances on the Tempus Receivables Loan. In addition, Mystic Dunes Receivables, LLC is required to make additional principal payments in the event the aging status of the receivables in the underlying portfolio does not meet certain requirements. Between July 1, 2011 and December 31, 2011, and during the year ended December 31, 2012, Mystic Dunes, LLC made additional principal payments of $3.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively, pursuant to this requirement. The Tempus Receivables Loan bears interest at a rate that is the

higher of (i) one-month LIBOR plus 7.0% or (ii) 10%, adjusted monthly, and matures on July 1, 2015. Furthermore,

the Company is obligated to pay Resort Finance America, LLC an initial defaulted timeshare loans release fee over 36 months from August 2011 through July 2014 (“Notes Payable—RFA fees”). The fee was recorded at fair value as of July 1, 2011 using a discount rate of 10%.

Tempus Acquisition, LLC, Mystic Dunes, LLC and each of its wholly-owned subsidiaries are special-purpose subsidiaries.

PMR Acquisition Loan and Inventory Loan. On May 21, 2012, DPMA completed the PMR Acquisition whereby it acquired assets pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement, among DPMA and Pacific Monarch Resorts, Inc., Vacation Interval Realty, Inc., Vacation Marketing Group, Inc., MGV Cabo, LLC, Desarrollo Cabo Azul, S. de R.L. de C.V., and Operadora MGVM S. de R.L. de C.V. Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, DPMA acquired four resort management agreements, unsold VOIs and the rights to recover and resell such interests, a portion of the seller’s consumer loans portfolio and certain real property and other assets for approximately $51.6 million in cash, plus the assumption of specified liabilities related to the acquired assets.

In order to fund the PMR Acquisition, on May 21, 2012, DPMA entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC, as administrative agent for lenders, which include affiliates of, or funds managed or advised by, Guggenheim Partners, LLC, which is an affiliate of the Guggenheim Investor, Wellington Management Company, LLP, including some of the Wellington Management Investors, and Silver Rock Financial LLC, which is an affiliate of the Silver Rock Investors (the “PMR Acquisition Loan”). The PMR Acquisition Loan is collateralized by substantially all of the assets of DPMA. The PMR Acquisition Loan was initially in an aggregate principal amount of $71.3 million (consisting of a $61.3 million term loan and a $10.0 million revolving loan). The PMR Acquisition Loan bears interest at a rate of 18.0% (of which an amount equal to not less than 10.0% per annum is paid in cash on a quarterly basis and the remaining accrued amount may be paid, at DPMA’s election, in cash or in kind by adding the applicable accrued amount to principal), and matures on May 21, 2016.

The PMR Acquisition Loan provides that, (i) DPMA is required to pay quarterly (a) to the administrative agent, for its own account, an administration fee, and (b) to Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC, for the benefit of lenders with commitments to make revolving loans thereunder, an unused line fee based upon each such lender’s commitment to provide revolving loans and the then outstanding principal amount of such lender’s revolving loan, (ii) DPMA shall make certain mandatory monthly and quarterly prepayments of amounts borrowed under the PMR Acquisition Loan, and (iii) on the maturity date for the term loan, if not paid earlier in accordance therewith, DPMA is required to pay an exit fee of up to 10.0% of the initial loan amount. On the closing date for the PMR Acquisition, pursuant to the PMR Acquisition Loan, DPMA paid a closing fee of approximately $2.1 million to the administrative agent and certain lenders party thereto. The proceeds of the PMR Acquisition Loan were used to fund the purchase price for the PMR Acquisition and the associated closing costs.

On September 28, 2012, DPMA amended the Loan and Security Agreement to terminate the revolving loan and transfer the then-outstanding balance under the revolving loan to the term loan.

On May 21, 2012, DPMA also entered into an Inventory Loan and Security Agreement (the “DPM Inventory Loan”) with RFA PMR LoanCo, LLC. The DPM Inventory Loan will provide debt financing for a portion of the purchase price of the defaulted receivables to be purchased by DPMA pursuant to a collateral recovery and repurchase agreement entered into between DPMA and an affiliate of RFA PMR LoanCo, LLC in connection with the PMR Acquisition. The interest rate is a variable rate equal to the sum of LIBOR plus 6.0% per annum, provided that LIBOR is never less than 2.0% or greater than 4.0% per annum.

DPMA and each of its wholly-owned subsidiaries are special-purpose subsidiaries.

Notes Payable. The Company finances premiums on certain insurance policies under unsecured notes. One of the unsecured notes matured in February 2013 and carried an interest rate of 3.1% per annum. The other unsecured note is scheduled to mature in September 2013 and carries an interest rate of 3.2% per annum. In addition, the Company purchased certain software licenses during the year ended December 31, 2012 with monthly interest-free payments due for the next two years and this obligation was recorded at fair value as of December 31, 2012 using a discount rate of 5.7%.

The following table presents selected information on the Company’s borrowings for the periods presented below (dollars in thousands):

All of the Company’s borrowing under the Senior Secured Notes, securitization notes, and 2008 Conduit Facility contain various restrictions and limitations that may affect its business and affairs. These include, but are not limited to, restrictions and limitations relating to its ability to incur indebtedness and other obligations, to make investments and acquisitions and to pay dividends. The Company is also required to maintain certain financial ratios and comply with other financial and performance covenants. The failure of the Company to comply with any of these provisions, or to pay its obligations, could result in foreclosure by the lenders of their security interests in the Company’s assets, and could otherwise have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Company was in compliance with all financial covenants as of December 31, 2012.

The anticipated maturities of the Company’s borrowings under the Senior Secured Notes, securitization notes, 2008 Conduit Facility and notes payable are as follows (in thousands) and not including the use of any proceeds from potential debt or equity transactions during 2013 to pay down borrowings:

Cash provided by operations was $24.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to cash provided by operations of $9.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. Cash and cash equivalents were $21.1 million and $19.9 million as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The Company believes there will be sufficient existing cash resources and cash flows from operations, in addition to future refinancing activities, to meet the anticipated debt maturities and the Company’s other cash requirements for the next twelve months. If cash flows from operations are less than expected, the Company would need to curtail its sales and marketing operations or raise additional capital.

The Company has a qualified retirement plan (the “401(k) Plan”) with a salary deferral feature designed to qualify under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Subject to certain limitations, the 401(k) Plan allows participating North America employees to defer up to 60% of their eligible compensation on a pre-tax basis. The 401(k) Plan allows the Company to make discretionary matching contributions of up to 50% of the first 6% of employee compensation.

During the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, the Company made matching contributions to its 401(k) Plan of $1.3 million, $1.0 million and $0.8 million, respectively.

In addition, the Company has a self-insured health plan that covers substantially all of its full-time employees in the U.S. The health plan uses employee and employer contributions to pay eligible claims. To supplement this plan, the Company has a stop-loss insurance policy to cover individual claims in excess of $0.2 million. At December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, the Company accrued $1.9 million, $1.5 million and $1.3 million, respectively, for claims that have been incurred but not reported. This accrual is calculated as the higher of (i) estimated accrual based on Company’s historical experience of claim payments and lag period between the service dates and claim payment dates or (ii) two times the average monthly claims made by the Company during the past fiscal year. The following table sets forth for each of the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, the amount of claims incurred during such period, changes in accruals during such period for claims incurred during prior periods, and the amount of payments made in such period (in thousands):

During the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, the Company recorded $14.7 million, $10.8 million and $8.6 million, respectively, in expenses associated with its health plans.

With certain exceptions, the Company’s European subsidiaries do not offer private health plans or retirement plans. The government in each country offers national health services and retirement benefits, which are funded by employee and employer contributions.

The components of the benefit for income taxes are summarized as follows for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):

Income (loss) before income taxes is comprised of the following for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):

The reconciliation between the statutory provision for income taxes and the actual benefit for income taxes is shown as follows for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. The Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows as of December 31 (in thousands):

ASC 740-10, “Income Taxes” requires that the tax benefit of net operating losses, temporary differences and credit carry forwards be recorded as an asset to the extent that management assesses that realization is “more likely than not.” Realization of the future tax benefits is dependent on the Company’s ability to generate sufficient taxable income within the carry forward period. Because of the Company’s history of operating losses, management believes that recognition of the deferred tax assets arising from the above-mentioned future tax benefits is currently not likely to be realized and, accordingly, has provided a valuation allowance. The majority of the valuation allowance change during 2012 is primarily due to bad debt allowance and treatment of installment sales.

As of December 31, 2012, the Company had available approximately $226.9 million of unused federal net operating loss carry forwards, $197.0 million of unused state net operating loss carry forwards, and $113.6 million of foreign net operating loss carry forwards (the “NOLs”), with expiration dates from 2017 through 2029 (except for certain foreign NOLs that do not expire) that may be applied against future taxable income subject to certain limitations.

As a result of the Company’s acquisition of Sunterra in 2007, use of the Company’s NOLs is limited under Internal Revenue Code Section 382 and comparable state laws. Even with the limitation, $93.0 million of federal NOLs is currently available for unlimited use and an additional $13.5 million becomes available each year. Similarly, use of the state NOLs is also available. Although the Company’s future cash tax liabilities cannot be entirely eliminated through the application of these NOLs due to a 90% statutorily imposed limitation applicable to a portion of its alternative minimum tax NOLs, the Company believes the availability of these NOLs to offset future taxable income will result in minimal cash tax obligations in future periods.

As a result of uncertainties regarding the Company’s ability to generate sufficient taxable income to utilize its net NOLs, the Company maintains a valuation allowance against the balance of its deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011.

No deferred tax liabilities have been provided for U.S. taxes on the undistributed earnings (if any) of foreign subsidiaries as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010. Those earnings have been and expect to be reinvested in the foreign subsidiaries. The amount of those undistributed earnings has not been determined as it is impracticable at this time to determine the amount.

In 2007, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Diamond Resorts (Europe) Ltd., filed a claim for refund with the United Kingdom income tax authority in the amount of $10.7 million (£7.4 million) with respect to its income tax return for the years ended December 31, 1999 to 2004. In accordance with ASC 450, the Company recorded an income tax receivable of $3.5 million (£2.4 million) in the consolidated balance sheet for the year ended December 31, 2008. During 2009, the Company received a partial refund from the United Kingdom income tax authority in the amount of $1.6 million (£1.0 million). In January 2010, the Company received an additional partial refund in the amount of $3.2 million (£2.0 million), plus interest of $0.6 million (£0.4 million). An additional benefit of $1.0 million (£0.6 million) was recorded in 2009 to reflect the amount of refund received in excess of the receivable balance at December 31, 2008. An additional partial refund of $3.2 million (£2 million) was received in October 2010, all of which was recorded as a benefit in 2010. Final tax refunds of $3.0 million (£1.9 million) plus interest of $1.4 million (£0.9 million) were received and recorded in 2011.

Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted guidance included in ASC 740. This guidance clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the Company’s financial statements. ASC 740 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The evaluation of a tax position in accordance with ASC 740 is a two-step process. The first step is recognition: the Company determines whether it is “more-likely-than-not” that a tax position will be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. In evaluating whether a tax position has met the “more-likely-than-not” recognition threshold, the Company presumes that the position will be examined by the appropriate taxing authority that would have full knowledge of all relevant information. The second step is measurement: a tax position that meets the “more-likely-than-not” recognition threshold is measured to determine the amount of benefit to recognize in the financial statements. The tax position is measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement. The adoption of ASC 740 did not result in material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

The Company does not currently anticipate that any significant increase or decrease to unrecognized tax benefits will be recorded during the next twelve months.

The Company’s continuing practice is to recognize potential interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax provision. As of December 31, 2012, the Company has no amount accrued for the payment of interest and penalties in the accompanying balance sheet.

The Company operates in multiple tax jurisdictions, both within the U.S. and outside of the U.S. The Company is no longer subject to income tax examinations by tax authorities in its major tax jurisdictions as follows:

In addition, the Company leases office and other equipment under both long-term and short-term lease arrangements, which are generally classified as operating leases.

Rental expense recognized for all operating leases during the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 totaled $18.7 million, $14.3 million and $13.9 million, net of sublease rental revenue of $0.7 million, $0.8 million and $0.5 million, respectively.

As of December 31, 2012, future minimum lease payments on operating leases were as follows (in thousands):

Minimum rental payments to be received in the future under non-cancelable sublease agreements totaled $0.4 million as of December 31, 2012.

The Company has entered into various purchase obligations relating to sales center remodeling and property amenity improvement projects. The total remaining commitment was $2.3 million as of December 31, 2012.

From time to time, the Company or its subsidiaries are subject to certain legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business.

Although the Company believes that it will not have any material liability when these matters are ultimately resolved, there can be no assurance that this will be the case. As of December 31, 2012, the Company had an estimated litigation accrual of $1.1 million in accrued liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet, which represents the write-down of FLRX’s investment in subsidiaries to $0. Legal fees associated with these cases are expensed as incurred.

$1.2 million in one case and $1.3 million in the other case). Due to the nature of the AKGI purchase and the underlying St. Maarten laws, the Company believes that the obligations to the claimants would only be enforceable if the agreement between the claimant and AKGI’s predecessor was either a timeshare agreement or a lease agreement. AKGI has answered that the claimants’ agreements were, in fact, investment contracts, and are therefore not enforceable under St. Maarten law. In February 2011, the case that was pending in the highest and final court of appeal was dismissed as to all claims, with the Company having no obligations, financial or otherwise, to claimant. The other case is currently pending in the intermediate court of appeal. A lien has been placed on AKGI’s interest in the Royal Palm Resort while the remaining action is pending.

In October 2011, the HOA of one of the Company’s managed resorts in Hawaii levied a $65.8 million water intrusion assessment to the owners of that resort, of which $9.7 million was assessed to the Company. During the quarter ended December 31, 2011, the Company’s portion of the water intrusion assessment was recorded as Vacation Interest carrying cost, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) with a corresponding increase to due to related parties, net in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The proceeds of this assessment are being used to repair the water intrusion damage at the resort. In April 2012, the Company was named as a defendant in a putative class action pending in the District Court for the District of Hawaii. The action, brought by five deeded owners and members of one of the Collections managed by the Company, alleges breaches of fiduciary duty and unfair and deceptive trade practices against us and certain of the Company’s officers and employees and seeks, among other things, to invalidate the water intrusion assessment and enjoin the water intrusion project. In November, 2012, the Company reached an agreement with the named plaintiffs and their counsel to settle the litigation in full. The settlement is subject to court approval. The Company does not expect the settlement to have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations.

As of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company’s derivative instruments were the 2010 Cap Agreement and the 2012 Cap Agreements, which had fair values of $0 based on valuation reports provided by counterparties. The 2010 Cap Agreement and the 2012 Cap Agreements were classified as Level 3, based on the fact that the credit risk data used for the valuation is not directly observable and cannot be corroborated by observable market data. The Company’s assessment of the significant inputs to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. See Note 3—Concentrations of Risk for further detail on these cap agreements.

As of December 31, 2012, mortgages and contracts receivable had a balance of $312.9 million, net of allowance. The allowance for loan and contract losses against the mortgages and contracts receivable is derived using a static pool analysis to develop historical default percentages based on FICO scores to apply to the mortgage and contract population. The Company evaluates other factors such as economic conditions, industry trends and past due aging reports in order to determine the adjustments needed to true up the allowance which adjust the carrying value of mortgages and contracts receivable to management’s best estimate of collectibility. As a result, the Company believes that the carrying value of the mortgages and contracts receivable approximated its fair value at December 31, 2012. These financial assets were classified as Level 3 as there is little market data available.

The borrowings under the Senior Secured Notes were classified as Level 2 based on a quoted price of 109.0 on a restricted bond market as they were not actively traded on the open market.

As of December 31, 2012, the Company’s 2008 Conduit Facility, DROT 2009 Notes and DROT 2011 Notes were classified as Level 2. The Company believes the fair value of the 2008 Conduit Facility approximated its carrying value due to the fact that it was recently amended and, therefore, measured using other significant observable inputs including the current refinancing activities. The fair value of the DROT 2009 Notes and DROT 2011 Notes was determined with the assistance of an investment banking firm, which the Company believes approximated similar instruments in active markets.

As of December 31, 2012, the fair value of all other debt instruments was not calculated, based on the fact that they were either due within one year or were immaterial.

As of December 31, 2011, mortgages and contracts receivable had a balance of $283.3 million, net of allowance. The allowance for loan and contract losses against the mortgages and contracts receivable is derived using a static pool analysis to develop historical default percentages based on FICO scores to apply to the mortgage and contract population. The Company evaluates other factors such as economic conditions, industry trends and past due aging reports. The Company believes that this balance approximated the fair value of the mortgages and contracts based on the recent extension of the Company’s 2008 Conduit Facility on October 14, 2011. These financial assets are classified as Level 3 as there is little market data available.

The borrowings under the Senior Secured Notes were classified as Level 2 based on a quoted price of 98.75 on a restricted bond market as they were not actively traded on the open market.

As of December 31, 2011, the Company’s 2008 Conduit Facility, DROT 2009 Notes and DROT 2011 Notes were classified as Level 2. The Company believes the fair value of the 2008 Conduit Facility approximated its carrying value due to the fact that it was recently amended and, therefore, measured using other significant observable inputs including the current refinancing activities. The fair value of the DROT 2009 Notes and DROT 2011 Notes was determined with the assistance of an investment banking firm, which the Company believes approximated similar instruments in active markets.

As of December 31, 2011, the Quorum Facility, the ILXA Receivables Loan, the ILXA Inventory Loan, the Tempus Acquisition Loan, the Tempus Receivables Loan and the Tempus Inventory Loan were classified as Level 2 and the Company believes their fair values approximated their carrying values due to the fact that these transactions were recently completed. The Quorum Facility was issued in April 2010, the ILXA Receivables Loan and ILXA Inventory Loan were issued in August 2010, and the Tempus Acquisition Loan, the Tempus Receivables Loan and the Tempus Inventory Loan were issued in July 2011.

As of December 31, 2011, the Company believes the fair value of the borrowings under Notes Payable—RFA fees approximated its carrying value as the carrying value represents the net present value of all future payments using an imputed interest rate of 10%.

As of December 31, 2011, the fair value of all other debt instruments was not calculated, based on the fact that they were either due within one year or were immaterial.

The carrying values and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments as of December 31, 2012 were as follows (dollars in thousands):

The carrying values and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments as of December 31, 2011 were as follows (dollars in thousands):

On June 17, 2010, the Company entered into a private placement transaction pursuant to agreements with the “Guggenheim Investor, an investment vehicle managed by an affiliate of Guggenheim Partners, LLC, which provided for DRP Holdco, LLC to make a $75.0 million investment in Class A common and preferred units of the Company. At an initial closing on June 17, 2010, the Company sold 70.67 Class A common units and 333.33 preferred units to the Guggenheim Investor for $25.0 million. At a subsequent closing on August 13, 2010, DRP sold 198.63 Class A common units and 666.67 preferred units to the Guggenheim Investor for $50.0 million. The entire $75.0 million investment was attributed to preferred units in accordance with the agreements and the value assigned to common units was $0. The proceeds of this investment were used to repurchase the equity securities previously held by another institutional investor and, therefore, the Company did not retain any net proceeds from these transactions.

These agreements also contained a provision to allow the Company, at its discretion, to redeem any of the preferred units at any time after August 13, 2012, for any reason or no reason, at optional redemption premiums ranging from 100% to 103% depending on the redemption date. In addition, the Guggenheim Investor may have required the Company to redeem all or any portion of the preferred units it held under the following circumstances: (i) simultaneously with an initial public offering of the Company’s equity securities; (ii) at any time after August 13, 2019; (iii) upon the acceleration of payment of principal by any lender of senior indebtedness; and (iv) in the event of certain uncured breaches of the agreements that governed the preferred units. The preferred redemption premiums varied from 100% to 105% depending on the event leading to the redemption.

The Company applied the guidance enumerated in ASC 480, “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity” (“ASC 480”) when determining the classification and measurement of preferred stock. In addition, the Company classified the $75.0 million of conditionally redeemable preferred units as temporary member capital due to the fact that the preferred units contained redemption rights that were either within the control of the holder or subject to redemption upon the occurrence of uncertain events not solely within the Company’s control.

Furthermore, the preferred units had a priority return of 17.0% per annum from June 17, 2010 to August 13, 2010 and had a priority return of 16.5% per annum from August 14, 2010 through redemption, compounded quarterly, as well as a liquidation preference with respect to the common equity securities.

In accordance with ASC 480, the Company was required to record the redemption premiums and accrete for the priority returns periodically as it was probable that the preferred units would be redeemed by the Company. Both the redemption premiums and the priority returns were recorded as an increase to accumulated deficit and a corresponding increase to redeemable preferred units in temporary member capital.

Prior to any distributions to the common unit holders, the holders of the preferred units were entitled to receive from the Company the product of (a) an amount equal to the sum of (i) such holder’s contribution with respect to the preferred units reduced by any distributions to such holders, and (ii) accrued but unpaid distributions of priority returns, and (b) the relevant redemption premiums based on the date of redemption. Once the sum of any unpaid priority returns and the unreturned contributions with respect to the preferred units was reduced to $0, the preferred units would have been deemed canceled. The balance, if any, would have been distributed to the common unit holders on a pro rata basis.

On February 18, 2011, DRP sold an aggregate of 25.1 Class A common units and 133.33 preferred units in a private placement transaction to four investment vehicles affiliated with certain affiliates of Silver Rock Financial LLC (the “Silver Rock Investors”) in exchange for $10.1 million. This transaction brought the total number of issued and outstanding common units to 1,115.1 and issued and outstanding preferred units to 1,133.3. The terms of the new equity investor agreements were consistent with the terms included in the Guggenheim agreements discussed above.

Also on February 18, 2011, DRP entered into a warrant purchase agreement to repurchase certain warrants issued by DRC from various holders of the warrants. These warrants were originally issued to holders of DRC’s Second Lien Facility but became detached and transferable to other parties when the Second Lien Facility was extinguished in August 2010. DRP purchased warrants that were exercisable into approximately 5.2% of the shares of common stock of DRC, in exchange for approximately $10.1 million in cash.

