As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 13, 2012

Registration No. 333- 179558

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

AMENDMENT NO. 4

TO

FORM S-1

REGISTRATION STATEMENT

UNDER

THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

E2open, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	7372	94-3366487
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)

4100 East Third Avenue, Suite 400

Foster City, California 94404

(650) 645-6500

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

Mark E. Woodward

President and Chief Executive Officer

4100 East Third Avenue, Suite 400

Foster City, California 94404

(650) 645-6500

(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)

Copies to:

Larry W. Sonsini Aaron J. Alter Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C. 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304 (650) 493-9300 Peter J. Maloney Chief Financial Officer 4100 East Third Avenue, Suite 400 Foster City, California 94404 (650) 645-6500 Richard A. Kline Christopher J. Austin Goodwin Procter LLP 135 Commonwealth Drive Menlo Park, California 94025 (650) 752-3100

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after this registration statement becomes effective.

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box: ¨

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨

If this Form is a post effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨

If this Form is a post effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ¨	Accelerated filer ¨	Non-accelerated filer x	Smaller reporting company ¨
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE CHART

Title of Each Class of Securities to be Registered	Amount to be Registered	Proposed Maximum Offering Price Per Share	Proposed Maximum Aggregate Offering Price(1)	Amount of Registration Fee(2)
Common Stock, par value $0.001 par share	5,390,625	$17.00	$91,640,625	$10,502.02

(1) Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee in accordance with Rule 457(a) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Includes offering price of shares that the underwriters have the option to purchase to cover over-allotments.

(2) The Registrant previously paid $9,884.25 in connection with the previous filings of this Registration Statement.

The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the registration statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. Neither we nor the selling stockholders may sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.

Subject to Completion

Preliminary Prospectus dated July 13, 2012

PROSPECTUS

4,687,500 Shares

Common Stock

This is E2open, Inc.’s initial public offering. We are selling 3,750,000 shares of our common stock and the selling stockholders are selling 937,500 shares of our common stock. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares to be offered by the selling stockholders.

We expect the public offering price to be between $15.00 and $17.00 per share. Currently, no public market exists for the shares. We have applied to list our common stock for quotation on The NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “EOPN”.

We are an “emerging growth company” under applicable federal securities laws and will be subject to reduced public company reporting requirements.

Investing in the common stock involves risks that are described in the “Risk Factors” section beginning on page 14 of this prospectus.

	Per Share	Total
Public offering price	$	$
Underwriting discount	$	$
Proceeds, before expenses, to us	$	$
Proceeds, before expenses, to the selling stockholders	$	$

The underwriters may also exercise their option to purchase up to an additional 703,125 shares from the selling stockholders, at the public offering price, less the underwriting discount, for 30 days after the date of this prospectus.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

The shares will be ready for delivery on or about                     , 2012.

BofA Merrill Lynch
William Blair	Pacific Crest Securities	Canaccord Genuity	Needham & Company

The date of this prospectus is                     , 2012.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Page
Prospectus Summary		1
Risk Factors		14
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements and Industry Data		35
Use of Proceeds		37
Dividend Policy		37
Capitalization		38
Dilution		40
Selected Consolidated Financial Data		42
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		47
Business		88
Management		108
Executive Compensation		118
Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions		135
Principal and Selling Stockholders		138
Description of Capital Stock		142
Shares Eligible for Future Sale		146
Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences to Non-U.S. Holders		149
Underwriting		153
Legal Matters		159
Experts		159
Where You Can Find More Information		159
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-1

You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus and in any free writing prospectus prepared by or on behalf of us and delivered or made available to you. We have not, the selling stockholders have not and the underwriters have not, authorized anyone to provide you with information different from, or in addition to, that contained in this prospectus or any related free writing prospectus. Neither we nor the selling stockholders take responsibility for, and can provide no assurance as to the reliability of, any other information that others may give you. This prospectus is an offer to sell only the shares offered hereby but only under circumstances and in jurisdictions where it is lawful to do so. The information contained in this prospectus is current only as of its date.

No action is being taken in any jurisdiction outside the United States to permit a public offering of our common stock or possession or distribution of this prospectus in that jurisdiction. Persons who come into possession of this prospectus in a jurisdiction outside the United States are required to inform themselves about, and to observe any restrictions as to, this offering and the distribution of this prospectus applicable to that jurisdiction.

i

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this prospectus and does not contain all of the information that you should consider in making your investment decision. Before investing in our common stock, you should carefully read this entire prospectus, including our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in this prospectus and the information set forth under “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

Company Overview

We are a leading provider of cloud-based, on-demand software solutions delivered on an integrated platform that enables companies to collaborate with their trading partners to procure, manufacture, sell and distribute products more efficiently. Our customers depend on outsourced manufacturing strategies and complex trading networks to compete in today’s global economy. They use our solutions to gain visibility into and control over their trading networks through the real-time information, integrated business processes and advanced analytics that we provide. Our solutions enable our customers and their trading partners to overcome problems arising from communications across disparate systems by offering a reliable source of data, processes and analytics, which our customers rely on as the single version of the truth. Our solutions empower our customers to manage demand they cannot predict and supply they do not control.

We refer to the combination of our software applications delivered on our cloud-based platform, the content contributed by our network participants and our enabling services as the E2open Business Network. The E2open Business Network has grown to over 32,000 unique registered trading partners. It allows our network participants to access and share data and execute business processes in a secure, real-time manner, while providing them with collaboration tools and analytics so that our customers can make more informed and efficient decisions. Our customer base includes companies that represent seven of the top ten supply chains in the world, according to Gartner, Inc., and spans several industries including many large multinational companies such as Boeing, Cisco, Dell, the Gap, GE, Flextronics, IBM, Lab126 (part of the Amazon.com, Inc. group of companies), Motorola and Vodafone. To date, our target markets have been Technology, Telecommunications, Aerospace and Defense, and Consumer Products.

E2open transcends traditional supply chain software categories, which include business-to-business, or B2B, integration, procurement, forecasting, planning and execution, by enabling coordination and collaboration among enterprises, which we call “collaborative execution.” By providing our solutions in an integrated cloud-based environment, our customers and their trading partners can easily share detailed and relevant content and data to gain the visibility they need for collaborative execution across their extended trading network.

Our customers benefit from the following key differentiating features of the E2open Business Network:

• Cross-network analytics. We provide cross-network analytics for real-time monitoring and control of large volumes of data to sense and respond quickly and collaboratively to changes, opportunities or disruptions in the supply chain.

• Multi-enterprise, multi-tier supply and demand process management. We support key operational processes, such as forecast, order and inventory management, for our customers and their multi-tiered supply and demand trading networks.

• Scalable, secure cloud-based connectivity platform. Our solutions combine B2B connectivity and integration capabilities that allow our customers to securely connect, share and act on information across their trading networks that can include thousands of partners.

1

• Integration with existing systems. Our highly-configurable solutions integrate with many Enterprise Resource Planning, or ERP, systems to efficiently manage complex networks and facilitate the interchange of transactions.

We believe that the E2open Business Network is strategic to our customers in that it enables them to increase revenue and productivity, and to reduce operating expenditures, working capital and cost of goods sold. Our solutions seamlessly integrate with and enhance our customers’ mission critical business systems and processes across their trading networks.

We have achieved strong growth as our network has scaled and as we have expanded our solutions. Our platform originated as a solution to help our customers connect with their manufacturing and distribution partners in their trading network. Next, we introduced solutions for multi-enterprise supply management, and then we introduced solutions to help our customers coordinate multi-enterprise demand management. Our revenue has grown from $37.7 million in fiscal 2009 to $44.4 million in fiscal 2010 to $55.5 million in fiscal 2011 and $59.7 million in fiscal 2012. Revenue increased from $11.2 million for the three months ended May 31, 2011 to $15.5 million for the three months ended May 31, 2012. Effective March 1, 2011, we adopted new accounting guidance relating to multiple-element arrangements, which had the effect of increasing fiscal 2012 revenue by $10.9 million more than would have been recognized during the year had such accounting guidance not been adopted by us. Bookings were $57.5 million for fiscal 2010, $56.9 million for fiscal 2011 and $72.6 million for fiscal 2012. For the three months ended May 31, 2012, total bookings was $37.8 million compared to $15.8 million for the three months ended May 31, 2011, representing a 139.1% increase. Additionally, from March 1, 2008 through May 31, 2012, we increased backlog from $24.4 million to $102.6 million, representing a 320.3% increase.

Operating income (loss) was $(5.8) million in fiscal 2010, $6.9 million in fiscal 2011 and $0.3 million in fiscal 2012. Net income (loss) was $(6.6) million in fiscal 2010, $6.6 million in fiscal 2011 and $(0.2) million in fiscal 2012. Net income (loss) adjusted for interest and other expense, net, provision for income taxes, depreciation and amortization, and stock-based compensation expense (Adjusted EBITDA) was $(3.0) million in fiscal 2010, $9.4 million in fiscal 2011 and $2.5 million in fiscal 2012. For the three months ended May 31, 2012, operating loss was $(2.2) million, net loss was $(2.4) million and Adjusted EBITDA was $(1.4) million. For the three months ended May 31, 2011, operating loss was $(2.0) million, net loss was $(2.1) million and Adjusted EBITDA was $(1.5) million. See “Adjusted EBITDA” below for more information and for a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income (loss). Our accumulated deficit as of February 29, 2012 and May 31, 2012 was $340.6 million and $343.0 million, respectively.

Our Opportunity

The accelerating trends of supply chain globalization and outsourced manufacturing and distribution have combined to increase complexity and risk for brand owners while decreasing visibility into their expanding and evolving supply chains and distribution networks. These trends have created a fundamental shift in the way companies source and distribute goods and services. They have led to an ever more complex product and service delivery paradigm which increasingly relies on specialized, globally distributed trading partners to reduce costs.

As trading networks become more complex, companies are increasingly demanding integrated solutions that facilitate not only collaborative inventory management, but also the demand and supply forecasts, procurement systems, order management and analytics required to efficiently coordinate a company’s entire business ecosystem. We believe a significant opportunity exists to help companies improve their competitive advantage by delivering the visibility and control once characteristic of vertically integrated companies while retaining the advantages of outsourcing. The ability to navigate modern supply chain complexities and to resolve

2

problems in a timely and collaborative manner, combined with enhanced knowledge of end customer demand, is critical to enabling businesses to better match supply and demand.

Our collaborative execution solutions address an opportunity comprised of three markets that include supply chain execution software, supply chain planning software and procurement software. These three markets are forecasted by Gartner, Inc. to grow collectively at a 9.2% compound annual growth rate from $7.6 billion in 2011 to $11.7 billion in 2016. Further, Gartner, Inc. forecasts the market for supply chain management solutions offered via software-as-a-service, or SaaS, to grow at a 21.1% compound annual growth rate from $1.3 billion in 2011 to $3.4 billion in 2016.

Our Solutions

We develop, operate and market an integrated cloud-based platform that addresses supply chain management challenges by providing cross-network analytics, multi-enterprise business process management and B2B integration solutions for companies seeking visibility across and control over their trading networks. We deliver our solutions in a highly secure, cloud-based computing environment. Our customers subscribe to our on-demand SaaS solutions with multi-year contract terms that are typically three years in length.

The E2open Business Network enables integrated planning and execution across trading partner networks. Our cloud-based technology stack is purpose-built for managing trading partner networks and enables our customers and their partners to increase their revenues while reducing costs by minimizing errors and maximizing efficiency. The key characteristics of the E2open Business Network that drive customer adoption include:

• Large global business network. Our solutions have been designed for companies that either manage or participate in distributed supply chains and whose business processes require collaboration among numerous entities performing multiple interdependent activities to source, produce and fulfill demand for their products across disparate geographies.

• Demand-driven model. Our solutions enable our customers to transform their trading networks from a forecast-driven production model, where products are manufactured in anticipation of future demand, to a demand-driven fulfillment model, which is responsive to changes in actual current end-user demand or constraints in supply.

• Multi-tier functionality. Our solutions allow trading network participants to better manage processes and information relating to raw materials, products, finished goods and related services across multiple tiers—from the extended supply base, to their outsourced manufacturing partners, then on to their distribution channels and ultimately to the end customer.

• Big data analytics and business intelligence. Our solutions provide the ability to manage large amounts of data and information generated through both trading partner repositories and through the course of their interactions on our network. Our solutions offer sophisticated reporting and cross-network, real-time analytics for intelligent supply chain decision-making while providing the ability to continuously monitor information, evaluate performance, recognize disruptions and take corrective actions.

• Cloud-based platform. Unlike many companies operating legacy on-premise solutions that are difficult and costly to configure and support, our customers and their trading partners using the E2open Business Network are able to share, analyze and act on information in real time on a common platform. Our cloud-based platform enables process management and information exchange among our customers and their trading partners.

3

Enterprises can leverage our enabling expertise and services when they need to change or deploy a new process capability or add a trading partner. By creating a single, unified source of information within the trading network, we enable enterprises to operate and make decisions based on reliable and trustworthy information in real time, allowing our customers and their trading partners to improve communication, multi-enterprise process performance, and tactical and strategic decision making. Our customers use our solutions to:

• Increase sales by optimizing inventory levels;

• Achieve greater revenue assurance and customer satisfaction through timely order fulfillment;

• Reduce costs and working capital requirements through automation of operations, inventory reduction and enhanced procurement efficiency;

• Achieve faster and easier on-boarding of trading partners to our platform by utilizing each partner’s existing technological infrastructure; and

• Reduce deployment risk, streamline operations and lower maintenance costs, without a significant upfront investment in on-premise software or ongoing investments in software maintenance.

Our Strategy for Growth

Our objective is to be the leading provider of multi-enterprise, cloud-based, on-demand software enabling enterprises to more efficiently and profitably procure, manufacture, sell and distribute products through collaborative execution. The key elements of our strategy include:

• Leverage our existing network to add customers. The E2open Business Network creates a network effect by attracting the largest suppliers and customers in a particular industry vertical to establish and grow our presence. We intend to leverage our customers’ expanding ecosystems to attract new customers and convert trading partners from within our network into direct customers.

• Up-sell additional solutions to our existing customers. Once our customers begin to rely on the real-time data and visibility provided by our platform and solutions, they typically purchase additional solutions from us. We intend to continue to leverage our knowledge of and familiarity with our existing customers to deliver additional solutions to them.

• Expand into new verticals. We believe our experience with our customers in our initial target markets provides a successful model for future growth. We have found that the challenges presented by managing inventory, orders and planning are similar across many industries which makes our solutions applicable to a wide array of industry verticals. We intend to leverage our experience, expertise and proven customer success within our current key verticals to accelerate entry into and delivery of our solutions to these new vertical markets.

• Introduce new products. We will continue to expand our portfolio of solutions by leveraging our familiarity with advanced supply chains and over 32,000 of our partners in our trading network to develop new applications and introduce new products that are strategic to our customers and their trading networks.

• Expand our international presence. In 2010, we grew our sales team in Europe and we intend to hire additional sales personnel in Germany, France and the Nordic countries. In 2011, we opened an office and established a direct sales force and a sales, hosting and distribution alliance with a local

4

partner in China. We intend to make additional investments outside of the United States in order to expand our geographic reach.

• Expand our target market to include mid-market customers. Historically, we have focused our sales and marketing efforts on the largest companies within specific vertical markets. By leveraging our established trading network and cloud-based subscription model, we can now offer cost-effective, pre-packaged solutions to expand our target market to include mid-market customers.

• Make targeted, strategic acquisitions. We intend to complement our organic growth with strategic acquisitions of technologies, solutions and businesses that enhance and expand our existing offerings.

Risk Factors

Investing in our common stock involves risks and uncertainties. You should carefully read “Risk Factors” for an explanation of these risks before investing in our common stock. In particular, the following considerations, among others, may offset our competitive strengths or have a negative effect on our growth strategy, which could cause a decline in the price of our common stock and result in a loss of all or a portion of your investment:

• We have incurred operating losses in the past and may incur operating losses in the future;

• If we are unable to attract new customers or sell additional products to our existing customers, our revenue growth and profitability will be adversely affected;

• We derive a significant portion of our revenue from a relatively small number of customers, and our growth depends on our ability to retain existing customers and add new customers;

• We encounter long sales cycles, particularly with our larger customers, and seasonality in sales, which could have an adverse effect on the amount, timing and predictability of our revenue;

• Our quarterly results of operations may fluctuate. As a result, we may fail to meet or exceed the expectations of investors or securities analysts which could cause our stock price to decline;

• We operate in an emerging and evolving market, which may make it difficult to evaluate our business and future prospects. If this market does not develop or develops more slowly than we expect, our revenue may decline or fail to grow, and we may incur additional operating losses;

• Downturns in general economic and market conditions and reductions in information technology spending may reduce demand for our solutions, which could negatively affect our revenue, results of operations and cash flows;

• If we are unable to develop new products and services, sell our solutions into new markets or further penetrate our existing markets, our revenue will not grow as expected; and

• Our directors, executive officers and principal stockholders, together with their affiliates, will beneficially own, in the aggregate, approximately 35.1% of our outstanding common stock after this offering, and continue to have substantial control over us after this offering and could delay or prevent a change in corporate control.

Corporate Information

E2open, LLC commenced operations in 2000 as a venture between a number of strategic corporate investors, financial investors and advisors. In 2003, E2open, Inc. was incorporated in Delaware, and merged with

5

E2open, LLC, with E2open, Inc. becoming the surviving entity in the merger. Our principal executive offices are located at 4100 East Third Avenue, Suite 400, Foster City, California 94404, and our telephone number is (650) 645-6500. Our website address is www.e2open.com. Information contained on our website is not a part of this prospectus and the inclusion of our website address in this prospectus is an inactive textual reference only. Unless the context requires otherwise, the words “E2open,” “we,” “company,” “us” and “our” refer to E2open, Inc. and our wholly owned subsidiaries.

E2open, the E2open logo and other trademarks of E2open appearing in this prospectus are the property of E2open. Trade names and trademarks of other companies appearing in this prospectus are the property of the respective holders.

6

THE OFFERING

Common stock offered by E2open, Inc. 3,750,000 shares

Common stock offered by the selling stockholders 937,500 shares

Common stock to be outstanding after the offering 24,928,796 shares

Over-allotment option offered by the selling stockholders 703,125 shares

Use of Proceeds The net proceeds to us from this offering, after expenses, will be approximately $52.9 million after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. We will not receive any of the proceeds from the shares sold by selling stockholders. We intend to use the net proceeds from this offering for general corporate purposes, including working capital, sales and marketing activities, general and administrative matters and capital expenditures. We may also use a portion of the net proceeds for acquisitions of complementary technologies, solutions or businesses and repayment of our existing indebtedness.

Risk Factors See “Risk Factors” and the other information included in this prospectus for a discussion of factors you should carefully consider before deciding to invest in our common stock.

Proposed NASDAQ Global Market symbol “EOPN”

The number of shares of our common stock to be outstanding after the completion of this offering is based on 21,178,796 shares outstanding as of May 31, 2012, and excludes:

• 2,857,903 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options outstanding as of May 31, 2012 at a weighted average exercise price of $2.74 per share; and

• 2,730,000 shares reserved for future issuance under our 2012 Equity Compensation Plan, as well as shares originally reserved for issuance under our 2003 Stock Plan, but which may become available for awards under our 2012 Equity Compensation Plan, which plan will become effective in connection with this offering and contains provisions that will automatically increase its share reserve each year, as more fully described in “Executive Compensation—Employee Benefit Plans.”

Except for historical financial statements or as otherwise indicated, information in this prospectus reflects or assumes the following:

• a one-for-thirty-five reverse stock split of our preferred stock and common stock effected on June 29, 2012;

7

• the filing of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation immediately prior to the closing of this offering;

• the conversion of all of our outstanding convertible preferred stock into an aggregate of 14,845,528 shares of common stock immediately prior to the closing of this offering;

• no exercise after May 31, 2012 of outstanding options or warrants; and

• no exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option.

On June 29, 2012 we effected a 1-for-35 reverse stock split of our preferred stock and common stock. Upon the effectiveness of the reverse stock split, (i) every 35 shares of outstanding preferred stock and common stock was decreased to one share of preferred stock or common stock, as applicable, (ii) the number of shares of common stock into which each outstanding option to purchase common stock is exercisable was proportionally decreased on a 1-for-35 basis and (iii) the exercise price of each outstanding option to purchase common stock was proportionately increased on a 1-for-35 basis. All of the share numbers, share prices and exercise prices have been adjusted within the registration statement to which this prospectus relates, on a retroactive basis, to reflect this 1-for-35 reverse stock split.

8

SUMMARY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

We have derived the summary consolidated financial data for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012 from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. We have derived the summary consolidated financial data for the three months ended May 31, 2011 and 2012 and as of May 31, 2012 from our unaudited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of our future results. The following summary consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.

	Year Ended February 28 or 29,									Three Months Ended
	2010			2011			2012			May 31, 2011			May 31, 2012
	(In thousands, except per share data)
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
Revenue
Subscriptions and support	$	29,976		$	39,419		$	35,816		$	8,053		$	9,814
Professional services		14,401			16,104			23,871			3,194			5,659
Total revenue		44,377			55,523			59,687			11,247			15,473
Cost of revenue
Subscriptions and support		9,269			7,531			7,514			1,787			2,039
Professional services		11,493			11,774			14,116			3,333			3,653
Total cost of revenue		20,762			19,305			21,630			5,120			5,692
Gross profit
Subscriptions and support		20,707			31,888			28,302			6,266			7,775
Professional services		2,908			4,330			9,755			(139	)		2,006
Total gross profit		23,615			36,218			38,057			6,127			9,781
Operating expenses:
Research and development		13,077			11,463			13,240			3,110			4,092
Sales and marketing		11,421			12,756			18,590			3,730			6,147
General and administrative		4,884			5,064			5,963			1,307			1,782
Total operating expenses		29,382			29,283			37,793			8,147			12,021
Income (loss) from operations		(5,767	)		6,935			264			(2,020	)		(2,240	)
Interest and other expense, net		(532	)		(259	)		(411	)		(86	)		(95	)
Income (loss) before income taxes		(6,299	)		6,676			(147	)		(2,106	)		(2,335	)
Provision for income taxes		(349	)		(33	)		(78	)		(31	)		(43	)
Net income (loss)		(6,648	)		6,643			(225	)		(2,137	)		(2,378	)
Undistributed earnings allocated to preferred stockholders		—			(6,643	)		—			—			—
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders	$	(6,648	)	$	—		$	(225	)	$	(2,137	)	$	(2,378	)
Net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders:
Basic	$	(1.58	)	$	—		$	(0.04	)	$	(0.37	)	$	(0.38	)
Diluted	$	(1.58	)	$	—		$	(0.04	)	$	(0.37	)	$	(0.38	)
Weighted average shares used to compute income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders:
Basic		4,210			5,788			5,918			5,798			6,190
Diluted		4,210			5,788			5,918			5,798			6,190
Pro forma net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders(1)
Basic							$	(0.01	)				$	(0.11	)
Diluted							$	(0.01	)				$	(0.11	)
Pro forma weighted average shares used to compute pro forma net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders:
Basic								20,689						21,036
Diluted								20,689						21,036

9

	Year Ended February 28 or 29,									Three Months Ended
	2010			2011			2012			May 31, 2011			May 31, 2012
	(In thousands, except per share data)
Other Financial and Operational Data:
Adjusted EBITDA (2)	$	(2,999	)	$	9,371		$	2,517		$	(1,490	)	$	(1,352	)
Free cash flow (3)	$	(5,325	)	$	(697	)	$	(2,495	)	$	(266	)	$	(1,477	)
Number of unique registered trading partners (at period end) (4)		22,529			26,440			30,772			27,364			32,390
Number of unique registered users (at period end) (4)		62,528			73,377			88,012			77,311			94,708

(1) Pro forma net income (loss) per share has been calculated assuming the conversion of all outstanding shares of our preferred stock into 14,845,528 shares of common stock prior to the completion of this offering.

(2) We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) adjusted for interest and other expense, net, provision for income taxes, depreciation and amortization, and stock-based compensation expense. Please see “Adjusted EBITDA” below for more information and for a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income (loss), the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP.

(3) We define free cash flow as net cash provided by (used in) operating activities less capital expenditures. Please see “Free Cash Flow” below for more information and for a reconciliation of free cash flow to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities, the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP.

(4) We define unique registered trading partners and unique registered users as entities and individuals, respectively, that are connected to our network as of the balance sheet date. We view the number of unique registered trading partners and unique registered users as key indicators of the reach of our network and the value our enterprise customers are deriving from our solutions.

Stock-based compensation included in the consolidated statements of operations data above was as follows:

	Year Ended February 28 or 29,						Three Months Ended May 31,
	2010		2011		2012		2011		2012
	(In thousands)
Cost of revenue	$	106	$	223	$	203	$	51	$	121
Research and development		82		108		84		23		53
Sales and marketing		155		154		259		43		145
General and administrative		102		92		181		27		160
Total stock-based compensation	$	445	$	577	$	727	$	144	$	479

The following table sets forth our summary consolidated balance sheet data as of May 31, 2012:

• on an actual basis;

• on a pro forma basis to reflect the conversion of all outstanding shares of our convertible preferred stock into 14,845,528 shares of our common stock, which will occur immediately prior to the closing of this offering and the filing of our post-offering amended and restated certificate of incorporation, which will occur immediately prior to the closing of this offering; and

• on a pro forma as adjusted basis to reflect the pro forma adjustments described above and our receipt of the net proceeds from our sale of 3,750,000 shares of common stock in this offering at an assumed initial public offering price of $16.00 per share, the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.

10

	As of May 31, 2012
	Actual			Pro forma			Pro forma as adjusted  (1)
	(In thousands)
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	10,092		$	10,092		$	63,856
Property and equipment, net		2,629			2,629			2,629
Working capital, excluding deferred revenue		5,440			5,440			58,335
Total assets		29,662			29,662			81,447
Convertible preferred stock		84,191			—			—
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)		(34,499	)		(34,499	)		18,395

⁽¹⁾  A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price of $16.00 per share, the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, would increase (decrease) cash and cash equivalents and each of working capital, excluding deferred revenue, total assets and total stockholders’ deficit by $3.5 million, assuming that the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same, and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. Each increase (decrease) of 1.0 million shares in the number of shares offered by us would increase (decrease) cash and cash equivalents and each of working capital, excluding deferred revenue, total assets and total stockholders’ deficit by $14.9 million. The pro forma as adjusted information discussed above is illustrative only and will be adjusted based on the actual public offering price and other terms of this offering determined at pricing.

Key Financial Performance Metrics

We monitor the key financial metrics set forth below as well as revenue, gross profit, gross margin, cash and cash equivalents, and available debt capacity, which are discussed in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” to help us evaluate trends, establish budgets, measure the effectiveness of our sales and marketing efforts and assess operational effectiveness and efficiencies.

Adjusted EBITDA

We have included Adjusted EBITDA in this prospectus because it is a key measure used by our management and board of directors to understand and evaluate our core operating performance and trends, to prepare and approve our annual budget and to develop short- and long-term operational plans.

Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net income (loss) adjusted for interest and other expense, net, provision for income taxes, depreciation and amortization, and stock-based compensation expense. Management believes that the use of Adjusted EBITDA provides consistency and comparability with our past financial performance, facilitates period to period comparisons of results of operations, and also facilitates comparisons with other peer companies, many of which use similar non-GAAP financial measures to supplement their GAAP results.

Management believes that it is useful to exclude certain non-cash charges, such as depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation, and non-core operational charges, such as interest and other expense, net from Adjusted EBITDA because (1) the amount of such expenses in any specific period may not directly correlate to the underlying performance of our business operations and (2) such expenses can vary significantly between periods as a result of the timing of new stock-based awards, acquisitions or restructurings, as the case may be.

Our use of Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider it in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are:

11

• Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;

• Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect the potentially dilutive impact of equity-based compensation;

• Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect tax payments that may represent a reduction in cash available to us;

• Although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized may have to be replaced in the future, and Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect the future need to augment or replace such assets; and

• Other companies, including companies in our industry, may calculate Adjusted EBITDA differently, which reduces its usefulness as a comparative measure.

Because of these limitations, you should consider Adjusted EBITDA alongside other financial performance measures, including various cash flow metrics, net income (loss) and our other GAAP results. The following table presents a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income (loss) for each of the periods indicated:

	Year Ended February 28 or 29,								Three Months Ended May  31,
	2010			2011		2012			2011			2012
	(In thousands)
Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA:
Net income (loss)	$	(6,648	)	$	6,643	$	(225	)	$	(2,137	)	$	(2,378	)
Interest and other expense, net		532			259		411			86			95
Provision for income taxes		349			33		78			31			43
Depreciation and amortization		2,323			1,859		1,526			386			409
Stock-based compensation		445			577		727			144			479
Adjusted EBITDA	$	(2,999	)	$	9,371	$	2,517		$	(1,490	)	$	(1,352	)

Free Cash Flow

Free cash flow is a key measure used in our internal operating reports and allows us to manage the cash available to fund our debt obligations and potential strategic initiatives. Management believes that free cash flow is useful to investors as a supplemental measure to evaluate our business over time.

Free cash flow is defined as net cash provided by (used in) operating activities less capital expenditures. Capital expenditures consist of purchases of property, equipment and software. Management believes that the use of free cash flow provides consistency and comparability with our past financial performance, facilitates period-to-period comparisons of operating performance and also facilitates comparisons with other peer companies, many of which use similar non-GAAP financial measures to supplement their GAAP results.

12

Free cash flow should not be considered a substitute for other measures of financial performance reported in accordance with GAAP. There are limitations to using non-GAAP financial measures, including that other companies may calculate these measures differently than we do. Management compensates for the inherent limitations associated with measuring free cash flow through disclosure of such limitations, presentation of our financial statements in accordance with GAAP and reconciliation of free cash flow to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, net cash provided by (used in) operating activities. A reconciliation of net cash provided by (used in) operating activities to free cash flow is presented below:

	Year Ended February 28 or 29,									Three Months Ended May 31,
	2010			2011			2012			2011			2012
	(In thousands)
Free Cash Flow Data:
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	(4,401	)	$	88		$	(826	)	$	(78	)	$	(823	)
Capital expenditures		(924	)		(785	)		(1,669	)		(188	)		(654	)
Free cash flow	$	(5,325	)	$	(697	)	$	(2,495	)	$	(266	)	$	(1,477	)

13

RISK FACTORS

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should consider carefully the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information in this prospectus, including our financial statements and related notes, before deciding whether to purchase shares of our common stock. If any of the following risks is realized, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects could be materially and adversely affected. In that event, the price of our common stock could decline, and you could lose part or all of your investment.

Risks Related to Our Business and Industry

We have incurred operating losses in the past and may incur operating losses in the future.

We began our operations in 2000. Throughout most of our history, we have experienced net losses and negative cash flows from operations. As of February 29, 2012 and May 31, 2012, we had an accumulated deficit of $340.6 million and $343.0 million, respectively. We expect our operating expenses to increase in the future as we expand our operations. Furthermore, as a public company, we will incur legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company. If our revenue does not grow to offset these increased expenses, we will not be profitable. We cannot assure you that we will be able to achieve or maintain profitability. You should not consider recent revenue growth as indicative of our future performance.

If we are unable to attract new customers or sell additional products to our existing customers, our revenue growth and profitability will be adversely affected.

To increase our revenue and achieve and maintain profitability, we must regularly add new customers or sell additional solutions to our existing customers, which we plan to do. Numerous factors, however, may impede our ability to add new customers and sell additional solutions to our existing customers, including our inability to convert companies that have been referred to us by our existing network into paying customers, failure to attract and effectively train new sales and marketing personnel, failure to retain and motivate our current sales and marketing personnel, failure to develop relationships with resellers or failure to ensure the effectiveness of our marketing programs. In addition, if prospective customers do not perceive our solutions to be of sufficiently high value and quality, we will not be able to attract the number and types of new customers that we are seeking.

We derive a significant portion of our revenue from a relatively small number of customers, and our growth depends on our ability to retain existing customers and add new customers.

We derive a significant percentage of our revenue from a relatively small number of customers, and the loss of any one or more of those customers for any reason, including without limitation, early termination of our contract with them could decrease our revenue and harm our current and future results of operations. For example, RIM may terminate its agreement with us upon 90 days written notice. For the year ended February 29, 2012, our top ten customers accounted for 72.9% of our total revenue, and two customers each accounted for at least 10% of our total revenue; RIM accounted for 16.8% of our total revenue and Vodafone accounted for 14.8% of our total revenue. For the three months ended May 31, 2012, our top ten customers accounted for 69.5% of our total revenue, and three customers each accounted for at least 10% of our total revenue; RIM, Exostar and Vodafone accounted for 13.2%, 11.1% and 10.8% of our total revenue, respectively. Although our largest customers may vary from period to period, we anticipate that we will continue to depend on revenue from a relatively small number of customers.

14

We encounter long sales cycles, particularly with our larger customers, and seasonality in sales, which could have an adverse effect on the amount, timing and predictability of our revenue.

Our products have lengthy sales cycles, which typically extend from four to 12 months and may in some instances take longer than one year. Potential and existing customers, particularly larger enterprises, often commit significant resources to an evaluation of available solutions and services and require us to expend substantial time and resources in connection with our sales efforts. The length of our sales cycles also varies depending on the type of customer to which we are selling, the product being sold and customer requirements. We may incur substantial sales and marketing expenses and expend significant management effort during this time, regardless of whether we make a sale. Many of the risks relating to sales processes are beyond our control, including:

• Our customers’ budgetary and scheduling constraints;

• The timing of our customers’ budget cycles and approval processes;

• Our customers’ willingness to augment or replace their currently deployed software products; and

• General economic conditions.

As a result of the lengthy and uncertain sales cycles of our products and services, it is difficult for us to predict when customers may purchase products or services from us, thereby affecting when we can recognize the associated revenue, and our results of operations may vary significantly and may be adversely affected. The length of our sales cycle makes us susceptible to having pending transactions delayed or terminated by our customers if they decide to delay or withdraw funding for information technology, or IT, projects. Our customers may decide to delay or withdraw funding for IT projects for various reasons, including global economic cycles and capital market fluctuations.

In addition, we may experience seasonality in the sales of our solutions. For instance, historically, the agreements we have signed in our fiscal first quarter have had an aggregate value less than that of the agreements signed in our preceding fiscal fourth quarter. Seasonal variations in our sales may lead to significant fluctuations in our cash flows and deferred revenue on a quarterly basis. If we experience a delay in signing or a failure to sign a significant customer agreement in any particular quarter, then our results of operations for such quarter and for subsequent quarters may be below the expectations of securities analysts or investors, which may result in a decline in our stock price.

Our quarterly results of operations may fluctuate. As a result, we may fail to meet or exceed the expectations of investors or securities analysts which could cause our stock price to decline.

Our quarterly revenue and results of operations may fluctuate as a result of a variety of factors, many of which are outside of our control. If our quarterly revenue or results of operations fall below the expectations of investors or securities analysts, the price of our common stock could decline substantially. Fluctuations in our results of operations may be due to a number of factors, including, but not limited to, those listed below:

• Demand for and market acceptance of our products;

• Our ability to retain and increase sales to customers and attract new customers;

• The timing of product deployment which determines when we can recognize the associated revenue;

• The timing and success of introductions of new solutions or upgrades by us or our competitors;

15

• The strength of the economy;

• Changes in our pricing policies or those of our competitors;

• Competition, including entry into the industry by new competitors and new offerings by existing competitors;

• The impact of seasonality on our business;

• The amount and timing of expenditures related to expanding our operations, research and development or introducing new solutions; and

• Changes in the payment terms for our solutions.

Due to the foregoing factors, and the other risks discussed in this prospectus, you should not rely on quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our results of operations as an indication of our future performance.

We operate in an emerging and evolving market, which may make it difficult to evaluate our business and future prospects. If this market does not develop or develops more slowly than we expect, our revenue may decline or fail to grow, and we may incur additional operating losses.

The market for trading network solutions, including our integrated platform, is in an early stage of development, and it is uncertain how rapidly this market will develop, and even if it does develop, whether our software and solutions will achieve and sustain high levels of demand and market acceptance. In addition, we sell our solutions as an on-demand, SaaS solution, which is an alternative to the traditional licensed hardware and software solutions, and solutions developed in-house to which many of our customers or potential customers are accustomed. Our software relies on the acceptance and proliferation of cloud computing, which may not be widespread or happen in a timely fashion.

Some companies may be reluctant or unwilling to use our solutions for a number of reasons, including existing investments in demand and supply network management technology. For example, supply chain management functions traditionally have been performed using purchased or licensed hardware and software implemented by each company in the supply chain. Because this traditional approach often requires significant initial investments to purchase the necessary technology and to establish systems that comply with customers’ unique requirements, suppliers may be unwilling to abandon their current options for our integrated, multi-enterprise solution.

Other factors that may limit market acceptance of our solutions include:

• Our ability to maintain high levels of customer satisfaction;

• Our ability to maintain availability of service across all users of our products;

• The price, performance and availability of competing products;

• Our ability to address confidentiality concerns about information stored outside of our customers’ controlled computing environments; and

• Concerns about data protection and confidentiality of data stored in the United States, for customers with headquarters outside of the United States.

If companies do not perceive or value the benefits of our solutions, or if companies are unwilling to accept our platform as an alternative to the traditional approach, the market for our products might not continue

16

to develop or might develop more slowly than we expect, either of which would significantly adversely affect our revenue and growth prospects.

Downturns in general economic and market conditions and reductions in IT spending may reduce demand for our solutions, which could negatively affect our revenue, results of operations and cash flows.

Our revenue, results of operations and cash flows depend on the overall demand for our solutions. Concerns about the systemic impact of a potential widespread recession, energy costs, geopolitical issues, the availability and cost of credit and the global housing and mortgage markets have contributed to increased market volatility, decreased consumer confidence and diminished growth expectations in the U.S. economy and abroad. This in turn has resulted in reductions in IT spending by some of our customers.

Further worsening, broadening or protracted extension of the economic downturn could have a significant negative impact on our business, revenue, results of operations and cash flows. Prolonged economic slowdowns may result in customers requiring us to renegotiate existing contracts on less advantageous terms to us than those currently in place or defaulting on payments due on existing contracts.

Furthermore, during weak economic times, there is an increased risk that one or more of our customers will file for bankruptcy protection, which may adversely affect our revenue, profitability and results of operations. If a customer files for bankruptcy, we may be required to forego collection of pre-petition amounts owed and to repay amounts remitted to us during the 90-day preference period preceding the filing, which may be significant due to extended payment terms for software contract fees, and significant billings for professional services on large projects. We also face risk from international customers that file for bankruptcy protection in foreign jurisdictions, in that the outcome of the application of foreign bankruptcy laws may be more difficult to predict. In addition, we may determine that the cost of pursuing any claim may outweigh the recovery potential of such claim.

If we are unable to develop new products and services, sell our solutions into new markets or further penetrate our existing markets, our revenue will not grow as expected.

Our ability to attract new customers and increase revenue from existing customers will depend in large part on our ability to enhance and improve our solutions, to introduce new products and services in a timely manner, to sell into new markets and to further penetrate our existing markets. The success of any enhancement or new product or service depends on several factors, including the timely completion, introduction and market acceptance of the enhancement or new product or service. Any new product or service we develop or acquire may not be introduced in a timely or cost-effective manner and may not achieve the broad market acceptance necessary to generate significant revenue. Any new markets into which we attempt to sell our solutions, including new vertical markets and new countries or regions, may not be receptive. If we are unable to successfully develop or acquire new products or services, enhance our existing products or services to meet customer requirements, sell products and services into new markets or sell our products and services to additional customers in our existing markets, our revenue will not grow as expected. Moreover, we are frequently required to enhance and update our products and services as a result of changing standards and technological developments, which makes it difficult to recover the cost of development and forces us to continually qualify new products with our customers.

If we do not maintain the compatibility of our solutions with third-party applications that our customers use in their business processes, demand for our solutions could decline.

Our solutions can be used alongside a wide range of other systems, such as enterprise software systems and business software applications used by our customers in their businesses. If we do not support the continued integration of our solutions with third-party applications, including through the provision of application programming interfaces that enable data to be transferred readily between our solutions and third-party applications, demand for our solutions could decline, and we could lose sales. We will also be required to make

17

our solutions compatible with new or additional third-party applications that are introduced into the markets that we serve. We may not be successful in making our solutions compatible with these third-party applications, which could reduce demand for our solutions. In addition, prospective customers, especially large enterprise customers, may require heavily customized features and functions unique to their business processes. If prospective customers require customized features or functions that we do not offer, then the market for our solutions will be adversely affected.

Our inability to adapt to rapid technological change could impair our ability to remain competitive.

The industry in which we compete is characterized by rapid technological change, frequent introductions of new products and evolving industry standards. Our ability to attract new customers and increase revenue from customers will depend in significant part on our ability to anticipate industry standards and to continue to enhance existing solutions or introduce or acquire new solutions on a timely basis to keep pace with technological developments. The success of any enhancement or new solution depends on several factors, including the timely completion and market acceptance of the enhancement or new solution. Any new solution we develop or acquire might not be introduced in a timely or cost-effective manner and might not achieve the broad market acceptance necessary to generate significant revenue. If any of our competitors implements new technologies before we are able to implement them, those competitors may be able to provide more effective solutions than ours at lower prices. Any delay or failure in the introduction of new or enhanced solutions could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our solutions are complex and customers may experience difficulty in implementing or upgrading our products successfully or otherwise achieving the benefits attributable to our products.

Due to the scope and complexity of the solutions that we provide, our implementation cycle can be lengthy and unpredictable. Our products may require modification or customization and must integrate with many existing computer systems and software programs of our customers and their trading partners. This can be time-consuming and expensive for our customers and can result in delays in the implementation and deployment of our products. As a result, some customers have had, and may in the future have, difficulty implementing our products successfully or otherwise achieving the expected benefits of our products. Delayed or ineffective implementation or upgrades of our software may limit our future sales opportunities, impact revenue, result in customer dissatisfaction and harm our reputation.

The markets in which we participate are highly competitive, and our failure to compete successfully would make it difficult for us to add and retain customers and would reduce or impede the growth of our business.

The markets for supply chain management solutions are increasingly competitive and global. We expect competition to increase in the future both from existing competitors and new companies that may enter our markets. Increased competition could result in pricing pressure, reduced sales, lower margins or the failure of our solutions to achieve or maintain broad market acceptance. We currently face, or may face in the future, competition from:

• SaaS providers that deliver B2B information systems;

• Traditional on-premise software providers; and

• Managed service providers that combine traditional on-premise software with professional information technology services.

To remain competitive, we will need to invest continuously in software development, marketing, customer service and support and product delivery infrastructure. However, we cannot assure you that new or established competitors will not offer solutions that are superior to or lower in price than ours. We may not have

18

sufficient resources to continue the investments in all areas of software development and marketing needed to maintain our competitive position. In addition, some of our competitors have longer operating histories, greater name recognition, larger customer bases and significantly greater financial, technical, sales, marketing and other resources than us, which may provide them with an advantage in developing, marketing or servicing new solutions. Increased competition could reduce our market share, revenue and operating margins, increase our operating costs and otherwise adversely affect our business.

If we are unable to manage our diverse and complex operations, our reputation in the market and our ability to generate revenue from new or existing customers may be adversely affected.

Because our operations are geographically diverse and complex, our personnel resources and infrastructure could become strained and our reputation in the market and our ability to successfully implement our business plan may be adversely affected. We have experienced a period of rapid growth in our headcount and operations. From February 28, 2011 to February 29, 2012, our employee headcount grew from 273 to 332. During the three months ended May 31, 2012, our employee headcount grew from 332 to 351. The growth in the size, complexity and diverse nature of our business and the expansion of our product lines and customer base have placed increased demands on our management and operations, and further growth, if any, may place additional strains on our resources in the future. Our ability to effectively compete and to manage our planned future growth will depend on, among other things, the following:

• Maintaining continuity in our senior management and key personnel;

• Increasing the productivity of our existing employees;

• Attracting, retaining, training and motivating our employees, particularly our technical and management personnel;

• Deploying our solutions using third-party systems integrators, which will require changes to our applications, documentation and operational processes;

• Improving our operational, financial and management controls; and

• Improving our information reporting systems and procedures.

If we do not manage the size, complexity and diverse nature of our business effectively, we could experience delayed software releases and longer response times for assisting our customers with implementation of our products and services, and could lack adequate resources to support our customers on an ongoing basis, any of which could adversely affect our reputation in the market, our ability to successfully implement our business plan and our ability to generate revenue from new or existing customers.

If we fail to retain our key employees, our business would be harmed and we might not be able to implement our business plan successfully.

Given the complex nature of the technology on which our business is based and the speed with which such technology advances, our future success is dependent, in large part, upon our ability to attract and retain highly qualified managerial, technical and sales personnel. In particular, Mark E. Woodward, our Chief Executive Officer, is critical to the management of our business and operations. Competition for talented personnel is intense, and we cannot be certain that we can retain our managerial, technical and sales personnel or that we can attract, assimilate or retain such personnel in the future. Our inability to attract and retain such personnel could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

19

Our growth is dependent upon the continued development of our direct sales force.

We believe that our future growth will depend on the continued development of our direct sales force and their ability to obtain new customers, particularly large enterprise customers, and to manage our existing customer base. Our ability to achieve significant growth in revenue in the future will depend, in large part, on our success in recruiting, training and retaining a sufficient number of direct sales personnel. New sales personnel require significant training and may, in some cases, take more than a year before becoming productive, if at all. If we are unable to hire and develop sufficient numbers of productive direct sales personnel, sales of our software and services will suffer and our growth will be impeded.

If we experience significant fluctuations in our rate of anticipated growth and fail to balance our expenses with our revenue forecasts, our results could be harmed.

Due to our evolving business model and the unpredictability of future general economic and financial market conditions, we may not be able to accurately forecast our rate of growth. We plan our expense levels and investment on estimates of future revenue and future anticipated rate of growth. We may not be able to adjust our spending quickly enough if the addition of new subscriptions or the renewal rate for existing subscriptions falls short of our expectations. As a result, we expect that our revenues, operating results and cash flows may fluctuate significantly on a quarterly basis. We believe that period to period comparisons of our revenues, operating results and cash flows may not be meaningful and should not be relied upon as an indication of future performance.

Interruptions or delays in the services provided by third-party data centers and/or internet service providers could impair the delivery of our solutions and our business could suffer.

We host our solutions in Equinix co-location facilities in Sunnyvale and San Jose, California and a suburb of Chicago, Illinois. Exostar hosts our solutions for the aerospace and defense industry in third party data centers and with third-party internet service providers outside of Washington, D.C. All of our solutions reside on hardware owned or leased and operated by us and Exostar in these locations. Our operations depend on the protection of the equipment and information we store in these third-party data centers and which third-party internet service providers transmit against damage or service interruptions that may be caused by fire, flood, severe storm, earthquake, power loss, telecommunications failures, unauthorized intrusion, computer viruses and disabling devices, natural disasters, war, criminal act, military action, terrorist attack and other similar events beyond our control. A prolonged service disruption affecting our solutions for any of the foregoing reasons could damage our reputation with current and potential customers, expose us to liability, cause us to lose customers from whom we receive recurring revenue or otherwise adversely affect our business. We may also incur significant costs for using alternative equipment or taking other actions in preparation for, or in reaction to, events that damage the data centers we use.

Our solutions are accessed by a large number of customers often at the same time. As we continue to expand the number of our customers and solutions available to our customers, we may not be able to scale our technology to accommodate the increased capacity requirements, which may result in interruptions or delays in service. In addition, the failure of our third-party data centers or third-party internet service providers to meet our capacity requirements could result in interruptions or delays in access to our solutions or impede our ability to scale our operations. In the event that our data center or third-party internet service provider arrangements are terminated, or there is a lapse of service, interruption of internet service provider connectivity, or damage to such facilities, we could experience interruptions in access to our solutions as well as delays and additional expense in arranging new facilities and services.

We may experience service failures or interruptions due to defects in the software, infrastructure, third-party components or processes that comprise our existing or new solutions, any of which could adversely affect our business.

Our products may contain undetected defects in the software, infrastructure, third-party components or processes that are part of the solutions we provide. If these defects lead to service failures after introduction of a

20

solution or an upgrade to the solution, we could experience delays or lost revenue during the period required to correct the cause of the defects. We cannot be certain that defects will not be found in new solutions or upgraded solutions, resulting in loss of, or delay in, market acceptance, which could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Because customers use our solutions for critical business processes, any defect in our solutions, any disruption to our solutions or any error in execution could cause recurring revenue customers to cancel their contracts with us, prevent potential customers from purchasing our solutions and harm our reputation. Although our contracts with our customers limit our liability to our customers for these defects, disruptions or errors, we nonetheless could be subject to litigation for actual or alleged losses to our customers’ businesses, which may require us to spend significant time and money in litigation or arbitration or to pay significant settlements or damages. We do not currently maintain any warranty reserves. Defending a lawsuit, regardless of its merit, could be costly and divert management’s attention and could cause our business to suffer.

The insurers under our existing liability insurance policy could deny coverage of a future claim that results from an error or defect in our technology or a resulting disruption in our solutions, or our existing liability insurance might not be adequate to cover all of the damages and other costs of such a claim. Moreover, we cannot assure you that our current liability insurance coverage will continue to be available to us on acceptable terms or at all. The successful assertion against us of one or more large claims that exceeds our insurance coverage, or the occurrence of changes in our liability insurance policy, including an increase in premiums or imposition of large deductible or co-insurance requirements, could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Even if we succeed in litigation with respect to a claim, we are likely to incur substantial costs and our management’s attention will be diverted from our operations.

We may be required to defer recognition of some of our revenue, which may adversely affect our financial results in any given period.

We may be required to defer recognition of revenue for a significant period of time after entering into an agreement due to a variety of factors, including whether:

• The transaction involves both current on-demand software solutions and on-demand software solutions that are under development;

• The customer requires significant modifications, configurations or complex interfaces that could delay delivery or acceptance of our solutions;

• The transaction involves extended payment terms;

• The transaction involves acceptance criteria or other terms that may delay revenue recognition; or

• The transaction involves performance milestones or payment terms that depend upon contingencies.

Because of these factors and other specific revenue recognition requirements under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or GAAP, we must have very precise terms in our contracts in order to recognize revenue when we initially provide access to our software solutions or perform services. Although we strive to enter into agreements that meet the criteria under GAAP for current revenue recognition on delivered elements, our agreements are often subject to negotiation and revision based on the demands of our customers. The final terms of our agreements sometimes result in deferred revenue recognition well after the time of delivery, which may adversely affect our financial results in any given period. In addition, because of prevailing economic conditions, more customers may require extended payment terms, shorter term contracts or alternative licensing arrangements that could reduce the amount of revenue we recognize upon delivery of our solutions and could adversely affect our short-term profitability.

21

Furthermore, the presentation of our financial results requires us to make estimates and assumptions that may affect revenue recognition. In some instances, we could reasonably use different estimates and assumptions, and changes in estimates are likely to occur from period to period. Accordingly, actual results could differ significantly from our estimates.

If we are unable to substantially utilize our net operating loss carryforward, our financial results will be adversely affected.

As of February 29, 2012, our net operating loss, or NOL, carryforward amounts for U.S. federal income and state tax purposes were approximately $316.5 million and $118.3 million, respectively. Under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, a corporation that undergoes an “ownership change” may be subject to limitations on its ability to utilize its pre-change NOLs to offset future taxable income. In general, an ownership change occurs if the aggregate stock ownership of certain stockholders (generally 5% stockholders, applying certain look-through and aggregation rules) increases by more than 50% over such stockholders’ lowest percentage ownership during the testing period (generally three years). We believe that there was an ownership change in a prior year, which resulted in an annual NOL limitation. In addition, purchases of our common stock in amounts greater than specified levels, which will be beyond our control, could create an additional limitation on our ability to utilize our NOLs for tax purposes in the future. Limitations imposed on our ability to utilize NOLs could cause U.S. federal and state income taxes to be paid earlier than would be paid if such limitations were not in effect and could cause such NOLs to expire unused, in each case reducing or eliminating the benefit of such NOLs. Furthermore, we may not be able to generate sufficient taxable income to utilize our NOLs before they expire. If any of these events occur, we may not derive some or all of the expected benefits from our NOLs. In addition, at the state level there may be periods during which the use of NOLs is suspended or otherwise limited, which would accelerate or may permanently increase state taxes owed.

A failure to protect the integrity and security of our customers’ information could expose us to litigation, materially damage our reputation and harm our business. Furthermore, the unanticipated costs of protecting against such a failure could adversely affect our results of operations.

Our business involves the collection and use of confidential information of our customers and their trading partners. We cannot assure you that our efforts to protect this confidential information will be successful. If any compromise of this information security were to occur, we could be subject to legal claims and government action, experience an adverse effect on our reputation and need to incur significant additional costs to protect against similar information security breaches in the future, each of which could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects. In addition, because of the critical nature of data security, any perceived breach of our security measures could cause existing or potential customers not to use our solutions and could harm our reputation.

Evolving regulation of the Internet may increase our expenditures related to compliance efforts, which may adversely affect our financial condition.

As Internet commerce continues to evolve, increasing regulation by federal, state or foreign agencies becomes more likely. We are particularly sensitive to these risks because the Internet and cloud computing are critical components of our business model. For example, we believe that increased regulation is likely in the area of data privacy on the Internet, and laws and regulations applying to the solicitation, collection, processing or use of personal or consumer information could affect our customers’ ability to use and share data, potentially reducing demand for solutions accessed via the Internet and restricting our ability to store, process and share data with our clients via the Internet. In addition, taxation of services provided over the Internet or other charges imposed by government agencies or by private organizations for accessing the Internet may be imposed. Any regulation imposing greater fees for Internet use or restricting information exchange over the Internet could result in a decline in the use of the Internet and the viability of Internet-based services, which could harm our business.

22

If we fail to protect our intellectual property and proprietary rights adequately, our business could be adversely affected.

We believe that proprietary technology is essential to establishing and maintaining our leadership position. We seek to protect our intellectual property through trade secrets, copyrights, confidentiality, non-compete and nondisclosure agreements, patents, trademarks, domain names and other measures, some of which afford only limited protection. We also rely on patent, trademark, trade secret and copyright laws to protect our intellectual property. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of our technology or to obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary. We cannot assure you that our means of protecting our proprietary rights will be adequate or that our competitors will not independently develop similar or superior technology or design around our intellectual property. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect our proprietary rights to as great an extent as the laws of the United States. Intellectual property protections may also be unavailable, limited or difficult to enforce in some countries, which could make it easier for competitors to capture market share. Our failure to adequately protect our intellectual property and proprietary rights could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

An assertion by a third party that we are infringing its intellectual property could subject us to costly and time-consuming litigation or expensive licenses which could harm our business.

The industries in which we compete are characterized by the existence of a large number of patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secrets and by frequent litigation based on allegations of infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights. As we seek to extend our solutions, we could be constrained by the intellectual property rights of others. In addition, our customer contracts require us to indemnify our customers against certain liabilities they may incur as a result of our infringement of any third-party intellectual property.

We might not prevail in any intellectual property infringement litigation given the complex technical issues and inherent uncertainties in such litigation. Defending such claims, regardless of their merit, could be time-consuming and distracting to management, result in costly litigation or settlement, cause development delays or require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements. Furthermore, if our solutions exceed the scope of in-bound licenses or violate any third-party proprietary rights, we could be required to withdraw those solutions from the market, re-develop those solutions or seek to obtain licenses from third parties, which might not be available on reasonable terms or at all. Any efforts to re-develop our solutions, obtain licenses from third parties on favorable terms or license a substitute technology might not be successful and, in any case, might substantially increase our costs and harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. If we were compelled to withdraw any of our solutions from the market, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be harmed.

The use of open source software in our products may expose us to additional risks and harm our intellectual property.

We incorporate open source software into our platform. Given the nature of open source software, third parties might assert copyright and other intellectual property infringement claims against us based on our use of certain open source software programs. The terms of many open source licenses to which we are subject have not been interpreted by U.S. or foreign courts, and there is a risk that those licenses could be construed in a manner that imposes unanticipated conditions or restrictions on our ability to commercialize our solutions. In that event, we could be required to seek licenses from third parties in order to continue offering our solutions, to re-develop our solutions, to discontinue sales of our solutions or to release our proprietary software code under the terms of an open source license, any of which could adversely affect our business.

Some of our products use or incorporate software that is subject to one or more open source licenses. Open source software is typically freely accessible, usable and modifiable. Certain open source software licenses

23

require a user who intends to distribute the open source software as a component of the user’s software to disclose publicly part or all of the source code to the user’s software. In addition, certain open source software licenses require the user of such software to make any derivative works of the open source code available to others on unfavorable terms or at no cost. This can subject previously proprietary software to open source license terms.

While we monitor the use of all open source software in our products, processes and technology and try to ensure that no open source software is used in such a way as to require us to disclose the source code to the related product or solution when we do not wish to do so, such use may have inadvertently occurred in deploying our proprietary solutions. Additionally, if a third-party software provider has incorporated certain types of open source software into software we license from such third party for our products and solutions, we could, under certain circumstances, be required to disclose the source code to our products and solutions. This could harm our intellectual property position and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our strategy includes pursuing acquisitions and our potential inability to successfully integrate newly-acquired companies or businesses may adversely affect our financial results.

We believe part of our growth will be driven by acquisitions of other companies or their businesses. Any acquisitions we complete will give rise to risks, including:

• Incurring significantly higher than anticipated capital expenditures and operating expenses;

• Failing to assimilate the operations and personnel or failing to retain the key personnel of the acquired company or business;

• Failing to integrate the acquired technologies, or incurring significant expense to integrate acquired technologies into our solutions;

• Disrupting our ongoing business;

• Incurring significant accounting charges;

• Dissipating our management resources;

• Failing to maintain uniform standards, controls and policies;

• Impairing relationships with employees and customers as a result of changes in management;

• Finding that the acquired company, asset or technology does not further our business strategy, that we overpaid for the company, asset or technology or that we may be required to write off acquired assets or investments partially or entirely;

• Not realizing the expected synergies of the transaction;

• Facing delays in customer purchases due to difficulty in retaining customers of acquired businesses;

• Exposure to unforeseen liabilities and contingencies that were not identified prior to acquiring the company; and

• An inability to generate sufficient revenue from acquisitions to offset the associated acquisition costs.

Fully integrating an acquired company or business into our operations may take a significant amount of time. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in overcoming these risks or any other problems

24

encountered with acquisitions. To the extent we do not successfully avoid or overcome the risks or problems related to any acquisitions, our results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected. Acquisitions also could impact our financial position and capital needs, and could cause substantial fluctuations in our quarterly and annual results of operations. Acquisitions could include significant goodwill and intangible assets, which may result in future impairment charges that would reduce our stated earnings. We may incur significant costs in our efforts to engage in strategic transactions and these expenditures may not result in successful acquisitions.

Future acquisitions of technologies or companies, which are paid for partially or entirely through the issuance of stock or stock rights, could dilute the ownership of our existing stockholders.

We expect that the consideration we might pay for any future acquisitions of companies or technologies could include stock, rights to purchase stock, cash or some combination of the foregoing. If we issue stock or rights to purchase stock in connection with future acquisitions, net income (loss) per share and then-existing holders of our common stock may experience dilution.

Mergers or other strategic transactions involving our competitors could weaken our competitive position, which could harm our results of operations.

Our industry is highly fragmented, and we believe it is likely that some of our existing competitors will consolidate or will be acquired. In addition, some of our competitors may enter into new alliances with each other or may establish or strengthen cooperative relationships with systems integrators, third-party consulting firms or other parties. Any such consolidation, acquisition, alliance or cooperative relationship could lead to pricing pressure and our loss of market share and could result in a competitor with greater financial, technical, marketing, service and other resources, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We may not receive significant revenue as a result of our current research and development efforts.

We have made and expect to continue to make significant investments in research and development and related product opportunities. In the fiscal year ended February 28, 2011 and February 29, 2012, we spent $11.5 million and $13.2 million on research and development expenses, respectively. In the three months ended May 31, 2012, we spent $4.1 million on research and development expenses. High levels of expenditures for research and development could adversely affect our results of operations if not offset by corresponding future revenue increases. We believe that we must continue to dedicate a significant amount of resources to our research and development efforts to maintain our competitive position. However, it is difficult to estimate when, if ever, we will receive significant revenue as a result of these investments.

