c/o Seacastle Operating Holdings LLC
1 Maynard Drive
Park Ridge, New Jersey 07656
(201) 391-0800
(Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number,
Including Area Code, of Registrant’s Principal Executive Offices)

Joseph Kwok
Chief Executive Officer
Seacastle Inc.
c/o Seacastle Operating Holdings LLC
1 Maynard Drive
Park Ridge, New Jersey 07656
(201) 391-0800
(Name, Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone
Number, Including Area Code, of Agent For Service)

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after the effective date of this registration statement.

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box.

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.

The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the Registration Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and we are not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.

We are selling 20,000,000 shares of our common stock. After this offering, certain private equity funds managed by an affiliate of Fortress Investment Group LLC will beneficially own approximately 82% of our common stock.

This is the initial public offering of our common stock. We currently expect the initial public offering price to be between $15.00 and $17.00 per share. Our common stock has been approved for listing on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol ‘‘SC’’, subject to official notice of issuance.

Investing in our common stock involves risks. See ‘‘Risk Factors’’ beginning on page 12.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

We have granted the underwriters an option to purchase up to 3,000,000 additional shares of common stock at the public offering price less underwriting discounts and commissions for the purpose of covering over-allotments.

You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus or in any free writing prospectus we may authorize to be delivered to you. We have not, and the underwriters have not, authorized anyone to provide you with different information. If anyone provides you with different information, you should not rely on it. We are not, and the underwriters are not, making an offer of these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer is not permitted. You should not assume that the information contained in this prospectus is accurate as of any date other than the date on the front of this prospectus.

Until , 2008 (25 days after the date of this prospectus), all dealers that buy, sell or trade our common stock, whether or not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This is in addition to each dealer’s obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriter and with respect to its unsold allotments or subscriptions.

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this prospectus. You should read the entire prospectus carefully, including the section entitled ‘‘Risk Factors’’ and our financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus, before making an investment decision to purchase shares of our common stock. Unless the context suggests otherwise, references in this prospectus to ‘‘Seacastle,’’ the ‘‘Company,’’ ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to Seacastle Inc. and its subsidiaries. References in this prospectus to ‘‘Fortress’’ refer to Fortress Investment Group LLC. We use the term ‘‘twenty foot equivalent unit,’’ or ‘‘TEU,’’ the international standard measure of containers, in describing certain quantities of our containers and the capacity of our containerships, and ‘‘ISO’’ to refer to the International Organization for Standardization. For the definition of certain intermodal terms used in this prospectus, see the ‘‘Glossary’’ at the end of the prospectus. All amounts in this prospectus are expressed in U.S. dollars and the financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the Unites States (‘‘GAAP’’).

We are one of the largest operating lessors of intermodal equipment in the world based on total assets. We acquire and lease chassis, containers and containerships, which are essential intermodal equipment used in global containerized cargo trade. This equipment has enabled the growth in global containerized trade because it allows efficient movement of goods via multiple transportation modes, including ships, rail and trucks. We lease our equipment primarily under long-term contracts to the world’s largest shipping lines and several major U.S. rail and trucking companies. As of September 30, 2007, we had total assets of $4.5 billion and we plan to make additional investments in intermodal assets. We intend to pay regular quarterly dividends and expect to grow our dividends.

We own or manage 247,000 intermodal chassis, 985,000 TEUs of dry freight and refrigerated shipping containers and seven containerships aggregating 32,770 TEUs. In addition, we have purchase agreements to acquire six containerships aggregating 27,320 TEUs to be delivered in 2009 and 2010. We have long-term relationships with an extensive group of customers in the intermodal shipping industry. As of September 30, 2007, we employed 341 people in 36 offices in seven countries.

We expect to benefit from the size and growth of the intermodal asset market and to increase our revenues and operating cash flow by acquiring additional chassis, containers and containerships. Over the last 25 years, containerized trade has grown by more than 9% per year, consistently outpacing world GDP growth by an average of 2.6 times, and is expected to grow by 10.7% in 2007 and 9.3% in 2008. The current intermodal market includes over one million chassis, 24 million TEUs of containers and over 4,000 containerships. We estimate that the global intermodal equipment fleet has an aggregate value of over $250 billion and approximately 40-50% of these assets are leased.

We generated total revenue of $144.5 million and $150.7 million, respectively, for the years ended 2004 and 2005, and $477.2 million and $425.2 million, respectively, on a pro forma basis for the year ended 2006 and the nine months ended September 30, 2007. We generated net income (loss) of $44 million and $(4.6) million, respectively, for the years ended 2004 and 2005, and $(6.2) million and $47.7 million, respectively, on a pro forma basis for the year ended 2006 and the nine months ended September 30, 2007.

We believe that the key competitive strengths that will enable us to execute our strategy include:

We plan to grow our assets and dividends per share by employing the following business strategies:

Carlisle was founded in 1993 and was acquired by certain of our Initial Shareholders in 2006. SHL was formed in 2006 by certain of our Initial Shareholders for the purpose of engaging in the business of acquiring and leasing containerships. Prior to the Interpool Acquisition, Interpool was listed on the NYSE and had been operating since it was established in 1968.

Financial information about the Company in this prospectus does not reflect the business conducted by Interpool, except to the extent the information relates to periods or dates after the Interpool Acquisition which was completed in July 2007, unless otherwise specified.

Since we are a newly formed company with limited separate operating history, our historical financial and operating data may not be representative of our future results.

While we do not yet have final results for the fourth quarter of 2007, we currently expect that our revenues, expenses and other results will generally increase from the comparable period of 2006 due primarily to the Seacastle Combination and the Interpool Acquisition.

Following the completion of this offering, certain private equity funds managed by an affiliate of Fortress will beneficially own approximately 82% of our outstanding common stock, or 81% if the underwriters’ over-allotment option is fully exercised. These Fortress funds are described in the section of this prospectus entitled ‘‘Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions – Shareholders Agreement,’’ and are referred to in this prospectus as our Initial Shareholders. After this offering, these Fortress funds will beneficially own shares sufficient for the majority vote over fundamental and significant corporate matters and transactions. See ‘‘Risk Factors – Risks Related to Our Organization and Structure.’’

Fortress is a global alternative asset manager with approximately $40 billion in assets under management as of September 30, 2007. Fortress manages private equity funds, hedge funds and publicly traded alternative investment vehicles. The private equity funds total approximately $20.9 billion of the firm’s assets under management as of September 30, 2007. Fortress was founded in 1998, is headquartered in New York and has affiliates with offices in Dallas, San Diego, Los Angeles, Toronto, London, Rome, Hong Kong, Frankfurt and Sydney.

We are incorporated in the Republic of the Marshall Islands. Our principal executive offices are located at c/o Seacastle Operating Holdings LLC, 1 Maynard Drive, Park Ridge, New Jersey 07656. Our telephone number is (201) 391-0800. Our internet address is www.seacastleinc.com. Information on our website does not constitute part of this prospectus.

The number of shares of common stock to be issued and outstanding after the completion of this offering is based on 110,599,773 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of January 14, 2008, and excludes an additional 4,000,000 shares reserved for issuance under our equity incentive plan, all of which remain available for grant.

Prior to the acquisition of Carlisle by certain of our Initial Shareholders on February 14, 2006, Seacastle did not have any results of operations. Therefore, the following summary historical consolidated financial information as of and for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005 and for the period from January 1, 2006 through February 14, 2006 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of Carlisle (the predecessor to Seacastle) included elsewhere in this prospectus. We derived historical consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2006 from the audited balance sheets of Seacastle as of December, 31, 2006, included elsewhere in this prospectus. Historical consolidated statement of operations data and historical consolidated statement of cash flows data for the period from February 15, 2006 through December 31, 2006 were derived from the audited consolidated statement of operations and statement of cash flows for Seacastle, included elsewhere in this prospectus.

Historical consolidated statement of operations data and historical consolidated statement of cash flows data for the period from February 15, 2006 through September 30, 2006 were derived from the unaudited consolidated financial statements for the period from February 15, 2006 through September 30, 2006 for Seacastle, included elsewhere in this prospectus. Historical consolidated balance sheet data, historical consolidated statement of operations data and historical consolidated statement of cash flows data as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 were derived from the unaudited consolidated financial statements as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 of Seacastle.

The results for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for a full fiscal year. The interim results have been derived from our unaudited interim consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared on a basis consistent with the audited financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. In the opinion of management, such unaudited financial information reflects all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the results of those periods.

The following summary unaudited pro forma, as adjusted balance sheet information as of September 30, 2007 has been prepared to give pro forma effect to this offering. The following summary unaudited pro forma statements of operations information for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and for the year ended December 31, 2006 have been prepared to give pro forma effect to the offering and the Interpool Acquisition as if they occurred on January 1, 2006. The pro forma adjustments used in preparing pro forma financial information reflect our estimates of the purchase price allocation, which may change upon finalization of our analysis. These adjustments also assume that this offering is completed at a price per share equal to the midpoint of the estimated price range on the cover of this prospectus, after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and other expenses, and that we will have estimated net proceeds of $289.9 million, we will use a portion to repay certain outstanding debt and we will pay dividends for periods prior to the offering. We discuss the potential impact of a change in the assumed offering price on available proceeds in ‘‘Use of Proceeds.’’ The pro forma financial information is provided for informational purposes only and should not be considered indicative of actual results that would have been achieved had the Interpool Acquisition actually been consummated on the dates indicated and does not purport to indicate balance sheet information and results of operations as of any future date or any future period.

The following tables summarize the consolidated financial information for our business. You should read these tables along with ‘‘Selected Historical Consolidated Financial Data,’’ ‘‘Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,’’ ‘‘Business,’’ ‘‘Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information’’ and our consolidated historical financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.


	Predecessor											Successor			Pro Forma				Pro Forma, As Adjusted				Successor						Pro Forma				Pro Forma, As Adjusted
	Year Ended December 31,							Period from January 1, 2006 through February 14, 2006				Period from February 15, 2006 through December 31, 2006			Year Ended December 31, 2006				Year Ended December 31, 2006				Period from February 15, 2006 through September 30, 2006			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007				Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
	2004			2005				Period from January 1, 2006 through February 14, 2006				Period from February 15, 2006 through December 31, 2006			Year Ended December 31, 2006				Year Ended December 31, 2006				Period from February 15, 2006 through September 30, 2006			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007				Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
	(dollars in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
Total revenue		$144,482			$	150,689			$	18,205			$	138,422		$	477,218			$	477,218			$	97,079		$	222,359		$	425,219			$	425,219
Direct operating expenses		5,320				7,934				790				5,889			113,035				113,035				4,442			30,039			77,498				77,498
Selling, general and administrative expenses		36,554				37,390				3,627				20,021			69,957				69,957				12,759			28,216			64,418				64,418
Depreciation of leasing equipment		42,348				48,461				6,812				55,723			124,639				124,639				39,411			69,543			104,385				104,385
Fair value adjustment for derivative instruments		(12,755	)			(10,434	)			(3,527	)			—			(5,714	)			(5,714	)			—			—			(1,218	)			(1,218	)
Goodwill impairment		—				38,900				—				—			—								—			—
Interest expense		32,243				36,920				5,196				39,490			167,270				167,270				29,352			65,248			132,254				130,384
Net income (loss)		43,950				(4,631	)			4,806				3,614			(6,206	)			(6,206	)			2,012			26,597			47,651				49,521
Net income per share of common stock⁽¹⁾:
Basic and diluted		—				—				—			$	0.11		$	(0.06	)		$	(0.06	)		$	0.06		$	0.48		$	0.45			$	0.43
Supplemental net income per share⁽²⁾													$	0.10													$	0.45
Other Operating Data:
Adjusted EBITDA⁽³⁾		$108,689			$	111,785			$	13,603			$	107,403										$	80,008		$	161,886
Distributions to Members		6,000				4,500				—				—			—				—				—			—			—
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows Data:
Cash flows provided by operating activities		$75,463			$	66,130			$	5,839			$	69,821										$	47,434		$	88,086
Capital expenditures		$161,933			$	148,735			$	4,533			$	127,300										$	30,514		$	680,943
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data at end of period:
Net investment in finance leases		$142,583			$	177,062							$	171,714													$	680,635
Leasing equipment, net		570,390				593,035								843,401														2,976,641
Total assets		830,456				857,861								1,098,407														4,475,300
Debt and capital lease obligations, current		40,265				71,002								68,500														1,193,506							1,051,656
Debt and capital lease obligations, long-term		510,728				546,633								720,667														1,951,934							1,951,934
Total liabilities		602,649				638,613								853,232														3,479,588							3,389,781
Total shareholders’ equity/Members’ interest		227,807				219,248								245,175														995,712							1,233,569


	Predecessor												Successor
	Year Ended December 31,								Period from January 1, 2006 through February 14, 2006				Period from February 15, 2006 through December 31, 2006			Period from February 15, 2006 through September 30, 2006			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
	2004				2005				Period from January 1, 2006 through February 14, 2006				Period from February 15, 2006 through December 31, 2006			Period from February 15, 2006 through September 30, 2006			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
	(dollars in thousands)
Net Income (loss)		$	43,950			$	(4,631	)		$	4,806			$	3,614		$	2,012		$	26,597
Depreciation and amortization			45,316				51,369				7,208				57,492			41,562			70,356
Interest expense, net of interest income (includes loss on retirement of debt)			32,178				36,581				5,116				46,259			36,411			60,238
Income tax provision			—				—				—				38			23			4,695
EBITDA			121,444				83,319				17,130				107,403			80,008			161,886
Fair value adjustment on derivative instruments			(12,755	)			(10,434	)			(3,527	)			—			—			—
Goodwill Impairment			—				38,900				—				—			—			—
Adjusted EBITDA		$	108,689			$	111,785			$	13,603			$	107,403		$	80,008		$	161,886

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the following risk factors, as well as other information contained in this prospectus, before deciding to invest in our common stock. The occurrence of any of the following risks could materially and adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow, in which case, the trading price of our common stock could decline and you could lose all or part of your investment.

The demand for leased chassis, containers and containerships depends on many economic, political and other factors beyond our control, and a decrease in the volume of world trade and other operating factors may adversely affect our business.