In connection with the funding of the Tempus Acquisition Loan pursuant to the Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2011, among Tempus Acquisition, LLC, the lenders party thereto and Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC, which was entered into in connection with the Tempus Resorts Acquisition, DRP issued a warrant (the “Tempus Warrant”) to Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC, as administrative agent, for the benefit of the lenders, pursuant to a Warrant Agreement, between DRP and Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC. The Tempus Warrant vests and becomes exercisable, subject to the provisions of the Tempus Warrant described below, upon the sixty-first day (the “Tempus Warrant Exercise Date”) following, among other things, an initial underwritten public offering of the common stock of DRC or of any successor corporation of DRP (“DRP Successor”), a payment default by Tempus Acquisition, LLC (after expiration of applicable grace and care periods) under the Tempus Acquisition Loan, and a sale of DRP or DRC (a “ Tempus Warrant Triggering Event”). Following a Tempus Warrant Triggering Event, the Tempus Warrant would become exercisable on the Tempus Warrant Exercise Date as to an aggregate percentage of the fully-diluted outstanding common equity of DRP equal to the quotient of (i) the dollar amount by which the actual total repayments of principal on the Tempus Acquisition Loan from the date of the Tempus Warrant through the day immediately preceding the Tempus Warrant Exercise Date is less than a certain benchmark amount (the “Tempus Benchmark Amount”) as determined pursuant to the terms of the Tempus Warrant, divided by (ii) the fair market value of the common equity of DRP as determined pursuant to the terms of the Tempus Warrant. The purchase price for each common unit of DRP issuable upon exercise of the Tempus Warrant is $0.0001 per common unit. During the 60-day period following a Tempus Warrant Triggering Event, DRP or the DRP Successor, as applicable, has the option to purchase the Tempus Warrant from the holder for a cash payment equal to the Tempus Benchmark Amount, less any cash payments made on the Tempus Acquisition Loan from the date of the Tempus Warrant through the date of such Tempus Warrant Triggering Event. The Company determined that the Tempus Warrant had a nominal value as of December 31, 2012.

On July 21, 2011, DRP consummated a recapitalization transaction pursuant to which it sold 280.89 Class A common units in a private placement transaction to seven institutional accredited investors that are investment advisory clients of Wellington Management Company, LLP in exchange for $136.5 million. DRP paid approximately $4.5 million in fees in conjunction with the recapitalization transactions. DRP used $108.7 million of the proceeds and issued an aggregate of 26.56 Class A common units to the Guggenheim Investor and the Silver Rock Investors to redeem all of the previously issued and outstanding preferred units (including accrued

and unpaid priority returns) pursuant to the terms of a Preferred Unit Redemption Agreement. In addition, DRP paid $16.4 million to CDP, a related party of the Company, to redeem 34.74 common units previously held by CDP. Immediately after the transaction above, CDP owns approximately 54.3% of the issued and outstanding common units with the remainder owned by various institutional investors.

On July 21, 2011 and July 29, 2011, DRP entered into various warrant purchase agreements to repurchase certain warrants issued by DRC from various warrant holders. These warrants were also originally issued to holders of DRP’s Second Lien Facility but became detached and transferable to other parties when the Second Lien Facility was extinguished in August 2010. DRP purchased warrants that were exercisable into approximately 3.3% of the shares of common stock of DRC for approximately $6.4 million in cash.

In connection with the funding of the PMR Acquisition Loan pursuant to the Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of May 21, 2012, among DPMA, the lenders party thereto and Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC, which was entered into in connection with the PMR Acquisition, DRP issued a warrant (the “PMR Warrant”) to Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC, as administrative agent, for the benefit of the lenders, pursuant to a Warrant Agreement, between DRP and Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC. The PMR Warrant vests and becomes exercisable, subject to the provisions of the PMR Warrant described below, upon the sixty-first day (the “PMR Warrant Exercise Date”) following, among other things, an initial underwritten public offering of the common stock of DRC or of any DRP Successor, a payment default by DPMA (after expiration of applicable grace and care periods) under the PMR Acquisition Loan, and a sale of DRP or DRC (a “PMR Warrant Triggering Event”). Following a PMR Warrant Triggering Event, the PMR Warrant would become exercisable on the PMR Warrant Exercise Date as to an aggregate percentage of the fully-diluted outstanding common equity of DRP equal to the quotient of (i) the dollar amount by which the actual total repayments of principal on the PMR Acquisition Loan from the date of the PMR Warrant through the day immediately preceding the PMR Warrant Exercise Date is less than a certain benchmark amount (the “PMR Benchmark Amount”) as determined pursuant to the terms of the PMR Warrant, divided by (ii) the fair market value of the common equity of DRP as determined pursuant to the terms of the PMR Warrant. The purchase price for each common unit of DRP issuable upon exercise of the PMR Warrant is $0.0001 per common unit. During the 60-day period following a PMR Warrant Triggering Event, DRP or the DRP Successor, as applicable, has the option to purchase the PMR Warrant from the holder for a cash payment equal to the PMR Benchmark Amount, less any cash payments made on the PMR Acquisition Loan from the date of the PMR Warrant through the date of such PMR Warrant Triggering Event. The Company determined that the PMR Warrant had a nominal value as of December 31, 2012.

DRP, they are subject to forfeiture if the grantee’s employment with DRP is terminated for cause and subject to repurchase by DRP (at its option) if the grantee’s employment with DRP is terminated for any reason other than termination by DRP for cause. The BCUs are not entitled to any distributions nor do they have any fair value unless and until the cumulative amount distributed to holders of DRP common units other than BCUs is at least equal to a specified amount.

The Company measured compensation expense related to the BCUs at fair value on the issuance date and recognized this expense in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). For the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company recognized $3.3 million in such compensation expense based on a weighted-average grant-date fair value of $32,008 per unit. The Company used the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate the fair value of the BCUs granted. The estimated volatility of 28.0% was calculated based on the historical volatility of the stock prices for a group of identified peer companies and then adjusted for the debt leverage of the Company. The expected annual dividend per share was 0% based on the Company’s expected dividend rate. The average expected life of 0.6 years represented the period of time the BCUs were expected to be outstanding at the issuance date based on management’s estimate. The risk-free interest rate of 0.2% was calculated based on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon yield with a remaining term that approximated the expected life assumed at the date of issuance.

On August 31, 2010, ILXA acquired a majority of the assets of ILX Resorts Incorporated for an aggregate cash purchase price of $30.7 million. The ILX Acquisition added ten additional resorts new owner-families to the Diamond Resorts family. These assets complement Diamond Resorts’ existing resort network and are expected to increase the Company’s value proposition to its owner base. The ILX Acquisition was financed through the ILXA Inventory Loan and the ILXA Receivables Loan. See Note 15—Borrowings for additional detail. In addition, ILXA assumed $4.0 million in liabilities as part of the purchase price. The acquisition resulted in no goodwill or gain from business combinations due to the fact the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed equals the purchase price.

The Company accounted for this acquisition under the purchase method in accordance with ASC 805, “Business Combinations” (“ASC 805”). As of August 31, 2010, the acquisition was recorded based on a preliminary appraisal. During the twelve-month period ended August 31, 2011, adjustments were recorded to the respective accounts to reflect the values included in the final appraisal. The following table summarizes the consideration paid and the amounts of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date based on the preliminary and final appraisals (in thousands):

Acquired intangible assets consist of the following (dollar amounts in thousands):

The ILX management contracts have automatic renewals for a weighted average term of approximately ten years. The weighted average period before the next renewal or extension is approximately five years.

On July 1, 2011, the Company completed the Tempus Resorts Acquisition through Mystic Dunes, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Tempus Acquisition, LLC, with $104.9 million in borrowings. The Tempus Resorts Acquisition added two additional resorts and new owner-families to the Company’s owner base. In order to fund the Tempus Resorts Acquisition, Tempus Acquisition, LLC entered into the Tempus Acquisition Loan, Tempus Receivables Loan and the Tempus Inventory Loan. See Note 15—Borrowings for more information.

The Company accounted for this acquisition under the purchase method in accordance with ASC 805. As of July 1, 2011, the acquisition was recorded based on a preliminary appraisal; accordingly, provisional amounts were assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The Company recorded $34.2 million in gain on bargain purchase from business combination for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, in accordance with ASC 805 due to the fact that the assets were purchased as part of a distressed sale as Tempus Resorts International Ltd. had filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings in November 2010.

During the twelve-month period ended June 30, 2012, adjustments were recorded to the respective accounts to reflect the values included in the final appraisal. Specifically, the Company originally reported its gain on bargain purchase with respect to the Tempus Resorts Acquisition based upon historical trends and the Company’s limited records regarding the acquired assets and financial performance, including its portfolio of mortgages and contracts receivables. However, the Company subsequently developed further information regarding the inherent acquisition date default rate with respect to the portfolio of mortgages and contracts receivable acquired, which rate was higher than the Company had originally estimated in its preliminary valuation. This additional default data caused the Company to re-value the acquisition date fair value of the acquired portfolio of mortgages and contracts receivable, which resulted in a reduction of $10.6 million in the fair value of mortgages and contracts receivable and, accordingly, a corresponding deduction in gain on bargain purchase reflected in the fourth quarter of 2011.

In addition, for the three months ended September 30, 2011, the gain on bargain purchase was reported on a gross basis, without reduction for the deferred tax liability attributable to the difference in book value and tax basis. The effect of recording the acquired deferred tax liability and the equal and offsetting release of the Company’s valuation allowance was included in the benefit for income taxes line. Based upon further review of technical guidance in connection with the Company’s preparation of financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011, however, the Company determined that it would be appropriate to include the deferred tax effect of the acquired deferred tax liability in the gain on bargain purchase line as opposed to the benefit for income taxes line. Accordingly, for the three months ended December 31, 2011, the gain on bargain purchase was further reduced by the $8.6 million deferred tax liability attributable to the difference in book and tax basis in the assets acquired.

The following table summarizes the consideration paid and the amounts of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date based on the preliminary appraisal and the final appraisal (in thousands).

Acquired Tempus intangible assets consist of the following (dollar amounts in thousands):

The following sets forth the methodologies used by the Company for valuing the assets acquired in the Tempus Resorts Acquisition. Based upon such valuation methodologies, the total value exceeded the purchase price for such assets resulting in the gain on bargain purchase reported in these financial statements.

The Company acquired two separate pools of receivables. Both pools were valued using the present value of the after-tax cash flows generated over the life of the assets. Several assumptions were used in modeling the expected cash flows in addition to the regular principal payments outlined in the terms of the mortgage, including a weighted average coupon of 17.0%, a loan servicing fee of 1.5%, a prepayment rate of 6.8% and a default rate of 43.9% for the Company’s collateralized pool and a prepayment rate of 12.2% and a default rate of 43.4% for the Company’s in-house pool.

It has been the experience of the Company that existing customers (including customer relationships acquired by the Company) purchase more VOIs, and the customers at closing of the Tempus Resorts Acquisition were assumed to act similarly. Based upon the Company’s past experience (in particular with respect to past acquisitions), the Company assumed an upgrade rate of approximately 50.0% (the rate at which the customer relationships acquired pursuant to the Tempus Resorts Acquisition at the time of the acquisition are expected to purchase additional Vacation Interests) and an attrition rate of approximately 50.0% (the rate at which the customer relationships acquired pursuant to the Tempus Resorts Acquisition are no longer likely to purchase additional Vacation Interests, which the Company used to adjust the upgrade rate for future years) for the customers to predict the revenues generated over time. This means that the Company assumed that, of the customer relationships acquired, approximately 50.0%, 25.0% and 12.5% of such customer relationships were expected to upgrade during the first year, second year and third year following the closing, respectively. Accordingly, by the end of the third year, under these assumptions, the Company assumed that there would be total attrition of the acquired customer relationships. An increase in the upgrade rate and/or a decrease in the attrition rate would have resulted in an increase in the estimated fair value of the acquired customer relationships, while a decrease in the upgrade rate and/or an increase in the attrition rate would have resulted in a decrease in the estimated fair value of the acquired customer relationships. The Company estimated costs and expenses required to market and sell Vacation Interests to existing members based upon the historical performance of existing members and then deducted costs and expenses from the estimated revenues generated from the upgrades during the three years following the closing, resulting in the after-tax cash flows for such three-year period. The value of the customer relationships was then set by taking the present value of the after-tax cash flows.

The Company acquired two management contracts. Each was valued at the expected present value of the after-tax cash flows generated over the estimated useful life of such contract. The expected cash flows projected were based off the terms of the management contracts, and adjusted for inflation and the costs and expenses required to generate the revenues under such contracts.

The Company valued inventory purchased based on projected revenue using a 3.0% projected growth rate each year. The Company estimated that inventory purchased as part of the transaction (including the recovery of the initial defaulted receivables) would be substantially sold 16 years following the date of the consummation of the Tempus Resorts Acquisition. The Company subtracted for each year in such 16-year period a 50.0% advertising, sales, and marketing cost, and then tax-affected that number with a 39.0% corporate tax rate. This gave the Company its Net revenue after costs to generate. The Company then used a present value rate of 30.0% to calculate the fair value of the inventory.

The amenity fee agreement was valued at the expected present value of the after-tax cash flows to be generated over the useful life of the contract.

The assets were reviewed for reasonableness and collectibility and recorded at the historic book value.

All of the property and equipment acquired by the Company was valued by a third party and is depreciated in a straight line basis over the estimated useful life of the asset.

The Tempus Resorts Acquisition contributed $20.1 million of revenue and $14.6 million of net income, which includes $34.2 million of gain on bargain purchase, from the acquisition date through December 31, 2011. These amounts are included in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2011.

On May 21, 2012, the Company completed the PMR Acquisition through DPMA, a wholly-owned special-purpose subsidiary of the Company, whereby DPMA acquired certain resort management agreements, unsold VOIs and the rights to recover and resell such interests, portfolio of consumer loans and certain real property and other assets for approximately $51.6 million in cash, plus the assumption of specified liabilities related to the acquired assets. In order to fund the PMR Acquisition, DPMA entered into the PMR Acquisition Loan, which is collateralized by substantially all of the assets of DPMA. See Note 15—Borrowings for more information.

The PMR Acquisition added nine locations to the Company’s network of available resorts, four management contracts, VOI inventory, new owner-families to the Company’s owner base and additional VOI inventory to sell to existing members and potential customers. The Company accounted for the PMR Acquisition under the purchase method in accordance with ASC 805. As of May 21, 2012, the acquisition was recorded based on a preliminary appraisal; accordingly, provisional amounts were assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The Company recorded $20.7 million in gain on bargain purchase from business combinations during the quarter ended June 30, 2012 in accordance with ASC 805 due to the fact that the assets were purchased as part of a distressed sale as Pacific Monarch Resorts, Inc. had filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings in October 2011.

During the period between May 22, 2012 and December 31, 2012, adjustments were recorded to the respective accounts to reflect the values included in the updated appraisal as of December 31, 2012 and the Company recorded a reduction of gain on bargain purchase from business combination in the amount of $2.2 million resulting from the aforementioned adjustments.

The following table summarizes the consideration paid and the amounts of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed from Pacific Monarch Resorts, Inc. at the acquisition date based on the appraisals as of May 21, 2012 and December 31, 2012 (in thousands).

Acquired PMR intangible assets consist of the following (dollar amounts in thousands):

The following sets forth the methodologies used by the Company for valuing the assets acquired in the PMR Acquisition. Based upon such valuation methodologies, the total value exceeded the purchase price for such assets resulting in the gain on bargain purchase reported in these financial statements.

The Company acquired a single pool of receivables. This pool was valued using the present value of the after-tax cash flows generated over the life of the assets. Several assumptions were used in modeling the

expected cash flows in addition to the regular principal payments outlined in the terms of the mortgage, including a weighted average coupon of 14.4%, a loan servicing fee of 1.0%, a prepayment rate of 9.4% and a default rate of 39.2%.

It has been the experience of the Company that existing customers (including customer relationships acquired by the Company) purchase more VOIs, and the customers at closing of the PMR Acquisition were assumed to act similarly. Based upon the Company’s past experience (in particular with respect to past acquisitions), the Company assumed an upgrade rate of approximately 50.0% (the rate at which the customer relationships acquired pursuant to the PMR Acquisition at the time of the acquisition are expected to purchase additional Vacation Interests) and an attrition rate of approximately 50.0% (the rate at which the customer relationships acquired pursuant to the PMR Acquisition are no longer likely to purchase additional Vacation Interests, which the Company used to adjust the upgrade rate for future years) for the customers to predict the revenues generated over time. This means that the Company assumed that, of the customer relationships acquired, approximately 50.0%, 25.0% and 12.5% of such customer relationships were expected to upgrade during the first year, second year and third year following the closing, respectively. Accordingly, by the end of the third year, under these assumptions, the Company assumed that there would be total attrition of the acquired customer relationships. An increase in the upgrade rate and/or a decrease in the attrition rate would have resulted in an increase in the estimated fair value of the acquired customer relationships, while a decrease in the upgrade rate and/or an increase in the attrition rate would have resulted in a decrease in the estimated fair value of the acquired customer relationships. The Company estimated costs and expenses required to market and sell Vacation Interests to existing members based upon the historical performance of existing members and then deducted costs and expenses from the estimated revenues generated from the upgrades during the three years following the closing, resulting in the after-tax cash flows for such three-year period. The value of the customer relationships was then set by taking the present value of the after-tax cash flows.

The Company acquired four management contracts. Each was valued at the expected present value of the after-tax cash flows generated over the estimated useful life of such contract. The expected cash flows projected were based off the terms of the management contracts, and adjusted for inflation and the costs and expenses required to generate the revenues under such contracts.

The value included an ownership association receivable, late fees and assessments. The value also accounted for the estimated collectibility of these receivables.

The value included other loan receivables net of allowance, pending loans, and accrued interest receivables. The value also accounted for the estimated collectibility of these receivables.

Prepaid expenses and other assets consisted of maintenance fees that are paid in the first month of each quarter for the current quarter, prepaid insurance fees, and a villa in one of the buildings acquired.

All of the property and equipment acquired by the Company was valued by a third party and is depreciated in a straight line over the estimated useful life of the asset.

The PMR Acquisition contributed $39.0 million of revenue and $22.3 million of net income, which includes $20.7 million of gain on bargain purchase and $13.0 million of related income tax benefit, from the acquisition date through December 31, 2012. These amounts are included in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2012.

On October 5, 2012, the Company completed the Aegean Blue Acquisition through AB Acquisition Company, Ltd, a wholly-owned special-purpose subsidiary of Diamond Resorts (Group Holdings) Plc, and acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of Aegean Blue Holdings Plc. Pursuant to the Aegean Blue Acquisition, AB Acquisition Company, Ltd acquired certain resort management agreements, unsold VOIs and the rights to recover and resell such interests, portfolio of consumer loans and certain real property and other assets for approximately $6.5 million in cash, assumption of specified liability related to the acquired assets and a contingent liability associated with an earn-out clause. Tempus Acquisition LLC, the parent entity of Aegean Blue Acquisition, LLC, borrowed $6.6 million under the term loan portion of Tempus Acquisition Loan to fund the Aegean Blue Acquisition. See Note 15—Borrowings for further detail on this borrowing.

This acquisition is accounted for under the purchase method in accordance with ASC 805. As of December 31, 2012, the acquisition was recorded based on a preliminary appraisal; accordingly, provisional amounts have been assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Changes to the provisional amounts may be material. The Company expects to make all changes to provisional amounts within one year of the acquisition date.

The following table summarizes the consideration paid and the amounts of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed from Aegean Blue Holdings Plc at the acquisition date based on the preliminary appraisal (in thousands). The Company recorded $0.1 million in gain on bargain purchase from business combinations in accordance with ASC 805.

The following table presents unaudited consolidated pro forma financial information as if the closing of the Tempus Resorts Acquisition and PMR Acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2011 for purposes of the financial information presented for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands). The impact of Aegean Blue Acquisition is excluded from the following table as the pro forma financial information reflecting the Aegean Blue Acquisition is not required pursuant to Rule 11-01 of Regulation S-X under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, because the acquisition was below the significance thresholds set forth in such rule, and management does not believe that such financial information would be material to investors. Further, given that the Aegean Blue Acquisition is so far below the significance thresholds of such rule, and that the Company views the acquired operations of Aegean Blue Holdings Plc, from a financial perspective as otherwise immaterial, the Company believes that the inclusion of pro forma financial information reflecting the Aegean Blue Acquisition would not provide any material benefit to readers of this report.

The historical audited consolidated financial information has been adjusted to give effect to pro forma events that are (i) directly attributable to the acquisition, (ii) factually supportable, and (iii) expected to have a continuing impact on the combined results of the Company and the new entities created.

The unaudited pro forma results have been adjusted with respect to certain aspects of each acquisition to reflect:

The unaudited pro forma results do not reflect future events that either have occurred or may occur after each acquisition including, but not limited to, the anticipated realization of ongoing savings from operating synergies in subsequent periods. They also do not give effect to certain one-time charges the Company expected to incur in connection with the acquisitions including, but not limited to, charges that were expected to achieve ongoing cost savings and synergies.

Management believes that it is impracticable to allocate specific assets and liabilities related to each business segment. In addition, management does not review balance sheets by business segment as part of their evaluation of operating segment performances. Consequently, no balance sheet segment reports have been presented.

Information about the Company’s operations in different business segments for the periods presented below is as follows:

Note 23 —Consolidating Financial Statements—Guarantor and Non-guarantor Subsidiaries

The following consolidating financial statements present, on a supplemental basis, the financial position, results of operations, and statements of cash flow for (i) those subsidiaries of the Company which have been designated “Non-guarantor Subsidiaries” for purposes of the indenture governing the Senior Secured Note; and (ii) the Company and all of its other subsidiaries. Please see Exhibit 21.1 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 for a list of the guarantor subsidiaries. The Company’s non-guarantor subsidiaries include its European subsidiaries, special-purpose subsidiaries and a wholly-owned captive insurance entity. For purposes of the indenture governing the Senior Secured Note, the financial position, results of operations, and statements of cash flows of Non-guarantor Subsidiaries are excluded from the Company’s financial results to determine whether the Company is in compliance with the financial covenants governing the Senior Secured Notes. Accordingly, management believes that the following presentation is helpful to readers of this annual report.

The Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value amount of the asset may not be fully recoverable.

Impairment and other write-offs consist of the following for the year ended December 31 (in thousands):

For the year ended December 31, 2012, $0.5 million of the impairment charge is attributable to the write down of a European resort held for sale to its net realizable value based on an accepted offer. The impairment relates to a downturn in the real estate market. In addition, $0.2 million relates to intangible assets associated with an unprofitable European golf course operation, $0.2 million relates to information technology projects that are no longer viable, and $0.1 million relates to various other assets.