We will incur increased costs and demands upon management as a result of complying with the laws and regulations affecting public companies, which could adversely affect our results of operations and our ability to attract and retain qualified executives and board members.

As a public company, we will incur legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company, including costs associated with public company reporting and corporate governance requirements. These requirements include compliance with Section 404 and other provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, or the Dodd-Frank Act, as well as rules implemented by the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, The NASDAQ Stock Market, or NASDAQ, and other applicable securities or exchange-related rules and regulations. In addition, our management team will also have to adapt to the requirements of being a public company. We expect complying with these rules and regulations will substantially increase our legal and financial compliance costs and to make some activities more time-consuming and costly.

25

The increased costs associated with operating as a public company will decrease our net income or increase our net loss, and may require us to reduce costs in other areas of our business or increase the prices of our products or services. Additionally, if these requirements divert our management’s attention from other business concerns, our results of operations could be adversely effected.

However, for as long as we remain an “emerging growth company” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or JOBS Act, we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not “emerging growth companies” including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding an annual nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and seeking nonbinding stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. We may take advantage of these reporting exemptions until we are no longer an “emerging growth company.”

We will remain an “emerging growth company” for up to five years, although we would cease to be an “emerging growth company” prior to such time if we have more than $1.0 billion in annual revenue, more than $700 million in market value of our common stock is held by non-affiliates or we issue more than $1.0 billion of non-convertible debt over a three-year period.

As a public company, we also expect that it may be more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. As a result, it may be more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified individuals to serve on our board of directors or as our executive officers.

We rely significantly on recurring revenue, which may decline or fail to be renewed, and our future results of operations could be harmed.

Our revenue from subscriptions to our software and software-related support services accounted for approximately 60.0% of our total revenue for the year ended February 29, 2012 and approximately 63.4% of our total revenue for the three months ended May 31, 2012. Revenue from our subscriptions is recognized over the contractual term of the license, which is typically three years, and is generally recurring in nature. Sales of new or recurring subscriptions and software-related support service contracts and renewals after expiration of the initial term may decline or fluctuate as a result of a number of factors, including end customers’ level of satisfaction with our software solutions, the prices of our software solutions, the prices of products and services offered by our competitors or reductions in our customers’ spending levels. A software industry-wide movement towards shorter contractual license terms led by other SaaS providers, which competitive pressures may compel us to follow, could lead to increased volatility and diminished visibility into future recurring revenue. If our sales of new or recurring subscriptions and software related support service contracts decline, our revenue and revenue growth may decline, and our business will suffer.

Because we recognize revenue from subscriptions and support services over the term of the relevant service period, downturns or upturns in sales are not immediately fully reflected in our results of operations.

We recognize recurring subscriptions and software-related support services revenue monthly over the term of the relevant service period, which is typically three years. As a result, much of the revenue we report each quarter is the recognition of deferred revenue from recurring subscriptions and software-related support service contracts entered into during previous quarters. Consequently, a decline in new or renewed recurring subscriptions and software-related support service contracts in any one quarter will not be fully reflected in revenue in that quarter, but will negatively affect our revenue in future quarters. Accordingly, the effect of significant downturns in new or renewed sales of our recurring subscriptions and software-related support services are not reflected in full in our results of operations until future periods. Revenue from our recurring

26

subscriptions and software-related support services also makes it difficult for us to rapidly increase our revenue through additional service sales in any period, as revenue from new and renewal software-related service contracts must be recognized over the applicable service period.

Our failure to raise additional capital or generate cash flows necessary to expand our operations and invest in new technologies in the future could reduce our ability to compete successfully and adversely affect our results of operations.

We may need to raise additional funds, and we may not be able to obtain additional debt or equity financing on favorable terms, if at all. If we raise additional equity financing, our security holders may experience significant dilution of their ownership interests and the value of shares of our common stock could decline. If we engage in debt financing, we may be required to accept terms that restrict our ability to incur additional indebtedness, force us to maintain specified liquidity or other ratios or restrict our ability to pay dividends or make acquisitions. If we need additional capital and cannot raise it on acceptable terms, if at all, we may not be able to, among other things:

• Develop and enhance our solutions;

• Continue to expand our technology development, sales and marketing organizations;

• Hire, train and retain employees;

• Respond to competitive pressures or unanticipated working capital requirements; or

• Pursue acquisition opportunities.

Our inability to do any of the foregoing could reduce our ability to compete successfully and adversely affect our results of operations.

Because our long-term success depends, in part, on our ability to expand the sales of our solutions to customers located outside of the United States, our business will be susceptible to risks associated with international operations.

We have limited experience operating in foreign jurisdictions. Conducting and launching operations on an international scale requires close coordination of activities across multiple jurisdictions and time zones and consumes significant management resources. Customers in countries outside of the United States accounted for 38.2% of our revenue for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2012 and 35.1% of our total revenue for the three months ended May 31, 2012. Our limited experience in operating our business outside of the United States increases the risk that our current and any future international expansion efforts will not be successful. Conducting international operations subjects us to new risks that, generally, we have not faced in the United States, including:

• Fluctuations in currency exchange rates;

• Unexpected changes in foreign regulatory requirements;

• Longer accounts receivable payment cycles and difficulties in collecting accounts receivable;

• Difficulties in managing and staffing international operations, including differences in labor laws;

• Potentially adverse tax consequences, including the complexities of foreign value added tax systems and restrictions on the repatriation of earnings;

27

• Localization of our solutions, including translation into foreign languages and associated expenses;

• The burdens of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws and different legal standards, including laws and regulations related to privacy and data security;

• Requirements for regional hosting of customer solutions and data, which may require additional capital expenditures necessary to set up new data centers;

• Increased financial accounting and reporting burdens and complexities;

• Political, social and economic instability abroad, terrorist attacks and security concerns in general; and

• Reduced or varied protection for intellectual property rights in some countries.

The occurrence of any one of these risks could negatively affect our international business and, consequently, our results of operations generally. Additionally, operating in international markets also requires significant management attention and financial resources. We cannot be certain that the investment and additional resources required in establishing, acquiring or integrating operations in other countries will produce desired levels of revenue or profitability.

From time to time, we may become defendants in legal proceedings as to which we are unable to assess our exposure and which could become significant liabilities in the event of an adverse judgment.

We may become defendants in legal proceedings from time to time. Companies in our industry have been subject to claims related to patent infringement and product liability, as well as contract and employment-related claims. We may not be able to accurately assess the risk related to these suits, and we may be unable to accurately assess our level of exposure.

We are required to comply with U.S. export control laws and regulations. Noncompliance with those laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our solutions are subject to U.S. export controls and we incorporate encryption technology into certain of our solutions. These encrypted solutions and the underlying technology may be exported outside the United States only with the required export authorizations, including by license, a license exception or other appropriate government authorizations, including the filing of an encryption registration. U.S. export control laws and economic sanctions prohibit the shipment of certain solutions and services to U.S. embargoed or sanctioned countries, governments and persons and complying with export control and sanctions regulations for a particular sale may be time-consuming and may result in the delay or loss of sales opportunities. Penalties for violations of the U.S. export control laws include fines of up to $250,000 or twice the value of the transaction, whichever is greater, per violation, the possible loss of export or import privileges and criminal action for knowing or willful violations.

Further, if our operating partners fail to obtain appropriate import, export or re-export licenses or permits, we may also be adversely affected, become the subject of government investigations or penalties, and incur reputational harm.

In addition, various countries regulate the import of certain encryption technology, including import permitting and licensing requirements, and have enacted laws that could limit our ability to sell our solutions or could limit our customers’ ability to implement our solutions in those countries. Changes in our solutions or changes in export and import regulations may create delays in the introduction of our solutions in international markets, prevent our customers with international operations from deploying our solutions globally or, in some

28

cases, prevent the export or import of our solutions to certain countries, governments or persons altogether. Any change in export or import regulations, economic sanctions or related legislation, shift in the enforcement or scope of existing regulations, or change in the countries, governments, persons or technologies targeted by such regulations, could result in decreased use of our solutions by, or in our decreased ability to export or sell our solutions to, existing or potential customers with international operations. Any decreased use of our solutions or limitation on our ability to export or sell our solutions would likely adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our facilities in California are located near known earthquake faults, and the occurrence of an earthquake or other catastrophic disaster could cause damage to our facilities and equipment, which could negatively impact our operations.

Our facilities in the San Francisco Bay Area are located near known earthquake fault zones and are vulnerable to damage from earthquakes. We are also vulnerable to damage from other types of disasters, including fire, floods, power loss, communications failures and similar events. If any disaster were to occur, our ability to operate our business at our facilities would be seriously, or potentially completely, impaired. The insurance we maintain may not be adequate to cover our losses resulting from disasters or other business interruptions. Accordingly, an earthquake or other disaster could materially and adversely harm our ability to conduct business.

We may be subject to additional tax liabilities.

We are subject to income, sales, use, value added and other taxes in the United States and other countries in which we conduct business, which such laws and rates vary greatly by jurisdiction. Certain jurisdictions in which we do not collect sales, use, value added or other taxes on our sales may assert that such taxes are applicable, which could result in tax assessments, penalties and interest, and we may be required to collect such taxes in the future. Significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide provision for income taxes. These determinations are highly complex and require detailed analysis of the available information and applicable statutes and regulatory materials. In the ordinary course of our business, there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable, the final determination of tax audits and any related litigation could be materially different from our historical tax practices, provisions and accruals. If we receive an adverse ruling as a result of an audit, or we unilaterally determine that we have misinterpreted provisions of the tax regulations to which we are subject, there could be a material effect on our tax provision, net income or cash flows in the period or periods for which that determination is made. In addition, liabilities associated with taxes are often subject to an extended or indefinite statute of limitations period. Therefore, we may be subject to additional tax liability (including penalties and interest) for a particular year for extended periods of time.

Changes in existing financial accounting standards or practices, or taxation rules or practices, may adversely affect our results of operations.

Changes in existing accounting or taxation rules or practices, new accounting pronouncements or taxation rules, or varying interpretations of current accounting pronouncements or taxation practice could have a significant adverse effect on our results of operations or the manner in which we conduct our business. Further, such changes could potentially affect our reporting of transactions completed before such changes are effective.

Risks Relating to Owning Our Common Stock and this Offering

Our share price may be volatile and you may be unable to sell your shares at or above the offering price.

The initial public offering price for our shares was determined by negotiations between us and representatives of the underwriters and may not be indicative of prices that will prevail in the trading market. The

29

market price of our common stock could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to many risk factors listed in this section, and others beyond our control, including:

• Actual or anticipated fluctuations in our financial condition and results of operations;

• Overall conditions in our industry and market;

• Addition or loss of significant customers;

• Changes in laws or regulations applicable to our products;

• Actual or anticipated changes in our growth rate relative to our competitors;

• Announcements by us or our competitors of significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments;

• Additions or departures of key personnel;

• Competition from existing products or new products that may emerge;

• Issuance of new or updated research or reports by securities analysts;

• Fluctuations in the valuation of companies perceived by investors to be comparable to us;

• Disputes or other developments related to proprietary rights, including patents, litigation matters and our ability to obtain intellectual property protection for our technologies;

• Sales of our common stock by us or our stockholders;

• Share price and volume fluctuations attributable to inconsistent trading volume levels of our shares;

• The expiration of contractual lock-up agreements with our executive officers, directors and stockholders; and

• General economic and market conditions.

Furthermore, the stock markets have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected and continue to affect the market prices of equity securities of many companies. These fluctuations often have been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies. These broad market and industry fluctuations, as well as general economic, political and market conditions such as recessions, interest rate changes or international currency fluctuations, may negatively impact the market price of our common stock. If the market price of our common stock after this offering does not exceed the initial public offering price, you may not realize any return on your investment in us and may lose some or all of your investment. In the past, companies that have experienced volatility in the market price of their stock have been subject to securities class action litigation. We may be the target of this type of litigation in the future. Securities litigation against us could result in substantial costs and divert our management’s attention from other business concerns, which could seriously harm our business.

No public market for our common stock currently exists and an active trading market may not develop or be sustained following this offering.

Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our common stock. An active trading market may not develop following the completion of this offering or, if developed, may not be sustained. The lack of an

30

active market may impair your ability to sell your shares at the time you wish to sell them or at a price that you consider reasonable. The lack of an active market may also reduce the fair market value of your shares. An inactive market may also impair our ability to raise capital to continue to fund operations by selling shares and may impair our ability to acquire other companies or technologies by using our shares as consideration.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, or publish negative reports about our business, our share price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our common stock will depend on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. We do not have any control over these analysts. If one or more of the analysts who cover us downgrade our shares or change their opinion of our shares, our share price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of our company or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which could cause our share price or trading volume to decline.

Future sales of our common stock in the public market could cause our share price to fall.

Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market after this offering, or the perception that these sales might occur, could depress the market price of our common stock and could impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional equity securities. Based on the number of shares of common stock outstanding as of May 31, 2012, upon the closing of this offering, we will have 24,928,796 shares of common stock outstanding, assuming no exercise of outstanding options or the underwriters’ over-allotment option.

All of the common stock sold in this offering will be freely tradable without restrictions or further registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, except for any shares held by our affiliates as defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act. 19,884,305 shares of common stock outstanding after this offering, based on shares outstanding as of May 31, 2012, will be restricted as a result of securities laws, lock-up agreements or other contractual restrictions that restrict transfers for at least 180 days after the date of this prospectus, subject to certain extensions.

The underwriters may, in their sole discretion, release all or some portion of the shares subject to lock-up agreements with the underwriters prior to expiration of the lock-up period. See “Shares Eligible for Future Sale.”

The holders of 9,243,555 shares of common stock, or 43.6% based on shares outstanding as of May 31, 2012, will be entitled to rights with respect to registration of such shares under the Securities Act pursuant to a registration rights agreement between such holders and us. See “Description of Capital Stock—Registration Rights.” If such holders, by exercising their registration rights, sell a large number of shares, the market price for our common stock could be adversely affected. If we file a registration statement for the purpose of selling additional shares to raise capital and are required to include shares held by these holders pursuant to the exercise of their registration rights, our ability to raise capital may be impaired. We intend to file a registration statement on Form S-8 under the Securities Act to register shares for issuance under our 2003 Stock Plan and 2012 Equity Compensation Plan. Our 2012 Equity Compensation Plan provides for automatic increases in the shares reserved for issuance under the plan which could result in additional dilution to our stockholders. Once we register these shares, they can be freely sold in the public market upon issuance and vesting, subject to a lock-up period of at least 180 days and other restrictions provided under the terms of the applicable plan and/or the option agreements entered into with option holders.

31

As a result of becoming a public company, we will be obligated to develop and maintain a system of effective internal controls over financial reporting. We may not complete our analysis of our internal control over financial reporting in a timely manner, or these internal controls may not be determined to be effective, which may adversely affect investor confidence in our company and, as a result, the value of our common stock.

We will be required, pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to furnish a report by management on, among other things, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting in the second annual report we file with the SEC. This assessment will need to include disclosure of any material weaknesses identified by our management in our internal control over financial reporting, as well as a statement that our auditors have issued an attestation report on effectiveness of our internal controls. However, our auditors will not be required to formally attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 until we are no longer an “emerging growth company” as defined in the JOBS Act if we take advantage of the exemptions available to us through the JOBS Act.

We are in the very early stages of the costly and challenging process of compiling the system and processing documentation necessary to perform the evaluation needed to comply with Section 404. We may not be able to remediate future material weaknesses, or to complete our evaluation, testing and any required remediation in a timely fashion. During the evaluation and testing process, if we identify one or more material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, we will be unable to assert that our internal controls are effective. If we are unable to assert that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, or if our auditors are unable to express an opinion on the effectiveness of our internal controls, we could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which would have a material adverse effect on the price of our common stock.

We are an “emerging growth company” and we cannot be certain whether the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies will make our common stock less attractive to investors.

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act, and we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not “emerging growth companies” including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding an annual non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation and nonbinding stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive because we will rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our stock price may become more volatile.

In addition, Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that an “emerging growth company” can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. In other words, an “emerging growth company” can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. However, we are choosing to “opt out” of such extended transition period, and as a result, we will comply with new or revised accounting standards on the relevant dates on which adoption of such standards is required for non-emerging growth companies. Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that our decision to opt out of the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards is irrevocable.

Our management team may invest or spend the proceeds of this offering in ways with which you may not agree or in ways which may not yield a return.

The net proceeds from this offering may be used for working capital purposes and for other general corporate purposes, including the research and development of new products, sales and marketing activities, to

32

finance acquisition opportunities and other capital expenditures. Although we may also use a portion of the net proceeds to acquire complementary products, services, technologies or businesses, we have no current understandings, agreements or commitments to do so at this time.

Our management will have considerable discretion in the application of the net proceeds, and you will not have the opportunity, as part of your investment decision, to assess whether the proceeds are being used appropriately. The net proceeds may be used for corporate purposes that do not improve our results of operations or increase our market value.

Purchasers in this offering will experience immediate and substantial dilution in the book value of their investment.

The anticipated initial public offering price of our common stock is substantially higher than the net tangible book value per share of our outstanding common stock immediately after this offering. Therefore, if you purchase our common stock in this offering, you will incur immediate dilution of $15.26 in net tangible book value per share from the price you paid. In addition, following this offering, purchasers in this offering will have contributed 16.3% of the total consideration paid by our stockholders to purchase shares of common stock, in exchange for acquiring approximately 15.0% of our total outstanding shares as of May 31, 2012 after giving effect to this offering. In addition, if outstanding options or warrants to purchase our common stock are exercised, you will experience additional dilution.

Our directors, executive officers and principal stockholders will continue to have substantial control over us after this offering and could delay or prevent a change in corporate control.

After this offering, our directors, executive officers and holders of more than 5% of our common stock, together with their affiliates, will beneficially own, in the aggregate, approximately 35.1% of our outstanding common stock, assuming no exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares of our common stock in this offering. As a result, these stockholders, acting together, would have the ability to control the outcome of matters submitted to our stockholders for approval, including the election of directors and any merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets. In addition, these stockholders, acting together, would have the ability to control the management and affairs of our company. Accordingly, this concentration of ownership might harm the market price of our common stock by:

• Delaying, deferring or preventing a change in corporate control;

• Impeding a merger, consolidation, takeover or other business combination involving us; or

• Discouraging a potential acquirer from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us.

Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and under Delaware law could make an acquisition of us, which may be beneficial to our stockholders, more difficult and may prevent attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management and limit the market price of our common stock.

Provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, as amended and restated upon the closing of this offering, may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control or changes in our management. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws, which will become effective upon the closing of this offering, include provisions that:

• Authorize our board of directors to issue, without further action by the stockholders up to 10,000,000 shares of undesignated preferred stock;

33

• Require that any action to be taken by our stockholders be effected at a duly called annual or special meeting and not by written consent;

• Specify that special meetings of our stockholders can be called only by our board of directors, the Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer or the President;

• Establish an advance notice procedure for stockholder approvals to be brought before an annual meeting of our stockholders, including proposed nominations of persons for election to our board of directors;

• Provide that directors may be removed only for cause;

• Provide that vacancies on our board of directors may be filled only by a majority of directors then in office, even though less than a quorum;

• Establish that our board of directors is divided into three classes — Class I, Class II and Class III — with each class serving staggered terms; and

• Require a super-majority of votes to amend certain of the above-mentioned provisions.

These provisions, alone or together, could delay or prevent hostile takeovers and changes in control. These provisions may also frustrate or prevent any attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management by making it more difficult for stockholders to replace members of our board of directors, which is responsible for appointing the members of our management.

As a Delaware corporation, we are also subject to provisions of Delaware law, including Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation law, which prevents some stockholders holding more than 15% of our outstanding common stock from engaging in certain business combinations without approval of the holders of substantially all of our outstanding common stock.

Any provision of our certificate of incorporation or bylaws or Delaware law that has the effect of delaying or deterring a change of control could limit the opportunity for our stockholders to receive a premium for their shares of our common stock, and could also affect the price that some investors are willing to pay for our common stock.

We do not intend to pay dividends for the foreseeable future.

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock and do not intend to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. We anticipate that we will retain all of our future earnings for use in the operation of our business and for general corporate purposes. Any determination to pay dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our board of directors. Accordingly, investors must rely on sales of their common stock after price appreciation, which may never occur, as the only way to realize any future gains on their investments.

34

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND INDUSTRY DATA

This prospectus contains forward-looking statements that are based on our management’s beliefs and assumptions and on information currently available to our management. The forward-looking statements are contained principally in, but not limited to, the “Prospectus Summary,” “Risk Factors,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Business” and “Executive Compensation.” Forward-looking statements include all statements that are not historical facts and can be identified by terms such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “could,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” “potential,” “predicts, “projects,” “should,” “will,” “would” or similar expressions and the negatives of those terms. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about:

• Our growth strategy;

• Our plans for future products;

• Our operating results;

• Our ability to anticipate future market demands and future needs of our customers;

• Our customer concentration;

• Our ability to effectively manage our growth;

• Our expectations regarding the use of proceeds;

• Our expectations regarding our expenses, sales and operations;

• Our anticipated trends and challenges in the markets in which we operate;

• Our competition;

• Our ability to successfully enter new markets and manage our international expansion; and

• Our intellectual property.

Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. We discuss these risks in greater detail in “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this prospectus. Given these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Also, forward-looking statements represent our management’s beliefs and assumptions only as of the date of this prospectus. You should read this prospectus and the documents that we have filed as exhibits to the registration statement, of which this prospectus is a part, completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect.

Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update these forward-looking statements publicly, or to update the reasons actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes available in the future.

This prospectus also contains estimates and other information concerning our industry, including market size and growth rates, that are based on industry publications, surveys and forecasts, including those generated by Gartner, Inc., or Gartner. This information involves a number of assumptions and limitations, and you are cautioned not to give undue weight to these estimates. These industry publications, surveys and forecasts generally indicate

35

that their information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. The industry in which we operate is subject to a high degree of uncertainty and risk due to variety of factors, including those described in “Risk Factors.”

Each of the Gartner publications referenced herein, Forecast: Enterprise Software Markets, Worldwide, 2011-2016, 2Q12 Update by Colleen Graham, Yanna Dharmasthira, Chad Eschinger, Bianca Francesca Granetto, Joanne M. Correia, Laurie F. Wurster, Tom Eid, Ruggero Contu, Fabrizio Biscotti, Chris Pang, Dan Sommer, Matthew Cheung, Hai Hong Swinehart, Bhavish Sood, Asheesh Raina, Jie Zhang and David M. Coyle, dated June 2012, Forecast: Public Cloud Services, Worldwide, 2010-2016, 2Q12 Update by Ed Anderson, Warren Bell, Fabrizio Biscotti, Robert H. Brown, Ruggero Contu, Susan Cournoyer, Federico De Silva, Chad Eschinger, Andrew Frank, Hai Hong Swinehart, Venecia K Liu, Gregor Petri, Dan Sommer, Laurie F. Wurster, Morgan Yeates, Jie Zhang and Alan Dayley, dated June 2012 and The Gartner Supply Chain Top 25 for 2012 by Debra Hofman and Stan Aronow, dated May 2012, speaks as of its original publication date (and not as of the date of this prospectus). The opinions expressed in Gartner publications are not representations of fact, and are subject to change without notice. All statements in this prospectus attributable to Gartner represent our interpretation of data, research opinion or viewpoints published as part of a syndicated subscription service provided by Gartner, and the statements attributable to The Gartner Supply Chain Top 25 for 2012 have not been reviewed by Gartner.

36

USE OF PROCEEDS

We estimate that the net proceeds from our sale of 3,750,000 shares of common stock in this offering at an assumed initial public offering price of $16.00 per share, the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us, will be approximately $52.9 million. A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price would increase (decrease) the net proceeds to us from this offering by $3.5 million, assuming the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions.

We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares of common stock by the selling stockholders.

We intend to use the net proceeds of this offering primarily for general corporate purposes and other operating expenses, including: capital expenditures, expenditures relating to the expansion of our operations; sales and marketing expenses; and general and administrative expenses.

In addition, if appropriate opportunities arise to acquire or invest in complementary businesses, product lines, products or technologies, we may use a portion of the net proceeds for such acquisition or investment. However, we are not currently discussing any such potential acquisition or investment with any third party. We may also use a portion of the net proceeds for repayment of our existing indebtedness as more fully described in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources.” The amount and timing of these expenditures will vary depending on a number of factors, including competitive and technological developments and the rate of growth, if any, of our business.

Pending their use, we plan to invest our net proceeds from this offering in short-term, interest-bearing obligations, investment-grade instruments, certificates of deposit or direct or guaranteed obligations of the U.S. government.

DIVIDEND POLICY

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings for use in the operation of our business and do not anticipate paying any dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Any future determination to declare dividends will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our financial condition, operating results, capital requirements, general business conditions and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant. In addition, our credit facility prohibits us from declaring or paying cash dividends on our capital stock.

37

CAPITALIZATION

The following table sets forth our cash and cash equivalents and capitalization as of May 31, 2012:

• on an actual basis;

• on a pro forma basis to reflect the conversion of all outstanding shares of our convertible preferred stock into 14,845,528 shares of our common stock, which will occur immediately prior to the closing of this offering and the filing of our post-offering amended and restated certificate of incorporation, which will occur immediately prior to the closing of this offering; and

• on a pro forma as adjusted basis to reflect the pro forma adjustments described above and our receipt of the net proceeds from our sale of 3,750,000 shares of common stock in this offering at an assumed initial public offering price of $16.00 per share, the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.

The information below is illustrative only and our capitalization following the completion of this offering will be adjusted based on the actual initial public offering price and other terms of this offering determined at pricing. You should read this table together with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our financial statements and the related notes appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.

	May 31, 2012
	Actual			Pro Forma			Pro Forma As Adjusted
	(Unaudited) (In thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	10,092		$	10,092		$	63,856
Current liabilities		58,751			58,751			57,642
Long-term liabilities		5,410			5,410			5,410
Stockholders’ equity (deficit)
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, Authorized, 17,499,997 shares, issued and outstanding, 13,869,114 shares, aggregate liquidation preference of $126,913, actual; authorized, 10,000,000, issued and outstanding, none, pro forma and pro forma as adjusted		84,191			—			—
Common stock, $0.001 par value. Authorized, 25,057,142 shares, issued and outstanding, 6,262,480 shares, actual; authorized, 100,000,000, issued and outstanding, 21,178,796, pro forma; and authorized, 100,000,000, issued and outstanding, 24,928,796, pro forma as adjusted		6			21			25
Additional paid-in capital		224,306			308,482			361,372
Accumulated other comprehensive income		(8	)		(8	)		(8	)
Accumulated deficit		(342,994	)		(342,994	)		(342,994	)
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)		(34,499	)		(34,499	)		18,395
Total capitalization	$	29,662		$	29,662		$	81,447

The number of shares of our common stock outstanding after the completion of this offering is based on 21,178,796 shares outstanding as of May 31, 2012, and excludes:

• 2,857,903 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options outstanding as of May 31, 2012 at a weighted average exercise price of $2.74 per share; and

38

• 2,730,000 shares reserved for future issuance under our 2012 Equity Compensation Plan, as well as shares originally reserved for issuance under our 2003 Stock Plan, but which may become available for awards under our 2012 Equity Compensation Plan, which plan will become effective in connection with this offering and contains provisions that will automatically increase its share reserve each year, as more fully described in “Executive Compensation-Employee Benefit Plans.”

A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price of $16.00 per share, the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, would increase (decrease) cash and cash equivalents and total stockholders’ equity (deficit) and total capitalization by $3.5 million, assuming that the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same, and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. Each increase (decrease) of 1.0 million shares in the number of shares offered by us, assuming that the assumed initial public offering price remains the same, would increase (decrease) cash and cash equivalents and total stockholders’ equity (deficit) by $14.9 million.

39

DILUTION

If you invest in our common stock, your interest will be diluted to the extent of the difference between the amount per share paid by purchasers of shares of common stock in this initial public offering and the pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share of common stock immediately after this offering.

At May 31, 2012, our pro forma net tangible book value was approximately $(34.5) million, or $(1.63) per share of common stock. Net tangible book value per share represents the amount of our total tangible assets less our total liabilities, divided by the shares of common stock outstanding at May 31, 2012, assuming conversion of all our outstanding preferred stock to common stock as of May 31, 2012. After giving effect to our sale of 3,750,000 shares of common stock in this offering at an assumed initial public offering price of $16.00 per share, the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us, our pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value at May 31, 2012 would have been $18.4 million, or $0.74 per share of common stock. This represents an immediate increase in pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value of $2.37 per share to existing stockholders and an immediate dilution of $15.26 per share to new investors.

The following table illustrates this dilution:

Assumed initial public offering price per share				$	16.00
Pro-forma net tangible book value per share as of May 31, 2012	$	(1.63	)
Increase per share attributable to this offering		2.37
Pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share after giving effect to this offering					0.74
Net tangible book value dilution per share to investors in this offering				$	15.26

If all our outstanding options had been exercised, the pro forma net tangible book value as of May 31, 2012 would have been $(26.7) million, or $(1.11) per share, and the pro forma net tangible book value after this offering would have been $26.2 million, or $0.94 per share, causing dilution to new investors of $15.06 per share.

If the underwriters fully exercise their over-allotment option, the pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share after giving effect to this offering would be $0.74 per share, and the dilution in pro forma net tangible book value per share to investors in this offering would be $15.26 per share.

The following table summarizes, on a pro forma as adjusted basis as of May 31, 2012, the total number of shares of common stock purchased from us, the total consideration paid to us and the average price per share paid to us by existing stockholders and by new investors purchasing shares in this offering at the assumed initial public offering price of $16.00 per share, the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, before deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us:

	Shares Purchased					Total Consideration					Average Price Per Share
	Number		Percent			Amount		Percent
Existing stockholders		21,178,796		85	%	$	308,502,371		84	%	$	14.57
New investors		3,750,000		15	%		60,000,000		16	%	$	16.00
Total		24,928,796		100	%	$	368,502,371		100	%	$	14.78

40

The foregoing calculations are based on 21,178,796 shares of our common stock outstanding as of May 31, 2012, and excludes:

• 2,857,903 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options outstanding as of May 31, 2012 at a weighted average exercise price of $2.74 per share;

• 2,730,000 shares reserved for future issuance under our 2012 Equity Compensation Plan, as well as shares originally reserved for issuance under our 2003 Stock Plan, but which may become available for awards under our 2012 Equity Compensation Plan, which plan will become effective in connection with this offering and contains provisions that will automatically increase its share reserve each year, as more fully described in “Executive Compensation-Employee Benefit Plans;” and

• Sales by the selling stockholders in this offering will cause the number of shares owned by the existing stockholders to be reduced by 937,500 shares or 3.8% of the total number of shares of our common stock outstanding upon the closing of the offering.

A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price of $16.00 per share, the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, would increase (decrease) our pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value by $3.5 million, or $0.14 per share, and the pro forma dilution per share to investors in this offering would be $16.12 per share, assuming that the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same, and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. Each increase (decrease) of 1.0 million shares in the number of shares offered by us would increase (decrease) our pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value by approximately $14.9 million, or $0.55 per share, and the pro forma dilution to investors in this offering would be $14.72 per share, assuming that the assumed initial public offering price remains the same, and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. The pro forma information discussed above is illustrative only and will change based on the actual initial public offering price and other terms of this offering determined at pricing.

41

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

We have derived the selected consolidated statement of operations data for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012 and selected consolidated balance sheet data as of February 28, 2011 and February 29, 2012 from our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. We have derived the summary consolidated financial data for the three months ended May 31, 2011 and 2012 and as of May 31, 2012 from our unaudited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. We have derived the statement of operations data for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2009 and the balance sheet data as of February 29, 2008, February 28, 2009 and February 28, 2010, from our audited consolidated financial statements not included in this prospectus. Our unaudited selected consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the annual consolidated financial statements and include all adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair presentation of these statements in all material respects. The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any future period and the results for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in the full year.

42

	Year Ended February 28 or 29,															Three Months Ended May 31,
	2008			2009			2010			2011			2012			2011			2012
	(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
Revenue
Subscriptions and support	$	N/A	(1)	$	21,107		$	29,976		$	39,419		$	35,816		$	8,053		$	9,814
Professional services		N/A	(1)		16,627			14,401			16,104			23,871			3,194			5,659
Total revenue		32,721			37,734			44,377			55,523			59,687			11,247			15,473
Cost of revenue
Subscriptions and support		N/A	(1)		8,885			9,269			7,531			7,514			1,787			2,039
Professional services		N/A	(1)		14,685			11,493			11,774			14,116			3,333			3,653
Total cost of revenue		22,072			23,570			20,762			19,305			21,630			5,120			5,692
Gross margin
Subscriptions and support		N/A	(1)		12,222			20,707			31,888			28,302			6,266			7,775
Professional services		N/A	(1)		1,942			2,908			4,330			9,755			(139	)		2,006
Total gross profit		10,649			14,164			23,615			36,218			38,057			6,127			9,781
Operating expenses:
Research and development		10,412			12,943			13,077			11,463			13,240			3,110			4,092
Sales and marketing		14,012			11,792			11,421			12,756			18,590			3,730			6,147
General and administrative		8,193			6,448			4,884			5,064			5,963			1,307			1,782
Restructuring costs		—			1,146			—			—			—			—			—
Total operating expenses		32,617			32,329			29,382			29,283			37,793			8,147			12,021
Income (loss) from operations		(21,968	)		(18,165	)		(5,767	)		6,935			264			(2,020	)		(2,240	)
Interest and other expense, net		(886	)		(1,618	)		(532	)		(259	)		(411	)		(86	)		(95	)
Income (loss) before income taxes		(22,854	)		(19,783	)		(6,299	)		6,676			(147	)		(2,106	)		(2,335	)
Provision for income taxes		(190	)		(60	)		(349	)		(33	)		(78	)		(31	)		(43	)
Net income (loss)		(23,044	)		(19,843	)		(6,648	)		6,643			(225	)		(2,137	)		(2,378	)
Undistributed earnings allocated to preferred stockholders		—			—			—			(6,643	)		—			—			—
Net loss attributable to common stockholders:	$	(23,044	)	$	(19,843	)	$	(6,648	)	$	—		$	(225	)	$	(2,137	)	$	(2,378	)
Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders:
Basic	$	(7.41	)	$	(6.02	)	$	(1.58	)	$	—		$	(0.04	)	$	(0.37	)	$	(0.38	)
Diluted	$	(7.41	)	$	(6.02	)	$	(1.58	)	$	—		$	(0.04	)	$	(0.37	)	$	(0.38	)
Weighted average shares used to compute net loss per share attributable to common stockholders:
Basic		3,110			3,297			4,210			5,788			5,918			5,798			6,190
Diluted		3,110			3,297			4,210			5,788			5,918			5,798			6,190
Pro forma net loss per share attributable to common stockholders (unaudited) (2):
Basic													$	(0.01	)				$	(0.11	)
Diluted													$	(0.01	)				$	(0.11	)
Pro forma weighted average shares used to compute pro forma net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders (unaudited):
Basic														20,689						21,036
Diluted														20,689						21,036
Other Financial and Operational Data:
Adjusted EBITDA (3)	$	(20,316	)	$	(15,163	)	$	(2,999	)	$	9,371		$	2,517		$	(1,490	)	$	(1,352	)
Free cash flow (4)	$	(17,799	)	$	(16,453	)	$	(5,325	)	$	(697	)	$	(2,495	)	$	(266	)	$	(1,477	)
Number of unique registered trading partners (5)		N/A	(6)		18,117			22,529			26,440			30,772			27,364			32,390
Number of unique registered users (5)		N/A	(6)		48,918			62,528			73,377			88,012			77,311			94,708

⁽¹⁾  Historically, we presented our revenue as one line item in the statement of operations. Prior to fiscal 2009, we did not for accounting purposes differentiate between revenue from subscriptions and support and professional services.

⁽²⁾  Pro forma net income (loss) per share has been calculated assuming the conversion of all outstanding shares of our preferred stock into 14,845,528 shares of common stock prior to the completion of this offering.

43

⁽³⁾  We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) adjusted for interest and other expense, net, provision for income taxes, depreciation and amortization, and stock-based compensation expense. See “Adjusted EBITDA” below for more information and for a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income (loss), the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP.

⁽⁴⁾  We define free cash flow as net cash provided by (used in) operating activities less capital expenditures. See “Free Cash Flow” below for more information and for a reconciliation of free cash flow to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities, the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP.

⁽⁵⁾  We define unique registered trading partners and unique registered users as entities and individuals, respectively, that are connected to our network as of the balance sheet dates. We view the number of unique registered trading partners and unique registered users as key indicators of the reach of our network and the value our enterprise customers are deriving from out solutions.

⁽⁶⁾  The information of unique registered trading partners and unique registered users prior to fiscal 2009 is not available.

Stock-based compensation included in the consolidated statements of operations data above was as follows:

	Year Ended February 28 or 29,										Three Months Ended May 31,
	2008		2009		2010		2011		2012		2011		2012
	(In thousands)
Cost of revenue	$	9	$	85	$	106	$	223	$	203	$	51	$	121
Research and development		20		58		82		108		84		23		53
Sales and marketing		16		107		155		154		259		43		145
General and administrative		9		92		102		92		181		27		160
Total stock-based compensation	$	54	$	342	$	445	$	577	$	727	$	144	$	479

The following table sets forth our selected consolidated balance sheet data as of the dates presented:

	As of February 28 or 29,															As of May 31,
	2008			2009			2010			2011			2012			2011			2012
	(In thousands)
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	12,727		$	15,645		$	9,530		$	10,060		$	10,219		$	10,373		$	10,092
Property and equipment, net		2,864			3,149			2,720			1,889			2,249			1,741			2,629
Working capital, excluding deferred revenue		(5,098	)		(2,835	)		7,678			10,287			9,939			8,093			5,440
Total assets		26,603			30,834			24,474			26,418			32,693			24,497			29,662
Convertible preferred stock		54,342			73,212			83,346			83,346			83,491			83,346			84,191
Total stockholders’ deficit		(52,069	)		(52,134	)		(41,827	)		(34,157	)		(33,334	)		(36,106	)		(34,499	)

Key Financial Performance Metrics

We monitor the key financial metrics set forth below as well as revenue, gross profit, gross margin, cash and cash equivalents and available debt capacity, which are discussed in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” to help us evaluate trends, establish budgets, measure the effectiveness of our sales and marketing efforts and assess operational effectiveness and efficiencies.

44

Adjusted EBITDA

We have included Adjusted EBITDA in this prospectus because it is a key measure used by our management and board of directors to understand and evaluate our core operating performance and trends, to prepare and approve our annual budget and to develop short- and long-term operational plans.

Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net income (loss) adjusted for interest and other expense, net, provision for income taxes, depreciation and amortization, and stock-based compensation expense. Management believes that the use of Adjusted EBITDA provides consistency and comparability with our past financial performance, facilitates period to period comparisons of results of operations, and also facilitates comparisons with other peer companies, many of which use similar non-GAAP financial measures to supplement their GAAP results.

Management believes that it is useful to exclude certain non-cash charges, such as depreciation and amortization, and stock-based compensation, and non-core operational charges, such as interest and other expense, net from Adjusted EBITDA because (1) the amount of such expenses in any specific period may not directly correlate to the underlying performance of our business operations and (2) such expenses can vary significantly between periods as a result of the timing of new stock-based awards, acquisitions or restructurings, as the case may be.

Our use of Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider it in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are:

• Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;

• Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect the potentially dilutive impact of equity-based compensation;

• Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect tax payments that may represent a reduction in cash available to us;

• Although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized may have to be replaced in the future, and Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect the future need to augment or replace such assets; and

• Other companies, including companies in our industry, may calculate Adjusted EBITDA differently, which reduces its usefulness as a comparative measure.

Because of these limitations, you should consider Adjusted EBITDA alongside other financial performance measures, including various cash flow metrics, net income (loss) and our other GAAP results. The following table presents a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA for each of the periods indicated:

	Year Ended February 28 or 29,														Three Months Ended May 31,
	2008			2009			2010			2011		2012			2011			2012
	(In thousands)
Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA:
Net income (loss)	$	(23,044	)	$	(19,843	)	$	(6,648	)	$	6,643	$	(225	)	$	(2,137	)	$	(2,378	)
Interest and other expense, net		886			1,618			532			259		411			86			95
Provision for income taxes		190			60			349			33		78			31			43
Depreciation and amortization		1,598			2,660			2,323			1,859		1,526			386			409
Stock-based compensation		54			342			445			577		727			144			479
Adjusted EBITDA	$	(20,316	)	$	(15,163	)	$	(2,999	)	$	9,371	$	2,517		$	(1,490	)	$	(1,352	)

45

Free Cash Flow

Free cash flow is a key measure used in our internal operating reports and allows us to manage the cash available to fund our debt obligations and potential strategic initiatives. Management believes that free cash flow is useful to investors as a supplemental measure to evaluate our business over time.

Free cash flow is defined as net cash provided by (used in) operating activities less capital expenditures. Capital expenditures consist of purchases of property, equipment and software. Management believes that the use of free cash flow provides consistency and comparability with our past financial performance, facilitates period to period comparisons of operating performance and also facilitates comparisons with other peer companies, many of which use similar non-GAAP financial measures to supplement their GAAP results.

Free cash flow should not be considered a substitute for other measures of financial performance reported in accordance with GAAP. There are limitations to using non-GAAP financial measures, including that other companies may calculate these measures differently than we do. Management compensates for the inherent limitations associated with measuring free cash flow through disclosure of such limitations, presentation of our financial statements in accordance with GAAP and reconciliation of free cash flow to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, net cash provided by (used in) operating activities. A reconciliation of net cash provided by (used in) operating activities to free cash flow is presented below:

	Year Ended February 28 or 29,															Three Months Ended May 31,
	2008			2009			2010			2011			2012			2011			2012
	(In thousands)
Free Cash Flow Data:
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	(15,331	)	$	(14,607	)	$	(4,401	)	$	88		$	(826	)	$	(78	)	$	(823	)
Capital expenditures		(2,468	)		(1,846	)		(924	)		(785	)		(1,669	)		(188	)		(654	)
Free cash flow	$	(17,799	)	$	(16,453	)	$	(5,325	)	$	(697	)	$	(2,495	)	$	(266	)	$	(1,477	)

46

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with the “Selected Consolidated Financial Data” and the consolidated financial statements and related notes that are included elsewhere in this prospectus. This discussion contains forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth under “Risk Factors” or in other parts of this prospectus. Our fiscal year end is the last day of February and our fiscal quarters end on May 31, August 31, November 30 and February 28 or February 29. We refer to our fiscal year ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012 as fiscal 2010, fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2012.

Overview

We are a leading provider of cloud-based, on-demand software solutions delivered on an integrated platform that enables companies to collaborate with their trading partners to procure, manufacture, sell and distribute products more efficiently. Our software applications allow network participants to input, access and share data and execute business processes across internal operating units and external entities in a secure, real-time and cost-effective manner. We refer to the combination of our software applications delivered on our cloud-based platform, the content contributed by our network participants and our enabling services as the E2open Business Network. The E2open Business Network supports key operational business processes of our customers and their trading partners, including supply chain management, procurement, sales and finance functions. These functions enable our customers to share product information, forecasts, inventory positions, sales orders, purchase orders, manufacturing work orders, quality and environmental data, shipments, invoices and payments with their trading partners.

The accelerating trends of supply chain globalization and outsourced manufacturing and distribution have combined to increase complexity and risk for brand owners while decreasing visibility into their expanding and evolving supply chains and distribution networks. These trends have created a fundamental shift in the way companies source and distribute goods and services. They have led to an ever more complex product and service delivery paradigm which increasingly relies on specialized, globally distributed trading partners to reduce costs.

As trading networks become more complex, companies are increasingly demanding integrated solutions that facilitate not only collaborative inventory management, but also the demand and supply forecasts, procurement systems, order management and analytics required to efficiently coordinate a company’s entire business ecosystem. We believe a significant opportunity exists to help companies improve their competitive advantage by delivering the visibility and control once characteristic of vertically integrated companies while retaining the advantages of outsourcing. The ability to navigate modern supply chain complexities and to resolve problems in a timely and collaborative manner, combined with enhanced knowledge of end customer demand, is critical to enabling businesses to better match supply and demand.

Our agreements with customers are typically three years in length with annual billings in advance. The annual contract value for each customer agreement is largely related to the size of the customer, the number of solutions the customer has purchased, the number of the customer’s unique registered users, and the maturity of our relationship with the customer. Average annual contract value can therefore fluctuate period to period depending upon the size of new customers and the pace at which we up-sell additional solutions and services to existing customers. Additionally, these new and up-sell customer agreements can create significant variability in the aggregate annual contract value of agreements signed in any given fiscal quarter.

As of February 29, 2012, we had 240 customers, of which 56 are what we refer to as Enterprise Customers who purchase both on-demand software solutions and network connectivity solutions. The remaining

47

184 customers purchase our network connectivity solutions directly. As of May 31, 2012, we had 248 customers, of which 58 were Enterprise Customers. For fiscal 2012, Enterprise Customers represented 99.3% of our total revenue. During fiscal 2012, the average annual billing for Enterprise Customers was $1.1 million. Our customers represent a wide range of industries and include many of the Fortune 500, among them seven of the top ten as designated in the Gartner Supply Chain Top 25. The E2open Business Network is a community comprised of our customers, over 32,000 unique registered trading partners and over 94,000 unique registered users.

During the year ended February 29, 2012, we retained 97.7% of our Enterprise Customers and the total dollars billed to these customers was over 100% of the dollars billed to the same customers for the prior year. This reflects our ability to both retain and increase the revenue generated from our existing customers. We believe we have yet to significantly penetrate our customer base and have a significant opportunity to up-sell additional solutions to our existing customers. The total number of Enterprise Customers was 33 as of February 28, 2010, 43 as of February 28, 2011, 56 as of February 29, 2012 and 58 as of May 31, 2012.

We are headquartered in Foster City, California. We continue to expand our operations internationally. We currently generate a portion of our revenue outside the United States, including through our offices in the United Kingdom, Germany, China, Malaysia and Taiwan. For fiscal 2010, fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2012, the percentage of our revenue generated from customers outside the United States was 22.9%, 36.9% and 38.2%, respectively. As part of our growth strategy, we expect the percentage of our revenue generated outside of the United States to continue to increase as we invest in and enter new and emerging markets. In 2011, we grew our sales team in Europe, and we intend to hire additional sales personnel in Germany, France and the Nordic countries. In fiscal 2012, we opened an office and established a direct sales force and a sales, hosting and distribution alliance with a local partner in China. We intend to make additional investments outside of the United States in order to expand our geographic reach.

We have achieved strong growth as our network has scaled and as we have expanded our solutions. Our platform originated as a solution to help our customers connect with their manufacturing and distribution partners in their trading network. Next, we introduced solutions for multi-enterprise supply management, and then we introduced solutions to help our customers coordinate multi-enterprise demand management. Our revenue has grown from $37.7 million in fiscal 2009 to $44.4 million in fiscal 2010 to $55.5 million in fiscal 2011 and $59.7 million in fiscal 2012. Revenue increased from $11.2 million for the three months ended May 31, 2011 to $15.5 million for the three months ended May 31, 2012. Effective March 1, 2011, we adopted new accounting guidance relating to multiple-element arrangements, which had the effect of increasing fiscal 2012 revenue by $10.9 million more than would have been recognized during the year had such accounting guidance not been adopted. Bookings were $57.5 million for fiscal 2010, $56.9 million for fiscal 2011 and $72.6 million for 2012. For the three months ended May 31, 2012, total bookings was $37.8 million compared to $15.8 million for the three months ended May 31, 2011, representing a 139.1% increase. Additionally, from March 1, 2008 through May 31, 2012, we increased backlog from $24.4 million to $102.6 million, representing a 320.3% increase.

During the period from March 1, 2008 through February 29, 2012, we focused on cost management and increased investments in research and development and operating infrastructure. This resulted in gross profits and gross margins of $14.2 million, or 37.5%, in fiscal 2009, $23.6 million, or 53.2%, in fiscal 2010, $36.2 million, or 65.2%, in fiscal 2011 and 38.1 million, or 63.8%, in fiscal 2012, and operating income of $(18.2) million in fiscal 2009, $(5.8) million in fiscal 2010, $6.9 million in fiscal 2011 and $0.3 million in fiscal 2012. Adjusted EBITDA was $(15.2) million, or (40.2%) of revenue, in fiscal 2009, $(3.0) million, or (6.8)% of revenue, in fiscal 2010, $9.4 million, or 16.9% of revenue, in fiscal 2011 and $2.5 million, or 4.2% of revenue, in fiscal 2012. As we have improved our business model, we have made additional investments in sales and marketing, research and development, and operating infrastructure. Starting in fiscal 2011 we have increased our investment in sales and marketing including hiring additional quota carrying sales people, and increased the number of Enterprise Customers from 33 as of February 28, 2010 to 43 as of February 28, 2011 to 56 as of February 29, 2012, representing a 69.7% increase from the end of fiscal 2010 to the end of fiscal 2012. During

48

fiscal 2012, we continued to invest in sales and marketing and began to increase our investment in research and development to introduce new solutions, including enhanced analytics and business intelligence, in order to enable our customers to derive greater value from our platform. Our accumulated deficit as of February 29, 2012 was $340.6 million.

Our financial objective is to create sustainable revenue, earnings and cash flow growth over the long term. Consistent with this objective, we intend to continue to invest in the development of our solutions and network. We expect to continue the aggressive expansion of our field sales organization and alliances to market our solutions both in the United States and internationally. We intend to continue making focused investments to upgrade our network infrastructure in order to improve our ability to profitably scale the business. We may also evaluate acquisitions to further augment our strategies and objectives and will base our evaluation on a number of factors which may include strategic fit, stage of company, price, geography and industry.

We face challenges and risks related to the growth of our business, similar to other software companies, including the general economic environment, aggressive competition and prospective customers electing to postpone purchase decisions or maintain the status quo. We also face challenges and risks that may be unique to our own growth initiatives. We mitigate those risks, in part, by creating a balanced portfolio of growth initiatives while managing such risks to the best of our ability based on our prior experience and operating history. For example, one of our strategies relies upon our entrance into new vertical markets. Through our experience of entering into new markets, such as the Telecommunications, Technology and Consumer Products sectors, we believe we are better prepared to enter into adjacent markets due to this experience. A subsequent strategy involves expanding our target market to include mid-market customers. We believe our understanding of the complexities surrounding our existing customers has prepared us for evaluating and transitioning our solutions to be applicable to mid-market customers. Historically, we have collaborated, and will continue to interact, with our existing customers to define our product roadmap and specific functionalities. Many of our products, which resulted from such collaboration, have been purchased by our customers. For a more detailed analysis of the risks we face, see “Risk Factors.”

Sources of Revenue

We generate our revenue primarily from selling access to our cloud-based platform of on-demand software solutions, which we refer to as subscriptions and support, through our field sales organization and alliance partners. We also generate revenue from professional services by helping our customers deploy, manage and support our software applications. Our customer contracts typically have a term of three years in length and we invoice our customers for subscriptions and support in advance for annual use of our software solutions.

	Year Ended February 28 or 29,									Three Months Ended May 31,
	2010			2011			2012			2011			2012
	(In thousands)
Revenue by type:
Subscriptions and support	$	29,976		$	39,419		$	35,816		$	8,053		$	9,814
Professional services		14,401			16,104			23,871			3,194			5,659
Total	$	44,377		$	55,523		$	59,687		$	11,247		$	15,473
Percentage of revenue by type:
Subscriptions and support		67.5	%		71.0	%		60.0	%		71.6	%		63.4	%
Professional services		32.5			29.0			40.0			28.4			36.6
Total		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%

Subscriptions and Support. We offer on-demand software solutions, which enable our customers to have constant access to our solutions without the need to manage and support the software and associated hardware themselves. We house the hardware and software in third-party facilities, and provide our customers

49

with access to the software applications, along with data security and storage, backup, and recovery services. We invoice our customers for subscriptions and support in advance for annual use of our software solutions.

Professional Services. Professional services revenue is derived primarily from fees for enabling services, such as solution consulting, solution deployment, B2B on-boarding and solution support, that help our customers deploy, manage and support our solutions. These services are sold in conjunction with the sale of our on-demand software solutions or on a standalone basis. We provide professional services both on a fixed fee and a time and materials basis, and invoice our customers in advance, monthly, or upon reaching project milestones.

Our future revenue growth will depend on our ability to increase sales of our existing and new on-demand software solutions and services to new and existing customers. Our revenue generally fluctuates, and we expect it to continue to fluctuate, between periods due primarily to inconsistent timing of sales of our software solutions, revenue recognition requirements and seasonality, among other factors. As a result, transactions that were expected to be recognized in one period may be recognized in a subsequent period, which may materially affect our financial performance in a reporting period.

For the fiscal year ended February 28, 2010, February 28, 2011 and February 29, 2012, the percentage of our revenue generated outside of the United States was 22.9%, 36.9% and 38.2%, respectively. For the three months ended May 31, 2012, the percentage of our revenue generated outside of the United States was 35.1%. We intend to continue to invest in markets outside of the United States and expect the international revenue growth trends to continue.

Key Operating Performance Measures

We regularly review a number of metrics, including the following key metrics, to evaluate our business, measure our performance, identify trends affecting our business, formulate financial projections and make strategic decisions.

Bookings, Billings and Backlog. We generally recognize subscription and support revenue from our customer agreements ratably over the terms of those agreements. For this reason, a significant portion of our revenue in any period will be from customer agreements signed in prior periods rather than new business activity signed during such period. In order to assess our business performance with metrics that more fully reflect current period business activity, we track bookings, billings and backlog. Bookings represent the full value of customer orders or contracts signed during a reporting period. The value of our bookings is impacted by new contracts, renewals, amendments and terminations. Billings represent invoices issued to customers during the period. Backlog represents the cumulative value of bookings existing at the end of the period less the cumulative amount billed to customers. Due to the seasonality of our sales, bookings and backlog fluctuate from quarter to quarter throughout the fiscal year.

Number of Unique Registered Trading Partners. We define the number of unique registered trading partners as the number of distinct trading partner entities currently connected to the E2open Business Network as of the balance sheet date. We believe the number of unique registered trading partners is a key indicator of the growth of our network and both our and our customers’ ability to receive the benefits of the network effects resulting from such growth. Growth in the number of unique registered trading partners depends, in part, on our ability to successfully develop and market our solutions to our existing customers and companies that have not yet become part of our network. In addition to the growth in number of these entities, we view a large, existing network as providing greater incentive and ease for new customers seeking to join if they share existing trading partners already operating on our system.

The number of unique registered trading partners in the E2open Business Network increased from 22,529 as of February 28, 2010 to 32,390 as of May 31, 2012, or by 43.8%. While growth in the number of

50

unique registered trading partners is an important indicator of expected revenue growth, it also informs our management of areas of our business that will require further investment to support such growth.

Number of Unique Registered Users. We define the number of unique registered users as individuals within our customers’ organizations and their trading partners who are currently authorized to use and access our software applications as of a balance sheet data. We view unique registered users as a key indicator of growth and whether we are providing our customers with useful tools and applications, thereby increasing user engagement. Growth in unique registered users will be driven by our business expansion, growth in the number of unique registered trading partners and improvements to features and products available to our customers. The number of unique registered users increased from 62,528 as of February 28, 2010 to 94,708 as of May 31, 2012, or by 51.5%.

Key Financial Performance Measures

We monitor the key financial metrics set forth below as well as cash and cash equivalents and available debt capacity, which are discussed in “—Liquidity and Capital Resources,” to help us evaluate trends, establish budgets, measure the effectiveness of our sales and marketing efforts and assess operational effectiveness and efficiencies.

	Year Ended February 28 or 29,									Three Months Ended May 31,
	2010			2011			2012			2011			2012
	(Dollars in thousands)
Revenue	$	44,377		$	55,523		$	59,687		$	11,247		$	15,473
Gross profit	$	23,615		$	36,218		$	38,057		$	6,127		$	9,781
Gross margin		53.2	%		65.2	%		63.8	%		54.5	%		63.2	%
Adjusted EBITDA (1)	$	(2,999	)	$	9,371		$	2,517		$	(1,490	)	$	(1,352	)
Free cash flow (2)	$	(5,325	)	$	(697	)	$	(2,495	)	$	(266	)	$	(1,477	)

⁽¹⁾  We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) adjusted for interest and other expense, net, provision for income taxes, depreciation and amortization, and stock-based compensation expense. See “Adjusted EBITDA” below for more information and for a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income (loss), the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP.

⁽²⁾  Free cash flow is defined as net cash provided by (used in) operating activities less capital expenditures. See “Free Cash Flow” below for more information and for a reconciliation of Free Cash Flow to net cash

51

provided by (used in) operating activities, the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP.

Gross Profit and Gross Margin. Gross profit and gross margin have been and will continue to be affected by a variety of factors, including the average sales price of our products, the mix of solutions sold, the mix of revenue between subscriptions and support and professional services, and our level of investment in operating infrastructure. Our gross profit and gross margin in each of the last three fiscal years was $23.6 million, or 53.2%, in fiscal 2010, $36.2 million, or 65.2%, in fiscal 2011, and $38.1 million, or 63.8%, in fiscal 2012, and we expect them to improve year-on-year. Gross margin on subscriptions and support revenue was 79.0% and gross margin on professional services revenue was 40.9% for the year ended February 29, 2012. For the three months ended May 31, 2012, our gross profit and gross margin was $9.8 million and 63.2%. Gross margin on subscriptions and support revenue was 79.2% and gross margin on professional services revenue was 35.4% for the three months ended May 31, 2012.

An increase in the proportion of our total revenue generated by sales of subscriptions and support for our on-demand software applications would increase our overall margins, due to the higher margins on subscriptions and support compared to professional services. Our gross margin may also fluctuate due to the timing of revenue recognition for our on-demand solutions and services, since our cost of revenue is recognized as incurred whereas revenue on certain arrangements with customers is recognized ratably over the contract term.

Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net income (loss) adjusted for interest and other expense, net, provision for income taxes, depreciation and amortization, and stock-based compensation expense. Management believes that the use of Adjusted EBITDA provides consistency and comparability with our past financial performance, facilitates period to period comparisons of operations, and also facilitates comparisons with other peer companies, many of which use similar non-GAAP financial measures to supplement their reported GAAP results.

Management believes that it is useful to exclude certain non-cash charges, such as depreciation and amortization and stock-based compensation, and non-core operational charges, such as other expense, net from Adjusted EBITDA because (1) the amount of such expenses in any specific period may not directly correlate to the underlying performance of our business operations and (2) such expenses can vary significantly between periods as a result of the timing of new stock-based awards, acquisitions or restructurings, as the case may be.

Our Adjusted EBITDA improved from $(3.0) million in fiscal 2010 to $9.4 million in fiscal 2011. This growth was a result of the combination of an increase in revenue and a decrease in operating expenses as we improved our business model.

During the year ended February 29, 2012, Adjusted EBITDA was $2.5 million compared to $9.4 million in the prior fiscal year as we increased our investment in research and development and sales and marketing, to drive future revenue growth, which increased expenses and decreased Adjusted EBITDA. For the three months ended May 31, 2012, our Adjusted EBITDA was $(1.4) million as we continued to invest in research and development and sales and marketing.

52

The following table presents a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income (loss) for each of the periods indicated:

	Year Ended February 28 or 29,								Three Months Ended May 31,
	2010			2011		2012			2011			2012
	(In thousands)
Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA:
Net income (loss)	$	(6,648	)	$	6,643	$	(225	)	$	(2,137	)	$	(2,378	)
Interest and other expense, net		532			259		411			86			95
Provision for income taxes		349			33		78			31			43
Depreciation and amortization		2,323			1,859		1,526			386			409
Stock-based compensation		445			577		727			144			479
Adjusted EBITDA	$	(2,999	)	$	9,371	$	2,517		$	(1,490	)	$	(1,352	)

Free Cash Flow. Free cash flow is defined as net cash provided by (used in) operating activities less capital expenditures. Capital expenditures consist of purchases of property, equipment and software. The following table details our calculation (and reconciliation to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities) of free cash flow. Free cash flow is a key measure used in our internal operating reports and allows us to manage the cash available to fund our debt obligations and potential strategic initiatives. Management believes that free cash flow is useful to investors as a supplemental measure to evaluate our business over time. Further, the use of free cash flow provides consistency and comparability with our past financial performance, facilitates period to period comparisons of operations, and also facilitates comparisons with other peer companies, many of which use similar non-GAAP financial measures to supplement their GAAP results.

