Form 10-Q

JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)


	For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2011	For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2010	From Inception (May 21, 2009) to March 31, 2011
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net income loss	$ (5,564)	$ -	$ (10,450)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Issuance of common stock per court order	-	-	1,085
Net cash used in operating activities	(5,564)	-	(9,365)

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Due to Director	1,000	-	3,500
Issuance of common stock	-	-	6,000
Net cash provided by financing activities	1,000	-	9,500

Net increase in cash	(4,564)	-	135
Cash beginning of period	4,699	-	-
Cash end of period	$ 135	$ -	$ 135

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash paid during period for:
Interest Paid	$ -	$ -	$ -
Income Taxes Paid	$ -	$ -	$ -

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

March 31, 2011

NOTE 1. NATURE AND BACKGROUND OF BUSINESS

Journal of Radiology, Inc. ("the Company" or "the Issuer") was organized under the laws of the State of Nevada on May 21, 2009. The Company was established as part of the Chapter 11 reorganization of AP Corporate Services, Inc. ("AP"). Under AP's Plan of Reorganization, as confirmed by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California, the Company was organized to own and develop a professional journal devoted to radiology. Management believes the Company lacks the resources to effectively develop such a journal on its own at this time and is therefore engaged in a search for a strategic partner to assist in the development of the journal, or for a merger or acquisition partner with the resources to take the Company in a new direction and bring greater value to its shareholders.

The unaudited financial statements included herein have been prepared by Journal of Radiology, Inc. (the “Company”). In the opinion of management, the interim financial statements reflect all adjustments of a normal recurring nature necessary for a fair statement of the results for interim periods. It is suggested that these financial statements and notes to the financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010.

The Company has been in the development stage since its formation and has not yet realized any revenues from its planned operations.

NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

a. BASIS OF ACCOUNTING

The Company's financial statements are prepared using the accrual method of accounting. The Company has elected a June 30 year-end.

b. RECLASSIFACTIONS

The Company reclassified $1,085 of common stock issued per court order in the statement of cash flows as an adjustment to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities from cash flows from financing activities. As a result of the change, net cash provided by operating activities from inception increased to ($9,365) and net cash provided by financing activities since inception decreased to $9,500. There was no change in the overall cash at the end of the period from inception.

c. BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE

The Company reports earnings (loss) per share in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 260 (ASC 260-10), "Earnings Per Share". This statement requires dual presentation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share with a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the loss per share computations. Basic earnings per share amounts are based on the weighted average shares of common shares outstanding. If applicable, diluted earnings per share assumes the conversion, exercise or issuance of all common stock instruments such as options, warrants and convertible securities, determined by the treasury stock method, unless the effect is to reduce a loss or increase earnings per share. Accordingly, this presentation has been adopted for the period presented. There were no adjustments required for the period presented in the computation of diluted earnings per share.

d. ESTIMATES

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

e. CASH and CASH EQUIVALENTS

Investments with maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents.

f. REVENUE RECOGNITION

The Company recognizes revenues and the related costs when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery and acceptance has occurred or service has been rendered, the price is fixed or determinable, and collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. Amounts invoiced or collected in advance of product delivery or providing services are recorded as deferred revenue. The Company accrues for warranty costs, sales returns, bad debts, and other allowances based on its historical experience.

g. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

We follow ASC 718-10, "Stock Compensation", which addresses the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services, with a primary focus on transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. ASC 718-10 requires measurement of the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award (with limited exceptions). Incremental compensation costs arising from subsequent modifications of awards after the grant date must be recognized. The Company has not adopted a stock option plan and has not granted any stock options. The Company granted stock awards, at par value, to its officers, directors and advisors for services rendered in its formation. Accordingly, stock-based compensation has been recorded to date.

h. INCOME TAXES

Income taxes are provided in accordance with Codifications topic 740, “Income Taxes”, which requires an asset and liability approach for the financial accounting and reporting of income taxes. Current income tax expense (benefit) is the amount of income taxes expected to be payable (receivable) for the current year. A deferred tax asset and/or liability is computed for both the expected future impact of differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities and for the expected future tax benefit to be derived from tax loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred income tax expense is generally the net change during the year in the deferred income tax asset and liability. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be “more likely than not” realized in future tax returns. Tax rate changes and changes in tax law are reflected in income in the period such changes are enacted.

