virolab10k3312013.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number: 000-54059

VIROLAB, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware		27-2787170
State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

951 Mariners Island Blvd, Suite 300, San Mateo, California		94404
(Address of principal executive office)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (650) 283-2653

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


Title of Each Class		Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
None		None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the act:

Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes  No 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o	Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company x
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes  No x

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $0 as of March 31, 2012 because there was no trading market for the registrant’s securities and all outstanding stock was owned by an affiliate.

On July 14, 2013, there were 25,350,000 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

ITEM 1.	BUSINESS	3
ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS	12
ITEM 1B.	UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS	12
ITEM 2.	PROPERTIES	12
ITEM 3.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	12
ITEM 4.	(REMOVED AND RESERVED)	13

PART II

ITEM 5.	MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES	13
ITEM 6.	SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA	13
ITEM 7.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION	13
ITEM 7A.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	18
ITEM 8.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA	18
ITEM 9.	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE	19
ITEM 9B.	OTHER INFORMATION	19

PART III

ITEM 10.	DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE	20
ITEM 11.	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	21
ITEM 12.	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS	22
ITEM 13.	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE	23
ITEM 14	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES	23

PART IV

ITEM 15.	EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES	24

SIGNATURES		25

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

This report contains forward-looking statements. In some cases, these statements may be identified by terminology such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “continue,” “estimates,” “expects,” “may,” “plans,” “potential,” “predicts,” “should,” “will,” and other comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements were based on various factors and were derived utilizing numerous assumptions and other factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. These factors include, but are not limited to, our ability to develop our operations, our ability to satisfy our obligations, our ability to raise capital as necessary, our ability to generate revenues and pay our operating expenses, our ability to consummate the acquisition of additional assets, economic, political and market conditions and fluctuations, government and industry regulation, U.S. and global competition, and other factors. Most of these factors are difficult to predict accurately and are generally beyond our control. You should consider the areas of risk described in connection with any forward-looking statements that may be made herein. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements and readers should carefully review this report in its entirety, including the risks described in Item 1A - "Risk Factors" as well as the risk factors described in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Except for our ongoing obligations to disclose material information under the Federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to update any of our forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report, and you should not rely on these statements without also considering the risks and uncertainties associated with these statements and our business. “We,” “us,” “our,” the “Company,” “Accelerated Acquisitions X, Inc.,” and “Virolab” as used in this report refer to Virolab, Inc., a Delaware corporation..

None of the Company’s securities are registered for resale with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The outstanding shares of common stock may only be resold through registration under the Securities Act of 1933, or under an applicable exemption from registration.

From inception on May 4, 2010, Accelerated Acquisitions X, Inc. was organized as a vehicle to investigate and, if such investigation warranted, acquire a target company or business seeking the perceived advantages of being a publicly held corporation. Our principal business objectives were to achieve long-term growth potential through a combination with a business rather than immediate, short-term earnings.

On May 4, 2010, the Company sold 5,000,000 shares of Common Stock to Accelerated Venture Partners, LLC, or AVP, for an aggregate investment of $2,000. The Company sold these shares of Common Stock under the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.

On February 27, 2011, Virolab S de RL de CV (the “Purchaser” or “Virolab Mexico”) acquired 22,350,000 shares of the Company’s common stock par value $0.0001 for a price of $0.0001 per share. At the same time, AVP tendered 3,500,000 of their 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for cancellation. In addition, AVP received an option to purchase 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for a price of $0.0001 per share, which AVP immediately exercised. The 1,500,000 shares purchased under option by AVP are subject to repurchase by the Company as described in the February 27, 2011 Consulting Services Agreement disclosure below. Following these transactions, Virolab S de RL de CV., owned 88.2% of the Company’s 25,350,000 issued and outstanding shares of common stock and AVP owned the remaining 11.8%. Simultaneously with the share purchase, Ricardo Rosales, PhD was appointed to the Company’s Board of Directors. Such action represents a change of control of the Company.

Prior to the purchase of the shares, the Purchaser was not affiliated with the Company. However, the Purchaser will be deemed an affiliate of the Company after the share purchase as a result of its stock ownership interest in the Company and position on the Board of Directors. The purchase of the shares by the Purchaser was completed pursuant to a written Subscription Agreement with the Company. The purchase was not subject to any other terms and conditions other than the sale of the shares in exchange for the cash payment. Following the sale of common stock to the Purchaser, the Company was still seeking to achieve its objective of acquiring a target company or business.

On February 27, 2011, the Company entered into a Consulting Services Agreement with AVP. The agreement requires AVP

to provide the Company with certain advisory services that include reviewing the Company’s business plan, identifying and introducing prospective financial and business partners, and providing general business advice regarding the Company’s operations and business strategy in consideration of (a) an option granted by the Company to AVP to purchase 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $0.0001 per share (the “AVP Option”) (which was immediately exercised by the holder) subject to a repurchase option granted to the Company to repurchase the shares at a price of $0.0001 per share in the event the Company fails to complete funding as detailed in the agreement subject to the following milestones:

●	Milestone 1 – Company’s right of repurchase will lapse with respect to 60% of the shares upon securing $5 million in available cash from funding;

●	Milestone 2 – Company’s right of repurchase will lapse with respect to 40% of the Shares upon securing $10 million in available cash (inclusive of any amounts attributable to Milestone 1);

and (b) cash compensation at a rate of $66,667 per month. The payment of the cash compensation is subject to the Company’s achievement of certain designated milestones, specifically, cash compensation of $400,000 is due consultant upon the achievement of Milestone 1, and an additional $400,000 is due upon the achievement of Milestone 2. Upon achieving each Milestone, the cash compensation is to be paid to consultant in the amount then due at the rate of $66,667 per month. The total cash compensation to be received by the consultant is not to exceed $800,000 unless Virolab receives an amount of funding in excess of the amount specified in Milestone 2. If the Company receives equity or debt financing that is an amount less than Milestone 1, in between any of the above Milestones or greater than the above Milestones, the cash compensation earned by the Consultant under this Agreement will be prorated according to the above Milestones. The Company also has the option to make a lump sum payment to AVP in lieu of the monthly cash payments.

On March 8, 2011, the Company entered into a Licensing Agreement (“Licensing Agreement”) with Virolab Nevada, LLC (“Licensor”) pursuant to which the Company was granted an exclusive, non-transferrable worldwide license for the commercial rights to an investigational therapeutic vaccine for the human papillomavirus, or HPV, and HPV-related cancers and a specific blood test for HPV (the “Technology”). Rather than acquiring an operating company, the Company acquired an exclusive license to trade secrets, patents, know-how and other intellectual property that had been developed in Mexico. We will lose our rights to the Technology that we licensed if we do not raise at least $0.5 million for its future development before March 8, 2012, if we do not raise at least $1.0 million for its future development before March 8, 2013, and if we do not raise at least $2.0 million for its future development before March 8, 2014. Although the Company did not spend the $0.5 million additional funds per the Licensing Agreement before March 8, 2012, we have not received a default letter and as of March 31, 2013 the Company was in negotiations to extend the terms of the Agreement.

Prior to the licensing transaction entered into on March 8, 2011, the Company was a “blank check company.” Shares of the Company’s common stock are not registered under the securities laws of any state or other jurisdiction, and accordingly there is no public trading market for our common stock. Therefore, outstanding shares of our common stock cannot be offered, sold, pledged or otherwise transferred unless subsequently registered pursuant to, or exempt from registration under, the Securities Act and any other applicable federal or state securities laws or regulations. Shares of our common stock including shares issued to AVP cannot be sold under the exemptions from registration provided by Rule 144 under or Section 4(1) of the Securities Act (“Rule 144”) for at least 12 months after the Company ceases to be a “shell company,” provided the Company otherwise is in compliance with the applicable rules and regulations. Compliance with the criteria for securing exemptions under federal securities laws and the securities laws of the various states is extremely complex, especially in respect of those exemptions affording flexibility and the elimination of trading restrictions in respect of securities received in exempt transactions and subsequently disposed of without registration under the Securities Act or state securities laws.

AVP has indicated to the Company that it will pay the on-going administrative expenses of the Company until Virolab enters into a financing transaction. These on-going administrative expenses differ from the services covered in the Consulting Services Agreement. Through March 31, 2013, the Company has incurred approximately $110,675 of expenses related to its operations, and of this amount approximately $108,795 remained due to AVP. Virolab currently does not pay any cash compensation to its directors, officers or employees, but plans to do so if it succeeds in securing additional financing.

Throughout this document, we refer to our therapeutic vaccine as “investigational” or as a “candidate” because it has not received approval for commercial sale anywhere in the world, and we also refer to the investigational vaccine as “therapeutic” because it is designed to treat an existing viral infection and the resulting cervical lesions. Most of the currently approved vaccines for all diseases are not therapeutic, but instead are designed to prevent an infection from occurring before a patient is actually exposed to a virus or other infectious agent. We believe the intended therapeutic nature of our vaccine candidate differentiates it from other vaccines.

We believe that the HPV therapeutic vaccine technology that we have in development has the potential to be the first therapeutic to clear pre-cancerous and cancerous lesions of the Cervix along with the underlying HPV viral infection. This belief is based on the results of two phase 2 clinical trials and one phase 3 clinical conducted in Mexico in which cancerous and pre-cancerous cervical lesions were eliminated or regressed in 88% to 97% of the patients. In addition, detectable HPV virus was eliminated from approximately half of the 1,246 patients treated in the three trials. All studies showed the vaccine candidate to be well tolerated, although headaches and other flu-like symptoms appeared in some of the patients. More detailed results from the trials conducted by Virolab Mexico are contained in the section “Clinical Trials of Therapeutic Vaccine Candidate” below.

In addition to the therapeutic vaccine candidate, Virolab has licensed rights to a specific blood-based diagnostic test for HPV that is in development. Currently, diagnosis of an infection with HPV requires a gynecological examination and testing of cervical tissue samples. We believe that a diagnosis from a simple blood draw will be less expensive and more convenient for patients.

The Company is evaluating its options to commercialize its therapeutic vaccine candidate and diagnostic test. These product candidates have not been approved for commercial sale anywhere in the world, and each country has different requirements for approval, so the commercialization process is likely to be lengthy and complex. The Company may employ different strategies in different areas of the world, such as sublicensing development and commercialization rights for some territories while retaining rights for other territories. Based on the historical work of Virolab Mexico in the country of Mexico, the Company believes that the path to obtain government approval may be shorter in the Latin America countries.