For the year ended December 31, 2011, $0.7 million of the impairment charge related to the sale of one of the Company’s European resorts. In addition, the Company recorded $0.4 million of the impairment charge related to information technology projects that are no longer viable, $0.2 million related to unrecoverable deposits on open market purchases of Vacation Interest Points, and $0.2 million in impairments of various other assets.

For the year ended December 31, 2010, $2.3 million of the impairment charges is attributable to the write down of two European resorts held for sale to their net realizable value based on accepted offers. The impairment relates to a downturn in the real estate market. Additionally, $0.9 million of the 2010 impairment charge is attributable to a receivable associated with an inventory recovery agreement that terminated in conjunction with the termination of the respective management contract and $0.1 million relates to impairment of various other assets.

On January 23, 2013, the Company completed a securitization transaction and issued the DROT 2013 Notes, with a face value of $93.6 million. The DROT 2013 Notes mature on January 20, 2025 and carry a weighted average interest rate of 2.0%. The net proceeds were used to pay off the outstanding principal balance under the Company’s 2008 Conduit Facility and to pay expenses incurred in connection with the issuance of the DROT 2013 Notes, including the funding of a reserve account required thereby.

Pacific Monarch Resorts, Inc. (“PMR” or the “Company”) is a California company organized on December 27, 1987, headquartered in Laguna Hills, California. PMR’s mission is to develop and market timeshare resort properties. The Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries (the “Company”), generate revenues from the sale and financing of vacation ownership interest (“VOI Points”) in a multilocation time share offering known as Monarch Grand Vacations (“MGV”). MGV is operated by Monarch Grand Vacations Owners Association (“MGVOA”), an affiliated nonprofit mutual benefit corporation. VOI Points entitle the owner to use of a fully furnished vacation resort unit at an MGV resort based on the number of VOI Points purchased. VOI Points are created through the transfer to MGVOA of resort units developed or purchased by the Company. In exchange, MGVOA has provided the Company with the exclusive right to market and sell VOI Points. MGVOA is a separate entity which owns the transferred properties for the benefit of time share owners. The Company has established several subsidiary Mexican corporations to acquire, develop and operate a resort property in San Jose del Cabo, Mexico.

The Company sells VOI Points to individuals principally in the United States of America. The Company typically finances sales to new owners after requiring a minimum 10% down payment. The Company also has a program that allows owners of its “deeded interest” resorts to trade in their deeded interests for MGV Points for a conversion fee. All note receivable balances are secured by the VOI Points sold.

The resort properties include a total of nine resort properties: five located in Southern California; one located in Lake Tahoe, California; one located in Las Vegas, Nevada; one located in Brian Head, Utah; and one located in San Jose del Cabo, Mexico.

On October 23, 2011 (the “Petition Date”), PMR and a number of its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the “Debtors”) filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California (the “Bankruptcy Court”). The filings included all wholly-owned subsidiaries except PMR Corporation I, Inc., and PMR Insurance Company, Inc. It also excluded Constructora Cabo Azul, S. de R.L. de C.V. because it was inactive. The Debtor’s Chapter 11 filings were due to prevailing economic conditions and unanticipated reductions in credit facilities caused by instability in the credit markets, and the Company was in default on substantially all of its debt.

On May 21, 2012, the Bankruptcy Court approved the sale of certain Debtor assets to DPM Acquisition, LLC (“DPM”). In accordance with the approved asset purchase agreement (the “DPM Purchase Agreement”), DPM acquired all unsold vacation interest inventory, all construction in progress, Kona land and improvements, certain cash in escrow and restricted cash accounts related to customer down payments, certain physical assets including machinery, equipment, computers, software, owned vehicles, furniture and fixtures, in-house customer notes receivable, and certain prepaid expenses. In addition, DPM agreed to assume certain liabilities including customer down payment liabilities, the AD&C Loan (Note 10), some maintenance fees owed to vacation plan ownership associations, and certain related party payables.

On May 21, 2012, the Bankruptcy Court approved the sale of certain Debtor assets to Resort Funding America, LLC (“RFA”). In accordance with the approved asset purchase agreements (the “RFA Purchase Agreement”), RFA acquired certain customer notes receivable that were collateral for the Receivables Loan (Note 10) and certain cash balances.

On July 30, 2012, the Debtors filed their plan of reorganization with the Bankruptcy Court (the “Plan”). The Plan objectives include: the transition of assets and the completion of the DPM and RFA transactions; the merger

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

and consolidation of PMR with certain non-Mexican entities; the merger and consolidation of the Mexican entities while providing full payment of all claims against the Mexican entities; and the transfer of remaining PMR assets into a trust that would liquidate the assets and distribute the proceeds among the remaining creditors.

The Company incurred $2,252 of professional, trustee and other fees in connection with its Chapter 11 filing as of March 31, 2012. At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company accrued for $494 and $1,707, respectively, in unpaid professional fees in accrued liabilities.

The consolidated financial statements include the activities of PMR and the following wholly-owned subsidiaries or controlled entities—Vacation Marketing Group, Inc., Vacation Interval Realty, Inc., MGV Cabo, LLC, Pacific Monarch Resorts Corporation I, Inc. (“PMR Corp I”), PMR Resorts 2007-A LLC, PMR Insurance Company, Inc. (“PMRIC”), PMR Cabo LLC, Constructora Cabo Azul, S. de R.L. de C.V. (“CCA”), Operadora MGVM, S. de R.L. de C.V. (“Operadora”), MGVM Reclutadora de Empleados, S. C., DCAONE, LLC, and Desarrollo Cabo Azul, S. de R.L. de C.V. (“DCA”) (collectively referred to as “PMR” or the “Company”). All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Company are unaudited, but in the opinion of management, include all adjustments, which are of a normal recurring nature, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. These statements should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2011. The operating results and cash flows for the three-month periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that will be achieved for the full fiscal year or for future periods.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”).

The Company has suffered recurring losses from operations, has defaulted on substantially all of its debt, and is currently in bankruptcy at March 31, 2012. The Company’s need for additional capital, and the uncertainties surrounding its ability to raise such funding, raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Accordingly, the consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue to operate as a going concern, which contemplates that the Company will realize its assets and satisfy its liabilities and commitments in the ordinary course of business. The financial statements do not include adjustments relating to the recoverability of recorded asset amounts or the amounts or classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern, except related to the classification of liabilities subject to compromise (Note 3).

The US dollar is the functional currency for all of the Company’s operations. The Company’s foreign operations hold the US dollar as the functional currency. The Company recognized foreign currency gains (losses) of $195 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. These gains (losses) were recorded in vacation ownership interest sales in the consolidated financial statements.

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Cash and cash equivalents consist of all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less. Cash and cash equivalents include cash and money market funds.

Cash in escrow and restricted cash consists of: (1) escrow deposits received on sales of vacation ownership interests that are held in escrow, until the applicable statutory rescission period has expired and the funds have been released from escrow, (2) cash accounts required to fund our captive insurance company (under Note 2, Self Insurance), and (3) lender-controlled deposits (Note 4).

Customer Notes Receivable and Allowance for Collectible Customer Notes Receivable

The Company accounts for customer notes receivable under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 978, “Real Estate—Time Sharing Activities” Customer notes receivable are recorded net of the related allowance for collectible customer notes receivable. The Company records a provision for collectible vacation ownership interest sales as a reduction to vacation ownership interest sales revenue. This provision is calculated as projected gross losses for customer notes receivable, taking into account estimated Vacation Interest recoveries. If actual collectible losses on customer notes receivable differ materially from these estimates, the Company’s future results of operations may be adversely impacted.

The Company provides for estimated future losses to be incurred related to uncollectible customer notes receivable. Management evaluates allowance requirements by examining current delinquencies, historical loan losses developed through a static pool analysis, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay (including the timing of future payments), current economic conditions, the value of the underlying collateral, and other relevant factors.

The Company has historically charged off customer notes receivable upon the earliest of (i) the initiation of cancellation or foreclosure proceedings; or (ii) the customer’s account becoming over 120 days delinquent. As a requirement of Forbearance Agreement (Note 10), the Company has agreed not to charge off any accounts without lender consent. Customer notes receivable that meet the qualifications to be charged off that have not been charged off are $85,206 and $90,429 at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. All collection and foreclosure costs are expensed as incurred.

Unsold vacation interests inventory represents the cost of unsold ownership interests in MGVOA (“VOI Points”), timeshare resorts that are under construction, and other timeshare inventory that have been completed but are not legally registered to be sold as timeshare. As the Company completes the construction of resort properties, ownership is transferred by the Company to MGVOA in return for the exclusive right to sell ownership interest in MGVOA. The Company determines the available VOI Points basis for each resort using a formula based upon the number of user days available as well as the relative value of each property. The cost of the VOI Points includes land, the completed timeshare units, any allocable amenity costs, and the cost of any allocable infrastructure. VOI Points are carried at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Rental activity and operations for other timeshare inventory are accounted for as rental operations in accordance with the guidance in ASC 978.

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over the assets’ estimated useful lives or lease term, if shorter. Depreciation and amortization is calculated using the straight line method over the estimated useful lives as follows:

In accordance with ASC 360, “Property, Plant & Equipment” (“ASC 360”), the Company reviews the carrying value of its long-lived assets for possible impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset is considered impaired when anticipated undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition are less than its carrying amount. As of March 31, 2012, the Company has not identified any impairments of its long-lived assets.

Undeveloped land consists of the land and improvements in Kona, Hawaii. These assets are recorded at estimated fair value. As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, undeveloped land was $4,015.

Deferred revenue primarily consists of deferred revenue related to payments received on timeshare samplers and vacation packages. PMR enters into sampler agreements whereby the prospective owner pays a minimum down payment and small monthly payments for the right to use a unit week within a stated time period (generally 18 to 24 months). Utilization of the unit week is dependent upon the sampler meeting specified payment criteria. Amounts collected under these sampler agreements are recorded as deferred revenue until the earlier of the use date, the expiration of the stated period, or the customer default date. PMR sells vacation packages for which a deposit is collected in advance of travel. These deposits are recorded as deferred revenue until the earlier of the travel date or the expiration date (generally 3 to 18 months) as stated on the certificate.

On April 6, 2006, the Company loaned $2,165 to one of its stockholders, who used the funds to personally purchase the outstanding shares in four other entities. The loan is secured by a note receivable that was due on April 1, 2011, and bears interest at 4.75%. In April 2011, the Company and the stockholder agreed that payments on the receivable due from stockholder would discontinue and that interest would continue to accrue based upon the stated interest rate. The balance of the receivable and accrued interest due from stockholder was $2,475 and $2,450 at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, and has been included as a contra-equity balance to stockholders’ deficit.

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

With respect to the Company’s recognition of revenue from VOI Point sales, the Company follows the guidelines included in ASC 978. Under ASC 978, vacation ownership interest sales revenue is divided into separate components that include the revenue earned on the sale of the VOI Points and the revenue earned on the sales incentive given to the customer as motivation to purchase the VOI Points. In order to recognize revenue on the sale of VOI Points, ASC 978 requires a demonstration of a buyer’s commitment (generally a minimum cash payment of 10% of the purchase price plus the value of any sales incentives provided). A buyer’s down payment and subsequent mortgage payments are adequate to demonstrate a commitment to pay for the VOI Points once 10% of the purchase price plus the value of the incentives provided to consummate a VOI Points transaction has been covered. The Company recognizes sales of VOI Points on an accrual basis after (i) a binding sales contract has been executed; (ii) the buyer has adequately demonstrated a commitment to pay for the VOI Points; (iii) the rescission period required under applicable law has expired; (iv) collectibility of the receivable representing the remainder of the sales price is reasonably assured; and (v) the Company has completed substantially all of its obligations with respect to any development related to the real estate sold (i.e., construction has been substantially completed and certain minimum project sales levels have been met). If the buyer’s commitment has not met ASC 978 guidelines, the VOI Point sales revenue and related vacation ownership interest cost of sales are deferred and recognized under the installment method until the buyer’s commitment is satisfied, at which time the full amount of the sale is recognized. The net deferred revenue is included in customer notes receivable on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. Under ASC 978, the provision for uncollectible vacation ownership interest sales revenue is recorded as a reduction of vacation ownership interest sales revenue.

Revenue from the sales incentive given to the customer as motivation to purchase the VOI Points is recorded upon recognition of the related vacation ownership interest sales revenue in other income.

Resort revenues and expenses consist of the revenues and expenses derived from operating the Cabo Azul Resort in San Jose del Cabo, Mexico. The operations include food and beverage operations, providing cable, and telephone services, and retail and gift shop operations. Resort revenues are generally recognized at the completion of the services performed. Costs are expensed as incurred.

Management and member services revenue includes resort management fees charged to VPOAs and other fees charged to VPOAs for services performed. Management fee revenues are recognized in accordance with the terms of the Company’s management contracts. Revenues related to management fees are recorded as the management services are provided. Other management and member services revenues are generally recognized at the completion of the services performed.

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The Company’s interest revenue consists primarily of interest earned on customer notes receivable. Interest earned on customer notes is accrued based on the contractual provisions of the loan documents which approximates the effective interest rate method. Interest accruals on customer notes are suspended at the earliest of (i) a first payment default; (ii) the initiation of cancellation or foreclosure proceedings; or (iii) the customer’s account becoming over 90 days delinquent. If payments are received while a consumer loan is considered delinquent, interest is recognized on a cash basis. The Company had $87,383 and $94,257 of customer notes receivable that were more than 90 days delinquent at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

Other income consists of revenue from certain sales incentives given to customers as motivation to purchase VOI Points which is recorded upon recognition of the related vacation ownership interest sales revenue, rental revenue received from the VPOA for the rental office space and furniture which is recognized ratably over the rental period, and late/impound fees assessed on delinquent costumer notes receivable which is recognized as collected, as follows:

The Company records vacation interest cost of sales using the relative sales value method in accordance with ASC 978, which requires the Company to make significant estimates. At the time the Company records related vacation ownership interest sales revenue, the Company records vacation interest cost of sales. In determining the appropriate amount of costs using the relative sales value method, the Company relies on complex, multi-year financial models that incorporate a variety of inputs, most of which are management estimates. These amounts include, but are not limited to, estimated costs to build or acquire any additional vacation interests, estimated total revenues expected to be earned on a project, including estimated sales price per point and estimated number of points sold, related estimated provision for uncollectible vacation ownership interest sales revenue and sales incentives, and estimated projected future cost and volume of recoveries of vacation ownership interests. Any changes in the estimates the Company uses to determine the vacation ownership interest cost of sales are recorded in the current period.

All advertising, sales, and marketing costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising expense recognized was $6 and $130 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Financial services expenses include payroll and administrative costs of the finance operations as well as loan servicing fees paid to third parties. These costs are expensed as incurred.

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The Company is responsible for paying VPOA annual maintenance fees, assessments, and reserves on the Company’s unsold vacation interests. To offset the Company’s vacation interest carrying cost, the Company rents unsold vacation interests controlled by the Company to third parties on a short-term basis. The Company also generates revenue on sales of one-week rentals and mini-vacations, which allow prospective owners to sample a resort property. This revenue and the associated expenses are deferred until the vacation is used by the customer or the expiration date, whichever is earlier. Revenue from the rental of unsold VOI Points, one-week rentals and mini-vacations is recognized as a reduction to vacation interest carrying cost in accordance with ASC 978.

ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The guidance describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, customer notes receivable had a balance of $121,808 and $122,178, respectively, net of allowance. The allowance for collectible customer notes receivable is derived using a static pool analysis to develop historical default percentage to apply to the customer notes receivable population. The Company evaluates other factors such as economic conditions, industry trends, default rates and past due aging reports. The Company was unable to determine the fair value of customer notes receivable as there is little market data available.

Fair value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management as of each fiscal year end. The carrying amount reported in the consolidated balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents, cash in escrow and restricted cash, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximates fair market value due to the immediate or short-term maturity of these financial instruments. The carrying amount of notes payable approximates fair value because the interest rates on notes payable approximate current interest rates on debt with similar terms and remaining maturities.

The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities using the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are calculated based upon the temporary differences between the consolidated financial statement and income tax bases of assets and liabilities using currently enacted tax rates. These differences are based upon estimated differences between the book and tax basis of the assets and liabilities for the Company as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. Effective July 1, 2010, the Company converted from an S-Corp to a C-Corp. The Company’s income tax expense for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 is based on the actual results for such interim period. Due to the Company’s status in bankruptcy, sale of certain assets and assumption of certain liabilities in connection with the sale to DPM, and the sale of debtor assets to RFA, such issues make it difficult for the Company to reasonably estimate its annual tax results for fiscal 2012 as the tax consequences of such transactions could be material.

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The Company’s deferred tax assets are recorded net of a valuation allowance when, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the recorded deferred tax assets will not be realized in future periods. Decreases to the valuation allowance are recorded as reductions to the Company’s provision for income taxes and increases to the valuation allowance result in additional provision for income taxes. The realization of the Company’s deferred tax assets, net of the valuation allowance, is primarily dependent on estimated future taxable income. A change in the Company’s estimate of future taxable income may require an addition to or reduction from the valuation allowance.

For tax positions the Company has taken or expects to take in a tax return, the Company applies a more likely than not threshold, under which the Company must conclude a tax position is more likely than not to be sustained, assuming that the position will be examined by the appropriate taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information, in order to recognize or continue to recognize the benefit. In determining the Company’s provision for income taxes, the Company uses judgment, reflecting its estimates and assumptions, in applying the more likely than not threshold.

In 2005, the Company formed PMR Insurance Company, Inc. (“PMRIC”), a pure captive insurance company, for the purpose of self-insuring for product and completed operations liability arising from the construction of Cancun Resort Phase V in Las Vegas, Nevada. Losses are provided for based on past experience and using assumptions for losses incurred but not reported. The method for determining such estimates is continually reviewed and updated. Any adjustments are reflected in current operations. As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company recorded an accrued liability for self insurance of $712 and $718, respectively, representing an estimate of losses incurred, but not reported. PMRIC maintains cash balances to fund the estimated losses. The cash balances of $715 at March 31, 2012 and $722 at December 31, 2011 are recorded in cash in escrow and restricted cash. There were no reported losses as of March 31, 2012. Management believes that the accrual is adequate to cover the losses incurred to date, however, this accrual is based on estimates and the ultimate liability may be more or less than the amount provided.

Credit Risk—The Company offers financing to the buyers of VOIs. The customer notes received by the Company bear interest at a fixed rate, are payable over a 1- to 12-year period, and are secured by an interest on the VOI owned by the customer. Any adverse change in economic conditions or significant price increases or adverse events related to the travel and tourism industry could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business. Such conditions may also adversely affect the future availability and cost of financing for the Company or its customers and result in a material adverse effect on the Company’s business. In addition, changes in general economic conditions may adversely affect the Company’s ability to collect on its outstanding customer notes receivable.

Interest Rate Risk—The Company has historically derived net interest income from its financing activities because the interest rates it charges its customers who finance the purchase of their VOIs exceed the interest rates the Company pays to its lenders. Because the Company’s indebtedness bears interest at variable rates and the Company’s customer notes receivable bear interest at fixed rates, increases in interest rates will erode the spread in interest rates that the Company has historically obtained and could cause the rate on the Company’s borrowings to exceed the rate at which the Company provides financing to its customers. The Company funds substantially all of the customer notes receivable, unsold vacation interest inventory, and undeveloped land which it originates or purchases with borrowings through its financing facilities and internally generated funds. Borrowings are in turn repaid with the proceeds received by the Company from repayments of such customer notes receivable.

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Concentration of cash balances—The Company maintains cash and restricted cash in financial institutions in excess of amounts insured by the US government. The Company has not experienced any losses on such accounts. Cash is also maintained at financial institutions in Mexico which may, at times, exceed the government backed limits in Mexico.

Availability of Funding Sources—The Company has historically funded customer notes receivable and unsold vacation interests with borrowings through its financing facilities and internally generated funds. Borrowings are in turn repaid with the proceeds received by the Company from repayments of such customer contracts receivable. To the extent that the Company is not successful in maintaining or replacing existing financings, it would have to curtail its sales and marketing operations or sell assets, thereby resulting in a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition.

Foreign Operations—The Company, through its wholly owned subsidiaries, sells vacation ownership interests and operates the Cabo Azul Resort in San Jose del Cabo, Mexico. As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, net assets in Mexico were $33,371 and $33,634, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, revenues from our Mexican operations were $4,631 and $3,939, respectively.

Geographic Concentration—The Company’s notes receivable are primarily originated in California. Borrowers residing in California accounted for 83.87% and 84.06% of customer notes receivable for March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, borrowers residing in the United States accounted for 99.83% and 99.84% of customer notes receivable, respectively. No other state or foreign country concentration accounted for more than approximately 10% of gross outstanding customer notes receivable. The risk inherent in such concentrations is dependent upon regional and general economic stability which affects the financial stability of the borrowers. The Company’s VOI Points are generated by resorts concentrated primarily in Las Vegas, Nevada; Brian Head, Utah; California and Mexico. The risk inherent in such concentrations is in the continued popularity of the resort destinations, which affects the marketability of the Company’s VOI Points and the collection of customer notes receivable.

Telemarketing—The Company has historically generated a portion of its sales leads through telemarketing. In recent years, state regulators have increased legislation and enforcement regarding telemarketing operations, including requiring the adherence to state “do not call” lists. In addition, the Federal Trade Commission has implemented national “do not call” legislation. Companies infringing on the “do not call” legislation may be subject to significant fines. The increased regulation may impact the Company’s current marketing strategies.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. In preparing the consolidated financial statements, the Company made significant estimates which include: (1) allowance for collectible customer notes receivable, and provision for uncollectible vacation ownership interest sales revenue; (2) useful lives of property and equipment; (3) estimated total revenues expected to be earned on a project, related estimated provision for uncollectible vacation ownership interest sales revenue and sales incentives, estimated projected future cost and volume of recoveries of vacation interests, estimated sales price per point and estimated number of points sold used to allocate certain unsold vacation interests to vacation interest cost of sales under the relative sales value method; and (4) the valuation allowance recorded against deferred tax assets. It is at least reasonably possible that a material change in one or more of these estimates may occur in the near term and that such change may materially affect actual results.

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The Company has evaluated events and transactions occurring subsequent to March 31, 2012 through August 6, 2012, which is the date the consolidated financial statements were available to be issued. Subsequent events occurring after August 6, 2012 have not been evaluated by management. No material events have occurred since March 31, 2012 that require recognition or disclosure in the consolidated financial statements, except as disclosed in Note 16.