We have historically made significant investments in product development and in marketing our solutions, resulting in net use of cash in operating activities since inception. However, we significantly improved free cash flow, from $(5.3) million in fiscal 2010 to $(0.7) million in fiscal 2011 through increased sales, improved management of our spending and focus on profitability and working capital management.

Our free cash flow was $(2.5) million in fiscal 2012, compared to $(0.7) million in fiscal 2011, and our free cash flow was $(1.5) million for the three months ended May 31, 2012 compared to $(0.3) million for the three months ended May 31, 2011. The decreases in free cash flows were due to increased investment in research and development, sales and marketing and deployment capacity. This is consistent with our strategy to expand our product offerings and customer base to help drive future revenue growth.

	Year Ended February 28 or 29,									Three Months Ended May 31,
	2010			2011			2012			2011			2012
	(In thousands)
Free Cash Flow Data:
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities	$	(4,401	)	$	88		$	(826	)	$	(78	)	$	(823	)
Capital expenditures		(924	)		(785	)		(1,669	)		(188	)		(654	)
Free cash flow	$	(5,325	)	$	(697	)	$	(2,495	)	$	(266	)	$	(1,477	)

We expect to continue to incur negative free cash flow for fiscal 2013 as we continue to invest in the development and implementation of new solutions and software applications, and expand our sales and marketing resources in order to further penetrate our market both in the United States and internationally.

53

Costs and Expenses

Cost of Revenue

Total cost of revenue consists of costs related to third party hosting of our equipment and delivery of our software solutions, software license fees, salaries, and benefits and personnel-related expenses included in our operations, professional services, and support departments, as well as allocated facilities, information technology and supporting overhead costs. The cost associated with providing professional services is significantly higher as a percentage of revenue than the cost associated with delivering our on-demand software applications due to the labor intensive nature of providing professional services.

Our total cost of revenue has declined in the last three fiscal years as a percentage of revenue, and while we expect absolute cost of revenue to increase as we continue to invest in our business, we expect cost of revenue to increase at a slower rate than that of our total revenue on an annual basis.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses consist of research and development, sales and marketing, and general and administrative expenses.

Research and Development

Research and development expense consists of salaries, benefits and personnel-related expenses, software development tools, as well as allocated facilities, information technology and supporting overhead costs. We expect to continue to invest in research and development to enhance and expand our existing solutions and develop new solutions and tools for improved deployment and customer support and, consequently, we expect research and development expense to increase in absolute dollars in future periods.

Sales and Marketing

Sales and marketing expense consists of salaries, benefits and personnel-related expenses, including sales commissions, advertising and marketing materials, trade shows and other marketing events, travel and entertainment expenses, as well as an allocation of facilities, information technology and supporting overhead expenses. We intend to continue to invest in sales and marketing to pursue new customers and expand relationships with existing customers. Accordingly, we expect sales and marketing expense to increase in absolute dollars in future periods.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expense consists of salaries, benefits and personnel-related expenses for our finance, accounting, legal, human resources, facilities and information technology employees; third-party professional fees; communication expenses; allocated facilities expenses; and other administrative expenses. We expect that the costs of being a public company, including the costs of compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and other regulations governing public companies, increased directors and officers insurance, and professional and other services, will increase our general and administrative expense in absolute dollars in future periods.

Interest and Other Expense, Net

Interest and other expense, net, consists primarily of interest income on our cash and cash equivalents, interest expense on our credit facilities, notes payable and capital leases, amortization of deferred financing fees, and foreign exchange currency transaction and translation gains and losses.

54

Provision for Income Taxes

We are subject to income tax in the United States as well as other jurisdictions or countries in which we conduct business. Earnings from our non-U.S. activities are subject to local country income tax. Our effective tax rates differ from the statutory rate due primarily to valuation allowances on our deferred taxes, state taxes, foreign taxes, research and development tax credits and tax contingencies.

Results of Operations

The following tables summarize key components of our results of operations for the periods indicated, both in dollars and as a percentage of revenue:

	Year Ended February 28 or 29,									Three Months Ended
	2010			2011			2012			May 31, 2011			May 31, 2012
	(In thousands)
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
Revenue
Subscriptions and support	$	29,976		$	39,419		$	35,816		$	8,053		$	9,814
Professional services		14,401			16,104			23,871			3,194			5,659
Total Revenue		44,377			55,523			59,687			11,247			15,473
Cost of revenue
Subscriptions and support		9,269			7,531			7,514			1,787			2,039
Professional services		11,493			11,774			14,116			3,333			3,653
Total Cost of revenue		20,762			19,305			21,630			5,120			5,692
Gross profit
Subscriptions and support		20,707			31,888			28,302			6,266			7,775
Professional services		2,908			4,330			9,755			(139	)		2,006
Total Gross profit		23,615			36,218			38,057			6,127			9,781
Operating Expenses:
Research and development		13,077			11,463			13,240			3,110			4,092
Sales and marketing		11,421			12,756			18,590			3,730			6,147
General and administrative		4,884			5,064			5,963			1,307			1,782
Total operating expenses		29,382			29,283			37,793			8,147			12,021
Income (loss) from operations		(5,767	)		6,935			264			(2,020	)		(2,240	)
Interest and other expense, net		(532	)		(259	)		(411	)		(86	)		(95	)
Income (loss) before income taxes		(6,299	)		6,676			(147	)		(2,106	)		(2,335	)
Provision for income taxes		(349	)		(33	)		(78	)		(31	)		(43	)
Net income (loss)	$	(6,648	)	$	6,643		$	(225	)	$	(2,137	)	$	(2,378	)

55

	Year Ended February 28 or 29,									Three Months Ended
	2010			2011			2012			May 31, 2011			May 31, 2012
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
Revenue
Subscriptions and support		67.5	%		71.0	%		60.0	%		71.6	%		63.4	%
Professional services		32.5			29.0			40.0			28.4			36.6
Total revenue		100.0			100.0			100.0			100.0			100.0
Cost of revenue (1)
Subscriptions and support		30.9			19.1			21.0			22.2			20.8
Professional services		79.8			73.1			59.1			104.4			64.6
Total cost of revenue		46.8			34.8			36.2			45.5			36.8
Gross margin (1)
Subscriptions and support		69.1			80.9			79.0			77.8			79.2
Professional services		20.2			26.9			40.9			(4.4	)		35.4
Total gross margin		53.2			65.2			63.8			54.5			63.2
Operating expenses:
Research and development		29.5			20.6			22.2			27.7			26.4
Sales and marketing		25.7			23.0			31.1			33.2			39.8
General and administrative		11.0			9.1			10.0			11.6			11.5
Total operating expenses		66.2			52.7			63.3			72.5			77.7
Income (loss) from operations		(13.0	)		12.5			0.4			(18.0	)		(14.5	)
Interest and other expense, net		(1.2	)		(0.5	)		(0.7	)		(0.8	)		(0.6	)
Income (loss) before income taxes		(14.2	)		12.0			(0.2	)		(18.8	)		(15.1	)
Provision for income taxes		(0.8	)		(0.1	)		(0.2	)		(0.3	)		(0.3	)
Net income (loss)		(15.0	)%		11.9	%		(0.4	)%		(19.1	)%		(15.4	)%

⁽¹⁾  The table shows cost of revenue and gross margin as a percentage of each component of revenue.

Three Months Ended May 31, 2011 and 2012

Revenue

	Three Months Ended May 31,				Change
	2011		2012		$		%
	(Dollars in thousands)
Revenue
Subscriptions and support	$	8,053	$	9,814	$	1,761		21.9	%
Professional services		3,194		5,659		2,465		77.2
Total revenue	$	11,247	$	15,473	$	4,226		37.6	%
Bookings	$	15,827	$	37,849	$	22,022		139.1	%
Billings	$	11,110	$	12,952	$	1,842		16.6	%
Backlog at end of period	$	70,903	$	102,648	$	31,745		44.8	%

Total revenue increased by $4.2 million, or 37.6%, from the three months ended May 31, 2011 to the three months ended May 31, 2012. The increase was due to a $1.8 million, or 21.9%, increase in subscriptions and support and a $2.5 million, or 77.2%, increase in professional services revenue attributable primarily to increased sales of additional solutions and services to our existing customers. Subscriptions and support revenue

56

and professional services revenue comprised 63.4% and 36.6% of total revenue, respectively, for the three months ended May 31, 2012.

In the three months ended May 31, 2012, we had three customers, RIM, Vodafone and Exostar, that each accounted for more than 10% of revenue. In the three months ended May 31, 2012, total customers headquartered in Canada and the United States each accounted for more than 10% of total revenue. In the three months ended May 31, 2011, we had one customer, RIM, that accounted for more than 10% of revenue. In the three months ended May 31, 2011, total customers headquartered in Canada and the United States each accounted for more than 10% of total revenue.

Bookings increased by $22.0 million, or 139.1%, from the three months ended May 31, 2011 to the three months ended May 31, 2012, due primarily to sales of additional software solutions and professional services to existing customers.

Cost of Revenue, Gross Profit and Gross Margin

	Three Months Ended May 31,						Change
	2011			2012			$		%
	(Dollars in thousands)
Cost of revenue
Subscriptions and support	$	1,787		$	2,039		$	252		14.1	%
Professional services		3,333			3,653			320		9.6
Total cost of revenue	$	5,120		$	5,692		$	572		11.2	%
Gross profit
Subscriptions and support	$	6,266		$	7,775		$	1,509		24.1	%
Professional services		(139	)		2,006			2,145		1,543.2
Total gross profit	$	6,127		$	9,781		$	3,654		59.6	%
Gross margin
Subscriptions and support		77.8	%		79.2	%				1.4	%
Professional services		(4.4	)		35.4					39.8
Total gross margin		54.5	%		63.2	%				8.7	%

Total cost of revenue increased $0.6 million, or 11.2%, from the three months ended May 31, 2011 to the three months ended May 31, 2012. The increase in total cost of revenue was driven primarily by increased headcount resulting in a $0.4 million increase in employee-related expense and a $0.2 million increase in fees paid for externally-sourced professional services. Total cost of revenue fluctuates period-to-period depending on the growth of our professional services business and any associated increased costs relating to the delivery of our on-demand software solutions and professional services, as well as the timing of significant expenditures.

Gross margin is impacted by the timing of when we record our revenue and costs related to arrangements with customers. We recognize revenue on certain arrangements ratably over the contract term or only upon completion of work performed, whereas we recognize costs as incurred. As such, this may cause our gross margins to fluctuate between periods.

57

Operating Expenses

	Three Months Ended May 31,				Change
	2011		2012		$		%
	(Dollars in thousands)
Operating Expenses:
Research and development	$	3,110	$	4,092	$	982		31.6	%
Sales and marketing		3,730		6,147		2,417		64.8
General and administrative		1,307		1,782		475		36.3
Total operating expenses	$	8,147	$	12,021	$	3,874		47.6	%

Research and Development

Research and development expense increased by $1.0 million, or 31.6%, from the three months ended May 31, 2011 to the three months ended May 31, 2012. The increase was attributable to an increase of $0.5 million in employee-related costs, an increase of $0.3 million in fees paid to third-party contract developers, and a $0.2 million increase in software and hardware maintenance costs. These increases are attributable to increased product development activities. As a percentage of revenue, research and development expense was 27.7% in the three months ended May 31, 2011 and 26.4% in the three months ended May 31, 2012.

Sales and Marketing

Sales and marketing expense increased by $2.4 million, or 64.8%, from the three months ended May 31, 2011 to the three months ended May 31, 2012. The increase was attributable to an increase in employee-related costs as we continue to expand our field sales organization globally. Average headcount in sales and marketing increased from 43 in the three months ended May 31, 2011 to 72 in the three months ended May 31, 2012. Total sales and marketing headcount increased by 65.9% from 44 as of May 31, 2011 to 73 as of May 31, 2012. As a percentage of revenue, sales and marketing expense increased from 33.2% in the three months ended May 31, 2011 to 39.7% in the three months ended May 31, 2012 reflecting our investment in sales and marketing to drive business growth.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expense increased $0.5 million, or 36.3%, from the three months ended May 31, 2011 to the three months ended May 31, 2012. The increase was driven primarily by a $0.4 million increase in employee-related expense resulting from increased headcount to support the growth of the business and the infrastructure required to support a public company. Headcount increased from 34 as of May 31, 2011 to 42 as of May 31, 2012. As a percentage of revenue, general and administrative expenses was 11.6% in the three months ended May 31, 2011 and 11.5% in the three months ended May 31, 2012.

Fiscal Year Ended February 28, 2011 and February 29, 2012

Revenue

	Year Ended February 28 or 29,						2010 to 2011 change						2011 to 2012 change
	2010		2011		2012		$			%			$			%
	(Dollars in thousands)
Revenue
Subscriptions and support	$	29,976	$	39,419	$	35,816	$	9,443			31.5	%	$	(3,603	)		(9.1	)%
Professional services		14,401		16,104		23,871		1,703			11.8			7,767			48.2
Total revenue	$	44,377	$	55,523	$	59,687	$	11,146			25.1	%	$	4,164			7.5	%
Bookings	$	57,517	$	56,916	$	72,615	$	(601	)		(1.0	)%	$	15,669			27.6	%
Billings	$	44,235	$	47,900	$	60,108	$	3,665			8.3	%	$	12,208			25.5	%
Backlog at end of year	$	57,170	$	66,186	$	78,617	$	9,016			15.8	%	$	12,431			18.8	%

58

During the past three fiscal years, our revenue increased due both to the addition of new customers and the increased volume of sales of additional solutions and services to our existing customer base. Pricing changes have not had a significant impact on our revenue growth. The total number of Enterprise Customers was 33 as of the beginning of fiscal 2010 and grew to 56 as of the end of fiscal 2012. During this time, we increased our investment in sales and marketing, leveraged our customer network and expanded further to adjacent verticals to add new customers and create new markets for our products both domestically and abroad. Due to our past successes with our customers, we have been able to sell additional solutions and services to them. Typically, we sell additional solutions and services to our existing customers when they experience returns on investment from the use of our solutions in one business process and they choose to purchase more solutions for additional business processes. We continue to develop new products and services to introduce to both our existing and new customers.

2012 compared to 2011. Total revenue increased by $4.2 million, or 7.5%, from fiscal 2011 to fiscal 2012. The increase was due primarily to a $7.8 million increase in professional services revenue, offset by a $3.6 million decrease in subscriptions and support revenue. Subscriptions and support revenue and professional services revenue comprised 60.0% and 40.0% of total revenue in fiscal 2012, respectively. The increase in revenue in fiscal 2012 was due substantially to sales to new customers. We added 13 new customers during fiscal 2012 bringing the total number of Enterprise Customers to 56 as of February 29, 2012.

Effective March 1, 2011, we adopted new accounting guidance relating to multiple-element arrangements, which had the effect of increasing subscriptions and support revenue by $1.0 million, and professional services revenue by $9.9 million, or a total of $10.9 million more than would have been recognized during the year had such accounting guidance not been adopted.

Prior to our adoption of the new revenue accounting guidance at the beginning of fiscal 2012, the timing of when we commenced revenue recognition on customer arrangements depended in large part upon customer acceptance of our deployment of on-demand solutions, and as such, resulted in fluctuations in revenue between periods. For fiscal 2011, our revenue included $6.4 million of subscriptions and support revenue and $4.8 million of professional services revenue, or a total of $11.2 million in revenue, related to multiple-element arrangements with a single customer which were executed between fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2011 and treated as a single unit of accounting for revenue recognition purposes. All revenue related to these arrangements was recognized ratably from the acceptance of the final deliverable between November 2010 and February 2011, the remaining term of the on-demand subscriptions and support. Typically, our first arrangement with a customer is for the initial deployment of our software solutions, and prior to adoption of the new accounting guidance, we commenced revenue recognition once we completed such deployment and recognized the fees ratably over the contractual term. Subsequent arrangements were then generally treated as separate units of accounting for revenue recognition purposes. Had the revenue on this arrangement been recognized in a pattern similar to our typical customer arrangements, we would have recognized that $11.2 million in revenue over three years, with $4.2 million of subscriptions and support revenue and $2.3 million of professional services revenue in years prior to fiscal 2011, and $2.2 million of subscriptions and support revenue and $2.5 million of professional services revenue in fiscal 2011. Our deferred revenue as of February 28, 2011 did not include a similar arrangement. Additionally, with the adoption of the new revenue accounting guidance in fiscal 2012, relating to multiple-element arrangements, we recognize revenue for the estimated selling price of each element as it is delivered to our customers. As such, it is unlikely that we will experience a similar fluctuation in our revenue resulting from such type of arrangement in the future.

Excluding the effect of the adoption of new accounting guidance on multiple-element arrangements in fiscal 2012 and the impact of the revenue arrangement described above, total revenue decreased by $0.3 million, or 0.6%, compared to fiscal 2011 due to $0.4 million lower subscriptions and support fees, offset by $0.1 million increase in professional service fees. See table below.

In fiscal 2012, we had two customers, RIM and Vodafone, that each accounted for more than 10% of revenue. Revenue generated from customers headquartered outside the United States accounted for 38.2% of

59

total revenue in fiscal 2012. In fiscal 2012, total customers headquartered in Canada and the United Kingdom each accounted for more than 10% of total revenue.

Bookings increased by $15.7 million, or 27.6%, from fiscal 2011 to fiscal 2012 due to the addition of new customers and sales of additional software solutions and professional services to existing customers reflecting the improved productivity from our investment in sales and marketing. The growth rates for revenue and bookings are not necessarily directly correlated with each other in a given year due to the seasonality of our customer agreements, the recognition in most cases of subscriptions revenue on a straight-line basis over the term of each customer agreement, and the recognition of professional services revenue over the period the services are performed or upon project completion.

2011 compared to 2010. Total revenue increased by $11.1 million, or 25.1%, from fiscal 2010 to fiscal 2011. The increase was primarily due to a $9.4 million, or 31.5%, growth in subscriptions and support revenue, most of which is attributable to an increased volume of sales of additional solutions and services to our existing customers. Subscriptions and support revenue, and professional services revenue comprised 71.0% and 29.0% of total revenue in fiscal 2011, respectively.

Prior to our adoption of the new revenue accounting guidance at the beginning of fiscal 2012, the timing of when we commenced revenue recognition on customer arrangements depended in large part upon customer acceptance of our deployment of on-demand solutions, and as such, resulted in fluctuations in revenue between periods. For fiscal 2011, our revenue included $6.4 million of subscriptions and support revenue and $4.8 million of professional services revenue, or a total of $11.2 million in revenue, related to multiple-element arrangements with a single customer which were executed between fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2011 and treated as a single unit of accounting for revenue recognition purposes. All revenue related to these arrangements was recognized ratably from the acceptance of the final deliverable between November 2010 through February 2011, the remaining term of the on-demand subscriptions and support. Typically, our first arrangement with a customer is for the initial deployment of our software solutions, and prior to adoption of the new accounting guidance, we commenced revenue recognition once we completed such deployment and recognized the fees ratably over the contractual term. Subsequent arrangements were then generally treated as separate units of accounting for revenue recognition purposes. Had the revenue on this arrangement been recognized in a pattern similar to our typical customer arrangements, we would have recognized that $11.2 million in revenue over three years, with $4.2 million of subscriptions and support revenue and $2.3 million of professional services revenue in years prior to fiscal 2011, and $2.2 million of subscriptions and support revenue and $2.5 million of professional services revenue in fiscal 2011. Our deferred revenue as of February 28, 2011 did not include a similar arrangement. Additionally, with the adoption of the new revenue accounting guidance in fiscal 2012, relating to multiple-element arrangements, we recognize revenue for the estimated selling price of each element as it is delivered to our customers. As such, it is unlikely that we will experience a similar fluctuation in our revenue resulting from such type of arrangement in the future.

For fiscal 2010, we had an increase in revenue of $5.1 million due, in part, to the mutual termination of a certain customer contract that resulted in recognition of the total arrangement fees during the fiscal year rather than ratably over the contract term.

Excluding the revenue from these arrangements described above, revenue increased by $5.7 million, or 13.2%, from fiscal 2010 to fiscal 2011.

60

The table below presents the revenue impact of transactions described above and the adoption of the new revenue accounting guidance in fiscal 2010, fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2012.

	Year Ended February 28 or 29,									2010 to 2011 change						2011 to 2012 change
	2010			2011			2012			$			%			$			%
	(Dollars in thousands)
Revenue, as reported
Subscriptions and support	$	29,976		$	39,419		$	35,816		$	9,443			31.5	%	$	(3,603	)		(9.1	)%
Professional services		14,401			16,104			23,871			1,703			11.8			7,767			48.2
Total		44,377			55,523			59,687			11,146			25.1			4,164			7.5
Effect of multiple-element arrangement transaction described above:
Subscriptions and support		2,335			(4,194	)		—
Professional services		1,748			(2,281	)		—
Total		4,083			(6,475	)		—
Effect of mutual termination of a certain customer contract in fiscal 2010:
Subscriptions and support		(4,342	)		—			—
Professional services		(780	)		—			—
Total		(5,122	)		—			—
Pro-forma basis, adjusted for the above transactions
Subscriptions and support		27,969			35,225			35,816			7,256			25.9			591			1.7
Professional services		15,369			13,823			23,871			(1,546	)		(10.1	)		10,048			72.7
Total	$	43,338		$	49,048		$	59,687		$	5,710			13.2	%	$	10,639			21.7	%
Impact of adoption of the new accounting guidance:
Subscriptions and support		—			—			(985	)
Professional services		—			—			(9,947	)
Total		—			—		$	(10,932	)
Revenue, as adjusted
Subscriptions and support		27,969			35,225			34,831			7,256			25.9			(394	)		(1.1	)
Professional services		15,369			13,823			13,924			(1,546	)		(10.1	)		101			(0.7	)
Total	$	43,338		$	49,048		$	48,755		$	5,710			13.2	%	$	(293	)		(0.6	)%

In fiscal 2011, we had two customers, Dell and RIM, that each accounted for more than 10% of revenue. In fiscal 2010, we had three customers, Exostar, IBM and YRC Worldwide, that each accounted for more than 10% of revenue. For fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2011, revenue generated outside the United States accounted for 22.9% and 36.9% of total revenue, respectively. In fiscal 2012, customers in Canada and the United Kingdom accounted for more than 10% of total revenue.

Bookings in fiscal 2011 were comparable to fiscal 2010.

61

Cost of Revenue, Gross Profit and Gross Margin

	Year Ended February 28 or 29,									2010 to 2011 change					2011 to 2012 change
	2010			2011			2012			$		%			$			%
	(Dollars in thousands)
Cost of Revenue
Subscriptions and support	$	9,269		$	7,531		$	7,514			$(1,738)		(18.8	)%	$	(17	)		(0.2	)%
Professional services		11,493			11,774			14,116			281		2.4			2,342			19.9
Total cost of revenue	$	20,762		$	19,305		$	21,630			$(1,457)		(7.0	)%	$	2,325			12.0	%
Gross profit
Subscriptions and support	$	20,707		$	31,888		$	28,302			$11,181		54.0	%	$	(3,586	)		(11.2	)%
Professional services		2,908			4,330			9,755			1,422		48.9			5,425			125.3
Total gross profit	$	23,615		$	36,218		$	38,057			$12,603		53.4	%	$	1,839			5.1	%
Gross margin
Subscriptions and support		69.1	%		80.9	%		79.0	%				11.8	%					(1.9	)%
Professional services		20.2			26.9			40.9					6.7						14.0
Total gross margin		53.2	%		65.2	%		63.8	%				12.0	%					(1.4	)%

2012 compared to 2011. Total cost of revenue increased by $2.3 million, or 12.0%, in fiscal 2012 compared to fiscal 2011. The increase in total cost of revenue was driven primarily by increased headcount resulting in a $2.7 million increase in employee-related expense and an increase of $0.9 million in fees paid for externally-sourced professional services. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $0.9 million in hosting costs and $0.3 million in software and hardware maintenance costs. Total cost of revenue fluctuates period-to-period depending on the growth of our professional services business and any associated increased costs relating to the delivery of our on-demand software solutions and professional services, as well as the timing of significant expenditures.

The increase in revenue associated with the adoption of the new revenue accounting guidance in fiscal 2012 impacted our margins positively as our revenue increased without a corresponding increase in our cost of revenue since our cost of revenue is recognized as incurred and would have been the same without the increase in revenue. The adoption of the new revenue accounting guidance also had the effect of increasing gross margin on professional services by 42.3% from (1.4)% to 40.9%. Overall, the adoption of the new revenue accounting guidance had the effect of increasing gross margin by 8.2% from 55.6% to 63.8%.

Gross margin is impacted by the timing of when we record our revenue and costs related to arrangements with customers. We recognize revenue on certain arrangements ratably over the contract term or only upon completion of work performed, whereas we recognize costs as incurred. As such, this may cause our gross margins to fluctuate between periods.

2011 compared to 2010. Total cost of revenue decreased by $1.5 million, or 7.0%, from fiscal 2010 to fiscal 2011. The decrease in total cost of revenue was due primarily to a $1.2 million decrease in hosting fees attributable to process efficiencies implemented in our data centers, a $0.4 million decrease in fees paid for externally-sourced professional services, a $0.3 million decrease in facilities and internal information technology costs, and a $0.3 million decrease in depreciation and amortization expense. These decreases were partially offset by a $0.7 million increase in employee related costs resulting from changes in staffing levels.

Gross margin was 53.2% in fiscal 2010 and 65.2% in fiscal 2011. For fiscal 2011, our revenue included $4.2 million of subscriptions and support revenue and $2.3 million of professional services revenue, or a total of $6.5 million in revenue, related to multiple arrangements with a single customer executed between fiscal 2008

and fiscal 2011 and treated as a single unit of accounting for revenue recognition purposes, which would have

62

been recorded in prior years had the revenue on this arrangement been recognized in a pattern similar to our typical customer arrangements. With no corresponding cost recorded for this arrangement in fiscal 2011, gross margin on subscriptions and support was positively affected by 2.3%, from 78.6% to 80.9%, and professional services by 12.1%, from 14.8% to 26.9%, resulting in an overall increase in gross margin of 4.6%. Excluding the revenue from these arrangements, fiscal 2011 gross margin would have been 78.6% on subscriptions and support and 14.8% on professional services, or a total gross margin of 60.6%, or 7.4% higher compared to 53.2% in fiscal 2010.

Operating Expenses

	Year Ended February 28 or 29,						2010 to 2011 change						2011 to 2012 change
	2010		2011		2012		$			%			$		%
	(Dollars in thousands)
Research and development	$	13,077	$	11,463	$	13,240	$	(1,614	)		(12.3	)%	$	1,777		15.5	%
Sales and marketing		11,421		12,756		18,590		1,335			11.7			5,834		45.7
General and administrative		4,884		5,064		5,963		180			3.7			899		17.8
Total operating expenses	$	29,382	$	29,283	$	37,793	$	(99	)		(0.3	)%	$	8,510		29.1	%

Research and Development

2012 compared to 2011. Research and development expense increased by $1.8 million, or 15.5%, from fiscal 2011 to fiscal 2012. The increase was attributable primarily to an increase of $0.9 million in employee-related costs and an increase of $0.7 million in fees paid to third-party contract developers attributed to increased product development activities. As a percentage of revenue, research and development expense was 20.6% in fiscal 2011 and 22.2% in fiscal 2012.

2011 compared to 2010. Research and development expense decreased by $1.6 million, or 12.3%, from fiscal 2010 to fiscal 2011. The $1.6 million decrease was due primarily to a decrease of $2.0 million in employee-related costs and a $0.3 million decrease in facilities costs. These decreases were partially offset by a $0.5 million increase in data center costs and a $0.1 million increase in fees paid to external contractors for product development projects. As a percentage of revenue, research and development expense decreased from 29.5% in fiscal 2010 to 20.6% in fiscal 2011 due primarily to growth in revenue and a decrease in overall research and development expense.

Sales and Marketing

2012 compared to 2011. In fiscal 2012, sales and marketing expense increased by $5.8 million, or 45.7%, from fiscal 2011 to fiscal 2012. The increase was attributable primarily to a $4.8 million increase in employee-related costs as we expanded our field sales organization globally. Average headcount in sales and marketing increased from 38 in fiscal 2011 to 51 in fiscal 2012. Total sales and marketing headcount increased by 85.3% from 34 as of March 1, 2010 to 63 as of February 29, 2012. We also incurred $0.3 million of additional fees paid to sales representatives in China and Europe in order to expand our customer base in those geographic locations. Additionally, our marketing expenses increased by $0.4 million as a result of additional marketing and branding programs in fiscal 2012. As a percentage of revenue, sales and marketing expense increased from 23.0% in fiscal 2011 to 31.1% in fiscal 2012 reflecting our investment in sales and marketing to drive business growth.

2011 compared to 2010. Sales and marketing expense increased by $1.3 million, or 11.7%, from fiscal 2010 to fiscal 2011. The increase was driven primarily by increased headcount as we expanded our sales organization which resulted in a $0.7 million increase in payroll and related expenses and a $0.4 million increase in travel expenses. We also incurred $0.1 million in increased recruiting expenses to hire additional sales personnel, and a $0.1 million increase in fees paid for outside services to support the expansion of our presence in the European market. These increases were partially offset by a $0.1 million decrease in marketing expenses

63

resulting from fewer marketing and branding programs and more direct sales activities in fiscal 2011. As a percentage of revenue, sales and marketing expense decreased from 25.7% in fiscal 2010 to 23.0% in fiscal 2011.

General and Administrative

2012 compared to 2011. General and administrative expense increased by $0.9 million, or 17.8%, from fiscal 2011 to fiscal 2012. The increase was attributable primarily to higher employee-related costs of $0.8 million and $0.2 million higher legal and accounting fees. These increases were offset by a $0.1 million decrease in fees paid to contractors for administrative services. As a percentage of revenue, general and administrative expense was 9.1% in fiscal 2011 and 10.0% in fiscal 2012.

2011 compared to 2010. General and administrative expense increased $0.2 million, or 3.7%, from fiscal 2010 to fiscal 2011. The increase was driven primarily by $0.1 million higher employee-related salaries, a $0.1 million increase in fees paid to contractors for administrative services and a $0.1 million increase in legal and accounting fees. These increases were partially offset by $0.1 million lower depreciation expenses. As a percentage of revenue, general and administrative expense decreased from 11.0% in fiscal 2010 to 9.1% in fiscal 2011.

Interest and Other Expense, Net

	Year Ended February 28 or 29,									2010 to 2011 change						2011 to 2012 change
	2010			2011			2012			$			%			$			%
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest income	$	25		$	5		$	2		$	(20	)		(80.0	)%	$	(3	)		(60.0	)%
Interest expense		(393	)		(115	)		(185	)		278			(70.7	)		(70	)		60.9
Other expense, net		(164	)		(149	)		(228	)		15			(9.1	)		(79	)		53.0
Total interest and other expense, net	$	(532	)	$	(259	)	$	(411	)	$	273			(51.3	)%	$	(152	)		58.7	%

2012 compared to 2011. In fiscal 2012, interest and other expense, net, increased by $0.2 million, or 58.7%, compared to fiscal 2010. The increase was largely driven by net transaction losses on foreign exchange and interest expense on our term loan.

2011 compared to 2010. In fiscal 2011, interest and other expense, net, decreased by $0.3 million, or 51.3%, compared to fiscal 2010. The decrease was due primarily to a decrease in interest expense as a result of reduced equipment finance borrowing.

64

Quarterly Results of Operations

The following tables present our unaudited consolidated quarterly results of operations data in dollars and as a percentage of revenue for each of the nine most recent quarters commencing with the quarter ended May 31, 2010 and ending with the quarter ended May 31, 2012. We have prepared this information on a basis consistent with our audited consolidated financial statements and have included all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, which, in the opinion of management, are necessary to fairly present our operating results for the quarters presented. You should read the following tables in conjunction with our audited and unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. Our quarterly results of operations have varied in the past and are likely to do so again in the future. As such, we believe that comparisons of our quarterly results of operations should not be relied upon as an indication of our future performance. The items discussed below highlight unusual events and circumstances that make comparability between quarters difficult.

	Three Months Ended
	May 31, 2010			Aug 31, 2010			Nov 30, 2010			Feb 28, 2011			May 31, 2011			Aug 31, 2011			Nov 30, 2011			Feb 29, 2012			May 31, 2012
	(In thousands, except per share data)
Revenue
Subscriptions and support	$	8,420		$	8,657		$	9,896		$	12,446		$	8,053		$	9,195		$	9,315		$	9,253		$	9,814
Professional services		3,137			3,405			3,838			5,724			3,194			7,411			5,494			7,772			5,659
Total revenue		11,557			12,062			13,734			18,170			11,247			16,606			14,809			17,025			15,473
Cost of revenue
Subscriptions and support		1,993			1,920			1,861			1,757			1,787			1,884			1,928			1,915			2,039
Professional services		2,603			2,937			3,223			3,011			3,333			3,362			3,529			3,892			3,653
Total cost of revenue		4,596			4,857			5,084			4,768			5,120			5,246			5,457			5,807			5,692
Gross profit
Subscriptions and support		6,427			6,737			8,035			10,689			6,266			7,311			7,387			7,338			7,775
Professional services		534			468			615			2,713			(139	)		4,049			1,965			3,880			2,006
Total gross profit		6,961			7,205			8,650			13,402			6,127			11,360			9,352			11,218			9,781
Operating expenses:
Research and development		2,924			2,806			2,744			2,989			3,110			3,369			3,401			3,360			4,092
Sales and marketing		2,956			3,048			3,023			3,729			3,730			4,318			5,113			5,429			6,147
General and administrative		1,124			1,219			1,403			1,318			1,307			1,337			1,661			1,658			1,782
Total operating expenses		7,004			7,073			7,170			8,036			8,147			9,024			10,175			10,447			12,021
Income (loss) from operations		(43	)		132			1,480			5,366			(2,020	)		2,336			(823	)		771			(2,240	)
Interest and other expense, net		(109	)		(70	)		(40	)		(40	)		(86	)		(129	)		(242	)		46			(95	)
Income (loss) before income taxes		(152	)		62			1,440			5,326			(2,106	)		2,207			(1,065	)		817			(2,335	)
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes		(3	)		(4	)		7			33			31			43			48			(44	)		43
Net income (loss)		(149	)		66			1,433			5,293			(2,137	)		2,164			(1,113	)		861			(2,378	)
Undistributed earnings allocated to preferred stockholders		—			(66	)		(1,433	)		(4,410	)		—			(2,164	)		—			(861	)		—
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders	$	(149	)	$	—		$	—		$	883		$	(2,137	)	$	—		$	(1,113	)	$	—		$	(2,378	)

65

	Three Months Ended
	May 31, 2010			Aug 31, 2010			Nov 30, 2010			Feb 28, 2011			May 31, 2011			Aug 31, 2011			Nov 30, 2011			Feb 29, 2012			May 31, 2012
	(In thousands, except per share data)
Net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders:
Basic	$	(0.03	)	$	—		$	—		$	0.15		$	(0.37	)	$	—		$	(0.18	)	$	—		$	(0.38	)
Diluted	$	(0.03	)	$	—		$	—		$	0.04		$	(0.37	)	$	—		$	(0.18	)	$	—		$	(0.38	)
Weighted average shares used to compute earnings per share attributable to common stockholders:
Basic		4,501			5,974			6,017			6,057			5,798			6,154			5,985			6,215			6,190
Diluted		4,501			5,974			6,017			21,701			5,798			6,154			5,985			6,215			6,190
Revenue
Subscriptions and Support		72.9	%		71.8	%		72.1	%		68.5	%		71.6	%		55.4	%		62.9	%		54.3	%		63.4	%
Professional Services		27.1			28.2			27.9			31.5			28.4			44.6			37.1			45.7			36.6
Total Revenue		100.0			100.0			100.0			100.0			100.0			100.0			100.0			100.0			100.0
Cost of revenue (1)
Subscriptions and Support		23.7			22.2			18.8			14.1			22.2			20.5			20.7			20.7			20.8
Professional Services		83.0			86.3			84.0			52.6			104.4			45.4			64.2			50.1			64.6
Total cost of revenue		39.8			40.3			37.0			26.2			45.5			31.6			36.8			34.1			36.8
Gross margin (1)
Subscriptions and Support		76.3			77.8			81.2			85.9			77.8			79.5			79.3			79.3			79.2
Professional Services		17.0			13.7			16.0			47.4			(4.4	)		54.6			35.8			49.9			35.4
Total gross margin		60.2			59.7			63.0			73.8			54.5			68.4			63.2			65.9			63.2
Operating expenses:
Research and development		25.3			23.3			20.0			16.5			27.7			20.3			23.0			19.7			26.4
Sales and marketing		25.6			25.3			22.0			20.5			33.2			26.0			34.5			31.9			39.8
General and administrative		9.7			10.1			10.2			7.3			11.6			8.1			11.2			9.8			11.5
Total operating expenses		60.6			58.6			52.2			44.3			72.5			54.3			68.7			61.4			77.7
Income (loss) from operations		(0.4	)		1.1			10.8			29.5			(18.0	)		14.1			(5.6	)		4.5			(14.5	)
Interest and other expense, net		(0.9	)		(0.6	)		(0.3	)		(0.2	)		(0.8	)		(0.8	)		(1.6	)		0.3			(0.6	)
Income (loss) before income taxes		(1.3	)		0.5			10.5			29.3			(18.8	)		13.3			(7.2	)		4.8			(15.1	)
Provision for income taxes		0.0			(0.0	)		0.1			0.2			0.3			0.3			0.3			(0.3	)		0.3
Net income (loss)		(1.3	)%		0.5	%		10.4	%		29.1	%		(19.1	)%		13.0	%		(7.5	)%		5.1	%		(15.4	)%

⁽¹⁾ The table above shows cost of revenue and gross margin as a percentage of each component of revenue.

66

	Three Months Ended
	May 31, 2010			Aug 31, 2010			Nov 30, 2010			Feb 28, 2011		May 31, 2011			Aug 31, 2011			Nov 30, 2011			Feb 29, 2012			May 31, 2012
	(Dollars in thousands)
Other Financial and Operational Data:
Adjusted EBITDA (1)	$	580		$	731		$	2,009		$	6,051	$	(1,490	)	$	2,830		$	(287	)	$	1,464		$	(1,352	)
Free cash flow (2)	$	(455	)	$	(1,121	)	$	(374	)	$	1,253	$	(266	)	$	(2,923	)	$	697		$	(3	)	$	(1,477	)
Number of unique registered trading partner (3)		23,654			24,662			25,554			26,440		27,364			28,003			29,599			30,772			32,390
Number of unique registered users (3)		65,645			67,909			70,847			73,377		77,311			79,772			84,461			88,012			94,708

⁽¹⁾ We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) adjusted for interest and other expense, net, provision for income taxes, depreciation and amortization, and stock-based compensation expense. See “Adjusted EBITDA” in the “Key Financial Performance Measures” of this section for more information and for a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income (loss), the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP.

⁽²⁾ We define free cash flow as net cash provided by (used in) operating activities less capital expenditures. See “Free Cash Flow” in the “Key Financial Performance Measures” of this section for more information and for a reconciliation of free cash flow to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities, the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP.

⁽³⁾ We define unique registered trading partners and unique registered users as current entities and individuals, respectively, that are connected to our network as of the balance sheet date. We view the number of unique registered trading partners and unique registered users as key indicators of the reach of our network and the value our enterprise customers are deriving from our solutions.

Stock-based compensation included in the consolidated statements of operations data above was as follows:

	Three Months Ended
	May 31, 2010		Aug 31, 2010		Nov 30, 2010		Feb 28, 2011		May 31, 2011		Aug 31, 2011		Nov 30, 2011		Feb 29, 2012		May 31, 2012
	(In thousands)
Cost of revenue	$	37	$	38	$	36	$	112	$	51	$	25	$	46	$	81	$	121
Research and development		20		21		20		47		23		10		20		31		53
Sales and marketing		28		28		24		74		43		39		53		124		145
General and administrative		20		21		18		33		27		27		46		81		160
Total stock-based compensation	$	105	$	108	$	98	$	266	$	144	$	101	$	165	$	317	$	479

67

Adjusted EBITDA

The following table presents a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA for each of the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended
	May 31, 2010			Aug 31, 2010			Nov 30, 2010		Feb 28, 2011		May 31, 2011			Aug 31, 2011		Nov 30, 2011			Feb 29, 2012			May 31, 2012
	(In thousands)
Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA:
Net income (loss)	$	(149	)	$	66		$	1,433	$	5,293	$	(2,137	)	$	2,164	$	(1,113	)	$	861		$	(2,378	)
Interest and other expense, net		109			70			40		40		86			129		242			(46	)		95
Provision for income taxes		(3	)		(4	)		7		33		31			43		48			(44	)		43
Depreciation and amortization		518			491			431		419		386			393		371			376			409
Stock-based compensation		105			108			98		266		144			101		165			317			479
Adjusted EBITDA	$	580		$	731		$	2,009	$	6,051	$	(1,490	)	$	2,830	$	(287	)	$	1,464		$	(1,352	)

Free Cash Flow

A reconciliation of net cash provided by (used in) operating activities to free cash flow is presented below:

	Three Months Ended
	May 31, 2010			Aug 31, 2010			Nov 30, 2010			Feb 28, 2011			May 31, 2011			Aug 31, 2011			Nov 30, 2011			Feb 29, 2012			May 31, 2012
	(In thousands)
Free Cash Flow Data:
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities	$	(171	)	$	(961	)	$	(155	)	$	1,375		$	(78	)	$	(2,754	)	$	835		$	1,171		$	(823	)
Capital expenditures		(284	)		(160	)		(219	)		(122	)		(188	)		(169	)		(138	)		(1,174	)		(654	)
Free cash flow	$	(455	)	$	(1,121	)	$	(374	)	$	1,253		$	(266	)	$	(2,923	)	$	697		$	(3	)	$	(1,477	)

Revenue and Gross Margin

Our quarterly revenue fluctuates, due primarily to the timing of revenue recognition, which depends primarily on revenue recognition requirements and seasonality. We believe that this seasonality is due to customer buying patterns typical in this industry and is likely to continue in the future. In the future, we expect our revenue to also reflect such seasonality as a result of our adoption of the new revenue accounting guidance.

Over the past nine quarters, our gross margins have ranged from 54.5% to 73.8%. As reflected in the table above, we have experienced quarter to quarter volatility in gross margin. We believe that this volatility was largely the result of our revenue mix in a particular period and the timing of revenue recognition. The amount of subscriptions and support in a period is a significant driver of our overall gross margin because of the high margins our software solutions generally produce. Gross margins in professional services may be affected by the nature and scope of work required in our contracts with customers.

We recognized $1.4 million of subscriptions and support revenue and $1.1 million of professional services revenue in the quarter ended November 30, 2010 and $5.0 million of subscriptions and support revenue

68

and $3.6 million of professional services revenue in the quarter ended February 28, 2011 related to arrangements which were executed between fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2011 and treated as a single unit of accounting for revenue recognition purposes. All revenue related to these arrangements was recognized from the acceptance of the final deliverable in November 2010 ratably through February 2011, the remaining term of the on-demand subscriptions and support arrangements, whereas the costs related to these arrangements were substantially recognized in the prior periods as they were incurred. As a result of the timing of the revenue recognition and costs associated with these arrangements, our gross margins decreased by 2.3% for the quarter ended November 30, 2010 and increased by 17.9% for the quarter ended February 28, 2011. Excluding the revenue from these arrangements, gross margins for the quarters ended November 30, 2010 and February 28, 2011 would have been 65.3% and 55.9%, respectively.

Effective March 1, 2011, we adopted the new accounting guidance on multiple-element arrangements, which had the effect of increasing revenue and gross profit by $0.8 million, $4.0 million, $2.4 million and $3.7 million for the quarters ended May 31, 2011 August 31, 2011, November 30, 2011 and February 29, 2012, respectively. The new accounting guidance also increased gross margin by 3.5%, 10.0%, 7.1% and 9.6% during the quarters ended May 31, 2011 August 31, 2011, November 30, 2011 and February 29, 2012, respectively.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

	Year Ended February 28 or 29,									Three Months Ended May 31,
	2010			2011			2012			2011			2012
	(In thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period	$	9,530		$	10,060		$	10,219		$	10,373		$	10,092
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		(4,401	)		88			(826	)		(78	)		(823	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(958	)		(768	)		(1,764	)		(220	)		(680	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(756	)		1,210			2,750			613			1,394

As of February 29, 2012 and May 31, 2012, we had cash and cash equivalents of $10.2 million and $10.1 million, consisting of cash and money market accounts. We did not have any short-term or long-term investments. Since inception, we have financed our operations primarily through the sale of preferred stock, borrowings under credit facilities and issuances of notes payable to stockholders. Our principal uses of cash are to fund operations, working capital requirements and capital expenditures. We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents, together with cash generated from operations, will be sufficient to meet our working capital requirements for at least the next 12 months.

Operating Cash Flow

Our cash flow from operating activities is significantly influenced by the amount and timing of customer payments and the amount of cash we invest in personnel and infrastructure to support the anticipated future growth of our business. Net cash used in operating activities has historically resulted from losses from operations and changes in working capital.

Net cash used in operating activities was $0.8 million for the three months ended May 31, 2012. The timing of our billings and collections relating to our sales and the timing of the payment of our liabilities have a significant impact on our cash flows. The use of cash in operating activities reflects our $2.4 million net loss adjusted by non-cash stock-based compensation of $0.5 million, depreciation and amortization of $0.4 million and other non-cash charges of $0.1 million. This was offset by $0.8 million in cash provided by the net change in our operating assets and liabilities. The net change in our operating assets and liabilities resulted primarily from a decrease in accounts receivable of $4.4 million due to the timing of collections from customers. This was partially offset by a decrease in deferred revenue of $2.6 million resulting from the recognition of revenue in the three months ended May 31, 2012 associated with cash collected in previous periods, an increase in prepayments

69

of $0.6 million associated with software and hardware maintenance expense and a decrease in accounts payable of $0.4 million due to timing of payments to our suppliers.

Net cash used in operating activities was $0.1 million for the three months ended May 31, 2011. The use of cash in operating activities reflects a $2.1 million net loss adjusted by non-cash stock-based compensation of $0.1 million and depreciation and amortization of $0.4 million. This was substantially offset by $1.5 million in cash provided by the net change in our operating assets and liabilities. The net change in our operating assets and liabilities resulted primarily from a decrease in accounts receivable of $2.0 million due to the timing of collections from customers and a decrease of $0.1 million in prepaid expenses offset by a decrease in accounts payable of $0.6 million due to the timing of payments to our suppliers.

Net cash used in operating activities was $0.8 million in fiscal 2012. The timing of our billings and collections relating to our sales and the timing of the payment of our liabilities have a significant impact on our cash flows. The use of cash in operating activities was attributable primarily to the net change in our operating assets and liabilities of $2.7 million resulting from an increase in accounts receivable of $4.0 million due to growth in our billings and an increase of $1.0 million in prepaid expenses for software and hardware maintenance expense, and marketing costs. This was offset by an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $1.9 million reflecting timing of payments to our suppliers and growth in business activities and a $0.4 million increase in deferred revenue resulting from increased sales and billings. Net cash used in operating activities in fiscal 2012 also reflects our $0.2 million net loss adjusted for non-cash depreciation and amortization of $1.5 million, stock-based compensation of $0.7 million and other non-cash items of $0.2 million.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $0.1 million in fiscal 2011. The timing of our billings and collections relating to our sales and the timing of the payment of our liabilities have a significant impact on our cash flows. The cash provided by operating activities reflects our $6.6 million net income adjusted for depreciation and amortization of $1.9 million and stock-based compensation of $0.6 million. This was offset by an $8.8 million use of cash from the net change in our operating assets and liabilities. The net change in our operating assets and liabilities of $8.8 million resulted primarily from a $7.6 million decrease in deferred revenue due to the recognition of revenue in fiscal 2011 where cash was collected in previous periods and an increase in accounts receivable of $1.9 million due to revenue and billings growth, offset by an increase in accounts payable of $0.8 million reflecting timing of payments to our suppliers.

Net cash used in operating activities was $4.4 million in fiscal 2010. The timing of our billings and collections relating to our sales and the timing of the payment of our liabilities have a significant impact on our cash flows. The use of cash in operating activities reflects our $6.6 million net loss adjusted by non-cash depreciation and amortization of $2.3 million and stock-based compensation of $0.4 million. Additionally, we used $0.6 million from the net change in our operating assets and liabilities. The net change in our operating assets and liabilities resulted primarily from a decrease in accounts payable of $1.3 million due to the timing of payments to our suppliers, partially offset by a $0.2 million decrease in accounts receivable due to the timing of collections from customers and a decrease of $0.3 million in prepaid expenses and other current assets.

Investing Cash Flow

Historically, our primary investing activities have consisted of capital expenditures associated with expanding our cloud-based, on-demand software solutions infrastructure and growing our workforce.

Net cash used in investing activities for the three months ended May 31, 2012 was $0.7 million, which was comprised primarily of capital expenditures.

Net cash used in investing activities for fiscal 2012 was $1.8 million, which was comprised primarily of capital expenditures.

70

Net cash used in investing activities for fiscal 2011 was $0.8 million, which was comprised primarily of capital expenditures.

Net cash used in investing activities for fiscal 2010 was $1.0 million, which was comprised primarily of capital expenditures.

Financing Cash Flow

Since inception, we have financed our operations primarily through the sale of preferred stock and borrowings under credit facilities and from our stockholders.

Net cash provided by financing activities for the three months ended May 31, 2012 was $1.4 million. In fiscal 2013, we received $0.7 million from the issuance of Series BB preferred stock upon the exercise of warrants. We maintain a credit facility consisting of a line of credit and growth capital term loan. For the three months ended May 31, 2012, our net borrowings under our credit facility amounted to $1.2 million. We also made payments of $0.3 million on notes payable for fixed asset purchases and $0.3 million for costs associated with preparing for our initial public offering. We will continue to incur costs associated with preparing for our initial public offering.

Net cash provided by financing activities for the three months ended May 31, 2011 was $0.6 million. For the three months ended May 31, 2011, our net borrowings under our credit facility amounted to $1.0 million. We also made payments of $0.3 million on notes payable for fixed asset purchases and $0.1 million for costs associated with preparing for our initial public offering.

Net cash provided by financing activities for fiscal 2012 was $2.8 million. In fiscal 2012, we received $0.1 million from the issuance of Series CC preferred stock upon the exercise of warrants. For the year ended February 29, 2012, our net borrowings under our credit facility amounted to $4.2 million. We also made payments of $1.1 million on notes payable for fixed asset purchases and $0.6 million for costs associated with preparing for our initial public offering.

Net cash provided by financing activities for fiscal 2011 was $1.2 million. During fiscal 2011, we received $0.6 million from exercises of stock options. For fiscal 2011, our net borrowings from our credit facility amounted to $1.6 million. We also made payments of $0.3 million on our capital lease obligation and $0.7 million on notes payable for fixed asset purchases.

Net cash used in financing activities for fiscal 2010 was $0.8 million. We received $0.1 million in proceeds from exercises of stock options. During fiscal 2010, we received $6.1 million in proceeds from the issuance of Series D preferred stock. For fiscal 2010, our net repayments under our credit facility amounted to $6.0 million. We also made payments of $0.5 million on notes payable and $0.4 million on our capital lease obligation.

Adequacy of Capital Resources

Our future capital requirements may vary materially from those now planned and will depend on many factors. These may include the costs to develop and implement new solutions and applications, the sales and marketing resources needed to further penetrate our target markets, the expansion of our operations in the United States and internationally and the response of competitors to our solutions and applications.

We believe our cash and cash equivalents, funds available under our credit facility and cash flows from our operations will be sufficient to meet our working capital and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next 12 months.

From time to time, we may consider additional financing sources and means to lower our cost of capital, which could include the sale of equity, equity-linked and debt financing, and the application of the proceeds

71

therefrom to the repayment of bank debt or other indebtedness. In addition, in connection with any future acquisitions, we may require additional funding which may be provided in the form of additional debt, equity or equity-linked financing or a combination thereof. There can be no assurance that any additional financing will be available to us on acceptable terms or at all.

Our Indebtedness

We maintain a credit facility having a total borrowing limit of $26.7 million as of February 29, 2012 and May 31, 2012 with Bridge Bank, National Association, or Bridge Bank. Of the total facility, $20.0 million consists of formula-based lines of credit secured by our accounts receivable, and $6.7 million consists of term loans. The term of the lines of credit expires in August 2012 and the term loans expire in August 2015. Amounts outstanding under the credit facility bear interest at a rate equal to the Wall Street Journal “prime rate” plus additional interest ranging from 1.25% to 4.00%, with a floor for the prime rate of 3.25%.

In connection with this credit facility, warrants were issued to Bridge Bank to purchase 70,312 shares of Series BB preferred stock in March 2005. These warrants expired unexercised in March 2012.

We borrowed $2.5 million against the term loan on February 10, 2011. We were obligated to make interest-only payments on amounts drawn through April 10, 2011. On April 30, 2011, the principal balance outstanding was converted to a term loan payable in 30 monthly installments of principal plus accrued interest. The amount outstanding under the term loan was $2.5 million, $1.7 million and $1.4 million as of February 28, 2011, February 29, 2012 and May 31, 2012, respectively, and is recorded in notes payable on the balance sheet. As of February 29, 2012 and May 31, 2012, an additional $5.0 million and $5.3 million, respectively, was available under the term loan. As of February 29, 2012, the amounts outstanding under the lines of credit were $9.7 million and $10.3 million was unused under the lines of credit. As of May 31, 2012, the amounts outstanding under the lines of credit were $10.9 million and $9.1 million was unused under the lines of credit.

The bank lines of credit and term loan are secured by our tangible and intangible assets, as well as a negative pledge whereby we agree not to give any creditor a security interest in our intellectual property. Our credit facility also requires us to comply with periodic reporting requirements, limits our ability to incur additional indebtedness and merge or consolidate with another entity, requires we maintain Bridge Bank as our primary lender and that we maintain certain types of business insurance, and limits our use of proceeds from the credit facility. Our credit facility also requires compliance with various financial covenants, which include requirements for a minimum asset coverage ratio, sales achievement of at least 80% of the plan approved by our board of directors and accepted by Bridge Bank and minimum cash to be maintained with Bridge Bank. We were in compliance with all debt covenants as of February 28, 2011, February 29, 2012 and May 31, 2012. Any inability to meet our significant debt service obligations could have a materially adverse effect on us.

72

Contractual Obligations, Commitments and Contingencies

We generally do not enter into long-term minimum purchase commitments. Our principal commitments, in addition to those related to our line of credit discussed above, consist of obligations under capital leases for equipment and furniture and operating leases for computer equipment and office space. The following table summarizes our outstanding contractual obligations:

	As of February 29, 2012
	Payments Due by Period
	Total		Less Than 1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		More Than 5 Years
	(In thousands)
Notes payable (1)	$	1,671	$	1,003	$	668	$	—	$	—
Operating lease obligations (2)		2,627		1,654		973		—		—
Purchase obligations		—		—		—		—		—
Total contractual obligations (3)	$	4,298	$	2,657	$	1,641	$	—	$	—

⁽¹⁾ In fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010, we financed the purchase of certain software licenses and related support and maintenance with notes payable. In fiscal 2011, we borrowed $2.5 million against our growth capital term loan, which converted to a term loan payable in 30 monthly installments. As of February 29, 2012, the total principal payments remaining under the equipment notes and the growth capital term loan was $1.7 million.

⁽²⁾  We lease our primary office space under noncancelable operating leases with various expiration dates through 2015.

⁽³⁾ As of February 29, 2012, we had gross unrecognized tax benefits of $4.0 million and an additional $0.1 million for gross interest and penalties classified as other noncurrent liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. At this time, we are unable to make a reasonably reliable estimate of the timing of payments in individual years due to uncertainties in the timing of settlement for potential tax audit outcomes. As a result, such amounts are not included in the above contractual obligations table.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

During the fiscal year ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012 and the three months ended May 31, 2012, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually limited purposes.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reported period. Generally, we base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions in accordance with GAAP that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Accordingly, actual results may differ from these estimates under other assumptions or conditions.

Critical accounting policies and estimates are those that we consider the most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations because they require our most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Our critical accounting policies and estimates include those related to:

• revenue recognition;

• income taxes; and

73

• stock-based compensation.

Please refer to the notes to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion of our accounting policies.

Revenue Recognition

Our revenue consists of subscriptions and support fees for access to our on-demand software solutions and fees for the provision of professional services associated with consultation and deployment services. Our sales agreements have contract terms typically three years in length. Arrangements with customers do not provide the customer with the right to take possession of the software. Therefore, these arrangements are treated as service agreements. We invoice our customers for subscriptions and support in advance for annual use of our software solutions. We invoice our customers for professional services either in advance, monthly, or upon achievement of project milestones. Generally, all payments are non-refundable. In most instances, our on-demand solutions are sold as part of multiple element arrangements which typically includes subscriptions and support fees and professional services.

Typically, we commence revenue recognition when all of the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, access has been granted to our on-demand software solutions or services have been rendered, the price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and collectability of the fees is reasonably assured. Additionally, if an agreement contains non-standard acceptance terms or requires non-standard performance criteria to be met, we defer revenue until the satisfaction of such conditions.

In fiscal 2012, we adopted a new accounting guidance for arrangements with multiple deliverables which:

• provides updated guidance on whether multiple deliverables exist, how the deliverables in an arrangement should be separated, and how the consideration should be allocated;

• requires an entity to allocate revenue in an arrangement using estimated selling prices, or ESP, of each deliverable if a vendor does not have vendor-specific objective evidence of selling price, or VSOE, or third-party evidence of selling price, or TPE; and

• eliminates the use of the residual method and requires a vendor to allocate revenue using the relative selling price method.

We adopted this accounting guidance on March 1, 2011 (the beginning of our fiscal year) on a prospective basis for applicable transactions originating or materially modified after February 28, 2011.

Prior to the adoption of this guidance, we determined that we did not have objective and reliable evidence of fair value for each deliverable of our arrangements. As a result, we accounted for subscriptions and professional services revenue as a single unit of accounting and recognized the total arrangement fee ratably over the contractual term of the subscription agreement.

Upon adoption of this guidance, we account for subscriptions and support revenue and professional services revenue as separate units of accounting and allocate revenue to each deliverable in an arrangement based on a selling price hierarchy. As we have been unable to establish VSOE or TPE for the elements of its arrangements, we determine the ESP for each element primarily by considering prices we charge for similar offerings, size of the order and historical pricing practices. Revenue allocated to subscriptions and support is recognized over the contractual term. Revenue from professional services sold on a fixed fee basis is recognized under the proportional performance method of accounting using estimated labor hours, or upon acceptance of the services. Revenue from professional services sold on a time and materials basis is recognized as services are delivered.

74

During the year ended February 29, 2012, total revenue as reported and total revenue that would have been reported, if the transactions entered into or materially modified after February 28, 2011 were subject to previous accounting guidance, are shown in the following table:

	As reported		Pro forma basis as if previous accounting guidance were in effect		Impact of adoption of the new accounting guidance
	(In thousands)
Revenue
Subscriptions and support	$	35,816	$	34,831	$	985
Professional services		23,871		13,924		9,947
Total	$	59,687	$	48,755	$	10,932

The $10.9 million impact to total net revenue during the year ended February 29, 2012 resulted from the adoption of the new accounting guidance pursuant to which we recorded revenue on certain transactions for which the previous accounting guidance would have required deferral until the final delivery of the on-demand solutions occurred, after which revenue would be ratably recognized over the term of the arrangement. With the adoption of the new accounting guidance, we recognize revenue for subscriptions and support or professional services when all of the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, access has been granted to our customers to the on-demand software solutions or services have been rendered.