The Company will not be able to commercialize either its vaccine candidate or its diagnostic test without additional capital. The Company is evaluating various means of raising this capital, including through the sale of equity securities, licensing agreements or other means. If the Company does not raise additional funds of at least $2 million for the advancement of its technology over the next three years it will lose its rights to the technology. The Company plans to seek at least $10 million of capital within the next 12 months, and plans to use these funds to determine the FDA’s requirements for approval of its vaccine candidate, begin working on these requirements, file patents on its technology, broaden its pipeline of investigational drugs, vaccines and/or diagnostics, establish a biotechnology laboratory, and continue the process of seeking approval of its vaccine candidate and diagnostic test outside of the United States. The Company is not presently able to allocate the specific costs for its plans because it does not yet know the requirements for approval of either its vaccine candidate or its diagnostic test.

HPV and Cervical Cancer Background

According to The World Health Organization, or WHO, cervical cancer is the second most frequent form of cancer among women in the world and second most frequent among women aged 15 – 44 years. WHO also reports that about 300 million women, about 10% of women worldwide, are estimated to be infected with HPV at a given time and that virtually 100% of cervical cancer cases are caused by HPV infection. HPV is transmitted through sexual contact and is extremely contagious. While the WHO estimates that an equal number of men are infected with HPV, in general HPV infected men do not show symptoms, although genital warts and codylomata may appear.

HPV-infected women can develop pre-cancerous cervical lesions of increasing seriousness known as CIN 1, CIN 2, and CIN 3 which can develop into cancer and, if they do, can ultimately cause the death of the patient. Since the virus may foster the growth of cancer cells anytime from six months to 15 years after infection, women at risk currently have to undergo gynecological testing and pap-smears for early detection of potential cancer at least once a year.

Under current treatment practices, when a cervical lesion is detected, outpatient surgery is generally performed to remove the lesion. The underlying HPV infection, however, remains and new lesions can develop. Therefore, recommended check up frequency is increased to twice a year for these patients.

Virolab’s goal is to complete the clinical development of its therapeutic vaccine candidate, and seek regulatory approval to commercialize the therapeutic vaccine throughout the world. We believe that a vaccine which has potential to clear an underlying HPV infection from patients would be a cost effective and advantageous alternative to surgery that does not clear the underlying viral infection from patients. However, we must raise additional funds, conduct additional positive clinical trials and establish qualified manufacturing facilities in order for us to meet this goal of commercializing the vaccine candidate.

Virolab’s Therapeutic Vaccine Candidate

Below is an example of a cervical cancer before and after treatment with the investigational therapeutic vaccine candidate exclusively licensed to Virolab. This illustration was taken from one of the women that have been treated with the vaccine candidate in clinical trials.

The technology licensed to Virolab involves the key process of developing production of the therapeutic vaccine candidate, which is referred to as MEL-1. MEL-1 is derived from the smallpox virus vaccine MVA, which was originally developed in Germany during the 1940s. The World Health Organization has approved MVA for use in other human vaccines in the early 1990s (note that this does not imply that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, or any other governmental regulatory agency will approve any vaccine based on the use of MVA). Scientists working for Virolab Mexico experimented by inserting certain genes from the Bovine Papillomavirus into MVA. One of the genes inserted was E2, an anti-tumor protein that self-regulates the activity of HVP’s tumor-generating proteins.

Under the protocols of completed phase 1, 2, and 3 clinical trials, the modified vaccine with the E2 gene inserted is injected directly into the cervix. This then produces an overdose of anti-tumor E2 protein immediately surrounding the HPV-infected tumor cells of the host. The immunological system of the patient reacts and destroys weakened HPV-infected cells. As a result, the patient develops antibodies against HPV and against additional foreign contents that may be contained in those cells.

The MEL-1 therapeutic vaccine has demonstrated in clinical trials conducted in Mexico that it can regress and heal pre-cancerous or cancerous lesions of the cervix in 88% to 97% of patients treated and eliminate detectable levels of HPV in approximately half of the treated patients. The standard treatments used in the clinical trials include weekly injections of MEL-1 for a period of six weeks. See more detailed information on the clinical trials immediately below.

To our knowledge, no other treatment has demonstrated elimination of detectable levels of HPV from patients.

Clinical Trials of Therapeutic Vaccine Candidate

Medical protocols under which Virolab Mexico’s human clinical trials were conducted were reviewed in Mexico by the Health Ministry at the State and Governmental levels. Because the trials were not conducted in the United States, no protocols were submitted to or reviewed by the U.S. FDA, nor has an Investigational New Drug Application (“IND”) been submitted to the U.S. FDA. As is customary in human clinical trials, the proposed clinical trials of the therapeutic vaccine and subsequent results from its use were also reviewed by various Hospital Ethics Committees before each approved their institution’s participation in the trials. In addition, the clinical trials were conducted in accordance with international standards for Good Clinical Practice and all study patients met pre-defined enrollment criteria and provided signed informed consent after being fully advised of the risks and potential benefits of participating in the trials.

The therapeutic vaccine candidate licensed by Virolab is a recombinant live virus vaccine based on a highly attenuated vaccinia virus vector, known as MVA, or Modified Vaccinia Ankara. Viroloab’s licensors have spliced into MVA a gene encoding the E2 protein from the bovine papillomavirus, which is similar to HPV, the human papillomavirus, to create the Company’s therapeutic vaccine candidate. Virolab refers to its therapeutic vaccine candidate as the MEL-1 vaccine. MVA is a very well characterized vaccine that has been used commercially for decades and tested on more than 100,000 people as a vaccine to prevent smallpox. It is currently stockpiled by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and similar organizations in other countries in the event of future smallpox outbreaks.

Virolab’s MEL-1 therapeutic vaccine has been evaluated in multiple animal models (preclinical) and has completed phase 1, 2, and 3 clinical trials in Mexico. We expect additional clinical trials will be required before the vaccine candidate can be considered for approval in the United States.

The following table summarizes the results of the clinical trials conducted with Virolab’s MEL-1 HPV therapeutic vaccine candidate, all of which received requisite governmental approval in Mexico before initiation. Unless noted separately below, each of these trials evaluated the use of MEL-1 as a therapeutic vaccine for treating pre-cancerous or cancerous cervical lesions in women who have been infected with human papillomavirus. In each study MEL-1 was administered by injection directly into the cervix in a radial manner, at 12 o’clock, three o’clock, six o’clock, and nine o’clock positions, once per week for six weeks. Each weekly injection consisted of 107 MEL-1 virus units per dose. All women who enrolled in the trials completed the study. Efficacy was evaluated at study week 9, three weeks after completion of treatment and was determined by regression in lesion size and severity and reduction in detectable HPV viral DNA. According to the American Association of Cancer Research (AACR) task force on treatment and prevention of intra-epithelial neoplasia, obtaining a 50% regression rate in CIN2/3 with a new treatment is clinically meaningful. Regression Rate is defined by the AACR as both Complete Response (CR) and Partial Response (PR) where CR is regression to normal histology and PR is regression of CIN 2/3 to CIN 1, with no new CIN 2/3 lesions in at least 50% of treated patients (Clin. Cancer Res., (8):314-346, 2002).

	Phase 1	1st Phase 2	2nd Phase 2	Phase 3

Primary endpoint	Human safety study	Safety and lesion reduction	Elimination of high-grade lesions	Reduction in lesions
Dates conducted	1999	2000-2002	2002-2004	2004-2008
Treatment protocol	Evaluate safety in volunteers	Evaluate vaccine candidate against cryosurgery	Evaluate vaccine candidate against conization	Evaluate reduction in viral load and reduction in lesions
Patient eligibility	Disease-free women with no cervical lesioins	Women with HPV and cervical lesions (CIN 1-3)	Women with HPV and high-grade lesions (CIN 2-3)	Women with HPV and pre-cancerous lesions (CIN 1-3) or carcinoma
Number of participants	120	78 total 36 MEL-1 42 Control (cryosurgery)	54 total 34 MEL-1 20 Control (conization)	1,176 All patients treated with MEL-1
Dosage and administration of study medication	MEL-1 vaccine injection into uterus once per week for 6 weeks at 107 MEL-1 virus units per dose.	MEL-1 vaccine injection into uterus once per week for 6 weeks at 107 MEL-1 virus units per dose.	MEL-1 vaccine injection into uterus once per week for 6 weeks at 107 MEL-1 virus units per dose.	MEL-1 vaccine injection into uterus once per week for 6 weeks at 107 MEL-1 virus units per dose.
Trial type	Open label safety study	Open-label vs. control	Open label vs. control	No control group
Trial outcome	Established initial safety database to allow commencement of trials to evaluate efficacy	Demonstrated lesion regression or elimination in 94% of MEL-1 treated patients and HPV virus elimination or significant reduction in 50% of MEL-1 treated patients	Elimination and regression of lesions in 88% of MEL-1 treated patients and HPV virus elimination or significant reduction in all MEL-1 patients	Elimination of lesions in 97% of participants. Elimination of HPV virus in 50% of patients
Trial location	Mexico City	Mexico City	Mexico City	Mexico City; Michoacan, Mexico; Barquisimento, Venezuela
Major adverse effects noted	Flu-like symptoms	Headaches, flu-like symptoms, chills, transient fever (>39º C), abdominal pain	Headaches, flu-like symptoms, chills, transient fever (>39º C), abdominal pain	Headaches, flu-like symptoms, chills, transient fever (>39º C), abdominal pain
Outcome publication	Not published	Human Gene Therapy, May 2004 (Peer Reviewed)	Cancer Gene Therapy, February 2006 (Peer Reviewed)	Publication submitted

In addition to the completed trials, in 2009 Virolab Mexico initiated an open-label phase 4 clinical trial at three different sites in Mexico. The Company refers to this trial as a phase 4 because this is how it is classified in Mexico, although the drug is not approved for commercial sale as is often the case with other phase 4 trials. To date, approximately 1,000 patients have been enrolled and treated in the trial, and efficacy results are consistent with the outcomes of the phase 2 and 3 clinical trials. Due to the Company’s limited funds, no on-going responsibility for the clinical trial has been assigned to Virolab, Inc., although it may at a future date if the Company is able to secure additional financing.

