Form S-1

(Name, address, including zip code and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box. ¨

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨

The registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until this Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and we are not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.

Intrepid Potash, Inc. is offering shares of our common stock. We are a corporation recently formed by Intrepid Mining LLC. This is our initial public offering and no public market currently exists for our common stock. We anticipate that the initial public offering price will be between $ and $ per share.

We intend to apply for the listing of our common stock on a national securities exchange.

Investing in the common stock involves risks. See “ Risk Factors” beginning on page 13.

We have granted the underwriters the right to purchase up to an additional shares of common stock to cover over-allotments. We intend to use the net proceeds we receive from any shares sold pursuant to the underwriters’ over-allotment option to pay a dividend to the current members of Intrepid Mining LLC.

The Securities and Exchange Commission and state securities regulators have not approved or disapproved these securities, or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated expects to deliver the shares of common stock to purchasers on , 2008.

You may rely on the information contained in this prospectus. Neither we nor any of the underwriters have authorized anyone to provide information different from that contained in this prospectus. When you make a decision about whether to invest in our common stock, you should not rely upon any information other than the information in this prospectus and any free writing prospectus we provide you with. Neither the delivery of this prospectus nor sale of common stock means that information contained in this prospectus is correct after the date of this prospectus. This prospectus is not an offer to sell or solicitation of an offer to buy these shares of common stock in any circumstances under which the offer or solicitation is unlawful.

Until , 2008 (25 days after the commencement of this offering), all dealers that effect transactions in these securities, whether or not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This is in addition to the dealers’ obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters and with respect to their unsold allotments or subscriptions.

We own, or claim ownership rights to, a variety of trade names, service marks and trademarks for use in our business, including Intrepid Potash, Intrepid Potash (stylized logo) appearing on the cover page of this prospectus, in the U.S. and, where appropriate, in foreign countries. This prospectus also includes product names and other trade names and service marks owned by us and other companies. The trade names and service marks of other companies are the property of those other companies.

Market data and industry statistics used throughout this prospectus are based on independent industry publications and other publicly available information. We have not independently verified, and do not guarantee, the accuracy of this information. Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on this information.

Actual production, revenue and expenditures with respect to our reserves will likely vary from estimates, and these variations may be material. As a result, you should not place undue reliance on the muriate of potash and langbeinite reserve data included in this prospectus.

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

The following summary highlights selected information contained in other parts of this prospectus. The summary is qualified in its entirety by the information contained elsewhere in this prospectus. You should read the entire prospectus carefully, especially the matters discussed under “Risk Factors” and the financial statements and related notes included in this prospectus, before deciding to invest in our common stock. We include a glossary of some of the terms used in this prospectus as Appendix A.

References in this prospectus to “Intrepid Potash”, “our”, “we” or “us” are to Intrepid Potash, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries and include Intrepid Mining LLC unless the context otherwise requires. References to “Intrepid Mining” are to Intrepid Mining LLC. References to Intrepid Moab, Intrepid New Mexico and Intrepid Wendover are to Intrepid Potash–Moab, LLC, Intrepid Potash–New Mexico, LLC and Intrepid Potash–Wendover, LLC, respectively, our principal operating subsidiaries. References to “tons” in this prospectus refer to short tons. One short ton equals 2,000 pounds. References to “the current members of Intrepid Mining” or “the original stockholders” are to Harvey Operating and Production Company, Intrepid Production Corporation, and Potash Acquisition, LLC, who, as of the date of this prospectus, collectively own 100% of the membership interests of Intrepid Mining. Unless otherwise indicated, references to “potash” in this prospectus refer to muriate of potash.

INTREPID POTASH, INC.

Overview

We are the largest producer of muriate of potash (MOP, or potassium chloride) in the U.S. and are dedicated to the production and marketing of potash and langbeinite, another mineral containing potassium. Potassium is one of the three nutrients essential to plant formation and growth. Since 2004, we have supplied, on average, 1.5% of world potash consumption and 8.5% of U.S. consumption annually, and we have supplied a considerably higher proportion of the potash consumed in the southwestern and western U.S., our core markets. We are one of two exporting producers in the world of langbeinite (sulfate of potash magnesia), a low-chloride fertilizer that is better suited than MOP for chloride-sensitive crops. We own five active potash production facilities—three in New Mexico and two in Utah—and we have the nameplate capacity to produce 1,100,000 tons of potash and 250,000 tons of langbeinite annually. We own two development assets in New Mexico—the HB Mine, which is an idled potash mine that we are in the process of reopening as a solution mine, and the North Mine. We expect that the expansion opportunities at our operating facilities and the HB Mine will increase production by an aggregate of over 370,000 tons of potash and langbeinite annually over the next five to seven years. We also produce salt, magnesium chloride and metal recovery salts from our potash mining processes.

Our principal assets include:

•

Two conventional, underground potash mines in Carlsbad, New Mexico—the West Mine and the East Mine—and the North Facility compaction plant. The West Mine has the nameplate capacity to produce 510,000 tons of potash annually. Potash from our West Mine is processed at our North Facility compaction plant. The East Mine produces two products, with the nameplate capacity to produce 390,000 tons of potash and 250,000 tons of langbeinite annually. The East Mine mill is a dual potash and langbeinite facility that uses a first-of-its-kind milling process.

•

Two potash facilities in Utah—the Moab Mine and the Wendover Facility. The Moab Mine uses solution mining methods to extract potash and has the nameplate capacity to produce 100,000 tons of potash annually. The Wendover Facility collects potash from natural brines and has the nameplate capacity to produce 100,000 tons of potash annually. Both of these facilities use low-cost solar evaporation to recover potash.

•

Two development assets in Carlsbad, New Mexico—the HB Mine and the North Mine. The HB Mine is an idled potash mine that we are in the process of reopening as a solution mine. We expect to commence Phase I of the project in 2008, with production beginning in 2009. We believe Phase I has the potential to ultimately add up to 150,000 to 200,000 tons of additional low-cost potash production annually by 2011. The North Mine is another idled underground potash mine that we may choose to reopen in the future and that already has in place mine shafts and much of the transportation and utility infrastructure required for operation.

For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007, we sold 678.7 thousand tons of potash and 131.6 thousand tons of langbeinite, generating net sales of $140.1 million, EBITDA of $36.2 million and net income of $23.1 million. During this period, we sold approximately 95% of our potash and langbeinite volumes in North America, with the remainder being sold outside North America on our behalf by Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc., or PCS. The agricultural market represented approximately 64% of our potash sales in the nine months ended September 30, 2007, with sales to industrial and feed markets accounting for 30% and 6% of our potash sales, respectively.

Company History

Intrepid Mining was formed in January 2000 for the purpose of acquiring the Moab Mine from PCS. The Moab Mine was a solution mine which had experienced sustained declining production. Our management team stabilized production volumes at nearly twice the pre-acquisition level by applying horizontal drilling technology that is commonly used in the oil and gas industry but had never before been used to mine potash.

We observed that potash from Moab shared markets with potash produced in Carlsbad, New Mexico and in Wendover, Utah. Accordingly, we formulated a strategy to acquire assets in those areas in order to consolidate marketing efforts and effect operating synergies. We acquired the assets of Mississippi Potash, Inc. and Eddy Potash, Inc. in Carlsbad, New Mexico from Mississippi Chemical Company in February 2004. In April 2004, we acquired the potash assets of Reilly Chemical, Inc. in Wendover, Utah.

Intrepid Potash was formed as a Delaware corporation on November 19, 2007 and, in connection with the completion of this offering, will acquire all of the assets of Intrepid Mining other than cash and will assume $ million of Intrepid Mining’s liability under its existing senior credit facility and all other existing liabilities of Intrepid Mining.

Industry Overview

Fertilizers serve a fundamental role in global agriculture by providing vital nutrients that help sustain both the yield and the quality of crops. The three essential nutrients required for plant growth are nitrogen, phosphate and potassium (potash), and there are no known substitutes for these nutrients. A proper balance of each of the three nutrients is necessary to maximize their effectiveness. Potash helps regulate plants’ physiological functions and improves plant durability, providing crops with protection from drought, disease, weeds, parasites and cold weather. Unlike nitrogen and phosphate, potash does not require additional chemical conversion to be used as a plant nutrient.

Fertecon Limited, a fertilizer industry consultant, expects global potash fertilizer consumption to grow 3.4% annually from 2007 to 2011. This growth is driven primarily by strong global demand for agricultural commodities, which in turn is driven by the demand for food and alternative energy sources. As populations grow, more food is required from decreasing arable land per capita, which requires higher crop yields and, therefore, more plant nutrients. As incomes grow in the developing world, people consume more animal protein, which requires large amounts of grain for feed. In addition, high oil prices and associated energy concerns have recently placed a renewed emphasis on ethanol and bio-diesel production, which currently rely on agricultural products as feedstocks.

Potash is mined either from conventional underground mines or, less frequently, from surface or sub-surface brines. According to the International Fertilizer Industry Association, or IFA, six countries accounted for approximately 87% of the world’s aggregate potash production in the first half of 2007. During this time period, the top seven potash producers controlled approximately 84% of world production. Five of the top ten producers are further concentrated into two marketing groups, which together controlled approximately 58% of global potash production in the first half of 2007.

Virtually all of the world’s potash is currently extracted from twenty commercial deposits, and the most recently constructed operating mine in the world was opened in 1987. Barriers to adding new potash production are significant because economically recoverable potash deposits are scarce, deep and geographically concentrated. A further challenge is that the majority of unexploited mineralized deposits of potash existing outside the Canadian province of Saskatchewan are located in remote and/or politically unstable regions such as the Congo, Thailand and Argentina.

In recent years, consistent growth in global demand coupled with limited increases in global supply have led to significant increases in producer operating rates. During 2007, we believe the global potash industry has operated at or near the highest achievable production rates. As a result of increasing demand and tight supply, potash prices have increased rapidly, leading to an 89% increase in delivered granular MOP prices in the midwestern U.S., from $205.00 per ton as of December 1, 2006 to $387.50 per ton as of December 1, 2007.


	Nine Months Ended September 30,				Year Ended December 31,
	2007		2006		2006		2005		2004
Average delivered list prices for granular MOP (per ton)⁽¹⁾
Saskatchewan, Canada	$	202.37	$	185.50	$	185.50	$	172.85	$	123.43
Midwestern, U.S.		231.22		205.94		204.81		209.52		158.82
Carlsbad, New Mexico		203.28		195.00		195.00		182.26		133.29
Intrepid Potash average net selling prices for potash (per ton)⁽²⁾	$	185.15	$	180.03	$	177.51	$	161.28	$	119.43

(1)

Average delivery list prices include delivery to the list price location. Source: Green Markets Fertilizer Market Intelligence Weekly.

(2)

Intrepid Potash net selling prices are net of freight.

Our Competitive Strengths

•

U.S. potash-only producer. We are the largest producer of potash in the U.S., the second largest potash-consuming country in the world. We are dedicated to the production and marketing of potash and langbeinite, whereas nearly all of our competitors are meaningfully diversified, primarily into other fertilizer and chemical businesses. As a dedicated potash producer, we believe our financial performance is subject to less volatility than that of other fertilizer companies. Historically, potash prices have been subject to less volatility than prices for other fertilizers and commodity chemicals. In addition, the costs to mine and produce potash are relatively fixed and stable, whereas the costs to produce other fertilizers have significantly greater exposure to volatile raw material costs, such as natural gas used to produce nitrogen and phosphate products.

After the completion of this offering, we will be one of two publicly-traded potash-only companies producing today, the other being Uralkali, a Russian producer. As a U.S. producer, we enjoy a significantly lower total tax and royalty burden than our primary competitors, which are located in Saskatchewan, Canada.

•

Assets located near our primary customer base. Our mines are advantageously located near our largest customers. We believe that our location allows us to incur lower freight costs than our competitors, who must ship their products across longer distances to consuming markets, which are often export

markets. Also, because consumption of potash in our core markets exceeds our production capabilities, we can target sales to the markets in which we have the greatest transportation advantage, maximizing our net sales per ton. Our access to strategic rail destination points and our location along major agricultural trucking routes support this advantage. In addition, our location in an oil and gas producing region allows us to serve industrial customers, the majority of whom we reach by truck. Our geographic advantage is difficult for competitors to erode, particularly in an environment of historically high and rising transportation costs.

The chart below sets forth what we believe to be our average net sales per ton advantage, which results primarily from our freight cost advantage, over our primary Canadian competitors per product ton of potassium chloride for each of 2006, 2005 and 2004.


	2006		2005		2004
Intrepid Potash net sales per ton advantage⁽¹⁾	$	41	$	27	$	13

(1)

Based on net sales per ton for Agrium, Mosaic and PCS for muriate of potash only. Mosaic’s MOP revenues were calculated by subtracting langbeinite-only revenues, assuming $100 net sales per ton for langbeinite (K-Mag^®).

•

Diversification into niche markets. We sell to three different markets for potash—the agricultural, industrial and feed markets. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, these markets represented approximately 64%, 30% and 6% of our potash sales, respectively. According to the IFA, 95% of all potash produced is used as a fertilizer. As a result, we believe our sales are diversified across more distinct, unrelated consumer markets than those of many of our competitors, adding stability to our potash revenues. In addition, according to SRI Consulting, U.S. industrial consumption of potash is growing rapidly relative to the agricultural market, with a compound annual growth rate of 5.1% from 1990 to 2005.

We are one of two exporting producers of langbeinite in the world. Both producing facilities are located in Carlsbad, New Mexico. Given the greater scarcity of langbeinite relative to potash and its agronomic suitability for certain soils and crops, there is demand for our langbeinite production outside of our core potash markets. PCS markets our langbeinite production outside North America. This relationship gives us access to PCS’ extensive international sales network and informs us about developments in the international market. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we sold 131,600 tons of langbeinite, representing 16.2% of our total product tons sold during this period.

•

Significant reserve life and water rights. Our potash and langbeinite reserves each have substantial life, with remaining reserve life ranging from 30 to 124 years. This lasting reserve base is the result of our past acquisition and development strategy. In addition to our reserves, we have access to significant mineralized deposits for potential future exploitation and valuable water rights.

•

Valuable existing facilities and infrastructure. Constructing a new potash production facility requires extensive capital investment in mining, milling and infrastructure, which is expensive and requires substantial time to complete. Our five operating facilities and the HB Mine already have significant facilities and infrastructure in place. We have the ability to expand our business using existing installed infrastructure, in less time and with lower expenditures than would be required to construct entirely new mines.

•

Track record of innovation and modernization. Our management team has a history of building successful operations through the acquisition of underutilized assets, followed by creative use of technology to increase productivity and reliability. As an entrepreneurial, potash-only producer, we have devoted considerable management attention to each facility, with a focus on modernization and improving production. We have applied technologies from other industries, including the oil and gas industry, and implemented innovative production processes. From inception to date, we have spent $69.9 million on capital improvements at our facilities. We believe these investments have enhanced the reliability and productivity of our operations.

•

Low-cost solar evaporation operations. The Moab Mine and the Wendover Facility, both located in the Utah desert, use solar evaporation to crystallize potash from brines. Solar evaporation is a low-cost and energy-efficient method of producing potash. Our understanding and application of solution mining, combined with our location in regions with favorable climates for evaporation, allow our Utah facilities to enjoy low production costs. We plan to develop the HB Mine using the same solar evaporation and solution mining technology we use at our Moab Mine.

Our Business Strategy

•

Expand potash production from existing facilities. We have expansion opportunities at our operating facilities that we expect will significantly increase production, drive down our unit cost per ton and increase our cash flow. Because of our market share, we believe increases in our production have limited effect on international potash prices, allowing us to enjoy expanding margins on incremental production through full price realization and decreasing production costs per ton. We estimate that these opportunities will increase potash production by an expected aggregate of over 110,000 tons annually over the next five to seven years.

•

Reopen the HB Mine as a solution mine. The HB Mine, located in Carlsbad, New Mexico, was formerly operated as a conventional underground mine and was idled in 1997 by its previous owner. We are in the process of reopening the HB Mine as a solution mine, using the same solar evaporation and solution mining technology we currently use at our Moab Mine. We believe the HB Mine is especially suitable for solution mining due to the easily accessible mineral resource and our ability to rely in part on existing equipment and personnel to process potash. We expect production from the HB Mine to begin in 2009 and believe Phase I of the project has the potential to ultimately add up to 150,000 to 200,000 tons of additional potash production annually by 2011. We expect the potash produced from the mine to be our lowest-cost product on a per-ton basis.

•

Expand langbeinite production and demand. We are one of two exporting producers of langbeinite. We mine langbeinite in Carlsbad, New Mexico from the only known reserves of langbeinite in the world. In order to better capitalize on the strong and growing demand for langbeinite, we have initiated two projects that we expect will allow us to increase our annual langbeinite production by approximately 90,000 tons over the next three to four years and lower our production costs per ton.

•

Increase our profitability. We will continue to seek to increase our profitability both by targeting sales to our most profitable markets and reducing costs. We plan to execute on additional opportunities to further reduce our fixed and variable operating expenses and pursue various projects designed to increase the reliability of our mining facilities and minimize production downtime.

Formation Transactions and Organizational Structure

General

Intrepid Potash is a Delaware corporation that was formed on November 19, 2007 and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intrepid Mining. In connection with this offering, we will enter into the following transactions, which we refer to in this prospectus as the “formation transactions”:

•

cash in an amount of $ (approximately % of the net proceeds from this offering);

•

shares of common stock of Intrepid Potash; and

•

the assumption by Intrepid Potash of $ million of Intrepid Mining’s liability under its existing senior credit facility and all other existing liabilities of Intrepid Mining.

The transactions provided for in the exchange agreement and this offering will be consummated simultaneously. The foregoing dollar and share figures assume in all cases that the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares of common stock is not exercised.

As a part of the formation transactions, we will declare a dividend with respect to our common stock currently issued and outstanding, which we refer to in this prospectus as the “formation distribution”. The formation distribution will be paid in shares of our common stock; provided, however, that for each share of our common stock purchased by the underwriters pursuant to their over-allotment option, the number of shares payable pursuant to the formation distribution will be reduced, one-for-one, and in lieu of such shares, we will pay cash in an amount equal to the net proceeds, before offering expenses but after underwriting discounts and commissions, we receive from the exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option. The formation distribution will be payable to Intrepid Mining, the holder of record of the common stock prior to this offering, upon the earlier of the expiration of the underwriters’ over-allotment option period or the exercise of the over-allotment option.

After the completion of this offering, Intrepid Mining will satisfy its liabilities, liquidate and distribute its remaining assets, including the cash and common stock received pursuant to the exchange agreement and the right to receive the formation distribution described above, to the current members of Intrepid Mining.

Organizational Structure After the Formation Transactions

The following diagram depicts our organizational structure after giving effect to the offering and the related formation transactions, assuming that the underwriters do not exercise any portion of their option to purchase additional shares of common stock to cover over-allotments (and, therefore, that shares will be distributed to the current members of Intrepid Mining pursuant to the formation distribution):

LOGO

THE OFFERING

Common stock offered by us

shares.

Common stock outstanding after this offering

shares (including shares that will be sold to the underwriters pursuant to the exercise of their over-allotment option or, to the extent the over-allotment option is not exercised, distributed to the current members of Intrepid Mining pursuant to the formation distribution).

Use of proceeds

We expect to receive net proceeds of approximately $ million from this offering, assuming an offering price of $ per share, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. We expect to apply the net proceeds from this offering as follows:

•

approximately $ million (approximately % of the net proceeds from this offering) will be paid to Intrepid Mining (together with shares of our common stock) in exchange for all of Intrepid Mining’s assets other than cash; and

•

the remainder of the net proceeds will be used by us for repayment of debt under our existing senior credit facility.

To the extent that the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option, all of the net proceeds we receive from the exercise of the over-allotment option will be used to pay the formation distribution.

A $1.00 change in the assumed initial public offering price would change net proceeds to us from this offering by approximately $ million and would increase (decrease) the amount of net proceeds payable to Intrepid Mining pursuant to the exchange agreement. Assuming that the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full, a $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price would increase (decrease) net proceeds to us from the exercise of the over-allotment option by approximately $ million and would increase (decrease) the cash payable pursuant to the formation distribution. Any amount of the formation distribution that is not paid in cash will be paid in shares of our common stock.

In addition, we will assume $ million of Intrepid Mining’s liability under its existing senior credit facility and all other existing liabilities of Intrepid Mining.

After the completion of this offering, Intrepid Mining will satisfy the $ million liability under its existing senior credit facility that was not assumed by Intrepid Potash pursuant to the terms of the exchange agreement and any remaining liabilities, liquidate and distribute its remaining assets, including the cash and common stock received pursuant to the exchange agreement and the right to receive the formation distribution, to the current members of Intrepid Mining.

Voting rights

One vote per share.

Exchange listing

We intend to apply to list our common stock on a national securities exchange.

Risk factors

See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 13 and other information included in this prospectus for a discussion of factors you should carefully consider before deciding whether to invest in our common stock.

The number of shares of common stock to be outstanding after this offering is based on shares of our common stock outstanding as of , 2007. Except as otherwise indicated or required by context, all information in this prospectus assumes that:

•

the underwriters will not exercise any portion of their option to purchase additional shares to cover over-allotments (and, therefore, that shares will be distributed to the current members of Intrepid Mining pursuant to the formation distribution); and

•

the initial offering price is $ per share, the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus.

Summary Historical and Pro Forma Combined Financial and Operating Data

The following tables show summary historical financial and operating data of Intrepid Mining and pro forma combined financial and operating data of Intrepid Mining and Intrepid Potash for the periods and as of the dates indicated. The historical financial statements included in this prospectus reflect the results of operations of Intrepid Mining. The summary historical financial data for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and the nine months ended September 30, 2006 are derived from Intrepid Mining’s unaudited financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. The summary historical financial data as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 and for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 are derived from Intrepid Mining’s audited financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. The summary pro forma combined financial data for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and for the year ended December 31, 2006 are derived from the unaudited pro forma combined financial statements of Intrepid Mining and Intrepid Potash included elsewhere in this prospectus. The pro forma adjustments have been prepared as if certain transactions to be effected upon completion of this offering had taken place on September 30, 2007, in the case of the pro forma combined balance sheet, or as of January 1, 2006, in the case of the pro forma combined statements of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and for the year ended December 31, 2006. The transactions reflected in the pro forma adjustments assume that Intrepid Potash will complete its initial public offering of common stock, acquire all of the assets of Intrepid Mining other than cash, and assume $ million of Intrepid Mining’s liability under its existing senior credit facility and all other existing liabilities of Intrepid Mining. The pro forma combined financial information should not be relied upon as being indicative of Intrepid Potash or Intrepid Mining’s results of operations or financial condition had the transactions been completed on January 1, 2006, with respect to the pro forma combined statements of operations, or as of September 30, 2007, with respect to the pro forma combined balance sheet.

The summary historical and pro forma combined financial and operating data should be read in conjunction with the information contained in “Selected Historical and Pro Forma Combined Financial and Operating Data”, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the consolidated financial statements and related notes of Intrepid Mining and Intrepid Potash included elsewhere in this prospectus.


	Pro Forma September 30, 2007	Nine Months Ended September 30,					Pro Forma December 31, 2006	Year Ended December 31,
	Pro Forma September 30, 2007	2007		2006			Pro Forma December 31, 2006	2006			2005			2004
		(unaudited)
	(in thousands, except per share data)
Statement of Operations Data:
Net sales:
U.S.	$	$	130,897	$	95,107		$	$	131,920		$	135,682		$	90,765
International			9,228		5,624				7,685			5,267			10,268

Total			140,125		100,731				139,605			140,949			101,033
Cost of goods sold			99,263		78,804				113,949			99,051			68,913

Gross margin			40,862		21,927				25,656			41,898			32,120
Selling and administrative			10,579		6,742				10,053			7,529			7,065
Other operating—net			434		(487	)			(4,386	)		329			327

Operating income			29,849		15,672				19,989			34,040			24,728
Interest expense			6,587		2,083				2,907			1,473			1,802
Other non-operating			128		193				(7,016	)		(47	)		(195	)

Income from continuing operations		$	23,134	$	13,396			$	24,098		$	32,614		$	23,121

Pro forma income tax⁽¹⁾

Pro forma income from continuing operations	$						$


Pro Forma Share and Per Share Data (unaudited)⁽²⁾:
Pro forma basic and diluted net income (loss) per share	$						$

Pro forma weighted average shares outstanding—basic and diluted

(footnotes on following page)


	Pro Forma September 30, 2007	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Pro Forma December 31, 2006	Year Ended December 31,
	Pro Forma September 30, 2007	2007			2006			Pro Forma December 31, 2006	2006			2005			2004
		(unaudited)
	(in thousands)
Other Financial Data:
EBITDA⁽³⁾	$	$	36,152		$	21,276		$	$	35,033		$	39,580		$	28,445
Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion			6,431			5,797				8,028			5,493			3,522
Capital expenditures			(21,317	)		(5,145	)			(13,125	)		(21,732	)		(8,936	)
Acquisition costs			—			—				—			—			(38,473	)

	Pro Forma September 30, 2007	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Pro Forma December 31, 2006	Year Ended December 31,
	Pro Forma September 30, 2007	2007			2006			Pro Forma December 31, 2006	2006			2005			2004
		(unaudited)
Selected Operating Data:
Sales volume (in thousand tons):
Potash			679			519				729			869			846
Langbeinite			132			69				95			6			—
Average net selling prices (per ton):
Potash	$	$	185.15		$	180.03		$	$	177.51		$	161.28		$	119.43
Langbeinite			108.45			104.63				105.50			107.82			—
Potash cost of goods sold (per ton):
Cost of production less inventory adjustments			123.87			135.12				139.86			111.04			81.38
Depreciation, depletion and amortization			6.57			7.79				7.81			4.81			2.88
Royalties			6.62			6.01				6.01			3.50			2.60
By-product revenues⁽⁴⁾			(7.27	)		(8.47	)			(8.95	)		(6.82	)		(5.40	)

Total			129.79			140.45				144.73			112.53			81.46

Average potash gross margin (per ton)	$	$	55.36		$	39.58		$	$	32.78		$	48.75		$	37.97


	Pro Forma September 30, 2007	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Pro Forma December 31, 2006	Year Ended December 31,
	Pro Forma September 30, 2007	2007			2006			Pro Forma December 31, 2006	2006			2005			2004
		(unaudited)
	(in thousands)
Selected Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	$	2,490		$	—		$	$	286		$	157		$	2,169
Total current assets			41,622			43,631				50,853			29,124			33,726
Total assets			137,868			124,648				129,314			106,506			90,310
Total current liabilities			24,135			16,533				24,112			19,061			24,578
Total debt			90,822			46,785				132,189			37,156			36,387
Stockholders’ equity (deficit)			18,926			50,761				(31,458	)		42,485			23,192

(1)

A pro forma provision for income taxes at statutory rates has been made in the pro forma financial statements on the assumption that Intrepid Mining was a taxable entity for the respective periods. As a limited liability company, Intrepid Mining’s taxable income was included in its members’ income tax returns whereas Intrepid Potash will be subject to income tax as a corporation.

(2)

Pro forma net income (loss) per share is based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding after giving effect to the offering, assuming that the offering had occurred as of the beginning of the earliest period presented.

(3)

We define EBITDA as net income before interest, income taxes, depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion. EBITDA is used as a supplemental financial measure by our management and by external users of our financial statements to assess:

•

the financial performance of our assets without regard to financing methods, capital structure or historical cost basis;

•

our operating performance and return on capital as compared to other companies in the fertilizer business, without regard to financing or capital structure; and

•

the viability of acquisitions and capital expenditure projects and the overall rates of return on alternative investment opportunities.

The economic substance behind management’s use of EBITDA is to measure the ability of our assets to generate cash sufficient to pay interest costs, support our indebtedness and pay dividends, if any, to our investors.

The GAAP measure most directly comparable to EBITDA is net income. Our non-GAAP financial measure of EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to GAAP net income. EBITDA is not a presentation made in accordance with GAAP and has important limitations as an analytical tool. You should not consider EBITDA in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Because EBITDA excludes some, but not all, items that affect net income and is defined differently by different companies in our industry, our definition of EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies.

Management compensates for the limitations of EBITDA as an analytical tool by reviewing the comparable GAAP measures, understanding the differences between the measures and incorporating this information into management’s decision-making processes.

EBITDA is calculated and reconciled to income from continuing operations in the table below:


	Nine Months Ended September 30,				Year Ended December 31,
	2007		2006		2006		2005		2004
	(unaudited)
	(in thousands)
Calculation of EBITDA:
Income from continuing operations	$	23,134	$	13,396	$	24,098	$	32,614	$	23,121
Interest—net		6,587		2,083		2,907		1,473		1,802
Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion		6,431		5,797		8,028		5,493		3,522

EBITDA	$	36,152	$	21,276	$	35,033	$	39,580	$	28,445

(4)

When by-product inventories are sold, a by-product credit to the cost of goods sold is recognized.

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the following risk factors together with all of the other information included in this prospectus in evaluating an investment in our common stock. If any of the following risks were actually to occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. In that case, the trading price of our common stock could decline and you could lose all or part of your investment.

Our potash sales are subject to price and demand volatility resulting from periodic imbalances of supply and demand, which may negatively affect our operating results.

Historically, the market for potash has been cyclical, and the prices and demand for potash have fluctuated. Periods of high demand, increasing profits and high capacity utilization tend to lead to new plant investment and increased production. This growth continues until the market is over-saturated, leading to decreased prices and capacity utilization until the cycle repeats. Furthermore, potash producers have, at various times, suspended production in response to delayed purchasing decisions by potash customers in anticipation of lower prices. For example, in 2006, protracted negotiations between China and international producers delayed purchases of potash by the Chinese, which led to a build-up of inventory in North America. In response, suppliers slowed production of potash, notably in Canada and Russia, until the conclusion of negotiations with the Chinese. As a result, the price of potash has been volatile. This volume and price volatility may reduce profit margins and negatively affect our operating results. We sell the majority of our potash into the spot market in the U.S. and have no long-term or material short-term contracts for the sale of potash. In addition, there is no active hedge market for potash as compared to the gold market, for example. As a result, we do not have and cannot obtain protection from this volume and price volatility.

Mining is a complex and hazardous process which frequently experiences production disruptions, and the nature of our operations may make us more vulnerable to such disruptions than our competitors.

The process of mining is complex and equipment- and labor-intensive, and involves risks and hazards including environmental hazards, industrial accidents, labor disputes, unusual or unexpected geological conditions or acts of nature. Production delays can occur due to equipment failures, unforeseen mining problems and other unexpected events. For example, in December 2007, an outage at one of our power provider’s transformers caused three days of lost production at our West Mine. In addition, we must transport mined product for long distances to remove it from the mines for processing, which creates a higher probability of accidents. Our facilities and equipment are older than the average North American potash mine and may require more maintenance or be more likely to fail than newer facilities or equipment. Our shafts at our West Mine were constructed in 1932 and require frequent maintenance due to water inflow, wooden structure and salt buildup and are located in an area of known subsidence. Additionally, langbeinite ore is harder and more abrasive than muriate of potash ore and has caused greater wear on our mining and milling equipment, which has increased and may continue to increase the expense and frequency of maintenance and repairs. Operational difficulties can also arise from our milling processes; for example, our East Mine mill experiences build-ups of glaserite, an undesirable by-product of langbeinite production, and we must remove this build-up. The amounts that we are required to spend on maintenance and repairs may be significant and higher than expected, and we may have to divert resources from our planned capital expenditures focused on growth, such as increases in nameplate and effective capacity, for use on capital expenditures to maintain existing effective capacity. Production delays or stoppages will adversely affect our sales and operating results, and higher than expected maintenance and repair expenses may adversely affect our operating results.

New product supply can create structural market imbalances, which could negatively affect our operating results and financial performance.

Potash is a commodity, and the market for potash is highly competitive and affected by global supply and demand. With recent favorable prices for potash products, producers have been, and will likely continue to be,

engaged in expansion and development projects to increase production. Many of these projects to increase potash production are speculative. However, if potash production is increased beyond potash demand, the price at which we sell our potash and our sales volume would likely fall, which would materially adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.

The grade of ore that we mine may vary from our projections due to the complex geology of potash reserves, which could adversely affect our potash production and our financial results.

Our potash production is affected by the ore grade, or potassium content of the ore. Our projections of ore grade may vary from time to time, and the amount of potash that we actually produce may vary substantially from our projections. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating ore grade, including many factors beyond our control. Potash ore bodies have complex geology. The occurrence of large, unknown salt deposits, known as salt horsts, in core ore areas located in Carlsbad, New Mexico or Moab, Utah would adversely affect ore grades. An unexpected reduction in the grade of our ore reserves would decrease our potash production because we would need to process more ore to produce the same amount of saleable-grade product. As a result, our expected future cash flows would be materially adversely affected.

Our reserve estimates depend on many assumptions that may be inaccurate, which could materially adversely affect the quantities and value of our reserves.

Our reserve estimates may vary substantially from the actual amounts of muriate of potash and langbeinite we may be able to economically recover from our reserves. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of reserves, including many factors beyond our control. Estimates of muriate of potash and langbeinite reserves necessarily depend upon a number of variables and assumptions, any one of which, if incorrect, may result in an estimate that varies considerably from actual results. These factors and assumptions relate to:

Because reserves are only estimates, they cannot be audited for the purpose of verifying exactness. Instead, reserve information is reviewed by a reserve engineer in sufficient detail to determine if, in the aggregate, the data provided by us are reasonable and sufficient to estimate reserves in conformity with practices and standards generally employed by and within the mining industry and that are consistent with the requirements of U.S. securities laws.

Our business depends upon skilled and experienced personnel, and employee turnover may have a material adverse effect on our development and operating results.

The success of our business depends upon our ability to attract and retain skilled managers and other personnel. We compete for experienced laborers with other industries, including a copper mine in Moab, Utah, a nuclear waste management facility in southeast New Mexico, and oil fields and other potash facilities in Carlsbad, New Mexico. A new uranium enrichment facility in Eunice, New Mexico has just begun construction. Employee turnover in Carlsbad has generally been high, and the continued expansion of nuclear facilities in Carlsbad threatens to increase competition for qualified workers. If we are not able to attract and retain the personnel necessary for the development of our business, we may have to raise wages to keep employees or hire less qualified workers, either of which would ultimately result in higher labor costs per ton of potash produced.

Prices of natural gas and other important raw materials and energy used in our businesses are volatile. Changes in the prices of raw materials or energy or disruptions to supply could adversely impact our business and our sales.

Natural gas, electricity, steel, water, chemicals and fuel (diesel and gasoline) are key raw materials used in our production of potash products. Natural gas is a significant energy source used in the solution mining process at the Moab Mine and at the East Mine processing plant. Our sales and profitability from time to time have been and may in the future be impacted by the price and availability of these raw materials and other energy costs. Currently, we have no derivative contracts in place for 2008 with respect to natural gas or other raw materials, although we will continue to evaluate the possibility of entering into such arrangements in the future. A significant increase in the price of natural gas, electricity and fuel that is not recovered through an increase in the price of our potash, or an extended interruption in the supply of natural gas, electricity, water or fuel to our production facilities, could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or operating results. High natural gas costs also may increase farm input costs, which may cause our potash sales to decline.

The price of natural gas in North America is highly volatile. Since January 2004, natural gas prices according to the El Paso Natural Gas. Co. Permian Basin Index, on which the prices we pay for natural gas are primarily based, have ranged from a high of $10.75 per MMBtu in November 2005 to a low of $3.57 per MMBtu in October 2006. Steel is a commodity that is also subject to volatile pricing. Since January 2004, hot rolled steel prices have ranged from a high of $780 per ton in August 2004 to a low of $360 per ton in January 2004. Our forecasts of capital expenditures are based on assumptions with respect to prices of skilled labor and commodities, including steel and concrete. We cannot predict future commodity prices, and if such prices are higher than expected, we may lose sales to competitors with lower production costs, our profitability could be materially adversely affected and our capital expenditures could increase.

Aggressive pricing strategies by our competitors could materially adversely affect our sales and profitability.

Many of our competitors have significantly larger operations than we do and mine potash from reserves that are thicker, higher-grade and less geologically complex than our reserves. The large size of some of our competitors may give them greater leverage in pricing negotiations with customers and may enable them to negotiate better rates for transportation of products sold. The nature of our competitors’ reserves and the economies of scale of their operations may allow them to mine their potash at a lower cost. If one or more of these competitors were to decide for any reason to aggressively lower prices in an attempt to increase their sales, our size and cost structure might not allow us to match that pricing, such that we would likely lose sales and our operating results and profitability would be materially adversely affected.

Any decline in U.S. agricultural production or limitations on the use of our products for agricultural purposes could materially adversely affect the market for our products.

Conditions in the U.S. agricultural industry can significantly impact our operating results. The U.S. agricultural industry can be affected by a number of factors, including weather patterns and field conditions, current and projected grain inventories and prices, the domestic and international demand for U.S. agricultural products and U.S. and foreign policies regarding trade in agricultural products.

State and federal governmental policies, including farm and ethanol subsidies and commodity support programs, may also directly or indirectly influence the number of acres planted, the mix of crops planted and the use of fertilizers for particular agricultural applications. In addition, several states are currently considering limitations on the use and application of fertilizers due to concerns about the impact of these products on the environment.

A decline in oil and gas drilling or a reduction in the use of potash in drilling fluids in the Permian Basin or Rocky Mountain regions would increase our operating costs and decrease our average net sales per ton of potash.

A significant portion of our sales consists of sales of standard potash for use in oil and gas drilling fluids in the Permian Basin and Rocky Mountain regions. If oil and gas drilling were to decline significantly, we would be required to compact our standard product in order to sell it into the agricultural market, which would increase our production costs. Furthermore, our net sales per ton for these additional agricultural tons would likely be lower than the industrial sales they would replace, as agricultural sales may require transportation to more distant delivery points. Alternative products that have some of the clay-inhibiting properties of potash in oil and gas drilling fluids are commercially available. As the price of potash increases, these alternative products may replace some of our sales of standard potash, which would reduce our industrial sales and result in the same increases in production costs and decreases in net sales per ton.

Some of our competitors have greater capital and human resources than we do, which may place us at a competitive disadvantage and adversely affect our sales and profitability.

We compete with a number of producers in North America and throughout the world. Some of these competitors may have greater total resources than we do. Competition in our product lines is based on a number of considerations, including product performance, transportation costs, brand reputation, price and quality of client service and support. To remain competitive, we need to invest continuously in production infrastructure, marketing and customer relationships. We may have to adjust the prices of some of our products to stay competitive. We may also need to borrow funds and become more highly leveraged. We may not have sufficient resources to continue to make such investments or maintain our competitive position relative to some of our competitors who have greater capital and human resources. To the extent other potash producers enjoy competitive advantages, the price of our products, our sales volumes and our profits could be materially adversely affected.

A shortage of railcars and trucks for carrying our products as well as increased transit time could result in customer dissatisfaction, loss of production or sales and higher transportation or equipment costs.

We rely heavily upon truck and rail transportation to deliver our products to our customers. In addition, the cost of transportation is an important component of the price of our products. Identifying and securing affordable and dependable transportation is important in supplying our customers and, to some extent, in the delivery to us of chemicals and other supplies and equipment for our mining operations. A shortage of railcars for carrying product as well as increased transit time in North America due to congestion in the rail system could prevent us from making timely delivery to our customers or lead to higher transportation costs, either of which could result in customer dissatisfaction or loss of sales. In addition, PCS, which markets our products outside North America, may have difficulty obtaining access to ships for sales of our products overseas. Higher costs for transportation services or an interruption or slowdown in these transport services due to high demand, labor disputes, adverse weather or other environmental events, or changes to rail systems, would negatively affect our ability to deliver products to our customers, which would harm our performance and operating results.

The seasonal demand for our products and the variations in our cash flows from quarter to quarter may have an adverse effect on our operating results and make the price of our common stock more volatile.

The fertilizer business is seasonal, with operating results that vary from quarter to quarter as a result of crop growing and harvesting seasons and weather conditions, as well as other factors. Over the last three years, we have averaged 28% of our annual potash sales volume during the three-month period from February through April, when the demand for fertilizer typically peaks. We and our customers generally build inventories during low-demand periods of the year in order to ensure timely product availability during peak sales seasons. The seasonality of crop nutrient demand results in our sales volumes and net sales revenue typically being the highest during the North American spring season and our working capital requirements typically being the highest just

before the start of the spring season. Our quarterly financial results can vary significantly from one year to the next due to weather-related shifts in planting schedules and purchasing patterns. If seasonal demand exceeds our projections, our customers may acquire products from our competitors, and our profitability could be materially reduced as a result. If seasonal demand is less than we expect, we will be left with excess inventory and higher working capital and liquidity requirements.

We rely on our innovative senior management personnel for the development and execution of our business strategy, and the loss of any member of our senior management team may have a material adverse effect on our growth and operating results.

The innovative ideas developed by our senior management team are largely responsible for the success of our business. Each of our executives has over 25 years of relevant industry experience, and have developed and implemented first-of-their-kind processes that we currently use in our business. The loss of the services of any of our key executives could prevent us from achieving our business strategies or limit our business growth and operating results. We do not currently maintain “key person” life insurance on any of our key executives.

Weakening of the Canadian dollar and Russian ruble against the U.S. dollar could lead to lower domestic potash prices, which would adversely affect our operating results, and fluctuations in these currencies may cause our operating results and our stock price to fluctuate.

The U.S. imports the majority of its potash from Canada and Russia. As the Canadian dollar, or the looney, and the Russian ruble strengthen in comparison to the U.S. dollar, foreign suppliers realize a smaller margin in their local currencies unless they increase their nominal U.S. dollar prices. In 2006, the looney and ruble strengthened to 87 cents and 3.65 cents, respectively, compared to the U.S. dollar. As of December 14, 2007, the looney and ruble were trading at 98.58 cents and 4.09 cents, respectively, against the U.S. dollar. The continued strengthening of the looney and ruble thus tend to support higher U.S. potash prices, as Canadian and Russian potash producers attempt to maintain their margins. However, if the looney and ruble were to weaken in comparison to the U.S. dollar, foreign competitors may choose to lower prices significantly to increase sales volumes. A decrease in the net realized sales price of our potash would adversely affect our operating results, and the potential for volatility in potash prices may cause our operating results to vary significantly from quarter to quarter, which may create volatility in our stock price.

Existing and further oil and gas development in the “Potash Area” in New Mexico could result in methane gas leaking into our mines that could result in the loss of life and significant property damage, and require indefinite suspension of operations unless extensive modifications were made to the mines.

Our New Mexico operations are primarily on leased federal land administered by the Bureau of Land Management, or BLM, in the 497,000-acre “Potash Area” established by a 1986 order of the U.S. Secretary of the Interior. Under our leases, the BLM retains the right to permit other uses of the land on which our leases are located. The Potash Area also contains significant oil and gas deposits that are below our potash reserves, and approximately 3,000 oil and gas wells have been drilled in the Potash Area. Several oil and gas companies are actively seeking BLM and state permits to drill additional wells in the Potash Area.

Oil and gas drilling near our mines poses risks to our operations. The subsidence of the surface and underlying strata that occurs following completion of mining operations will damage the casing of any oil or gas well located within the subsidence area. That damage may result in methane gas escaping from the well and migrating through surrounding strata into our mines. Methane gas could also leak from a well located outside the subsidence area and migrate into a mine. We test our mines for methane gas daily; however, unlike coal mines which are constructed and equipped to handle the presence of methane gas, our mines are not constructed or equipped to deal with methane gas. Any intrusion of methane gas into our mines could cause an explosion resulting in loss of life and significant property damage and require suspension of all mining operations until the completion of extensive modifications and reequipping of the mine. The costs of modifying our mines and

equipment could make it uneconomic to reopen our mines because our liability, casualty and business interruption insurance would not be adequate to cover such catastrophic events.

Existing and further oil and gas development in the Potash Area in New Mexico could prevent us from mining potash reserves or deposits within the necessary safety pillar around oil and gas wells.