Liabilities subject to compromise (“LSTC”) refer to both secured and unsecured obligations that will likely be accounted for under a confirmed plan of reorganization. Actions to enforce or effect payment of pre-petition liabilities are stayed. ASC 852, “Reorganizations” requires pre-petition liabilities that are subject to compromise to be reported at amounts expected to be allowed, even if they may be settled for lesser amounts. These liabilities represent the estimated amount expected to be allowed on known or potential claims to be resolved through the Chapter 11 proceedings and remain subject to future adjustments arising from negotiated settlements, actions of the Bankruptcy Court, rejection of executory contracts and unexpired leases, the determination as to the value of collateral, proofs of claim, or other events. LSTC also includes certain items that may be assumed under the confirmed plan of reorganization and as such may be subsequently reclassified to liabilities not subject to compromise. The Company did not have any claims that were not subject to reasonable estimates.

Subsequent to the Petition Date, certain of the Company’s notes payable did not accrue interest. Had interest accrued on all notes payable as defined in the loan agreements, the Company would have recorded additional interest expense of $4,913 for the three months ended March 31, 2012.

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The Company provides financing for purchasers of vacation interests which are collateralized by their vacation interests. The term of the notes are from one year to twelve years and may be prepaid at any time without penalty. The weighted-average term of the customer notes receivable outstanding at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 is 117 months. Stated interest rates on customer notes receivable outstanding at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2011 range from 0% to 18.90% per annum (yielding a weighted-average of approximately 15.52% and 15.79% at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.)

The following reflects the scheduled contractual principal maturities of customer notes receivable:

A summary of credit quality of gross customer notes receivable as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 is as follows:

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Fair Isaac Corporation (“FICO”) credit scores were obtained at the time of the origination of the customer notes receivable.

Depreciation and amortization expense was $817 and $924 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had net property and equipment in Mexico of $3,114 and $3,634, respectively.

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Receivables Loan—Effective September 9, 2004, PMR entered into a $180,000 revolving loan agreement (the “Receivables Loan”) collateralized by the proceeds from the principal and interest obtained from customer notes receivable. The loan allows the Company to borrow up to 90% of customer notes receivable that are less than 90 days past their contractual payment. For customer notes that are more than 90 days past their contractual payment, the Company must either repurchase the note from the lender or replace the note with one that is less than 90 days past due.

Effective March 18, 2009, PMR entered into a forbearance agreement (the “Forbearance Agreement”) which extended the maturity of the Receivables Loan and changed certain terms of the agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the Forbearance Agreement, the lender agreed to temporarily forbear from exercising its rights and remedies under the loan agreements as a result of existing defaults and continued to make new advances to the Company. The Forbearance Agreement set the interest rate on the Receivables Loan at LIBOR plus 6% with a floor of 9%, suspended any requirement for principal payments on the AD&C Loan (see below), suspended the requirement to repurchase ineligible loans, required strengthening of the underwriting standards on new loans to timeshare buyers, required that servicing of the note receivable portfolio be moved to a third party servicer, required the hiring of a chief restructuring officer and added several new financial reporting requirements. The lender also encumbered all unsold dedicated points, any in-house points, the Kona land and undeveloped lots at the Cancun Resort in Las Vegas. The original Forbearance Agreement expired on July 30, 2010. Subsequent to that date, the Forbearance Agreement was amended a total of 31 times, primarily extending the expiration date out to October 23, 2011, and increasing the credit facility up to $220,300.

Revolver Loan—Effective January 1, 2008, PMR Corporation 1 entered into a $75,000 revolving loan agreement (the “Revolver Loan”) collateralized by the proceeds from the principal and interest obtained from customer notes receivable. The loan allows the Company to borrow up to 85% of customer notes receivable that are less than 90 days past their contractual payment. For customer notes that are more than 90 days past their contractual payment, the Company must either repurchase the note from the lender or replace the note with one that is less than 90 days past due.

AD&C Loan—Effective November 1, 2002, PMR entered into a $55,000 acquisition, development and construction loan (the “AD&C Loan”). The purpose of this loan was to acquire and develop the Cabo Azul Resort in Los Cabos Mexico. The loan is secured by a first mortgage on the Cabo Azul land and improvements.

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Hawaii Acquisition Loan—Effective June 3, 2003, PMR entered into an $893 acquisition, development and construction loan (the “Hawaii Acquisition Loan”). The purpose of this term loan was to acquire property in Kona, Hawaii. The loan is collateralized by a first mortgage by the Kona land and improvements.

Furniture and Equipment Loan—Effective June 15, 2006, PMR entered into a $9,991 line of credit (the “Furniture and Equipment Loan”) for the purpose of purchasing furniture and equipment for the Cabo Azul Resort in Los Cabos Mexico. The loan is secured by the Cabo Azul furniture and equipment.

Corporate Building Loan I—Effective March 24, 1999, PMR entered into a $2,100 mortgage loan agreement (the “Corporate Building Loan”) for the purpose of purchasing the Company’s corporate headquarters in Laguna Hills, CA. The loan is secured by a first trust deed on the building.

Corporate Building Loan II—Effective September 26, 2007, PMR entered into a $4,173 mortgage loan agreement (the “Corporate Building Loan II”) for the purpose of generating cash flow to fund operations. The loan is secured by a second trust deed on the building.

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

As discussed in Note 1, at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company was in default on substantially all of its debt. The majority of the Company’s outstanding debt has been reclassified to liabilities subject to compromise. The Company recorded interest expense related to notes payable of $193 and $6,150 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Amortization of $33 and $284 of debt issuance costs were included in interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

On April 6, 2006, the Company entered into a $12,193 unsecured loan agreement with one of the Company’s stockholders (the “Stockholder Note Payable”). The Stockholder Note Payable plus an $11,262 cash down payment was paid to the stockholder to purchase 100% of his outstanding shares. The note bears interest at 5%, was payable in 54 installment of $253, and was covered by a personal guaranty from a surviving stockholder. A total of 32 installments were paid through December 2008 and then were stopped because of cash flow issues. Because of the personal guaranty, in February 2009, the surviving stockholder negotiated the purchase of the Stockholder Note Payable from the selling stockholder for $4,000. The Company recorded interest expense related to this note of $119 and $119 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, $2,105 and $1,986 in accrued interest has been included in liabilities subject to compromise, respectively.

On January 14, 2009, the Company entered into a $676 unsecured loan agreement with a stockholder in exchange for operating cash. The Stockholder Note Payable bears interest at 4.75% and matured on April 1, 2011. The Company recorded interest expense related to this note of $8 and $8 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. At March 31 2012 and December 31, 2011, $140 and $132 in accrued interest has been included in liabilities subject to compromise, respectively.

On March 4, 2010, the Company entered into a $147 unsecured loan agreement with a stockholder in exchange for operating cash. The Stockholder Note Payable bears interest at 4.75% and matured on April 1, 2011. The Company recorded interest expense related to this note of $2 and $2 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, $23 and $21 in accrued interest has been included in liabilities subject to compromise, respectively.

The Forbearance Agreement effective on March 18, 2009, required subordination of all stockholder notes payable to all secured debt and precluding any subsequent payments.

PMR has entered into capital lease obligations for equipment which have terms from 24 to 60 months. These capital lease obligations include bargain purchase options. The property and equipment capitalized under these lease agreements totaled $212 with accumulated depreciation of $212 at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. Amortization expense related to the capital leases was $0 and $2 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, capital lease obligations of $55 and $40 were reclassified to liabilities subject to compromise, respectively. If the minimum lease payments are made on these leases, the remaining balance of $40 will be paid in 2012.

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The Company’s matching contributions to the plan are charged to expense at the time of the employee contribution. The total Company matching contributions were $18 and $17 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

The Company is, from time to time, party to certain litigation that relates to matters arising in the ordinary course of business. Management believes that the outcome of such litigation will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of the Company.

The Company has several buildings which as of March 31, 2012, have not been completed. The Company does not have any contracts or commitments related to the completion of the buildings. In addition, the Company is unable to estimate the costs to complete the buildings.

The Company has one building that is still under construction that has been dedicated. As a condition to the dedication, the Company is required to provide completion bonds or set-aside letters to guarantee the completion of the resort. The Company’s ability to obtain completion bonds or set-aside letters primarily depends upon capitalization, working capital, past performance, management expertise, and certain external factors. The Company’s inability to obtain completion bonds or set-aside letters in the future would significantly impact their ability to generate future VOI Points for sale through the dedication process, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

In accordance with Mexican Income Tax Law, companies carrying out transactions with related parties are subject to certain requirements as to the determination of prices, since such prices must be similar to those that would be used in arm’s-length transactions. Should the tax authorities examine the transactions and reject the related-party prices, they could assess additional taxes plus the related inflation adjustment and interest, in addition to penalties of up to 100% of the omitted taxes.

The Company has entered into an employee contract with a PMR executive. The contract requires that the Company pay the executive a severance payment of $300 based upon the occurrence of certain events. The transactions with DRI and RFA (Note 16) triggered the payment of the $300. The Company made this payment on May 21, 2012. The Company is also responsible for other severance payments to certain employees. The total amount of these payments is $161. These payments are expected to be paid during 2012.

Statutory labor laws and regulations cover Company employees hired to support sales and report operations at the Company’s Cabo Azul resort. These laws require the Company to pay a mandatory severance if, or when, employees are terminated without legal justification. While the Company did not have plans to terminate employees supporting these operations as of March 31, 2012, the decision to do so could lead to the Company incurring a material severance liability. Accordingly, such obligation is contingent in nature and has not been accrued in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Amounts due from related parties, net and due to related parties consist primarily of transactions with VPOAs and with the Company for companies that are owned by one or more of the Company’s stockholders (“Related Companies”). Amounts due from VPOAs include fees charged to the VPOAs for annual assessment billing and collection services, management fees paid by the VPOA to the Company, and the rental of assets and office space to the VPOAs. Amounts due to the VPOAs primarily include the payment of annual maintenance and assessment fees on unsold vacation ownership interest intervals to the VPOAs. In addition, the VPOAs may obtain vacation ownership interest inventory through foreclosure and repossession due to an owner’s unpaid assessments. The Company has the right but not the obligation to purchase the vacation ownership interest from the VPOA. In addition, the Company rents sales and marketing office space from certain VPOAs. Transactions with Related Companies are primarily the allocation of a portion of the Company’s general and administrative expenses for shared services or assets.

Total amounts due to related parties that are included in accounts payable and accrued expenses are as follows:

Sale of the Corporate Building—On June 29, 2012, the Company received a letter of intent for the purchase of the corporate building and improvements in Laguna Beach, California for $2,850.

DPM Purchase Agreement—On May 21, 2012, the Bankruptcy Court approved the sale of certain Debtor assets to DPM. In accordance with the approved asset purchase agreement, DPM acquired all unsold vacation interest inventory, all construction in progress, Kona land and improvements, certain cash in escrow and restricted cash accounts related to customer down payments, certain physical assets including machinery, equipment, computers, software, owned vehicles, furniture and fixtures, in-house customer notes receivable, and certain prepaid expenses. In addition, DPM agreed to assume certain liabilities including customer down payment liabilities, some maintenance fees owed to VPOAs, and certain related party payables. The total purchase price was $49,250. Part of the proceeds from this transaction were used to pay the AD&C Loan and the Hawaii Acquisition Loan

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

RFA Purchase Agreement—On May 21, 2012, the Bankruptcy Court approved the sale of certain Debtor assets to RFA through a credit bid transaction. Under the terms of the RFA Purchase Agreement, RFA acquired the pool of customer notes receivable that were collateral for the Receivables Loan (Note 11) which had a balance at May 21, 2012 of 236,657 and $2,000 of cash through a credit bid of $130,000.

Plan of Reorganization—On July 30, 2012, the Debtors filed their plan of reorganization with the Bankruptcy Court (the “Plan”). The Plan objectives include: the transition of assets and the completion of the DPM and RFA transactions; the merger and consolidation of PMR with certain non-Mexican entities; the merger and consolidation of the Mexican entities while providing full payment of all claims against the Mexican entities; and the transfer of remaining PMR assets into a trust that would liquidate the assets and distribute the proceeds among the remaining creditors.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Pacific Monarch Resorts, Inc. (Debtor-in-Possession) (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company at December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations, has defaulted on substantially all of its debt, and has filed petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), and that raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans concerning this matter is also discussed in Notes 1 and 18 to the consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has restated its December 31, 2009 consolidated financial statements.

On May 21, 2012, the Bankruptcy Court approved the sale of certain Debtor assets to DPM Acquisition, LLC (“DPM”). In accordance with the approved asset purchase agreement (the “DPM Purchase Agreement”), DPM acquired all unsold vacation interest inventory, all construction in progress, Kona land and improvements, certain cash in escrow and restricted cash accounts related to customer down payments, certain physical assets including machinery, equipment, computers, software, owned vehicles, furniture and fixtures, in-house customer notes receivable, and certain prepaid expenses. In addition, DPM agreed to assume certain liabilities including customer down payment liabilities, some maintenance fees owed to vacation plan ownership associations (“VPOAs”), and certain related party payables.

The Company incurred $1,735 of professional, trustee and other fees in connection with its Chapter 11 filing as of December 31, 2011. At December 31, 2011, the Company accrued for $1,707 in unpaid professional fees in accrued liabilities.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”).

The Company has suffered recurring losses from operations, has defaulted on substantially all of its debt, and is currently in bankruptcy at December 31, 2011. The Company’s need for additional capital, and the uncertainties surrounding its ability to raise such funding, raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue to operate as a going concern, which contemplates that the Company will realize its assets and satisfy its liabilities and commitments in the ordinary course of business. The financial statements do not include adjustments relating to the recoverability of recorded asset amounts or the amounts or classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern, except related to the classification of liabilities subject to compromise (Note 4).

The US dollar is the functional currency for all of the Company’s operations. The Company’s foreign operations hold the US dollar as the functional currency. The Company recognized foreign currency gains (losses) of $1,018 and ($15) for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. These gains (losses) were recorded in resort expenses in the consolidated financial statements.

Cash and cash equivalents consist of all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less. Cash and cash equivalents include cash and money market funds. Cash in escrow and restricted cash consists of: (1) escrow deposits received on sales of vacation ownership interests that are held in escrow, until the applicable statutory rescission period has expired and the funds have been released from escrow, (2) cash accounts required to fund the captive insurance company (under Note 2, Self Insurance), and (3) lender-controlled deposits (Note 5).

Customer Notes Receivable and Allowance for Uncollectible Customer Notes Receivable

The Company accounts for customer notes receivable under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 978, “Real Estate—Time Sharing Activities”. Customer notes receivable are recorded net of the related allowance for uncollectible customer notes receivable. The Company records a provision for uncollectible vacation ownership interest sales as a reduction to vacation ownership interest sales revenue. This provision is calculated as projected gross losses for customer notes receivable, taking into account estimated Vacation Interest recoveries. If actual uncollectible losses on customer notes receivable differ materially from these estimates, the Company’s future results of operations may be adversely impacted.

The Company has historically charged off customer notes receivable upon the earliest of (i) the initiation of cancellation or foreclosure proceedings; or (ii) the customer’s account becoming over 120 days delinquent. As a requirement of Forbearance Agreement (Note 11), the Company has agreed not to charge off any accounts without lender consent. Customer notes receivable that meet the qualifications to be charged off that have not been charged off are $90,429 and $67,104 at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. All collection and foreclosure costs are expensed as incurred.

During 2010, the Company obtained information that changed their estimates for losses for customer notes receivable that originated in periods prior to 2010. The effects of changes in estimates were accounted for on a prospective basis with an adjustment in the year ended December 31, 2010 to increase the estimated uncollectible revenue and the allowance for losses on customer notes receivable by $30,935.

During 2011 and 2010, the Company reviewed the values of their construction in progress and other timeshare inventory assets and recorded impairment charges of $2,617 and $52,147, respectively.

In accordance with ASC 360, “Property, Plant & Equipment” (“ASC 360”), the Company reviews the carrying value of its long-lived assets for possible impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset is considered impaired when anticipated undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition are less than its carrying amount. For the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, material impairments of long-lived assets of $0 and $4,815 were recorded in the consolidated statements of operations.

Undeveloped land consists of the land and improvements in Kona, Hawaii. These assets are recorded at estimated fair value. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, assets held for development were $4,015 and $3,978, respectively. In 2010, the Company obtained an estimated fair value for the undeveloped land and recorded impairment charges of $4,815 to reduce the asset’s carrying value to the estimated value. As of December 31, 2011, no additional impairment related to assets held for sale was noted.

On April 6, 2006, the Company loaned $2,165 to one of its stockholders, who used the funds to personally purchase the outstanding shares in four other entities. The loan is secured by a note receivable that was due on April 1, 2011, and bears interest at 4.75%. In April 2011, the Company and the stockholder agreed that payments on the receivable due from stockholder would discontinue and that interest would continue to accrue based upon the stated interest rate. The balance of the receivable and accrued interest due from stockholder was $2,450 at December 31, 2011 and $2,234 at December 31, 2010 and has been included as a contra-equity balance to stockholders’ deficit.

Revenue from the sales incentive given to the customer as motivation to purchase the VOI Points is recorded upon recognition of the related vacation ownership interest sales revenue in other income.

The Company’s interest revenue consists primarily of interest earned on customer notes receivable. Interest earned on customer notes is accrued based on the contractual provisions of the loan documents which approximates the effective interest rate method. Interest accruals on customer notes are suspended at the earliest of (i) a first payment default; (ii) the initiation of cancellation or foreclosure proceedings; or (iii) the customer’s account becoming over 90 days delinquent. If payments are received while a consumer loan is considered delinquent, interest is recognized on a cash basis. The Company had $94,257 and $72,288 of customer notes receivable that were more than 90 days delinquent at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

All advertising, sales, and marketing costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising expense recognized was $263 and $674 for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Financial services expenses include payroll and administrative costs of the finance operations as well as loan servicing fees paid to third parties. These costs are expensed as incurred.

Customer notes receivable had a balance net of allowance of $122,178 and $124,619 at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The allowance for uncollectible customer notes receivable is derived using a static pool analysis to develop historical default percentage to apply to the customer notes receivable population. The Company evaluates other factors such as economic conditions, industry trends, default rates and past due aging reports. The Company was unable to determine the fair value of customer notes receivable as there is little market data available.

the Company as of December 31, 2011 and 2010. Effective July 1, 2010, the Company converted Pacific Monarch Resorts, Inc. from an S-Corp to a C-Corp. The effect of this change has been reflected in income tax expense (benefit) for the year ended December 31, 2010.

In 2005, the Company formed PMR Insurance Company, Inc. (“PMRIC”), a pure captive insurance company, for the purpose of self-insuring for product and completed operations liability arising from the construction of Cancun Resort Phase V in Las Vegas, Nevada. Losses are provided for based on past experience and using assumptions for losses incurred but not reported. The method for determining such estimates is continually reviewed and updated. Any adjustments are reflected in current operations. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company recorded an accrued liability for self insurance of $718 and $721, respectively, representing an estimate of losses incurred, but not reported. PMRIC maintains cash balances to fund the estimated losses. The cash balances of $722 at December 31, 2011 and $706 at December 31, 2010 are recorded in cash in escrow and restricted cash. There were no reported losses as of December 31, 2011. Management believes that the accrual is adequate to cover the losses incurred to date, however, this accrual is based on estimates and the ultimate liability may be more or less than the amount provided.

Credit Risk—The Company offers financing to the buyers of VOIs. The customer notes received by the Company bear interest at a fixed rate, are payable over a 1- to 12-year period, and are secured by an interest on the VOI owned by the customer. Any adverse change in economic conditions or significant price increases or adverse events related to the travel and tourism industry could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business. Such conditions may also adversely affect the future availability and cost of financing for the Company or its customers and result in a material adverse effect on the Company’s business. In addition, changes in general economic conditions may adversely affect the Company’s ability to collect on its outstanding customer notes receivable.

in interest rates that the Company has historically obtained and could cause the rate on the Company’s borrowings to exceed the rate at which the Company provides financing to its customers. The Company funds substantially all of the customer notes receivable, unsold vacation interest inventory, and undeveloped land which it originates or purchases with borrowings through its financing facilities and internally generated funds. Borrowings are in turn repaid with the proceeds received by the Company from repayments of such customer notes receivable.

Foreign Operations—The Company, through its wholly owned subsidiaries, sells vacation ownership interests and operates the Cabo Azul Resort in San Jose del Cabo, Mexico. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, net assets in Mexico were $9,783 and $10,812, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, revenues from our Mexican operations were $15,915 and $15,019, respectively.

Geographic Concentration—The Company’s notes receivable are primarily originated in California. Borrowers residing in California accounted for 84.06% and 84.80% of customer notes receivable for December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, borrowers residing in the United States accounted for 99.84% and 99.93% of customer notes receivable, respectively. No other state or foreign country concentration accounted for more than approximately 10% of gross outstanding customer notes receivable. The risk inherent in such concentrations is dependent upon regional and general economic stability which affects the financial stability of the borrowers. The Company’s VOI Points are generated by resorts concentrated primarily in Las Vegas, Nevada; Brian Head, Utah; California and Mexico. The risk inherent in such concentrations is in the continued popularity of the resort destinations, which affects the marketability of the Company’s VOI Points and the collection of customer notes receivable.

total revenues expected to be earned on a project, related estimated provision for uncollectible vacation ownership interest sales revenue and sales incentives, estimated projected future cost and volume of recoveries of vacation interests, estimated sales price per point and estimated number of points sold used to allocate certain unsold vacation interests to vacation interest cost of sales under the relative sales value method; and (4) the valuation allowance recorded against deferred tax assets. It is at least reasonably possible that a material change in one or more of these estimates may occur in the near term and that such change may materially affect actual results.

The Company has evaluated events and transactions occurring subsequent to December 31, 2011 through August 6, 2012, which is the date the consolidated financial statements were available to be issued. Subsequent events occurring after August 6, 2012 have not been evaluated by management. No material events have occurred since December 31, 2011 that require recognition or disclosure in the consolidated financial statements, except as disclosed in Note 18.

Subsequent to the issuance of our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company determined that errors were included in the previously issued consolidated financial statements as described below. The following table presents the summary impacts of the restatement adjustments, net of tax, on the Company’s previously reported consolidated retained earnings at December 31, 2009:

In addition, receivable due from stockholder of $2,234 was reclassified from assets to contra-equity. See Note 2.