Market and Competition for Therapeutic Vaccine Candidate

According to The World Health Organization, or WHO, cervical cancer is the second most frequent form of cancer among women in the world and second most frequent among women aged 15 – 44 years. WHO also reports that approximately 300 million women, about 10% of women worldwide, are estimated to be infected with HPV at a given time and that virtually 100% of cervical cancer cases are caused by HPV infection. Also according to WHO, of the women infected with HPV, over 500,000 will develop cervical cancer and over half of them will die from their HPV-caused cancer.

Based on extrapolations of CIN 1 lesions of 1.2 per 1,000 population, and CIN 2/3 lesions of 1.5 per 1,000 population (the Company’s own estimates), the Company estimates the candidate patients for its therapeutic vaccine as follows:

Region	Candidate Patients
Americas		935,000
Europe		880,000
Asia		4,010,000
Africa		840,000
Oceania		36,000
World Total		6,700,000

The Company has not estimated prices yet for its therapeutic vaccine candidate, if it receives approval. Initial pricing studies are currently planned.

Two vaccines are currently available to prevent infection by some HPV types. These preventative vaccines are Gardasil, marketed by Merck, and Cervarix, marketed by GlaxoSmithKline. Both vaccines protect against initial infection with HPV types 16 and 18, which cause most of the HPV-associated cancer cases. Gardasil also protects against HPV types 6 and 11, which cause 90% of genital warts. However, the vaccines provide little benefit to women who have already been infected with HPV types 16 and 18. For this reason the vaccines are recommended primarily for those women who have not yet been exposed to HPV. Both preventative vaccines are delivered in three shots over six months. In most countries they are approved only for female use, but are approved for male use in relevant countries like USA and UK. These approved vaccines do not have any therapeutic effect on existing HPV infections or cervical lesions, the target market for Virolab’s therapeutic vaccine candidate.

We are also aware of several development-stage and established enterprises, including major pharmaceutical and biotechnology firms, which are actively engaged in infectious disease and cancer vaccine research and development. These include Crucell, Sanofi-Aventis, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline plc, MedImmune, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of AstraZeneca, Merck and Pfizer Inc. The company may also experience competition from companies that have acquired or may acquire technologies from companies, universities and other research institutions. As these companies develop their technologies, they may develop proprietary technologies which may materially and adversely affect our business.

In addition, a number of companies are developing products to address the same diseases that we are targeting. For example, Merck and GlaxoSmithKline have products on the market for cervical cancer in the therapeutic setting. Transgene, Inc. has a cervical cancer product in Phase II trials. Inovio, Inc. is also working on a vaccine for cervical cancer.

There are seven main approaches that we are aware of under which companies are investigating HPV vaccine product candidates:

1.	Live vectors

Peptides

Proteins

DNA

5.	RNA replicon

6.	Dendritic cell

7.	Tumor cell

Refer to Ma, et al., HPV and Therapeutic Vaccines: Where are we in 2010? Current Cancer Therapy Reviews, 2010, 6, 81-103, for a more thorough review of the potential approaches. Of the live vector approaches which are similar to the approach used to develop our therapeutic vaccine candidate, the Virolab investigational therapeutic vaccine is the only candidate using the E2 protein.

If any of our competitors develop products with efficacy or safety profiles significantly better than our products, we may not be able to commercialize our products. Some of our competitors and potential competitors have substantially greater product development capabilities and financial, scientific, marketing and human resources than we do. Competitors may develop products earlier, obtain FDA approvals for products more rapidly, or develop products that are more effective than the single vaccine candidate under development by us. We intend to seek to expand our technological capabilities to remain competitive, however, research and development by others may render our technologies or products obsolete or noncompetitive, or result in treatments superior to ours.

Our competitive position will be affected by the disease indications addressed by our product candidates and those of our competitors, the timing of market introduction for these products and the stage of development of other technologies to address these disease indications. For us and our competitors, proprietary technologies, the ability to complete clinical trials on a timely basis and with the desired results, and the ability to obtain timely regulatory approvals to market these product candidates are likely to be significant competitive factors. Other important competitive factors will include the efficacy, safety, ease of use, reliability, availability and price of products and the ability to fund operations during the period between technological conception and commercial sales.

The FDA and other regulatory agencies may expand current requirements applicable to virus-based products and product candidates, which may harm our competitive position relative to other companies developing virus-based products for similar indications.

Virolab’s HPV Diagnostic Test

The HPV diagnostic test recently licensed to the Company, referred to as EDIVPH, uses a standard Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, or ELISA, procedure to test for HPV antibodies in the blood serum. ELISA tests are widely-used blood-based diagnostic method of detecting diseases. The advantage compared to other HPV diagnostics is the quick and easy access to blood samples requiring no gynecological examination, as the other marketed tests for HPV require. Virolab plans to investigate ways to commercialize its diagnostic test throughout the world. Virolab does not have approval to market the test in any countries, and government regulations vary from country to country.

Virolab Mexico has conducted a study of 172 HPV-infected women in which the HPV diagnostic test was compared to tissue samples using traditional HPV diagnostic methods. Results indicated that using different traditional diagnostic methods on the same patients did not consistently produce similar test results (approximately 20% could be diagnosed incorrectly as either positive or negative). The study was conducted in Mexico in patients with known current or previous HPV infections, and was published in the Journal of Medical Virology in 2001. Based on the results, Virolab believes that its blood-based test has potential to be more accurate. However, additional clinical comparisons will be necessary to verify this belief and additional clinical work will be necessary to seek approval to market the test.

Competition for the HPV Diagnostic Test

The Company’s EDIVPH blood test is the only method of detecting HPV of which we are aware that does not involve a gynecological examination or biopsies or smears from the cervix. Virolab’s HPV test is done as an immunological reaction in a sample of blood serum. Since a specialist does not need to examine the patient and technicians to take blood samples are widespread, we believe that our method will allow the examination of thousands of patients by a single lab-based technician familiar with the technology. We believe the diagnostic process can be readily automated and results can be obtained overnight.

Competitive HPV diagnostics methods include Hybrid Capture, Liquid Cytology, PCR and Thin Prep DNA determination, all of which require tissue samples from the cervix. Virolab believes that all of these diagnostic tests are readily used in practice, and each test’s usage depends on facilities available to diagnosing physicians and individual preferences.

Specific HPV diagnostic tests are increasingly being used in conjunction with routine annual gynecological examination and PAP smears as a means for identifying women at risk for developing cervical cancer. Currently, a portion of the tissue collected during a gynecological examination is utilized in a clinical laboratory for conducting an HPV test using one of the currently available test kits while the remainder of the tissue is examined microscopically for evidence of cancer cells or precancerous cellular changes. We believe a blood-based test will offer advantages for patients because they would not need a separate gynecological examination.

An experimental Light Sensitive Device method, involves the insertion of the device in the vagina and taking the sample to a lab with a spectrometer to measure light absorptions, but is not approved for use in most countries.

Patents

The company and its licensor have written a PCT patent application covering its therapeutic vaccine candidate MEL-1and the method of application directly to carcinomas and plans to submit the application shortly. The Company plans a similar filing in the United States. Virolab owns proprietary information and trade secrets relating to its HPV diagnostic technology and also plans patent applications. To date, no patents have issued.

Government Regulation

Regulations applicable to Therapeutic Vaccine Candidate

In the United States, drugs are subject to regulation under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, or the FDC Act. Biological products, in addition to being subject to provisions of the FDC Act, are regulated in the United States under the Public Health Service Act. Both statutes and related regulations govern, among other things, testing, manufacturing, safety, efficacy, labeling, storage, record keeping, advertising, and other promotional practices.

Obtaining FDA approval or comparable approval from similar agencies in other countries is a costly and time-consuming process, and the results of seeking approval are uncertain. Generally, FDA approval requires that preclinical studies be conducted in the laboratory and in animal model systems to gain preliminary information on efficacy and to identify any major safety concerns. In the United States, the results of these studies are submitted as a part of an IND application which the FDA must review and allow before human clinical trials can start.

A company must submit an IND application or equivalent application in other countries for each proposed product and must conduct clinical studies to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the product necessary to obtain FDA approval or comparable approval from similar agencies in other countries. For example, in the United States, the FDA receives reports on the progress of each phase of clinical testing and may require the modification, suspension, or termination of clinical trials if an unwarranted risk is presented to patients.

Obtaining FDA approval prior to marketing a pharmaceutical product typically requires several phases of clinical development to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the product candidate. Clinical trials are the means by which experimental treatments are tested in humans, and are conducted following preclinical testing. Upon successful completion of clinical trials, approval to market the treatment for a particular patient population may be requested from the FDA and/or its counterparts in other countries.

Clinical trials are normally done in three phases. Phase 1 clinical trials are typically conducted with a small number of patients or healthy subjects to evaluate safety, determine a safe dosage range, identify side effects, and, if possible, gain early evidence of effectiveness. Phase 2 clinical trials are conducted with a larger group of patients to evaluate effectiveness of an investigational product for a defined patient population, and to determine common short-term side effects and risks associated with the drug. Phase 3 clinical trials involve large scale, multi-center, comparative trials that are conducted to evaluate the overall benefit-risk relationship of the investigational product and to provide an adequate basis for product labeling.

After completion of clinical trials of a new product, FDA marketing approval must be obtained, or equivalent approval by comparable agencies in other countries. For the FDA, if the product is regulated as a biologic, as we expect for our investigational therapeutic vaccine, a Biologics License Application, or BLA, is required. The BLA must include results of product development activities, preclinical studies, and clinical trials in addition to detailed chemistry, manufacturing and control information.

Applications submitted to the FDA are subject to an unpredictable and potentially prolonged approval process. Despite good-faith communication and collaboration between the applicant and the FDA during the development process, the FDA may ultimately decide, upon final review of the data, that the application does not satisfy its criteria for approval or requires additional product development or further preclinical or clinical studies. Even if FDA regulatory clearances are obtained, a marketed product is subject to continual review, and later discovery of previously unknown problems or failure to comply with the applicable regulatory requirements may result in restrictions on the marketing of a product or withdrawal of the product from the market.

Before marketing clearance for a product can be secured, the facility in which the product is manufactured must be inspected by the FDA and must comply with current Good Manufacturing Practices, or cGMP, regulations. In addition, after marketing clearance is secured, the manufacturing facility may be inspected periodically for cGMP compliance by FDA inspectors.