The drilling of oil and gas wells in the Potash Area is regulated by the 1986 order of the U.S. Secretary of the Interior as to federal lands (which constitute the vast majority of the Potash Area). Similar State of New Mexico regulations govern state and fee lands in the Potash Area. The Secretary’s order and related regulations, with certain exceptions, restrict oil and gas drilling that would result in the undue waste of potash or would constitute a safety hazard to potash miners. Drilling that does not immediately affect our current operations may limit our ability to mine valuable potash reserves or deposits in the future because safety considerations require that mining operations not be conducted close to a well, even if the well is inactive. As a result, we will be unable to mine potash located within the appropriate “safety pillar” around an oil or gas well. We review applications for permits to drill oil and gas wells as they are filed with the BLM and generally protest applications for drilling permits that we believe may impair our ability to mine our potash reserves or deposits. We may not prevail in any such protest or be able to prevent wells from being drilled in the vicinity of our potash reserves or deposits. Our potash reserves or deposits may be significantly impaired if, notwithstanding our protests and appeals, a sufficient number of wells are drilled through or near our potash reserves or deposits. We expect oil and gas companies to continue to seek drilling permits and to contest our efforts to restrict drilling within the Potash Area.

We have recently lobbied extensively to cause a reassessment by the BLM and Department of the Interior of their policies concerning granting of oil and gas drilling permits in the Potash Area in order to protect our existing operations and future potash reserves or deposits from the adverse effects of oil and gas drilling. In July 2007, the Department of the Interior said that it will conduct a new study on the safety of developing oil and gas wells in the Potash Area and that another study had been undertaken to update maps of the potash resource within the Potash Area. The outcome of these studies will affect the future issuance of drilling permits that could adversely affect our mining operations and the value of our potash reserves or deposits.

Our operations depend on our having received and maintained the required permits and approvals from and lease negotiations with governmental authorities.

We hold numerous governmental, environmental, mining and other permits and approvals authorizing operations at each of our facilities. A decision by a governmental agency to deny or delay issuing a new or renewed permit or approval, or to revoke or substantially modify an existing permit or approval, could prevent or limit our ability to continue operations at the affected facility and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results. Expansion of our existing operations also would require securing the necessary environmental and other permits and approvals, which we may not receive in a timely manner if at all. In addition, the federal government may require an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement as a condition of approving a project or permit, which could result in additional time delays and costs. Furthermore, our mining operations take place on land that is leased from federal and state governmental authorities. Expansion of our existing operations may require securing additional federal and state leases, which we may not obtain in a timely manner, if at all. In addition, our existing leases generally require us to commence mining operations within a specified time frame and to continue mining in order to retain the lease. The loss of a lease could adversely affect our ability to mine the associated reserves. Also, our existing leases require us to make royalty payments based on the revenue generated by the potash we produce from the leased land. The royalty rates are subject to change, which may lead to significant increases, at the time we renew our leases. As of September 30, 2007, approximately 30% of our state and federal lease acres at our New Mexico operations and approximately 18% of our state and federal lease acres at our Utah operations will be up for renewal within the next five years. Increases in royalty rates would reduce our profit margins and, if such increases were significant, would adversely affect our operating results.

Our preliminary plans for reopening the HB Mine and developing additional strategic growth opportunities may not be implemented or may require more time and greater capital spending than we expect.

We currently plan to reopen the HB Mine as a solution mine. We have commissioned a feasibility study for the purpose of publicly reporting the reserves related to this project, which we expect to be completed before the end of 2007. The feasibility study may show that reopening the mine would be impractical or unprofitable, or we may otherwise choose not to pursue reopening the mine for other reasons. If we do proceed with this project, reopening the mine will be subject to significant expenses and risks and may never actually occur. We will require site approval and various permits from the State of New Mexico, which we may be unable to obtain in a timely manner or on reasonable terms, or at all. In addition, oil and gas lessors in the region may oppose our permitting process, which may further delay or prevent the reopening of the mine. Even if we obtain all required approvals, it will be several years before the mine produces potash, and construction of the solar ponds and refurbishing of the mine facilities may take longer or cost significantly more than we expect. We may be unable to produce potash economically from the HB Mine if reopened, or our profitability from the project may be lower than we expect.

We are also considering various other potential opportunities for revenue and strategic growth, including potentially reopening the idled North Mine. These potential plans are at an early stage, and we may not actually proceed with any of them. If we do choose to proceed with any such opportunity, the project may not succeed, despite our having made substantial investments; it may cost significantly more than we expect; or we may encounter additional risks which we cannot anticipate at this time.

The market for langbeinite is still developing and could be affected by new market entrants or the introduction of langbeinite alternatives.

Langbeinite, a low-chloride source of potassium, is produced by Intrepid Potash and Mosaic from the only known langbeinite reserves located in the Carlsbad, New Mexico region. The demand for langbeinite has been limited due mostly to its limited supply and availability, and it is difficult to determine how the supply, demand and pricing for langbeinite will develop. Furthermore, additional competition in the market for langbeinite and comparable products exists and may increase in the future. A German company is currently producing a low-chloride fertilizer similar to langbeinite, and Chinese producers are working on a project to synthesize langbeinite from brines, with a goal of producing significant amounts of langbeinite by 2010. We plan to sell a significant amount of langbeinite in China, and these sales may be reduced to the extent China is able to produce its own product internally. Other companies may currently or in the future seek to create and market chemically similar alternatives to langbeinite. The market for langbeinite and our langbeinite sales may be affected by the success of these and other competitive sources for langbeinite, which could materially adversely affect the viability of our langbeinite business and our operating results and financial condition.

Inflows of water into our potash mines from heavy rainfall or groundwater could result in increased costs and production down time and may require us to abandon a mine, either of which could adversely affect our operating results.

Major weather events such as heavy rainfall can result in water inflows into our mines. In October 2006, water inflows from rainfall caused unused utilities in a mine shaft at our West Mine to break loose and block the mine shaft. As a result, we were forced to shut down the West Mine for 54 days to remove the utilities and improve water controls in the shaft. The shutdown significantly lowered our 2006 potash production from the West Mine. Additionally, the presence of water-bearing strata in many underground mines carries the risk of water inflows into the mines. If we experience additional water inflows at our mines in the future, our employees could be injured and our equipment and mine shafts could be seriously damaged. We might be forced to shut down the affected mine temporarily, potentially resulting in significant production delays, and spend substantial funds to repair or replace damaged equipment. Inflows may also destabilize the mine shafts over time, resulting in safety hazards for employees and potentially leading to the permanent abandonment of a mine. We do not carry insurance to cover the risks of water inflows.

Heavy fall precipitation or low evaporation rates at our Moab and Wendover facilities could delay our potash production at those facilities, which could adversely affect our sales and operating results.

Our facilities in Moab and Wendover, Utah use solar evaporation ponds to form potash crystals from brines. This process is limited by rainfall and evaporation rates. Heavy rainfall in September and October, just after the evaporation season ends, would temporarily reduce the amount of potash we can produce by causing the potash crystals to dissolve. Lower than average temperatures and higher than average seasonal rainfall reduce evaporation rates, which also would temporarily limit the amount of potash we are able to produce and push that production into later quarters or years. If these weather conditions occur at either or both of our Moab and Wendover facilities, we would have less potash available for sale and our sales and operating results could be materially adversely affected. In addition, we are investigating the installation of solar evaporation ponds in connection with the potential reopening of the HB Mine. As the number of our solar ponds increases, our production risks related to rainfall and evaporation rates will increase.

Environmental laws and regulations may subject us to significant liability and require us to incur additional costs in the future.

We are subject to many environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, including laws and regulations relating to mine safety, mine land reclamation, remediation of hazardous substance releases, and the regulation of discharges into the soil, air and water. Operations by us and our predecessors have involved the historical use and handling of regulated substances, refined petroleum products, potash, salt, related potash and salt by-products, and process tailings. These operations resulted, or may have resulted, in soil, surface water and groundwater contamination. At some locations, there are areas where salt-processing waste, building materials (including asbestos-containing transite) and ordinary trash may have been disposed or buried, and have since been closed and covered with soil and other materials. Under environmental remediation laws such as the U.S. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, or CERCLA, liability is imposed, without regard to fault or to the legality of a party’s conduct, on certain categories of persons (known as “potentially responsible parties”) who are considered to have contributed to the release of “hazardous substances” into the environment. We may in the future incur material liabilities under CERCLA and other environmental remediation laws, with regard to our current or former facilities, adjacent or nearby third party facilities or off-site disposal locations. Under CERCLA, or its various state analogues, one party may, under some circumstances, be required to bear more than its proportional share of cleanup costs at a site where it has liability if payments cannot be obtained from other responsible parties. Liability under these laws involves inherent uncertainties.

Previously, governmental agencies have required us to undertake certain remedial activities to address identified site conditions. For example, we have worked with Utah officials to address asbestos-related issues at our Moab Mine. Many of our facilities also contain permitted asbestos landfills, some of which have been closed. Additionally, we are currently working with federal officials to resolve issues concerning the disposal of asbestos-containing transite at an unpermitted location at our West Mine, which may require additional removal of transite material, a land swap or another remedy.

Additionally, certain environmental laws, such as the U.S. Clean Water Act and the U.S. Clean Air Act, regulate and permit discharges of pollutants and contaminants into the environment. Violations of these environmental, health and safety laws are subject to civil, and in some cases criminal, sanctions. We may in the future incur material liabilities under the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, or similar federal and state laws due to:

For example, our water disposal processes rely on dikes and reclamation ponds which could breach or leak, resulting in a possible release into the environment. Also, changes to existing environmental laws or permits, or the issuance of more stringent environmental laws or permits, could require additional equipment, facilities, or employees to address water disposal issues.

Mining and processing of potash also generates residual materials that must be managed both during the operation of the facility and upon facility closure. For example, potash tailings, consisting primarily of salt, iron and clay, are stored in surface disposal sites and require management. At least one of our New Mexico mining facilities, the HB Mine, may have issues regarding lead in the tailings pile. During the life of the tailings management areas, we have incurred and will continue to incur significant costs to manage potash residual materials in accordance with environmental laws and regulations and permit requirements.

As a potash producer, we currently are exempt from certain State of New Mexico mining laws related to reclamation obligations. If this exemption were to be eliminated or restricted in the future, we might be required to incur significant expenses related to reclamation at our Carlsbad, New Mexico facilities.

Government and public emphasis on environmental issues can be expected to result in future investments for environmental controls at ongoing operations, which will be charged against income from future operations. Present and future environmental laws and regulations applicable to our operations may require substantial capital expenditures and may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results. For more information, see “Business—Environmental, Health and Safety Matters” beginning on page 99.

Our indebtedness could adversely affect our financial condition and impair our ability to operate our business.

As of the completion of this offering, we expect to have $ million of outstanding indebtedness, including approximately $ million under our credit facility. Our credit facility will allow us to borrow up to an additional $ million. Our indebtedness could have important consequences, including the following:

In addition, our credit facility will contain financial and other restrictive covenants that may limit our ability to engage in activities that may be in our long-term best interests. Our failure to comply with those covenants could result in an event of default which, if not cured or waived, could result in the acceleration of all of our debt. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” beginning on page 41.

Mining is a capital-intensive business, and the inability to fund necessary or desirable capital expenditures could have an adverse effect on our growth and profitability.

Mining is a capital-intensive business. We anticipate making significant capital expenditures over the next several years in connection with the development of new projects such as reopening the HB Mine, the various

expansions at our existing operating facilities and sustaining existing operations. Costs associated with capital expenditures have escalated on an industry-wide basis over the last several years, largely as a result of major factors beyond our control such as increases in the price of natural gas, steel and other commodities. As costs associated with capital expenditures continue to increase, we could have difficulty funding or be unable to fund needed or planned capital expenditures, which would limit the expansion of our production or the inability to sustain our existing operations at optimal levels. Increased costs for capital expenditures could also have an adverse effect on the profitability of our existing operations and returns from our new projects.

Market upheavals due to global pandemics, military actions, terrorist attacks and any global and domestic economic repercussions from those events could reduce our sales and revenues.

Global pandemics, actual or threatened armed conflicts, future terrorist attacks or military or trade disruptions affecting the areas where we or our competitors do business may disrupt the global market for potash. As a result, our competitors may increase their sales efforts in our geographic markets and pricing of potash may suffer. If this occurs, we may lose sales to our competitors or be forced to lower our prices, which would reduce our revenues. In addition, due to concerns related to terrorism or the potential use of certain fertilizers as explosives, local, state and federal governments could implement new regulations impacting the production, transportation, sale or use of potash. Any such regulations could result in higher operating costs or limitations on the sale of our potash and could result in significant unanticipated costs, lower revenues and reduced profit margins.

We are a holding company with no operations of our own and depend on our subsidiaries for cash.

Because our operations are conducted through our subsidiaries, our ability to make payments on our indebtedness and pay dividends, if any, to our stockholders is dependent on the earnings and the distribution of funds from our subsidiaries. None of our subsidiaries is obligated to make funds available to us for payment on our indebtedness or to pay any dividends to holders of our common stock. Future financing arrangements of our subsidiaries, such as project financing, may significantly restrict or prohibit our subsidiaries from paying dividends or otherwise transferring assets to us.

If we are unsuccessful in negotiating new collective bargaining agreements, we may experience significant increases in the cost of labor or a disruption in our Wendover operations.

As of November 30, 2007, we had 710 employees. Approximately 5% of our workforce, consisting solely of employees at our Wendover Facility, is represented by labor unions. Our collective bargaining agreement with our employees in Wendover will expire on March 31, 2008. Although we believe that our relations with our employees are good, as a result of general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, political and other factors beyond our control, we may not be successful in negotiating new collective bargaining agreements. Such negotiations may result in significant increases in the cost of labor and a breakdown in such negotiations could disrupt our Wendover operations. If employees at any of our other facilities were to unionize in the future, these risks would increase.

There is no existing market for our common stock and we do not know if one will develop. Even if a market does develop, the stock prices in the market may not exceed the offering price.

Prior to this initial public offering, there has not been a public market for our common stock. Furthermore, because current members of Intrepid Mining will beneficially own % of our common stock immediately following this offering, only a limited number of our shares are likely to be actively traded and an active market in our shares may not develop. We cannot predict the extent to which investor interest in our company will lead to the development of an active trading market on a national securities exchange or otherwise, or how liquid that market may become. If an active trading market does not develop, you may have difficulty selling any shares that you buy.

The initial public offering price for the common stock was determined by negotiations among us and the representatives of the underwriters and may not be indicative of prices that will prevail in the open market following this offering. Consequently, you may not be able to sell shares of our common stock at prices equal to or greater than the price you pay in this offering.

Our common stock price may be volatile and you may lose all or part of your investment.

Securities markets worldwide experience significant price and volume fluctuations in response to general economic and market conditions and their effect on various industries. This market volatility could cause the price of our common stock to decline significantly and without regard to our operating performance, and you may not be able to resell your shares at or above the offering price. Those fluctuations could be based on various factors in addition to those otherwise described in this prospectus, including:

In addition, in recent years the stock market has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations. These fluctuations may be unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. These broad market fluctuations may cause declines in the market price of our common stock. The price of our common stock could fluctuate based upon factors that have little or nothing to do with our company or its performance, and those fluctuations could materially reduce our common stock price.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about us, our business or our market, or if they adversely change their recommendations regarding our stock, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our common stock is influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts publish about us, our business and our market. If one or more of the analysts who cover us change their recommendation regarding our stock adversely, our stock price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of our company or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose viability in the financial markets, which in turn could cause our stock price or trading volume to decline.

Future sales of our common stock, or the perception that such sales may occur, could depress our common stock price.

Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock, or the perception that such sales may occur, following this offering could depress the market price of our common stock. This would include sales by current members of Intrepid Mining. Under our restated certificate of incorporation, we will be authorized to issue up to shares of common stock, of which shares will be outstanding after completion of this offering and shares will be issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options. Shares of our common stock held

by our affiliates will continue to be subject to the volume and other restrictions of Rule 144 under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, or the Securities Act. We and all of our executive officers and directors, as well as the current members of Intrepid Mining, will enter into lock-up agreements described under the caption “Underwriting”. Of the shares outstanding after completion of this offering, shares will be freely tradable after the expiration date of the lock-up agreements, excluding any shares acquired by persons who may be deemed to be our affiliates. The shares that have been reserved pursuant to our directed share program will be subject to the contractual lock-up agreements with the underwriters discussed under “Underwriting”. Each of the current members of Intrepid Mining and their affiliates will have the ability to cause us to register, after the expiration date of such member’s lock-up agreement, some or all of the shares held by such member and its affiliates, as described under “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Registration Rights Agreement”. Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated may, in its sole discretion and at any time without notice, release all or any portion of the shares subject to the lock-up. We cannot predict the size of future issuances of our common stock or the effect, if any, that future sales and issuances of shares of our common stock would have on the market price of our common stock.

In addition, immediately following this offering, we intend to file a registration statement registering under the Securities Act the shares of common stock reserved for issuance under our 2007 Stock Incentive Plan. See the information under the heading “Shares Eligible for Future Sale” for a more detailed description of the shares that will be available for future sales upon completion of this offering.

We may issue additional securities, including securities that are senior in right of dividends, liquidation and voting to the common stock, without your approval, which would dilute your existing ownership interests.

Our restated certificate of incorporation will allow us to issue up to additional shares of common stock and up to shares of preferred stock at any time without the approval of our stockholders. Our board of directors may approve the issuance of preferred stock with terms that are senior to our common stock in right of dividends, liquidation or voting. The issuance by us of additional common shares or other equity securities of equal or senior rank will have the following effects:

Our original stockholders will enter into a voting agreement and, in the aggregate, will have sufficient voting power to control decisions that require the approval of our stockholders.

Immediately following the completion of this offering, our original stockholders, in the aggregate, will own approximately % of our common stock, or approximately % if the underwriters’ over-allotment option is exercised in full. The original stockholders will enter into a voting agreement, wherein they will each agree to nominate one candidate for election to the board and to vote their shares in favor of the others’ candidates. As a result of the voting agreement and the voting power of the shares they hold, our original stockholders will be able to control the election of three of the members of our board without the vote of any other stockholder. Furthermore, our original stockholders, in the aggregate, will continue to have the ability to approve any transaction that requires the approval of stockholders, regardless of whether our other stockholders believe that any such transaction is in their own best interests.

Non-U.S. holders may be subject to U.S. taxation under the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act.

We believe that we currently are a “United States real property holding corporation” for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a result, under U.S. federal income tax laws enacted as part of the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act, non-U.S. holders of our common stock may be subject to U.S. federal withholding tax or U.S.

federal income tax, or both, and may be required to file U.S. tax returns with respect to gain on the disposition of, and certain distributions with respect to, our common stock. Non-U.S. holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences that may arise from our expected characterization as a “United States real property holding corporation”. See the discussion under the headings “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations—Non-U.S. Holders—Distributions” and “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations—Non-U.S. Holders—Dispositions”.

We will incur increased costs as a result of being a publicly-traded company.

We have no history operating as a publicly-traded company. As a publicly-traded company, we will incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we would not incur as a private company. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as related rules implemented by the SEC and national securities exchanges, have required changes in corporate governance practices of publicly-traded companies. We expect these new rules and regulations to increase our legal and financial compliance costs and to make some activities more time-consuming and costly. For example, as a result of becoming a publicly-traded company, we will be required to have at least three independent directors, create additional board committees and adopt policies regarding internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures, including the preparation of reports on internal control over financial reporting. In addition, we will incur additional costs associated with our publicly-traded company reporting requirements. We also expect these new rules and regulations to make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. As a result, it may be more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors or as executive officers. We estimate that we will incur $2.0 million of incremental costs per year associated with being a publicly-traded company; however, it is possible that our actual incremental costs of being a publicly-traded company will be higher than we currently estimate.

We will not be fully subject to the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 until the end of 2009. If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud and, as a result, our business could be harmed and current and potential stockholders could lose confidence in us, which could cause our stock price to fall.

We will be required to document our system and process evaluation and testing (and any necessary remediation) to comply with the management certification and auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which we expect will first apply to us for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2009. As a result, we expect to incur substantial additional expenses and diversion of management’s time. We cannot be certain as to the timing of completion of our evaluation, testing and remediation actions or their effect on our operations. If we are not able to implement the requirements of Section 404 in a timely manner or with adequate compliance, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud and might be subject to sanctions or investigation by regulatory authorities, such as the SEC or the national securities exchange on which our common stock is listed. Any such action could harm our business or investors’ confidence in us, and could cause our stock price to fall.

You will experience immediate and substantial dilution in net tangible book value per share of common stock.

The initial public offering price of the common stock will be substantially higher than the pro forma combined net tangible book value per share of our outstanding common stock. If you purchase shares of our common stock, you will incur immediate and substantial dilution in the amount of $ per share. See “Dilution”.

Other than the formation distribution, we have never declared or paid any dividends on our common stock. For the foreseeable future, we intend to retain any earnings to finance the development and expansion of our business, and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock. See “Dividend Policy” and “The Formation Transactions”.

Provisions in our charter documents and Delaware law may delay or prevent our acquisition by a third party.

We are a Delaware corporation and the anti-takeover provisions of Delaware law impose various barriers to the ability of a third party to acquire control of us, even if a change of control would be beneficial to our existing stockholders. In addition, our restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws will contain several provisions that may make it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of us without the approval of our board of directors. These provisions may make it more difficult or expensive for a third party to acquire a majority of our outstanding common stock. Among other things, these provisions:

These provisions also may delay, prevent or deter a merger, acquisition, tender offer, proxy contest or other transaction that might otherwise result in our stockholders’ receiving a premium over the market price for their common stock. See “Description of Capital Stock—Anti-Takeover Effects of Certain Provisions of Delaware Law, the Certificate of Incorporation and the Bylaws”.

Some of the statements under “Summary”, “Risk Factors”, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, “Business” and elsewhere in this prospectus constitute forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “could”, “estimate”, “expect”, “intend”, “may”, “plan”, “potential”, “should”, “will” and “would” or similar words. You should read statements that contain these words carefully because they discuss our future expectations, contain projections of our future operating results or of our financial position or state other forward-looking information. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date of this prospectus. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to the following:

This list of factors that may affect future performance and the accuracy of forward-looking statements is illustrative but not exhaustive. Accordingly, all forward-looking statements should be evaluated with an understanding of their inherent uncertainty. Before you invest in our common stock, you should be aware that the occurrence of the events described in “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this prospectus could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial position.

We estimate that we will receive net proceeds from this offering of approximately $ million, after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and other expenses of the offering payable by us. For purposes of estimating our net proceeds, we have assumed that the initial public offering price of the shares of common stock will be $ , which is the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, and no exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares of common stock to cover over-allotments. A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price would increase (decrease) net proceeds to us from this offering by approximately $ million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us, and would increase (decrease) the amount of net proceeds payable to Intrepid Mining pursuant to the exchange agreement. Assuming that the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full, a $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price would increase (decrease) net proceeds to us from the exercise of the over-allotment option by approximately $ million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us, and would increase (decrease) the cash payable pursuant to the formation distribution.

The net proceeds we receive from the exercise of the over-allotment option will be used to pay the formation distribution. Any amount of the formation distribution that is not paid in cash will be paid in shares of our common stock.

In addition, we will assume $ million of Intrepid Mining’s liability under its existing senior credit facility and all other existing liabilities of Intrepid Mining. As of September 30, 2007, the total debt outstanding under the existing senior credit facility was $90.8 million, which bore interest at a weighted average interest rate of 6.74%. We borrowed an additional $15.0 million under the existing senior credit facility in October 2007. The $125.0 million revolving portion of the existing senior credit facility matures on March 9, 2012, and the $50.0 million term loan portion matures on March 9, 2014, with required payments of $1.25 million due quarterly until maturity. The existing senior credit facility was most recently refinanced on March 9, 2007 to permit the redemption by Intrepid Mining of the membership interests of Long Canyon, LLC and to provide available credit for our capital spending program.

After the completion of this offering, Intrepid Mining will satisfy the $ million liability under its existing senior credit facility that is not assumed by Intrepid Potash pursuant to the terms of the exchange agreement and any remaining liabilities, liquidate and distribute its remaining assets, including the cash and common stock received pursuant to the exchange agreement and the right to receive the formation distribution, to the current members of Intrepid Mining.

As described under “The Formation Transactions”, we will declare a dividend to Intrepid Mining before the closing of this offering. This dividend, which we refer to in this prospectus as the “formation distribution”, will be paid in shares of our common stock; provided, however, that for each share of our common stock purchased by the underwriters pursuant to their over-allotment option, the number of shares payable pursuant to the formation distribution will be reduced, one-for-one, and in lieu of such shares, we will pay cash in an amount equal to the net proceeds, before offering expenses but after underwriting discounts and commissions, we receive from the exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option. The formation distribution will be payable to Intrepid Mining, the holder of record of the common stock prior to this offering, upon the earlier of the expiration of the underwriters’ over-allotment option period or the exercise of the over-allotment option.

With the exception of the dividend described in the previous paragraph, we have never declared or paid any dividends on our common stock. We anticipate that we will retain any future earnings for the operation and expansion of our business. Accordingly, we do not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.

Any future determination relating to our dividend policy will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on then existing conditions, including our financial condition, results of operations, contractual restrictions, capital requirements, business prospects and other factors our board of directors may deem relevant.

You should read this table together with the sections of this prospectus entitled “Use of Proceeds” beginning on page 28 and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” beginning on page 41, as well as our financial statements and related notes and the other financial information appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. The data assume that there has been no exercise, in whole or in part, of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares of our common stock in this offering and that the dividend payable to Intrepid Mining is paid in shares of our common stock.

A $1.00 increase or decrease in the assumed initial public offering price per share would increase or decrease each of cash, additional paid-in capital, total stockholders’ equity and total capitalization by $ million (or $ million assuming full exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares of common stock), after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.

The outstanding share information as of September 30, 2007 shown in the table above excludes shares of common stock reserved for issuance under our 2007 Stock Incentive Plan. As of September 30, 2007, no options to purchase shares of common stock were outstanding.

If you purchase our common stock in the offering, you will suffer an immediate and substantial dilution in net tangible book value per share. Dilution is the amount by which the initial public offering price paid by purchasers of our common stock exceeds the net tangible book value per share of our common stock after the offering. Net tangible book value represents the amount of our total tangible assets reduced by our total liabilities. Tangible assets equal our total assets less goodwill and intangible assets. Net tangible book value per share represents our net tangible book value divided by the number of common shares outstanding. The number of shares of our common stock outstanding after this offering will be (including shares that will be sold to the underwriters pursuant to the exercise of their over-allotment option or, to the extent the over-allotment option is not exercised, distributed to the current members of Intrepid Mining pursuant to the formation distribution). As of September 30, 2007, our pro forma net tangible book value was $ million and our pro forma net tangible book value per share was $ .

After giving effect to the sale of shares of common stock in the offering (including shares that will be sold to the underwriters pursuant to the exercise of their over-allotment option or, to the extent the over-allotment option is not exercised, distributed to the current members of Intrepid Mining pursuant to the formation distribution) at an initial public offering price of $ per share, which is the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, the formation transactions and the application of the estimated net proceeds from the offering, our pro forma adjusted net tangible book value as of September 30, 2007 would have been $ million, or $ per share.⁽¹⁾ This represents an immediate increase in net tangible book value of $ per share to existing stockholders and an immediate dilution of $ per share to new investors purchasing shares in the offering.⁽²⁾ The following table illustrates this per share dilution:

A $1.00 increase or decrease in the assumed initial public offering price per share would increase or decrease our net tangible book value per share after the offering by approximately $ , and dilution per share to new investors by approximately $ , after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. Assuming that the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full, a $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price would increase (decrease) net proceeds to us from the exercise of the over-allotment option by approximately $ million, after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us, and would increase (decrease) the cash payable pursuant to the formation distribution. Any amount of the formation distribution that is not paid in cash will be paid in shares of our common stock.

The foregoing discussion and tables assume no exercise of any stock options that will be outstanding immediately following this offering. As of September 30, 2007, no options to purchase shares of common stock were outstanding. As of the date of completion of this offering, we will have outstanding options to purchase shares of our common stock. To the extent these options are exercised, there may be further dilution to new investors.

The following table illustrates, on the as adjusted basis described above as of September 30, 2007, the total number of shares held, total consideration paid and average price per share paid by existing stockholders and by new investors for the common stock, assuming the sale of shares of common stock in the offering at an initial public offering price of $ per share, which is the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus:

The following tables show selected historical financial and operating data of Intrepid Mining and pro forma combined financial and operating data of Intrepid Mining and Intrepid Potash for the periods and as of the dates indicated. The historical financial statements included in this prospectus reflect the results of operations of Intrepid Mining. The selected historical financial data for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and the nine months ended September 30, 2006, are derived from the unaudited financial statements of Intrepid Mining. The selected historical financial data as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 and for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 have been derived from Intrepid Mining’s audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. The following selected historical financial data as of December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 and for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 have been derived from Intrepid Mining’s audited consolidated financial statements, which are not included in this prospectus.

The selected pro forma combined financial and operating data for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and for the year ended December 31, 2006, are derived from the unaudited pro forma combined financial statements of Intrepid Mining and Intrepid Potash included elsewhere in this prospectus. The pro forma adjustments have been prepared as if certain transactions to be effected upon completion of this offering had taken place on September 30, 2007, in the case of the pro forma combined balance sheet, or as of January 1, 2006, in the case of the pro forma combined statements of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and for the year ended December 31, 2006. The transactions reflected in the pro forma adjustments assume that Intrepid Potash will complete its initial public offering of common stock, acquire all of the assets of Intrepid Mining other than cash, and assume $ million of Intrepid Mining’s liability under its existing senior credit facility and all other existing liabilities of Intrepid Mining. The pro forma combined financial information should not be relied upon as being indicative of Intrepid Potash or Intrepid Mining’s results of operations or financial condition had the transactions been completed on January 1, 2006, with respect to the pro forma combined statements of operations, or as of September 30, 2007, with respect to the pro forma combined balance sheet.

You should read the selected historical consolidated financial and operating data and the pro forma combined financial information in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, the “Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Information” and the historical financial statements and related notes of Intrepid Mining and Intrepid Potash appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.

EBITDA is calculated and reconciled to income from continuing operations in the table below:

Intrepid Potash was incorporated in the state of Delaware on November 19, 2007 for the purpose of acquiring all of Intrepid Mining’s assets other than cash and assuming $ million of Intrepid Mining’s liability under its existing senior credit facility and all other existing liabilities of Intrepid Mining. Intrepid Potash intends to continue the business of Intrepid Mining in corporate form. The acquisition of the net assets from Intrepid Mining will be accounted for at historical cost because the members of Intrepid Mining will receive common stock of Intrepid Potash in exchange for a controlling interest in Intrepid Potash.

The following unaudited pro forma combined statements of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and year ended December 31, 2006, and the unaudited pro forma combined balance sheet at September 30, 2007, present the combined results of operations and financial position of Intrepid Potash assuming the material offering and related transactions described below had become effective as of January 1, 2006 with respect to the pro forma combined statements of operations, and as of September 30, 2007 with respect to the pro forma combined balance sheet. The pro forma adjustments are based on available information and upon assumptions that management believes are reasonable to reflect, on a pro forma basis, the impact of the historical adjustments listed below and the transaction adjustments listed below on the historical financial information of Intrepid Potash and Intrepid Mining. The adjustments as set forth below are described in detail in the notes to the unaudited pro forma combined statements of operations and the unaudited pro forma combined balance sheet.

You should read this unaudited pro forma combined financial information together with the other information contained in this prospectus, including “Business”, “The Formation Transactions”, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, the audited historical financial statements and the notes thereto of Intrepid Potash and Intrepid Mining included elsewhere in this prospectus, and the unaudited historical consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto of Intrepid Mining as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 included elsewhere in this prospectus.

The unaudited pro forma combined financial information is for informational purposes only and does not purport to reflect the results of operations or financial condition of Intrepid Potash and Intrepid Mining that would have occurred had they been combined during the periods presented. The pro forma combined financial information should not be relied upon as being indicative of Intrepid Potash or Intrepid Mining’s results of operations or financial condition had the transactions been completed on January 1, 2006, with respect to the pro forma combined statements of operations, and as of September 30, 2007, with respect to the pro forma combined balance sheet. The pro forma combined financial information also does not project the results of operations or financial condition for any future period or date.

You should read the following discussion and analysis together with our consolidated financial statements and related notes and the other financial information that appear elsewhere in this prospectus. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including those discussed under “Risk Factors” beginning on page 13. Our actual results may differ materially from those expressed in or implied by these forward-looking statements. See “Forward-Looking Statements” for information about such statements beginning on page 27.

We are the largest producer of muriate of potash (MOP, or potassium chloride) in the U.S. and are dedicated to the production and marketing of potash and langbeinite, another mineral containing potassium. Potassium is one of the three nutrients essential to plant formation and growth. Since 2004, we have supplied, on average, 1.5% of world potash consumption and 8.5% of U.S. consumption annually, and we have supplied a considerably higher proportion of the potash consumed in the southwestern and western U.S., our core markets. We are one of two exporting producers of langbeinite (sulfate of potash magnesia), a low-chloride fertilizer that is better suited than MOP for chloride-sensitive crops. We own five active potash production facilities—three in New Mexico and two in Utah—and we have the nameplate capacity to produce 1,100,000 tons of potash and 250,000 tons of langbeinite annually. We own two development assets in New Mexico—the HB Mine, which is an idled potash mine that we are in the process of reopening as a solution mine, and the North Mine. We expect that the expansion opportunities at our operating facilities and the HB Mine will increase production by an aggregate of over 370,000 tons of potash and langbeinite annually over the next five to seven years. We also produce salt, magnesium chloride and metal recovery salts from our potash mining processes.

Our management team formed Intrepid Oil & Gas, LLC on September 1, 1996, for the purpose of acquiring oil and gas leases near Moab, Utah. While mapping the area for potential oil and gas resources, we learned about the substantial local potash deposits and discovered that the only operating potash mine in the area, which was then in decline, was scheduled to close. We determined that the decline in production in Moab could be reversed by applying horizontal drilling technology, commonly used in the oil and gas industry, to create potash solution mining caverns. This represented a new approach to potash mining. Our management team formed Intrepid Mining on January 26, 2000, for the purpose of acquiring Moab Salt, Inc. from PCS for cash consideration of approximately $3 million, plus the assumption of certain liabilities and closing costs for total consideration of approximately $14.8 million. We renamed the company Intrepid Potash–Moab, LLC.

During 2006, Intrepid Mining sold substantially all of its oil and gas assets. The remaining equity interests in its wholly-owned oil and gas subsidiary, Intrepid Oil & Gas, LLC, were distributed to the members of Intrepid Mining in 2007.

Intrepid Potash was formed as a Delaware corporation on November 19, 2007 and, in connection with the completion of this offering, will acquire all of the assets of Intrepid Mining other than cash and will assume $ million of Intrepid Mining’s existing liability under its existing senior credit facility and all other existing liabilities of Intrepid Mining.

Our two primary products are potash (MOP) and langbeinite (sulfate of potash magnesia). For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we derived 90% of our net sales and 92% of our gross margin from potash.

Our potash is marketed for sale into three primary markets: the agricultural market as a fertilizer, the industrial market as a component in drilling fluids for oil and gas exploration and the animal feed market as a nutrient. The agricultural market represented approximately 64% of our sales in the nine months ended September 30, 2007, with sales to industrial and feed markets accounting for 30% and 6% of our sales, respectively. Our primary regional markets include agricultural areas west of the Mississippi River, oil and gas exploration areas in the Rocky Mountains and the Permian Basin and feedlots in Texas and other western states. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, 97% of our potash sales volume was derived from sales within the U.S.

We are one of only two companies that have economic reserves of langbeinite and produce langbeinite for export, the other being Mosaic. We began producing langbeinite in late 2005 and are working to expand our production and increase demand. Although Mosaic has sold langbeinite from the Carlsbad, New Mexico region since the 1950s, we believe that our entry into the market as a second producer has increased growers’ willingness to use langbeinite. Langbeinite is marketed into two primary markets: the agricultural market as a fertilizer and the animal feed market as a nutrient. We market langbeinite throughout the world, including through an exclusive marketing agreement with PCS for sales outside North America. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, 60% of our langbeinite volume was sold in the U.S. and the remaining 40% was exported.

We operate in a highly competitive, global industry. Potash and langbeinite are globally-traded commodities and, as a result, we compete on the basis of delivered price, timely service and product quality. Moreover, our operating results are influenced by a broad range of factors, including those outlined below.

Global fertilizer demand has been driven by population growth, changes in dietary habits, planted acreage, crop yields, grain inventories, application rates, global economic conditions, weather patterns and farm sector income, among other things. We expect these key variables to continue to have a significant impact on fertilizer demand for the foreseeable future. Sustained income growth and agricultural policies in the developing world also affect demand for fertilizer. As incomes grow, diets become more diverse, nutritious and protein-rich, primarily through increased meat consumption. Producing meat from livestock and poultry requires large amounts of grain for feed. Fertilizer demand is also affected by other geopolitical factors like temporary disruptions in fertilizer trade related to government intervention and changes in the buying patterns of key consuming countries.

Economically recoverable potash deposits occur rarely. Virtually all potash is extracted from twenty commercial deposits located in twelve countries. According to the IFA, in the first half of 2007, six of these countries (Canada, Russia, Belarus, Germany, Israel and Jordan) accounted for approximately 87% of the world’s aggregate potash production. Companies in Canada and the former Soviet Union lead the global potash market due to the size and grade of their reserves, among other factors. The addition of new potash production is difficult because currently unexploited deposits are rare, deep in the earth and are often located in remote areas which would require significant capital investment to exploit. The most recently constructed operating mine in the world was opened in 1987. New potash supply projects are being developed primarily at areas of existing production, but are expected to take several years to become fully operational. Additional challenges faced by potash producers include mine flooding risks, aging facilities, depleting ore reserves and increasing transportation costs.

Energy prices and consumption affect the potash industry in several ways. Growing demands upon existing energy supplies have supported the development of biofuels, which currently rely upon agricultural products as feedstocks. As demand and prices for these feedstocks increase, the use of fertilizer becomes more economically attractive. In addition, energy prices affect the global levels of oil and gas drilling, which often consumes potash as a drilling fluid additive. Higher fuel prices increase the cost of transporting potash from producing to consuming regions.

Currency fluctuations can play a role in potash pricing. As the currencies of exporting countries strengthen, producers in those countries realize less sales revenue per ton when prices denominated in the recipient country’s currency are translated back into the exporter’s stronger currency. If this occurs during a period of strong potash demand, exporting producers tend to raise their potash prices in the recipient country’s currency to maintain margins in their own currency. For example, as the Canadian dollar and Russian ruble have recently strengthened in a period of high demand, U.S. dollar prices from those exporting producers have increased. Conversely, if the currencies of exporting countries weaken, producers from those countries realize higher sales revenue per ton on exports ton when prices denominated in the recipient country’s currency are translated back into the exporter’s weaker currency. If this occurs in a period of slow demand, exporters could choose to lower prices to increase export volumes.

Increased recognition of the benefits of balanced fertilizer use by growers and governmental support thereof directly affects the applications rates and usage of fertilizer in the developing world. The potash market is a global market experiencing demand growth in developing countries such as China, India and Brazil. The governmental policies of these and other countries have recently been supportive of agricultural policies that promote balanced fertilization, which has led to increases in potash demand.

Our gross sales are derived from the sales of potash and langbeinite and are determined by the quantities of fertilizers we sell and the selling price we realize. We quote prices to customers both on a delivered basis and on the basis of pick-up at our plants and warehouses. Transportation and distribution costs are incurred only on a portion of the sales as customers often arrange and pay for delivery to their sites. Our gross sales include freight and distribution costs, but we do not believe gross sales provides an accurate measurement of our performance in

the market due to the inclusion of freight and distribution costs. We view net sales, which is gross sales less freight and distribution costs, as the key performance indicator. We primarily utilize net sales per ton in the analysis of our sales trends in order to remove the effect of transportation and delivery costs on pricing.

The volumes we sell are determined by our production capabilities and by demand for our products. Our selling prices and product mix are determined by a combination of global and regional supply and demand factors. The domestic price of potash is impacted by international price movements and to a large extent by Canadian and Russian producers that export to the domestic market. We benchmark our prices off of international prices and have benefited from the weakening dollar. During 2007, we have been able to raise prices because of strong demand.

Potash prices increased through the first nine months of 2007 and we expect this trend to continue into 2008 due primarily to potash demand increasing faster than potash supply. Fertecon forecasts a 3.2% annual demand growth rate from 2007 to 2011, which would require an average of 1.2 million additional tons of K₂O every year to meet this future demand. However, potash suppliers are currently producing near their practical limits and announced expansions are not sufficient to keep pace with expected demand. As a result, we believe the global potash market will remain tight through at least 2011.

Domestic potash pricing is influenced by the interaction of global supply and demand; ocean, land and barge freight rates; and currency fluctuations. Our posted price for red granular potash in Carlsbad, New Mexico on December 1, 2006 was $195 per ton and has been increased 63% to $317 per ton as of December 1, 2007. Our posted price of granular langbeinite in Carlsbad on January 1, 2007 was $146 per ton and has been increased 17% to $171 per ton effective January 1, 2008. Actual prices realized in the market vary due to the timing and receipt of orders, among other factors.

Our cost of goods sold reflect the production costs of our products less credit generated from the sale of our by-products. Our costs are more fixed than variable, so as our production increases or decreases, our average cost per ton decreases or increases, respectively. Primary production costs include direct labor and benefits, maintenance, natural gas, electricity, operating supplies, chemicals, depreciation and amortization, royalties, leasing costs and other plant overhead expenses. We pay royalties to federal, state and private lessors under our mineral leases, and such taxes are a percentage of the net sales of minerals extracted and sold from the applicable lease. In some cases, federal royalties for potash are paid on a sliding-scale basis that varies with the grade of ore extracted. Our potash production results in by-product salt, magnesium chloride and metal recovery salts. Sales of these by-products are recorded as a by-product credit that reduces the cost of goods sold.

We expect our labor and benefit costs to increase in 2008 due to the addition of personnel at our Carlsbad mines to increase production and address our maintenance backlog. We also anticipate that the currently tight labor market for skilled workers will continue in the regions in which we operate, which will result in higher costs to hire and retain skilled workers.

We have purchased natural gas derivatives in the past. Based on our analysis of the supply and pricing fundamentals for natural gas in our operating regions, we have chosen not to have any derivative contracts in place for 2008. However, we will continue to evaluate the possibility of entering into such arrangements in the future. Fluctuations in natural gas prices will affect our operating results.

In the past, we have used operating leases to finance our mining equipment. Operating lease payments are accounted for as a cost of goods sold. We do not plan to use operating leases in this manner in the future. As a result, operating lease payments will decrease over time as the leases expire or as we make prudent and economic decisions to buy-out the leases. We intend, however, to purchase mining equipment in the future and the resulting depreciation expense will increase our cost of goods sold.

Our selling and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel and related costs; company airplane costs; costs related to arranging truck and rail transportation; legal, accounting and other professional fees; marketing and public relations expenses; and costs related to our information and technology systems. Because our facilities are difficult to reach by commercial aviation, we operate a company airplane in the management of our facilities.

We anticipate an increase in selling and administrative expenses after this offering. These expenses will include additional legal and corporate governance expenses, additional accounting staff costs, director compensation, exchange listing fees, transfer agent and stockholder-related fees and increased premiums for director and officer liability insurance coverage.

Other income (expense) consists primarily of interest and financing expenses. Other income (expense) also includes insurance proceeds in excess of property losses, loss on sale or disposition of assets, investment income, unrealized gains (losses) on investments, and other costs that do not relate directly to our core operations. In 2008, we may receive additional insurance proceeds in excess of our property losses related to the reconstruction of the warehouse at our East Mine.

As a limited liability company, Intrepid Mining did not pay federal or state income taxes. The taxable income or loss of Intrepid Mining has historically been included in the state and federal tax returns of its members.

Intrepid Potash is a corporation that will be required to pay federal and state income taxes on its taxable income.

The following table presents selected operations data for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 and the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006

For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we benefited from tight global supply conditions resulting from strong potash demand. Domestic sales of potash in the 2007 period increased primarily due to increased demand resulting from high agricultural prices and the largest acreage of corn planted since the 1940s. Gross margins increased $19.0 million, or 87%, from $21.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 to $40.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 due primarily to increased sales and production volumes and modest price increases. Operating income increased $14.1 million, or 90%, from $15.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 to $29.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007.

