UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2015

or

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number: 001-36005

RETAILMENOT, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	7389	26-0159761
(State or other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)	(Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number)	(IRS Employer Identification Number)

301 Congress Avenue, Suite 700

Austin, Texas 78701

(512) 777-2970

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of Registrant’s principal executive offices)

G. Cotter Cunningham

Chief Executive Officer

301 Congress Avenue, Suite 700

Austin, Texas 78701

(512) 777-2970

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of Agent for service)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer	x	Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 53,639,046 shares of Series 1 Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share as of July 30, 2015.

RETAILMENOT, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements (unaudited)	3
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June  30, 2015 and 2014	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014	5
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014	6
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	7
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	18
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	38
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	39
PART II: OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	41
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	41
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	68
Item 3.	Defaults upon Senior Securities	69
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	69
Item 5.	Other Information	70
Item 6.	Exhibits	70
SIGNATURES		71
Exhibit Index		72

2

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

RETAILMENOT, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

(unaudited)

	As of June 30, 2015			As of December 31, 2014
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	279,817		$	244,482
Accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,264 and $2,356 at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively)		38,337			69,603
Prepaid assets and other current assets, net		16,454			14,930
Total current assets		334,608			329,015
Property and equipment, net		20,428			16,949
Intangible assets, net		68,983			70,819
Goodwill		175,058			176,927
Other assets, net		8,659			5,394
Total assets	$	607,736		$	599,104
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	5,924		$	5,482
Accrued compensation and benefits		7,608			12,138
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		6,838			6,110
Income taxes payable		1,041			9,032
Current maturities of long term debt		10,000			10,000
Total current liabilities		31,411			42,762
Deferred tax liability—noncurrent		4,931			3,404
Long term debt		67,500			40,000
Other noncurrent liabilities		8,201			8,183
Total liabilities		112,043			94,349
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock: $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized; zero shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014		—			—
Series 1 common stock: $0.001 par value, 150,000,000 shares authorized; 53,614,712 and 54,253,452 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively		54			54
Series 2 common stock: $0.001 par value, 6,107,494 shares authorized; zero shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014		—			—
Additional paid-in capital		507,836			517,421
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(3,887	)		(1,942	)
Accumulated deficit		(8,310	)		(10,778	)
Total stockholders’ equity		495,693			504,755
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	607,736		$	599,104

See the accompanying notes, which are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

RETAILMENOT, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
Net revenues	$	53,180		$	59,506		$	113,564		$	120,776
Costs and expenses:
Cost of net revenues		5,176			4,648			10,522			9,078
Product development		13,072			12,980			26,392			23,686
Sales and marketing		22,636			19,195			44,277			40,367
General and administrative		9,712			10,291			19,282			19,638
Amortization of purchased intangible assets		2,739			3,194			5,365			6,637
Other operating expenses		763			1,112			1,528			2,460
Total cost and expenses		54,098			51,420			107,366			101,866
Income (loss) from operations		(918	)		8,086			6,198			18,910
Other income (expense):
Interest expense, net		(492	)		(494	)		(913	)		(1,025	)
Other expense, net		(154	)		(328	)		(397	)		(300	)
Income (loss) before income taxes		(1,564	)		7,264			4,888			17,585
Provision for income taxes		(27	)		(2,938	)		(2,420	)		(7,184	)
Net income (loss)	$	(1,591	)	$	4,326		$	2,468		$	10,401
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic	$	(0.03	)	$	0.08		$	0.05		$	0.19
Diluted	$	(0.03	)	$	0.08		$	0.04		$	0.19
Weighted average number of common shares used in computing net income (loss) per share:
Basic		53,482			53,791			53,754			53,472
Diluted		53,482			55,377			54,891			55,455

See the accompanying notes, which are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

RETAILMENOT, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
Net income (loss)	$	(1,591	)	$	4,326		$	2,468		$	10,401
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustments		986			(18	)		(1,945	)		462
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(605	)	$	4,308		$	523		$	10,863

See the accompanying notes, which are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

5

RETAILMENOT, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	2,468		$	10,401
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization expense		8,179			8,290
Stock-based compensation expense		13,357			11,380
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)		282			(1,788	)
Excess income tax benefit from stock-based compensation and other		(1,307	)		(10,523	)
Non-cash interest expense		203			193
Amortization of deferred compensation		1,536			2,459
Other non-cash losses, net		1,152			363
Provision for doubtful accounts receivable		(287	)		822
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable, net		30,961			16,787
Prepaid expenses and other current assets, net		(1,730	)		(1,307	)
Accounts payable		1,156			(1,966	)
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		(12,161	)		951
Other noncurrent assets and liabilities		832			405
Net cash provided by operating activities		44,641			36,467
Cash flows from investing activities:
Payments for acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired		—			(75	)
Purchase of property and equipment		(6,323	)		(3,459	)
Purchase of other assets		(4,302	)		(101	)
Purchase of non-marketable investment		(4,000	)		—
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment		5			—
Net cash used in investing activities		(14,620	)		(3,635	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from notes payable, net of issuance costs		29,950			—
Payments on notes payable		(2,500	)		(5,250	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of shares withheld for taxes		4,466			9,797
Excess income tax benefit from stock-based compensation and other		1,307			10,523
Payments of offering costs for follow-on offering		—			(61	)
Payments for repurchase of common stock		(27,192	)		(6	)
Payments of principal on capital lease arrangements		(7	)		(6	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		6,024			14,997
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate on cash		(710	)		195
Change in cash and cash equivalents		35,335			48,024
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		244,482			165,881
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	279,817		$	213,905
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Interest payments	$	591		$	1,039
Income tax payments	$	11,975		$	6,059

See the accompanying notes, which are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

6

RETAILMENOT, INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

1. Description of Business

We operate the world’s largest marketplace for digital offers, including the largest digital offer marketplace in the U.S., RetailMeNot.com, and in the U.K., VoucherCodes.co.uk, and the largest portfolio of digital offer websites in France, Bons-de-Reduction.com, Poulpeo.com and Ma-Reduc.com, connecting consumers with leading retailers and brands. Our websites, mobile applications, email newsletters and alerts and social media presence enable consumers to search for, discover and redeem relevant digital offers from retailers and brands. Our marketplace features digital offers across multiple product categories, including clothing and shoes; electronics; health and beauty; home and office; travel, food and entertainment; and personal and business services. We believe our investments in digital offer content quality, product innovation and direct retailer relationships allow us to offer a compelling experience to consumers looking to save money, whether online or in-store.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation

As used in this report, the terms “we,” “the Company,” “us” or “our” refer to RetailMeNot, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP, and Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, requirements for interim financial statements. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

The accompanying interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements and include all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation. Certain information and disclosures normally included in the notes to the annual consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been omitted from these interim condensed consolidated financial statements pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC. Accordingly, these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, which are included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2015 or for any other period.

Significant Estimates and Judgments

The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of net revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. These estimates and assumptions could have a material effect on our future results of operations and financial position. Significant items subject to our estimates and assumptions include stock-based compensation, income taxes, valuation of acquired goodwill and intangible assets, allowance for doubtful accounts, revenue returns reserve, unrecognized tax benefits, acquisition-related contingent liabilities and the useful lives of property and equipment and intangible assets. As a result, actual amounts could differ from those presented herein.

Business Segment

We have one operating and reporting segment consisting of various products and services that are all related to our marketplace for digital offers. Our chief operating decision maker is our Chief Executive Officer. Our Chief Executive Officer allocates resources and assesses performance of the business and other activities at a single reporting segment level.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

All highly-liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase are considered to be cash equivalents.

Accounts Receivable, Net

Accounts receivable, net represent amounts due from retailers, primarily through various performance marketing networks, for commissions earned on consumer purchases and amounts due for premium placement advertising. We record an allowance for doubtful accounts in an amount equal to the estimated probable losses net of recoveries, which are based on an analysis

7

of historical bad debt, current receivables aging and expected future write-offs of uncollectible accounts, as well as an assessment of specific identifiable accounts considered at risk or uncollectible. Accounts receivable are written off against the allowance for doubtful accounts when it is determined that the receivable is uncollectible.

Property and Equipment, Net

Property and equipment, net includes assets such as furniture and fixtures, leasehold improvements, computer hardware, office and telephone equipment and certain capitalized internally developed software and website development costs. We record property and equipment at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization, using the straight-line method. Ordinary maintenance and repairs are charged to expense, while expenditures that extend the physical or economic life of the assets are capitalized. Property and equipment are depreciated over their estimated economic lives, which range from three to five years, using the straight-line method. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the improvements or the lease term. Capitalized internally developed software and website development costs are depreciated over their estimated useful lives, which range from two to three years. We perform reviews for the impairment of property and equipment when management believes events or circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill arises from business combinations and is measured as the excess of the cost of the business acquired over the sum of the acquisition-date fair values of tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired, less any liabilities assumed.

We evaluate goodwill for impairment annually on October 1, during the fourth quarter of each year, or more frequently when an event occurs or circumstances change that indicates the carrying value may not be recoverable. Events or circumstances that could trigger an impairment test include, but are not limited to, a significant adverse change in the business climate or in legal factors, an adverse action or assessment by a regulator, a loss of key personnel, significant changes in our use of the acquired assets or the strategy for our overall business, significant negative industry or economic trends, significant underperformance relative to operating performance indicators and significant changes in competition.

We evaluate the recoverability of goodwill using a two-step impairment process tested at our sole reporting segment level. In the first step, the fair value for our reporting unit is compared to our book value including goodwill. If the fair value is less than the book value, a second step is performed that compares the implied fair value of goodwill to the book value of the goodwill. The fair value for the implied goodwill is determined based on the difference between the fair value of the sole reporting segment and the net fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities excluding goodwill. If the implied fair value of the goodwill is less than the book value, the difference is recognized as an impairment charge in the consolidated statements of operations. We did not record any goodwill impairment charges during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014.

Identifiable intangible assets consist of acquired customer intangible assets, marketing-related intangible assets, contract-based intangible assets, and technology-based intangible assets. Intangible assets with definite lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives on a straight-line or accelerated basis. See Note 3, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. The method of amortization applied represents our best estimate of the distribution of the economic value of the identifiable intangible assets. The factors we consider in determining the useful lives of identifiable intangible assets included the extent to which expected future cash flows would be affected by our intent and ability to retain use of these assets, including the period of time that would capture 90% or more of the assets value on a perpetuity basis.

Intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of intangible assets may not be recoverable. Conditions that would necessitate an impairment assessment include a significant decline in the observable market value of an asset, a significant change in the extent or manner in which an asset is used, or any other significant adverse change that would indicate that the carrying amount of an asset or group of assets may not be recoverable. When such events occur, we compare the carrying amounts of the assets to their undiscounted cash flows. If this comparison indicates that there is impairment, the amount of the impairment is calculated as the difference between the carrying value and the fair value.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, services have been rendered, the fee to the paid retailer, defined as a retailer with which we have a contract, is fixed or determinable and collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. For commission revenues, which represent the substantial majority of our net revenues, revenue recognition generally occurs when a consumer, having visited one of our websites and clicked on a digital offer for a paid retailer makes a purchase with such paid retailer, and completion of the order is reported to us by such paid retailer, either directly or through a performance marketing network. The reporting by the paid retailer includes the amount of commissions the paid retailer has calculated

8

as owing to us. Certain paid retailers do not provide reporting until a commission payment is made. In those cases, which have historically not been significant, we record commission revenues on a cash basis. For advertising revenues, revenue recognition occurs when we display a paid retailer’s advertisements on our websites or mobile applications.

Multiple Element Arrangements. When we enter into revenue arrangements with certain paid retailers that are comprised of multiple deliverables, we allocate consideration to all deliverables based on the relative selling price method in accordance with the selling price hierarchy. The objective of the hierarchy is to determine the price at which we would transact a sale if the service were sold on a stand-alone basis and requires the use of: (1) vendor-specific objective evidence, or VSOE, if available; (2) third-party evidence, or TPE, if VSOE is not available; and (3) a best estimate of the selling price, or BESP, if neither VSOE nor TPE is available.

VSOE. We determine VSOE based on our historical pricing and discounting practices for the specific service when sold separately. In determining VSOE, we require that a substantial majority of the stand-alone selling prices for these services fall within a reasonably narrow pricing range. We have not historically sold our services within a reasonably narrow pricing range. As a result, we have not been able to establish VSOE.

TPE. When VSOE cannot be established for deliverables in multiple element arrangements, we apply judgment with respect to whether we can establish a selling price based on TPE. TPE is determined based on competitor prices for similar deliverables when sold separately. Generally, our go-to-market strategy differs from that of our peers and our offerings contain a significant level of differentiation such that the comparable pricing of services cannot be obtained. Furthermore, we are unable to reliably determine what similar competitor services’ selling prices are on a stand-alone basis. As a result, we have not been able to establish selling price based on TPE.

BESP. When we are unable to establish selling price using VSOE or TPE, we use BESP in our allocation of arrangement consideration. The objective of BESP is to determine the price at which we would transact a sale if the service were sold on a stand-alone basis. BESP is generally used to allocate the selling price to deliverables in our multiple element arrangements. We determine BESP for deliverables by considering multiple factors including, but not limited to, prices we charge for similar offerings, market conditions, competitive landscape and pricing practices. We limit the amount of allocable arrangement consideration to amounts that are fixed or determinable and that are not contingent on future performance or future deliverables.

If the facts and circumstances underlying the factors we considered change or should future facts and circumstances lead us to consider additional factors, both our determination of our relative selling price under the hierarchy and our BESPs could change in future periods.

We estimate and record a reserve based upon actual, historical return rates as reported to us by paid retailers to provide for end-user cancelations or product returns, which may not be reported by the paid retailer or performance marketing network until a subsequent date. As such, we report commission revenues net of the estimated returns reserve. Net revenues are reported net of sales taxes, where applicable.

Our payment arrangements with paid retailers are both direct and through performance marketing networks, which act as intermediaries between the paid retailers and us. No paid retailer individually accounted for more than 10% of net revenues or accounts receivable as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014.

Cost of Net Revenues

Cost of net revenues is composed of direct and indirect costs incurred to generate revenue. These costs consist of personnel costs of our salaried merchandising and technology support employees and fees paid to third-party contractors engaged in the operation and maintenance of our existing websites and mobile applications. Such technology costs also include website hosting and Internet service costs. Other costs include allocated facility and general information technology costs.

Sales and Marketing Expense

Our sales and marketing expense consists primarily of personnel costs for our sales, marketing, search engine optimization, search engine marketing and business analytics employees, as well as online, brand and other marketing expenses. Our online, brand and other marketing costs include search engine fees, advertising on social networks, television and radio advertising, promotions, display advertisements, creative development fees, public relations, email campaigns, trade shows and other general marketing costs. Other costs include allocated facility and general information technology costs.

9

Product Development

Our product development expense consists primarily of personnel costs of our product management and software engineering teams, as well as fees paid to third-party contractors and consultants engaged in the design, development, testing and improvement of the functionality, offer content and user experience of our websites and mobile applications.

General and Administrative Expense

Our general and administrative expense represents personnel costs for employees involved in general corporate functions, including finance, accounting, legal and human resources, among others. Additional costs included in general and administrative expense include professional fees for legal, audit and other consulting services, the provision for doubtful accounts receivable, travel and entertainment, charitable contributions, recruiting, allocated facility and general information technology costs and other general corporate overhead expenses.

Stock-Based Compensation Expense

Stock-based compensation expense is measured at the grant date based on the estimated fair value of the award, net of estimated forfeitures. We recognize these compensation costs on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award. Forfeiture rates are estimated at grant date based on historical experience and adjusted in subsequent periods for differences in actual forfeitures from those estimates. We include stock-based compensation expense in cost of net revenues and operating expenses in our consolidated statements of operations, consistent with the respective employees’ cash compensation. We determine the fair value of stock options on the grant date using the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts of our financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and notes payable, approximate fair value due to the instruments’ short-term maturities or, in the case of the long-term notes payable, based on the variable interest rate feature. We record derivative liabilities at fair value.

Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes is determined using the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are calculated based upon the temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases using the enacted tax rates that are applicable in a given year. The deferred tax assets are recorded net of a valuation allowance when, based on the available supporting evidence, we believe it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the recorded deferred tax assets will not be realized in future periods.

The Company may be subject to income tax audits by the respective tax authorities in any or all of the jurisdictions in which the Company operates or has operated within a relevant period, including the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and the Netherlands. Significant judgment is required in determining uncertain tax positions. We utilize a two-step approach to recognize and measure uncertain tax positions. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement. We consider many factors when evaluating and estimating our tax positions and tax benefits, which may require periodic adjustments and which may not accurately forecast actual outcomes. We adjust these reserves in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the closing of an audit or the refinement of an estimate. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in which the change in judgment occurs. We include interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in the provision for income taxes on our consolidated statements of operations.

Foreign Currency

Our operations outside of the U.S. generally use the local currency as their functional currency. Assets and liabilities for these operations are translated at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Income and expense accounts are translated at average exchange rates for the period. Foreign currency translation adjustments are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). Gains and losses from foreign currency denominated transactions are recorded in other income (expense), net in our consolidated statements of operations.

10

Non-Marketable Investments and Other-Than-Temporary Impairment

During the second quarter of 2015, we invested $4.0 million in a non-controlling minority ownership stake in a privately-held marketing technology company in the United States. The minority interest is included at cost in other assets, net, on our consolidated balance sheets. We own less than 20% of the voting equity of the investee.

We regularly evaluate the carrying value of our cost-method investment for impairment and whether any events or circumstances are identified that would significantly harm the fair value of the investment. The primary indicators we utilize to identify these events and circumstances are the investee’s ability to remain in business, such as the investee’s liquidity and rate of cash use, and the investee’s ability to secure additional funding and the value of that additional funding. In the event a decline in fair value is judged to be other-than-temporary, we will record an other-than-temporary impairment charge in other income, net in our consolidated statements of operations. As the inputs utilized for our periodic impairment assessment are not based on observable market data, potential impairment charges related to our cost-method investment would be classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. To determine the fair value of this investment, we use all available financial information related to the entity, including information based on recent or pending third-party equity investments in the entity. In certain instances, a cost-method investment’s fair value is not estimated as there are no identified events or changes in the circumstances that may have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the investment and to do so would be impractical.

Derivative Financial Instruments

Our operations outside of the U.S. expose us to various market risks that may affect our consolidated results of operations, cash flows and financial position. These market risks include, but are not limited to, fluctuations in currency exchange rates. Our primary foreign currency exposures are in Euros and British Pound Sterling. As a result, we face exposure to adverse movements in currency exchange rates as the financial results of our operations are translated from local currency into U.S. dollars upon consolidation.

We have entered into a derivative instrument to hedge certain exposures of non-functional currency denominated intercompany loans and may enter into further such instruments in the future. We have not elected to apply hedge accounting or hedge accounting does not apply. Gains and losses resulting from a change in fair value for these derivatives are reflected in the period in which the change occurs and are recorded in other income (expense), net in our consolidated statement of operations. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, we recorded a loss of $0.4 million and a gain of $0.6 million, respectively, related to our foreign exchange derivative instruments. The fair value of our outstanding foreign exchange derivative instrument as of both June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the dates on which we entered into those respective instruments, was less than $0.1 million. The notional amount of our outstanding foreign exchange derivative instrument as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 was $6.3 million and $9.0 million, respectively. We did not enter into any foreign exchange derivative instruments during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014.

We do not use financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. Derivative instruments are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value and are short-term in duration. We are exposed to the risk that counterparties to derivative contracts may fail to meet their contractual obligations.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued new guidance that superseded previously existing revenue recognition requirements. The guidance provides a five-step process to recognize revenue that depicts the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration expected in exchange for those goods and services. The guidance requires disclosures enabling users of financial statements to understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. Additionally, qualitative and quantitative disclosures are required about contracts with customers, significant judgments and changes in judgments, and assets recognized from the costs to obtain or fulfill a contract. On July 9, 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date by one year to December 15, 2017 for the first interim period within annual reporting periods beginning after that date, using either a full or modified retrospective application method. Early adoption of the standard is permitted, but not before the first interim period within annual reporting periods beginning after the original effective date of December 15, 2016. We are currently evaluating which of the two retrospective application methods we will use and the effect that the adoption of this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued new guidance that amends the balance sheet presentation of debt issuance costs. The guidance requires debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability instead of being presented as an asset. The guidance requires retrospective application and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. The guidance is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

11

In April 2015, the FASB issued new guidance clarifying whether a customer should account for a cloud computing arrangement as an acquisition of a software license or as a service arrangement by providing characteristics that a cloud computing arrangement must have in order to be accounted for as a software license acquisition. The guidance allows either retrospective or prospective application and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. The guidance is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

3. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Changes in our goodwill balance for the year ended December 31, 2014 and the six months ended June 30, 2015 are summarized in the table below (in thousands):

Balance at December 31, 2013	$	179,659
Acquired in business combinations		75
Foreign currency translation adjustment		(2,807	)
Balance at December 31, 2014		176,927
Acquired in business combinations		—
Foreign currency translation adjustment		(1,869	)
Balance at June 30, 2015 (unaudited)	$	175,058

Intangible assets consisted of the following as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (dollars in thousands):

	Weighted- Average Amortization Period (Months)		Estimated Useful Life (Months)	June 30, 2015 (unaudited)
				Gross		Accumulated Amortization			Net
Customer relationships		180	180	$	16,094	$	(4,967	)	$	11,127
Marketing-related		155	48-180		80,856		(25,532	)		55,324
Contract-based		58	12-60		19,763		(17,231	)		2,532
Technology-based		12	12		7,662		(7,662	)		—
Total intangible assets				$	124,375	$	(55,392	)	$	68,983

	Weighted- Average Amortization Period (Months)		Estimated Useful Life (Months)	December 31, 2014
				Gross		Accumulated Amortization			Net
Customer relationships		180	180	$	16,156	$	(4,439	)	$	11,717
Marketing-related		160	48-180		77,379		(22,636	)		54,743
Contract-based		58	12-60		19,808		(15,449	)		4,359
Technology-based		12	12		7,773		(7,773	)		—
Total intangible assets				$	121,116	$	(50,297	)	$	70,819

4. Commitments and Contingencies

Operating Leases

We lease office space, including our corporate headquarters in Austin, Texas, under non-cancelable operating leases. Rent expense under these operating leases was $1.7 million and $1.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $3.0 million and $2.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Legal Matters

From time to time, we may be involved in litigation relating to claims arising in the ordinary course of business, including litigation related to claims of infringement of third party patents and other intellectual property. Management believes that there are no claims or actions pending or threatened against the Company, the ultimate disposition of which would have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

12

5. Stockholders’ Equity and Stock-Based Compensation

Common Stock

Our certificate of incorporation authorizes shares of stock as follows: 150,000,000 shares of Series 1 common stock, 6,107,494 shares of Series 2 common stock and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock. The common and preferred stock have a par value of $0.001 per share. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, 53,614,712 and 54,253,452 shares of Series 1 common stock were outstanding, respectively. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, zero shares of preferred stock and Series 2 common stock were outstanding.

In March 2014, the holders of all 6,107,494 shares of Series 2 common stock outstanding converted such shares into 6,107,494 fully paid and nonassessable shares of Series 1 common stock. Following such conversion, no shares of Series 2 common stock remained outstanding.

Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote at all meetings of stockholders, except each share of Series 2 common stock is not entitled to vote in connection with the election of the members of our board of directors. The number of authorized shares of common stock may be increased or decreased (but not below the number of shares thereof then outstanding) by the affirmative vote of the holders of shares of capital stock of the Company representing a majority of the votes represented by all outstanding shares of capital stock of the Company entitled to vote. The holders of common stock are also entitled to receive dividends, when, if and as declared by our board of directors, whenever funds are legally available therefore, subject to the priority rights of any outstanding preferred stock.

Share Repurchase

On February 5, 2015, our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $100 million worth of shares of our Series 1 common stock over a period of up to 24 months. During the six months ended June 30, 2015, we repurchased 1,545,017 shares of Series 1 common stock at an aggregate purchase price of $27.2 million.