Regulations Applicable to Diagnostic Test

In the United States, diagnostic tests are regulated by the FDA as medical devices. Medical devices are classified into one of three classes on the basis of the controls deemed by the FDA to be necessary to reasonably ensure their safety and effectiveness. Class I devices are subject to general controls, including labeling, premarket notification and adherence to FDA’s quality system regulations, which are device-specific good manufacturing practices. Class II devices are subject to general controls and special controls, including performance standards and postmarket surveillance. Class III devices are subject to most of the previously identified requirements as well as to premarket approval. Class I devices are exempt from premarket submissions to the FDA; most Class II devices require the submission of a 510(k) premarket notification to the FDA; and Class III devices require submission of a premarket approval application, or PMA. Most in vitro diagnostic tests are regulated as Class I or Class II devices and are either exempt from premarket notification or require a 510(k) submission. We presently do not know how the FDA will classify our HPV diagnostic test, but currently assume it is most likely to be a Class III device, since it would be the first blood-based diagnostic for HPV.

Class III devices require the submission and approval of a PMA prior to product sale. The PMA must be supported by detailed and comprehensive scientific evidence, including clinical data, to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the medical device for its intended purpose. From start to finish the approval process may take several years, and the FDA may also request additional clinical data as a condition of approval or after the PMA is approved. Product changes after approval typically require a supplemental submission with FDA review cycles ranging from 30 to 180 days.

Any products manufactured or distributed pursuant to FDA clearances or approvals are subject to pervasive and continuing regulation by the FDA, including recordkeeping requirements, reporting of adverse experiences with the use of the device, and restrictions on advertising and promotion. Device manufacturers are required to register their establishments and list their devices with the FDA and are subject to periodic inspections by the FDA and certain state agencies. Noncompliance with applicable FDA requirements can result in, among other things, warning letters, fines, injunctions, civil penalties, recalls or seizures of products, total or partial suspension of production, refusal of the FDA to grant PMA approval for devices, withdrawal of PMA approvals, or criminal prosecution.

Employees

As of March 31, 2013, we had two full time employees. AVP also provided us with administrative support as needed. These positions are currently unpaid also until we secure additional financing.

Available Information

Our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to these reports are electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. These reports may be obtained directly from the SEC’s website, www.sec.gov.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

As a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, the Company is not required to provide this information.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

No t applicable.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

At this time, the Company maintains its designated office at 1840 Gateway Drive, Suite 200, Foster City, CA 94404. The Company’s telephone number is 650-378-1232.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

While we are not currently a party to any material pending legal proceedings, from time to time we may be named as a party to lawsuits in the normal course of our business.

ITEM 4. (REMOVED AND RESERVED)

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

There is no established trading market for our common stock or any other class of our equity securities.

As of March 31, 2012, 2013, there were two (2) holders of record of our common stock and a total of 25,350,000 shares of common stock outstanding. All common stock currently outstanding was issued by the Company under applicable exemptions from registration under the Securities Act. None of our stock is registered under the Exchange Act, and no stock may be sold or offered unless registered with the SEC or sold under an applicable exemption from registration. There were no holders in “street name.”

To date, Virolab has not paid any dividends. Virolab does not intend to pay dividends in the foreseeable future, as the Company plans to retain its funds for operating purposes.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Not applicable.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

OVERVIEW

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Our discussion includes forward-looking statements within the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements made which are not purely historical are forward-looking, and are based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results and the timing of events could differ materially from those anticipated or implied in these forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, including those set forth In Item 1A -“Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We use words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “plan,” “project,” “continuing,” “ongoing,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements.

Plan of Operation

On March 8, 2011, we entered into a Licensing Agreement with Virolab Nevada, LLC pursuant to which we were granted an exclusive, non-transferrable worldwide license for certain intellectual property developed by Licensor, principally comprising the technology, intellectual property, know-how, trade secret information, clinical trial data, and all other commercial rights to an investigational therapeutic vaccine for HPV (human papillomavirus) and HPV-related cancers and a blood test for HPV. Before this transaction we were a shell company, as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

We believe that the HPV therapeutic vaccine technology that we have in development has the potential to be the first therapeutic to clear pre-cancerous and cancerous lesions of the cervix along with the underlying HPV viral infection. This belief is based on the results of two phase 2 clinical trials and one phase 3 clinical conducted in Mexico in which cancerous and pre-cancerous cervical lesions were eliminated or regressed in 88% to 97% of the patients. In addition, detectable HPV virus was eliminated from approximately 50% of the 1,246 patients treated in the three trials. All studies showed the vaccine candidate to be well tolerated, although headaches and other flu-like symptoms appeared in some of the patients.

In addition to the therapeutic vaccine candidate, Virolab has licensed rights to a specific blood-based diagnostic test for HPV. Currently, diagnosis of an infection with HPV requires a gynecological examination as well as a cervical tissue sample. We believe that a diagnosis from a simple blood draw will be less expensive and more convenient for patients.

The Company will not be able to commercialize either its therapeutic vaccine candidate or its diagnostic test without additional capital. The Company is evaluating various means of raising this capital, including through the sale of equity securities, licensing agreements or other means. If the Company does not raise additional funds of at least $2 million for the advancement of its technology before March 8, 2014 it will lose its rights to the technology (including at least $0.5 million of which must be raised before March 8, 2012, and $1 million of which must be raised before March 8, 2013). The Company plans to seek at least $10 million of capital within the next 12 months, and plans to use these funds to determine the FDA’s requirements for approval of our therapeutic vaccine candidate, begin working on these requirements, file patents on our technology, broaden our pipeline of investigational drugs, vaccines and/or diagnostics, establish a biotechnology laboratory, and continue the process of seeking approval of our therapeutic vaccine candidate and diagnostic test outside of the United States. The Company is not presently able to allocate the specific costs for its plans because it does not yet know the requirements for approval of either its therapeutic vaccine candidate or its diagnostic test. While the Company plans to raise additional capital, and may seek to do so by offering equity securities of the Company, none of the Company’s securities have been registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and they may only be sold under registration or an applicable exemption from registration.

If the Company or a sublicense is successful in commercializing its therapeutic vaccine candidate or diagnostic test, the Company will be obligated to pay the Licensor two percent (2%) of any royalties received if the Company grants any third parties royalty-bearing licenses to the Technology. In addition, the Company has agreed to pay Licensor a royalty of one quarter of one percent (0.25%) of all gross revenue resulting from use of the Technology by the Company.

Although the Company did not spend the $0.5 million additional funds per the Licensing Agreement before March 8, 2012, we have not received a default letter and as of March 31, 2013 the Company was in negotiations to extend the terms of the Agreement.

Going Concern

Because we only had no cash at March 31, 2013, which is insufficient to fund any operations, the report of our independent registered public accounting firm on our financial statements for the period ended March 31, 2013 contains an explanatory paragraph regarding their substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our auditors’ opinion is based upon our operating losses and our need to obtain additional financing to sustain operations. Our ability to continue as a going concern will be dependent upon our ability to obtain the necessary financing to meet our obligations and repay our liabilities when they become due, and to generate sufficient revenues from our operations to pay our operating expenses. We will need to raise substantial funds in order to develop the HPV products which we have recently licensed from Virolab Nevada, and if we cannot raise additional funds we may need to abandon development of these products and cease operations.

Results of Operations

The following is a summary of the Company’s operation results for the years ended March 31, 2013 and 2012:

	2013			2012

Total operating expenses	$	778,239		$	2,172,220
Total other income (expense)		---			--
Net loss	$	(778,239	)	$	(2,172,220	)

We were incorporated on May 4, 2010, and have incurred expenses of approximately $3,014,759 through March 31, 2013. These expenses largely consist of formation expenses, stock-based compensation and administrative expenses related to the start-up and organization of our business that have been incurred by and funded by the founder of the Company, Accelerated Venture Partners, LLC, or AVP. Expenses include stock-based compensation, legal fees, accounting fees, costs associated with SEC filings and preparation of documents.

For the year ended March 31, 2013, we had no revenue and incurred general and administrative expenses of $778,239. Our net loss was $778,239, due to general and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses for the first nine months of fiscal 2013 consisted of $750,699 for the estimated fair value of stock-based compensation and $27,530 for administrative support, which mostly consisted of document preparation and EDGAR filing with the SEC.

The estimated value of stock based compensation for our two executive officers was based on the employment agreements with James A.D. Smith, our Chief Executive Officer, and Matthew M. Loar, our Chief Financial Officer, which provide for 1,250,000 and 900,000 stock options, respectively, each vesting over approximately four years beginning April 15, 2011 and May 23, 2011, respectively. The stock based compensation expense is an estimate and significant judgment was involved in attempting to determine the value of the company, Virolab, Inc., for which the options are exercisable. The actual value of our common stock may turn out to be much higher or lower than estimated amount, due to the lack of any reliable data on the Company’s current valuation. Virolab common stock has never traded publicly, and no stock has traded in private markets either, except for privately negotiated sales to the founder of the company and the founder of the technology from which the company subsequently licensed rights. No common stock has been sold in any manner since Virolab emerged from its shell-company status. The Company does not have any offers for purchase of its common stock in any stage, and no stock is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission; therefore if any stock were to be sold the Company would need to do so under an effective registration statement or under an applicable exemption from registration. With the limited data points available to the Company and its board of directors regarding the Company’s valuation, we have estimated the value of common stock at $4 per share for financial reporting purposes. This amount was determined based on the minimum stock price required for listing on any Nasdaq market, and it closely approximates a $100 million valuation for the entire Company (considered “micro-cap” by most equity analysts), which we do not believe unreasonable for a development stage company with phase 3 data for an underserved medical condition. Each $1 change in estimated per-share value of our common stock would change the estimated stock-based compensation expense as reported for the year ending March 31, 2013 by approximately $56,651, so that a $3 estimated value for Virolab, Inc. common stock ($1 less per share) would result in general and administrative expenses of approximately $169,955 instead of the reported $226,606, likewise a $5 estimated value for Virolab, Inc. common stock would result in general and administrative expenses of approximately $283,257. Due to the low exercise price offered to our executive offers in their employment contracts ($0.10 per share, since they are currently not receiving any cash compensation) as compared to the estimated value for financial reporting purposes, the stock price volatility, stock option term and interest rate assumptions do not have a significant impact on the estimated value of the options as they would if the options were granted at market price. As noted above, the actual value of our common stock may turn out to be much higher or lower than the amount estimated for financial reporting purposes, due to the current lack of any reliable data on the Company’s current valuation. As of November 21, 2012 all the employee option had expired.