The following table presents potash and langbeinite sales and production for the subject periods.

Net sales of potash increased $32.4 million, or 35%, from $93.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 to $125.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 due primarily to increased sales volumes made possible by strong potash demand, increased production and inventory draw-downs. Production of potash increased 13% in the 2007 period compared to the 2006 period due primarily to better plant operating rates and productivity resulting from our maintenance and capital improvements. During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, larger international potash producers engaged in a price negotiation with China, which led to postponed global potash orders. We chose to build inventories during the negotiation, which we later sold at higher spot prices. Net sales of langbeinite increased $7.1 million, or 99%, from $7.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 to $14.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 due primarily to the same factors that increased potash sales. Production of langbeinite increased 13% in the 2007 period compared to the 2006 period due to improving operating rates at the dual potash and langbeinite plant.

The following table presents our cost of goods sold for potash and langbeinite for the subject periods.

The total cost of goods sold of our potash decreased $10, or 7%, from $140 per ton for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 to $130 per ton for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Our costs are more fixed than variable so that as our production increases or decreases, our average cost per ton decreases or increases. Potash costs decreased 7% in the 2007 period due primarily to a 13% increase in production. The total cost of goods sold of our langbeinite decreased $1 per ton, or 1%, from $86 per ton for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 to $85 per ton for the nine months ended September 30, 2007.

Costs that increased materially during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the 2006 period included chemical, operating lease, labor, royalty and depreciation expenses. Chemical costs increased $1.9 million, or 39%, for the 2007 period due primarily to chemical additive testing to increase potash recoveries at the East Mine. Depending on the results of this test, we may or may not continue using the chemical in our

process. Operating lease expenses increased $1.5 million, or 93%, for the 2007 period due to upgrades to our mining equipment financed using operating leases. Labor and benefit costs increased $1.8 million, or 5%, for the 2007 period due to wage increases and the addition of personnel to address maintenance backlogs. Royalty expense increased $1.7 million, or 50%, for the 2007 period due to increased sales revenue and higher langbeinite sales, which incur a slightly higher royalty than potash sales. Depreciation and amortization expenses increased $1.1 million, or 22%, for the 2007 period which reflects the capital replacement and improvement program in place in each of these periods and the completion of the dual potash and langbeinite plant.

Natural gas costs decreased $3.1 million, or 24%, for the 2007 period primarily due to changes in the fair value of our natural gas derivative contracts that are recorded as part of natural gas costs. Unrealized losses of $2.5 million were recorded for the 2006 period compared to unrealized gains of $1.6 million for the 2007 period.

Maintenance costs decreased $2.2 million, or 13%, for the 2007 period as a result of replacing contract maintenance labor with permanent labor and due to the improving condition of our assets as a result of our capital spending program. By-product sales credits reduced cost of goods sold by $4.9 million and $4.4 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and September 30, 2006, respectively.

Selling and administrative expenses increased $3.9 million, or 57%, from $6.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 to $10.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Selling and administrative expenses increased in the 2007 period due primarily to legal and lobbying fees; additional sales, administrative and management staff; and larger aggregate salaries and bonuses paid to the management team. We are a party to various legal proceedings that challenge decisions of the Bureau of Land Management, or BLM, relating to oil and gas drilling in the Potash Area in southeastern New Mexico, where our New Mexico mines are located. We refer to this as the “Potash Area dispute in New Mexico”. We are attempting to cause the BLM to more accurately map and protect the potash resource, conduct a comprehensive safety study as to oil and gas drilling around our mines and limit drilling in areas that we believe contain potash deposits.

In April 2006, a wind-shear struck the product warehouse at the East Mine in Carlsbad, New Mexico resulting in a property loss claim. Inventory losses resulting from the storage of product outdoors because of the damage to the warehouse were subsequently recovered from the insurance property loss claim. In the nine months ended September 30, 2006, we also received a settlement of $0.9 million for lost margin on the langbeinite inventory destroyed when the East Mine warehouse was damaged. We refer to this event as the “East Mine wind-shear event” and to the resulting claim as the “East Mine wind-shear claim”.

Other expenses increased $4.4 million, or 195%, from a net expense of $2.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 to a net expense of $6.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 due primarily to an increase in interest expense. Interest expense increased $4.5 million, or 216% in the 2007 period due primarily to higher net borrowing against our existing senior credit facility to redeem the membership interest of Long Canyon, LLC for $100.0 million.

In the nine months ended September 30, 2006, additional insurance claims from the East Mine wind-shear claim were still considered contingent and could not yet be recognized by us under generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, an expense was recorded because insurance proceeds related to this loss were $0.7 million less than our deductible and related costs. The warehouse’s replacement cost is expected to be approximately $22.0 million. Additional insurance payments to reconstruct the warehouse are contingent upon review by the insurer and, therefore, will be recognized in the future as settlements, if any, are agreed upon.

During the last quarter of 2006, we sold substantially all of our oil and gas assets. Income from discontinued operations of these oil and gas activities was $2.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006.

Intrepid Potash is a corporation that will be required to pay federal and state income taxes on its taxable income.

Operating results declined in 2006 compared to 2005 due primarily to production lost because of the production disruptions discussed below, partially offset by higher potash prices in 2006. Gross margins decreased $16.2 million, or 39%, from $41.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 to $25.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 due primarily to decreased sales volumes resulting from the two production disruptions. Operating income decreased $14.0 million, or 41%, from $34.0 million in 2005 to $20.0 million in 2006, again reflecting lower sales volumes and also reflecting increased cost of goods sold and selling and administrative expenses.

West Mine shaft disruption: Potash production at the West Mine decreased 93,000 tons, or 23%, from 398,000 tons in 2005 to 305,000 tons in 2006 due primarily to an unexpected production disruption. In October 2006, unused utilities in the West Mine production shaft broke loose due to an increase in groundwater flows into the shaft resulting from heavy rains from Hurricane John. We incurred a 54-day shutdown to remove all the unused utilities and to improve groundwater capture and conveyance systems in the shaft. Under the then terms of our business interruption insurance policy, the first 30 days of the interruption were not covered by insurance. We refer to this event as the “West Mine shaft disruption” and to the resulting business interruption insurance claim as the “West Mine shaft claim”.

East Mine plant ramp-up disruption: Potash production at the East Mine decreased 83,000 tons, or 24%, in 2006 compared to 2005 due primarily to the October 2005 commissioning of the dual potash and langbeinite facility. Implementing the new milling process at this facility, which is a first-of-its-kind process, involved operational inefficiencies which resulted in lower operating rates in the last quarter of 2005 and through the first three quarters of 2006. This investment in the East Mine allowed us to enter and process a mixed ore body containing both potash and langbeinite. We refer to this production disruption as the “East Mine plant ramp-up disruption”.

The following table presents potash and langbeinite sales and production for the subject years.

Net sales of potash decreased $10.7 million, or 8.0%, from $140.3 million in 2005 to $129.6 million in 2006 due to decreased sales volumes resulting primarily from the production disruptions discussed previously under “—Operating Results”, partially offset by increased prices. The average net sales price for potash increased $17 per ton, or 11%, from $161 per ton in 2005 to $178 per ton in 2006 due in part to strong industrial potash demand and price increases initiated by international competitors. Potash production decreased 172,000 tons, or 19%, from 897,000 tons in 2005 to 725,000 tons in 2006 due primarily to the West Mine shaft disruption and the East Mine plant ramp-up disruption. Net sales of langbeinite increased $9.3 million, or 1,329%, from $0.7 million in 2005 to $10.0 million in 2006 due to a full year of langbeinite production and sales in 2006. Langbeinite production increased 141,000 tons, or 940%, from 15,000 tons in 2005 to 156,000 tons in 2006 due primarily to having a full year of operations in the newly commissioned East Mine plant compared to only three months in 2005.

The following table presents our cost of goods sold for potash and langbeinite for the subject years.

The total cost of goods sold of our potash increased $32 per ton, or 28%, from $113 per ton in 2005 to $145 per ton in 2006 due primarily to the impact of spreading our fixed cost structure over lower production volumes resulting from the production disruptions mentioned previously under “—Operating Results”. The total cost of goods sold of our langbeinite decreased $113 per ton, or 56%, from $201 per ton in 2005 to $88 per ton in 2006 due primarily to high langbeinite start-up costs in 2005 and langbeinite production progressing closer to expected output in 2006.

Costs that increased materially in 2006 compared to 2005 included labor and benefits, maintenance, depreciation, royalty and operating lease expenses. Labor and benefits costs increased $5.3 million, or 14%, in 2006 due primarily to increases in employee headcount to staff the langbeinite plant at our East Mine and address our maintenance backlog and pay rate increases needed to compete for labor. Maintenance costs increased $3.4

million, or 19%, in 2006 relative to 2005. Maintenance costs were reduced by $3.9 million in 2005 due to the usage of low-cost spare parts inventory purchased from the previous owners of the Carlsbad facilities. Depreciation and amortization expenses increased $2.4 million, or 53%, in 2006 which resulted primarily from our capital replacement and improvement program and the completion of the dual potash and langbeinite plant at the East Mine. Natural gas costs increased 16%, from $14.1 million in 2005 to $16.2 million in 2006 due primarily to the change in the fair value of our natural gas derivative contracts. Unrealized losses of $2.3 million were recorded as a component of natural gas costs in 2006 compared to a $0.2 million gain on such contracts in 2005. Royalty expense increased $1.8 million, or 59%, in 2006 due to the expiration of a temporary royalty reduction on federal potash leases, higher potash prices and increased langbeinite sales. Operating lease expenses increased $1.7 million, or 161%, in 2006 due primarily to upgrades to our mining equipment financed using operating leases.

Selling and administrative expenses increased $2.6 million, or 34%, from $7.5 million in 2005 to $10.1 million in 2006. The increase was due primarily to increased legal and lobbying fees incurred in connection with the Potash Area dispute in New Mexico, additional sales, administrative and management staff and selling expenses related to adding langbeinite as a product line and larger aggregate salaries and bonuses paid to the management team.

We recognized $4.9 million in business interruption insurance settlements in 2006. The West Mine shaft claim resulted in a $4.0 million settlement for the 24 days of outage that were covered by our business interruption insurance policy. Additionally, the East Mine wind-shear claim resulted in a settlement of $0.9 million for lost margin on langbeinite destroyed when the East Mine warehouse was damaged.

We had other income of $4.1 million in 2006 compared to an expense of $1.4 million in 2005. We recognized a net gain of $6.7 million in 2006 related to property damage recoveries from the East Mine wind-shear claim. The insurance proceeds of $9.5 million for property damage replacement were received by early January 2007 and have been partially offset by the deductible and related costs. Additional insurance payments to reconstruct the warehouse are contingent upon review by the insurer and, therefore, will be recognized in the future as settlements, if any, are agreed upon.

Interest expense increased $1.4 million, or 97%, from $1.5 million in 2005 to $2.9 million in 2006 due to increased debt incurred as part of our capital improvement program.

In 2006, we sold substantially all of our oil and gas assets for gross proceeds of $19.2 million resulting in a gain of $9.5 million from the sale of discontinued oil and gas activities. Income from discontinued operations of these oil and gas activities was $1.8 million in 2005 and $2.4 million in 2006. The remaining undeveloped oil and gas assets were distributed to the members of Intrepid Mining in 2007.

Intrepid Potash is a corporation that will be required to pay federal and state income taxes on its taxable income.

During 2005, we benefited from increasing potash prices resulting from a trend of potash demand increasing faster than supply beginning in 2004. In 2005, we also benefited from a full year of operations from the facilities acquired in 2004. Costs increased in 2005 relative to 2004 due primarily to a full year of operating costs at all of our facilities and general input cost inflation. Gross margins increased $9.8 million, or 31%, from $32.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 to $41.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 due to increased sales volumes resulting from a full year of operations at our facilities and a 35% increase in potash pricing. Operating income increased $9.3 million, or 38%, from $24.7 million in 2004 to $34.0 million in 2005.

The following table presents potash and langbeinite sales and production for the subject years.

Net sales of potash increased $39.3 million, or 39%, from $101.0 million in 2005 to $140.3 million in 2004 due primarily to increased potash prices. The average net sales prices for potash increased $42 per ton, or 35%, from $119 per ton in 2004 to $161 per ton in 2005 due primarily to potash demand increasing faster than supply and price increases initiated by our international competitors. Production of potash increased 70,000 tons, or 8%, from 827,000 tons in 2004 to 897,000 tons in 2005 due primarily to a full year of operations at the facilities acquired in 2004. Net sales of langbeinite commenced in 2005 and resulted in $0.7 million in sales in 2005.

The following table presents our cost of goods sold for potash and langbeinite for the subject years.

The total cost of goods sold of our potash increased $31 per ton, or 38%, from $82 per ton in 2004 to $113 per ton in 2005 due primarily to increased labor, maintenance and natural gas expenses. Also, the majority of our operating costs are fixed so the East Mine plant ramp-up disruption resulted in higher average costs of production per ton produced at the East Mine in the latter half of 2005. After the acquisition of the Carlsbad facilities in

2004, we began the process of restoring and properly maintaining the assets. After an assessment of the facilities, we implemented a restorative program that resulted in additional labor and maintenance costs to restore the facilities to long-term reliability. The total cost of goods sold of our langbeinite was $201 per ton in 2005, which was high due to spreading the start-up costs related to the commissioning of the dual potash and langbeinite plant over a small amount of production.

Labor and benefit costs increased $10.2 million, or 36%, in 2005 compared to 2004 due primarily to additional maintenance personnel and a full year of ownership in 2005. Maintenance costs increased $10.2 million, or 129%, in 2005 compared to 2004 due primarily to addressing deferred maintenance and a full year of ownership in 2005. Maintenance costs were reduced by $3.9 million in 2005 due to the usage of low-cost spare parts inventory purchased from the previous owners of the Carlsbad facilities.

Natural gas and electricity costs increased $7.6 million, or 46%, in 2005 due primarily to a full year of ownership in 2005 and the effect of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita on the national energy infrastructure.

By-product sales credits reduced cost of goods sold by $5.9 million and $4.6 million in 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Selling and administrative expenses increased $0.4 million, or 6%, from $7.1 million in 2004 to $7.5 million in 2005 due primarily to the addition of staff needed to manage the assets acquired in 2004.

We had other expense of $1.6 million in 2004 compared to other expense of $1.4 million in 2005, which consisted primarily of interest expense.

Income from discontinued oil and gas activities was $1.3 million in 2004 and $1.8 million in 2005.

Since inception, we have funded our operations primarily through borrowings under our existing senior credit facility and through funds generated by operations. We believe that the net proceeds retained by Intrepid Potash from this offering, cash flow from operations and available borrowings under our existing senior credit facility described below will be sufficient to fund our operations, our capital spending program and debt service requirements for at least the next two years. If we do not achieve forecasted results from operations, additional financing in the form of debt or equity may be required to offset any cash flow deficiencies. As described below, our existing senior credit facility covenants are calculated using cash flow and fixed charges, so materially adverse operating results could restrict the availability of our credit.

As of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, we had cash and cash equivalents of $2.5 million and $0.3 million, respectively. As of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, we had $81.5 million and $17.6 million available, respectively, under the revolving portion of our existing senior credit facility. We traditionally

pay down our revolving line of credit when we have excess cash, because rates of return for short term investments are generally substantially less than the interest rate on our line of credit, which results in lower cash balances.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006

Total cash provided by operating activities was $31.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to $6.9 million for the comparable 2006 period. The $24.3 million increase in cash provided by operating activities is due primarily to increases in operating income, a collection of accounts receivable related to insurance reimbursements and changes in inventory levels. Net income increased $7.4 million, or 47%, in the 2007 period compared to the 2006 period due primarily to an increase in sales volumes and potash pricing. Accounts receivable collections from business interruption insurance settlements provided $3.7 million in the 2007 period. Inventory levels increased $14.0 million from December 31, 2005 to September 30, 2006, compared to a decrease in inventory levels of $3.1 million from December 31, 2006 to September 30, 2007. The increase in inventories in the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was a result of our decision to reduce sales while global potash orders were postponed during potash price negotiations between China and international potash producers.

Total cash provided by operating activities decreased to $14.8 million in 2006 from $37.8 million in 2005. The $23.0 million decrease in cash provided by operating activities in 2006 relative to 2005 was due primarily to the timing of insurance payments and changes in accounts payable and trade accounts receivable. We recognized income from business interruption insurance settlements resulting from the West Mine shaft claim and from an insurance settlement in excess of property losses resulting from the East Mine wind-shear claim. A receivable for these combined insurance claims totaled $12.0 million at December 31, 2006. Changes in accounts payable and trade accounts receivable resulted in a net $3.7 million decrease in cash flows from operations in 2006 compared to a net increase of $11.6 million in 2005. These changes were due to the timing of sales, purchases and receipt of payments.

Total cash provided by operating activities increased $6.9 million to $37.8 million in 2005 from $30.9 million in 2004 due primarily to increased operating income and a decrease in accounts receivable offset by a decrease in accounts payable related to discontinued operations. Net income increased $10.1 million in 2005 as a result of higher prices on our potash sales and a full year of operating the facilities acquired in 2004. The decrease in accounts receivable resulted in a $4.5 million increase to cash provided by operating activities in 2005, compared to a decrease of $4.4 million in 2004. Payables related to the discontinued operations of the oil and gas activities decreased cash flows from operations in 2005 by $7.8 million, compared to an increase of $5.3 million in 2004.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006

Total cash used in investing activities was $14.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to $9.3 million for the same period in 2006. Cash used in investing activities increased $5.1 million in the 2007 period due primarily to an additional $12.0 million spent on replacing and upgrading plant assets, increasing production and the reconstruction of the East Mine warehouse, which was destroyed in the East Mine wind-shear event. Cash spent on the warehouse reconstruction was offset by insurance proceeds totaling $6.9 million that were received in early 2007.

Total cash provided by investing activities was $1.3 million in 2006 compared to $23.0 million used in investing activities in 2005. The $24.3 million change was primarily due to decreased capital spending in 2006 and the sale of substantially all of our oil and gas assets. During 2005, additions to property, plant and equipment were $17.6 million compared to $12.2 million in 2006. Completion of the East Mine dual potash and langbeinite plant added significant property, plant and equipment spending in 2005. In addition, $4.1 million was spent on additions to mineral properties during 2005, the majority of which related to horizontal mine development at the Moab Mine. During 2006, we received net proceeds of $18.7 million from the sale of substantially all of our oil and gas assets.

Total cash used in investing activities was $23.0 million in 2005 compared to $48.0 million used in investing activities in 2004. The $25.0 million decrease was primarily due to the purchase of the Carlsbad and Wendover assets during 2004 for net cash of $38.5 million, offset by a $12.8 million increase in additions to property, plant and equipment and mineral properties during 2005 due to the completion of the East Mine dual potash and langbeinite plant and the horizontal mine development at the Moab Mine, as well as increased costs due to a full year of operations in 2005.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006

Total cash used in financing activities was $14.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to $2.3 million provided by financing activities for the same period in 2006. In June 2007, Potash Acquisition, LLC, or PAL, an affiliate of Platte River Ventures L.L.P. and an unrelated party to Intrepid Mining, acquired a 20% membership interest in Intrepid Mining for $38.8 million, net of transaction costs, inclusive of our obligations and liabilities. Funds received were used to decrease the outstanding balance of the revolving portion of our existing senior credit facility. Net payments on our long-term debt totaled $41.4 million in 2007. Distributions to our members totaled $10.5 million, including special distributions to our members of $3.9 million. These distributions were funded by draw-downs on our existing revolving line of credit, and were permitted under our existing senior credit facility discussed below.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, net proceeds from long-term debt totaled $9.6 million and distributions to our members totaled $7.3 million.

Total cash used in financing activities was $16.0 million in 2006 compared to $16.9 million in 2005. During 2006, net proceeds from long-term debt totaled $0.2 million and distributions to our members totaled $10.6 million. In addition, our members agreed to redeem the membership interests of Long Canyon, LLC for $5.0 million in cash and a $95.0 million note payable.

During 2005, net proceeds from long-term debt totaled $0.8 million, and distributions to our members totaled $17.6 million.

Total cash used in financing activities was $16.9 million in 2005 compared to $18.9 million provided by financing activities in 2004. During 2005, net proceeds from long-term debt totaled $0.8 million and distributions to our members totaled $17.6 million. During 2004, net proceeds from long-term debt totaled $24.0 million, which we used to finance the purchase of the Carlsbad and Wendover assets. Distributions to our members totaled $5.1 million during 2004.

The credit agreement, as amended, governing the existing senior credit facility was originally entered into in February 2000. The agreement currently provides for a maximum committed $125 million five-year revolving loan that matures on March 9, 2012, and a $50 million amortizing term loan that matures on March 9, 2014. The term loan requires quarterly payments of $1.25 million, with the balance of the revolving loan and the term loan due at maturity. The senior credit facility is secured by substantially all of the assets of Intrepid Mining and its subsidiaries. As of September 30, 2007, $43.3 million had been drawn against the revolving line of credit and there was $0.2 million in outstanding letters of credit, leaving $81.5 million of additional credit available under the credit agreement. In October 2007, we borrowed an additional $15.0 million and made corresponding distributions to members of Intrepid Mining.

Outstanding balances under the revolving loan and the term loan bear interest at a floating rate, which, at our option, is either (i) the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), plus a margin of between 1.25% and 2.5%, depending upon our leverage ratio, which is equal to the ratio of our total funded debt to our adjusted earnings before income taxes, depreciation and amortization; or (ii) an alternative base rate. We must pay a quarterly commitment fee on the outstanding portion of the unused revolving credit facility amount of between 0.25% and 0.50%, depending on our leverage ratio.

The senior credit facility contains certain covenants customary for financings of this type, including, without limitation, restrictions on: (i) indebtedness; (ii) the incurrence of liens; (iii) investments and acquisitions; (iv) mergers and the sale of assets; (v) guarantees; (vi) distributions; and (vii) transactions with affiliates. The credit facility also contains a requirement to maintain the following: at least $3.0 million of working capital; a ratio of adjusted earnings before income taxes, depreciation and amortization to fixed charges of 1.3 to 1.0; and a ratio of the outstanding principal balance of debt to adjusted earnings before income taxes, depreciation and amortization of 3.5 to 1.0.

The senior credit facility also contains events of default customary for financings of this type, including, without limitation, failure to pay principal and interest in a timely manner, the breach of certain covenants or representations and warranties, the occurrence of a change in control, and judgments or orders of the payment of money in excess of $1.0 million on claims not covered by insurance. We were in compliance with all covenants with respect to the senior credit facility on September 30, 2007.

Upon the closing of this offering, Intrepid Potash intends to replace Intrepid Mining as the borrower under the senior credit facility and request that Intrepid Mining be released. Intrepid Potash intends to repay $ million of the amount outstanding using net proceeds from this offering. Intrepid Mining will repay the remaining outstanding amount.

We operate in a capital-intensive industry that requires consistent capital expenditures to replace assets necessary to sustain safe and reliable production. We purchased relatively old potash facilities, some out of bankruptcy, that were all in need of investment. At each facility, we have developed a three-part accelerated investment plan to maintain safe and reliable production, improve and modernize equipment, increase production and decrease production costs per ton. We have identified key projects at each of our facilities that we believe will allow us to increase our potash and langbeinite production.

The primary focus of our improvement and modernization program has been the replacement of certain key items such as underground mining equipment. Through April 2007, this equipment was financed primarily through operating leases, which were recorded as an expense. We now purchase the equipment and capitalize the costs. Additionally, we are modernizing our control systems, belt-system technology, communications systems and other equipment. We also expect that our current high levels of spending to improve and modernize equipment will decrease in the future as we complete our accelerated investment plan.

Total capital spending in 2008 is expected to be approximately $90.0 million, which includes approximately $16.0 million to replace assets needed to maintain production, $21.0 million to improve and modernize equipment, $43.0 million to increase production as described more fully below, and $10.0 million, which we expect will be reimbursed by our insurance, to complete the replacement of the East Mine warehouse. Of the $21.0 million planned to improve and modernize equipment, approximately $12.0 million is planned for underground mining equipment and other equipment we would previously have leased. We believe our cash flow and debt capacity will be adequate to fund the capital spending program in 2008.

In 2008, we expect to undertake the following projects to improve and increase production:

All figures for future capital spending are initial estimates that are subject to change as the projects are further developed.

Capital expenditures in 2007 are expected to be $29.0 million, which includes approximately $11.7 million to replace assets needed to maintain production, $5.1 million to improve and modernize equipment, $0.9 million to increase production related primarily to the HB Mine and $11.3 million, which was reimbursed by our insurance, towards replacing the East Mine warehouse. Of the $5.1 million expenditure to improve and modernize equipment, approximately $3.5 million was for underground mining equipment and other equipment we would previously have leased.

Capital expenditures for mining operations in 2006 were $12.4 million, which was used primarily to replace assets needed to maintain production. Included in this $12.4 million expenditure was $0.6 million towards replacing the East Mine warehouse, which was reimbursed by our insurance. In 2006, we also entered into operating leases for approximately $9.7 million in mining equipment.

Capital expenditures in 2005 were $21.7 million, which includes approximately $9.0 million to replace assets needed to maintain production and $12.7 million to increase production. The majority of the $12.2 million expenditure was incurred for the new langbeinite plant at the East Mine. In 2005, we also leased approximately $2.8 million in mining equipment and other equipment designed to improve and modernize our equipment.

As of December 31, 2006, we had contractual obligations totaling $241.3 million, as indicated below. All contractual commitments shown are for the full calendar year indicated.

As of September 30, 2007, we had contractual obligations totaling $185.5 million, as indicated below. All contractual commitments shown are for the full calendar year indicated.

Payments related to derivative contracts cannot be reasonably estimated due to variable market conditions and are not included in the above tables.

As of the date of this prospectus, we do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, aside from the operating leases depicted in “—Contractual Obligations” above.

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in our financial statements. Actual results could differ from such estimates and assumptions, and any such differences could result in material changes to our financial statements. The following discussion presents information about our most critical accounting policies and estimates.

Revenue Recognition—Revenue is recognized when title transfers to a customer, selling price is determinable, and collection is reasonably assured. Title passes at the shipping point: the plant, a distribution warehouse, or a port. Title for some shipments into Mexico transfers at the border crossing, the port of exit. Prices are set at the time of or prior to shipment. We use few sales contracts so prices are based on our current published prices or upon negotiated short-term purchase orders from customers.

We quote prices to customers both on a delivered basis and on the basis of pick-up at our plants and warehouses. Transportation and distribution costs are incurred only on a portion of the sales as customers often arrange and pay for delivery to their sites. Our gross sales include freight and distribution costs, but we do not believe gross sales provides an accurate measurement of our performance in the market due to the inclusion of freight and distribution costs so we view net sales, which is gross sales less freight and distribution costs, as the key performance indicator. We primarily utilize net sales per ton in the analysis of our sales trends in order to remove the effect of transportation and delivery costs on pricing.

Application of this policy requires that we make estimates regarding creditworthiness of the customer, which impact our determination of allowance for doubtful accounts. We make those estimates based on the most recent information available and historical experience, but they may be affected by subsequent changes in market conditions.

Property, Plant and Equipment—Expenditures for new facilities or expenditures which extend the useful lives of our existing facilities are capitalized and depreciated using the straight-line method at rates sufficient to depreciate such costs over the estimated productive lives of such facilities. Productive lives range from 2 to 25 years. Productive lives are reviewed annually and changed as necessary. Interest expense allocable to the cost of developing mining properties and to constructing new facilities is capitalized until operations commence. Gains or losses from normal sales and retirements of assets are included in other income or expense.

Mineral Properties and Development Costs—Mineral properties and development costs, which we refer to collectively as mineral properties, include acquisition costs, the cost of drilling wells and the cost of other development work. Depletion of mineral properties is provided using the units-of-production method over the estimated life of the relevant ore body. The lives of reserves used for accounting purposes are shorter than current reserve life determinations prepared by us and reviewed and independently determined by Agapito Associates, Inc., due to uncertainties inherent in long-term estimates and in order to correlate to estimated building and plant lives of 25 years or less, where appropriate. Certain development costs are depleted over the life of the ore body or the life of the facility. Reserve studies and mine plans are updated periodically, and the remaining net balance of the mineral properties is depleted over the updated estimated life. Possible impairment is also considered. Our proven and probable reserves are based on extensive drilling, sampling, mine modeling and mineral recovery from which economic feasibility has been determined. The price sensitivity of reserves

depends upon several factors including ore grade, ore thickness and ore mineral composition. The reserves are estimated based on information available at the time the reserves are calculated. Recovery rates vary depending on the mineral properties of each deposit and the production process used. The reserve estimate utilizes the average recovery rate for the deposit, which takes into account the processing methods scheduled to be used. The cutoff grade, or lowest grade of mineralized material considered economic to process, varies with material type, mineral recoveries and operating costs. Proven and probable reserves are based on estimates, and no assurance can be given that the indicated levels of recovery of potash and langbeinite will be realized or that production costs and estimated future development costs will not exceed the net realizable value of the products. Tons of potash and langbeinite in the proven and probable reserves are expressed in terms of expected finished tons of product to be realized net of estimated losses. Reserve estimates may require revision based on actual production experience. Market price fluctuations of potash or langbeinite, as well as increased production costs or reduced recovery rates, could render proven and probable reserves containing relatively lower grades of mineralization uneconomic to exploit and might result in a reduction of reserves. In addition, the provisions of our mineral leases are subject to periodic readjustment, including royalties payable, by the state and federal government, which could impact the economics of our reserve estimates. Changes in the estimated reserves could have a material impact on our results of operations and financial position.

Inventory—Inventory consists of product and by-product stocks that are ready for delivery to market, mined ore, potash in evaporation ponds and parts and supplies inventory. Product and by-product inventory cost is determined using the lower of average cost for the year or estimated net realizable value. For purposes of identifying and allocating costs, inventory is assumed to turn over on a first-in-first-out basis. The value of potash within the solar ponds, work-in-process inventories, is estimated based on the amount of finished inventory expected to be recovered and the lower of cost incurred through the stage of completion or net realizable value less costs to complete the process. Estimates are used in the allocation of costs to different products, including by-products.

We conduct detailed reviews related to the net realizable value of parts inventory, giving consideration to quality, slow moving items, obsolescence, excessive levels and other factors. Parts inventories not having turned-over in more than a year, excluding parts classified as critical spares, are reviewed for obsolescence and included in the determination of an allowance for obsolescence. If the carrying amount exceeds the estimated net realizable value, we adjust our inventory balances accordingly. If the actual sales price ultimately realized were to be less than our estimate of net realizable value, additional losses would be incurred in the period of liquidation.

Recoverability of Long-Lived Assets—We evaluate our long-lived assets for impairment in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard, or SFAS, 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amount may not be recoverable. Impairment is considered to exist if the total estimated future cash flow on an undiscounted basis is less than the carrying amount of the related assets. An impairment loss is measured and recorded based on the discounted estimated future cash flows. Changes in significant assumptions underlying future cash flow estimates or fair values of assets may have a material effect on our financial position and results of operations.

Factors we generally will consider important and which could trigger an impairment review of the carrying value of long-lived assets include the following:

Although we believe the carrying values of our long-lived assets were realizable as of the balance sheet dates, future events could cause us to conclude otherwise.

Asset Retirement Obligation—All of our mining properties involve certain reclamation liabilities as required by the states in which they operate or by the Bureau of Land Management, or BLM. These asset retirement obligations are reviewed and updated at least annually with resultant changes in balances recorded as adjustments to the related assets and liabilities. Changes in estimates follow from changes in estimated probabilities, amounts, refinements in scope, technological developments and timing of the settlement of the asset retirement obligation, as well as changes in the legal requirements of an obligation. The estimates of amounts to be spent are subject to considerable uncertainty and long timeframes. Changes in these estimates could have a material impact on our results of operations and financial position.

Income Taxes—Before completion of this offering, Intrepid Mining will continue operating as a limited liability company, which does not pay federal or state income taxes. Intrepid Mining’s taxable income or loss has been included in the state and federal tax returns of its members.

The newly formed holding company, Intrepid Potash, Inc. will be subject to income taxes. Intrepid Potash will adopt Financial Accounting Standard, or FAS, 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, which requires an asset and liability approach for financial accounting and reporting of income taxes. Intrepid Potash will also adopt FASB Interpretation Number 48, or FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement Number 109. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or one expected to be taken. Intrepid Potash is currently evaluating the impact of adopting these pronouncements.

Financial Instruments—We use debt financing with variable interest rates, and we use significant volumes of natural gas purchased at variable rates. We enter into financial contracts to manage a portion of the costs for anticipated but not yet committed transactions when such transactions are probable and the significant characteristics and expected timing are identified. The value of these derivatives is estimated monthly based on fair market values and any change in fair market value is recorded in our income statement. Changes in these estimates could have a material impact on our results of operations and financial position.

FASB Interpretation Number 48, or FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FIN 109

In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement Number 109, which provides criteria for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of uncertain tax positions. A tax benefit from an uncertain position may be recognized only if it is “more likely than not” that the position is sustainable based on its technical merits. The provisions of FIN 48 are effective for fiscal year 2007. Under our previous limited liability company structure, FIN 48 would not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements; however, because it is a corporation, the impact of FIN 48 on Intrepid Potash will need to be determined.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure requirements regarding fair value measurement. Where applicable, this statement simplifies and codifies fair value related guidance previously issued within GAAP. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal year 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of SFAS 157 on our consolidated financial statements.

SFAS 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which permits entities to choose to measure certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value. SFAS 159 is effective for years beginning after November 15, 2007. We have not determined whether we will adopt the fair value option permitted by SFAS 159.

Our operations may be impacted by commodity prices, geographic concentration, changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates.

Potash and langbeinite, our principal products, are commodities, but are not traded on any commodity exchange. As such, direct hedging of the prices for future production cannot be undertaken. We also have not entered into long-term sales contracts with customers, so prices will vary with the transaction and individual bids received. Our potash is marketed for sale into three primary markets: the agricultural market as a fertilizer, the industrial market as a component in drilling fluids for oil and gas exploration and the animal feed market as a nutrient. Prices will vary based upon the demand from these different markets.

Our net sales and profitability are determined principally by the price of potash and, to a lesser extent, by the price of natural gas and other commodities used in the production of potash. The price of potash is influenced by agricultural demand and the prices of agricultural commodities. Decreases in agricultural demand or agricultural commodity prices could reduce our agricultural potash sales. If natural gas and oil prices were to decline enough to result in a reduction in drilling activity, our industrial potash sales would decline.

Our costs and capital investments are subject to market movements in other commodities such as natural gas, steel and chemicals. We may enter into derivative contracts for a portion of its expected natural gas usage under our existing senior credit facility, but we do not anticipate this occurring in 2008. We remain subject to market movements in the price of natural gas and other commodities.

We primarily sell potash into regional markets that include agricultural areas west of the Mississippi River, oil and gas exploration areas in the Rocky Mountains and the Permian Basin and feedlots in Texas and other southwestern and western states. Our potash business has a geographic concentration in the western U.S. and is, therefore, affected by weather and other conditions in this region.

We have fixed, through the use of derivatives, a portion of our floating interest rate exposure on anticipated debt through the end of 2012. Notional amounts for which the rate has been fixed as of September 30, 2007 range between $22.8 million for the year 2012 to $52.3 million for the two months ended March 1, 2010. Our existing senior credit facility requires us to fix a portion of our interest rate exposure through the use of derivatives. The weighted average notional amount outstanding as of September 30, 2007 and the weighted average 3-month LIBOR rate locked-in via these derivatives are $34.7 million and 5.05%. The interest rate paid under our existing senior credit facility varies both with the change in the 3-month LIBOR rate and with our leverage ratio.

Based on the principal outstanding under our existing senior credit facility as of September 30, 2007, a 1% change in interest rates would increase our annual interest expense by $0.9 million.

We typically have low balances of accounts receivable denominated in Canadian dollars and, as a result, we have minimal direct foreign exchange risk. There is an indirect foreign exchange risk as described below.

The U.S. imports the majority of its potash from Canada and Russia. As the Canadian dollar, or the looney, and the Russian ruble strengthen in comparison to the U.S. dollar, foreign suppliers realize a smaller margin in their local currencies unless they increase their nominal U.S. dollar prices. In 2006, the looney and ruble strengthened to 87 cents and 3.65 cents, respectively, compared to the U.S. dollar. As of December 14, 2007, the looney and ruble were trading at 98.58 cents and 4.09 cents, respectively, against the U.S. dollar. The continued strengthening of the looney and ruble thus tend to support higher U.S. potash prices, as Canadian and Russian potash producers attempt to maintain their margins, which has contributed to pricing strength. However, if the looney and ruble were to weaken in comparison to the U.S. dollar, foreign competitors may choose to lower prices significantly to increase sales volumes. A decrease in the net realized sales price of our potash would adversely affect our operating results.

Intrepid Potash is a Delaware corporation that was formed on November 19, 2007 and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intrepid Mining. Intrepid Mining has conducted no business or activities except in connection with this offering and the formation transactions. In connection with this offering, we will enter into the following formation transactions:

At or before the completion of this offering, Intrepid Potash and Intrepid Mining will enter into an exchange agreement, which will provide for the assignment of all of Intrepid Mining’s assets other than cash, comprised primarily of membership interests in six wholly-owned Delaware limited liability companies including our operating subsidiaries, to Intrepid Potash in exchange for:

As a part of the formation transactions, we will declare a dividend with respect to the 1,000 shares of our common stock currently issued and outstanding, which we refer to in this prospectus as the “formation distribution”. The formation distribution will be paid in shares of our common stock; provided, however, that for each share of our common stock purchased by the underwriters pursuant to their over-allotment option, the number of shares payable pursuant to the formation distribution will be reduced, one-for-one, and in lieu of such shares, we will pay cash in an amount equal to the net proceeds, before offering expenses but after underwriting discounts and commissions, we receive from the exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option. The formation distribution will be payable to Intrepid Mining, the holder of record of the common stock prior to this offering, upon the earlier of the expiration of the underwriters’ over-allotment option period or the exercise of the over-allotment option.

Concurrently with the completion of this offering, we intend to enter into an amendment to our existing senior credit facility to substitute Intrepid Potash as the borrower under the credit facility and release Intrepid Mining from the credit facility. The $ million of Intrepid Mining’s liability under its existing senior credit facility that is not assumed by Intrepid Potash pursuant to the terms of the exchange agreement will be repaid by Intrepid Mining from the net proceeds received from Intrepid Potash pursuant to the terms of the exchange agreement.

After the completion of the offering, Intrepid Mining will satisfy its liabilities, liquidate and distribute its remaining assets, including the cash and common stock received pursuant to the exchange agreement and the right to receive the formation distribution described above, to the current members of Intrepid Mining.

Once this offering and the related formation transactions are completed, assuming the underwriters do not exercise any portion of their option to purchase additional shares, the common stock of Intrepid Potash will be held as follows:

The following diagram depicts our current organizational structure as of the date of this prospectus:

The following diagram depicts our organizational structure after giving effect to this offering and the related formation transactions, assuming that the underwriters do not exercise any portion of their option to purchase additional shares of common stock to cover over-allotments (and, therefore, that shares will be distributed to the current members of Intrepid Mining pursuant to the formation distribution):

In connection with the completion of this offering, we intend to enter into a transition services agreement with Intrepid Oil & Gas, LLC, or IOG, an entity owned by Messrs. Jornayvaz and Harvey. Pursuant to this agreement, IOG, on a limited basis, may require specified employees of Intrepid Potash or its subsidiaries (other than Messrs. Jornayvaz and Harvey) to provide accounting, land title and engineering services in connection with IOG’s oil and gas venture. Under the prior arrangement with IOG, beginning in 2007, IOG reimbursed Intrepid Mining for actual time and expenses incurred on IOG’s behalf. Costs and expenses incurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 were $0.2 million.

IOG will be obligated to pay us a monthly fee and reimburse us for and in connection with the use of our services, in an amount equal to the sum of:

The transition services agreement will limit the aggregate time spent by any employee of Intrepid Potash or its subsidiaries on projects under the agreement to 15%. This limit may only be exceeded with the prior approval of our board of directors.

In addition, the transition services agreement will provide that IOG is permitted, at its own expense, to drill an oil and gas well at an agreed location near the Moab Mine. Any costs we incur in connection with the well will be reimbursable costs under the agreement. If IOG determines in its sole discretion that the well is noncommercial for oil and gas production, and we agree that the well is suitable for conversion to potash production, we will agree to buy the well from IOG for a specified amount. IOG will agree to indemnify us for any damage to the Moab Mine that is caused by the drilling of the well.

The transition services agreement will have a one-year term and may be terminated by IOG at any time on 30 days’ prior written notice.

We obtained the information in this prospectus about the fertilizer industry from several independent outside sources, including: British Sulphur Consultants, or British Sulphur, a fertilizer and chemicals industries consultant; Commodity Information Systems, Inc., or CIS, a commodities trading advisor; Green Markets Fertilizer Market Intelligence Weekly, or Green Markets, a fertilizer industry news publication; the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, or the FAO; Fertecon Limited, or Fertecon, a fertilizer industry consultant; the International Fertilizer Industry Association, or the IFA, a not-for-profit organization representing the global fertilizer industry; Integer Research Limited, or Integer, an information services provider and consultant in fertilizers and other commodity industries; the International Plant Nutrition Institute, or IPNI, a not-for-profit organization dedicated to responsible management of plant nutrients; Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc., or PCS; SRI Consulting, a division of Access Intelligence LLC, or SRI Consulting, a research service for the global chemical industry; The Fertilizer Institute, or TFI, a trade association representing the fertilizer industry; the United States Department of Agriculture, or the USDA; and the United States Geological Survey, or the USGS. We also obtained some of the information in this prospectus from the public filings of our peer companies.

Fertilizers play a fundamental role in global agriculture by replacing the nutrients that crops remove from the soil, thereby sustaining the yield and quality of crops. Nitrogen, phosphate and potassium (potash) are the three nutrients essential to crop development. According to the IFA, global consumption of these three principal crop nutrients in the 2006/2007 fertilizer year (the twelve months ended June 30, 2007) was approximately 181 million nutrient tons—108 million tons of nitrogen, or N (60%), 43 million tons of phosphate, or P₂O₅ (24%), and 30 million tons of potash, or K₂O (16%). Over time, these relative percentages have remained fairly consistent. Fertilizer for commercial agriculture is the primary use of these nutrients, accounting for approximately 94% of total global consumption in 2005, according to the FAO. The balance was used primarily in industrial applications and livestock feed. Growers of the major commodity crops are the largest consumers of fertilizer in the U.S., where in 2006 approximately two-thirds of agricultural fertilizer was used to grow corn, wheat, soybeans and cotton. Industrial uses of fertilizer nutrients include the production of resins, plastics, synthetic fibers, drilling fluids, explosives and detergents.

Global fertilizer demand is driven primarily by population growth and changes in dietary habits, which determine global demand for food. As populations grow, more food is required from decreasing arable land per capita, which requires higher crop yields and, therefore, more plant nutrients. Developed countries use fertilizer more intensively than developing countries, but sustained economic growth in the developing world is changing patterns of fertilizer use. As incomes have grown, particularly in the developing world, people have demanded a more nutritious, protein-rich diet, primarily through increased meat consumption. Producing meat from livestock requires large amounts of grain and the fertilizer used to grow it. In addition to these historical drivers, high oil prices and associated energy concerns have recently placed a renewed emphasis on ethanol and bio-diesel production, which currently rely on agricultural products as feedstocks.

To meet the needs of the food and biofuel markets, the FAO estimates that world grain demand will grow 2.1% in the 2007/2008 fertilizer year, which despite expected record crops in some commodities, will cause grain inventories, or stocks, to remain at historic lows. CIS forecasts that global markets for corn, soybeans and wheat will remain extremely tight as foreign markets look not only to meet their populations’ increasing demand but also to rebuild reserves which have recently fallen to unsustainable levels. For example, according to CIS, foreign stocks of corn have fallen by 60% this year. Additionally, CIS expects U.S. ending corn stocks to be the lowest in ten years by 2009, even when assuming increased planted acreage and yields in the 2007/2008 fertilizer year. These agricultural market conditions and record price levels make the use of fertilizer more economically attractive and, therefore, support fertilizer demand growth. Intrepid Potash believes the significant world demand is best illustrated by the continuing reduction in world grain stocks despite record grain production.