Stock-Based Compensation

In July 2013, our board of directors and stockholders approved our 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2013 Plan”) and our 2013 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “2013 Purchase Plan”). When the 2013 Plan took effect, all shares available for grant under our 2007 Stock Plan, as amended (the “2007 Plan”), were transferred into the share pool of the 2013 Plan. Subsequent to our initial public offering, we have not granted, and will not grant in the future, any additional awards under the 2007 Plan. However, the 2007 Plan will continue to govern the terms and conditions of all outstanding equity awards granted under the 2007 Plan.

2013 Equity Incentive Plan

Under our 2013 Plan, the following awards types may be granted: stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares and units and other cash-based or stock-based awards. To date we have granted non-statutory stock options and restricted stock units. Restricted stock units represent rights to receive shares of our Series 1 common stock (or their value in cash) at a future date without payment of a purchase price. Holders of restricted stock units have no voting rights or rights to receive cash dividends unless and until shares of Series 1 common stock are issued in settlement of such awards. The compensation committee of our board of directors, or a committee appointed by the compensation committee, determines the term of the option, option price, number of shares for which each option and restricted stock unit is granted, whether restrictions will be imposed on the shares subject to the option or restricted stock unit, and the vesting period for each option and restricted stock unit. Awards granted under the 2013 Plan generally vest over four years. The term of each option is no more than ten years from grant date.

2007 Stock Plan

Options granted under the 2007 Plan are either incentive stock options or nonstatutory stock options. Our board of directors determined the term of the option, option price, number of shares for which each option was granted, whether restrictions were imposed on the shares subject to the option, and the vesting period for each option. Generally, options become 25% vested after one year of service, with the remaining 75% vesting on a pro-rata basis over the remaining three years. The term of each option is ten years from grant date.

Stock-based compensation expense for all employee share-based payment awards is based upon the grant date fair value. We recognize compensation costs, net of estimated forfeitures, on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award. Forfeiture rates are estimated at grant date based on historical experience and adjusted in subsequent periods for differences in actual forfeitures from our previous estimates. We recorded stock-based compensation expense of $6.5 million and $6.4 million for the three

13

months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $13.4 million and $11.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. We include stock-based compensation expense in cost and expenses consistent with the classification of respective employees’ cash compensation in our consolidated statements of operations. Individuals exercised 658,488 and 1,219,159 stock options during the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

The fair value of common stock options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 was estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model. The weighted-average assumptions for stock options granted are outlined in the following table:

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014
	(unaudited)
Expected volatility		51.1	%		56.8	%
Expected term (in years)		6.0			6.0
Risk-free rate of return		1.7	%		1.9	%
Expected dividend yield		—			—

Due to our short history as a public company, our expected volatility is based on the volatility of comparable publicly traded entities. The expected term represents the period of time the stock options are expected to be outstanding and is based on the “simplified method.” We used the “simplified method” due to the lack of sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to otherwise estimate the expected life of the stock options. The risk-free interest rate assumptions we use are based on observed market interest rates appropriate for the term of our stock options.

6. Earnings Per Share

The rights of the holders of Series 1 and Series 2 common stock are identical, except with respect to voting. Each share of Series 1 and Series 2 common stock is entitled to one vote per share; however holders of Series 2 common stock are not entitled to vote in connection with the election of the members of our board of directors. Shares of Series 2 common stock may be converted into shares of Series 1 common stock at any time at the option of the stockholder. As of June 30, 2015 and 2014, no shares of Series 2 common stock were outstanding.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share of common stock (in thousands, except per share amounts):

	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014		2015		2014
	(unaudited)
Numerator
Net income (loss)	$	(1,591	)	$	4,326	$	2,468	$	10,401
Denominator
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic		53,482			53,791		53,754		53,472
Dilutive effect of stock options, restricted stock units, and Employee Stock Purchase Plan shares		—			1,586		1,137		1,983
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted		53,482			55,377		54,891		55,455
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic	$	(0.03	)	$	0.08	$	0.05	$	0.19
Diluted	$	(0.03	)	$	0.08	$	0.04	$	0.19

14

The following common equivalent shares were excluded from the diluted net income (loss) per share calculation, as their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015		2014		2015		2014
Stock options		1,622		1,349		2,964		1,173
Restricted stock units		2,295		654		680		438
Employee Stock Purchase Plan shares		403		29		—		2
Total		4,320		2,032		3,644		1,613

15

7. Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is defined as the exit price, or the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the measurement date. GAAP set forth a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. The three tiers are Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop our own assumptions.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below (in thousands):

	Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2015 (unaudited)
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets:
Money market deposit accounts	$	175,375	$	—	$	—	$	175,375
Foreign exchange forward contract	$	—	$	27	$	—	$	27
	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2014
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets:
Money market deposit accounts	$	170,196	$	—	$	—	$	170,196
Liabilities:
Foreign exchange forward contract	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—

Money market deposit accounts are reported on our consolidated balance sheets as cash and cash equivalents and derivative instruments are reported on our consolidated balance sheets as either prepaid assets and other current assets, net or accrued expenses and other current liabilities.

The fair value of our derivative instruments has been determined using pricing models that take into account the underlying contract terms, as well as all applicable inputs, such as currency rates. The derivative instruments have a fair value of $0.0 million as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 because we entered into such instruments on those period-ending dates.

Our other financial instruments consist primarily of accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and notes payable. The carrying value of these assets and liabilities approximate their respective fair values as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 due to the short-term maturities, or in the case of our long-term notes payable, based on the variable interest rate feature. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, no significant fair value adjustments were required for nonfinancial assets and liabilities.

8. Income Taxes

Our quarterly tax provision and our quarterly estimate of our annual effective tax rate are subject to significant variation due to several factors, including variability in accurately predicting our pre-tax and taxable income and loss and the mix of jurisdictions to which they relate, and by changes in tax laws and regulations. Additionally, our effective tax rate can be more or less volatile based on the amount of our pre-tax income or loss. For example, the impact of discrete items and non-deductible expenses on our effective tax rate is greater when our pre-tax income is lower.

Our annual effective tax rate may be adversely impacted by the amount of our pretax income, or loss, relative to our nondeductible expenses associated with stock-based compensation and deferred compensation charges. Our effective tax rate may also be adversely impacted by the amount of our pretax income, or loss, relative to changes in tax law such as the expiration of the U.S. federal research and development credit at the end of 2014.

For the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, we recorded income tax expense of $27 thousand and $2.9 million, resulting in an effective tax rate of (1.7%) and 40.4%, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, we recorded income tax expense of $2.4 million and $7.2 million, resulting in an effective tax rate of 49.5% and 40.9%, respectively. As of June 30, 2015, our effective tax rate estimate for the year ended December 31, 2015 differed from the statutory rate primarily due to tax charges associated with, non-deductible stock-based compensation charges, non-deductible deferred compensation expenses and state taxes, which are partially offset by the effect of different statutory tax rates in foreign jurisdictions and the benefit of disqualifying dispositions of incentive stock options. As of June 30, 2014, our effective tax rate estimate for the year ended December 31, 2014

16

differed from the statutory rate primarily due to tax charges associated with the implementation of our global corporate restructuring plan in the first fiscal quarter of 2014, non-deductible stock-based compensation charges, non-deductible deferred compensation expenses and state taxes, which is partially offset by the effect of different statutory tax rates in foreign jurisdictions and the benefit of disqualifying dispositions of incentive stock options.

9. Related Party Transactions

On December 26, 2013, we entered into an agreement with a domain registry company and certain of its subsidiaries. We agreed to pay the domain registry company $4.3 million for second level domains, or SLDs, contingent upon the domain registry company becoming the registry operator for such domains. In April 2015, we used $4.3 million to purchase the SLDs from the domain registry company pursuant to the terms of our agreement. An investment fund holds more than 10% of the outstanding capital stock of the domain registry company and holds more than 5% of a class of our voting securities as of March 3, 2015. In addition, during the period in which the agreement with the domain registry company was entered into and as of the date the purchase of the SLDs was completed, a member of our board of directors was a general partner of the entity that indirectly is the general partner of the investment fund.

10. Subsequent Events

In August 2015, we announced plans to reduce operating expenses in order to realign our cost structure with our current strategic plan. As part of this expense reduction, we have reduced U.S. headcount by approximately 10 percent. We currently expect to incur $1.2 million in severance costs associated with the targeted employee reductions, which will be included in the results of our operations for the third quarter of 2015.

17

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that are based on our management’s beliefs and assumptions and on information currently available to our management. The statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not purely historical are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. You can identify these statements by words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “can,” “continue,” “could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” “potential,” “predicts,” “projects,” “seeks,” “should,” “target,” “will,” or “would” and similar expressions or the negative of these terms. These statements are not guarantees of future performance or development and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that are in some cases beyond our control. All of our forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause our actual results to differ materially from our expectations. Factors that may cause such differences include, but are not limited to, the risks described under “Risk Factors” in this Form 10-Q and those discussed in other documents we file with the SEC.

Given these risks and uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Also, forward-looking statements represent our management’s beliefs and assumptions only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. You should read this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. We hereby qualify our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements. Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update these forward-looking statements publicly, or to update the reasons actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes available in the future.

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our interim condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in our other SEC filings, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 and subsequent reports on Form 8-K, which discuss our business in greater detail.

Overview

We operate the world’s largest marketplace for digital offers, connecting consumers with leading retailers and brands. In the year ended December 31, 2014, our marketplace featured digital offers from over 70,000 retailers and brands, and we had contracts with more than 10,000 retailers. According to our internal data compiled using Google Analytics, during the trailing twelve months ended June 30, 2015, we had more than 731 million total visits to our desktop and mobile websites. During the three months ended June 30, 2015, we averaged 18.4 million mobile unique visitors per month. We own and operate the largest digital offer marketplaces in the U.S. (RetailMeNot.com) and the U.K. (VoucherCodes.co.uk) and the largest portfolio of digital offer websites in France (Bons-de-Reduction.com, Poulpeo.com and Ma-Reduc.com).

We derive a substantial majority of our net revenues from retailers or brands that pay us directly or through third-party performance marketing networks. A retailer is a merchant that sells goods or services directly to consumers. A paid retailer is a retailer or brand with which we have a contract pursuant to which it has agreed to pay us a commission for sales attributable to us using affiliate tracking links to digital offers made available in our marketplace. These contracts specify the default commission rate that a paid retailer agrees to pay us; however, we generally attempt to negotiate increases in these rates with most of our top paid retailers. In some instances, the paid retailer itself provides affiliate tracking links for attribution of sales using digital offers made available in our marketplace and pays us directly. However, in most cases, paid retailers contract with performance marketing networks to provide affiliate tracking links for attribution of sales using digital offers made available in our marketplace. These paid retailers then pay the commissions we earn to the performance marketing network, which in turn pays those commissions to us. In general, our contracts with performance marketing networks govern our use of affiliate tracking links made available to us by the performance marketing network and the remittance of any commissions payable to us from paid retailers utilizing the performance marketing network. The performance marketing network with which a paid retailer contracts to provide affiliate tracking links provides us with the paid retailer’s contract terms, which must be accepted by us and the paid retailer, and which further govern our use of affiliate tracking links for such paid retailer and payment of commissions to us. Our contracts are generally short term, meaning that they can be cancelled by any of the contracting parties on 30 days’ notice or less.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, the substantial majority of our net revenues were derived from commissions earned when consumers made purchases using digital offers featured on our websites and mobile applications. We expect that a majority of our net revenues in the future will continue to be derived from these commissions. Commission rates are

18

determined through negotiations with retailers based on a variety of factors, including the level of exposure to consumers in our marketplace, the quality and volume of sales realized from consumers using digital offers from our marketplace, the category of products purchased using digital offers and whether the commission arrangement is entered into as part of an arrangement that includes other services such as premium advertising placements. We sell our solutions to retailers through a direct sales force.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, we generated net revenues of $53.2 million and $113.6 million, representing decreases over the comparable prior year periods of 10.6% and 6.0%, respectively. Net income (loss) decreased from income of $4.3 million and $10.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 to a loss of $1.6 million and income of $2.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015. Adjusted EBITDA decreased from $19.7 million and $41.0 million to $10.6 million and $29.3 million over the comparable three and six month periods. See page 22 for further discussion of adjusted EBITDA, our use of this measure, the limitations of this measure as an analytical tool, and the reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA to net income (loss), the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.

In August 2015, we announced plans to reduce operating expenses in order to realign our cost structure with our current strategic plan. As part of this expense reduction, we have reduced U.S. headcount by approximately 10%. We currently expect to incur $1.2 million in severance costs associated with the targeted employee reductions, which will be included in the results of our operations for the third quarter of 2015.

We believe that featuring desirable digital offers is necessary to attract visitors to our marketplace, which includes our websites, mobile applications and email, mobile alerts and social media distribution channels. In addition to increasing the number of visitors to our marketplace, we are focused on increasing the rate and frequency at which these visitors make purchases from retailers whose digital offers are featured in our marketplace. To meet these challenges, we are focused on a combination of marketing strategies, including pay-per-click advertising, search engine optimization, branding campaigns and e-mail and mobile alerts, with a goal of driving visits to our marketplace as well as increasing the exposure of the digital offer category. We are also investing in product enhancements to make it easier for consumers visiting our marketplace to search and find the right digital offers and in expanding the types of digital offers available to consumers on our marketplace. We believe these enhancements will increase consumers’ interactions with our retailers, which will in turn increase the value we are able to provide to our retailers.

We intend to achieve future success by continuing to focus on improving the monetization of our websites and mobile applications. Since the launch of our mobile websites and mobile applications, traffic to these properties has increased significantly. Mobile traffic generally monetizes at a lower rate than desktop traffic. We believe the comparatively lower rate of monetization primarily results from the following: (1) mobile visits tend to be more exploratory in nature, due to both lower purchase intent than desktop visits and difficulties in navigating from our mobile websites and applications to retailer websites, (2) many retailers currently do not recognize affiliate tracking links on their mobile websites or applications, and the tracking mechanisms related to such may not function to allow proper attribution of sales to us and (3) we do not receive sales commissions or attribution when consumers that visit our websites and mobile applications using a mobile device subsequently make a purchase by directly accessing a retailer’s website on another device, such as a desktop or tablet or in-store (a circumstance known as cross device switching). We intend to introduce new methods of monetizing our consumer traffic, particularly the traffic to our mobile websites and applications, including through the use of cost-per-click pricing, single use codes and the introduction of new products and types of offers.

We also believe that recruiting, training and retaining talented employees and strengthening our direct relationships with consumers and retailers will be critical to our future success. We also aim to further strengthen our value proposition for retailers by expanding our retailer solutions. For example, we have recently introduced sponsored category listings, more premium placement advertising opportunities and digital circulars and showcases. We also plan to improve the consistency and reliability of our marketplace by continuing to invest in the development and implementation of certain universal software platforms to support our websites. We believe this investment will allow us to more easily and rapidly expand organically in new geographic markets and integrate the systems of any additional digital offering businesses which we may acquire and should result in increased operational efficiency. We believe that these significant investments in our team, branding, relationships and technology will enable our expansion into new markets and improve the quality, consistency and monetization of our marketplace.

19

Key Financial and Operating Metrics

We measure our business using both financial and operating metrics. We use these metrics to assess the progress of our business, make decisions on where to allocate capital, time and technology investments, and assess the longer-term performance of our business. The key financial and operating metrics we use are as follows:

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015		2014		2015		2014
	(in thousands, except net revenues per visit)
Financial Metrics
Online transaction net revenues:
Desktop online transaction net revenues	$	38,622	$	51,337	$	85,707	$	106,403
Mobile online transaction net revenues		4,942		2,587		10,512		4,934
Total online transaction net revenues		43,564		53,924		96,219		111,337
Advertising and in-store net revenues		9,616		5,582		17,345		9,439
Net revenues		53,180		59,506		113,564		120,776
Adjusted EBITDA		10,642		19,650		29,317		41,040
Operating Metrics
Visits:
Desktop visits		97,229		115,360		206,388		237,084
Mobile visits		66,798		38,863		137,498		72,348
Total visits		164,027		154,223		343,886		309,432
Online transaction net revenues per visit:
Desktop online transaction net revenues per visit	$	0.40	$	0.45	$	0.42	$	0.45
Mobile online transaction net revenues per visit	$	0.07	$	0.07	$	0.08	$	0.07
Total online transaction net revenues per visit	$	0.27	$	0.35	$	0.28	$	0.36
Mobile unique visitors		18,403		12,754		18,403		12,754

Financial Metrics

Desktop Online Transaction Net Revenues. We define desktop online transaction net revenues as amounts paid to us by paid retailers, either directly or through performance marketing networks, in the form of commissions for completed online transactions on desktop computers and tablet devices. In general, we earn a commission from a paid retailer when a consumer clicks on a digital offer for that paid retailer on one of our websites or tablet applications and then makes an online purchase from that paid retailer.

Mobile Online Transaction Net Revenues. We define mobile online transaction net revenues as amounts paid to us by paid retailers, either directly or through performance marketing networks, in the form of commissions for completed online transactions on smartphones and other mobile devices. In general, we earn a commission from a paid retailer when a consumer clicks on a digital offer for that paid retailer on one of our websites or mobile applications and then makes an online purchase from that paid retailer.

Online Transaction Net Revenues. We define online transaction net revenues as the total of our desktop online transaction net revenues and our mobile online transaction net revenues.

Advertising and In-store Net Revenues. We define advertising net revenues collectively as amounts paid to us by paid retailers for displaying digital offers that may be redeemed on one of our websites, as well as amounts paid to us by paid retailers for providing premium placement advertising of the retailer’s brand on our websites, mobile applications and email newsletters. We define in-store net revenues collectively as commission amounts earned from paid retailers when a consumer presents a digital offer to the retailer and the digital offer is scanned or a unique digital offer code is entered by the retailer at the point of sale, as well as amounts paid to us by paid retailers for displaying digital offers on our websites and mobile applications that may be redeemed in-store.

20

Net Revenues. We define net revenues as the total of our online transaction net revenues and our advertising and in-store net revenues. We believe net revenues are an important indicator for our business because they are a reflection of the value we offer to consumers and retailers through our marketplace.

Adjusted EBITDA. We define this metric as net income (loss) plus depreciation, amortization of intangible assets, stock-based compensation expense, third party acquisition-related costs, other non-cash operating expenses (including compensation arrangements entered into in connection with acquisitions), net interest expense, other non-operating income and expenses and income taxes net of any foreign exchange income or expenses. We believe that the use of adjusted EBITDA is helpful in evaluating our operating performance because it excludes certain non-cash expenses, including depreciation, amortization of intangible assets and stock-based compensation expense. For further discussion regarding Adjusted EBITDA, along with a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income (loss), the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP, please see the information under the caption “Discussion Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below.

Operating Metrics

Desktop Visits. We define a desktop visit as a group of interactions that take place on one of our websites from desktop computers and tablet devices within a given time frame as measured by Google Analytics, a product that provides digital marketing intelligence. A single visit can contain multiple page views, events, social interactions, custom variables, and e-commerce transactions. A single visitor can open multiple visits. Visits can occur on the same day, or over several days, weeks, or months. As soon as one visit ends, there is then an opportunity to start a new visit. A visit ends either through the passage of time or a campaign change, with a campaign generally meaning arrival via search engine, referring site, or campaign-tagged information. A visit ends through passage of time either after 30 minutes of inactivity or at midnight Pacific Time. A visit ends through a campaign change if a visitor arrives via one campaign or source, leaves the site, and then returns via another campaign or source. Currently, visits do not include interactions on our tablet applications.

Mobile Visits. We define a mobile visit as a group of interactions that take place on one of our mobile websites from smartphones and other mobile devices within a given time frame as measured by Google Analytics, a product that provides digital marketing intelligence. A single visit can contain multiple page views, events, social interactions, custom variables, and e-commerce transactions. A single visitor can open multiple visits. Visits can occur on the same day, or over several days, weeks, or months. As soon as one visit ends, there is then an opportunity to start a new visit. A visit ends either through the passage of time or a campaign change, with a campaign generally meaning arrival via search engine, referring site, or campaign-tagged information. A visit ends through passage of time either after 30 minutes of inactivity or at midnight Pacific Time. A visit ends through a campaign change if a visitor arrives via one campaign or source, leaves the site, and then returns via another campaign or source. Currently, visits do not include interactions on our mobile applications.

Visits. We define visits as the total of our desktop visits and mobile visits. We view visits to our websites as a key indicator of our brand awareness among consumers and whether we are providing consumers with useful products and features, thereby increasing their usage of our marketplace. We believe that a higher level of usage may contribute to an increase in our net revenues and exclusive digital offers as retailers will have exposure to a larger potential customer base.

Desktop Online Transaction Net Revenues Per Visit. We define desktop online transaction net revenues per visit as desktop online transaction net revenues for the period divided by desktop visits for the period.

Mobile Online Transaction Net Revenues Per Visit. We define mobile online transaction net revenues per visit as mobile online transaction net revenues for the period divided by mobile visits for the period.

Online Transaction Net Revenues Per Visit. We define online transaction net revenues per visit as online transaction net revenues for the period divided by visits for the period.

Mobile Unique Visitors. This amount represents the average number of monthly mobile unique visitors for the three month periods ending June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. We define each of the following as a mobile unique visitor: (i) the first time a specific mobile device accesses one of our mobile applications during a calendar month, and (ii) the first time a specific mobile device accesses one of our mobile websites using a specific web browser during a calendar month. If a mobile device accesses more than one of our mobile websites or mobile applications in a single calendar month, the first access to each such mobile website or mobile application is counted as a mobile unique visitor, as they are tracked separately for each mobile domain. We measure mobile unique visitors with a combination of internal data sources and Google Analytics data.

21

We view mobile unique visitors as a key indicator of the size of our mobile audience as well as our brand awareness among consumers and usage of our mobile solutions, which we expect to be important as users increasingly rely on their mobile devices.

Discussion Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures

To provide investors with additional information regarding our financial results, we have disclosed in the tables above and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure. We have provided a reconciliation below of adjusted EBITDA to net income (loss), the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.

We have included adjusted EBITDA in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q because it is a key measure used by our management and board of directors to understand and evaluate our operating performance for the following reasons:

• our management uses adjusted EBITDA in conjunction with GAAP financial measures as part of our assessment of our business and in communications with our board of directors concerning our financial performance;

• our management and board of directors use adjusted EBITDA in establishing budgets, operational goals and as an element in determining executive compensation;

• adjusted EBITDA provides consistency and comparability with our past financial performance, facilitates period-to-period comparisons of operations that could otherwise be masked by the effect of the expenses that we exclude in this non-GAAP financial measure and facilitates comparisons with other peer companies, many of which use similar non-GAAP financial measures to supplement their GAAP results;

• securities analysts use a measure similar to our adjusted EBITDA as a supplemental measure to evaluate the overall operating performance and comparison of companies, and we include adjusted EBITDA in our investor and analyst presentations; and

• adjusted EBITDA excludes non-cash charges, such as depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation, because such non-cash expenses in any specific period may not directly correlate to the underlying performance of our business operations and can vary significantly between periods

Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider it in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are:

• although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized may have to be replaced in the future, and adjusted EBITDA does not reflect cash capital expenditure requirements for such replacements or for new capital expenditure requirements;

• adjusted EBITDA excludes stock-based compensation expense which has been, and will continue to be for the foreseeable future, a significant recurring expense in our business and is an important part of our employees’ compensation;

• adjusted EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;

• adjusted EBITDA does not reflect tax payments that may represent a reduction in cash available to us; and

• other companies, including companies in our industry, may calculate adjusted EBITDA differently, which reduces its usefulness as a comparative measure.

Because of these limitations, you should consider adjusted EBITDA alongside other financial performance measures, including various cash flow metrics, net income (loss) and our other GAAP results.