The accounting related to revenue recognition in the SaaS industry is complex and is affected by interpretations of the rules which are subject to change. We evaluate revenue recognition on a contract-by-contract basis as the terms of each arrangement vary. The evaluation of our contractual arrangements often requires judgments and estimates that affect the timing of revenue recognized in our statements of operations.

Income Taxes

As of February 29, 2012, we had net operating loss, or NOL, carryforwards for federal income tax purposes of $316.5 million, which begin to expire in fiscal 2023, and have NOL carryforwards for state income tax purposes of $118.3 million, which begin to expire in fiscal 2013. In order to utilize the NOLs, we must generate consolidated taxable income which can offset such carryforwards.

Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, or the Code, imposes limitations on a corporation’s ability to utilize its NOLs if the corporation experiences an ownership change, as defined in the Code. Based upon currently available information, we believe there was an ownership change in a prior year. As a result, utilization of our U.S. federal NOLs in future periods will likely be subject to an annual limitation under Code Section 382. As of February 29, 2012, federal and state net operating loss carryforwards for income tax purposes, before any Section 382 limitation, were $316.5 million and $118.3 million, respectively. Accordingly, we have reduced our deferred tax assets based upon the anticipated federal and state net operating losses that are expected to expire unutilized due to the annual limitation. The deferred tax asset associated with the NOLs is $94.6 million.

Consistent with GAAP requirements, we assessed, as of February 29, 2012, that it is not more likely than not that we will ultimately realize the benefit of our NOLs and have, therefore, recorded a full valuation allowance to reduce the carrying value of our NOLs to zero.

As of February 29, 2012, we had research and development tax credits of $5.2 million and $5.9 million available to reduce future federal and California income taxes, respectively. Federal research and development credit carryforwards will begin to expire in fiscal 2023. California research and development credits carry forward indefinitely.

75

Stock-Based Compensation

Determining the fair value of stock-based awards at the grant date requires judgment. We use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the fair value of stock options. The determination of the fair value of stock-based payment awards on the date of grant using a pricing model is affected by our common stock fair value as well as by assumptions including our expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards, actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors, risk-free interest rates, and expected dividends, which are estimated as follows:

• Fair Value of Our Common Stock. Because our stock is not currently publicly traded, we must estimate the fair value of common stock, as discussed in “Common Stock Valuation” below.

• Expected Term. The expected term was estimated using the simplified method allowed under SEC guidance giving consideration to the contractual terms of the stock-based awards, vesting schedules, and expectations of future employee behavior as influenced by changes to the terms of our stock-based awards.

• Volatility. As a non-public entity, historic volatility is not available for our shares. As a result, we estimated volatility based on a peer group of companies, which collectively provide a reasonable basis for estimating volatility. We intend to continue to consistently use the same group of publicly traded peer companies to determine volatility in the future until sufficient information regarding volatility of our share price becomes available or the selected companies are no longer similar to us, in which case, more suitable companies whose share prices are publicly available would be utilized in the calculation.

• Risk-free Rate. The risk-free interest rate is based on the yields of U.S. Treasury securities with maturities similar to the expected term of the options for each option group.

• Dividend Yield. We have never declared or paid any cash dividends and do not presently plan to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Consequently, we used an expected dividend yield of zero.

We are required to estimate forfeitures at the time of grant and revise those estimates in the subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. If we use different assumptions for estimating stock-based compensation expense in future periods or if actual forfeitures differ materially from our estimated forfeitures, future stock-based compensation expense may differ significantly from what we have recorded in the current period and could materially affect our operating income, net income (loss) and net income (loss) per share.

The fair value of employee stock options granted since March 1, 2009 was estimated at the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model by applying the following assumptions:

	Year Ended February 28 or 29,			Three Months Ended May 31,
	2010	2011	2012	2011	2012
Expected term (in years)	6.08	6.08	5.84	6.08	6.02
Volatility	50.8% - 57.7%	45.9% - 51.9%	49.1% - 54.5%	50.3%	55.0%
Risk-free interest rates	2.4% - 3.0%	1.8% - 2.8%	1.1% - 2.6%	2.6%	1.1 - 1.3%
Dividend yield	—	—	—	—	—

Changes to the underlying assumptions, including increased forfeiture rates, may have a significant impact on the underlying value of the stock options, which could have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

As of February 28, 2011, February 29, 2012 and May 31, 2012, we had $0.7 million, $0.8 million and $4.8 million, respectively, of unrecognized compensation costs, excluding estimated forfeitures, related to

76

unvested stock option awards, which are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.19 years, 2.69 years and 2.38 years, respectively.

Common Stock Valuation

Given the absence of any active market for our common stock, the fair value of the common stock underlying stock options granted was determined by our board of directors, with input from our management, and based in part on third-party valuations. The valuations were made with the intent to grant options at a price per share not less than the per share fair value of our common stock underlying those options on the date of grant.

We considered numerous objective and subjective factors in valuing our common stock at each valuation date in accordance with the guidance outlined in the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Practice Aid, Valuation of Privately-Held-Company Equity Securities Issued as Compensation. These objective and subjective factors included, but were not limited to:

• our financial position and historical operating and financial performance as well as progress to date against planned budgets;

• our financial projections and future prospects;

• business conditions at the time;

• the fact that option grants involved illiquid securities of a private company;

• the likelihood of achieving a liquidity event for the shares of common stock underlying the options, such as an initial public offering or sale of our company, given prevailing market conditions and our relative financial condition at the time of grant;

• the stock price performance of selected publicly held companies identified as being comparable to us;

• the consideration received in connection with the issuance of shares to outside investors in arm’s-length transactions; and

• the related rights and preferences associated with our common and preferred stock.

We believe the valuation methodology employed for each date of determination provided a reasonable basis for estimating the fair value of our common stock.

The following table sets forth all stock option grants since March 1, 2010 through the date of this prospectus:

Option Grant Dates	Number of Options Granted		Exercise Price ($)		Common Stock Market Value ($)
3/18/2010		92,942		0.35		0.35
6/15/2010		42,571		2.45		2.45
9/16/2010		6,771		2.45		2.45
12/14/2010		35,257		2.80		2.80
3/28/2011		191,371		3.15		3.15
7/18/2011		1,220,535		3.15		3.15
7/19/2011		24,385		3.15		3.15
7/20/2011		114,285		3.15		3.15
10/14/2011		75,200		3.85		3.85
1/11/2012		40,742		8.05		8.05
1/12/2012		54,285		8.05		8.05
3/29/2012		118,642		8.75		8.75
5/3/2012		60,000		8.75		8.75
6/29/2012		38,505		16.00		16.00

77

In order to determine the fair value of our common stock underlying option grants, we first determined our business enterprise value, and then allocated the business enterprise value to each element of our capital structure (preferred stock, common stock, warrants and options). Our business enterprise value was estimated using the market-based approach comparable company method. The market-based approach references actual transactions in the equity of the company being valued or transactions involving the equity of similar companies. This valuation method considers multiples of financial metrics based on both acquisitions and trading multiples of a selected peer group of companies. These multiples are then applied to our financial metrics to derive a range of indicated values. We also considered appropriate adjustments to recognize lack of marketability.

When considering which companies to include in our peer group for valuation purposes, we focused on United States–based publicly traded SaaS companies and considered a number of factors including the type of SaaS service offerings, the stage of development and the size of the companies. Additionally, we considered companies with which third parties had compared us and those that executed initial public offerings in recent years. Several of the companies in our peer group are generally larger than us in terms of total revenue and assets. As such, in determining our business enterprise value, we applied a discount to the median indication of these peer companies to reflect differences between us and our peers. In determining the applicable discount percentage applied to the median indication of these peer companies, we considered that our historical revenue growth and the absolute magnitude of our revenue are generally lower than that of our peers and that the majority of our peers generate positive operating income and net income and are, and have been, generating positive earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization for some time. The selection of our peer group of companies changes over time based on whether we believe the selected companies remain comparable to us. We believe that the companies we selected are a representative group for purposes of performing valuations.

In allocating the total equity value between preferred and common stock, we assumed that the preferred stock would convert to common stock. Our indicated business enterprise value at each valuation date was allocated to the shares of preferred stock, common stock, warrants and options, using an option pricing method, or a combination of an option pricing method and a probability weighted method, or PWERM. Under an option pricing method, the common stock value is viewed as a claim on the enterprise’s liquidation or proceeds from an initial public offering after debt holders and preferred stockholders have been paid their principal and interest or liquidation preferences. This approach considers that the value associated with the common shares is based on our performance relative to the liquidation preferences of our share classes. Under PWERM, the value of the common stock was estimated based upon the analysis of values for us assuming various outcomes, through an initial public offering, sale of the company or remaining private and the estimated probability of each outcome assuming that all preferred stock is converted into common stock and any applicable dividends were paid. The recent valuations utilized PWERM as the principal valuation model, but the option pricing method was also considered to evaluate the reasonableness of the PWERM results.

There is inherent uncertainty in the estimates used in our valuations. If different discount rates, assumptions or weightings had been used, the valuations would have been different.

Specifics related to grants from March 1, 2010 to May 31, 2012 are as follows:

First Quarter—Fiscal 2011

During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, we granted 92,942 stock options with a per share exercise price of $0.35. In estimating the fair value of the common stock to set the exercise price of such options as of the March 18, 2010 grant date, our board of directors reviewed and considered an independent valuation report for our common stock as of April 24, 2009. Our board of directors determined that there were no significant factors affecting the value of our common stock that occurred between April 24, 2009 and March 18, 2010. The primary valuation considerations were:

• A business enterprise equity value of $58.0 million as of the independent valuation report date, which was determined based on the market-based approach. In applying the market-based

78

approach, we utilized a valuation multiple based on the median of our peer group’s observed trailing and forward revenue multiples of 1.70 and 1.50. The valuation was lower compared to the $93.1 million equity value on the prior valuation report as of September 30, 2008. Our board of directors concluded that the lower valuation was reasonable considering the macro-economic climate and our financial position during the first quarter of fiscal 2011.

• Allocation of the business enterprise equity value utilizing the option pricing method, or OPM, and PWERM, which both yielded a $0.35 price per share, to arrive at the $0.35 per share fair market value of our common stock.

• We utilized OPM with the following assumptions: a time to a liquidity event of 1.43 years, a risk-free rate of 0.75% and volatility of 74%. The results from the OPM were then reduced by a 25% marketability discount which determined the fair value of the common stock to be $0.35 per share.

• We utilized PWERM with the following liquidity event scenario probabilities to determine the fair value of the common stock to be $0.35 per share: of 5% for an initial public offering, 50% for a near-term acquisition, 30% for a dissolution and 15% for a long-term acquisition. We determined that stock market conditions in general, and the market for initial public offerings in particular, were such that it was unlikely that we would be able to undertake an offering in 2010 and that there was only a 5% probability that we would be able to successfully complete an offering in 2011.

Second Quarter—Fiscal 2011

During the second quarter of fiscal 2011, we granted 42,571 stock options with a per share exercise price of $2.45. In estimating the fair value of the common stock to set the exercise price of such options as of June 15, 2010, our board of directors reviewed and considered an independent valuation report for our common stock as of April 30, 2010. Our board of directors determined that there were no significant factors affecting the value of our common stock that occurred between April 30, 2010 and June 15, 2010. The primary valuation considerations were:

• A business enterprise equity value of $145.9 million as of the independent valuation report date, which was determined based on the market-based approach. In applying the market-based approach, we utilized a valuation multiple based on the median of our peer group’s observed trailing and forward revenue multiple of 3.20 and 2.60. The increase from the prior valuation was driven primarily by higher revenue multiples reflected in the market prices of our specific benchmarked companies.

• A change in the specific comparable companies included in our benchmarked companies to a more focused group of companies. During the second quarter of fiscal 2011, our management team began receiving informal marketing materials and presentations from investment banks regarding a potential engagement in connection with capital raising activities. Our management considered all comparables listed by various investment banks in marketing presentations and selected what they believed to be the most comparable companies based on industry served.

• We utilized OPM with the following assumptions: a time to a liquidity event of 1.0 year, a risk-free rate of 0.4% and volatility of 40%. The results from the OPM were then reduced by a marketability discount of 20% to arrive at the $2.45 per share fair market value of our common stock. The discount was determined based on benchmarking our size, historical revenue growth and operational results against the comparable companies.

• We also utilized PWERM for a reasonableness check that also yielded a $2.45 per share fair market value of our common stock. We utilized PWERM with the following liquidity event scenario

79

probabilities: 20% for an initial public offering, 40% for a premium strategic sale, 30% for a strategic sale and 10% for dissolution. The probability of an initial public offering was more likely than previously estimated based on improved industry and financial market conditions.

Third Quarter—Fiscal 2011

During the third quarter of fiscal 2011, we granted 6,771 stock options with a per share exercise price of $2.45. In estimating the fair value of the common stock to set the exercise price of such options as of September 16, 2010, our board of directors reviewed and considered an independent valuation report for our common stock as of July 31, 2010. Our board of directors determined that there were no significant factors affecting the value of our common stock that occurred between July 31, 2010 and September 16, 2010. The primary valuation considerations were:

• A business enterprise equity value of $138.0 million as of the independent valuation report date, which was determined based on the market-based approach. In applying the market-based approach, we utilized a valuation multiple based on the median of our peer group’s observed trailing and forward revenue multiple of 3.0 and 2.5. The decrease from the prior valuation was driven primarily by a slight decrease in revenue multiples for the entire market. Notwithstanding the decrease in enterprise equity value, the board of directors elected not to change the per share value allocated to common stock based on an option pricing method.

• We utilized OPM with the following assumptions: a time to a liquidity event of 1.0 year, a risk-free rate of 0.3% and volatility of 45%. The results from the OPM were then reduced by a marketability discount of 20% to arrive at the $2.45 per share fair market value of our common stock.

• We also utilized PWERM for a reasonableness check that yielded a $2.80 per share fair market value of our common stock. We utilized PWERM with the following liquidity event scenario probabilities of 20% for an initial public offering, 40% for a premium strategic sale, 30% for a strategic sale and 10% for dissolution. There was no change in the probability assessments from the prior valuation. Based on the PWERM result, the $2.45 per share fair market value of our common stock under OPM was reasonable.

Fourth Quarter—Fiscal 2011

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, we granted 35,257 stock options with a per share exercise price of $2.80. In estimating the fair value of the common stock to set the exercise price of such options as of December 14, 2010, our board of directors reviewed and considered an independent valuation report for our common stock as of October 31, 2010. Our board of directors determined that there were no significant factors affecting the value of our common stock that occurred between October 31, 2010 and December 14, 2010. The primary valuation considerations were:

• A business enterprise equity value of $152.0 million as of the independent valuation report date, which was determined based on the market-based approach. In applying the market-based approach, we utilized a valuation multiple based on the median of our peer group’s observed trailing and forward revenue multiple of 3.0 and 2.7. The increase from the prior valuation was driven primarily by an increase in market values for companies in general, and thus an increase in revenue multiples for the entire market. Additionally, management also concluded that the use of the trailing 12 months revenue from the valuation date and next 12 months revenue in calculating the enterprise equity value were better value indicators, compared to the latest historical annual and forward revenue used in the prior valuation. This change increased the equity value reflecting our higher revenues in fiscal 2011 compared to fiscal 2010.

80

• We utilized OPM with the following assumptions: a time to a liquidity event of 1.0 year, a risk-free rate of 0.2% and volatility of 45%. The results from the OPM were then reduced by a marketability discount of 20% to arrive at the $2.80 per share fair market value of our common stock.

• We also utilized PWERM for a reasonableness check that yielded a $2.80 per share fair market value of our common stock. We utilized PWERM with the following liquidity event scenario probabilities: 20% for an initial public offering, 40% for a premium strategic sale, 30% for a strategic sale and 10% for dissolution. There was no change in the probability assessment from the prior valuation.

First Quarter—Fiscal 2012

On March 28, 2011, we granted 191,371 stock options with an exercise price of $3.15 per share. In estimating the fair value of the common stock to set the exercise price of such options as of March 28, 2011, our board of directors reviewed and considered an independent valuation report for our common stock as of January 31, 2011. The independent valuation report reflected a fair value for our common stock of $3.15 per share. Our board of directors determined that there were no significant factors affecting the value of our common stock that occurred between January 31, 2011 and March 28, 2011. The primary valuation considerations were:

• A business enterprise equity value of $160.0 million as of the independent valuation report date, which was determined based on the market-based approach. In applying the market-based approach, we utilized a valuation multiple based on the median of our peer group’s observed trailing and forward revenue multiple of 3.2 and 2.9. The slight increase in our enterprise value from $152.0 million to $160.0 million was driven primarily by the higher revenue multiples of our specific benchmarked companies.

• We utilized OPM with the following assumptions: a time to a liquidity event of 1.0 year, a risk-free rate of 0.3% and volatility of 43%. The results from the OPM were then reduced by a marketability discount of 20% to arrive at the $3.15 per share fair market value of our common stock. The discount rate remained unchanged from our prior valuation.

• We also utilized PWERM for a reasonableness check that yielded a $3.15 per share fair market value of our common stock. We utilized PWERM with the following liquidity event scenario probabilities: 20% for an initial public offering, 45% for a premium sale and 25% for a sale or merger and a 10% probability for dissolution. Our board of directors determined that stock market conditions in general, and the market for initial public offerings in particular, were such that there was only a 20% probability that we would be able to successfully complete an offering in 2011 or 2012.

Second Quarter—Fiscal 2012

In July 2011, we granted 1,359,205 stock options with a per share exercise price of $3.15 per share. In estimating the fair value of our common stock, the board of directors reviewed and considered an independent valuation report of our common stock as of May 13, 2011. The independent valuation report reflected a valuation of $2.80 per share. Our board of directors also considered the valuation report as of January 31, 2011, which reflected a valuation of $3.15 per share. Our board of directors, based on several factors, determined that the fair value of the common stock as of the grant dates in July 2011 was $3.15 per share. The primary valuation considerations were:

• A business enterprise equity value of $150.0 million as of the independent valuation report date, which was determined based on the market-based approach. In applying the market-based approach, we utilized a valuation multiple based on the median of our peer group’s observed trailing and forward revenue multiple of 3.2 and 2.6.

• We utilized OPM with the following assumptions: a time to a liquidity event of 1.0 year, a risk-free rate of 0.2% and volatility of 44.3%. The results from the OPM were then reduced by a

81

marketability discount of 20% to arrive at the $2.80 per share fair market value of our common stock. The discount rate remained unchanged from our prior valuation.

• We also utilized PWERM for a reasonableness check that also yielded a $2.80 per share fair market value of our common stock. We utilized PWERM with the following liquidity event scenario probabilities: 20% for an initial public offering, 45% for a premium sale, 25% for a sale or merger and 10% for dissolution. There was no change in the probability assessment from the prior valuation.

• Between the valuation date of May 13, 2011 and the grant dates in July 2011, our board of directors also considered several factors in determining the market value of the common stock to be $3.15 per share. These included consideration of our financial condition, revenue outlook, status of product development, book value, the current market and venture capital financing environment, conditions and risk factors relevant to our business, the value of our tangible and intangible assets, the present value of our future cash flows, and the market value of companies that were engaged in substantially similar businesses and whose equity securities were traded on an established market.

Third Quarter—Fiscal 2012

During the third quarter of fiscal 2012, we granted 75,200 stock options with a per share exercise price of $3.85. In estimating the fair value of the common stock to set the exercise price of such options as of October 14, 2011, the board of directors reviewed and considered an independent valuation report for our common stock as of September 15, 2011. The independent valuation report reflected a fair value for our common stock of $3.85 per share. Our board of directors determined that there were no significant factors affecting the value of our common stock that occurred between September 15, 2011 and October 14, 2011. The primary valuation considerations were:

• A business enterprise equity value of $158.6 million as of the independent valuation report date, which was determined based on the market-based approach. In applying the market-based approach, we utilized a valuation multiple based on the median of our peer group’s observed forward revenue multiple of 2.9. Using the observable variables and value indicators from our peer group, we determined that forward revenue multiple was the most relevant value indicator. We determined that potential acquirers would base valuations on the most recent reliable data available as well as current forecast estimates.

• We utilized OPM with the following assumptions: a time to a liquidity event of 0.94 year, a risk-free rate of 0.1% and volatility of 45.4%. The results from the OPM were then reduced by a marketability discount of 20% to arrive at the $3.15 per share fair market value of our common stock.

• We also utilized PWERM that yielded a $4.90 per share fair market value of our common stock. We utilized PWERM with the following liquidity event scenario probabilities: 40% for an initial public offering, 40% for a premium sale and 15% for a sale or merger. A dissolution scenario was deemed unlikely and was thus assigned only a 5% probability. The probability of an initial public offering in 2011 was deemed by our board of directors to be more likely than previously estimated. In determining the probabilities, our board of directors determined that the initial public market offering market appeared to be improving during the second half of 2011, and management commenced discussions on the timing of an initial public offering with investment banks. The higher probability of an initial public offering resulted in higher estimated common stock per share value of $4.90 per share compared to the prior valuation of $3.15 per share under PWERM.

• We placed equal weight on the OPM, which yielded a $3.15 price per share, and PWERM, which yielded a $4.90 price per share, to arrive at the $3.85 per share fair market value of our common

82

stock. The valuation for the third quarter of fiscal 2012 was the first period we utilized PWERM. Prior to this quarter, we were primarily using the OPM, and the use of PWERM was limited to a confirmatory check on the OPM’s reasonableness. Subsequent to the third quarter of fiscal 2012, we solely relied on PWERM. For the third quarter of fiscal 2012, we placed equal weight on the OPM and PWERM.

Fourth Quarter—Fiscal 2012

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, we granted 95,027 stock options with a per share exercise price of $8.05. In estimating the fair value of the common stock to set the exercise price of such options as of January 11, 2012 and January 12, 2012, our board of directors reviewed and considered an independent valuation report for our common stock as of December 15, 2011. The independent valuation report reflected a fair value for our common stock of $8.05. Our board of directors determined that there were no significant factors affecting the value of our common stock that occurred between December 15, 2011 and January 11, 2012 or January 12, 2012. The primary valuation considerations were:

• A business enterprise equity value of $224.1 million as of the independent valuation report date, which was determined based on the market-based approach using PWERM and represented an increase in value of $65.5 million since the September 15, 2011 independent valuation report.

• We utilized PWERM that yielded a $8.05 per share fair market value of our common stock. We utilized PWERM with the following liquidity event scenario probabilities: 50% for an initial public offering, 35% for a premium sale and 10% for a sale or merger. A dissolution scenario was deemed unlikely and was thus assigned only a 5% probability. The probability of an initial public offering was more likely than previously estimated reflecting management’s expectations regarding our ability to execute an initial public offering based on our operational results for the nine months ended November 30, 2011 and current industry and financial market conditions. In each liquidity event scenario under the PWERM model, the future equity value was estimated utilizing the guideline public company method of the market approach and management estimates. In the market approach, appropriate forward and trailing multiples of revenue were selected for each liquidity event scenario based on review of the guideline public companies and our specific operating outlook. In each scenario, equal weighting was placed on the forward and trailing value indications, as a hypothetical investor would look at both forward projections and historical performance in their investment decision-making. Management’s estimates of future estimated equity values for each scenario were also selected as inputs into the PWERM model with the market approach as a corroborative supporting calculation given that management is closely involved in our planning. The results from the PWERM were reduced by a discount rate for common shares of 20% to reflect the relative risk of operating a business in a pre-event period, the relative uncertainty about the timing and amount of sale, and the time value of money to an estimated event date. The results from the PWERM were reduced by a marketability discount of 10% to arrive at the $8.05 per share fair market value of our common stock. The decline in the lack of marketability discount from our prior independent valuation report was due to a reduction in time to the expected initial public offering.

83

First Quarter—Fiscal 2013

During the first quarter of fiscal 2013, we granted 178,642 stock options with a per share exercise price of $8.75. In estimating the fair value of the common stock to set the exercise price of such options as of March 29, 2012 and May 3, 2012, our board of directors reviewed and considered an independent valuation report for our common stock as of March 15, 2012. The independent valuation report reflected a fair value for our common stock of $8.75 per share. Our board of directors determined that there were no significant factors affecting the value of our common stock that occurred between March 15, 2012 and March 29, 2012 or May 3, 2012. The primary valuation considerations were:

• A business enterprise equity value of $243.6 million as of the independent valuation report date, which was determined based on the market-based approach using PWERM and represented an increase in value of $19.5 million since the December 15, 2011 independent valuation report.

• We utilized PWERM that yielded a $8.75 per share fair market value of our common stock. We utilized PWERM with the following liquidity event scenario probabilities: 55% for an initial public offering, 30% for a premium sale and 10% for a sale or merger. A dissolution scenario was deemed unlikely and was thus assigned only a 5% probability. Similar to the prior valuation, in each liquidity event scenario under the PWERM model, the future equity value was estimated utilizing the guideline public company method of the market approach and management estimates. The results from the PWERM were then reduced by a discount rate of 20% and a marketability discount of 10% to arrive at the $8.75 per share fair market value of our common stock.

Second Quarter—Fiscal 2013

On June 29, 2012, we granted 38,505 stock options with a per share exercise price of $16.00, the midpoint of the price range on the cover of this prospectus. In estimating the fair value of the common stock to set the exercise price of such options, we relied on the preliminary price range of $15.00 to $17.00 per share as recommended to us by our underwriters, numerous objective and subjective factors as previously discussed, a valuation report that we received from our independent valuation specialists, which concluded that the fair market value of our common stock was $12.25 per share as of June 15, 2012, as well as the following factors:

• Our financial performance in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 improved significantly year-over-year, with revenue increasing from $11.2 million for the three months ended May 31, 2011 to $15.5 million for the three months ended May 31, 2012, and total bookings increasing from $15.8 million for the three months ended May 31, 2011 and $14.5 million for the three months ended February 29, 2012 to $37.8 million for the three months ended May 31, 2012. While total revenue decreased from $17.8 million for the three months ended February 29, 2012 to $15.5 million for the three months ended May 31, 2012, subscription revenue increased from $9.3 million to $9.8 million during the period. The decrease in sequential quarterly revenue was attributable to a drop in professional services revenue from $7.8 million for the three months ended February 29, 2012 to $5.7 million for the three months ended May 31, 2012 reflecting seasonality, and we therefore did not view this as indicative of a trend. The March 15, 2012 valuation report was issued at the beginning of the first quarter of fiscal 2013 and, therefore, did not reflect our improved financial performance during the first quarter of fiscal 2013. Conversely, the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus reflects our improved financial performance.

• The March 15, 2012 valuation report that was used by our board of directors as part of its determination of the fair value of our common stock on May 3, 2012 reflected the illiquidity of our common stock on that date and the uncertainty of our public offering and assumed there was a 55% probability of an initial public offering, a 30% probability of a premium sale, a 10% probability of a sale or merger and a 5% probability of a dissolution. The June 15, 2012 valuation report reflected a

84

business enterprise equity value of $287.4 million as of such date, which was determined based on the market-based approach using PWERM and represented an increase in value of $43.8 million since the March 15, 2012 independent valuation report. The June 15, 2012 valuation report assumed there was a 75% probability of an initial public offering, a 20% probability of a premium sale, a 5% probability of a sale or merger and a 0% probability of a dissolution, and similar to the prior valuation, in each liquidity event scenario under the PWERM model, the future equity value was estimated utilizing the guideline public company method of the market approach and management estimates. The results from PWERM were then reduced by a discount rate of 20% and a marketability discount of 0% to arrive at the $12.25 per share fair value of our common stock. Given the proximity to the completion of our initial public offering, the valuation reflected in the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus assumes a successful offering and represents an estimate of the fair value of the unrestricted, freely tradable stock that would be sold in the public market without discounts for illiquidity and lack of marketability.

• Given the proximity to the completion of our initial public offering, the valuation reflected in the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus assumes a successful offering. A successful offering provides us with (i) proceeds, which substantially strengthen our balance sheet as a result of increased cash, (ii) access to the public debt and equity markets and (iii) a ‘currency’ to enable us to make strategic acquisitions as our board of directors may deem appropriate, which are reflected in the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus.

• While our independent valuation consultants used a group of comparable companies in the SaaS, supply chain and collaboration software sectors, the underwriters of this offering, in anticipating our public company valuation, used a group of recent initial public offerings by technology companies, and an anticipated peer group of public company comparables, which we believed to be more appropriate for us at this time.

• The holders of our convertible preferred stock currently enjoy substantial economic rights and preferences over the holders of its common stock. In particular, holders of our outstanding Series AA, BB, CC and D preferred stock are entitled to (i) dividends prior to any dividends declared or paid on any shares of our common stock, (ii) liquidation payments prior to payments to holders of common stock, (iii) anti-dilution protection under certain circumstances and (iv) special voting rights. The price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus assumes the conversion of all outstanding convertible preferred stock into common stock upon the completion of our initial public offering. The corresponding elimination of the preferences and rights enjoyed by the holders of our preferred stock results in a significantly increased common stock valuation.

• Our board of directors determined that the primary valuation consideration, after giving effect to the foregoing, should be the preliminary price range set out on the cover of this prospectus, as it represents the most recent and highest estimate of the value of the common stock which we have received in anticipation of the offering contemplated by this prospectus.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Market risk represents the risk of loss that may impact our financial position due to adverse changes in financial market prices and rates. Our market risk exposure is a result primarily of fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. We do not hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes.

Interest Rate Risk

We had cash and cash equivalents of $9.5 million at February 28, 2010, $10.1 million at February 28, 2011, $10.2 million at February 29, 2012 and $10.1 million at May 31, 2012. These amounts were held primarily

85

in cash or money market funds. Cash and cash equivalents are held for working capital purposes, and restricted cash amounts are held as security against various lease obligations. Due to the short-term nature of these investments, we believe that we do not have any material exposure to changes in the fair value of our investment portfolio as a result of changes in interest rates. We believe that we do not have any material exposure to changes in the fair value as a result of changes in interest rates. Declines in interest rates, however, would reduce future investment income.

At February 28, 2010, February 28, 2011, February 29, 2012 and May 31, 2012, we had bank borrowings of $6.3 million, $8.0 million, $11.3 million and $12.2 million under our line of credit and term loan facility. The interest rate on our line of credit is variable and adjusts periodically based on the prime rate.

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

Our results of operations and cash flows are subject to fluctuations due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, particularly the exchange rates for the Euro and the Malaysian Ringgit. In the year ended February 29, 2012 and the three months ended May 31, 2012, we sought to hedge the risks associated with exchange rate fluctuations through entry into forward exchange contracts. The tables below present the notional amounts (at the contract exchange rates), the weighted-average contractual foreign currency exchange rates, and the estimated fair value of our contracts outstanding as of February 29, 2012 and May 31, 2012.

	As of February 29, 2012							As of May 31, 2012
	Notional Sell (Buy)			Average Contract Rate		Estimated Fair Value		Notional Sell (Buy)			Average Contract Rate		Estimated Fair Value
	(Dollars in thousands except average contract rates)
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts:
Euro	$	4,387			1.3	$	83	$	4,827			1.3	$	387
Malaysian Ringgit		(2,032	)		3.1		75		(2,436	)		3.1		(81	)
Total	$	2,355				$	158	$	2,391				$	306

We entered into all of the foreign exchange contracts with a single counterparty. Typically, we have the right of offset for gains earned and losses incurred under these contracts.

The following table presents a sensitivity analysis of our foreign forward exchange contract portfolio using a statistical model to estimate the potential gain or loss in fair value that could arise from hypothetical appreciation or depreciation of foreign currency.

	As of February 29, 2012
Foreign Forward Exchange Contracts	Value of Contracts Given X% Appreciation of Foreign  Currency						Notional Amount Sell (Buy)			Value of Contracts Given X% Depreciation of Foreign Currency
	10%			5%						-5%			-10%
	(Dollars in thousands)
Euro	$	3,948.7		$	4,168.1		$	4,387.5		$	4,606.8		$	5,067.5
Malaysian Ringgit		(1,829.1	)		(1,930.8	)		(2,032.4	)		(2,134.0	)		(2,347.4	)
	As of May 31, 2012
Foreign Forward Exchange Contracts	Value of Contracts Given X% Appreciation of Foreign  Currency						Notional Amount Sell (Buy)			Value of Contracts Given X% Depreciation of Foreign Currency
	10%			5%						-5%			-10%
	(Dollars in thousands)
Euro	$	4,344.4		$	4,585.8		$	4,827.1		$	5,068.5		$	5,309.8
Malaysian Ringgit		(2,192.5	)		(2,314.3	)		(2,436.1	)		(2,558.0	)		(2,679.8	)

86

As our international operations continue to grow, we may choose to utilize more foreign currency forward and option contracts to manage currency exposures. We did not have similar contracts in place during fiscal years 2010 or 2011.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

We do not have material exposure to market risk with respect to investments, as our investments consist primarily of highly liquid investments purchased with a remaining maturity of three months or less. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes; however, this does not mean that we may not adopt specific hedging strategies in the future.

Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Guidance

Effective March 1, 2011, we adopted new authoritative guidance for revenue recognition which revised existing guidance for arrangements with multiple deliverables, as more fully described in “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates.” The revised guidance establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable, which includes: (i) vendor-specific objective evidence, or VSOE, if available; (ii) third-party evidence, or TPE, if VSOE is not available; and (iii) estimated selling price, or ESP, if neither VSOE nor TPE is available. The revised guidance also eliminates the residual method of allocation and requires that arrangement consideration be allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method. We elected to adopt this accounting guidance on a prospective basis for all periods.

Under the previous accounting guidance, we treated our multiple element arrangements as a single unit of accounting as we generally did not have VSOE for our undelivered elements. Under the new guidance, we are required to use ESP when neither VSOE nor TPE is available. As a result, we recognize the estimated selling price of the elements as they are delivered, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria are met.

On May 12, 2011, the FASB issued new guidance about fair value measurement and disclosure requirements. The new standards do not extend the use of fair value but, rather, provide guidance about how fair value should be applied where it already is required or permitted under International Financial Reporting Standards or GAAP. A public entity is required to apply the guidance prospectively for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011, and early adoption is not permitted. We adopted the new accounting guidance effective March 1, 2012. The adoption of this accounting guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

On June 16, 2011, the FASB issued new guidance on the presentation of other comprehensive income (loss) in financial statements. Under this new accounting guidance, an entity will have the option to present the components of net income and comprehensive income in either one or two consecutive financial statements. The new accounting guidance eliminates the option in U.S. GAAP to present other comprehensive income in the statement of changes in equity. An entity should apply the new accounting guidance retrospectively. For a public entity, the new accounting guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. We adopted the provisions of the new accounting guidance effective March 1, 2012. The adoption of this accounting guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

87

BUSINESS

Company Overview

We are a leading provider of cloud-based, on-demand software solutions delivered on an integrated platform that enables companies to collaborate with their trading partners to procure, manufacture, sell and distribute products more efficiently. Our customers depend on outsourced manufacturing strategies and complex trading networks to compete in today’s global economy. They use our solutions to gain visibility into and control over their trading networks through the real-time information, integrated business processes and advanced analytics that we provide. Our solutions enable our customers and their trading partners to overcome problems arising from communications across disparate systems by offering a reliable source of data, processes and analytics, which our customers rely on as the single version of the truth. Our solutions empower our customers to manage demand they cannot predict and supply they do not control.

We refer to the combination of our software applications delivered on our cloud-based platform, the content contributed by our network participants and our enabling services as the E2open Business Network. The E2open Business Network has grown to over 32,000 unique registered trading partners. It allows our network participants to access and share data and execute business processes in a secure, real-time manner, while providing them with collaboration tools and analytics so that our customers can make more informed and efficient decisions. This enables our customers to make more informed and efficient decisions.

E2open transcends traditional supply chain software categories, which include B2B integration, procurement, forecasting, planning and execution, by also enabling coordination and collaboration between enterprises, which we call “collaborative execution.” By providing our solutions in an integrated cloud-based environment, our customers and their trading partners can easily share detailed and relevant content and data to gain the visibility they need for collaborative execution across their extended trading network. We enable collaborative execution for multi-enterprise and multi-tier process coordination, real-time analytics to identify risks and opportunities, and collaborative decision support for managing exceptions and executing decisions.

Our customers benefit from the following key differentiating features of the E2open Business Network:

• Cross-network analytics. We provide cross-network analytics for real-time monitoring and control of large volumes of data to sense and respond quickly and collaboratively to changes, opportunities or disruptions in the supply chain.

• Multi-enterprise, multi-tier supply and demand process management. We support key operational processes, such as forecast, order and inventory management, for our customers and their multi-tiered supply and demand trading networks.

• Scalable, secure cloud-based connectivity platform. Our solutions combine B2B connectivity and integration capabilities that allow our customers to securely connect, share and act on information across their trading networks can include thousands of partners.

• Integration with existing systems. Our highly-configurable solutions integrate with many ERP systems to efficiently manage complex networks and facilitate the interchange of transactions.

We believe that the E2open Business Network is strategic to our customers in that it enables them to increase revenue and productivity, and to reduce operating expenditures, working capital and cost of goods sold. Our solutions seamlessly integrate with and enhance our customers’ mission critical business systems and processes across their trading network.

Our customers are primarily multi-national corporations with complex product and services portfolios. To date, our target markets have been Technology, Telecommunications, Aerospace and Defense, and Consumer

88

Products. Our customers represent a wide range of industries and include many of the Fortune 500, among them seven of the top ten as designated in the Gartner Supply Chain Top 25. As we continue to scale our business, our platform will allow us to better serve middle market companies in a cost-effective manner.

Our revenue has grown from $44.4 million in fiscal 2010 to $55.5 million in fiscal 2011 and $59.7 million in fiscal 2012. For the fiscal year ended February 28, 2010, February 28, 2011, and February 29, 2012, the percentage of our revenue generated outside of the United States was 22.9%, 36.9% and 38.2%, respectively. Our revenue has increased from $11.2 million for the three months ended May 31, 2011 to $15.5 million for the three months ended May 31, 2012. For the three months ended May 31, 2011 and 2012, the percentage of our revenue generated outside of the United States was 36.5% and 35.1%, respectively.

Effective March 1, 2011, we adopted new accounting guidance relating to multiple-element arrangements, which had the effect of increasing fiscal 2012 revenue $10.9 million more than would have been recognized during the year had such accounting guidance not been adopted.

Operating income (loss) was $(5.8) million in fiscal 2010, $6.9 million in fiscal 2011 and $0.3 million in fiscal 2012. Net income (loss) was $(6.6) million in fiscal 2010, $6.6 million in fiscal 2011 and $(0.2) million in fiscal 2012. Net income (loss) adjusted for interest and other expense, net, provision for income taxes, depreciation and amortization, and stock-based compensation expense, or Adjusted EBITDA, was $(3.0) million in fiscal 2010, $9.4 million in fiscal 2011 and $2.5 million in fiscal 2012. For the three months ended May 31, 2012, operating loss was $2.2 million, net loss was $2.4 million and adjusted EBITDA was $(1.4) million. See “Adjusted EBITDA” above for more information and for a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income (loss). Our accumulated deficit as of February 29, 2012 and May 31, 2012 was $340.6 million and $343.0 million.

Industry Overview

The accelerating trends of supply chain globalization and outsourced manufacturing and distribution have combined to increase complexity and risk for brand owners while decreasing visibility into their expanding and evolving supply chains and distribution networks. These trends have created a fundamental shift in the way companies source and distribute goods and services. They have led to an ever more complex product and service delivery paradigm which increasingly relies on specialized, globally distributed trading partners to reduce costs.

Driving these trends are increasing global competition and mounting pressure to reduce costs, which have led companies to focus on their core activities in which they have a competitive advantage while outsourcing business functions such as manufacturing, distribution and transportation. Brand owners historically manufactured, distributed and sold their own products; today, those functions are often handled by distinct entities dispersed around the world. As a result, goods and services are frequently sourced from, produced by and distributed through various external parties. The process of bringing products to market now requires increased coordination across multiple tiers of a supply chain, creating a need for better communication, connectivity and collaboration across supply chain participants, which to date has been addressed principally by inefficient, labor-intensive methods such as phone, faxes, e-mails and spreadsheets.

Today, supply chains are complicated by the increasingly global nature of the supply and demand of products and services. Diverse local customer preferences and evolving international markets require that companies respond more effectively to diverse consumer demands. Different time zones, languages, laws and regulations, levels of technological sophistication and cultural differences increase the challenges involved in managing a global supply chain. As economies become more interdependent and as business cycles require more timely responsiveness, companies need to be able to operate with increased flexibility, improved orchestration of complex processes and faster execution.

The systems currently in place at most companies to address these business complexities, namely ERP systems, were developed within a legacy environment through which companies generally managed their supply

89

chains in a compartmentalized, linear fashion, relying upon sequential planning and step-by-step execution. While ERP systems are capable of providing an effective data and transaction repository inside the four walls of a company, brand owners struggle with fragmented planning and execution outside the four walls of their enterprise. These traditional, on-premise enterprise systems can be difficult and costly to connect externally and scale across the expanding network of trading partners.

Adding to these complications are the challenges commonly associated with “Big Data.” Large, multi-national corporations are producing and accessing large and growing volumes of data. The volume of such information often requires continuous sharing among the various partners in the supply chain. Existing infrastructure typically lacks the ability to coordinate and process these interactions effectively, and inaccuracies and delays can cause costly mistakes or render data obsolete. Even if data is quickly and seamlessly transmitted, most current systems are not designed to allow managers to interpret the information they are receiving or make the real-time decisions that are often required when responding to changes in production or delivery. Because managers using such systems lack the end-to-end visibility across trading networks that extends from the brand owner to the components provider in the supply channel, they are prone to build products that are not of the quantity or fit required to satisfy their customers’ demands. In addition, brand owners are generally sourcing from providers over which they do not have visibility or control. As a result, companies are hindered from executing efficiently and struggle to provide the superior customer service, return on assets and profitability their stakeholders require.

Without an integrated, real-time solution, companies are forced to continue relying on inefficient manual methods, such as phone, faxes, e-mails and spreadsheets, causing them to hedge against under- or misdelivery. This often results in inventory buffering to avoid shortages, or in cases of shortages, emergency shipping, both of which are inefficient and costly uses of working capital. Further, demand volatility, accelerating product lifecycles and supply disruptions (e.g. tsunamis, floods, political unrest and economic uncertainty) have and will continue to stress traditional supply chain management systems and practices. Today’s brand owners require a collaborative platform to bridge these disparate ERP and point solutions which goes beyond connecting data and enables companies to act on real-time information.

As trading networks become more complex, companies are increasingly demanding integrated solutions that facilitate not only collaborative inventory management, but also the demand and supply forecasts, procurement systems, order management and analytics required to efficiently coordinate a company’s entire business ecosystem. We believe a significant opportunity exists to help companies improve their competitive advantage by delivering the visibility and control once characteristic of vertically integrated companies while retaining the advantages of outsourcing. The ability to navigate modern supply chain complexities and to resolve problems in a timely and collaborative manner, combined with enhanced knowledge of end customer demand, is critical to enabling businesses to better match supply and demand.

Our collaborative execution solutions address an opportunity comprised of three markets that include, supply chain execution software, supply chain planning software and procurement software. These three markets are forecasted by Gartner, Inc. to grow collectively at a 9.2% compound annual growth rate from approximately $7.6 billion in 2011 to $11.7 billion in 2016. Further, Gartner, Inc. forecasts the market for supply chain management solutions offered via SaaS to grow at a 21.1% compound annual growth rate from $1.3 billion in 2011 to $3.4 billion in 2016.

Our Solutions

We develop, operate and market an integrated platform that addresses supply chain management challenges by providing cross-network analytics, multi-enterprise, business process management and B2B integration solutions for companies seeking visibility across and control over their trading networks. We deliver our solutions in a highly secure, cloud-based computing environment. Our customers subscribe to our on-demand SaaS solutions with multi-year contract terms that are typically three years in length. Our offerings include not only robust and highly scalable software, but also the benefits of having over 32,000 unique registered trading

90

partners participating in a broad range of multi-tier supply chains. We also provide enabling services to our customers, ranging from consulting services to ongoing support services, which ultimately result in improved business processes for our customers and their trading partners.

The E2open Business Network

The E2open Business Network enables integrated planning and execution across trading partner networks. Our cloud-based technology stack is purpose-built for managing trading partner networks and enables our customers and their partners to increase their revenues while reducing costs by minimizing errors and maximizing efficiency. The key characteristics of the E2open Business Network that drive customer adoption include:

Large global business network. Our solutions have been designed for companies that either manage or participate in distributed supply chains and whose business processes require collaboration among numerous entities performing multiple interdependent activities to source, produce and fulfill demand for their products across disparate geographies. We serve more than 248 customers in 62 countries who use our solutions in 9 languages and trade in 26 different currencies. At its core, the E2open Business Network allows network participants to securely provide and access information and execute business processes with external parties in real time to coordinate their key supply chain related functions.

Demand-driven model. Our solutions enable our customers to transform their trading networks from a forecast-driven production model, where products are manufactured in anticipation of future demand, to a demand-driven fulfillment model, which is responsive to changes in actual current end-user demand or constraints in supply. Our platform allows trading partners to collaborate in real time, execute carefully-managed

91

business processes across trading partners and sense and respond to information in a timely manner, allowing them to more effectively react to changes in demand. These real-time capabilities enable enterprises to interact with their global trading partners essentially as if they were internal operating units.

Multi-tier functionality. Our solutions allow trading network participants to better manage processes and information, relating to raw materials, products, finished goods and related services, across multiple tiers—from the extended supply base, to their outsourced manufacturing partners, then on to their distribution channels and ultimately to the end customer. Our solutions were designed to overcome the challenges arising from expanded trading networks, including siloed processes, limited connectivity and data integrity issues. These solutions not only extend an enterprise’s existing systems and processes to its immediate trading partners, but also support visibility into and management of the extended tiers of its manufacturing, production and distribution network.

Big data, fast data analytics and business intelligence. Our solutions provide the ability to manage large amounts of frequently changing data and information generated through both trading partner repositories and through the course of their interactions on our network. Our solutions offer sophisticated reporting and cross-network, real-time analytics for intelligent supply chain decision-making. Our solutions also permit our partners to integrate the information contained in their data warehouses. Through our collaborative dashboard, we enable users to structure the information in a useable manner allowing our participants to create key performance metrics and utilize predictive analytics. The platform provides the ability to continuously monitor information, evaluate performance, recognize disruptions and make corrective actions. Our customers can leverage our platform to extend data visibility, improve data accuracy, and overcome latency with real-time information for enhanced decision making capabilities.

Cloud-based platform. Unlike many companies operating legacy on-premise solutions that are difficult and costly to configure and support, our customers and their trading partners using the E2open Business Network are able to share, analyze and act on information in real time on a common platform. Our cloud-based platform enables process management and information exchange among our customers and their trading partners.

Enterprises can leverage our enabling expertise and services when they need to deploy a new or changed process capability or add a trading partner. By creating a single, unified source of information within the trading network, we enable enterprises to operate and make decisions based on reliable and trustworthy information in real time. By implementing the E2open Business Network and adopting collaborative execution, our customers and their trading partners improve communication, multi-enterprise process performance, and tactical and strategic decision making. Our customers use our solutions to:

• Increase sales by optimizing inventory levels;

• Achieve greater revenue assurance and customer satisfaction through timely order fulfillment;

• Reduce costs and working capital requirements through automation of operations, inventory reduction and enhanced procurement efficiency;

• Achieve faster and easier on-boarding of trading partners to our platform by utilizing each partner’s existing technological infrastructure; and

• Reduce deployment risk, streamline operations and lower maintenance costs, without a significant upfront investment in on-premise software or ongoing investments in software maintenance.

92

Our Strategy for Growth

Our objective is to be the leading provider of multi-enterprise, cloud-based, on-demand software enabling enterprises to more efficiently and profitably procure, manufacture, sell and distribute products through collaborative execution. The key elements of our strategy include:

Leverage our existing network to add customers. The E2open Business Network creates a network effect by attracting the largest suppliers and customers in a particular industry vertical to establish and grow our presence. Once a number of prominent enterprises purchase our solutions and develop separate ecosystems comprised of their trading partners, their trading partners then add data onto our platform that ultimately drives growth in the use of our applications. As our network of trading partners grows in an industry, the value we deliver to our customers, and potential customers, increases. We intend to leverage our customers’ expanding ecosystems to attract new customers and convert trading partners from within our network into direct customers.

Up-sell additional solutions to our existing customers. Once our customers begin to rely on the real-time data and visibility provided by our platform and solutions, they typically purchase additional solutions from us. We intend to continue to leverage our knowledge of and familiarity with our existing customers to deliver additional solutions to them. Through our existing customer network and growing product portfolio, we have a significant opportunity to up-sell additional applications as our customers seek to add greater functionality to their respective networks. With each of our major customers, we nurture this up-sell strategy by developing a multi-year business plan or roadmap for the customer which provides continuous improvement to their operations and results in further growth for both our customer and our company.

Expand into new verticals. We believe our experience with our customers in our initial target markets provides a successful model for future growth. We have found that the challenges presented by managing inventory, orders, and planning are similar across many industries which makes our solutions applicable to a wide array of industry verticals. We intend to leverage our experience, expertise and proven customer success within our current key verticals to accelerate entry into and delivery of our solutions to these new vertical markets. Our expansion into the consumer products industry demonstrates our ability to transfer our capabilities to companies in new verticals that face challenges common to our existing customers.

Introduce new products. We will continue to expand our portfolio of solutions by leveraging our familiarity with advanced supply chains and over 32,000 of our partners in our trading network to develop new applications and introduce new products that are strategic to our customers and their trading networks. Our analytics solution enables cross-network collaborative decision making and problem or exception resolution, all of which provides users with a real-time system for faster and more effective decision making.

Expand our international presence. For the three months ended May 31, 2012, and for the year ended February 29, 2012, we generated 35.1% and 38.2% of our revenue, respectively, from sales to customers outside of the United States. In 2011, we grew our sales team in Europe, and we intend to hire additional sales personnel in Germany, France and the Nordic countries. In fiscal 2012, we opened an office and established a direct sales force and a sales, hosting and distribution alliance with a local partner in China. We intend to make additional investments outside of the United States in order to expand our geographic reach.

Expand our target market to include mid-market customers. Historically, we have focused our sales and marketing efforts on the largest companies within specific vertical markets. Once these key relationships are developed, they have historically yielded very low churn rates, allowing us to focus on driving adoption of our solutions by smaller, mid-market companies in the same industry. By leveraging our established trading network and cloud-based subscription model, we can offer cost-effective, pre-packaged solutions to expand our target market to include mid-market customers. By packaging, designing and pricing our solutions for the mid-market, we are able to expand our addressable market, accelerate our sales cycles and further expand our E2open Business Network.

93

Make targeted, strategic acquisitions. We intend to complement our organic growth with strategic acquisitions of technologies, solutions and businesses that enhance and expand our existing offerings.

Our Products and Services

We believe that our solutions transcend the limitations of traditional supply chain technology barriers by utilizing cloud-based strategic collaboration to connect companies within their trading networks. Our solutions help enterprises more efficiently manage and interact with their trading partners to procure, manufacture, sell and distribute their products to end customers, with the goal of efficiently and profitably fulfilling end customer demand.

Our software offers multi-enterprise analytics; flexible demand, supply and multi-tier processes; and B2B integration functionality configurable to the customer’s specific needs. In addition to our software offerings, we provide network content and enabling services to our customers.

E2open Business Network:

Multi-Enterprise Software Platform and Network Content Supported by Enabling Services

E2open Collaboration Center: Execution Analytics and Rapid Resolutions

The increasingly complex and distributed flow of goods and information across the entire network of demand, supply, logistics and warehousing partners has presented companies with significant challenges in collectively sensing and responding to changes in demand and supply. The E2open Collaboration Center provides real-time dashboard visibility for multiple partners on the network into demand and supply changes as well as access to cutting edge analytics to assess the operational and financial impact of changes, and “what-if” decision support to preempt issues or resolve problems rapidly.

The following are examples of capabilities offered through our E2open Collaboration Center:

Execution Analytics provide predictive intelligence, based on multi-enterprise data and process input, including key performance indicators, trends, scorecards and event notifications for supply and demand. This

94

solution provides real-time data related to transformation, aggregation and loading of standard business intelligence processes. Our execution analytics solutions reside on two dashboards:

Demand Analytics Dashboard

• Provides real-time visibility to demand side metrics and critical actionable events

• Features a dashboard that presents critical financial metrics such as revenue trends, inventory turns and gross margin

Supply Analytics Dashboard

• Provides real-time visibility to procurement, inbound logistics and inventory related metrics and critical actionable events related to parts shortages, cost and liability exposure

• Features a dashboard that presents critical financial metrics such as total cost to serve, component inventory liability and gross margin

Rapid Resolutions provide decision support intelligence assessing both unit and financial views of opportunities and tradeoffs thereby providing the opportunity to select alternate resolutions with the ability to collaboratively execute those chosen paths with partners across the network. Third party services, content and applications, including advanced planning, can also be integrated and shared via the Collaboration Center.

Allocation Workbench

• Run-time simulation tool that allows companies to identify projected part shortages at suppliers

• Enables companies to determine finished good impact, provides severity based prioritization alternatives and global shortage visibility

• Enables chosen-scenario inventory transfers via workflow management

Fulfillment Workbench

• Run-time simulation tool that allows companies to evaluate, validate, change and confirm order promises using a wide criteria set including customer priority, gross margins, revenue impact and other priority criteria in a discrete order-based or vendor managed inventory, or VMI,-based environment

• Enables companies to use financial metrics to fine tune the customer fulfillment workflow

Replenishment Workbench

• Run-time simulation tool that allows companies to rebalance inventories and redirect shipments to ensure continuity of supply based on end customer priority

• Features workbench “what-if” capability that allows scenario comparisons based on a wide range of metrics enabling planners to select the execution signals that best resolve their issues

95

E2 Process Management: Demand

Our multi-enterprise software for demand processes allows enterprises, in their role as suppliers, to reduce the cost and complexity of order fulfillment for their products. Examples of demand processes enabled by our multi-enterprise, business process management applications include:

Collaborative Demand Planning

• Communication and collaboration between a company and its customers on forward-looking forecasts to synchronize mid to long term plans

Sales Order Collaboration

• Customer collaboration on sales orders including order acceptance, order change, order promise, order fulfillment, invoices and payments

Inventory Visibility

• Visibility into inventory positions at customers’ sites or in their distribution channels

Inventory Replenishment (vendor/supplier managed inventory, or VMI/SMI)

• Customer collaboration on inventory positions and automated management of inventory replenishment in distribution channels

Logistics Visibility

• Track products as they move through a transportation and logistics network while proactively assessing and managing impact of delays

Channel Master Data

• Collection of data from distribution channels by facilitating connection, transfer, and transformation of data to and from external systems

E2 Process Management: Multi-tier

Our multi-enterprise software for multi-tier processes allows enterprises to better manage the demand for materials, products and finished goods. Improved control and visibility is extended not only to first tier trading partners, but also to a customer’s outsourced manufacturing partners and throughout its various distribution channels.

These solutions also support visibility and management into the extended tier two and three supply base as well as tier two and three customer fulfillment network. Examples of multi-tier processes enabled by our multi-enterprise, business process applications include:

Order Execution

• Capability to couple and de-couple orders across multiple internal and/or external parties masking specific data elements such as price. Management of collaboration of these multi-party orders including order acceptance, order change, order promise, order fulfillment, invoices and payments

96

Customer Fulfillment

• Provides complete coordination of customer demand fulfillment, from order capture to identifying the optimal source for fulfillment, rapid order promise and fulfillment of the orders using a network of finished goods, semi-finished goods and manufacturing partner capacity

• Provides logistics visibility of goods flow to the customer and supports key financial transactions such as invoices and payments to provide end-to-end workflow visibility

Central Procurement

• Enables companies to consolidate spending and coordinate supply assurance for key components with their external outsourced manufacturing partners

• Enables customers to support procurement through purchase orders and take control of component shortages by strategically allocating material to contract manufacturers

• Allows companies to centralize, whether for tax optimization or otherwise, while supporting fully distributed fulfillment and logistics

Inventory Execution

• Enables companies to coordinate supply assurance for key components with their external outsourced manufacturing partners using a VMI based process

• Enables customers to use a blanket purchase order process and take control of component shortages by strategically allocating material to contract manufacturers

• Allows companies to centralize, whether for tax optimization or otherwise, while supporting fully distributed fulfillment and logistics

Demand Driven Replenishment

• Provides a platform for companies that support their customers using a replenishment model

• Allows companies to strategically position finished goods and semi-finished goods at customer or regional hubs and ensure continuous availability of products to customers

Multi-tier Cost Management

• Allows customers to collect and manage the total landed cost by aggregating component costs across the full bill of materials and by incorporating other cost elements such as logistics and holding costs

• Allows customers to factor in rebates and volume discounts for components for accurate cost accounting as well as for strategic buy decisions

• Allows customers to quickly compare negotiated and actual costs and identify reasons for deviation

Multi-Tier Logistics Visibility

• Ability to track material as it moves through a transportation and logistics network across multiple tiers of the supply chain proactively assessing and managing impact of delays

97

E2 Process Management: Supply

Our multi-enterprise software for supply processes allows enterprises, in their role as customers, to better fulfill their demand for material and products into their own manufacturing and distribution facilities. Examples of supply processes enabled by our multi-enterprise, business process management applications include:

Collaborative Supply Planning

• Communication and collaboration between a company and its suppliers on forward-looking forecasts to synchronize mid to long term plans

Purchase Order Collaboration

• Supplier collaboration on purchase orders including order acceptance, order change, order promise, order fulfillment, invoices and payments

Inventory Visibility

• Visibility into inventory positions at suppliers across finished goods, work-in-process and raw components

Inventory Replenishment

• Supplier collaboration on inventory positions and automated management of inventory replenishment at supplier owned or third-party managed inventory locations for inbound materials

Logistics Visibility

• Track material as it moves through a transportation and logistics network from suppliers to consumption sites while proactively assessing and managing impact of delays

E2 Cloud Connectivity

Our multi-enterprise software for B2B integration allows enterprises to integrate their internal applications and the applications of their trading partners through our E2open Business Network. We offer multiple connectivity options by supporting an extensive set of industry standard B2B protocols for application-to-application connectivity.

In addition, we provide a platform to support the development and leveraging of customer and trading partner communities, including the accumulation and re-use of user-generated information content.

Among the examples of functionality provided by our B2B integration solutions are:

Foundation

• Our Cloud Connectivity Foundation is the shared physical and software infrastructure, including servers, routers, firewalls and operating system database, for all E2open solutions, which delivers key capabilities for multi-enterprise integration, multi-enterprise business process management, exception management, multi-enterprise business intelligence, and operations management. It delivers the cloud infrastructure, which enables scalable collaboration, visibility, and control across the multi-enterprise demand-supply network. Our multi-enterprise foundation includes a

98

comprehensive Wide Area Backup/Recovery package, a standard service level agreement, which provides customers with production safeguards for high availability within a single data center, with off-site storage of data backups and a proven disaster recovery methodology to ensure rapid recovery in the event of a production outage.

Connect

• Support B2B protocols and message formats with our software

• Support a wide variety of standard as well as custom transaction formats

• Support customers who do not have existing B2B capabilities by providing a complementary B2B software product, which we call the E2open B2B Client, which can be configured by our customers and is remotely managed and supported by our engineers for the convenience of our customers and their trading partners

• Use of electronic trading partner profiles to manage complex, synchronous and asynchronous processes between parties

• Field-by-field validation utilizing standard validation frameworks

• Translation and transformation engine capable of mapping varied message types enabling customers and their trading partners to send and receive information in their preferred formats and protocols without implementing costly and maintenance-intensive B2B/electronic data interchange gateways

• Network security for transaction integrity and guaranteed messaging

• Network visibility for transaction monitoring, policy setting and troubleshooting

• Application connectors connect with enterprise applications reducing the time, cost and risk associated with projects

Enterprise Community Management

• Facilitate the on-boarding of a community of trading partners

• Connectivity profiles of trading partners already participating in the E2open Business Network indicating their multi-enterprise process capabilities and technical integration preferences

• Grouping of trading partners in business communities that share common process characteristics such as transportation carriers, telecom operators and consumer products retailers

• Network-to-network integration with complementary business networks that exist in areas such as indirect procurement and logistics services

Business Network Content

Business Network Content is reusable information about trading partners’ content, communications and processes, including:

• Connections which integrate disparate systems;

99

• Message specifications, including required format for transmission and receipt of content;

• Transformation maps, which convert data into forms that are comprehensible to other systems and ensures that both the data elements and the business process logic underlying the data are accurately communicated from one system to another;

• Business process configurations; and

• Business process best practices that are generated by the users of the E2open Business Network.