Each of the three key nutrients serves a different vital function in plant formation, and a proper balance of the three nutrients is necessary to maximize the fertilizer’s effectiveness. These functions cannot be carried out by other nutrients.

Potash helps regulate plants’ physiological functions and improves plant durability, providing crops with protection from drought, disease, weeds, parasites and cold weather. Potash currently has no practical substitute as a potassium fertilizer source. Potash is mined either from underground mines or, less frequently, from naturally occurring surface or sub-surface brines. Unlike nitrogen and phosphate, potash does not require additional chemical conversion to be used as a plant nutrient. Naturally occurring, economically recoverable deposits of potash are scarce, deep and geographically concentrated. Virtually all of the world’s potash is currently extracted from twenty commercial deposits located in twelve countries. This scarcity has resulted in a high degree of concentration among the leading producers and higher profitability with relatively low volatility.

Nitrogen has the most visible impact on yield because it promotes protein formation. The primary input for producing nitrogen fertilizer is natural gas, which typically represents 70% to 90% of the cost to make ammonia, according to TFI. Barriers to entering the nitrogen fertilizer business are low as widespread natural gas deposits allow many countries to produce the two most common nitrogen fertilizer products—ammonia and urea—for the domestic and international markets. Currently, approximately 68 countries produce ammonia and 55 countries produce urea, according to the IFA. Ammonia and other nitrogen fertilizers have historically been the subject of volatile product and natural gas input pricing, contributing to significant swings in profitability.

Phosphate plays a key role in the photosynthesis process (i.e., the production, transportation and accumulation of sugars in the plant). Phosphate is also involved in seed germination and helps plants use water efficiently. The principal mineral used in the production of phosphate fertilizers is phosphate rock, which is processed using sulfuric acid and ammonia. The primary phosphate fertilizer products are diammonium phosphate (DAP), which has a phosphate content of 46% and a nitrogen content of 18%, and monoammonium phosphate (MAP), which has a phosphate content of 52% and a nitrogen content of 11%. The leading producing

regions of phosphate fertilizers are the U.S., China, Morocco and Russia, primarily because they contain the leading global deposits of phosphate rock. Markets for phosphate products are highly competitive and industry producers have endured protracted periods of low profitability due to excess supply and high and volatile input costs, including natural gas for ammonia. For example, after China, India and Australia overbuilt capacity in the late 1990s and early 2000s, a number of U.S. phosphate producers declared bankruptcy, and several plants were permanently closed.

The term potash arose from the traditional practice of producing potassium carbonate, needed for making soap, by the leaching of wood ashes in large iron pots. Potash is now used to describe a wide variety of compounds valued primarily for their potassium content, which is commonly measured in K₂O units. The most concentrated and commonly available form of potash is potassium chloride (KCl—muriate of potash or MOP), which is between 60-62% K₂O by weight and accounts for approximately 95% of total fertilizer use of K₂O. Secondary forms of potash include sulfate of potash magnesia, also known as langbeinite (22% K₂O), potassium sulfate (50% K₂O) and potassium nitrate (44% K₂O).

According to the IFA, 95% of all potash produced is used as a fertilizer, most of it in the form of MOP. Nonfertilizer uses of potash include chemical and pharmaceutical products, drilling fluid additive during oil and gas exploration, animal feed, detergents, glass and ceramics, textiles and dyes.

Economically recoverable potash reserves occur naturally in rare, but large buried evaporite deposits, created when ancient seas evaporated, or less frequently in salt lakes such as the Dead Sea and Great Salt Lake. Because potash occurs in concentrated, soluble forms in nature, most ores are mined and refined by direct physical means, with chemical conversion used only for specialty products. Potash is extracted from underground

deposits either by direct physical mining or by dissolving the potash in place in a process called solution mining. The extraction method for potash depends on the composition, depth and uniformity of the ore. Potash ore that is physically mined is traditionally hoisted to the surface for potash recovery. In the solution mining process, brine is pumped into the ground, allowed to saturate with potash and then pumped back to the surface for potash recovery.

The recovery of potash from ore is capital-intensive and requires specialized knowledge. The two most common methods of potash recovery are flotation and crystallization. Once potash recovery is complete, the potash is dried and is often compacted to form a granular product desirable for agricultural applications.

The agricultural cycle of growing and harvesting crops depletes soil of potassium, nitrogen and phosphate, which should be reapplied in consistent ratios. As a result, potash demand depends primarily on the demand for fertilizer, which is based on the total planted acreage, crop mix, fertilizer application rates, crop yields and farm income. Each of these factors is affected by current and projected grain stocks and prices, agricultural policies, improvements in agronomic efficiency, fertilizer application rates and weather.

From 1962 to 2007, global consumption of potash as a fertilizer grew at a rate of 2.5% per year, from approximately 10 million nutrient tons to approximately 30 million nutrient tons, according to the IFA. The only significant downturn in global potash demand since 1962 was in the late 1980s and early 1990s when the collapse of the Soviet Union resulted in a dramatic drop in consumption there and in Eastern Europe. Excluding the former Soviet Union, or FSU, world consumption of potash grew at an annual rate of 2.8% since 1962, 3.2% since 1993 and 3.6% since 2000. If global potash consumption grows at an average rate of 3.2% per year from 2007 to 2011, as estimated by Fertecon, an average of 1.2 million additional tons of K₂O will be required every year by potash consumers and capacity additions will be needed to meet this future demand.

While developed countries have traditionally been the largest consumers of potash, developing countries are the fastest growing markets for potash. Over the next five years, Fertecon estimates that potash fertilizer consumption will grow at an average rate of 5.7%, 5.9% and 3.0% per year in Brazil, India and China,

respectively. Population growth combined with income growth in the developing world is producing high levels of potash demand. As incomes grow, people demand a more nutritious, protein-rich diet, primarily through increased meat consumption. This creates demand for potash fertilizers to grow grain for animal feed. From 1991 to 2004, meat production more than doubled in China and Brazil and increased 55% in India, according to the FAO. Over the same period, grain production increased 69%, 19% and 6% in Brazil, India and China, respectively. Also driving demand in the developing world is increased recognition of fertilizer’s benefits. For example, the Chinese government actively promotes its use and sets the goal of being self-sufficient in grain production, which according to IPNI, would require an increase in potash consumption from the 8.9 million tons consumed in 2005 to 15.5 million tons of potash consumption in 2010 and 19.2 million tons in 2015. IPNI also reports that India is currently depleting its soil of nutrients, especially potassium, because farmers are not replacing the nutrients consumed by crops with sufficient levels of fertilizer use. The biofuels industry has further added to global potash demand because it increases demand for feedstock crops, which require a higher ratio of potash than other crops. Increasingly, corn in the U.S., sugar cane in Brazil and palm oil in Indonesia and Malaysia are being used for the production of biofuels.

Over 120 countries use potash, but only twelve countries produce nearly all of the world’s supply, making much of the world dependent upon imports to satisfy their potash requirements. According to the IFA, 79% of potash produced was traded across borders in 2006. With its highly developed agricultural economy and limited domestic production capability, the U.S. is the second largest consumer of potash globally, representing 17.9% of total estimated consumption for 2007, as reported by Fertecon. According to Fertecon, in 2006 the U.S. was the largest importer of potash in the world, importing approximately 80% of its potash requirements. Approximately 90% of U.S. potash imports come from Canada, with the remainder primarily coming from Belarus and Russia, according to the USGS. The high level of potash consumption in the U.S. is in large part due to its extensive cultivation of commodity crops such as corn, wheat and soybeans. Increasing global production and use of ethanol further supports fertilizer demand, especially in the U.S., where ethanol is derived from corn.

According to SRI Consulting, approximately 10% of U.S. potash consumption was used in the production of potassium chemicals for industrial markets. Industrial applications for potassium chloride include the production of potassium hydroxide, which is used in the production of other potassium chemicals; the production of potassium carbonate, which is primarily used for specialty glasses for cathode-ray tubes and as a component in dry-chemical fire extinguishers; leavening agents; and as a pharmaceutical ingredient. Potassium chloride is also used in the oil and gas industry as a drilling fluid additive. The amount of potassium chloride used in the oil and gas industry is related to the prevailing drilling rig count. The number of oil rigs in the U.S. has more than doubled since 2002, according to Baker Hughes. Alternative products that have some of the clay-inhibiting properties of potash in oil and gas drilling fluids are commercially available. Other industrial applications of potassium chloride include use as a flux in secondary aluminum processing, as a potassium supplement in animal feeds, and in ceramics, textiles and dyes. From 1990 to 2005, U.S. industrial consumption of potash grew at a rate of 5.1% per year, from 450,000 tons to 943,000 tons, according to SRI Consulting. Most industrial applications use standard 60% K₂O grade potash, with 62% product grade required for some applications.

The supply of potash fertilizers is influenced by a broad range of factors including available capacity and achievable operating rates; mining, production and freight costs; government policies and global trade. Barriers to adding new potash production are significant because economically recoverable potash deposits with the appropriate geologic conditions occur rarely. Virtually all of the world’s potash is currently extracted from twenty commercial deposits located in twelve countries. According to the IFA, in the first half of 2007, six of these countries (Canada, Russia, Belarus, Germany, Israel and Jordan) accounted for approximately 87% of the world’s aggregate potash production. Canada alone contains approximately one-half of the world’s known reserves as of 2007, according to the USGS, the vast majority of which are located in the province of Saskatchewan. This scarcity has resulted in a high degree of concentration among the leading producers. As depicted in the table below, the top seven potash producers controlled approximately 84% of world potash production in the first half of 2007. Five of the top ten producers are further concentrated into two marketing groups: Canpotex, which represents the three Canadian producers (PCS, Mosaic and Agrium), and BPC, which represents a Belarusian producer (Belaruskali) and a Russian producer (Uralkali). Together, Canpotex and BPC controlled approximately 58% of global potash production in the first half of 2007. Additionally, PCS markets Intrepid Potash’s product outside North America and has equity ownership positions in a number of the leading independent potash companies: Arab Potash Company (Jordan) (26%), Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile (32%), Sinofert Holdings Limited (China) (19%) and Israel Chemicals Ltd. (10%).

In the U.S., three producers account for 100% of potash production. Intrepid Potash is the largest producer, with Mosaic representing most of the remainder of domestic production. U.S. potash reserves are concentrated in the southwestern U.S. and account for approximately 4% of world production, according to Fertecon. Intrepid Potash has estimated annual nameplate capacity of 726,000 K₂O tons and estimated annual effective capacity of 635,000 K₂O tons of potash and langbeinite. As reported by Fertecon, Mosaic’s U.S. production has estimated annual nameplate capacity of 625,000 K₂O tons. Intrepid Potash estimates that Mosaic’s U.S. production has annual effective capacity of 553,000 K₂O tons of potash and langbeinite.

In addition to the scarcity of economic deposits, another significant barrier to entry into the potash business is the location of the world’s currently identified and unexploited potash reserves. A large portion of such reserves resides in politically unstable and/or remote locations such as the Congo, Ethiopia, Laos, Russia, Thailand, Uzbekistan and the Rio Colorado region of Argentina, where it would be very costly to build the infrastructure necessary to develop a new mine, such as electricity, water and links to rail transportation. In some cases, appropriate infrastructure, such as deep sea ports to allow shipment of potash to consuming regions, may be impractical to construct. Another barrier to entry is the long lead time necessary to develop and construct a new mine, which adds to the development costs for a new potash mine, especially in currently unexploited regions where ore bodies tend to be much deeper than the reserves that are currently being mined. Globally, the most recently constructed operating mine in the world is Uralkali’s Berezniki 4 mine in Russia, which opened in 1987.

The delivered cost of potash often includes a significant transportation cost component. Accordingly, producers seek markets located closer to their production sites (e.g., Saskatchewan producers serving Canada and the midwestern U.S., New Brunswick producers serving the U.S. eastern seaboard, and New Mexico and Utah producers serving the southern and western U.S.).

Intrepid Potash believes significant differences exist between the nameplate and effective capacities of potash producers. Nameplate capacity, as reported by industry consultants such as Fertecon and the IFA, is typically the maximum achievable production the potash mill can achieve assuming there is enough ore of a specified grade to maximize the processing rate. Nameplate capacities have not typically been adjusted over time in the potash industry to give effect to the depletion of ore resulting in lower ore grades to mills, losses in productivity that can result as facilities mature, or adverse events that materially reduce the amount of feed available to the mill. Intrepid Potash estimates the effective capacity for potash facilities as the amount of potash production a facility can achieve based on the amount and quality of ore that can currently be mined, milled and/or processed assuming no modifications to the system and a normal amount of scheduled down-time.

In 2005 and 2007, Intrepid Potash believes that global potash demand exceeded supply, which spurred suppliers to produce at their highest achievable rates and draw down inventories. Based on the chart below, North American inventory levels have been in decline since 1995. IPNI reports that North American inventory levels for the twelve months ended October 31, 2007 are 26% below the average for the last twenty years and that October 2007 levels are 53% below the average for October over the last twenty years. Based on significant potash demand, increasing prices and inventory reduction which occurred throughout 2005 and 2007, Intrepid Potash believes that the production rates achieved during those periods are most reflective of the industry’s effective capacity rates. Intrepid Potash estimates that the industry produced at 92% and 93%, respectively, of effective capacity, compared to 86% and 85%, respectively, of nameplate capacity, as reported by Fertecon. Because production at 100% of capacity is impossible to attain for prolonged periods due to routine maintenance, equipment failures, adverse weather events, changes in ore quality and other factors, Intrepid Potash believes that the 2005 and 2007 effective capacities may represent the highest achievable production rates for the potash industry, absent additional major capital spending.

The risk of flooding at key potash mines around the world is an ongoing challenge for their owners. For example, Uralkali has suffered the permanent loss of two of its four mines in the last 21 years. One of the consequences of the most recent flood, at the Berezniki Mine 1 in October 2006, was the formation of a sinkhole above the mine. This sinkhole temporarily threatened delivery of additional supply from the Russian producer Silvinit, according to an announcement by Silvinit on October 29, 2007. Additional potash mines that have flooded include PCS’ mine at Patience Lake, Saskatchewan, Canada (since converted to a solution mine); Potacan Mining Co.’s mine near Sussex, New Brunswick, Canada; and the Holle mine in the Congo. Numerous other potash mines are currently experiencing water inflows, which create operational challenges but do not necessarily mean the mine will flood. Those mines include PCS’ Sussex, New Brunswick mine and Mosaic’s Esterhazy, Saskatchewan mine, the world’s largest potash mine. In the over 75-year history of potash operations in Carlsbad, New Mexico, no mine floods have occurred.

A decline in potash production is natural as a mine matures. As a potash mine ages, the extraction point where ore is extracted moves further away from the shaft. This requires longer conveyor belt distances, more transfer points, longer travel times and more road maintenance, all of which contribute to lower productivity, higher costs, and greater potential for mechanical failures. As the ore body depletes, significant capital investments are needed to sustain production. Several mines have closed in the world due to depletion of the ore body, including former potash mines in France, Spain, Germany and the U.S.

Excluding the former Soviet Union, world consumption of potash grew 3.6% per annum between 2000 and 2007, as reported by Fertecon, which expects global potash consumption to grow approximately 3.2% per annum from 2007 to 2011. With no new operating mines constructed since 1987, and with the global potash industry believed to be operating at or near the highest achievable production rates, a number of existing potash producers have announced intentions to pursue expansions in order to keep the market from slipping into a significant supply deficit. Most recently, on November 14, 2007, PCS announced plans for a 2.2 million ton mine and mill expansion at Rocanville, Saskatchewan, which will capitalize on existing PCS infrastructure in the region. PCS

currently estimates the cost of a 2.2 million ton greenfield mine at $2.5 billion, which does not include infrastructure outside the plant gates such as rail lines, paved roads, gas, water and electricity. Based on Fertecon’s demand growth expectations, and assuming normal effective capacity utilization rates and timely completion of all announced capacity expansions, Intrepid Potash believes the global potash market will remain tight through at least 2011.

Source: Fertecon, British Sulphur, Intrepid Potash, public filings, annual reports and select country data from IFA

Before 2003, potash pricing remained relatively flat, primarily due to excess potash supply that was created following the collapse of the Soviet Union. By 2003, potash demand had grown sufficiently to absorb this excess supply, and prices began to increase considerably. Since that time, consistent growth in global demand, coupled with limited increases in global supply, has led to a significant increase in potash prices. For example, according to Green Markets, granular MOP prices in the midwestern U.S. were $387.50 per ton as of December 1, 2007, an 89.0% increase over the December 1, 2006 price of $205.00 per ton and a 238.4% increase over the January 2003 price of $114.50 per ton. During 2007, Intrepid Potash believes that the industry has been operating at or near full effective capacity.

Following the collapse of the Soviet Union and during other periods of temporary demand slowing, PCS and other leading producers have chosen to temporarily idle some production. Given the relatively high margins in the potash business, Saskatchewan producers in particular were able to do this and remain profitable. By comparison, global nitrogen fertilizer and phosphate producers have historically not responded to demand slowdowns in a similar manner, leading to periods of protracted downturns, characterized by excess inventory and poor industry profitability.

While secondary to the impact of global demand and supply dynamics, U.S. potash prices have tended to increase when the U.S. dollar weakens because as the Russian ruble and Canadian dollar appreciate there is upward pricing pressure from the Russian and Canadian producers to maintain their profit margins on U.S. sales.

Like potash (which contains between 60% to 62% K₂O commercially), langbeinite or sulfate of potash magnesia is a source of potassium (approximately 22% K₂O) and is therefore used primarily as a fertilizer. Langbeinite, however, also contains two additional valuable micro-nutrients—magnesium (11% Mg) and sulfur (22% SO₄). Langbeinite’s high-nutrient and low-chloride content make langbeinite an attractive fertilizer for chloride-sensitive crops and crops that require higher magnesium or sulfur applications.

Langbeinite demand is strongly linked to its potassium and magnesium nutrient value and its low-chloride properties. Demand stems primarily from the cultivation of chloride-sensitive crops such as leafy vegetables, citrus, tobacco and palm trees. Current demand fundamentals for langbeinite appear favorable, particularly in countries like China that are increasing vegetable production in response to dietary changes and increased demand. Palm tree cultivation has increased markedly, because it is a major feedstock for bio-diesel. Global palm oil production has increased 52% from 2000 to 2007, according to the USDA. Palm trees require higher magnesium applications than most crops. Intrepid Mining began producing langbeinite in the fall of 2005 and has

found that global demand appears to be greater than what it and the other producers can currently supply. Accordingly, Intrepid Potash has realized significant demand for its langbeinite products at favorable prices in both the domestic and international markets.

Langbeinite is primarily produced using underground mining techniques, similar to those used for potash, to extract the ore. It is then milled at the surface to separate the langbeinite from salt and other accompanying minerals. The only known reserves of langbeinite in the world are in Carlsbad, New Mexico. These reserves have been mined continuously since the 1950s, and are currently owned and mined by Intrepid Potash and Mosaic. While there are no other known langbeinite reserves in the world, a low-chloride fertilizer derived from kieserite mixed with potassium sulfate competes with langbeinite in the marketplace and is commercially available from the German producer Kali und Salz. China produces potassium sulfate, which contains no magnesium and also competes effectively as a low-chloride product. According to the IFA, China also produces langbeinite synthesized from brines, which production is consumed primarily in China.

The combined effective capacity of langbeinite, potassium sulfate and other non-chloride potassium salts in K₂O tons is summarized below:

World Langbeinite and Alternative Product Nameplate Capacity (000’s of product tons)

Langbeinite pricing follows the pricing of potash with a premium (on a potassium content basis) due to its added value as a magnesium, sulfur and low-chloride fertilizer. Langbeinite pricing did not decline in response to the additional supply Intrepid Potash brought into the market. Instead, the market has experienced a price increase with supply growth as current demand for low-chloride potassium fertilizers appears to exceed supply.

Intrepid Potash is the largest producer of muriate of potash (MOP or potassium chloride) in the U.S. and is dedicated to the production and marketing of potash and langbeinite, another mineral containing potassium. Potassium is one of the three essential nutrients required for plant formation and growth. Since 2004, we have supplied, on average, 1.5% of world potash consumption and 8.5% of U.S. consumption annually, and we have supplied a considerably higher proportion of the potash consumed in the southwestern and western U.S., our core markets. We are one of two exporting producers in the world of langbeinite (sulfate of potash magnesia), a low-chloride fertilizer that is better suited than MOP for chloride-sensitive crops such as leafy vegetables, citrus, tobacco and palm trees.

We own five active potash production facilities—three in New Mexico and two in Utah. At each of these facilities, we have incorporated innovative mining techniques to extend reserve life and increase annual production and have modernized the plants in order to lower operating risks and production costs. Today we have the nameplate capacity to produce 1,100,000 tons of potash and 250,000 tons of langbeinite annually. We expect the expansion opportunities at each of our operating facilities will increase production by an aggregate of over 110,000 tons of potash annually over the next five to seven years and 90,000 tons of langbeinite annually over the next three to four years. We also own two attractive development assets in New Mexico, the HB Mine, which is an idled potash mine that we are in the process of reopening as a solution mine, and the North Mine. We currently plan to commence Phase I of the HB Mine project in 2008, with production beginning in 2009. Assuming a continuation of favorable market conditions and receipt of all necessary permits and approvals, we believe Phase I of the HB Mine project has the potential to ultimately add up to 150,000 to 200,000 tons of additional low-cost potash production annually by 2011. At our existing production facilities we also produce salt, magnesium chloride and metal recovery salts from our potash mining processes.

Our potash production comes from five facilities—three in or near Carlsbad, New Mexico and two in Utah, all of which we own and operate. We also own two idled mines in Carlsbad. Our facilities near Carlsbad include the West Mine and East Mine, both of which are conventional underground mines, and the North Facility compaction plant which processes potash from the West Mine. Our facilities in Utah are the Moab Mine, a solution mine located near Moab, and the Wendover Facility, a sub-surface brine facility located near Wendover.

Our facilities have the nameplate capacity to produce approximately 1,100,000 tons of potash and 250,000 tons of langbeinite annually, and the effective capacity to produce approximately 966,000 tons of potash and 210,000 tons of langbeinite annually. Since acquiring our facilities, we have made capital expenditures of approximately $51.3 million at our Carlsbad facilities, $14.5 million at our Moab Mine and $4.1 million at our Wendover Facility. At Carlsbad, our expenditures were intended to restore, modernize and improve the assets, and included a modification to the East Mine surface plant that enabled the plant to profitably process a mixed ore zone, and allowed us to recover langbeinite that was previously discarded as tailings. At our Moab Mine, we have invested in a variety of capital projects, including the use of horizontal drilling at the mine, which significantly increased the amount of reserves. At our Wendover Facility, we have invested funds to complete modernizations and improvements, including planning, drilling and properly finishing a new well using the latest in brine well technology to lengthen well life and create more stable production.

Our production capabilities and capital improvements at our facilities are described in more detail below:

We also own two idled mines in or near Carlsbad—the HB Mine and a mine at the North Facility which we refer to as the North Mine.

During the extraction of potash, we also recover marketable salt and magnesium chloride. We also produce metal recovery salt, which is potash mixed with salt in customer-requested ratios, at our Wendover Facility. We account for the revenue generated from sales of these minerals as a reduction in the cost of goods sold of our primary potash product. During 2006, we produced and sold a total 311,000 tons of by-products from our Moab Mine and Wendover Facility, which reduced our operating costs by $6.5 million in the aggregate.

The estimates of our proven and probable reserves as of December 13, 2007, were prepared by us and were reviewed and independently determined by Agapito Associates, Inc. based on mine plans and other data furnished by us. The following table summarizes our reserves.

The following table summarizes production of our primary products at each of our facilities for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and each of the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004.

The following table summarizes production of by-products at each of our facilities for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and each of the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004.

We believe the following core strengths will allow us to consistently increase stockholder value:

We intend to increase production and profitability through the execution of the following strategies:

Muriate of potash is the primary potash mineral, both in our business and in the potash industry generally. Secondary potash minerals include sulfate of potash magnesia, or langbeinite, which we produce, and potassium sulfate and potassium nitrate, which we do not currently produce.

Muriate of potash, which we generally refer to as potash in this prospectus, is the most common commercial form of potassium chloride (KCl). Muriate of potash is the most abundant, least expensive source of potassium on a delivered K₂O basis and is the preferred source of potassium for fertilizer use, currently accounting for approximately 95% of total potassium fertilizer use. Because the amount of potassium contained in potash varies, the industry has established a common standard of measurement by defining a product’s potassium content in terms of equivalent percentages of potassium oxide (K₂O). Commercial grades for fertilizer use are usually 95% to 98% potassium chloride, containing about 60% to 62% K₂O. According to the IFA, approximately 95% of muriate of potash produced is used as a fertilizer, with the remaining 5% being used in the oil and gas drilling industry and other industrial applications. Potassium chloride is the primary raw material used to produce industrial potassium hydroxide and its derivative salts, the most commercially important of which are potassium carbonate, potassium chromate, potassium permanganate and the potassium phosphates. It is also used as an intermediate in chemical synthesis routes to potassium sulfate and potassium nitrate. Potash is either red or white in appearance, depending on how it was produced.

We sell potash in various grades, colors and sizes typical to the industry. A description of typical potash characteristics follows:

Like muriate of potash (which contains between 60% and 62% K₂O commercially), langbeinite is a source of potassium (approximately 22% K₂O) and is therefore used primarily as a fertilizer. Langbeinite, however, also contains two valuable micro-nutrients, magnesium (11% Mg) and sulfur (22% SO₄). Langbeinite is thus 55% fertilizer nutrients by weight, which is slightly below potassium chlorides at 60 to 62%. Langbeinite is an attractive fertilizer for chloride-sensitive crops and crops that require higher magnesium or sulfur applications

because of its high-nutrient, low-chloride content. Because of its scarcity, langbeinite has not been available to many end markets, which has resulted in unmet demand for additional production.

Sulfate of potash magnesia is the most common commercial form of langbeinite. We produce langbeinite in three grades: fine, standard and coarse. The distinctions are very similar to those of potash. In the nine months ended September 30, 2007, our langbeinite production represented 16% of world effective capacity from naturally occurring langbeinite deposits. We market our langbeinite under the name Intrepid Trio™. Mosaic, our leading competitor in the langbeinite market, markets its langbeinite under the name K-Mag^®.

The crystallization of potash and salt through solar evaporation at our Moab Mine and Wendover Facility yields a high-quality solar salt. We produce salt in three grades: fine, medium and coarse, which we sell as bagged or bulked out of our Moab Mine. We also sell salt in bulk form from our Wendover Facility.

Magnesium chloride is plentiful in nature and is obtained through refining magnesium-bearing brines similar to those found in the Great Salt Lake. We harvest magnesium chloride brines, which typically are used in the deicing and dedusting markets, during the last stages of evaporation in the solar ponds at our Wendover Facility.

We also produce metal recovery salts, which are mixtures of salt and potash. Metal recovery salts are blended in ratios requested by our customers and are sold primarily for use in the metallurgical processing industry.

For all of our by-products, we have capacity to produce at levels to meet market demand and choose to limit production to demand in order to control our inventories. Our by-product reserve life is linked to the underlying potash resource. As long as potash can be economically mined, the by-products may be produced. However, as we add horizontal caverns at our Moab Mine, we will produce more potash and less salt from that mine over time.

Potash is either mined from deep ore deposits or, in a few cases, extracted from surface or sub-surface brines containing high levels of potassium. We mine our underground deposits using either conventional mining or solution mining. The method of underground extraction depends primarily on the characteristics of the ore body. Shallow ore bodies that are relatively flat, with good roof support, minimal flood risk and above four feet in thickness will typically be mined using conventional mining. Greenfield projects involving deposits that are deeper than 4,000 feet, have a folded or thin ore seam, poor rock mechanics, or high flood risk and are of an appropriate ore grade and mineral composition are typically mined using solution mining. Solution mining is also used to recover additional potash from idled conventional mines.

We use continuous mining at our East and West Mines to extract ore for processing in the respective surface facilities. Continuous mining is a form of room and pillar mining that uses continuous miners to cut a network of interconnected passages as high as the potash seem. Roof bolters stabilize the mine roof and pillars are left to provide additional roof support. Ore extracted at the face is conveyed using belts and a hoist system to the surface for processing.

Our potash deposits in Carlsbad, New Mexico have traditionally been mined using continuous mining with high extraction ratios made possible by the presence of 400 feet of stable salt overburden. These conventional mining operations utilize a shaft sunk to the ore body and continuous mining machines to cut out the ore, which is then lifted to the surface for processing.

We currently extract approximately 2.5 million tons of ore annually from our West Mine. We currently extract 2.3 million tons of mixed potash ore and langbeinite ore annually at our East Mine.

We use solution mining at our Moab Mine and plan to utilize solution mining to extract potash from our idled HB Mine, which we are planning to reopen. Solution mining does not require men or machines to be underground. The potash in the ore zones at the Moab Mine and the HB Mine is soluble and can be extracted from the ground by injecting a solvent (usually salt-saturated water) into a potash ore body. The solvent dissolves the potash, which causes the density of the solvent to increase. The dense, potash-rich solvent then sinks to the bottom of the mine, where an extraction well pumps the salt and potash saturated brine to the surface for processing.

Our Moab Mine uses solution mining technology to extract potash from a mine formerly operated as a conventional mine and from potash caverns created through an innovative horizontal drilling program initiated by Intrepid Mining. Moab’s potash reserves are extracted using solution-mining techniques utilizing both vertical and horizontal wells and heated injection brine. At our Moab Mine, we inject heated, salt-saturated brine into a potash and salt formation to selectively dissolve potash. The double (salt and potash) saturated brine is then extracted to the surface where the water is evaporated from the minerals in solar evaporation ponds. The salt and potash crystals are then separated in a mill.

We use solar evaporation at our Moab Mine and Wendover Facility, which are located in favorable climates for evaporation, with abundant sunlight, warm temperatures and low precipitation. We also plan to use solar evaporation technology similar to that used in Moab as part of the HB Mine project, since evaporation rates in Carlsbad, New Mexico are comparable to those in Moab. The Wendover Facility exploits primarily sub-surface brines containing salt, potash and magnesium chloride that are collected in ditches from the shallow aquifers of the Bonneville Salt Flats. In dry years, brines from a deep, potassium-rich aquifer supplement the sub-surface brines. At the Moab Mine, brines are extracted from the solution mining caverns and pumped to the surface. Once a brine containing potash is available at the surface, it is placed into solar evaporation ponds, where natural evaporation of the water is used to crystallize out the potash and salt contained in the brine. The resulting white potash and salt are then processed and prepared for sale. At our Wendover Facility, the liquid remaining after solar evaporation contains a high concentration of magnesium chloride, which is processed to produce a by-product—magnesium chloride brine.

We use either flotation or hot leach and crystallization technology at our mills to separate potash from the salt and other minerals we send to our mills. At our East Mine, we use hot leach and crystallization to recover potash from the mixed ore and then utilize cyclones and leaching technology to recover langbeinite.

We use flotation at the mills at our West Mine, Moab Mine and Wendover Facility to recover potash. Potash extracted from mines or crystallized in solar ponds must be separated from the salt that accompanies potash in the process. While in principal this is a simple process, the art of flotation requires careful management of ore grinding, insoluble minerals, the brines used in the process, reagents ratios, product leaching and debrining and

treatment of the finished product. The most common method of separating the potash from the salt is to mix a biodegradable oil called amine with potash and salt. Amine binds to potash but not salt. Next, the salt and potash are mixed in a double-saturated brine and air is bubbled through the brine. The air attaches to the amine, causing the potash crystal to float. The floated potash is leached, dried, screened and then either sold as standard potash or compacted to become granular grade potash. Potash refined by flotation is typically 60% K₂O, which is the normal standard for commercial-grade potash. We have compaction facilities at our Moab Mine and Wendover Facility. Our West Mine does not have a compaction facility, so we transport the potash by truck to the compaction mill at our North Facility, where it is compacted and stored for final sale.

The process of hot leaching and crystallization used at our East Mine is based on the different solubilities of potash and salt. Potash is much more soluble at higher temperatures than at lower temperatures, while salt is equally soluble across a wide range of temperatures. The process begins by dissolving the potash away from the salt, a process called leaching. The salt-saturated brine used to dissolve the potash is heated, which allows the brine to hold a large amount of potash in a dissolved state. After leaching the potash, we recover the potash by rapidly cooling the brine using vacuum crystallizers. As the brine cools, it can no longer hold as much potash, which causes the potash to form solid crystals and drop out of the brine. The resulting potash, which is 62% K₂ O, is then dried and compacted for sale as granular or standard potash.

After the potash ore is leached from the mixed ore at the East Mine, salt and langbeinite remain as solids. We recover the langbeinite by taking advantage of two of its key physical properties—first, langbeinite has a much higher density than salt and second, langbeinite is much less soluble in fresh water than salt. We utilize brine cyclones that circulate the langbeinite and salt at high velocities in a brine. This process causes the denser langbeinite material to gravitate towards the bottom of the cyclone while sending much of the salt out the top of the cyclone. We continue processing the langbeinite and salt mixture that exits the bottom of the cyclones by combining it with fresh water and sending it into a leach pipeline to dissolve the salt. The salts dissolve in the leach pipeline, leaving behind product-grade langbeinite, which is dried and screened into appropriate product sizes. We are the first company to use brine cyclones as a primary means of recovering langbeinite. Langbeinite can also be separated from salt using heavy media or a flotation process similar to the flotation of potash ore.

Our mines have long operating histories, and immediately after their acquisition required initial high levels of restoration and sustaining capital to ensure predictable long-term operations. While much of the restoration work has been completed, we expect we will require moderately higher capital expenditures for two more years to complete identified sustaining capital projects. We have also identified significant opportunities to increase production and are executing a capital spending program to incrementally increase production at each of our mines.

Our management team strives to increase production by looking outside the potash industry to see how other companies are addressing issues that are common to their industry and ours. We then apply that knowledge to our business, using our own employees to develop and execute improvements. During the last five years, we have successfully executed the following opportunity capital projects, which have resulted in increased production:

In addition, in the last five years, we have completed the following modernizations and improvements at our facilities:

During the next five years, we plan to execute the following opportunity capital projects to increase our production:

We sell the majority of our potash, approximately 81% in the nine months ended September 30, 2007, on the spot market in the U.S. The remainder of our sales were under short-term industrial or feed contracts. We have no material contracts to sell potash at pre-determined prices in the future. Our prime regional markets include agricultural areas west of the Mississippi River, oil and gas exploration areas in the Rocky Mountains and the Permian Basin and feedlots in Texas and other southwestern and western states. We sell potash in North America through our Arlington, Texas and Denver, Colorado sales offices.

The cost of transporting potash is significant and gives a clear cost advantage to producers located near potash consumers. We enjoy a transportation cost advantage in the potash-consuming regions we can most easily reach using our primary rail service and local truck markets. Our assets are located along major truck routes used to transport grain from the midwestern U.S. into our region and then back haul potash from our mines back to those agricultural areas. In addition, our location in an oil and gas producing region allows us to serve industrial customers, the majority of whom we reach via the truck market. We also have access to primary rail lines that allow us to reach strategic destinations without switching rail carriers, which lowers transportation costs. In the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we transported approximately 60% of our potash by rail and 40% by truck. The regional truck market poses some additional barriers to entry for competitors as they would have longer hauls and need to establish trans-loading and warehouse facilities to reach our truck customers. Additionally, because truck shipments are more frequent and of a smaller size than rail shipments, participating in the regional truck market enables us to manage inventory levels and service customers who value just-in-time delivery. Due to the close proximity of our mines to potash-consuming regions and our ability to sell over 97% of our potash production into the domestic market, we command much higher net sales per ton than our competitors who must transport their potash over longer distances to reach a broader North American market and also must ship much of their production to foreign ports. In most cases, we sell our product FOB the mine, which means our customers acquire title to the product once it is loaded and leaves the plant and they therefore bear the cost and risk of transportation.

We own, lease or contract for the necessary infrastructure and distribution system to store and deliver our products. We have significant storage capacity at our facilities, and in addition, we have contractual arrangements with six strategically located warehouses that provide for timely local delivery. We lease 109 rail cars and use system cars for the remainder of our deliveries.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we sold approximately 60% of our langbeinite production into the domestic spot market. We began marketing langbeinite in late 2005 with a team of experienced salespeople who have helped build a diverse and growing customer base. We have also expanded our support systems for our langbeinite business by hiring an agronomist and establishing a network of warehouses throughout North America for the distribution of langbeinite. While we enjoy a freight advantage relative to our competitors with respect to potash sales, the same is not true for langbeinite as our primary competitor is also located in Carlsbad, New Mexico.

All of our international sales of potash, with the exception of sales to Canada and Mexico, are negotiated by PCS on a spot basis. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, approximately 40% of our langbeinite was sold internationally, and the majority of these international sales were negotiated on our behalf through PCS. Our relationship with PCS is important to us because it gives us access to PCS’ extensive international sales network and informs us about developments in the international market. The chart below shows the percentage of sales of potash and langbeinite made to various countries during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004. We expect continued growth in international sales, particularly for langbeinite.

We have a diversified customer base. We sell to three different markets for potash—the agricultural, industrial and feed markets. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, these markets represented approximately 64%, 30% and 6% of our potash sales, respectively. According to the IFA, 95% of all potash produced is used as a fertilizer. As a result, we believe our sales are diversified across more distinct consumer markets than those of many of our competitors, adding stability to our potash revenues. We are one of two exporting producers of langbeinite in the world. Both producing facilities are located in Carlsbad, New Mexico. Given the greater scarcity of langbeinite relative to potash and its agronomic suitability for certain soils and crops, there is demand for our langbeinite production outside of our core potash markets.

Within the agricultural market, we supply a diversified customer base of distributors, retailers and cooperatives, who in turn supply growers producing a wide range of crops. Agricultural markets primarily consume granular potash, whereas the industrial and feed markets primarily consume standard potash. Our facilities were designed to produce either of these products, and we are able to easily switch production between them, giving us the flexibility to adjust our product mix to market conditions. Servicing the industrial market provides us with customers that are unrelated to agricultural markets.

In 2006, 2005 and 2004, one customer, a distributor, accounted for 10.0%, 14.9%, and 11.3% of net sales, respectively. In 2006 and 2005, a second distributor, accounted for 10.9% and 10.2% of net sales, respectively. Although we consider our relationships with both of these customers to be very important, we do not believe that under normal market conditions, their loss or a significant decline in their purchases would have a material adverse effect upon our financial results.

Salt produced at our Moab Mine is sold in either a dried bulk or dried and packaged form. Salt produced at our Wendover Facility is sold in bulk form only. Salt sales help reduce total production costs, as salt is considered a by-product. Due to the cost of transporting salt, it is typically sold into local markets by truck and rail.

In 2004, Intrepid Mining entered into an exclusive magnesium chloride marketing agreement with Envirotech Services, Inc. of Greeley, Colorado. Under this agreement, Envirotech markets the majority of our magnesium chloride.

The sales patterns of our agricultural products are generally seasonal. Over the last three years, we have averaged 28% of our annual potash sales volume during the three-month period from February through April, when the demand for fertilizer typically peaks. The strongest demand for our fertilizer products occurs during the spring planting season, with a second period of strong demand following the fall harvest. We and our customers generally build inventories during the low demand periods of the year in order to ensure timely product availability during the peak sales seasons. The seasonality of fertilizer demand results in our sales volumes and net sales being the highest during the spring and our working capital requirements being the highest just before the start of the spring season. Our quarterly financial results can vary from one year to the next due to weather-related shifts in planting schedules and purchasing patterns. Our higher percentage of sales to industrial and animal feed markets relative to our competitors tends to smooth the seasonal sales pattern.

We sell into commodity markets and compete based on delivered price, timely service and quality product. Products must maintain particle size and K₂O content benchmarks to compete effectively. Further, our customers highly value the ability to deliver product in a timely manner.

We compete primarily with much larger potash producers, principally Canadian producers and, to a lesser extent, producers located in the former Soviet Union. As a smaller producer, we seek to maintain an advantage through timely service, the ability to time our sales to market conditions and a focus on the markets in which we have a transportation cost advantage.

As of November 30, 2007, we had 710 employees. Of these employees, 586 were located in Carlsbad, New Mexico, 47 in Wendover, Utah, 50 in Moab, Utah, 20 in Denver, Colorado and 7 in other locations. We have a collective bargaining agreement with a labor organization representing our employees in Wendover, Utah, which expires on March 31, 2008. We consider our relationships with our employees to be satisfactory.

We are a party to various legal proceedings that challenge decisions of the Bureau of Land Management, or BLM, relating to oil and gas drilling in the Potash Area in southeastern New Mexico, where our New Mexico mines are located. Through the proceedings described below, we are attempting to cause the BLM to more accurately map and protect the potash resource, conduct a comprehensive safety study as to oil and gas drilling around our mines and limit drilling in areas that we believe contain potash deposits.

Potash Association of New Mexico v. United States Department Of The Interior, et al., pending in the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico. We are not a party to this action, which does not currently involve any claims against us. We are a member of the Potash Association of New Mexico, or PANM, and in that capacity we are participating in this action. On December 6, 2006, PANM commenced this challenge of certain holdings of the Interior Board of Land Appeals, or IBLA, in IMC Kalium Carlsbad, Inc., et al., 170 IBLA 25 (2006) (We are not a party in IMC Kalium). IMC Kalium, commenced July 29, 1992, involves appeals of the denial of 72 applications for permits to drill, or APDs, for oil and gas wells in the Potash Area, including approximately 40 APDs on our federal potash leases or adjacent areas of interest to us. The BLM denied these APDs between 1992 and 1994 under the applicable order of the Secretary of the Interior, or the Secretarial Order, relating to the Potash Area. The holdings being appealed relate to how and to what extent the BLM may consider the potential impact of a proposed oil and gas well on the safety of potash miners when acting on an APD. If this appeal is not successful, it may result in the BLM granting the APDs that are the subject of IMC Kalium, or APDs for other wells, on or near our potash leases that the BLM would not grant if the appeal is successful. Such wells would interfere with our ability to mine the potash reserves and other potash deposits within a reasonable safety buffer around the wells.

Intrepid Potash–New Mexico, LLC v. BLM. We filed this appeal on September 19, 2006, challenging the BLM’s approval of 11 APDs located approximately one and one-half miles east of our East Mine near Carlsbad, New Mexico. This appeal does not currently involve any claims against us, and our current potash leases do not cover the lands on which these wells would be drilled. We argue in this appeal that: (i) BLM failed to consider electric log data in mapping commercially recoverable potash in violation of its duties under the Secretarial Order to use the latest information and technology to map and protect commercially recoverable potash from undue waste from oil and gas drilling and (ii) BLM did not comply with the requirements imposed by the National Environmental Policy Act when considering the APDs, including the impact of wasting the potash resource. The IBLA has granted our motion to stay BLM’s approval of the APDs pending resolution of the appeal, citing the IBLA’s prior decision in IMC Kalium in finding that the BLM may not approve the APDs unless its potash mapping standard is updated using the latest data and technology available, and finding that Intrepid Mining had demonstrated a likelihood that it would prevail in its argument that the mapping standard is deficient in this respect. If Intrepid Mining’s appeal is not successful, the BLM may grant APDs for wells in areas that we believe contain potash reserves or other commercially recoverable potash deposits but that the BLM is unwilling to recognize unless we drill additional core holes to corroborate the electric log data relied on by Intrepid Mining. There is no assurance that we would be able to obtain the necessary permits for such core holes and drill such core holes quickly enough to substantiate the presence of commercially recoverable potash prior to the drilling of the wells. Such wells would interfere with our ability to mine the potash deposits within a reasonable safety buffer around the wells.