i. IMPACT OF NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In February 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-09, “Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements” (“ASU 2010-09”), which is included in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the “ASC”) Topic 855 (Subsequent Events). ASU 2010-09 clarifies that an SEC filer is required to evaluate subsequent events through the date that the financial statements are issued. ASU 2010-09 is effective upon the issuance of the final update and did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance now codified as ASC 105, “Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” as the single source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP, aside from those issued by the SEC. ASC 105 does not change current U.S. GAAP, but is intended to simplify user access to all authoritative U.S. GAAP by providing all authoritative literature related to a particular topic in one place. The adoption of ASC 105 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements, but did eliminate all references to pre-codification standards.

The Company does not expect the adoption of recently issued accounting pronouncements to have a significant impact on the Company's results of operations, financial position, or cash flow.

NOTE 3. GOING CONCERN

The Company's financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern. Currently, the Company does not have significant cash or other material assets, nor does it have operations or a source of revenue sufficient to cover its operation costs and allow it to continue as a going concern. As of March 31, 2011 the Company had a accumulated deficit during development stage of $10,450. The officers and directors have committed to advancing certain operating costs of the Company. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts, or amounts and classification of liabilities that might result from this uncertainty.

Management plans to seek a strategic partner to assist in the development of the journal business, or a merger or acquisition partner with the resources to take the Company in a new direction and bring greater value to its shareholders. Management has yet to identify any of these and there is no guarantee that the Company will be able to identify such opportunities in the future.

NOTE 4. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY - COMMON STOCK

The authorized common stock of the Company consists of 75,000,000 shares with $0.001 par value. No other class of stock is authorized. As of March 31, 2011, there were a total of 7,085,000 common shares issued and outstanding.

The Company's first stock issuance, totaling 1,085,000 shares, took place on May 21, 2009 pursuant to the Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization confirmed by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in the matter of AP Corporate Services, Inc. ("AP"). The Court ordered the distribution of shares in Journal of Radiology, Inc. to all general unsecured creditors of AP, with these creditors to receive their PRO RATA share (according to amount of debt held) of a pool of 80,000 shares in the Company.

The Court also ordered the distribution of shares in the Company to all shareholders of AP, with these shareholders to receive their PRO RATA share (according to number of shares held) of a pool of 5,000 shares in the Company.

The Court also ordered the distribution of shares and warrants in the Company to all administrative creditors of AP, with these creditors to receive one share and five warrants in the Company for each $0.10 of AP's administrative debt which they held. These creditors received an aggregate of 1,000,000 common shares in the Company and 5,000,000 warrants consisting of 1,000,000 "A Warrants" each convertible into one share of common stock at an exercise price of $1.00; 1,000,000 "B Warrants" each convertible into one share of common stock at an exercise price of $2.00; 1,000,000 "C Warrants" each convertible into one share of common stock at an exercise price of $3.00; 1,000,000 "D Warrants" each convertible into one share of common stock at an exercise price of $4.00; and 1,000,000 "E Warrants" each convertible into one share of common stock at an exercise price of $5.00. All warrants are exercisable at any time during the five year period immediately following the effective date January 4, 2009.

On July 6, 2009 the President of the Issuer acquired 6,000,000 common shares from the Issuer in a private placement for cash. The shares were purchased at par value ($0.001 per share) for a total investment of $6,000.

As a result of these issuances there were a total 7,085,000 common shares issued and outstanding, and a total of 5,000,000 warrants issued and outstanding, at March 31, 2011.

NOTE 5. WARRANTS AND OPTIONS

On May 21, 2009 (inception), the Company issued 5,000,000 warrants exercisable into 5,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock. These warrants were issued per order of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in the matter of AP Corporate Services, Inc. ("AP") to the administrative creditors of AP. These creditors received an aggregate of 5,000,000 warrants consisting of 1,000,000 "A Warrants" each convertible into one share of common stock at an exercise price of $1.00; 1,000,000 "B Warrants" each convertible into one share of common stock at an exercise price of $2.00; 1,000,000 "C Warrants" each convertible into one share of common stock at an exercise price of $3.00; 1,000,000 "D Warrants" each convertible into one share of common stock at an exercise price of $4.00; and 1,000,000 "E Warrants" each convertible into one share of common stock at an exercise price of $5.00. All warrants are exercisable at any time prior to January 4, 2014. As of the date of this report, no warrants have been exercised.