Business Network Content originates from the individual users of the E2open Business Network shared among its over 32,000 unique registered trading partners. The value of this information increases as the size of the network grows, providing both increased benefit to our customers and acting as a barrier to entry to our competitors. By leveraging our existing business network content, we are able to deploy our system in a cost-effective, reliable and secure manner to our customers, thereby enabling our customers to achieve faster time-to-value from our system.

Additionally, the value of our network content continues to increase as more trading partners and more customers use and add data to our network, bringing to life the power of the “network effect” to our users. Since we were founded over 10 years ago, network content has become a significant competitive advantage over traditional approaches to supporting external business processes and acts as a significant differentiator for our products in the market. Network content includes:

Integration Library

• E2open common data model for multi-enterprise processes

• Message specifications for all the relevant transactions occurring between trading partners

• Transformation maps that translate industry standard formats and payload types, such as EDI, into a common data model

• Packaged integration into enterprise applications such as ERP, transportation management system and supply chain management

Business Processes

• Configuration of multi-enterprise processes specific to industries and supply chain models

• Packaged reports and analytics to measure key performance indicators

Professional Services

We offer enabling services directly and through our channel partners that include solution consulting services, solution deployment and B2B on-boarding services, and solution support services that help our customers deploy, manage and support our solutions. Our services are comprised of the necessary methodology, tools and experienced resources to configure and deploy our process management and integration solutions to support customers’ unique business network requirements.

Our Customers

As of May 31, 2012, we had 248 customers located in 62 countries, who use our solutions in 9 languages and trade in 26 different currencies. Our customers included 58 Enterprise Customers who purchase

100

both on-demand software solutions and network connectivity solutions. The remaining 190 customers purchase our network connectivity solutions. For fiscal 2012, Enterprise Customers represented 99.3% of our total revenue. Our customers represent a wide range of industries and include many of the Fortune 500, among them seven of the top ten as designated in the Gartner Supply Chain Top 25.

Our customer base includes companies that have purchased our solutions directly from us as well as through our resellers and integrators. Revenue attributable to sales to customers by us directly was 92.8% and 91.0% of total revenue for the year ended February 28, 2011 and February 29, 2012, respectively. The E2open Business Network is a community comprised of our customers, over 32,000 unique registered trading partners and over 94,000 unique registered users.

The following table illustrates the diversity of our customer base across various industries.

Industry	Representative Customers (1)
Computers & Peripherals, Electronics	Dell, IBM, Hitachi, Lab126 (part of the Amazon.com, Inc. group of companies), Lenovo, NetApp, Seagate, Xerox
Contract Manufacturers	Celestica, Flextronics, Sonic
Semiconductors	Freescale, LSI, Spansion
Telecom/Network	Alcatel-Lucent, Cisco, Motorola, Nokia Siemens Networks, RIM, Vodafone
Aerospace and Defense	Embraer, Exostar (2) (Customers of Exostar include BAE Systems, Boeing, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Raytheon, Rolls-Royce, UK Ministry of Defense)
Industrial Manufacturing	Diebold, GE Energy, Konecranes, Omron, SPX
Consumer Goods	Avon, Clorox, Coca-Cola, The GAP, GE Lighting, L’Oreal, HAVI Global Solutions (servicing McDonalds), Levi Strauss, Studio Moderna, Unilever
Medical Equipment	Bio-Rad, GE Healthcare
Logistics/Wholesale Distribution	AJC International, Averitt, Kuehne + Nagel, MavenWire, Tieto Finland

⁽¹⁾  These customers represent current Enterprise Customers that have consented to the inclusion of their names in this registration statement and represent 98% of our fiscal 2012 total revenue.

⁽²⁾  Exostar is a reseller and operating partner of ours that delivers services to companies in the United States and United Kingdom Aerospace and Defense market.

The following case studies demonstrate the breadth and depth of our ability to help companies in multiple industries transform their trading networks into strategic business functions and achieve a significant return on investment.

Telecommunications. One of the world’s largest telecommunications companies was faced with problems assimilating over 20 acquired operating companies into a more highly functioning, integrated enterprise. The company sought a common platform for business management and support in its efforts to create a more centralized procurement organization capable of better managing the pricing and inventories for mobile

101

phones. Using E2open, the company was able to achieve the aggregation and visibility it desired and did so by implementing a global consolidated forecast coupled with a process for tracking procurement and global spend management, together responsible for better price negotiation and global price compliance. Simultaneously, the company was also able to more consistently assure supply by implementing an automated replenishment process capable of refreshing inventory on hand when it reaches predetermined levels. Using our solution, the company realized reductions in inventories, lowered purchasing costs through demand and forecast aggregation and improved its negotiating position with suppliers by achieving greater visibility and connectedness among its business units. In turn, the company also improved overall customer satisfaction through fewer product shortages and more timely deliveries.

Aerospace and Defense. A global aircraft manufacturer was encumbered by a globally complex supply chain involving hundreds of suppliers, thousands of components, and multiple manufacturing and assembly sites. The company required a common solution to manage the processes, visibility, and decision making among diverse partners that was flexible and fast enough to be deployed efficiently to its expanding network. Using E2open’s multi-tier supply side solution, the company was able to quickly automate the communication and sharing of critical, timely correspondences, such as new delivery schedules and order changes. The solution provided for a managed inventory program which improved cash flow for trading partners and improved on-time delivery with lower logistics costs. As a result, the company achieved real-time visibility and a scalable solution for all trading partners irrespective of their technological sophistication.

Consumer Electronics. A global computer manufacturer had experienced a series of delays and additional costs from late shipments, and in attempting to address these issues, added expensive inventory to lower the risk of shortages. To alleviate these ongoing problems, the company sought added visibility into both its supply and demand channels in order to assure the optimal amount of product was on hand to be delivered at the lowest practicable cost. E2open was able to provide a control tower solution capable of providing cross network visibility and control. The company was able to improve collaboration among partners in the channel, more effectively plan and decrease transportation costs, rapidly improve on-board time for new partners and, as a result, reduce inventory levels and costs. With the help of our applications, the customer gained visibility into supply and demand, and was able to achieve automated customer fulfillment and management by exception while improving partner visibility and collaboration.

For the fiscal year ended February 28, 2011, our two largest customers each accounted for more than 10% of total revenue; Dell accounted for 22.5% of our total revenue and RIM accounted for 11.7% of our total revenue. For the fiscal year ended February 29, 2012, our two largest customers each accounted for more than 10% of total revenue; RIM accounted for 16.8% of our total revenue and Vodafone accounted for 14.8% of our total revenue.

For the three months ended May 31, 2012, our three largest customers each accounted for more than 10% of total revenue. RIM, Exostar and Vodafone accounted for 13.2%, 11.1% and 10.8% of our total revenue, respectively.

Vodafone has been a customer since 2004. We have a contract, the Vodafone Agreement, with Vodafone for on-demand software applications with a term of 2.75 years from August 2010 to May 2013. This is our fourth consecutive contract with Vodafone for on-demand software applications. The payment terms of the Vodafone Agreement are consistent with our typical customer contracts. The Vodafone Agreement contains provisions whereby we have agreed to indemnify Vodafone and its affiliates against certain claims made by third parties against Vodafone, including for taxes and infringement of intellectual property rights. We may not assign the Vodafone Agreement to a Vodafone competitor. The Vodafone Agreement provides for standard product warranties such as our products comply with its specifications and applicable laws and standards. We periodically enter into additional contracts with Vodafone for professional services related to the on-demand software applications that we provide to Vodafone under the Vodafone Agreement.

102

We have a contract with RIM, the RIM Agreement, for on-demand software applications with a term of five years from November 2009 to November 2014. RIM has the option to renew for additional one-year terms at specified renewal rates. RIM may terminate its agreement with us upon 90 days written notice. Upon termination, RIM would be required to pay all accrued but unpaid fees as of the effective date of the termination, and for any transition services that may be required. The payment terms of the RIM Agreement are consistent with our typical customer contracts. The RIM Agreement contains provisions whereby we have agreed to indemnify RIM and its affiliates against certain claims made by third parties against RIM, including for breach of confidentiality provisions, infringement intellectual property rights as well as defaults under contracts required for the operation of the solution. There are restrictions against us assigning the RIM Agreement to a competitor of RIM. The RIM Agreement provides for standard product warranties such as our products comply with its specifications and applicable laws and standards. We periodically enter into additional contracts with RIM for professional services related to the on-demand software applications that we provide to RIM under the RIM Agreement.

Research and Development

We have over 10 years of experience defining, designing and implementing high value and robust multi-enterprise software that operates in a cloud-computing model. We also have extensive practical experience designing multi-enterprise, business process management and B2B integration systems for the industries on which we have focused to date, in particular the Technology, Telecommunications, Aerospace and Defense, and Consumer Products industries. We draw from our extensive experience and our ability to work closely with key customers to define new products and services that provide business solutions that are simple to use and understand.

In the year ended February 28, 2011 and February 29, 2012, we spent $11.5 million and $13.2 million, respectively, on research and development expenses. For the three months ended May 31, 2012, we spent $4.1 million on research and development expenses.

Sales and Marketing

Our products and services are sold to businesses through our worldwide sales force and channel partners.

Direct Sales. Our senior sales executives seek to establish and maintain executive-level relationships with Fortune 2,000 companies. The focus of our sales team is identifying business network-related challenges and initiatives and then engaging with these customers to develop a solution roadmap and business case. Within our direct sales channel, we use a highly interactive sales approach to grow our enterprise-level, high-revenue client base. We have two distinct sales teams, one focused on new customer acquisition and the other focused on up-sell and cross-sell to our current customers.

Joint-Marketing and Selling Alliances. We have developed strategic alliances with information technology, or IT, and business services vendors that serve our targeted end markets. Our alliance strategy is three pronged:

• Resellers. We establish reselling relationships with select partners who are prominent in our target markets, such as Avnet, Exostar, MavenWire and Tieto.

• Consulting and Systems Integrators. We work with consulting and systems integrator partners such as Barkawi, Camelot and Oracle to collaboratively design and implement customer solutions.

• Independent Software Vendors, or ISVs. We leverage solutions providers with expertise in certain verticals or industries to deliver comprehensive solutions for customers. Oracle is an ISV partner.

Our sales process is consultative in nature. Prior to engagement, prospective customers work with us to identify ways to overcome their complex business problems by utilizing our solutions. While each customer is

103

unique, the marketing and sales teams use a systematic, repeatable process for lead qualification, nurturing and conversion. We believe that our sales process is a unique differentiator, as customers receive valuable insights and actionable ideas tailored to their unique requirements throughout the process. Our solutions and the systems they integrate with are usually “mission critical” and address complex business challenges typically requiring longer sales cycles than deployment of point solutions. A company’s dependence on E2open solutions results in higher retention rates and greater opportunity to up-sell additional solutions.

Our marketing activities facilitate the sales process by branding E2open as an industry expert and thought leader while generating qualified leads. We market our products and services to current and potential customers through various marketing programs. Our marketing programs include our corporate website, online and in-person conferences, trade shows, seminars, telemarketing and specialty marketing campaigns.

Our global headquarters is located in Foster City, California. We have six sales offices located across the United States, Europe and Asia, including Foster City, California, Austin and Dallas, Texas, Reading, United Kingdom, Shanghai, China and Taipei City, Taiwan.

Operations

Certified Operators. We work with partner operators to deliver our solutions in certain vertical markets and geographies. Exostar is a certified operator and has provided E2open solutions to the Aerospace and Defense industry since 2005. We have initiated a partnership with Camelot Information Systems Inc. to augment our delivery capabilities in China.

Data Centers. We host our development, quality assurance, configuration and staging environments at an Equinix co-location facility in Sunnyvale, California. Production environments are hosted in Equinix co-location facilities in San Jose, California and a suburb of Chicago, Illinois. To proactively identify and respond to potential problems, our global support and IT operations teams continually monitor customer solutions, using a systems management infrastructure that combines network and systems management tools, automated external scripts and synthetic transactions. Our production environment is designed in a high availability configuration. We use redundant storage systems, arrays, and other technologies to ensure the integrity of customer data stored on production systems. In the event of equipment failure, we maintain service contracts and on-site production spares for rapid equipment replacement. We began SAS70 compliance efforts in 2006 and have successfully completed annual Type II SAS70 audits since 2007. Beginning in 2011, we began using the SSAE 16 audit standard that superseded SAS70. The SSAE 16 audit for the period July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2011 was completed by independent auditors, and covers controls over technology, security and related processes as they relate the E2open Business Network. We have strong uptime performance and virtually no payments for service level deficiency.

Competition

While we do not believe that any specific competitor offers the breadth of business network solutions and collaborative capabilities that we do, the distinct markets that make up the business network space are each rapidly evolving and highly competitive. We face competition from the following types of companies:

• ERP vendors. Companies such as Infor, Oracle and SAP offer ERP extension solutions that provide features similar to a limited subset of our offerings in the area of trading partner portals. These companies may include those solutions as part of their larger ERP or business application offerings. As each trading partner is likely to have some form of existing ERP system, we are able to provide a common platform tying these disparate systems together as a business network. Our solutions generally do not replace the current functionality of existing ERP systems and therefore tend not to undermine our customers’ investments in their existing business applications. Our customers have found that our solutions extend and enhance the value of their existing ERP systems by adding integration, multi-enterprise processes, and real-time collaboration capabilities. Therefore, we do

104

not believe traditional ERP vendors view our solutions as a competitive alternative to their own offerings.

• Multi-enterprise B2B infrastructure vendors. Companies like GXS Corporation, IBM/Sterling Commerce and SPS Commerce provide point solutions in the B2B integration space. We do not view these offerings as competitive with our solutions. While our strategy is to provide a broader solution which can include B2B integration functionality, we believe integration platforms as standalone solutions lack the business processes and analytics that E2open provides.

• Niche applications vendors. Companies like JDA Software Group, Inc. have specialized functionality for specific process areas such as transportation management, demand planning or network design. Niche applications may provide important functionality for enterprises, but they typically are not built for multi-enterprise process management or a multi-tier environment.

• Internally developed solutions. Potential customers with large in-house IT departments are capable of developing applications customized for their businesses and many have. Typically, these applications lack complete functionality required to run complex, multi-tier trading networks.

Technology

Our technology platform is based on a service oriented architecture and uses J2EE technologies designed to run in a cloud-computing environment. Our technology platform addresses the requirements for multi-enterprise, business process management, management-by-exception, B2B integration and tactical and strategic decision support, while the cloud-based model provides flexibility and scalability to our customers without large up front hardware and software deployment costs.

Our platform provides a reliable, extensible, real-time foundation for multi-enterprise, business process management applications. Our platform has been designed to be deployed as a scalable web application, enabling users to view and interact with business objects using standard web browsers, spreadsheet applications and other portable user interface technologies including mobile devices. Underlying our technology platform, a built-in workflow engine leads users through a logical progression of steps to enable collaboration among business partners.

Our software is unique in that a single platform provides the capability to handle various supply and demand chain business processes through configuration. When configured, our software can assimilate business data from a large variety of disparate systems, present such data to the user and allow users to modify it in real time.

In addition to business process applications, our Business Intelligence software provides web-based reporting and data mining capabilities. This software maintains the context of the execution process and is capable of collecting data from multi-enterprise, business process management applications and external systems, providing our users the ability to mine critical business intelligence. With its flexible mechanisms for acquiring, storing and presenting historical information, as well as an extremely secure infrastructure, our Business Intelligence software enables rapid deployment of business reporting solutions.

Our software provides B2B integration capabilities that support B2B protocols and message formats including RosettaNet, EDI-VAN, AS2, cXML, xCBL and Web Services. It provides extensible message validation and transformation services that allow any-to-any message and protocol transaction. Our software includes pre-defined application connectors to ERP applications, such as Oracle and SAP. Our software also includes security and naming services that provide authentication, authorization, data privacy and non-repudiation. For easy integration with existing user management systems, our software supports protocols for authentication and authorization.

We also provide an extensive set of self-service software tools, such as tools to enable customers to quickly integrate their business partners, and a tool for creating and managing maps and integrating metadata that

105

enable customers to quickly configure our standard maps to meet their business and technical needs. Additional self-service software tools are available to allow customers to manage their security attributes, user accounts and message processing parameters to ensure that customers have control over the operation of their business processes.

Our software is engineered to run on multiple parallel servers to enable access by a large number of concurrent users and external systems. The distributed nature of our software enhances data security and transactional integrity for each business operation.

Intellectual Property

Our success and ability to compete depends, in part, upon our ability to establish and adequately protect our core technology and intellectual property. To accomplish this, we rely on a combination of intellectual property rights, including, patents, copyrights and trademarks, as well as customary contractual protections such as non-disclosure agreements and additional contractual restrictions on disclosure and use. We also protect our intellectual property through the terms of our license agreements with customers and by confidentiality agreements and intellectual property assignment agreements with our employees, consultants, business partners and advisors where appropriate.

As of May 31, 2012, we had eight U.S. and one foreign issued patents and we had one U.S. patent application pending. We do not know whether our current or future pending patent applications will result in the issuance of patents or whether the examination process will require us to narrow our claims. Even if granted, there can be no assurance that these pending patent applications will provide us with protection. The issued and allowed patents begin expiring in 2021 through 2024. The name E2open and the E2open logo are registered trademarks in the United States and several foreign countries.

Employees

As of May 31, 2012, we employed 351 people, including 73 in sales and marketing, 177 in operations and professional services, 57 in product development and 44 in general and administrative functions. We also engage a number of temporary employees and consultants to support our operations.

None of our employees are represented by a labor union. We have not experienced any work stoppages and we consider our relations with our employees to be good. Our continued success will depend upon our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel. Currently, there are no existing vacancies within our management team. All members of the current management team have been employed by us for approximately two years or more. We maintain a succession plan for key management positions to proactively manage the impact of the loss of key personnel on the operations of the business.

Facilities

Our corporate headquarters are located in Foster City, California and consist of approximately 24,070 square feet of office space under a lease that expires in February 2013. Our headquarters accommodates our principal sales, marketing professional services and administrative activities. We occupy space in Austin, Texas, consisting of 14,796 square feet under a lease that expires in December 2014 and space in Dallas, Texas, consisting of 12,211 square feet under a lease that expires in August 31, 2014. We also occupy space in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia consisting of 10,269 square feet under a lease that expires in November 2013 and space in Berkshire, United Kingdom, consisting of 3,300 square feet under a lease that expires in April 25, 2013. We use all of these facilities primarily for sales, professional services, customer support and software engineering. We also maintain sales offices in San Jose, California, Taipei, Taiwan, Dusseldorf, Germany and Shanghai, China. We do not own any real property.

106

We believe that our current facilities are suitable and adequate to meet our current needs and that suitable additional or substitute space will be available as needed in the future to accommodate our operations.

Legal Proceedings

We may be subject from time to time to various legal proceedings and claims which arise in the ordinary course of our business. Although the outcome of these and other claims cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, cash flows or results of operations.

107

MANAGEMENT

Executive Officers and Directors

The following table sets forth the names, ages and positions of our executive officers and directors as of May 31, 2012:

Name	Age		Position
Mark E. Woodward		54	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Peter J. Maloney		49	Chief Financial Officer
David P. Hale		48	Chief Information Officer
Lorenzo Martinelli		47	Senior Vice President, Corporate Strategy
David W. Packer		47	Senior Vice President, Worldwide Field Operations
Michael A. Schmitt		54	Senior Vice President, Marketing
Robert Schoenthaler		42	Senior Vice President, Customer Solutions
John B. Mumford		68	Chairman of the Board of Directors
Carl Bass (2) (3)		55	Director
Johnston L. Evans (2) (3)		64	Director
Bernard F. Mathaisel (1)		67	Director
Nicholas G. Moore (1)		70	Director
Patrick J. O’Malley, III (1)		50	Director
Stephen M. Ward, Jr. (1) (2) (3)		57	Director

⁽¹⁾  Member of the Audit Committee

⁽²⁾  Member of the Compensation Committee

⁽³⁾  Member of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

Mark E. Woodward has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer and a member of our board of directors since June 2008. Prior to joining E2open, Mr. Woodward was a Senior Advisor with The Blackstone Group, an investment and advisory firm from June 2007 to June 2008. Prior to joining The Blackstone Group, Mr. Woodward consulted for several private equity firms from January to June 2007. Mr. Woodward served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Serena Software, an application lifecycle management vendor, from November 1998 to December 2006. He joined Serena in November 1998 as the Vice President of Americas Sales, was promoted to Vice President Worldwide Operations in February 2000, and then promoted to President and Chief Executive Officer in May 2000. He served on Serena’s board of directors from June 2000 to December 2006. He also served on the board of directors of Clear Technology, Inc. from June 2005 to June 2007. Mr. Woodward attended the University of California, Los Angeles. We believe that Mr. Woodward possesses specific attributes that qualify him to serve as a member of our board of directors, including the perspective and experience he brings as our Chief Executive Officer and his experience as a seasoned executive with over 30 years of technology industry experience focused on sales, marketing and general management.

Peter J. Maloney has served as our Chief Financial Officer since January 2008. Mr. Maloney served as the Chief Financial Officer at SNOCAP, Inc., a digital licensing and copyright management service for online music distribution, from January 2006 to April 2008. Prior to SNOCAP, Mr. Maloney was employed by Keynote Systems, Inc., a mobile and internet performance management company, from October 2001 to January 2006 where he held senior management positions including Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Finance. Mr. Maloney holds a Master of Business Administration degree in Corporate Finance from University of Southern California’s Marshall School of Business and a Bachelor of Business Administration degree in Economics from Temple University’s Fox School of Business. Mr. Maloney is an inactive Certified Public Accountant.

David P. Hale has been employed by us since December 2000, and has served as our Chief Information Officer since January 2011. From 2005 until January 2011, Mr. Hale served as our Senior Vice President, IT

108

Operations, managing our SaaS operations, IT operations and global support functions. From January 2008 to December 2009, he concurrently served as General Manager, Asia Pacific and headed our Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia office. Mr. Hale was interim General Manager of our Tokyo office in 2002, and has served in various other executive positions for us. Mr. Hale holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Industrial Engineering, a Master of Arts degree in Education Policy Analysis and a Master of Business Administration degree, each from Stanford University.

Lorenzo Martinelli has been employed by us since October 2001 and has served as our Senior Vice President, Corporate Strategy since May 2007. Prior to that, he served as our Senior Vice President, Marketing from January 2006 to May 2007, our Executive Vice President, Sales Marketing & Account Management from July 2002 to January 2006 and our Vice President, Strategy & Marketing from October 2001 to July 2002. Mr. Martinelli earned a Bachelor of Applied Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Waterloo, Canada with a specialization in Operations Research and Organizational Behavior.

David W. Packer has served as our Senior Vice President, Worldwide Field Operations since September 2008. From March 2005 to September 2008, Mr. Packer was employed by Borland Software, an open application lifecycle management solutions company, where he served as Senior Vice President, Worldwide Field Operations from January 2007 to August 2008 and as Vice President, Americas from March 2005 to January 2007. Mr. Packer earned his Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics & Political Science from Claremont McKenna College and his Master of Science degree from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Michael A. Schmitt has served as our Senior Vice President, Marketing since January 2011. Prior to joining E2open, he served as Senior Vice President of Western Area Sales for Mitratech Holdings, an enterprise supplier of legal operations and e-billings solutions, from June 2009 to December 2010. Prior to Mitratech, he served as President and CEO of Siderean Software, an enterprise search company, from September 2006 to September 2008. Mr. Schmitt holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration from California Polytechnic State University.

Robert Schoenthaler has served as our Senior Vice President, Customer Solutions since April 2012. From July 2007 to April 2012 he served as our Senior Vice President, Deployment. From June 2006 to July 2007, Mr. Schoenthaler was the Managing Vice President of the High Tech industry segment at Hitachi Consulting, a business and consulting company. From January 1995 to February 2006, Mr. Schoenthaler worked at BearingPoint (formerly KPMG Consulting Inc.), a professional services firm offering management and consulting capabilities, where he helped lead their Consumer, Industrial and Technology practice. Mr. Schoenthaler earned his Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from Northwestern University.

John B. Mumford was a co-founder of E2open and has been a member and the Chairman of our Board of Directors since our inception in July 2000. Mr. Mumford also served as our interim Chief Executive Officer from May 2008 to June 2008. Mr. Mumford is the Founding Partner of Crosspoint Venture Partners, a venture capital firm, which was founded in 1982. Mr. Mumford was a co-founder and member of the board of directors of four public companies: Hello Direct, Inmac, Office Club (Office Depot) and Ariba. Mr. Mumford received a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting from Arizona State University and a Masters of Business Administration from the Stanford Graduate School of Business. We believe that Mr. Mumford possesses specific attributes that qualify him to serve as a member of our board of directors, including his experience as a successful venture capital investor for over 30 years.

Carl Bass has been a member of our board of directors since July 2011. Mr. Bass has been the President and Chief Executive Officer of Autodesk, Inc., a software design company, since May 2006. From June 2004 to April 2006, he was Autodesk’s Chief Operating Officer responsible for worldwide sales, marketing and product development. His earlier roles at Autodesk included Chief Technology Officer and Executive Vice President of product development. Mr. Bass served on the board of directors of McAfee, Inc. from January 2008 until its

109

acquisition in February 2011. Mr. Bass serves on the board of directors of Autodesk. He is also a member of the Executive Advisory Boards of the Cornell Computing and Information Science and the UC Berkeley School of Information. He holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Mathematics from Cornell University. We believe that Mr. Bass possesses specific attributes that qualify him to serve as a member of our board of directors, including his experience as Chief Executive Officer of a public software company.

Johnston L. Evans has been a member of our board of directors since June 2005. Mr. Evans has served as General Partner at Invesco Private Capital, Inc. and its predecessor, a venture capital firm since 1995. Mr. Evans received a Bachelor of Arts degree in Political Science from Boston University. We believe that Mr. Evans possesses specific attributes that qualify him to serve as a member of our board of directors, including his financial experience with both public and private companies.

Bernard F. Mathaisel has been a member of our board of directors since April 2003. Since January 2011 Mr. Mathaisel has served as Executive Advisor for Achievo Corporation, a global software development and information technology outsourcing provider, from December 2009 to January 2011 he served as Achievo’s Chief Operations Officer, North America and from April 2007 to December 2009 as their Chief Information Officer. He previously served on the board of directors of Packeteer, Inc., from 2004 until it was acquired by Blue Coat Systems, Inc. in June 2008. He also served on the Boards of AcXess, Inc. and QD Technologies, Inc. Mr. Mathaisel holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Engineering and a Master of Science degree in Engineering, both from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. We believe that Mr. Mathaisel possesses specific attributes that qualify him to serve as a member of our board of directors, including his executive experience with public companies over the past 25 years and his experience in information technology applications and information technology management.

Nicholas G. Moore has been a member of our board of directors since November 2004. Mr. Moore was elected Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Coopers & Lybrand (U.S.) in 1994 and Coopers & Lybrand International in 1997. Following the merger with Price Waterhouse in July 1998, Mr. Moore served as Chief Executive Officer of the U.S. firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers for two years and served for three years as global Chairman of PricewaterhouseCoopers. Mr. Moore serves on the board of directors of Bechtel Group, Inc., NetApp, Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Wells Fargo & Company. Mr. Moore received a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting from St. Mary’s College and a Juris Doctorate degree from Hastings College of Law, University of California at Berkeley. We believe that Mr. Moore possesses specific attributes that qualify him to serve as a member of our board of directors, including his financial and accounting experience with both public and private companies.

Patrick J. O’Malley, III has served as a member of our board of directors since January 2012. Mr. O’Malley has been the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Seagate Technology, a manufacturer of hard drives, since August 2008. Previously, he served as Seagate’s Senior Vice President, Finance from 2005 to August 2008, and assumed the additional roles of Principal Accounting Officer and Treasurer in 2006. Prior to that, he was Senior Vice President, Consumer Electronics from 2004 to 2005; Senior Vice President, Finance, Manufacturing from 1999 to 2004; Vice President, Finance-Recording Media from 1997 to 1999; Senior Director Finance, Desktop Design, from 1996 to 1997; Senior Director, Finance, Oklahoma City Operations from 1994 to 1996; Director and Manager, Corporate Financial Planning & Analysis from 1991 to 1994; Manager, Consolidations & Cost Accounting from 1990 to 1991; Manager, Consolidations from 1988 to 1990; and Senior Financial Analyst in 1988 all at Seagate. Mr. O’Malley holds a Bachelor of Business Administration degree from the University of Notre Dame. We believe that Mr. O’Malley possesses specific attributes that qualify him to serve as a member of our board of directors, including his financial experience and longstanding leadership at a public company.

Stephen M. Ward, Jr. has been a member of our board of directors since July 2006, and he was also a member of our board of directors from August 2000 to November 2004. Mr. Ward served as Chief Executive Officer and President of Lenovo, the international computer company formed by the merger of Lenovo of China

110

and IBM’s personal computing business, from April 2005 to January 2006. He served as a Management Consultant to the Chairman of Lenovo from January 2006 to March 2006. Mr. Ward also serves on the board of directors, chairs the corporate governance committee, is a member and was former chair of the human resources and compensation committee, is a member of the operations committee and was a member of the audit committee of Carpenter Technology, a specialty metals company, since 2001. Mr. Ward is a member of the founding team, member of the board of directors and member of the executive committee and has been the chair of the compensation committee at C3, a cloud software company which helps enterprises monitor, mitigate and monetize carbon. Mr. Ward was also on the board of directors and the compensation committee of E-Ink, a materials company providing electronic paper screens to e-book companies and other customers, from January 2007 to December 2009. Prior to joining Lenovo, Mr. Ward was the Senior Vice President and General Manager of IBM’s Personal Systems Group, responsible for IBM’s Retail Store Solutions Division, IBM’s Printing Systems Division and IBM’s Personal Computing Division. Mr. Ward also held positions as the leader of IBM’s worldwide sales for all industrial, electronics, chemical and aerospace companies, and was Chief Information Officer and Vice President of Transformation of IBM from March 1998 to April 2000. Mr. Ward holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from California Polytechnic at San Luis Obispo. We believe that Mr. Ward possesses specific attributes that qualify him to serve as a member of our board of directors, including his experience growing multiple technology companies.

There are no family relationships among any of our directors and/or executive officers.

Board Composition

Our board of directors is currently composed of eight members. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide that the number of our directors shall be fixed from time to time by a resolution of the majority of our board of directors. Upon completion of this offering, our board of directors will be divided into three staggered classes of directors. At each annual meeting of stockholders, a class of directors will be elected for a three-year term to succeed the same class of directors whose terms are then expiring. The terms of the directors will expire upon the election and qualification of successor directors at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held during 2013 for the Class I directors, 2014 for the Class II directors and 2015 for the Class III directors.

• Our Class I directors will be Messrs. Evans and Mathaisel.

• Our Class II directors will be Messrs. Bass, Moore and Ward.

• Our Class III directors will be Messrs. Mumford, O’Malley and Woodward.

The division of our board of directors into three classes with staggered three-year terms may delay or prevent a change of our management or a change of control. See “Description of Capital Stock—Anti-Takeover Effects of Delaware Law and Our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws” for a discussion of other anti-takeover provisions found in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws.

Director Independence

Under the rules of The NASDAQ Stock Market, or NASDAQ, independent directors must comprise a majority of a listed company’s board of directors within a specified period of the completion of its offering. In addition, the rules of NASDAQ require that, subject to specified exceptions, each member of a listed company’s audit, compensation and nominating and corporate governance committees be independent. Audit committee members must also satisfy the independence criteria set forth in Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Under the rules of NASDAQ, a director will only qualify as an “independent director” if, in the opinion of that company’s board of directors, that person does not have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.

111

In order to be considered independent for purposes of Rule 10A-3, a member of an audit committee of a listed company may not, other than in his or her capacity as a member of the audit committee, the board of directors or any other board committee: (1) accept, directly or indirectly, any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee from the listed company or any of its subsidiaries or (2) be an affiliated person of the listed company or any of its subsidiaries.

On February 14, 2012, our board of directors undertook a review of its composition, the composition of its committees and the independence of each director. Based upon information requested from and provided by each director concerning his background, employment and affiliations, our board of directors has determined that none of Messrs. Bass, Evans, Mathaisel, Moore, Mumford or Ward, representing six of our eight directors, has a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and that each of these directors is “independent” as that term is defined under the rules of NASDAQ. On March 29, 2012, based upon information requested from and provided by Mr. O’Malley, our board of directors determined that Mr. O’Malley did not have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and that he is “independent” as that term is defined under the rules of NASDAQ. Our board of directors also determined that Messrs. Moore, Mathaisel, O’Malley and Ward, who comprise our audit committee, Messrs. Ward, Bass and Evans, who comprise our compensation committee, and Messrs. Bass, Evans and Ward, who comprise our corporate governance and nominating committee, satisfy the independence standards for those committees established by applicable SEC rules and the rules of NASDAQ. In making this determination, our board of directors considered the relationships that each non-employee director has with our company and all other facts and circumstances our board of directors deemed relevant in determining their independence, including the beneficial ownership of our capital stock by each non-employee director.

Role of the Board in Risk Oversight

One of the key functions of our board of directors is informed oversight of our risk management process. Our board of directors does not have a standing risk management committee, but rather administers this oversight function directly through the board of directors as a whole, as well as through its standing committees that address risks inherent in their respective areas of oversight. In particular, our board of directors is responsible for monitoring and assessing strategic risk exposure. Our audit committee is responsible for reviewing and discussing our major financial risk exposures and the steps our management has taken to monitor and control these exposures, including guidelines and policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management. Our audit committee also monitors compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, in addition to oversight of the performance of our external audit function. Our corporate governance and nominating committee monitors the effectiveness of our corporate governance guidelines. Our compensation committee reviews and discusses the risks arising from our compensation philosophy and practices applicable to all employees that are reasonably likely to have a materially adverse effect on us.

Board Committees

Our board of directors has an audit committee, a compensation committee and a corporate governance and nominating committee, each of which has the composition and responsibilities described below. The audit committee, compensation committee and corporate governance and nominating committee all operate under charters approved by our board of directors, which will be available on our website upon the closing of this offering.

Audit Committee. Our audit committee oversees our corporate accounting and financial reporting process and assists the board of directors in monitoring our financial systems and our legal and regulatory compliance. Our audit committee will also:

• oversee the work of our independent auditors;

112

• approve the hiring, discharging and compensation of our independent auditors;

• approve engagements of the independent auditors to render any audit or permissible non-audit services;

• review the qualifications and independence of the independent auditors;

• monitor the rotation of partners of the independent auditors on our engagement team as required by law;

• review our financial statements and review our critical accounting policies and estimates;

• review the adequacy and effectiveness of our internal controls; and

• review and discuss with management and the independent auditors the results of our annual audit and our quarterly financial statements.

The members of our audit committee are Messrs. Moore, Mathaisel, O’Malley and Ward. Mr. Moore is our audit committee chairman. Our board of directors has concluded that the composition of our audit committee meets the requirements for independence under, and the functioning of our audit committee complies with, the current requirements of and SEC rules and regulations, and Messrs. Moore, O’Malley and Ward are our audit committee financial experts as defined under SEC rules and regulations.

Compensation Committee. Our compensation committee oversees our corporate compensation programs. The compensation committee will also:

• review and approve corporate goals and objectives relevant to compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers;

• evaluate the performance of our executive officers in light of established goals and objectives;

• review and recommend compensation of our executive officers based on its evaluations;

• review and recommend compensation of our directors; and

• administer the issuance of stock options and other awards under our stock plans.

The members of our compensation committee are Messrs. Ward, Bass and Evans. Mr. Ward is the chairman of our compensation committee. Our board of directors has determined that each member of our compensation committee is independent under the applicable rules of NASDAQ.

Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. Our corporate governance and nominating committee oversees and assists our board of directors in reviewing and recommending corporate governance policies and nominees for election to our board of directors. The corporate governance and nominating committee will also:

• evaluate and make recommendations regarding the organization and governance of the board of directors and its committees;

• assess the performance of members of the board of directors and make recommendations regarding committee and chair assignments;

113

• recommend desired qualifications for board of directors membership and conduct searches for potential members of the board of directors; and

• review and make recommendations with regard to our corporate governance guidelines.

The members of our corporate governance and nominating committee are Messrs. Bass, Evans and Ward. Mr. Bass is the chairman of our corporate governance and nominating committee. Our board of directors has determined that each member of our corporate governance and nominating committee is independent under the applicable rules of NASDAQ.

Our board of directors may from time to time establish other committees.

Director Compensation

The following table sets forth information concerning compensation paid or accrued for services rendered to us by members of our board of directors for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2012. The table excludes Mr. Woodward, who is a named executive officer and did not receive any compensation from us in his role as a director in the fiscal year ended February 29, 2012.

Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)		Option Awards ($)(1)			Total ($)
John B. Mumford		0		17,220	(2)		17,220
Carl Bass		0		73,853			73,853
Johnston L. Evans		0		17,220	(3)		17,220
Bernard F. Mathaisel		5,000		40,270			45,270
Nicholas G. Moore		5,000		40,270			45,270
Patrick J. O’Malley, III		0		195,364			195,364
Stephen M. Ward, Jr.		8,000		71,875			79,875

⁽¹⁾  The amounts reported in the Option Awards column represent the grant date fair value of the stock options granted to the non-employee directors during fiscal 2012, computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718. The assumptions used in calculating the grant date fair value of the stock options reported in the Option Awards column are set forth in Note 13 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. The amounts reported in this column reflect the accounting cost for these stock-based awards, and do not correspond to the actual economic value that may be received by the non-employee directors from the awards.

⁽²⁾  Includes (i) $15,498 from an option held directly by Crosspoint Venture Partners 2000(Q), L.P.; and (ii) $1,722 from an option held directly by Crosspoint Venture Partners 2000, L.P. Mr. Mumford serves as a Managing General Partner of Crosspoint Associates 2000, L.L.C., the general partner of Crosspoint Venture Partners 2000(Q), L.P. and Crosspoint Venture Partners 2000, L.P.

⁽³⁾  Includes (i) $10,301 from an option held directly by Chancellor V, L.P.; (ii) $5,310 from an option held directly by Chancellor V-A, L.P.; and (iii) $1,609 from an option held directly by Citiventure 2000, L.P. (collectively referred to as the “Invesco Capital Entities”). Mr. Evans is the Head of Invesco Private Capital, Inc. and a member of the investment committee of IPC Direct Associates V, LLC. IPC Direct Associates V, LLC is the general partner of each of the Invesco Capital Entities and its managing member is Invesco Private Capital, Inc.

Historically, outside directors received compensation for participation in board meetings equal to $1,000 per meeting and participation in audit committee meetings equal to $1,000 per meeting, but this practice was discontinued in August 2011. On March 28, 2011, July 20, 2011 and January 12, 2012, certain of our non-employee directors were granted stock options as described in the table below. These options are scheduled to vest as indicated below, provided that a portion of each 12-month period’s vesting will be forfeited if the director has not participated in at least 75% of the aggregate number of the meetings of our board of directors or the

114

committees on which the directors serves for that 12-month period (or portion of the period, if the director terminates service before the end of the period). In addition, if we are subject to a change in control, then 100% of the shares subject to the then-outstanding portion of each of these options shall vest in full if the director’s service is terminated immediately prior to, on, or within 12 months following, the change in control, in each case at our request or at the request of such other company involved in the change in control. Following the completion of this offering, we expect to implement an annual compensation program for our non-employee directors.

Our policy has been and will continue to be to reimburse our non-employee directors for their travel, lodging and other reasonable expenses incurred in attending meetings of our board of directors and committees of the board of directors.

Directors who are employees do not receive any compensation for their service on our board of directors.

As of February 29, 2012, our non-employee directors held outstanding stock options as follows:

	Option Awards
	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#)
Name	Exercisable			Unexercisable		Option Exercise Price ($)		Option Expiration Date
John B. Mumford		5,713 12,000	(1)(2) (3)(4)		—   —		0.35 3.15		9/4/2014 07/20/2021
Carl Bass		48,285	(5)		—		3.15		7/20/2021
Johnston L. Evans		3,752 11,999	(1)(6) (7)(8)		—   —		0.35 3.15		9/4/2015 7/20/2021
Bernard F. Mathaisel		6,785 14,285 14,285 12,000	(1) (9) (10) (11)		—   —   —   —		0.35 0.35 3.15 3.15		2/18/2017 6/25/2019 03/28/2021 07/20/2021
Nicholas G. Moore		3,571 10,714 14,285 12,000	(1) (12) (10) (13)		—   —   —   —		0.35 0.35 3.15 3.15		11/8/2017 6/25/2019 03/28/2021 07/20/2021
Patrick J. O’Malley, III		48,285	(14)		—		8.05		01/12/2022
Steven M. Ward, Jr.		—   14,285 18,000 6,000	(15) (10) (16) (17)		—   —   —   —		—   3.15 3.15 8.05		—   03/28/2021 07/20/2021 01/12/2022

⁽¹⁾  The option is fully vested and immediately exercisable.

⁽²⁾  Includes (i) 5,127 options held directly by Crosspoint Venture Partners 2000(Q), L.P.; and (ii) 586 options held directly by Crosspoint Venture Partners 2000, L.P. Mr. Mumford serves is a Managing General Partner of Crosspoint Associates 2000, L.L.C., the general partner of Crosspoint Venture Partners 2000(Q), L.P. and Crosspoint Venture Partners 2000, L.P.

⁽³⁾  The option is subject to an early exercise provision and is immediately exercisable. The option vests monthly over one year beginning on July 20, 2011. As of February 29, 2012, 7,000 shares were vested and 5,000 shares vest over the remainder of the vesting period.

115

⁽⁴⁾  Includes (i) 10,800 options held directly by Crosspoint Venture Partners 2000(Q), L.P. and (ii) 1,200 options held directly by Crosspoint Venture Partners 2000, L.P. Mr. Mumford serves as a Managing General Partner of Crosspoint Associates 2000, L.L.C., the general partner of Crosspoint Venture Partners 2000(Q), L.P. and Crosspoint Venture Partners 2000, L.P.

⁽⁵⁾  The option is subject to an early exercise provision and is immediately exercisable. The option vests annually over four years beginning on July 20, 2011. As of February 29, 2012, no shares were vested and 48,285 shares vest over the remainder of the vesting period.

⁽⁶⁾ Includes (i) 2,245 options held directly by Chancellor V, L.P.; (ii) 1,157 options held directly by Chancellor V-A, L.P.; and (iii) 350 options held directly by Citiventure 2000, L.P. (collectively referred to as the “Invesco Capital Entities”). Mr. Evans is the Head of Invesco Private Capital, Inc. and a member of the investment committee of IPC Direct Associates V, LLC. IPC Direct Associates V, LLC is the general partner of each of the Invesco Capital Entities and its managing member is Invesco Private Capital, Inc.

⁽⁷⁾  The options are subject to any early exercise provision and are immediately exercisable. The option vests monthly over one year beginning on July 20, 2011. As of February 29, 2012, 6,999 shares were vested and 5,000 shares vest over the remainder of the vesting period.

⁽⁸⁾  Includes (i) 7,178 options held directly by Chancellor V, L.P.; (ii) 3,700 options held directly by Chancellor V-A, L.P.; and (iii) 1,121 options held directly by Citiventure 2000, L.P. Mr. Evans is the Head of Invesco Private Capital, Inc. and a member of the investment committee of IPC Direct Associates V, LLC. IPC Direct Associates V, LLC is the general partner of each of the Invesco Capital Entities and its managing member is Invesco Private Capital, Inc.

⁽⁹⁾  The option is subject to an early exercise provision and is immediately exercisable. The option vests annually over four years beginning on June 25, 2010. As of February 29, 2012, 7,142 shares were vested and 7,143 shares vest over the remainder of the vesting period.

⁽¹⁰⁾  The option is subject to an early exercise provision and is immediately exercisable. The option vests annually over four years beginning on March 28, 2011. As of February 29, 2012, no shares were vested and 14,285 shares vest over the remainder of the vesting period.

⁽¹¹⁾  The option is subject to an early exercise provision and is immediately exercisable. The option vests annually over one year beginning on July 20, 2011. As of February 29, 2012, 7,000 shares were vested and 5,000 shares vest over the remainder of the vesting period.

⁽¹²⁾  The option is subject to an early exercise provision and is immediately exercisable. The option vests annually over four years beginning on June 25, 2009 and was exercised in part. As of February 29, 2012, 3,571 shares were vested and 7,143 shares vest over the remainder of the vesting period.

⁽¹³⁾ The option is subject to an early exercise provision and is immediately exercisable. The option vests monthly over one year beginning on July 20, 2011. As of February 29, 2012, 7,000 shares were vested and 5,000 shares vest over the remainder of the vesting period.

⁽¹⁴⁾  The option is subject to an early exercise provision and is immediately exercisable. The option vests annually over four years beginning on January 12, 2012. As of February 29, 2012, no shares were vested and 48,285 shares vest over the remainder of the vesting period.

⁽¹⁵⁾ Mr. Ward acquired 7,738 shares of common stock pursuant to early exercise which are subject to a repurchase option we hold as of February 29, 2012.

⁽¹⁶⁾  The option is subject to an early exercise provision and is immediately exercisable. The option vests annually over one year beginning on July 20, 2011. As of February 29, 2012, 10,500 shares were vested and 7,500 shares vest over the remainder of the vesting period.

⁽¹⁷⁾  The option is subject to an early exercise provision and is immediately exercisable. The option vests annually over one year beginning on July 20, 2011. As of February 29, 2012, 500 shares were vested and 5,500 shares vest over the remainder of the vesting period.

On March 29, 2012, certain of our non-employee directors were granted stock options to purchase shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $8.75 per share in the following amounts: 12,000 shares to Mr. Mathaisel; 18,000 shares to Mr. Moore; 18,000 shares to Mr. Ward; 6,000 shares to Mr. Bass; 12,000 shares to Mr. Mumford to be allocated among Crosspoint Ventures Partners 2000(Q), L.P. and Crosspoint Venture Partners 2000, L.P.; and 12,000 shares to Mr. Evans to be allocated among the Invesco Capital Entities. Each of

116

these options is subject to an early exercise provision and is immediately exercisable, vests monthly over one year beginning on March 29, 2012 and is subject to the forfeiture and change in control provisions described above.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

We have adopted a code of business conduct and ethics that is applicable to all of our employees, officers and directors including our chief executive officer and senior financial officers, which will be available on our website upon the closing of this offering.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

Messrs. Evans and Mumford served as the members of the compensation committee in fiscal 2011. In July 2011, Mr. Ward was also appointed to the compensation committee. None of the members of our compensation committee is an officer or employee of our company. In February 2012, Carl Bass was appointed to the compensation committee, replacing Mr. Mumford. Mr. Mumford served as our interim Chief Executive Officer from May 2008 to June 2008. None of our executive officers currently serves, or in the past year has served, as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our board of directors or compensation committee.

117

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table

The following table provides information regarding the compensation of our principal executive officer and each of the named executive officers as required by Item 402(m)(2) of Regulation S-K during our fiscal year ended February 28, 2011 and February 29, 2012.

Name and Principal Position	Year		Salary ($)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) (1)			Option Awards ($) (2)(3)			All Other Compensation ($)			Total ($)
Mark E. Woodward		2012		350,000		385,000			413,250	(4)		456	(5)		1,148,706
President and Chief Executive Officer		2011		350,000		356,650			—			17,251	(6)		723,901
Peter J. Maloney Chief Financial Officer		2012 2011		300,000 300,000		165,000 152,850			76,125 —	(7)		456 6,248	(5) (8)		541,581 459,098
David W. Packer Senior Vice President, Field Operations		2012 2011		300,000 300,000		311,987 207,581	(9) (11)		65,250 —	(10)		456 3,332	(5) (12)		677,693 510,913

⁽¹⁾ The amounts included in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column represent the amounts earned and payable under the fiscal 2011 bonus plan, called the 2011 Executive Incentive Plan, which were paid in April 2011 and the amounts earned and payable under the fiscal 2012 bonus plan, called the 2012 Executive Incentive Plan, which were paid in April 2012.

⁽²⁾ The amounts reported in the Option Awards column represent the grant date fair value of the stock options granted to the named executive officers during fiscal 2012 as computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718. The assumptions used in calculating the grant date fair value of the stock options reported in the Option Awards column are set forth in Note 13 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. Note that the amounts reported in this column reflect the accounting cost for these stock options, and do not correspond to the actual economic value that may be received by the named executive officers from the options.

⁽³⁾ Includes stock option expense of performance-based and time-based options granted on July 18, 2011.

⁽⁴⁾  Includes $413,250 for an option subject to time-based vesting and $0 for an option subject to performance-based vesting plus additional time-based vesting as described below under “2012 Equity Grants.” For the performance-based option, between 0% and 150% of the 271,428 target number of shares subject to the option may become eligible for time-based vesting based on level of performance achievement. The grant date fair value of the performance-based option was excluded from the table because at the date of grant achievement of the performance goals at all target levels was not deemed probable. If the maximum level of performance achievement was assumed, the grant date fair value of this performance-based option would be $638,400. On March 29, 2012, we revised certain performance targets applicable to the performance-based option such that on March 29, 2012 the target level was deemed probable and we will record a charge of $425,934 in fiscal 2013 based on the fair value of the modified performance-based options.

⁽⁵⁾ Includes (i) life insurance premiums of $336 and (ii) accidental death insurance premiums in the amount of $120.

⁽⁶⁾  Includes (i) payment of withholding taxes paid by the company on behalf of the individual associated with the vesting of 61,428 shares of restricted stock in the amount of $16,831; (ii) life insurance premiums in the amount of $336; and (iii) accidental death insurance premiums in the amount of $84.

⁽⁷⁾  Includes $76,125 for an option subject to time-based vesting and $0 for an option subject to performance-based vesting plus additional time-based vesting as described below under “2012 Equity Grants.” For the performance-based option, between 0% and 150% of the 50,000 target number of shares subject to the option may become eligible for time-based vesting based on level of performance achievement. The grant date fair value of the performance-based option was excluded from the table because at the date of grant achievement of the performance goals at all target levels was not deemed probable. If the maximum level of

118

performance achievement was assumed, the grant date fair value of this performance-based option would be $117,600. On March 29, 2012, we revised certain performance targets applicable to the performance-based option such that on March 29, 2012 the target level was deemed probable and we will record a charge of $78,462 in fiscal 2013 based on the fair value of the modified performance-based options.

⁽⁸⁾ Includes (i) payment of withholding taxes paid by the company on behalf of the individual associated with the vesting of 21,428 shares of restricted stock in the amount of $5,888; (ii) life insurance premiums in the amount of $288; and (iii) accidental death insurance premiums in the amount of $72.

⁽⁹⁾  Includes (i) $165,000 paid under the 2012 Executive Incentive Plan and (ii) $146,987 paid under our annual sales management incentive plan.

⁽¹⁰⁾  Includes $65,250 for an option subject to time-based vesting and $0 for an option subject to performance-based vesting plus additional time-based vesting as described below under “2012 Equity Grants.” For the performance-based option, between 0% and 150% of the 42,857 target number of shares subject to the option may become eligible for time-based vesting based on level of performance achievement. The grant date fair value of the performance-based option was excluded from the table because at the date of grant achievement of the performance goals at all target levels was not deemed probable. If the maximum level of performance achievement was assumed, the grant date fair value of this performance-based option would be $100,800. On March 29, 2012, we revised certain performance targets applicable to the performance-based option such that on March 29, 2012 the target level was deemed probable and we will record a charge of $67,253 in fiscal 2013 based on the fair value of the modified performance-based options.

⁽¹¹⁾ Includes (i) $152,850 paid under the 2011 Executive Incentive Plan and (ii) $54,731 paid under our annual sales management incentive plan.

⁽¹²⁾  Includes (i) payment of withholding taxes paid by the company on behalf of the individual associated with the vesting of 14,285 shares of restricted stock in the amount of $2,972; (ii) life insurance premiums in the amount of $288; and (iii) accidental death insurance premiums in the amount of $72.

Bonuses

We provide our named executive officers an opportunity to receive a year-end, formula-based bonus. The bonus is based on a target incentive amount for each named executive officer.

Fiscal 2011 Bonus Payments

In fiscal 2011, the target incentive amount and year-end payments for our named executive officers under the fiscal 2011 Executive Incentive Plan were the following:

Name and Position	Target Incentive ($)		Actual Paid ($)
Mark E. Woodward—President and Chief Executive Officer		350,000		356,650
Peter J. Maloney—Chief Financial Officer		150,000		152,850
David W. Packer—Senior Vice President, Worldwide Field Operations		150,000		152,850

For fiscal 2011, the amount of the formula-based bonus paid to our executives was determined based upon the percentage of achievement of two equally weighted goals: revenue and fiscal 2011 earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA. Upon achievement of both performance goals at target levels, each named executive officer was eligible to earn 100% of his target amount. The minimum and maximum amount of the fiscal 2011 bonus amounts that could have been earned were 0% and 150% respectively. If we had failed to achieve either of these goals at target levels, our named executive officers would not have received any bonus for the year under the 2011 Executive Incentive Plan. For achievement above the performance threshold, incentive payouts were prorated based on the achievement percentage between determined payout levels. Based on actual achievement of the performance goals for fiscal 2011, each of our

119

named executive officers earned 101.9% of the target bonus amount for fiscal 2011 under the 2011 Executive Incentive Plan.

In addition to his participation in the 2011 Executive Incentive Plan, Mr. Packer also participated in a sales incentive plan. Mr. Packer’s annual target incentive under the sales incentive plan for fiscal 2011 was $150,000 and the actual fiscal 2011 bonus paid to him under the sales incentive plan was $54,731. Mr. Packer’s bonus under the sales incentive plan was calculated based on the actual percentage achievement of the company’s fiscal 2011 billings, bookings, and new customer attainment goals. Pursuant to the terms of Mr. Packer’s sales incentive plan, Mr. Packer was eligible to receive a pro-rated portion of his bonus upon the achievement of minimum thresholds for the goals set forth above.

Fiscal 2012 Bonus Payments

In fiscal 2012, the target incentive amount and year-end payments for our named executive officers under the fiscal 2012 Executive Incentive Plan were the following:

Name and Position	Target Incentive ($)		Actual Paid ($)
Mark E. Woodward—President and Chief Executive Officer		350,000		385,000
Peter J. Maloney—Chief Financial Officer		150,000		165,000
David W. Packer—Senior Vice President, Worldwide Field Operations		150,000		165,000

For fiscal 2012, the amount of the formula-based bonus paid to our executives was determined based upon the achievement of goals relating to bookings, billings, free cash flow and accounts receivables performance against the established fiscal 2012 financial plan targets. Upon achievement of the performance goals at target levels, each named executive officer was eligible to earn 100% of his target incentive amount. The minimum and maximum amount of the fiscal 2012 bonus amounts that could have been earned were 0% and 150% respectively. If we failed to achieve any of these goals at target levels, our named executive officers would not have received a bonus for the year under the 2012 Executive Incentive Plan. For achievement at or above the minimum threshold for performance, bonuses were awarded between the target payout (100% of target incentive amount) and the maximum payout (150% of target incentive amount) based on the achievement level of the various goals. Based on actual achievement of the performance goals for fiscal year 2012, each of our named executive officers earned 110% of the target bonus amount for fiscal 2012 under the 2012 Executive Incentive Plan.

In addition to his participation in the 2012 Executive Incentive Plan, Mr. Packer also participated in a sales incentive plan. Mr. Packer’s annual target incentive under the sales incentive plan for fiscal 2012 was $150,000 and the actual fiscal 2012 bonus paid to him under the sales incentive plan was $146,987. Mr. Packer’s bonus under the sales incentive plan was calculated based on the actual percentage achievement of the company’s fiscal 2012 billings, bookings, and new customer attainment goals. Pursuant to the terms of Mr. Packer’s sales incentive plan, Mr. Packer was eligible to receive a pro-rated portion of his bonus upon the achievement of minimum thresholds for the goals set forth above.

Equity Grants

Fiscal 2011 Equity Grants

No option awards or stock awards were granted to our named executive officers during fiscal 2011.

Fiscal 2012 Equity Grants

On May 13, 2011, the board of directors approved in advance the grant to each of Messrs. Woodward, Maloney and Packer of two stock option grants each as set forth in the table below, with one grant subject to

120

time-based vesting (each, a “merit option”) and one grant subject to performance-based vesting with additional time-based vesting requirements (each, a “performance-based option”). The grants became effective on July 18, 2011, when the compensation committee approved an exercise price for the grants of $3.15 per share, which was higher than or equal to the fair market value of our stock on the date of grant.

Merit Option. Each merit option is scheduled to vest in equal monthly installments over four years from the vesting commencement date of March 1, 2011 based on continued service to us, and is subject to an early exercise provision and therefore is immediately exercisable. The executive also may become eligible for acceleration of vesting pursuant to the terms of his change of control arrangement, as described under “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control” below.

Name	Number of Shares Subject to Merit Option
Mark Woodward		271,428
Peter Maloney		50,000
David Packer		42,857

Performance-Based Option. Between 0% and 150% of the target number of shares subject to each performance-based option may become eligible for time-based vesting. The target and maximum number of shares under each performance-based option is as follows:

Name	Target Number of Shares		Maximum Number of Shares that can become Eligible for Time- Based Vesting
Mark Woodward		271,428		407,142
Peter Maloney		50,000		75,000
David Packer		42,857		64,285

The number of shares subject to each performance-based option that will become eligible for time-based vesting (that is, that will become “eligible shares”), and the time-based vesting schedule of such shares, will be determined based upon the percentage achievement of goals relating to bookings, billings, free cash flow and receivables performance against the established fiscal 2012 and 2013 targets (collectively, the “performance goals”), which performance is measured as of February 28, 2013.

The percentage of the target number of shares subject to the performance-based vesting stock option grant that will become eligible shares is based upon the percentage achievement of the performance goals is as follows:

Aggregate Achievement Level of Performance Targets	Percentage of Target Number of Shares Subject to the Performance- Based Option that will become Eligible Shares
< 84.99%		0	%
85% - 99.99%		50	%
100% - 124.99%		100	%
³125%		150	%

121

The time-based vesting schedule of the shares subject to the performance-based option that have become eligible for time-based vesting is as follows:

Aggregate Achievement Level of Performance Targets	Time-Based Vesting Schedule of Eligible Shares
<84.99%	N/A
85% - 99.99%	1/48th of the Eligible Shares will be scheduled to vest in equal monthly installments over the 4-year period following the vesting commencement date of March 1, 2013
100% - 124.99%	1/36th of the Eligible Shares will be scheduled to vest in equal monthly installments over the 3-year period following the vesting commencement date of March 1, 2013
³125%	1/24th of the Eligible Shares will be scheduled to vest in equal monthly installments over the 2-year period following the vesting commencement date of March 1, 2013

If the executive’s employment is terminated without cause (as defined in his option agreement), including as a result of his disability (as defined in his option agreement) or death, or he experiences an involuntary termination (as defined in his option agreement), in each case within 12 months following a change in control of the company, then the vesting of (1) 50% of the target number of shares subject to his performance-based option will accelerate if the termination occurs before February 28, 2013, and (2) 100% of his eligible shares subject to the performance-based option will accelerate if the termination occurs on or after February 28, 2013.

Benefits

We provide the following benefits to our named executive officers, generally on the same basis provided to all of our employees:

• medical, dental and vision insurance;

• 401(k) plan (see “Retirement Plans” below for a description of our 401(k) plan);

• employee assistance program;

• short-and long-term disability, life insurance, accidental death and dismemberment insurance; and

• health and dependent care flexible spending accounts.

Pension Benefits

We do not offer pension benefits to our named executive officers.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

We do not offer non-qualified deferred compensation to our named executive officers.

Employment Agreements and Change of Control Arrangements

We have executed employment agreements, current change of control arrangements and the Company has approved the terms of Change in Control Severance Agreements with each of our named executive officers. Summaries of such arrangements follow.