Protests of Pending APDs. As of November 30, 2007, Intrepid Mining has protested approximately 20 additional APDs in the Potash Area on or near its BLM and State of New Mexico potash leases that have been submitted by various oil and gas operators. These protests, filed in 2006 and 2007, do not currently involve any claims against us. Intrepid Mining’s protests are based on the arguments advanced in the proceedings described above, and additional arguments including that the proposed drilling presents an unacceptable safety hazard to our underground potash operations. There can be no assurance that our protests will result in the denial of the APDs and, if these APDs are granted and we are not successful in any appeal thereof, the wells would interfere with our ability to mine the potash reserves and other potash deposits within a reasonable safety buffer around the wells.

We are subject to claims and legal actions in the ordinary course of our business. We do not believe any currently pending or threatened matter would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.

We control the rights to mine approximately 109,000 acres of land northeast of Carlsbad, New Mexico. We lease approximately 28,000 acres from the State of New Mexico and approximately 81,000 acres from the federal government through the Bureau of Land Management, or BLM.

We control the rights to mine approximately 7,000 acres of land west of Moab, Utah. We lease all of this acreage from the State of Utah. We own approximately 3,600 surface acres overlying and adjacent to portions of our State of Utah mining leases.

We control the rights to mine approximately 88,000 acres of land near Wendover, Utah. We own approximately 57,000 acres, and we lease approximately 6,000 acres from the State of Utah and approximately 25,000 acres from the federal government through the BLM.

We conduct most of our mining operations on properties that we lease from the state or federal government. These leases generally require us to commence mining operations within a specified term and continue mining to retain the lease.

Our leases with the State of New Mexico are issued for terms of 10 years and for as long thereafter as potash is produced in commercial quantities. Our State of Utah leases are issued for terms of 10 years subject to extension by the State of Utah. Our leases for our Moab Mine are operated as a unit under a unit agreement with the State of Utah, which extends the terms of all of the leases as long as operations are conducted on any portion of the leases. The terms of the leases for our Moab Mine are currently extended until 2014. Our federal leases are issued for indefinite terms subject to readjustment every 20 years.

The provisions of our leases are subject to periodic readjustment by the state and federal government. The lease provisions could change in the future, and such changes could impact the economics of our operations. Our federal leases are subject to readjustment of the lease provisions, including the royalty payable to the federal government, every 20 years. Our leases with the State of New Mexico are subject to readjustment of the lease provisions, including the royalty payable to the state, every five years. Our leases with the State of Utah are subject to extension and possible readjustment of the lease provisions every ten years. As of September 30, 2007, approximately 30% of our state and federal lease acres at our New Mexico operations and approximately 18% of our state and federal lease acres at our Utah operations will be up for renewal within the next five years.

We pay royalties to the state and federal governments for potash produced from our leases. The royalty rates on our state and federal leases in New Mexico are currently set at various rates from two to five percent, with most of our recent royalty rates set at five percent. The royalty rates on our state and federal leases in Utah are currently set at rates from two to three percent.

We lease approximately 10,486 square feet of office space in Denver, Colorado for a term extending through May 31, 2008. We also lease approximately 2,400 square feet of office space in Arlington, Texas for a term extending through August 31, 2010.

All of our mining operations are accessible by paved state highways. All of our operations obtain electric power under contracts with local utilities.

We mine and process potash and potash-related products which subjects us to an evolving set of federal, state and local environmental, health and safety, or EHS, laws that regulate, or propose to regulate: (i) product content and labeling; (ii) conduct of mining and production operations, including safety procedures followed by employees; (iii) management and handling of raw materials; (iv) air and water quality impacts from our facilities; (v) disposal, storage and management of hazardous and solid wastes; (vi) remediation of contamination at our facilities and (viii) post-mining land reclamation.

We employ, both within the company and outside the company, environmental health professionals to review our operations and assist with environmental compliance. These environmental health professionals identify and address compliance issues regarding used oil and petroleum product management, solid and hazardous waste management and disposal, water and air quality, asbestos abatement, drinking water quality, radiation control and other EHS issues.

We have spent, and anticipate that we will continue to spend, substantial financial and managerial resources to comply with EHS standards. We estimate that our 2007 environmental expenditures at our facilities will total approximately $1.0 million, primarily related to air quality improvements, drinking and process water treatment system improvements, process and waste water containment system improvements, encapsulating certain asbestos containing materials and replacing PCB transformers. For 2008, we have budgeted approximately $2.3 million for environmental expenditures at our facilities primarily relating to air quality improvements (including replacing or upgrading pollution control equipment), asbestos removal and disposal, process and waste water containment system improvements, secondary containment improvements and water well system improvements.

We cannot predict the impact of new or changed laws, regulations or permit requirements, including the matters discussed below, or changes in the ways that such laws, regulations or permit requirements are enforced, interpreted or administered. Environmental, health and safety laws and regulations are complex, change frequently and have tended to become more stringent over time. It is possible that greater than anticipated EHS capital expenditures or reclamation expenditures will be required in 2007 or in the future. We expect continued government and public emphasis on environmental issues will result in increased future investments for environmental controls at our operations.

We are required to register fertilizer products with each U.S. state and foreign country where products are sold. Each brand and grade of commercial fertilizer must be registered with the appropriate state agency before being offered for sale, sold or distributed in that state. Registration requires a completed application, guaranteed analysis, product labels and registration fee. Sold products must have specified information printed on the bag, on tags affixed to the end of the package, or, if in bulk shipments, written or printed on the invoice, bill of lading or shipping papers.

State registrations are for one- to two-year periods, depending on each state’s requirements. In addition, each state also requires tonnage reporting for products sold into that state either monthly, quarterly, semi-annually or annually, depending on each state’s requirements. Some states do require the same registration and reporting process for feed grade products; industrial grade products do not require registration or tonnage reporting.

Permits. We are subject to numerous EHS laws and regulations, including laws and regulations regarding land reclamation; release of air or water contaminants; the generation, treatment, storage, disposal and handling of hazardous substances and wastes; and the cleanup of hazardous substances releases. These laws include the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, RCRA, CERCLA, the Toxic Substances Control Act, and various other federal, state, and local laws and regulations. Violations can result in substantial penalties, court orders to install pollution-control equipment, civil and criminal sanctions, permit revocations and facility shutdowns. In addition, EHS laws and regulations may impose joint and several liability, without regard to fault, and for cleanup costs on potentially responsible parties who have released, disposed of or arranged for release or disposal of hazardous substances in the environment.

We hold numerous environmental, mining and other permits or approvals authorizing operations at each of our facilities. Our operations are subject to permits for, among other things, extraction of salt and brine, discharges of process materials to air and surface water, and injection of brine and wastewater to subsurface wells. Some of our proposed activities may require waste storage permits. A decision by a government agency to deny or delay issuing a new or renewed permit or approval, or to revoke or substantially modify an existing permit or approval, could limit or prevent us from mining at these properties. In addition, changes to environmental and mining regulations or permit requirements could limit our ability to continue operations at the affected facility. Expansion of our operations also is predicated upon securing the necessary environmental or other permits or approvals. For instance, over the next several years, we will be continuing our efforts to obtain permits in support of an anticipated expansion of our New Mexico mining operations at certain properties, including the HB Mine. For years, we have successfully permitted mining properties and anticipate that we will be able to permit these properties as well. A denial of these permits or the issuance of permits with cost-prohibitive conditions would prevent us from mining at these properties.

In certain cases, as a condition to procuring such permits and approvals, we are required to comply with financial assurance regulatory requirements. The purpose of these requirements is to assure the government that sufficient company funds will be available for the ultimate closure, post-closure care and/or reclamation at our facilities. We obtain bonds as financial assurance for these obligations. These bonds require annual payment and renewal.

Except as set forth herein, we believe we are in material compliance with existing regulatory programs, permits, and approvals. From time to time, we have received notices from governmental agencies that we are not in compliance with certain environmental laws, regulations, permits or approvals. For example, although designated as zero discharge facilities under the applicable water quality laws and regulations, our East Mine and North Mine at times may discharge during significant rainfall events. We have identified, and are in the process of implementing, several initiatives to attempt to address this issue, including reconstruction or modification of certain dams, increased evaporation through water sprays, pumping and a reduction of process discharges. State and federal officials are aware of this issue and have visited the site to review the issue. No citations or orders have been issued regarding this issue. Our Moab Mine also is designated as a zero discharge facility under the applicable water quality laws and regulations, but may experience discharges during significant rainfall events. We have undertaken several projects to attempt to address this issue, including check dams and recovery of fugitive brine. State officials are aware of this issue and no citations or orders have been issued. We have expended significant sums in 2007 and have budgeted additional significant funds in 2008 to address this issue at our facilities.

In 2006, Notices of Violation were issued by the applicable New Mexico authorities regarding drinking water-related issues at our New Mexico facilities. We believe these issues were addressed in 2006. In May 2007, an administrative order was issued by New Mexico authorities requiring us to take action to comply with drinking water standards at our New Mexico facilities, but not imposing any penalties in connection with this order. As a result, we have submitted quarterly progress reports and taken steps to correct the problems, including some repairs to our New Mexico drinking water systems.

Air Emissions. With respect to air emissions, we anticipate that additional actions and expenditures may be required in the future to meet increasingly stringent U.S. federal and state regulatory and permit requirements, including existing and anticipated regulations under the federal Clean Air Act. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has issued a number of regulations establishing requirements to reduce nitrogen oxide emissions and other air pollutant emissions. Additionally, with increased attention paid to emissions of greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide, new regulations could develop that may affect our operations. We will continue to monitor developments in these various programs and assess their potential impacts on our operations.

We received a Notice of Violation in October 2006 regarding certain air quality violations at one of our New Mexico facilities. We took corrective action in response to that Notice of Violation and, in the last quarter of 2007, resolved the Notice of Violation by agreeing to pay an approximately $13,000 monetary penalty and performing a supplemental environmental project (paving an access road to control dust). In 2008, we have budgeted and expect to spend significant funds to improve our production and pollution control equipment. Although we are not aware of any additional air quality enforcement actions pending for our New Mexico facilities, the malfunction or failure of pollution control equipment and/or production equipment, more stringent air quality regulations, or a change in interpretation and enforcement of applicable air quality laws and regulations could result in an enforcement action.

Health and Safety Regulation and Programs. Our New Mexico and Utah facilities are subject to either the Occupational Safety and Health Act, the Mine Safety and Health Act, related state statutes and regulations, or a combination of these laws.

The Mine Safety and Health Administration, referred to herein as MSHA, is the governing agency for our New Mexico facilities. As required by MSHA for underground mines and attendant surface facilities, our New Mexico facilities are inspected by MSHA personnel regularly. Over the past three years, MSHA citations and orders, both significant and substantial and non-significant and substantial, have decreased steadily. Recently, our New Mexico facilities have begun participating in MSHA’s Region 8 “partnership” program. Intrepid is one of nine facilities in the partnership program of over 1500 mines in the region. This is a formally signed document and plan, pursuant to which each party commits to specific actions and behaviors. Principles include for example,

working for an open, cooperative environment, agreeing to citation and conflict processes, improving training, and helping other, less equipped or staffed locations. Annual and refresher training for all employees at our New Mexico facilities is held, covering required topics as well as site-specific issues and incidents. Each of our New Mexico facilities has an on-site mine rescue team, which is there to respond to any on-site incidents. The teams practice and participate at state and federal events and competitions. Our New Mexico facilities also recently embarked on a behavior-based safety initiative in which the hourly workforce takes the lead to observe and coach proper safety behavior.

Because our Utah facilities are not underground operations, OSHA governs the safety standards at those facilities. Both our Moab Mine and Wendover Facility have active safety and health programs. Regular meetings are held covering various safety topics. Annual and refresher training is held for all employees at these facilities, covering required topics, as well as site specific issues and incidents.

Remediation at Intrepid Facilities. Many of our current facilities have been in operation for a number of years. Operations by us and our predecessors have involved the historical use and handling of regulated substances, refined petroleum products, potash, salt, related potash and salt by-products and process tailings. These operations resulted, or may have resulted, in soil, surface water and groundwater contamination. At some locations, there are areas where salt-processing waste, building materials (including asbestos-containing transite), and ordinary trash may have been disposed or buried, and have since been closed and covered with soil and other materials.

At many of these facilities, spills or other releases of regulated substances have occurred previously and potentially could occur in the future, possibly requiring us to undertake or fund cleanup efforts under CERCLA or state laws governing cleanup or disposal of hazardous and solid waste substances. In some instances, we have agreed, pursuant to consent orders or agreements with the appropriate governmental agencies, to undertake investigations, which currently are in progress, to determine whether remedial action may be required to address such contamination. At other locations, we have entered into consent orders or agreements with appropriate governmental agencies to perform required remedial activities that will address identified site conditions.

For example, buildings located at our facilities in both Utah and New Mexico have a type of transite siding that contains asbestos. We have adopted programs to encapsulate and stabilize the siding through use of an adhesive spray and to remove the transite siding, replacing it with an asbestos-free material. Also, we have authorized asbestos abatement crews that handle and dispose of the asbestos-containing transite and related materials. Many of our facilities also contain permitted asbestos landfills, some of which have been closed. We have worked closely with Utah officials to address asbestos-related issues at our Moab Mine. We are working with federal officials to resolve issues concerning the disposal of asbestos-containing transite at an unpermitted location at our West Mine, which may require additional removal of transite material, a land swap or another remedy.

At other locations, we have undertaken voluntary environmental remediation and/or compliance programs. Expenditures for these known conditions currently are not expected, individually or in the aggregate, to be material. However, if additional contamination is discovered or the contamination is of a greater magnitude than currently estimated, material expenditures could be required in the future to remediate the contamination at these or at other current or former sites.

Mining and processing of potash generates residual materials that must be managed both during the operation of the facility and upon facility closure. Potash tailings, consisting primarily of salt and clay, are stored in surface disposal sites. These tailing materials may also include other contaminants, such as lead, that may require additional management and could cause additional disposal and reclamation requirements to be imposed. For example, at least one of our New Mexico mining facilities, the HB Mine, may have issues regarding lead in

the tailings pile. During the life of the tailings management areas, we have incurred and will continue to incur significant costs to manage potash residual materials in accordance with environmental laws and regulations and with permit requirements. Additional legal and permit requirements will take effect when these facilities are closed.

Additionally, several of our permits require us to reclaim property disturbed by operations at our facilities. Our operations in Utah and New Mexico have specific reclamation obligations related to restoration of the land after mining and processing operations are concluded. As of September 30, 2007, the discounted present value of our estimated reclamation costs for our mines is as follows: approximately $2.5 million at our Moab Mine; approximately $1.3 million at our Wendover Facility; approximately $1.4 million at our West and North Mines; approximately $0.7 million at our East Mine; and approximately $1.7 million at our HB Mine, resulting in a total present value of approximately $7.6 million, which is reflected in our financial statements. However, various permits and authorization documents negotiated with or issued by the appropriate governmental authorities include these estimated reclamation costs on an undiscounted basis. As of September 30, 2007, these undiscounted amounts are as follows: approximately $5.7 million at our Moab Mine; approximately $3.2 million at our Wendover Facility; approximately $3.7 million at our West and North Mines; approximately $2.0 million at our East Mine; and approximately $4.0 million at our HB Mine, resulting in a total undiscounted value of approximately $18.6 million.

Our remediation and reclamation obligations and potential liabilities have been, and can be expected to continue to be, significant. It is often difficult to estimate and predict the potential costs and liabilities associated with remediation and reclamation, and there is no guarantee that we will not in the future be identified as potentially responsible for additional remediation and reclamation costs, either as a result of changes in existing laws and regulations or as a result of the identification of additional matters or properties subject to remediation and/or reclamation obligations or liabilities.

The potash we produce and sell from fee leases is subject to royalty payments. The terms of the royalty payments are determined at the time of the issuance or renewal of the leases. Some royalties are determined as a fixed percent of revenue and others are on a sliding scale that varies with the ore grade. We paid $4.9 million in royalties in 2006.

Our principal competitors are based in Saskatchewan, Canada. The Saskatchewan tax system for potash producers includes a capital tax and several potash mineral taxes, none of which are imposed on us as a U.S. producer. The Saskatchewan potash mineral tax includes a crown royalty, a base payment and a profit tax. The combination of the capital tax and potash mineral taxes creates a much greater tax and royalty burden per ton for Saskatchewan producers than we experience as a U.S. producer. This relative tax and royalty advantage for U.S. producers becomes more pronounced when profits per ton increase due primarily to the profit tax component of the Saskatchewan potash mineral tax.

Before this offering, we have operated as a limited liability company, with income taxes paid by the members of Intrepid Mining. After the completion of this offering, we will be treated as a corporation for federal income tax purposes.

We maintain insurance policies covering general liability, property and business interruption, workers’ compensation, business automobile, umbrella liability, aviation hull and liability, directors and officers liability and various ancillary and customary policies.

In 2006, we suffered two insurable losses. The first loss occurred on April 22, 2006, when a wind-shear struck the product warehouse at the East Mine in Carlsbad, New Mexico. Damage to the warehouse and the product in the warehouse and alternative handling and storage costs were covered by our insurance policies at replacement value less a $1 million deductible. The warehouse’s replacement cost is expected to be approximately $22 million. Additional insurance payments to reconstruct the warehouse are still contingent upon review by the insurer and, therefore, will be recognized in the future as settlements, if any, are agreed upon. Through September 30, 2007, we had received insurance settlements on the East Mine of approximately $10.4 million, comprised of property loss settlements of $9.5 million, resulting in a gain of $6.7 million, and business interruption settlements of $0.9 million.

The second loss occurred on October 10, 2006, when unused utilities in the West Mine production shaft broke loose due to an increase in groundwater flows into the shaft resulting from heavy rains from Hurricane John. We incurred a 54-day shutdown to remove all the unused utilities and to improve groundwater capture and conveyance systems in the shaft. Under the then terms of our business interruption insurance policy, the first 30 days of the interruption were not covered by insurance. We received full payment of $4.0 million in insurance settlements on the West Mine on our business interruption claim.

While experiencing a significant increase in premiums, we were able to renew the property insurance program with the same insurance carrier in 2007. Limits and coverage were improved from the previous policy periods.

The table below shows information about our directors, executive officers and key employees as of December 10, 2007:

Robert P. Jornayvaz III has served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Intrepid Potash since its formation in November 2007 and has served, directly or indirectly, as a manager of Intrepid Mining since its formation in January 2000. Mr. Jornayvaz is 100% owner of Intrepid Production Corporation, which owns 40% of Intrepid Mining and 100% of IPC Management LLC, one of two managers of Intrepid Mining. He also owns 50% of Intrepid Oil & Gas, LLC. He graduated from Phillips Exeter Academy and holds a B.A. degree from the Plan II Honors Program at the University of Texas and has 27 years’ experience in the oil and gas industry. Mr. Jornayvaz has been associated with Mr. Harvey for approximately 12 years, participating in joint property acquisition arrangements through their own companies until forming Intrepid Oil & Gas, LLC in 1996.

Hugh E. Harvey, Jr. has served as Executive Vice President of Technology and Director of Intrepid Potash since its formation in November 2007 and has served, directly or indirectly, as a manager of Intrepid Mining since its formation in January 2000. Mr. Harvey is 100% owner of Harvey Operating and Production Company, which owns 40% of Intrepid Mining and 100% of HOPCO Management LLC, one of two managers of Intrepid Mining. He also owns 50% of Intrepid Oil & Gas, LLC. Mr. Harvey earned a B.Sc. in Mining Engineering and an M.E. in Petroleum Engineering, from the Colorado School of Mines. He has ten years’ experience in the mining industry, over 24 years of experience in the oil and gas industry and a unique combination of mining, mineral processing, drilling, field operations and economic evaluation experience. Mr. Harvey has been associated with Mr. Jornayvaz for approximately 12 years, participating in joint property acquisition arrangements through their own companies until forming Intrepid Oil & Gas, LLC in 1996.

Patrick L. Avery has served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Intrepid Potash since its formation in November 2007. He joined Intrepid Mining as Vice President of Operations and Chief Operating Officer in April 2007 and was named Intrepid Mining’s President and Chief Operating Officer in October 2007. Prior to joining Intrepid Mining, Mr. Avery served in various capacities for J.R. Simplot, a privately-held food and agribusiness company, for over ten years. Most recently, Mr. Avery led and managed all aspects of Simplot’s agribusiness fertilizer and chemical business. As Senior Vice President of Mining and Manufacturing for Simplot, Mr. Avery was responsible for production, optimization, capital and project management, lean manufacturing and Six Sigma efforts. In such capacity, Mr. Avery was responsible for ten facilities, a $600 million operating budget with 5 million tons of fertilizer. Mr. Avery holds a B.A. in Biology and Chemistry from the University of Colorado, an M.S. in Engineering from Loyola, and an M.B.A. from Pepperdine University.

R.L. Moore has served as Senior Vice President of Marketing and Sales of Intrepid Potash since its formation in November 2007. He has served as Senior Vice President of Marketing of Intrepid New Mexico since March 2005 and prior to such time, served as Vice President of Marketing of Intrepid New Mexico since March 2004. Prior to joining Intrepid New Mexico, Mr. Moore served as Vice President of Marketing for Mississippi Potash, Inc. since August 1996. Mr. Moore directed all marketing and sales activities for Mississippi Potash’s potash mining and processing. Mr. Moore holds a Certified Traffic Manager Certification from the College of Advanced Traffic.

James N. Whyte has served as Executive Vice President of Human Resources and Risk Management of Intrepid Potash since its formation in November 2007. He joined Intrepid Mining as Vice President of Human Resources and Risk Management in January 2004 and was named Executive Vice President of Human Resources and Risk Management in October 2007. Prior to joining Intrepid Mining, Mr. Whyte served as President of Caleb Insurance Group, Inc. since December 1998. Mr. Whyte’s other previous roles included serving as a Senior Vice President for Marsh and McLennan, a global professional services and insurance brokerage firm, and a senior landman for Diamond Shamrock, an oil refining and marketing company. Mr. Whyte holds a B.B.A. in Finance from Southern Methodist University and an M.B.A. from The University of Denver.

Patrick A. Quinn, CPA has served as Interim Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of Intrepid Potash since its formation in November 2007 and has served as Interim Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer since Intrepid Mining’s inception in January 2000. For the past nineteen years, Mr. Quinn has been the President of Quinn & Associates, P.C., or Q&A, a ten-person firm of Certified Public Accountants. Q&A provides accounting, tax and auditing services primarily to the extractive industries. Mr. Quinn has extensive experience in oil and gas and mining operations including serving as the Controller of Hamilton Oil Corporation, which was the first company to produce oil in the U.K. sector of the North Sea. Mr. Quinn holds a B.S. in Accounting from Colorado State University, where he graduated with highest distinction.

Rodney D. Gloss has served as Vice President and Controller of Intrepid Potash since its formation in November 2007 and has served as Intrepid Mining’s Vice President and Controller since July 2004. Prior to that time, he held the positions of Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller of Timminco Limited, an international light metal manufacturing and mining company, since November 1998. Mr. Gloss’ additional experience includes positions as the Finance Manager and Controller with Sulzer Intermedics, an international manufacturer of high-tech medical devices, and the Controller and Director of Finance with North American Chemical, a private international mining and processing company of inorganic chemicals. Mr. Gloss holds an M.B.A. in Business Administration from the Anderson School, University of California—Los Angeles and a B.S. in Math and B.S.B.A. in Business Administration from Northern Arizona University.

J. Landis Martin has served as a director of Intrepid Potash since November 2007 and a director of Intrepid Mining since June 2007. Mr. Martin is the founder of the private equity firm Platte River Ventures and has been a Managing Director since November 2005. Mr. Martin retired as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Titanium Metals Corporation, an integrated producer of titanium metals, where he served from 1989 until November 2005. Mr. Martin served as President and Chief Executive Officer of NL Industries, Inc., a manufacturer of titanium dioxide chemicals, from 1987 to 2003 and was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Baroid Corporation from 1990 to 1994. Mr. Martin is Chairman of the Board of Directors of Crown Castle International Corp. and is also a director of Halliburton Company and Apartment Investment Management Company. Mr. Martin holds a B.S.B.A. in Business Administration and Economics from Northwestern University and a J.D. from Northwestern University School of Law.

Our board of directors currently consists of three directors. The members of our board of directors named above expect to appoint, effective as of the consummation of this offering and the formation transactions, three additional members who will be “independent” as that term is defined by the rules of the national securities exchange on which our common stock is listed. The three independent members will serve as the initial members of the audit, compensation and nominating and corporate governance committees.

Upon completion of the offering, we expect that our board will consist of Mr. Harvey, Mr. Jornayvaz and Mr. Martin and three additional independent directors who have not yet been identified.

The board of directors will have a standing audit committee, a standing compensation committee and a standing nominating and corporate governance committee.

Audit Committee. The audit committee will be responsible, among its other duties and responsibilities, for engaging, overseeing and evaluating our independent registered public accounting firm, pre-approving all audit and non-audit services by that firm, reviewing the scope of the audit plan and the results of each audit with management and our independent registered public accounting firm, reviewing the internal audit function, reviewing the adequacy of our system of internal accounting controls and disclosure controls and procedures, reviewing the financial statements and related financial information we will include in our SEC filings and exercising oversight with respect to our code of conduct and other policies and procedures regarding adherence with legal requirements. We expect that the members of the audit committee will be appointed prior to the completion of this offering. All of the members of the audit committee will be independent within the meaning of the independent director guidelines of the national securities exchange on which our common stock is listed and applicable federal securities laws and regulations. We expect our board to have one “audit committee financial expert” as defined in the federal securities laws and regulations.

Compensation Committee. The compensation committee will be responsible, among its other duties and responsibilities, for establishing the compensation and benefits of our executive officers and other key employees, monitoring compensation arrangements applicable to management employees for consistency with corporate objectives and stockholders’ interests and administering our stock incentive plans. We expect that the members of the compensation committee will be appointed prior to the completion of this offering. All of the members of our compensation committee will be independent within the meaning of the independent director guidelines of the national securities exchange on which our common stock is listed and applicable federal securities laws and regulations.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The nominating and corporate governance committee will be responsible for recommending candidates for election to the board of directors. The committee is also responsible, among its other duties and responsibilities, for making recommendations to the board of directors or otherwise acting with respect to corporate governance matters, including board size and membership qualifications, new director orientation, committee structure and membership, non-employee director compensation, succession planning for officers and key executives and communications with stockholders. We expect that the members of the nominating and corporate governance committee will be appointed prior to the completion of this offering. All of the members of our nominating and corporate governance committee will be independent within the meaning of the independent director guidelines of the national securities exchange on which our common stock is listed and applicable federal securities laws and regulations.

We are currently seeking to hire an individual to serve as our full-time Chief Financial Officer.

The following discussion and analysis of the compensation arrangements of our named executive officers should be read together with the tables and related disclosures set forth below under the heading entitled “—Executive Compensation”. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that are based on our current plans, considerations, expectations and determinations regarding future executive compensation programs. Actual compensation programs that we adopt may differ materially from the anticipated programs described below.

Our primary goals with respect to executive compensation are to attract, retain, motivate and reward talented executives, to tie compensation incentives to individual and company performance, and to sustain our continued growth and profitability by having total executive compensation reflect the overall success of the business. We currently use a mix of base salary, annual cash bonuses, benefits and perquisites to achieve those goals, although we anticipate transitioning from cash bonuses to a short-term incentive program and adding equity incentive awards to our executive compensation packages on or around the completion of the offering.

Our compensation approach has traditionally been tied to the operation of the business as a closely held limited liability company. Historically, the principal owners of Intrepid Mining, Robert P. Jornayvaz III and Hugh E. Harvey, Jr., have been solely responsible for setting and adjusting the overall design of our pay programs for the named executive officers, except for themselves. The principal owners negotiate executive compensation packages as part of the hiring process and review the aggregate levels of each executive’s compensation as part of the annual budget and performance review processes. In setting or adjusting executive compensation packages, the principal owners have relied on compensation consultants to recommend pay levels to ensure that executive compensation remains competitive in the marketplace. For example, we engaged Mercer, LLC in 2004 and 2005 and Delphi Management Solutions, Inc. in 2006 to recommend competitive base salary ranges and associated target bonus opportunities for our executive officers and other key employees. In developing pay recommendations, both consulting companies used several different proprietary compensation surveys containing pay data for companies similar in size, revenue and industry. In 2006, Delphi Management Solutions, Inc. recommended base salary ranges and target bonus opportunities that were at the median of the data pulled by them from the surveys. In setting the exact amount and mix of compensation elements for executive officers, the principal owners have in the past considered the following:

In 2003 and 2004, the principal owners entered into negotiations with the minority owner of the business at the time in order to establish base salary and target cash bonus levels for themselves. As a direct result of these negotiations, Intrepid Mining engaged J. Richard & Co., a nationally recognized compensation consultant, to recommend compensation for the principal owners. Those recommendations were eventually instituted by the principal owners in fiscal 2004 and 2005. In 2006, J. Richard & Co. updated its initial report and recommended new base salary and bonus opportunities for the principal owners. In arriving at its recommendations for 2006, J. Richard & Co. first established a peer group of the following 10 publicly-traded companies involved in natural resource extraction, the fertilizer industry, or both:

This peer group was designed to reflect a representative cross-section of companies of different sizes involved in businesses similar to ours. J. Richard & Co. then used the executive compensation data publicly reported by each of these companies to run a regression analysis comparing the base salary and total cash compensation of chief executive officers to the market capitalization and revenues of the companies in the peer group. They then applied the results of that analysis to our revenues and hypothetical market capitalization in formulating their recommendations. The recommendations were instituted in 2006 and continued as to base salary in 2007, and were approved by Potash Acquisition, LLC, the current minority owner of the business, upon the purchase of its interest in Intrepid Mining.

As we continue to evolve as a company, we expect that the specific direction, emphasis and components of our executive compensation programs will also continue to evolve. For example, over time, we expect to add equity incentives to executive pay packages, to transition from discretionary annual bonuses to a formal short-term cash incentive program, and to use peer groups and survey data in determining compensation for all of our executive officers. We anticipate that doing so will allow us to offer incentive compensation programs that are more in line with those used by public companies, including our primary competitors. We also believe that this approach will better motivate and reward our executive team. In furtherance of those expectations, we recently engaged Towers Perrin to recommend base salary levels, short-term incentive awards, and equity incentive awards for our named executive officers, including Messrs. Jornayvaz and Harvey. We anticipate that in developing its recommendations, Towers Perrin will rely on two sets of internally generated survey data, one set for all companies in Towers Perrin’s compensation database, the other including only companies in the agricultural/chemical industries. We anticipate that these data sets will then be manipulated through a regression analysis to generate information regarding pay levels for executives of companies of our size. We anticipate further that Towers Perrin will then select a peer group of similarly sized, publicly-traded companies engaged in potash extraction, fertilizer production, or in the agricultural/chemical industries generally in order to gather information on the pay practices of our closest competitors. We expect that Towers Perrin will analyze each of these data points and recommended compensation ranges for our executives that are benchmarked at the median of the analyzed data.

After completion of the offering, we expect that management, in consultation with Towers Perrin, will make annual recommendations of executive base salaries, short-term incentives and annual equity awards to our compensation committee, which will review the recommendations and make all final decisions with regard to our executive compensation programs and packages.

Our executive compensation program currently consists of the following components:

In general, base salary and annual cash bonus opportunities are established jointly for each executive officer based on the principal owners’ review of recommendations from the various compensation consultants described above, in order to set a total target cash pay opportunity for the executive for the year that is at or around the median of the total cash compensation data pulled by the relevant consultant. In order to better incentivize those individuals who can have the greatest impact on our success, the more senior the executive, the more of that individual’s total cash pay opportunity is generally weighted toward bonus. Benefits are available to all employees regardless of the base salary, bonus opportunity or perquisites made available to the employee. Perquisites are determined individually for each employee based on the individual’s job responsibilities and position with the company and have not generally affected the base salary or bonus opportunities of our executives.

Base salaries for executive officers other than our principal owners are established based on position-specific responsibilities, taking into account the median competitive market compensation for similar positions as set forth in the relevant survey data described above, the seniority of the individual, internal equity among executive officers, and other subjective factors deemed relevant by the principal owners. The base salaries of those executive officers are reviewed annually and may be adjusted pursuant to such review or at other appropriate times to reflect significant changes in job responsibilities or market conditions, as well as to reflect individual performance of the executive and the growth of the business. Historically, in determining salary adjustments, we have placed particular emphasis on an individual’s performance, as determined by our principal owners. Base salaries for the principal owners were set in 2006 at the average of the salary range recommended by J. Richard & Co. and have not changed in 2007. We expect that base salaries of all of our executive officers after the offering will be set by our compensation committee within base salary ranges recommended by Towers Perrin, which we expect to be benchmarked at the median of the competitive market data. We expect that the exact amount of an executive’s salary will be determined by our compensation committee after taking into account the factors described above.

Principal Owners. Bonus amounts for the principal owners are determined for each fiscal year, generally in accordance with one or more objective formulas developed by J. Richard & Co. for such year, but adjusted to take into account exceptional efforts or time spent by the principal owners in managing the business. In 2006, for example, the objective piece of the bonus was calculated by taking the average of the bonuses calculated under two separate bonus formulas. Each bonus formula was applied using the same two EBITDA targets for 2006. The first EBITDA target was based on the original financial case submitted to the various banking institutions upon the purchase of the Carlsbad facility from Mississippi Chemical Company in February 2004 and was $23,333,312. This target EBITDA was achieved in 2006. The second EBITDA target was based on our 2006 annual plan and was $44,594,130. This target EBITDA was not achieved in 2006. The bonus formulas for 2006 were as follows:

The bonus amounts calculated under each of the formulas were averaged, resulting in a total bonus under the objective formula for each of the principal owners of $394,875. Additional bonus amounts of $85,000 and $45,000 were then added to the amount calculated under the objective formula in order to compensate Messrs.

Jornayvaz and Harvey, respectively, for the significant additional effort and time necessary to address the needs of the business in 2006, as compared to prior years. See “Business—Insurance” above. The proposed bonus calculation, as described above, was approved by the managing members in October 2006. The bonuses, totaling $479,875 for Mr. Jornayvaz and $439,875 for Mr. Harvey, were paid in a lump sum in early 2007.

Other Executives. The principal owners have traditionally awarded to executive officers and other key employees discretionary annual bonuses in order to compensate those employees for individual and company performance during the year, as determined in the sole discretion of the principal owners. As described previously, target bonuses, expressed as a percentage of base salary, are established by the principal owners for each executive based on the recommendations from the relevant compensation consultant. However, the amount actually awarded in a given fiscal year is highly variable and can be eliminated entirely or exceed the target percentage based on the principal owners’ review of individual performance during the year and our financial performance during the year. Our principal owners have traditionally placed the greatest emphasis on individual performance in determining an executive’s annual bonus, and have determined that only truly exceptional individual performance warrants a bonus in excess of the target amount. Bonus payments are made in a lump sum by March 15^th of the following fiscal year.

For our principal owners, we intend to seek recommendations from Towers Perrin with respect to an approach for annual bonuses for fiscal 2007. For executives other than principal owners, we intend to follow a similar approach with respect to bonuses for fiscal 2007 as we did in fiscal 2006. We intend to transition to a more formal short-term incentive program after the offering for all executive officers. See “—Transition From Annual Cash Bonuses to Short-Term Incentive Program” below.

Our employees, including our named executive officers, are entitled to various employee benefits, including medical and dental insurance, group life, accidental death, and disability insurance, health and dependent care flexible spending accounts, a 401(k) plan, and paid time off. Pursuant to the terms of the 401(k) plan, we generally match 100% of an employee’s deferrals up to a specified percentage of compensation.

All of our executive officers, aside from Messrs. Quinn and Whyte, receive use of a company-provided automobile of their choice. Personal use of a company automobile is a relatively inexpensive perquisite that we feel satisfies a compensation expectation of our executive team based on their collective work experience in the mining, oil and gas, and fertilizer industries. Our principal owners are also each entitled to personal use of the company aircraft for up to 10% of its total flight time per year. Use of the aircraft was granted based on the relatively low additional cost to us, the security that it affords each of our principal owners in their personal travels and the benefit to us of keeping those individuals safe, and the fact that by virtue of their ownership of Intrepid Mining, each of the principal owners is an indirect stakeholder in the aircraft. We expect that management, together with our compensation committee, will address perquisites for our named executive officers after the offering.

We anticipate that in the future, creating long-term value for our stockholders will be achieved, in part, by aligning the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders through the use of equity incentive awards. Therefore, prior to the completion of the offering, we plan to adopt for the first time an equity incentive plan, the Intrepid Potash, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, which we refer to herein as the “equity incentive plan”. We expect that the equity incentive plan will assist us in attracting, motivating and retaining employees, directors and consultants, and will reward such individuals for achievement of long-term financial objectives and company growth. Given the lack of current equity holdings by our executive officers other than our principal

owners, we anticipate making significant initial grants to such non-equity-holding executive officers on or around the closing of the offering. Specifically, we anticipate that the initial grants will be based on a multiple of an annual equity incentive award amount recommended for each executive officer by Towers Perrin. We anticipate that the principal owners will forego or receive nominal grants at that time, and that some or all of the grants that would otherwise be made to them (based on the methodology in the preceding sentence) will instead be made to other executive officers and key employees. The specific types and actual amounts of the initial equity awards have yet to be determined. Equity incentive awards made after the initial grants will be determined by our compensation committee and are expected to be more in line with the annual equity incentive award amounts recommended by Towers Perrin. See “—Grants of Plan-Based Awards—Establishment of Equity Incentive Plan” below for a description of the anticipated terms of the equity incentive plan.

We anticipate that in the future, we will transition away from annual cash bonuses into a more formalized short-term incentive program for all of our executive officers, including our principal owners, with target award opportunities, company financial objectives, and individual performance goals that are communicated in advance to program participants, and payouts that are conditioned explicitly on achievement of those goals and objectives. Although our current annual bonus program and the anticipated short-term incentive program would reward similar achievements, we anticipate that the pre-establishment of performance goals and the communication of those goals under a formalized short-term incentive program will provide more transparency to annual incentive compensation decisions and will better motivate and reward our executive team. The parameters of such a short-term incentive program, including the target award opportunity levels for each of the named executive officers, the company financial objectives and the individual performance goals, are expected to be established by our compensation committee after the offering.

To date, the principal owners have not considered accounting and tax treatment in structuring our executive compensation programs as they have focused primarily on the practical aspects of compensating our executives and because, unlike equity incentive awards, the selected programs are subject to little variability in their accounting and tax treatment. However, in the course of reevaluating our compensation programs as described above, we plan to consider the anticipated accounting and tax implications to us and our executives. For example, upon completion of the offering, Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code will impose a limit on the amount of compensation that we may deduct in any one year with respect to our named executive officers, unless certain specific and detailed criteria are satisfied. We intend to monitor our executive pay programs with respect to Section 162(m) to maximize the deductibility of compensation paid to our named executives. However, we may pay compensation in excess of the Section 162(m) limitation if we conclude that doing so would be in the best interests of the company and its stockholders. In addition, when we implement an equity incentive plan for our executive officers and other key employees, we will take into account the accounting treatment of equity awards made under the plan under SFAS No. 123(R) in determining the amount and type of such awards. While we will consider the applicable accounting and tax treatment, these factors alone are not dispositive, and we will also consider the cash and non-cash impact of the programs and whether a program is consistent with our overall compensation philosophy and objectives.

The following table sets forth the compensation paid to our Co-Chief Executive Officers, our Chief Financial Officer and the two other individuals who were serving as our executive officers on December 31, 2006. These individuals are sometimes referred to collectively as the “named executive officers”.

We have not entered into employment agreements with any of our named executive officers. However, on March 19, 2007, we extended an offer letter to Patrick L. Avery, our Chief Operating Officer, which sets forth certain terms and conditions of his employment. We considered the extension of a formal offer letter, and the items of compensation provided therein, to be vital to our ability to secure Mr. Avery’s employment, which was in high demand. Mr. Avery received a $50,000 signing bonus pursuant to the offer letter. His current base salary is $334,000. In addition to base salary, Mr. Avery is eligible for an annual cash bonus, determined in the same manner as bonuses are determined for other executives, equal to 50% of his base salary. Mr. Avery is entitled to a company-provided vehicle of his choice, and received relocation benefits and the reimbursement of personal travel expenses to and from his prior state of employment on an as-needed basis through July 1, 2007. In the

event that Intrepid Mining effectuates a major financial restructuring, such as this offering, Mr. Avery is entitled to a long-term incentive compensation reward appropriate for his position. We believe this obligation would be satisfied through the equity incentive grant that we anticipate making to him in connection with the offering. See “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Establishment of Long-Term Incentive Program” above. In the event that Mr. Avery is terminated without cause as a result of a sale of Intrepid Mining, he is eligible for severance equal to two (2) times his annual salary. Pursuant to the terms of the offer letter, such amount is decreased by 1/24 for each month Mr. Avery is employed by us and such amount will be eliminated entirely upon his receipt of an equity incentive award pursuant to the establishment of a long-term incentive program. Mr. Avery is also entitled to use the company aircraft for business purposes.

We expect to enter into employment agreements with Messrs. Jornayvaz and Harvey in connection with the completion of this offering in order to secure their services on a long-term basis and to protect the company following their termination of employment by securing their agreement not to compete with us. The anticipated terms of the employment agreements were developed based on recommendations by Towers Perrin and input from counsel and the principal owners.

Pursuant to the terms of these agreements, Mr. Jornayvaz will agree to serve as our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Harvey will agree to serve as our Executive Vice President of Technology. We expect that Messrs. Jornayvaz and Harvey will devote substantially full-time attention to their employment with us. In addition, they may continue to manage their personal investments owned in whole or in part by each executive, including Intrepid Oil & Gas, provided the management of such investments does not interfere substantially with the performance of their duties for Intrepid Potash. We expect the employment agreements to be for initial terms of 18 months from the completion of this offering, with automatic extensions for successive terms of 12 months each, unless notice of termination is given by us or the executive 90 days prior to the end of the initial or any successive term. The agreements will provide for an annual base salary of $487,500, subject to annual review by the compensation committee with adjustments to be consistent with salaries paid to executives holding similar positions at peer group companies. We expect that the agreements will provide for the executives to be eligible for all benefits offered generally to senior management, for participation in the senior management bonus programs established by the compensation committee, for grants under the Intrepid Potash Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan in such amounts and subject to such terms and conditions as are established by our compensation committee and for all perquisites available generally to senior management. Each of Messrs. Jornayvaz and Harvey shall be entitled to a company-provided automobile of his choice valued at under $75,000, to personal use of our aircraft for 45 hours of flight time per year and the right to dry lease our aircraft for personal use on the same terms as we dry lease the aircraft to unrelated third parties.

We expect these agreements to provide that if an executive is terminated for cause, the executive will be paid accrued compensation, if any, and will be offered continued group health care coverage as required by law, but the executive will not be entitled to severance. If the executive is terminated without cause, the executive will be paid accrued compensation, if any, and will be offered continued group health care coverage as required by law and will be entitled to severance in the amount of compensation payable for the remainder of the current term of the agreement. The employment agreements will also provide that, in the event that we experience a change of control, as defined in the employment agreements, all equity awards to executives will become vested in full.

We expect that the employment agreements will contain an “efficient” golden parachute tax gross up. Thus, if any of the payments and benefits due an executive upon a change in control would constitute an “excess parachute payment” (as defined in Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code), then we will first perform a calculation to determine the net after-tax benefit to the executive assuming the executive receives either (a) all compensation and benefits due as a result of the change in control (other than any excise tax gross up provided for in his employment agreement), or (b) the maximum amount of compensation and benefits permissible without triggering an excess parachute payment under Section 280G. If the executive would receive a greater after-tax benefit by cutting back to the maximum amount permissible without triggering an excess parachute

payment, then the executive’s compensation and benefits upon the change in control will be cut back to that amount. If the executive would receive a greater after-tax benefit by receiving the full amount of compensation and benefits due upon the change in control (without regard to any excise tax gross up), then the executive shall receive the full amount of such compensation and benefits plus an additional payment that would, after payment of all federal, state and local taxes on such payment, equal the amount of excise tax due.