Demand for leasing our chassis and containers and chartering our containerships, which we sometimes refer to collectively as the leasing of our intermodal assets, depends largely on the extent of world trade and economic growth, with U.S. consumer demand being the most critical factor affecting this growth. Economic downturns in one or more countries, particularly in the United States, the European Union and other countries with consumer-oriented economies, could result in a reduction in world trade volume or in demand by container shipping, rail and trucking lines for leased equipment and vessels. Cyclical recessions can negatively affect lessors’ operating results because during economic downturns or periods of reduced trade, shipping, rail and trucking lines tend to lease fewer intermodal assets, or lease intermodal assets only at reduced rates, and tend to rely more on their own equipment and fleets to satisfy a greater percentage of their requirements. Thus, a decrease in the volume of world trade may adversely affect our leased asset utilization and lease rates and lead to reduced revenue, reduced capital investment, increased operating expenses (such as storage and positioning) and reduced financial performance. We cannot predict whether, or when, such downturns will occur.

We believe that a substantial amount of our leasing business involves shipments of goods exported from Asia. As a result, a negative change in economic conditions in any Asia Pacific country, particularly in China or Japan, may have an adverse affect on our business and results of operations, as well as our future prospects. In particular, in recent years, China has been one of the world’s fastest growing economies in terms of gross domestic product. We cannot assure you that such growth will be sustained or that the Chinese economy will not experience negative growth in the future. In addition, from time to time, there have been other disruptions in Asia, such as health scares, including SARS and avian flu, financial markets turmoil, natural disasters and political instability in certain countries. If these events were to occur in the future, they could adversely affect our lessees and the general demand for shipping and lead to reduced demand for leased equipment and chartered containerships or otherwise adversely affect us.

Other general factors affecting demand, utilization and per diem rates for leased chassis, containers and containerships include the following:

All of these factors are inherently unpredictable and beyond our control. These factors will vary over time, often quickly and unpredictably, and any change in one or more of these factors may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Many of these factors also influence the decision by current and potential customers to lease our intermodal assets. Should one or more of these factors influence current and potential customers to buy a larger percentage of the intermodal assets they operate, our utilization rate would decrease, resulting in decreased revenue, increased storage and repositioning costs, and as a result, lower operating cashflow.

Equipment prices, lease rates and charter hire rates may decrease, which may adversely affect our earnings.

Equipment lease rates depend on the cost of the equipment, the type and length of the lease, the type and age of the equipment, competition, and other factors more fully discussed herein. Because steel is the major component used in the construction of new intermodal equipment, the price for new equipment, as well as prevailing lease rates, are both highly correlated with the price of steel. Intermodal equipment prices and leasing rates have increased since late 2003, partially due to an increase in worldwide steel prices, while in the late 1990s, new equipment prices and lease rates declined, due to, among other factors, a drop in worldwide steel prices and a shift in container manufacturing from Taiwan and Korea to areas with lower labor costs in mainland China. Such factors, among others, may cause container prices and leasing rates to fall again.

In addition, lease rates can be negatively impacted by the entrance of new leasing companies, overproduction of new chassis, containers or containerships by factories and over-buying by shipping lines and leasing competitors. For example, during 2001 and again in the second quarter of 2005, overproduction of new containers, coupled with a build-up of container inventories in Asia by leasing companies and shipping lines, led to decreasing prices and utilization rates. Also, over the last three years, average per diem for reefer containers has decreased from $7.83 to $6.98. In the event that the container shipping industry were to be characterized by over-capacity in the future, or if available supply of intermodal assets were to increase significantly as a result of, among other factors, new companies entering the business of leasing and selling intermodal equipment, both utilization and lease rates can be expected to decrease, thereby adversely affecting the revenues generated by our container leasing business.

Containership values may fluctuate substantially and, if those values are lower at a time when we are attempting to dispose of a vessel, we may incur a loss.

Containership values generally experience a certain degree of volatility. The value of our vessels may fluctuate substantially over time due to a number of different factors, including:

These factors will affect our ability to renew or obtain charters as well as the rates we will be able to charge for such charters at the termination of the existing charters and the price of our containerships at the time of the sale. If, for any reason, including our inability to recharter a containership at attractive rates at the termination of its charter, we elect to dispose of a containership, we will be subject to prevailing market rates. Our inability to dispose of any vessel at a reasonable price could result in a loss and have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and our inability to pay dividends to our shareholders.

We face extensive competition in the intermodal asset leasing industry, and if we are not able to compete successfully, our business will be harmed.

We may be unable to compete favorably in the highly competitive intermodal asset leasing business after completion of this offering. We compete with many domestic and foreign intermodal asset leasing companies, many smaller lessors, financial institutions such as banks, promoters of container or chassis ownership, shipping lines, which sometimes lease their excess container stocks, and suppliers of alternative types of equipment for freight transport. Some of these competitors may have large, underutilized inventories of containers, which could lead to significant downward pressure on lease rates, asset utilization and operating margins.

Competition among intermodal asset leasing companies depends upon many factors, including, among others, lease rates, lease terms (including lease duration, drop-off restrictions and repair provisions), customer service, and the location, availability, quality and individual characteristics of equipment as well as quality and experience of a ship or equipment manager. New entrants into the leasing business have been attracted by the high rate of containerized trade growth in recent years, and new entrants have generally been less disciplined, in our opinion, than we are in pricing and structuring leases. As a result, the entry of new market participants together with the already highly competitive nature of our industry, may undermine our ability to maintain a high level of asset utilization or, alternatively, could force us to reduce our pricing and accept lower revenue and profit margins in order to achieve our growth plans.

In addition, we may not be able to compete for containership charters with new entrants or with established companies with more years of experience than us in the ship chartering business. We employ our containerships, and expect to employ any containerships we acquire in the future, in highly competitive markets that are capital intensive and highly fragmented.

Competition for long-term charter contracts can be intense and depends upon price, location, size, age, condition and acceptability of the containership and its managers to the charterers. Due in part to the highly fragmented market, competitors with substantial resources could enter the market and

operate larger fleets through consolidations or acquisitions and may be able to offer more competitive prices, charter rates and containerships.

Our customers may decide to buy rather than lease chassis, containers and containerships, which would adversely affect our earnings.

We, like other suppliers of leased intermodal assets, are dependent upon decisions by shipping and trucking lines to lease rather than buy their equipment. Should shipping, railroad and trucking lines decide to buy a larger percentage of the containers, chassis or containerships they operate, our utilization rates would decrease, resulting in decreased leasing revenue, increased storage and repositioning costs and lower operating cashflow. Most of the factors affecting the decisions of our customers, including whether to lease or buy their equipment, are outside our control. See ‘‘The demand for leased chassis, containers and containerships depends on many economic, political and other factors beyond our control, and a decrease in the volume of world trade and other operating factors may adversely affect our business.’’

While the percentage of containers and chassis leased compared with the percentage of containers and chassis owned by shipping companies, railroads and trucking lines has been fairly steady historically, several trends may cause the percentage of leased containers and chassis to decrease in the future. These trends include, among other things, increased access of shipping lines, railroads and trucking companies to low-cost bank financing, the consolidation of the shipping, rail and truck industries and improvements in information technology. The materialization of any of such trends could negatively affect our business.

Lessee defaults and terminations of agreements by our customers may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operation and cash flow by decreasing revenues and increasing storage, positioning, collection and recovery expenses.

Our intermodal assets are leased to numerous customers. Lease payments and other compensation, as well as indemnification for damage to or loss of leased intermodal assets, is generally payable by the end users under leases and other arrangements. Inherent in the nature of the leases and other arrangements for use of the chassis, containers and containerships is the risk that once a lease is consummated, we may not receive, or may experience delay in realizing, all of the compensation and other amounts to be paid in respect of the leased intermodal assets. Furthermore, not all of our customers provide detailed financial information regarding their operations. As a result, customer risk is largely assessed on the basis of our customers’ reputation in the market, and there can be no assurance that they can or will fulfill their obligations under the contracts we enter into with them. Our customers could incur financial difficulties, or otherwise have difficulty making payments to us when due for any number of factors which may be out of our control and which we may be unable to anticipate. If a sufficient number of our customers were to default or were to terminate their agreements with us, in particular one or more of our largest customers, it could have a material adverse effect on our results of operation. For example, in 2006 one of our customers gave notice of early termination of some leases with us which resulted in a negative impact on utilization, and in November 2007, the same customer gave notice of additional early terminations, the impact of which is uncertain. A delay or diminution in amounts received under the leases and other arrangements could adversely affect our business and financial prospects and our ability to make payments on our debt or to pay dividends to our shareholders.

The cash flow from the intermodal assets, principally lease rentals, management fees, proceeds from the sale of owned chassis, containers and containerships and commissions earned on agency and brokerage activities, is affected significantly by the ability to collect payments under leases and other arrangements for the use of the leased equipment and containerships and the ability to replace cash flows from terminating leases by re-leasing or selling leased equipment and containerships on favorable terms. All of these factors are subject to external economic conditions and the performance by lessees and service providers that will not fully be within our control.

When lessees or sub-lessees default, we may fail to recover all of our leased intermodal assets, and the intermodal assets we do recover may be returned in locations where we will not be able to

efficiently re-lease or sell them. We may have to reposition such leased intermodal assets to other places where we can re-lease or sell them, which could be expensive depending on the locations and distances involved. As a result, we may lose lease or management revenues and incur additional operating expenses in repossessing, repositioning and storing the equipment or containerships.

The volatility of the residual value of chassis, containers and containerships upon expiration of their leases or at the time of their sale could adversely affect our operating results.

Although our operating results primarily depend upon equipment leasing, profitability is also affected by the residual values (either for sale or re-leasing) of the chassis and containers upon expiration of their leases. These values, which can vary substantially, depend upon, among other factors:

Most of these factors are outside of our control. Operating leases, under which we derived 85% of our revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, are subject to greater residual risk than direct financing leases. If the residual value of our assets during any period proves lower than anticipated, our operating results may be adversely affected. Furthermore, we base our decision to invest in new intermodal assets in part on our expectations of our ability to sell or re-lease existing assets. To the extent we fail to anticipate the degree to which we need to replace existing assets, we may not have sufficient assets to meet demand and would therefore forgo revenues.

Changes in market price, availability or transportation costs of equipment manufactured in China could adversely affect our ability to maintain our supply of chassis and containers.

Changes in the political, economic or financial conditions of China, which would increase the market price, availability or transportation costs of chassis or containers, could adversely affect our ability to maintain our supply of equipment. China is currently the largest container producing nation in the world and a significant supplier of chassis. We currently purchase the vast majority of our containers and a majority of our chassis from manufacturers in China. In the event that it were to become more expensive for us to procure containers and chassis in China or to transport these containers or chassis at a low cost from China to the locations where they are needed, because of a shift in United States trade policy towards China, increased tariffs imposed by the United States or other governments, a significant downturn in the political, economic or financial conditions in China,

or for any other reason, we would have to seek alternative sources of supply. We may not be able to make alternative arrangements quickly enough to meet our equipment needs, and any alternative arrangements may increase our costs.

We depend on key personnel, and we may not be able to operate and grow our business effectively if we lose the services of any of our key personnel or are unable to attract qualified personnel in the future.

The success of our business is heavily dependent on our ability to retain our current management and other key personnel and to attract and retain qualified personnel in the future. In particular, we are dependent upon the management and leadership of Joseph Kwok. Competition for senior management personnel is intense, and we may not be able to retain our personnel. The loss of key personnel could affect our ability to run our business effectively. Although we have entered into employment agreements with certain of our key personnel, these agreements do not ensure that our key personnel will continue in their present capacity with us for any particular period of time. We do not have key man insurance for any of our current management or other key personnel. The loss of any key personnel requires the remaining key personnel to divert immediate and substantial attention to seeking a replacement. An inability to find a suitable replacement for any departing executive officer on a timely basis could adversely affect our ability to operate and grow our business.

Our ability to enforce lessees’ obligations under our leases, charters and other arrangements for use of our intermodal assets will be subject to applicable law in the jurisdictions in which enforcement is sought. While our chassis are used in the United States, our containers and containerships are predominantly used on international waterways, and it is not possible to predict, with any degree of certainty, the jurisdictions in which enforcement proceedings may be commenced. For example, repossession from defaulting lessees may be difficult and more expensive in jurisdictions whose laws do not confer the same security interests and rights to creditors and lessors as those in the United States and in jurisdictions where recovery of equipment from the defaulting lessee is more cumbersome. As a result, the relative success and expedience of enforcement proceedings with respect to the containers and containerships in various jurisdictions also cannot be predicted.

We are also subject to risks inherent in conducting business across national boundaries, any one of which could adversely impact our business. These risks include:

Any one of these factors could impair our current or future international operations and, as a result, harm our overall business.

We may incur costs and business disruptions associated with new security regulations, particularly regarding our containers.

We are and will likely continue to be subject to regulations promulgated in various countries, including the United States, seeking to protect the integrity of international commerce and prevent the use of containers or containerships for international terrorism or other illicit activities. For example, the Container Security Initiative, the Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism and Operation Safe Commerce are among the programs administered by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security that are designed to enhance security for cargo moving throughout the international transportation system by identifying existing vulnerabilities in the supply chain and developing improved methods for ensuring the security of containerized cargo entering and leaving the United States. Moreover, the International Convention for Safe Containers, 1972 (CSC), as amended, adopted by the International Maritime Organization, applies to new and existing containers and seeks to maintain a high level of safety of human life in the transport and handling of containers by providing uniform international safety regulations. Inspection procedures can result in the seizure of contents of our containers, delays in the loading, offloading or delivery and, in some instances, the levying of customs duties, fines or other penalties against container or containership operators and owners. Changes to inspection procedures could also impose additional costs and obligations on our lessees and may, in certain cases, render the shipment of certain types of cargo uneconomic or impractical.

As these regulations develop and change, we may incur increased compliance costs due to the acquisition of new, compliant containers and/or the adaptation of existing containers to meet any new requirements imposed by such regulations. Additionally, certain companies are currently developing or may in the future develop products designed to enhance the security of containers transported in international commerce. Regardless of the existence of current or future government regulations mandating the safety standards of intermodal shipping containers, our competitors may adopt such products or our customers may require that we adopt such products in the conduct of our container leasing business. In responding to such market pressures, we may incur increased costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Terrorist attacks could negatively impact our operations and our profitability and may expose us to liability.

Terrorist attacks may negatively affect our operations and your investment. Such attacks in the past have caused uncertainty in the world financial markets and economic instability in the United States and elsewhere, and further acts of terrorism, violence or war could similarly affect world financial markets and trade, as well as the industries in which we and our customers operate. In addition, terrorist attacks or hostilities may directly impact ports our containerships and containers come in and out of, depots, our physical facilities or those of our suppliers or customers and could impact our sales and our supply chain. These uncertainties could also adversely affect our ability to obtain additional financing on terms acceptable to us or at all. A severe disruption to the worldwide ports system and flow of goods could result in a reduction in the level of international trade in which our containerships are involved and lower demand for our chassis and containers. The consequences of any terrorist attacks or hostilities are unpredictable, and we may not be able to foresee events that could have an adverse effect on our operations or your investment.