22

The following table presents a reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA to net income (loss) for each of the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014		2015		2014
	(in thousands)
Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA:
Net income (loss)	$	(1,591	)	$	4,326	$	2,468	$	10,401
Depreciation and amortization		4,253			4,086		8,179		8,290
Stock-based compensation expense		6,544			6,366		13,357		11,380
Third party acquisition-related costs		—			—		55		—
Other operating expenses		763			1,112		1,528		2,460
Interest expense, net		492			494		913		1,025
Other expense, net		154			328		397		300
Provision for income taxes		27			2,938		2,420		7,184
Adjusted EBITDA	$	10,642		$	19,650	$	29,317	$	41,040

The following tables present depreciation expense and stock-based compensation expense as included in the various lines of our consolidated statements of operations:

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015		2014		2015		2014
	(in thousands)
Depreciation Expense:
Cost of net revenues	$	123	$	111	$	252	$	232
Product development		792		350		1,455		641
Sales and marketing		331		248		638		478
General and administrative		268		183		469		302
Total depreciation expense	$	1,514	$	892	$	2,814	$	1,653
	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015		2014		2015		2014
	(in thousands)
Stock-Based Compensation Expense:
Cost of net revenues	$	530	$	470	$	1,119	$	811
Product development		2,074		1,896		4,333		3,220
Sales and marketing		1,525		1,476		2,947		2,714
General and administrative		2,415		2,524		4,958		4,635
Total stock-based compensation expense	$	6,544	$	6,366	$	13,357	$	11,380

Key Components of Our Results of Operations

Net Revenues

The substantial majority of our net revenues consist of commissions we receive from paid retailers, either directly or through performance marketing networks. In general, we earn commissions from a paid retailer when a consumer makes a purchase online from that paid retailer after clicking on a digital offer for that paid retailer on one of our websites or mobile applications. We also earn revenues from our in-store product, which include commissions earned from a paid retailer when a consumer presents a digital offer to the retailer in-store and the digital offer is scanned or a unique digital offer code is entered by the retailer at the point of sale, and amounts paid to us by retailers for displaying digital offers that may be redeemed in-store on our websites or mobile applications. We provide performance marketing solutions under contracts with retailers, which generally provide for commission payments to be facilitated by performance marketing networks. Commission rates are typically negotiated with individual retailers with which we have contracts. Our commission rates vary based on the retailer, the product category and whether the commission arrangement is entered into as part of an arrangement that includes other services such as premium advertising placements. We

23

recognize commission revenues when we receive confirmation that a consumer has completed a purchase transaction with a paid retailer, as reported to us through a performance marketing network, or in some cases, by the retailer directly. When a digital offer applies only to specific items, the discount to the consumer will be applied only to those specific items, but our commission is generally based on the aggregate purchase price of all items purchased at that time by the consumer. Finally, we also earn advertising revenues from premium placement advertising on our websites, mobile applications and email newsletters. Rates for advertising are typically negotiated with individual retailers with which we have contracts. Payments for advertising may be made directly by retailers or through performance marketing networks. We expect that the majority of our net revenues in the future will continue to be derived from commissions. Commission revenues are reported net of a reserve for estimated returns. We estimate returns based on our actual historical returns experience; these returns have not been significant.

Costs and Expenses

We classify our costs and expenses into six categories: cost of net revenues, product development, sales and marketing, general and administrative, amortization of purchased intangible assets and other operating expenses. We allocate our personnel, facilities and general information technology, or IT, costs, which include IT and facilities-related personnel costs, rent, depreciation and other general costs, to all of the above categories of operating expenses, other than amortization of purchased intangibles and other operating expenses.

In August 2015, we announced plans to reduce operating expenses in order to realign our cost structure with our current strategic plan. As part of this expense reduction, we have reduced U.S. headcount by approximately 10%. In so doing, we expect to reduce personnel costs by approximately $3.0 million for the remainder of 2015. We currently expect to incur $1.2 million in severance costs associated with the targeted employee reductions, which will be included in the results of our operations for the third quarter of 2015.

Including the costs savings expected to be recognized as a result of our August 2015 expense reduction, we continue to expect personnel costs will be higher in 2015, both in absolute dollars and as a percentage of net revenues, when compared to the prior year as a result of personnel hired during the first two quarters of 2015 and the full year impact of personnel hired in 2014. Personnel costs for employees include salaries and amounts earned under variable compensation plans, payroll taxes, benefits, stock-based compensation expense, costs associated with recruiting new employees, travel costs and other employee-related costs.

Cost of Net Revenues

Our cost of net revenues consists of direct and indirect costs incurred to generate net revenues. These costs consist primarily of personnel costs of our merchandising, site operations and website technical support employees; fees paid to third-party contractors engaged in the operation and maintenance of our websites and mobile applications; depreciation; and website hosting and Internet service costs. We expect our cost of net revenues to increase in both absolute dollars and as a percentage of net revenues in 2015 as we continue to build our infrastructure to support our business across multiple markets and endeavor to improve offer quality and increase the number and amount of consumer purchases resulting from visits to our websites and from use of our mobile applications.

Product Development

Our product development expense consists primarily of personnel costs of our product management and software engineering teams, as well as fees paid to third-party contractors and consultants engaged in the design, development, testing and improvement of the functionality and user experience of our websites and mobile applications. Due to personnel costs associated with employees hired during the first two quarters of 2015 and the full year impact of employees hired in 2014, we expect our product development expense to increase both in absolute dollars and as a percentage of net revenues in 2015.

Sales and Marketing

Our sales and marketing expense consists primarily of personnel costs of our sales, marketing, SEO and business analytics employees, as well as online and other advertising expenditures, branding programs and other marketing expenses. Our advertising, branding programs and other marketing costs include paid search advertising fees, online display advertising, including on social networking sites, television advertising, creative development fees, public relations, email campaigns, trade show costs, sweepstakes and promotions and other general marketing costs. We intend to increase our sales efforts in 2015 to strengthen our relationships with retailers. Therefore, we expect our sales and marketing expenses to increase in absolute dollars and as a percentage of net revenues in 2015.

24

General and Administrative

Our general and administrative expense consists primarily of the personnel costs of our general corporate functions, including executive, finance, accounting, legal and human resources. Other costs included in general and administrative include professional fees for legal, audit and other consulting services, travel and entertainment, charitable contributions, provision for doubtful accounts receivable and other general corporate overhead expenses. After giving effect to our expense reduction plans discussed above, we expect our general and administrative expenses to decrease in absolute dollars and as a percentage of net revenues in 2015.

Amortization of Purchased Intangibles

We have recorded identifiable intangible assets in conjunction with our various acquisitions, and are amortizing those assets over their estimated useful lives. We perform impairment testing of goodwill annually on October 1 of each year and, in the case of intangibles with definite lives, whenever events or circumstances indicate that impairment may have occurred. We expect our amortization expenses to decline in absolute dollars and as a percentage of net revenues in 2015. However, changes in our amortization expenses will depend upon the level of our future acquisition activity.

Other Operating Expenses

Other operating expenses consists primarily of amortization expense related to deferred compensation agreements with the selling stockholders of YSL Ventures, Inc. and Bons-de-Reduction.com and Poulpeo.com. In 2013, we acquired YSL Ventures, Inc. and entered into $6.2 million in deferred compensation agreements with the selling stockholders of the business, $3.1 million of which was paid in October 2014. The deferred compensation is due and payable contingent upon the continued employment of the selling stockholders and as a result we are amortizing the associated expense over the term of the compensation arrangement with the sellers. In 2012, we acquired Bons-de-Reduction.com and Poulpeo.com and issued $3.5 million in seller notes to the selling stockholders of the business. These seller notes were due and payable contingent upon the continued employment of the selling stockholders and as a result have been recorded as deferred compensation, which we amortized over the term of the compensation arrangement with the sellers, which was completed in May 2014. We expect other operating expenses to decrease in absolute dollars and as a percentage of net revenues in 2015 as a result of the completion during 2014 of our deferred compensation agreement with the selling stockholders of Bons-de-Reduction.com and Poulpeo.com.

Other Income (Expense)

Amounts included in other income (expense) include interest income earned on our available cash and cash equivalents, interest expense incurred in connection with our senior debt and seller notes and the amortization of deferred financing costs. We also include in other income (expense), net foreign currency exchange gains and losses. Changes in these amounts will depend to some extent upon the level of our future borrowing activity and movements in foreign currency.

Income Tax Expense

Our provision for income taxes for interim periods is determined using an estimate of our annual effective tax rate, adjusted for discrete items, if any, which are taken into account in the relevant period. We update our estimate of the annual effective tax rate each quarter, and make a cumulative adjustment if our estimated tax rate changes.

Our effective tax rate is affected by recurring items, such as tax rates in foreign jurisdictions and the relative amount of income we earn in those jurisdictions, state taxes and non-deductible expenses, such as deferred compensation and stock-based compensation. Our mix of foreign versus U.S. income, our ability to generate tax credits and our incurrence of any non-deductible expenses will likely cause our effective tax rate to fluctuate in the future. Our effective tax rate is also affected by discrete items that may occur in any given period, but are not consistent from period to period. Additionally, our effective tax rate can be more or less volatile based on the amount of pre-tax income or loss. For example, the impact of discrete items and non-deductible expenses on our effective tax rate is greater when our pre-tax income is lower.

In prior periods, we have benefited from the tax credit incentives under the U.S. research and experimentation tax credit extended to taxpayers engaged in qualified research and experimental activities. The tax credit expired on December 31, 2014, and as such, no benefit is reflected in our income tax expense in the three and six months ended June 30, 2015. If this credit is renewed under similar terms as in prior years, the result could benefit our effective tax rate.

25

During the first quarter of 2014, we implemented a global corporate restructuring plan involving our non-U.S. entities to streamline our non-U.S. operations. The impact of this restructuring has resulted in and may continue to result in volatility in our provision for income taxes and our effective tax rate.

26

Results of Operations

The following table presents our historical operating results for the periods indicated. The period-to-period comparisons of financial results are not necessarily indicative of future results.

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
	(in thousands)
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
Net revenues	$	53,180		$	59,506		$	113,564		$	120,776
Costs and expenses:
Cost of net revenues		5,176			4,648			10,522			9,078
Product development		13,072			12,980			26,392			23,686
Sales and marketing		22,636			19,195			44,277			40,367
General and administrative		9,712			10,291			19,282			19,638
Amortization of purchased intangible assets		2,739			3,194			5,365			6,637
Other operating expenses		763			1,112			1,528			2,460
Total costs and expenses		54,098			51,420			107,366			101,866
Income (loss) from operations		(918	)		8,086			6,198			18,910
Other income (expense):
Interest expense, net		(492	)		(494	)		(913	)		(1,025	)
Other expense, net		(154	)		(328	)		(397	)		(300	)
Income (loss) before income taxes		(1,564	)		7,264			4,888			17,585
Provision for income taxes		(27	)		(2,938	)		(2,420	)		(7,184	)
Net income (loss)	$	(1,591	)	$	4,326		$	2,468		$	10,401
	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data as Percentage of Net Revenues:
Net revenues		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%
Costs and expenses:
Cost of net revenues		9.7			7.8			9.3			7.5
Product development		24.6			21.8			23.2			19.6
Sales and marketing		42.6			32.3			39.0			33.4
General and administrative		18.3			17.3			17.0			16.3
Amortization of purchased intangible assets		5.2			5.4			4.7			5.5
Other operating expenses		1.3			1.8			1.3			2.0
Total cost and expenses		101.7			86.4			94.5			84.3
Income (loss) from operations		(1.7	)		13.6			5.5			15.7
Other income (expense):
Interest expense, net		(0.9	)		(0.8	)		(0.8	)		(0.8	)
Other expense, net		(0.3	)		(0.6	)		(0.4	)		(0.3	)
Income (loss) before income taxes		(2.9	)		12.2			4.3			14.6
Provision for income taxes		(0.1	)		(4.9	)		(2.1	)		(6.0	)
Net income (loss)		(3.0	)%		7.3	%		2.2	%		8.6	%

27

Net Revenues

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
	(dollars in thousands)
Net Revenues by Source:
Desktop online transactions	$	38,622		$	51,337		$	85,707		$	106,403
Mobile online transactions		4,942			2,587			10,512			4,934
Online transactions		43,564			53,924			96,219			111,337
Advertising and in-store		9,616			5,582			17,345			9,439
Total net revenues	$	53,180		$	59,506		$	113,564		$	120,776
Percentage of Net Revenues by Source:
Desktop online transactions		72.6	%		86.3	%		75.5	%		88.1	%
Mobile online transactions		9.3			4.3			9.2			4.1
Online transactions		81.9			90.6			84.7			92.2
Advertising and in-store		18.1			9.4			15.3			7.8
Total percentage		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%
Net Revenues by Geography:
U.S.	$	41,544		$	46,038		$	88,250		$	93,603
International		11,636			13,468			25,314			27,173
Total net revenues	$	53,180		$	59,506		$	113,564		$	120,776
Percentage of Net Revenues by Geography:
U.S.		78.1	%		77.4	%		77.7	%		77.5	%
International		21.9			22.6			22.3			22.5
Total percentage		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%

Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2014. Net revenues decreased by $6.3 million, or 10.6%, for the three months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2014.

The overall decrease in net revenues was driven by a $12.7 million, or 24.8%, decrease in desktop online transaction net revenues, partially offset by a $2.4 million, or 91.0%, increase in mobile online transaction net revenues and a $4.0 million, or 72.3%, increase in our advertising and in-store net revenues. The decrease in our desktop online transaction net revenues was primarily caused by a 15.7% decrease in the total volume of visits to our desktop websites and was further driven by deterioration in the average commission rate paid to us. The growth in our mobile online transaction net revenues was primarily driven by a 71.9% increase in visits to our mobile websites, as well as improved monetization driven by an increase in the percentage of visits, including the incremental visits in the period, that resulted in a paid transaction. The growth in our advertising and in-store net revenues was primarily due to the expansion and efforts of our direct sales force as well as improvements to the usability and functionality enhancements of our in-store product.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2014. Net revenues decreased by $7.2 million, or 6.0%, for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2014.

The overall decrease in net revenues was driven by a $20.7 million, or 19.5%, decrease in desktop online transaction net revenues, partially offset by a $5.6 million, or 113.1%, increase in mobile online transaction net revenues and a $7.9 million, or 83.8%, increase in our advertising and in-store net revenues. The decrease in our desktop online transaction net revenues was primarily caused by a 12.9% decrease in the total volume of visits to our desktop websites and deterioration in the average commission rate paid to us and was further driven by a shift in commissioned sales towards product categories with lower average order values. The growth in our mobile online transaction net revenues was primarily driven by a 90.1% increase in visits to our mobile websites, as well as improved monetization driven by an increase in the percentage of visits, including the incremental visits in the period, that resulted in a paid transaction. The growth in our advertising and in-store net revenues was primarily due to the expansion and efforts of our direct sales force as well as improvements to the usability and functionality enhancements of our in-store product.

28

Cost of Net Revenues

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
	(dollars in thousands)
Cost of net revenues	$	5,176		$	4,648		$	10,522		$	9,078
Percentage of net revenues		9.7	%		7.8	%		9.3	%		7.5	%

Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2014. For the three months ended June 30, 2015, cost of net revenues increased by $0.5 million, or 11.4%, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2014. This increase was largely attributable to a $0.3 million increase in personnel costs.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2014. For the six months ended June 30, 2015, cost of net revenues increased by $1.4 million, or 15.9%, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2014. This increase was largely attributable to a $0.8 million increase in personnel costs.

Product Development

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
	(dollars in thousands)
Product development	$	13,072		$	12,980		$	26,392		$	23,686
Percentage of net revenues		24.6	%		21.8	%		23.2	%		19.6	%

Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2014. For the three months ended June 30, 2015, product development expense increased by $0.1 million, or 0.7%, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2014. This increase was primarily attributable to a $1.3 million increase in personnel costs. We increased personnel in order to enhance the functionality of, and develop new features and products for, our websites and mobile applications, and to strengthen our reporting and analytics capabilities. Additionally, fees for third-party data storage and hosting services increased by $0.4 million. These increases were partially offset by the capitalization of $1.4 million of internally developed software and website development costs, net of depreciation expense recognized during the period, related primarily to infrastructure development to enhance our advertising and in-store products, personalization capabilities and content quality and delivery capabilities.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2014. For the six months ended June 30, 2015, product development expense increased by $2.7 million, or 11.4%, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2014. This increase was primarily attributable to a $4.2 million increase in personnel costs. We increased personnel in order to enhance the functionality of, and develop new features and products for, our websites and mobile applications, and to strengthen our reporting and analytics capabilities. Additionally, fees for third-party data storage and hosting services increased by $0.8 million. These increases were partially offset by the capitalization of $2.7 million of internally developed software and website development costs, net of depreciation expense recognized during the period, related primarily to infrastructure development to enhance our advertising and in-store products, personalization capabilities and content quality and delivery capabilities.

29

Sales and Marketing

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
	(dollars in thousands)
Sales and marketing	$	22,636		$	19,195		$	44,277		$	40,367
Percentage of net revenues		42.6	%		32.3	%		39.0	%		33.4	%

Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2014. For the three months ended June 30, 2015, sales and marketing expense increased by $3.4 million, or 17.9%, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2014. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase in advertising and personnel costs. Personnel costs increased by $1.7 million. We increased personnel in order to continue the expansion of our sales teams to support our growing business and to further strengthen relationships with leading retailers. We also added personnel to expand our email marketing, social media and other consumer acquisition initiatives. Online, brand and other marketing expenses increased by $1.4 million. This increase was primarily attributable to online advertising for brand building, contextual advertising placements and user acquisition efforts. We also incurred an increase of $0.7 million in paid search expenses.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2014. For the six months ended June 30, 2015, sales and marketing expense increased by $3.9 million, or 9.7%, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2014. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase of $3.0 million in personnel costs. We increased personnel in order to continue the expansion of our sales teams to support our growing business and to further strengthen relationships with leading retailers. We also added personnel to expand our email marketing, social media and other consumer acquisition initiatives. We also incurred an increase of $1.0 million in paid search expenses.

General and Administrative

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
	(dollars in thousands)
General and administrative	$	9,712		$	10,291		$	19,282		$	19,638
Percentage of net revenues		18.3	%		17.3	%		17.0	%		16.3	%

Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2014. For the three months ended June 30, 2015, general and administrative expense decreased by $0.6 million, or 5.6%, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2014. This decrease was primarily attributable to a $0.5 million decrease in our provision for doubtful accounts receivable.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2014. For the six months ended June 30, 2015, general and administrative expense decreased by $0.4 million, or 1.8%, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2014. This decrease was primarily attributable to a $1.1 million decrease in our provision for doubtful accounts receivable, partially offset by a $0.4 million increase in professional services fees.

30

Amortization of Purchased Intangible Assets

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
	(dollars in thousands)
Amortization of purchased intangible assets	$	2,739		$	3,194		$	5,365		$	6,637
Percentage of net revenues		5.2	%		5.4	%		4.7	%		5.5	%

Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2014. For the three months ended June 30, 2015, amortization of purchased intangible assets decreased by $0.5 million, or 14.2%, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2014. The decrease in amortization expense was primarily due to the expiration of the useful life of certain of the purchased intangible assets as part of our acquisition of the businesses of Bons-de-Reduction.com and Poulpeo.com in May 2012, Ma-Reduc.com in July 2013 and YSL Ventures, Inc. in October 2013.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2014. For the six months ended June 30, 2015, amortization of purchased intangible assets decreased by $1.3 million, or 19.2%, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2014. The decrease in amortization expense was primarily due to the expiration of the useful life of certain of the purchased intangible assets as part of our acquisition of the businesses of Bons-de-Reduction.com and Poulpeo.com in May 2012, Ma-Reduc.com in July 2013 and YSL Ventures, Inc. in October 2013.

Other Operating Expenses

	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014		2015			2014
	(in thousands)
Deferred compensation	$	768		$	1,112	$	1,536		$	2,459
Asset disposal loss (gain)		(5	)		—		(8	)		1
Total other operating expenses	$	763		$	1,112	$	1,528		$	2,460

Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2014. During the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, we recognized $0.8 million and $1.1 million, respectively, in deferred compensation charges for our October 2013 acquisition of the business of YSL Ventures, Inc. and our May 2012 acquisition of the businesses of Bons-de-Reduction.com and Poulpeo.com. Our obligations to pay the outstanding amounts under these deferred compensation arrangements are contingent upon the continued employment of the selling stockholders and, as a result, have been recorded as deferred compensation, which we amortize over the term of the compensation arrangements with the sellers. The decrease in deferred compensation expense is due primarily to the May 2014 completion of our deferred compensation agreement with the selling stockholders of Bons-de-Reduction.com and Poulpeo.com.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2014. During the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, we recognized $1.5 million and $2.5 million, respectively, in deferred compensation charges for our October 2013 acquisition of the business of YSL Ventures, Inc. and our May 2012 acquisition of the businesses of Bons-de-Reduction.com and Poulpeo.com. Our obligations to pay the outstanding amounts under these deferred compensation arrangements are contingent upon the continued employment of the selling stockholders and, as a result, have been recorded as deferred compensation, which we amortize over the term of the compensation arrangements with the sellers. The decrease in deferred compensation expense is due primarily to the May 2014 completion of our deferred compensation agreement with the selling stockholders of Bons-de-Reduction.com and Poulpeo.com.

31

Other Income (Expense)

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
	(in thousands)
Interest expense, net	$	(492	)	$	(494	)	$	(913	)	$	(1,025	)
Other expense, net		(154	)		(328	)		(397	)		(300	)

Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2014. Interest expense, net, remained relatively constant for the three months ended June 30, 2015 as compared to the comparable prior year period. The impact of lower average interest rates on our outstanding debt, due to the repayment during 2014 of seller notes we issued in connection with our acquisitions of businesses was largely offset by an increase in average outstanding principal on our senior debt facility.

The decrease in other expense, net is due to a decrease in our net foreign currency exchange loss. For the three months ended June 30, 2015, our foreign exchange net loss of $0.2 million was primarily driven by a loss of $0.4 million related to our foreign exchange derivative instrument. We did not enter into any foreign exchange derivative instruments during the three months ended June 30, 2014.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2014. The decrease in interest expense, net for the six months ended June 30, 2015 is primarily the result of lower average interest rates on our outstanding debt, due to the repayment during 2014 of seller notes we issued in connection with our acquisitions of businesses. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in average outstanding principal on our senior debt facility.

The increase in other expense, net is due to an increase in our net foreign currency exchange loss. For the six months ended June 30, 2015, we had an unrealized foreign exchange net loss of $1.3 million, which was partially offset by a $0.9 million realized foreign exchange gain. The realized gain was primarily driven by a gain of $0.6 million related to our foreign exchange derivative instrument. We did not enter into any foreign exchange derivative instruments during the six months ended June 30, 2014.

Income Taxes

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
	(dollars in thousands)
Provision for income taxes	$	(27	)	$	(2,938	)	$	(2,420	)	$	(7,184	)
Percentage of net revenues		(0.1	)%		(4.9	)%		(2.1	)%		(6.0	)%

Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2014. Our income tax expense for the three months ended June 30, 2015 was $27 thousand, compared to income tax expense of $2.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014. Our effective tax rate was (1.7%) and 40.4% during the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

The change in our quarterly tax provision and our quarterly estimate of our annual effective tax rate as compared to the prior year comparable period was subject to significant variation due to several factors, including variability in accurately predicting our pre-tax and taxable income and loss and the mix of jurisdictions to which they relate, and by changes in tax laws and regulations. Additionally, our effective tax rate was more volatile in the current period due to the comparatively greater impact of discrete items and non-deductible expenses on our effective tax rate when our pre-tax income (loss) is lower.

As of June 30, 2015, our effective tax rate estimate for the year ended December 31, 2015 differed from the statutory rate primarily due to non-deductible stock-based compensation charges, non-deductible deferred compensation expenses and state taxes, which are partially offset by the effect of different statutory tax rates in foreign jurisdictions and the benefit of disqualifying dispositions of incentive stock options. As of June 30, 2014, our effective tax rate estimate for the year ended December 31, 2014 differed from the statutory rate primarily due to tax charges associated with the implementation of our global corporate restructuring plan in the first fiscal quarter of 2014, non-deductible stock-based compensation charges, non-deductible deferred compensation expenses and state taxes, which is partially offset by the effect of different statutory tax rates in foreign jurisdictions and the benefit of disqualifying dispositions of incentive stock options.