Under the terms of these employment agreements, we expect the executives to agree that during the term of their employment and for a period of 24 months after a termination event, the executives will not solicit our employees or compete with us in the potash business and any other business in which we are engaged during the term or at the termination of the employment agreement. However, if the executive’s employment is terminated without cause more than 24 months after the date of the employment agreement, the non-solicitation and non-compete obligations will survive only until the end of the current term of the employment agreement. In addition, the agreements will prohibit the executives from divulging our confidential information, which prohibition will survive the termination of employment.

We anticipate that in connection with the offering we will enter into employment agreements with several other of our named executive officers, including a new chief financial officer, in order to more formally establish the terms of their employment and to secure their services on a long-term basis. The terms of the employment agreements, including who would enter into them, have not been established, but may include payment to the executive officers of severance or other amounts upon termination of employment or upon a change in control. The agreements may also prohibit the executives from competing with us, soliciting our employees, or divulging our confidential information during their employment and for a specified period following termination of employment.

As discussed previously, we have not yet adopted any formal incentive plans and have not to date made equity incentive awards of any type. Therefore, there were no grants of plan based awards to our named executive officers during the 2006 fiscal year, there were no outstanding equity awards at the end of the 2006 fiscal year for the named executive officers, and no options were exercised by any of the named executive officers during the 2006 fiscal year, or through September 30, 2007.

As described previously, prior to the completion of the offering, we plan to adopt for the first time an equity incentive plan. We anticipate that the equity incentive plan will provide for the grant of options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, and other equity-based and cash incentive awards to directors, officers, employees, consultants and other individuals (including advisory board members) who perform services for us or for our affiliates.

The total number of shares of our common stock that we plan to make available for issuance or delivery under the equity incentive plan will be shares, subject to adjustment in the event of any stock dividend or split, reorganization, recapitalization, merger, share exchange or any other similar corporate event. For purposes of determining the number of shares remaining available for issuance under the equity incentive plan, to the extent that an award expires or is canceled, forfeited, settled in cash or otherwise terminated without delivery to the participant of the full number of shares to which the award related, the undelivered shares will again be available for grant. Shares withheld in payment of the exercise price or taxes relating to an award and shares equal to the number surrendered in payment of any exercise price or taxes relating to an award will be deemed to constitute shares not delivered to the participant and will be deemed to again be available for awards under the plan. Shares issued under the equity incentive plan may be authorized and unissued shares or treasury shares.

We anticipate that the maximum number of shares that may be covered by an award granted under the equity incentive plan to any single participant in any calendar year will not exceed . The maximum dollar amount that may be awarded to a single participant in any calendar year is not expected to exceed $ .

Generally, the compensation committee, or the committee, will administer the equity incentive plan and will designate those persons who will be granted awards and the amount, type and other terms and conditions of the awards. The committee will have full authority to administer the equity incentive plan, including the authority to interpret and construe any provision in the plan and the terms of any award agreement and to adopt such rules and regulations for administering the plan that it may deem necessary or appropriate. Pursuant to this authority, on or after the date of grant of an award, the committee may:

The following is a description of the significant terms we expect to apply to each type of award issued under the equity incentive plan:

Options and Stock Appreciation Rights. Each option will entitle the holder to purchase a specified number of shares at a specified exercise price. Each option agreement will specify whether the option is an “incentive stock option”, or “ISO” (within the meaning of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code), or a nonqualified stock option. Each stock appreciation right will entitle the holder to receive, upon exercise, the excess of the fair market value of a share at the time of exercise over the base price of the stock appreciation right multiplied by the specified number of shares to which the stock appreciation right is being exercised. The exercise or base price of each option and stock appreciation right will be at least 100% of the fair market value of a share on the date the award is granted. The term of any option or stock appreciation right will not exceed ten years and the option or stock appreciation right will vest over a period determined by the committee. Each option or stock appreciation right agreement will specify the consequences to the award with respect to a termination of service with us and our affiliates.

Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units. The committee may grant a restricted stock award, which is a grant of actual shares subject to a risk of forfeiture and restrictions on transfer. The committee may also grant an award of restricted stock units, a contractual commitment to deliver shares at a future date. The terms and conditions of any restricted stock award or award of restricted stock units will be determined by the committee.

Other Equity-Based Awards. The committee may grant other types of equity-based awards in such amounts and subject to such terms and conditions as the committee determines. Each such award may, among other things, (i) involve the transfer of actual shares, either at the time of grant or thereafter, or payment in cash of amounts based on the value of shares; (ii) be subject to performance-based and/or service-based vesting conditions; and (iii) be in the form of phantom stock, performance shares, deferred share units or other full value stock awards.

The plan will provide that participants may elect to satisfy certain federal income tax withholding requirements by remitting to us cash or, subject to certain conditions, shares, or by instructing us to withhold shares payable to the participant.

Our board of directors may amend, suspend, discontinue, or terminate the equity incentive plan or the committee’s authority to grant awards under the equity incentive plan in any respect, except that, to the extent that any applicable law, regulation or rule of a stock exchange requires stockholder approval for any revision or amendment to be effective, the revision or amendment will not be effective without stockholder approval. We will not make any grants under the equity incentive plan following the tenth anniversary of the date the plan becomes effective, but awards outstanding at that time will continue in accordance with their terms.

The following is intended only as a brief summary of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the equity incentive plan. The tax consequences to a participant will depend generally upon the type of award issued to the participant. In general, if a participant recognizes ordinary income in connection with the grant, vesting or exercise of an award, we will be entitled to a corresponding deduction equal to the amount of the income recognized by the participant. This summary does not address the effects of other federal taxes (including possible “golden parachute” excise taxes) or taxes imposed under state, local or foreign tax laws.

Options and Stock Appreciation Rights. In general, a participant does not have taxable income upon the grant of an option or a stock appreciation right. The participant will recognize ordinary income upon exercise of a nonqualified stock option equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares acquired on exercise over the aggregate option price for the shares. Upon exercising a stock appreciation right, the participant will recognize ordinary income equal to the cash or fair market value of the shares received. A participant will not recognize ordinary income upon exercise of an ISO, except that the alternative minimum tax may apply. If a participant disposes of shares acquired upon exercise of an ISO before the end of the applicable holding periods, the participant will recognize ordinary income. Otherwise, a sale of shares acquired by exercise of an option or a stock appreciation right generally will result in short-term or long-term capital gain or loss measured by the difference between the sale price and the participant’s tax basis in the shares. We normally can claim a tax deduction equal to the amount recognized as ordinary income by a participant in connection with an option or stock appreciation right, but no tax deduction relating to a participant’s capital gains. We will not be entitled to any tax deduction with respect to an ISO if the participant holds the shares for the applicable ISO holding periods before selling or transferring the shares.

Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units and Other Equity-Based Awards. If an award is subject to a restriction on transferability and a substantial risk of forfeiture (for example, restricted stock), the participant generally must recognize ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the transferred amounts at the earliest time either the transferability restriction or risk of forfeiture lapses. If an award has no restriction on transferability or is not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, the participant generally must recognize ordinary income equal to the cash or the fair market value of shares received. We can ordinarily claim a tax deduction in an amount equal to the ordinary income recognized by the participant, except as discussed below regarding Section 162(m). A participant may irrevocably elect to accelerate the taxable income to the time of grant of restricted stock rather than upon lapse of restrictions on transferability or the risk of forfeiture (Section 83(b) election).

Section 409A. Section 409A of the Code imposes election, payment and funding requirements on “nonqualified deferred compensation” plans. If a nonqualified deferred compensation arrangement subject to Section 409A of the Code fails to meet, or is not operated in accordance with, the requirements of Section 409A, then compensation deferred under the arrangement may become immediately taxable and subject to a 20% additional tax. Certain awards that may be issued under the plan may constitute a “deferral of compensation” subject to the requirements of Section 409A of the Code.

Section 162(m). Compensation that qualifies as “performance-based” compensation is excluded from the $1 million deduction limitation of Section 162(m) of the Code. Under the equity incentive plan, options and stock appreciation rights granted with an exercise price at least equal to 100% of the fair market value of the underlying shares on the date of grant and certain other awards that are conditioned upon achievement of

performance goals are intended to qualify as “performance-based” compensation. A number of requirements must be met in order for particular compensation to so qualify, and we cannot assure you that compensation under the equity incentive plan will be fully deductible by us under all circumstances.

None of our named executive officers participate in or have accrued benefits under qualified or non-qualified defined benefit plans sponsored by us. We do not anticipate establishing such plans at any time in the future.

None of our named executive officers participate in or have account balances in non-qualified defined contribution plans or other deferred compensation plans maintained by us. While we do not currently anticipate establishing any such plans or programs, our compensation committee may in the future determine that doing so would be desirable and may institute such plans or programs at that time.

The following summarizes potential termination and change in control payments to be made to our named executive officers.

Messrs. Jornayvaz and Harvey would be eligible for the following termination and change in control payments pursuant to the anticipated terms of their employment agreements, which we expect to be in effect as of the completion of this offering.

The anticipated terms of the employment agreements provide for severance solely in the event that either is terminated without “cause,” as defined in the agreements. In such event, the executive will be entitled to severance in the amount of compensation payable for the remainder of the then-current term of the agreement.

The anticipated terms of the employment agreements also provide that, in the event that we experience a change in control, as defined in the agreements, (a) all equity awards to these executives will become vested in full, and (b) the executives will be entitled to an “efficient” gross up of any golden parachute tax due. See “Executive Compensation — Employment Agreements” above. A termination of employment is not required to receive the change in control benefits.

Assuming the events below had each occurred on December 31, 2006, the above-described payments and benefits to each of Messrs. Jornayvaz and Harvey would have had the estimated values set forth in the table below:

We are not currently obligated to pay severance or other amounts to our other named executive officers upon termination of employment or a change in control, except to Mr. Avery pursuant to his offer letter. Pursuant to Mr. Avery’s offer letter, in the event that Mr. Avery is terminated without cause as a result of a sale of Intrepid Mining, he is eligible for severance equal to two (2) times his annual salary. Such amount is decreased by 1/24 for each month Mr. Avery is employed by us and such amount is eliminated entirely upon his receipt of an equity incentive award on or around the closing of the offering. See “—Employment Agreements” above. In connection with the offering, we expect to enter into formal employment agreements with certain of our executive officers, including Mr. Avery, pursuant to which we may become obligated to pay severance or other amounts upon termination of employment or a change in control. The terms of those agreements, including who would enter into them, have yet to be established.

We have not yet decided whether to pay any compensation to our directors prior to the offering, although we will reimburse directors for any out-of-pocket expenses incurred by them in connection with services provided in such capacity. We expect to establish a non-employee director compensation policy that will go into effect upon completion of the offering that may include some or all of the following components: an annual retainer for board service, cash compensation for each meeting attended, an annual retainer for chairing or serving on our audit committee, compensation committee and nominating and corporate governance committee, and grants under the equity incentive plan.

We do not anticipate any interlocking relationships between any member of our compensation committee or our nominating and corporate governance committee and any of our executive officers that would require disclosure under the applicable rules promulgated under the U.S. federal securities laws.

As permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law, or DGCL, our restated certificate of incorporation will contain provisions that limit or eliminate the personal liability of our directors and officers for monetary damages for a breach of their fiduciary duty of care as a director or officer. The duty of care generally requires that, when acting on behalf of the corporation, directors and officers exercise an informed business judgment based on all material information reasonably available to them. Consequently, a director or officer will not be personally liable to us or our stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director or officer, except for liability for:

These limitations of liability do not generally affect the availability of equitable remedies such as injunctive relief or rescission.

As permitted by the DGCL, our restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws will provide that:

Our restated certificate of incorporation will require us to advance expenses to our directors and officers in connection with a legal proceeding, subject to receiving an undertaking from such director or officer to repay advanced amounts if it is determined he or she is not entitled to indemnification. Our amended and restated bylaws will provide that we may advance expenses to our employees and other agents, upon such terms and conditions, if any, as we deem appropriate.

We intend to enter into separate indemnification agreements with each of our directors and officers, which may be broader than the specific indemnification provisions contained in the DGCL. These indemnification agreements may require us, among other things, to indemnify our directors and officers against liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service as directors or officers, other than liabilities arising from willful misconduct. These indemnification agreements may also require us to advance any expenses incurred by the directors or officers as a result of any proceeding against them as to which they could be indemnified and to obtain directors’ and officers’ insurance, if available on reasonable terms.

To our knowledge, there is currently no pending litigation or proceeding involving any of our directors, officers, employees or agents in which indemnification by us is sought, nor are we aware of any threatened litigation or proceeding that may result in a claim for indemnification.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted for our directors, officers and controlling persons under the foregoing provisions or otherwise, we have been informed that, in the opinion of the SEC, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.

We intend to adopt a written related party transactions policy, requiring the approval of the audit committee for any transaction, valued at or above a specified threshold to be determined, between Intrepid Potash and an executive officer, director, substantial stockholder or a family member of any of them, other than transactions pursuant to the transition services agreement.

The table presented below shows information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of December 10, 2007, before and after giving effect to the offering and the formation transactions described under “The Formation Transactions” above, by:

The information in the following table has been presented in accordance with the rules of the SEC. Under SEC rules, beneficial ownership of a class of securities includes any shares of such class as to which a person, directly or indirectly, has or shares voting power or investment power and also any shares as to which a person has the right to acquire such voting or investment power within 60 days through the exercise of any stock option, warrant or other right. If two or more persons share voting power or investment power with respect to specific securities, each such person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of such securities. Except as otherwise indicated below and under applicable community property laws, we believe that the beneficial owners of the common shares listed below, based on information they have furnished to us, have sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares shown. Percentage of beneficial ownership is based on shares of common stock to be outstanding after the completion of this offering, assuming that the underwriters will not exercise any portion of their option to purchase additional shares to cover over-allotments (and therefore, that shares will be distributed to the current members of Intrepid Mining pursuant to the formation distribution). No shares of common stock subject to options are exercisable currently or within 60 days of December 10, 2007. Unless otherwise specified, the address of each named beneficial owner is c/o Intrepid Potash, Inc., 700 17^th Street, Suite 700, Denver, CO 80202.

Our board of directors will consist of six members upon consummation of this offering and may be subsequently expanded to seven as necessary for efficient functioning of the board. We also may expand the board in the future as may be required by the rules of the national securities exchange on which our common stock is listed. In connection with the formation transactions, the original stockholders will enter into a voting agreement, wherein they will each agree to nominate one candidate for election to the board and to vote their shares in favor of the others’ candidates. The original stockholders will own in the aggregate, after giving effect to this offering and assuming the underwriters do not exercise their option to purchase additional shares, % of our issued and outstanding common stock. The initial nominees of the original stockholders will be Mr. Harvey (nominated by HOPCO), Mr. Jornayvaz (nominated by IPC), and Mr. Martin (nominated by PAL). The rights and obligations under the voting agreement will not be transferable upon sale or other transfer of common stock by an original stockholder. The voting agreement will terminate with respect to an original stockholder when that stockholder’s ownership falls below a specified threshold.

Under the voting agreement, each original stockholder will also agree, except in the case of a public tender offer, to not knowingly sell shares of its common stock to any person if the result of that sale would be that the purchaser of such shares would own, directly or indirectly, 5% or more of the outstanding common stock of Intrepid Potash.

In connection with the completion of this offering, we will enter into a registration rights agreement with the original stockholders. Under the registration rights agreement, each of the original stockholders will have the right, in certain circumstances after the consummation of this offering, to require us to register some or all of the shares of common stock held by such stockholder in connection with a public offering and sale. Subject to the terms and conditions of the registration rights agreement, each original stockholder will have the right to make three such “demands” for registration, one of which may be pursuant to a shelf registration statement. In addition, in connection with registered offerings by us after the consummation of this offering, whether pursuant to a “demand” registration or otherwise, the original stockholders will have the ability to exercise certain “piggyback registration rights” and have some or all of their shares included in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no registration statement may be filed during the lock-up period following the date of this prospectus, as described under “Shares Eligible for Future Sale—Sale of Restricted Shares and Lock-Up Agreements”. We will bear all costs of registration pursuant to the registration rights provided in the registration rights agreement.

Under Intrepid Mining’s existing policy, which will remain in effect until completion of this offering, managing members are allowed to use Intrepid Mining’s plane for non-business purposes up to 10% of its total flight time per year. This is recorded by Intrepid Mining as compensation to the members. The amounts classified as compensation are recorded as partial offsets to the operating expenses of the plane. See “Management—Executive Compensation”. In addition, IPC and HOPCO have the right to dry lease our plane on the same terms as the plane is dry leased to unrelated third parties.

Following completion of the offering, we expect to have employment agreements with Mr. Jornayvaz and Mr. Harvey that will allow each of them to use 45 hours of flight time of our plane for non-business purposes. In addition, IPC and HOPCO will have the right to dry lease our plane on the same terms as the plane is dry leased to unrelated third parties.

In connection with the completion of this offering, we intend to enter into a transition services agreement with Intrepid Oil & Gas, LLC, or IOG, an entity owned by Messrs. Jornayvaz and Harvey. Pursuant to this agreement, IOG, on a limited basis, may require specified employees of Intrepid Potash or its subsidiaries (other than Messrs. Jornayvaz and Harvey) to provide geology, land title and engineering services in connection with IOG’s oil and gas venture. Under the prior arrangement with IOG, beginning in 2007, IOG reimbursed Intrepid Mining for actual time and expenses incurred on IOG’s behalf. Costs and expenses incurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 were $0.2 million.

IOG will be obligated to pay us a monthly fee and reimburse us for and in connection with the use of our services, in an amount equal to the sum of:

The transition services agreement will have a one-year term and may be terminated by IOG at any time on 30 days’ prior written notice.

Mr. Quinn, our Interim Chief Financial Officer, is an independent contractor and performs services for us through the accounting firm of Quinn & Associates, P.C., of which he is the primary owner. In 2006, we paid Q&A $468,456 for services rendered on our behalf by Mr. Quinn and other employees of Q&A, $175,175 of which was attributable directly to services performed by Mr. Quinn. In 2006, payments from Intrepid Mining represented approximately one-third of Q&A’s annual revenue.

An acquisition of a 20% membership interest in Intrepid Mining by a new member, PAL, was completed for $39.0 million in June 2007. The largest beneficial owner of PAL is Platte River Ventures I, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership. One of our directors, J. Landis Martin, is the managing member of Platte River Ventures I, L.P.’s general partner, PRV Investors I, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.

On December 28, 2006, Intrepid Mining agreed to redeem the entire membership interest of Long Canyon, which at the time represented 42.5% of Intrepid Mining’s outstanding membership interests. The total redemption price was $100.0 million, which included a $95.0 million note paid in March 2007. The $100.0 million cost to redeem the membership interest of Long Canyon, as well as costs of the redemption transaction, were treated as distributions to Long Canyon, resulting in Intrepid Mining having a members’ deficit as of December 31, 2006.

Intrepid Mining declared special distributions to its members of $3.9 million and $15.0 million in June 2007 and October 2007, respectively. These distributions were funded by draws upon the existing revolving line of credit, and were permitted under the existing senior credit facility.

In early 2007, Intrepid Mining decided to distribute its remaining interests in Intrepid Oil and Gas, LLC (IOG) to its members. The amount of the equity distribution was $0.8 million.

Intrepid Mining made advances from time to time to its managing members. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the outstanding advances were approximately $0.4 million and $0.2 million, respectively. All such advances have been repaid to Intrepid Mining.

The following description of material terms of our capital stock and certain provisions of our restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws, each of which will be in effect on the completion of this offering, are summaries and are qualified by reference to the restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws, copies of which have been filed as exhibits to the registration statement, of which this prospectus forms a part.

Upon the completion of this offering, we expect there will be shares of common stock issued and outstanding, excluding any restricted stock issued under our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan and including shares that will be sold to the underwriters pursuant to the exercise of their over-allotment option or, to the extent the over-allotment option is not exercised, distributed to the current members of Intrepid Mining pursuant to the formation distribution.

Our directors will be elected by all of our common stockholders voting together as a single class. Holders of shares of common stock will not be entitled to cumulate their votes in the election of directors.

Generally, all matters to be voted on by stockholders must be approved by the vote of a majority (or, in the case of election of directors, by a plurality) of our outstanding common stock. Except as otherwise required by the DGCL, our restated certificate of incorporation or the voting rights granted to any preferred stock we subsequently issue, the holders of outstanding shares of common stock and preferred stock entitled to vote thereon, if any, will vote as one class with respect to all matters to be voted on by our stockholders. Except as otherwise provided by law, and subject to any voting rights granted to any preferred stock we subsequently issue, amendments to our restated certificate of incorporation must be approved by the holders of at least a majority of the outstanding common stock. Under the DGCL, amendments to our restated certificate of incorporation that would alter or change the powers, preferences or special rights of the common stock so as to affect them adversely also must be approved by a majority of the votes entitled to be cast by the holders of the shares affected by the amendment, voting as a separate class. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any amendment to our restated certificate of incorporation to increase or decrease the authorized shares of common stock shall be approved upon the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the common stock, voting together as a single class.

agreement, wherein they will each agree to nominate one candidate for election to the board and to vote their shares in favor of the others’ candidates. The original stockholders will own in the aggregate, after giving effect to this offering and assuming the underwriters do not exercise their option to purchase additional shares, % of our issued and outstanding common stock. The initial nominees of the original stockholders will be Mr. Harvey (nominated by HOPCO), Mr. Jornayvaz (nominated by IPC), and Mr. Martin (nominated by PAL). The rights and obligations under the voting agreement will not be transferable upon sale or other transfer of common stock by an original stockholder. The voting agreement will terminate with respect to an original stockholder when that stockholder’s ownership falls below a specified threshold.

As discussed under the heading “Dividend Policy”, other than the dividend we will declare to Intrepid Mining as a part of the formation transactions, we do not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future following the completion of this offering. Holders of common stock will share ratably (based on the number of shares of common stock held) in any dividend declared by our board of directors, subject to any preferential rights of any outstanding preferred stock.

Upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, after payment in full of the amounts required to be paid to holders of preferred stock, if any, all holders of common stock, regardless of class, will be entitled to share ratably in any assets available for distribution to holders of shares of common stock. No shares of any class of common stock are subject to redemption or have preemptive rights to purchase additional shares of common stock.

In connection with the completion of this offering, our board of directors will be authorized, without further stockholder approval, to issue from time to time up to an aggregate of shares of preferred stock in one or more series and to fix or alter the designations, preferences, rights and any qualifications, limitations or restrictions of the shares of each such series thereof, including the dividend rights, dividend rates, conversion rights, voting rights, terms of redemption (including sinking fund provisions), redemption price or prices, liquidation preferences and the number of shares constituting any series or designations of such series. Upon the completion of this offering, there will be no shares of preferred stock outstanding. We have no present plans to issue any shares of preferred stock. See “—Anti-Takeover Effects of Certain Provisions of Delaware Law, the Certificate of Incorporation and the Bylaws”.

We expect to issue options to purchase approximately shares under our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan to our employees at or before the completion of this offering. Upon completion of this offering, we anticipate that options to purchase a total of shares of common stock and shares of restricted stock will be outstanding. See “Management—Grants of Plan-Based Awards” and “Shares Eligible for Future Sale”.

Anti-Takeover Effects of Certain Provisions of Delaware Law, the Certificate of Incorporation and the Bylaws

Some provisions of Delaware law and our restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws could make the following transactions more difficult:

These provisions, summarized below, are expected to discourage and prevent coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids. These provisions are designed to encourage persons seeking to acquire control of our company to first negotiate with our board of directors. They are also intended to provide our management with the flexibility to enhance the likelihood of continuity and stability if our board of directors determines that a takeover is not in the best interests of our stockholders. These provisions, however, could have the effect of discouraging attempts to acquire us, which could deprive our stockholders of opportunities to sell their shares of common stock at prices higher than prevailing market prices.

Delaware Anti-Takeover Statute. We are subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. Section 203 is an anti-takeover law. In general, Section 203 prohibits a publicly held Delaware corporation from engaging in a business combination with an interested stock holder for a period of three years following the date that the person became an interested stockholder, unless the business combination or the transaction in which the person became an interested stockholder is approved in a prescribed manner. Generally, a business combination includes a merger, asset or stock sale, or another transaction resulting in a financial benefit to the interested stockholder. Generally, an interested stockholder is a person who, together with affiliates and associates, owns 15% or more of the corporation’s voting stock. The existence of this provision may have an anti-takeover effect with respect to transactions that are not approved in advance by our board of directors, including discouraging attempts that might result in a premium over the market price for the shares of common stock held by stockholders.

Special Stockholder Meetings. Under our restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws, only the chairman of the board and our board of directors will be able to call special meetings of stockholders.

Election and Removal of Directors. Our restated certificate of incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws will contain provisions that establish specific procedures for appointing and removing members of the board of directors. Under our restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws, our board will be classified into three classes of directors and, under our amended and restated bylaws, directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast in each election. Only one class will stand for election at each annual meeting, and directors will be elected to serve three-year terms. In addition, our restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws will provide that vacancies and newly created directorships on the board of directors may be filled only by a majority of the directors then serving on the board (except as otherwise required by law or by resolution of the board). Our restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws will provide that directors may be removed only for cause.

Undesignated Preferred Stock. The authorization of undesignated, or “blank check”, preferred stock will make it possible for our board of directors to issue preferred stock with voting or other rights or preferences that could impede the success of any attempt to change control of our company.

Requirements for Advance Notification of Stockholder Nominations and Proposals. Our amended and restated bylaws will establish advance notice procedures with respect to stockholder proposals and the nomination of candidates for election as directors, other than nominations made by or at the direction of the board of directors or a committee of the board of directors. See “—Advance Notice Requirements for Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominations”.

No Stockholder Action by Written Consent. Our restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws will not permit stockholders to act by written consent without a meeting.

No Cumulative Voting. Under Delaware law, cumulative voting for the election of directors is not permitted unless a corporation’s certificate of incorporation authorizes cumulative voting. Our restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws will not provide for cumulative voting in the election of directors. Cumulative voting allows a minority stockholder to vote a portion or all of its shares for one or more candidates for seats on the board of directors. Without cumulative voting, a minority stockholder will not be able to gain as many seats on our board of directors based on the number of shares of our stock the stockholder holds as the stockholder would be able to gain if cumulative voting were permitted. The absence of cumulative voting makes it more difficult for a minority stockholder to gain a seat on our board of directors to influence our board’s decision regarding a takeover.

Amendment of Provisions in Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws. The amendment of most of the above provisions in our restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws will require approval by holders of at least a majority of our outstanding capital stock entitled to vote generally in the election of directors.

These and other provisions could have the effect of discouraging others from attempting hostile takeovers and, as a consequence, they may also inhibit temporary fluctuations in the market price of our common stock that often result from actual or rumored hostile takeover attempts. These provisions may also have the effect of preventing changes in our management. It is possible that these provisions could make it more difficult to accomplish transactions that stockholders may otherwise deem to be in their best interests.

Advance Notice Requirements for Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominations

Our amended and restated bylaws will provide that stockholders seeking to bring business before an annual meeting of stockholders, or to nominate candidates for election as directors at an annual meeting of stockholders, must provide timely notice thereof in writing. To be timely, a stockholder’s notice generally must be delivered to and received at our principal executive offices, not less than 30 days nor more than 60 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting; provided, that if less than 40 days notices of the date of the annual meeting is given to stockholders, notice from the stockholder must be received at our principal executive officers no later than 10 days from the date of that notice. Our amended and restated bylaws also will specify certain requirements as to the form and content of a stockholder’s notice. These provisions may preclude stockholders from bringing matters before an annual meeting of stockholders or from making nominations for directors at an annual meeting of stockholders.

The authorized but unissued shares of common stock and preferred stock are available for future issuance without stockholder approval. These additional shares may be used for a variety of corporate purposes, including future public offerings to raise additional capital, corporate acquisitions and employee benefit plans. The existence of authorized but unissued shares of common stock and preferred stock could render more difficult or discourage an attempt to obtain control of us by means of a proxy contest, tender offer, merger or otherwise.

Our restated certificate of incorporation will provide for the allocation of certain corporate opportunities between us, on the one hand, and the original stockholders and their affiliates, on the other hand. Specifically:

The DGCL provides generally that the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares entitled to vote on any matter is required to amend a corporation’s certificate of incorporation or bylaws, unless a corporation’s certificate of incorporation or bylaws, as the case may be, requires a greater percentage. The affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of our issued and outstanding common stock, voting as a single class, is generally required to amend or repeal our restated certificate of incorporation or to amend or repeal a bylaw. In addition, under the DGCL, an amendment to our restated certificate of incorporation that would alter or change the powers, preferences or special rights of the common stock so as to affect them adversely also must be approved by a majority of the votes entitled to be cast by the holders of the shares affected by the amendment, voting as a separate class. Subject to our amended and restated bylaws, our board of directors may from time to time make, amend, supplement or repeal our amended and restated bylaws by vote of a majority of our board of directors. Any proposal to increase or decrease our authorized share capital will require the affirmative vote of the holders of a simple majority of our issued and outstanding common stock, voting as a single class.

three such “demands” for registration, one of which may be pursuant to a shelf registration statement. In addition, in connection with registered offerings by us after the consummation of this offering, whether pursuant to a “demand” registration or otherwise, the original stockholders will have the ability to exercise certain “piggyback registration rights” and have some or all of their shares included in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no registration statement may be filed during the lock-up period following the date of this prospectus, as described under “Shares Eligible for Future Sale—Sale of Restricted Shares and Lock-Up Agreements”. We will bear all costs of registration pursuant to the registration rights provided in the registration rights agreement.

The transfer agent and registrar for the common stock is expected to be , New York, New York.

Before this offering, there has been no public market for our common stock, and we cannot assure you that a significant public market for our common stock will develop or be sustained after this offering. Sales of significant amounts of our common stock in the public market after this offering, including shares of our common stock issued upon exercise of outstanding options, or the perception that such sales could occur, could adversely affect the prevailing market price of our common stock and could impair our future ability to raise capital through the sale of our equity securities.

Upon completion of this offering, shares of common stock will be outstanding, including shares that will be sold to the underwriters pursuant to the exercise of their over-allotment option or, to the extent the over-allotment option is not exercised, distributed to the current members of Intrepid Mining pursuant to the formation distribution.

Of the shares of common stock to be outstanding upon completion of this offering, shares of common stock offered pursuant to this offering will be freely tradable without restriction or further registration under federal securities laws, except to the extent shares of common stock are purchased in this offering by our affiliates, as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act.

We and all of our executive officers and directors, as well as the current members of Intrepid Mining, will agree with the underwriters not to offer, sell, dispose of or hedge any shares of our common stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable for shares of our common stock, subject to specified limited exceptions and extensions described elsewhere in this prospectus, during the period continuing through the date that is days (subject to extension) after the date of this prospectus, except with the prior written consent of Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, on behalf of the underwriters. The shares that have been reserved pursuant to the directed share program will be subject to the contractual lock-up agreements with the underwriters discussed under “Underwriting”. Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, in its sole discretion on behalf of the underwriters, may release any of the securities subject to these lock-up agreements at any time without notice. The lock-up period may be extended in the circumstances described under “Underwriting”.

In general, Rule 144 as currently in effect allows a stockholder (or stockholders where shares are aggregated) who has beneficially owned shares of our common stock for at least one year (including the holding period of any prior owner other than an affiliate) and who files a Form 144 with the SEC to sell within any three-month period a number of those shares that does not exceed the greater of:

Sales under Rule 144 are also subject to manner of sale provisions and notice requirements and to the availability of current public information about us. An “affiliate” is a person that directly, or indirectly, through one or more intermediate controls or is controlled by, or is under common control with us.

Under Rule 144(k), a person (or persons whose shares are aggregated) who is not deemed to have been an affiliate of ours at any time during the 90 days preceding a sale, and who has beneficially owned the shares proposed to be sold for at least two years, would be entitled to sell those shares without regard to the manner of sale, public information, volume limitation or notice requirements of Rule 144.

To the extent that our affiliates sell their shares, other than pursuant to Rule 144 or a registration statement, the purchaser’s holding period for the purpose of effecting a sale under Rule 144 commences on the date of transfer from the affiliate.

In connection with the completion of this offering, we will enter into a registration rights agreement with the original stockholders. Under the registration rights agreement, each of the original stockholders will have the right, in certain circumstances after the consummation of this offering, to require us to register some or all of the shares of common stock held by such stockholder in connection with a public offering and sale. Subject to the terms and conditions of the registration rights agreement, each original stockholder will have the right to make three such “demands” for registration, one of which may be pursuant to a shelf registration statement. In addition, in connection with registered offerings by us after the consummation of this offering, whether pursuant to a “demand” registration or otherwise, the original stockholders will have the ability to exercise certain “piggyback registration rights” and have some or all of their shares included in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no registration statement may be filed during the lock-up period following the date of this prospectus, as described under “—Sale of Restricted Shares and Lock-Up Agreements”. We will bear all costs of registration pursuant to the registration rights provided in the registration rights agreement.

As soon as practicable after the completion of this offering, we intend to file a registration statement on Form S-8 under the Securities Act covering shares of our common stock reserved for issuance under our 2007 Stock Incentive Plan. Accordingly, shares of our common stock registered under such registration statement will be available for sale in the open market upon exercise by the holders, subject to vesting restrictions, Rule 144 limitations applicable to our affiliates and the contractual lock-up provisions described above.

The following discussion is a summary of the material U.S. federal income tax considerations generally applicable to beneficial owners of our common stock that acquire shares of our common stock pursuant to this offering and that hold such shares as capital assets. Such persons are referred to in this summary as “acquiring holders”. For purposes of this summary, the term “U.S. holder” means an acquiring holder that is, for U.S. federal income tax purposes:

For purposes of this summary, the term “non-U.S. holder” means an acquiring holder that is neither a U.S. holder nor a partnership (including an entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes).

If a partnership, or other entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, is an acquiring holder, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner in that partnership generally will depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. We urge each beneficial owner of our common stock that is such a partnership, and the partners of each such partnership, to consult their tax advisors regarding the tax consequences of acquiring, owning and disposing of our common stock.

This summary is based upon provisions of the Code, applicable U.S. Treasury regulations, and administrative and judicial interpretations thereof, all as of the date hereof and all of which are subject to change (possibly on a retroactive basis), as well as differing interpretations. This summary does not include any discussion of any non-U.S., state, local or other tax considerations.

This summary does not consider specific facts and circumstances that may be relevant to a person’s particular tax position and does not apply to persons that are subject to special tax treatment under U.S. federal income tax laws (including, without limitation, partnerships or other pass-through entities, financial institutions, insurance companies, dealers in securities, regulated investment companies, persons that hold our common stock as part of a “straddle”, “hedge”, “conversion transaction”, or other risk-reduction or integrated transaction, controlled foreign corporations, passive foreign investment companies, companies that accumulate earnings to avoid U.S. federal income tax, U.S. holders whose “functional currency” is not the U.S. dollar, tax-exempt organizations, and individuals subject to tax as U.S. expatriates).

This summary is included for general information purposes only. We urge you to consult your own tax advisor with respect to the application of U.S. federal income tax laws to your particular situation, as well as any other U.S. federal tax consequences and any tax consequences that may arise under the laws of any non-U.S., state, local or other taxing jurisdiction or under any applicable tax treaty.

The following discussion summarizes certain material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our common stock generally applicable to U.S. holders, subject to the limitations described above.

As discussed above under “Dividend Policy”, we do not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. However, if we do make distributions of cash or property in respect of our common stock, the distributions generally will constitute dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the extent paid from our current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles, and will be includible in gross income by a U.S. holder upon receipt. Any distribution that is a dividend will be eligible for the dividends received deduction if received by an otherwise qualifying corporate U.S. holder that meets the holding period and other requirements for the dividends received deduction. Dividends paid by us to certain non-corporate U.S. holders, including individuals, with respect to taxable years beginning on or before December 31, 2010, are eligible for U.S. federal income taxation at the rates generally applicable to long-term capital gains for individuals, currently at a maximum tax rate of 15%, provided that the U.S. holder receiving the dividend satisfies applicable holding period and other requirements.

If the amount of a distribution exceeds our current and accumulated earnings and profits, the excess first will be treated as a return of capital to the extent of the U.S. holder’s adjusted tax basis in our common stock, and thereafter, will be treated as gain realized on a sale or other disposition of the common stock, taxable as described below under “—U.S. Holders—Dispositions”.

Upon a sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of our common stock, a U.S. holder generally will recognize capital gain or loss equal to the difference between the amount realized on the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition and the U.S. holder’s adjusted tax basis in the shares of our common stock. Such capital gain or loss will be long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S. holder has held the shares of the common stock for more than one year at the time of disposition. Long-term capital gains of certain non-corporate U.S. holders, including individuals, are currently subject to U.S. federal income taxation at a maximum rate of 15%. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations under the Code.

In general, dividends on our common stock, and payments of the proceeds of a sale, exchange or other disposition of our common stock paid to a U.S. holder are subject to information reporting and may be subject to backup withholding at a current maximum rate of 28% unless the U.S. holder (i) is an exempt recipient (such as a corporation) and properly establishes its exemption, or (ii) provides an accurate taxpayer identification number and certifies that it is not subject to backup withholding.

Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules from a payment to a U.S. holder generally will be refunded or credited against the U.S. holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, if any, provided that the required information is timely furnished to the Internal Revenue Service, or IRS.

The following discussion summarizes the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our common stock generally applicable to non-U.S. holders, subject to the limitations described above.

For purposes of this discussion, dividend income and gain on the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of our common stock by a non-U.S. holder will be considered to be “U.S. trade or business income” if the income or gain is (i) effectively connected with the conduct by such non-U.S. holder of a trade or business within the U.S. and (ii) in the case of a non-U.S. holder that is eligible for the benefits of an income tax treaty with the U.S., attributable to a permanent establishment or a fixed base maintained by the non-U.S. holder in the U.S. Generally, U.S. trade or business income is not subject to withholding of U.S. federal income tax, provided the non-U.S. holder complies with applicable certification and disclosure requirements; instead, a non-U.S. holder is subject to U.S. federal income tax on a net income basis at regular U.S. federal income tax rates, in the same manner as a United States person, on its U.S. trade or business income. Any U.S. trade or business income received by a non-U.S. holder that is a corporation also may give rise to a “branch profits tax” at a 30% rate, or at a lower rate prescribed by an applicable income tax treaty, under specific circumstances.

As discussed above under “Dividend Policy”, we do not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. However, if we do make distributions of cash or property in respect of our common stock, the distributions generally will constitute dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the extent paid from our current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles. If the amount of a distribution exceeds our current and accumulated earnings and profits, the excess will first be treated as a return of capital to the extent of the non-U.S. holder’s tax basis in our common stock, and thereafter, will be treated as gain realized on a sale or other disposition of the common stock, taxable as described below under “—Non-U.S. Holders—Dispositions”.

A non-U.S. holder generally will be subject to withholding of U.S. federal income tax at a 30% rate, or at a reduced rate prescribed by an applicable income tax treaty, on any dividends received in respect of our common stock. In order to obtain a reduced rate of U.S. federal income tax withholding under an applicable income tax treaty, a non-U.S. holder generally will be required to provide a properly executed IRS Form W-8BEN certifying its entitlement to benefits under the treaty. A non-U.S. holder of our common stock that is eligible for a reduced rate of U.S. federal income tax withholding under an income tax treaty may generally obtain a refund or credit of any excess amounts withheld by filing an appropriate claim for a refund with the IRS. In addition, because we likely are and will continue to be a “United States real property holding corporation”, as defined under “—Dispositions” below, if a non-U.S. holder’s interest in our common stock constitutes a United States real property interest, we generally will be required to withhold 10% of any distribution that exceeds our current and accumulated earnings and profits. Consequently, although we generally intend to withhold at a rate of 30%, or a lower rate as specified in an applicable income tax treaty, on the entire amount of any distribution, to the extent that we do not do so, we generally will withhold at a rate of 10% on any portion of a distribution not subject to withholding at a rate of 30%, or a lower rate as specified in an applicable income tax treaty.

The 30% withholding, or a lower rate as specified in an applicable income tax treaty, described in the preceding paragraph does not apply to dividends that represent U.S. trade or business income of a non-U.S. holder that provides a properly executed IRS Form W-8ECI, certifying that the dividends are effectively connected with the non-U.S. holder’s conduct of a trade or business within the U.S.

Under the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act of 1980, or FIRPTA, any person who acquires a “United States real property interest”, as described below, from a non-U.S. holder generally must deduct and withhold a tax equal to 10% of the amount realized by the transferor, referred to as “FIRPTA withholding”. In addition, a non-U.S. holder who disposes of a United States real property interest generally is required to recognize gain or loss in the same manner as a United States person, referred to as the “FIRPTA tax”.

Stock in a “United States real property holding corporation” is generally treated as a United States real property interest. A corporation is a United States real property holding corporation if the fair market value of its U.S. real property interests equals or exceeds 50% of the sum of the fair market value of its worldwide real property interests plus its other assets used or held for use in a trade or business. We believe that we currently are, and we anticipate remaining, a United States real property holding corporation. As a result, a non-U.S. holder generally will be taxed on a disposition of our common stock at capital gain rates applicable to United States persons, subject to applicable alternative minimum tax. However, if our common stock is treated as being regularly traded on an established securities market, within the meaning of applicable U.S. Treasury regulations, (i) the FIRPTA tax would not apply to any non-U.S. holder who, directly, indirectly or constructively, held 5% or less of the total fair market value of our common stock at all times during the shorter of the non-U.S. holder’s holding period or the five-year period preceding the date of the disposition and (ii) regardless of the amount of our common stock owned by a non-U.S. holder, FIRPTA withholding would not apply to the disposition of our common stock by such holder.

If we are not a United States real property holding corporation or if the tax under FIRPTA does not otherwise apply, a non-U.S. holder generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income or withholding tax in respect of any gain realized on a sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of our common stock unless:

We must report annually to the IRS and to each non-U.S. holder the amount of any dividends paid to that holder and the tax withheld with respect to those dividends. Copies of these information returns may also be made available under the provisions of a specific treaty or agreement to the tax authorities of the country in which the non-U.S. holder resides.

Under certain circumstances, the Code imposes a backup withholding obligation, currently at a rate of 28%, on certain reportable payments. Dividends paid to a non-U.S. holder of common stock generally will be exempt from backup withholding if the non-U.S. holder provides a properly executed IRS Form W-8BEN, or otherwise establishes an exemption, and the payor does not have actual knowledge or reason to know that such person is a U.S. person.

The payment of the proceeds from the disposition of our common stock to or through the U.S. office of any broker, U.S. or foreign, generally will be subject to information reporting and possible backup withholding unless the owner certifies as to its non-U.S. status under penalties of perjury or otherwise establishes an exemption and provided that the broker does not have actual knowledge or reason to know that such person is a U.S. person or that the conditions of any other exemption are not, in fact, satisfied. The payment of the proceeds from the disposition of our common stock to or through a non-U.S. office of a non-U.S. broker will not be subject to information reporting or backup withholding unless the non-U.S. broker has certain types of relationships with the U.S. (a “U.S. related person”). In the case of the payment of the proceeds from the disposition of our common

stock to or through a non-U.S. office of a broker that is either a U.S. person or a U.S. related person, the Treasury regulations require information reporting, but not backup withholding, on the payment unless the broker has documentary evidence in its files that the owner is a non-U.S. holder and the broker has no knowledge to the contrary or an exemption is otherwise established.

Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules from a payment to a non-U.S. holder may be allowed as a refund or credit against the non-U.S. holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, if any, provided that the required information is timely furnished to the IRS.

This offering and the formation transactions, together, are intended to be treated as an exchange described in Section 351 of the Code. Although this treatment generally does not affect persons who acquire shares of our common stock for cash pursuant to this offering, an acquiring holder who, immediately following this offering, owns at least 5% of the total combined voting power or total fair market value of our outstanding common stock will be required to include on or with such person’s income tax return for the taxable year in which the offering is consummated a statement that contains the information set forth in Treasury Regulation Section 1.351-3. No private letter ruling from the IRS is being requested in connection with this offering, the formation transactions, or the integrated exchange described in Section 351 of the Code.