Liabilities subject to compromise (“LSTC”) refer to both secured and unsecured obligations that will likely be accounted for under a confirmed plan of reorganization. Actions to enforce or effect payment of pre-petition liabilities are stayed. ASC 852, “Reorganizations”, requires pre-petition liabilities that are subject to compromise to be reported at amounts expected to be allowed, even if they may be settled for lesser amounts. These liabilities represent the estimated amount expected to be allowed on known or potential claims to be resolved through the Chapter 11 proceedings and remain subject to future adjustments arising from negotiated settlements, actions of the Bankruptcy Court, rejection of executory contracts and unexpired leases, the determination as to the value of collateral, proofs of claim, or other events. LSTC also includes certain items that may be assumed under the confirmed plan of reorganization and as such may be subsequently reclassified to liabilities not subject to compromise. The Company did not have any claims that were not subject to reasonable estimates.

The Company provides financing for purchasers of vacation interests which are collateralized by their vacation interests. The term of the notes are from one year to twelve years and may be prepaid at any time without penalty. The weighted-average term of the customer notes receivable outstanding at December 31, 2011 and 2010 is 117 months. Stated interest rates on customer notes receivable outstanding at December 31, 2011 and 2010 range from 0% to 18.90% per annum (yielding a weighted-average of approximately 15.79% at December 31, 2011 and 15.72% at December 31, 2010).

The following reflects the scheduled contractual principal maturities of customer notes receivable:

A summary of credit quality of gross customer accounts receivable as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 is as follows:

Fair Isaac Corporation (“FICO”) credit scores were obtained at the time of the origination of the customer notes receivable.

Depreciation and amortization expense was $3,524 and $3,999 for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company had net property and equipment in Mexico of $3,634 and $5,732, respectively.

the Cancun Resort in Las Vegas. The original Forbearance Agreement expired on July 30, 2010. Subsequent to that date, the Forbearance Agreement was amended a total of 31 times, primarily extending the expiration date out to October 23, 2011, and increasing the credit facility up to $220,300.

Hawaii Acquisition Loan—Effective June 3, 2003, PMR entered into an $894 acquisition, development and construction loan (the “Hawaii Acquisition Loan”). The purpose of this term loan was to acquire property in Kona, Hawaii. The loan is collateralized by a first mortgage by the Kona land and improvements.

Corporate Building Loan I—Effective March 24, 2009, PMR entered into a $2,100 mortgage loan agreement (the “Corporate Building Loan”) for the purpose of purchasing the Company’s corporate headquarters in Laguna Hills, CA. The loan is secured by a first trust deed on the building.

As discussed in Note 1, for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company was in default on substantially all of its debt. The majority of the Company’s outstanding debt has been reclassified to liabilities subject to compromise. The Company recorded interest expense related to notes payable of $20,413 and $24,944 for years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Amortization of $1,432 and $1,240 of debt issuance costs were included in interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

down payment was paid to the stockholder to purchase 100% of his outstanding shares. The note bears interest at 5%, was payable in 54 installment of $253, and was covered by a personal guaranty from a surviving stockholder. A total of 32 installments were paid through December 2008 and then were stopped because of cash flow issues. Because of the personal guaranty, in February 2009 the surviving stockholder negotiated the purchase of the Stockholder Note Payable from the selling stockholder for $4,000. The Company recorded interest expense related to this note of $477 and $730 for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. At December 31, 2011, $1,986 in accrued interest has been included in liabilities subject to compromise. At December 31, 2010, $1,510 in accrued interest has been included in accrued liabilities.

On January 14, 2009, the Company entered into a $676 unsecured loan agreement with a stockholder in exchange for operating cash. The Stockholder Note Payable bears interest at 4.75% and matured on April 1, 2011. The Company recorded interest expense related to this note of $69 and $32 for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. At December 31, 2011, $132 in accrued interest has been included in liabilities subject to compromise. At December 31, 2010, $63 in accrued interest has been included in accrued liabilities.

On March 4, 2010, the Company entered into a $147 unsecured loan agreement with a stockholder in exchange for operating cash. The Stockholder Note Payable bears interest at 4.75% and matured on April 1, 2011. The Company recorded interest expense related to this note of $15 and $6 for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. At December 31, 2011, $21 in accrued interest has been included in liabilities subject to compromise. At December 31, 2010, $6 in accrued interest has been included in accrued liabilities.

The Forbearance Agreement effective on March 18, 2009, required subordination of all stockholder notes payable to all secured debt and precluding any subsequent payments.

PMR has entered into capital lease obligations for equipment which have terms from 24 to 60 months. These capital lease obligations include bargain purchase options. The property and equipment capitalized under these lease agreements totaled $212 and $303 with accumulated depreciation of $212 and $204 as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Amortization expense related to the capital leases was $9 and $28 for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. In 2011, capital lease obligations of $55 were reclassified to liabilities subject to compromise. If the minimum lease payments are made on these leases, the remaining balance of $54 will be paid in 2012.

Deferred income taxes represent the temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. There were no foreign taxes current or deferred as of and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010. The principal components of deferred tax assets and liabilities relating to the Company’s activities in the various tax jurisdictions at December 31, 2011 and 2010 are as follows:

ASC 740, “Income Taxes” requires that the tax benefit of net operating losses, temporary differences and credit carry forwards be recorded as an asset to the extent that management assesses that realization is “more likely than not.” Realization of the future tax benefits is dependent on the Company’s ability to generate sufficient taxable income within the carry forward period. Because of the Company’s history of operating losses, management believes that recognition of the deferred tax assets arising from the above-mentioned future tax benefits is currently not likely to be realized and, accordingly, has provided a valuation allowance. The amount of the deferred tax asset considered realizable, however, could be reduced in the near term if estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward period are reduced.

ASC 740 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The evaluation of a tax position in accordance with ASC 740 is a two-step process. The first step is recognition: the Company

determines whether it is “more-likely-than-not” that a tax position will be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. In evaluating whether a tax position has met the “more-likely-than-not” recognition threshold, the Company presumes that the position will be examined by the appropriate taxing authority that would have full knowledge of all relevant information. The second step is measurement: a tax position that meets the “more-likely-than-not” recognition threshold is measured to determine the amount of benefit to recognize in the financial statements. The tax position is measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement. The adoption of ASC 740 did not result in material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

The Company does not currently anticipate that any significant increase or decrease to unrecognized tax benefits will be recorded during the next twelve months.

The Company’s continuing practice is to recognize potential interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax provision. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company has no amount accrued for the payment of interest and penalties in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

The Company maintains a 401(k) defined contribution plan offered to all employees who are eligible as defined in the plan. Under the terms of the plan, the employer contributes an amount equal to 25% of an individual employee’s contribution up to a maximum contribution of 4% of the employee’s gross compensation. The Company’s matching contributions to the plan are charged to expense at the time of the employee contribution. The total Company matching contributions were $71 and $74 for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

PMR has entered into several operating leases including office, equipment, marketing booth, and billboard leases which have varying terms generally ranging from 1 to 10 years. Certain of these operating leases include renewal options, fair market value purchase options, and escalation clauses based on contractual rate increases.

Future minimum lease payments as of December 31, 2011, under operating leases with initial or remaining noncancelable lease terms in excess of one year are as follows:

Total rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 was $4,795 and $4,990, respectively.

The Company has several buildings which as of December 31, 2011, have not been completed. The Company does not have any contracts or commitments related to the completion of the buildings. In addition, the Company is unable to estimate the costs to complete the buildings.

The Company has entered into an employee contract with a PMR executive. The contract requires that the Company pay the executive a severance payment of $300 based upon the occurrence of certain events. The transactions with DPM and RFA (Note 18) triggered the payment of the $300. The Company made this payment on May 21, 2012. The Company is also responsible for other severance payments to certain employees. The total amount of these payments is $161. These payments are expected to be paid during 2012.

Statutory labor laws and regulations cover Company employees hired to support sales and report operations at the Company’s Cabo Azul resort. These laws require the Company to pay a mandatory severance if, or when, employees are terminated without legal justification. While the Company did not have plans to terminate employees supporting these operations as of December 31, 2011, the decision to do so could lead to the Company incurring a material severance liability. Accordingly, such obligation is contingent in nature and has not been accrued in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

the VPOA. In addition, the Company rents sales and marketing office space from certain VPOAs. Transactions with Related Companies are primarily the allocation of a portion of the Company’s general and administrative expenses for shared services or assets.

Total amounts due to related parties that are included in accounts payable and accrued expenses are as follows:

Sale of the Corporate Building—On June 29, 2012, the Company received a letter of intent for the purchase of the corporate building and improvements in Laguna Beach, California for $2,850.

Island One, Inc. (the “Company”) is the “successor” company which emerged from a Chapter 11 bankruptcy on May 27, 2011. As the successor company, which met the criteria for “fresh-start” reporting, Island One, Inc. is considered to be a “new” entity. The Company adopted fresh-start reporting because holders of existing voting shares immediately before filing and confirmation of the Bankruptcy Plan received less than 50% of the voting shares of the emerging entity and its reorganization value is less than its post-petition liabilities.

The Company accounted for the reorganization using fresh-start reporting. Accordingly, all assets and liabilities were restated to reflect their reorganization value, which approximated their fair value at the date of reorganization. The reorganization value of the Company was determined in consideration of several factors and by reliance on various independent valuation methods, including discounting cash flows, projected sales growth and other applicable ratios. Accordingly, adopting fresh-start accounting results in a new reporting entity with no beginning retained earnings or deficit.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Island One, Inc. and its 100%-owned subsidiaries, IOI Funding I, LLC, IOI Funding II, LLC and Island One Resorts Management Corporation (“IORMC”). IORMC has two wholly-owned subsidiaries: Navigo Vacation Club, Inc. (“Club Navigo”) and Galaxy Exchange Company, Inc. (“Galaxy”). The consolidated financial statements also include the accounts of its variable interest entity Crescent One, LLC, (“Crescent”), a Florida corporation that is the owner and developer of a timeshare resort in Miami, Florida.

All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

The Company follows the provisions of ASC 810, Consolidation (“ASC 810”). These provisions were previously issued as Interpretation No. 46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, which clarified how a business enterprise should evaluate whether it has a controlling interest in an entity through means other than voting rights and accordingly should consolidate the entity.

Crescent is not owned by Island One, Inc., however, its shareholder is the majority shareholder of Island One, Inc. and it shares common officers. In addition, Island One, Inc. manages all of Crescent’s operations and it receives substantially all of its funding for operations from the Company. As a result, it was determined Crescent lacks sufficient equity to finance their activities without additional financial support from the Company. The Company has determined that Crescent is a variable interest entity and that the Company is the primary beneficiary. In accordance with ASC 810, the Company consolidated the financial statements of Crescent.

Island One, Inc. amended its articles of incorporation in the State of Florida during May 2011 to acquire, develop, market and sell time-share intervals. The Company’s time-share resorts are located in Central Florida and South Florida. Island One Resorts Management Corporation is primarily engaged in the management of the time-share resorts and their respective owners’ associations and the operations of a vacation ownership exchange program. Club Navigo and Galaxy operate an internal exchange reservation system that allows purchasers of the Company’s time-share intervals to obtain use rights in the various time-share resorts developed by the Company along with access to an external international exchange program.

The Company has evaluated events and transactions occurring subsequent to March 31, 2013 as of May 16, 2013, which is the date the financial statements were issued. Subsequent events occurring after May 16, 2013 have not been evaluated by management. On January 29, 2013, the Company agreed to modify the terms of its May 27, 2011 services agreements with a strategic operating company (“Manager”) in the timeshare industry, see Subsequent Events Note 13 below.

In accordance with the requirements of FASB Accounting Standards Codification ASC 978, Accounting for Real Estate Time-Sharing Transactions, time-share interval sales are recognized when a minimum of 10% of the sales price, after taking into consideration the value of certain incentives provided to the buyer at the time of sale, has been received in cash (demonstrating the buyer’s commitment), the legal rescission period has expired, collectability of the receivable representing the remainder of the sales price is reasonably assured and the Company has completed substantially all of its obligations with respect to any development related to the real estate sold. The Company believes that it uses a reasonably reliable methodology to estimate the collectability of the receivables representing the remainder of the sales price of the time-share intervals sold. Should the Company’s estimates regarding the collectability of its receivables change adversely, it may have to defer the recognition of sales, and its results of operations could be negatively impacted. Under ASC 978, the calculation of the adequacy of a buyer’s commitment for the sale of time-share intervals provides that cash received towards the purchase of time-share intervals is reduced by the value of certain incentives provided to the buyer at the time of sale. If after considering the value of the incentive the 10% requirement is not met, the time-share interval sale, and the related cost and direct selling expenses, are deferred until such time that sufficient cash is received from the customer, generally through receipt of mortgage payments. If a contract is canceled before qualifying as a sale, non-recoverable selling expenses are charged to expenses and deposits forfeited are recognized as income.

The Company rents unsold inventory of intervals on a short-term basis. In accordance with ASC 978, the revenues generated from these incidental operations are recorded as a reduction to resort operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.

The Company recognizes interest income as earned. Interest income is accrued on mortgages and installment receivables until principal and interest payments on the individual receivables are more than 120 days contractually past due. Once a receivable becomes more than 120 days delinquent, the accrual of interest income ceases and is recognized on a cash basis until the receivable is no longer more than 120 days delinquent. As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company had mortgages and installment receivables that were more than 120 days delinquent of $13,107,035 and $12,621,578, respectively.

The Company has management agreements with each managed resort’s respective owners’ association. Each agreement provide for an original term of three years, with a provision for automatic renewals for successive three-year terms. Management fees under these agreements are, generally, 15% of the amounts assessable to each association’s owners, as defined. Management fees are recognized as earned in accordance with the related management contract.

The Company also provides various concessions and ancillary services in conjunction with its duties as management agent for it various resorts. These concessions and ancillary services include accounting and computer support, administration of the resorts rental programs, recreation and activities concessions, and resort gift shops and merchandising. The Company is also reimbursed by each managed resort’s respective owners’ association for specific and allocated costs incurred.

Club enrollment and fee revenue represents annual dues from owners of timeshare interests for membership in Club Navigo entitling the owner to the use of Club Navigo’s reservation and exchange system and other services. Revenue is recognized ratably over the term of the membership.

The Company operates a water park recreational facility. Revenues from this activity include food and beverage sales and charges to the Company’s managed resorts whose owners have use of the facility. Revenues from food and beverage sales are recognized at the point of sale. Revenues from use of the water park are recognized at the time of use.

The Company operates a reservation system and solicits rental guests to occupy unsold developer units or available owner units. The Company earns a commission on the rental revenue which is recognized when the rental stay occurs.

The Company recognizes revenue from resort hotel operations when the rooms are occupied and services have been performed.

Inventory consists of completed time-share intervals stated at fair value based on an appraisal at May 27, 2011, which is not greater than its net realizable value. Inventory of time-share intervals includes all contents, cost of improvements and amenities, capitalized interest, real estate taxes and other costs incurred during construction. Marketing, advertising, commissions and other selling costs are expensed during the period incurred in Sales and Marketing expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Inventory and cost of sales is accounted for under the provisions of ASC 978, which defines a specific method of the relative sales value method for relieving inventory and recording cost of sales. Under the relative sales value method, cost of sales is calculated as a percentage of net sales based on the ratio of total estimated development and other cost to total estimated revenue, including the estimated incremental revenue from the resale of inventory repossessed, generally as a result of the default of the related receivable. The effects of changes in estimates are accounted for in the period in which such changes first became known on a retrospective basis, such that the balance sheet at the end of the period of change and the accounting in subsequent periods reflect the revised estimates as if such estimates had been the original estimates.

Also pursuant to ASC 978, the Company does not relieve inventory for cost of sales related to anticipated credit losses (accordingly, no adjustment is made when inventory is reacquired upon default of the related receivable).

The Company periodically evaluates the recovery of the carrying amount of its inventory of time-share intervals under the guidelines of ASC 360, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. The Company did not recognize any impairment charges on its inventory during the quarters ended March 31, 2013 and 2012.

The Company defines cash equivalents as all highly liquid investments purchased with a maturity of three months or less. The Company maintains its cash balances at various financial institutions. Deposits aggregating $250,000 per financial institution are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Amounts on deposit may from time to time exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts. Management believes that the Company is not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash.

Restricted cash includes principal and interest payments on mortgages pledged as collateral for debt that are deposited into lock box accounts controlled by lenders.

Accounts receivable consist primarily of maintenance fees billed by the Company on behalf of the owners’ associations and club enrollment and membership fees.

The Company provides for estimated future losses to be incurred due to uncollectible accounts receivable at amounts deemed to be sufficient to sustain any material losses. Receivables are considered delinquent when they are 30 days past due. Receivables which are considered delinquent are charged against the allowance when all collection efforts have been exhausted. Factors which influence management’s judgment in determining the appropriate allowance for doubtful accounts, and for charging off uncollectible amounts, include past collection and industry experience.

Mortgages and installment receivables reflect amounts due from time-share interval purchasers who have accepted purchase money mortgage financing. The obligations are evidenced by promissory notes and mortgages which are recorded in the State of Florida. The majority of these mortgages and installment receivables collateralize certain debt obligations of the Company. The purchase money mortgages mature over various terms of up to 120 months. The weighted average interest rate on outstanding installment and contracts receivable as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was 15.52% and 16.0%, respectively. The mortgages may be prepaid at any time without penalty.

which tracks uncollectible mortgages receivable for each year over the entire life of those receivables. It also considers whether the historical economic conditions are comparable to current economic conditions. Additionally, under ASC 978, no consideration is given for future recoveries of recaptured inventory, and the Company records it allowance for loan losses as a reduction to sales.

Property and equipment were stated at an estimated fair value at May 27, 2011 and at cost since May 27, 2011. Property and equipment is comprised primarily of a building and office furniture, fixtures, and equipment. Depreciation is computed using both the straight-line and accelerated methods over the estimated useful lives of 5 to 39 years.

Intangible assets were comprised of Management contracts with various Home Owner Associations as well as the valuation of exchange club memberships. Amortization is computed on a straight-line method over a 10-year period.

When facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying values of long-lived assets may be impaired, an evaluation of recoverability is performed by comparing the carrying values of the assets to projected undiscounted future cash flows in addition to other quantitative and qualitative analyses. Upon indication that the carrying values of such assets may not be recoverable, the Company recognizes an impairment loss by a charge against current operations. The Company did not recognize an impairment charge on intangibles in the first quarters of 2013 or 2012.

The Company adopted FASB ASC 740, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, (“ASC 740”) which clarifies the accounting and disclosure for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a company’s financial statements. ASC 740 requires that the Company recognize in its financial statements the impact of a tax position if that position is more likely than not to be sustained in an audit, based on the technical merits of the position. There is no recognition of Fresh-Start Reporting for income tax purposes. For tax purposes, a company generally realizes income from the cancellation of indebtedness (COD) when the indebtedness is satisfied for less than the face amount of the debt. COD income is excluded from gross income if the cancellation occurs in a Title 11 Case (relating to bankruptcy) and such discharge is granted by the Court or is pursuant to a plan approved by the Court. Any COD income excluded from gross income under this bankruptcy exception is generally applied to reduce certain tax attributes of the company. The specific tax attributes to be reduced are not identified until the end of the tax year. The Company performed its evaluation of the requirements under ASC 740 and has determined the adoption had no material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. Federal jurisdiction. The Company’s federal income tax returns for the tax years 2009 and beyond remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.

The Company did not have any unrecognized tax benefits as of March 31, 2013 or December 31, 2012 and does not expect this to change significantly over the next 12 months. As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company had not accrued any interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions.

The Company expenses all resort advertising expenses as they are incurred. Total advertising costs for the quarters ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 were $125,764 and $145,578, respectively.

The Company has adopted FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements, (“ASC 820”) to value its financial assets and liabilities. ASC 820 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Fair value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012. The Company uses the market approach to measure fair value for its Level 1 financial assets which include cash equivalents. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets and liabilities. The respective carrying value of certain on-balance-sheet financial instruments approximated their fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments. These financial instruments include cash, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses and due to/from related parties.

The carrying value of the mortgages and installment receivables approximated their fair values because the weighted average interest rate on the portfolio approximated current interest rates charged on similar mortgages receivable. The carrying value of notes payable approximated their fair value because the interest rates on these notes approximated rates charged on similar current borrowings.

The Company’s non-financial intangible assets are measured for impairment on an annual basis using an income approach, which utilizes inputs classified as level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The table below summarizes the activity in the Company’s allowance for loan losses:

On July 18, 2011, the Company entered into a line of credit with a bank to provide periodic borrowings as may be required from time to time. This line was a demand facility with no stated maturity date specified. The interest rate on any borrowings was prime plus 1.0% with a floor of 6.0%. The company never borrowed under this line and it was closed in 2012.

Deferred income taxes arise from temporary differences resulting from income and expense items reported for financial accounting and tax purposes in different periods. Deferred tax assets are recorded to reflect deductible temporary differences and operating loss carryforwards while deferred tax liabilities are recorded to reflect taxable temporary differences.

At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, due from and due to related parties represents noninterest bearing cash advances to affiliates arising out of the normal course of business.

As a condition for the acceptance of the plan sponsor agreement and concurrent with the emergence from bankruptcy on May 27, 2011, the lenders required the Company to enter into five year services agreements with a strategic operating company (“Manager”) in the timeshare industry. These agreements may be terminated by either party after the one year anniversary in accordance with certain minimum performance targets. These agreements include the following:

Under this agreement, the Manager provides executive and strategic oversight of services provided by the Company to the respective owners’ associations (HOAs), the scope of which services shall be jointly determined by the Manager and the Company, including but not limited to management, supervision, advice and assistance concerning any and all aspects of the operations, planning and financing of the HOAs, as needed from time to time.

Additionally it provides for the Manager to render executive, corporate and strategic oversight of the Company’s operations and administrative services, the scope of which services shall be jointly determined by the Manager and the Company.

The minimum annual fee for these services is $1,500,000 plus expenses. The Company recorded $375,000 as operating expenses during each of the quarters ended March 31, 2013 and 2012.