General and administrative expenses were lower in the year ended in March 31, 2013 compared to the period ended March 31, 2012 because:

●	We were no longer a shell company for the fiscal 2013 period,

●	We incurred lower costs to prepare and file our current and periodic reports with the SEC in the fiscal 2013 period, and

●	We incurred lower costs for stock based compensation, as noted above, compared to no stock-based compensation in the prior period.

To date, our general and administrative expenses, which in most other cases are paid in cash by the reporting companies, have been funded by Accelerated Venture Partners, LLC, or AVP. Expenses include legal fees, accounting fees, costs associated with SEC filings and preparation of documents.

We expect that, if we are successful in securing additional capital, future general and administrative expenses will increase significantly as compared to the period ended March 31, 2013. In addition, we expect to incur research and development expenses as we seek to advance our product candidates.

Liquidity and Capital Resource

As of March 31, 2013, we had a cash balance of $0. There were no other assets, and accrued expenses were approximately $3,014,759, of which 108,795 was due to AVP, a related party. We had a stockholders’ deficit of approximately $110,675 and no means to pay the liabilities in excess of our assets. AVP has agreed to fund certain administrative operating expenses of Virolab until the Company succeeds in raising additional funds, at which point the administrative operating expenses will be due. However, AVP may seek to force earlier payment of the amounts which we owe, or AVP may decide in the future not to continue funding costs on behalf of Virolab, although we are not aware of any plans for them to do so. If we are not successful in raising additional capital, we may not be able to pay our liabilities and may have to cease operations.

We plan to seek to raise at least $10 million of capital through the sale of equity or other means that could dilute existing shareholders within the next 12 months, and plan to use these funds to determine the FDA’s requirements for approval of our therapeutic vaccine candidate, begin working on these requirements, file patents on our technology, broaden our pipeline of investigational drugs, vaccines and/or diagnostics, establish a biotechnology laboratory, and continue the process of seeking approval of our therapeutic vaccine candidate and diagnostic test outside of the United States. We are not presently able to determine the specific costs for our plans because we do not yet know the requirements for approval of either our therapeutic vaccine candidate or our diagnostic test.

We have a consulting agreement with AVP under which AVP has agreed to provide us with certain advisory services that include reviewing our business plan, identifying and introducing prospective financial and business partners, and providing general business advice regarding our operations and business strategy. Under the consulting agreement, cash compensation of $400,000 is due to AVP upon our securing $5 million in available cash from funding, and an additional $400,000 is due upon our securing $10 million in available cash from funding (inclusive of the first $5 million). The cash compensation is to be paid to AVP at the rate of $66,667 per month. The total cash compensation to be received by AVP under the consulting agreement is not to exceed $800,000 unless we receive an amount of funding in excess of $10 million. If we receive equity or debt financing that is an amount less than $5 million, in between $5 million and $10 million, or greater than $10 million, the cash compensation earned by the AVP under its consulting services agreement will be prorated. We have the option to make a lump sum payment to AVP in lieu of the monthly cash payments.

If we do not raise additional funds of at least $2 million for the advancement of our technology before July 12, 2015, we will lose our rights to the HPV technology that we recently licensed; at least $0.5 million of these additional funds must be raised before July 12, 2013, and at least $1 million must be raised before July 12, 2014.

If we or a sublicense is successful in commercializing our therapeutic vaccine candidate or diagnostic test, we will be obligated to pay the licensor two percent (2%) of any royalties received if we grant any third parties royalty-bearing licenses to the technology. In addition, we have agreed to pay the licensor a royalty of one quarter of one percent (0.25%) of all gross revenue resulting from use of the licensed technology.

We plan to measure our future liquidity primarily by the cash and working capital available to fund our operations, if we are ever able to raise capital. To date we have not raised any capital and, accordingly; do not have any capital available to fund our operations, as stated above. We will not be able to commercialize either our therapeutic vaccine candidate or our diagnostic test without additional capital. We are evaluating various means of raising our initial capital, including through the sale of equity securities, licensing agreements or other means. We expect to incur losses for at least several years into the future as we develop our investigational therapeutic vaccine and diagnostic test, and we are unable to estimate when, if ever, we will receive revenue or have a positive cash flow.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a material current or future effect on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or capital resources.

Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates

Our significant accounting policies are more fully disclosed in Note 1 to our financial statements. However, some of our accounting policies may be more particularly important to the portrayal of our financial position and results of operations and require the application of significant judgment by our management. To date, due to our limited operations, we do not believe any specific accounting policies have required significant judgment or use of estimates, other than our assumption that we will continue as a going concern, as described above. If we succeed in securing additional financing and commencing research and development activities, we expect the preparation of our financial statements will require a greater number of estimates and more significant judgment. We currently believe the following critical accounting policies will require significant judgments and estimates in the preparation of our future financial statements.

Stock-Based Compensation

We plan to account for stock awards granted to recipients using an estimate of the fair value of the stock award on the date that the award is granted. This estimated fair value will be recognized as an expense in the statement of operations on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the underlying stock option, generally four years for employees. There is a high degree of subjectivity involved in estimating the input values needed to estimate the fair value of stock options and other awards. For Virolab in particular, our stock has never traded and therefore it will be difficult to determine the underlying fair value of our common stock on each date a stock award is made. Changes in any of the assumptions required to estimate the fair value, particularly the estimated value of the underlying stock and the estimated volatility, as well as the estimated term of the options, can materially affect the resulting estimates of the fair values of the awards that are granted. Also, the expenses recorded for stock-based compensation in our financial statements may differ significantly from the actual value realized by the recipients of the stock options, and these expenses are not adjusted to the actual amounts, if any, realized by the stock option recipients. Users of the financial statements should also understand that the expenses we recognize for stock-based compensation do not result in payments of cash by us.

Research and development expenses

We plan to expense our research and development costs as incurred. If we succeed in securing additional funding, research and development expenses are expected to include clinical trial costs, development and manufacturing costs for investigational drugs, payments to clinical and contract research organizations, compensation expenses for drug development personnel, consulting and advisor costs, preclinical studies and other costs related to development of our product candidates. Research and development expenses are expected to include expenses that are incurred over multiple reporting periods, such as fees for contractors and consultants, patient treatment costs related to clinical trials and investigational drug manufacturing costs. It may be difficult to determine the accounting period in which certain research and development costs are incurred, particularly when outside contractors are involved and there are differences between clinical trial assumptions and actual experience (such as rate of patient enrollment, levels and timing of services provided, review and correction of data inconsistencies, etc.). We plan to assess the level and related costs of the services provided during each reporting period, including the percentage of work completed through each reporting period, to determine the portion to expense in each period. The assessment of the percentage of work completed that determines the amount of research and development expense that should be recognized in a given period sometimes requires significant judgment. We plan to apply our judgment and base our estimates on our historical experience at other companies and on the best information available at the time of reporting.

Revenue recognition

While we do not expect to have any products ready for commercial sale for several years, if at all, we may enter into contractual arrangements with other entities that provides us with revenue before our product candidates are approved. Under such contractual arrangements, if we succeed in entering into any, we plan to recognize revenues when our performance requirements have been fulfilled, the amount of revenue is fixed and determinable, and collection is reasonably assured.

Revenue from license fees with non-cancelable, non-refundable terms and no future performance obligations would be recognized when collection is assured. Milestone payments would be recognized when we fulfill the development milestone requirements and collection is assured. We expect that future royalty revenue, if any, would be recorded when payments are received, since we do not expect that we will be able to reasonably estimate the sales upon which the royalties are based.

If we enter into revenue arrangements with multiple components, we expect to divide the components into separate units of accounting. Consideration received would be allocated among the separate units of accounting based on their relative fair values, and the applicable revenue recognition criteria identified and applied to each of the units.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

We recently commenced our operations and do not believe that there are any recently issued accounting pronouncements that we have not adopted which are likely to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or other disclosures.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not applicable.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms	F-2

Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2013 and March 31, 2012	F-4

Statements of Operations for the period ended March 31, 2013, period ended March 31, 2012 and from inception (May 4, 2010) through March 31, 2013	F-5

Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficit for the period from inception (May 4, 2010) through March 31, 2013	F-6

Statement of Cash Flows for the period ended March 31, 2013, period ended March 31, 2012 and from inception (May 4, 2010) through March 31, 2013	F-7

Notes to Financial Statements	F-8

F-1

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

Virolab, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Virolab, Inc. (the “Company”) as of March 31, 2013, and the related statements of operations, stockholder's deficit and cash flows for the year then ended and for the period from inception (May 4, 2010) to March 31, 2013. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. The financial statements of the Company as of March 31, 2012, were audited by other auditor, whose report, dated June 27, 2012, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and also included an explanatory paragraph that raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. Our audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as, evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of March 31, 2013, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended and for the period from inception (May 4, 2010) to March 31, 2013, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company is a development stage enterprise, had an accumulated deficit of $110,675 as of March 31, 2013 and continues to experience losses. These considerations raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans regarding those matters are also described in Note 2 which contemplates equity financing through a reverse merger transaction and/ or related party advances. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ Anton & Chia LLP

Newport Beach, CA

July 15, 2013

F-2

Peter Messineo

Certified Public Accountant

1982 Otter Way Palm Harbor FL 34685

peter@pm-cpa.com

T 727.421.6268 F 727.674.0511

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Virolab, Inc.

I have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Virolab, Inc. as of March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011 and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ deficit and cash flows for the year then ended and for the period May 4, 2010 (date of inception) through March 31, 2012. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on my audits.

I conducted my audit in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that I plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company was not required to have, nor was I engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. My audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly I express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. I believe that my audit provides a reasonable basis for my opinion.