The fair value of these warrants was estimated at the date of the Company's inception, May 21, 2009, which was also the date of the grant, using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model with current value of the stock at $0.001 (par value) since there is no market for the stock at the time; dividend yield of 0%; risk-free interest rate of 2.16% (5 year Treasury Note rate at the issue date); volatility rate of 67%; and expiration date of 5 years. Since the stock does not trade, and since its par value is $0.001, the fair value of the warrants came out to be zero.

NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company received from a director, a related party $3,500, for payment of expenses. This amount is included on the balance sheet as due to director as a current liability. The loan is non-interest bearing, unsecured, and due on demand.

The Company neither owns nor leases any real or personal property. An officer of the corporation provides office services without charge. Such costs are immaterial to the financial statements and accordingly, have not been reflected therein. The officers and directors for the Company are involved in other business activities and may, in the future, become involved in other business opportunities. If a specific business opportunity becomes available, such persons may face a conflict in selecting between the Company and their other business interests. The Company has not formulated a policy for the resolution of such conflicts.

NOTE 7. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

There are no commitments or contingencies to disclose as of the quarter ended March 31, 2011.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2011 AND 2010

Journal of Radiology, Inc. was organized under the laws of the State of Nevada on May 21, 2009. The Company was established as part of the Chapter 11 reorganization of AP Corporate Services, Inc. ("AP"). Under AP's Plan of Reorganization, as confirmed by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California, the Company was organized to own and develop a professional journal devoted to radiology. Management believes the Company lacks the resources to effectively develop such a journal on its own at this time and is therefore engaged in a search for a strategic partner to assist in the development of the journal, or for a merger or acquisition partner with the resources to take the Company in a new direction and bring greater value to its shareholders.

The Company has been in the development stage since its formation and has not yet realized any revenues from its planned operations.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

COMPARISON OF THE THREE-MONTH PERIODS ENDED MARCH 31, 2011 AND 2010

REVENUES

For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 we generated $0 and $0 revenue, respectively. We are completely dependent upon the willingness of our management to fund our initial operations by way of loans from our Chief Executive Officer. The Company has been in the development stage since its formation and has not yet realized any revenues from its planned operations.

COSTS OF GOODS SOLD

We did not incur cost of sales for the three months ended March 31, 2011 or three months ended March 31, 2010.

GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES

General and administrative expenses were $3,548 for the three months ended March 31, 2011, compared to $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, an increase of $3,548. The increase is attributed to business accounting and professional services.

NET LOSS

Our net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $3,548 and $0, respectively.

COMPARISON OF THE NINE-MONTH PERIODS ENDED MARCH 31, 2011 AND 2010

REVENUES

For the nine months ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 we generated $0 and $0 revenue, respectively. We are completely dependent upon the willingness of our management to fund our initial operations by way of loans from our Chief Executive Officer. The Company has been in the development stage since its formation and has not yet realized any revenues from its planned operations.

COSTS OF GOODS SOLD

We did not incur cost of sales for the nine months ended March 31, 2011 or nine months ended March 31, 2010.

GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES

General and administrative expenses were $5,564 for the nine months ended March 31, 2011, compared to $0 for the nine months ended March 31, 2010, an increase of $5,564. The increase is attributed to business accounting and professional services.

NET LOSS

Our net loss for the nine months ended March 31, 2011 and the nine months ended March 31, 2010 was $5,564 and $0, respectively.

LIQUIDITY

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. As of March 31, 2011, we had cash of $135 and total liabilities of $3,500. Our cash flows from operating activities for the nine month ended March 31, 2011 resulted in cash used of $5,564. Our current cash balance and cash flow from operating activities will not be sufficient to fund our operations. Our cash flow from financing activities for the nine months ended March 31, 2011 was $0. The Company has an accumulated deficit during development stage at March 31, 2011 and June 30, 2010 of $10,450 and $4,886, respectively. The deficit reported at March 31, 2011 is largely a result of operating expenses for accounting and legal costs. These conditions led to our auditor reporting substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Over the next 12 months we expect to expend approximately $10,000 in cash for legal, accounting and related services. Cash used for other expenditures is expected to be minimal. We hope to be able to attract suitable investors for our business plan, which will not require us to use our cash, although there can be no assurances that we will be successful in these efforts.