32

Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2014. Our income tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2015 was $2.4 million, compared to income tax expense of $7.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014. Our effective tax rate was 49.5% and 40.9% during the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

The change in our interim tax provision and our interim estimate of our annual effective tax rate as compared to the prior year comparable period was subject to significant variation due to several factors, including variability in accurately predicting our pre-tax and taxable income and loss and the mix of jurisdictions to which they relate, and by changes in tax laws and regulations. Additionally, our effective tax rate was more volatile in the current period due to the comparatively greater impact of discrete items and non-deductible expenses on our effective tax rate when our pre-tax income (loss) is lower.

As of June 30, 2015, our effective tax rate estimate for the year ended December 31, 2015 differed from the statutory rate primarily due to non-deductible stock-based compensation charges, non-deductible deferred compensation expenses and state taxes, which are partially offset by the effect of different statutory tax rates in foreign jurisdictions and the benefit of disqualifying dispositions of incentive stock options. As of June 30, 2014, our effective tax rate estimate for the year ended December 31, 2014 differed from the statutory rate primarily due to tax charges associated with the implementation of our global corporate restructuring plan in the first fiscal quarter of 2014, non-deductible stock-based compensation charges, non-deductible deferred compensation expenses and state taxes, which is partially offset by the effect of different statutory tax rates in foreign jurisdictions and the benefit of disqualifying dispositions of incentive stock options.

Seasonality and Quarterly Results

Our overall operating results fluctuate from quarter to quarter as a result of a variety of factors, including seasonal factors and economic cycles that influence consumer purchasing of retail products. Historically, we have experienced the highest levels of visitors to our websites and mobile applications and net revenues in the fourth quarter of the year, which coincides with the winter holiday season in the U.S. and Europe. During the fourth quarter of 2014, we generated net revenues of $87.4 million, which represented 33.0% of our net revenues for 2014. Further, we believe net revenues from our advertising and in-store products may be even more heavily weighted to the fourth quarter of the year. As net revenues from this part of our business grow as a percentage of overall net revenues, our seasonality may increase.

Our investments have led to uneven quarterly operating results due to increases in personnel costs, product and technology enhancements and the impact of strategic projects. The return on these investments is generally achieved in future periods and, as a result, these investments can adversely impact near term results.

Our business is directly affected by the behavior of consumers. Economic conditions and competitive pressures can impact, both positively and negatively, the types of digital offers featured on our websites and mobile applications and the rates at which consumers utilize them. Consequently, the results of any prior quarterly or annual periods should not be relied upon as indications of our future operating performance.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Since our inception, we have funded our operations and acquisitions primarily through private placements of our preferred stock, the issuance of equity securities through our initial public offering and follow-on public offering, bank borrowings and cash flows from operations. We generated positive cash flows from operations for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014. As of June 30, 2015, we had $279.8 million in cash and cash equivalents, compared to $244.5 million at December 31, 2014. At June 30, 2015, certain of our foreign subsidiaries held approximately $16.0 million of our cash and cash equivalents. If these assets were distributed to the U.S., we might be subject to additional U.S. taxes in certain circumstances, subject to an adjustment for foreign tax credits, and foreign withholding taxes. We have not provided for these taxes because we consider these assets to be permanently reinvested in our foreign subsidiaries. We have no plans or intentions to repatriate cumulative earnings of our foreign subsidiaries through June 30, 2015.

The following table summarizes our cash flows for the periods indicated:

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014
	(in thousands)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	44,641		$	36,467
Net cash used in investing activities		(14,620	)		(3,635	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		6,024			14,997
Effects of foreign currency exchange rate on cash		(710	)		195

33

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015		2014
	(in thousands)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		35,335		48,024
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period		244,482		165,881
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period	$	279,817	$	213,905

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities

Cash provided by operating activities primarily consists of our net income adjusted for certain non-cash items and the effect of changes in operating assets and liabilities. Net cash provided by operating activities was $44.6 million and $36.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

During the six months ended June 30, 2015, cash flows from operating activities were primarily generated through net income of $2.5 million, including the impact of depreciation and amortization expense of $8.2 million, stock-based compensation expense of $13.4 million, amortization of deferred compensation of $1.5 million and $19.1 million from changes in cash flows associated with operating assets and liabilities, offset by excess income tax benefits from stock-based compensation of $1.3 million. The changes in cash flows associated with operating assets and liabilities were primarily driven by a decrease in accounts receivable of $31.0 million due to a seasonal decrease in net revenues following the fourth quarter, which was partially offset by other changes in operating assets and liabilities of $11.9 million.

During the six months ended June 30, 2014, cash flows from operating activities were primarily generated through net income of $10.4 million, including the impact of depreciation and amortization expense of $8.3 million, stock-based compensation expense of $11.4 million, amortization of deferred compensation of $2.5 million and $14.9 million from changes in cash flows associated with operating assets and liabilities, offset by excess income tax benefits from stock-based compensation of $10.5 million and a deferred income tax benefit of $1.8 million. The changes in cash flows associated with operating assets and liabilities were primarily driven by a decrease in accounts receivable of $16.8 million due to a seasonal decrease in net revenues following the fourth quarter.

Net Cash Used in Investing Activities

Our primary investing activities consist of purchases of property and equipment and other assets and the purchase of a non-marketable investment. Net cash used in investing activities was $14.6 million and $3.6 million during the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

During the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, we used $10.6 million and $3.6 million, respectively related to the purchase of computer equipment and software, office furniture and fixtures, leasehold improvements, certain capitalized internally developed software and website development costs and domain names. As we expand our business and facilities, we intend to purchase additional technology resources and invest in our operating facilities.

During the six months ended June 30, 2015, we used $4.0 million to invest in a non-controlling minority ownership stake in a privately-held marketing technology company in the United States.

We may make acquisitions in the future that could have a material impact on our cash flows and operations.

Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities

Our primary financing activities consisted of proceeds from borrowings under our revolving credit facility, the repurchase of our Series 1 common stock, repayments of our senior debt and the share based payment activity. Net cash provided by financing activities was $6.0 million and $15.0 million in the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

During the six months ended June 30, 2015, we borrowed $30.0 million under our revolving credit facility and used $27.2 million to repurchase our Series 1 common stock. The remainder of our financing activities was primarily composed of proceeds from the issuance of common stock, net of shares withheld for taxes, of $4.5 million, the repayment of a $2.5 million portion of our senior debt and the excess income tax benefit from stock-based compensation and other costs of $1.3 million.

During the six months ended June 30, 2014, we used $5.3 million to repay a portion of our senior debt and certain seller notes payable. The remainder of our financing activities was primarily composed of proceeds from the issuance of common stock, net of shares withheld for taxes, of $9.8 million and the excess income tax benefit from stock-based compensation and other costs of $10.5 million.

34

Capital Resources

We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents and cash generated from operations will be sufficient to satisfy our currently anticipated cash requirements through at least the next 12 months. As of June 30, 2015, we had $77.5 million in long-term debt outstanding, $10.0 million of which is classified as current maturities, and $95.0 million available for borrowing under our revolving credit facility.

Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including our rate of net revenues growth, the expansion of our marketing and sales initiatives, the timing and extent of spending to support product development efforts, the timing of introductions of new products and services and enhancements to existing products and services, potential acquisitions, repurchases of our common stock and the continuing market acceptance of our products and services. We may need to raise additional capital through future debt or equity financing to the extent necessary to fund such activities. Additional financing may not be available at all or on terms favorable to us. We may enter into arrangements in the future with respect to investments in, or acquisitions of, similar or complementary businesses, products, services or technologies, which could also require us to seek additional debt or equity financing.

On February 5, 2015 our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $100 million worth of our Series 1 common stock over a period of up to 24 months. We plan to fund any purchases under this program from one or a combination of existing cash balances, future cash flow, availability under our revolving credit facility and additional debt financing. During the six months ended June 30, 2015, we used $27.2 million to repurchase 1,545,017 shares of our Series 1 common stock.

Contractual Obligations

There were no material changes to our commitments under contractual obligations as compared to those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, we did not, and we do not currently, have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and classifications of assets and liabilities, net revenues and expenses and the related disclosures of contingent liabilities in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. The SEC has defined a company’s critical accounting policies as the ones that are most important to the portrayal of the company’s financial condition and results of operations, and which require the company to make its most difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain. Based on this definition, we have identified the following critical accounting policies and estimates addressed below.

We also have other key accounting policies, which involve the use of estimates, judgments, and assumptions that are significant to understanding our results. See Note 2 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to the condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report. Of those policies, we believe that the accounting policies enumerated above involve the greatest degree of complexity and exercise of judgment by our management. We evaluate our estimates, judgments and assumptions on an ongoing basis, and while we believe that our estimates, judgments and assumptions are reasonable, they are based upon information available at the time. Actual results may differ significantly from these estimates under different assumptions, judgments or conditions.

Business Combinations and the Recoverability of Goodwill and Long-Lived Intangible Assets

A significant component of our growth strategy has been to acquire and integrate businesses that complement our existing operations. We account for business combinations using the purchase method of accounting and allocate the purchase price of each acquired business to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair value at the purchase date. The difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill.

35

In determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination, we use recognized valuation methods, including the income approach, market approach and cost approach, and apply present value modeling. Our significant estimates in the income, market or cost approach include identifying business factors such as size, growth, profitability, risk and return on investment and assessing comparable net revenues and operating income multiples in estimating the fair value. We also make certain assumptions specific to present value modeling valuation techniques which include risk-adjusted discount rates, future commission rates, rates of increase in operating expenses, weighted-average cost of capital, long-term growth rate assumptions and the future effective income tax rates.

Most of the businesses we have acquired did not have a significant amount of tangible assets. As a result, our acquisitions have resulted in the majority of the purchase price being allocated to identifiable intangible assets and goodwill. The long-lived intangible assets we have identified in each acquisition include customer relationships and marketing-related, contract-related and technology-based intangible assets. All of our long-lived intangible assets have a definite life that ranges from one year to 15 years, which we have determined reflects our best estimate of the pattern in which the economic benefit of the related intangible asset will be utilized. The valuations of our acquired businesses have been performed by valuation specialists under our management’s supervision. We believe that the estimated fair value assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are based on reasonable assumptions and estimates that marketplace participants would use. However, such assumptions are inherently uncertain and actual results could differ from those estimates. Future changes in our assumptions or the interrelationship of those assumptions may negatively impact future valuations. In future measurements of fair value, adverse changes in discounted cash flow assumptions could result in an impairment of goodwill or intangible assets that would require a non-cash charge to the consolidated statements of operations and may have a material effect on our financial condition and operating results.

We perform our annual impairment testing of goodwill as of October 1 of each year, and whenever events or circumstances indicate that impairment may have occurred. Events or circumstances that could trigger an impairment review include, but are not limited to, a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate, an adverse action or assessment by a regulator, significant changes in competition, a loss of key personnel, significant changes in our use of the acquired assets or the strategy for our overall business, significant negative industry or economic trends, or significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future results of operations.

We evaluate the recoverability of goodwill using a two-step impairment process tested at the reporting segment level. In the first step, the fair value for our reporting unit is compared to our book value including goodwill. For purposes of performing the required impairment test, we derive enterprise fair value utilizing the market capitalization approach, whereby the market value of our outstanding shares of common stock are utilized to calculate the fair value of our sole reporting unit. In the case that the fair value is less than the book value, a second step is performed that compares the implied fair value of goodwill to the book value of the goodwill. The fair value for the implied goodwill is determined based on the difference between the fair value of the sole reporting segment and the net fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities excluding goodwill. If the implied fair value of the goodwill is less than the book value, the difference is recognized as an impairment charge in the consolidated statements of operations.

Long-lived assets, including intangible assets, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. When such events occur, we compare the carrying amounts of the assets to their undiscounted expected future cash flows. If this comparison indicates that there is impairment, the amount of the impairment is calculated as the difference between the carrying value and fair value.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, services have been rendered, the fee to our customers is fixed or determinable and collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. For commission revenues, which represent the substantial majority of our net revenues, revenue recognition generally occurs when a consumer, having visited one of our websites and clicked on a digital offer for a paid retailer, makes a purchase with such paid retailer, and completion of the order is reported to us by such paid retailer, either directly or through a performance marketing network. Certain paid retailers do not provide reporting until a cash payment is made. In those cases, which have historically not been significant, we record commission revenues on a cash basis. For advertising revenues, revenue recognition occurs over the period that we display a retailer’s advertisements on our websites and mobile applications.

Multiple Element Arrangements. When we enter into revenue arrangements with customers that are comprised of multiple deliverables, we allocate consideration to all deliverables based on the relative selling price method in accordance with the selling price hierarchy. The objective of the hierarchy is to determine the price at which we would transact a sale if the service were sold on a stand-alone basis and requires the use of: (1) vendor-specific objective evidence, or VSOE, if available; (2) third-party evidence, or TPE, if VSOE is not available; and (3) best estimate of selling price, or BESP, if neither VSOE nor TPE is available.

36

VSOE. We determine VSOE based on our historical pricing and discounting practices for the specific service when sold separately. In determining VSOE, we require that a substantial majority of the stand-alone selling prices for these services fall within a reasonably narrow pricing range. We have not historically sold our services within a reasonably narrow pricing range. As a result, we have not been able to establish VSOE.

TPE. When VSOE cannot be established for deliverables in multiple element arrangements, we apply judgment with respect to whether we can establish a selling price based on TPE. TPE is determined based on competitor prices for similar deliverables when sold separately. Generally, our go-to-market strategy differs from that of our peers and our offerings contain a significant level of differentiation such that the comparable pricing of services cannot be obtained. Furthermore, we are unable to reliably determine what similar competitor services’ selling prices are on a stand-alone basis. As a result, we have not been able to establish selling price based on TPE.

BESP. When we are unable to establish selling price using VSOE or TPE, we use BESP in our allocation of arrangement consideration. The objective of BESP is to determine the price at which we would transact a sale if the service were sold on a stand-alone basis. BESP is generally used to allocate the selling price to deliverables in our multiple element arrangements. We determine BESP for deliverables by considering multiple factors including, but not limited to, prices we charge for similar offerings, market conditions, competitive landscape and pricing practices. We limit the amount of allocable arrangement consideration to amounts that are fixed or determinable and that are not contingent on future performance or future deliverables.

If the facts and circumstances underlying the factors we considered change or should future facts and circumstances lead us to consider additional factors, both our determination of our relative selling price under the hierarchy and our BESPs could change in future periods.

We estimate and record a reserve based upon actual, historical return rates as reported to us by paid retailers to provide for end-user cancelations or product returns, which may not be reported by the paid retailer or performance marketing network until a subsequent date. As such, we report commission revenues net of the estimated returns reserve. Net revenues are reported net of sales taxes, where applicable.

Income Taxes

We are subject to income taxes in both the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in evaluating our tax positions and determining our provision for income taxes. During the ordinary course of business, there are many transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. For example, our effective tax rate could be affected by differences between our anticipated and the actual mix of earnings generated across different tax jurisdictions which have higher or lower statutory tax rates, by changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities, by changes in foreign currency exchange rates or by changes in the relevant tax, accounting and other laws, regulations, principles and interpretations.

We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method, under which deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized based upon anticipated future tax consequences attributable to differences between financial statement carrying values of assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be reversed or settled. We regularly review deferred tax assets to assess their potential realization and establish a valuation allowance for portions of such assets to reduce the carrying value if we do not consider it to be more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized. Any change in the valuation allowance would be charged to income in the period such determination was made. We recognize a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position in the financial statements only when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained.

The calculation of our tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax laws and regulations in a multitude of jurisdictions across our global operations. ASC 740 states that a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position may be recognized when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolutions of any related appeals or litigation processes, on the basis of the technical merits.

We record unrecognized tax benefits as liabilities in accordance with ASC 740 and adjust these liabilities when our judgment changes as a result of the evaluation of new information not previously available. Because of the complexity of some of these uncertainties, the ultimate resolution may result in a payment that is materially different from our current estimate of the unrecognized tax benefit liabilities. These differences will be reflected as increases or decreases to income tax expense in the period in which new information is available.

We are subject to audit in various jurisdictions, and such jurisdictions may assess additional income taxes against us. Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable, the final determination of any tax audits and any related litigation could be materially different from historical income tax provisions and accruals. The results of an audit or litigation could have a material effect on our operating results or cash flows in the period or periods for which that determination is made.

37

We consider the earnings of certain non-U.S. subsidiaries to be indefinitely invested outside the United States on the basis of estimates that future domestic cash generation will be sufficient to meet future domestic cash needs and our specific plans for reinvestment of those subsidiary earnings. We have not recorded a deferred tax liability related to the U.S. federal and state income taxes and foreign withholding taxes of our undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries indefinitely invested outside the U.S. Should we decide to repatriate our foreign earnings, we would need to adjust our income tax provision in the period we determined that those earnings would no longer be indefinitely invested outside the U.S.

Stock-Based Compensation

We measure stock-based compensation expense at fair value net of estimated forfeitures and generally recognize the corresponding compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the service period during which awards are expected to vest. Forfeiture rates are estimated periodically based on historical experience and adjusted in subsequent periods for differences in actual forfeitures from those estimates.

We use the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model to determine the fair value of stock options. The determination of the grant date fair value of options using an option-pricing model is affected by our estimates of a number of complex and subjective variables. These variables include:

• Fair Value of Our Common Stock. Because our stock was not publicly traded prior to our offering in July 2013, the fair value of our common stock underlying our stock options was previously determined by our board of directors, which intended all options to be exercisable at a price per share not less than the per share value of our common stock underlying those options on the date of grant. Following the completion of our initial public offering our common stock is being valued by reference to its publicly traded price.

• Expected Term. The expected term represents the period of time the stock options are expected to be outstanding and is based on the “simplified method” allowed under applicable SEC guidance. We used the “simplified method” due to the lack of sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to otherwise estimate the expected life of the stock options.

• Expected Volatility. Since we do not have a significant trading history for our Series 1 common stock, the expected stock price volatility was estimated by taking the average historical price volatility for publicly-traded stock of comparable industry peers similar in size, stage of life cycle and financial leverage, based on daily price observations over a period equivalent to the expected term of the stock option grants. We did not rely on implied volatilities of traded options in our industry peers’ common stock because the volume of activity was relatively low. We intend to continue to consistently apply this process using the same or similar public companies until a sufficient amount of historical information regarding the volatility of our Series 1 common stock share price becomes available, or unless circumstances change such that the identified companies are no longer similar to us, in which case more suitable companies whose share prices are publicly available would be utilized in the calculation.

• Dividend Yield. We do not presently plan to pay cash dividends on our Series 1 common stock in the foreseeable future. Consequently, we used an expected dividend yield of zero.

• Risk-free Interest Rate. The risk-free interest rate is based on the yields of U.S. Treasury securities with maturities similar to the expected term of the options for each option group.

The fair value of restricted stock units, or RSUs, equals their intrinsic value on the date of grant.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We have both U.S. and international operations, and we are exposed to market risks in the ordinary course of our business, including the effect of foreign currency fluctuations, interest rate changes and inflation. Information relating to quantitative and qualitative disclosures about these market risks is set forth below.

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

We transact business in various currencies other than the U.S. dollar, principally the British pound sterling and the Euro, which exposes us to foreign currency risk. Net revenues and related expenses generated from our international operations are

38

denominated in the functional currencies of the corresponding country. The functional currency of each of our non-U.S. subsidiaries that either operate or support these markets is generally the same as the corresponding local currency. For the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, approximately 22.3% and 22.5%, respectively, of our net revenues were denominated in such foreign currencies.

We have entered into a forward contract to hedge fluctuations in the value of certain intercompany debt denominated in foreign currencies but did not enter into any derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. Although we have experienced and will continue to experience fluctuations in our net income (loss) as a result of the consolidation of our international operations due to transaction gains (losses) related to revaluing certain cash balances and trade accounts receivable that are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, we believe such a change will not have a material impact on our results of operations.

We assess our market risk based on changes in foreign currency exchange rates utilizing a sensitivity analysis that measures the potential impact in earnings, fair values and cash flows based on a hypothetical 10% change (increase and decrease) in currency rates. We use a current market pricing model to assess the changes in the value of the U.S. dollar on foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities.

The primary assumption used in these models is a hypothetical 10% weakening or strengthening of the U.S. dollar against all of our currency exposures as of June 30, 2015, assuming instantaneous and parallel shifts in exchange rates. As of June 30, 2015, our working capital surplus (defined as current assets less current liabilities) subject to foreign currency translation risk was $22.9 million. The potential decrease in net current assets from a hypothetical 10.0% adverse change in quoted foreign currency exchange rates would be $2.3 million. This compares to a working capital surplus subject to foreign currency translation risk of $23.0 million as of December 31, 2014, for which a hypothetical 10% adverse change would have resulted in a potential decrease in net current assets of $2.3 million.

Interest Rate Risk

As of June 30, 2015, we had total notes payable of $77.5 million, consisting of variable interest rate debt based on 3-month LIBOR. Our variable interest rate debt is subject to interest rate risk, because our interest payments will fluctuate with movements in the underlying 3-month LIBOR rate. A 100 basis point change in LIBOR rates would result in an increase in our interest expense of $0.8 million for the next 12 months based on current outstanding borrowings.

Our exposure to market risk on our cash and cash equivalents for changes in interest rates is limited because nearly all of our cash and cash equivalents have a short-term maturity and are used primarily for working capital purposes.

Impact of Inflation

We believe that our results of operations are not materially impacted by moderate changes in the inflation rate. Inflation and changing prices did not have a material effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations in the three and six months ended June  30, 2015.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act refers to controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to a company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2015, the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based upon such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of such date.

39

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

During the second quarter of 2015, we had a change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred as a result of our implementation of a new enterprise resource planning, or ERP, system that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

The introduction of our new ERP system resulted in changes to many of our financial reporting controls and procedures. Such changes were identified and planned prior to their introduction into our internal controls over financial reporting. Following implementation, these new controls are being validated according to our established processes. The integration of the ERP system and related workflow changes will continue throughout 2015 and may result in further changes to our financial reporting controls and procedures.

There were no other changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the three month period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which were identified in connection with management’s evaluation required by Rules 13a-15(d) and 15d-15(d) under the Exchange Act, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

40

Part II

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we may be involved in litigation relating to claims arising in the ordinary course of business, including those related to claims of infringement of third party patents and other intellectual property. Management believes that there are no claims or actions pending or threatened against the Company, the ultimate disposition of which would have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Our business, prospects, financial condition or operating results could be materially adversely affected by any of the risks and uncertainties described below, as well as other risks not currently known to us or that are currently considered immaterial. The trading price of our Series 1 common stock could decline due to any of these risks, and you may lose all or part of your investment. In assessing these risks, you should also refer to the other information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including our condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes.

Risks Related to Our Business

We are an early-stage company with a limited operating history, which makes it difficult to evaluate our current business and future prospects and may increase the risk of your investment.

We began our operations in September 2007 and did not enter the digital offer industry until late 2009. Our limited operating history may make it difficult to evaluate our current business and our future prospects. We have encountered and will continue to encounter risks and difficulties frequently experienced by growing companies in rapidly changing industries, including challenges in accurate financial planning and forecasting. You should consider our business and prospects in light of the risks and difficulties we may encounter as an early-stage company.

Traffic to our desktop websites has declined significantly year-over-year. If we are unable to continue to attract visitors to our websites from search engines, then consumer traffic to our websites could decrease, which could negatively impact the number of purchases generated for our retailers through our marketplace, and therefore negatively impact our ability to maintain or grow our net revenues and profitability.

We generate consumer traffic to our websites using various methods, including search engine marketing, or SEM, search engine optimization, or SEO, email campaigns and social media referrals. Our net revenues and profitability levels are dependent upon our continued ability to use a combination of these methods to generate consumer traffic to our websites in a cost-efficient manner. We have experienced and continue to experience fluctuations in search result rankings for a number of our websites. There can be no assurances that we will be able to grow or maintain current levels of consumer traffic either as a whole or with respect to either our desktop or mobile websites.