122

Mr. Woodward

We entered into an offer letter with Mr. Woodward on June 20, 2008. Currently, Mr. Woodward is entitled to receive $350,000 in annual base salary and is eligible for an incentive bonus targeted at $350,000 payable upon the achievement of certain performance goals as will be determined by our board of directors. Mr. Woodward is also eligible to participate in all employee benefit plans and vacation programs. For information relating to potential payments upon termination, see “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control—Change in Control Severance Agreements” or “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control.”

Mr. Maloney

We entered into an offer letter with Mr. Maloney on December 26, 2007 and an addendum to the letter dated June 10, 2008. Currently, Mr. Maloney is entitled to receive $300,000 in annual base salary and is eligible for an incentive bonus targeted at $150,000 payable upon the achievement of certain performance goals as will be determined by our board of directors. Mr. Maloney is also eligible to participate in all company employee benefit plans and vacation programs. For information relating to potential payments upon termination, see “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control—Change in Control Severance Agreements” or “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control.”

Mr. Packer

We entered into an offer letter with Mr. Packer on August 18, 2008, as amended December 22, 2008. Currently, Mr. Packer is entitled to receive $300,000 in annual base salary and is eligible for an incentive bonus targeted at $150,000 payable upon the achievement of certain performance goals as will be determined by our board of directors and a bonus of $150,000 payable upon achievement of certain performance goals as determined by the chief executive officer under our annual sales management incentive plan. Mr. Packer is also eligible to participate in all company employee benefit plans and vacation programs. For information relating to potential payments upon termination, see “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control—Change in Control Severance Agreements” or “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control.”

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control—Change in Control Severance Agreements

We have approved entering into a Change in Control Severance Agreement with each of Messrs. Woodward, Maloney and Packer (each, an “Agreement” and collectively, the “Agreements”). The Agreements will supersede the severance arrangements described below that are currently in place, except with respect to certain equity awards (as described below). Each Agreement will have a three (3) year term and will automatically renew for an additional three (3) year term upon the expiration of the then-current term unless either party provides the other party with written notice of non-renewal or the Agreement is modified, in each case within the ninety (90) days prior to the date of automatic renewal. However, if we are actively discussing and/or negotiating a Change in Control (as defined below) of E2open during such ninety (90) day period, no changes may be made to the Agreement except with the employee’s express written consent. Additionally, if a Change in Control occurs when there are fewer than twelve (12) months remaining during the then-current term, the term of the Agreement will extend automatically through the twelve (12) month anniversary of the date of the Change in Control.

Each Agreement will provide that if (x) we terminate the employee’s employment with us for a reason other than for Cause (as defined below) or the employee’s death or disability, or (y) the employee terminates his employment for Good Reason (as defined below), and in each case, the termination does not occur within the three (3) month period prior to and through the twelve (12) month period following a Change in Control, the employee will receive the following severance: (i) continuing payments of severance pay at a rate equal to the employee’s base salary in effect on the termination date for a period of twelve (12) months (in the case of

123

Mr. Woodward) or six (6) months (in the case of Messrs. Maloney and Packer), and (ii) continuing payments of $1,900, which the employee may, in his discretion, elect to use to pay for health continuation coverage for a period of twelve (12) months (in the case of Mr. Woodward) or six (6) months (in the case of Messrs. Maloney and Packer). In order to receive the severance, the employee must first sign and not revoke a release of claims against us including non-disparagement and non-solicitation provisions and any other standard terms required by us.

Each Agreement will further provide that if (x) we terminate the employee’s employment with us for a reason other than for Cause or the employee’s death or disability, or (y) the employee terminates his employment for Good Reason, and in each case, the termination occurs within the three (3) month period prior to and through the twelve (12) month period following a Change in Control, the employee will receive the severance benefits listed above, plus 100% vesting of any equity awards outstanding as of the date of termination, excluding those equity awards outstanding as of the date of the Agreement that were granted with only time-based vesting provisions and those equity awards that contain performance-based vesting provisions (outstanding equity awards with only time-based vesting will be governed by their current arrangements (see “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control” below for information) and equity awards with performance-based vesting will be governed by the change in control provisions, if any, contained in the governing equity award agreement (see “Performance-Based Option” under the heading “2012 Equity Grants” above for information on the vesting acceleration provisions of current performance-based awards)). In order to receive the severance, the employee must first sign and not revoke a release of claims against us including non-disparagement and non-solicitation provisions and any other standard terms required by us. Each Agreement will also provide that if the severance benefits provided in the Agreement or otherwise payable to the employee would constitute “parachute payments” that would subject the employee to any excise tax under the golden parachute rules under the Code, the severance benefits will either be delivered in full or delivered to a lesser extent so as not to be subject to the excise tax, whichever of the foregoing amounts would provide the employee the greater amount of severance benefits on an after-tax basis.

As will be defined in the Agreements, “Cause” means (i) any act of material fraud or dishonesty taken by the employee in connection with his responsibilities as an employee (ii) the employee’s improper disclosure of E2open’s confidential information; (iii) the employee being convicted of, or accepting a plea of “guilty” or “no contest” to, a felony under the laws of the U.S. or any state thereof; (iv) an intentional act by the employee which constitutes misconduct; (v) the employee’s continued material failure to perform his employment duties after he has received a written demand of performance from us which specifically sets forth the factual basis for our belief that the employee has not substantially performed his duties and he has failed to cure such non-performance to our satisfaction within thirty (30) days after receiving such notice; (vi) an act by the employee that constitutes (A) a material breach of any agreement between the employee and E2open or (B) a material failure to comply with our written policies or rules, in each case under this clause (vii) if such breach or failure has not been cured by the employee within thirty (30) days after written notification by us to the employee of such breach or failure; or (viii) the employee’s failure to cooperate in good faith with a governmental or internal investigation of E2open or its directors, officers or employees, if we have requested the employee’s cooperation.

As will be defined in the Agreements, “Change in Control” means the occurrence of any of the following: (i) a change in the ownership of E2open which occurs on the date that any one person, or more than one person acting as a group (“Person”), acquires ownership of our stock that, together with the stock held by such Person, constitutes more than 50% of the total voting power of the stock of E2open; provided, however, that for purposes of this subsection (i), the acquisition of additional stock by any one Person, who is considered to own more than 50% of the total voting power of our stock will not be considered a Change in Control; or (ii) a change in the effective control of E2open which occurs on the date that a majority of members of the board of directors (each, a “Director”) is replaced during any twelve (12) month period by Directors whose appointment or election is not endorsed by a majority of the members of the board of directors prior to the date of the appointment or election. For purposes of this subsection (ii), if any Person is considered to be in effective control

124

of E2open, the acquisition of additional control of E2open by the same Person will not be considered a Change in Control; or (iii) a change in the ownership of a substantial portion of our assets which occurs on the date that any Person acquires (or has acquired during the twelve (12) month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition by such person or persons) assets from us that have a total gross fair market value equal to or more than 50% of the total gross fair market value of all of the assets of E2open immediately prior to such acquisition or acquisitions; provided, however, that for purposes of this subsection (iii), the following will not constitute a change in the ownership of a substantial portion of our assets: (A) a transfer to an entity that is controlled by our stockholders immediately after the transfer, or (B) a transfer of assets by us to: (1) a stockholder of ours (immediately before the asset transfer) in exchange for or with respect to our stock, (2) an entity, 50% or more of the total value or voting power of which is owned, directly or indirectly, by us, (3) a Person, that owns, directly or indirectly, 50% or more of the total value or voting power of all the outstanding stock of E2open, or (4) an entity, at least 50% of the total value or voting power of which is owned, directly or indirectly, by a Person described in this subsection (iii)(B)(3). For purposes of this subsection (iii), gross fair market value means the value of the assets of E2open, or the value of the assets being disposed of, determined without regard to any liabilities associated with such assets. For purposes of this definition of Change in Control, persons will be considered to be acting as a group if they are owners of a corporation that enters into a merger, consolidation, purchase or acquisition of stock, or similar business transaction with E2open. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a transaction will not be deemed a Change in Control under the Agreements unless the transaction qualifies as a change in control event within the meaning of Code Section 409A, as it has been and may be amended from time to time, and any proposed or final Treasury Regulations and Internal Revenue Service guidance that has been promulgated or may be promulgated thereunder from time to time. Further and for the avoidance of doubt, a transaction will not constitute a Change in Control under the Agreements if: (i) its sole purpose is to change the state of E2open’s incorporation, or (ii) its sole purpose is to create a holding company that will be owned in substantially the same proportions by the persons who held our securities immediately before such transaction.

As will be defined in the Agreements, “Good Reason” means the employee’s termination of employment within thirty (30) days following the expiration of any cure period (discussed below) following the occurrence of one or more of the following, without the employee’s express written consent: (i) a material reduction in the employee’s base compensation as in effect immediately prior to such reduction, but not including a substantially similar reduction that applies to all similarly-situated executives; (ii) the assignment to the employee of any duties or responsibilities, or the material reduction of or the removal from, his duties, position, authority or responsibilities, in each case which results in a material diminution in the employee’s authority, duties, or responsibilities with E2open in effect immediately prior to such assignment, reduction or removal. For Mr. Woodward and Mr. Maloney, if we are acquired and made part of a larger entity and by virtue of such event, the employee experiences a material diminution in his authority, duties, or responsibilities (for example, if Mr. Woodward remains the chief executive officer of E2open, or Mr. Maloney remains the chief financial officer of E2open, after a change of control in which we have become a wholly owned subsidiary of the acquirer, but he is not made the chief executive officer (for Mr. Woodward) or the chief financial officer (for Mr. Maloney) of the acquiring corporation), such material diminution will constitute “Good Reason” under this prong; (iii) a material change in the geographic location of the employee’s primary work facility or location; provided, that a relocation of twenty-five (25) miles or less from the employee’s then present location or to employee’s home as his primary work location will not be considered a material change in geographic location; or (iv) the failure of E2open to obtain the assumption of the Agreement by a successor, which would constitute a material breach of the Agreement. In order for an event to qualify as Good Reason under the Agreements, the employee must not terminate employment with E2open without first providing us with written notice of the acts or omissions constituting the grounds for “Good Reason” within ninety (90) days of the initial existence of the grounds for “Good Reason” and a reasonable cure period of not less than thirty (30) days following the date of such notice, and such grounds must not have been cured during such time.

125

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control

Currently, Messrs. Woodward, Maloney and Packer are subject to change of control agreements and/or arrangements whereby one hundred percent (100%) of the then-unvested, unexpired portion of their new hire option and any future option grants and, with respect to Mr. Maloney, all equity grants, accelerate and our right to repurchase such restricted stock lapse upon the termination of their employment by E2open without “Cause” or for Messrs. Woodward and Packer for “Good Reason” and for Mr. Maloney for “Involuntary Termination,” in each case if such termination occurs within 12 months following a “Change of Control Transaction.” These provisions will be superseded by the Change in Control Severance Agreements, described above, to be entered into with each of Messrs. Woodward, Maloney and Packer, except with respect to equity awards granted with only time-based vesting that are outstanding as of the date of such Change in Control Severance Agreements (see “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control—Change in Control Severance Agreements” above for information). “Cause” means (i) any act of personal dishonesty taken in connection with the person’s responsibilities as an employee; (ii) being convicted of, or accepting a plea of “guilty” or “no contest” to, a felony under the laws of the U.S. or any state thereof; (iii) a willful act by the employee which constitutes gross misconduct and which is materially injurious to E2open; or (iv) a willful act by the employee that constitutes (A) a material breach of a material provision of any agreement between the employee and us or (B) a material failure to comply with our written policies or rules, in each case under this clause (iv) if such breach or failure has not been cured by the employee within 30 days after written notification by us to the employee of such breach or failure. For Mr. Maloney, termination without “Cause” will include termination due to his death or “Disability” (defined as Mr. Maloney suffering from a physical or mental disability to an extent that renders it impracticable for him to continue performing his duties under the agreement, if a physician advises the company that his physical or mental condition will render him unable to perform his duties for a period exceeding three consecutive months or if, due to physical or mental condition, he has not substantially performed his duties under his agreement for a period of three consecutive months). “Good Reason” means the employee provides written voluntary resignation within sixty (60) days following (i) a material reduction in the level of responsibility to which the employee did not consent, including a change in position or status to a position that is not at their current level or above with the successor; (ii) a reduction of greater than ten percent (10%) of the employee’s then current salary unless a commensurate reduction is made for all executive officers of E2open; (iii) an order to report financial results illegally or not consistent with generally accepted accounting principles or with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002; or (iv) relocation of the employee’s principal place of employment by more than 50 miles. For Mr. Maloney, “Involuntary Termination” means without Mr. Maloney’s consent, (i) a material reduction in his level of responsibility to which he has not consented, including a change in his position or status to a position that is not at the executive officer level of Chief Financial Officer or above with the successor entity to E2open; (ii) a reduction by E2open in his compensation (including base salary, fringe benefits and participation in bonus or incentive programs based on E2open’s performance) as in effect immediately prior to such reduction; (iii) an order to report financial results illegally or not consistent with generally accepted accounting principles or with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002; (iv) any purported termination of him by us that is not effected for “Cause”; (v) relocation of his principal place of employment by more than 25 miles; (vi) the failure of any successor entity to the company to assume Mr. Maloney’s agreement or other written agreements between him and us (including his offer letter or stock option agreement(s)); (vii) any act or set of circumstances that would constitute constructive termination of his employment under California case law or statute; and (viii) any material breach by us of any material provision of the agreement with us which has not been cured within 30 days of written notice to us by Mr. Maloney of such breach.

As defined in the agreements, “Change of Control Transaction” means the occurrence of any of the following events: (i) any “person” (as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) is or becomes the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Section 13d-3 of said Act), directly or indirectly, of our securities representing 50% or more of the total voting power of the then outstanding voting securities; (ii) our stockholders approve a merger or consolidation of E2open with any other corporation, other than a merger or consolidation which would result in our voting securities outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity) at least 50% of the total voting power represented by our or such surviving entity’s voting securities outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation; or (iii) our stockholders approve a plan of

126

complete liquidation of E2open or an agreement for the sale, exclusive license or disposition by us of all, or substantially all, of our assets; provided, however, that a “Change of Control” shall not include a transaction that only changes the state of E2open’s incorporation.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table presents certain information concerning equity awards held by our named executive officers at the end of fiscal 2012.

	Option Awards										Stock Awards
Name	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#)										Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)			Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)
	Exercisable			Unexercisable			Option Exercise Price ($)		Option Expiration Date
Mark E. Woodward		— — — 62,202	(4)		— — 407,142 209,226	(3)		— — 3.15 3.15		— — 07/18/2021 07/18/2021		57,142 60,752 — —	(1) (2)		460,000 489,057 — —
Peter J. Maloney		49,189 703 54,285 — 11,458	(5) (6) (7) (4)		— 2,814 — 75,000 38,541	(3)		0.35 0.35 0.35 3.15 3.15		12/16/2018 8/9/2018 6/25/2019 07/18/2021 07/18/2021		— — — — —			— — — — —
David W. Packer		124,028 31,142 — 9,821	(8) (9) (4)		— 15,571 64,285 33,035	(3)		0.35 0.35 3.15 3.15		6/9/2018 6/25/2019 07/18/2021 07/18/2021		— — — —			— — — —

⁽¹⁾  Shares acquired pursuant to an early exercise provision and are subject to a right of repurchase we hold as of February 28, 2011. The shares vest ratably on a monthly basis through June 26, 2012.

⁽²⁾  Shares acquired pursuant to an early exercise provision and are subject to a right of repurchase we hold as of February 28, 2011. The shares vest ratably on a monthly basis through June 25, 2013.

⁽³⁾  The option is subject to performance-based vesting plus additional time-based vesting. The number of shares subject to the option eligible for time-based vesting and the time-based vesting schedule of options (vesting monthly effective March 1, 2013 for two, three or four years) will be determined based upon the percentage achievement of goals relating to bookings, billings, free cash flow and accounts receivables performance against the established fiscal 2012 and 2013 targets. Depending on levels of performance achievement, time-based vesting will be scheduled to be between two and four years from March 1, 2013. Between 0% and 150% of the target number of shares subject to the option (271,428 for Mr. Woodward, 50,000 for Mr. Maloney and 42,857 for Mr. Packer) can become eligible for time-based vesting based on level of performance achievement.

⁽⁴⁾  The option vests monthly over four years from March 1, 2011.

⁽⁵⁾  The option is subject to an early exercise provision and is immediately exercisable. One-fourth of the shares vested on January 30, 2009 and one thirty-sixth of the remaining shares vest monthly thereafter. As of February 29, 2012, 49,189 shares were vested.

⁽⁶⁾  One-fourth of the shares subject to the option vested on October 9, 2009 and one thirty-sixth of the remaining shares vest monthly thereafter.

⁽⁷⁾  The option is subject to an early exercise provision and is immediately exercisable. The option vests monthly over four years beginning on June 25, 2009. As of February 29, 2012, 45,714 shares were vested and 22,857 shares vest over the remainder of the vesting period.

⁽⁸⁾  The option is subject to an early exercise provision and is immediately exercisable. One-fourth of the shares vested on September 10, 2009 and one thirty-sixth of the remaining shares vest monthly thereafter. As of

127

February 29, 2012, 99,691 shares were vested and 24,337 shares vest over the remainder of the vesting period.

⁽⁹⁾  The option vests monthly over four years beginning on June 25, 2009.

Employee Benefit Plans

2012 Equity Compensation Plan

We expect that our board of directors and our stockholders will adopt and approve our 2012 Plan prior to the completion of this offering. Subject to stockholder approval, the 2012 Plan will be effective upon its adoption by our board of directors, but we do not expect to utilize our 2012 Plan until after the completion of this offering. Our 2012 Plan permits the grant of incentive stock options, within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code, to our employees and any of our parent and subsidiary corporations’ employees, and the grant of nonstatutory stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance units and performance shares to our employees, directors and consultants and our parent and subsidiary corporations’ employees and consultants.

Authorized Shares

The maximum aggregate number of shares issuable under the 2012 Plan is 2,730,000 shares of our common stock, plus (i) any shares that as of the completion of this offering, have been reserved but not issued pursuant to any awards granted under our 2003 Plan and are not subject to any awards granted thereunder, and (ii) any shares subject to stock options or similar awards granted under the 2003 Plan that after the completion of the offering expire or terminate without having been exercised in full and shares issued pursuant to awards granted under the 2003 Plan that after the completion of the offering are forfeited to or repurchased by us, with the maximum number of shares to be added to the 2012 Plan from the 2003 Plan equal to 2,910,315 shares. In addition, the number of shares available for issuance under the 2012 Plan will be annually increased on the first day of each of our fiscal years beginning with fiscal 2014, provided, that our board of directors specifically approves the increase prior to the first day of the fiscal year to which the increase applies, by an amount equal to the least of:

• 5,000,000 shares;

• 5% of the outstanding shares of our common stock as of the last day of our immediately preceding fiscal year; or

• such other amount as our board of directors may determine.

Shares issued pursuant to awards under the 2012 Plan that we repurchase or that expire, become unexercisable or are forfeited, shares that are surrendered pursuant to an exchange program, as well as shares used to pay the exercise price of an award or to satisfy the tax withholding obligations related to an award, will become available for future grant under the 2012 Plan. In addition, to the extent that an award is paid out in cash rather than shares, such cash payment will not reduce the number of shares available for issuance under the 2012 Plan. With respect to stock appreciation rights, only shares actually issued pursuant to the award cease to be available under the 2012 Plan.

Plan Administration

Our board of directors or one or more committees appointed by our board of directors will administer the 2012 Plan. It is anticipated that the compensation committee of the board of directors will administer the 2012 Plan. In the case of awards intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” within the meaning of Code Section 162(m), the committee will consist of two or more “outside directors” within the meaning of Code Section 162(m).

128

Subject to the provisions of our 2012 Plan, the administrator has the power to determine the terms of awards, including the recipients, the exercise price, if any, the number of shares covering each award, the fair market value of a share of our common stock, the vesting schedule applicable to the awards, together with any vesting acceleration, the form of consideration, if any, payable upon exercise of the award, and the terms of the award agreement for use under the 2012 Plan. The administrator also has the authority, subject to the terms of the 2012 Plan, to amend existing awards to reduce or increase their exercise price, to allow participants the opportunity to transfer outstanding awards to a financial institution or other person or entity selected by the administrator, to institute an exchange program by which outstanding awards may be surrendered in exchange for awards that may have different exercise prices and terms, to prescribe rules and to construe and interpret the 2012 Plan and awards granted under the 2012 Plan.

Stock Options

The administrator may grant incentive and/or nonstatutory stock options under our 2012 Plan, provided that incentive stock options are only granted to employees. The exercise price of such options must equal at least the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. The term of an incentive stock option may not exceed 10 years; provided, however, that an incentive stock option held by a participant who owns more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of our stock, or of certain of our parent or subsidiary corporations, may not have a term in excess of five years and must have an exercise price of at least 110% of the fair market value of our common stock on the grant date. The administrator will determine the methods of payment of the exercise price of an option, which may include cash, shares or other property acceptable to the administrator, as well as other types of consideration permitted by applicable law. Subject to the provisions of our 2012 Plan, the administrator determines the remaining terms of the options (e.g., vesting). After the termination of service of an employee, director or consultant, the participant may exercise his or her option, to the extent vested as of such date of termination, for the period of time stated in his or her option agreement. However, in no event may an option be exercised later than the expiration of its term.

Stock Appreciation Rights

Stock appreciation rights may be granted under our 2012 Plan. Stock appreciation rights allow the recipient to receive the appreciation in the fair market value of our common stock between the exercise date and the date of grant. Subject to the provisions of our 2012 Plan, the administrator determines the terms of stock appreciation rights, including when such rights vest and become exercisable and whether to settle such awards in cash or with shares of our common stock, or a combination thereof, except that the per share exercise price for the shares to be issued pursuant to the exercise of a stock appreciation right will be no less than 100% of the fair market value per share on the date of grant. The specific terms of any grant of stock appreciation rights will be set forth in an award agreement between us and the recipient.

Restricted Stock

Restricted stock may be granted under our 2012 Plan. Restricted stock awards are grants of shares of our common stock that are subject to various restrictions, including restrictions on transferability and forfeiture provisions. Shares of restricted stock will vest and the restrictions on such shares will lapse, in accordance with terms and conditions established by the administrator. Such terms may include, among other things, vesting upon the achievement of specific performance goals determined by the administrator and/or continued service to us. The administrator, in its sole discretion, may accelerate the time at which any restrictions will lapse or be removed. Recipients of restricted stock awards generally will have voting and dividend rights with respect to such shares upon grant without regard to vesting, unless the administrator provides otherwise. Shares of restricted stock that do not vest for any reason will be forfeited by the recipient and will revert to us. The specific terms of any grant of restricted stock will be set forth in an award agreement between us and the recipient.

129

Restricted Stock Units

Restricted stock units may be granted under our 2012 Plan. Each restricted stock unit granted is a bookkeeping entry representing an amount equal to the fair market value of one share of our common stock. The administrator determines the terms and conditions of restricted stock units including the vesting criteria, which may include achievement of specified performance criteria or continued service to us, and the form and timing of payment. The administrator, in its sole discretion, may accelerate the time at which any restrictions will lapse or be removed. The administrator determines in its sole discretion whether an award will be settled in stock, cash or a combination of both. The specific terms of any grant of restricted stock units will be set forth in an award agreement between us and the recipient.

Performance Units/Performance Shares

Performance units and performance shares may be granted under our 2012 Plan. Performance units and performance shares are awards that will result in a payment to a participant only if performance goals established by the administrator are achieved or the awards otherwise vest. The administrator will establish organizational or individual performance goals in its discretion, which, depending on the extent to which they are met, will determine the number and/or the value of performance units and performance shares to be paid out to participants. After the grant of a performance unit or performance share, the administrator, in its sole discretion, may reduce or waive any performance objectives or other vesting provisions for such performance units or performance shares. Performance units shall have an initial dollar value established by the administrator prior to the grant date. Performance shares will have an initial value equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the grant date. The administrator, in its sole discretion, may pay earned performance units or performance shares in the form of cash, in shares or in some combination thereof. The specific terms of any grant of performance units and performance shares will be set forth in an award agreement between us and the recipient.

Transferability of Awards

Unless the administrator provides otherwise, our 2012 Plan generally does not allow for the transfer of awards other than by will or the laws of descent or distribution and only the recipient of an award may exercise such an award during his or her lifetime.

Certain Adjustments

In the event of certain changes in our capitalization, to prevent diminution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits available under the 2012 Plan, the administrator will make adjustments to one or more of the number and class of shares that may be delivered under the plan and/or the number, class and price of shares covered by each outstanding award and the numerical share limits contained in the 2012 Plan. In the event of our proposed liquidation or dissolution, the administrator will notify participants as soon as practicable and, to the extent not exercised, all awards will terminate immediately prior to the consummation of such proposed transaction.

Merger or Change of Control

Our 2012 Plan provides that in the event of a merger or change of control, as defined under the 2012 Plan, each outstanding award will be treated as the administrator determines, except that if a successor corporation or its parent or subsidiary does not assume or substitute an equivalent award for any outstanding award, then such award will fully vest, all restrictions on such award will lapse, all performance goals or other vesting criteria applicable to such award will be deemed achieved at 100% of target levels and such award will become fully exercisable, if applicable, for a specified period prior to the transaction. The award will then terminate upon the expiration of the specified period of time. If the service of an outside director is terminated on or following a change of control, other than pursuant to a voluntary resignation, his or her awards that are

130

assumed or substituted for will become fully vested and exercisable, and all performance goals or other vesting requirements will be deemed achieved at 100% of target levels.

Plan Amendment, Termination

Our board of directors has the authority to amend, suspend or terminate the 2012 Plan provided such action does not impair the existing rights of any participant. Our 2012 Plan will automatically terminate in 2022, unless we terminate it sooner.

2003 Stock Plan, as amended

Our board of directors and stockholders approved our 2003 Plan, as amended through February 14, 2012. The following is a discussion of the 2003 Plan as so amended, and is qualified in its entirety by the text of the 2003 Plan. The 2003 Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options, within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code, to our employees and any of our parent or subsidiary’s employees, and for the grant of nonstatutory stock options and restricted stock awards to our employees, directors and consultants and any of our parent or subsidiary’s employees and consultants. As of the effective date of this offering, the 2003 Plan will be terminated and we will not grant any additional awards under the 2003 Plan. However, the 2003 Plan will continue to govern the terms and conditions of outstanding awards granted thereunder.

Authorized Shares

We have reserved a total of 5,797,431 shares of our common stock for issuance pursuant to the 2003 Plan. As of May 31, 2012, there were 2,857,903 options to purchase shares of common stock outstanding, 70,788 shares of restricted stock outstanding and 38,722 shares were available for future grant under the 2003 Plan. Shares subject to options or restricted stock that expire or are cancelled will become available for future grant under the 2003 Plan, or, following this offering, under the 2012 Plan. Shares under the 2003 Plan are authorized but unissued shares or treasury shares.

Administration

The 2003 Plan is administered by one or more committees. Each committee shall consist of one or more members of the board of directors who have been appointed by the board of directors. Each committee shall have such authority and be responsible for such functions as the board of directors has assigned to it. If no committee has been appointed, the board of directors shall administer the 2003 Plan. Subject to the provisions of the 2003 Plan, the board of directors shall have full authority and discretion to take any actions it deems necessary or advisable for the administration of the 2003 Plan, including, subject to the terms of the 2003 Plan, to institute a program (with the terms and conditions of such program to be determined in the sole discretion of the board of directors (or a committee of the board of directors, as applicable)) under which (i) outstanding options and/or restricted stock are surrendered or cancelled in exchange for awards of the same type (which may have higher or lower exercise prices and different terms), different type, and/or cash, (ii) participants would have the opportunity to transfer outstanding options and restricted stock to a financial institution or other person or entity selected by the board of directors (or a committee of the board of directors, as applicable), and/or (iii) the exercise price of an outstanding award is increased or reduced. All decisions, interpretations and other actions of the board of directors shall be final and binding on all participants and all persons deriving their rights from a participant.

Eligibility

Only employees, outside directors and consultants shall be eligible for the grant of nonstatutory options or the direct award or sale of shares. Only employees shall be eligible for the grant of incentive stock options, or ISOs.

131

Stock Options

The 2003 Plan permits the grant of incentive and/or nonstatutory stock options. Each grant of an option under the 2003 Plan shall be evidenced by a stock option agreement between the optionee and E2open. The option shall be subject to all applicable terms and conditions of the 2003 Plan and may be subject to any other terms and conditions which are not inconsistent with the 2003 Plan and which the board of directors deems appropriate for inclusion in a stock option agreement. The provisions of the various stock option agreements entered into under the 2003 Plan need not be identical.

Each stock option agreement shall specify the number of shares that are subject to the option and shall provide for the adjustment of such number in accordance with Section 8 of the 2003 Plan. The stock option agreement shall also specify whether the option is an ISO or a nonstatutory option.

Each stock option agreement shall specify the exercise price. The exercise price of an ISO shall not be less than 100% of the fair market value of a share on the date of grant (and not less than 110% of the fair market value of a share on the date of grant for any incentive stock option granted to a person who at the time of grant owns stock possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the company or any parent or subsidiary of the company). The exercise price of a nonstatutory option shall not be less than 100% of the fair market value of a share on the date of grant. Subject to the preceding two sentences, the exercise price under any option shall be determined by the board of directors at its sole discretion.

Each stock option agreement shall specify the date when all or any installment of the option is to become exercisable. The stock option agreement shall specify the term of the option. The term shall not exceed 10 years from the date of grant (or five years for any incentive stock option granted to a person who at the time of grant owns stock possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of our stock or any parent or subsidiary of ours).

Effects of Termination of Service with E2open

If an optionee’s service terminates for any reason other than the optionee’s death, then the optionee’s options shall expire on the earliest of the following: (i) the expiration date determined pursuant to the 2003 Plan; (ii) the date three months after the termination of the optionee’s service for any reason other than disability, or such later date as the board of directors may determine; or (iii) the date six months after the termination of the optionee’s service by reason of disability, or such later date as the board of directors may determine.

The optionee may exercise all or part of the optionee’s options at any time before the expiration of such options under the preceding sentence, but only to the extent that such options had become exercisable before the optionee’s service terminated (or became exercisable as a result of the termination) and the underlying shares had vested before the optionee’s service terminated (or vested as a result of the termination). The balance of such options shall lapse when the optionee’s service terminates.

If an optionee dies while the optionee is providing services to E2open, then the optionee’s options shall expire on the earlier of the following: (i) the expiration date determined pursuant to the 2003 Plan or (ii) the date 12 months after the optionee’s death, or such later date as the board of directors may determine.

Any shares issued upon exercise of an option may be subject to special forfeiture conditions, rights of repurchase, rights of first refusal and other transfer restrictions as the board of directors may determine. Such restrictions shall be set forth in the applicable stock option agreement and shall apply in addition to any restrictions that may apply to holders of our shares generally.

132

Payment for Shares

The entire purchase price or exercise price of shares issued under the 2003 Plan shall be payable in cash or cash equivalents at the time when such shares are purchased.

Restricted Stock

Restricted stock awards are grants of rights to purchase our common stock that are subject to various restrictions, including restrictions on transferability and forfeiture provisions. Restricted stock awards are evidenced by a restricted stock agreement, which will include the terms, conditions and restrictions related to the offer of restricted stock, including the number of shares that the participant may purchase, the price to be paid, and a provision stating that the offer will expire automatically if not exercised within 30 days after the grant is communicated to the participant.

Transferability of Awards

Our 2003 Plan generally does not allow for the transfer of options or restricted stock other than by beneficiary designation or by will or the laws of descent and distribution, unless the plan administrator determines.

Certain Adjustments

In the event of certain changes in our capitalization, the number of shares and exercise or purchase price of shares subject to outstanding awards, as well as the number of shares reserved under the 2003 Plan will be adjusted in order to prevent the dilution or enlargement of any benefits or potential benefits to be granted under the 2003 Plan.

Merger or Consolidation

In the event that we become party to a merger or consolidation, outstanding options will be subject to the agreement of merger or consolidation, which will provide for one or more of the following: (i) continuation of outstanding options if E2open is the surviving corporation; (ii) assumption or substitution for a new option by the surviving corporation or its parent; (iii) full acceleration with respect to any unvested shares subject to outstanding options, followed by cancellation of such options; or (iv) cancellation and payment with respect to each cancelled option (regardless of whether such shares are vested or unvested) in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares as of the completion of the merger or consolidation, over the option’s exercise price. Such payments may be subject to continued vesting at a rate not less favorable than the original terms of the option.

Duration and Amendments

The 2003 Plan shall terminate automatically 10 years after the later of (i) its adoption by the board of directors or (ii) the most recent increase in the number of shares reserved that was approved by our stockholders. The 2003 Plan may be terminated on any earlier date pursuant to the terms below.

The board of directors may amend, suspend or terminate the 2003 Plan at any time and for any reason; provided, however, that any amendment of the 2003 Plan shall be subject to the approval of our stockholders if it (i) increases the number of shares available for issuance under the 2003 Plan or (ii) materially changes the class of persons who are eligible for the grant of ISOs. Stockholder approval shall not be required for any other amendment of the 2003 Plan.

133

Retirement Plans

We maintain a 401(k) retirement plan which is intended to be a tax qualified defined contribution plan under Section 401(k) of the Code. All of our U.S. employees are eligible to participate on the first day of the month following their date of hire. The 401(k) plan includes a salary deferral arrangement pursuant to which participants may elect to reduce their current compensation up to the statutorily prescribed limit, which was equal to $16,500 in 2011 and is equal to $17,000 in 2012 (catch up contribution for employees over 50 allow for an additional $5,500 each year), and have the amount of their compensation reduction contributed to the 401(k) plan.

Limitation on Liability and Indemnification Matters

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws that will become effective upon the completion of this offering contain provisions that limit the personal liability of our directors for monetary damages to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. Consequently, our directors will not be personally liable to us or our stockholders for monetary damages for any breach of fiduciary duties as directors, except liability for:

• any breach of the director’s duty of loyalty to us or our stockholders;

• any act or omission not in good faith or that involves intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law;

• unlawful payments of dividends or unlawful stock repurchases or redemptions as provided in Section 174 of the Delaware General Corporation Law; or

• any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws, each of which will become effective upon the completion of this offering, provide that we indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. Our amended and restated bylaws, that will become effective upon the completion of this offering, also provide that we shall advance expenses incurred by a director or officer in advance of the final disposition of any action or proceeding, and permit us to secure insurance on behalf of any officer, director, employee or other agent for any liability arising out of his or her actions in that capacity, regardless of whether we would otherwise be permitted to indemnify him or her under the provisions of Delaware law. We have entered and expect to continue to enter into agreements to indemnify our directors, executive officers and other employees as determined by the board of directors. With certain exceptions, these agreements provide for indemnification for related expenses including, among others, attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines and settlement amounts incurred by any of these individuals in any action or proceeding. We believe that these bylaw provisions and indemnification agreements are necessary to attract and retain qualified persons as directors and officers. We also maintain directors’ and officers’ liability insurance.

The limitation of liability and indemnification provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws, that will become effective upon the completion of this offering, may discourage stockholders from bringing a lawsuit against our directors for breach of their fiduciary duty of care. They may also reduce the likelihood of derivative litigation against our directors and officers, even though an action, if successful, might benefit us and other stockholders. Further, a stockholder’s investment may be adversely affected to the extent that we pay the costs of settlement and damage awards against directors and officers. At present, there is no pending litigation or proceeding involving any of our directors, officers or employees for which indemnification is sought, and we are not aware of any threatened litigation that may result in claims for indemnification.

134

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

In addition to the director and executive compensation arrangements discussed above in “Management” and “Executive Compensation,” we have been a party to the following transactions since March 1, 2009, in which the amount involved exceeded or will exceed $120,000, and in which any director, executive officer or holder of more than 5% of any class of our voting stock, or any member of the immediate family of or entities affiliated with any of them, had or will have a material interest. We also describe below certain transactions and series of similar transactions since March 1, 2009 with our directors, executive officers, holders of more than 5% of any class of our voting securities, or any member of the immediate family of or any entities affiliated with any of the foregoing persons to which we are party.

Sales of Series D Preferred Stock

In May 2009, we issued and sold an aggregate of 4,670,687 shares of our Series D preferred stock at a per share price of $3.50, for an aggregate consideration of approximately $16.3 million, including the conversion of convertible promissory notes (as discussed below). We believe that the terms obtained and consideration received in connection with the Series D financing are comparable to terms available and the amounts we would have received in an arm’s length transaction.

The table below summarizes purchases of shares of our Series D preferred stock by our directors, executive officers, holders of more than 5% of any class of our voting securities, or any member of the immediate family of or any entities affiliated with any of the foregoing persons. Each outstanding share of our Series D preferred stock will be converted into one share of our common stock upon the completion of this offering.

Purchasers	Shares of Series D Preferred Stock		Aggregate Purchase Price		Aggregate Amount of Promissory Notes Converted
Seagate Technology LLC (1)		719,149	$	2,517,023	$	1,648,519
Entities affiliated with Crosspoint Venture Partners (2)		284,741		996,597		596,597
Entities affiliated with Invesco Private Capital (3)		436,725		1,528,543		778,543
Entities affiliated with JK&B Capital Group (4)		408,515		1,429,805		936,448
B&M Ventures, LLC (5)		1,205,609		4,219,632		2,773,831
JBM 2009 Irrevocable Trust dtd 09/30/09 (6)		1,142,857		4,000,000		2,629,453
Total		4,197,596	$	14,691,600	$	9,363,391

⁽¹⁾  Consists of 719,149 shares held by Seagate Technology LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Seagate Technology Public Limited Company.

⁽²⁾  Consists of 255,367 shares held by Crosspoint Venture Partners 2000 (Q), L.P. and 29,374 shares held by Crosspoint Venture Partners 2000, L.P. John B. Mumford, a member of our board of directors, is a Managing General Partner at Crosspoint Associates, L.L.C., which is the general partner of Crosspoint Venture Partners 2000 (Q) and Crosspoint Venture Partners 2000, L.P.

⁽³⁾  Consists of 261,238 shares held by Chancellor V, L.P., 134,673 shares held by Chancellor V-A, L.P. and 40,814 shares held by Citiventure 2000, L.P., (collectively referred to as the “Invesco Capital Entities”). Johnston L. Evans, a member of our board of directors, is the Head of Invesco Capital, Inc. and a member of the investment committee of IPC Direct Associates V, LLC. IPC Direct Associates V, LLC is the general partner of each of the Invesco Capital Entities and its managing member is Invesco Private Capital, Inc.

⁽⁴⁾  Consists of 375,852 shares held by JK&B Capital IV, L.P. and 32,663 shares held by JK&B Capital IV QIP, L.P.

⁽⁵⁾  Consists of 1,205,609 shares held by B&M Ventures, LLC. John Mumford, a member of our board of directors, is the sole Managing Member of B&M Ventures, LLC.

135

⁽⁶⁾  Consists of 1,142,857 shares held by JBM 2009 Irrevocable Trust dtd 09/30/09. JBM 2009 Irrevocable Trust dtd 09/30/09 is a holder of more than 5% of our voting securities.

Transactions with Our Executive Officers and Directors and Entities Affiliated with Our Executive Officers and Directors

One of our directors, Patrick J. O’Malley, III, is the Chief Financial Officer of Seagate Technology Public Limited Company, or Seagate PLC. Seagate LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Seagate PLC, is one of our customers and we have received payments in excess of $120,000 from Seagate LLC relating to subscriptions to our solutions. We have received payments of $1,760,568, $1,359,235 and $2,310,565 for fiscal 2010, 2011 and 2012, and $599,500 and $421,097 for the three months ended May 31, 2011 and 2012, respectively, from Seagate LLC.

Registration Rights Agreement

Certain holders of our capital stock are entitled to registration rights with respect to the common stock issued or issuable upon conversion of the preferred stock other than with respect to the Series D preferred stock. See “Description of Capital Stock—Registration Rights” for more information.

Second Amended and Restated Stockholders Agreement

We have entered into a Second Amended and Restated Stockholders Agreement, or the Stockholders Agreement, with certain of our stockholders, including entities with which certain of our directors are affiliated, and certain other stockholders. The parties to the Stockholders Agreement have agreed, subject to certain conditions, to vote their shares so as to elect as directors the nominees designated by certain of our investors, including one nominee designated by Invesco Private Capital, Inc. and its affiliated funds, or Invesco, and three nominees designated by stockholders holding Series AA Preferred Stock, including one nominee designated by Crosspoint Venture Partners 2000, L.P. and Crosspoint Venture Partners 2000 (Q), L.P., or together Crosspoint, so long as Crosspoint owns the most shares of any holder of the Series AA preferred stock, Series BB preferred stock and Series CC preferred stock, in the aggregate. Invesco has designated Mr. Evans for election to our board of directors and stockholders holding Series AA preferred stock have designated Messrs. Mumford (Crosspoint’s designee), Bass and O’Malley for election to our board of directors. In addition, the parties to the Stockholders Agreement have agreed to vote their shares so as to elect our then current chief executive officer to our board of directors, who presently is Mr. Woodward. The Stockholders Agreement also provides certain holders of our capital stock a right of purchase and of co-sale in respect of the sale of securities by certain holders of our capital stock, as well as certain rights of purchase in respect of certain issuances of our securities. Upon the closing of this offering, the Stockholders Agreement will terminate in its entirety and all rights and obligations under the Stockholders Agreement will terminate.

Employment Agreements

We have entered into agreements containing compensation, termination and change of control provisions, among others, with certain of our executive officers as described under the caption “Executive Compensation—Employment Agreements and Change of Control Arrangements” above.

Indemnification of Officers and Directors

We have also entered into indemnification agreements with each of our directors and executive officers. The indemnification agreements and our certificate of incorporation and bylaws require us to indemnify our directors and executive officers to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. See “Executive Compensation—Limitation on Liability and Indemnification Matters” above.

136

Policies and Procedures for Related Party Transactions

We have adopted a written policy, effective upon the completion of this offering, which provides that our executive officers, directors, holders of more than 5% of any class of our voting securities, and any member of the immediate family of and any entity affiliated with any of the foregoing persons, are not permitted to enter into a related party transaction with us without the prior consent of our audit committee, or other independent members of our board of directors in the case it is inappropriate for our audit committee to review such transaction due to a conflict of interest. Pursuant to such policy, any request for us to enter into a transaction with an executive officer, director, principal stockholder, or any of their immediate family members or affiliates, in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000 must first be presented to our audit committee for review, consideration and approval. In approving or rejecting any such proposal, our audit committee is to consider the relevant facts and circumstances available and deemed relevant to the audit committee, including, but not limited to, whether the transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances and the extent of the related party’s interest in the transaction. All of the transactions described above were entered into prior to the adoption of this policy.

137

PRINCIPAL AND SELLING STOCKHOLDERS

The following table sets forth information regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock as of May 31, 2012 and as adjusted to reflect the shares of common stock to be issued and sold in the offering assuming no exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option, by:

• each person or group of affiliated persons known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock;

• each of our named executive officers;

• each of our directors;

• all executive officers and directors as a group; and

• all selling stockholders.

We have determined beneficial ownership in accordance with SEC rules. The information does not necessarily indicate beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under these rules, the number of shares of common stock deemed outstanding includes shares issuable upon exercise of options held by the respective person or group which may be exercised or converted within 60 days after May 31, 2012. For purposes of calculating each person’s or group’s percentage ownership, stock options exercisable within 60 days after May 31, 2012 are included for that person or group but not the stock options or warrants of any other person or group. Certain options to purchase shares of our common stock included in the table below are early exercisable, and to the extent such shares are unvested as of a given date, such shares will remain subject to a right of repurchase held by us.

Applicable percentage ownership is based on 21,178,796 shares of common stock outstanding as of May 31, 2012, assuming the conversion of all outstanding shares of our preferred stock on a one-for-one basis into shares of our common stock, except that outstanding shares of Series BB preferred stock and Series CC preferred stock will convert into shares of our common stock at a conversion rate equal to 1:1.185. Our total outstanding preferred stock will convert into 14,845,528 shares of our common stock. For purposes of the table below, we have assumed that 24,928,796 shares of common stock will be outstanding upon completion of this offering.

138

Unless otherwise indicated and subject to applicable community property laws, to our knowledge, each stockholder named in the following table possesses sole voting and investment power over the shares listed. Unless otherwise noted below, the address of each person listed on the table is c/o E2open, Inc., 4100 East Third Avenue, Suite 400, Foster City, CA 94404.

	Shares Beneficially Owned Prior to the Offering				Number  of Shares Offered		Shares Beneficially Owned After the Offering
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Shares		Percentage				Shares		Percentage
5% Stockholders:
Entities affiliated with Crosspoint Venture Partners (1)		4,208,566		19.8		–		4,208,566		16.9
JBM 2009 Irrevocable Trust dtd 09/30/09 (2)		3,834,467		18.1		–		3,834,467		15.4
Seagate Technology LLC (3)		2,615,603		12.4		509,756		2,105,847		8.4
Entities affiliated with JK&B Capital Group (4)		1,475,387		7.0		–		1,475,387		5.9
Entities affiliated with Invesco Private Capital, Inc. (5)		1,351,450		6.4		–		1,351,450		5.4
B&M Ventures, LLC (6)		1,205,609		5.7		–		1,205,609		4.8
Named Executive Officers and Directors:
Mark E. Woodward (7)		1,019,872		4.8		–		1,019,872		4.1
Peter J. Maloney (8)		265,351		1.2		–		265,351		1.1
David Packer (9)		231,463		1.1		–		231,463		*
John B. Mumford (10)		5,414,175		25.5		–		5,414,175		21.7
Carl Bass (11)		54,285		*		–		54,285		*
Johnston L. Evans (12)		1,351,450		6.4		–		1,351,450		5.4
Bernard F. Mathaisel (13)		59,355		*		–		59,355		*
Nicholas G. Moore (14)		87,141		*		–		87,141		*
Patrick J. O’Malley, III (15)		48,285		*		–		48,285		*
Steven M. Ward, Jr. (16)		127,713		*		–		127,713		*
All executive officers and directors as a group (14 persons) (17)		9,052,549		41.1		–		9,052,549		35.1
Other Selling Stockholders:
Gregory S. Clark		657,466		3.1		256,267		401,199		1.6
Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. (18)		142,960		*		55,723		87,237		*
Matthew MacKenzie		97,885		*		38,154		59,731		*
Entities affiliated with Morgan Stanley (19)		95,237		*		37,122		58,115		*
All other selling stockholders (20)		144,799		*		40,478		104,321		*

^(*) Represents beneficial ownership of less than 1%.

⁽¹⁾  Consists of (i) 3,748,882 shares held of record by Crosspoint Venture Partners 2000 (Q), L.P. (“CVP 2000 (Q)”); (ii) 429,972 shares held of record by Crosspoint Venture Partners 2000, L.P. (“CVP 2000”); (iii) options to purchase 26,671 shares exercisable within 60 days of May 31, 2012 held of record by CVP 2000 (Q), of which 19,508 are vested; and (iv) options to purchase 3,041 shares exercisable within 60 days of May 31, 2012 held of record by CVP 2000, of which 2,204 are vested. Of the reported shares and prior to the conversion of our preferred stock into common stock, as of May 31, 2012 (i) CVP 2000(Q) held 2,573,236 shares of our Series AA preferred stock, 56,083 shares of our Series BB preferred stock and 255,367 shares of our Series D preferred stock; and (ii) CVP 2000 held 294,425 shares of our Series AA preferred stock, 6,416 shares of our Series BB preferred stock and 29,374 shares of our Series D preferred stock. Crosspoint Associates 2000, L.L.C. (“Crosspoint Associates”) is the general partner of CVP 2000 (Q) and CVP 2000. John B. Mumford, one of our directors, is a Managing General Partner of Crosspoint Associates and has sole voting and dispositive power of the shares held by CVP 2000 (Q) and CVP 2000. The address for these entities is 2925 Woodside Road, Woodside, California 94062.

⁽²⁾  All shares are held of record by The JBM 2009 Irrevocable Trust dtd 09/30/09 (the “JBM Trust”). Of the reported shares and prior to the conversion of our preferred stock into common stock, as of May 31, 2012 the JBM Trust held 446,428 shares of our Series BB preferred stock, 1,824,619 shares of our Series CC preferred stock and 1,142,857 shares of our Series D preferred stock. Roy A. Brizio serves as the trustee of

139

the JBM Trust and has sole voting and dispositive power of the shares held the JBM Trust. The address for the JBM Trust is 2925 Woodside Road, Woodside, California 94062.

⁽³⁾  All shares are held of record by Seagate Technology LLC (“Seagate”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Seagate Technology Public Limited Company. Of the reported shares and prior to the conversion of our preferred stock into common stock, as of May 31, 2012 Seagate held 1,058,065 shares of our Series AA preferred stock, 267,857 shares of our Series BB preferred stock, 271,687 shares of our Series CC preferred stock and 719,149 shares of our Series D preferred stock. The address for Seagate is 10200 South DeAnza Boulevard, Cupertino, California 95014.

⁽⁴⁾  Consists of (i) 1,357,424 shares held of record by JK&B Capital IV, L.P. (“JK&B”); and (ii) 117,963 shares held of record by JK&B Capital IV QIP, L.P. (“JK&B QIP”). Of the reported shares and prior to the conversion of our preferred stock into common stock, as of May 31, 2012 (i) JK&B held 657,142 shares of our Series BB preferred stock, 171,061 shares of our Series CC preferred stock and 375,852 shares of our Series D preferred stock; and (ii) JK&B QIP held 57,142 shares of our Series BB preferred stock, 14,831 shares of our Series CC preferred stock and 32,663 shares of our Series D preferred stock. JK&B Management IV, L.P., (“JK&B Management”), the general partner of JK&B and JK&B QIP, may be deemed to have sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares held of record by JK&B and JK&B QIP. JK&B Capital IV, L.L.C. (“JK&B Capital”) is the general partner of JK&B Management. David Kronfeld, as the managing member of JK&B Capital, may be deemed to have sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares held by these entities. The address for these entities is c/o JK&B Capital, Two Prudential Plaza, 180 N. Stetson Avenue, Suite 4500, Chicago, Illinois 60601.

⁽⁵⁾  Consists of (i) 791,805 shares held of record by Chancellor V, L.P. (“Chancellor V”); (ii) 408,190 shares held of record by Chancellor V-A, L.P. (“Chancellor V-A”); (iii) 123,705 shares held of record by Citiventure 2000, L.P. (“Citiventure”); (iv) options to purchase 16,601 shares exercisable within 60 days of May 31, 2012 held of record by Chancellor V, of which 11,815 are vested; (v) options to purchase 8,557 shares exercisable within 60 days of May 31, 2012 held of record by Chancellor V-A, of which 6,090 are vested; and (vi) options to purchase 2,592 shares exercisable within 60 days of May 31, 2012 held of record by Citiventure, of which 1,844 are vested. Of the reported shares and prior to the conversion of our preferred stock into common stock, as of May 31, 2012 (i) Chancellor V held 350,892 shares of our Series BB preferred stock, 96,774 shares of our Series CC preferred stock and 261,238 shares of our Series D preferred stock; (ii) Chancellor V-A held 180,892 shares of our Series BB preferred stock, 49,889 shares of our Series CC preferred stock and 134,673 shares of our Series D preferred stock; and (iii) Citiventure held 54,821 shares of our Series BB preferred stock, 15,119 shares of our Series CC preferred stock and 40,814 shares of our Series D preferred stock. Invesco Private Capital, Inc. is the managing member of IPC Direct Associates V, LLC, which is the general partner of each of the Invesco Capital Entities. Johnston L. Evans, one of our directors, is the Head of Invesco Private Capital, Inc. and a member of the investment committee of IPC Direct Associates V, LLC. Accordingly, Mr. Evans may be deemed to share voting and dispositive power of the shares held by the Invesco Capital Entities. The address for these entities is c/o Invesco Private Capital, Inc., 1166 Avenue of the Americas, 25th Floor, New York, New York 10036.

⁽⁶⁾  All shares are held of record by B&M Ventures, LLC (“B&M”). Of the reported shares and prior to the conversion of our preferred stock into common stock, as of May 31, 2012 B&M held 1,205,609 shares of our Series D preferred stock. John B. Mumford, one of our directors, is the sole Managing Member of B&M and has sole voting and dispositive power of the shares held by B&M. The address for this entity is 505 Railroad Avenue, South San Francisco, California 94080.

⁽⁷⁾  Consists of (i) 61,428 shares held of record by Mr. Woodward, (ii) 645,114 shares held by the Mark E. Woodward and Laurie S. Woodward Family Trust dtd July 17, 1999 for which Mr. Woodward serves as a trustee, 63,646 of which are subject to a repurchase option we hold as of May 31, 2012; (iii) 74,285 shares held by the Alec Woodward 2010 Irrevocable Trust under Agreement dtd May 22, 2010 for which Mr. Woodward serves as the trustee; (iv) 74,285 shares held by the Hayley Woodward 2010 Irrevocable Trust under Agreement dtd May 22, 2010 for which Mr. Woodward serves as the trustee; (v) 74,285 shares held by the Ryan Woodward 2010 Irrevocable Trust under Agreement dtd May 22, 2010 for which Mr. Woodward serves as the trustee; and (vi) options to purchase 90,475 shares exercisable within 60 days

140

of May 31, 2012, all of which are vested. None of the reported shares are represented by shares of preferred stock.

⁽⁸⁾  Consists of (i) 142,750 shares held of record by Mr. Maloney and (ii) options to purchase 122,601 shares exercisable within 60 days of May 31, 2012, of which 106,887 are vested. None of the reported shares are represented by shares of preferred stock.

⁽⁹⁾  Consists of (i) 57,142 shares held of record by Mr. Packer and (ii) options to purchase 174,321 shares exercisable within 60 days of May 31, 2012, of which 167,368 are vested. None of the reported shares are represented by shares of preferred stock.

⁽¹⁰⁾  Consists of (i) the shares and options to purchase shares exercisable within 60 days of May 31, 2012 held of record by CVP 2000 (Q) and CVP 2000 as disclosed in footnote (1) above; and (ii) the shares held of record by B&M as disclosed in footnote (6) above. Mr. Mumford has sole voting and dispositive power of the shares held by CVP 2000 (Q), CVP 2000 and B&M.

⁽¹¹⁾  Consists of options to purchase 54,285 shares exercisable within 60 days of May 31, 2012, of which 14,071 are vested.

⁽¹²⁾  Consists of the shares held of record by Chancellor V, Chancellor V-A and Citiventure as disclosed in footnote (5) above. Mr. Evans is the Head of Invesco Private Capital, Inc. and a member of the investment committee of IPC Direct Associates V, LLC. Accordingly, Mr. Evans may be deemed to share voting and dispositive power of the shares held by the Invesco Capital Entities.

⁽¹³⁾  Consists of options to purchase 59,355 shares exercisable within 60 days of May 31, 2012, of which 37,070 are vested.

⁽¹⁴⁾  Consists of (i) 28,571 shares held of record by Moore Family Ventures, L.P. for which Mr. Moore serves as a general partner; and (ii) options to purchase 58,570 shares exercisable within 60 days of May 31, 2012, of which 32,284 are vested. None of the reported shares are represented by shares of preferred stock.

⁽¹⁵⁾  Consists of options to purchase 48,285 shares exercisable within 60 days of May 31, 2012, none of which are vested.

⁽¹⁶⁾  Consists of (i) 71,428 shares held of record by Mr. Ward, of which 7,142 are subject to a repurchase option we hold as of May 31, 2012; and (ii) options to purchase 56,285 shares exercisable within 60 days of May 31, 2012, of which 30,571 are vested. None of the reported shares are represented by shares of preferred stock.

⁽¹⁷⁾  Consists of (i) 8,187,102 shares beneficially owned by our current executive officers and directors, of which 70,788 are subject to a repurchase right we hold as of May 31, 2012; and (ii) options to purchase 865,447 shares exercisable within 60 days of May 31, 2012, of which 659,084 are vested. Of the reported shares and prior to the conversion of our preferred stock into common stock, our current executive officers and directors beneficially owned, as of May 31, 2012, (i) 2,867,661 shares of our Series AA preferred stock; (ii) 649,104 shares of our Series BB preferred stock; (iii) 161,782 shares of our Series CC preferred stock; and (iv) 1,927,075 shares of our Series D preferred stock.

⁽¹⁸⁾ Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. (“Alcatel USA”) is an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Alcatel Lucent, a publicly-held entity with American depository shares listed on the New York Stock Exchange. The address for Alcatel USA is 600 Mountain Avenue, Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974. The address for Alcatel-Lucent is 3 avenue Octave Gréard, 75007 Paris, France.

⁽¹⁹⁾  Consists of (i) 82,455 shares held of record by Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Venture Partners IV, L.P. (“MSVP IV, LP”); (ii) 9,566 shares held of record by Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Venture Investors IV, L.P. (“MSVI IV, LP”); and (iii) 3,216 shares held of record by Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Venture Offshore Investors IV, L.P. (“MSVOI IV, LP”) and, together with MSVP IV, LP and MSVI IV, LP, the “Partnerships”). MSDW Venture Partners IV, LLC (the “General Partner”) is the general partner of each of the Partnerships. MSDW Venture Partners IV, Inc. (the “Member”) is the managing member of the General Partner and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Morgan Stanley. Alan K. Jones, the Chairman/President; Peter Chung, a Managing Director; and Debra Abramovitz and Melissa Daniels, Executive Directors, of the Member may be deemed to share voting and dispositive power over the shares held by the Partnerships. The address for these entities is 1585 Broadway, 39th Floor, New York, New York 10036.

⁽²⁰⁾  Includes each other selling stockholder who in the aggregate beneficially owns less than 1.0% of our common stock.

141

DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK

General

The following is a summary of the rights of our common stock and preferred stock and of certain provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws, as they will be in effect upon the completion of this offering. For more detailed information, please see our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws, which are filed as exhibits to the registration statement of which this prospectus is part.

• Immediately following the completion of this offering, our authorized capital stock will consist of 110,000,000 shares, all with a par value of $0.001 per share, of which:

• 100,000,000 shares are designated as common stock; and

• 10,000,000 shares are designated as preferred stock.

As of May 31, 2012, we had outstanding 21,178,796 shares of common stock held of record by 354 stockholders, assuming the conversion of all outstanding shares of our preferred stock on a one-for-one basis into 14,845,528 shares of common stock, except that the outstanding shares of Series BB Preferred Stock and Series CC Preferred Stock will convert into shares of our common stock at a conversion rate equal to 1.185. Pursuant to the terms of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, our preferred stock will automatically convert into common stock effective upon the closing of this offering. In addition, as of May 31, 2012, 2,857,903 shares of our common stock were subject to outstanding options.

Common Stock

The holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters to be voted on by our stockholders. Subject to preferences that may be applicable to any outstanding shares of preferred stock, holders of common stock are entitled to receive ratably such dividends as may be declared by our board of directors out of funds legally available for that purpose. In the event of our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the holders of common stock are entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining after the payment of liabilities, subject to the prior distribution rights of preferred stock then outstanding. Holders of common stock have no preemptive, conversion or subscription rights. There are no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable to the common stock.

Preferred Stock

Upon the closing of this offering, all currently outstanding shares of preferred stock will convert into shares of our common stock on a one-for-one basis, except that the outstanding shares of Series BB preferred stock and Series CC preferred stock will convert into shares of our common stock at a conversion rate equal to 1.185, and there will be no shares of preferred stock outstanding.

Though we currently have no plans to issue any shares of preferred stock, upon the closing of this offering and the filing of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, our board of directors will have the authority, without further action by our stockholders, to designate and issue up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more series. Our board of directors may also designate the rights, preferences and privileges of the holders of each such series of preferred stock, any or all of which may be greater than or senior to those granted to the holders of common stock. Though the actual effect of any such issuance on the rights of the holders of common stock will not be known until such time as our board of directors determines the specific rights of the holders of preferred stock, the potential effects of such an issuance include:

• diluting the voting power of the holders of common stock;

142

• reducing the likelihood that holders of common stock will receive dividend payments;

• reducing the likelihood that holders of common stock will receive payments in the event of our liquidation, dissolution, or winding up; and

• delaying, deterring or preventing a change-in-control or other corporate takeover.