The Company entered into this agreement with the Manager to act as the exclusive broker and sales agent for the purpose of selling all timeshare interests owned by the Company, including those subject to the Club Navigo vacation club. The Manager was granted marketing rights at substantially all of the Company resorts, including any sales center or other facility operated by the Company. The Manager is paid a commission of 60% of the Net Proceeds of each timeshare interest’s sale subject to reserve and chargeback requirements. The Manager bears all costs and expenses incurred directly or indirectly relating to the performance of its duties as broker and sales agent. The Company recorded $1,360,011 and $1,122,999 sales and marketing expenses during the periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The Company is obligated for the payment of annual maintenance fees and real estate taxes on certain unsold time-share intervals of certain owners’ associations owned by the Company. Maintenance fees and taxes for the quarters ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 were $722,316 and $859,495, respectively, and are included in cost of resort operations, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

The Company is required to deposit into an escrow account certain payments it receives from buyers of time-share intervals. Pursuant to Florida law, it may alternately obtain escrow bonds or letters of credit in an amount equal to all or a portion of the funds that are required to be escrowed in accordance with the time-share interval sales contract. The Company had a $1,000,000 letter of credit that expired in 2012. In December 2012, the Company opened an escrow account at a certain bank. As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the balance in the escrow account was $500,844 and $500,092, respectively.

On June 1, 2011, the Company entered into a two-year lease subject to certain early termination rights for its office facility with the predecessor company’s landlord.

On February 1, 2012, the Company agreed to amend and restate the June 1, 2011 lease for a new two-year lease for approximately 53% of the space it had occupied in the previous lease. The base annual rent under the new lease is $556,491.

The Company is involved in certain litigation in the normal course of business. Management cannot predict the outcome of this litigation or estimate the amount of any loss that may result. Management believes that losses resulting from these matters, if any, would not have a material effect on the financial position of the Company.

The Company has established a 401(k) defined contribution plan. The plan covers all employees meeting certain minimum age and service requirements. The Company contributes to the plan at a matching rate of 50.0% of the employees’ contributions up to 5.0% of the employees’ compensation. Employer contributions and administrative costs to the plan for the quarters ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 were $19,504 and $17,803, respectively.

In order to increase the range of options available to club members, Club Navigo has entered into agreements with Interval International, Inc. and Resort Condominiums International, LLC. These agreements allow club members to exchange the use of their time-share interest to resorts that participate in the interval exchange programs conducted by the companies referred to above. Fees incurred under these agreements totaled $228,864 and $161,460, respectively, for the quarters ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, and are included in club expenses in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.

Cash paid for interest during the quarters ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 was $196,997 and $117,843, respectively.

The Company’s ability to provide attractive financing to its customers depends to a large extent upon the availability of financing at acceptable interest rates. A significant decrease in the availability of such financing or a significant increase in interest rates could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business.

On January 29, 2013, the Company agreed to modify the terms of its May 27, 2011 services agreements with a strategic operating company (“Manager”) in the timeshare industry. These modifications require the Manager to take over day-to-day operations of the Company upon execution of Definitive Documentation. These documents were executed and became effective on May 8, 2013.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Island One, Inc. and subsidiaries, which comprise the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2012 and for the period from date operations commenced (May 27, 2011) through December 31, 2011, and the related notes to the consolidated financial statements.

Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Island One, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2012 and for the period from date operations commenced (May 27, 2011) through December 31, 2011, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The Company accounted for the reorganization using fresh-start reporting. Accordingly, all assets and liabilities are restated to reflect their reorganization value, which approximates fair value at the date of reorganization. The reorganization value of the Company was determined in consideration of several factors and by reliance on various independent valuation methods, including discounting cash flows, projected sales growth and other applicable ratios. Accordingly, adopting fresh-start accounting results in a new reporting entity with no beginning retained earnings or deficit.

The following is a summary of the Company’s reorganization value immediately before May 27, 2011, the date of confirmation of the Bankruptcy Plan:

All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

The Company has evaluated events and transactions occurring subsequent to December 31, 2012 as of May 8, 2013, which is the date the financial statements were issued. Subsequent events occurring after May 8, 2013 have not been evaluated by management. On January 29, 2013, the Company agreed to modify the terms of its May 27, 2011 services agreements with a strategic operating company (“Manager”) in the timeshare industry, see Subsequent Events Note 13 below.

The Company recognizes interest income as earned. Interest income is accrued on mortgages and installment receivables until principal and interest payments on the individual receivables are more than 120 days contractually past due. Once a receivable becomes more than 120 days delinquent, the accrual of interest income ceases and is recognized on a cash basis until the receivable is no longer more than 120 days delinquent. As of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had mortgages and installment receivables that were more than 120 days delinquent of $12,621,578 and $19,699,953, respectively.

The Company recognizes revenue from resort hotel operations when the rooms are occupied and services have been performed.

Inventory consists of completed time-share intervals and is carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair value, less costs to sell. Inventory of time-share intervals includes all contents, cost of improvements and

amenities, capitalized interest, real estate taxes and other costs incurred during construction. Marketing, advertising, commissions and other selling costs are expensed during the period incurred in Sales and Marketing expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Restricted cash includes principal and interest payments on mortgages pledged as collateral for debt that are deposited into lock box accounts controlled by lenders.

Accounts receivable consist primarily of maintenance fees billed by the Company on behalf of the owners’ associations and club enrollment and membership fees.

which are recorded in the State of Florida. The majority of these mortgages and installment receivables collateralize certain debt obligations of the Company. The purchase money mortgages mature over various terms of up to 120 months. The weighted average interest rate on outstanding installment and contracts receivable as of December 31, 2012 and December 2011 was 16.0% and 16.3%, respectively. The mortgages may be prepaid at any time without penalty.

The Company provides for estimated future losses to be incurred due to uncollectible receivables currently held in the mortgage portfolio in accordance with ASC 978. The Company estimates uncollectible receivables based on historical collection rates for similar mortgages receivable. The Company uses a static pool analysis, which tracks uncollectible mortgages receivable for each year over the entire life of those receivables. It also considers whether the historical economic conditions are comparable to current economic conditions. Additionally, under ASC 978, no consideration is given for future recoveries of recaptured inventory, and the Company records it allowance for loan losses as a reduction to sales.

Intangible assets are comprised of Management contracts with various Home Owner Associations as well as the valuation of exchange club memberships. Amortization is computed on a straight-line method over a 10-year period.

When facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying values of fixed assets and intangible assets may be impaired, an evaluation of recoverability is performed by comparing the carrying values of the assets to projected undiscounted future cash flows in addition to other quantitative and qualitative analyses. Upon indication that the carrying values of such assets may not be recoverable, the Company recognizes an impairment loss by a charge against current operations. During 2012, the Company recorded a loss on the impairment of fixed assets of $582,448 related to the abandonment of certain computer software.

reduce certain tax attributes of the company. The specific tax attributes to be reduced are not identified until the end of the tax year. The Company performed its evaluation of the requirements under ASC 740 and has determined the adoption had no material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

The Company did not have any unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2012 or 2011 and does not expect this to change significantly over the next 12 months. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company had not accrued any interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions.

The Company expenses all resort advertising expenses as they are incurred. Total advertising costs for the year ended December 31, 2012 were $426,428 and $251,276 for the period from May 27, 2011 through December 31, 2011, and are included in sales and marketing expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

The Company has adopted FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements, (“ASC 820”) to value its financial assets and liabilities. ASC 820 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Fair value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management as of December 31, 2012 and 2011. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets and liabilities. The respective carrying value of certain on-balance-sheet financial instruments approximated their fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments. These financial instruments include restricted cash, accounts receivable, accrued interest receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses and due from related parties.

The Company’s non-financial intangible assets are measured for impairment on an annual basis using an income approach, which utilizes inputs classified as level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.

Certain items have been reclassified in the 2011 financial statements to conform to the 2012 presentation.

The table below summarizes the activity in the Company’s allowance for loan losses:

Pursuant to the plan of reorganization as discussed in Note 1, the Company entered into new Notes Payable with the predecessor company’s three major lenders.

Contractual minimum principal payments required on debt, net of unamortized discount, by type, for each of the five years thereafter are shown below:

The income tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

At December 31, 2012 and 2011, due from and due to related parties represents noninterest bearing cash advances to affiliates arising out of the normal course of business.

strategic operating company (“Manager”) in the timeshare industry. These agreements may be terminated by either party after the one year anniversary (see Note 13) in accordance with certain minimum performance targets. These agreements include the following:

Under this agreement, the Manager provides executive and strategic oversight of services provided by the Company to the respective homeowners’ associations (HOAs), the scope of which services shall be jointly determined by the Manager and the Company, including but not limited to management, supervision, advice and assistance concerning any and all aspects of the operations, planning and financing of the HOAs, as needed from time to time.

The minimum annual fee for these services is $1,500,000 plus expenses. The Company recorded $1,500,000 as operating expenses during the year ended December 31, 2012 and $875,000 during the period from May 27, 2011 through December 31, 2011.

The Company entered into this agreement with the Manager to act as the exclusive broker and sales agent for the purpose of selling all timeshare interests owned by the Company, including those subject to the Club Navigo vacation club. The Manager was granted marketing rights at substantially all of the Company resorts, including any sales center or other facility operated by the Company. The Manager is paid a commission of 60% of the net proceeds of each timeshare interest’s sale subject to reserve and chargeback requirements. The Manager bears all costs and expenses incurred directly or indirectly relating to the performance of its duties as broker and sales agent. The Company recorded $5,028,782 and $2,566,026 in sales and marketing expenses during the periods ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

The Company is obligated for the payment of annual maintenance fees and real estate taxes on certain unsold time-share intervals of certain owners’ associations owned by the Company. Maintenance fees and taxes for the year ended December 31, 2012 and during the period May 27, 2011 through December 31, 2011 were $2,947,410 and $1,845,930, respectively, and are included in cost of resort operations, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

The Company is required to deposit into an escrow account certain payments it receives from buyers of time-share intervals. Pursuant to Florida law, it may alternately obtain escrow bonds or letters of credit in an amount equal to all or a portion of the funds that are required to be escrowed in accordance with the time-share interval sales contract. The Company had a $1,000,000 letter of credit that expired in 2012. In December 2012, the Company opened an escrow account at a certain bank. As of December 31, 2012, the balance in the escrow account was $500,092.

On June 1, 2011, the Company entered into a two-year lease subject to certain early termination rights for its office facility with the predecessor company’s landlord.

The Company has established a 401(k) defined contribution plan. The plan covers all employees meeting certain minimum age and service requirements. The Company contributes to the plan at a matching rate of 50.0% of the employees’ contributions up to 5.0% of the employees’ compensation. Employer contributions and administrative costs to the plan for the year ended December 31, 2012 and during the period May 27, 2011 through December 31, 2011 were approximately $71,633 and $55,306, respectively.

In order to increase the range of options available to club members, Club Navigo has entered into agreements with Interval International, Inc. and Resort Condominiums International, LLC. These agreements allow club members to exchange the use of their time-share interest to resorts that participate in the interval exchange programs conducted by the companies referred to above. Fees incurred under these agreements totaled $631,353 for the year ended December 31, 2012 and $203,341 for the period from May 27, 2011 to December 31, 2011, and are included in club expenses in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.

Cash paid for interest during the year ended December 31, 2012 was $653,157 and was $345,095 during the period from May 27, 2011 through December 31, 2011.

Manager to take over day-to-day operations of the Company upon execution of Definitive Documentation. It is anticipated these documents will be executed during May 2013. Concurrent with the execution of the documents, the Company’s executive officers will resign and the Company will appoint new executive officers.

The Company has recorded a prior period adjustment as of May 27, 2011, date operations commenced, to reflect the correction of an error in recording the Company’s reorganization value using fresh-start reporting. The effect of the adjustment was to decrease the deferred tax liability and increase additional paid-in capital. There was no effect on the consolidated statement of operations for the period from date operations commenced (May 27, 2011) through December 31, 2011.

Resort Services Group, LLC, Monarch Grand Vacations Management, LLC, Monarch Owner Services, LLC, and Monarch Owner Services, Inc., (collectively, the “Company”) is a group of Nevada and California companies which provide support and services to timeshare resort properties. The Company generates revenues from customer service and reservations services, asset recovery services, accounting services, assessment dues billing and collection services and management fees for resort properties.

The resort properties include a total of seven resort properties, four located in Southern California, one located in Las Vegas, Nevada, one located in Brian Head, Utah, and one located in San Jose del Cabo, Mexico.

The combined financial statements include the activities of Resort Services Group, LLC, Monarch Grand Vacations Management, LLC and Monarch Owner Services, LLC (limited liability companies formed in Nevada in 2011) and Resort Services Group, Inc., Monarch Grand Vacations Management, Inc. and Monarch Owner Services, Inc. (California corporations). In 2011, all existing contracts, agreements, loans, etc. of the California companies were assigned to or assumed by the new Nevada companies and operations of the California companies were terminated. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated, as the combined operations are all controlled under sole common ownership

The accompanying combined financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The preparation of combined financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the combined financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. In preparing the combined financial statements, the Company made significant estimates which include the useful lives of property and equipment. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.

Cash and cash equivalents consist of all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less. Cash and cash equivalents include cash and money market funds.

Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over the assets’ estimated useful lives ranging from 3 to 5 years.

The Company reevaluates the recoverability of long-lived assets as well as the depreciation periods to determine whether an adjustment to carrying value or a revision to estimated useful lives is appropriate. The primary indicators of recoverability are a significant event or change in the environment in which the business operates and current and forecasted undiscounted operating cash flows.

Management and member services revenue includes resort management fees charged to Vacation Plan Owner’s Associations (“VPOA”) and other fees charge to VPOAs for services performed. Management and member services revenues are recognized in accordance with the terms of the Company’s management agreements, which are recognized ratably throughout the year as earned.

Revenues related to accounting services, customer service and reservation fees and assessment billing and collection services are recorded as the services are provided on a monthly basis.

Revenues related to asset recovery services are recorded when the loans related to defaulted vacation ownership interests are reclaimed on behalf of the VPOA. (Note 3)

The individual companies included within the combined financial statements are all owned by a single member or a single shareholder, and under the terms of the LLC agreements, or based on the S-Corporation election of Monarch Owner Services, Inc under the rules of the IRS, all income, losses and other attributes of the each of the combined companies are included in the taxable income of the individual stockholder or member for federal and state income tax purposes. The Company is subject to a 1.5% tax on its taxable income for California state purposes.

The Company maintains cash in financial institutions in excess of amounts insured by the federal government. The Company has never experienced any losses related to these balances. All of the cash balances were fully insured at December 31, 2012 and 2011 due to a temporary federal program in effect from December 31, 2010 through December 31, 2012. Under the program, there is a no limit to the amount of insurance for eligible accounts. Beginning 2013, insurance coverage will revert to $250,000 per depositor at each financial institution.

Accounts receivable consist of contractual amounts billed to client Vacation Plan Owners Associations (“VPOAs”) for various services performed by the Company. The balances invoiced are typically due in 30 days and do not bear interest. Collection is reasonably assured since the cost is included in each VPOA’s annual budget used to establish the level of assessments billed to individual timeshare owners. No provision for doubtful accounts has, therefore, been provided.

Under the terms of a “MGV Assets Recovery Agreement” (ARA) dated January 1, 2005, Monarch Grand Vacation Owners Association (“MGVOA”) was billed $3,133,949 by the Company as of March 31, 2012. A portion of these services were provided prior to 2012. In order to pay off that amount, MGVOA agreed through a board resolution to a payment plan of $214,286 per month starting June 1, 2012, then increasing to $230,000 per month in 2013, until all amounts owed are paid current. Six payments totaling $1,285,716 were collected in 2012 leaving a balance due of $1,848,233 as of December 31, 2012 and March 31, 2013.

Depreciation expense related to property and equipment was $2,405 and $16,164 for the quarters ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The Company maintains a 401(k) defined contribution plan offered to all employees who are eligible as defined in the plan. Under the terms of the plan, the employer contributes an amount equal to 25% of an individual employee’s contribution up to a maximum contribution of 4% of the employee’s gross compensation. The Company’s matching contributions to the plan are charged to expense at the time of the employee contribution. The total Company matching contributions were $23,017 and $13,976 for the quarters ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The Company is, from time to time, party to certain litigation that relates to matters arising in the ordinary course of business. Management believes that such litigation will not have a material impact on the financial position or results of operations of the Company.

The Company has entered into several operating leases including office and office equipment leases which have varying terms generally ranging from 1 to 10 years. Certain of these operating leases include renewal options, fair market value purchase options, and escalation clauses based on contractual rate increases. Total rent expense for the quarters ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 was $51,230 and $65,299, respectively.

The Company has evaluated subsequent events through May 14, 2013, the date the accompanying combined financial statements were issued

We have audited the accompanying combined financial statements of Resort Services Group, LLC, Monarch Grand Vacations Management, LLC, Monarch Owner Services, LLC, and Monarch Owner Services, Inc., (collectively, the “Company”), which are comprised of the combined balance sheets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 and the related combined statements of income, changes in equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes to the combined financial statements.

Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these combined financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of combined financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these combined financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the combined financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the combined financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the combined financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the combined financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the combined financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

In our opinion, the combined financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the combined financial position of Resort Services Group, LLC, Monarch Grand Vacations Management, LLC, Monarch Owner Services, LLC, and Monarch Owner Services, Inc., as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the combined results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying combined financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Cash and cash equivalents consist of all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less. Cash and cash equivalents include cash and money market funds.

Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over the assets’ estimated useful lives ranging from 3 to 5 years.

Receivables due from stockholder arose from the capitalization of various entities. They do not bear interest, have no stated due date and are classified as a reduction to member’s equity on the combined balance sheet in the amount of $3,000, and $14,295 for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 respectively.

Revenues related to accounting services, customer service and reservation fees and assessment billing and collection services are recorded as the services are provided on a monthly basis.

Revenues related to asset recovery services are recorded when the loans related to defaulted vacation ownership interests are reclaimed on behalf of the VPOA. (Note 3)

Depreciation expense related to property and equipment was $64,655 and $110,303 for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

The Company maintains a 401(k) defined contribution plan offered to all employees who are eligible as defined in the plan. Under the terms of the plan, the employer contributes an amount equal to 25% of an individual employee’s contribution up to a maximum contribution of 4% of the employee’s gross compensation. The Company’s matching contributions to the plan are charged to expense at the time of the employee contribution. The total Company matching contributions were $63,052 and $51,263 for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

The Companies have entered into several operating leases including office and office equipment leases which have varying terms generally ranging from 1 to 10 years. Certain of these operating leases include renewal options, fair market value purchase options, and escalation clauses based on contractual rate increases.

Future minimum lease payments as of December 31, 2012, under operating leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year are as follows:

Total rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $572,378 and $1,000,732, respectively.

The Company has evaluated subsequent events through May 6, 2013, the date the accompanying combined financial statements were issued.

Our audits of the combined financial statements included in the preceding section of this report were conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on those statements as a whole. The supplementary information presented in the following section of this report is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the combined financial statements. Such information is the responsibility of management and was derived from and relates directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the combined financial statements. The information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the combined financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the combined financial statements or to the combined financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the information is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the combined financial statements as a whole.

The following table sets forth all the costs and expenses, other than underwriting discounts, payable in connection with the issuance and distribution of the common stock being registered. Except as otherwise noted, the registrant will pay all of those amounts. All amounts shown below are estimates, except the registration fee and FINRA filing fee.

Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law provides that a corporation may indemnify directors and officers as well as other employees and individuals against expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection with any threatened, pending or completed actions, suits or proceedings in which such person is made a party by reason of such person being or having been a director, officer, employee or agent to the Registrant. The Delaware General Corporation Law provides that Section 145 is not exclusive of other rights to which those seeking indemnification may be entitled under any bylaw, agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise. The Registrant’s amended and restated bylaws provide for indemnification by the Registrant of its directors, officers and employees to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law.

Prior to the consummation of this offering, we intend to enter into indemnification agreements with each of our current directors and executive officers. These agreements will require us to indemnify these individuals to the fullest extent permitted under Delaware law against liabilities that may arise by reason of their service to us, and to advance expenses incurred as a result of any proceeding against them as to which they could be indemnified. We also intend to enter into indemnification agreements with our future directors and executive officers.

Section 102(b)(7) of the Delaware General Corporation Law permits a corporation to provide in its certificate of incorporation that a director of the corporation shall not be personally liable to the corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except for liability (i) for any breach of the director’s duty of loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders, (ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) for unlawful payments of dividends or unlawful stock repurchases, redemptions or other distributions or (iv) for any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit. The Registrant’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides for such limitation of liability.

The Registrant maintains standard policies of insurance under which coverage is provided (a) to its directors and officers against loss arising from claims made by reason of breach of duty or other wrongful act, and (b) to the Registrant with respect to payments which may be made by the Registrant to such officers and directors pursuant to the above indemnification provision or otherwise as a matter of law.

The proposed form of underwriting agreement filed as Exhibit 1.1 to this Registration Statement provides for indemnification of directors and officers of the Registrant by the underwriters against certain liabilities.

The following is a summary of our transactions within the past three years involving sales of our securities that were not registered under the Securities Act. Also included is the consideration, if any, received by us for such securities and information relating to the section of the Securities Act, or rule of the SEC, under which we claimed an exemption from registration.

On June 17, 2010, Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC entered into a private placement transaction pursuant to agreements with DRP Holdco, LLC, an investment vehicle managed by an affiliate of Guggenheim Partners, LLC (the “Guggenheim Investor”), which provided for DRP Holdco, LLC to make a $75 million investment in Class A common units and preferred units of Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC. At an initial closing on June 17, 2010, Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC sold 70.67 Class A common units and 333.33 preferred units to the Guggenheim Investor. At a subsequent closing on August 13, 2010, Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC sold 198.63 Class A common units and 666.67 preferred units to the Guggenheim Investor. The Class A common units and preferred units were offered, sold and issued in reliance upon the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, in each case as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering. Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC relied on such exemptions based in part on representations made by the Guggenheim Investor, including representations with respect to the Guggenheim Investor’s status as an accredited investor and investment intent with respect to the acquired securities. No underwriter was involved in these sales of securities.

On August 13, 2010, Diamond Resorts Corporation completed an offering of $425 million aggregate principal amount of 12% Senior Secured Notes due 2018. The notes and the related guarantees were offered and sold to the initial purchaser in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, and were subsequently offered and sold by the initial purchaser only to qualified institutional buyers in reliance on Rule 144A under the Securities Act, and outside the United States, only to non-U.S. investors pursuant to Regulation S. Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, Bank of America Merrill Lynch and Guggenheim Securities, LLC were the Joint Book-Running Managers in connection with the sale of the notes. The notes were issued with an original issue discount of 2.5%, or $10.6 million. Each of Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC, Diamond Resorts Holdings, LLC and all of Diamond Resorts Corporation’s existing and future direct or indirect U.S. restricted subsidiaries jointly and severally, irrevocably and unconditionally guarantee, on a secured senior basis, the performance and full and punctual payment when due of all obligations of Diamond Resorts Corporation under the notes and the indenture governing the notes. In order to satisfy certain of our obligations under the registration rights agreement entered into in connection with the placement of the outstanding notes, Diamond Resorts Corporation and each of the guarantors agreed to file with the SEC a registration statement with respect to an offer to exchange each of the notes for a new issue of notes registered under the Securities Act, with terms substantially identical to those of the then-outstanding notes. The exchange offer was completed on August 12, 2011.