Our SEM and SEO techniques have been developed to work with existing search algorithms utilized by the major search engines. Major search engines frequently modify their search algorithms. Changes in these algorithms could cause our websites to receive less favorable placements, which could reduce the number of users who visit our websites. For example, in May 2014 Google released an update to its search algorithm that impacted the rankings of all of our websites for certain keywords. In some of those instances, consumer traffic to our websites decreased when compared to traffic levels immediately prior to the algorithm update. We also experienced disruptions in organic search traffic to our websites in the second fiscal quarter of 2015 due to additional updates to the Google search engine algorithm. As of June 30, 2015, traffic to our websites had not returned to levels immediately prior to the algorithm update. We may be unable to modify our SEM and SEO strategies in response to existing and any future search algorithm changes made by the major search engines, which could require a change in the strategy we use to generate consumer traffic to our websites. In addition, websites must comply with search engine guidelines and policies. These guidelines and policies are complex and may change at any time. If we fail to follow such guidelines and policies properly, search engines may rank our content lower in search results or could remove our content altogether from their indices. If we fail to understand and comply with these guidelines, our SEO strategy may become unsuccessful.

In some instances, search engines may change their displays or rankings in order to promote their own competing products or services or the products or services of one or more of our competitors. For example, Google is currently promoting its product-listing advertisements adjacent to its search results, which could reduce traffic to our websites. Given the large volume of search-driven traffic to our websites and the importance of the placement and display of results of a user’s search, similar actions in the future could have a negative effect on our business and results of operations.

41

If we are listed less prominently or fail to appear in search result listings for any reason, it is likely that the number of visitors to our websites will decline. Any such decline in consumer traffic to our websites could adversely impact the number of purchases we generate for our retailers, which could in turn adversely affect our online transaction net revenues. For example, after Google released updates to its search algorithm in May 2014 and the second quarter of 2015, consumer traffic to our websites decreased in some instances when compared to traffic levels immediately prior to the algorithm updates, which negatively impacted our online transaction net revenues. We may not be able to replace this traffic with the same volume of visitors or in the same cost-effective manner from other channels, such as SEM, display advertising, e-mail or social media, or at all. An attempt to replace this traffic through other channels may require us to increase our sales and marketing expenditures, which would adversely affect our operating results and which additional net revenues may not offset.

Although consumer traffic to our mobile applications is not reliant on search results, growth in mobile device usage may not decrease our overall reliance on search results if mobile users use our mobile websites rather than our mobile applications. In fact, growth in mobile device usage may exacerbate the risks associated with how and where our websites are displayed in search results because mobile device screens are smaller than desktop computer screens and therefore display fewer search results.

Consumers are increasingly using mobile devices to access our content and if we are unsuccessful in expanding the capabilities of our digital offer solutions for our mobile platforms to allow us to generate net revenues as effectively as our desktop platforms, our net revenues could decline.

Web usage and the consumption of digital content are increasingly shifting to mobile platforms such as smartphones and other connected devices. In the six months ended June 30, 2015 and in fiscal 2014, visits to our mobile websites represented approximately 40% and 28%, respectively, of the total visits to our websites, and we expect the percentage of visits to our mobile websites to continue to grow. Industry-wide solutions to monetize digital offer content effectively on these platforms are at an early stage of development and the future demand and growth prospects for digital offer content on these mobile platforms are uncertain. Further, the rate at which we monetize digital offer content on our mobile websites and applications is significantly lower than the rate on our desktop websites.

The growth of our business depends in part on our ability to deliver compelling solutions to consumers and retailers through these new mobile marketing channels. Our success on mobile platforms will be dependent on our interoperability with popular mobile operating systems that we do not control, such as Android, iOS and Windows Mobile, and any changes in such systems that degrade our functionality or give preferential treatment to competitive services could adversely affect usage of our services through mobile devices.

Further, to deliver high quality mobile offerings, it is important that our solutions integrate with a range of other mobile technologies, systems, networks and standards that we do not control. We may not be successful in developing relationships with key participants in the mobile industry or in developing products that operate effectively with these technologies, systems, networks or standards. For example, some retailers today do not recognize affiliate tracking links on their mobile websites or applications, and affiliate tracking links on mobile websites or applications may not function to allow retailers’ sales to be attributed to us. Further, consumers may click on a digital offer displayed on our mobile websites or in our mobile applications, but execute a purchase using that digital offer on a different platform, such as on the retailer’s desktop website or in-store (a circumstance known as cross device switching), which may result in those retailer sales not being attributed to us. As a result, in each such case, we may not receive commission revenues when a consumer executes a purchase on the retailer’s platform after clicking through a digital offer displayed on our mobile websites or in our mobile applications. If retailers fail to recognize affiliate tracking links on their mobile websites or applications, or affiliate tracking links on mobile websites or applications do not function to allow retailers’ sales to be attributed to us and our mobile traffic continues to increase or represent a higher percentage of our consumer traffic, our business could be harmed and our operating results could be adversely affected.

If we fail to develop mobile applications and mobile websites that effectively address consumer and retailer needs, or if we are not able to implement strategies that allow us to monetize mobile platforms and other emerging platforms, our ability to grow will be constrained, and our business, financial condition and operating results would be adversely affected.

If retailers alter the way they attribute credit to publishers in their performance marketing programs, our net revenues could decline and our operating results could be adversely affected.

Retailers often advertise and market digital offers through performance marketing programs, a type of performance-based marketing in which a retailer rewards one or more publishers such as us for each visitor or customer generated by the publisher’s own

42

marketing efforts. When a consumer executes a purchase on a retailer’s website as a result of a performance marketing program, most performance marketing conversion tracking tools credit the most recent link or ad clicked by the consumer prior to that purchase. This practice is generally known as “last-click attribution.” We generate the vast majority of our net revenues through transactions for which we receive last-click attribution. In recent years, some retailers have sought, and in some cases adopted, alternatives to last-click attribution. These alternatives are primarily “first-click attribution,” which credits the first link or ad clicked by a consumer prior to executing a purchase, or “multichannel attribution,” which applies weighted values to each of a retailer’s advertisements and tracks how each of those advertisements contributed to a purchase. If retailers widely adopt first-click attribution, multichannel attribution or otherwise alter the ways they attribute credit for purchases to us, and if we are unable to adapt our business practices to such alterations, our net revenues could decline and our business, financial condition and operating results could be adversely affected.

If we are unable to retain our existing retailers, expand our business with existing retailers or attract new retailers and consumers, our net revenues could decline.

Our ability to continue to grow our net revenues will depend in large part on expanding our business with existing retailers and attracting new retailers. The number of our current retailers may not expand materially beyond our existing base and may decline. Even for our largest retailers, the amount they pay us is typically only a small fraction of their overall advertising budget. Retailers may view their spend with us as experimental and may either reduce or terminate their spend with us if they determine a superior alternative for generating sales. In addition, retailers may determine that distributing digital offers through our platform results in undesirably broad distribution of their digital offers or otherwise does not provide a compelling value proposition. Some retailers have demanded that we remove digital offers relating to their products or services from our marketplace, and we anticipate that some retailers will do so in the future. Retailers have in some cases reduced, and may reduce in the future, the commission rates they pay to us for sales we facilitate. If we are unable to negotiate favorable terms with current or new retailers in the future, including the commission rates they pay us, our operating results will be adversely affected.

While we enter into agreements with certain retailers that may be performed over a period of one year or longer, retailers generally do not enter into long-term obligations with us requiring them to use our solutions. Retailers’ contracts with us, with few exceptions, are cancelable upon short or no notice and without penalty. We cannot be sure that our retailers will continue to use our solutions or that we will be able to replace retailers that do not renew their campaigns with new ones generating comparable revenues.

If we are unable to attract new consumers and maintain or increase consumer traffic to our websites and use of our mobile applications, new retailers may choose not to use, and existing retailers may not continue to use, our solutions for their promotional campaigns, and our volume of new digital offer inventory may suffer as the perceived usefulness of our marketplace declines. If our existing retailers do not continue to use our solutions for their promotional campaigns, or if we are unable to attract and expand the amount of business we do with new retailers, our sales will decrease and our operating results will be adversely affected.

We experience quarterly fluctuations in our operating results due to a number of factors that make our future results difficult to predict and could cause our operating results to fall below expectations or our guidance.

Our business is subject to seasonal fluctuations. Specifically, our net revenues are traditionally strongest in the third and fourth quarters of each year due to increases in holiday shopping. Conversely, our first and second quarter net revenues are typically lower.

Since the majority of our expenses are personnel-related and include salaries and stock-based compensation, benefits and incentive-based compensation plan expenses, we have not experienced significant seasonal fluctuations in the timing of our expenses from period to period other than increases in discretionary advertising and promotional spending during the third and fourth quarter holiday shopping period. We may continue to increase our investment in sales, engineering and product development substantially as we seek to leverage our solution to capitalize on what we see as a growing global opportunity. We also expect that our general and administrative expense will continue to increase over time to support our growing operations. For the foregoing reasons or other reasons we may not anticipate, historical patterns should not be considered indicative of our future sales activity, expenditure levels or performance.

Factors that may affect our quarterly operating results include the following:

• the number and quality of the digital offers on our websites and mobile applications;

• consumer visits to our websites and use of our mobile applications, and purchases of retail products by consumers resulting from those visits or application sessions;

• our ability to maintain or increase the commissions and other revenues associated with consumer visits to our mobile websites or use of our mobile applications;

• the success and costs of our online advertising and marketing initiatives, including advertising costs for paid search keywords that we deem relevant to our business and advertising costs for driving consumer downloads of our mobile applications;

• the levels of compensation that retailers are willing to pay us to attract customers;

• the amount that consumers spend when they make purchases using the digital offers we provide;

• market acceptance of our current and future solutions, including our ability to retain current retailers, sell additional solutions to existing retailers and to add new retailers to our business in multiple regions around the world;

• our ability to achieve performance targets anticipated by us in setting our operating and capital expense budgets;

• overall levels of consumer spending;

• the budgeting cycles of our retailers;

• the cyclical and discretionary nature of marketing spend and any resulting changes in the number and quality of digital offers that retailers choose to offer;

• changes in the competitive dynamics of the digital offer industry, including consolidation among competitors, performance marketing networks or customers, and our reputation and brand strength relative to our competitors;

• the response of consumers to our digital offer content and our personalization initiatives;

• our ability to control costs, including our operating expenses;

• network outages, errors in our solutions or security breaches and any associated expenses and collateral effects;

• foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, as our foreign sales and costs are denominated in local currencies;

• interest rate fluctuations, as our senior indebtedness carries a variable interest rate;

• costs related to acquisitions or licensing of, or investments in, products, services, technologies or other businesses and our ability to integrate and manage any acquisitions successfully;

• our ability to collect amounts billed to retailers directly and through performance networks; and

• general economic and political conditions in our domestic and international markets.

As a result of these and other factors, we have a limited ability to forecast the amount of future net revenues and expenses, and our operating results may vary from quarter to quarter and have, and may in the future, fall below our estimates or the expectations of public market analysts and investors. Fluctuations in our quarterly operating results may lead analysts to change their long-term models for valuing our common stock, cause us to face short-term liquidity issues, impact our ability to retain or attract key personnel or cause other unanticipated issues, all of which could cause our stock price to decline. As a result of the potential variations in our quarterly net revenues and operating results, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our net revenues and operating results may not be meaningful and the results of any single quarter should not be relied upon as an indication of future performance.

We are highly dependent on performance marketing networks as intermediaries. Factors adversely affecting our relationships with performance marketing networks, or the termination of our relationships with these networks, may adversely affect our ability to attract and retain business and our operating results.

Most of our net revenues come from commissions earned for promoting digital offers on behalf of retailers. Often, the commissions we earn are tracked and paid by performance marketing networks. For 2014, 94.8% of our net revenues came from retailers that pay us through performance marketing networks, primarily Commission Junction and LinkShare. Performance marketing networks provide retailers with affiliate tracking links for attributing revenues to publishers like us and the ability to distribute digital offer content to multiple publishers. We do not have exclusive relationships with performance marketing networks. They do not enter into long-term commitments to us allowing us to use their solutions, and their contracts with us are cancelable upon short or no notice and without penalty.

Our sales could be adversely impacted by industry changes relating to the use of performance marketing networks. For example, if retailers seek to bring the distribution of their digital offer content in-house rather than using a performance marketing network, we would need to develop relationships with more retailers directly, which we might not be able to do and which could increase our sales, marketing and product development expenses. Additionally, we face challenges associated with consumers’ increasing use of mobile devices to complete their online purchases. For example, many retailers currently do not recognize affiliate tracking links on their mobile websites or applications, and tracking mechanisms on mobile websites or applications may not function to allow retailers to properly attribute sales to us. As a result, we may not receive commission revenues when a consumer makes a purchase from their mobile device on a retailer’s mobile website after clicking through a digital offer displayed on one of our websites or mobile applications if the retailer’s mobile monetization mechanisms are not enabled.

Moreover, as a result of dealing primarily with performance marketing networks, we have less of a direct relationship with retailers than would be the case if we dealt directly with retailers. The presence of performance marketing networks as intermediaries

43

between us and retailers creates a challenge to building our own brand awareness and affinity with retailers. Additionally, in the event that our relationship with a performance marketing network were to terminate, our mechanism for receiving payments from the retailers we service through that network would terminate, which could materially and adversely impact our net revenues. Additionally, retailers may fail to pay the performance marketing networks the fees the retailers owe, which is a prerequisite to us receiving our commissions from the networks.

Some performance marketing networks that we work with could be considered our competitors because they also offer some components of our solution, including publishing digital offers, on their own properties. For example, in September 2014, the parent company of LinkShare announced its purchase of ebates.com, a cash back business with which we compete. LinkShare could elect to terminate its relationship with us or limit our ability to maintain or establish new relationships with retailers participating in its network in order to drive business to its own properties. If a performance marketing network further develops its own properties with digital offer capabilities or limits our access to its network for the purposes of driving revenue to its own properties, our ability to compete effectively could be significantly compromised and our business and operating results could be adversely affected.

The market in which we participate is intensely competitive, and we may not be able to compete successfully.

The market for digital offer solutions is highly competitive, fragmented and rapidly changing. Our competition for traffic from consumers seeking to save money on online or in-store purchases includes digital offer websites and mobile applications, cash back, loyalty and discounted gift card websites and mobile applications, retailers, search engines, social networks, comparison shopping websites, newspapers and direct mail campaigns. Our competition for retailer marketing spend includes digital offer websites that offer a pay-for-performance model, digital offer websites and mobile applications, search engines and social networks that compete for online advertising spend and television, magazines and newspapers that compete for offline advertising spend. With the introduction of new technologies and the influx of new entrants to the market, we expect competition to persist and intensify in the future, which could harm our ability to increase sales and maintain our profitability. We also expect competition in e-commerce generally, and digital offer solutions in particular, to continue to increase because there are no significant barriers to entry. A substantial number of digital offer websites and mobile applications, including those that attempt to replicate all or a portion of our business model, have emerged globally. In addition to such competitors, we are experiencing increasing competition from other businesses that provide digital offers similar to ours as an add-on to their core business. For example, Groupon, Living Social and Coupons.com are now providing digital offers, and Google and PayPal are now providing digital offers for in-store purchases. We also expect to compete against other websites and mobile applications that serve niche markets and interests. In addition, we compete with traditional offline coupon and discount services, as well as newspapers, magazines and other traditional media companies that provide coupons and discounts on products and services.

Our success depends on the breadth, depth, quality and reliability of our digital offer selection, as well as our continued innovation and ability to provide features that make our marketplace useful and appealing to consumers. If we are unable to develop quality features that consumers want to use, then consumers may become dissatisfied with our marketplace and elect to use the offerings of one of our competitors, which could adversely affect our operating results.

Certain of our larger actual or potential competitors may have the resources to significantly change the nature of the digital offer industry to their advantage, which could materially disadvantage us. For example, Google now displays product-listing advertisements above the organic search results returned by its search engine in response to user searches, which may reduce the amount of traffic to our websites. Additionally, potential competitors such as PayPal, Yahoo!, Bing and Facebook have widely adopted industry platforms which they could leverage to distribute digital offers that could be disadvantageous to our competitive position.

Our current and potential competitors may have significantly more financial, technical, marketing and other resources than we have, be able to devote greater resources to the development, promotion, sale and support of their products and services, have more extensive consumer bases and deeper relationships, and may have longer operating histories and greater name recognition than we have. As a result, these competitors may be better able to respond quickly to new technologies, develop deeper retailer relationships or offer services at lower prices. Any of these developments would make it more difficult for us to sell our solutions and could result in increased pricing pressure, reduced profit margins, increased sales and marketing expense or the loss of market share.

In the traditional coupon landscape, our primary competitors for advertising spend include publishers of printable coupons. Many of these competitors have significant consumer reach, well-developed retailer relationships, and much larger financial resources and longer operating histories than we have.

We also directly and indirectly compete with retailers for consumer traffic. Many retailers market and provide their own digital offers directly to consumers using their own websites, email newsletter and alerts, mobile applications, social media presence and other distribution channels. Our retailers could be more successful than we are at marketing their own digital offers or could decide to terminate their relationship with us because they no longer want to pay us to compete against them.

44

We may also face competition from companies we do not yet know about. If existing or new companies develop, market or resell competitive digital offer solutions, acquire one of our existing competitors or form a strategic alliance with one of our competitors, our ability to compete effectively could be significantly compromised and our operating results could be harmed.

45

Our business has grown in scope and complexity in recent periods. If we fail to manage that expansion, our financial performance may suffer.

We have expanded our overall business and product offerings, consumer traffic, paid retailers, employee headcount and operations in recent periods. We increased our total number of full-time employees from 35 as of December 31, 2010 to 569 as of June 30, 2015. In August 2015 reduced our U.S. headcount by approximately 10%. We have also established or acquired operations in other countries. In 2011, we acquired the business of VoucherCodes.co.uk, which is based in the U.K. In 2012, we acquired Bons-de-Reduction.com and Poulpeo.com, which are based in France, and relaunched Deals.com in Germany. In March 2013, we acquired Actiepagina.nl, which is based in the Netherlands. In July 2013, we acquired Ma-Reduc.com, which is based in France. In most of these instances, we previously had no presence in these countries. Our business is becoming increasingly complex, especially in light of the number of acquisitions we have integrated and are in the process of integrating. Our limited operating history, reliance on multiple websites, mobile applications and brands and our rapid expansion have placed, and will continue to place, a significant strain on our managerial, operational, product development, sales and marketing, administrative, financial and other resources.

We expect to continue to hire more specialized personnel in the future. We will need to continue to hire, train and manage additional qualified website and mobile application developers, software engineers, sales staff, and product development specialists in order to improve and maintain our technology to properly manage our growth. If our new hires perform poorly, if we are unsuccessful in hiring, training, managing and integrating these new employees or if we are not successful in retaining our existing employees, our business may be harmed.

Further, to accommodate our expected expansion we must add new hardware and software and improve and maintain our technology, systems and network infrastructure. Failure to effectively upgrade our technology or network infrastructure to support our expected increases in traffic volume could result in unanticipated system disruptions, slow response times or poor experiences for consumers. To manage the expected expansion of our operations and personnel and to support financial reporting requirements as a public company, we will need to continue to improve our transaction processing and reporting, operational and financial systems, procedures and controls. These improvements will be particularly challenging if we acquire new operations with different back-end systems. Our current and planned personnel, systems, procedures and controls may not be adequate to support our future operations. If we are unable to manage any growth and increased complexity successfully and hire additional qualified personnel in an efficient manner, our business, financial conditions and operating results could be adversely affected.

46

If online commerce does not continue to grow, or contracts, our business may suffer.

The business of selling goods and services over the Internet and via mobile applications, and the use of digital offers in those transactions, is dynamic and relatively new. Concerns about fraud, privacy and other challenges may discourage additional consumers from adopting the Internet and mobile applications as a medium of commerce. Acquiring new customers for our marketplace and increasing consumer traffic may become more difficult and costly than it has been in the past, particularly in markets where our marketplace has been available for some time. In order to increase consumer traffic to our websites and increase use of our mobile applications, we must appeal to consumers who historically have used traditional means of commerce to purchase goods and services and may prefer alternatives to our websites and mobile applications, such as the retailer’s own website or mobile application. In addition, consumers may not be accustomed to using one of our mobile applications to access digital offers that can be used by the consumer while in a retail store or restaurant. If these consumers prove to be less active than consumers who are already providing traffic to our websites or using our mobile applications, or we are unable to gain efficiencies in our operating costs, including our cost of increasing consumer traffic to our websites or increasing the number of mobile application sessions, our business could be adversely impacted. Furthermore, to the extent that weak economic conditions cause consumer spending to decline or cause our customers and potential customers to freeze or reduce their marketing budgets, particularly in the online retail market, demand for our solutions may be negatively affected.

47

If we are not able to maintain a positive perception of the content available through our marketplace, maintain and enhance our RetailMeNot brand and the brands associated with each of our other websites and mobile applications, our reputation and business may suffer.

A decrease in the quality of the digital offers available through our marketplace could harm our reputation and damage our ability to attract and retain consumers and retailers, which could adversely affect our business. Additionally, maintaining and enhancing our RetailMeNot brand and the brands of each of our other websites is critical to our ability to attract new retailers and consumers to our marketplace, generate net revenues and successfully introduce new solutions. We may not be able to successfully build our RetailMeNot brand in the U.S. without losing some or all of the value associated with, or decreasing the effectiveness of, our other brands. We expect that the promotion of our brands will require us to make substantial investments and as our market becomes more competitive, these branding initiatives may become increasingly difficult and expensive. The successful promotion of our brands will depend largely on our marketing and public relations efforts. If we do not successfully maintain and enhance our brands, we could lose consumer traffic, which could, in turn, cause retailers to terminate or reduce the extent of their relationship with us. Our brand promotion activities may not be successful or may not yield net revenues sufficient to offset this cost, which could adversely affect our reputation and business.

Our business model depends upon digital offer inventory that we do not own or otherwise control, and the failure to maintain sufficient inventory or quality of the digital offers available on our websites may adversely affect our perceived value by consumers and therefore retailers.

Our success depends on our ability to provide consumers with the digital offers they seek. A substantial majority of our revenues come from arrangements in which we are paid by retailers to promote their digital offers. Additionally, as much as one-third of the digital offers on our websites are submitted by users. Therefore, we do not own or control the inventory of content upon which our business depends. Because a large number of our digital offers are submitted by users, our efforts to ensure the quality and reliability of those digital offers are critical to our success. From time to time consumers submit complaints that our digital offers are invalid or expired. If our algorithms and automated processes for validating and sorting user-submitted digital offers are ineffective, or if our employees responsible for manual review and curation of user-submitted digital offers are unable to effectively select and sort the digital offers that are reliable and most appealing to our users, we may be unable meet the needs of consumers and our operating results may be adversely affected.

Retailers have a variety of channels through which to promote their products and services. If these retailers elect to promote their offers and discounts through other channels, offer less compelling offers or discounts or not to promote offers or discounts at all, or if our competitors are willing to accept lower commissions than we are to promote these digital offers, our ability to obtain content may be impeded and our business, financial condition and operating results will be adversely affected. Similarly, if users do not contribute digital offers to our websites, or if they contribute digital offers that are not attractive or reliable, the digital offer inventory in our marketplace may decrease or become less valuable to consumers. If we cannot maintain sufficient digital offer inventory in our marketplace, consumers may perceive our marketplace as less relevant, consumer traffic to our websites and use of our mobile applications would decline and, as a result, our business, financial condition and operating results would be adversely affected.

If Texas or any other jurisdiction in which we are resident implements regulations that impose sales tax on certain e-commerce or m-commerce transactions, our net revenues could decline and our business, financial condition and operating results will be adversely affected.