It is also possible that our containers or our containerships could be involved in a terrorist attack. Although our lease agreements require our lessees to indemnify us against all damages arising out of

the use of our containers or containerships, and we carry insurance to potentially offset any costs in the event that our customer indemnifications prove to be insufficient, we may not be fully protected from liability arising from a terrorist attack which utilizes our containers or containerships. In addition, any terrorist attack involving any of our containers or containerships may cause reputational damage, or other losses, which could be catastrophic to our business.

Environmental liability may adversely affect our business and financial condition.

Like other companies, we are subject to federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment, including those regulating discharges to air and water, health and safety, ballast water management and the use and disposal of hazardous substances. We and the third party equipment owners could incur substantial costs, including cleanup costs, fines and third-party claims for property damage and personal injury, as a result of violations of or liabilities under environmental laws and regulations in connection with our current or historical operations. Under some environmental laws in the United States and certain other countries, the owner of a leased container may be liable for environmental damage, cleanup or other costs in the event of a spill or discharge of material from a container without regard to the owner’s fault. While we maintain insurance and require lessees to indemnify us against certain losses, such insurance and indemnities may not cover or be sufficient to protect us and our third party equipment owners against losses arising from environmental damage.

In addition, our containerships are subject to a number of environmental regulations set forth in the IMO’s International Management Code for the Safe Operation of Ships and Pollution Prevention, which was adopted in July 1998 (the ‘‘ISM Code’’). The ISM Code requires shipowners to develop and maintain an extensive ‘‘Safety Management System’’ that includes the adoption of a safety and environmental protection policy setting forth instructions and procedures for safe operation and describing procedures for dealing with emergencies. If we fail to comply with the ISM Code, we may be subject to increased liability, decreased available insurance coverage for the affected vessels and possibly a denial of access to, or destination, in certain ports. Currently, each of our containerships is ISM Code-certified. However, there can be no assurance that such certification will be maintained in the future. In addition, our containerships are subject to various other environmental regulations, which may vary depending upon the jurisdictions in which the vessels operate. If we fail to comply with these regulations, we may be subject to monetary fines or restrictions on our ability to operate.

Moreover, environmental laws are subject to frequent change and have tended to become more stringent over time. For example, the refrigerant specified by virtually all reefer box operators and used in substantially all of our refrigerated containers is R134a (also known as HFC134a). R134a, like other refrigerants used before R134a became the industry standard, may, at some point, become due for replacement and phase-out. Market pressure or government regulation of refrigerants and synthetic insulation materials may require refrigerated containers using non-conforming substances to be retrofitted with refrigerants deemed to be less destructive to atmosphere ozone at substantial cost to us. In addition, refrigerated containers that are not retrofitted may command lower prices in the market for used containers once we retire these containers from our fleet.

As a result, additional environmental laws and regulations may be adopted that could limit our ability to conduct business or increase the cost of our doing business, which may have a materially negative impact on our business, results of operation and financial condition. New regulations could diminish the resale value or useful lives of our containers and containerships, require us to retrofit our assets for continued use, require a reduction in cargo capacity or other operational changes or restrictions.

Proposed Federal roadability rules and regulations for intermodal equipment providers may impose additional obligations and costs on us.

The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (‘‘FMCSA’’) of the United States Department of Transportation (‘‘USDOT’’) has proposed regulations for entities offering intermodal chassis to motor carriers for transportation of intermodal containers in interstate commerce (‘‘Roadability

Regulations’’). Pursuant to authority delegated by the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Act 49 U.S.C. 31151, this rulemaking, if adopted in its currently proposed form, would require each intermodal equipment provider to register and file certain reports with the FMCSA, display a USDOT number on each chassis offered for interstate commerce, establish a systematic chassis inspection, repair and maintenance program (to the extent it did not already have one), maintain documentation with regard to such program and provide means for drivers and motor carriers to report on chassis deficiencies and defects. The FMCSA is also proposing additional inspection requirements for motor carriers and drivers operating intermodal equipment, including chassis. The proposed rulemaking would establish sanctions for chassis that fail to comply with the applicable Federal safety regulations. While we believe our current chassis safety practices and procedures are suitable and sound, at this stage we cannot predict whether we will incur additional substantive or reporting obligations as a result of any such new rules and regulations as may be adopted or whether and to what extent we will incur additional costs if any such rules and regulations are implemented.

Depot operators, repairmen, transporters, vessel mortgagees and other parties may come into possession of our chassis, containers or containerships from time to time and have sums due to them from the lessees or sublessees of the transportation equipment. In many jurisdictions, a maritime lienholder may enforce its lien by arresting a containership through foreclosure proceedings. In the event of nonpayment of those charges by the lessees or sublessees, we may be delayed in, or entirely barred from, repossessing the equipment or containerships, or be required to make payments or incur expenses to discharge such liens on the equipment.

Our future business prospects could be adversely affected by consolidation within the container shipping industry.

Over the last few years, there have been several large shipping line acquisitions that have resulted in some consolidation within the container shipping industry, including among some of our customers. This has resulted in a reduction of the number of large shipping lines and also in an increase in concentration of business in a smaller number of larger customers. Our future business prospects could be adversely affected if there was a continued reduction in the number of shipping lines in the world. Due to concentration risk, we might decide to limit the amount of business exposure we have with any single customer if the exposure were deemed unacceptable, which could negatively impact the volume of equipment we lease and the revenues we would otherwise earn if we had leased assets despite the concentration risk or had the previously separate customers not combined.

We may not be able to pay or maintain dividends and the failure to do so may negatively affect our share price.

We intend to pay regular quarterly dividends to the holders of our common stock. Our ability to pay dividends, if any, will depend on, among other things, our cash flows, our cash requirements, our financial condition, cash available under our existing credit facilities, contractual restrictions binding on us, provisions of applicable law and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant. Because we intend to use funds available under our existing credit facilities from time to time as an efficient source to pay a portion of any future dividends, our ability to pay dividends will depend, in part, on our ability to maintain credit facilities or other external sources of financing with favorable terms. In addition, our loan agreements contain certain restrictions on our ability to make dividend payments if an event of default under a loan agreement has occurred and is continuing, or would result therefrom, or upon the occurence of specified amortization events. There can be no assurance that we will generate sufficient cash from continuing operations or external sources of financing in the future, or have sufficient surplus or net profits, as the case may be, under the laws of the Marshall Islands, Bermuda, Luxembourg, the Republic of Cyprus, Singapore or other jurisdictions where our subsidiaries are located, to pay dividends on our common stock. Our dividend policy is based upon our directors’ current assessment of our business and the environment in which we operate and that

assessment could change based on a number of factors, including competitive developments (which could, for example, increase our need for capital expenditures), market conditions or new growth opportunities. Our board of directors may, in its discretion, amend or repeal this dividend policy to decrease the level of dividends or entirely discontinue the payment of dividends. The reduction or elimination of dividends may negatively affect the market price of our common stock.

We may have difficulty integrating the acquired assets and businesses of Interpool and SHL.

In the past few months, we were combined with SHL and acquired Interpool with the expectation that these transactions would result in certain benefits and economies of scale, including an increase in our operational efficiencies. Achieving the benefits of these transactions will depend upon the successful integration of the acquired businesses into our existing operations. The integration risks associated with these transactions include but are not limited to:

In addition, the integration of these businesses may make the process of reviewing and, if necessary, remediating our internal control processes more challenging as we prepare to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in integrating into our current businesses the assets acquired through our combination with SHL and the acquisition of Interpool. The failure to successfully integrate Interpool or SHL with us could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flow.

We intend to continue to pursue acquisition opportunities, which may subject us to considerable business and financial risk.

In order to grow our business, we expect to employ various strategies, including consummating strategic and complementary acquisitions and joint ventures from time to time. We may not be successful in identifying acquisition opportunities, assessing the value, strengths and weaknesses of these opportunities and consummating acquisitions on acceptable terms. Furthermore, suitable acquisition opportunities may not be made available or known to us. Unanticipated issues may arise in the implementation of these contemplated strategies, which could impair our ability to expand our business as expected. For example:

Any of the above risks could adversely affect our financial position and results of operations and could cause us to abandon some or all of our growth strategies. Furthermore, any acquisitions may expose us to particular business and financial risks that include, but are not limited to:

We may not be able to successfully manage acquired businesses or increase our cash flow from these operations. If we are unable to successfully implement our acquisition strategy or address the risks associated with acquisitions, or if we encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications or delays frequently encountered in connection with the integration of acquired entities and the expansion of operations, our growth and ability to compete may be impaired, we may fail to achieve acquisition synergies and we may be required to focus resources on integration of operations rather than on other profitable areas. We anticipate that we may finance acquisitions through cash provided by operating activities, borrowings under our credit facilities and other indebtedness, which would reduce our cash available for other purposes, including the repayment of indebtedness and payment of dividends.

We intend to incur substantial additional debt and issue substantial additional equity in order to expand our business and pay dividends.

We plan to expand our business substantially by continuing to acquire leasing equipment, including containerships, each year. We intend to fund a portion of this growth with additional borrowings from time to time, which will increase our indebtedness and interest expense. We also intend to fund this growth with sales of additional equity securities, and such sales may be significant. There is no assurance that we will continue to have access to the debt and equity markets to the extent necessary to fund our plans, or that our cash flow will increase sufficiently to enable us to cover our increased borrowing costs and dividend payments. Were our cash flow to be insufficient, we may need to restrict our growth or dividend payments, or both, and we could face an increased risk of default. Our ability to fund our plans will depend on market conditions in our industry and in the financial markets, as well as on our operating performance, and to a significant extent is out of our control. Recent turbulence in the financial markets and the possibility of reduced economic growth in key world markets underscore the uncertainty concerning our ability to achieve our plans for growth and dividend payments.

We currently own seven containerships and have contracts for the construction and purchase of six additional containerships. Over time, we anticipate to further expand our fleet of vessels. As we acquire more containerships, our exposure to vessel related risks will likely increase. These operating risks include risks relating to:

In addition, containerships can be used to smuggle unlawful cargo in violation of the laws of various jurisdictions. For example, the U.S. government recently announced that in late 2007 it seized unlawful narcotics aboard several containerships that had sailed from China to the United States via Panama, two of which the Company owns and has selected a third party to operate.

Failure to manage these risks which may subject us to fines, increased costs and reputational damage, each of which could adversely affect us. In addition, delays in deliveries of the six newbuildings or other vessels to be acquired by us could delay our receipt of revenues under time charters for these vessels, and thereby adversely affect our results of operations.

We depend on a limited number of customers for a substantial portion of our revenue, and the loss of, or a significant reduction in revenue resulting from a default by, any key customer could significantly reduce our revenue.

A significant portion of our revenue is derived from a relatively small number of customers. Our ten largest customers accounted for 57% of our revenue in the first nine months of 2007, 57% of our revenue in 2006, and 55% of our total revenue in 2005, and revenue from CSAV, our largest customer, accounted for approximately 10% of our revenue in the first nine months of 2007. Our operating results in the foreseeable future will continue to depend on our ability to enter into agreements with these customers. The loss of, or a significant reduction in revenue from, any of our key customers, or a default by any key customers on its obligations under this contract with us would significantly reduce our revenue and adversely affect our business.

In addition, the contracts under which we lease our chassis and containers contain early termination provisions. Although in the past we have experienced minimal early returns due in part to penalties including early termination fees and costs associated with repairs and repositioning upon return borne by lessees, we cannot assure you that the number of leases that our customers terminate early will not increase in the future. This could happen due to any number of factors that are outside of our control, such as financial difficulty or a business downturn experienced by any of our customers.

There can be no assurance that we or our customers have or can maintain sufficient insurance to cover losses that may occur to our containerships or result from our operations due to the inherent operational risks of the shipping industry.

The operation of sea-going vessels involves the inherent risks of sinking, collision and other maritime disasters, environmental pollution, leaks or spills, personal injury and loss of life, losses due to mechanical failure, human error, political action, labor strikes, adverse weather conditions, fire and other factors, which could result in the loss of charter revenues, increased costs, reputational damage

or could require us to pay significant damages under certain circumstances. We procure insurance for our fleet against risks commonly insured against by vessel owners and operators. The current insurance includes hull and machinery insurance, war risks insurance, and indemnity insurance. However, no insurance can compensate for all potential losses, and there can be no assurance that the insurance coverage we have will be adequate or that our insurers will pay a particular claim. Moreover, our customers are not required to maintain insurance to cover various risks for which they may be responsible while using our containerships, including environmental claims. As a result, under certain circumstances, we may be liable for potentially significant losses in the event that our customers do not, or are unable to, cover certain losses.

Even if the insurance coverage is adequate to cover all losses, we may not be able to provide our charterers with a replacement vessel in a timely manner in the event of a loss, which could, in certain circumstances, lead to the termination of the relevant charter. In addition, under the terms of certain of our credit facilities, we will be subject to restrictions on the use of any proceeds we may receive from claims under our insurance policies. Furthermore, in the future, we may not be able to obtain adequate insurance coverage at reasonable rates for our fleet of vessels, if at all. We may also be subject to calls or premiums in amounts based not only on our own claim records but also the claim records of all other members of the protection and indemnity associations through which our special purpose companies receive indemnity insurance coverage. Our insurance policies also contain deductibles, limitations and exclusions which, although we believe are standard in the shipping industry, may nevertheless increase our costs.

Our insurance policies also do not cover risks arising from the damage caused by wear and tear, or the damage caused by willful misconduct of a ship’s crewmembers or office managers. Accordingly, any loss or damage to a vessel or extended vessel off-hire, due to any reason, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.

Because Seacastle Inc. is a newly formed company with a limited separate operating history, our historical financial and operating data may not be representative of our future results.

Seacastle Inc. is a newly incorporated company with little separate operating history. The consolidated financial statements included in this prospectus reflect the results and operation and financial condition of the separate businesses that were combined to form Seacastle Inc. In particular, our acquisition of Interpool, which accounted for approximately 60% of our assets at September 30, 2007, was not completed until July 2007, and our financial performance and condition reflect the Interpool business for only a brief period. Our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows reflected in our consolidated financial statements may not be indicative of the results we would have achieved had we operated as a stand-alone company or as a public entity for all periods presented or of the future results that we may achieve as a publicly traded company with our current holding company structure. These consolidated financial statements also do not reflect the results we would have obtained under our current lease and charter agreements and, in any event, are not a meaningful representation of our future results of operations.