On August 31, 2010, in connection with the then-annual renewal of the conduit facility entered into on November 3, 2008 (as amended and extended, the “2008 Conduit Facility”) by Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC, secured VOI receivable-backed variable funding notes were issued by a subsidiary of Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $64.6 million. On October 14, 2011, Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC entered into an amended and restated 2008 Conduit Facility. The amendment provides for an 18-month facility pursuant to which secured VOI receivable-backed variable funding notes were issued by a subsidiary of Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $75.0 million. In each case, the notes issued pursuant to the 2008 Conduit Facility were offered and sold in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act.

On June 30, 2011, Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC issued a warrant (the “Tempus Warrant”) to Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC, as administrative agent, for the benefit of the lenders under the Tempus Acquisition Loan (defined below), pursuant to a Warrant Agreement between Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC and Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC. The Tempus Warrant was issued in connection with the Loan and Security Agreement, dated July 1, 2011, between Tempus Acquisition, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC, and Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC, as administrative agent for the lenders (the “Tempus Acquisition Loan”). The Tempus Warrant vests and becomes exercisable, subject to the provisions of the Tempus Warrant described below, upon the sixty-first day (the “Tempus Warrant Exercise Date”) following, among other things, an underwritten public offering pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act (a “Public Offering”). Upon the consummation of a Public Offering, the Tempus Warrant would become exercisable as to an aggregate percentage of the fully-diluted outstanding common equity of Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC equal to the quotient of (1) the dollar amount by which the actual total repayments of principal on the Tempus Acquisition Loan from the date of the Tempus Warrant through the day immediately preceding the Tempus Warrant Exercise Date is less than an a certain benchmark amount (the “Tempus Benchmark Amount”) as determined pursuant to the terms of the Tempus Warrant (which Tempus Benchmark Amount will not exceed $6,075,000, provided that the Public Offering is consummated on or prior to June 30, 2013), divided by (2) the fair market value of the common equity of Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC as determined pursuant to the terms of the Tempus Warrant. The purchase price for each common unit of Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC purchasable upon exercise of the Tempus Warrant is $0.0001 per common unit. During the 60-day period following the consummation of the Public Offering, Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC has the option to purchase the Tempus Warrant from the holder for a cash payment equal to the Tempus Benchmark Amount, less any cash payments made on the Tempus Acquisition Loan from the date of the Tempus Warrant through the date of the consummation of the Public Offering. The issuance of the Tempus Warrant was exempt from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, as a transaction by the issuer not involving a public offering. No underwriter was involved in the issuance of the Tempus Warrant.

On February 18, 2011, Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC sold an aggregate of 25.1 Class A common units and 133.33 preferred units in a private placement transaction to four investment vehicles affiliated with certain affiliates of Silver Rock Financial LLC (the “Silver Rock Investors”) in exchange for $10.1 million. The Class A common units and preferred units were offered, sold and issued in reliance upon the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, in each case as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering. Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC relied on such exemptions based in part on representations made by each of the Silver Rock Investors, including representations with respect to each of the Silver Rock Investors’ status as an accredited investor and investment intent with respect to the acquired securities. No underwriter was involved in these sales of securities.

On April 27, 2011, Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC completed a securitization transaction, and Diamond Resorts Owner Trust 2011-1 issued Diamond Resorts Owners Trust Series 2011-1 Timeshare Loan Backed Notes, Series 2011-1 (the “DROT 2011 Notes”), with a face value of $64.5 million. The initial purchaser of the DROT 2011 Notes was Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC. The DROT 2011 Notes mature on March 20, 2023 and carry an interest rate of 4.0%. The DROT 2011 Notes were offered and sold to the initial purchaser in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, and were subsequently offered and sold by the initial purchaser only to qualified institutional buyers in reliance on Rule 144A under the Securities Act and, outside the United States, only to non-U.S. investors pursuant to Regulation S.

On July 21, 2011, Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC consummated a recapitalization transaction pursuant to which it sold 280.89 Class A common units in a private placement transaction to seven institutional accredited investors that are investment advisory clients of Wellington Management Company, LLP in exchange for $136.5 million. Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC used $108.7 million of the proceeds and issued an aggregate of 26.56 Class A common units to the Guggenheim Investor and the Silver Rock Investors to redeem all of the previously issued and outstanding preferred units (including accrued and unpaid priority returns) pursuant to the terms of a Preferred Unit Redemption Agreement. The Class A common units were offered, sold and issued in reliance upon the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, in each case as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering. Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC relied on such exemptions based in part on representations made by each of the investors, including representations with respect to each of the investors’ status as an accredited investor and investment intent with respect to the acquired securities. The Class A common units issued pursuant to the Preferred Unit Redemption Agreement were issued upon the exchange of the preferred units in reliance upon the exemption from registration set forth in Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act for any security exchanged by an issuer with its existing securityholders exclusively where no commission or other remuneration is paid or given directly or indirectly for soliciting such exchange. No underwriter was involved in these sales of securities.

On May 21, 2012, Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC issued a warrant (the “PMR Warrant”) to Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC, as administrative agent, for the benefit of the lenders under the PMR Acquisition Loan (defined below), pursuant to a Warrant Agreement, dated as of May 21, 2012, between Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC and Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC. The PMR Warrant was issued in connection with a Loan and Security Agreement between DPM Acquisition, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC, and Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC, as administrative agent for lenders (the “PMR Acquisition Loan”). The PMR Warrant vests and becomes exercisable, subject to the provisions of the PMR Warrant described below, upon the sixty-first day (the “PMR Warrant Exercise Date”) following, among other things, a Public Offering. Upon the consummation of a Public Offering, the PMR Warrant would become exercisable as to an aggregate percentage of the fully-diluted outstanding common equity of Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC equal to the quotient of (1) the dollar amount by which the actual total repayments of principal on the PMR Acquisition Loan from the date of the PMR Warrant through the day immediately preceding the PMR Warrant Exercise Date is less than an a certain benchmark amount (the “PMR Benchmark Amount”) as determined pursuant to the terms of the PMR Warrant (which PMR Benchmark Amount will not exceed $15,525,000, provided that the Public Offering is consummated on or prior to December 31, 2014), divided by (2) the fair market value of the common equity of Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC as determined pursuant to the terms of the PMR Warrant. The purchase price for each common unit of Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC purchasable upon exercise of the PMR Warrant is $0.0001 per common unit. During the 60-day period following the consummation of the Public Offering, Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC has the option to purchase the PMR Warrant from the holder for a cash payment equal to the PMR Benchmark Amount, less any cash payments made on

the PMR Loan from the date of the PMR Warrant through the date of the consummation of the Public Offering. The issuance of the PMR Warrant was exempt from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, as a transaction by the issuer not involving a public offering. No underwriter was involved in the issuance of the PMR Warrant.

On October 15, 2012, Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC issued an aggregate of 103.753 Class B common units to certain participants in the Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC 2012 Equity Incentive Plan for no cash consideration in reliance upon the exemption from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act. Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC relied on such exemption based in part on representations made by such participants in the Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, including representations with respect to status as an accredited investor and investment intent with respect to the acquired securities. No underwriter was involved in these issuances of securities.

On January 23, 2013, Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC completed a securitization transaction, and Diamond Resorts Owner Trust 2013-1 issued Timeshare Loan-Backed Notes, Series 2013-1, Class A, with a face value of $88.64 million (the “Class A DROT 2013 Notes”) and Timeshare Loan-Backed Notes, Series 2013-1, Class B, with a face value of $4.92 million (the “Class B DROT 2013 Notes” and, together with the Class A DROT 2013 Notes, the “DROT 2013 Notes”). The initial purchaser of the DROT 2013 Notes was Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC. The DROT 2013 Notes carry a weighted average interest rate of 2.0%, with the Class A DROT 2013 Notes carrying an interest rate of 1.95% and the Class B DROT 2013 Notes carrying an interest rate of 2.89%. All of the DROT 2013 Notes mature on January 20, 2025. The DROT 2013 Notes were offered and sold to the initial purchaser in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, and were subsequently offered and sold by the initial purchaser only to qualified institutional investors in reliance on Rule 144A under the Securities Act and, outside the United States, only to non-U.S. investors pursuant to Regulation S.

Diamond Resorts Corporation and Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC expect to enter into a transaction agreement with Island One, Inc. and Crescent One, LLC (together, the “Island One Companies”) and the holder of their respective equity interests (the “Island One Equityholder”), pursuant to which Diamond Resorts Corporation and Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC will agree to acquire, upon the consummation of this offering and subject to other conditions included in the transaction agreement, management contracts, unsold VOIs, a portfolio of consumer loans and other assets owned by the Island One Companies. The Registrant expects that, pursuant to the terms of the transaction agreement, it will issue to the Island One Equityholder at the closing of the transaction, subject to customary conditions contained in the transaction agreement, an aggregate of shares of the Registrant’s common stock as the purchase price to the Island One Equityholder, based on an assumed initial public offering price of $ per share (the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover of the prospectus included in this Registration Statement). However, if the assumed initial public offering price were $ per share (the high point of the price range set forth on the cover of the prospectus included in this Registration Statement), the Registrant would issue an aggregate of shares of common stock as the purchase price to the Island One Equityholder, or, if the assumed initial public offering price were $ per share (the low end of the price range set forth on the cover of the prospectus included in this Registration Statement), the Registrant would issue an aggregate of shares of common stock as the purchase price to the Island One Equityholder. The Registrant expects that its offer, sale and issuance of shares of common stock to the Island One Equityholder upon the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the transaction agreement will be made in reliance upon the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, in each case as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering. The Registrant expects to rely on such exemptions based in part on representations expected to be made by the Island One Equityholder, including

representations with respect to the Island One Equityholder’s status as an accredited investor and investment intent with respect to the shares of common stock proposed to be acquired. No underwriter is involved in the offer or sale of the shares of common stock proposed to be issued.

(a) Exhibits. The list of exhibits is set forth under “Index to Exhibits” at the end of this registration statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

(b) Financial Statement Schedules. All other schedules are omitted because they are not required, are not applicable or the information is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to provide to the underwriters at the closing specified in the underwriting agreement, certificates in such denominations and registered in such names as required by the underwriters to permit prompt delivery to each purchaser.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and, therefore, unenforceable. In the event a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer of controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

(1) For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of this Registration Statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to be part of this Registration Statement as of the time it was declared effective.

(2) For the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new Registration Statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Las Vegas, State of Nevada, on June 13, 2013.

Each person whose signature appears below hereby constitutes and appoints each of David F. Palmer, C. Alan Bentley and Howard S. Lanznar his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, acting alone, with full power and substitution and resubstitution, to sign on his or her behalf, individually and in each capacity stated below, all amendments and post-effective amendments to this Registration Statement on Form S-1 (including any registration statement filed pursuant to Rule 462(b), (c) or (d) under the Securities Act of 1933, and all amendments thereto) and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and any other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act of 1933, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully and to all intents and purposes as each might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming each act that said attorneys-in-fact and agents may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, this Registration Statement has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


Large accelerated filer	¨		Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	x	(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	¨



Title of Each Class of Securities to be Registered	Proposed Maximum Aggregate Offering Price(1)	Amount of Registration Fee
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share	$200,000,000	$27,280


	Price to Public	Underwriting Discounts and Commissions	Proceeds to Company¹	Proceeds to Selling Stockholders
Per Share . . . . . . . .	$	$	$	$
Total . . . . . . . . . . . .	$	$	$	$


	Page
BUSINESS		123
MANAGEMENT		159
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION		165
PRINCIPAL AND SELLING STOCKHOLDERS		173
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS		176
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK		185
SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE		189
MATERIAL UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS FOR NON-U.S. HOLDERS OF COMMON STOCK		191
UNDERWRITING (CONFLICTS OF INTEREST)		194
LEGAL MATTERS		201
EXPERTS		201
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION		201
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS		F-1


	Page
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY		1
RISK FACTORS		22
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS		46
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE		47
USE OF PROCEEDS		51
DIVIDEND POLICY		54
CAPITALIZATION		55
DILUTION		57
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION		60
SELECTED HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA		70
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS		72
THE VACATION OWNERSHIP INDUSTRY		120


	March 31, 2013 (unaudited)
	Actual			Pro Forma for the Reorganization Transactions		Pro Forma for the Reorganization Transactions and the Probable Acquisitions	Pro Forma for the Reorganization Transactions, the Probable Acquisitions and this Offering(1)(2)
	(in thousands, except share data)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	26,204		$		$	$

Long-term debt (including current maturities):
Senior Secured Notes	$	416,747		$		$	$
Securitization notes and Funding Facilities		278,928
Notes payable		137,545

Total long term debt		833,220

Members’ capital (deficit)		155,568			—			—
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share; no shares authorized, issued and outstanding (actual); shares authorized and shares issued and outstanding (pro forma for the Reorganization Transactions); and shares authorized and shares issued and outstanding (pro forma for the Reorganization Transactions and this Offering)		—
Additional paid-in capital		—
Accumulated deficit		(235,161	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(19,465	)

Total members’ capital (deficit)		(99,058	)

Total stockholders’ equity		—

Total capitalization	$	734,162		$		$	$


Assumed initial public offering price per share		$
Pro forma net tangible book value per share as of March 31, 2013	$
Increase per share attributable to new investors

Pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share after this offering (“Post-Offering Pro Forma Net Tangible Book Value Per Share”)

Dilution per share to new investors		$


Assumed initial public offering price per share		$
Post-Offering Pro Forma Net Tangible Book Value Per Share as of March 31, 2013	$
Dilution in pro forma net tangible book value per share attributable to the consummation of the Probable Acquisitions

Pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share after giving effect to the Probable Acquisitions

Total dilution attributable to all transactions described above		$


	Shares Purchased				Total Consideration				Average Price Per Share
	Number	Percent			Amount	Percent			Average Price Per Share
Existing Equityholders(1)				%				%	$
New investors(1)				%				%	$
Island One Equityholder(2)				%				%	$

Total			100	%			100	%


	Historical
	Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC			Island One Companies			PMR Service Companies		Island One Acquisition Adjustments⁽¹⁾					PMR Service Companies Acquisition Adjustments⁽²⁾					Pro Forma for Island One Acquisition and PMR Service Companies Acquisition			Offering Adjustments⁽³⁾			Pro Forma
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	26,204		$	2,834		$	351	$	—				$	(52,083	)	(c	)(d)	$	(22,694	)	$	(f	)	$
Cash in escrow and restricted cash		56,381			573			—		—					—					56,954
Mortgages and contracts receivable, net of allowance of $84,907, $16,300, $0, $3,047, $0 and $104,254, respectively		320,967			15,867			—		101		(a	)		—					336,935
Due from related parties, net		22,978			2,503			—		—					—					25,481
Other receivables, net		35,737			2,052			7,951		—					(5,980	)	(d	)		39,760
Income tax receivable		29			—			—		—					—					29
Prepaid expenses and other assets, net		122,766			893			113		—					—					123,772
Unsold Vacation Interests, net		300,488			6,807			—		3,026		(a	)		—					310,321
Property and equipment, net		55,055			742			39		159		(a	)		(39	)	(d	)		55,956
Assets held for sale		4,886			—			—		—					—					4,886
Intangible assets, net		108,312			21,997			—		22,143		(a	)		38,440		(d	)		190,892
Goodwill		—			—			—		24,248		(a	)		11,641		(d	)		35,889

Total Assets	$	1,053,803		$	54,268		$	8,454	$	49,677				$	(8,021	)			$	1,158,181		$			$

LIABILITIES AND MEMBER CAPITAL (DEFICIT)/STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Accounts payable	$	13,524		$	101		$	816	$	—				$	(410	)	(d	)	$	14,031		$			$
Due to related parties, net		96,799			—			—		—					—					96,799
Accrued liabilities		100,020			2,316			27		—					—					102,363
Income taxes payable		855			—			—		—					—					855
Deferred income taxes		—			8,293			—		—					—					8,293
Deferred revenues		108,443			3,552			—		—					—					111,995
Senior Secured Notes, net of unamortized original issue discount of $8,253, $0, $0, $0, $0 and $8,253, respectively		416,747			—			—		—					—					416,747
Securitization notes and Funding Facilities, net of unamortized original issue discount of $673, $0, $0, $0, $0 and $673, respectively		278,928			—			—		—					—					278,928
Notes payable		137,545			9,461			—		—					—					147,006			(g	)

Total Liabilities		1,152,861			23,723			843		—					(410	)				1,177,017

Commitments and contingencies
Member capital (deficit)/stockholders’ equity:
Member capital (authorized and issued 1,387.8 Class A common units, no par value, and authorized 112.2 and issued 103.8 Class B common units, no par value)		155,568			—			—		80,222		(a	)		—					235,790			(h	)
Common Stock		—			11			10		(11	)	(b	)		(10	)	(e	)		—
Treasury Stock		—			(1,210	)		—		1,210		(b	)		—					—
Additional Paid-in Capital		—			34,795			7,573		(34,795	)	(b	)		(7,573	)	(e	)		—
Accumulated (deficit) earnings		(235,161	)		(3,051	)		28		3,051		(b	)		(28	)	(e	)		(235,161	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(19,465	)		—			—		—					—					(19,465	)

Total member capital (deficit)/stockholders’ equity		(99,058	)		30,545			7,611		49,677					(7,611	)				(18,836	)

Total liabilities and member capital (deficit)/stockholders’ equity	$	1,053,803		$	54,268		$	8,454	$	49,677				$	(8,021	)			$	1,158,181		$			$


	Fair Value Based on Preliminary Appraisal
Consideration:
Diamond Resorts International, Inc. common stock	$	80,222

Fair value of total consideration transferred upon completion of the offering	$	80,222


Recognized amounts of identifiable assets and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2,834
Cash in escrow and restricted cash		573
Mortgages and contracts receivable		15,968
Due from related parties, net		2,503
Other receivables, net		2,052
Prepaid expenses and other assets		893
Unsold Vacation Interests		9,833
Property and equipment		901
Intangible assets		44,140

Total assets		79,767
Liabilities assumed		23,723

Total identifiable net assets	$	55,974

Goodwill	$	24,248


	Fair Value Based on Preliminary Appraisal
Consideration:
Cash	$	52,083

Fair value of total consideration transferred upon completion of the offering	$	52,083


Recognized amounts of identifiable assets and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	351
Other receivables, net		1,971
Prepaid expenses and other assets		113
Intangible assets		38,440

Total assets		40,875
Liabilities assumed		433

Total identifiable net assets	$	40,442

Goodwill	$	11,641


																													Pro Forma for PMR Acquisition, Island One Acquisition and PMR Service Companies Acquisition

	Historical													Historical										PMR Service Companies Acquisition Adjustments⁽⁵⁾
	Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC			Pacific Monarch Resorts, Inc.⁽¹⁾										Historical
						PMR Acquisition Adjustments⁽²⁾					Pro Forma for PMR Acquisition						PMR Service Companies		Island One Acquisition Adjustments⁽⁴⁾
														Island One Companies⁽³⁾																		Offering Adjustments⁽⁶⁾
														Island One Companies⁽³⁾																		Offering Adjustments⁽⁶⁾			Pro Forma
Revenues:
Management and member services	$	114,937		$	5,307	$	—				$	120,244		$	10,491		$	16,982	$	—				$	—				$	147,717		$			$
Consolidated resort operations		33,756			2,973		(2,973	)	(a	)		33,756			1,519			—		—					—					35,275
Vacation Interest sales, net of provision of $25,457, $7,168, $0, $32,625, $1,001, $0, $0, $0 and $33,626, respectively		293,098			15,666		—					308,764			7,492			—		—					—					316,256
Interest		53,206			10,433		(10,427	)	(a	)		53,212			2,964			—		—					—					56,176
Other		28,671			3,459		(2,087	)	(a	)		30,043			2,932			—		—					—					32,975

Total revenues		523,668			37,838		(15,487	)				546,019			25,398			16,982		—					—					588,399

Costs and Expenses:
Management and member services		35,330			—		—					35,330			6,331			9,462		—					—					51,123
Consolidated resort operations		30,311			2,111		(2,111	)	(a	)		30,311			2,095			—		—					—					32,406
Vacation Interest cost of sales		32,150			2,183		—					34,333			906			—		—					—					35,239
Advertising, sales and marketing		178,365			14,522		—					192,887			4,541			—		—					—					197,428
Vacation Interest carrying cost, net		36,363			207		—					36,570			(1,632	)		—		—					—					34,938
Loan portfolio		9,486			1,867		(1,867	)	(a	)		9,486			448			—		—					—					9,934
Other operating		8,507			—		—					8,507			—			—		—					—					8,507
General and administrative		99,015			2,977		(1,218	)	(a	)		93,854			9,123			—		—					—					102,977
		—			—		(6,920	)	(b	)		—			—			—		—					—					—
Depreciation and amortization		18,857			1,169		(1,169	)	(c	)		20,925			2,918			64		(2,918	)	(h	)		(64	)	(j	)		26,813
		—			—		2,068		(d	)		—			—			—		3,325		(i	)		2,563		(k	)
Interest expense		96,157			691		(691	)	(e	)		102,198			662			—		—					—					102,860			(l	)
		—			—		6,041		(f	)		—			—			—		—					—					—
Impairments and other write-offs		1,009			—		—					1,009			583			—		—					—					1,592
Reorganization items		—			4,150		—					4,150			1,090			—		—					—					5,240
Gain on disposal of assets		(605	)		—		—					(605	)		—			—		—					—					(605	)
(Gain) adjustment on bargain purchase from business combination		(20,610	)		—		20,652		(g	)		42			—			—		—					—					42

Total costs and expenses		524,335			29,877		14,785					568,997			27,065			9,526		407					2,499					608,494

(Loss) income before (benefit) provision for income taxes		(667	)		7,961		(30,272	)				(22,978	)		(1,667	)		7,456		(407	)				(2,499	)				(20,095	)
(Benefit) provision for income taxes		(14,310	)		2,821		10,894					(595	)		(608	)		—		—					—					(1,203	)