In 2008, New York implemented regulations that require retailers to collect and remit sales taxes on sales made to residents of New York if the publisher that facilitated that sale is a New York resident. In 2011, California passed similar regulations, and several other states have proposed similar regulations, although some of the regulations proposed by these other states have not passed. In addition, the State of New Jersey, a state in which we have operations, passed similar regulations on July 1, 2014. The requirement to collect and remit sales tax in New Jersey has not had a material impact on our results of operations to date. However, in the future, paid retailers in our marketplace that do not currently have sales tax nexus in New Jersey or in any other state that passes or has passed similar regulations and in which we have operations, employees or contractors in the future, may significantly alter the manner in which they pay us, cease paying us for sales we facilitate for that retailer in that state or cease using our marketplace, each of which could adversely impact our operating results. Further, if Texas were to pass similar regulations, we believe a substantial number of the paid retailers in our marketplace would cease paying us for sales we facilitate for that retailer in Texas, significantly alter the manner in which they pay us or cease using our marketplace. This would decrease our sales and our business, financial condition and operating results would be adversely affected.

Our failure or the failure of third-party service providers to protect our platform and network against security breaches, or otherwise protect our confidential information, could damage our reputation and brand and substantially harm our business and operating results.

We deliver digital offers via our websites, mobile applications, email newsletter and alerts and social media presence, and we collect and maintain data about consumers, including personally identifiable information, as well as other confidential or

48

proprietary information. Our security measures may not detect or prevent all attempts to hack our systems, denial-of-service attacks, viruses, malicious software, break-ins, phishing attacks, social engineering, security breaches or other attacks and similar disruptions that may jeopardize the security of information stored in and transmitted by our platform or that we or our third-party service providers otherwise maintain. Breaches of our security measures or those of our third-party service providers could result in unauthorized access to our platform or other systems; unauthorized access to and misappropriation of consumer information, including consumers’ personally identifiable information, or other confidential or proprietary information of ourselves or third parties; viruses, worms, spyware or other malware being served from our platform; deletion or modification of content, or the display of unauthorized content, on our websites or our mobile applications; or a denial of service or other interruption in our operations. Our risk and exposure to these matters remains heightened because of, among other things, the evolving nature of these threats, our size and scale, our geographic footprint and international presence, our use of open source software and technologies, the outsourcing of some of our business operations and continued threats of cyber-attacks. Although cybersecurity and the development and enhancement of controls, processes and practices designed to protect our and our third party providers’ systems, computers, software, data and networks from attack, damage or unauthorized access are a high priority for us, this may not successfully protect our respective systems against all vulnerabilities, including technologies developed to bypass our security measures. In addition, outside parties may attempt to fraudulently induce employees, users or retailers to disclose sensitive information in order to gain access to our or our third party providers’ secure systems and networks.

Because techniques used to obtain unauthorized access to or sabotage systems change frequently and may not be known until launched against us or our third-party service providers, we and they may be unable to anticipate these attacks or to implement adequate preventative measures. As cyber threats continue to evolve, we may be required to expend significant additional resources to continue to modify or enhance our protective measures or to investigate and remediate any information security vulnerabilities. Any actual or perceived breach of our security could damage our reputation and brand, expose us to a risk of loss or litigation and possible liability, require us to expend significant capital and other resources to alleviate problems caused by such breaches and deter consumers and retailers from using our online marketplace, which would harm our business, financial condition and operating results.

Interruptions or delays in service from third-party data center hosting facilities and other third parties could impair the delivery of our solutions and harm our business.

We operate our business using third-party data center hosting facilities located in California, Oregon, Virginia, the U.K., France, Germany, Ireland and the Netherlands. All of our data gathering and analytics are conducted on, and the content we deliver is processed through, servers in these facilities. We also rely on bandwidth providers, Internet service providers and mobile networks to deliver content. Any damage to, or failure of, the systems of our third-party providers could result in interruptions to our service.

Despite precautions taken at our third-party data centers, these facilities may be vulnerable to damage or interruption from break-ins, computer viruses, denial-of-service attacks, acts of terrorism, vandalism or sabotage, power loss, telecommunications failures, fires, floods, earthquakes, hurricanes, tornadoes and similar events. The occurrence of any of these events, a decision to close the facilities without adequate notice or other unanticipated problems at these facilities could result in loss of data, lengthy interruptions in the availability of our services and harm to our reputation and brand. While we have disaster recovery arrangements in place, they have not been tested under actual disasters or similar events.

Additionally, our third-party data center facility agreements are of limited duration, and our third-party data center facilities have no obligation to renew their agreements with us on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. If for any reason we are unable to renew our agreements with these facilities on commercially reasonable terms or if our arrangement with one or more of our data centers is terminated, we could experience additional expense in arranging for new facilities and support, and we may experience delays in the provisioning of our solutions until an agreement with another data center facility can be arranged. This shift to alternate facilities could take more than 24 hours depending on the nature of the event, which could cause significant interruptions in the delivery of our solutions and adversely affect our business and reputation. In addition, the failure of these facilities to meet our capacity requirements could result in interruptions in the availability or functionality of our solutions or impede our ability to scale our operations.

Furthermore, we depend on continuous and uninterrupted access to the Internet through third-party bandwidth providers to operate our business. If we lose the services of one or more of our bandwidth providers for any reason or if their services are disrupted, we could experience disruption in our services or we could be required to retain the services of a replacement bandwidth provider, which could increase our operating costs and harm our business and reputation.

Any errors, defects, disruptions or other performance problems with our solutions could harm our reputation and may damage our retailers’ businesses. Interruptions in our solutions could cause retailers to terminate their contracts with us, which would likely reduce our net revenues and harm our business, operating results and financial condition.

49

An increase in the return rate of paid retailers’ products or a change in the categories of products retailers choose to promote using digital offers could reduce our net revenues.

The commission revenues we receive from paid retailers are in part a function of the amount consumers purchase from paid retailers net of product returns. We do not have control over the categories or quality of products or services that our retailers deliver, nor do we have control over the digital offers they provide us. As a result, we rely on our historical experience for our estimate of returns. If paid retailers’ actual levels of returns are greater than the level of returns we estimate or if paid retailers elect to use digital offer content to promote products and services with a higher return rate than what we have experienced historically, our net revenues could decline. Because some categories of products tend to experience higher return rates than others, a shift in the types of goods consumers purchase using our solutions could lead to an increase in returns and our net revenues could decline. Additionally, return rates in the foreign countries in which we operate are currently higher than return rates in the U.S. If we continue to expand our operations in countries with high return rates, our operating results may be negatively affected.

Regulatory, legislative or self-regulatory developments regarding Internet privacy matters could adversely affect our ability to conduct our business.

Consumer and industry groups have expressed concerns about online data collection and use by companies, which has resulted in the release of various industry self-regulatory codes of conduct and best practice guidelines that are binding for member companies and that govern, among other things, the ways in which companies can collect, use and disclose user information, how companies must give notice of these practices and what choices companies must provide to consumers regarding these practices. We are obligated in certain cases to comply with best practices or codes of conduct addressing matters, such as the online tracking of users or devices.

U.S. regulatory agencies have also placed an increased focus on online privacy matters and, in particular, on online advertising activities that utilize cookies, which are small files of non-personalized information placed on an Internet user’s computer, and other online tracking methods. Such regulatory agencies have released, or are expected to release, reports pertaining to these matters. For example, on March 26, 2012, the Federal Trade Commission, or FTC, issued a report on consumer privacy intended to articulate best practices for companies collecting and using consumer data. The report recommends companies adopt several practices that could have an impact on our business, including giving consumers notice and offering them choices about being tracked across other parties’ websites and implementing a persistent “Do Not Track” mechanism to enable consumers to choose whether to allow tracking of their online search and browsing activities, including on mobile devices. Various industry participants have worked to develop and finalize standards relating to a Do Not Track mechanism, and such standards may be implemented and adopted by industry participants at any time. We may be required or otherwise choose to adopt Do Not Track mechanisms, in which case our ability to use our existing tracking technologies and permit their use by performance marketing networks and other third parties could be impaired. This could cause our net revenues to decline and adversely affect our operating results.

U.S. and foreign governments have enacted, considered or are considering legislation or regulations that could significantly restrict industry participants’ ability to collect, augment, analyze, use and share anonymous data, such as by regulating the level of consumer notice and consent required before a company can employ cookies or other electronic tracking tools. A number of bills have been proposed in the U.S. Congress in the past that contained provisions that would have regulated how companies can use cookies and other tracking technologies to collect and use information about consumers. Some of those bills also contained provisions that would have specifically regulated the collection and use of information, particularly geolocation information, from mobile devices. At least one such bill presently has been proposed in the U.S. Congress.

Additionally, the EU has traditionally imposed more strict obligations under data privacy laws and regulations. Individual EU member countries have had discretion with respect to their interpretation and implementation of EU data privacy laws, resulting in variation of privacy standards from country to country. Legislation and regulation in the EU and some EU member states requires companies to obtain specific types of notice and consent from consumers before using cookies or other tracking technologies. To comply with these requirements, the use of cookies or other similar technologies may require the user’s affirmative, opt-in consent. Additionally, in January 2012, the European Commission announced significant proposed reforms to its existing data protection legal framework that, if implemented, may result in a greater compliance burden with respect to our operations in Europe. These reforms continue to be debated and there remains uncertainty surrounding them both with respect to their scope and if and when they will be implemented. In addition, the European Court of Justice, or ECJ, recently found that there is a “right to be forgotten,” which means that the user has a right to request his or her personal information be deleted. In deciding this case, the ECJ purported to extend jurisdictional reach over foreign Internet activities. As a result of this decision, significant new restraints may be imposed on the retention of personal data throughout the EU, which could impact the operation and growth of our business in EU.

50

Changes in global privacy laws and regulations and self-regulatory regimes may force us to incur substantial costs or require us to change our business practices. This could compromise our ability to pursue our growth strategies effectively and may adversely affect the demand for our solutions or otherwise harm our business and financial condition. For instance, new privacy laws or regulations or changed interpretations of existing laws or regulations could require performance marketing networks or us to take additional measures to facilitate consumer privacy preferences or to limit or cease altogether the collection, use or disclosure of data. For example, one potential restriction on the use of cookies would allow a website that a consumer has elected to visit to continue to place cookies on the user’s browser without explicit consent, but would require the user’s explicit consent for a third party to place its cookies on the user’s browser. A recent FTC staff report also recommends that websites offer consumers a choice about whether the owner of the website can use third parties to track the consumer’s activity for certain purposes. We are dependent on third parties, including performance marketing networks, to place cookies on browsers of users that visit our websites. If in the future we are restricted from allowing cookies, if there is a material increase in the number of users who choose to opt out or block cookies and other tracking technologies, or if performance marketing networks’ cookies or other tracking mechanisms otherwise do not function properly, our ability to generate net revenues would be significantly impaired.

Finally, we may be subject to foreign laws regulating online advertising even in jurisdictions where we do not have any physical presence to the extent a digital media content provider has advertising inventory that we manage or to the extent that we collect and use data from consumers in those jurisdictions. Such laws may vary widely around the world, making it more costly for us to comply with them. Failure to comply may harm our business and our operating results could be adversely affected.

Changes in consumer sentiment or laws, rules or regulations regarding the use of cookies and other tracking technologies and other privacy matters could have a material adverse effect on our ability to generate net revenues and could adversely affect our ability to collect proprietary data on consumer shopping behavior.

Consumers may become increasingly resistant to the collection, use and sharing of information online, including information used to deliver advertising and to attribute credit to publishers such as us in performance marketing programs, and take steps to prevent such collection, use and sharing of information. For example, consumer complaints and/or lawsuits regarding online advertising or the use of cookies or other tracking technologies in general and our practices specifically could adversely impact our business.

Consumers can currently opt out of the placement or use of most cookies for online advertising purposes by either deleting or disabling cookies on their browsers, visiting websites that allow consumers to place an opt-out cookie on their browsers, which instructs participating entities not to use certain data about consumers’ online activity for the delivery of targeted advertising, or by downloading browser plug-ins and other tools that can be set to: identify cookies and other tracking technologies used on websites; prevent websites from placing third-party cookies and other tracking technologies on the user’s browser; or block the delivery of online advertisements on websites and applications.

Changes in device and software features could make it easier for Internet users to prevent the placement of cookies or to block other tracking technologies. In particular, the default settings of consumer devices and software may be set to prevent the placement of cookies unless the user actively elects to allow them. For example, Apple’s Safari browser currently has a default setting under which third-party cookies are not accepted, and users must activate a browser setting to enable cookies to be set. Additionally, Mozilla Corporation announced on February 25, 2013, that its Firefox browser also will not accept third-party cookies by default. On February 22, 2012, the Digital Advertising Alliance announced that its members will work to add browser-based header signals to the set of tools by which consumers can express their preferences not to be tracked online. As discussed above, a recent FTC report on consumer privacy calls for the development and implementation of a persistent Do Not Track mechanism that enable consumers to choose whether to allow the tracking of their online search and browsing activities. Various industry participants have worked to develop and finalize standards relating to a Do Not Track mechanism, and such standards may be implemented and adopted by industry participants at any time.

We are dependent on performance marketing networks or in some instances, retailers, to place cookies on browsers of users that visit our websites or to use other tracking mechanisms to allow retailer sales through our marketplace to be attributed to us, and if we are restricted from allowing these or if they do not function in a manner that allows retailer sales through our marketplace to be attributed to us, our ability to generate net revenues would be significantly impaired. In particular, if consumer sentiment regarding privacy issues or the development and deployment of new browser solutions or other Do Not Track mechanisms results in a material increase in the number of users who choose to opt out or block cookies and other tracking technologies or who are otherwise using browsers where they need to, and fail to, configure the browser to accept cookies, or otherwise results in cookies or other tracking technologies not functioning properly, our ability to conduct our business, operating results and financial condition would be adversely affected.

51

In addition to this change in consumer preferences, if retailers or brands perceive significant negative consumer reaction to targeted online advertising or the tracking of consumers’ online activities, they may determine that such advertising or tracking has the potential to negatively impact their brand. In that case, advertisers may limit or stop the use of our solutions, and our operating results and financial condition would be adversely affected.

Our business practices with respect to data and consumer protection could give rise to liabilities or reputational harm as a result of governmental regulation, legal requirements or industry standards relating to consumer privacy, data protection and consumer protection.

Federal, state and international laws and regulations govern the collection, use, retention, sharing and security of data that we collect. In addition, certain laws impose restrictions on communications with persons by email, SMS text messages and other means of delivery. We are also subject to the terms of our privacy policies and privacy-related obligations to third parties. We strive to comply with all applicable laws, regulations, self-regulatory requirements and legal obligations relating to privacy, data protection and consumer protection, including those relating to the use of data for marketing purposes. It is possible, however, that these requirements may be interpreted and applied in a manner that is inconsistent from one jurisdiction to another and may conflict with other rules or our practices. For example, several Internet companies have incurred penalties for failing to abide by the representations made in their privacy policies and practices. We cannot assure you that our practices have complied, comply, or will comply fully with all such laws, regulations, requirements and obligations. Any failure, or perceived failure, by us to comply with federal, state or international laws or regulations, including laws and regulations regulating privacy, data security, marketing communications or consumer protection, our own privacy policies and practices, or other policies, self-regulatory requirements or legal obligations could result in harm to our reputation, a loss in business, and proceedings or actions against us by governmental entities, consumers, retailers or others. Additionally, if third parties we work with violate applicable laws, our policies or other privacy-related obligations, such violations may also put our users’ information at risk and could in turn have an adverse effect on our business.

Government regulation of the Internet, e-commerce and mobile commerce is evolving, and unfavorable changes or failure by us to comply with these laws and regulations could substantially harm our business and results of operations.

We are subject to general business regulations and laws as well as regulations and laws specifically governing the Internet, e-commerce and mobile commerce, or m-commerce, in a number of jurisdictions around the world. Existing and future regulations and laws could impede the growth of the Internet, e-commerce, m-commerce or other online services. These regulations and laws may involve taxation, tariffs, privacy and data security, anti-spam, data protection, content, copyrights, distribution, electronic contracts, electronic communications, money laundering, electronic payments and consumer protection. It is not clear how existing laws and regulations governing issues such as property ownership, sales and other taxes, libel and personal privacy apply to the Internet as the vast majority of these laws and regulations were adopted prior to the advent of the Internet and do not contemplate or address the unique issues raised by the Internet, e-commerce or m-commerce. It is possible that general business regulations and laws, or those specifically governing the Internet, e-commerce or m-commerce may be interpreted and applied in a manner that is inconsistent from one jurisdiction to another and may conflict with other rules or our practices. We cannot assure you that our practices have complied, comply or will comply fully with all such laws and regulations. Any failure, or perceived failure, by us to comply with any of these laws or regulations could result in damage to our reputation, a loss in business, and proceedings or actions against us by governmental entities or others. Any such proceeding or action could hurt our reputation, force us to spend significant resources in defense of these proceedings, distract our management, increase our costs of doing business, and cause consumers and retailers to decrease their use of our marketplace, and may result in the imposition of monetary liability. We may also be contractually liable to indemnify and hold harmless third parties from the costs or consequences of noncompliance with any such laws or regulations. In addition, it is possible that governments of one or more countries may seek to censor content available on our websites and mobile applications or may even attempt to completely block access to our marketplace. Adverse legal or regulatory developments could substantially harm our business. In particular, in the event that we are restricted, in whole or in part, from operating in one or more countries, our ability to retain or increase our customer base may be adversely affected and we may not be able to maintain or grow our net revenues as anticipated.

As we develop and provide solutions, we may be subject to additional and unexpected regulations, or increased risk of fraud, which could increase our costs or otherwise harm our business.

As we develop and provide solutions that address new market segments, we may become subject to additional laws and regulations, which could create unexpected liabilities for us, cause us to incur additional costs or restrict our operations.

We have begun to introduce new product offerings, which may be subject to regulation by federal, state and local authorities and by authorities in foreign countries. For example, unlike our other solutions, in order to facilitate product offerings such as card-linked offers or the sale of gift cards, we may acquire, store and process consumer credit card data or other personally identifiable information. The processing of such information requires compliance with the Payment Card Industry Data Security

52

Standard, or PCI DSS, which compliance certification we previously obtained. Under the PCI DSS, we are required to maintain internal controls over the use, storage and security of credit card data and other personally identifiable information to help prevent credit card fraud. Failure to comply with this standard or other loss of our PCI DSS compliance could result in breaches of contractual obligations with our payment processors, may subject us to fines, penalties, damages and civil liability and could eventually prevent us from processing or accepting credit cards.

Transactions involving either the purchase or sale of gift cards, which we expect to offer in the future, will require us to comply with numerous state, federal and international laws and regulations. We have limited experience operating our business in accordance with these specific laws and regulations. In addition, purchases and sales of gift cards, and particularly the purchase and sale of gift cards acquired from consumers rather than directly or indirectly from the issuing retailer, increase our exposure to various types of fraud committed by third parties or by our own employees. Our failure to accurately anticipate the application of laws and regulations related to the purchase and sale of gift cards, or other failure to comply, and our failure to anticipate, prevent or discover fraud related to the purchase or sale of gift cards, could create liability for us, result in adverse publicity or cause us to alter our business practices, any of which could cause our net revenues to decrease, our costs to increase, or our business otherwise to be harmed.

From time to time, we may be notified of or otherwise become aware of additional laws and regulations that governmental organizations or others may claim should be applicable to our business. Our failure to anticipate the application of these laws and regulations accurately, or other failure to comply, could create liability for us, result in adverse publicity or cause us to alter our business practices, which could cause our net revenues to decrease, our costs to increase or our business otherwise to be harmed.

We may face liability for, and may be subject to claims related to, inaccurate or outdated content provided to us, or content provided to us without permission, which could require us to pay significant damages, may be extremely costly to defend even if decided in our favor and could limit our ability to operate.

The information on our websites and mobile applications that is provided by performance marketing networks and retailers and collected from third parties relates to digital offers from retailers. We are exposed to the risk that some of this content may contain inaccurate or outdated information about retailer products or services or the discounts thereon, or digital offers that are not made available or intended to be made available to all consumers. This could cause consumers and retailers to lose confidence in the information provided on our platform or become dissatisfied with our platform and result in lawsuits being filed against us.

In addition, we currently face and may in the future be exposed to potential liability relating to information that is published or made available through our marketplace, including information generated by us, user-generated content and proprietary information of third parties. This content may expose us to claims related to trademark and copyright infringement and other intellectual property rights, rights of privacy, defamation, fraud, negligence, breach of contract, tortious interference, unfairness, deceptiveness, false or misleading advertising, personal injury torts, noncompliance with state or federal laws relating to digital offers or other theories based on the nature and content of the information. The laws relating to the liability of service providers for activities of their users is currently unsettled both within the U.S. and internationally, although risks related to these types of lawsuits may be enhanced in certain jurisdictions outside the U.S. where our protection from liability for third-party actions is more unclear and where we may be less protected under local laws than we are in the U.S.

Such claims or lawsuits currently and could in the future divert the time and attention of management and technical personnel away from our business and result in significant costs to investigate and defend, regardless of the merits of the claims. Such potential claims and lawsuits could also result in significant damages if we are found liable. The scope and amount of our insurance may not adequately protect us against these types of damages. Additionally, as a result of such claims, we have elected and may in the future elect or be compelled to remove valuable content from our websites or mobile applications, which could decrease the usefulness of our platform for consumers and result in less traffic to our websites and less usage of our mobile applications. If any of these events occur, our business and financial results could be adversely affected.

Our business could suffer if the jurisdictions in which we operate change the way in which they regulate user-generated content.

Our business, including our ability to operate and expand internationally, could be adversely affected if legislation or regulations are adopted, interpreted or implemented in a manner that is inconsistent with our current business practices related to user-generated content and that requires changes to these practices or the design of our platform or solutions. For example, laws relating to the liability of providers of online services for activities of their users and other third parties are currently being tested by a number of claims against third parties, including actions based on invasion of privacy and other torts, unfair competition, copyright and trademark infringement and other theories based on the nature and content of the materials searched, the ads posted or the content provided by users. If immunities currently afforded to websites that publish user-generated content are limited, we may be compelled to remove content from our platform that we would otherwise publish or restrict the types of businesses that we can promote digital offer content for, among other changes. Such changes in law could increase our operating costs and make it more difficult for consumers to use our platform, resulting in less consumer traffic and net revenues, and our business and operating results could suffer.

53

The growth of e-commerce and m-commerce in the U.S. could suffer if the federal government implements new regulations that obligate retailers, or permit states to obligate retailers, to collect sales taxes from consumers on certain e-commerce or m-commerce transactions, which would adversely affect our growth.

Legislation introduced in the 113^th Congress in 2013, including H.R. 684 and S. 336, and approved by the U.S. Senate in May 2013, and similar legislation introduced in the U.S. Senate in March, 2015, would grant states the authority to require out-of-state retailers to collect and remit sales taxes. The adoption of remote sales tax collection legislation would result in the imposition of sales taxes and additional costs associated with complex sales tax collection, remittance and audit compliance requirements on many of our retailers, which would make selling online or through mobile applications less attractive for these retailers. Additionally, the introduction of new or increased taxes applicable to online transactions could make online purchases less attractive to consumers relative to in-store retail purchases. These changes could substantially impair the growth of e-commerce and m-commerce in the U.S., and could diminish our opportunity to derive financial benefit from our activities in the U.S.

We may be sued by third parties for infringement or other violation of their intellectual property or proprietary rights.

Internet, advertising and e-commerce companies frequently are subject to litigation based on allegations of infringement, misappropriation, dilution or other violations of intellectual property rights. Some Internet, advertising, e-commerce companies and m-commerce companies, including some of our competitors, own large numbers of patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secrets, which they may use to assert claims against us.

Third parties have asserted, and may in the future assert, that we have infringed, misappropriated or otherwise violated their intellectual property rights.

For instance, the use of our technology to provide our solutions could be challenged by claims that such use infringes, dilutes, misappropriates or otherwise violates the intellectual property rights of a third party. In addition, we currently face and may in the future be exposed to claims that content published or made available through our websites or mobile applications violates third-party intellectual property rights. For example, retailers and other third parties frequently have complained that their trademarks, copyrights or other intellectual property are being used on our websites or mobile applications without their permission and in violation of their rights or in violation of laws or regulations. In March 2015, a retailer filed suit against us based on trademark infringement and other claims, and litigation related to those claims is ongoing.