Under the terms and subject to the conditions contained in an underwriting agreement dated the date of this prospectus, the underwriters named below, for whom Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated and are acting as representatives, severally agreed to purchase, and we agreed to sell to them, severally, the number of shares indicated below:

The underwriters are offering the shares of common stock subject to their acceptance of the shares from us and subject to prior sale. The underwriting agreement provides that the obligations of the several underwriters to pay for and accept delivery of the shares of common stock offered by this prospectus are subject to the approval of certain legal matters by their counsel and to certain other conditions. The underwriters are obligated to take and pay for all of the shares of common stock offered by this prospectus if any such shares are taken. However, the underwriters are not required to take or pay for the shares covered by the underwriters’ over-allotment option described below.

The underwriters initially propose to offer part of the shares of common stock directly to the public at the public offering price listed on the cover page of this prospectus and part to certain dealers at a price that represents a concession not in excess of $ per share under the public offering price. No underwriter may allow, and no dealer may re-allow, a concession to other underwriters or to any dealer. After the initial offering of the shares of common stock, the offering price and other selling terms may from time to time be varied by the representatives.

We have granted to the underwriters an option, exercisable for 30 days from the date of this prospectus, to purchase up to additional shares of our common stock at the public offering price listed on the cover page of this prospectus, less underwriting discounts and commissions. The underwriters may exercise this option solely for the purpose of covering over-allotments, if any, made in connection with the offering of the shares of common stock offered by this prospectus. To the extent the option is exercised, each underwriter will become obligated, subject to certain conditions, to purchase about the same percentage of the additional shares of common stock as the number listed next to the underwriter’s name in the preceding table bears to the total number of shares of common stock listed next to the names of all underwriters in the preceding table.

The following table shows the per share public offering price, underwriting discounts and commissions to be paid by us, and proceeds before expenses to us. These amounts are shown assuming both no exercise and full exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase up to an additional shares of our common stock.

The expenses of this offering payable by us, not including underwriting discounts and commissions, are estimated to be approximately $ million.

The underwriters have informed us that they do not intend sales to discretionary accounts to exceed five percent of the total number of shares of common stock offered by them.

We intend to apply to list our common stock for trading on a national securities exchange.

We, all of our directors and officers and the holders of substantially all of our outstanding common stock and stock options will agree that, subject to certain exceptions, without the prior written consent of Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated on behalf of the underwriters, we and they will not, during the period ending days after the date of this prospectus:

whether any such transaction described above is to be settled by delivery of common stock or such other securities, in cash or otherwise. In addition, each such person will agree that, without the prior written consent of Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated on behalf of the underwriters, it will not, during the period ending days after the date of this prospectus, make any demand for, or exercise any right with respect to, the registration of any shares of common stock or any security convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for common stock.

The restrictions described in the immediately preceding paragraph will not apply to:

provided that in the case of each of the fourth and fifth types of transactions, each donee, distributee, transferee and recipient agrees to be subject to the restrictions described in the preceding paragraph and in the case of each

of the third, fourth and fifth types of transactions, no filing under Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, reporting a reduction in beneficial ownership of shares of common stock is required or voluntarily made in connection with these transactions during this -day restricted period.

The restricted period described in the preceding paragraphs will be extended if:

in which case the above restrictions shall continue to apply until the expiration of the 18-day period beginning on the issuance of the earnings release or the occurrence of the material news or material event, unless Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated waives, in writing, such extension.

In order to facilitate this offering of the common stock, the underwriters may engage in transactions that stabilize, maintain or otherwise affect the price of the common stock. Specifically, the underwriters may sell more shares than they are obligated to purchase under the underwriting agreement, creating a short position. A short sale is covered if the short position is no greater than the number of shares available for purchase by the underwriters under the over-allotment option. The underwriters can close out a covered short sale by exercising the over-allotment option or purchasing shares in the open market. In determining the source of shares to close out a covered short sale, the underwriters will consider, among other things, the open market price of shares compared to the price available under the over-allotment option. The underwriters may also sell shares in excess of the over-allotment option, creating a naked short position. The underwriters must close out any naked short position by purchasing shares in the open market. A naked short position is more likely to be created if the underwriters are concerned that there may be downward pressure on the price of the common stock in the open market after pricing that could adversely affect investors who purchase in this offering. In addition, to stabilize the price of the common stock, the underwriters may bid for, and purchase, shares of common stock in the open market. Finally, the underwriting syndicate may reclaim selling concessions allowed to an underwriter or a dealer for distributing the common stock in this offering, if the syndicate repurchases previously distributed common stock to cover syndicate short positions or to stabilize the price of the common stock. These activities may raise or maintain the market price of the common stock above independent market levels or prevent or retard a decline in the market price of the common stock. The underwriters are not required to engage in these activities and may end any of these activities at any time.

We and the underwriters have agreed to indemnify each other against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act.

A prospectus in electronic format may be made available on websites maintained by one or more underwriters, or selling group members, if any, participating in this offering. The representative may agree to allocate a number of shares of common stock to underwriters for sale to their online brokerage account holders. Internet distributions will be allocated by the representative to underwriters that may make Internet distributions on the same basis as other allocations.

In relation to each Member State of the European Economic Area which has implemented the Prospectus Directive, each Manager has represented and agreed that with effect from and including the date on which the Prospectus Directive is implemented in that Member State it has not made and will not make an offer of shares to the public in that Member State, except that it may, with effect from and including such date, make an offer of shares to the public in that Member State:

For the purposes of the above, the expression an “offer of shares to the public” in relation to any shares in any Member State means the communication in any form and by any means of sufficient information on the terms of the offer and the shares to be offered so as to enable an investor to decide to purchase or subscribe the shares, as the same may be varied in that Member State by any measure implementing the Prospectus Directive in that Member State and the expression Prospectus Directive means Directive 2003/71/EC and includes any relevant implementing measure in that Member State.

Each Manager has represented and agreed that it has only communicated or caused to be communicated and will only communicate or cause to be communicated an invitation or inducement to engage in investment activity (within the meaning of Section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000) in connection with the issue or sale of the shares in circumstances in which Section 21(1) of such Act does not apply to us and it has complied and will comply with all applicable provisions of such Act with respect to anything done by it in relation to any shares in, from or otherwise involving the United Kingdom.

Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our common stock. The initial public offering price was determined by negotiations among us and the representatives of the underwriters. Among the factors considered in determining the initial public offering price were our future prospects and those of our industry in general, our sales, earnings and certain other financial and operating information in recent periods, and the price earnings ratios, price sales ratios, market prices of securities and certain financial and operating information of companies engaged in activities similar to ours. An active trading market for the shares may not develop. It is also possible that after the offering the shares will not trade in the public market at or above the initial public offering price.

At our request, the underwriters have reserved approximately percent of the shares of common stock offered by this prospectus for sale, at the initial public offering price, to certain business associates and related persons of ours. The number of shares of common stock available for sale to the general public will be reduced to the extent these persons purchase such reserved shares. Any reserved shares that are not so purchased will be offered by the underwriters to the general public on the same basis as the other shares offered by this prospectus.

Certain of the underwriters or their affiliates may provide in the future financial advisory services to us in the ordinary course of business, for which they may receive customary fees and commissions.

The validity of the common shares offered by this prospectus will be passed upon for us by Holme Roberts & Owen LLP, Denver, Colorado. The underwriters have been represented by Andrews Kurth LLP, Houston, Texas.

The consolidated financial statements of Intrepid Mining LLC as of December 31, 2006, and for the year then ended, have been included herein in reliance upon the report of KPMG LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, appearing elsewhere herein, and upon the authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing.

The financial statement of Intrepid Potash, Inc. as of December 10, 2007 has been included herein in reliance upon the report of KPMG LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, appearing elsewhere herein, and upon the authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing.

The financial statements of Intrepid Mining as of December 31, 2005, and for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2005 included in this prospectus have been audited by Hein & Associates LLP, independent registered public accountants, as stated in their report appearing in this registration statement, and have been so included in reliance upon the report of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.

Estimated quantities of our proven and probable reserves as of December 13, 2007, set forth in this prospectus are based upon reserve reports prepared by us and reviewed and independently determined by Agapito Associates, Inc., independent engineering reserve consultants, based on mine plans and other data furnished by us.

We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-1, including exhibits, schedules and amendments filed with the registration statement, under the Securities Act with respect to the shares of common stock to be sold in the offering. This prospectus does not contain all of the information contained in the registration statement. For further information about us and our common stock, we refer you to the registration statement and the exhibits and schedules that have been filed with the registration statement. Statements in this prospectus concerning the contents of any contract or any other document are not necessarily complete. If a contract or document has been filed as an exhibit to the registration statement, we refer you to that exhibit. Each statement in this prospectus relating to a contract or document filed as an exhibit to the registration statement is qualified by the filed exhibit.

Upon completion of the offering, we will become subject to the reporting and information requirements of the Securities Exchange Act and, as a result, will file periodic and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy, at prescribed rates, all or any portion of the registration statement or any other information that we file with the SEC at the SEC’s public reference room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information concerning the operation of the SEC’s public reference room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Our SEC filings, including the registration statement, will also be available to the public on the SEC’s Internet site at http://www.sec.gov.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Intrepid Potash, Inc. as of December 10, 2007. This balance sheet is the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial statement based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the balance sheet referred to above presents fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Intrepid Potash, Inc. as of December 10, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Intrepid Potash, Inc. (the “Company”), was incorporated in the state of Delaware on November 19, 2007 for the purpose of continuing the business of Intrepid Mining LLC in corporate form. The Company was capitalized with $1,000 cash and has 1,000 shares of $.001 par value common stock authorized, issued and outstanding. The Company intends to file its initial registration statement on Form S-1 with the Securities and Exchange Commission in December, 2007 concerning the sale of common stock. At or before the completion of the initial public offering, the Company and Intrepid Mining LLC intend to enter into an exchange agreement, which will provide for the contribution of all of Intrepid Mining’s assets other than cash to the Company in exchange for cash, shares of the Company’s common stock, and the assumption by the Company of a portion of Intrepid Mining LLC’s liability under its existing senior debt facility and all other existing liabilities of Intrepid Mining LLC. As a part of the contribution and exchange transaction described above, the Company will declare a dividend with respect to its common stock currently issued and outstanding. The dividend will be paid in shares of the Company’s common stock; provided, however, that for each share of common stock purchased by the underwriters pursuant to their over-allotment option, the number of shares payable pursuant to the dividend will be reduced, one-for-one, and in lieu of such shares, the Company will pay cash in an amount equal to the net proceeds, before offering expenses but after underwriting discounts and commissions received from the exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option. The dividend will be payable to Intrepid Mining upon the earlier of the expiration of the underwriters’ over-allotment option period or the exercise of the over-allotment option.

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF MEMBERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT) AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Intrepid Mining LLC and its subsidiaries (“Intrepid” or the “Company”) produce muriate of potash (MOP or potassium chloride). Intrepid has one operating segment as defined by FAS 131, the extraction and production of potash-related products. Intrepid’s mining operations also extract one co-product, langbeinite, and various by-products including: salt, magnesium chloride, and metal recovery salts. As of September 30, 2007, Intrepid has five active potash production facilities; three in New Mexico and two in Utah.

Principles of Consolidation—The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Intrepid Mining LLC and its wholly owned subsidiaries: Intrepid Potash-Moab, LLC (“Moab”), Intrepid Oil & Gas, LLC (“IOG”), Intrepid Potash-New Mexico, LLC (“NM”), HB Potash, LLC (“HB”), Intrepid Potash-Wendover, LLC (“Wendover”), Moab Pipeline, LLC, and Intrepid Aviation, LLC. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Interim Financial Statements—The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and regulation S-X. The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, which are normal and recurring in nature, and which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position as of September 30, 2007 and results of operations for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006. These unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes for the year end December 31, 2006.

Use of Estimates—The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Intrepid bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Accordingly, actual results may differ significantly from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Asset Retirement Obligation—All of Intrepid’s mining properties involve certain reclamation liabilities, which are allocated to expense over the life of the related assets and are periodically adjusted to reflect changes in the estimates of either the timing or amount of the reclamation and abandonment costs.

Following is a table of the changes to Intrepid’s asset retirement obligations for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and the year ended December 31, 2006.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments—Intrepid’s financial instruments including cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable are carried at cost, which approximates fair value due

to the short-term maturity of these instruments. The revolving credit facility’s recorded value approximates its fair value as it bears interest at a floating rate. Intrepid’s interest rate and natural gas swaps are recorded at fair value.

Business Interruption Insurance Settlement—In connection with the property loss discussed below under “Property Insurance Settlements”, during the nine months ended September 30, 2006, the Company received $884,182 in business interruption proceeds for lost margin on product destroyed at the East Mine warehouse.

Property Insurance Settlements—In April 2006, a wind-shear struck the product warehouse at the East Carlsbad, New Mexico site. The warehouse had a book value of $9,000. Its replacement cost is expected to be approximately $22 million. Damage to the warehouse, damage to the product stored in the warehouse, and alternative handling and storage costs are covered by Intrepid’s insurance policies at market / replacement value, less a $1 million deductible. During 2006, the Company recorded $9.5 million of insurance settlements on the warehouse. As of September 30, 2007, Intrepid had an additional receivable of $1.4 million to cover similar costs, which were reimbursed subsequent to period end and are considered non-refundable. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, a $729,039 property loss was recorded because agreement had not been reached on settlement amounts. Additional insurance payments are contingent upon review by the insurer and therefore will be recognized in the future as settlements are agreed upon.

Discontinued Operations—In 2006, all of the operating properties of Intrepid Oil and Gas, LLC were sold. IOG operations and the sale of the oil and gas assets have been accordingly reclassified as discontinued operations in 2006. Initial drilling costs for a well-in-progress and certain unproved oil and gas rights were retained by IOG and are included in the balance sheets as of December 31, 2006. Gross revenues from the discontinued oil and gas operations were $4.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006.

Redemption of Equity Interest—On December 28, 2006, the Members of Intrepid agreed to redeem the entire Membership interest of Long Canyon, LLC, at the time representing 42.5% of the Membership interests of Intrepid for a total redemption cost of $100 million, which included a $95 million note paid in March 2007. The $100 million costs to redeem Long Canyon, LLC as well as costs of the redemption transaction were treated as distributions to Long Canyon, LLC resulting in Intrepid having a Members’ deficit as of December 31, 2006.

The Members of Intrepid as of December 31, 2006 include Intrepid Production Corp. (“IPC”), whose sole shareholder is Robert P. Jornayvaz III (“Jornayvaz”), Harvey Operating and Production Company (“HOPCO”), whose sole shareholder is Hugh E. Harvey, Jr. (“Harvey”), and Robert P. Jornayvaz and Hugh E. Harvey Jr. as individual Members. Long Canyon, LLC, an entity controlled by Aspect Energy, LLC, (“Aspect”) was a Member until December 28, 2006 when their interest was redeemed.

In June of 2007, a 20% membership interest was sold to an investment group, Potash Acquisition, LLC (PAL), controlled by Platte River Ventures, LLC for a gross price of $39 million; or approximately $38.8 million net of transaction costs. Substantially all of the proceeds were used to reduce debt.

Effective January 1, 2007, the net equity of IOG’s remaining unproved oil and gas assets was distributed to the members, resulting in an equity distribution of $937,532. This distribution effectively separated IOG from Intrepid, although IOG remains a related party. In the nine months ended September 30, 2007, IOG expenditures of $174,428 were paid by Intrepid and recognized as a receivable. As of September 30, 2007, Intrepid carried a receivable balance from IOG of $167,060, included within related parties’ accounts receivable.

On June 1, 2007, the Intrepid membership interest of Jornayvaz was assigned to IPC, and the Intrepid membership interest of Harvey was assigned to HOPCO.

At December 31, 2006, the related parties’ accounts receivable balance of $302,097 consisted of advances to Members and employees. At September 30, 2007, the related parties’ accounts receivable balance of $230,013 consisted of advances to Members and employees and Intrepid Oil & Gas, LLC. Non-business expenses initially paid by Intrepid and recognized as a receivable from Jornayvaz and Harvey were $105,579 and $77,271 in the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

Intrepid’s interim Chief Financial Officer is the primary owner of a firm of certified public accountants, Quinn & Associates, P.C. (“Q&A”) that provides accounting, consulting, and tax services to Intrepid. Q&A billed Intrepid based on actual hours incurred and at standard hourly rates. Q&A billings to Intrepid were $409,388 and $326,904 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

The following summarizes Intrepid’s long-term debt at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006:

Intrepid has a credit agreement with a syndication of banks led by US Bank National Association (the “Bank”), as amended through October 12, 2007, to provide a total commitment from the Syndication of $175 million, inclusive of an initial $50 million term loan. On March 9, 2007, Intrepid and the Bank entered into a new credit agreement in part to retire the “Redemption” Note to Long Canyon, LLC issued in connection with the redemption transaction described in Note 2. The line of credit is also being used to fund capital projects and to meet working capital requirements. The Bank, with the full cooperation and agreement of Intrepid, formed a syndication of banks to assume the lender’s responsibilities. Intrepid paid and capitalized a fee of 1% of the then $150 million line of credit under the new credit agreement in March 2007.

The Note to Long Canyon, LLC was $95 million. The Note was presented as long-term debt as of December 31, 2006 giving consideration to the refinancing with the Bank. This Note was retired in March of 2007 and the average interest rate for the period it had been outstanding was approximately 8%.

Under the Credit Agreement, as amended through October 12, 2007, the $125 million revolving line terminates on March 9, 2012. The $50 million term loan requires a principal repayment of $1.25 million each quarter beginning June 29, 2007 and terminates with its outstanding balance due on March 9, 2014. Additionally, capital leases of up to $8 million and operating leases with annual payments of up to $10 million are permitted.

From July 1, 2005 through March 9, 2007, interest on the loan was set at LIBOR plus between 1.5% and 2.0%, dependent on level of borrowings. Effective March 9, 2007, interest on the loan was at LIBOR plus between 1.25% and 2.5%, dependent on the level of borrowings. Intrepid could base interest on the Bank’s prime rate, instead of LIBOR, plus between 0% and 0.5%, dependent on the level of borrowings, until March 9, 2007 at which time Intrepid may base interest on the loan on the Bank’s prime rate, instead of LIBOR, plus between 0% and 0.75%, again dependent on the level of borrowings. The LIBOR-based interest rates, including the Bank’s margin, ranged from and were 6.64% to 7.04% at September 30, 2007 and 7.12% to 7.51% at December 31, 2006. There were no outstanding prime-rate advances at September 30, 2007. Outstanding prime-rate advances at December 31, 2006 were at a rate of 8.5%.

A commitment fee has been charged Intrepid for the unused portion of the revolving line of credit since July, 1, 2005. The commitment fee has been 0.35% to 0.5%, dependent on the level of borrowings. Under the Credit Agreement of March 9, 2007, as amended through October 12, 2007, the commitment fee is 0.25% to 0.5%, dependent on the level of borrowings.

The Credit Agreement includes covenants requiring Intrepid to maintain a specified net working capital, a current ratio, cash flow and fixed charge coverage. Intrepid was in compliance with all covenants at September 30, 2007.

The Syndication has a security interest in substantially all of the assets of Intrepid. Obligations are cross-collateralized between all of Intrepid’s legal entities, parent and subsidiaries.

The following summarizes Intrepid’s inventory, recorded at the lower of average cost for the year or estimated net realizable value, as of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006:

Parts inventories are shown net of obsolescence reserves of $819,354 and $668,154 as of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. No obsolescence or other reserves were deemed necessary for the product inventories.

Marketing Agreements—Effective April 1, 2004, NM and Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan (“PCS”) entered into a marketing agreement appointing PCS the exclusive sales representative for potash export sales, with the exception of those to Canada and Mexico, and appointing PCS a non-exclusive sales representative for potash sales into Mexico. This agreement is cancelable with thirty days written notice. The commission to PCS is variable, based on the net price realized.

Effective August 1, 2004, Wendover and Envirotech Services, Inc. (“ESI”) entered into a sales agreement appointing ESI the exclusive distributor for magnesium chloride, with the exception of up to 15,000 tons per year sold for applications other than dust control, de-icing, and soil stabilization. This agreement is cancelable with two year’s written notice, unless a breach or other specified special event has occurred. Sales prices were specified to ESI in the agreement subject to cost-based escalators. Wendover also participates in excess profits, as defined by the agreement, earned by ESI upon resale. No excess profits were earned in 2006, 2005, or 2004.

Sinking Fund—The Moab reclamation sinking fund, a restricted deposit, is included within “Other long term assets” and had balances of $3,025,122 and $2,857,510 as of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006. Assuming an approximate annual return of 6.5%, Intrepid has invested enough in the sinking fund to meet Moab’s expected reclamation cost inclusive of inflation. Intrepid is allowed to invest the sinking fund as the

Members deem appropriate. Unrealized gains of $129,838 and $202,167 were recorded in the statements of income for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 respectively, on the marketable securities held for trade by the sinking fund.

Future Lease Commitments—Intrepid has certain operating and capital leases for mining and other operating equipment, an airplane, offices, railcars, and vehicles, with terms ranging up to one hundred and twenty months.

Rental and lease expenses were $3.7 million and $1.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. These figures exclude lease payments for railcars, approximately $0.3 million for both 2007 and 2006, used to deliver product and recorded as a distribution cost. These figures also exclude lease payments for an electrical substation of approximately $0.1 million recorded as a cost of electricity for both 2007 and 2006.

Intrepid has managed through the use of interest rate derivative contracts a portion of its floating interest rate exposure. Intrepid’s forward LIBOR-based contracts reduce Intrepid’s risk from interest rate movements as gains and losses on such contracts offset losses and gains on its variable-rate debt. The counterparty to the contracts is a large commercial bank and therefore credit risk of counterparty non-performance is unlikely.

The fair value of financial instruments as of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 are depicted below.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Intrepid Mining LLC and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2006 and the related consolidated statements of income, members’ equity (deficit) and comprehensive income, and cash flows for the year then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Intrepid Mining LLC and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Intrepid Mining LLC and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, members’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provided a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Intrepid Mining LLC and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

In addition to paying $5,431,384 in cash, the Company issued a $95 million note for the redemption of Long Canyon’s Membership Interest.

Intrepid Mining LLC and its subsidiaries (“Intrepid” or the “Company”) produce muriate of potash (MOP or potassium chloride or potash). Intrepid has one operating segment as defined by FAS 131, the extraction and production of potash-related products. Intrepid’s mining operations also extract one co-product, langbeinite, and various by-products including: salt, magnesium chloride, and metal recovery salt. As of December 31, 2006, Intrepid has five active potash production facilities; three in New Mexico and two in Utah.

Intrepid was formed as a Colorado limited liability company on January 26, 2000 for the purpose of acquiring all of the common stock of Moab Salt, Inc. (“Moab”) from PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. (“PCS”). Moab was acquired on February 22, 2000 for cash consideration of approximately $3 million, plus the assumption of certain liabilities and closing costs for total consideration of approximately $14.8 million. Moab owns and operates a potash and salt mine located along the Colorado River southwest of Moab, Utah. Moab was converted into a limited liability company on February 23, 2000 and was renamed Intrepid Potash – Moab, LLC in June of 2004. Moab’s potash reserves are extracted using solution mining techniques utilizing both vertical and horizontal wells and heated injection brine.

On February 29, 2004 Intrepid acquired substantially all of the assets of Mississippi Potash, Inc. (“MPI”) and Eddy Potash, Inc. for cash consideration of $28.4 million, plus the assumption of certain liabilities for total consideration of approximately $36.6. The assets acquired included two conventional, operating potash mines and two inactive potash mines in the Carlsbad, New Mexico area. The surface facility at one of the inactive mines is operating to compact, store, and ship product from one of the active mines. HB Potash, LLC (“HB”), a wholly owned subsidiary, was formed in 2004 to acquire one of the inactive mines. Intrepid Potash – New Mexico, LLC (“NM”), also a wholly owned subsidiary, was formed in 2004 to acquire the two active mines and the second inactive mine.

Effective April 1, 2004, Intrepid purchased the potash assets of Reilly Chemical, Inc. (“Reilly”) for consideration of $10.7 million. Including liabilities assumed and closing costs, the total acquisition cost of approximately $12 million was recorded in Intrepid Potash – Wendover (“Wendover”), another wholly owned subsidiary. Acquired assets included a natural brine and potash production facility on the Bonneville salt-flats of Utah.

In 2001, Intrepid formed Moab Gas Pipeline, LLC (“Moab Pipeline”) for the purpose of acquiring and operating the natural gas transmission line that services the Moab mine. The line was acquired from the local utility for the assumption of ongoing maintenance liabilities.

In 2004, Intrepid Aviation, LLC (“Aviation”) was formed to lease and operate an aircraft.

During 2006, Intrepid sold all of its producing oil and gas operations, owned by Intrepid’s wholly owned subsidiary Intrepid Oil & Gas, LLC (“IOG”) for approximately $18.6 million net of transaction costs, resulting in a gain from sale of discontinued oil and gas operations of $9.5 million. The remaining unproven IOG assets were included in the December 31, 2006 balance sheet; and as an event subsequent to year-end, were distributed to the Members in 2007.

The cash flow and profitability of Intrepid’s operations are affected by the market prices of potash, our other products, natural gas, and commodities such as chemicals and steel. These commodity prices can fluctuate widely and are affected by numerous factors beyond Intrepid’s direct control.

Principles of Consolidation—The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Intrepid and its wholly owned subsidiaries: Moab, IOG, NM, HB, Wendover, Moab Pipeline, and Aviation. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Significant estimates with regard to Intrepid’s consolidated financial statements include the estimate of proved and probable mineral reserve volumes and the related present value of estimated future net cash flows. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of proved and probable reserves, projecting future rates of production, and the timing of development expenditures. Future mineral prices may vary significantly from the prices in effect at the time the estimates are made. The estimate of proved mineral reserve volumes and the related present value of estimated future net cash flows can affect depletion and depreciation expenses, and the net carrying value of Intrepid’s mineral properties.

The determination of reclamation liabilities also involve significant estimates, including the projections of future costs of the reclamation projects, the potentially changing scope of the projects, and the present value factors used to discount the future commitments. The estimates can affect the carrying value of the reclamation liability as well as the accretion expense. Salvage values are determined and recorded separately from reclamation liabilities, but involve related estimates including the projection of future recovery of material and the future salvage values of that material. Estimates of salvage value can affect the depreciation expense and carrying value of the assets.

Valuations of acquired businesses require us to make significant estimates, which are derived from information obtained from the management of acquired businesses, our business plans for the acquired business or intellectual property and other sources. Critical assumptions and estimates used in the initial valuation of mineral resources and other tangible and intangible assets include, but are not limited to:

Other significant estimates impacting the financial statements include post retirement benefits for certain pension holders and employees’ health care costs. The determination of product inventories, supply inventories, accounts receivable, property, plant and equipment and water rights also involve material estimates. The estimates involved include: the allocation of production costs, the value of byproducts, the determination of impairment, collectibility, the risk of obsolescence, the depreciable lives, and rates of depreciation, depletion, and amortization.

Revenue Recognition—Revenue is recognized when evidence of an arrangement exists, risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to customers, selling price is fixed and determinable, and collection is reasonably assured; which is when title passes. Title passes at the shipping point: the plant, a distribution warehouse, or a port. Title transfers for some shipments into Mexico at the border crossing, the port of exit.

Prices are set at the time of or prior to shipment. Intrepid uses few sales contracts, so prices are based on Intrepid’s current published prices or upon negotiated short-term purchase orders from customers. Sales are final with customers not having a right of return.

Sales are reported on a gross basis. Intrepid quotes prices to customers both on a delivered basis and on the basis of pick-up at Intrepid’s plants and warehouses. “Freight and other distribution costs” are incurred and billed by Intrepid and apply to only a portion of the sales as customers often arrange and pay for freight and other distribution costs.

Byproduct credits—When byproduct inventories are sold, a byproduct credit to “Cost of goods sold” is recognized.

Concentrations of Credit Risk—Credit risk represents the accounting loss that would be recognized at the reporting date if counterparties failed completely to perform as contracted.

Intrepid’s products are marketed for sale into three primary markets: the agricultural market as a fertilizer, the industrial market as a component in drilling fluids for oil and gas exploration, and the animal feed market as a nutrient. Credit risks associated with the collection of accounts receivable are primarily related to the impact of external factors on our customers. Those factors include: soil nutrient levels, crop prices, weather, the type of crops planted, changes in diets, growth in population, the amount of land under cultivation, fuel prices and consumption, the demand for biofuels, government policy, and the relative value of currencies.

Concentrations of credit risk, whether on or off balance sheet, that arise from financial instruments exist for counterparties when they have similar economic characteristics that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations to be similarly affected by changes in economic or other conditions

Intrepid maintains several cash accounts with several financial institutions. At times the balances in the accounts may exceed the $100,000 balance insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts—Trade accounts receivable are recorded at their estimated net realizable value. The allowance for doubtful accounts is determined through an analysis of the past-due status of accounts receivable and assessments of risk regarding collectibility. If the financial condition of Intrepid’s customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. The consolidated balances of the allowance for doubtful accounts as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, were approximately $104,000 and $25,000.

Cash and Cash Equivalents—Cash and cash equivalents consist of all cash balances and highly liquid investments with original maturity dates of three months or less.

Inventory and Long-Term Parts Inventory—Inventory consists of product and byproduct stocks, which are ready for delivery to market, mined ore, MOP in evaporation ponds and parts and supplies inventory. Product and byproduct inventory cost is determined using the lower of average cost for the year or estimated net realizable value. Product inventory costs include direct costs, operational overhead, depreciation, depletion, amortization, and equipment lease costs applicable to the production process. Direct costs and operational overhead include labor. Inventory includes products, inclusive of transportation and storage costs, that have been delivered to remote warehouses for which the revenue recognition criteria have not been met.

Parts inventory, including critical spares, that is not expected to be utilized within a period of one year is classified as non-current. Parts and supply inventory cost is determined using the lower of average acquisition cost or estimated replacement cost.

Intrepid conducts detailed reviews related to the net realizable value of inventory, giving consideration to quality, slow-moving items, obsolescence, excessive levels and other factors. Parts inventories not having turned-over in more than a year, excluding parts classified as critical spares, are reviewed for obsolescence and included in the determination of an allowance for obsolescence.

Financial Instruments—Intrepid uses debt financing with variable interest rates, and Intrepid uses significant volumes of natural gas purchased at variable rates. Intrepid enters into financial derivative contracts to fix a portion of the costs for anticipated but not yet committed transactions when such transactions are probable and the significant characteristics and expected timing are identified. These derivative contracts are not designated as an accounting hedge, and changes in their fair market values are included in the “Statement of Income”. The realized and unrealized gains or losses resulting from the natural gas derivative contracts are recorded as a component of natural gas expense within production costs, while realized and unrealized gains or losses on interest-rate derivative contracts are shown within interest expense. Unrealized gains or losses resulting from investments constituting portions of security bonds or other sources are recorded as investment income and included in “Other Income.”

Property, Plant, and Equipment—Cost of property, plant, and equipment are capitalized when having a future economic benefit and a useful and economic life of over a year. Property, plant, and equipment are stated at historical cost or at the allocated values determined upon acquisition of the business entities. Property, plant, and equipment are depreciated under the straight-line method using estimated useful lives. No depreciation is taken on construction in progress until placed in use. Gains and losses are recorded upon retirement, sale, or disposal of assets. Maintenance costs are expensed.

Exploration Costs—Mineral exploration costs are expensed as incurred. When it has been determined that an ore body can be economically developed, the costs incurred to further delineate and develop the ore body are capitalized.

Mineral Properties and Development Costs—Mineral properties and development costs include acquisition costs and development costs for proven and probable reserves. Depletion of mineral properties and development costs is determined using the units-of-production method over the estimated life of the proven and probable reserves. The lives of reserves used for accounting purposes are shorter than current reserve-life determinations due to uncertainties inherent in long term estimates and to correlate to estimated building and plant lives of 25 years, or less where appropriate. Certain development costs are depleted over the life of each ore body or the life of the facility. Internal labor and overhead directly incurred as a result of development is capitalized.

Oil and Gas Properties—Intrepid used the full cost method of accounting for its oil and gas operations. All costs associated with property acquisition, exploration, and development activities were capitalized. Exploration and development costs included dry hole costs, geological and geophysical costs, direct overhead related to exploration, and development activities and other costs incurred for the purpose of finding oil and gas reserves. Capitalized costs were depleted using the units-of-production method based on estimated proven reserves.

Capitalized costs of oil and gas properties, net of accumulated depletion, was limited to an amount equal to the estimated future net cash flows from proved oil and gas reserves, discounted at 10%, using year-end pricing, plus the cost (net of impairment) of unproved properties as adjusted for related tax effects (the full cost ceiling test limitation). If capitalized costs exceeded this limit, the excess was charged to expense. The expense was not reversed in future periods, even if higher oil and gas prices subsequently increased the full cost ceiling limitation. Costs of acquiring and evaluating unproved properties were initially excluded from the costs subject to depletion. These unproved properties were assessed periodically to ascertain whether impairment had occurred. When proved reserves were assigned or the property was considered to be impaired, the cost of the property or the amount of the impairment was added to the costs subject to depletion.

Research and Development Expenditures—Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. There were no research and development costs in the year ended December 31, 2006. Intrepid expensed $968,626 and $1,081,336 during the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 for costs incurred in developing new production equipment and processes; principally for its langbeinite product and on experimental drilling techniques for a new horizontal injection well in Moab.

Impairment of Long Lived Assets—Intrepid evaluates its long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amount may not be recoverable. Impairment is considered to exist if the total estimated future cash flow on an undiscounted basis is less than the carrying amount of the related assets. An impairment loss is measured and recorded based on the discounted estimated future cash flows. Changes in significant assumptions underlying future cash flow estimates or fair values of assets may have a material effect on Intrepid’s financial position and results of operations.

Non-compete Agreement—The amount paid, $750,000, for the non-compete agreement, entered into with PCS as part of the 2000 Moab acquisition, was amortized over five years, the period of such agreement. Intrepid recorded amortization of $18,750 and $150,000 associated with the non-compete agreement in the years 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Asset Retirement Obligation—Reclamation costs are allocated to expense over the life of the related assets and are periodically adjusted to reflect changes in the estimates of either the timing or amount of the reclamation and abandonment costs. The asset retirement obligation is based on when the spending for an existing environmental reclamation activity is expected to occur. Intrepid reviews, on at least an annual basis, the asset retirement obligation at each mine site to determine whether any adjustments are necessary.

While updating estimates in 2006, it was determined that the inactive HB mine would be reopened as a solution mine at a future date and that the activities related to the HB asset retirement obligation would not occur until the reopened solution mine’s operations ceased. The change in the estimated timing of the related activities resulted in an adjustment to the estimated discounted fair value of the future retirement obligation. The HB obligation was previously undiscounted because reclamation was expected to be currently undertaken.

The carrying costs for mining properties, buildings, plant, and ponds; the assets most related to the retirement obligations, are adjusted based on changes in the asset retirement obligation.

Following is a table of the changes to Intrepid’s asset retirement obligation for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005. Accretion in 2004 was $326,558.

Future Employee Benefits—Intrepid accrues its obligations under a frozen defined-benefit plan for Moab and the related costs of administration as incurred and as determined periodically by independent actuaries. The plan is frozen in the sense that only employees hired before February 22, 2000 are eligible to participate and only pay and service through February 22, 2002 are included in the calculation of benefits.

Income Taxes—As a limited liability company, Intrepid does not pay federal or state income taxes. The taxable income or loss of Intrepid will be included in the state and federal tax returns of the Members.

Comprehensive Income—Comprehensive income consists of net income and accrued pension benefit obligations in excess of plan assets.

the short-term maturity of these instruments. The revolving credit facility’s recorded value approximates its fair value as it bears interest at a floating rate. Intrepid’s interest rate and natural gas swaps are recorded at fair value.

Business Interruption Insurance Settlements—In October 2006, heavy rain from the remnants of a hurricane caused abandoned utility lines to break loose from and block the mine shaft at the West Carlsbad, New Mexico site. The mine and mill were closed for 54 days to clean-out the shaft and all of the abandoned utility lines. Business interruption insurance did not cover the first 30 days, considered a deductible period, but did cover the next 24 days. The insurer agreed to reimburse Intrepid approximately $4.0 million for this 24 day period. Such amount is included within “Business interruption insurance settlements”.

Additionally, $884,182 of estimated lost gross margin on the product destroyed during the wind-shear incident, described below in “Property Insurance Settlements”, was paid by the insurer and included within business interruption insurance settlements.

Discontinued Operations—In 2006, all of the operating properties of Intrepid Oil and Gas, LLC were sold. IOG operations and the sale of the oil and gas assets have been reclassified as discontinued operations in both 2005 and 2006. Initial drilling costs for a well-in-progress and certain unproved oil and gas rights were retained by IOG and are included in the balance sheets as of December 31, 2005 and 2006. As an event subsequent to December 31, 2006, the remaining IOG assets were distributed to the Members in 2007.

Property Insurance Settlements—In April 2006, a wind-shear struck the product warehouse at the East Carlsbad, New Mexico site. The warehouse had a book value of $9,000. Its replacement cost is expected to be approximately $22 million. Damage to the warehouse, damage to the product stored in the warehouse, and alternative handling and storage costs are covered by Intrepid’s insurance policies at replacement value, less a $1 million deductible. Insurance payments for property losses through January of 2007 to Intrepid of approximately $9.5 million less the deductible and related costs for a net gain of $6.7 million have been recognized as “Insurance settlements in excess of property losses” in 2006 as such payments are considered non-refundable. Additional insurance payments to reconstruct the warehousing facilities are contingent upon review by the insurer and therefore will be recognized in the future as settlements are agreed upon.

Redemption of Equity Interest—On December 28, 2006, the Members of Intrepid agreed to redeem the Membership interest of Long Canyon, LLC, at the time representing 42.5% of the Membership interests of Intrepid for a total redemption cost of $100 million, which included a $95 million note paid in March 2007. The $100 million cost to redeem Long Canyon, LLC as well as costs of the redemption transaction were treated as distributions to Long Canyon, LLC resulting in Intrepid having a Members’ deficit as of December 31, 2006.

Annual maintenance—Each operation typically shuts-down annually for maintenance. The NM operations typically shut-down for ten to fourteen days. Generally the Moab and Wendover operations cease harvesting potash from our solar ponds during one or more summer months to make the most of the evaporation season. During these summer shut-downs, annual maintenance is performed. Intrepid expenses the cost of the maintenance performed during the shut-downs when it occurs.

Leases—Upon entering into leases, Intrepid evaluates whether they are operating or capital leases. Operating lease expense is recognized as incurred. If lease payments change over the contractual term, the total cost over the term is recognized on a straight-line basis.

Reclassifications—Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year consolidated financial statements to conform to the current year presentation. Such reclassifications had no effect on net income.

FASB Interpretation Number 48, or FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FIN 109: In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement Number 109, which provides criteria for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of uncertain tax positions. A tax benefit from an uncertain position may be recognized only if it is “more likely than not” that the position is sustainable based on its technical merits. The provisions of FIN 48 are effective for fiscal year 2007. Under our previous limited liability corporate structure, FIN 48 would not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements but under any corporate structure, the impact of adopting FIN 48 will need to be determined.

SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements: In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure requirements regarding fair value measurement. Where applicable, this statement simplifies and codifies fair value related guidance previously issued within GAAP. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal year 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of SFAS 157 on our consolidated financial statements.

SFAS 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities: In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which permits entities to choose to measure certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value. SFAS 159 is effective for years beginning after November 15, 2007. We have not determined whether we will adopt the fair value option permitted by SFAS 159.

In 2004, Intrepid had an informal arrangement with Aspect to share in a portion of Aspect’s derivative contracts involving oil. Intrepid recorded losses of $382,636 in the year ended December 31, 2004 resulting from this agreement. The agreement was terminated in 2004.

At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the related parties’ accounts receivable balances of $302,097 and $70,924, respectively, consisted of advances to Members and employees. In addition, a contra-equity balance existed at December 31, 2006 and 2005 of $147,939 related to a receivable from Jornayvaz and Harvey for the purchase of Membership interests from Aspect in 2002. Non-business expenses initially paid by Intrepid and recognized as a receivable from Jornayvaz and Harvey were $361,319, $133,528, and $105,119 in 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.

Under Intrepid’s policy, Jornayvaz and Harvey were allowed to use Intrepid’s plane for non-business purposes, such use being treated as compensation to them at the federal standard rate for such travel. Additionally, Members may use the plane under dry-leases and reimburse Intrepid the lesser of the actual cost or the maximum amount chargeable under Federal Aviation Regulation 91-501(d). The amounts recognized as compensation and the reimbursements for the use by Members are recorded as offsets to the operating expenses of the plane. Personal use of the airplane is calculated based on occupied seat-miles, rather than flight miles. Flight segments may have passengers for both personal and business purposes. Each seat occupied for personal use is multiplied by the flight-segment miles to calculate the percentage of flight time reported as personal use. Non-business use of the plane treated as compensation was $32,718; $24,439; and $0 in 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. These figures are also included in the non-business expenses summarized in the prior paragraph.

Intrepid’s interim Chief Financial Officer is the primary owner of a firm of certified public accountants, Quinn & Associates, P.C. (“Q&A”) that provides accounting, consulting, and tax services to Intrepid. Q&A billed Intrepid based on actual hours incurred and at standard hourly rates. Q&A billings to Intrepid aggregated $468,456; $352,183, and $390,446 in 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.

Subsequent to December 31, 2006, the Members decided to distribute their remaining interests in IOG. The amount of the equity distribution was $937,532. While IOG continued as a related party, this distribution effectively separated IOG from Intrepid Mining LLC.

As an event subsequent to 2006, in June of 2007, a 20% membership interest was sold to an investment group, Potash Acquisition, LLC (PAL), controlled by Platte River Ventures, LLC, a then unrelated party, for a gross price of $39 million; or approximately $38.8 million net of transaction costs. Proceeds were used to reduce debt.

The following summarizes Intrepid’s long-term debt at December 31, 2006 and 2005:

Intrepid has a credit agreement with a syndication of banks led by US Bank National Association (the “Bank”), as amended through October 12, 2007, to provide a total commitment from the Syndication of $175 million, inclusive of an initial $50 million term loan. On March 9, 2007, Intrepid and the Bank entered into a new credit agreement in part to retire the Note to Long Canyon, LLC issued in connection with the redemption transaction described in Note 2. The line of credit is also being used to fund capital projects and to meet working capital requirements. The Bank, with the full cooperation and agreement of Intrepid, formed a syndication of banks to assume the lender’s responsibilities. Intrepid paid issuance costs of 1% of the $150 million line of credit under the new credit agreement of March 2007.

Under the Credit Agreement as amended through October 12, 2007, the $125 million revolving line terminates on March 9, 2012. The $50 million term loan requires a principal repayment of $1.25 million each quarter beginning June 29, 2007 and terminates with its outstanding balance due on March 9, 2014. Additionally, capital leases of up to $8 million and operating leases with annual payments of up to $10 million are permitted.

In 2004 and until July 1, 2005, interest on the loans was at either LIBOR plus between 2.75% and 3.25% or the Bank’s prime rate plus between 0% and 0.5%, in each case dependent on the level of borrowings. From July 1, 2005 until March 9, 2007, interest on the loan was set at either LIBOR plus between 1.5% and 2.0% or the Bank’s prime rate plus between 0% and 0.5%, in each case dependent on the level of borrowings. Effective March 9, 2007, interest on the loan was set at either LIBOR plus between 1.25% and 2.5% or the Bank’s prime rate plus between 0% and 0.75%, in each case dependent on the level of borrowings. The LIBOR-based interest

rate, including the Bank’s margin, ranged from 7.12% to 7.51% at December 31, 2006 and was 6.27% at December 31, 2005. Outstanding prime-rate advances at December 31, 2006 and 2005 were at a rate of 8.5% and 7.5%, respectively.

The Syndication has a security interest in substantially all of the assets of Intrepid. Obligations are cross-collateralized between all of Intrepid’s legal entities, parent and subsidiaries.

The following summarizes the scheduled maturities of Intrepid’s long-term debt as of the amendment dated October 12, 2007:

The following summarizes Intrepid’s inventory, recorded at the lower of average cost for the year or estimated net realizable value, as of December 31, 2006 and 2005:

Parts inventories are shown net of obsolescence reserves of $668,154 and $468,023 as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. No obsolescence or other reserves were deemed necessary for the product inventories.