Our loan agreements contain restrictive covenants that may limit our liquidity and corporate activities.

Our loan and credit agreements impose operating and financial restrictions on us. These restrictions may limit our ability to:

Specifically, as described in ‘‘Description of Indebtedness’’ we are required to maintain certain financial ratios, such as earnings to interest charges, debt to net worth and depreciation to fixed charges, as well as operating ratios, such as minimum chassis fleet utilization rates, maximum container fleet age and maximum loan to value ratios with respect to our containerships. Were we unable to maintain these ratios, our creditors could accelerate our debt, which could materially harm our financial condition. Therefore, we may need to seek permission from our lenders in order to engage in some corporate actions. Our lenders’ interests may be different from ours, and we cannot guarantee that we will be able to obtain our lenders’ permission when needed. This may prevent us from taking actions that are in our best interest.

Our inability to service our debt obligations or to obtain additional financing as needed would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We have substantial amounts of outstanding debt and other payment obligations coming due in the next twelve to twenty-four months and in later years, and we will need to obtain substantial additional financing to meet these commitments. Current conditions in the debt and other capital markets may make it difficult to obtain the additional financing we need at the times we need it, on terms we consider favorable or at all. For a description of our outstanding debt and other obligations, see ‘‘– Liquidity and Capital Resources’’ and ‘‘– Contractual Obligations’’ under ‘‘Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.’’

Our ability to meet our debt obligations will depend upon, among other things, our financial and operating performance, which will be affected by prevailing economic conditions and by financial, business, regulatory and other factors affecting our operations. Many of these factors are beyond our control. If our cash flow is insufficient to service our current and future indebtedness and to meet our other obligations and commitments, or if we are unable to obtain new financing on a timely basis, we will be required to adopt one or more alternatives, such as reducing or delaying our business activities, acquisitions, investments, capital expenditures, the payment of dividends or the implementation of our other strategies, refinancing or restructuring our debt obligations, selling intermodal assets, seeking to raise additional debt or equity capital or seeking bankruptcy protection. However, we may not be able to effect any of these remedies or alternatives on a timely basis, on satisfactory terms or at all.

The market values of our intermodal assets may decrease, which could cause us to breach covenants in our financing agreements and adversely affect our operating results.

If the market values of our intermodal assets decrease, we may breach some of the covenants contained in our financing agreements. If we are in breach of our covenants and we are unable to cure the breach, we may be required to prepay certain of our outstanding loans or pledge additional collateral. If we are unable to prepay our loans or pledge additional collateral, our lenders could accelerate our debt and foreclose on our equipment. Failure to comply with any of the covenants in our existing or future financing agreements could result in a default under those agreements and under other agreements containing cross-default provisions.

The market value of newbuild vessels are primarily determined by the balance of the supply of shipbuilding berths to the market and the demand for new vessels to fill them. Other factors, such as steel prices and currency movements can also have an impact. It is important to note that newbuilding prices for different ship types move, to a large extent, in parallel with one another. This means that reduced demand in one sector (for example tankers) may reduce prices in another sector (for example containerships). This is because the newbuilding price is a function of the supply of berths to the whole market and not just to individual fleet sectors.

Strategic purchases of containerships may not be possible at the times or on the terms that we may seek.

We expect to grow our containership business substantially in the near term. While we currently own seven containerships, and have contracted to acquire two newbuildings for delivery in 2009 and

four newbuildings for delivery in 2010, we also plan to selectively acquire secondhand containerships in the near term. With respect to the additional secondhand containerships, we have not yet identified any such containerships for acquisition, and there can be no assurance that additional containerships of the age and quality we desire will be available for purchase at prices we are willing to pay or at delivery times acceptable to us. Further, demand for containership charters fluctuates and we may be unable to obtain desirable leasing rates for optimal periods. As a result, we cannot assure you that we will be able to increase our revenue through containership acquisitions in the timeframe we anticipate. In addition, because we sometimes decide to pay for the containerships in advance of when they are chartered, our profitability may be adversely affected if we are unable to charter our ships at sufficient lease rates on a timely basis.

We may have more difficulty entering into long-term, fixed-rate charters if a more active short-term or spot container shipping market develops.

One of our principal strategies is to enter into additional long-term, fixed-rate containership time charters. As more vessels become available for the spot or short-term market, we may have difficulty entering into additional long-term, fixed-rate time charters for our vessels due to the increased supply of vessels and possibly cheaper rates in the spot market and, as a result, our cash flow may be subject to instability in the long-term. A more active short-term or spot market may require us to enter into charters based on changing market prices, as opposed to long-term fixed rate contracts, which could result in a decrease in our cash flow in periods when the market price for container shipping is depressed or insufficient funds are available to cover our financing costs for related vessels.

If the ownership of our common stock continues to be highly concentrated, it may prevent you and other minority shareholders from influencing significant corporate decisions and may result in conflicts of interest.

Following the completion of this offering, certain private equity funds managed by an affiliate of Fortress, referred to in this prospectus as the Initial Shareholders, will beneficially own approximately 82% of our outstanding common stock or 81% if the underwriters’ over-allotment options are fully exercised. As a result, the Initial Shareholders will beneficially own shares sufficient for the majority vote over all matters requiring a shareholder vote, including: the election of directors; mergers, consolidations or acquisitions; the sale of all or substantially all of our assets and other decisions affecting our capital structure; the amendment of our amended and restated articles of incorporation, referred to in this prospectus as our articles of incorporation, and our amended and restated bylaws, referred to in this prospectus as our bylaws; and our winding up and dissolution. This concentration of ownership may delay, deter or prevent acts that would be favored by our other shareholders. The interests of the Initial Shareholders may not always coincide with our interests or the interests of our other shareholders. This concentration of ownership may also have the effect of delaying, preventing or deterring a change in control of our Company. Also, the Initial Shareholders may seek to cause us to take courses of action that, in their judgment, could enhance their investment in us, but which might involve risks to our other shareholders or adversely affect us or our other shareholders, including investors in this offering. As a result, the market price of our common stock could decline or shareholders might not receive a premium over the then-current market price of our common stock upon a change in control. In addition, this concentration of share ownership may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock because investors may perceive disadvantages in owning shares in a company with significant shareholders. See ‘‘Principal Shareholders’’ and ‘‘Description of Capital Stock – Anti-Takeover Effects of Our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws.’’

We are a holding company with no operations and rely on our operating subsidiaries to provide us with funds necessary to meet our financial obligations and to pay dividends.

We are a holding company with no material direct operations. Our principal assets are the equity interests we directly or indirectly hold in our operating subsidiaries, which own our operating assets.

As a result, we are dependent on loans, dividends and other payments from our subsidiaries to generate the funds necessary to meet our financial obligations and to pay dividends on our common stock. Our subsidiaries are legally distinct from us and may be prohibited or restricted from paying dividends or otherwise making funds available to us under certain conditions. If we are unable to obtain funds from our subsidiaries, we may be unable to, or our board may exercise its discretion not to, pay dividends.

We have anti-takeover provisions in our bylaws that may discourage a change of control.

Our bylaws contain provisions that could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us without the consent of our board of directors. These provisions provide for:

In addition, these provisions may make it difficult and expensive for a third party to pursue a tender offer, change in control or takeover attempt that is opposed by our Initial Shareholders, our management and/or our board of directors. Public shareholders who might desire to participate in these types of transactions may not have an opportunity to do so, even if the transaction is favorable to shareholders. These anti-takeover provisions could substantially impede the ability of public shareholders to benefit from a change in control or change our management and board of directors and, as a result, may adversely affect the market price of our common stock and your ability to realize any potential change of control premium. See ‘‘Description of Capital Stock – Anti-Takeover Effects of Our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws.’’

Certain of our shareholders have the right to engage or invest in the same or similar businesses as us.

The Initial Shareholders, and their respective subsidiaries and affiliates (referred to in this prospectus, collectively, as the ‘‘Significant Shareholders’’), have other investments and business activities in addition to their ownership of us. Under our articles of incorporation, the Significant Shareholders have the right, and have no duty to abstain from exercising such right, to engage or invest in the same or similar businesses as us, do business with any of our clients, customers or vendors or employ or otherwise engage any of our officers, directors or employees. If the Significant Shareholders or any of their officers, directors or employees acquire knowledge of a potential transaction that could be a corporate opportunity, they have no duty, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to offer such corporate opportunity to us, our shareholders or our affiliates.

In the event that any of our directors and officers who is also a director, officer or employee of any of the Significant Shareholders acquires knowledge of a corporate opportunity or is offered a

corporate opportunity, provided that this knowledge was not acquired solely in such person’s capacity as a director or officer of Seacastle and such person acts in good faith, then to the fullest extent permitted by law such person is deemed to have fully satisfied such person’s fiduciary duties owed to us and is not liable to us, if the Significant Shareholder pursues or acquires the corporate opportunity or if the Significant Shareholder does not present the corporate opportunity to us. See ‘‘Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions – Shareholders Agreement.’’

We are incorporated in the Marshall Islands, which does not have a well-developed body of corporate law.

Our corporate affairs are governed by our articles of incorporation and bylaws and by the Marshall Islands Business Corporations Act, or the BCA. The provisions of the BCA resemble provisions of the corporation laws of a number of states in the United States. However, there have been few judicial cases in the Marshall Islands interpreting the BCA. The rights and fiduciary responsibilities of directors under the laws of the Marshall Islands are not as clearly established as the rights and fiduciary responsibilities of directors under statutes or judicial precedent in existence in the United States. The rights of shareholders of companies incorporated in the Marshall Islands may differ from the rights of shareholders of companies incorporated in the United States. While the BCA provides that it is to be interpreted according to the laws of the State of Delaware and other states with substantially similar legislative provisions, there have been few, if any, court cases interpreting the BCA in the Marshall Islands and we can not predict whether Marshall Islands courts would reach the same conclusions as United States courts. Thus, you may have more difficulty in protecting your interests in the face of actions by the management, directors or controlling shareholders than would shareholders of a corporation incorporated in a United States jurisdiction which has developed a relatively more substantial body of case law.

There are provisions in our articles of incorporation and bylaws that may require certain of our non-U.S. shareholders to sell their shares to us or to a third party.

Our articles of incorporation and bylaws provide that if our board of directors determines that we or any of our subsidiaries do not meet, or in the absence of repurchases of shares will fail to meet, the ownership requirements of a limitation on benefits article of any bilateral income tax treaty with the U.S. applicable to us or such subsidiary, and that such tax treaty would provide material benefits to us or any of our subsidiaries, we generally have the right, but not the obligation, to repurchase, at fair market value (as determined pursuant to the method set forth in our bylaws), shares of our common stock from any shareholder who beneficially owns more than 5% of our issued and outstanding common stock and who fails to demonstrate to our satisfaction that such shareholder is either (i) a U.S. citizen or (ii) a qualified resident of the U.S. or the other contracting state of any applicable tax treaty with the U.S. (as determined for purposes of the relevant provision of the limitation on benefits article of such treaty).

We will have the option, but not the obligation, to purchase all or a part of the shares held by such shareholder (to the extent the board of directors, in the reasonable exercise of its discretion, determines it is necessary to avoid or cure such adverse consequences); provided that the board of directors will use its reasonable efforts to exercise this option equitably among similarly situated shareholders (to the extent feasible under the circumstances).

Instead of exercising the repurchase right described above, we will have the right, but not the obligation, to cause the transfer to, and procure the purchase by, any U.S. citizen or a qualified resident of the U.S. or the other contracting state of the applicable tax treaty (as determined for purposes of the relevant provision of the limitation on benefits article of such treaty) of the number of issued and outstanding shares of common stock beneficially owned by any shareholder that are otherwise subject to repurchase under our bylaws as described above, at fair market value (as determined in the good faith discretion of our board of directors). See ‘‘Description of Capital Stock – Acquisition of Common Stock by Seacastle and Option to Require Sale of Shares.’’

An active trading market for our common stock may never develop or be sustained.

Our common stock has been approved for listing on the New York Stock Exchange (the ‘‘NYSE’’) under the symbol ‘‘SC’’, subject to official notice of issuance. However, we cannot assure you that an active trading market of our common stock will develop on that exchange or elsewhere or, if developed, that any market will be sustained. Accordingly, we cannot assure you of the likelihood that an active trading market for our common stock will develop or be maintained, the liquidity of any trading market, your ability to sell your shares of common stock when desired, or the prices that you may obtain for your shares.

The market price and trading volume of our common stock may be volatile, which could result in rapid and substantial losses for our shareholders.

Even if an active trading market develops, the market price of our common stock may be highly volatile and could be subject to wide fluctuations. In addition, the trading volume in our common stock may fluctuate and cause significant price variations to occur. The initial public offering price of our common stock will be determined by negotiation between us, the Initial Shareholders and the representatives of the underwriters based on a number of factors and may not be indicative of prices that will prevail in the open market following completion of this offering. If the market price of our common stock declines significantly, you may be unable to resell your shares at or above your purchase price, if at all. We cannot assure you that the market price of our common stock will not fluctuate or decline significantly in the future. Some of the factors that could negatively affect our share price or result in fluctuations in the price or trading volume of our common stock include:

These broad market and industry factors may decrease the market price of our common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance. The stock market in general has from time to time

experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations, including in recent months. In addition, in the past, following periods of volatility in the overall market and the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against these companies. This litigation, if instituted against us, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our management’s attention and resources.

Future offerings of debt or equity securities by us may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

In the future, we may attempt to obtain financing or to further increase our capital resources by issuing additional shares of our common stock or offering debt or additional equity securities, including commercial paper, medium-term notes, senior or subordinated notes or shares of preferred stock. Among other things, we expect to raise substantial new financing in the form of debt and equity to cover the cost of new containerships we have contracted to buy. See ‘‘Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.’’ Issuing additional shares of our common stock or other additional equity offerings may dilute the economic and voting rights of our existing shareholders or reduce the market price of our common stock, or both. Upon liquidation, holders of such debt securities and preferred shares, if issued, and lenders with respect to other borrowings, would receive a distribution of our available assets prior to the holders of our common stock. Preferred shares, if issued, could have a preference with respect to liquidating distributions or a preference with respect to dividend payments that could limit our ability to pay dividends to the holders of our common stock. Because our decision to issue securities in any future offering will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond our control, we cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing or nature of our future offerings. Thus, holders of our common stock bear the risk of our future offerings reducing the market price of our common stock and diluting their share holdings in us. See ‘‘Description of Capital Stock.’’