We expect to be able to secure capital through advances from our Chief Executive Officer in order to pay expenses such as organizational costs, filing fees, accounting fees and legal fees. We believe it will be difficult to secure capital in the future because we have no assets to secure debt and there is currently no trading market for our securities. We will need additional capital in the next twelve months and if we cannot raise such capital on acceptable terms, we may have to curtail our operations or terminate our business entirely.

The inability to obtain financing or generate sufficient cash from operations could require us to reduce or eliminate expenditures for acquiring suitable partners or otherwise curtail or discontinue our operations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, to the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the issuance of such securities may result in dilution to existing stockholders. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of debt securities, these securities may have rights, preferences and privileges senior to holders of our common stock and the terms of such debt could impose restrictions on our operations. Regardless of whether our cash assets prove to be inadequate to meet our operational needs, we may seek to compensate providers of services by issuing stock in lieu of cash, which may also result in dilution to existing stockholders.

OPERATING CAPITAL AND CAPITAL EXPENDITURE REQUIREMENTS

We are currently funding our initial operations by way of issuing 6,000,000 shares of our common stock valued at $0.001 per share to our Chief Executive Officer. We hope to be able to attract suitable publishing partners seeking the benefits of stock-based compensation, which will not require us to use our cash, although there can be no assurances that we will be successful in these efforts. Our Chief Executive Officer has committed to advancing us an additional $10,000 for certain operating costs in order to start implementing our business plan, the funds are loaned to the company as required to pay amounts owed by the Company. As such, our operating capital is currently limited to the personal resources of our Chief Executive Officer. The loans from our Chief Executive

Officer are unsecured and non-interest bearing and have no set terms of repayment. We anticipate receiving additional capital once we are able to have our securities quoted on a public exchange, there is no guarantee our stock will become quoted on a public exchange or develop a market.

PLAN OF OPERATION AND FUNDING

We do not currently engage in any business activities that provide cash flow. The costs of investigating and analyzing business combinations for the next 12 months and beyond such time will be paid with amounts to be loaned to or invested in us by our stockholders, management or other investors.

During the next twelve months we anticipate incurring costs related to:

(i) filing of Exchange Act reports, and

(ii) costs relating to developing a professional journal devoted to radiology.

We believe we will be able to meet these costs through amounts, as necessary, to be loaned to or invested in us by our stockholders, management or other investors.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

Going Concern

The Company's financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern. This contemplates the realization of assets and the liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. Currently, the Company does not have material assets, nor does it have operations or a source of revenue to cover its operation costs and allow it to continue as a going concern. The Company has a deficit accumulated during development stage at March 31, 2011 and June 30, 2010 of $10,450 and $4,886, respectively. The Company will be dependent upon the raising of additional capital through placement of its common stock in order to implement its business plan. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in this situation.

Accordingly, these factors raise substantial doubt as to the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. These financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or amounts and classifications of liabilities that might result from this uncertainty. The Company is funding its initial operations by way of loans from its Chief Executive Officer. The Company's officers and directors have committed to advancing certain operating costs of the Company.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not applicable.

ITEM 4T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) that are designed to be effective in providing reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

In designing and evaluating disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute assurance of achieving the desired objectives. Also, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. The design of any system of controls is based, in part, upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based on their evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures need improvement and were not adequately effective as of March 31, 2011 to cause the information required to be disclosed in reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act to be recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods prescribed by the SEC, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to ensure timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management is in the process of identifying deficiencies with respect to the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and implementing corrective measures.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the requisite evaluation that occurred during the last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

NONE.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks described below before deciding to purchase shares of our common stock. If any of the events, contingencies, circumstances or conditions described in the risks below actually occurs, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be seriously harmed.

RISK FACTORS CONCERNING OUR BUSINESS

Our business is subject to numerous risk factors, including the following:

We have had little operating history and no revenues or earnings from operations.

We have no assets. We will, in all likelihood, sustain operating expenses without corresponding revenues, at least until the consummation of a business combination. This may result in us incurring a net operating loss that will increase continuously until we can consummate a business combination with a profitable business entity. There is no assurance that we can identify such a business entity and consummate such an agreement or combination.