Registration Rights

As of May 31, 2012, the holders of an aggregate of 9,243,555 shares of our common stock issued or issuable upon conversion of preferred stock other than the Series D preferred stock are entitled to the following rights with respect to the registration of such shares for public resale under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, pursuant to a registration rights agreement by and among us and certain of our stockholders. We refer to these shares collectively as “registrable securities.”

The registration of shares of common stock as a result of the following rights being exercised would enable the holders to trade these shares without restriction under the Securities Act when the applicable registration statement is declared effective. Ordinarily, we will be required to pay all expenses, other than underwriting discounts and commissions, related to any registration effected pursuant to the exercise of these registration rights.

The registration rights terminate five years after completion of this offering, upon a Liquidation Event (as defined in our certificate of incorporation) or, with respect to the registration rights of an individual holder, when such holder’s registrable securities represent 1% or less of our outstanding common stock and can be sold pursuant to Rule 144 of the Securities Act.

Demand Registration Rights

If at any time after this offering the holders of at least 40% of the registrable securities then outstanding request in writing that we effect a registration that has a reasonably anticipated aggregate price to the public of at least $5,000,000, we may be required to register their shares. At most, we are obligated to effect two registrations for the holders of registrable securities in response to these demand registration rights. Depending on certain conditions, however, we may defer such registration for up to 90 days. If the holders requesting registration intend to distribute their shares by means of an underwriting, the managing underwriter of such offering will have the right to limit the number of shares to be underwritten for reasons related to the marketing of the shares.

Piggyback Registration Rights

If at any time after this offering we propose to register any shares of our securities under the Securities Act, the holders of registrable securities will be entitled to notice of the registration and to include their shares of registrable securities in the registration, subject to certain exceptions relating to employee benefit plans and mergers and acquisitions. If our proposed registration involves an underwriting, the managing underwriter of such offering will have the right to limit the number of shares to be underwritten, subject to certain restrictions, for reasons related to the marketing of the shares.

Form S-3 Registration Rights

If at any time after 180 days following the effective date of a registration statement pursuant to which we registered shares of our common stock under the Securities Act we become entitled under the Securities Act to register our shares on Form S-3 and the holders of at least 15% of the registrable securities then outstanding request in writing that we register their shares for public resale on Form S-3, we will be required to use our best efforts to effect such registration; provided, however, that if such registration would be seriously detrimental to

143

us or our stockholders, we may defer the registration for up to 90 days. We are only obligated to effect up to two registrations on Form S-3 in any 12 month period.

Indemnification

We are obligated to indemnify the selling stockholders and any person who might be deemed to control them in the event of material misstatements or omissions in the registration statement or related violations of law attributable to us. Each selling stockholder is severally and not jointly, obligated to indemnify us, each underwriter, if any, each person who controls us or any underwriter within the meaning of Section 15 of the Securities Act, and each other selling stockholder in the event of material misstatements or omissions in the registration statement attributable to such stockholder. The liability of such selling stockholder shall be limited to an amount equal to the net proceeds to each such selling stockholder.

Voting Rights

Under the provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to become effective upon completion of this offering, holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote for each share of common stock held by such holder on any matter submitted to a vote at a meeting of stockholders. Our post-offering amended and restated certificate of incorporation does not provide cumulative voting rights to holders of our common stock.

Anti-Takeover Effects of Delaware Law and Our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws

Certain provisions of Delaware law and our restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws that will become effective upon completion of this offering contain provisions that could have the effect of delaying, deferring or discouraging another party from acquiring control of us. These provisions, which are summarized below, are expected to discourage certain types of coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids. These provisions are also designed in part to encourage anyone seeking to acquire control of us to first negotiate with our board of directors. We believe that the advantages gained by protecting our ability to negotiate with any unsolicited and potentially unfriendly acquirer outweigh the disadvantages of discouraging such proposals, including those priced above the then-current market value of our common stock, because, among other reasons, the negotiation of such proposals could improve their terms.

Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws to become effective upon completion of this offering include provisions that:

• authorize our board of directors to issue, without further action by the stockholders, up to 10,000,000 shares of undesignated preferred stock;

• require that any action to be taken by our stockholders be effected at a duly called annual or special meeting and not by written consent;

• specify that special meetings of our stockholders can be called only by our board of directors, the Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer or the President;

• establish an advance notice procedure for stockholder proposals to be brought before an annual meeting of our stockholders, including proposed nominations of persons for election to our board of directors;

• provide that directors may be removed only for cause;

• provide that vacancies on our board of directors may be filled only by a majority of directors then in office, even though less than a quorum;

144

• establish that our board of directors is divided into three classes — Class I, Class II and Class III —with each class serving staggered terms; and

• require a super-majority of votes to amend certain of the above-mentioned provisions.

Delaware Anti-Takeover Statute

We are subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware regulating corporate takeovers. In general, Section 203 prohibits a publicly-held Delaware corporation from engaging, under certain circumstances, in a business combination with an interested stockholder for a period of three years following the date the person became an interested stockholder unless:

• prior to the date of the transaction, the board of directors of the corporation approved either the business combination or the transaction which resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder;

• upon completion of the transaction that resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, the interested stockholder owned at least 85% of the voting stock of the corporation outstanding at the time the transaction commenced, excluding for purposes of determining the voting stock outstanding, but not for determining the outstanding voting stock owned by the interested stockholder, (1) shares owned by persons who are directors and also officers, and (2) shares owned by employee stock plans in which employee participants do not have the right to determine confidentially whether shares held subject to the plan will be tendered in a tender or exchange offer; or

• at or subsequent to the date of the transaction, the business combination is approved by the board of directors of the corporation and authorized at an annual or special meeting of stockholders, and not by written consent, by the affirmative vote of at least 66 2/3% of the outstanding voting stock which is not owned by the interested stockholder.

Generally, a business combination includes a merger, asset or stock sale, or other transaction resulting in a financial benefit to the interested stockholder. An interested stockholder is a person who, together with affiliates and associates, owns or, within three years prior to the determination of interested stockholder status, did own 15% or more of a corporation’s outstanding voting stock. We expect the existence of this provision to have an anti-takeover effect with respect to transactions our board of directors does not approve in advance. We also anticipate that Section 203 may discourage business combinations or other attempts that might result in a premium over the market price for the shares of common stock held by our stockholders.

The provisions of Delaware law and our restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws to become effective upon completion of this offering could have the effect of discouraging others from attempting hostile takeovers and, as a consequence, may also inhibit temporary fluctuations in the market price of our common stock that often result from actual or rumored hostile takeover attempts. These provisions may also have the effect of preventing changes in our management. It is possible that these provisions could make it more difficult to accomplish transactions that stockholders may otherwise deem to be in their best interests.

Transfer Agent and Registrar

Upon the completion of this offering, the transfer agent and registrar for our common stock will be Computershare Trust Company, N.A.

Listing

We have applied to list our common stock for quotation on The NASDAQ Stock Market under the trading symbol “EOPN.”

145

SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE

Before this offering, there has not been a public market for shares of our common stock. Future sales of substantial amounts of shares of our common stock, including shares issued upon the exercise of outstanding options, in the public market after this offering, or the possibility of these sales occurring, could cause the prevailing market price for our common stock to fall or impair our ability to raise equity capital in the future.

Upon the completion of this offering, a total of 24,928,796 shares of common stock will be outstanding, assuming that there are no exercises of options after May 31, 2012. Of these shares, all 4,687,500 shares of common stock sold in this offering by us and the selling stockholders, plus any shares sold upon exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option, will be freely tradable in the public market without restriction or further registration under the Securities Act, unless these shares are held by “affiliates,” as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act.

The remaining 20,241,296 shares of common stock will be “restricted securities,” as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act. These restricted securities are eligible for public sale only if they are registered under the Securities Act or if they qualify for an exemption from registration under Rules 144 or 701 under the Securities Act, which are summarized below.

Subject to the lock up agreements described below and the provisions of Rules 144 and 701 under the Securities Act, these restricted securities will be available for sale in the public market as follows:

Date	Number of Shares
On the date of this prospectus		356,991
Between 90 and 180 days after the date of this prospectus		—
At various times beginning more than 180 days after the date of this prospectus		19,884,305

In addition, of the 2,857,903 shares of our common stock that were subject to stock options outstanding as of May 31, 2012, options to purchase 2,732,182 shares of common stock were vested as of May 31, 2012 and will be eligible for sale 180 days following the effective date of this offering.

Lock-Up Agreements

We and all of our directors and officers, as well as the other holders of substantially all shares of common stock outstanding immediately prior to this offering, have agreed that, without the prior written consent of Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated on behalf of the underwriters, we and they will not, during the period ending 180 days after the date of this prospectus:

• offer, pledge, sell, contract to sell, sell any option or contract to purchase, purchase any option or contract to sell, grant any option, right or warrant to purchase, lend or otherwise transfer or dispose of, directly or indirectly, any shares of our common stock or any securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for shares of our common stock; or

• enter into any swap or other arrangement that transfers to another, in whole or in part, any of the economic consequences of ownership of our common stock;

whether any transaction described above is to be settled by delivery of shares of our common stock or such other securities, in cash or otherwise. This agreement is subject to certain exceptions, and is also subject to extension for up to 34 additional days, as set forth in “Underwriting.”

146

Rule 144

In general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect, once we have been subject to public company reporting requirements for at least 90 days, a person who is not deemed to have been one of our affiliates for purposes of the Securities Act at any time during 90 days preceding a sale and who has beneficially owned the shares proposed to be sold for at least six months, including the holding period of any prior owner other than our affiliates, is entitled to sell such shares without complying with the manner of sale, volume limitation or notice provisions of Rule 144, subject to compliance with the public information requirements of Rule 144. If such a person has beneficially owned the shares proposed to be sold for at least one year, including the holding period of any prior owner other than our affiliates, then such person is entitled to sell such shares without complying with any of the requirements of Rule 144.

In general, under Rule 144, as currently in effect, our affiliates or persons selling shares on behalf of our affiliates are entitled to sell upon expiration of the lock-up agreements described above, within any three-month period beginning 90 days after the date of this prospectus, a number of shares that does not exceed the greater of:

• 1% of the number of shares of common stock then outstanding, which will equal approximately 249,288 shares immediately after this offering; or

• the average weekly trading volume of the common stock during the four calendar weeks preceding the filing of a notice on Form 144 with respect to such sale.

Sales under Rule 144 by our affiliates or persons selling shares on behalf of our affiliates are also subject to certain manner of sale provisions and notice requirements and to the availability of current public information about us.

Rule 701

Rule 701 generally allows a stockholder who purchased shares of our common stock pursuant to a written compensatory plan or contract and who is not deemed to have been an affiliate of our company during the immediately preceding 90 days to sell these shares in reliance upon Rule 144, but without being required to comply with the public information, holding period, volume limitation, or notice provisions of Rule 144. Rule 701 also permits affiliates of our company to sell their Rule 701 shares under Rule 144 without complying with the holding period requirements of Rule 144. All holders of Rule 701 shares, however, are required to wait until 90 days after the date of this prospectus before selling such shares pursuant to Rule 701.

As of May 31, 2012, 2,900,416 shares of our outstanding common stock had been issued in reliance on Rule 701 as a result of exercises of stock options and stock awards.

Stock Options

We intend to file a registration statement on Form S-8 under the Securities Act covering all of the shares of our common stock subject to options outstanding or reserved for issuance under our stock plans and shares of our common stock issued upon the exercise of options by employees. We expect to file this registration statement as soon as practicable after this offering. In addition, we intend to file a registration statement on Form S-8 or such other form as may be required under the Securities Act for the resale of shares of our common stock issued upon the exercise of options that were not granted under Rule 701. We expect to file this registration statement as soon as permitted under the Securities Act. However, the shares registered on Form S-8 will be subject to volume limitations, manner of sale, notice and public information requirements of Rule 144 and will not be eligible for resale until expiration of the lock up agreements to which they are subject.

147

Registration Rights

Upon completion of this offering, the holders of an aggregate of 9,243,555 shares of our common stock issued or issuable upon conversion of preferred stock other than the Series D preferred stock will be entitled to various rights with respect to the registration of these shares under the Securities Act. Registration of these shares under the Securities Act would result in these shares becoming fully tradable without restriction under the Securities Act immediately upon the effectiveness of the registration, except for shares purchased by affiliates. See “Description of Capital Stock—Registration Rights” for additional information.

148

MATERIAL UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX

CONSEQUENCES TO NON-U.S. HOLDERS

The following is a summary of the material U.S. federal income tax and estate tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of our common stock to non-U.S. holders. It is not intended to be a complete analysis of all the U.S. federal income tax considerations that may be relevant to a non-U.S. holder. This summary is based upon the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder, administrative rulings and judicial decisions, all as of the date hereof. These authorities may be changed, possibly with retroactive effect, which may result in U.S. federal income tax consequences different from those set forth below. We have not sought any ruling from the Internal Revenue Service, or the IRS, with respect to the statements made and the conclusions reached in the following summary. There can be no assurance that the IRS will agree with such statements and conclusions or that any contrary position taken by the IRS would not be sustained by a court.

This summary also does not address the tax considerations arising under the laws of any foreign, state or local jurisdiction. In addition, this discussion does not address tax considerations applicable to an investor’s particular circumstances or to investors that may be subject to special tax rules, including, without limitation:

• banks, insurance companies or other financial institutions;

• persons subject to the alternative minimum tax;

• tax-exempt organizations;

• an integral part or controlled entity of a foreign sovereign;

• dealers in securities or currencies;

• traders in securities that elect to use a mark-to-market method of accounting for their securities holdings;

• persons that own, or are deemed to own, more than five percent of our capital stock (except to the extent specifically set forth below);

• controlled foreign corporations or passive foreign investment companies;

• certain former citizens or long-term residents of the United States;

• persons who hold our common stock as a position in a hedging transaction, “straddle,” “conversion transaction” or other risk reduction transaction;

• persons deemed to sell our common stock under the constructive sale provisions of the Code; or

• persons who hold our common stock other than as a capital asset (generally, an asset held for investment purposes).

In addition, if a partnership, or entity classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, holds our common stock, the tax treatment of a partner generally will depend on the status of the partner and upon the activities of the partnership. Accordingly, partnerships that hold our common stock, and partners in such partnerships, should consult their tax advisors.

149

YOU ARE URGED TO CONSULT YOUR TAX ADVISOR WITH RESPECT TO THE APPLICATION OF THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX LAWS TO YOUR PARTICULAR SITUATION, AS WELL AS ANY TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE PURCHASE, OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSITION OF OUR COMMON STOCK ARISING UNDER THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL ESTATE OR GIFT TAX RULES OR UNDER THE LAWS OF ANY STATE, LOCAL, FOREIGN OR OTHER TAXING JURISDICTION OR UNDER ANY APPLICABLE TAX TREATY.

Non-U.S. Holder Defined

For purposes of this discussion, you are a non-U.S. holder if you are a holder that, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, is not a U.S. person or a partnership. For purposes of this discussion, you are a U.S. person if you are:

• an individual citizen or resident of the United States;

• a corporation or other entity taxable as a corporation created or organized in the United States or under the laws of the United States or any political subdivision thereof;

• an estate whose income is subject to U.S. federal income tax regardless of its source; or

• a trust (x) if a court within the United States is able to exercise primary jurisdiction over the administration of the trust and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust or (y) that has made an election to be treated as a U.S. person.

Distributions

We have not made any distributions on our common stock and do not plan to make any distributions for the foreseeable future. However, if we do make distributions on our common stock, those payments will constitute dividends for U.S. tax purposes to the extent paid from our current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles. To the extent those distributions exceed both our current and our accumulated earnings and profits, they will constitute a return of capital and will first reduce your basis in our common stock, but not below zero, and then will be treated as gain from the sale of stock, which will be subject to tax as described in “Gain on Disposition of Common Stock,” below.

Any dividend paid to you generally will be subject to U.S. withholding tax either at a rate of 30% of the gross amount of the dividend or such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty. In order to receive a reduced treaty rate, you must provide us with a properly completed IRS Form W-8BEN or other appropriate version of IRS Form W-8 certifying qualification for the reduced rate.

Dividends received by you that are effectively connected with your conduct of a U.S. trade or business are exempt from such withholding tax. In order to obtain this exemption, you must provide us with a properly completed IRS Form W-8ECI certifying such exemption. Such effectively connected dividends, although not subject to withholding tax, are taxed at the same graduated rates applicable to U.S. persons, net of certain deductions and credits. In addition, if you are a corporate non-U.S. holder, dividends you receive that are effectively connected with your conduct of a U.S. trade or business may also be subject to a branch profits tax at a rate of 30% or such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty.

If you are eligible for a reduced rate of withholding tax pursuant to a tax treaty, you may obtain a refund from the U.S. Treasury of any excess amounts withheld if you timely file an appropriate claim for refund with the IRS.

150

Gain on Disposition of Common Stock

You generally will not be required to pay U.S. federal income tax on any gain realized upon the sale or other disposition of our common stock unless:

• the gain is effectively connected with your conduct of a U.S. trade or business;

• you are an individual non-U.S. holder who is present in the United States for a period or periods aggregating 183 days or more during the calendar year in which the sale or disposition occurs and certain other conditions are met; or

• our common stock constitutes a U.S. real property interest by reason of our status as a “United States real property holding corporation” for U.S. federal income tax purposes, or a USRPHC, at any time within the shorter of the five-year period preceding the disposition or your holding period for our common stock.

If you are a non-U.S. holder described in the first bullet above, you will be required to pay tax on the net gain derived from the sale under regular graduated U.S. federal income tax rates. Corporate non-U.S. holders described in the first bullet above may be subject to the branch profits tax at a 30% rate or such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty. If you are an individual non-U.S. holder described in the second bullet above, you will be required to pay a flat 30% tax on the gain derived from the sale, which may be offset by U.S.-source capital losses (even though you are not considered a resident of the United States). You should consult any applicable income tax or other treaties, which may provide for different rules.

We believe that we are not currently and will not become a USRPHC. However, because the determination of whether we are a USRPHC depends on the fair market value of our U.S. real property relative to the fair market value of our other business assets, there can be no assurance that we will not become a USRPHC in the future. Even if we become a USRPHC, however, as long as our common stock is regularly traded on an established securities market, such common stock will be treated as U.S. real property interests only if you actually or constructively hold more than five percent of such regularly traded common stock at any time during the shorter of the five-year period preceding the disposition or your holding period for our common stock. If gain on the sale or other taxable disposition of our stock is subject to tax because we are a USRPHC, you would be subject to regular U.S. federal income tax with respect to such gain, generally in the same manner as a U.S. person.

Federal Estate Tax

Common stock held or beneficially owned by an individual non-U.S. holder (as defined for U.S. federal estate tax purposes) at the time of death will be included in such holder’s gross estate for U.S. federal estate tax purposes, unless an applicable estate tax treaty provides otherwise.

Backup Withholding and Information Reporting

Generally, we must report annually to the IRS the amount of dividends paid to you, your name and address, and the amount of tax withheld, if any. A similar report will be sent to you. Pursuant to applicable income tax treaties or other agreements, the IRS may make these reports available to tax authorities in your country of residence.

Payments of dividends or of proceeds on the disposition of stock made to you may be subject to information reporting and backup withholding (currently at a rate of 28%, which such rate is scheduled to increase to 31% for payments made after December 31, 2012) unless you establish an exemption, for example by properly certifying your non-U.S. status on a Form W-8BEN or another appropriate version of IRS Form W-8.

151

Notwithstanding the foregoing, backup withholding and information reporting may apply if either we or our paying agent has actual knowledge, or reason to know, that you are a U.S. person.

Backup withholding is not an additional tax; rather, the U.S. income tax liability of persons subject to backup withholding will be reduced by the amount of tax withheld. If withholding results in an overpayment of taxes, a refund or credit may be obtained from the U.S. Treasury, provided that the required information is furnished to the IRS in a timely manner.

Taxation of our Common Stock Held By or Through Foreign Entities

New withholding rules in the Code may impose withholding taxes on certain types of payments made to “foreign financial institutions” (as specially defined under these rules) and certain other non-U.S. entities if certification, information reporting and other specified requirements are not met. The legislation potentially imposes a 30% withholding tax on dividends on or gross proceeds from the sale or other disposition of our common stock if they are paid to a foreign financial institution or to a foreign non-financial entity, unless (i) the foreign financial institution undertakes certain diligence and reporting obligations and other specified requirements are satisfied or (ii) the foreign non-financial entity either certifies it does not have any substantial U.S. owners or furnishes identifying information regarding each substantial U.S. owner and other specified requirements are satisfied. If the payee is a foreign financial institution, it must enter into an agreement with the U.S. Treasury requiring, among other things, that it undertake to identify accounts held by certain U.S. persons or U.S.-owned foreign entities, annually report certain information about such accounts and withhold 30% on payments to account holders whose actions prevent it from complying with these reporting and other requirements. Withholding on certain types of income, including dividends, will be required beginning January 1, 2014. Prospective investors should consult their tax advisors regarding the impact of this legislation on their investment in our common stock.

152

UNDERWRITING

Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated is acting as representative of each of the underwriters named below. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in an underwriting agreement among us, the selling stockholders and the underwriters, we and the selling stockholders have agreed to sell to the underwriters, and each of the underwriters has agreed, severally and not jointly, to purchase from us and the selling stockholders, the number of shares of common stock set forth opposite its name below.

Underwriter	Number of Shares
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith                        Incorporated
William Blair & Company, L.L.C.
Pacific Crest Securities
Canaccord Genuity Inc.
Needham & Company, LLC
Total		4,687,500

Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the underwriting agreement, the underwriters have agreed, severally and not jointly, to purchase all of the shares sold under the underwriting agreement if any of these shares are purchased. If an underwriter defaults, the underwriting agreement provides that the purchase commitments of the nondefaulting underwriters may be increased or the underwriting agreement may be terminated.

We and the selling stockholders have agreed to indemnify the underwriters against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act, or to contribute to payments the underwriters may be required to make in respect of those liabilities.

The underwriters are offering the shares, subject to prior sale, when, as and if issued to and accepted by them, subject to approval of legal matters by their counsel, including the validity of the shares, and other conditions contained in the underwriting agreement, such as the receipt by the underwriters of officer’s certificates and legal opinions. The underwriters reserve the right to withdraw, cancel or modify offers to the public and to reject orders in whole or in part.

Commissions and Discounts

The representative has advised us and the selling stockholders that the underwriters propose initially to offer the shares to the public at the public offering price set forth on the cover page of this prospectus and to dealers at that price less a concession not in excess of $         per share. After the initial offering, the public offering price, concession or any other term of the offering may be changed.

The following table shows the public offering price, underwriting discount and proceeds before expenses to us and the selling stockholders. The information assumes either no exercise or full exercise by the underwriters of their option to purchase additional shares.

	Per Share	Without Option	With Option
Public offering price	$	$	$
Underwriting discount	$	$	$
Proceeds, before expenses, to us	$	$	$
Proceeds, before expenses, to the selling stockholders	$	$	$

153

The expenses of the offering, not including the underwriting discount, are estimated at $2.9 million and are payable by us.

Option to Purchase Additional Shares

The selling stockholders granted an option to the underwriters, exercisable for 30 days after the date of this prospectus, to purchase up to 703,125 additional shares at the public offering price, less the underwriting discount. If the underwriters exercise this option, each will be obligated, subject to conditions contained in the underwriting agreement, to purchase a number of additional shares proportionate to that underwriter’s initial amount reflected in the above table.

No Sales of Similar Securities

We and the selling stockholders, our executive officers and directors and substantially all of our other existing security holders have agreed not to sell or transfer any common stock or securities convertible into, exchangeable for, exercisable for, or repayable with common stock, for 180 days after the date of this prospectus without first obtaining the written consent of Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated. Specifically, we and these other persons have agreed, with certain limited exceptions, not to directly or indirectly

• offer, pledge, sell or contract to sell any common stock,

• sell any option or contract to purchase any common stock,

• purchase any option or contract to sell any common stock,

• grant any option, right or warrant for the sale of any common stock,

• lend or otherwise dispose of or transfer any common stock,

• request or demand that we file a registration statement related to the common stock, or

• enter into any swap or other agreement that transfers, in whole or in part, the economic consequence of ownership of any common stock whether any such swap or transaction is to be settled by delivery of shares or other securities, in cash or otherwise.

This lock-up provision applies to common stock and to securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for or repayable with common stock. It also applies to common stock owned now or acquired later by the person executing the agreement or for which the person executing the agreement later acquires the power of disposition. In the event that either (x) during the last 17 days of the lock-up period referred to above, we issue an earnings release or material news or a material event relating to us occurs or (y) prior to the expiration of the lock-up period, we announce that we will release earnings results or become aware that material news or a material event will occur during the 16-day period beginning on the last day of the lock-up period, the restrictions described above shall continue to apply until the expiration of the 18-day period beginning on the issuance of the earnings release or the occurrence of the material news or material event.

     Listing

We have applied to list our common stock for quotation on The NASDAQ Stock Market, subject to notice of issuance, under the symbol “EOPN.” In order to meet the requirements for listing on that exchange, the underwriters have undertaken to sell a minimum number of shares to a minimum number of beneficial owners as required by that exchange.

Before this offering, there has been no public market for our common stock. The initial public offering price will be determined through negotiations among us, the selling stockholders and the representative. In

154

addition to prevailing market conditions, the factors to be considered in determining the initial public offering price are

• the valuation multiples of publicly traded companies that the representative believes to be comparable to us,

• our financial information,

• the history of, and the prospects for, our company and the industry in which we compete,

• an assessment of our management, its past and present operations, and the prospects for, and timing of, our future revenues,

• the present state of our development, and

• the above factors in relation to market values and various valuation measures of other companies engaged in activities similar to ours.

An active trading market for the shares may not develop. It is also possible that after the offering the shares will not trade in the public market at or above the initial public offering price.

The underwriters do not expect to sell more than 5% of the shares in the aggregate to accounts over which they exercise discretionary authority.

Price Stabilization, Short Positions and Penalty Bids

Until the distribution of the shares is completed, SEC rules may limit underwriters and selling group members from bidding for and purchasing our common stock. However, the representative may engage in transactions that stabilize the price of the common stock, such as bids or purchases to peg, fix or maintain that price.

In connection with the offering, the underwriters may purchase and sell our common stock in the open market. These transactions may include short sales, purchases on the open market to cover positions created by short sales and stabilizing transactions. Short sales involve the sale by the underwriters of a greater number of shares than they are required to purchase in the offering. “Covered” short sales are sales made in an amount not greater than the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares described above. The underwriters may close out any covered short position by either exercising their option to purchase additional shares or purchasing shares in the open market. In determining the source of shares to close out the covered short position, the underwriters will consider, among other things, the price of shares available for purchase in the open market as compared to the price at which they may purchase shares through the option granted to them. “Naked” short sales are sales in excess of such option. The underwriters must close out any naked short position by purchasing shares in the open market. A naked short position is more likely to be created if the underwriters are concerned that there may be downward pressure on the price of our common stock in the open market after pricing that could adversely affect investors who purchase in the offering. Stabilizing transactions consist of various bids for or purchases of shares of common stock made by the underwriters in the open market prior to the completion of the offering.

The underwriters may also impose a penalty bid. This occurs when a particular underwriter repays to the underwriters a portion of the underwriting discount received by it because the representative has repurchased shares sold by or for the account of such underwriter in stabilizing or short covering transactions.

Similar to other purchase transactions, the underwriters’ purchases to cover the syndicate short sales may have the effect of raising or maintaining the market price of our common stock or preventing or retarding a

155

decline in the market price of our common stock. As a result, the price of our common stock may be higher than the price that might otherwise exist in the open market. The underwriters may conduct these transactions on The NASDAQ Stock Market, in the over-the-counter market or otherwise.

Neither we nor any of the underwriters make any representation or prediction as to the direction or magnitude of any effect that the transactions described above may have on the price of our common stock. In addition, neither we nor any of the underwriters make any representation that the representative will engage in these transactions or that these transactions, once commenced, will not be discontinued without notice.

Electronic Distribution

In connection with the offering, certain of the underwriters or securities dealers may distribute prospectuses by electronic means, such as e-mail.

Other Relationships

Some of the underwriters and their affiliates have engaged in, and may in the future engage in, investment banking and other commercial dealings in the ordinary course of business with us or our affiliates. They have received, or may in the future receive, customary fees and commissions for these transactions.

In addition, in the ordinary course of their business activities, the underwriters and their affiliates may make or hold a broad array of investments and actively trade debt and equity securities (or related derivative securities) and financial instruments (including bank loans) for their own account and for the accounts of their customers. Such investments and securities activities may involve securities and/or instruments of ours or our affiliates. The underwriters and their affiliates may also make investment recommendations and/or publish or express independent research views in respect of such securities or financial instruments and may hold, or recommend to clients that they acquire, long and/or short positions in such securities and instruments.

Notice to Prospective Investors in the European Economic Area

In relation to each Member State of the European Economic Area which has implemented the Prospectus Directive, or each, a Relevant Member State, with effect from and including the date on which the Prospectus Directive is implemented in that Relevant Member State, or the “Relevant Implementation Date, no offer of shares may be made to the public in that Relevant Member State other than:

A. to any legal entity which is a qualified investor as defined in the Prospectus Directive;

B. to fewer than 100 or, if the Relevant Member State has implemented the relevant provision of the 2010 PD Amending Directive, 150, natural or legal persons (other than qualified investors as defined in the Prospectus Directive), as permitted under the Prospectus Directive, subject to obtaining the prior consent of the representative; or

C. in any other circumstances falling within Article 3(2) of the Prospectus Directive,

provided that no such offer of shares shall require the Company or the representative to publish a prospectus pursuant to Article 3 of the Prospectus Directive or supplement a prospectus pursuant to Article 16 of the Prospectus Directive.

Each person in a Relevant Member State (other than a Relevant Member State where there is a Permitted Public Offer) who initially acquires any shares or to whom any offer is made will be deemed to have represented, acknowledged and agreed that (A) it is a “qualified investor” within the meaning of the law in that Relevant Member State implementing Article 2(1)(e) of the Prospectus Directive, and (B) in the case of any

156

shares acquired by it as a financial intermediary, as that term is used in Article 3(2) of the Prospectus Directive, the shares acquired by it in the offering have not been acquired on behalf of, nor have they been acquired with a view to their offer or resale to, persons in any Relevant Member State other than “qualified investors” as defined in the Prospectus Directive, or in circumstances in which the prior consent of the representative has been given to the offer or resale. In the case of any shares being offered to a financial intermediary as that term is used in Article 3(2) of the Prospectus Directive, each such financial intermediary will be deemed to have represented, acknowledged and agreed that the shares acquired by it in the offer have not been acquired on a non-discretionary basis on behalf of, nor have they been acquired with a view to their offer or resale to, persons in circumstances which may give rise to an offer of any shares to the public other than their offer or resale in a Relevant Member State to qualified investors as so defined or in circumstances in which the prior consent of the representative has been obtained to each such proposed offer or resale.

The Company, the representative and their affiliates will rely upon the truth and accuracy of the foregoing representation, acknowledgement and agreement.

This prospectus has been prepared on the basis that any offer of shares in any Relevant Member State will be made pursuant to an exemption under the Prospectus Directive from the requirement to publish a prospectus for offers of shares. Accordingly any person making or intending to make an offer in that Relevant Member State of shares which are the subject of the offering contemplated in this prospectus may only do so in circumstances in which no obligation arises for the Company or any of the underwriters to publish a prospectus pursuant to Article 3 of the Prospectus Directive in relation to such offer. Neither the Company nor the underwriters have authorized, nor do they authorize, the making of any offer of shares in circumstances in which an obligation arises for the Company or the underwriters to publish a prospectus for such offer.

For the purpose of the above provisions, the expression “an offer to the public” in relation to any shares in any Relevant Member State means the communication in any form and by any means of sufficient information on the terms of the offer and the shares to be offered so as to enable an investor to decide to purchase or subscribe the shares, as the same may be varied in the Relevant Member State by any measure implementing the Prospectus Directive in the Relevant Member State and the expression “Prospectus Directive” means Directive 2003/71/EC (including the 2010 PD Amending Directive, to the extent implemented in the Relevant Member States) and includes any relevant implementing measure in the Relevant Member State and the expression “2010 PD Amending Directive” means Directive 2010/73/EU.

Notice to Prospective Investors in the United Kingdom

In addition, in the United Kingdom, this document is being distributed only to, and is directed only at, and any offer subsequently made may only be directed at persons who are “qualified investors” (as defined in the Prospectus Directive) (i) who have professional experience in matters relating to investments falling within Article 19 (5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005, as amended, or the Order, and/or (ii) who are high net worth companies (or persons to whom it may otherwise be lawfully communicated) falling within Article 49(2)(a) to (d) of the Order (all such persons together being referred to as “relevant persons”). This document must not be acted on or relied on in the United Kingdom by persons who are not relevant persons. In the United Kingdom, any investment or investment activity to which this document relates is only available to, and will be engaged in with, relevant persons.

Notice to Prospective Investors in Switzerland

The shares may not be publicly offered in Switzerland and will not be listed on the SIX Swiss Exchange, or SIX, or on any other stock exchange or regulated trading facility in Switzerland. This document has been prepared without regard to the disclosure standards for issuance prospectuses under art. 652a or art. 1156 of the Swiss Code of Obligations or the disclosure standards for listing prospectuses under art. 27 ff. of the SIX Listing Rules or the listing rules of any other stock exchange or regulated trading facility in Switzerland. Neither

157

this document nor any other offering or marketing material relating to the shares or the offering may be publicly distributed or otherwise made publicly available in Switzerland.

Neither this document nor any other offering or marketing material relating to the offering, the Company, the shares have been or will be filed with or approved by any Swiss regulatory authority. In particular, this document will not be filed with, and the offer of shares will not be supervised by, the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA (FINMA), and the offer of shares has not been and will not be authorized under the Swiss Federal Act on Collective Investment Schemes, or CISA. The investor protection afforded to acquirers of interests in collective investment schemes under the CISA does not extend to acquirers of shares.

Notice to Prospective Investors in the Dubai International Financial Centre

This prospectus supplement relates to an Exempt Offer in accordance with the Offered Securities Rules of the Dubai Financial Services Authority, or DFSA. This prospectus supplement is intended for distribution only to persons of a type specified in the Offered Securities Rules of the DFSA. It must not be delivered to, or relied on by, any other person. The DFSA has no responsibility for reviewing or verifying any documents in connection with Exempt Offers. The DFSA has not approved this prospectus supplement nor taken steps to verify the information set forth herein and has no responsibility for the prospectus supplement. The shares to which this prospectus supplement relates may be illiquid and/or subject to restrictions on their resale. Prospective purchasers of the shares offered should conduct their own due diligence on the shares. If you do not understand the contents of this prospectus supplement you should consult an authorized financial advisor.

158

LEGAL MATTERS

The validity of the shares of common stock offered hereby will be passed upon for us by Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Professional Corporation, Palo Alto, California. Certain legal matters in connection with this offering will be passed upon for the underwriters by Goodwin Procter LLP, Menlo Park, California.

EXPERTS

The consolidated financial statements of E2open, Inc. and subsidiaries as of February 28, 2011 and February 29, 2012, and for each of the years in the three-year period ended February 29, 2012, have been included herein and in the registration statement in reliance upon the report of KPMG LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, appearing elsewhere herein, and upon the authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing.

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-1 under the Securities Act with respect to the shares of common stock we are offering. The registration statement, including the attached exhibits and schedules, contains additional relevant information about us and our common stock. This prospectus does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration statement and the exhibits and schedules thereto. The rules and regulations of the SEC allow us to omit from this prospectus certain information included in the registration statement.

For further information about us and our common stock, you may inspect a copy of the registration statement and the exhibits and schedules to the registration statement without charge at the offices of the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain copies of all or any part of the registration statement from the Public Reference Section of the SEC, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549 upon the payment of the prescribed fees.

You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding registrants like us that file electronically with the SEC. You can also inspect our registration statement on this website.

Upon the closing of this offering, we will become subject to the reporting and information requirements of the Exchange Act, and we will file reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC.

159

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

	Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets		F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)		F-4
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit		F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows		F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-7

F-1

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

E2open, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of E2open, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of February 29, 2012 and February 28, 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ deficit and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended February 29, 2012. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of E2open, Inc. and subsidiaries as of February 29, 2012 and February 28, 2011, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended February 29, 2012, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of classifying payments made for deferred initial public offering costs in the consolidated statements of cash flows.

\s\ KPMG LLP

Santa Clara, CA

May 3, 2012, except as to

the caption “Change in Accounting

Principle” in note 2, and note 16,

which are as of June 29, 2012

F-2

E2open, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except shares and per share data)

	February 28 or 29,						May 31, 2012			Pro forma Stockholders’ Deficit as of May 31, 2012 (Note 2)
	2011			2012
							(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	10,060		$	10,219		$	10,092
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $28, $24 and $91		12,288			16,304			11,858
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		1,604			3,211			4,326
Total current assets		23,952			29,734			26,276
Property and equipment, net		1,889			2,249			2,629
Other assets		577			710			757
Total Assets	$	26,418		$	32,693		$	29,662
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	7,080		$	9,142		$	8,973
Deferred revenue		27,507			38,101			37,915
Lines of credit		5,460			9,650			10,860
Current portion of notes payable		1,090			1,003			1,003
Current portion of capital lease obligations		35			—			—
Total current liabilities		41,172			57,896			58,751
Deferred revenue		17,124			6,958			4,496
Notes payable, net of current portion		1,667			668			417
Other noncurrent liabilities		612			505			497
Total liabilities		60,575			66,027			64,161
Commitments and contingencies (note 9)
Stockholders’ deficit:
Series AA preferred stock, $0.001 par value. 4,571,428 authorized shares; 3,925,726 shares issued and outstanding, aggregate liquidation preference of $52,212		13,336			13,336			13,336		$	—
Series BB preferred stock, $0.001 par value. 2,857,142 authorized shares; 2,327,672 shares issued and outstanding as of February 28, 2011 and February 29, 2012 and 2,390,172 as of May 31, 2012, aggregate liquidation preference of $26,070 as of February 28, 2011 and February 29, 2012 and $26,767 as of May 31, 2012		26,560			26,560			27,260			—
Series CC preferred stock, $0.001 par value. 4,357,142 authorized shares, 2,869,592 as of February 28, 2011 and 2,882,529 shares issued and outstanding as of February 29, 2012 and May 31, 2012, aggregate liquidation preference of $32,139 as of February 28, 2011 and $32,284 as of February 29, 2012 and May 31, 2012		27,114			27,259			27,259			—
Series D preferred stock, $0.001 par value. 5,714,285 authorized shares; 4,670,687 shares issued and outstanding, aggregate liquidation preference of $16,347		16,336			16,336			16,336			—
Common stock, $0.001 par value. 25,057,142 authorized shares, 5,739,034, 6,133,544 and 6,262,480 shares issued and outstanding as of February 28, 2011, February 29, 2012 and May 31, 2012; 21,108,008 (unaudited) shares issued and outstanding pro forma		6			6			6			21
Additional paid-in capital		222,882			223,776			224,306			308,482
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		—			9			(8	)		(8	)
Accumulated deficit		(340,391	)		(340,616	)		(342,994	)		(342,994	)
Total stockholders’ deficit		(34,157	)		(33,334	)		(34,499	)	$	(34,499	)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit	$	26,418		$	32,693		$	29,662

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-3

E2open, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(In thousands, except per share data)

	Years Ended February 28 or 29,									Three Months Ended
	2010			2011			2012			May 31, 2011			May 31, 2012
										(Unaudited)
Revenue
Subscriptions and support	$	29,976		$	39,419		$	35,816		$	8,053		$	9,814
Professional services and other		14,401			16,104			23,871			3,194			5,659
Total revenue		44,377			55,523			59,687			11,247			15,473
Cost of revenue
Subscriptions and support		9,269			7,531			7,514			1,787			2,039
Professional services and other		11,493			11,774			14,116			3,333			3,653
Total cost of revenue		20,762			19,305			21,630			5,120			5,692
Gross profit
Subscriptions and support		20,707			31,888			28,302			6,266			7,775
Professional services and other		2,908			4,330			9,755			(139	)		2,006
Total gross profit		23,615			36,218			38,057			6,127			9,781
Operating expenses:
Research and development		13,077			11,463			13,240			3,110			4,092
Sales and marketing		11,421			12,756			18,590			3,730			6,147
General and administrative		4,884			5,064			5,963			1,307			1,782
Total operating expenses		29,382			29,283			37,793			8,147			12,021
Income (loss) from operations		(5,767	)		6,935			264			(2,020	)		(2,240	)
Interest and other expense, net		(532	)		(259	)		(411	)		(86	)		(95	)
Income (loss) before income taxes		(6,299	)		6,676			(147	)		(2,106	)		(2,335	)
Provision for income taxes		(349	)		(33	)		(78	)		(31	)		(43	)
Net income (loss)		(6,648	)		6,643			(225	)		(2,137	)		(2,378	)
Undistributed earnings allocated to preferred stockholders		—			(6,643	)		—			—			—
Net loss attributable to common stockholders:	$	(6,648	)	$	—		$	(225	)	$	(2,137	)	$	(2,378	)
Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders:
Basic	$	(1.58	)	$	—		$	(0.04	)	$	(0.37	)	$	(0.38	)
Diluted	$	(1.58	)	$	—		$	(0.04	)	$	(0.37	)	$	(0.38	)
Weighted average shares used to compute net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders:
Basic		4,210			5,788			5,918			5,798			6,190
Diluted		4,210			5,788			5,918			5,798			6,190
Pro forma net loss per share attributable to common stockholders:
Basic							$	(0.01	)				$	(0.11	)
Diluted							$	(0.01	)				$	(0.11	)
Pro forma weighted average shares used to compute pro forma net loss per share attributable to common stockholders:
Basic								20,689						21,036
Diluted								20,689						21,036
Other comprehensive income (loss), net:
Cumulative translation adjustment		—			—			9			4			(17	)
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(6,648	)	$	6,643		$	(216	)	$	(2,133	)	$	(2,395	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-4

E2open, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit

Years Ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012, and Three Months Ended May 31, 2012 (Unaudited)

(In thousands, except share data)

	Preferred stock						Common stock					Note receivable			Additional paid-in capital			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Accumulated deficit			Total stockholders’ deficit
	Shares			Amount			Shares			Amount
Balances, February 28, 2009		9,889,219		$	73,212			3,403,376		$	4	$	(93	)	$	215,129		$	—		$	(340,386	)	$	(52,134	)
Exercise of options for common stock		—			—			209,409			—		—			106			—			—			106
Issuance of Series D preferred stock, net of issuance cost of $12		1,741,741			6,085			—			—		—			—			—			—			6,085
Conversion of notes to Series D preferred stock		2,928,946			10,251			—			—		—			—			—			—			10,251
Mandatory conversion of preferred stock to common		(766,229	)		(6,202	)		766,229			1		—			6,201			—			—			—
Restricted stock awards		—			—			—			—		—			52			—			—			52
Share-based compensation expense		—			—			—			—		—			394			—			—			394
Forfeiture of common shares upon default of note receivable		—			—			(74,852	)		—		93			(26	)		—			—			67
Net loss and comprehensive loss		—			—			—			—		—			—			—			(6,648	)		(6,648	)
Balances, February 28, 2010		13,793,677			83,346			4,304,162			5		—			221,856						(347,034	)		(41,827	)
Exercise of options for common stock		—			—			1,286,301			1		—			449			—			—			450
Restricted stock awards		—			—			148,571			—		—			—			—			—			—
Share-based compensation expense		—			—			—			—		—			577			—			—			577
Net income and comprehensive income		—			—			—			—		—			—			—			6,643			6,643
Balances, February 28, 2011		13,793,677			83,346			5,739,034			6		—			222,882			—			(340,391	)		(34,157	)
Exercise of options for common stock		—			—			170,375			—		—			89			—			—			89
Issuance of Series CC preferred stock upon exercise of warrants		12,937			145			—			—		—			—			—			—			145
Vesting of early exercised options		—			—			224,135			—		—			78			—			—			78
Share-based compensation expense		—			—			—			—		—			727			—			—			727
Cumulative translation adjustment		—			—			—			—		—			—			9			—			9
Net loss		—			—			—			—		—			—			—			(225	)		(225	)
Balances, February 29, 2012		13,806,614			83,491			6,133,544			6		—			223,776			9			(340,616	)		(33,334	)
Exercise of options for common stock (unaudited)					—			74,093			—		—			32			—			—			32
Vesting of early exercised options (unaudited)		—			—			54,843			—		—			19			—			—			19
Issuance of Series BB preferred stock upon exercise of warrants (unaudited)		62,500			700			—			—		—			—			—			—			700
Share-based compensation expense (unaudited)		—			—			—			—		—			479						—			479
Cumulative translation adjustment (unaudited)		—			—			—			—		—			—			(17	)		—			(17	)
Net loss (unaudited)		—			—			—			—		—			—			—			(2,378	)		(2,378	)
Balances, May 31, 2012		13,869,114		$	84,191			6,262,480		$	6	$	—		$	224,306		$	(8	)	$	(342,994	)	$	(34,499	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-5

E2open, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

	Years Ended February 28 or 29,									Three Months Ended May 31,
	2010			2011			2012			2011			2012
										(Unaudited)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	(6,648	)	$	6,643		$	(225	)	$	(2,137	)	$	(2,378	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Stock-based compensation		445			577			727			144			479
Depreciation and amortization		2,323			1,859			1,526			386			409
Deferred income taxes		—			(193	)		—			—			—
Other		75			10			(158	)		—			(142	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable, net		200			(1,876	)		(4,016	)		2,058			4,446
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		281			(147	)		(992	)		59			(552	)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(1,341	)		772			1,912			(495	)		(447	)
Income taxes payable		21			184			—			—			—
Accrued interest on convertible note		145			—			—			—			—
Deferred revenue		(142	)		(7,623	)		428			(137	)		(2,648	)
Deferred rent		240			(118	)		(28	)		44			10
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		(4,401	)		88			(826	)		(78	)		(823	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures		(924	)		(785	)		(1,669	)		(188	)		(654	)
Long-term deposits and restricted cash		(34	)		17			(95	)		(32	)		(26	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(958	)		(768	)		(1,764	)		(220	)		(680	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from bank debt		31,760			45,592			46,650			6,820			21,210
Repayments of bank debt		(37,743	)		(46,462	)		(42,460	)		(5,860	)		(20,000	)
Proceeds from note payable		—			2,500			—			—			—
Repayments of note payable		(532	)		(730	)		(1,089	)		(253	)		(251	)
Repayment of capital lease obligations		(432	)		(263	)		(35	)		(14	)		—
Proceeds from exercise of common share options		106			573			89			20			32
Payments of deferred initial public offering costs		—			—			(550	)		(100	)		(297	)
Issuance of Series BB preferred stock, net of issuance costs		—			—			—			—			700
Issuance of Series CC preferred stock, net of issuance costs		—			—			145			—			—
Issuance of Series D preferred stock, net of issuance costs		6,085			—			—			—			—
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(756	)		1,210			2,750			613			1,394
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		—			—			(1	)		(2	)		(18	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(6,115	)		530			159			313			(127	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		15,645			9,530			10,060			10,060			10,219
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	9,530		$	10,060		$	10,219		$	10,373		$	10,092
Supplemental cash flows information:
Cash paid during the year:
Interest	$	314		$	117		$	185		$	45		$	72
Income taxes	$	294		$	177		$	102			4			57
Property and equipment acquired under notes payable and capital leases	$	1,648		$	156			—			—			—
Mandatory conversion of preferred stock to common stock	$	6,202			—			—			—			—
Cancellation of note receivable from stockholder	$	93			—			—			—			—
Vesting of early exercised options		—			—		$	78			19			19
Conversion of notes payable and interest to preferred stock	$	10,251			—			—			—			—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-6

E2OPEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012

and the Three Months Ended May 31, 2011 and 2012 (unaudited)

(1) Organization and Business Description

E2open, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company), a Delaware corporation, was incorporated in September 2003. The Company provides cloud-based, on-demand software solutions delivered on an integrated platform that enables companies to collaborate with their trading partners to procure, manufacture, sell and distribute products more efficiently. The Company’s customers depend on outsourced manufacturing strategies and complex trading networks to compete in today’s global economy. They use the Company’s solutions to gain visibility into and control over their trading networks. The Company’s solutions enable its customers and their trading partners to overcome problems arising from communications across disparate systems by offering a reliable source of data, processes and analytics, which its customers rely on as the single version of the truth. The Company’s solutions empower its customers to manage demand they cannot predict and supply they do not control.

The Company’s corporate headquarters are located in Foster City, California, with additional offices in Austin and Dallas, Texas, China, Germany, Malaysia, Sweden, Taiwan and the United Kingdom.

Risks and Uncertainties

The Company conducts business in a dynamic high-technology industry and believes that changes in any of the following areas could have a material adverse effect on its future financial position, results of operations, or cash flows: advances and trends in new technologies and industry standards; pressures resulting from new applications offered by competitors; changes in certain customer relationships; litigation or claims against the Company based on intellectual property, patent, product, regulatory, or other factors; changes in domestic and international economic or political conditions or regulations; the ability of the Company to finance its operations; and the Company’s ability to attract and retain employees necessary to support its growth, among other things.

(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). Certain reclassifications have been made in the prior year consolidated financial statements to conform to the current year presentation.

The consolidated financial statements include the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

See Note (16) Subsequent Events, for presentation of share numbers, share prices and exercise prices.

Change in Accounting Principle

The Company changed its classification of cash flows related to payments made for deferred initial public offering (IPO) costs from cash flows from operating activities to cash flows from financing activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows. The Company believes the new classification is preferable because it better correlates the cash flows from the deferred IPO costs with the cash flows from the proceeds to be received from the IPO. In connection with this change in accounting principle, the Company reclassified $0, $0, and $550,000 from operating cash flows to financing cash flows for the years ended February 28, 2010, February 28, 2011 and February 29, 2012 from amounts previously reported.

F-7

E2OPEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012

and the Three Months Ended May 31, 2011 and 2012 (unaudited)

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported results of operations during the reporting period. Such estimates include the allowance for doubtful accounts, deferred tax asset valuation allowance, unrecognized tax benefits, accrued liabilities, stock-based compensation, and valuation of common and preferred stock. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Unaudited Interim Financial Information

The accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of May 31, 2012, the consolidated interim statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) and cash flows for the three months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011 and the interim consolidated statement of stockholders’ deficit for the three months ended May 31, 2012 are unaudited. The unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the annual consolidated financial statements and, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position as of May 31, 2012 and results of operations and cash flows for the three months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011. The financial data and the other information disclosed in these notes to the consolidated financial statements related to these three month periods are unaudited. The results of the three months ended May 31, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the fiscal year ending February 28, 2013 or for any other future annual or interim period.

Unaudited Pro-forma Stockholders’ Deficit

The pro forma stockholders’ deficit as of May 31, 2012 presents the equity-related components of the Company’s consolidated balance sheet assuming the automatic conversion of all outstanding shares of preferred stock as of May 31, 2012 into shares of common stock. The pro forma shares issued and outstanding does not include 70,788 shares of common stock subject to repurchase resulting from early exercise of employee stock options. The proceeds expected to be received in the initial public offering are excluded from such pro forma information.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to a concentration of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. The Company deposits cash and cash equivalents with high quality financial institutions. Accounts receivable are typically unsecured and are derived from sales of subscriptions and support and professional services, principally to large technology and industrial companies. Credit risk is concentrated primarily in North America, Europe, and parts of Asia. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and has historically experienced insignificant credit losses. The Company maintains allowances for estimated credit losses based on management’s assessment of the likelihood of collection.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. As of February 28, 2011, February 29, 2012 and May 31, 2012, the Company’s cash equivalents consisted of money market accounts.

F-8

E2OPEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012

and the Three Months Ended May 31, 2011 and 2012 (unaudited)

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally two to three years. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the remaining lease term or over the estimated lives of the assets, if shorter. Upon sale or retirement of assets, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the consolidated balance sheet, and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in the consolidated statement of operations.

Software Development Costs

The Company capitalizes the costs of software used internally in its operations, primarily for the delivery of its on-demand subscriptions and support services. Such capitalized costs are included in property and equipment for perpetual licenses with a useful life greater than one year, and in prepaid expenses and other current assets for term licenses. Management evaluates the useful lives of these assets on an annual basis and tests for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances occur that could impact the recoverability of these assets. There were no such indicators of impairment during the years ended February 28, 2011 and February 29, 2012. The Company capitalized $473,000 and $842,000 of internal use software during the years ended February 28, 2011 and February 29, 2012 and $281,000 for the three months ended May 31, 2012 (unaudited). Amortization expense totaled $277,000, $349,000 and $508,000 during the years ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012 and $181,000 and $215,000 for the three months ended May 31, 2011 and 2012 (unaudited). The net book value of capitalized internal use software was $333,000, $620,000 and $688,000 as of February 28, 2011, February 29, 2012 and May 31, 2012 (unaudited).

Indemnification

The Company includes service level commitments to its customers warranting certain levels of uptime reliability and performance and permitting those customers to receive credits in the event that the Company fails to meet those levels. To date, the Company has not incurred any material costs as a result of such commitments and has not accrued any liabilities related to such obligations in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The Company has also agreed to indemnify its directors and executive officers for costs associated with any fees, expenses, judgments, fines and settlement amounts incurred by any of these persons in any action or proceeding to which any of those persons is, or is threatened to be, made a party by reason of the person’s service as a director or officer, including any action by the Company, arising out of that person’s services as the Company’s director or officer or that person’s services provided to any other company or enterprise at the Company’s request. The Company maintains director and officer insurance coverage that may enable the Company to recover a portion of any future amounts paid. The Company’s arrangements include provisions indemnifying customers against liabilities if our products infringe a third-party’s intellectual property rights. The Company has not incurred any costs as a result of such indemnifications and has not accrued any liabilities related to such obligations in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company evaluates its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is

F-9

E2OPEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012

and the Three Months Ended May 31, 2011 and 2012 (unaudited)

measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. No impairment loss was recorded for the years ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012, and the three months ended May 31, 2011 and 2012.

Revenue Recognition

The Company generates revenue from the sale of subscriptions and support and professional services.

Subscriptions and Support. The Company offers on-demand software solutions, which enable its customers to have constant access to its solutions without the need to manage and support the software and associated hardware themselves. The Company houses the hardware and software in third-party facilities, and provides its customers with access to the software solutions, along with data security and storage, backup, and recovery services. The Company’s customer contracts typically have a term of three years. The Company invoices its customers for subscriptions and support in advance for annual use of the software solutions. The Company’s payment terms typically require customers to pay within 30 to 60 days from the invoice date.

Professional Services. Professional services revenue is derived primarily from fees for enabling services, such as solution consulting, solution deployment, B2B on-boarding and solution support, that help the Company’s customers deploy, manage and support its solutions. These services are sold in conjunction with the sale of the Company’s on-demand software solutions. The Company provides professional services both on a fixed fee and a time and materials basis, and invoices customers either in advance, monthly, or upon reaching project milestones.

The Company enters into arrangements with multiple elements, comprised of subscriptions and support and professional services. Arrangements with customers typically do not provide the customer with the right to take possession of the software supporting the on-demand solutions. The Company commences revenue recognition when all of the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the Company’s price to the customer is fixed or determinable, and collectability of the fees is reasonably assured.

The Company evaluates each of these criteria as follows:

Evidence of an Arrangement. The Company considers a noncancelable agreement signed by it and the customer to be evidence of an arrangement.

Delivery. The Company typically considers delivery to have occurred when the on-demand software solutions are made available to the customer or services have been rendered. In arrangements where an existing customer purchases additional solutions, delivery occurs upon commencement of the contractual term.

Fixed or Determinable Fee. The Company considers the fee to be fixed or determinable unless the fee is subject to refund or adjustment or is not payable within its standard payment terms. If the fee is not fixed or determinable, the Company recognizes the revenue as amounts become due and payable.

Collectability of the Fees Is Reasonably Assured. Collectability of the fees is reasonably assured if the Company expects that the customer will be able to pay amounts under the arrangement as payments become due. If the Company determines that collection is not reasonably assured, the Company defers the recognition of revenue until cash collection.

F-10

E2OPEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012

and the Three Months Ended May 31, 2011 and 2012 (unaudited)

In October 2009, the FASB amended the accounting standards for multiple deliverable revenue arrangements to:

• provide updated guidance on whether multiple deliverables exist, how the deliverables in an arrangement should be separated, and how the consideration should be allocated;

• require an entity to allocate revenue in an arrangement using estimated selling prices, or ESP, of each deliverable if a vendor does not have vendor-specific objective evidence of selling price, or VSOE, or third-party evidence of selling price, or TPE; and

• eliminate the use of the residual method and require a vendor to allocate revenue using the relative selling price method.

The Company adopted this accounting guidance March 1, 2011 (the beginning of our fiscal 2012) on a prospective basis for applicable transactions originating or materially modified after February 28, 2011.

Prior to the adoption of this guidance, the Company determined that it did not have objective and reliable evidence of fair value for each deliverable of our arrangements. As a result, the Company accounted for subscriptions and support and professional services revenue as a single unit of accounting and recognized the total arrangement fee ratably over the contractual term of the subscription agreement.

Upon adoption of this guidance, the Company accounts for subscriptions and support and professional services revenue as separate units of accounting and allocates revenue to each deliverable in an arrangement based on a selling price hierarchy. As the Company has been unable to establish VSOE or TPE for the elements of its arrangements, the Company determines the ESP for each element primarily by considering prices we charge for similar offerings, size of the order and historical pricing practices. Revenue allocated to subscriptions and support is recognized over the contractual term. Professional services revenue sold on a fixed fee basis is recognized either under the proportional performance method of accounting using estimated labor hours, or upon acceptance of the services. Revenue from professional services sold on a time and material basis is recognized as services are delivered.

During the year ended February 29, 2012, total revenue as reported and total revenue that would have been reported, if the transactions entered into or materially modified after February 28, 2011 were subject to previous accounting guidance, are shown in the following table (in thousands):

	As reported		Basis as if previous accounting guidance were in effect		Impact of adoption of the new accounting guidance
	(In thousands)
Total revenues for the year ended February 29, 2012
Subscriptions and support	$	35,816	$	34,831	$	985
Professional services and other		23,871		13,924		9,947
Total	$	59,687	$	48,755	$	10,932

F-11

E2OPEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012

and the Three Months Ended May 31, 2011 and 2012 (unaudited)

The $10.9 million impact of the adoption of the new accounting guidance was due to deferral of revenue on certain arrangements until the on-demand solutions were fully implemented under the previous accounting guidance. With the adoption of the new accounting guidance, the Company recognizes revenue for subscriptions and support over the contractual term commencing when the on-demand software solutions are made available to the customer, and for professional services, as services are delivered.

Out-of-pocket expenses reimbursed by customers are recorded as revenue and included in professional services. The costs of professional services are expensed as incurred and included in cost of revenue.

Deferred revenue comprises amounts that have been invoiced to customers for which the related services have not been fully delivered. Amounts that will not be earned for more than 12 months were $17,124,000 and $6,958,000 as of February 28, 2011 and February 29, 2012, and are included in long-term deferred revenue.

The Company excludes from revenue sales and other taxes collected on behalf of customers and remitted to governmental authorities.

Cost of Revenue

Cost of revenue consists primarily of costs related to third party hosting of our equipment and software applications, software license fees, salaries and benefits of our operations, professional services, and support personnel, and allocated facilities, information technology and supporting overhead costs.

Advertising Costs

Advertising costs, which include primarily print materials and sponsorship of events, are expensed as incurred, and included in sales and marketing expense in the consolidated statements of operations. Advertising expense for the years ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012 was $547,000, $761,000 and $1,114,000, and $244,000 and $139,000 for the three months ended May 31, 2011 and 2012 (unaudited).

Sales Commissions

Sales commissions are expensed as incurred, and included in sales and marketing expense in the consolidated statements of operations.

Stock-based Compensation

Stock-based compensation expense associated with awards to employees and directors is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award, which is generally four years.