The market price of our common stock could be negatively affected by sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public markets.

After this offering, there will be 130,693,523 shares of common stock outstanding. There will be 133,693,523 shares issued and outstanding if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full. Of our issued and outstanding shares, all the common stock sold in this offering will be freely transferable, except for any shares held by our ‘‘affiliates,’’ as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the ‘‘Securities Act.’’ Following completion of the offering, approximately 84% of our outstanding common stock (or 82% if the underwriters’ over-allotment option is exercised in full) will be held by the Initial Shareholders and members of our management and employees, and can be resold into the public markets in the future in accordance with the requirements of Rule 144. See ‘‘Shares Eligible For Future Sale.’’

We and our executive officers, directors and shareholders holding in the aggregate approximately 99% of our issued and outstanding common stock as of January 14, 2008 have agreed with the underwriters that, subject to limited exceptions, for a period of 120 days after the date of this prospectus, we and they will not directly or indirectly offer, pledge, sell, contract to sell, sell any option or contract to purchase or otherwise dispose of any common stock or any securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for common stock, or in any manner transfer all or a portion of the economic consequences associated with the ownership of common stock, or cause a registration statement covering any common stock to be filed, without the prior written consent of Citigroup Global Markets Inc. Citigroup Global Markets Inc. may waive these restrictions at their discretion. Shares of common stock held by our employees, other than our officers who are subject to the lockup provisions, are not subject to these restrictions and may be sold without restriction at any time.

Pursuant to our Shareholders Agreement that we will enter into prior to completion of this offering, the Initial Shareholders and certain of their affiliates and permitted third-party transferees will have the right, in certain circumstances, to require us to register their approximately 107.7 million shares of our common stock under the Securities Act for sale into the public markets. Upon the

effectiveness of such a registration statement, all shares covered by the registration statement will be freely transferable. See ‘‘Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions – Shareholders Agreement.’’

In addition, following the completion of this offering, we intend to file a registration statement on Form S-8 under the Securities Act to register an aggregate of 4,000,000 shares common stock reserved for issuance under our incentive plans. We may increase the number of shares registered for this purpose at any time. Subject to any restrictions imposed on the shares and options granted under our incentive plans, shares registered under the registration statement on Form S-8 will be available for sale into the public markets subject to the 120-day lock-up agreements referred to above.

The market price of our common stock may decline significantly when the restrictions on resale by our existing shareholders lapse. A decline in the price of our common stock might impede our ability to raise capital through the issuance of additional common stock or other equity securities.

The future issuance of additional common stock in connection with our incentive plans, acquisitions or otherwise will dilute all other shareholdings.

After this offering, assuming the exercise in full by the underwriters of their over-allotment option, we will have an aggregate of 612,400,227 shares of common stock authorized but unissued and not reserved for issuance under our incentive plans. We may issue all of these shares of common stock without any action or approval by our shareholders, subject to certain exceptions. We also intend to continue to actively pursue acquisitions of intermodal assets and may issue common stock in connection with these acquisitions. Any common stock issued in connection with our incentive plans, our acquisitions, the exercise of outstanding stock options or otherwise would dilute the percentage ownership held by the investors who purchase common stock in this offering.

The initial public offering price of our common stock will be substantially higher than the as adjusted net tangible book value per share issued and outstanding immediately after this offering. Our net tangible book value per share as of September 30, 2007 was approximately $6.59 and represents the amount of book value of our total tangible assets minus the book value of our total liabilities, excluding deferred gains, divided by the number of our shares of common stock then issued and outstanding. Investors who purchase common stock in this offering will pay a price per share that substantially exceeds the net tangible book value per share of common stock. If you purchase shares of our common stock in this offering, you will experience immediate and substantial dilution of $8.61 in the net tangible book value per share, based upon the initial public offering price of $16.00 per share (the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus). Investors who purchase common stock in this offering will have purchased 15.3% of the shares issued and outstanding immediately after the offering, but will have paid 24.2% of the total consideration for those shares.

We will have broad discretion in the use of a significant part of the net proceeds from this offering and may not use them effectively.

Our management currently intends to use the net proceeds from this offering in the manner described in ‘‘Use of Proceeds’’ and will have broad discretion in the application of a significant part of the net proceeds from this offering. The failure by our management to apply these funds effectively could affect our ability to operate and grow our business.

As a public company we will incur additional costs and face increased demands on our management.

As a public company with shares listed on a U.S. exchange, we will need to comply with an extensive body of regulations that did not apply to us previously, including provisions of the Sarbanes Oxley Act, regulations of the SEC and requirements of the NYSE. We expect these rules and regulations to increase our legal and financial compliance costs and to make some activities more time-consuming and costly. For example, as a result of becoming a public company, we intend to add

independent directors, create additional board committees and adopt certain policies regarding internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures. In addition, we will incur additional costs associated with our public company reporting requirements and maintaining directors’ and officers’ liability insurance. We are currently evaluating and monitoring developments with respect to these rules, and we cannot predict or estimate the amount of additional costs we may incur or the timing of such costs. Furthermore, our management will have increased demands on its time in order to ensure we comply with public company reporting requirements and the compliance requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as the rules subsequently implemented by the SEC and the applicable stock exchange requirements of the NYSE.

We will be required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to evaluate the effectiveness of our internal controls by the end of fiscal 2008, and we cannot predict the outcome of that effort.

As a U.S.-listed public company, we will be required to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act by December 31, 2008. Section 404 will require that we evaluate our internal control over financial reporting to enable management to report on, and our independent auditors to audit as of the end of the next fiscal year, the effectiveness of those controls. While we have begun the lengthy process of evaluating our internal controls, we are in the early phases of our review and will not complete our review until well after this offering is completed. We cannot predict the outcome of our review at this time. During the course of our review, we may identify control deficiencies of varying degrees of severity, and we may incur significant costs to remediate those deficiencies or otherwise improve our internal controls. As a public company, we will be required to report control deficiencies that constitute a ‘‘material weakness’’ in our internal control over financial reporting. We would also be required to obtain an audit report from our independent auditors regarding the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting. If we fail to implement the requirements of Section 404 in a timely manner, we may be subject to sanctions or investigation by regulatory authorities, including the SEC or the NYSE. Furthermore, if we discover a material weakness or our auditor does not provide an unqualified audit report, our share price could decline and our ability to raise capital could be impaired.

If we were treated as engaged in a trade or business in the United States, we would be subject to U.S. federal income taxation on a net income basis, which would adversely affect our business and result in decreased cash available for distribution to our shareholders.

If, contrary to expectations, we were treated as engaged in a trade or business in the United States, the portion of our net income, if any, that was ‘‘effectively connected’’ with such trade or business would be subject to U.S. federal income taxation at a maximum rate of 35%. In addition, we would be subject to the U.S. federal branch profits tax on our effectively connected earnings and profits at a rate of 30%. The imposition of such taxes would adversely affect our business and would result in decreased cash available for distribution to our shareholders.

If SHL were to be treated as having a fixed place of business in the United States involved in the earning of United States source gross transportation income and substantially all of the U.S. source leasing income of SHL with respect to time charter leases were attributable to regularly scheduled transportation, SHL could be subject to U.S. federal income taxation on a net income basis rather than at a rate of 4% of its U.S. source gross leasing income with respect to time charter leases, which would adversely affect our business and result in decreased cash available for distribution to our shareholders.

It is generally expected that SHL will not have a fixed place of business in the United States involved in the earning of United States source gross transportation income. Accordingly, it is generally expected that SHL’s U.S. source leasing income with respect to time charter leases will be subject to U.S. federal taxation, on a gross income basis, at a rate not in excess of 4%. If, contrary to expectations, SHL were treated as having a fixed place of business in the United States involved in the earning of United States source gross transportation income and SHL did not comply with certain

administrative guidelines of the Internal Revenue Service, or the IRS, such that 90% or more of SHL’s U.S. source leasing income with respect to time charter leases were attributable to regularly scheduled transportation, SHL’s U.S. source rental income with respect to time charter leases could be treated as income effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States. In such case, SHL’s U.S. source leasing income with respect to time charter leases would be subject to U.S. federal income taxation at a maximum rate of 35%. In addition, SHL would be subject to the U.S. federal branch profits tax on its effectively connected earnings and profits at a rate of 30%. The imposition of such taxes would adversely affect our business and would result in decreased cash available for distribution to our shareholders.

Our Luxembourg subsidiary could fail to qualify for treaty benefits, which would increase the amount of United States federal income taxation that is assessed on dividends paid to our Luxembourg subsidiary by Interpool, which would adversely affect our business and result in decreased cash available for distribution to our shareholders.

Dividends paid by Interpool to our Luxembourg subsidiary are intended to be eligible for a reduced U.S. withholding tax rate of 5%. In order for such dividends to be eligible for such reduced withholding tax rate, it will be necessary for our Luxembourg subsidiary to qualify for the benefits of the income tax treaty between the United States and Luxembourg, or the ‘‘Luxembourg Treaty.’’ Qualification for the benefits of the Luxembourg Treaty depends on many factors, including being able to establish the identity of the ultimate beneficial owners of our common stock. Our Luxembourg subsidiary may not satisfy all the requirements of the Luxembourg Treaty and thereby may not qualify each year for the benefits of the Luxembourg Treaty. Failure to so qualify could result in the dividend being paid from Interpool to our Luxembourg subsidiary being subject to U.S. federal income taxation at a rate of 30%. The imposition of such an increased tax rate would adversely affect our business and would result in decreased cash available for distribution to our shareholders.

We may become subject to income or other taxes in the non-U.S. jurisdictions in which our ships operate or where our containers are used, where our lessees are located or where we perform certain services which would adversely affect our business and result in decreased cash available for distributions to shareholders.

Certain of our subsidiaries may be subject to income or other taxes in other jurisdictions by reason of our activities and operations, where our ships operate, where our containers are used, or where the lessees of our ships or containers (or others in possession of our ships or containers) are located. The imposition of such taxes would adversely affect our business and would result in decreased earnings available for distribution to our shareholders.

We expect to be a controlled foreign corporation, or CFC, for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

We expect to be treated as a CFC for U.S. federal income tax purposes. We will be a CFC for any year in which U.S. Holders (as defined in ‘‘Material Tax Considerations – Material United States Federal Income Tax Considerations’’) that each own (directly, indirectly or by attribution) at least 10% of our voting shares together own more than 50% of the total combined voting power of all classes of our voting shares or more than 50% of the total value of our shares. If you are a U.S. person and you own 10% or more of our voting shares, you could recognize taxable income in a taxable year with respect to our common stock in excess of any distributions that we make to you in that year, thus giving rise to so-called ‘‘phantom income’’ and to a potential out-of-pocket tax liability. See ‘‘Material Tax Considerations – Material United States Federal Income Tax Considerations.’’

Some of the statements under ‘‘Prospectus Summary,’’ ‘‘Risk Factors,’’ ‘‘Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,’’ ‘‘Industry,’’ ‘‘Business’’ and elsewhere in this prospectus may contain forward-looking statements that reflect our current views with respect to, among other things, future events and financial performance. You can identify these forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking words such as ‘‘outlook,’’ ‘‘believes,’’ ‘‘expects,’’ ‘‘potential,’’ ‘‘continues,’’ ‘‘may,’’ ‘‘will,’’ ‘‘should,’’ ‘‘seeks,’’ ‘‘approximately,’’ ‘‘predicts,’’ ‘‘intends,’’ ‘‘plans,’’ ‘‘estimates,’’ ‘‘anticipates’’ or the negative version of those words or other comparable words. Any forward-looking statements contained in this prospectus are based upon the historical performance of us and our subsidiaries and on our current plans, estimates and expectations in light of information currently available to us. The inclusion of this forward-looking information should not be regarded as a representation by us, Fortress, the Initial Shareholders, the underwriters or any other person that the future plans, estimates or expectations contemplated by us will be achieved. Such forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, there are or will be important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those indicated in these statements. We believe that these factors include, but are not limited to, a decrease in the overall demand for leased intermodal assets, the economic condition of the global intermodal asset leasing industry and the ability of our lessees and potential lessees to make operating lease payments to us, the condition of the global economy and world financial markets, changes in the values of our assets, acquisition risks, competitive pressures within the industry, risks related to the geographic markets in which we and our lessees operate, our ability to retain key personnel, the impact of new or existing regulations and other factors described in the section entitled ‘‘Risk Factors’’ beginning on page 12 of this prospectus. These factors should not be construed as exhaustive and should be read in conjunction with the other cautionary statements that are included in this prospectus. We do not undertake any obligation to publicly update or review any forward-looking statement after the date of this prospectus except as required by law, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.

If one or more of these or other risks or uncertainties materialize, or if our underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect, our actual results may vary materially from what we may have expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statements you read in this prospectus reflect our current views with respect to future events and are subject to these and other risks, uncertainties and assumptions relating to our operations, financial results, financial condition, business prospects, growth strategy and liquidity. We caution that you should not place undue reliance on any of our forward-looking statements. You should specifically consider the factors identified in this prospectus that could cause actual results to differ before making an investment decision to purchase our common stock. Furthermore, new risks and uncertainties arise from time to time, and it is impossible for us to predict those events or how they may affect us.

This prospectus includes market share and industry data and forecasts that we have obtained or developed from independent consultant reports, publicly available information, various industry publications, other published industry sources and our internal data and estimates. This includes information relating to the intermodal asset leasing industry from several independent outside sources including Clarkson Research Services Limited, Containerisation International, and the U.S. Department of Transportation. See ‘‘Industry.’’

Our internal data, estimates and forecasts are based upon information obtained from our customers, partners, trade and business organizations and other contacts in the markets in which we operate and our management’s understanding of industry conditions.

The net proceeds to us from the sale of the 20,000,000 shares of common stock offered hereby are estimated to be approximately $289.9 million, assuming an initial public offering price of $16.00 per share (the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus) and after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses payable by us. Our net proceeds will increase by approximately $44.6 million if the underwriters’ over-allotment option is exercised in full. We intend to use the net proceeds from this offering for working capital and other general corporate purposes, which will include the repayment or refinancing of outstanding indebtedness.