Our auditor's going concern opinion and the notation in the financial statements indicate that we do not have significant cash or other material assets and that we are relying on advances from stockholders, officers and directors to meet our limited operating expenses. We may become insolvent if we are unable to pay our debts in the ordinary course of business as they become due.

Our proposed plan of operation is speculative.

The success of our proposed plan of operation will depend to a great extent on the operations, financial condition and management of the business opportunity which we identify, if any is identified. While management intends to seek business agreement(s) or combination(s) with entities having established operating histories, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in locating candidates meeting such criteria. In the event we complete a business agreement or combination, of which there can be no assurance, the success of our operations may be dependent upon management of the successor firm or venture partner firm and numerous other factors beyond our control.

We face intense competition for business combination opportunities.

We are and will continue to be an insignificant participant in the business of seeking mergers with, joint ventures with and acquisitions of small private and public entities. A large number of established and well-financed entities, including venture capital firms, are active in mergers and acquisitions of companies that may be our desirable target candidates. Nearly all such entities have significantly greater financial resources, technical expertise and managerial capabilities than we have and, consequently, we will be at a competitive disadvantage in identifying possible business opportunities and successfully completing a business combination. Moreover, we will also compete in seeking merger or acquisition candidates with numerous other small public companies.

We have no agreements for a business combination or licensing transaction and have established no standards for such transactions.

We have no arrangement, agreement or understanding with respect to entering into an agreement or engaging in a merger with, joint venture with or acquisition of, a private or public entity. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in identifying and evaluating suitable business opportunities or in concluding a business transaction. Management has not identified any particular business for our evaluation. There is no assurance that we will be able to negotiate a business combination on terms favorable to us. We have not established a specific length of operating history or a specified level of earnings, assets, net worth or other criteria which we will require a target business opportunity to have achieved, and without which we would not consider a business transaction in any form with such business opportunity. Accordingly, we may enter into a business agreement or a business combination with a business having no significant operating history, losses, limited potential or no potential for earnings, limited assets, negative net worth or other negative characteristics.

Our success is dependent on management that has other full time employment, has limited experience and will only devote limited time (part time) to working for the Company, all of which makes our future even more uncertain.

Aaron Shrira is the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer, and Elana Berman-Shrira is the Secretary and Treasurer and CFO of the Issuer. Both Mr. Shrira and Ms. Berman-Shrira will serve without pay whilemaintaining other employment. Although both Mr. Shrira and Ms. Berman-Shrira have considerable business and marketing experience, neither has any experience in the publishing industry or in mergers and acquisitions. Notwithstanding the limited experience and availability of management, loss of the services of either officer would adversely affect development of our business and its likelihood of continuing in operation.

The reporting requirements under federal securities law may delay or prevent us from making certain acquisitions.

Sections 13 and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the "1934 Act"), require companies subject thereto to provide certain information about significant acquisitions, including certified financial statements for the company acquired, covering one, two, or three years, depending on the relative size of the acquisition. The time and additional costs that may be incurred by some target entities to prepare such statements may significantly delay or essentially preclude consummation of an otherwise desirable acquisition by the Company. Acquisition prospects that do not have or are unable to obtain the required audited statements may not be appropriate for acquisition so long as the reporting requirements of the 1934 Act are applicable.

In addition to the audited financial statements, in the filing of the Form 8-K that we file to report an event that causes us to cease being a shell company, we will be required to include that information that is normally reported by a company in a Form 10. The time and additional costs that may be incurred by some target entities to prepare and disclose such information may significantly delay or essentially preclude consummation of an otherwise desirable acquisition by the Company.

An acquisition could create a situation wherein we would be required to register under The Investment Company Act of 1940 and thus be required to incur substantial additional costs and expenses.

Although we will be subject to regulation under the 1934 Act, management believes the Company will not be subject to regulation under the Investment Company Act of 1940, insofar as we will not be engaged in the business of investing or trading in securities. In the event we engage in a business combination that results in us holding passive investment interests in a number of entities, we could be subject to regulation under the Investment Company Act of 1940. In such event, we would be required to register as an investment company and could be expected to incur significant registration and compliance costs. We have obtained no formal determination from the Securities and Exchange Commission as to the status of our Company under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and, consequently, any violation of such Act would subject us to material adverse consequences.