As we face increasing competition and as a public company, the possibility of intellectual property rights claims against us grows. Such claims and litigation may involve patent holding companies or other adverse intellectual property rights holders who have no relevant product revenue, and therefore our own pending patents and other intellectual property rights may provide little or no deterrence to these rights holders in bringing intellectual property rights claims against us. There may be intellectual property rights held by others, including issued or pending patents and trademarks, that cover significant aspects of our technologies, content, branding or business methods, and we cannot assure that we are not infringing or violating, and have not violated or infringed, any third-party intellectual property rights or that we will not be held to have done so or be accused of doing so in the future.

Any claim that we have violated intellectual property or other proprietary rights of third parties, with or without merit, and whether or not it results in litigation, is settled out of court or is determined in our favor, could be time-consuming and costly to address and resolve, and could divert the time and attention of management and technical personnel from our business. Furthermore, an adverse outcome of a dispute may result in an injunction and could require us to pay substantial monetary damages, including treble damages and attorneys’ fees, if we are found to have willfully infringed a party’s intellectual property rights. Any settlement or adverse judgment resulting from such a claim could require us to enter into a licensing agreement to continue using the technology, content or other intellectual property that is the subject of the claim; restrict or prohibit our use of such technology, content or other intellectual property; require us to expend significant resources to redesign our technology or solutions; and require us to indemnify third parties. Royalty or licensing agreements, if required or desirable, may be unavailable on terms acceptable to us, or at all, and may require significant royalty payments and other expenditures. There also can be no assurance that we would be able to develop or license suitable alternative technology, content or other intellectual property to permit us to continue offering the affected technology, content or services to our customers. Any of these events could harm our business, operating results and financial condition.

54

Failure to protect or enforce our intellectual property rights could harm our business and results of operations.

We pursue the registration of our patentable technology, domain names, trademarks and service marks in the U.S. and in certain jurisdictions abroad. We also strive to protect our intellectual property rights by relying on federal, state and common law rights, as well as contractual restrictions. We typically enter into confidentiality and invention assignment agreements with our employees and contractors, and confidentiality agreements with parties with whom we conduct business in order to limit access to, and disclosure and use of, our proprietary information. However, we may not be successful in executing these agreements with every party who has access to our confidential information or contributes to the development of our technology or intellectual property rights. Those agreements that we do execute may be breached, and we may not have adequate remedies for any such breach. These contractual arrangements and the other steps we have taken to protect our intellectual property rights may not prevent the misappropriation or disclosure of our proprietary information nor deter independent development of similar technology or intellectual property by others.

Effective trade secret, patent, copyright, trademark and domain name protection is expensive to obtain, develop and maintain, both in terms of initial and ongoing registration or prosecution requirements and expenses and the costs of defending our rights. We are seeking to protect our patentable technology, trademarks and domain names in an increasing number of jurisdictions, a process that is expensive and may not be successful or which we may not pursue in every location. We may, over time, increase our investment in protecting our intellectual property through additional patent filings that could be expensive and time-consuming. We have two patents issued and 73 pending patent applications, including 12 provisional applications. We do not know whether any of our pending patent applications will result in the issuance of additional patents or whether the examination process will require us to narrow our claims or we may otherwise be unable to obtain patent protection for the technology covered in our pending patent applications. Our patents, trademarks and other intellectual property rights may be challenged by others or invalidated through administrative process or litigation. Moreover, any issued patents may not provide us with a competitive advantage and, as with any technology, competitors may be able to develop similar or superior technologies to our own, now or in the future.

Additionally, in the U.S., the central provisions of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act became effective recently. Among other things, this law switched U.S. patent rights from the former “first-to-invent” system to a “first inventor-to-file” system. This may result in inventors and companies having to file patent applications more frequently to preserve rights in their inventions. This may favor larger competitors that have the resources to file more patent applications.

Monitoring unauthorized use of the content on our websites and mobile applications, and our other intellectual property and technology, is difficult and costly. Our efforts to protect our proprietary rights and intellectual property may not have been and may not be adequate to prevent their misappropriation or misuse. Third parties from time to time copy content or other intellectual property or technology from our solutions without authorization and seek to use it for their own benefit. We generally seek to address such unauthorized copying or use, but we have not always been successful in stopping all unauthorized use of our content or other intellectual property or technology, and may not be successful in doing so in the future. Further, we may not have been and may not be able to detect unauthorized use of our technology or intellectual property, or to take appropriate steps to enforce our intellectual property rights. Our competitors may also independently develop similar technology. Effective patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret protection may not be available to us in every country in which our solutions or technology are hosted or available. The laws of some foreign countries may not be as protective of intellectual property rights as those in the U.S., and mechanisms for enforcement of intellectual property rights may be inadequate. Further, legal standards relating to the validity, enforceability and scope of protection of intellectual property rights are uncertain. The laws in the U.S. and elsewhere change rapidly, and any future changes could adversely affect us and our intellectual property. Our failure to meaningfully protect our intellectual property rights could result in competitors offering solutions that incorporate our most technologically advanced features, which could reduce demand for our solutions.

We may find it necessary or appropriate to initiate claims or litigation to enforce our intellectual property rights, protect our trade secrets or determine the validity and scope of intellectual property rights claimed by others. Litigation is inherently uncertain and any litigation of this nature, regardless of outcome or merit, could result in substantial costs and diversion of management and technical resources, any of which could adversely affect our business and operating results. If we fail to maintain, protect and enhance our intellectual property, our business and operating results may be harmed.

We may be unable to continue the use of our domain names, or prevent third parties from acquiring and using domain names that infringe on, are similar to, or otherwise decrease the value of our brands, trademarks or service marks.

We have registered domain names for our websites that we use in our business. If we lose the ability to use a domain name, whether due to trademark claims, failure to renew the applicable registration, or any other cause, we may be forced to market our solutions under a new domain name, which could cause us substantial harm, or to incur significant expense in order to purchase rights to the domain name in question. In addition, our competitors and others could attempt to capitalize on our brand recognition by

55

using domain names similar to ours. Domain names similar to ours have been registered in the U.S. and elsewhere. We may be unable to prevent third parties from acquiring and using domain names that infringe on, are similar to, or otherwise decrease the value of our brands, trademarks or service marks. Protecting and enforcing our rights in our domain names may require litigation, which could result in substantial costs and diversion of management’s attention.

ICANN (the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers), the international authority over top-level domain names, recently increased the number of generic top-level domains, or “TLDs.” This may allow companies or individuals to create new web addresses that appear to the right of the “dot” in a web address, beyond such long-standing TLDs as “.com,” “.org” and “.gov.” ICANN may also add additional TLDs in the future. As a result, we may be unable to maintain exclusive rights to all potentially relevant or desirable domain names in the United States or in other countries in which we operate, which may harm our business. Furthermore, attempts may be made by third parties to register our trademarks as new TLDs or as domain names within new TLDs, and we may be required to enforce our rights against such registration attempts, which could result in significant expense and the diversion of management’s attention.

56

The consumer traffic to our websites and mobile applications may decline and our business may suffer if other companies copy information from our platform and publish or aggregate it with other information for their own benefit.

From time to time, other companies copy information or content from our platform, through website scraping, robots or other means, and publish or aggregate it with other information for their own benefit. When third parties copy, publish or aggregate content from our platform, it makes them more competitive, and decreases the likelihood that consumers will visit our websites or use our mobile applications to search and discover the information they seek, which could negatively affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. We may not be able to detect such third-party conduct in a timely manner or at all and, even if we are able to identify these situations, we may not be able to prevent them and have not always been able to prevent them in the past. In some cases, particularly in the case of websites operating outside of the U.S., our available remedies may be inadequate to protect us against such practices. In addition, we may be required to expend significant financial or other resources to successfully enforce our rights.

Indemnity provisions in various agreements potentially expose us to substantial liability for intellectual property infringement, violation of law and other losses.

Our agreements with retailers, performance marketing networks and other third parties may include indemnification provisions under which we agree to indemnify them for losses suffered or incurred as a result of claims of intellectual property infringement, sales taxes due as a result of our activities within a state or other liabilities relating to or arising from our products, services or other contractual obligations, including noncompliance with any laws, regulations, self-regulatory requirements or other legal obligations relating to privacy, data protection and consumer protection or any inadvertent or unauthorized use or disclosure of data that we store or handle as part of operating our business. Any such proceeding or action, and any related indemnification obligation, could hurt our reputation, force us to incur significant expenses in defense of these proceedings, distract our management, increase our costs of doing business and cause consumers and retailers to decrease their use of our marketplace, and may result in substantial monetary liability. The term of these indemnity provisions generally survives termination or expiration of the applicable agreement.

We rely on information technology to operate our business and maintain competitiveness, and any failure to adapt to technological developments or industry trends could harm our business.

We depend on the use of information technologies and systems. As our operations grow in size and scope, we must continuously improve and upgrade our systems and infrastructure while maintaining or improving the reliability and integrity of our infrastructure. Our future success also depends on our ability to adapt our systems and infrastructure to meet rapidly evolving consumer trends and demands while continuing to improve the performance, features and reliability of our solutions in response to competitive services and product offerings. The emergence of alternative platforms such as smartphones and tablets and the emergence of niche competitors who may be able to optimize products, services or strategies for such platforms will require new investment in technology. New developments in other areas, such as cloud computing, could also make it easier for competition to enter our markets due to lower up-front technology costs. In addition, we may not be able to maintain our existing systems or replace or introduce new technologies and systems as quickly as we would like or in a cost-effective manner.

Some of our solutions contain open source software, which may pose particular risks to our proprietary software and solutions.

We use open source software in our solutions and will use open source software in the future. Some licenses governing our use of open source software contain requirements that we make available source code for modifications or derivative works we create based upon the open source software, and that we license such modifications or derivative works under the terms of a particular open source license or other license granting third parties certain rights of further use. By the terms of certain open source licenses, we could be required to release the source code of our proprietary software, and to make our proprietary software available under open source licenses, if we combine our proprietary software with open source software in certain manners. Although we monitor our use of open source software, we cannot assure you that all open source software is reviewed prior to use in our solutions, that our developers have not incorporated open source software into our solutions, or that they will not do so in the future. Additionally, the terms of many open source licenses to which we are subject have not been interpreted by U.S. or foreign courts. There is a risk that open source software licenses could be construed in a manner that imposes unanticipated conditions or restrictions on our ability to market or provide our solutions. In addition, the terms of open source software licenses may require us to provide software that we develop using such open source software to others on unfavorable license terms. As a result of our current or future use of open source software, we may face claims or litigation, be required to release our proprietary source code, pay damages for breach of contract, re-engineer our solutions, discontinue making our solutions available in the event re-engineering cannot be accomplished on a timely basis or take other remedial action. Any such re-engineering or other remedial efforts could require significant additional research and development resources, and we may not be able to successfully complete any such re-engineering or other remedial efforts. Further, in

57

addition to risks related to license requirements, use of certain open source software can lead to greater risks than use of third-party commercial software, as open source licensors generally do not provide warranties or controls on the origin of software. Any of these risks could be difficult to eliminate or manage, and, if not addressed, could have a negative effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

We are subject to international business uncertainties that could adversely affect our operations and operating results.

Our net revenues from operations outside the U.S. comprised 22.3% and 21.8% of our net revenues in the six months ended June 30, 2015 and in fiscal year 2014, respectively. We operate websites marketing to residents of the U.K., France, the Netherlands, Germany and Canada. We currently have operations in the U.K., France and the Netherlands. We intend to maintain or expand our existing operations in these countries as well as establish a presence in additional countries to grow our international sales. Operating in foreign countries requires significant resources and management attention, and we have limited experience entering new geographic markets. In addition, the varying commercial and Internet infrastructure in other countries may make it difficult for us to replicate our business model. In many countries, we compete with local companies that have more experience in their respective markets than we do, and we may not benefit from first-to-market advantages. To achieve widespread acceptance in new countries and markets, we must continue to tailor our solutions and business model to the unique circumstances of such countries and markets, which can be difficult and costly. Failure to adapt practices and models effectively to each country into which we expand could slow our international growth. We cannot assure you that our international efforts will be successful. International sales and operations may be subject to risks such as:

• competition with local or foreign companies operating in or entering the same markets;

• the suitability, compatibility and successful implementation of the shared information technology infrastructure that we are developing to power our marketplace in certain of our international markets;

• the cost and resources required to localize our solutions, while maintaining retailer and consumer satisfaction such that our marketplace will continue to attract high quality retailers;

• difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations due to distance, time zones, language and cultural differences;

• higher product return rates;

• burdens of complying with a wide variety of laws and regulations, including regulation of digital offer terms, Internet services, privacy and data protection, bulk emailing and anti-competition regulations, which may limit or prevent us from offering of our solutions in some jurisdictions or limit our ability to enforce contractual obligations;

• exposure to markets where there is a concentration of retailers and those retailers individually or collectively exercise their market power to negotiate lower commissions or cease to monetize with us entirely;

• adverse tax effects and foreign exchange controls making it difficult to repatriate earnings and cash;

• political and economic instability;

• terrorist activities and natural disasters;

• differing employment practices and laws and labor disruptions;

• technology compatibility;

• credit risk and higher levels of payment fraud;

• increased financial accounting and reporting burdens and complexities and difficulties in implementing and maintaining adequate internal controls;

• slower adoption of the Internet as an advertising, broadcast and commerce medium in certain of those markets as compared to the U.S.;

• lower levels of consumer spending and fewer opportunities for growth compared to the U.S.;

• preference for local vendors; and

• different or lesser degrees of intellectual property protection.

In addition, the U.S. has in the past proposed, and is currently evaluating, changes to the corporate tax structure that would include taxation of offshore earnings of U.S. businesses. If this were to occur, our effective tax rates would likely increase. Further, we are subject to U.S. and foreign legislation, such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the U.K. Bribery Act. While we maintain

58

high standards of ethical conduct, our policies, training and monitoring of compliance with applicable anti-corruption laws are at an early stage of development. If any of our employees or agents were to violate these laws in the conduct of our business, we could be subject to substantial penalties and our reputation could be impaired.

These factors could have an adverse effect on our net revenues from advertisers located outside the U.S. and, consequently, on our business and operating results.

We may be unable to identify suitable candidates for strategic transactions, effectively integrate newly acquired businesses or technology, or achieve expected operating results from acquisitions or other strategic transactions.

Part of our growth strategy is to increase our net revenues and improve our operating results through the acquisition of, or entry into other strategic transactions such as joint ventures or partnerships with, similar or complementary businesses. There can be no assurance that suitable candidates for acquisitions or other strategic transactions will be identified or, if suitable candidates are identified, that strategic transactions can be completed on acceptable terms, if at all.

Since our inception, we have completed more than 10 acquisitions and numerous other strategic transactions, and we may continue to make acquisitions or other strategic transactions such as joint ventures or partnerships in the future. Our success will depend in part on our ability to identify, negotiate, and complete strategic transactions and integrate acquired businesses or technology and, if necessary, satisfactory debt or equity financing to fund those transactions. As is the case with our current debt facility, if we finance a strategic transaction with debt financing, we will incur interest expense and may have to comply with financing covenants or secure the debt obligations with our assets. Mergers and acquisitions and other strategic transactions are inherently risky, and any transactions we complete may not be successful. Any strategic transactions we undertake in the future would involve numerous risks, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business and the market price of our common stock, including the following:

• use of cash resources and incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities in funding strategic transactions, which may limit our operational flexibility and other potential uses of our cash, including stock repurchases, dividend payments and retirement of outstanding indebtedness;

• expected and unexpected costs incurred in identifying and pursuing strategic transactions and performing due diligence regarding potential strategic transactions that may or may not be successful;

• failure of the acquired company to achieve anticipated consumer traffic, revenue, earnings, cash flows or other desired technological goals;

• our responsibility for the liabilities of the businesses we acquire, including the assumption of liabilities that were not disclosed to us or that exceed our estimates;

• difficulties in integrating and managing the combined operations, technologies and solutions;

• failure to identify all of the problems, liabilities or other shortcomings or challenges of a counterparty to a strategic transaction or an acquired company, including issues related to intellectual property, solution quality or architecture, regulatory compliance practices, revenue recognition or other accounting practices or employee or customer issues;

• diversion of management’s attention or other resources from our existing business;

• inability to maintain the key business relationships and the reputations of the businesses we acquire;

• difficulties in assigning or transferring technology or intellectual property licensed by acquired companies from third parties to us or our subsidiaries;

• uncertainty of entry into markets in which we have limited or no prior experience or in which competitors have stronger market positions;

• our dependence on unfamiliar retailers or performance marketing networks of the companies we acquire;

• insufficient incremental revenue to offset our increased expenses associated with strategic transactions;

• our inability to maintain internal standards, controls, procedures and policies;

• challenges in integrating and auditing the financial statements of acquired companies that have not historically prepared financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles;

• impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets such as trademarks or other intellectual property arising from acquisitions;

• amortization of expenses related to acquired intangible assets and other adverse accounting consequences;

59

• potential loss of key employees from the companies we acquire, as has occurred after previous acquisitions;

• dilution of our stockholders’ ownership interests if we finance all or a portion of the purchase price of any strategic transactions by issuing equity; and

• litigation or other claims from the counterparty to the strategic transaction, including claims from former stockholders, claims related to intellectual property infringement or other matters or various commercial or tort claims.

Further, we rely heavily on the representations and warranties provided to us by counterparties to strategic transactions, including the sellers of acquired companies and assets, including as they relate to creation of, ownership of and rights in intellectual property, existence of open source code, existence of encumbrances and operating restrictions and compliance with laws and contractual requirements. If any of these representations and warranties is inaccurate or breached, such inaccuracy or breach could result in costly litigation and assessment of liability for which there may not be adequate recourse against such sellers, in part due to contractual time limitations and limitations of liability.

We may need additional capital in the future, which may not be available to us on favorable terms, or at all, and may dilute your ownership of our Series 1 common stock.

As of June 30, 2015, we have an aggregate of 83,515,515 shares of Series 1 common stock authorized but unissued and not reserved for issuance under our stock option plans or otherwise. We may issue all of these shares without any action or approval by our stockholders, subject to certain limitations of the NASDAQ Global Select Market. We may require additional capital from equity or debt financing in the future in order to take advantage of strategic opportunities, or to support our existing business. We may not be able to secure timely additional financing on favorable terms, or at all. The terms of any additional financing may place limits on our financial and operating flexibility, including our ability to issue or repurchase equity, develop new or enhanced existing products, complete acquisitions or otherwise take advantage of business opportunities. If we raise additional funds or finance acquisitions through further issuances of equity, convertible debt securities or other securities convertible into equity, you and our other stockholders could suffer significant dilution in your percentage ownership of our company, and any new securities we issue could have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of holders of our Series 1 common stock. If we are unable to obtain adequate financing or financing on terms satisfactory to us, if and when we require it, our ability to grow or support our business and to respond to business challenges could be significantly limited.

If our management team or other key employees do not remain with us in the future, our business, operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected.

We have been successful in attracting a knowledgeable and talented management team and key operating personnel. Our future success depends in large part on our ability to attract and retain these employees. Our senior management team’s in-depth knowledge of and deep relationships with the participants in our industry are extremely valuable to us and there can be no assurance that our senior management team will remain with us in the future, or that we will successfully recruit and retain qualified replacements for those who have departed or depart in the future. For example, executive searches remain ongoing for two positions on our senior management team, one of which is our permanent chief financial officer.

Our business also requires skilled engineering, marketing, product and sales personnel, who are in high demand and are often subject to competing offers. Competition for qualified employees is intense in our industry, and the loss of even a few qualified employees could harm our operating results and impair our ability to grow. The reduction in headcount effected in August 2015 could not only make it difficult to retain other remaining employees, but also could make it difficult to attract additional personnel, to the extent we need to replace departed employees.

To attract and retain key personnel, we use various measures, including an equity incentive program, an employee stock purchase program and non-equity incentive bonuses. These measures may not be enough to attract and retain the personnel we require to operate our business effectively. For example, we have a number of employees who were granted stock options that have an exercise price per share that is higher than the current fair market value. Those employees may feel they are not sufficiently incentivized to remain at our company. Conversely, we also have a number of employees who were granted stock options that have an exercise price per share that is lower than the current fair market value. If we are successful, these employees may choose to exercise their options and sell the shares, recognizing a substantial gain. As a result, it may be difficult for us to retain such employees. It may also be difficult to retain employees due to the volatility in our stock.

60

The reduction in headcount effected in August 2015 will result in the loss of certain expertise and the reallocation of certain employment responsibilities, all of which could adversely affect operational efficiencies, employee performance and retention. To the extent that we are unable to effectively reallocate employee responsibilities and retain key employees, our strategic goals and our financial results may be adversely affected.

Our current management team has a limited history of working together and may not be able to execute our business plan.

Certain members of our senior management team, including our interim Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel, Senior Vice President of Corporate Development and Senior Vice President of Product, have only recently joined our management team or assumed their roles. As such, our current management team has worked together for only a limited period of time and has a limited track record of executing our business plan as a team. In addition, we expect to fill several positions in our senior management team in the current fiscal year. Accordingly, it is difficult to predict whether our management team, individually and collectively, will be effective in operating our business.

If we are unable to retain our sales representatives, or attract replacement sales representatives, our ability to increase our net revenues could be negatively impacted.

Our ability to expand our business will depend, in part, on our ability to retain our current sales representatives and properly incentivize them to obtain new retailer and brand relationships. If a significant number of our sales representatives were to leave us or join our competitors, our net revenues could be negatively impacted. In certain circumstances, we have entered into agreements with our sales representatives that contain non-compete provisions to mitigate this risk, but we may need to litigate to enforce our rights under these agreements, which could be time-consuming, expensive and ineffective. A significant increase in the turnover rate among our sales representatives could also increase our recruiting costs and decrease our operating efficiency, which could lead to a decline in our net revenues and profitability.

Competition for qualified sales representatives can be intense, and we may be unable to hire additional team members when we need them or at all. Any difficulties we experience in attracting additional sales representatives could have a negative impact on our ability to expand our retailer base, increase net revenues and continue our growth.

Our business relies in part on email and other messaging, and any technical, legal or other restrictions on the sending of emails or messages or an inability to timely deliver such communications could harm our business.

Our business is in part dependent upon email and other messaging. We provide emails and mobile alerts and other messages to consumers informing them of the offers on our websites and mobile applications, and we believe these communications help generate a portion of our net revenues. Because of the importance of email and other messaging services to our business, if we are unable to successfully deliver emails or other messages to consumers, if there are legal restrictions on delivering these messages to consumers, or if consumers do not open our emails or messages, our net revenues and profitability could be adversely affected. Changes in how webmail applications organize and prioritize email may result in our emails being delivered in a less prominent location in a consumer’s inbox or viewed as “spam” by consumers and may reduce the likelihood of that consumer opening our emails. Actions by third parties to block, impose restrictions on or charge for the delivery of emails or other messages could also harm our business. From time to time, Internet service providers or other third parties may block bulk email transmissions or otherwise experience technical difficulties that result in our inability to successfully deliver emails or other messages to consumers. Changes in the laws or regulations that limit our ability to send such communications or impose additional requirements upon us in connection with sending such communications would also adversely impact our business. We also rely on social networking messaging services to send communications. Changes to the terms of these social networking services to limit promotional communications, any restrictions that would limit our ability or our customers’ ability to send communications through their services, disruptions or downtime experienced by these social networking services or decline in the use of or engagement with social networking services by consumers could harm our business.

We rely on a third-party service for the delivery of daily emails, and delay or errors in the delivery of such emails or other messaging we send have occurred and may in the future occur and be beyond our control, which could result in damage to our reputation or harm our business, financial condition and operating results. If we were unable to use our current email service or other messaging services, alternate services are available; however, we believe our results could be impacted for some period if we transition to a new provider. Any disruption or restriction on the distribution of our emails or other messages, termination or disruption of our relationship with our messaging service providers, including our third-party service that delivers our emails, or any increase in our costs associated with our email and other messaging activities could harm our business.