Net income (loss)	$	13,643		$	5,140	$	(41,166	)			$	(22,383	)	$	(1,059	)	$	7,456	$	(407	)			$	(2,499	)			$	(18,892	)	$			$

Net income (loss) per share
Basic																																			$
Diluted																																			$
Weighted average common shares outstanding
Basic
Diluted


	For the Year Ended December 31, 2012			For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012
Cash and paid-in-kind interest at 18%	$	12,048		$	2,883
Exit fee at 2.5%		1,531			383
Unused commitment fee		73			18
Debt issuance cost amortization		643			161

Total interest expense		14,295			3,445

Minus: Actual interest expense		(8,254	)		—

	$	6,041		$	3,445


	Year Ended December 31,															Three Months Ended March 31,
	2008			2009			2010			2011			2012			2012			2013
	($ in thousands, except per share data and as noted)
Statement of Operations Data:
Total revenues	$	402,414		$	410,961		$	370,825		$	391,021		$	523,668			108,950			153,452
Total costs and expenses		489,577			432,757			391,258			390,235			524,335			117,550			150,741

(Loss) income before provision (benefit) for income taxes		(87,163	)		(21,796	)		(20,433	)		786			(667	)		(8,600	)		2,711
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		1,809			(799	)		(1,274	)		(9,517	)		(14,310	)		975			438

Net (loss) income	$	(88,972	)	$	(20,997	)	$	(19,159	)	$	10,303		$	13,463			(9,575	)		2,273

Other Financial Data (Unaudited):
Capital expenditures	$	13,861		$	4,672		$	5,553		$	6,276		$	14,335		$	1,885		$	2,524
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities		45,086			87,793			66,001			9,292			24,600			20,701			10,338
Investing activities		(7,263	)		(4,250	)		(37,399	)		(109,800	)		(69,338	)		(1,666	)		(2,524	)
Financing activities		(60,024	)		(89,660	)		(18,271	)		93,035			45,540			(20,978	)		(2,131	)
Operating Data:
Branded resorts(1)		56			62			70			71			79			71			80
Affiliated resorts(1)		74			99			109			144			180			144			211
Cruise itineraries(1)		—			—			—			4			4			4			4

Total destinations (1)		130			161			179			219			263			219			295

Total number of tours(2)		150,912			123,045			130,801			146,261			180,981			34,942			44,499
Closing percentage(3)		18.0	%		19.2	%		17.4	%		14.4	%		14.8	%		14.5	%		13.9	%
Total number of VOI sale transactions(4)		27,144			23,571			22,719			21,093			26,734			5,057			6,169
Average VOI sale price per transaction(5)	$	10,950		$	9,712		$	9,526		$	10,490		$	12,510		$	12,060		$	15,565
Volume per guest(6)	$	1,970		$	1,861		$	1,655		$	1,513		$	1,848		$	1,745		$	2,158


	As of December 31,										As of March 31, 2013
	2008		2009		2010		2011		2012		As of March 31, 2013
	($ in thousands)
Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	22,707	$	17,186	$	27,329	$	19,897	$	21,061	$	26,204
Mortgages and contracts receivable, net		300,795		263,556		245,287		283,302		312,932		320,967
Unsold vacation interests, net		218,116		203,225		190,564		256,805		315,867		300,488
Total assets		749,318		672,118		680,751		833,219		993,008		1,053,803
Borrowings under line of credit agreements		389,000		393,954		—		—		—		—
Securitization notes and conduit facilities		291,965		222,913		186,843		250,895		256,302		278,928
Senior secured notes, net of unamortized original issue discount		—		—		414,722		415,546		416,491		416,747
Notes payable		2,694		1,792		23,273		71,514		137,906		137,545
Total liabilities		837,066		775,979		807,998		950,421		1,091,607		1,152,861


	Three Months Ended March 31, 2013										Three Months Ended March 31, 2012
	Hospitality and Management Services		Vacation Interest Sales and Financing		Corporate and Other			Total			Hospitality and Management Services		Vacation Interest Sales and Financing		Corporate and Other			Total
	(In thousands)
	(Unaudited)
Revenues:
Management and member services	$	31,587	$	—	$	—		$	31,587		$	27,280	$	—	$	—		$	27,280
Consolidated resort operations		8,620		—		—			8,620			8,534		—		—			8,534
Vacation Interest sales, net of provision $0, $6,672, $0, $6,672, $0, $4,115, $0 and $4,115, respectively		—		91,668		—			91,668			—		54,572		—			54,572
Interest		—		12,858		397			13,255			—		13,327		329			13,656
Other		3,490		4,832		—			8,322			882		4,026		—			4,908

Total revenues		43,697		109,358		397			153,452			36,696		71,925		329			108,950

Costs and Expenses:
Management and member services		9,779		—		—			9,779			8,275		—		—			8,275
Consolidated resort operations		7,722		—		—			7,722			7,082		—		—			7,082
Vacation Interest cost of sales		—		17,846		—			17,846			—		8,231		—			8,231
Advertising, sales and marketing		—		50,359		—			50,359			—		34,819		—			34,819
Vacation Interest carrying cost, net		—		8,237		—			8,237			—		9,272		—			9,272
Loan portfolio		246		2,259		—			2,505			223		2,128		—			2,351
Other operating		—		368		—			368			—		1,158		—			1,158
General and administrative		—		—		22,800			22,800			—		—		20,760			20,760
Depreciation and amortization		—		—		6,254			6,254			—		—		3,805			3,805
Interest expense		—		4,078		20,764			24,842			—		4,920		17,011			21,931
Impairments and other write-offs		—		—		79			79			—		—		(11	)		(11	)
Gain on disposal of assets		—		—		(50	)		(50	)		—		—		(72	)		(72	)
Gain on bargain purchase from business combinations		—		—		—			—			—		—		(51	)		(51	)

Total costs and expenses		17,747		83,147		49,847			150,741			15,580		60,528		41,442			117,550

Income (loss) before provision for income taxes		25,950		26,211		(49,450	)		2,711			21,116		11,397		(41,113	)		(8,600	)
Provision for income taxes		—		—		438			438			—		—		975			975

Net income (loss)	$	25,950	$	26,211	$	(49,888	)	$	2,273		$	21,116	$	11,397	$	(42,088	)	$	(9,575	)


	Year ended December 31, 2012										Year ended December 31, 2011
	Hospitality and Management Services		Vacation Interest Sales and Financing		Corporate and Other			Total			Hospitality and Management Services		Vacation Interest Sales and Financing			Corporate and Other			Total
	(In thousands)
Revenues:
Management and member services	$	114,937	$	—	$	—		$	114,937		$	99,306	$	—		$	—		$	99,306
Consolidated resort operations		33,756		—		—			33,756			29,893		—			—			29,893
Vacation Interest sales, net of provision $0, $25,457, $0, $25,457, $0, $16,562, $0 and $16,562, respectively		—		293,098		—			293,098			—		194,759			—			194,759
Interest		—		51,769		1,437			53,206			—		44,410			2,875			47,285
Other		4,595		24,076		—			28,671			8,079		11,699			—			19,778

Total revenues		153,288		368,943		1,437			523,668			137,278		250,868			2,875			391,021

Costs and Expenses:
Management and member services		35,330		—		—			35,330			27,125		—			—			27,125
Consolidated resort operations		30,311		—		—			30,311			27,783		—			—			27,783
Vacation Interest cost of sales		—		32,150		—			32,150			—		(9,695	)		—			(9,695	)
Advertising, sales and marketing		—		178,365		—			178,365			—		128,717			—			128,717
Vacation Interest carrying cost, net		—		36,363		—			36,363			—		41,331			—			41,331
Loan portfolio		858		8,628		—			9,486			1,211		7,441			—			8,652
Other operating		—		8,507		—			8,507			—		3,399			—			3,399
General and administrative		—		—		99,015			99,015			—		—			80,412			80,412
Depreciation and amortization		—		—		18,857			18,857			—		—			13,966			13,966
Interest		—		18,735		77,422			96,157			—		18,624			63,386			82,010
Impairments and other write-offs		—		—		1,009			1,009			—		—			1,572			1,572
Gain on disposal of assets		—		—		(605	)		(605	)		—		—			(708	)		(708	)
Gain on bargain purchase from business combinations		—		—		(20,610	)		(20,610	)		—		—			(14,329	)		(14,329	)

Total costs and expenses		66,499		282,748		175,088			524,335			56,119		189,817			144,299			390,235

Income (loss) before benefit for income taxes		86,789		86,195		(173,651	)		(667	)		81,159		61,051			(141,424	)		786
Benefit for income taxes		—		—		(14,310	)		(14,310	)		—		—			(9,517	)		(9,517	)

Net income (loss)	$	86,789	$	86,195	$	(159,341	)	$	13,643		$	81,159	$	61,051		$	(131,907	)	$	10,303


	Year Ended December 31, 2011											Year Ended December 31, 2010
	Hospitality and Management Services		Vacation Interest Sales and Financing			Corporate and Other			Total			Hospitality and Management Services		Vacation Interest Sales and Financing		Corporate and Other			Total
	(In thousands)
Revenues:
Management and member services	$	99,306	$	—		$	—		$	99,306		$	86,206	$	—	$	—		$	86,206
Consolidated resort operations		29,893		—			—			29,893			26,547		—		—			26,547
Vacation Interest sales net of provision of $0, $16,562, $0, $16,562, $0, $12,655, $0 and $12,655, respectively		—		194,759			—			194,759			—		202,109		—			202,109
Interest		—		44,410			2,875			47,285			—		39,150		177			39,327
Other		8,079		11,699			—			19,778			4,969		11,667		—			16,636

Total revenues		137,278		250,868			2,875			391,021			117,722		252,926		177			370,825

Costs and Expenses:
Management and member services		27,125		—			—			27,125			22,444		—		—			22,444
Consolidated resort operations		27,783		—			—			27,783			23,972		—		—			23,972
Vacation Interest cost of sales		—		(9,695	)		—			(9,695	)		—		39,730		—			39,730
Advertising, sales and marketing		—		128,717			—			128,717			—		114,029		—			114,029
Vacation Interest carrying cost, net		—		41,331			—			41,331			—		29,821		—			29,821
Loan portfolio		1,211		7,441			—			8,652			1,025		7,575		—			8,600
Other operating		—		3,399			—			3,399			—		3,168		—			3,168
General and administrative		—		—			80,412			80,412			—		—		67,905			67,905
Depreciation and amortization		—		—			13,966			13,966			—		—		11,939			11,939
Interest expense		—		18,624			63,386			82,010			—		18,203		48,959			67,162
Loss on extinguishment of debt		—		—			—			—			—		—		1,081			1,081
Impairments and other write-offs		—		—			1,572			1,572			—		—		3,330			3,330
Gain on disposal of assets		—		—			(708	)		(708	)		—		—		(1,923	)		(1,923	)
Gain on bargain purchase from business combination		—		—			(14,329	)		(14,329	)		—		—		—			—

Total costs and expenses		56,119		189,817			144,299			390,235			47,441		212,526		131,291			391,258

Income (loss) before benefit for income taxes		81,159		61,051			(141,424	)		786			70,281		40,400		(131,114	)		(20,433	)
Benefit for income taxes		—		—			(9,517	)		(9,517	)		—		—		(1,274	)		(1,274	)

Net income (loss)	$	81,159	$	61,051		$	(131,907	)	$	10,303		$	70,281	$	40,400	$	(129,840	)	$	(19,159	)


	December 31, 2012			March 31, 2013 (unaudited)
	Principal Balance			Principal Balance			Weighted Average Interest Rate			Maturity	Gross Amount of Mortgages and Contracts as Collateral		Borrowing/ Funding Availability
Senior Secured Notes	$	425,000		$	425,000			12.0	%	8/15/2018	$	—	$	—
Original issue discount related to Senior Secured Notes		(8,509	)		(8,253	)						—		—
Diamond Resorts Owners Trust Series 2013-1 (1)(2)		—			86,233			2.0	%	1/20/2025		88,322		—
PMR Acquisition Loan(1)(3)(4)(5)		62,211			61,237			20.5	%	5/21/2016		—		—
Quorum Facility (1)(2)		52,417			55,711			6.1	%	12/31/2015		60,116		24,289	(6)
Tempus Acquisition Loan (1)(3)(4)(5)		50,486			49,209			19.8	%	6/30/2015		—		—
Diamond Resorts Owners Trust Series 2009-1(1)(2)		50,025			42,489			9.5	%	3/20/2026		82,667		—
Original issue discount related to Diamond Resorts Owners Trust Series 2009-1 (2)		(441	)		(383	)						—		—
Diamond Resorts Owners Trust Series 2011-1 (1)(2)		36,849			33,296			4.0	%	3/20/2023		33,750		—
Original issue discount related to Diamond Resorts Owners Trust Series 2011-1 (2)		(312	)		(290	)						—		—
Tempus Receivables Loan (1)(2)(4)		44,027			40,054			10.0	%	7/1/2015		52,265		—
Payments in Transit (1)(2)(4)		(1,150	)		(1,506	)						—		—
10% participation interest (Tempus Acquisition, LLC) (1)(2)(4)		(5,945	)		(5,749	)						—		—
Conduit Facility (1)(2)		70,912			22,583			4.5	%	4/12/2013		26,422		49,878	(6)
Conduit Facility (1)(2)(4)		4,088			713			4.5	%	4/12/2013		824		1,556	(6)
ILXA Inventory Loan (1)(3)(4)		15,939			13,929			7.5	%	8/31/2015		—		—
Notes payable-insurance policies (3)		2,366			5,888			3.2	%	Various		—		—
ILXA Receivables Loan (1)(2)(4)		5,832			5,507			10.0	%	8/31/2015		3,420		—
Tempus Inventory Loan (1)(3)(4)		2,992			2,819			7.5	%	6/30/2016		—		—
DPM Inventory Loan (1)(3)(4)		1,267			2,560			8.0	%	Various		—		—
Note Payable-RFA fees (1)(3)(4)		1,395			1,190			10.0	%	6/20/2014		—		—
Notes payable-other (3)		872			697			5.6	%	Various		—		—
Notes payable-other (1)(3)(4)		18			16					11/18/2015		—		—

Total	$	810,699		$	833,220						$	347,786	$	75,723


	Historical
	Year Ended December 31,									Three Months Ended March 31,
	2010			2011			2012			2012			2013			LTM
										(unaudited)			(unaudited)			(unaudited)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	66,001		$	9,292		$	24,600		$	20,701		$	10,338		$	14,237
Income tax expense		(1,274	)		(9,517	)		(14,310	)		975			438			(14,847	)
Provision for uncollectible Vacation Interest revenues(a)		(12,655	)		(16,562	)		(25,457	)		(4,115	)		(6,672	)		(28,014	)
Amortization of capitalized financing costs and original issue discounts(a)		(2,521	)		(6,138	)		(6,293	)		(1,506	)		(1,874	)		(6,661	)
Stock-based compensation(a)		—			—			(3,321	)		—			—			(3,321	)
Deferred income taxes(b)		377			8,567			13,010			—			—			13,010
(Loss) gain on foreign currency(c)		(42	)		72			(113	)		29			(61	)		(203	)
Gain on mortgage purchase(a)		191			196			27			11			—			16
Unrealized gain on derivative instruments(d)		314			79			—			—			—			—
Gain on insurance settlement(e)		—			3,535			—			—			2,203			2,203
Corporate Interest Expense(f)		48,959			63,386			77,422			17,011			20,764			81,175
Change in operating assets and liabilities excluding acquisitions(g)		(53,391	)		15,325			12,183			(21,272	)		5,852			39,307
Vacation interests cost of sales(h)		39,730			(9,695	)		32,150			8,231			17,846			41,765

Adjusted EBITDA – Consolidated		85,689			58,540			109,898			20,065			48,834			138,667
Less: Adjusted EBITDA – Unrestricted Subsidiaries(i)		(6,534	)		(12,349	)		8,957			509			7,974			16,422
Plus: Intercompany elimination(j)		—			3,203			19,058			2,905			6,751			22,904

Adjusted EBITDA – Diamond Resorts Parent, LLC and Restricted Subsidiaries	$	92,223		$	74,092		$	119,999		$	22,461		$	47,611		$	145,149


Contractual Obligations	Total		Less than 1 year		1-3 years		3-5 years		More than 5 years
Senior Secured Notes, including interest payable	$	711,875	$	51,000	$	102,000	$	102,000	$	456,875
Securitization notes payable, including interest payable(1)		205,080		75,241		118,393		4,781		6,665
Conduit facility, including interest payable(1)		76,079		76,079		—		—		—
Notes payable, including interest payable		183,151		39,568		102,484		40,534		565
Purchase obligations		2,277		2,277		—		—		—
Operating lease obligations		38,948		8,879		13,762		12,184		4,123

Total	$	1,217,410	$	253,044	$	336,639	$	159,499	$	468,228


	For the Years Ended December 31,								Three months ended March 31,
	2009		2010		2011		2012		2013		2012
									(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Revenue
North America	$	359,790	$	325,710	$	346,803	$	476,053	$	139,451	$	99,386
Europe		51,171		45,115		44,218		47,615		14,001		9,564

Total Revenues	$	410,961	$	370,825	$	391,021	$	523,668		$153,452	$	108,950


	As of December 31,								As of March 31,
	2009		2010		2011		2012		2013
									(unaudited)
Mortgages and contracts receivable, net
North America	$	263,007	$	244,541	$	281,958	$	310,955	$	319,172
Europe		549		746		1,344		1,977		1,795

Total mortgages and contracts receivable, net	$	263,556	$	245,287	$	283,302	$	312,932	$	320,967

Unsold Vacation Interest, net
North America	$	174,675	$	174,642	$	233,721	$	275,352	$	260,674
Europe		28,550		15,922		23,084		40,515		39,814

Total unsold vacation interest, net	$	203,225	$	190,564	$	256,805	$	315,867	$	300,488

Property and equipment, net
North America	$	19,794	$	24,248	$	43,697	$	50,643	$	50,753
Europe		5,914		4,849		4,480		4,477		4,302

Total property and equipment, net	$	25,708	$	29,097	$	48,177	$	55,120	$	55,055

Intangible assets, net
North America	$	35,664	$	40,926	$	63,882	$	103,141	$	100,291
Europe		6,969		4,787		4,227		9,357		8,021

Total intangible assets, net	$	42,633	$	45,713	$	68,109	$	112,948	$	108,312

Total long-term assets, net
North America	$	493,140	$	484,357	$	623,258	$	740,091	$	730,890
Europe		41,982		26,304		33,135		56,326		53,932

Total long-term assets, net	$	535,122	$	510,661	$	656,393	$	796,417	$	784,822


Resort		Location
RVC’s The Sandcastle, Birch Bay		Blaine, Washington
Great Wolf Lodge Grand Mound		Grand Mound, Washington
Blackbird Lodge		Leavenworth, Washington
VI at Homestead		Lynden, Washington


Resort		Location
Point Brown		Ocean Shores, Washington
Great Wolf Lodge Wisconsin Dells		Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin
Mirror Lake & Tamarack Resort		Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin
Teton Club		Jackson, Wyoming


Resort		Location
Holiday Club Schloesslhof		Austria
Holiday Club Siesta		Austria
Mondi-Holiday Hotel Bellevue		Austria
Mondi-Holiday Hotel Grundlsee		Austria
Balkan Jewel Resort		Bulgaria
Burnside Park		Bowness-on-Windermere, England
Broome Park Mansion House		Kent, England
Stouts Hill		Uley, England
Walton Apartments		Walton, England
Mondi-Holiday Hotel Oberstaufen		Germany
Holiday Club Breitenbergerhof		Italy
Mondi-Holiday Hotel Tirolensis		Italy
Royal Reserve Safari and Beach Club		Nr Mombasa, Kenya


Resort		Location
Gålå Fjellgrend		Gudbrandsdalen, Norway
Pestana Miramir		Funchal, Portugal
Pestana Alvor Park		Madeira, Portugal
Pestana Grand		Madeira, Portugal
Pestana Palms		Madeira, Portugal
Pestana Porches Praia		Porches, Portugal
Pestana Village		Madeira, Portugal
The Peninsula		Cape Town, South Africa
Breakers Resort		KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
Champagne Sports Resorts		Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa
Avalon Springs		Montagu, Garden Route, South Africa
Jackalberry Ridge		Mpumalanga, South Africa
Wilderness Dunes		Wilderness, Garden Route, South Africa


Resort		Location
Basingstoke Country Hotel		Basingstoke, England
Combe Grove Manor***		Bath, England
The Imperial Blackpool		Blackpool, England
The Old Ship Hotel***		Brighton, England
The Lygon Arms***		Broadway, England
The Palace Hotel		Buxton, England
Cheltenham Park Hotel		Cheltenham, England
Redworth Hall Hotel		County Durham, England
Daventry Court Hotel		Daventry, England
The Majestic Hotel Harrogate		Harrogate, England
Hinckley Island Hotel		Hinckley, England


Resort		Location
The Oxford Hotel		Oxford, England
Shrigley Hall Hotel Golf & Country Club		Shrigley, England
Billesley Manor Hotel		Stratford, England
The Imperial Hotel Torquay		Torquay, England
Walton Hall***		Walton, England
Walton Hotel		Walton, England
The Carlton Hotel		Edinburgh, Scotland
Stirling Highland Hotel		Stirling, Scotland
The Marine Hotel***		Troon, Scotland
The Angel Hotel		Cardiff, Wales


Resort		Location
Norwegian Cruise Lines Alaskan Glacier Bay Cruise		Alaska
Norwegian Cruise Lines Baltic Capitals Cruise		Baltic Capitals


Resort		Location
Norwegian Cruise Lines Western Caribbean Cruise		Caribbean
Norwegian Cruise Lines Western Mediterranean Cruise		Mediterranean


Name	Age(1)	Principal Position
Stephen J. Cloobeck	51	Chairman of the Board of Directors

David F. Palmer	51	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

C. Alan Bentley	53	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Howard S. Lanznar	57	Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer

Lowell D. Kraff	52	Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors

B. Scott Minerd	54	Director

Zachary D. Warren	40	Director


Underwriter		Number of Shares
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC
Guggenheim Securities LLC
Cantor Fitzgerald & Co.


Total


	Per Share		Total
	Without Over-allotment	With Over-allotment	Without Over-allotment	With Over-allotment
Underwriting Discounts and Commissions paid by us
Expenses payable by us
Underwriting Discounts and Commissions paid by selling stockholders
Expenses payable by selling stockholders