A merger, acquisition, or licensing agreement would most likely be exclusive, resulting in a lack of diversification.

Management anticipates that it may be able to participate in only one potential business venture because a business partner might require exclusivity. This lack of diversification should be considered a substantial risk to our shareholders because it will not permit us to offset potential losses from one venture against gains from another.

If we do any business combination, each shareholder will most likely hold a substantially lesser percentage ownership in the Company.

If we enter a business combination with a private concern, that, in all likelihood, would result in the Company issuing securities to shareholders of any such private company. The issuance of our previously authorized and unissued Common Stock would result in reduction in percentage of shares owned by our present and prospective shareholders.

As a shell company, we face substantial additional adverse business and legal consequences if we enter a business combination.

We may enter into a business combination with an entity that desires to establish a public trading market for its shares. A business opportunity may attempt to avoid what it deems to be adverse consequences of undertaking its own public offering by seeking a business combination with us. Such consequences may include, but are not limited to, time delays of the registration process, significant expenses to be incurred in such an offering, loss of voting control to public shareholders and the inability or unwillingness to comply with various federal and state laws enacted for the protection of investors.

On June 29, 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted final rules amending the Form S-8 and the Form 8-K for shell companies like us. The amendments expand the definition of a shell company to be broader than a company with no or nominal operations/assets or assets consisting of cash and cash equivalents. The amendments prohibit the use of a Form S-8 (a form used by a corporation to register securities issued to an employee, director, officer, consultant or advisor), under certain circumstances, and revise the Form 8-K to require a shell company to include current Form 10 information, including audited financial statements, in the filing on Form 8-K that the shell company files to report the acquisition of the business opportunity. This initial filing must be made within four days of the acquisition. The Form 8-K filing may be reviewed by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the prospects of certain disclosures or review or the lack of the ability to issue securities using a Form S-8 may delay the consummation of a business combination because of the target entity's inability to comply with various federal and state laws enacted for the protection of investors or the unwillingness to assume the significant costs of compliance.

The requirement of audited financial statements may disqualify some business opportunities seeking a business combination with us.

Our management believes that any potential business combination opportunity must provide audited financial statements for review, for the protection of all parties to the business combination. One or more attractive business opportunities may choose to forego the possibility of a business combination with us, rather than incur the expenses associated with preparing audited financial statements.

Our officers and directors are the principal shareholders and will be able to approve all corporate actions without shareholder consent and will control our Company.

Our principal shareholder, Aaron Shrira, currently owns approximately 85% of our Common Stock. He will have significant influence over all matters requiring approval by our shareholders, but not requiring the approval of the minority shareholders. In addition, he is now an officer and director. Because he is the majority shareholder, he will be able to elect all of the members of our board of directors, allowing him to exercise significant control of our affairs and management. In addition, he may transact most corporate matters requiring shareholder approval by written consent, without a duly-noticed and duly-held meeting of shareholders.

Our Common Stock may never be publicly traded and you may have no ability to sell the shares.

There is no established public trading market for our shares of Common Stock, and there is no assurance that our Common Stock will be accepted for listing on the OTC Bulletin Board or in any other trading system in the future.

There can be no assurance that a market for our Common Stock will be established or that, if established, a market will be sustained. Therefore, if you purchase our Common Stock you may be unable to sell the shares. Accordingly, you should be able to bear the financial risk of losing your entire investment.

Only market makers can apply to quote securities. A market maker who desires to initiate quotations in the OTC Bulletin Board system must complete an application (Form 211) (unless an exemption is applicable) and by doing so, will have to represent that it has satisfied all applicable requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15c2-11 and the filing and information requirements promulgated under the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("Finra") Bylaws. The OTC Bulletin Board will not charge us a fee for being quoted on the service. Finra rules prohibit market makers from accepting any remuneration in return for quoting issuers' securities on the OTC Bulletin Board or any similar medium. Finra will review the market maker's application (unless an exemption is applicable) and if cleared, it cannot be assumed by any investor that any federal, state or self-regulatory requirements other than certain Finra rules and Rule 15c2-11 have been considered by Finra. Furthermore, the clearance should not be construed by any investor as indicating that Finra, the Securities and Exchange Commission, or any state securities commission has passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of the documents contained in the submission.