In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Virolab, Inc. at March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the periods then ended and for the period from May 4, 2010 (date of inception) through March 31, 2012, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has no revenues from operation, has not emerged from the development stage, has had recurring losses resulting in accumulated deficit, negative cash flows from operations and is requiring traditional financing or equity funding to commence its operating plan. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Further information and management’s plans in regard to this uncertainty were also described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ Peter Messineo, CPA

Palm Harbor, Florida

August 24, 2012

F-3

VIROLAB, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
BALANCE SHEETS

	March 31,				March 31,
	2013				2012


ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash		$	-			$	40

TOTAL ASSETS			-				40

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Due to shareholder			108,795				81,295
Other accounts payable			1,880				1,880
TOTAL LIABILITIES			110,675				83,175

STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT:
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding
Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 25,350,000 shares issued and outstanding			2,535				2,535
Additional paid-in capital			2,901,549				2,150,850
Deficit accumulated during the development stage			(3,014,759	)			(2,236,520	)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT			(110,675	)			(83,135	)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY		$	-			$	40

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-4

VIROLAB, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)

	Year Ended						Inception (May 4, 2010) through March 31, 2013
	March 31, 2013			March 31,2012			(Cumulative)


Revenues	$	-		$	-		$	-

Operating expenses
General and administrative		778,239			2,172,220			3,014,759

Total operating expenses		778,239			2,172,220			3,014,759

Net loss	$	(778,239	)	$	(2,172,220	)	$	(3,014,759	)

Basic and diluted net loss per share	$	-		$	-

Shares used in basic and diluted net loss per share calculation		25,350,000			23,350,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-5

VIROLAB, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

	Common Stock											Total
	Shares			Amount			APIC		Accumulated Deficit			Stockholders' Deficit
Balance Prior to Inception		-		$	-		$	-	$	-		$	-
Issuance of Common Stock -Founders for cash		5,000,000			500			1,500		-			2,000
Tender of shares by founder		(3,500,000	)		(350	)		350		-			-
Issuance of Common Stock under stock option granted to founder for consulting services		1,500,000			150			-		-			150
Issuance of Common Stock under subscription agreement with Virolab Sde RL de CV		22,350,000			2,235			-		-			2,235
Net loss		-			-			-		(64,300	)		(64,300	)
Balance at March 31, 2011		25,350,000			2,535			1,850		(64,300	)		(59,915	)
Net loss		-			-			-		(2,172,220	)		(2,172,220	)
Stock option expense		-			-			2,149,000		-			2,149,000
Balance at March 31, 2012		25,350,000			2,535			2,150,850		(2,236,520	)		(83,135	)
Net loss		-			-			-		(778,239	)		(778,239	)
Stock option expense		-			-			750,699		-			750,699
Balance at March 31, 2013		25,350,000		$	2,535		$	2,901,549	$	(3,014,759	)	$	(110,675	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-6

VIROLAB, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)

	Year Ended						Inception (May 4, 2010) through March 31, 2013
	March 31, 2013			March 31, 2012			(Cumulative)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(778,239	)	$	(2,172,220	)	$	(3,014,759	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Stock-based compensation		750,699			2,149,000			2,899,699
Changein operating assets and liabilities		-
Due to shareholder		27,500			21,180			108,795
Other accounts payable		-			1,880			1,880
Net cash used in operating activities		(40	)		(160	)		(4,385	)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock		-			-			4,385
Net increase (decrease) in cash		(40	)		(160	)		8

Cash at beginning of period		40			200			8

Cash at end of period	$	-		$	-		$	-

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-7

Virolab, Inc.

(A Development Stage Corporation)

Notes to Financial Statements

1. Background Information

Virolab, Inc. (“the Company”) was incorporated in the state of Delaware on May 4, 2010 under the name Accelerated Acquisitions X, Inc. The Company was formed as a “shell company” with no operations while it sought new business opportunities. On March 8, 2011, the Company entered into a Licensing Agreement pursuant to which the Company received an exclusive, non-transferrable worldwide license to specified technology, patents, intellectual property, know-how, trade secret information, clinical trial protocols and data, as well as commercial rights to:

●	an investigational therapeutic vaccine for the human papillomavirus (“HPV”) and HPV-related cancers and

●	a diagnostic blood test for HPV.

As a result of entering into the licensing agreement and undertaking efforts into the research and development its product candidates, the Company ceased to be a shell company. The Company changed its name to Virolab, Inc. on April 5, 2011. The Company operates in one reportable business segment, the development and commercialization of products to improve human healthcare.

The Company is currently in the development stage. All activities of the Company to date relate to its organization and acquiring rights to its product candidates. None of the Company’s product candidates have been approved for sale in any countries.

2. Stock-Based Compensation

The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense in its statement of operations based on estimates of the fair value of employee stock option and stock grant awards as measured on the grant date. For stock options, the Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the value of the awards granted. The Company amortizes the estimated value of the options as of the grant date over the stock options’ vesting period, which is generally four years.

During the year ended March 31, 2013, the Company did not enter into any agreements under which it agreed to grant stock-based compensation to any employees or any others. During the year ended March 31, 2012, the Company entered into employment agreements under which it agreed to grant options to purchase 2,550,000 shares of common stock to its officers. Pursuant to the terms of each of the employment agreements, the options would have vested over approximately four years from the date each of the officers commenced employment and will have an exercise price of $0.10 per share. The Company granted options to these officers at the $0.10 per share exercise price, in part, because the employment agreements do not provide for the officers to receive any cash compensation until the Company secures at least $5 million in financing. The aforementioned employment agreements have been terminated and the option to purchase any of the 2,550,000 shares has expired as of November 21, 2012.

The Company has estimated the value of common stock into which the options are exercisable at $4 per share for financial reporting purposes. This amount was determined based on the minimum stock price required for listing on any Nasdaq market, and the amount also approximates a $100 million valuation for the entire Company, which is considered “micro-cap” by most equity analysts. The stock based compensation expense is an estimate and significant judgment was involved in attempting to determine the value of common stock. Virolab common stock has never traded publicly, and no stock has traded in private markets either, except for privately negotiated sales to the founder of the company and the founder of the technology from which the company subsequently licensed rights. No common stock has been sold in any transactions since Virolab emerged from its shell-company status. The Company does not have any offers for purchase of its common stock in any stage, and no stock is registered for resale with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Company believes the only material estimate used in estimating the value stock options was the estimated fair value of the common stock, and that assumed volatility, term, interest rate and dividend yield changes would be not result in material differences in stock option valuations. Based on the assumed value of common stock, the grant-date fair value of options granted during the year ended March 31, 2012 was $9,945,000. The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of $2,149,000 for the year ended March 31, 2012, respectively, and $750,699 for the year ended March 31, 2013 which was all included in general and administrative expenses. As of March 31, 2013, there was $0 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock-based compensation awards and takes in to consideration the 400,000 options that expired March 31, 2012, 1,250,000 options that expired November 5, 2012 and 900,000 options that expired November 21, 2012.

F-8

Virolab, Inc.

(A Development Stage Corporation)

Notes to Financial Statements

The Company has reserved a total of 5,962,500 shares of common stock for issuance under its stock award plan, and issued 2,550,000 that all expired in November of 2012 and per our Company’s Stock Plan the plan re-triggers to 25% of the total outstanding shares on January 1, 2013, therefore as of March 31, 2013 the Company has a reserve of 5,962,500 shares of common stock for issuance under its stock award plan.

3. Significant of Significant Accounting Policies

The significant accounting policies followed are:

Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which assumes the Company will realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has a deficit accumulated during the development stage of $3,014,759, due to shareholder of $108,795 and cash of only $0 as of March 31, 2013. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to obtain financing necessary for it to meet its obligations, develop the products that it has licensed, and ultimately generate revenues from the sale of these products. The Company’s founder has agreed to fund certain administrative operating expenses of the Company until the Company succeeds in raising additional funds. Management’s plans include raising additional funds through an equity financing or licensing transaction in order to meet the Company’s obligations and develop its product candidates, but funding may not be available and the Company may be unsuccessful in raising additional capital of any type. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might arise as a result of this uncertainty.

USE OF ESTIMATES - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - All cash, other than held in escrow, is maintained with a major financial institution in the United States. Deposits with this bank may exceed the amount of insurance provided on such deposits. Temporary cash investments with an original maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents. The Company has no cash equivalent as of March 31, 2013 and March 31, 2012.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES - Expenditures for research, development, and engineering of products are expensed as incurred.

ADVERTISING COSTS - The Company's policy regarding advertising is to expense advertising when incurred.

INCOME TAXES - Income taxes are provided for the tax effects of transactions reported in the financial statements and consist of taxes currently due plus deferred taxes resulting from temporary differences. Such temporary differences result from differences in the carrying value of assets and liabilities for tax and financial reporting purposes. The deferred tax assets and liabilities represent the future tax consequences of those differences, which will either be taxable or deductible when the assets and liabilities are recovered or settled. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

The Company adopted the provisions of FASB ASC 740-10 "Uncertainty in Income Taxes" (ASC 740-10), on January 1, 2007. The Company has not recognized a liability as a result of the implementation of ASC 740-10. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits has not been provided since there is no unrecognized benefit since the date of adoption. The Company has not recognized interest expense or penalties as a result of the implementation of ASC 740-10. If there were an unrecognized tax benefit, the Company would recognize interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in operating expenses.

LOSS PER SHARE - Basic loss per share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted loss per share is computed giving effect to all potentially dilutive common shares. Potentially dilutive common shares may consist of incremental shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options and warrants and the conversion of notes payable to common stock. In periods in which a net loss has been incurred, all potentially dilutive common shares are considered anti-dilutive and thus are excluded from the calculation. At March 31, 2013, the Company did not have any potentially dilutive common shares.

F-9

Virolab, Inc.

(A Development Stage Corporation)

Notes to Financial Statements

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS - In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) introduced a framework for measuring fair value and expanded required disclosure about fair value measurements of assets and liabilities. The Company adopted the standard for those financial assets and liabilities as of the beginning of the 2008 fiscal year and the impact of adoption was not significant. FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820 "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures" (ASC 820) defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity's own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

·	Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

Level 2 - Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (e.g., interest rates); and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

·	Level 3 - Inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.

Fair value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management as of March 31, 2013. The respective carrying value of certain on-balance-sheet financial instruments approximated their fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments. These financial instruments include accounts receivable, other current assets, accounts payable, accrued compensation and accrued expenses. The fair value of the Company's notes payable is estimated based on current rates that would be available for debt of similar terms which is not significantly different from its stated value.

On January 1, 2011, the Company applied ASC 820 for all non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis. The adoption of ASC 820 for non-financial assets and liabilities did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial statements.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Except for rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws and a limited number of grandfathered standards, the FASB Accounting Standards Codification™ (“ASC”) is the sole source of authoritative GAAP literature recognized by the FASB and applicable to the Company. Management has reviewed the aforementioned rules and releases and believes any effect will not have a material impact on the Company's present or future financial statements.

4. Equity Transactions

Preferred Stock

The Company has authorized 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, with a par value of $0.0001 per share. The Company’s Board of Directors has the ability to determine the rights and preferences of any series of preferred stock issued. There are no shares of preferred stock currently issued or outstanding.