Foreign Currency Translation

The functional currency of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries is the U.S. dollar, except for its subsidiary located in the United Kingdom. Accordingly, the consolidated financial statements of those subsidiaries that are maintained in the local currency are remeasured into U.S. dollars at the reporting date.

F-12

E2OPEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012

and the Three Months Ended May 31, 2011 and 2012 (unaudited)

Unrealized exchange gains or losses from the remeasurement of monetary assets and liabilities that are not denominated in U.S. dollars are included as a component of other expense, net in the consolidated statements of operations, and totaled losses (gains) of $27,000, $53,000 and $63,000 for the years ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012, and $33,000 and $(13,000) for the three months ended May 31, 2011 and 2012 (unaudited).

The functional currency of the Company’s subsidiary in the United Kingdom is the British pound sterling. Assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries, where functional currencies are the local currency, are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet date. Operating accounts are translated at an average rate of exchange for the respective accounting periods. Translation adjustments resulting from the process of translating foreign currency financial statements into U.S. dollars are reported separately as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. Transaction gains and losses reflected in the functional currencies are charged to income or expense at the time of the transaction.

Net transaction gains, including gains from foreign currency contracts, recorded in the statements of operations were $3,000, $108,000 and $6,000 for the years ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012, and $34,000 and $24,000 for the three months ended May 31, 2011 and 2012 (unaudited).

Interest and Other Expense, Net

Interest and other expense, net for the periods presented consisted of the following (in thousands):

	Years Ended February 28 or 29,									Three Months Ended May 31,
	2010			2011			2012			2011			2012
										(Unaudited)
Interest expense	$	393		$	115		$	185		$	45		$	72
Bank financing fees		149			178			177			44			64
Foreign exchange (gains) and losses—realized and unrealized, net		24			(55	)		261			(2	)		151
Gains from foreign currency contracts—realized and unrealized, net		—			—			(204	)		—			(188	)
Interest income		(25	)		(5	)		(2	)		(1	)		(1	)
Other, net		(9	)		26			(6	)		—			(3	)
	$	532		$	259		$	411		$	86		$	95

Income Taxes

The Company uses the asset and liability method for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the consolidated financial statement carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards, and are measured using the enacted tax rates that are expected to be in effect when the differences reverse. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount that, in the opinion of management, is more likely than not to be realized.

F-13

E2OPEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012

and the Three Months Ended May 31, 2011 and 2012 (unaudited)

The Company accounts for uncertain tax positions by reporting a liability for unrecognizable tax benefits resulting from uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The Company recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.

Net Income (Loss) Per Share Attributable to Common Stockholders

Basic and diluted net income (loss) per common share is presented in conformity with the two-class method required for participating securities. Holders of Series AA, Series BB, Series CC and Series D convertible preferred stock are each entitled to receive noncumulative dividends out of any funds legally available, when, as and if declared by the board of directors, payable prior and in preference to any dividends on any shares of the Company’s common stock. The dividend rates for Series AA, Series BB, Series CC and D are 8% of the original issuance price of $13.30, $11.20, $11.20 and $3.50 per share. In the event a dividend is paid on common stock, the holders of the convertible preferred stock are entitled to a proportionate share of any such dividend as if they were holders of common stock (on an as-if converted basis). Holders of Series AA, Series BB, Series CC and Series D convertible preferred stock did not have a contractual obligation to share in the losses of the Company.

Under the two-class method, net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders is determined by allocating undistributed earnings, calculated as net income less current period convertible preferred stock non-cumulative dividends, between common stock and preferred stock. In computing diluted net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders, undistributed earnings are re-allocated to reflect the potential impact of dilutive securities. Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Shares of common stock subject to repurchase resulting from the early exercise of employee stock options are considered participating securities and are therefore included in the basic weighted-average common shares outstanding. Diluted net income per share attributable to common stockholders is computed by dividing the net income attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, including potential dilutive common shares assuming the dilutive effect of outstanding stock options and warrants using the treasury stock method.

The presentation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share for the year ended February 28, 2011 has been revised to apply the two-class method.

F-14

E2OPEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012

and the Three Months Ended May 31, 2011 and 2012 (unaudited)

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share (in thousands, except share data):

	Years Ended February 28 or 29,									Three Months Ended May 31,
	2010			2011			2012			2011			2012
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
Net income (loss)	$	(6,648	)	$	6,643		$	(225	)	$	(2,137	)	$	(2,378	)
Less: undistributed earnings allocated to preferred stockholders		—			(6,643	)		—			—			—
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders	$	(6,648	)	$	—		$	(225	)	$	(2,137	)	$	(2,378	)
Basic shares:
Weighted average common shares outstanding		4,358			5,788			6,165			6,126			6,297
Less: weighted average unvested common shares subject to repurchase or cancellation		(148	)		—			(247	)		(328	)		(107	)
	$	4,210		$	5,788		$	5,918		$	5,798		$	6,190
Diluted shares:
Weighted average common shares outstanding	$	4,358		$	5,788		$	6,165		$	6,126		$	6,297
Less: Weighted average unvested common shares subject to repurchase or cancellation		(148	)		—			(247	)		(328	)		(107	)
		4,210			5,788			5,918			5,798			6,190
Net income (loss) per share attributable to common stock holders:
Basic	$	(1.58	)	$	—		$	(0.04	)	$	(0.37	)	$	(0.38	)
Diluted	$	(1.58	)	$	—		$	(0.04	)	$	(0.37	)	$	(0.38	)

The following outstanding shares, options and warrants were excluded from the computation of diluted net income (loss) per share in the periods presented because including them would have had an antidilutive effect (in thousands):

	Years Ended February 28 or 29,						Three Months Ended May 31,
	2010		2011		2012		2011		2012
Options to purchase common stock		2,821		959		999		1,047		1,217
Convertible preferred stock		14,756		14,756		14,771		14,756		14,846
Preferred stock warrants		268		268		189		268		—
Unvested common shares subject to repurchase		148		—		126		295		71

F-15

E2OPEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012

and the Three Months Ended May 31, 2011 and 2012 (unaudited)

Unaudited Pro Forma Net Loss Per Share Attributable to Common Stockholders

Pro forma basic and diluted net loss per share were computed to give effect to the conversion of the preferred stock using the as-if-converted into common shares method as though the conversion had occurred as of the beginning of the period or the original date of issuance, if later (in thousands, except per share data).

	Year Ended February 29, 2012			Three Months Ended May 31, 2012
Net loss attributable to common stockholders	$	(225	)	$	(2,378	)
Basic Shares:
Weighted average common shares outstanding		5,918			6,190
Pro forma adjustment to reflect assumed conversion of preferred stock to occur upon consummation of the Company's expected initial public offering		14,771			14,846
		20,689			21,036
Diluted shares:
Weighted average common shares outstanding		5,918			6,190
Pro forma adjustment to reflect assumed conversion of preferred stock to occur upon consummation of the Company's expected initial public offering		14,771			14,846
		20,689			21,036
Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders:
Basic	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.11	)
Diluted	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.11	)

The following outstanding shares, options and warrants were excluded from the computation of pro forma diluted net loss per share data in the periods presented because including them would have had an antidilutive effect (in thousands):

	Year Ended February 29, 2012		Three Months Ended May 31, 2012
Options to purchase common stock		1,000		1,217
Preferred stock warrants		189		—
Unvested common shares subject to repurchase		126		71

Segment Information

The Company reports information about the segments of its business based on how the information is used by the chief operating decision maker. Since inception, management has evaluated the Company’s performance and made operating decisions based on consolidated results. Accordingly, the Company operates as one reportable segment.

Recently Issued or Adopted Authoritative Accounting Guidance

Effective March 1, 2011, the Company adopted new authoritative guidance for revenue recognition which revised existing guidance for arrangements with multiple deliverables. The revised guidance establishes a

F-16

E2OPEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012

and the Three Months Ended May 31, 2011 and 2012 (unaudited)

selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable, which includes: (i) vendor-specific objective evidence, or VSOE, if available; (ii) third-party evidence, or TPE, if VSOE is not available; and (iii) estimated selling price, or ESP, if neither VSOE nor TPE is available. The revised guidance also eliminates the residual method of allocation and requires that arrangement consideration be allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method. Under the previous accounting guidance, the Company treated its multiple element arrangements as a single unit of accounting as the Company generally did not have VSOE for its undelivered elements. Under the new guidance, the Company is required to use ESP when neither VSOE nor TPE is available. As a result, the Company recognizes the estimated selling price of the elements as they are delivered, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria are met.

This new guidance applies prospectively to revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2010. The Company has adopted this standard on a prospective basis, effective on March 1, 2011.

On May 12, 2011, the FASB issued new guidance about fair value measurement and disclosure requirements. The new standards do not extend the use of fair value but, rather, provide guidance about how fair value should be applied where it already is required or permitted under International Financial Reporting Standards or U.S. GAAP. A public entity is required to apply the guidance prospectively for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011, and early adoption is not permitted. The Company adopted the new accounting guidance effective March 1, 2012. The adoption of this accounting guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

On June 16, 2011, the FASB issued new guidance on the presentation of other comprehensive income (loss) in financial statements. Under this new accounting guidance, an entity will have the option to present the components of net income and comprehensive income in either one or two consecutive financial statements. The accounting guidance eliminates the option in U.S. GAAP to present other comprehensive income in the statement of changes in equity. An entity should apply the new accounting guidance retrospectively. For a public entity, the new accounting guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted the new accounting guidance effective March 1, 2012. The adoption of this accounting guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

F-17

E2OPEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012

and the Three Months Ended May 31, 2011 and 2012 (unaudited)

(3) Consolidated Balance Sheet Components

Consolidated balance sheet components as of the years presented consisted of the following (in thousands):

	February 28 or 29,						May 31, 2012
	2011			2012
							(Unaudited)
(a) Prepaid expenses and other current assets:
Prepaid hardware and software maintenance	$	436		$	478		$	982
Deferred initial public offering costs		203			1,246			1,978
Prepaid employee benefits premiums		161			171			—
Foreign currency forward contracts		—			158			286
Prepaid marketing		151			262			293
Restricted cash		40			—			—
Other prepaids and other current assets		613			896			787
	$	1,604		$	3,211		$	4,326
(b) Property and equipment, net:
Computer equipment	$	13,654		$	7,958		$	8,470
Software		8,778			8,259			8,338
Furniture and fixtures		61			87			117
Leasehold improvements		422			430			473
		22,915			16,734			17,398
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(21,026	)		(14,485	)		(14,769	)
	$	1,889		$	2,249		$	2,629

	February 28 or 29,									May 31, 2012
	2010			2011			2012
										(Unaudited)
(c) Allowance for doubtful accounts:
Balance, beginning of year	$	134		$	96		$	28		$	24
Add: Provision for (recovery of) doubtful accounts		54			(39	)		67			85
Less write-offs		(92	)		(29	)		(71	)		(18	)
Balance, end of year	$	96		$	28		$	24		$	91

	February 28 or 29,									May 31, 2012
	2010			2011			2012
										(Unaudited)
(d) Accumulateddepreciation and amortization of property and equipment:
Balance, beginning of year	$	24,245		$	19,532		$	21,026		$	14,485
Add: Depreciation and amortization		2,323			1,859			1,526			409
Less: disposals, write-offs and other		(7,036	)		(365	)		(8,067	)		(125)
Balance, end of year	$	19,532		$	21,026		$	14,485		$	14,769

F-18

E2OPEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012

and the Three Months Ended May 31, 2011 and 2012 (unaudited)

Specific incremental costs directly associated with the Company’s initial public offering, or IPO, primarily legal, accounting and printing costs, were deferred and reflected as an asset until reclassification to stockholders’ equity (deficit) upon closing of the IPO.

Equipment and software under capital leases included above aggregated $2,573,000 as of February 28, 2011. Accumulated amortization on these assets aggregated $1,865,000 as of February 28, 2011. Amortization of assets held under capital leases is included with depreciation expense. There are no equipment and software under capital lease as of February 29, 2012.

Other assets consist primarily of security deposits held by lessors of the Company’s office facilities and the noncurrent portion of prepaid expenses (in thousands).

	February 28 or 29,				May 31, 2012
	2011		2012
					(Unaudited)
(e) Accounts payable and accrued liabilities:
Accrued compensation costs	$	3,701	$	5,326	$	4,043
Trade accounts payable		1,537		2,028		3,152
Accrued taxes		1,509		1,441		1,420
Other accrued liabilities		333		347		358
	$	7,080	$	9,142	$	8,973
(f) Other noncurrent liabilities
Deferred rent	$	205	$	231	$	242
Accrued taxes		285		230		230
Unvested stock options subject to repurchase		122		44		25
	$	612	$	505	$	497

(4) Restricted Cash

Restricted cash is classified as current or long-term based on when the restrictions expire, and consists of a certificate of deposit, which secures a standby letter of credit in connection with an operating lease. Restricted cash is included in prepaid expenses and other current assets, and other assets in the balance sheet.

(5) Credit Facility

The Company maintains a credit facility having a total borrowing limit of $20,000,000 as of February 28, 2011 with a commercial bank. Of the total facility, $17,500,000 consists of formula-based lines of credit secured by the Company’s accounts receivable, and $2,500,000 is a term loan. Amounts outstanding under the credit facility bear interest at a rate equal to the Wall Street Journal “prime rate” plus additional interest ranging from 1.25% to 4.00%, with a floor for the prime rate of 3.25%.

F-19

E2OPEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012

and the Three Months Ended May 31, 2011 and 2012 (unaudited)

The bank lines of credit and term loan are secured by the Company’s tangible and intangible assets, as well as a negative pledge whereby the Company agrees not to give any creditor a security interest in the Company’s intellectual property. Our credit facility also requires us to comply with periodic reporting requirements, limits our ability to incur additional indebtedness and requires compliance with various financial covenants, which include requirements for minimum asset coverage ratios, sales achievement, and minimum cash to be maintained at the bank. In connection with this credit facility, warrants were issued to a commercial bank to purchase 70,312 shares of Series BB preferred stock in March 2005 (note 12). Amounts outstanding under the lines of credit were $6,330,000 and $5,460,000 as of February 28, 2010 and February 28, 2011.

The Company borrowed $2,500,000 against the term loan on February 10, 2011. The Company was obligated to make interest-only payments on amounts drawn through April 10, 2011. On April 30, 2011, the principal balance outstanding was converted to a term loan payable in 30 monthly installments of principal plus accrued interest. The amount outstanding under the term loan was $2,500,000 as of February 28, 2011 and is recorded in notes payable on the balance sheet.

In August 2011, the Company amended its credit facility to increase the total borrowing limit to $22,250,000 and to extend the term of the lines of credit through February 2012 and the term loan through February 2015. In February 2012, the Company further amended its credit facility to increase the total borrowing limit to $26,750,000 and to extend the term of the lines of credit through August 2012 and the term loan through August 2015. As of February 29, 2012, the amounts outstanding under the lines of credit were $9,650,000, and under the term loan were $1,667,000, with $10,350,000 of borrowing unused under the lines of credit. As of February 29, 2012, an additional $5,083,000 was available under the term loan. As of May 31, 2012, the amounts outstanding under the lines of credit were $10,860,000, and under the term loan were $1,417,000, with $9,140,000 of borrowings unused under the lines of credit and $5,333,000 available under the term loan.

The Company was in compliance with all debt covenants as of February 28, 2011, as of February 29, 2012 and as of May 31, 2012.

(6) Notes Payable

In fiscal 2011, the Company financed the purchase of certain software licenses and related support and maintenance with notes payable. The total amount financed was $169,000 in fiscal 2011. The term of the note is for 24 months, and the notes bear interest at rates ranging from 2.36% to 3.28% per annum. In fiscal 2011, the Company borrowed $2,500,000 against its growth capital term loan, which converted to a term loan payable in 30 monthly installments. As of February 28, 2011, February 29, 2012 and May 31, 2012, the total principal payments remaining under the equipment notes and the growth capital term loan are $2,757,000, $1,671,000 and $1,420,000, and become due as follows (in thousands):

	February 28 or 29,				May 31, 2012
	2011		2012
					(Unaudited)
Fiscal year end:
2012	$	1,090	$	—	$	—
2013		1,001		1,003		753
2014		666		668		667
	$	2,757	$	1,671	$	1,420

F-20

E2OPEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012

and the Three Months Ended May 31, 2011 and 2012 (unaudited)

(7) Transactions with Customers

The Company purchased hosting capacity and leased equipment from a vendor, who is also a customer, during the year ended February 28, 2010. Total amounts paid to this vendor for the hosting capacity was $311,000, during the years ended February 28, 2010 and was classified as cost of revenue in the consolidated statements of operations. In addition, the Company financed software purchases from this vendor during fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2011 in the amount of $386,000 and $162,000 with notes payable and capital lease obligations. The Company also earns revenue from this vendor in the normal course of business, and such revenue amounted to $6,161,000, $3,724,000 and $4,659,000, or 13.9%, 6.7% and 7.8% of total revenue, for the years ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012 and $908,000 and $1,180,000, or 8.1% and 7.6% of total revenue for the three months ended May 31, 2011 and 2012. The transactions have been recorded at fair value, and the revenue and services are presented on a gross basis, as the Company received an identifiable benefit in exchange for the consideration, and the fair value of such benefit identified can be reasonably estimated and revenue was collected from the customer in cash.

(8) Related Party Transactions

In August 2004, an employee exercised options for common stock via a full recourse promissory note totaling $106,000 which bore interest at 5.25% compounded annually. The note was secured by shares of the Company’s common stock and was due in 2009. The former employee ceased to be employed by the Company in May 2008. In fiscal 2009, the employee repaid a portion of the note amounting to $13,000, and as of February 28, 2009, the outstanding balance of the note was $93,000. In June 2009, the outstanding balance on the full recourse promissory note of $96,000, including accrued interest, was in default. The Company and the former employee agreed to fully settle the former employee’s obligation to the Company via transfer to the Company of the 74,852 shares of the Company’s common stock held by the former employee collateralizing the note. At the time the obligation was settled, the fair market value of the collateral was less than the amount of the obligation, and the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of the debt obligation in the amount of $67,000.

In September and December 2008, and January 2009, the Company issued Subordinated Unsecured Convertible Promissory Notes (Convertible Notes) to certain existing stockholders and employees (Note Investors) for proceeds of $9,915,000. The Convertible Notes bore interest at 6% per annum. On May 29, 2009, the notes and accrued interest were converted into 2,928,946 shares of Series D preferred stock.

The Convertible Notes included certain options available to the Note Investors that were accounted for as an embedded derivative. The estimated fair value of the embedded derivative was calculated using the Binomial-Lattice model and was $1.2 million at the date of issuance. The assumptions used were: no dividends, contractual life of one year, volatility of 75.4% to 82.9%, a risk-free interest rate of 0.57% to 0.65%, and a 100% premium payout. In May 2009, the notes were converted to Series D preferred stock, and the options expired unexercised.

One of the Company’s directors, Patrick J. O’Malley, III, is the Chief Financial Officer of Seagate Technology Public Limited Company, or Seagate PLC. Seagate LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Seagate PLC, is one of the Company’s customers and the Company received payments in excess of $120,000 from Seagate LLC relating to subscriptions to the Company’s solutions. The Company received payments of $1,761,000, $1,359,000 and $2,311,000 in the years ended February 28, 2010 and 2011, and February 29, 2012, and $600,000 and $421,000 for the three months ended May 31, 2011 and 2012.

F-21

E2OPEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012

and the Three Months Ended May 31, 2011 and 2012 (unaudited)

(9) Commitments and Contingencies

Leases

The Company leases its primary office space under noncancelable operating leases with various expiration dates through 2013. Rent expense for the years ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012 was $2,115,000, $1,812,000, and $1,700,000, and $400,000 and $426,000 for the three months ended May 31, 2011 and 2012.

Future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases are as follows (in thousands):

	As of February 29, 2012		As of May 31, 2012
			(Unaudited)
Fiscal year ending:
2013	$	1,654	$	1,269
2014		663		663
2015		310		310
Total minimum lease payments	$	2,627	$	2,242

Several of the operating lease agreements require the Company to provide security deposits. As of February 28, 2011, February 29, 2012 and May 31, 2012, lease deposits totaled $315,000, $346,000 and $342,000. The deposits are generally refundable at the expiration of the lease, assuming all of the Company’s obligations under the lease agreement have been met, and are included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets.

Contingencies

From time to time, the Company is subject to contingent liabilities that arise in the ordinary course of business. The Company records an accrual for a contingency when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. The Company does not currently believe the resolution of these actions will have a material adverse effect upon the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

(10) Income Taxes

The following table presents the income or loss before income taxes for domestic and foreign operations (in thousands):

	February 28 or 29,
	2010			2011		2012
United States	$	(7,684	)	$	6,458	$	121
Foreign		1,385			218		(268	)
	$	(6,299	)	$	6,676	$	(147	)

F-22

E2OPEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012

and the Three Months Ended May 31, 2011 and 2012 (unaudited)

Income tax expense (benefit) consisted of the following (in thousands):

	February 28 or 29,
	2010		2011			2012
Current:
Federal	$	25	$	7		$	(55	)
Foreign		319		158			128
State		5		39			20
Total current tax expense		349		204			93
Deferred:
Federal		—		—			—
Foreign		—		(171	)		(15	)
State		—		—			—
Total deferred tax benefit		—		(171	)		(15	)
Total income tax expense	$	349	$	33		$	78

The income tax expense differed from the amounts computed by applying the U.S. federal income tax rate of 35% to pretax income (loss) as a result of the following (in thousands):

	February 28 or 29,
	2010			2011			2012
Federal tax expense (benefit) at statutory rate	$	(2,205	)	$	2,322		$	(51	)
State taxes		(251	)		182			189
Foreign rate differential		79			23			42
Nondeductible expenses		142			93			218
Foreign withholding tax		106			50			44
Loss from dissolution of subsidiary		(737	)		—			—
Research and development credits		(364	)		(545	)		(742	)
Expired net operating losses		1,663			247			2,548
Other		182			377			689
Change in valuation allowance		1,734			(2,716	)		(2,859	)
Total income tax expense	$	349		$	33		$	78

F-23

E2OPEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012

and the Three Months Ended May 31, 2011 and 2012 (unaudited)

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. The types of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows (in thousands):

	As of February 28 or 29,
	2011			2012
Deferred tax assets:
Accruals and reserves	$	868		$	1,390
Deferred revenue		4,501			5,498
Stock-based compensation		73			165
State income taxes		14			7
Net operating loss carryforwards		96,342			94,616
Property and equipment		236			(10	)
Credit carryforwards		4,105			4,203
Other items		151			—
Gross deferred tax assets		106,290			105,869
Valuation allowance		(106,097	)		(103,238	)
Total deferred tax assets		193			2,631
Deferred tax liabilities:
Other		—			(2,424	)
Total deferred tax liabilities		—			(2,424	)
Net deferred tax assets	$	193		$	207

Recognition of deferred tax assets is appropriate when realization of such assets is more likely than not. Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon generating sufficient taxable income, carryback of losses, offsetting deferred tax liabilities, and availability of tax planning strategies. As of February 29, 2012, the Company determined that it is not more likely than not that the Company will ultimately realize the benefit of its net deferred tax assets domestically, and in all but one of its foreign operations and has therefore recorded a valuation allowance to reduce the carrying value of these deferred tax assets to zero. The Company has recorded deferred tax assets in one of its foreign operations for the year ended February 29, 2012, and believes that it is more likely than not that these deferred tax assets will be fully realized.

As of February 29, 2012, the Company has net operating loss, or NOL, carryforwards for federal and state income tax purposes of $316.5 million and $118.3 million, respectively, which begin to expire in the years 2023 and 2013, respectively. These NOL carryforwards are likely subject to an annual limitation in future periods under Internal Revenue Code Section 382 and similar state provisions that impose limitations on a corporation’s ability to utilize its NOLs if the corporation experiences an ownership change. The Company believes that there was an ownership change in a prior year. As a result, utilization of the Company’s NOLs in future periods will likely be subject to an annual limitation. Accordingly, the Company has reduced its deferred tax assets based upon the anticipated net operating losses that are expected to expire unutilized due to the annual limitation. Furthermore, the Company has a NOL carryforward for Japan income tax purposes of $0.8 million, which will begin to expire in 2013. The deferred tax asset associated with the NOLs as of February 29, 2012 is $94.6 million.

F-24

E2OPEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012

and the Three Months Ended May 31, 2011 and 2012 (unaudited)

As of February 29, 2012, the Company had research and development tax credits of $5.2 million and $5.9 million available to reduce future federal and California income taxes. Federal credit carryforwards expire beginning in 2023. California research and development tax credits carry forward indefinitely.

As of February 28, 2011, the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits was $3.6 million, of which $0.3 million, if recognized, would affect the Company’s effective tax rate. As of February 29, 2012, the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits was $4.0 million, of which $0.2 million, if recognized, would affect the Company’s effective tax rate. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense. The total amount of gross interest and penalties accrued was $147,000 and $92,000 in 2011 and 2012, and was classified as other noncurrent liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company’s management believes that it has adequately provided for any adjustments that may result from tax examinations. However, the outcome of tax audits cannot be predicted with certainty. The Company is not under examination or audit by any taxing authorities.

A reconciliation of the change in gross unrecognized tax benefits, including interest and penalties, is as follows (in thousands):

	February 28 or 29,
	2011		2012
Balance as of the beginning of the year	$	3,413	$	3,655
Tax positions related to the current year:
Additions		242		334
Reductions		—		—
Tax positions related to prior year:
Additions		—		41
Reductions		—		—
Settlements		—		—
Lapses in statutes of limitations		—		(55	)
Balance as of the end of the year	$	3,655	$	3,975

There is $385,000 of undistributed earnings of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries at February 29, 2012. Federal income taxes have not been provided for on the unremitted earnings of foreign corporations because such earnings are intended to be indefinitely reinvested. It is not practicable to determine the income tax liability that might be incurred if these earnings were to be repatriated.

The Company is subject to taxation in the U.S., various states and foreign jurisdictions. The 2000 to 2012 tax years’ statutes of limitations generally remain open and are subject to U.S. federal and state tax examinations. The statutes of limitations in foreign jurisdictions range from four to seven years, and the open tax years subject to examination are from 2004 to 2012.

F-25

E2OPEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012

and the Three Months Ended May 31, 2011 and 2012 (unaudited)

(11) Stockholders’ Equity

Authorized Capital

In May 2009, the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation was amended and restated to authorize the Company to issue up to 42,557,139 shares, of which 25,057,142 shares were designated as common stock and 17,499,997 shares were designated as preferred stock. The authorized preferred stock for all periods presented is as follows: (i) 4,571,428 shares of Series AA preferred stock, (ii) 2,857,142 shares of Series BB preferred stock, (iii) 4,357,142 shares of Series CC preferred stock, and (iv) 5,714,285 shares of Series D preferred stock.

Convertible Preferred Stock

On May 29, 2009, the Company issued to existing holders of preferred stock 4,670,687 shares of Series D Preferred Stock at a purchase price of $3.50 in exchange for the payment of cash proceeds of $6,085,000, net of issuance costs of $12,000, and the conversion of $10,251,000 of subordinated, unsecured convertible notes (note 8), including accrued interest. As a result of the issuance of Series D preferred stock, an antidilution adjustment was made with respect to the Series BB and Series CC preferred stock. Since the $3.50 price per share of the Series D preferred stock was lower than the $11.20 price per share of the Series BB and Series CC preferred stock, the conversion price was lowered to $9.45 post Series D financing. In addition, pursuant to the special mandatory conversion section of the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation (as amended in May 2009), for those stockholders not participating in the Series D issue, 766,229 shares of their Series AA, BB, and CC preferred stock were automatically converted into an equal number of shares of the Company’s common stock.

Preemptive Rights

In connection with any issuance or sale of additional stock by the Company, each stockholder holding preferred stock shall have preemptive rights. These preemptive rights shall not apply to (i) the issuance of options, warrants, or similar rights under equity participation plans approved by the Company’s board of directors; (ii) the issuance of stock or rights to acquire stock pursuant to stock splits, stock dividends, or similar transactions; (iii) the issuance of shares upon the conversion of preferred stock; (iv) the issuance of stock or rights to acquire stock pursuant to currently outstanding securities of the Company; (v) the issuance of stock or rights to acquire stock in connection with a bona fide business acquisition permitted by the Company’s stockholders’ agreement; (vi) the issuance of shares in connection with an Initial Public Offering, or IPO; or (vii) the issuance of stock or rights to acquire stock to banks or equipment lessors for debt financing purposes, provided that such issuances are for other than primarily equity financing purposes.

Voting Rights

The holders of Series AA, BB, CC, and D preferred stock are entitled to the number of votes equal to the number of shares of common stock into which such preferred stock is convertible.

Conversion of Preferred Stock

Each share of Series AA preferred stock shall automatically be converted into shares of common stock at the then-applicable conversion price (i) at the election of the holder at any time after the date of issuance of

F-26

E2OPEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012

and the Three Months Ended May 31, 2011 and 2012 (unaudited)

such shares, (ii) immediately prior to the closing of the Company’s sale of its securities in a firm commitment underwritten IPO, or (iii) at any time upon the written election of holders of a majority of the then outstanding Series AA preferred stock.

Each share of Series BB preferred stock shall automatically be converted into shares of common stock at the then-applicable conversion price (i) at the election of the holder at any time after the date of issuance of such shares, (ii) immediately prior to the closing of the Company’s sale of its securities in a firm commitment underwritten IPO at a price per share of at least two times the Series BB preferred original issue price, and resulting in gross proceeds to the Company of not less than $30,000,000, or (iii) at any time upon the written election of holders of a majority of the then outstanding Series BB preferred stock. The conversion rates for the preferred stock are subject to adjustment for dilution, including, but not limited to, stock splits, stock dividends, and stock combinations.

Each share of Series CC preferred stock shall automatically be converted into shares of common stock at the then-applicable conversion price (i) at the election of the holder at any time after the date of issuance of such shares, (ii) immediately prior to the closing of the Company’s sale of its securities in a firm commitment underwritten IPO at a price per share of at least two times the Series CC preferred original issue price, and resulting in gross proceeds to the Company of not less than $30,000,000, or (iii) at any time upon the written election of holders of a majority of the then outstanding Series CC preferred stock. The conversion rates for the preferred stock are subject to adjustment for dilution, including, but not limited to, stock splits, stock dividends, and stock combinations.

Each share of Series D preferred stock shall automatically be converted into shares of common stock at the then-applicable conversion price (i) at the election of the holder at any time after the date of issuance of such shares, (ii) immediately prior to the closing of the Company’s sale of its securities in a firm commitment underwritten IPO at a price per share of at least two times the Series D preferred original issue price, and resulting in gross proceeds to the Company of not less than $30,000,000, or (iii) at any time upon the written election of holders of a majority of the then outstanding Series D preferred stock. The conversion rates for the preferred stock are subject to adjustment for dilution, including, but not limited to, stock splits, stock dividends, and stock combinations.

Dividends

Dividends shall be made solely at the discretion of the Company’s board of directors. Any dividends, excluding liquidation distributions, shall be made as follows:

(a) First, ratably among holders of shares of (i) Series AA preferred stock, (ii) Series BB preferred stock, (iii) Series CC preferred stock, and (iv) Series D preferred stock in cash or other property, until holders of such shares shall have received in any calendar year an amount per share equal to 8.0% of the Series AA preferred original issue price of $13.30, Series BB preferred original issue price of $11.20, Series CC preferred original issue price of $11.20, and Series D preferred original issue price of $3.50.

(b) Thereafter, ratably among the holders of all shares of both preferred and common stock, in cash or other property.

In each case, such distributions shall be based upon the issued and outstanding shares on the record date determined by the board of directors. Any such distributions shall be made when, as, and if declared by the

F-27

E2OPEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012

and the Three Months Ended May 31, 2011 and 2012 (unaudited)

board of directors, and shall not accrue or accumulate if not so declared and paid by the board of directors. The provisions of this section shall not apply to (i) any repurchase of common stock by the Company pursuant to agreements that permit the Company to repurchase such common stock upon the occurrence of certain events, such as termination of services to the Company or the exercise of any right of first refusal or similar right; or (ii) any repurchase of any outstanding securities of the Company that is approved by a disinterested majority of the board of directors of the Company.

Liquidating Distributions

Any liquidating distributions shall be made as follows:

(a) First, ratably among holders of shares of Series D preferred stock, in cash or other property, until holders of such shares shall have received an amount per share equal to the Series D Preferred original issue price.

(b) Second, ratably among holders of shares of Series CC preferred stock, in cash or other property, until holders of such shares shall have received an amount per share equal to the Series CC Preferred original issue price.

(c) Third, ratably among holders of shares of Series BB preferred stock, in cash or other property, until holders of such shares shall have received an amount per share equal to the Series BB Preferred original issue price.

(d) Fourth, ratably among the holders of Series AA preferred stock, in cash or other property, until the holder of such shares shall have received an amount equal to the Series AA original issue price.

(e) Finally, ratably among holders of common stock, in cash or other property.

In each case, such distributions shall be based upon the issued and outstanding shares on the record date determined by the board of directors for the liquidating distribution. A liquidating event shall include (i) the sale, transfer, or other disposition of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets in a single transaction or a series of related transactions; (ii) a merger, consolidation, or other business combination of the Company with or into another entity (excluding a transaction in which the holders of capital stock of the Company immediately prior to such transaction continue to hold at least 50% of the voting power of the capital stock of the Company or the surviving or acquiring entity); (iii) the disposition by exclusive license, sale, or assignment of all or substantially all of the Company’s intellectual property rights in a single transaction or a series of related transactions; or (iv) a liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the Company; provided, however, that such a transaction shall not constitute a liquidation event if (A) its sole purpose is to change the state of the Company’s incorporation or to create a holding company that will be owned in substantially the same proportions by the persons who held the Company’s securities immediately prior to such transaction, or (B) holders of more than 50% of the outstanding (i) Series AA preferred stock, (ii) Series BB preferred stock, and (iii) Series CC preferred stock, in each case voting separately as a single class, elect otherwise.

(12) Warrants

In March 2005, in connection with establishing a line of credit with a commercial bank, a warrant was issued to a commercial bank to purchase 70,312 shares of Series BB preferred stock at $11.20 per share. As of February 28, 2011 and 2012, these warrants were still outstanding. These warrants expired in March 2012.

F-28

E2OPEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012

and the Three Months Ended May 31, 2011 and 2012 (unaudited)

In April 2005, in exchange for providing a personal guarantee on a promissory note issued by the Company to two stockholders, the Company issued warrants to purchase 26,785 and 62,500 shares of Series BB preferred stock at $11.20 per share. In April 2012, 62,500 warrants were exercised for total proceeds of $700,000. The remaining 26,785 warrants expired unexercised in April 2012.

In February 2007, in connection with the Company’s Series CC financing, the Company issued 44,642 warrants to purchase Series CC preferred stock at $11.20 per share. In October 2011, warrants were exercised by a stockholder to purchase 12,937 shares of Series CC preferred stock at $11.20 per share. The remaining warrants expired unexercised in October 2011.

In March 2007, in connection with the Company’s Series CC financing, the Company issued 22,321 warrants to purchase Series CC preferred stock at $11.20 per share. These warrants expired unexercised in October 2011.

(13) Stock-based Compensation

Options and Awards Granted to Employees

The Company maintains a 2003 Stock Plan, or the Plan, which provides for both the direct award of common stock and for the grant of options to purchase common stock. Options granted under the Plan may include nonstatutory stock options, or NSOs, as well as incentive stock options, or ISOs. Only employees are eligible to receive grants of ISOs.

Options under the Plan may be granted for periods of up to 10 years and at prices no less than 85% of the estimated fair value of the underlying shares of common stock on the date of grant as determined by the board of directors; provided, however, that (i) the exercise price of an ISO and NSO shall not be less than 100% and 85% of the estimated fair value of the shares on the date of grant, and (ii) the exercise price of an ISO granted to a 10% stockholder shall not be less than 110% of the estimated fair value of the shares on the date of grant. Options generally vest 25% on the one-year anniversary of the option grant date, and then monthly for three additional years, and are exercisable for a period of 10 years after the date of grant.

Some options granted are immediately exercisable and any unvested portion of the shares acquired upon early exercise is subject to a right of repurchase by the Company upon the employee’s termination at the original purchase price. The right of repurchase lapses as the options vest, which is generally over the four-year vesting period of the related options. As of February 28, 2011, February 29, 2012 and May 31, 2012 there were 349,769, 125,633 and 70,788 shares exercised that were subject to repurchase, respectively. The $122,419, $43,972 and $24,776 aggregate exercise price of the options subject to repurchase as of February 28, 2011, February 29, 2012, and May 31, 2012 is recorded in Other noncurrent liabilities and will be amortized to equity as the options vest.

As of February 28, 2011, February 29, 2012 and May 31, 2012, there were 2,883,954, 2,816,587 and 2,896,864 shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the Plan, respectively. In January 2012, the Company’s board of directors and stockholders approved to an increase to the number of stock reserved for issuance under the Plan by 171,428 shares.

In May 2009, the Company’s board of directors approved an option repricing program whereby eligible option holders were given an opportunity to elect to have their eligible options (options with exercise price greater than $0.35) amended so that such eligible options would have an exercise price equal to the current fair

F-29

E2OPEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012

and the Three Months Ended May 31, 2011 and 2012 (unaudited)

value of the Company’s common stock on the date of the repricing. The vesting terms of the repriced options were to remain unchanged; however, the repriced options were to have an expiration date two months earlier than the original expiration date. In June 2009, 2,659,170 eligible options of participating employees were repriced to $0.35 per share. Additional incremental compensation expense of $85,000 was to be recorded over the remaining term of the new grants to reflect the excess of the fair value of the exchanged options prior to the repricing over the fair value of the repriced options.

During fiscal 2010, the Company awarded 171,428 shares of restricted common stock to certain employees. Upon termination of employment with the Company, 22,857 of the shares were canceled prior to vesting during fiscal 2010, and the remaining 148,571 shares vested on March 1, 2010. Total compensation expense for these awards was $52,000, of which $51,000 and $1,000 was recorded in the consolidated statement of operations for the years ended February 28, 2010 and 2011.

In July 2011, the Company awarded 749,464 stock options that were subject to certain financial-based performance requirements that must be achieved by February 28, 2013, and the employee’s continued employment through February 28, 2013, before vesting can occur. For the year ended February 29, 2012, the Company had not recognized compensation expense associated with these grants because the Company believes that, based on current and expected operational results, it is not probable that the associated financial performance requirements will be achieved. If such requirements become probable of achievement, compensation cost will be recognized over the estimated service period. In March 2012, the Board of Directors approved a modification of the financial performance requirements. At the date of the modification, the Company determined that the achievement of the modified performance requirements were probable and, accordingly, compensation cost related to the modified awards of $149,000 was recorded in the consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended May 31, 2012. The unrecognized compensation cost related to these options is $3,183,000 as of May 31, 2012. To the extent the Company’s estimate of the timing of achievement of the performance requirements changes in the future, the timing of recognition of the related compensation expense may change.

The determination of the fair value of stock-based payment awards on the date of grant using a pricing model is affected by the Company’s stock price as well as by certain assumptions including the Company’s expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards, actual and projected employee stock option exercise behavior, risk-free interest rates, and expected dividends. The estimated grant date fair values of the employee stock options were calculated using the Black Scholes valuation model, based on the following assumptions:

	Years Ended February 28 or 29,			Three Months Ended May 31,
	2010	2011	2012	2012
				(Unaudited)
Expected term (in years)	6.08	6.08	5.84	6.02
Expected stock price volatility	50.8% – 57.7%	45.9% – 51.9%	49.1% – 54.5%	55%
Risk-free interest rate	2.4% – 3.0%	1.8% – 2.8%	1.1% – 2.6%	1.1% – 1.3%
Expected dividend yield	—	—	—

The expected term represents the period that stock-based awards are expected to be outstanding, giving consideration to the contractual terms of the stock-based awards, vesting schedules, and expectations of future employee behavior as influenced by changes to the terms of the Company’s stock-based awards. The Company estimated the expected term, using the simplified method due to limited exercise data, to be the period of time between the date of grant and the midpoint between option vesting and expiration. The Company estimated the

F-30

E2OPEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012

and the Three Months Ended May 31, 2011 and 2012 (unaudited)

expected volatility of its common stock based on the average of historical and implied volatility of comparable companies from a representative peer group based on industry and market capitalization data. The risk-free interest rate represents the yield on a constant maturity U.S. Treasury security with a term equal to the expected term of the options. Expected dividend yield is set at 0% because the Company does not expect to pay dividends during the term of the option, and historically has not paid out any dividends to its stockholders. Management made an estimate of expected forfeitures and is recognizing compensation costs only for those equity awards expected to vest.

As of February 28, 2011, February 29, 2012 and May 31, 2012, the Company had $716,000, $811,000 and $4,801,000 of unrecognized compensation costs, excluding estimated forfeitures, related to unvested stock option awards, which are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.19 years, 2.69 years and 2.38 years.

As of February 28, 2011, February 29, 2012 and May 31, 2012, there were 309,760, 154,369 and 38,722 shares available for future grants under the Plan.

Activity under the Plan is as follows:

	Number of shares			Weighted average exercise price		Weighted average remaining term
Balance of options outstanding, February 28, 2009		2,829,057		$	1.75		7.43 years
Options granted		3,191,656			0.35
Options exercised		(209,409	)		0.35
Options canceled and forfeited		(2,990,463	)		1.75
Balance of options outstanding, February 28, 2010		2,820,841			0.35		7.21 years
Options granted		177,542			1.40
Options exercised		(1,636,070	)		0.35
Options canceled and forfeited		(45,266	)		0.35
Balance of options outstanding, February 28, 2011		1,317,047		$	0.35		6.48 years
Options granted		1,720,807			3.50
Options exercised		(170,375	)		0.35
Options canceled and forfeited		(51,130	)		1.40
Balance of options outstanding, February 29, 2012		2,816,349		$	2.45		8.05 years
Options granted		178,642			8.75
Options exercised		(74,093	)		0.35
Options canceled and forfeited		(62,995	)		2.45
Balance of options outstanding, May 31, 2012 (unaudited)		2,857,903			2.74		7.83 years
Balance of options expected to vest February 28, 2011		1,215,809			0.35		6.32 years
Balance of options exercisable February 28, 2011		740,424			0.35		5.36 years
Balance of options expected to vest February 29, 2012		2,190,981			2.10		7.68 years
Balance of options exercisable February 29, 2012		1,041,214			1.05		6.23 years
Balance of options expected to vest May 31, 2012		2,559,044			2.35		7.77 years
Balance of options exercisable May 31, 2012		1,104,110			1.05		6.03 years

F-31

E2OPEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012

and the Three Months Ended May 31, 2011 and 2012 (unaudited)

The weighted average grant date fair value of the employee stock options granted during the years ended February 28, 2010 and 2011, February 29, 2012, and for the three months ended May 31, 2012 was $0.35, $0.70, $3.50 and $8.75.

The intrinsic values of employee stock options exercised during the years ended February 28, 2010 and 2011, February 29, 2012 and May 31, 2012 were $14,000, $334,000, $843,000 and $602,000. The intrinsic values of vested shares as of February 28, 2010 and 2011, February 29, 2012 and May 31, 2012 were $0, $1,942,000, $7,431,000 and $8,353,000.

As of February 28, 2011, February 29, 2012 and May 31, 2012, the number of unvested options was 576,861, 1,775,373 and 1,754,031.

Compensation expense recorded for share-based payments amounted to $445,000, $577,000 and $727,000 for the years ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012, and $144,000 and $479,000 for the three months ended May 31, 2011 and 2012 (unaudited). No compensation cost was capitalized during the years ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012. Compensation expense for the year ended February 28, 2011 included $165,000 recorded to correct expense not originally recorded for the year ended February 28, 2010.

The table below sets forth the functional classification of stock-based compensation expense for the periods presented (in thousands):

	Years Ended February 28 or 29,						Three Months Ended May 31,
	2010		2011		2012		2011		2012
							(Unaudited)
Cost of revenue	$	106	$	223	$	203	$	51	$	121
Research and development		82		108		84		23		53
Sales and marketing		155		154		259		43		145
General and administrative		102		92		181		27		160
	$	445	$	577	$	727	$	144	$	479

(14) Fair Value Measurements

The Company’s financial instruments includes cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, net, accounts payable, line of credit, capital lease obligations and notes payable. Accounts receivable, net, accounts payable and line of credit are stated at their carrying value, which approximates fair value due to their short maturity. The Company estimates the fair value for capital lease obligations and notes payable by discounting the future cash flows of the lease and notes payments.

Current accounting guidance defines fair value as an exchange or exit price that would be received for an asset or an exit price, or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between knowledgeable and willing market participants.

F-32

E2OPEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012

and the Three Months Ended May 31, 2011 and 2012 (unaudited)

As a basis for considering such assumptions, accounting guidance establishes a three-tier value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:

Level 1 — Observable inputs such as quoted prices in an active market;

Level 2 — Inputs other than the quoted prices in active markets that are observable either directly or indirectly; and

Level 3 — Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which requires the Company to develop its own assumptions.

This hierarchy requires the Company to use observable market data, when available, and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value.

On a recurring basis, the Company measures certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value. The Company’s money market accounts and certificate of deposit are classified as Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices. Money market accounts are included in cash and cash equivalents as of February 28, 2011, February 29, 2012 and May 31, 2012, and the certificate of deposit is classified as restricted cash included in prepaid expenses and other current assets, and other assets.

The fair value of the Company’s foreign currency forward contracts is based on foreign currency rates quoted by banks. Such instruments are classified as Level 2 and are included in prepaid expenses and other current assets, and other assets.

The following table represents the Company’s fair value hierarchy for its financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value as of February 28, 2011, February 29, 2012 and May 31, 2012 (in thousands):

	As of February 28, 2011						As of February 29, 2012						As of May 31, 2012
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
													(Unaudited)
Money market accounts	$	2,028		—		—	$	2,030	$	—		—	$	2,030	$	—		—
Certificate of deposit		79		—		—		56		—		—		16		—		—
Foreign currency forward exchange		—		—		—		—	$	158		—		—	$	306		—

F-33

E2OPEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012

and the Three Months Ended May 31, 2011 and 2012 (unaudited)

In the year ended February 29, 2012 and the three months ended May 31, 2012, the Company sought to hedge the risks associated with exchange rate fluctuations through entry into forward exchange contracts. The contracts are classified as Level 2. The tables below present the notional amounts (at the contract exchange rates), the weighted-average contractual foreign currency exchange rates, and the estimated fair value of contracts outstanding as of February 29, 2012 and May 31, 2012.

	As of February 29, 2012							As of May 31, 2012
	Notional Sell (Buy)			Average Contract Rate		Estimated Fair Value		Notional Sell (Buy)			Average Contract Rate		Estimated Fair Value
											(Unaudited)
	(Dollars in thousands, except average contract rate)
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts:
Euro	$	4,387			1.3	$	83	$	4,827			1.3	$	387
Malaysian Ringgit		(2,032	)		3.1		75		(2,436	)		3.1		(81	)
Total	$	2,355				$	158	$	2,391				$	306

The Company entered into the foreign exchange contracts with two counterparties. The Company has the right of offset for gains earned and losses incurred under contracts with the same counterparty, and therefore has recorded contracts with the same counterparty on a net basis in the balance sheet.

The Company does not use derivatives for speculative or trading purposes.

(15) Significant Customer Information

Customers accounting for 10% or more of revenue or accounts receivable were as follows:

	Years Ended February 28 or 29,
	2010		2011		2012
	Percentage of total revenue	Percentage of total accounts receivable	Percentage of total revenue	Percentage of total accounts receivable	Percentage of total revenue	Percentage of total accounts receivable
Customer A	*	25%	23%	27%	*	*
Customer B	*	14	12	15	17%	14%
Customer C	15%	12	*	10	*	*
Customer D	14	10	*	*	*	*
Customer E	12	*	*	*	*	*
Customer F	*	*	*	*	15	11

F-34

E2OPEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012

and the Three Months Ended May 31, 2011 and 2012 (unaudited)

	Three Months Ended May 31,
	2011				2012
	Percentage of total revenue		Percentage of total accounts receivable		Percentage of total revenue		Percentage of total accounts receivable
	(Unaudited)
Customer A		*		*		*		*
Customer B		20		27		13		11
Customer C		*		*		11		12
Customer D		*		*		*		*
Customer E		*		*		*		*
Customer F		*		12		11		13

* Indicates less than 10%

The majority of revenue from Customer A in fiscal 2011 is related to arrangements which were executed from fiscal 2008 through fiscal 2011 and treated as a single unit of accounting for revenue recognition purposes. All revenue related to these arrangements was recognized ratably from the acceptance of the final deliverable in November 2010 through February 2011, the remaining term of the on-demand subscriptions and support arrangements.

Revenue from Customer E in fiscal 2010 was recognized upon cancellation of the arrangement by the customer.

Revenue by geographic region, based on the billing address of the customer, was as follows (in thousands):

	Years Ended February 28 or 29,						Three Months Ended May 31,
	2010		2011		2012		2011		2012
							(Unaudited)
Americas	$	37,498	$	43,965	$	49,064	$	9,735	$	12,432
Europe		4,324		7,018		9,151		1,112		2,895
Asia		2,555		4,540		1,472		400		146
	$	44,377	$	55,523	$	59,687	$	11,247	$	15,473

For the year ended February 28, 2010, the percentage of revenue generated from customers in the United States was 77.1%. For the year ended February 28, 2011, the percentage of revenue generated from customers in the United States and Canada was 63.1% and 13.8%. For the year ended February 28, 2012, the percentage of revenue generated from customers in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom was 61.8%, 19.8% and 12.2%. For the three months ended May 31, 2011, the percentage of revenue generated from customers in the United States and Canada was 63.5% and 23.1%. For the three months ended May 31, 2012, the percentage of revenue generated from customers in the United States and Canada was 64.9% and 15.4%. No other country exceeded 10% of total revenue during any of the periods presented.

F-35

E2OPEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended February 28, 2010 and 2011 and February 29, 2012

and the Three Months Ended May 31, 2011 and 2012 (unaudited)

(16) Subsequent Events

On June 29, 2012, we effected a 1-for-35 reverse stock split of our prefered stock and common stock. Upon the effectiveness of the reverse stock split, (i) every 35 shares of outstanding preferred stock and common stock was decreased to one share of preferred stock or common stock, as applicable, (ii) the number of shares of common stock into which each outstanding option to purchase common stock is exercisable was proportionally decreased on a 1-for-35 basis and (iii) the exercise price of each outstanding option to purchase common stock was proportionately increased on a 1-for-35 basis. All of the share numbers, share prices and exercise prices have been adjusted within the consolidated financial statements, on a retroactive basis, to reflect this 1-for-35 reverse stock split.

The Company evaluated subsequent events through June 29, 2012, the date the annual consolidated financial statements were issued.

F-36

Through and including,                     , 2012 (the 25th day after the date of this prospectus), all dealers effecting transactions in these securities, whether or not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This is in addition to a dealer’s obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as an underwriter and with respect to an unsold allotment or subscription.

4,687,500 Shares

Common Stock

P R O S P E C T U S

BofA Merrill Lynch

William Blair

Pacific Crest Securities

Canaccord Genuity

Needham & Company

                    , 2012

PART II

INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN THE PROSPECTUS

Item 13. Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution.

Estimated expenses, other than underwriting discounts and commissions, payable by the Registrant in connection with the sale of the common stock being registered under this registration statement are as follows:

SEC registration fee	$	10,502
FINRA filing fee		9,934
Listing fee		125,000
Printing and engraving expenses		240,000
Legal fees and expenses		1,500,000
Accounting fees and expenses		800,000
Transfer agent and registrar fees and expenses		10,000
Miscellaneous		210,000
Total	$	2,905,436

Item 14. Indemnification of Directors and Officers.

On completion of this offering, the Registrant’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation will contain provisions that eliminate, to the maximum extent permitted by the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, the personal liability of the Registrant’s directors and executive officers for monetary damages for breach of their fiduciary duties as directors or officers. The Registrant’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws will provide that the Registrant must indemnify its directors and executive officers and may indemnify its employees and other agents to the fullest extent permitted by the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

Sections 145 and 102(b)(7) of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware provide that a corporation may indemnify any person made a party to an action by reason of the fact that he or she was a director, executive officer, employee or agent of the corporation or is or was serving at the request of a corporation against expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him or her in connection with such action if he or she acted in good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the corporation and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful, except that, in the case of an action by or in right of the corporation, no indemnification may generally be made in respect of any claim as to which such person is adjudged to be liable to the corporation.

The Registrant has entered into indemnification agreements with its directors and executive officers, in addition to the indemnification provided for in its amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws, and intends to enter into indemnification agreements with any new directors and executive officers in the future.

The Registrant has purchased and intend to maintain insurance on behalf of each person who is or was a director or officer of the Registrant against any loss arising from any claim asserted against him or her and incurred by him or her in any such capacity, subject to certain exclusions.

The Underwriting Agreement (Exhibit 1.1 hereto) provides for indemnification by the underwriters of the Registrant and its executive officers and directors, and by the Registrant of the underwriters, for certain liabilities, including liabilities arising under the Securities Act.

II-1

See also the undertakings set out in response to Item 17 herein.

Item 15. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities.

During the last three years, we sold the following unregistered securities:

(1) From March 1, 2009 through May 31, 2012, we sold and issued to our employees, consultants or former service providers an aggregate of 2,099,011 shares of common stock pursuant to option exercises under the 2003 Stock Plan, as amended, at prices ranging from $0.35 to $3.15 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $799,868.

(2) From March 1, 2009 through May 31, 2012, we granted options under our 2003 Stock Plan, as amended, to purchase an aggregate of 5,268,648 shares of common stock to our employees, directors and consultants, having exercise prices ranging from $0.35 to $8.75 per share for an aggregate exercise price of $8,887,267.

(3) In May 2009, we sold and issued 4,670,687 shares of Series D preferred stock to 17 accredited investors, at $3.50 per share, for a total consideration of $16.3 million, including the conversion of subordinated unsecured convertible promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of $9,914,590.

None of the foregoing transactions involved any underwriters, underwriting discounts or commissions, or any public offering, and the registrant believes that each transaction was exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act in reliance on the following exemptions:

• with respect to the transactions described in paragraphs (1) and (2), Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act as transactions pursuant to a compensatory benefit plan approved by the registrant’s board of directors; and

• with respect to the transactions described in paragraphs (3), (4) and (6), Section 4(2) of the Securities Act, or Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder, as transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering. Each recipient of the securities in these transactions represented his or her intention to acquire the securities for investment only and not with a view to, or for resale in connection with, any distribution thereof, and appropriate legends were affixed to the share certificates issued in each such transaction. In each case, the recipient received adequate information about the Registrant or had adequate access, through his or her relationship with the registrant, to information about the Registrant.

Item 16. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

(a) Exhibits.

See Exhibit Index immediately following the signature pages.

(b) Financial Statement Schedules.

All other schedules have been omitted because the information required to be presented in them is not applicable or is shown in the consolidated financials statements or related notes.

Item 17. Undertakings.

The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes to provide to the underwriters at the closing specified in the Underwriting Agreement, certificates in such denominations and registered in such names as required by the underwriters to permit prompt delivery to each purchaser.

II-2

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the Registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the Registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the Registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the Registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes that:

(1) For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act, the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of this Registration Statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed by the Registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to be part of this Registration Statement as of the time it was declared effective.

(2) For the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

(3) That, for the purpose of determining liability of the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser in the initial distribution of the securities: the undersigned Registrant undertakes that in a primary offering of securities of the undersigned Registrant pursuant to this registration statement, regardless of the underwriting method used to sell the securities to the purchaser, if the securities are offered or sold to such purchaser by means of any of the following communications, the undersigned Registrant will be a seller to the purchaser and will be considered to offer or sell such securities to such purchaser:

(i) Any preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the undersigned Registrant relating to the offering required to be filed pursuant to Rule 424;

(ii) Any free writing prospectus relating to the offering prepared by or on behalf of the undersigned Registrant or used or referred to by the undersigned Registrant;

(iii) The portion of any other free writing prospectus relating to the offering containing material information about the undersigned Registrant or its securities provided by or on behalf of the undersigned Registrant; and

(iv) Any other communication that is an offer in the offering made by the undersigned Registrant to the purchaser.

II-3

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Foster City, State of California, on July 13, 2012.

E2OPEN, INC.
By:	/s/ Mark E. Woodward
	Mark E. Woodward President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature	Title	Date
/s/    Mark E. Woodward         Mark E. Woodward	Director, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)	July 13, 2012
/s/    Peter J. Maloney         Peter J. Maloney	Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)	July 13, 2012
* John B. Mumford	Chairman of the Board of Directors	July 13, 2012
* Carl Bass	Director	July 13, 2012
* Johnston L. Evans	Director	July 13, 2012
* Bernard F. Mathaisel	Director	July 13, 2012
* Nicholas G. Moore	Director	July 13, 2012
* Patrick J. O’Malley, III	Director	July 13, 2012
* Stephen M. Ward, Jr.	Director	July 13, 2012

*By:	/s/ Peter J. Maloney
	Attorney-in-Fact

II-4

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit Number	Exhibit Title
1.1†	Form of Underwriting Agreement.
3.1†	Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, as currently in effect.
3.1.1†	Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation.
3.2†	Form of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, to be effective upon closing of the offering.
3.3†	Bylaws of the Registrant, as currently in effect.
3.4†	Form of Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant, to be effective upon closing of the offering.
4.1†	Specimen Common Stock Certificate of the Registrant.
4.2†	Registration Rights Agreement, dated June 27, 2005, as amended.
4.3†	Second Amended and Restated Stockholders Agreement, dated June 27, 2005, as amended.
4.4†	Form of Warrant to Purchase Shares of Series BB Preferred Stock.
5.1	Opinion of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Professional Corporation.
10.1†#	Form of Director and Executive Officer Indemnification Agreement.
10.2†#	2003 Stock Plan, as amended and forms of option agreements thereunder.
10.3†#	2012 Equity Compensation Plan and forms of agreements thereunder to be in effect upon the closing of this offering.
10.4†#	Offer Letter to Mark E. Woodward, dated June 20, 2008.
10.5†#	Offer Letter to Peter J. Maloney, dated December 26, 2007.
10.6†#	Addendum to Offer Letter to Peter J. Maloney, dated June 10, 2008.
10.7†#	Change of Control Agreement with Peter J. Maloney, dated August 7, 2009.
10.8†#	Offer Letter to Lorenzo Martinelli, dated October 8, 2001, as amended.
10.9†#	Offer Letter to David W. Packer, dated August 18, 2008, as amended.
10.10†#	Offer Letter to Michael A. Schmitt, dated December 13, 2010.
10.11†#	Offer Letter to Robert Schoenthaler, dated June 18, 2007.
10.12†#	Change of Control Agreement with Robert Schoenthaler, dated May 22, 2009.
10.13†	Lease Agreement by and between Bayside Towers, Inc. and the Registrant, dated May 7, 2009.
10.14†	Office Building Lease by and between TPG—Great Hills Plaza LLC and Registrant, dated September 2, 2005, as amended.
10.15†	Office Lease Agreement by and between Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America and Registrant, dated April 27, 2005, as amended.
10.16†	Tenancy Agreement by and between Inter Heritage (M) Sdn. Bhd. and E2open Development Corporation, a subsidiary of the Registrant, dated November 19, 2007, as amended.
10.17†	License for Use of ASMEC Facilities by and between Asmec Management Associates Ltd and Registrant, dated March 30, 2007, as amended.
10.18†	Fourth Amended and Restated Business Financing Agreement by and between Bridge Bank, National Association and Registrant, dated April 30, 2010.
10.19†	Intellectual Property Security Agreement by and between Bridge Bank, National Association and Registrant, dated April 30, 2010.
10.20†	Master Services Agreement by and between Equinix Operating Co., Inc. and Registrant, dated May 7, 2004, as amended.
10.21#	Form of Change in Control Severance Agreement to be entered into with the Company’s executive officers.
21.1†	List of Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
23.1	Consent of KPMG LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
23.2	Consent of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Professional Corporation (included in Exhibit 5.1).
24.1†	Power of Attorney.

# Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan.

† Previously filed.