61

The intended tax benefits of our corporate structure and intercompany arrangements depend on the application of the tax laws of various jurisdictions and on how we operate our business.

Our corporate structure and intercompany arrangements, including the manner in which we develop, value, and use our intellectual property and the transfer pricing of our intercompany transactions, are intended to reduce our worldwide effective tax rate. We completed a restructuring of our non-U.S. entities to streamline our European operations, effective January 1, 2014, and we may implement other such structures and arrangements in the future. The application of the tax laws of various jurisdictions, including the U.S., to our international business activities is subject to interpretation and depends on our ability to operate our business in a manner consistent with our corporate structure and intercompany arrangements. The taxing authorities of the jurisdictions in which we operate may challenge our methodologies for valuing developed technology or intercompany arrangements, including our transfer pricing, or determine that the manner in which we operate our business does not achieve the intended tax consequences, which could increase our worldwide effective tax rate and harm our financial position and results of operations.

Our corporate structure includes legal entities located in jurisdictions with income tax rates lower than the U.S. statutory tax rate. Our intercompany arrangements allocate income to such entities in accordance with arm’s-length principles and commensurate with functions performed, risks assumed and ownership of valuable corporate assets. We believe that income taxed in certain foreign jurisdictions at a lower rate relative to the U.S. statutory rate will have a beneficial impact on our worldwide effective tax rate.

Significant judgment is required in evaluating our tax positions and determining our provision for income taxes. During the ordinary course of business, there are many transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. For example, our effective tax rates could be adversely affected by earnings being lower than anticipated in countries where we have lower statutory rates and higher than anticipated in countries where we have higher statutory rates, by changes in foreign currency exchange rates or by changes in the relevant tax, accounting and other laws, regulations, principles and interpretations. As we operate in numerous taxing jurisdictions, the application of tax laws can be subject to diverging and sometimes conflicting interpretations by tax authorities of these jurisdictions. It is not uncommon for taxing authorities in different countries to have conflicting views, for instance, with respect to, among other things, the manner in which the arm’s length standard is applied for transfer pricing purposes, or with respect to the valuation of intellectual property. In addition, tax laws are dynamic and subject to change as new laws are passed and new interpretations of the law are issued or applied.

Our existing corporate structure and intercompany arrangements have been implemented in a manner we believe is in compliance with current prevailing tax laws. However, the tax benefits that we intend to derive from our current and any future intercompany transactions could be undermined if we are unable to adapt the manner in which we operate our business and if tax laws change.

The enactment of legislation implementing changes in the U.S. taxation of international business activities or the adoption of other tax reform policies, within the U.S. or internationally, could adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations.

The current administration has made public statements indicating that it has made international tax reform a priority, and key members of the U.S. Congress have conducted hearings and proposed new legislation. Recent changes to U.S. tax laws, including limitations on the ability of taxpayers to claim and utilize foreign tax credits and the deferral of certain tax deductions until earnings outside of the U.S. are repatriated to the U.S., as well as changes to U.S. tax laws that may be enacted in the future, could impact the tax treatment of our foreign earnings, as well as cash and cash equivalent balances we currently maintain outside of the U.S. We are also subject to the taxation regimes of numerous foreign jurisdictions where our subsidiaries are organized or operate. Due to economic and political conditions, tax rates and policies in the U.S. or internationally may be subject to significant change. For example, effective April 1, 2015, the UK enacted a new taxing regime known as the diverted profits tax, which aims to counteract arrangements by corporate multinationals that result in the erosion of the UK tax base. As a result of the expanding scale of our international business activities, any changes in the U.S. or foreign taxation of such activities may increase our worldwide effective tax rate and, in turn, adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations.

We rely on performance marketing networks and retailers to determine the amount payable to us accurately. If their reports are inaccurate or delayed, our operating results could be harmed and we could experience fluctuations in our performance.

Our performance marketing networks and retailers typically pay us on a monthly basis based upon sales generated from digital offers. We rely on our performance marketing networks and retailers to report accurately and in a timely manner the amount of commission revenues earned by us. We calculate our net revenues, prepare our financial reports, projections and budgets and direct our advertising, marketing and other operating efforts based on reports we receive from our performance marketing networks and retailers. It is difficult for us to determine independently whether our performance marketing networks or retailers are reporting all revenue data due to us. We have occasionally experienced instances of incomplete or delayed reports from our performance marketing

62

networks and retailers, and we generally do not have the contractual right to audit our performance marketing networks or retailers. We have also experienced instances where payments may not be made by retailers through performance marketing networks, which can increase the likelihood that accounts receivable will be written off as uncollectible. To the extent that our performance marketing networks or retailers fail to report accurately the amount of net revenues payable to us in a timely manner or at all, we will not recognize and collect net revenues to which we are entitled, which could harm our operating results. If we are allowed to audit a performance marketing network or retailer and do so, or if we otherwise dispute the accuracy of a revenue report a performance marketing network or retailer has delivered to us, our recognition of net revenues to which we may ultimately be entitled could be delayed. Conversely, if a performance marketing network or retailer delivers a report overstating the amount of net revenues earned by us in one period and attempts to reverse the overpayment in a subsequent period, whether by seeking a refund from us or reducing a future payment due to us, our recognition of revenue could be overstated. Any such delay or overstatement in our revenue recognition could harm our business and operating results.

We obtain the revenue reporting information from our performance marketing networks using a variety of methods, including the use of file transfer protocol file feeds, various application programming interfaces provided by the performance marketing networks and manual downloads of data from the performance marketing networks’ web portals. The use of any of these methods, in isolation, inherently subjects us to lower levels of internal control over revenue data, which could result in a misstatement of our net revenues. We have automated the process for collecting a substantial portion of the data necessary to record our net revenues. We currently augment this automated data collection process with manual validation of data from certain of the performance marketing networks’ web portals to help minimize risk of error. However, our validation methods may evolve over time. We cannot guarantee our ability to detect all errors in the data obtained automatically, which could affect our ability to accurately report our net revenues.

If we are unable to comply with all covenants of our current and future debt arrangements, and if our lenders fail to waive any violation of those covenants by us, we could be subject to substantial penalties, which would impair our ability to operate and adversely affect our operating results.

We currently have a term debt facility that provides us with cash, which we use to fund our operations and which requires us to comply with a number of restrictive covenants. We may enter into other debt arrangements in the future, which may contain similar or additional restrictive covenants. We are currently subject to covenants related to minimum trailing twelve-month EBITDA levels, a total debt to EBITDA ratio, a senior secured debt to EBITDA ratio, and a fixed charge coverage ratio (each as more fully described in our second amended and restated revolving credit and term loan agreement), and the defense of our intellectual and other property, among others. We may become subject to additional covenants in connection with future debt arrangements. If we are unable to comply with one or more covenants applicable to us and our lenders are unwilling to waive our noncompliance, our lenders may have the right to terminate their commitments to lend to us, cause all amounts outstanding to become due and payable immediately, sell certain of our assets which are collateral for our obligations upon the satisfaction of certain conditions and take other measures which may impair our operations. If funds under our loan arrangements become unavailable or if we are forced unexpectedly to repay amounts outstanding under our loan arrangements, our assets and cash flow may be insufficient to make such repayments or may leave us with insufficient funds to continue our operations as planned and would have a material adverse effect on our business.

If we cannot maintain our corporate culture, we could lose the innovation, teamwork and focus that contribute to our business.

We believe that a critical component of our success has been our corporate culture, which we believe fosters innovation, encourages teamwork, cultivates creativity and promotes focus on execution. We have invested and continue to invest substantial time, energy and resources in building a highly collaborative team that works together effectively in an environment designed to promote openness, honesty, mutual respect and the pursuit of common goals. As we continue to develop the infrastructure of a public company, and particularly in light of the reduction in headcount that was effected in August 2015, we may find it difficult to maintain these valuable aspects of our corporate culture and to attract competent personnel who are willing to embrace our culture. Any failure to preserve our culture could negatively impact our future success, including our ability to attract and retain personnel, encourage innovation and teamwork and effectively focus on and pursue our corporate objectives.

We are subject to currency exchange risk in connection with our international business operations and are exposed to interest rate risk.

Cash inflows and outflows in our international operations are typically denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, which is our functional currency for financial reporting purposes. For the six months ended June 30, 2015 and for fiscal year 2014, approximately 22.3% and 21.8%, respectively, of our net revenues were denominated in such foreign currencies. In addition,

63

certain intercompany indebtedness between us and a foreign subsidiary, which uses the Euro as its functional currency, is dollar denominated. Our reliance on and exposure to foreign currencies subjects our financial results to fluctuations in currency exchange rates and changes in the proportion of our net revenues and expenses attributable to each of our foreign locations. For example, we recognized a foreign exchange loss of $0.4 million and $0.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2015 and in fiscal year 2014, respectively. In addition, we expect our exposure to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates to increase as we expand our business in existing and new international markets and when the exchange rates strengthen or weaken against the U.S. dollar. We began entering into hedging arrangements related to our intercompany indebtedness in December 2014, and we expect to continue to enter into hedging arrangements in the future in order to manage our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations, but such activity may not completely eliminate fluctuations in our operating results. Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations adversely impacted our profitability in 2014 and may continue to do so in the future.

In addition, we face exposure to fluctuations in interest rates for amounts outstanding under our credit facility, which may increase our borrowing costs, adversely impacting our profitability.

64

We may be required to record a significant charge to earnings if our goodwill or amortizable intangible assets become impaired.

We are required under GAAP to review our amortizable intangible assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Goodwill is required to be tested for impairment at least annually. Conditions that would necessitate an impairment assessment include a significant decline in the observable market value of an asset, a significant change in the extent or manner in which an asset is used, or any other significant adverse change that would indicate that the carrying amount of an asset or group of assets may not be recoverable. The events and circumstances we consider include the business climate, legal factors, operating performance indicators and competition. We may be required to record a significant charge to earnings in our consolidated financial statements during the period in which any impairment of our goodwill or amortizable intangible assets is determined. This could adversely impact our results of operations.

Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock

Our stock price is highly volatile.

The trading price of our common stock has been, and is likely to continue to be, highly volatile. Since shares of our common stock were sold in our initial public offering in July 2013 at a price of $21.00 per share, the reported high and low sales prices of our Series 1 common stock has ranged from $13.29 to $48.73 per share through December 31, 2014. The trading price of our stock has been and is likely to continue to be subject to wide fluctuations in response to various factors, including the risk factors described in this section and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and other factors beyond our control. Factors affecting the trading price of our common stock include:

• variations in our actual or projected operating results or the operating results of similar companies;

• periodic changes to search engine algorithms that lead to actual or perceived decreases in traffic to our websites;

• announcements of technological innovations, new services or service enhancements and strategic alliances or agreements by us or by our competitors;

• marketing and advertising initiatives by us or our competitors;

• the gain or loss of retailer relationships;

• threatened or actual litigation;

• major changes in our management;

• recruitment or departure of key personnel;

• changes in the estimates of our operating results or changes in recommendations by any securities analysts that follow our Series 1 common stock;

• market conditions in our industry, the industries of our customers and the economy as a whole;

• the overall performance of the equity markets;

• sales of shares of our Series 1 common stock by existing stockholders, including our directors and executive officers and their affiliates;

• the concentration of ownership of outstanding shares of our Series 1 common stock:

• our share repurchase program;

• volatility in our stock price, which may lead to higher stock-based compensation expense under applicable accounting standards;

• reaction to our press releases or other public announcements and filings with the SEC;

• rumors and market speculation involving us or other companies in our industry;

• raising additional capital from any equity or debt financing in the future; and

• adoption or modification of regulations, policies, procedures or programs applicable to our business

In addition, the stock market in general and the market for e-commerce companies in particular, has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies.

65

Broad market and industry factors may harm the market price of our Series 1 common stock regardless of our actual operating performance. Each of these factors, among others, could adversely affect your investment in our Series 1 common stock. Some companies that have had volatile market prices for their securities have had securities class action lawsuits filed against them. If a suit were filed against us, regardless of its merits or outcome, it could result in substantial costs and divert management’s attention.

Insiders have substantial control over us, and this control may limit our stockholders’ ability to influence corporate matters and delay or prevent a third party from acquiring control over us.

As of July 30, 2015, our directors and executive officers and their affiliates beneficially owned, in the aggregate, up to approximately 30.3% of our outstanding Series 1 common stock. This concentration of ownership may adversely affect the trading price for our Series 1 common stock because investors often perceive disadvantages in owning stock in companies with concentrated ownership. In addition, these stockholders will be able to exercise influence over all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and approval of corporate transactions, such as a merger or other sale of our company or its assets. This concentration of ownership could limit your ability to influence corporate matters and may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control, including a merger, consolidation or other business combination involving us, or discouraging a potential acquirer from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control, even if that change in control would benefit our other stockholders.

Our stock price could decline due to the large number of outstanding shares of our common stock eligible for future sale.

Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market, or the perception that these sales could occur, could cause the market price of our common stock to decline. These sales could also make it more difficult for us to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and price that we deem appropriate.

As of June 30, 2015 we had 53,614,712 shares of common stock outstanding. Shares beneficially owned by our affiliates and employees are subject to volume and other restrictions under Rules 144 and 701 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, various vesting agreements, our insider trading policy and any applicable 10b5-1 trading plan.

In addition, we have registered 15,608,683 shares of Series 1 common stock that we have issued and may issue under our equity plans, 2,738,910 shares of which were issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2015. These shares can be freely sold in the public market upon issuance, subject in some cases to volume and other restrictions under Rules 144 and 701 under the Securities Act, and various vesting agreements. In addition, some of our employees, including some of our named executive officers, have entered into 10b5-1 trading plans regarding sales of shares of our Series 1 common stock. If any of these additional shares are sold, or if it is perceived that they will be sold, in the public market, the trading price of our common stock could decline.

As of July 30, 2015, holders of approximately 27.8% of our common stock were entitled to rights with respect to the registration of these shares under the Securities Act. If we register their shares of common stock, these stockholders could sell those shares in the public market without being subject to the volume and other restrictions of Rule 144 and Rule 701.

Our responsibilities as a public company may cause us to incur significant costs, divert management’s attention and affect our ability to attract and retain qualified board members and executives.

We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, including the requirements of Section 404, as well as rules and regulations subsequently implemented by the SEC, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and the NASDAQ Global Select Market. Compliance with these public company requirements has made some activities more time-consuming. It has also increased our legal and financial compliance costs and demand on our systems and resources. For example, we have created new board committees and adopted new internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures. In addition, we have incurred and will continue to incur additional expenses associated with our SEC reporting requirements. Furthermore, if we identify any issues in complying with those requirements (for example, if we or our auditors identify a material weakness or significant deficiency in our internal control over financial reporting), we could incur additional costs rectifying those issues, and the existence of those issues could adversely affect us, our reputation or investor perceptions of us. Advocacy efforts by stockholders and third parties may also prompt additional changes in governance and reporting requirements, which could further increase our costs. It also may be more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors or as executive officers.

In addition, changing laws, regulations and standards relating to public disclosure and corporate governance are creating uncertainty for public companies, increasing legal and financial compliance costs and making some activities more time consuming. These laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations, and, as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. This could result in continuing uncertainty regarding

66

compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to our disclosures and to our governance practices. We have invested, and intend to continue to invest, resources to comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards, and this investment may result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management’s time and attention away from activities that generate revenue and help grow our business.

If we fail to maintain proper and effective internal controls, our ability to produce accurate and timely financial statements could be impaired, which could harm our operating results, our ability to operate our business and investors’ views of us.

Ensuring that we have adequate internal financial and accounting controls and procedures in place so that we can produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis is a costly and time-consuming effort that needs to be re-evaluated frequently. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP. We are in the process of documenting, reviewing and improving our internal controls and procedures for compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which requires annual management assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. During the second quarter of 2015, we had a change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred as a result of our implementation of a new enterprise resource planning, or ERP, system that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. If we fail to maintain proper and effective internal controls, our ability to produce accurate and timely financial statements could be impaired, which could harm our operating results, harm our ability to operate our business, and reduce the trading price of our stock.

We cannot guarantee that we will repurchase additional shares of our common stock pursuant to our ongoing share repurchase program or that our share repurchase program will enhance long-term stockholder value. Share repurchases could also increase the volatility of the price of our common stock and could diminish our cash reserves.

In February 2015, our Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program. Under the program, we are authorized to repurchase shares of Series 1 common stock for an aggregate purchase price not to exceed $100 million, over the 24-month period following the program’s approval by our Board. During the six months ended June 30, 2015, we repurchased 1,545,017 shares of our Series 1 common stock at an aggregate purchase price of $27.2 million.

Although the Board has authorized the share repurchase program, the share repurchase program does not obligate us to repurchase any specific dollar amount or to acquire any specific number of shares. The timing and amount of repurchases will depend upon several factors, including market and business conditions, the trading price of our Series 1 common stock and the nature of other investment opportunities. The repurchase program may be limited, suspended or discontinued at any time without prior notice. In addition, repurchases of our Series 1 common stock pursuant to our share repurchase program could affect the market price of our Series 1 common stock or increase its volatility. For example, the existence of a share repurchase program could cause our stock price to be higher than it would be in the absence of such a program and could potentially reduce the market liquidity for our stock. Additionally, our share repurchase program has increased our level of long-term debt and could diminish our cash reserves, which may impact our ability to finance future growth and to pursue possible future strategic opportunities and acquisitions. There can be no assurance that any share repurchases will enhance stockholder value because the market price of our Series 1 common stock may decline below the levels at which we repurchase shares of stock. Although our share repurchase program is intended to enhance long-term stockholder value, there is no assurance that it will do so, and short-term stock price fluctuations could reduce the program’s effectiveness.

If securities or industry analysts do not continue to publish research or publish unfavorable or misleading research about our business, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our common stock depends in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. If one or more of the analysts who covers us downgrades our stock or publishes unfavorable or misleading research about our business, our stock price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of our company or fails to publish reports on us regularly, we could lose visibility in the market for our stock and demand for our stock could decrease, which could cause our stock price or trading volume to decline.

67

Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and Delaware law could discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our company and may affect the trading price of our Series 1 common stock.

We are a Delaware corporation and the anti-takeover provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which apply to us, may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control by prohibiting us from engaging in a business combination with an interested stockholder for a period of three years after the stockholder becomes an interested stockholder, even if a change in control would be beneficial to our existing stockholders. In addition, our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may discourage, delay or prevent a change in our management or control over us that stockholders may consider favorable. Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws:

• authorize the issuance of “blank check” preferred stock that could be issued by our board of directors to defend against a takeover attempt;

• establish a classified board of directors, as a result of which the successors to the directors whose terms have expired will be elected to serve from the time of election and qualification until the third annual meeting following their election;

• require that directors only be removed from office for cause and only upon a supermajority stockholder vote;

• provide that vacancies on the board of directors, including newly created directorships, may be filled only by a majority vote of directors then in office rather than by stockholders;

• prevent stockholders from calling special meetings; and

• prohibit stockholder action by written consent, requiring all actions to be taken at a meeting of the stockholders.

We currently do not intend to pay dividends on our common stock and, consequently, your only opportunity to achieve a return on your investment is if the price of our Series 1 common stock appreciates.

We currently do not plan to declare dividends on shares of our common stock in the foreseeable future. Any payment of future dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors, subject to compliance with certain covenants contained in our credit facility, which limit our ability to pay dividends, and will depend on our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, general business conditions, and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant. Consequently, your only opportunity to achieve a return on your investment in our company will be if the market price of our Series 1 common stock appreciates and you sell your shares at a profit.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(a) Sales of Unregistered Securities

None.

(b) Use of Proceeds

On July 24, 2013, we closed our initial public offering, or IPO, of 10,454,544 shares of Series 1 common stock, at a price of $21.00 per share, before underwriting discounts and commissions. We sold 4,545,454 of such shares and existing stockholders sold an aggregate of 5,909,090 of such shares, including 1,363,636 shares sold by selling stockholders as a result of the underwriters’ exercise of their over-allotment option to purchase additional shares. The IPO generated net proceeds to us of approximately $85.4 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions. Expenses incurred by us for the IPO were approximately $3.4 million and were recorded against the proceeds received from the IPO. We did not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares by the selling stockholders in the IPO.

On December 16, 2013, we closed our follow-on public offering of 7,207,207 shares of Series 1 common stock, at a price of $26.00 per share before underwriting discounts and commissions. We sold 2,000,000 of such shares and existing stockholders sold an aggregate of 5,207,207 of such shares, including 940,070 shares sold by selling stockholders as a result of the underwriters’ exercise of their option to purchase additional shares. The follow-on public offering generated net proceeds to us of $49.1 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions. Expenses incurred by us for the follow-on offering were approximately $0.6 million and were recorded against the proceeds received from the follow-on public offering. We did not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares by the selling stockholders in the follow-on public offering.

68

With the net proceeds of our IPO and our follow-on public offering, we:

• paid in full accumulated dividends on our previously outstanding shares of preferred stock, which totaled approximately $52.5 million;

• repaid the outstanding principal and accrued interest on seller notes issued in connection with our acquisition of eConversions Limited in 2011, which totaled approximately $6.6 million;

• acquired YSL Ventures, Inc. in October 2013 for approximately $11.6 million in cash consideration and entered into deferred compensation arrangements with the former owners of YSL Ventures, Inc., which totaled approximately $6.2 million;

• repaid $1.75 million of our senior debt in each of October 2013, January 2014, April 2014, July 2014 and October 2014;

• acquired certain website domains in August 2014 and in April 2015, which totaled approximately $7.6 million in the aggregate;

• repaid the outstanding principal and accrued interest on seller notes issued in conjunction with our acquisition of Bons-de-Reduction.com and Poulpeo.com in 2012, which totaled approximately $1.8 million;

• repaid the outstanding principal and accrued interest on seller notes issued in conjunction with our acquisition of Actiepagina.nl in 2013, which totaled approximately $1.2 million;

• repaid the outstanding principal and accrued interest on seller notes issued in conjunction with our acquisition of Ma-Reduc.com in 2013, which totaled approximately $5.3 million; and

• used $4.0 million to invest in a non-controlling minority ownership stake in a privately-held marketing technology company in the United States.

There have been no material changes in the use of proceeds from our IPO and our follow-on public offering from that described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.

(c) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities ⁽¹⁾

Our Series 1 common stock repurchase activity during the three months ended June 30, 2015 was as follows:

Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
	(in thousands, except average price per share)
April 1 – 30, 2015		142	$	18.40		142	$	72,934
May 1 – 31, 2015		6	$	17.81		6		72,832
June 1 – 30, 2015		—		—		—		72,832
Total		148	$	18.38		148	$	72,832

(1) On February 5, 2015, our board of directors authorized a program to repurchase up to $100 million worth of our Series 1 common stock over a period of up to 24 months. The repurchase program was publicly announced on February 10, 2015. As of June 30, 2015, $27.2 million of the $100 million has been utilized. Our share repurchase program does not obligate us to acquire any specific number of shares. Under the program, shares may be repurchased in privately negotiated and/or open market transactions, including under plans complying with Rule 10b5-1 under the Exchange Act.

Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

69

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

See the Index to Exhibits immediately following the signature pages of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which is incorporated herein by reference.

70

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	RETAILMENOT, INC.
Date: August 7, 2015	By:	/s/    G. Cotter Cunningham
	Name:	G. Cotter Cunningham
	Title:	President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: August 7, 2015	By:	/s/    Louis J. Agnese, III
	Name:	Louis J. Agnese, III
	Title:	Interim Chief Financial Officer

71

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit Nos.	Description
3.1*	Sixth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 23, 2013).
3.2*	Amended and Restated Bylaws (filed as Exhibit 3.4 to the Registrant’s Form S-1 Registration Statement, as amended, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 8, 2013 (Registration No. 333-189397)).
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule, 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule, 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1**	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2**	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

* Incorporated herein by reference to the indicated filing.

** Furnished herewith.

72