Common Stock

The Company has authorized 100,000,000 shares of common stock, with a par value of $0.0001 per share.

At inception (May 4, 2010), the Company issued 5,000,000 shares of common stock to Accelerated Venture Partners, LLC (“AVP”) for $2,000.

F-10

Virolab, Inc.

(A Development Stage Corporation)

Notes to Financial Statements

On February 27, 2011, AVP tendered 3,500,000 shares to the Company for cancellation. Also on February 27, the Company granted AVP an option to purchase 1,500,000 shares of common stock at par value in exchange for certain consulting services, and AVP immediately exercised this option. The Company has the option to repurchase the shares exercised under the option at par value if the below milestones are not met within a specified time:

·	Milestone 1 – Company’s right of repurchase will lapse with respect to 60% of the shares upon securing $5 million in available cash from funding;

·	Milestone 2 – Company’s right of repurchase will lapse with respect to 40% of the Shares upon securing $10 million in available cash (inclusive of any amounts attributable to Milestone 1).

On February 27, 2011, the Company issued 22,350,000 shares of common stock to Virolab S de RL de CV (“Virolab Mexico”) at par value.

On March 31, 2012 there were 49,998 vested employee stock options that expired and are considered non-issued.

As of March 31, 2013, there were 25,350,000 shares issued and outstanding and 5,962,500 shares of common stock were reserved for issuance under the Company’s Stock Option Plan and 5,962,500 of these shares remained available for future issuance as of March 31, 2013. There were 68,687,500 shares of common stock available for future issuance.

On November 5, 2012 there were 434,028 vested employee stock options that expired and are considered non-issued.

On November 21, 2012 there were 280,000 vested employee stock options that expired and are considered non-issued.

5. Income Taxes

The Company has not recognized an income tax benefit for its operating losses generated based on uncertainties concerning its ability to generate taxable income in future periods. The tax benefit for the periods presented is offset by a valuation allowance established against deferred tax assets arising from the net operating losses and other temporary differences, the realization of which could not be considered more likely than not. In future periods, tax benefits and related deferred tax assets will be recognized when management considers realization of such amounts to be more likely than not. As of March 31, 2013 the Company had a loss and for the period May 4, 2010 (date of inception) through March 31, 2013. The net operating losses resulting from operating activities result in deferred tax assets of approximately $110,675 at the effective statutory rates which will expire by the year 2031. The deferred tax asset has been off-set by an equal valuation allowance.

There are no current or deferred income tax expense or benefit recognized for the period ended March 31, 2013.

6. License Agreement

On March 8, 2011, we entered into a Licensing Agreement, pursuant to which the Company received an exclusive, non-transferrable worldwide license to specified technology, patents, intellectual property, know-how, trade secret information, clinical trial protocols and data, as well as commercial rights to:

·	an investigational therapeutic vaccine for the human papillomavirus (“HPV”) and HPV-related cancers and

·	a diagnostic blood test for HPV.

On July 12, 2012, The Company entered into a modified Licensing Agreement that was originally signed on March 8, 2011, pursuant to which the Company received an exclusive, non-transferrable worldwide license to specified technology, patents, intellectual property, know-how, trade secret information, clinical trial protocols and data, as well as commercial rights to:

·	an investigational therapeutic vaccine for the human papillomavirus (“HPV”) and HPV-related cancers and

·	a diagnostic blood test for HPV.

F-11

Virolab, Inc.

(A Development Stage Corporation)

Notes to Financial Statements

7. Related Party Transactions

The Managing Partner of AVP is Timothy Neher, a director of the Company and the only officer of the Company prior to February 27, 2011. From inception through March 31, 2013, the Company paid $4,385 cash to AVP and accrued $108,795 for expenses due to AVP. See Note 4 for a description of the stock transactions involving AVP. See Note 8 for a description of commitments to AVP.

The President and majority stockholder of Virolab Mexico is Ricardo Rosales, a director and CEO of the Company and also an officer from February 27, 2011 through March 31, 2013. Dr. Rosales was the principal inventor of the technology licensed by the Company on February 27, 2011. Dr. Rosales is the only stockholder of Virolab Nevada LLC, the licensor of the technology, which acquired all rights to the technology directly from Virolab Mexico. See Note 4 for a description of the stock transaction involving Virolab Mexico. See Note 6 for a description of the license agreement with Virolab Nevada. Also see Note 8 for a description of commitments to Virolab Nevada under the license agreement.

On August 22, 2012 the Board of Directors appointed the Chairman of the Company Ricardo Rosales as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

8. Commitments and Contingencies

·	an investigational therapeutic vaccine for the human papillomavirus (“HPV”) and HPV-related cancers and

·	a diagnostic blood test for HPV.

The license agreement covers a term of thirty (30) years, provided that the Company is not in breach or default of any of the terms or conditions contained in the agreement. The continuation of the license is conditioned on the Company generating net revenues in the normal course of operations or the funding by the Company of specified amounts for qualifying research, development and commercialization expenses related to the licensed technology, as described in Note 8. The Company is required to fund certain specified expenses related to the commercialization of the licensed technology. There are additional customary commercialization requirements covered in the licensing agreement. The continuation of the license is conditioned on the Company generating net revenues in the normal course of operations or the funding by the Company of specified amounts for qualifying research, development and commercialization expenses related to the licensed technology, Under the terms of the license agreement under which the Company acquired the rights to its product candidates, in order to retain its rights to the licensed technology the Company must receive revenues or fund a minimum of $2 million in qualified research, development and commercialization expenses before July 12, 2015 (at least $0.5 million of which must be before July 12, 2013 and at least $1million before July 12, 2014). If the Company or a sublicense is successful in commercializing the therapeutic vaccine candidate or diagnostic test, the Company will be obligated to pay the licensor two percent (2%) of any royalties received if the Company grants any third parties royalty-bearing licenses to the licensed technology. In addition, the Company has agreed to pay the licensor a royalty of one quarter of one percent (0.25%) of all gross revenue resulting from use of the technology licensed by the Company. There are additional customary commercialization requirements covered in the licensing agreement.

On March 8, 2011, under the terms of the license agreement under which the Company acquired the rights to its product candidates, in order to retain its rights to the licensed technology the Company must receive revenues or fund a minimum of $2 million in qualified research, development and commercialization expenses before March 8, 2014 (at least $0.5 million of which must be before March 8, 2012 and at least $1million before March 8, 2013). If the Company or a sublicense is successful in commercializing the therapeutic vaccine candidate or diagnostic test, the Company will be obligated to pay the licensor two percent (2%) of any royalties received if the Company grants any third parties royalty-bearing licenses to the licensed technology. In addition, the Company has agreed to pay the licensor a royalty of one quarter of one percent (0.25%) of all gross revenue resulting from use of the technology licensed by the Company.

F-12

Virolab, Inc.

(A Development Stage Corporation)

Notes to Financial Statements

On February 27, 2011, the Company entered into a Consulting Services Agreement with AVP. The agreement requires AVP to provide the Company with certain advisory services that include reviewing the Company’s business plan, identifying and introducing prospective financial and business partners, and providing general business advice regarding the Company’s operations and business strategy. Cash compensation of $400,000 is due upon the Company securing $5 million in available cash from funding, and an additional $400,000 is due upon the Company securing $10 million in available cash from funding (inclusive of the first $5 million). The cash compensation is to be paid to AVP at the rate of $66,667 per month. The total cash compensation to be received by AVP is not to exceed $800,000 unless the Company receives an amount of funding in excess of $10 million. If the Company receives equity or debt financing that is an amount less than $5 million, in between $5 million and $10 million, or greater than $10 million, the cash compensation earned by the AVP under its consulting services agreement will be prorated. The Company has the option to make a lump sum payment to AVP in lieu of the monthly cash payments.

As permitted under Delaware law and in accordance with its Bylaws, Virolab indemnifies its officers and directors for certain expenses incurred from legal or other proceedings that arise as a result of the director or officer’s service to the Company. There is no limitation on the term of the indemnification and the maximum amount of potential future indemnification is unlimited. The Company currently does not have a directors and officers insurance policy that could limit its exposure and enable it to recover a portion of any future amounts paid. The Company believes the fair value of these officer and director indemnification agreements is minimal, and, accordingly, has not recorded any liabilities for these agreements as of March 31, 2013 and March 31, 2012, respectively.

From time to time, Virolab may be involved in claims and other legal matters arising in the ordinary course of business. Management is not currently aware of any matters that it believes are likely to have a material adverse effect on its financial position or results of operations.

F-13

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

There are not and have not been any disagreements between the Company and its accountants on any matter of accounting principles, practices or financial statement disclosure. On December 17, 2012 the Board of Directors dismissed Peter Messineo, CPA, as our registered public accountants. The Board elected Anton & Chia, LLP, Newport Beach CA. as our auditor. Prior to Board approval, we had not consulted with Anton & Chia, LLP on any accounting or audit matters.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) that is designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive officer or officers and principal financial officer or officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

In accordance with Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15, an evaluation was completed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s President, Principal Financial Officer and Secretary, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management including the President, Principal Financial Officer and Secretary, concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, were effective in providing reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act was recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms.

Evaluation of Internal Controls and Procedures

This annual report does not include a report of management's assessment regarding internal control over financial reporting or an attestation report of the Company's registered public accounting firm due to a transition period established by rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission for newly public companies.

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

There have been no significant changes to the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter of the year ended March 31, 2013, that materially affected, or were reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

In our fiscal fourth quarter which ended March 31, 2013, we had no events that were required to be reported on Form 8-K that were not filed to date.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The following table sets forth the members of our Board of Directors as of June 29, 2011, the year each director was first elected a director, the age of each director and the positions with the Company currently held by each director.