We intend to use a portion of the net proceeds from this offering to repay approximately $235 million of indebtedness outstanding under the Seacastle Revolving Credit Facility, described below in ‘‘Description of Indebtedness.’’ The amounts borrowed under the Seacastle Revolving Credit Facility were used to acquire containerships in the third quarter of this year, place deposits on certain shipbuilding contracts and make progress payments in the first quarter of 2008 on those contracts. Affiliates of Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc. and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., each of which is a lead underwriter for this offering, are lenders under the Seacastle Revolving Credit Facility. The revolving loan granted under the Seacastle Revolving Credit Facility is scheduled to expire on July 25, 2008, but subject to certain conditions, the maturity date may be extended by six months at our option. At our option, this revolving loan bears interest at either (i) the greater of (a) the prime lending rate as set forth by the applicable reference bank plus a margin of 0.50% and (b) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus ½ of 1% plus a margin of 0.50%, or (ii) the Eurodollar rate plus a margin of 1.50%. See ‘‘Description of Indebtedness – Seacastle Revolving Credit Facility.’’

We may use a portion of the net proceeds from this offering to repay indebtedness incurred to pay the dividends declared and expected to be declared in January 2008 as described in ‘‘Dividend Policy.’’ The aggregate amount of these dividends is approximately $52.0 million, all of which will be paid to the Initial Shareholders and other shareholders who owned shares of our common stock on the applicable record dates.

A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price of $16.00 per share (the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus) would increase (decrease) the net proceeds to us from this offering by $18.6 million, assuming the number of shares of common stock offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering and other expenses payable by us.

On January 11, 2008, our board of directors declared a dividend of $0.35 per share of our common stock, or an aggregate of $38.7 million, for the three months ended December 31, 2007, which is payable on February 15, 2008 to shareholders of record on January 11, 2008. In addition, our board of directors is expected to declare a dividend of $0.12 per share of our common stock, or an aggregate of $13.3 million, for the period commencing on January 1, 2008 and ending on January 31, 2008, which is payable on February 15, 2008 to shareholders of record as of January 11, 2008. We are paying these dividends so that holders of our common stock prior to this offering will receive a distribution for the periods prior to this offering. These dividends may not be indicative of the amount of any future dividends. We intend to pay these dividends with cash on hand and, if necessary, with funds available through open lines of credit that will be repaid with a portion of the proceeds of this offering. Purchasers in this offering will not be entitled to receive this dividend.

We intend to continue to pay regular quarterly dividends to our shareholders. We plan to grow our dividends per share through the growth and optimization of our portfolio of intermodal assets. By paying dividends to our shareholders, rather than investing our earnings in future growth, we risk slowing the pace of our growth or not having a sufficient amount of cash on hand to fund unanticipated capital expenditures, should they arise.

In addition, our dividend policy is subject to certain risks and limitations. We are a holding company and, as such, our ability to pay dividends to holders of our common stock is further subject to the ability of our subsidiaries to provide cash to us. Moreover, our ability to pay dividends, if any, will depend on, among other things, our cash flows, our cash requirements (including requirements to service or repay our indebtedness), cash available under our credit facilities, general economic and business conditions, our strategic plans and prospects, our financial results and condition, contractual restrictions binding on us, provisions of applicable law and regulations and other factors that our board of directors considers to be relevant, which process is described in more detail below. Because we intend to use funds available under our credit facilities from time to time as an efficient source to pay a portion of any future dividends, our ability to pay dividends will depend, in part, on our ability to maintain credit facilities or other external sources of financing with favorable terms. In addition, our loan agreements contain certain restrictions on our ability to make dividend payments if an event of default under a loan agreement has occurred and is continuing, or would result therefrom, or upon the occurrence of specified amortization events. There can be no assurance that we will generate sufficient cash from continuing operations or external sources of financing in the future, or have sufficient surplus or net profits, as the case may be, under the laws of the Marshall Islands, Bermuda, Luxembourg, the Republic of Cyprus, Singapore, the State of Delaware or other jurisdictions where our subsidiaries are located, to pay dividends on our common stock.

Our dividend policy is based upon our directors’ current assessment of our business and the environment in which we operate and that assessment could change based on a number of factors, including competitive developments (which could, for example, increase our need for capital expenditures), market conditions or new growth opportunities. Our board of directors may, in its discretion, amend or repeal our dividend policy at any time to decrease the level of dividends or entirely discontinue the payment of dividends. The reduction or elimination of dividends may negatively affect the market price of our common stock.

The Company has not paid dividends in the last two fiscal years, although, prior to Fortress’ acquisition of the Company, there were distributions to members of $4.5 million in 2005.

This table contains unaudited information and should be read in conjunction with ‘‘Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations’’ and our historical and pro forma consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes that appear elsewhere in this prospectus.


	Actual				As Adjusted
	(in thousands except per share data)
Credit Facilities:
Seacastle Revolving Credit Facility		$	141,850			$	—
National City Bank Credit Facility			37,492				37,492
ING Loan			225,000				225,000
Chassis Securitization Facility⁽¹⁾			390,569				390,569
Interpool Chassis Funding II Floating Rate Asset-Backed Notes, Series 2007-1			295,116				295,116
Capital Lease Obligations			398,847				398,847
Notes and Loans Payable			4,159				4,159
Carlisle Revolving Credit Facility			18,000				18,000
Carlisle Asset-Backed Securitizations			860,791				860,791
CLI Funding II Credit Facility			398,110				398,110
HSH Nordbank Facility			375,506				375,506

Shareholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, 25,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding, actual; and 100,000,000 shares authorized and no shares issued and outstanding (as adjusted)			—
Shares of common stock, $0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized, 110,513,773 shares issued and outstanding, actual; and 750,000,000 shares authorized, 130,693,523 shares issued and outstanding (as adjusted)⁽²⁾			1,105				1,307
Additional paid-in capital			1,000,696				1,250,834
Retained earnings			12,483				—
Accumulated other comprehensive income			(18,572	)			(18,572	)
Total shareholders’ equity			995,712				1,233,569
Total capitalization		$	4,141,152			$	4,237,159

If you invest in our common stock, your interest will be diluted to the extent of the difference between the initial public offering price in this offering per share and the pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share upon consummation of this offering. Net tangible book value per share represents the book value of our total tangible assets less the book value of our total liabilities divided by the number of shares of common stock then issued and outstanding.

Our net tangible book value as of September 30, 2007, was approximately $728.0 million, or approximately $6.59 per share based on the 110,513,773 shares of common stock, issued and outstanding as of such date. After giving effect to our sale of common stock in this offering at the initial public offering price of $16.00 per share (the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus), and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and estimated expenses related to this offering, our pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value as of September 30, 2007 would have been $965.9 million, or $7.39 per share (assuming no exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option). This represents an immediate and substantial dilution of $8.61 per share to new investors purchasing common stock in this offering. The following table illustrates this dilution per share:

A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price of $16.00 per share (the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus) would increase (decrease) our net tangible book value by $18.6 million, the pro forma net tangible book value per share after this offering by $0.14 per share and the net tangible book value to new investors in this offering by $0.93 per share, assuming the number of shares of common stock offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering and other expenses payable by us.

The following table summarizes, on a pro forma basis as of September 30, 2007, the differences between the number of shares of common stock purchased from us, the total price and the average price per share paid by existing shareholders and by the new investors in this offering, before deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us, at an assumed initial public offering price of $16.00 per share (the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus).

A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price of $16.00 per share (the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus) would increase (decrease) total consideration paid by new investors in this offering, total consideration paid by all shareholders and the average price per share paid by all shareholders by $18.6 million, $18.6 million and $0.14 per share, respectively, assuming the number of shares of common stock offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same, and after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering and other expenses.

Total contribution and average price per share paid by the existing shareholders in the table above do not give effect to the aggregate $52.0 million of dividends we intend to pay our shareholders of record prior to this offering (of which $50.6 million will be paid to the Initial Shareholders).

The following unaudited pro forma condensed Statements of Operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and for the year ended December 31, 2006, have been derived from our historical financial statements and the historical financial statements of Interpool, Inc. As a result of the acquisition of Container Leasing International, LLC by a wholly-owned subsidiary of Seacastle Inc., on February 15, 2006, our financial results were separately presented in our financial statements for the ‘‘Predecessor’’ entity for periods prior to the acquisition date of February 15, 2006 and for the ‘‘Successor’’ entity for periods after the acquisition date.

The pro forma condensed Statements of Operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and the year ended December 31, 2006 give effect to each of the following as if they had occurred on January 1, 2006:

Seacastle Inc. acquired Interpool, Inc., on July 19, 2007. The acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting.

Container Leasing International, LLC refinanced their credit facility during the year ended December 31, 2006. The information in the Container Leasing International LLC acquisition and refinancing column of the unaudited pro forma condensed Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2006 reflects the results of the refinancing as if it had occurred on January 1, 2006.

The information in the Interpool Disposals pro forma adjustments column of the unaudited pro forma condensed Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2006 reflects the elimination of the historical results from January 1 through March 31, 2006 of Interpool, Inc. specifically related to Interpool, Inc.’s disposal of certain containers prior to our acquisition of Interpool, Inc.

Additionally, the Interpool Disposals pro forma adjustments column of the unaudited pro forma condensed Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2006 represents the deconsolidation of Interpool’s 50% investment in CAI prior to our acquisition of Interpool, Inc. Interpool, Inc. sold the 50% investment in CAI on October 1, 2006.

The unaudited pro forma adjustments are based on available information and certain assumptions that we believe are reasonable. The unaudited information was prepared on a basis consistent with that used in preparing our audited consolidated financial statements and includes all adjustments, consisting of normal and recurring items, that we consider necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations for the unaudited periods.

The unaudited pro forma condensed Balance Sheet and Statements of Operations should be read in conjunction with the sections of this prospectus entitled ‘‘Selected Historical Consolidated Financial Data,’’ ‘‘Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,’’ our historical consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto and the historical

consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto of Interpool Inc., included elsewhere in this prospectus. The unaudited pro forma condensed financial statements should not be considered indicative of actual results that would have been achieved had the transactions been consummated on the date indicated. Also, the unaudited pro forma condensed financial statements should not be viewed as indicative of our financial condition or results of operations as of any future dates or for any future period.

Seacastle Inc.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
(dollars in thousands, except as otherwise noted and for share and per share amounts)


	Historical
	Seacastle Inc.				Interpool, Inc.
	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007				Period from January 1, 2007 through July 18, 2007				Interpool, Inc. Acquisition - Pro forma Adjustments (Note B)				Pro forma				Offering Pro forma Adjustments (Note A)				Pro forma As Adjusted

Revenue
Equipment leasing revenue		$	189,785			$	158,311			$	—			$	348,096			$	—			$	348,096
Finance revenue			21,945				22,214				(59	)⁽³⁾			44,100				—				44,100
Other revenue			10,629				22,394								33,023				—				33,023
Total revenue			222,359				202,919				(59	)			425,219				—				425,219

Expenses:
Direct operating expenses			30,039				52,327				(4,868	)⁽⁴⁾			77,498				—				77,498
Selling, general and administrative expenses			28,216				35,762				440	⁽⁵⁾			64,418				—				64,418
Provision for doubtful accounts			137				446								583				—				583
Depreciation of leasing equipment			69,543				26,185				8,657	⁽⁶⁾			104,385				—				104,385
Fair value adjustment on derivatives			—				(956	)			(262	)⁽⁷⁾			(1,218	)			—				(1,218	)
Impairment on assets held for sale			557				1,708				1,658	⁽⁸⁾			3,923				—				3,923
Net (gain) loss on sale of leasing equipment			—				(815	)			1,411	⁽⁹⁾			596				—				596
Loss on retirement of debt			—				381								381				—				381
Loss (income) for investment accounted for under the equity method			—				64				—				64				—				64
Interest expense			65,248				56,089				10,917	⁽¹⁰⁾			132,254				(1,870	)⁽¹⁾			130,384
Interest income			(5,010	)			(12,968	)			1,200	⁽¹¹⁾			(16,778	)			—				(16,778	)
Other expense / (income), net			2,337				(809	)							1,528				—				1,528
Total expenses			191,067				157,414				19,153				367,634				(1,870	)			365,764
Income (loss) before income taxes and minority interests			31,292				45,505				(19,212	)			57,585				1,870				59,455
Minority interest income / (expense), net			—				(1,525	)			1,574	⁽¹²⁾			49				—				49
Income (loss) before income taxes			31,292				43,980				(17,638	)			57,634				1,870				59,504
Provision for (benefit from) income tax			4,695				9,914				(4,626	)⁽¹³⁾			9,983				—	⁽²⁾			9.983
Net income (loss)		$	26,597			$	34,066			$	(13,012	)		$	47,651			$	1,870			$	49,521
Net income per share (Note E):
Basic and diluted		$	0.48											$	0.45							$	0.43
Weighted average shares outstanding (Note E):
Basic and diluted			55,402,347												105,481,285								115,267,418

Seacastle Inc.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2006
(dollars in thousands, except as otherwise noted and for share and per share amounts)