The OTC Bulletin Board is a market maker or dealer-driven system offering quotation and trading reporting capabilities - a regulated quotation service - that displays real-time quotes, last-sale prices, and volume information in OTC equity securities. The OTC Bulletin Board securities are not listed and traded on the floor of an organized national or regional stock exchange. Instead, OTC Bulletin Board securities transactions are conducted through a telephone and computer network connecting market makers or dealers in stocks.

If our Common Stock does not meet blue sky resale requirements, certain shareholders may be unable to resell our Common Stock.

The resale of Common Stock must meet the blue sky resale requirements in the states in which the proposed purchasers reside. If we are unable to qualify the Common Stock and there is no exemption from qualification in certain states, the holders of the Common Stock or the purchasers of the Common Stock may be unable to sell them.

Our shareholders may face significant restrictions on the resale of our Common Stock due to state "blue sky" laws or if we are determined to be a "blank check" company.

There are state regulations that may adversely affect the transferability of our Common Stock. We have not registered our Common Stock for resale under the securities or "blue sky" laws of any state. We may seek qualification or advise our shareholders of the availability of an exemption. We are under no obligation to register or qualify our Common Stock in any state or to advise the shareholders of any exemptions.

Current shareholders, and persons who desire to purchase the Common Stock in any trading market that may develop in the future, should be aware that there might be significant state restrictions upon the ability of new investors to purchase the Common Stock.

Blue sky laws, regulations, orders, or interpretations place limitations on offerings or sales of securities by "blank check" companies or in "blind-pool" offerings, or if such securities represent "cheap stock" previously issued to promoters or others. Our majority shareholder, because he received stock at a price of $.001 for each share, may be deemed to hold "cheap stock." These limitations typically provide, in the form of one or more of the following limitations, that such securities are:

(a) Not eligible for sale under exemption provisions permitting sales without registration to accredited investors or qualified purchasers;

(b) Not eligible for the transaction exemption from registration for non-issuer transactions by a registered broker-dealer;

(c) Not eligible for registration under the simplified small corporate offering registration (SCOR) form available in many states;

(d) Not eligible for the "solicitations of interest" exception to securities registration requirements available in many states;

(e) Not permitted to be registered or exempted from registration, and thus not permitted to be sold in the state under any circumstances.

Virtually all 50 states have adopted one or more of these limitations, or other limitations or restrictions affecting the sale or resale of stock of blank check companies or securities sold in "blind pool" offerings or "cheap stock" issued to promoters or others. Specific limitations on such offerings have been adopted in:


Alaska	Nevada	Tennessee
Arkansas	New Mexico	Texas
California	Ohio	Utah
Delaware	Oklahoma	Vermont
Florida	Oregon	Washington
Georgia	Pennsylvania
Idaho	Rhode Island
Indiana	South Carolina
Nebraska	South Dakota

Any secondary trading market which may develop, may only be conducted in those jurisdictions where an applicable exemption is available or where the shares have been registered.

We do not have any legal opinions as it relates to whether we are a blind pool or blank-check company. The Securities and Exchange Commission have adopted a rule (Rule 419) which defines a blank-check company as (i) a development stage company, that is (ii) offering penny stock, as defined by Rule 3a51-1, and (iii) that has no specific business plan or purpose or has indicated that its business plan is to engage in a merger or acquisition with an unidentified company or companies. Certain jurisdictions may have definitions that are more restrictive than Rule 419. We have been informed that the Securities and Exchange Commission has cautioned that "it will scrutinize registered offerings for attempts to create the appearance that the registrant has a specific business plan, in an effort to avoid the application of Rule 419." Provisions of Rule 419 apply to every registration statement filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, relating to an offering by a blank-check company. We have never filed a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

If we are later determined to be a so-called "blank check" company, our shareholders will be required to file a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, prior to the resale of the Common Stock, unless there exists a transactional or security exemption for such sale under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended or under Title 11 of the U.S. Code.

Current shareholders and persons who desire to purchase the Common Stock in any trading market that may develop in the future, should be aware that we are under no obligation to register the shares on behalf of our shareholders under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

The Company's officers, directors and majority shareholders have expressed their intentions not to engage in any transactions with respect to the Company's Common Stock except in connection with or following a business combination resulting in us no longer being defined as a blank check issuer. Any transactions in our Common Stock by said shareholders will require compliance with the registration requirements under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Our Common Stock may be subject to significant restriction on resale due to federal penny stock restrictions.