Director’s Name	Age	Position(s) with the Company	Year First Became a Director
Timothy Neher	47	Director	2010
Ricardo Rosales	52	Director	2011

Timothy Neher was the President, Secretary, Treasurer and sole director of the Company from its founding in May 2010 through February 27, 2011, when Mr. Neher resigned his positions as an officer of the company but not his position as a member of the board of directors. Mr. Neher is the founding partner of Accelerated Venture Partners, LLC, a private venture capital firm based in Foster City, California, and has over 15 years of experience in connection with the provision of debt and equity financing, mergers and public offering transactions. Timothy is the acting Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and a Director of Mikojo, Inc. a public reporting company since 2009. Mr. Neher is also Director of Pinpointed Solutions Inc. a private company since 2008, Director of Ipaypod Inc., a private company since 2007 and Director of Internet Card Present, Inc., a private company since 2007. He is also the President, Secretary and sole director of following public reporting companies: Accelerated Acquisitions IV, Inc., Accelerated Acquisitions XI, Inc., Accelerated Acquisitions XII, Inc., Accelerated Acquisitions XIII, Inc. and Accelerated Acquisitions XIV, Inc. Prior to founding Accelerated Venture Partners, Internet Card Present Industries, Pinpointed Solutions and Ipaypod, Timothy was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Wherify Wireless, a private to public company from 1999 to 2007. Other past experience includes roles as VP of Marketing & Sales for CTH Consumer Plastics and VP of Operations for Windy City Product Development.

Ricardo Rosales was Chief Executive Officer, President, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company from February 27, 2011 through April 15, 2011. Dr. Rosales was also appointed to the board of directors on February 27, 2011, a position which he still holds. Dr. Rosales has over 15 years of experience in vaccine research and is the founder and President of Virolab S de RL de CV, where he developed the investigational therapeutic vaccine and diagnostic test recently licensed to the Company. Dr. Rosales has a Ph.D. in Molecular Biology from the Luis Pasteur University in France, and did two years post-doctoral research at the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, MD. He then spent numerous years at the Biomedical Research Institute of UNAM (National Autonomous University of Mexico).

Board Committees

Due to the small size of our current Board of Directors, the Board has not established any committees and the full Board fulfills the responsibilities traditionally delegated to an audit committee, compensation committee, nominating committee and/or corporate governance committee. As the Board size grows and the Company increases its level of operations, the Board will consider delegating various responsibilities to committees.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table sets forth our executive officers as of March 31, 2012, the year each was first appointed as an officer, the age of each officer and the positions with the Company currently held by each officer.

Director’s Name		Age		Position(s) with the Company		Year First Became an Officer
Ricardo Rosales		52		Chief Executive Officer		2011

Ricardo Rosales was Chief Executive Officer, President, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company from February 27, 2011 through April 15, 2011. Dr. Rosales was also appointed to the board of directors on February 27, 2011, a position which he still holds. On August 22, 2012 the Board of Directors appointed the Chairman of the Company Ricardo Rosales as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Dr. Rosales has over 15 years of experience in vaccine research and is the founder and President of Virolab S de RL de CV, where he developed the investigational therapeutic vaccine and diagnostic test recently licensed to the Company. Dr. Rosales has a Ph.D. in Molecular Biology from the Luis Pasteur University in France, and did two years post-doctoral research at the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, MD. He then spent numerous years at the Biomedical Research Institute of UNAM (National Autonomous University of Mexico).

There are no family relationships between our officers and directors.

Matthew M. Loar joined Virolab as Chief Financial Officer in May 2011. Before joining the Company, Mr. Loar was Chief Financial Officer of Neurobiological Technologies, Inc., a Nasdaq-listed biopharmaceutical company, from April 2008 through September 2010. From 2006 through 2008 he was Chief Financial Officer of Osteologix, Inc. and from 2001 through 2006 Mr. Loar was Chief Financial Officer of Genelabs Technologies, Inc., a company which he joined in 1995. Earlier in his career, Mr. Loar held finance positions with an international manufacturing company and was an audit manager with an international public accounting firm. Mr. Loar is currently on the board of Neurobiological Technologies, Inc. and is a certified public accountant in California (inactive). Mr. Loar holds a B.A. degree from the University of California, Berkeley.

There are no family relationships between our officers and directors.

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our executive officers and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities to file reports of beneficial ownership and changes in beneficial ownership with the SEC. Executive officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all reports filed under Section 16(a). To the Company’s knowledge, based on information provided to the Company, all executive officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders were in compliance with all applicable Section 16(a) filing requirements in fiscal 2013.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following table summarizes all compensation recorded by us in 2012 for our principal executive officers, each other executive officer serving as such whose annual compensation exceeded $100,000, and up to two additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been made in this table but for the fact that the individual was not serving as an executive officer of our Company at March 31, 2013:

None

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2013Fiscal Year End

None

Compensation of Directors

We have not established standard compensation arrangements for our directors and the compensation, if any, payable to each individual for their service on our Board will be determined from time to time by our Board of Directors based upon the amount of time expended by each of the directors on our behalf and comparable director pay at other companies. To date, none of our directors have received any compensation for their services.

Pension Benefits

We do not have a defined benefit plan. None of our executive officers or directors participated in, or otherwise received any benefits under, any pension or retirement plan sponsored by us during fiscal 2013.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

During fiscal 2013, none of our executive officers or directors contributed to, or earned any amounts with respect to, any defined contribution or other plan sponsored by us that provides for the deferral of compensation on a basis that is not tax-qualified.

Compensation Decisions Made After End of Fiscal Year

None

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

As of March 31, 2013, none of our executive officers or directors are eligible for any payments upon a change in control of the Company.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table sets forth information regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 31, 2013, based on information available to us and filings with the SEC by:

●

each of our directors;

●

each of our executive officers;

●

all of our current directors and executive officers as a group; and

●

each person or group of affiliated persons known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock.

Beneficial ownership and percentage ownership are determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and include voting or investment power with respect to shares of stock. This information does not necessarily indicate beneficial ownership for any other purpose.

Unless otherwise indicated and subject to applicable community property laws, to our knowledge, each stockholder named in the following table possesses sole voting and investment power over their shares of common stock, except for those jointly owned with that person’s spouse. Percentage of beneficial ownership of common stock is based on 25,350,000 shares of common stock outstanding as of March, 31, 2013. Unless otherwise noted below, the address of each person listed on the table is c/o Virolab, Inc., 951 Mariners Island Blvd, Suite 300, San Mateo, CA.

			Total Beneficial Ownership
Name and Address	Shares of Common Stock Owned	Shares with Right to Acquire within 60 days	Total Beneficial Ownership	Percentage of Common Stock
Virolab S de RL de CV (1) 671 Montevideo Ave./ Lindavista Mexico City, Mexico 07300	22,350,000	—	22,350,000	88.2	%
Ricardo Rosales (2)	22,350,000	—	22,350,000	88.2	%
Accelerated Venture Partners, LLC (3)	3,000,000	—	3,000,000	11.8	%
Timothy Neher (4)	3,000,000	—	3,000,000	11.8	%
All current executive officers and directors as a group (2 persons)	25,350,000		25,350,000	100	%

____________

*	Less than one percent.

(1)	Ricardo Rosales is majority shareholder and President of Virolab S de RL de CV and holds voting and dispositive power for these shares. Ricardo Rosales is a director of the Company.
(2)	Shares are owned directly by Virolab S de RL de CV. Ricardo Rosales, a director of the Company, is President of Virolab S de RL de CV and holds voting and dispositive power for these shares.
(3)	Timothy Neher is Managing Partner of Accelerated Venture Partners, LLC and holds voting and dispositive power for these shares. Timothy Neher is a director of the Company.
(4)	Shares are owned directly by Accelerated Venture Partners, LLC. Timothy Neher, a director of the Company, is Managing Partner of Accelerated Venture Partners and holds voting and dispositive power for these shares.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Director Independence

As of March 31, 2013, the Board consisted of Ricardo Rosales and Timothy Neher. The Board has determined that neither of the two directors are independent directors as defined by the rules of The Nasdaq Stock Market.

Related Party Transaction Review and Approval

We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our directors for the indemnification of them to the fullest extent permitted by law. The indemnification agreements also allow advancement of expenses to the directors.

Our Board of Directors has not adopted formal policies and procedures for the review and approval of related party transactions. Our Board of Directors has reviewed and approved the material terms of our related party transactions.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The aggregate fees billed by Peter Messineo, CPA, our prior auditor, for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statement and limited review of financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q or services that are normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings were $2,000 for the period from July 6, 2011 to March 31, 2012. Anton & Chia LLP was elected as our auditor in December 2012 for our Form 10-K, estimated costs will be $750 for our year end March 31, 2013.

Audit-Related Fees

There were no fees billed or to be filled by Messineo for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements for the period from July 6, 2011 to March 31, 2012.

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)	Financial Statements and Schedules:

Financial statements as of March 31, 2013 and for the period then ended are included in Item 8. All schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.

(b)

Exhibits:

The following exhibits are incorporated by reference or filed as part of this report.


		Incorporated by Reference			Filed Herewith
Exhibit No.	Description	Form	Exhibit Number in form	Date of Filing	Filed Herewith
3.1	Certificate of Incorporation	10	3.1	7/30/2010
3.2	Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation	8-K	3.1	4/18/2011
3.3	Bylaws of the Company	10	3.2	7/30/2011
10.1	Subscription Agreement for sale of common stock to Virolab S de RL de CV, dated as of February 27, 2011	8-K	10.1	3/2/2011
10.2	Consulting Agreement by and among the Company and Accelerated Venture Partners, LLC, dated as of February 27, 2011	8-K	10.4	3/2/2011
10.3	Licensing Agreement by and among the Company and Virolab Nevada, LLC, dated as of March 8, 2011	8-K	10.1	3/18/2011
10.4	Employment Agreement between the Company and James A.D. Smith, dated as of April 15, 2011 *	8-K	10.1	4/18/2011
10.5	Employment Agreement between the Company and Matthew M. Loar, dated as of May 23, 2011 *	8-K	10.1	5/26/2011
10.6	2011 Employee, Director and Consultant Stock Plan *	10-K	10.6	6/29/11	x

10.7	Licensing Agreement by and among the Company and Virolab Nevada, LLC, dated as of July 12, 2012				x

24.1	Powers of Attorney. (Contained on Signature Page)				x

31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002				x

32.1	Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002				x

101	XBRL Reports

_______________

*	This exhibit is a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


	Virolab, Inc.

	By:	/ S / Ricardo Rosales
Dated: July 15, 2013		Ricardo Rosales Chief Executive Officer and Chairman

POWER OF ATTORNEY AND SIGNATURES

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints each of Ricardo Rosales and Timothy Neher as his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this report, and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent or his substitute may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


Signature	Title	Date


/ S / Timothy Neher Timothy Neher	Director	July 15, 2013

/ S / Ricardo Rosales Ricardo Rosales	Director / Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Financial and Accounting Officer)	July 15, 2013

- 25-