Marketing Agreements—Concurrent with the acquisition of Moab in 2000, Intrepid and PCS entered into a marketing agreement. Such marketing agreement gave PCS the exclusive right to sell Intrepid’s potash production through December 31, 2004. PCS received a 5% commission on total net sales. Said marketing

agreement was terminated effective April 1, 2004, without penalty, in conjunction with the acquisitions of NM, HB, and Wendover.

Effective April 1, 2004, NM and PCS entered into a marketing agreement appointing PCS the exclusive sales representative for potash export sales, with the exception of those to Canada and Mexico, and appointing PCS a non-exclusive sales representative for potash sales into Mexico. This agreement is cancelable with thirty days written notice.

Reclamation Deposits, Surety Bonds and Sinking Fund—From June 6, 2000 through February 2005, approximately $14.2 million in surety bonds was provided the State of Utah and the BLM for Moab reclamation through an agreement between Intrepid and an insurance company (“Insurer”). In February 2005, the amount of the required surety bonds was decreased by agreement with the State of Utah and the BLM to approximately $6.8 million. The terms of the surety-agreement include provisions governing the operation of the Moab mine; provide the Insurer a security interest in approximately 56% of the surface land owned by Moab; require the establishment and maintenance of a sinking fund; and require payment of an annual 1.5% premium which was $107,831, $106,316, and $248,765 in 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. The sinking fund is a restricted asset that provides security to the State of Utah and to the BLM, but its value is determined independently of the asset retirement obligations.

Through the first quarter of 2005 Intrepid funded the sinking fund through a monthly payment. Intrepid paid $90,000 and $360,000 into the sinking fund during the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The sinking fund, a restricted deposit, is included within other long-term assets and had balances of approximately $2.9 million and $2.4 million as of December 31, 2006 and 2005. Assuming an approximate annual return of 6.5%, Intrepid has invested enough in the sinking fund to meet Moab’s expected reclamation cost inclusive of inflation. Intrepid is allowed to invest the sinking fund as the Members deem appropriate. Unrealized gains of $388,224; $161,499; and $81,950 were recorded in the statement of income in 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively, on the marketable securities held for trade by the sinking fund.

Intrepid had reclamation security deposits outstanding for the NM and HB facilities of $634,584 and $644,000 at December 31, 2006 and 2005. A security deposit related to the Wendover facility of $250,000 was outstanding at both December 31, 2006 and 2005. These restricted deposits were included within “Other” long term assets.

As of December 31, 2005, two letters of credit issued through the Bank were outstanding with the State of Utah in the total amount of $165,000 as security for IOG activities. As of December 31, 2006, these same two letters of credit were outstanding, related to the unproven oil and gas properties, as well as a third letter of credit in the amount of $109,610 issued through the Bank to the State of Utah as security on a newly completed landfill site at Moab.

Intrepid may be required to post additional security to fund future reclamation obligations as reclamation plans are updated or as governmental entities change requirements.

Health Care Costs—Intrepid is self-insured, subject to a stop-loss policy, for its employees’ health care costs. The estimated liability for outstanding medical costs has been based on the historical pattern of claim settlements. The medical-claims liability was $788,248; $525,706; and $226,617 as of December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004. The estimated health care cost can affect the benefit expense and carrying value of Intrepid.

The minimum future operating lease payments by year, inclusive of railcars and an electrical substation, are as follows:

Payments on the operating lease for the airplane in 2009 through 2014, included above, will be adjusted based upon market interest rates in September 2009.

Rental and lease expenses were approximately $2.8 million; $1.5 million; and $1.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. The rental and lease expenses exclude lease payments for railcars; approximately $0.4 million, $0.4 million, and $0.2 million in 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively; used to deliver product and recorded as a distribution cost. Rental and lease expenses also exclude lease payments for an electrical substation, approximately $0.2 million in each of the three years, recorded as a cost of electricity. Rental and lease expenses are included within “Cost of goods sold”.

Intrepid had capital lease obligations totaling $64,099 and $8,843 at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The remaining capital lease matures at February 1, 2008. The lease obligations are collateralized by the related equipment, which had a net book value of $86,816 and $8,843 at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

The minimum future payments under the terms of the capital leases are as follows:

A savings plan qualified under Internal Revenue Code Sections 401(a) and 401(k) was adopted in 2000. The 401K Plan is available to all eligible employees of all of the consolidated entities. Employees may contribute amounts as allowed by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service to the 401K Plan (subject to certain restrictions) in either before tax or after tax contributions. Intrepid matches employee contributions on a dollar for dollar basis up to a maximum of 3% or 5%, dependent on the site, and on the employee’s base compensation. For the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, Intrepid contributed $794,411; $747,669; and $573,410, respectively, to the 401K Plan.

In accordance with the terms of the Moab Purchase Agreement with PCS, in 2000 Intrepid established an Employee Defined Benefit Pension Plan (“Pension Plan”). Pursuant to the terms of the Moab Purchase Agreement, PCS calculated the present value of the future benefits under the Pension Plan as of February 22, 2000 to be approximately $1.5 million and transferred the funds to the Pension Plan. In February 2002, Intrepid froze the benefits to be paid under the Pension Plan; however, Intrepid is required to maintain the Pension Plan for the existing participants as of that date.

Accumulated other comprehensive gains and losses as of December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004 were a $990,838 gain, a $43,287 gain, and a $1,173,473 loss, respectively, resulting from unrecognized actuarial gains and losses associated with the Pension Plan.

The following table provides a reconciliation of the changes in the Pension Plan’s benefit obligations and fair value of assets for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, as measured on those dates, and a statement of the funded status as of December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004. Intrepid adopted FAS 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans”, effective December 31, 2006. There was no impact upon the financial results or position of Intrepid from adopting FAS 158.

Intrepid reviewed prevailing interest rates for high-quality fixed-income investments, those rated Aa or better. The duration of the Plan’s liabilities as of December 31, 2006 was 12.9 years. Based on this review and the plans duration, Intrepid determined a reasonable discount rate for the benefit obligations as of December 31, 2006 was 5.75%.

The discount rate determined on the benefit obligations as of December 31, 2005, 5.5%, was used in computing the net periodic benefit cost in 2006.

The basis used to determine the overall expected long-term rate of return on assets assumptions was an analysis of the historical rate of return for a portfolio with a similar asset allocation. The assumed long-term asset allocation for the plan is: 60% equity securities, 36% fixed income, and 4% cash.

Using historical investment returns, the Plan’s expected asset mix, and adjusting for the difference between expected inflation and historical inflation, the 25^th to 75^th percentile range of annual rates of return is 7.0% – 8.7%. Intrepid selected a rate of return of 7.00%, which reflects our judgment of the best estimate for this assumption based on the historical investment returns and expected future conditions. This rate is net of investment related expenses.

Plan Assets—Moab Salt, L.L.C. Employees’ Pension Plan’s weighted-average asset allocations at December 31 by asset category are as follows:

The investment policy for pension plan assets is to maximize the expected return for an acceptable level of risk. As the Plan has a long-term investment horizon, limited liquidity needs, and exposure to purchasing power risk, and little concern for income stability, Intrepid has set the following target asset allocation: 35% – 82% equity securities, 25% – 65% fixed income, and 0% – 20% cash. The cash balance at December 31, 2005 was higher than the targeted range due principally to an investment decision to delay the acquisition of fixed income instruments until interest rates had increased.

Contributions: Intrepid expects to contribute $121,000 to its pension plan in 2007.

Estimated future benefit payments: The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid:

Intrepid has managed through the use of interest-rate derivative contracts a portion of its floating interest rate exposure. Intrepid’s forward LIBOR-based contracts reduce Intrepid’s risk from interest rate movements as gains and losses on such contracts partially offset the impact of changes in Intrepid’s variable-rate debt. The interest rate paid under Intrepid’s credit agreement varies both with the change in the 3-month LIBOR rate and with Intrepid’s leverage ratio. The counterparty to the contracts is a large commercial bank and therefore credit risk of counterparty non-performance is unlikely. Notional amounts for which the rate had been fixed as of December 31, 2006 ranged between $17.5 million for the year ending March 1, 2010 to $30 million for the two months ending March 1, 2007. The weighted average notional amount outstanding as of December 31, 2006 and the weighted average 3-month LIBOR rate locked-in via these derivatives were $22.5 million and 4.6%. At December 31, 2005, Intrepid had outstanding contracts through March 3, 2008 for notional amounts ranging between $29 and $39 million. The weighted average notional amount outstanding as of December 31, 2005 and the weighted average 3-month LIBOR rate locked-in via these derivatives were $30.3 million and 3.6%.

Intrepid has managed through the use of natural gas derivative contracts a portion of its exposure to movements in the market price of natural gas. Intrepid’s forward Permian-basis contracts reduce Intrepid’s risk from movements in the cost of gas consumed as gains and losses on such financial contracts offset losses and gains on its variable-cost supply contracts. The counterparties to the contracts are credit worthy trading houses and therefore credit risk of counterparty non-performance is unlikely. At December 31, 2006, Intrepid had outstanding financial contracts through December 31, 2007 for notional quantities of 1,200,000 MMBTU’s at a weighted average cost of $8.12/MMBTU. At December 31, 2005, Intrepid had outstanding financial contracts through December 31, 2006 for notional quantities of 460,000 MMBTU’s at a weighted average cost of $8.77/MMBTU.

The fair value of financial instruments included in the financial statements as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 are depicted below.

Intrepid extracts, processes, and sells potash and langbeinite as well as byproducts; salt, magnesium chloride, and metal recovery salt. (See Note 2 regarding discontinuance of IOG operating activities in 2006.)

All assets reside in the United States, with the exception of $110,000 as of December 31, 2006 of langbeinite moved to a third-party warehouse in Ontario, Canada for sales in 2007.

Title to all products sold transferred in the United States. An approximate distribution of net sales by geographic destination follows. Sales from discontinued operations are also shown in the table below.

In 2006, 2005, and 2004, one customer (“A”), a distributor, accounted for 10.0%, 14.9%, and 11.3% of net sales, respectively. In 2006 and 2005, a second distributor (“B”), accounted for 10.9% and 10.2% of net sales, respectively.

“Property, plant and equipment” and “Mineral properties and development costs” were comprised of the following:

“Mineral properties and development costs” include $1,466,782 and $2,221,957 at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, as the balances held by the inactive HB mine. Pending reopening as a solution mine, no depletion is recognized on this portion of the mineral reserves.

Intrepid incurred the following costs for depreciation, depletion, and amortization, which included costs capitalized into inventory.

Brownfield: A brownfield mine is a project which is constructed on previously developed land. An example of a brownfield project is our planned addition of new horizontal caverns at our Moab Mine.

Effective Capacity: As estimated by Intrepid Potash, the amount of potash production a facility can achieve based on the amount and quality of ore that can currently be mined, milled and/or processed assuming no modifications to the system and a normal amount of scheduled down-time.

Greenfield: A greenfield mine is a project constructed on previously undeveloped land. An example of a greenfield mine is Rio Tinto’s proposed potash mine in the Rio Colorado region of Argentina.

Imperial Ton: A long ton or gross ton, a measurement of mass equal to 2,240 pounds.

Magnesium Chloride (MgCl₂): An effective de-icing and de-dusting agent that is sold primarily into the Mountain West and Pacific Northwest regions.

Metal Recovery Salt: Potash combined with salt in various ratios chemically enhances the recovery of aluminum in aluminum recycling processing facilities.

Nameplate Capacity: Typically the maximum achievable production the potash mill can achieve assuming there is enough ore of a specified grade to maximize the processing rate. Nameplate capacities have not typically been adjusted over time in the potash industry for the depletion of ore resulting in lower ore grades to mills, losses in productivity that can result as facilities mature, or adverse events that materially reduce the amount of feed available to the mill.

PCS: Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc. and its subsidiaries, including PCS Sales (USA), Inc., with whom Intrepid Potash has entered into an exclusive marketing agreement, and PCS Phosphate Company, Inc., from whom Intrepid Potash acquired Moab Salt, Inc.

Potash: A generic term for potassium salts (primarily potassium chloride, but also sulfate of potash magnesia or langbeinite, potassium nitrate and potassium sulfate) used predominantly and widely as a fertilizer in agricultural markets worldwide. Potash also has numerous industrial uses, including oil and gas drilling and stimulation fluids. Potash ore is commonly called sylvite. Unless otherwise indicated, references to “potash” in this prospectus refer to muriate of potash.

Potassium Chloride (KCl—muriate of potash or MOP): The most abundant, least expensive source of potassium on a delivered K₂O basis and the preferred source of potassium for fertilizer use, currently accounting for approximately 95% of total fertilizer use of K₂O. Commercial grades for fertilizer use are typically 95-98% potassium chloride, containing about 60-62% K₂O. Potassium chloride is the primary raw material used to produce industrial potassium hydroxide and its derivative salts, the most commercially important of which are potassium carbonate, potassium chromate, potassium permanganate and the potassium phosphates. It is also used as an intermediate in chemical synthesis routes to potassium sulfate and potassium nitrate. Muriate of potash is either red or white in appearance, depending on how it is produced.

Sulfate of Potash Magnesia (K₂Mg₂(SO₄)₃)—langbeinite or potassium magnesium sulfate): A double salt containing potassium and magnesium sulfates. In the U.S., sulfate of potash magnesia, produced by refining langbeinite ore, accounts for approximately 3% of potash fertilizer. Commercial products typically contain 22% K₂ O, 11% magnesium and 22% sulfur. In Europe, a variety of these mixed salts is made from different ores, in

grades ranging from 12% to 42% K₂O, 2% to 5% magnesium and 3% to 7% sulfur. Langbeinite is marketed for sale as a low-chloride potassium, magnesium and sulfur-bearing fertilizer primarily for use in citrus, vegetable, sugarcane and palm applications and as an animal feed supplement.

Potassium Nitrate (KNO₃—niter, saltpeter, nitrate of potash or sal prunella): A white crystalline salt. In the U.S., its use is limited but it is used as a nonchloride source of potash and nitrate nitrogen. The nutrient content of commercial, fertilizer-grade material is about 13-14% nitrogen and 44% K₂O. Although potassium nitrate does exist as such in nature, there are no known large deposits of concentrated potassium nitrate-containing minerals. Recovery of naturally occurring materials has been primarily from the crude sodium nitrate (caliche) beds in Chile.

Potassium Sulfate (K₂SO₄—sulfate of potash or SOP): A crystalline salt that is derived directly from brines or synthesized from other potassium salts and minerals. Commercial grades for fertilizer use are usually 93-95% potassium sulfate, containing 50-51% K₂O. Potassium sulfate accounts for 1-2% of total potash fertilizer use.

Probable (Indicated) Reserves: Reserves for which quantity and grade and/or quality are computed from information similar to that used for proven (measured) reserves, but the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are farther apart or are otherwise less adequately spaced. The degree of assurance of probable (indicated) reserves, although lower than that for proven (measured) reserves, is high enough to assume geological continuity between points of observation.

Proven (Measured) Reserves: Reserves for which (a) quantity is computed from dimensions revealed in outcrops, trenches, workings or drill holes; grade and/or quality are computed from the results of detailed sampling, and (b) the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are spaced so closely and the geologic character is so well defined that the size, shape, depth and mineral content of the reserves are well established.

Reserve: That part of a mineral deposit which could be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination.

Salt (NaCl—sodium chloride): The salt industry is a commodity business with a heavy emphasis on price competition, which results in market boundaries being defined by delivered costs.

Tailings: Salt and insoluble minerals that remain after potash is removed from ore during processing, typically disposed of in a tailings pile.

Ton: A short ton, a measurement of mass equal to 2,000 pounds. References to “tons” in this prospectus refer to short tons.

Tonne: A metric ton, a measurement of mass equal to 1,000 kilograms or 2,204.6 pounds.

The following table sets forth the various fees and expenses, other than the underwriting discounts and commissions, payable by Intrepid Potash, Inc., or the registrant, in connection with the sale of the shares of common stock being registered hereby. All amounts shown are estimates except for the SEC registration fee and the NASD filing fee.

Section 102 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or the DGCL, grants us the power to limit the personal liability of our directors or our stockholders for monetary damages for breach of a fiduciary duty. Article of our restated certificate of incorporation eliminates the personal liability of directors for monetary damages for actions taken as a director, except for liability for breach of the duty of loyalty; for acts or omissions not in good faith or involving intentional misconduct or knowing violation of law; under Section 174 of the DGCL (unlawful dividends); or for transactions from which the director derived improper personal benefit.

Under Section 145 of the DGCL, a corporation has the power to indemnify directors and officers under certain prescribed circumstances against certain costs and expenses, actually and reasonably incurred in connection with any action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, to which any of them is a party by reason of his being a director or officer of the corporation if it is determined that he acted in accordance with the applicable standard of conduct set forth in such statutory provision. Article of our amended and restated bylaws requires us to indemnify any current or former directors or officers to the fullest extent permitted by the DGCL, and to pay expenses incurred in defending any such proceeding in advance of its final disposition upon delivery to us of an undertaking, by or on behalf of an indemnified person, to repay all amounts so advanced if it should be determined ultimately that such person is not entitled to be indemnified under this section or otherwise. Article also permits us to indemnify any current or former employees or agents to the fullest extent permitted by the DGCL, and to pay expenses incurred in defending any such proceeding in advance of its final disposition upon such terms and conditions, if any, as we deem appropriate.

Section 145 of the DGCL authorizes a corporation to purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any person who is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation against any liability asserted

against and incurred by such person in any such capacity, or arising out of such person’s status as such. As permitted by Section 145 and Section of our amended and restated bylaws, we intend to obtain insurance policies insuring its directors and officers against certain liabilities that they may incur in their capacity as directors and officers.

We expect that the Underwriting Agreement to be filed as an exhibit to this registration statement will obligate the underwriters, under certain circumstances, to indemnify our directors and officers for certain liabilities, including liabilities arising under the Securities Act.

The indemnification rights set forth above shall not be exclusive of any other right which an indemnified person may have or hereafter acquire under any statute, provision of our restated certificate of incorporation or amended and restated bylaws, agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise.

Except as set forth below, in the three years preceding the filing of this registration statement, the registrant has not issued any securities that were not registered under the Securities Act.

On December 7, 2007, in connection with the incorporation of the registrant, the registrant issued 1,000 shares of common stock to Intrepid Mining LLC in exchange for $1,000. The offer, sale and issuance of these securities was made in reliance upon the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act provided for by Section 4(2) thereof for transactions not involving a public offering. Appropriate legends have been affixed to the securities issued in this transaction. The purchaser of the securities had adequate access, through business or other relationships, to information about us.

The exhibits to this registration statement are listed on the exhibit index, which appears elsewhere herein and is incorporated by reference.

See the Index to Financial Statements included on page F-1 for a list of the financial statements included in this registration statement.

All schedules not identified above have been omitted because they are not required, are not applicable or the information is included in the selected consolidated financial data or notes contained in this registration statement.

(a) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

(1) For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act, the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as of the time it was declared effective.

(2) For the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

(c) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to provide to the underwriter at the closing specified in the underwriting agreement certificates in such denominations and registered in such names as required by the underwriter to permit prompt delivery to each purchaser.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Denver, Colorado, on December 20, 2007.

Each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Robert P. Jornayvaz III, Hugh E. Harvey, Jr. and Patrick A. Quinn, and each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, from such person and in each person’s name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments) to this Registration Statement or any Registration Statement relating to this Registration Statement under Rule 462 and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and all documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them, or his or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this Registration Statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the date indicated.


	*Price to* *Public*	*Underwriting* Discounts and Commissions	*Proceeds to* *Company*
Per share	$	$	$
Total	$	$	$


	September 30, 2007
	Pro Forma Combined	Pro Forma Combined As Adjusted
	(in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	$

Total debt, including current portion

Members’ equity

Stockholders’ equity (deficit):

Common stock, $0.001 par value; 1,000 shares authorized, 1,000 shares issued and outstanding actual, shares issued and outstanding as adjusted

Additional paid-in capital

Accumulated deficit

Accumulated other comprehensive loss


Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)


Total capitalization	$	$


Assumed initial public offering price per share		$

Pro forma net tangible book value per share as of September 30, 2007	$
Increase in net tangible book value per share attributable to new investors
Decrease in net tangible book value per share distributed to existing stockholders

Pro forma adjusted net tangible book value per share after the offering and the formation transactions

Pro forma dilution per share to new investors		$


	Payments due by period
	Total		2007		2008		2009		2010		2011		2012		2013 and later
	(in thousands)
Current and long-term debt^(a)	$	132,125	$	3,750	$	5,000	$	5,000	$	5,000	$	5,000	$	87,125	$	21,250
Imputed interest on long-term debt^(b)		52,168		9,249		8,986		8,636		8,286		7,936		7,587		1,488
Capital lease obligations^(c)		64		59		5		—		—		—		—		—
Operating lease obligations^(d)		20,902		4,604		4,403		4,211		3,382		2,673		692		937
Purchase commitments^(e)		930		930		—		—		—		—		—		—
Pension obligations^(f)		7,924		84		105		130		146		182		198		7,079
Asset retirement obligation^(g)		17,181		—		—		—		—		—		—		17,181
Minimum royalty payments^(h)		10,010		385		385		385		385		385		385		7,700

Total	$	241,304	$	19,061	$	18,884	$	18,362	$	17,199	$	16,176	$	95,987	$	55,635


	Payments due by period
	Total		Q4, 2007		2008		2009		2010		2011		2012		2013 and later
	(in thousands)
Current and long-term debt^(a)	$	90,800	$	1,250	$	5,000	$	5,000	$	5,000	$	5,000	$	48,300	$	21,250
Imputed interest on long-term debt^(b)		35,689		6,356		6,269		5,919		5,569		5,219		4,869		1,488
Capital lease obligations^(c)		22		17		5		—		—		—		—		—
Operating lease obligations^(d)		20,171		1,294		4,980		4,787		3,957		3,248		869		1,036
Purchase commitments^(e)		2,429		2,429		—		—		—		—		—		—
Pension obligations^(f)		7,840		—		105		130		146		182		198		7,079
Asset retirement obligation^(g)		18,556		—		—		—		—		—		—		18,556
Minimum royalty payments^(h)		10,010		385		385		385		385		385		385		7,700

Total	$	185,517	$	11,731	$	16,744	$	16,221	$	15,057	$	14,034	$	54,621	$	57,109


		Page
Prospectus Summary		1
Risk Factors		13
Forward-Looking Statements		27
Use of Proceeds		28
Dividend Policy		29
Capitalization		30
Dilution		31
Selected Historical and Pro Forma Combined Financial and Operating Data		33
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		41
The Formation Transactions		64
Potash Industry Overview		68
Business		81


		Page
Management		105
Principal Stockholders		121
Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions		122
Description of Capital Stock		125
Shares Eligible for Future Sale		131
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations		133
Underwriting		138
Validity of the Common Shares		142
Experts		142
Where You Can Find More Information		142
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-1
Appendix A – Glossary of Terms		A-1


	Pro Forma September 30, 2007	Nine Months Ended September 30,					Pro Forma December 31, 2006	Year Ended December 31
	Pro Forma September 30, 2007	2007		2006			Pro Forma December 31, 2006	2006			2005			2004			2003			2002
		(unaudited)
	(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Statement of Operations Data⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾:
Net sales:
U.S.	$	$	130,897	$	95,107		$	$	131,920		$	135,682		$	90,765		$	11,598		$	10,892
International			9,228		5,624				7,685			5,267			10,268			—			—

Total			140,125		100,731				139,605			140,949			101,033			11,598			10,892
Cost of goods sold⁽³⁾			99,263		78,804				113,949			99,051			68,913			6,694			6,019

Gross margin			40,862		21,927				25,656			41,898			32,120			4,904			4,873
Selling and administrative			10,579		6,742				10,053			7,529			7,065			1,958			1,964
Other operating—net⁽⁴⁾			434		(487	)			(4,386	)		329			327			279			300

Operating income			29,849		15,672				19,989			34,040			24,728			2,667			2,609
Interest expense			6,587		2,083				2,907			1,473			1,802			612			302
Other non-operating⁽⁵⁾			128		193				(7,016	)		(47	)		(195	)		(64	)		209

Income from continuing operations		$	23,134	$	13,396			$	24,098		$	32,614		$	23,121		$	2,119		$	2,098

Pro forma income tax⁽⁶⁾

Pro forma income from continuing operations	$						$


Pro Forma Share and Per Share Data (unaudited)⁽⁷⁾:
Pro forma basic and diluted net income (loss) per share	$						$

Pro forma weighted average shares outstanding—basic and diluted


	As of September 30, 2007
	Intrepid Potash, Inc.		Intrepid Mining LLC		Pro Forma Adjustments			Pro Forma Combined
	(unaudited)
	(in thousands)
Balance Sheet Data:
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	—	$	2,490	$	⁽¹	⁾	$
						⁽²	⁾
						⁽³	⁾
Accounts receivable:
Trade		—		19,566
Insurance and other		—		1,392
Related parties		—		230
Inventory, net		—		16,431
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		—		1,512

Total current assets		—		41,621

Property, plant and equipment, net		—		60,102
Mineral properties and development costs, net		—		23,350
Other assets		—		12,795
Deferred tax assets, net		—		—		⁽⁴	⁾

Total assets	$	—	$	137,868	$			$

Current Liabilities
Accounts payable	$	—	$	4,831	$			$
Accrued liabilities		—		13,117
Current installments of long-term debt		—		5,022		⁽³	⁾
Other current liabilities		—		1,165

Total current liabilities		—		24,135

Long-term debt, net of current installments		—		85,800		⁽³	⁾
Accrued pension liability		—		944
Asset retirement obligation		—		7,634
Other non-current liabilities		—		429

Total non-current liabilities		—		94,807

Commitments and Contingencies

Members’/Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)		—		18,926		⁽¹	⁾
						⁽²	⁾
						⁽³	⁾
						⁽⁴	⁾

Total Liabilities and Members’/Stockholders’ Equity	$	—	$	137,868	$			$


	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
	Intrepid Potash, Inc.		Intrepid Mining LLC			Pro Forma Adjustments			Pro Forma Combined
	(unaudited)
	(in thousands, except per share data)
Statement of Operations Data:
Sales	$	—	$	158,525		$			$
Less: freight and distribution		—		18,400

Net sales		—		140,125
Cost of goods sold		—		99,263

Gross Margin		—		40,862

Selling and administrative		—		10,579
Accretion of asset retirement obligation		—		434

Operating Income		—		29,849

Other Income (Expense)
Interest expense		—		(6,587	)		⁽⁵	⁾
Foreign currency translation		—		12
Other income (expense)		—		(140	)

Income from Continuing Operations Before Taxes		—		23,134

Income Taxes		—		—			⁽⁶	⁾

Income from Continuing Operations	$	—	$	23,134		$			$

Earnings Per Share:
Basic									$
Diluted

Weighted Average Shares Outstanding:
Basic
Diluted


	Year Ended December 31, 2006
	Intrepid Potash, Inc.		Intrepid Mining LLC			Pro Forma Adjustments		Pro Forma Combined
						(unaudited)
	(in thousands, except per share data)
Statement of Operations Data:
Sales	$	—	$	154,291		$		$
Less: freight and distribution		—		14,686

Net sales		—		139,605
Cost of goods sold		—		113,949

Gross Margin		—		25,656

Selling and administrative		—		10,053
Accretion of asset retirement obligation		—		541
Business interruption insurance settlements		—		(4,927	)

Operating Income		—		19,989

Other Income (Expense)
Interest expense		—		(2,907	)		⁽⁵⁾
Insurance proceeds in excess of property losses⁽⁶⁾		—		6,665
Other income		—		351

Income from Continuing Operations Before Taxes		—		24,098

Income Taxes		—		—			⁽⁷⁾

Income from Continuing Operations	$	—	$	24,098		$		$

Earnings Per Share:
Basic								$
Diluted

Weighted Average Shares Outstanding:
Basic
Diluted


	Nine Months Ended September 30, (unaudited)						Year Ended December 31,
	2007			2006			2006			2005			2004
	(unaudited)
	(in thousands)
Sales	$	158,525		$	110,640		$	154,291		$	153,014		$	114,326
Less: freight and distribution costs		18,400			9,909			14,686			12,065			13,293

Net sales		140,125			100,731			139,605			140,949			101,033
Cost of goods sold		99,263			78,804			113,949			95,051			68,913

Gross Margin		40,862			21,927			25,656			41,898			32,120

Selling and administrative		10,579			6,742			10,053			7,529			7,065
Accretion of asset retirement obligation		434			397			541			329			327
Business interruption insurance settlements		—			(884	)		(4,927	)		—			—

Operating Income		29,849			15,672			19,989			34,040			24,728

Other Income (Expense):
Interest expense		(6,587	)		(2,083	)		(2,907	)		(1,473	)		(1,802	)
Foreign currency translation		12			—			—			—			—
Insurance proceeds in excess of (less than) property costs		—			(729	)		6,665			—			—
Other income		(140	)		536			351			47			195

Income from Continuing Operations		23,134			13,396			24,098			32,614			23,121

Discontinued Operations:
Income from operations of discontinued oil and gas activities		—			2,316			2,407			1,849			1,277
Gain from disposal of discontinued oil and gas assets		—			—			9,517			—			—

		—			2,316			11,924			1,849			1,277

Net Income	$	23,134		$	15,712		$	36,022		$	34,463		$	24,398


	Year Ended December 31,
	2006		2005		Change			% Change
Cost per ton of potash sold⁽¹⁾	$	145	$	113	$	32		28	%
Cost per ton of langbeinite sold⁽²⁾	$	88	$	201	$	(113	)	(56	)%


	Potash	Nitrogen	Phosphate
Number of Producing Countries	12	68	42

Key Inputs	potash ore	natural gas (for ammonia)	phosphate rock sulfuric acid ammonia

Market Share of Top 5 Producers⁽¹⁾	67.3%	12.5% ammonia 38.8% urea	40.8% phosphoric acid 49.2% phosphate rock

Percent of Production Government Controlled	19%	57%	47%

Industry Nameplate Capacity Operating Rate	85% (93% effective capacity)⁽²⁾	86% ammonia 89% urea	81% phosphoric acid 82% phosphate rock

Time for Greenfield	5–7 years	2–3 years	3–4 years

Estimated Cost for Greenfield⁽³⁾	$2.5 billion for 2.2 million tons	$700 million for 1.1 million tons	$1.3 billion for 1.1 million tons


Producer	Primary Production Region	2006 Production	Percent of World Total		January to June 2007 Production	Percent of World Total
Canpotex
PCS	Canada	4,719	14.1	%	3,347	17.2	%
Mosaic⁽¹⁾	Canada	4,482	13.4	%	2,658	13.7	%
Agrium	Canada	813	2.4	%	584	3.0	%

		10,014	29.9	%	6,589	33.9	%

BPC
Belaruskali	Belarus	5,161	15.5	%	3,002	15.5	%
Uralkali	Russia	2,920	8.7	%	1,645	8.5	%

		8,081	24.2	%	4,647	24.0	%

Kali und Salz	Germany	4,052	12.1	%	2,124	10.9	%
Silvinit	Russia	3,495	10.5	%	1,930	9.9	%
Israel Chemicals Ltd.⁽²⁾	Dead Sea, Spain, UK	3,351	10.0	%	1,609	8.3	%
People’s Republic of China	China	1,762	5.3	%	1,102	5.7	%
Arab Potash Company⁽²⁾	Dead Sea	1,142	3.4	%	636	3.3	%
Intrepid Potash⁽³⁾	U.S.	475	1.4	%	276	1.4	%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile⁽²⁾	Chile	419	1.3	%	222	1.1	%
Companhia Vale do Rio Doce	Brazil	475	1.4	%	207	1.1	%
Compass Minerals⁽⁴⁾	U.S.	135	0.4	%	79	0.4	%

		33,401	100	%	19,421	100	%


Company	Primary Region	Langbeinite (22% K₂O)	Potassium Sulfate (50% K₂O)	Other (K₂O Varies)
Mosaic	U.S.	1,300	—	—
Intrepid Potash	U.S.	250	—	—
Citic Group	China	550	—	—
Qinghai Bingdi Potash	China	225	—	—
Kali und Salz	Germany	—	1,200	1,700
Compass Minerals⁽¹⁾	U.S.	—	161	—
Atacama	Chile	—	288	—

Total		2,325	1,649	1,700


Product/Operations	Date Mine Opened⁽²⁾	Current Extraction Method	Minimum Remaining Life (years)⁽³⁾	Proven Reserves KCl⁽³⁾	Proven Ore Grade⁽⁴⁾ (% KCl or % Lang)	Probable Reserves KCl⁽⁵⁾	Probable Ore Grade⁽⁴⁾ (% KCl or % Lang)
Muriate of Potash
Carlsbad West	1931	Underground	122	29,609	23.7	21,528	21.7
Carlsbad East	1965	Underground	42	6,148	19.0	6,511	17.8
Moab	1965	Solution	124	3,810	41.9	7,180	41.5
Wendover^(6, 7)	1932	Lake Brine Evaporation	30	—	—	2,806	1.2

Total Muriate of Potash				39,567	24.7	38,025	23.3

Sulfate of Potash Magnesia
Carlsbad East	1965	Underground	43	16,158	35.2	19,562	35.0

Total Sulfate of Potash Magnesia				16,158	35.2	19,562	35.0


	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007				Year Ended December 31,
	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007				2006⁽¹⁾				2005⁽²⁾				2004⁽³⁾
Primary Product	Ore Produc- tion	Mill Feed Grade		Finished Product	Ore Produc- tion	Mill Feed Grade		Finished Product	Ore Produc- tion	Mill Feed Grade		Finished Product	Ore Produc- tion	Mill Feed Grade		Finished Product
Muriate of Potash
Carlsbad West	1,965	13.4	%	322	2,013	12.7	%	305	2,544	12.9	%	398	1,966	13.3	%	323
Carlsbad East⁽⁴⁾	1,695	11.9	%	217	2,000	12.5	%	260	2,266	12.4	%	343	1,958	13.5	%	348
Moab⁽⁵⁾	249	13.9	%	47	535	14.4	%	104	500	14.8	%	94	572	15.4	%	106
Wendover	338	16.4	%	74	378	17.5	%	57	339	17.3	%	62	201	17.3	%	50

	4,247			660	4,926			726	5,649			897	4,697			827

Langbeinite Carlsbad East⁽⁴⁾	1,695	4.7	%	126	2,000	5.6	%	156	2,266	3.2	%	15	—	—		—

	1,695			126	2,023			156	5,649			15	—			—

Total Primary Products⁽⁴⁾	4,247			786	4,926			882	5,649			912	4,697			827


	Percentage of Net Sales
	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007		Year Ended December 31,
Region	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007		2006		2005		2004
Mexico/Latin America	4.7	%	4.4	%	2.7	%	6.8	%
Caribbean	0.2		0.9		1.0		2.3
Canada	0.9		0.2		0.0		0.1
Other	0.8		0.0		0.0		0.9

Export Subtotal	6.6		5.5		3.7		10.2
USA	93.4		94.5		96.3		89.8

Total Sales	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%


Name	Age	Position

Robert P. Jornayvaz III	49	Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

Hugh E. Harvey, Jr.	55	Executive Vice President of Technology and Director

Patrick L. Avery	55	President and Chief Operating Officer

R.L. Moore	58	Senior Vice President of Marketing and Sales

James N. Whyte	49	Executive Vice President of Human Resources and Risk Management

Patrick A. Quinn	54	Interim Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer

Rodney D. Gloss	51	Vice President and Controller

J. Landis Martin	62	Director


Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)	Bonus ($)	Non-Equity Plan Compensation ($)	All Other Compensation ($)		Total ($)
Robert P. Jornayvaz III Co-Chief Executive Officer	2006	487,500	479,875	—	179,092	^(1)(2)(3)	1,146,467

Hugh E. Harvey, Jr. Co-Chief Executive Officer	2006	487,500	439,875	—	29,698	^(3)(4)(5)	957,073

Patrick A. Quinn⁽⁶⁾ Interim Chief Financial Officer	2006	—	—	—	175,175	⁽⁷⁾	175,175

R.L. Moore Senior Vice President of Marketing and Sales	2006	207,270	100,000	—	—		307,270

James N. Whyte Vice President of Human Resources and Risk Management	2006	181,765	65,690	—	17,762	⁽⁸⁾⁽⁹⁾	265,217


	Cash Severance			Value of Accelerated Equity Awards ⁽¹)		280G Gross Up ⁽²)
Termination For Cause		—			—		—
Termination Without Cause	$	731,250	⁽³⁾		—		—
Change of Control		—		$		$


Name of Beneficial Owner	Shares Beneficially Owned Before Offering		Shares Acquired in Connection with the Offering and the Formation Transactions	Shares Beneficially Owned After Offering
Name of Beneficial Owner	Number	Percent		Number	Percent
Harvey Operating and Production Company⁽¹⁾
Intrepid Production Corporation⁽²⁾
Potash Acquisition, LLC⁽³⁾
Robert P. Jornayvaz III⁽²⁾
Hugh E. Harvey, Jr.⁽¹⁾
Patrick L. Avery
R.L. Moore
James N. Whyte
Patrick A. Quinn
Rodney D. Gloss
J. Landis Martin⁽³⁾
All directors and executive officers as a group ( persons)


Name		Number of Shares
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated

Total


	Per Share	Total
	Per Share	No Exercise	Full Exercise
Public offering price	$	$	$
Underwriting discounts and commissions
Proceeds, before expenses, to us


		Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F-2
Balance Sheet as of December 10, 2007		F-3
Notes to Balance Sheet		F-4


		Page
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007:
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2007 (unaudited) and December 31, 2006		F-5
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Income for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006		F-6
Unaudited Consolidated Statement of Members’ Equity (Deficit) and Comprehensive Income for the nine months ended September 30, 2007		F-7
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006		F-8
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-9

Consolidated Financial Statements for the Years Ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 and Select Financial Information for the Year Ended December 31, 2004:
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms		F-14
Consolidated Balance Sheets—December 31, 2006 and 2005		F-16
Consolidated Statements of Income—For the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004		F-17
Consolidated Statements of Members’ Equity (Deficit) and Comprehensive Income—For the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004		F-18
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows—For the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004		F-19
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-20


Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,000

Total assets	$	1,000

Stockholder’s Equity
Common stock, $.001 par value, 1,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding	$	1
Additional paid-in capital in excess of par		999

Total stockholder’s equity	$	1,000


	September 30, 2007		December 31, 2006
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2,490,018	$	285,947
Accounts receivable:
Trade		19,566,250		15,954,150
Insurance and other		1,392,438		12,011,316
Related parties		230,013		302,097
Inventory, net		16,431,130		20,994,887
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		1,511,977		1,304,975

Total current assets		41,621,826		50,853,372

Property, plant and equipment, net		60,101,790		42,370,980
Mineral properties and development costs, net		23,350,047		24,328,989
Oil & gas properties—unproved, at cost, using the full-cost method of accounting		—		886,121
Long-term parts inventory, net		4,167,401		3,371,180
Other assets		8,627,233		7,503,664

Total Assets	$	137,868,297	$	129,314,306

LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	4,831,084	$	6,232,090
Accrued liabilities		13,117,140		11,255,201
Current installments of long-term debt		5,021,522		3,808,701
Other current liabilities		1,165,124		2,816,008

Total current liabilities		24,134,870		24,112,000

Long-term debt, net of current installments		85,800,000		128,380,788
Accrued pension liability		943,959		943,959
Asset retirement obligation		7,634,315		7,202,611
Other non-current liabilities		429,313		132,946

Total liabilities		118,942,457		160,772,304

Commitments and Contingencies

Members’ Equity (Deficit)		18,925,840		(31,457,998	)

Total Liabilities and Members’ Equity (Deficit)	$	137,868,297	$	129,314,306


	September 30,
	2007			2006
Sales	$	158,525,210		$	110,639,986
Less: Freight and other distribution costs		18,400,611			9,908,736

Net Sales		140,124,599			100,731,250
Cost of goods sold		99,262,851			78,804,292

Gross Margin		40,861,748			21,926,958

Selling and administrative		10,579,140			6,742,333
Accretion of asset retirement obligation		433,970			396,999
Business interruption insurance settlement		—			(884,182	)

Operating Income		29,848,638			15,671,808

Other Income (Expense):
Interest expense		(6,587,341	)		(2,082,713	)
Foreign currency translation		12,223			—
Costs in excess of pending insurance settlement		—			(729,039	)
Other income (expense)		(139,401	)		535,563

Income from Continuing Operations		23,134,119			13,395,619

Discontinued Operations
Income from operations of discontinued oil and gas activities		—			2,316,860

Net Income	$	23,134,119		$	15,712,479


	Accumulated Equity (deficit)			Accumulated other comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total Members’ Equity (deficit)
Balance, December 31, 2006	$	(30,559,995	)	$	(898,003	)	$	(31,457,998	)
Net income and comprehensive income		23,134,119			—			23,134,119
Distribution of oil and gas assets		(937,532	)		—			(937,532	)
Capital contributions (net of transaction costs)		38,786,091			—			38,786,091
Capital distributions		(10,746,779	)		—			(10,746,779	)
Repayment of Members’ loans		147,939			—			147,939

Balance, September 30, 2007	$	19,823,843		$	(898,003	)	$	18,925,840


	2007			2006
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	23,134,119		$	15,712,479
Items not affecting cash:
Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion		6,430,619			5,796,667
Loss on disposal of assets		548,760			2,825
Financial instrument gain (loss)		(826,515	)		2,833,544
Bond sinking fund unrealized gains		(129,838	)		(202,167	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Trade accounts receivable		(3,612,100	)		(899,509	)
Insurance reimbursements and other receivables		3,678,166			—
Related party receivable		72,084			(17,742	)
Inventory		3,101,575			(14,012,585	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		(563,978	)		459,394
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(174,851	)		(1,700,332	)
Discontinued operations		—			(1,137,313	)
Other current liabilities		(497,966	)		37,373

Total cash provided by operating activities		31,160,075			6,872,634

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from insurance reimbursements		6,940,712			—
Additions to oil and gas properties		—			(713,425	)
Additions to property, plant, and equipment		(21,269,758	)		(4,422,554	)
Additions to mineral properties		(47,084	)		(9,001	)
Additions to bond sinking fund		(37,774	)		(35,712	)
Additions to non-current assets of discontinued operations		—			(4,152,945	)

Total cash used in investing activities		(14,413,904	)		(9,333,637	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from long-term debt		226,508,252			46,976,831
Repayments on long-term debt		(267,876,219	)		(37,348,201	)
Debt issuance costs		(1,607,787	)		—
Members’ capital contributions (net of transaction costs)		38,786,091			—
Members’ loan repayments		147,939			—
Members’ capital distributions		(10,500,376	)		(7,325,000	)

Total cash (used in )provided by financing activities		(14,542,100	)		2,303,630

Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents		2,204,071			(157,373	)

Cash and Cash Equivalents, beginning of period		285,947			157,373

Cash and Cash Equivalents, end of period	$	2,490,018		$	—

Cash paid for interest	$	6,325,769		$	1,909,796


	Sept 30, 2007			Dec 31, 2006
Asset retirement obligation—beginning of period	$	7,202,611		$	6,466,144
Change in estimated obligation		(2,266	)		195,445
Accretion of discount		433,970			541,022

Long-term asset retirement obligation—end of period	$	7,634,315		$	7,202,611


	September 30, 2007			December 31, 2006
US Bank / Bank Syndication	$	90,800,000		$	37,125,390
Long Canyon, LLC “Redemption” Note		—			95,000,000
Other		21,522			64,099

Total		91,821,522			132,189,489

Less current installments		(5,021,522	)		(3,808,701	)

Long-term debt	$	85,800,000		$	128,380,788


	Sept 30, 2007		Dec 31, 2006
Product inventory	$	6,580,695	$	12,442,902
In-process mineral inventory		2,952,292		2,325,202
Current parts inventory		6,851,446		6,203,081
Inventory in transit		46,697		23,702

Total current inventory		16,431,130		20,994,887
Long-term parts inventory		4,167,401		3,371,180

Total inventory	$	20,598,531	$	24,366,067