The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted rules that regulate broker or dealer practices in connection with transactions in penny stocks. Penny stocks generally are equity securities with a price of less than $5.00 (other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges or quoted on the Nasdaq system, provided that current price and volume information with respect to transactions in such securities is provided by the exchange system). The penny stock rules require a broker or dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document prepared by the Securities and Exchange Commission that provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker or dealer also must provide the customer with bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker or dealer, and its salesperson in the transaction, and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer's account. The penny stock rules also require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from such rules, the broker or dealer must make a special written determination that a penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser's written agreement to the transaction.

These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in any secondary market for our stock that becomes subject to the penny stock rules, and accordingly, shareholders of our Common Stock may find it difficult to sell their securities, if at all.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS. None.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES. None.

ITEM 4. [RESERVED AND REMOVED]

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION. None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.

Except as so indicated in Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2, the following exhibits are filed as part of, or incorporated by reference, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.


			Incorporated by reference
Exhibit	Exhibit Description	Filed herewith	Form	Period ending	Exhibit	Filing date
3.1	Articles of Incorporation		10/A#2		3.1	11/5/2009
3.2	Bylaws		10/A #2		3.2	11/5/2009
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	X
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	X
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	X
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	X

*Exhibits 32.1 are being furnished and shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, nor shall such exhibits be deemed to be incorporated by reference in any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act, except as otherwise stated in such filing.

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


	JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, INC.


Date: May 24, 2011	By:	/s/ Aaron Shrira
		Aaron Shrira President and Director (Principal Executive Officer)


Date: May 24, 2011	By:	/s/ Elana Berman-Shrira Elana Berman-Shrira Treasurer and Director (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)


Nevada	27-0491634
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

2230 Michigan Avenue Santa Monica, California	90404
(Address of Principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code.	(310) 460-7303


Large accelerated filer	o	Accelerated filer	o
Non-accelerated filer	o	Smaller reporting company	þ


		March 31, 2011		June 30, 2010
		(Unaudited)		(Audited)

Assets:
Current assets
Cash	$	135	$	4,699
Total current assets		135		4,699
Total assets	$	135	$	4,699

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current Liabilities
Due to Director	$	3,500	$	2,500
Total current liabilities		3,500		2,500
Total liabilities		3,500		2,500
Stockholders’ Equity:
Common Stock, $0.001 par value; 75,000,000 shares authorized, 7,085,000 and 7,085,000 issued and outstanding, respectively		7,085		7,085
Deficit accumulated during development stage		(10,450)		(4,886)
Total stockholders’ equity		(3,365)		2,199

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	135	$	4,699


	For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011	For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010	For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2011	For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2010	From Inception (May 21, 2009) to March 31, 2010


Revenue	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ -

Total revenue	-	-	-	-	-

Operating costs:
Professional fees	3,500	-	5,500	-	9,585
Administrative expenses	48	-	64	-	865

Total operating costs	3,548	-	5,564	-	10,450



Net loss	$ (3,548)	$ -	$ (5,564)	$ -	$ (10,450)

Basic net loss per share	$ (0.00)	$ (0.00)	$ (0.00)	$ (0.00)

Basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding	7,085,000	7,085,000	7,085,000	7,085,000



	Common Shares	Common Stock	Deficit Accumulated During the Development Stage	Total Stockholders’ Equity
Inception, May 21, 2009	-	$ -	$ -	$ -
Common stock issued per court order May 21, 2009	1,085,000	1,085	-	1,085
Net loss for the period ended June 30, 2009	-	-	(1,085)	(1,085)
Balance June 30, 2009	1,085,000	1,085	(1,085)	-

Common stock issued for cash July 6, 2009	6,000,000	6,000	-	6,000
Net loss	-	-	(3,801)	(3,801)
Balance June 30, 2010	7,085,000	7,085	(4,886)	2,199

Net loss	-	-	(5,564)	(5,564)
Balance March 31, 2011 (unaudited)	7,085,000	$ 7,085	$ (10,450)	$ (3,365)