	Seacastle Inc.												Interpool, Inc. Acquisition
	Historical
	Predecessor				Successor				Pro forma Adjustments								Pro forma Adjustments
	January 1, 2006 through February 14, 2006				February 15, 2006 through December 31, 2006				Carlisle Acquisition & Refinancing (Note C)				Historical				Interpool Disposals (Note D)				Interpool, Inc. Acquisition - Pro forma Adjustments (Note B)				Pro Forma				Offering Pro forma Adjustments (Note A)		Pro Forma As Adjusted
Revenue																														—
Leasing revenue		$	15,962			$	122,342			$	1,222	⁽¹⁴⁾		$	293,152			$	(41,360	)⁽¹⁸⁾						$	391,318			—		$	391,318
Finance revenue			2,088				14,027				—				39,775				(930	)⁽¹⁸⁾			(176	)⁽³⁾			54,784			—			54,784
Management fee income			—				—								17,299				(7,702	)⁽¹⁸⁾							9,597			—			9,597
Other revenue			155				2,053				(221	)⁽¹⁴⁾			24,004				(4,472	)⁽¹⁸⁾							21,519			—			21,519
Total revenue			18,205				138,422				1,001				374,230				(54,464	)			(176	)			477,218			—			477,218
Expenses:																														—
Direct operating expenses			790				5,889								112,756				(5,174	)⁽¹⁸⁾			(1,226	)⁽⁴⁾			113,035			—			113,035
Selling, general and administrative expenses			3,627				20,021				34	⁽¹⁴⁾			55,275				(9,800	)^(18),(19)			800	⁽⁵⁾			69,957			—			69,957
Provision (reversal) for doubtful accounts			—				—								1,432				(1,111	)⁽¹⁸⁾							321			—			321
Depreciation and amortization of leasing equipment			6,812				55,723				608	⁽¹⁴^),(15)			63,348				(18,339	)⁽¹⁸⁾			16,487	⁽⁶⁾			124,639			—			124,639
Fair value adjustment for derivative instruments			(3,527	)			—								(2,792	)			1,081	⁽¹⁸^),(19)			(476	)⁽⁷⁾			(5,714	)		—			(5,714	)
Impairment of assets held for sale			—				3,912								10,946				(224	)⁽¹⁸⁾			982	⁽⁸⁾			15,616			—			15,616
Fair value adjustment for warrants															5,209												5,209			—			5,209
Net (gain) loss on sale of leasing equipment			—				—								(77,180	)			75,369	⁽¹⁸^),(19)			1,464	⁽⁹⁾			(347	)		—			(347	)
Loss on retirement of debt			—				7,631								8,383				(5,362	)^(18),(19)							10,652			—			10,652
Loss (income) for investment accounted for under the equity method			—				—								58				—								58			—			58
Gain on sale of consolidated subsidiaries			—				—								(50,438	)			50,438	⁽²⁰⁾							—			—			—
Gain on insurance settlement			—				—								(2,950	)			—								(2,950	)		—			(2,950	)
Interest expense			5,196				39,490				(412	)^(14),(16)			109,956				(3,516	)⁽¹⁸⁾			16,556	⁽¹⁰⁾			167,270			—			167,270
Interest income			(80	)			(862	)			21	⁽¹⁴⁾			(20,657	)			154	⁽¹⁸⁾							(21,424	)		—			(21,424	)
Other expense / (income), net			581				2,966				(6	)⁽¹⁴⁾			(442	)			—								3,099			—			3,099
Total expenses			13,399				134,770				245				212,904				83,516				34,587				479,421			—			479,421
Income (loss) before income taxes and minority interests			4,806				3,652				756				161,326				(137,980	)			(34,763	)			(2,203	)		—			(2,203	)
Minority interest expense, net			—				—								(7,633	)			4,703	⁽¹⁸⁾			3,058	⁽¹²⁾			128			—			128
Income (loss) before income taxes			4,806				3,652				756				153,693				(133,277	)			(31,705	)			(2,075	)		—			(2,075	)
Provision for (benefit from) income tax			—				38				—	⁽¹⁷⁾			47,107				(34,329	)⁽²¹⁾			(8,685	)⁽¹³⁾			4,131			—			4,131
Net income (loss)		$	4,806			$	3,614			$	756			$	106,586			$	(98,948	)		$	(23,020	)		$	(6,206	)		—		$	(6,206	)
Net income per share (Note E):
Basic and diluted						$	0.11																			$	(0.06	)				$	(0.06	)
Weighted average shares outstanding (Note E):
Basic and diluted							33,404,368																				102,104,368						111,890,501

Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands, except as otherwise noted and for share and per share amounts)

On July 19, 2007, Seacastle Inc. completed the acquisition of Interpool, Inc. The acquisition of Interpool was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. On July 19, 2007, certain of our shareholders which we refer to as Fortress Investment Fund IV contributed $675,000 to Seacastle Inc. in exchange for 67,500,000 shares of Seacastle Inc. which were issued to a wholly-owned subsidiary of Fortress Investment Fund IV. On July 19, 2007, Seacastle Inc. used the proceeds from the sale of common shares along with the proceeds from the issuance of new debt to acquire Interpool, Inc.

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS ADJUSTMENTS FOR THE ACQUISITION OF INTERPOOL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands, except as otherwise noted and for share and per share amounts)

Pro forma depreciation charges related to chassis and container leasing equipment have been calculated by adding the incremental fair value to previous equipment values and recalculating depreciation on a straight line basis over the remaining lives of the assets down to their estimated residual values.

Pro forma depreciation for the buildings was calculated by depreciating the incremental value of the buildings of approximately $1.5 million over their remaining lives. Land rights valued at $1.4 million were depreciated over the remaining term of the land rights. Incremental values assigned to land owned by the Company were not depreciated. The pro forma depreciation and amortization adjustments for the periods indicated were calculated as follows:

Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands, except as otherwise noted and for share and per share amounts)

A one-eighth percent change in interest rates of the transaction debt would impact pro forma interest expense related to our new indebtedness by approximately $170 and $312 for the period from January 1, 2007 through July 18, 2007 and the year ended December 31, 2006, respectively.

Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands, except as otherwise noted and for share and per share amounts)

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS ADJUSTMENTS FOR ACQUISITION OF CARLISLE

On February 15, 2006, MACC and MACLH sold their interests in Carlisle to Seacastle Operating for $225 million. The acquisition of Carlisle is referred to as the ‘‘Carlisle Acquisition.’’ The Carlisle Acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and accordingly, the consideration paid has been allocated based on the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. In conjunction with the acquisition, two joint ventures that were 50% owned were acquired and consolidated by the Company. See Note 1 to the Seacastle Inc. December 31, 2006 financial statements for details of the allocation of the purchase price.

On August 24, 2006 the Company replaced their revolving credit facility and asset-backed securitization programs (‘‘Credit Facility 1’’) with a new revolving credit facility and asset-backed

Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands, except as otherwise noted and for share and per share amounts)

securitization program (‘‘Credit Facility 2’’). The refinancing is referred to as the ‘‘CLI Refinancing.’’ See Note 5 to the Seacastle Inc. December 31, 2006 financial statements for details of the Company’s refinancing.

Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands, except as otherwise noted and for share and per share amounts)

A one-eighth percent change in interest rates of the transaction debt would impact pro forma interest expense related to our new indebtedness by approximately $114 for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands, except as otherwise noted and for share and per share amounts)

On March 29, 2006, Interpool completed the sale of approximately 273,200 standard dry marine cargo containers to a newly formed subsidiary of an investor group based in Switzerland (the ‘‘Purchaser’’). In connection with the Sale Agreement, Interpool and CAI entered into management agreements with the Purchaser (the ‘‘Management Agreements’’) under which they agreed to perform management services on behalf of the Purchaser with respect to the containers sold, including billing, collecting, lease renewal, operations and disposition activities, in consideration of a management fee equal to 4% of the net operating income attributable to containers under long-term operating leases and 9% of the net operating income attributable to containers under short-term operating leases, as defined in the Management Agreements. The Management Agreements designate Interpool to serve as sub-manager of the containers currently under long-term lease for such period of time as the Company elects, up to the respective dates when the containers are returned by their current lessees. During that period, Interpool is entitled to receive the management fees described above. The Management Agreements have a term of ten years from the closing date, subject to extension for up to two additional years at the Purchaser’s option.

The adjustments give effect to the sale of these containers, the use of a portion of the proceeds of such sale to repay indebtedness required to be repaid as a result of the sale, and the execution of the management agreements. These transactions are referred to as the Container Sale.

On October 1, 2006, Interpool completed the sale of its 50% common equity interest in CAI for an aggregate price of $77.5 million with an effective date of October 1, 2006. The proceeds from the sale included $40.0 million in cash to be paid at closing and the issuance by CAI of a four year subordinated promissory note in the amount of $37.5 million. This note had a maturity date of October 2010 and earned interest at a rate of 7.87%, increasing by 100 basis points every six months until the note is paid in full. Interpool had the right to convert this note into shares of CAI’s common stock, and had the right to representation on CAI’s Board of Directors if the note remained outstanding after two years or earlier if it was not fully repaid in connection with an initial public offering by CAI. The note was subordinated to CAI’s senior debt. This note was paid in full on May 21, 2007. In connection with the sale, the Company and CAI revised their existing management agreements under which CAI agreed to perform management services on behalf of the Company. Concurrently with these transactions, the subordinated note from CAI was repaid together with accrued interest. These transactions are referred to as the CAI Sale.

Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands, except as otherwise noted and for share and per share amounts)


	Effect on earnings before minority interest expense and tax			Tax rate			Calculated tax provision
Represents the results of operations relative to CAI. This represents the impact for the period from January 1, 2006 through September 30, 2006 as Interpool, Inc. sold its 50% common equity interest in CAI on October 1, 2006.		$	15,778		41.42	%^(a)		$	6,535
Represents the gain recorded from the sale of a portion of the Company’s container fleet as well as the removal of the revenue and expenses attributable to the container fleet which was sold on during March 2006.			71,764		2.50	%^(b)			1,795
Represents the gain recorded on the sale of the Company’s 50% common equity interest in CAI.			50,438		51.55	%^(c)			25,999
								$	34,329

Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands, except as otherwise noted and for share and per share amounts)

Prior to the acquisition of Carlisle on February 15, 2006, Seacastle did not have any assets, liabilities or results of operations. Therefore, the selected historical consolidated financial information in the following tables as of and for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005 and for the periods from January 1, 2006 through February 14, 2006 have been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of Carlisle, the predecessor to Seacastle. The consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2005, for the two years in the period ended December 31, 2005 and for the period from January 1, 2006 through February 14, 2006 are included elsewhere in this prospectus. The audited financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003 for Carlisle and are not included in this prospectus. We derived historical consolidated financial information as of December 31, 2006 and for the period from February 15, 2006 through December 31, 2006 from the audited consolidated financial statements of Seacastle, included elsewhere in this prospectus. Historical consolidated financial information for the period from February 15, 2006 through June 30, 2006 were derived from the unaudited consolidated financial statements for the period from February 15, 2006 through September 30, 2006 for Seacastle, included elsewhere in this prospectus. Historical consolidated financial information as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 were derived from the unaudited consolidated financial statements as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 of Seacastle included elsewhere in this prospectus. In the opinion of management, such unaudited financial information reflects all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the results of those periods. Seacastle Operating Company Ltd., (formerly known as ‘‘FIF III CLI Holding Limited’’ and referred to in this prospectus as ‘‘Seacastle Operating Company’’), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Seacastle acquired Carlisle on February 15, 2006. Accordingly, the results of operations are separately stated for the periods from January 1, 2006 through February 14, 2006, from February 15, 2006 through December 31, 2006 and from February 15, 2006 through September 30, 2006.

The following table sets forth our selected historical consolidated financial data as of December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006 and for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005 and for the periods from January 1, 2006 through February 14, 2006 and February 15, 2006 through December 31, 2006 and selected historical consolidated financial data as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, for the periods from January 1, 2006 through February 14, 2006 and February 15, 2006 through September 30, 2006.

The results for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for a full fiscal year. You should read this information in conjunction with the information under ‘‘Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,’’ ‘‘Business’’ and our historical consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus.


	Predecessor																			Successor
	Year Ended December 31,															Period from January 1, 2006 through February 14, 2006				Period from February 15, 2006 through December 31, 2006			Period from February 15, 2006 through September 30, 2006			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
	2002			2003				2004				2005				Period from January 1, 2006 through February 14, 2006				Period from February 15, 2006 through December 31, 2006			Period from February 15, 2006 through September 30, 2006			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
	(dollars in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
Total revenue		$	114,453		$	135,180			$	144,482			$	150,689			$	18,205			$	138,422		$	97,079		$	222,359
Direct operating expenses			2,423			7,429				5,320				7,934				790				5,889			4,442			30,039
Selling, general and administrative expenses			35,154			41,172				36,554				37,390				3,627				20,021			12,759			28,216
Depreciation of leasing assets			30,369			37,997				42,348				48,461				6,812				55,723			39,411			69,543
Fair value adjustment for derivative instruments			13,942			(8,411	)			(12,755	)			(10,434	)			(3,527	)			—			—			—
Goodwill impairment			—			—				—				38,900				—				—			—			—
Interest expense			23,892			25,087				32,243				36,920				5,196				39,490			29,352			65,248
Net income (loss)			9,763			36,130				43,950				(4,631	)			4,806				3,614			2,012			26,597
Net income per share of common stock:
Basic and diluted																					$	0.11		$	0.06		$	0.48
Dividends per share			—			—				—				—				—				—			—			—
Supplemental earnings per share (1)																		—			$	0.10			—		$	0.45
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data (at end of period):
Cash and cash equivalents		$	4,708		$	9,554			$	8,397			$	15,697							$	12,088					$	62,217
Restricted cash			3,050			2,028				4,087				7,869								15,962						267,530
Net investment in finance leases			83,151			129,089				142,853				177,062								171,714						680,635
Leasing equipment, net			438,830			507,284				570,390				593,035								843,401						2,976,641
Total assets			617,630			752,288				830,456				857,861								1,098,407						4,475,300
Debt and capital lease obligations, current			21,405			39,815				40,265				71,002								68,500						1,193,506
Debt and capital lease obligations, long-term			371,811			432,196				510,728				546,633								720,667						1,951,934
Total liabilities			457,203			561,730				602,649				638,613								853,232						3,479,588
Total shareholders’ equity/members’ interest			160,426			190,557				227,807				219,248								245,175						995,712
Other Data:
Adjusted EBITDA (2)		$	80,662		$	94,185			$	108,689			$	111,785			$	13,603			$	107,403		$	80,008		$	161,886
Capital expenditures		$	102,143		$	198,304			$	161,933			$	148,735			$	4,533			$	127,300		$	30,514		$	680,943
Distribution to Members and Parent			5,625			6,000				6,000				4,500				—				—			—			17,728

(1) The supplemental earnings per share and supplemental weighted average number of shares outstanding for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and the period ended December 31, 2006, reflect the dividend of approximately $52.0 million and the issuance of 3,590,434 shares as a part of the Company’s initial public offering used to replace the capital in excess of earnings being withdrawn by the payment of the dividend.

(2) Adjusted EBITDA is a measure of operating performance that is not defined by GAAP and should not be considered a substitute for net income, income from operations or cash flow from operations, as determined in accordance with GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA is a key measure of our

operating performance used by management to focus on consolidated operating performance exclusive of income and expenses that relate to the financing, incomes taxes, and capitalization of the business.

We define Adjusted EBITDA as income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes, interest expenses including loss on retirement of debt, depreciation and amortization, fair value adjustments on derivative instruments and write-offs of goodwill. We use Adjusted EBITDA to assess our consolidated financial and operating performance and we believe this non-GAAP measure is helpful to management and investors in identifying trends in our performance. This measure provides an assessment of controllable expenses and affords management the ability to make decisions which are expected to facilitate meeting current financial goals as well as achieve optimal financial performance. It provides an indicator for management to determine if adjustments to current spending decisions are needed. Adjusted EBITDA provides us with a measure of operating performance because it assists us in comparing our operating performance on a consistent basis as it removes the impact of our capital structure (primarily interest charges on our outstanding debt) and asset base (primarily depreciation and amortization) from our operating results. Accordingly, this metric measures our financial performance based on operational factors that management can impact in the short-term, namely the cost structure or expenses of the organization. Adjusted EBITDA is one of the metrics used by senior management and our board of directors to review the consolidated financial performance of the business.

Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider it in isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. For example, Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect (i) our cash expenditures or future requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments, (ii) the interest expense or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments on our debt, or (iii) changes in or cash requirements for our working capital needs. In addition, our calculation of Adjusted EBITDA may differ from the Adjusted EBITDA or analogous calculations of other companies in our industry, limiting its usefulness as a comparative measure. Because of these limitations, Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered a measure of discretionary cash available to us to invest in the growth of our business. We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP results and using Adjusted EBITDA only supplementally.

The following table shows the reconciliation of net income (loss) to Adjusted EBITDA for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, February 15, 2006 through September 30, 2006, February 15, 2006 through December 31, 2006, January 1, 2006 through February 14, 2006 and the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004.


	Predecessor												Successor
	Year Ended December 31,								Period from January 1, 2006 through February 14, 2006				Period from February 15, 2006 through December 31, 2006			Period from February 15, 2006 through September 30, 2006			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
	2004				2005				Period from January 1, 2006 through February 14, 2006				Period from February 15, 2006 through December 31, 2006			Period from February 15, 2006 through September 30, 2006			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
	(dollars in thousands)
Net Income (loss)		$	43,950				($4,631	)		$	4,806			$	3,614		$	2,012		$	26,597
Depreciation and amortization			45,316				51,369				7,208				57,492			41,562			70,356
Interest expense, net of interest income (includes loss on retirement of debt)			32,178				36,581				5,116				46,259			36,411			60,238
Income tax provision			—				—				—				38			23			4,695
EBITDA		$	121,444			$	83,319			$	17,130			$	107,403		$	80,008		$	161,886
Fair value adjustment on derivative instruments			(12,755	)			(10,434	)			(3,527	)			—			—			—
Goodwill Impairment			—				38,900				—				—			—			—
Adjusted EBITDA		$	108,689			$	111,785			$	13,603			$	107,403		$	80,008		$	161,886

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Please see ‘‘Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements’’ for a discussion of the uncertainties, risks and assumptions associated with these statements. You should read the following discussion in conjunction with our historical consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this prospectus as well as the rest of the information in this prospectus, including ‘‘Capitalization,’’ ‘‘Summary Historical and Pro Forma Financial Information’’ and ‘‘Selected Historical Consolidated Financial Data.’’ The results of operations for the periods reflected herein are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for future periods, and our actual results may differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including but not limited to those listed under ‘‘Risk Factors’’ and included elsewhere in this prospectus. In this section, any reference to the term ‘‘Company’’ refers, for the period before February 15, 2006, to Carlisle, for the period between February 15, 2006 and July 19, 2007, to the entities combined as a result of the Seacastle Combination, and for the period after July 19, 2007, to Seacastle Inc. and its subsidiaries.

We are one of the largest operating lessors of intermodal equipment in the world based on total assets. We acquire and lease chassis, containers and containerships, which are essential intermodal equipment used in global containerized cargo trade. This equipment has enabled the growth in global containerized trade because it allows efficient movement of goods via multiple transportation modes, including ships, rail and trucks. We lease our equipment primarily under long-term contracts to the world’s largest shipping lines and several major U.S. rail and trucking companies. As of September 30, 2007, we had $4.5 billion in total assets and we plan to make additional investments in intermodal assets. We intend to pay regular quarterly dividends and expect to grow our dividends over time.

We own or manage 247,000 intermodal chassis, 985,000 TEUs of dry freight and refrigerated shipping containers, and seven containerships aggregating 32,770 TEUs. In addition, we have newbuild purchase agreements to acquire six containerships aggregating 27,320 TEUs to be delivered in 2009 and 2010. We have long-term relationships with an extensive group of customers in the intermodal shipping industry. As of September 30, 2007, we employed 341 people in 36 offices in seven countries.

We were formed in June 2007 for the purpose of combining under a single holding company the container and related equipment leasing business operated by Carlisle with the containership leasing business under SHL, which we acquired in June 2007, and the container and chassis leasing business of Interpool, which we acquired in July 2007. Carlisle was founded in 1993 and was acquired by certain of our Initial Shareholders in 2006. SHL was formed in 2006 by certain of our Initial Shareholders for the purpose of engaging in the business of acquiring and leasing containerships. Prior to the Interpool Acquisition, Interpool was listed on the NYSE and had been operating since it was established in 1968.

Our chassis fleet totaled approximately 247,000 chassis as of September 30, 2007. As of September 30, 2007, the average age of our chassis fleet was 9.7 years.

We concentrate on leasing our chassis on a long-term basis. Substantially all of our new equipment is initially leased for terms of five to eight years and approximately 64% of the total chassis fleet is currently on long-term or direct finance lease. Approximately 4% of our chassis are leased on a short-term basis to satisfy customers’ peak or seasonal requirements, generally at higher rates than under long-term leases to reflect the added flexibility that short-term leases provide. For customers who require daily or weekly chassis rentals, we operate chassis pools at major intermodal transportation points including domestic shipping ports and rail terminals. These pools can consist of both our chassis as well as those of our customers. Approximately 23% of our chassis are leased in chassis pools. As of September 30, 2007, the average remaining duration of our operating and direct finance leases (i.e., excluding pool leases) was 3.2 years and those leases provided for total contractual cash flow of $484.0 million (assuming early terminations only for which there are no penalties).

We offer our chassis customers both long-term operating leases as well as ‘‘direct finance’’ leases. Under an operating lease, the lessee commits to a fixed lease term, typically from five to eight years, and we retain the benefit and bear the risk of re-leasing and the residual value of the asset. Long-term operating leases can contain an early termination provision allowing the lessee to return equipment prior to expiration of the lease upon payment of an early termination fee or a retroactively applied increase in lease payments. Additionally, customers may bear substantial costs related to repositioning and repair upon return of the equipment.

Frequently, a lessee will retain long-term leased equipment well beyond the initial lease term. In these cases, long-term leases will be renewed at the then prevailing market rate, for one to five-year periods, or as a direct finance lease. We estimate that over the last three years, the average operating lease renewal rate has been approximately 80%.

Under a direct finance lease, the customer commits to a fixed lease term and typically receives a bargain purchase option at the expiration of the lease. Under this agreement, the substantive risks and rewards of equipment ownership are passed on to the lessee. The lease payments are segregated into principal and interest components similar to a loan. The interest component, calculated using the effective interest method over the term of the lease, is recognized by us in our statement of operations as equipment leasing revenue. The principal component of the lease, is reflected as a reduction to the net investment in the direct financing lease in our cash flow statement.

Lease rentals are typically calculated on a per diem basis, regardless of the term of the lease. Our leases generally provide for monthly billing and require payment by the lessee within 60 days after presentation of an invoice. Typically, the lessee is responsible for payment of all taxes, handling charges and other charges arising out of use of the equipment and must carry specified amounts of insurance to cover physical damage to and loss of equipment, as well as bodily injury and property damage to third parties. In addition, our leases usually require lessees to repair any damage to the chassis other than normal wear and tear. Lessees are also required to indemnify the owner of the equipment against losses arising from accidents and other occurrences involving the leased equipment. All of our operating leases, both short- and long-term, generally set forth a list of locations where lessees may return equipment, along with any monthly quantity return limits.

We operate two types of chassis pools – ‘‘neutral’’ pools and ‘‘cooperative’’ pools. A neutral chassis pool is an inventory of our chassis available for short-term leasing to customers at a port or rail terminal. Although the chassis are usually leased from neutral pools on a short-term basis, we often have long-term exclusive contracts with the port or rail terminal operator to be the exclusive neutral chassis pool provider. We operate neutral pools for many of the major port authorities and port and rail terminal operators on the Eastern seaboard and the Gulf coast. We also operate neutral pools at various inland rail terminals for railroads including CSX and BNSF.

customers contribute their chassis, which may be leased or owned, to the pools and we manage them. The contributed chassis may be used by other members of the pool or leased on a short-term basis by third parties when the pool does not need them. At the end of the month, we, as the pool manager, bill the pool members based on their utilization net of their contribution and receive a fee for our services. We have a highly-developed proprietary software system, known as ‘‘PoolStat®’’ to enable the management of both neutral and Co-op pools. This software provides us with fee business and, more importantly, as more customers participate in chassis pools, they look to us for chassis management and additional leased equipment.

As of September 30, 2007, we owned and managed a fleet of 985,000 TEU of containers. Our fleet consisted of the following two types of containers and generator sets:

Our leases are long-term, typically with terms of one to eight years. Long-term leases provide us with stable cash flows and minimize direct operating expenses associated with shorter-term operating leases. Our lease terms generally require operating costs including maintenance, insurance and other specified costs to be paid by the lessee. All of our leases require the lessee to maintain the leased equipment in good operating condition, defend and indemnify us from liabilities relating to container contents and handling and return the containers to specified drop-off locations.

As of September 30, 2007, 94% of our owned container TEU’s were on-hire to customers, with 33% of those container units classified as operating leases and 67% classified as direct finance leases. As of that date, the average remaining lease term for all owned container operating and direct finance leases was 3.6 years. Long-term operating leases for our containers generally contain an early termination provision allowing the lessee to return equipment prior to expiration of the lease upon payment of an early termination fee or a retroactively applied increase in lease payments.

Our revenue growth for our container business is driven by the size of our fleet, utilization and average lease rates. Over the last five years, our owned fleet size has grown from 39,314 to 464,620 units including 355,687 units acquired in connection with the Company’s acquisition of Interpool, Inc. Our utilization rates are determined by the percentage of our total owned fleet that is on hire. For the years ended December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2006 and the nine months ended September 30, 2007, utilization rates were 91%, 88% and 94%, respectively. Over the last 3 fiscal years, average rental per diem for reefer containers has decreased from $7.83 to $6.98. Container leasing rates are a function of several factors, including new container prices, which are primarily influenced by the price of steel, interest rates, and the number of available container units in the market. The decrease in our leasing rates for new leases entered into during this period was in part caused by these factors. Average leasing rates will gradually change as lease terms expire and new rates are set.

As a result of the acquisition of Seacastle Holdings LLC, we acquired two containerships on June 29, 2007. Consistent with our strategy to grow our fleet, we took delivery of five more containerships throughout the third quarter of 2007. The aggregate capacity of our fleet of seven containerships as of September 30, 2007 is 32,770 TEU. Three of our containerships had charter agreements in place when the ships were acquired and the remaining containerships are under charter agreements arranged by the Company. A time charter involves placing a containership at the charterer’s disposal for a set period of time during which the charterer may use the containership in return for the payment by the charterer for a specified daily rate. We typically charter our containerships through time charters with service periods ranging from 3 to 7 years. As of September 30, 2007, the average remaining contractual service period for our ‘‘on the water’’ vessels was 3.6 years.

As of September 30, 2007, we had entered into contracts with Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering Co., Ltd. for the construction and purchase of four 4,400 TEU containerships, which are scheduled to be delivered to us during 2010. Subsequent to the end of the period we entered into an agreement with a third party for the construction and acquisition of two additional containerships, which are scheduled to be delivered to us in 2009. We have arranged charter agreements for all of the six newbuilds.

Demand for chassis is principally a function of the volume of containerized trade in North America. According to the U.S. Department of Transportation, one container in every nine carrying global trade is bound for or is coming from the United States, comprising 11 percent of worldwide container traffic. On a typical day in 2005, U.S. container ports handled an average of 71,000 TEUs, up from 37,000 TEUs per day in 1995 according to the USDOT. According to the Port Import Export Reporting Service (PIERS), over the last ten years, container traffic to and from the U.S. has grown at an average rate of 7.1%. This rapid growth in container traffic has resulted in increased vessel, truck, and rail services in and around port regions. In recent years, domestic railroads and trucking lines located in North America have begun actively marketing intermodal services for the domestic transportation of freight. According to the Association of American Railroads, intermodal container traffic on U.S. railroads has grown from 5.2 million containers originated in 1997 to 9.4 million in 2006, or an average growth rate of 6.7% per year.

The demand for chassis, along with increased congestion at many of the rail and marine facilities around the country, has fueled an increase in the pooling of chassis for greater efficiencies. Correspondingly, we have experienced an increase in demand for our chassis management services, which utilizes ‘‘PoolStat®’’, our highly developed proprietary software system, as more shipping lines are entering into these chassis sharing arrangements. In addition, we have continued to experience strong demand in our own neutral chassis pools at railroads and marine terminals. As a result of these factors, we expect this trend to continue in the near future.

The demand for containers is principally a function of the growth in worldwide containerized trade and the growth in containership supply. According to Clarkson Research, worldwide container activity grew every year from 1980 through 2006. Over the last ten years, global container trade volume has grown from 47 million TEU to 117 million TEU, representing a compound growth rate of 9.6%. Furthermore, as of October 2007, Clarkson Research projected that global loaded container trade will grow by 10.7% in 2007 and 9.3% in 2008. In addition, according to Clarkson Research, the global containership fleet has grown from slightly over 1 million TEU of capacity in 1985 to 9.5 million TEU at the start of 2007, or a compound growth rate of 10.5%. This rapid growth has led to increased demand for marine containers, with approximately two marine containers required for

every TEU slot of total containership fleet capacity. Containerisation International expects that over the next few years more than 3.3 million TEU in annual container fleet additions will be required to match the growth in global container trade including approximately 1.3 million TEU in capacity required for replacement equipment.

Similar to containerized trade, refrigerated container trade has benefited from the increasing affluence of consumers globally, along with their increased preference for a variety of fresh foods year-round. This, along with the shift of refrigerated cargos from the older conventional (non-containerized) refrigerated vessels to containerized refrigerated vessels and the infrastructural developments in the global transportation network, all have contributed to and promoted intermodal transport and containerized trade. In contrast to dry cargo trades, refrigerated trades have a higher tendency to run in north-south trades due to reversal of seasons in the Southern versus Northern Hemispheres enabling countries such as Chile and South Africa to supply a variety of fresh produce to Northern Hemisphere consumer markets in their winter season. The North-South seasonality factor, as well as demand during the holiday season, tends to drive refrigerated trade upwards starting in the fourth quarter and running through Chinese New Year in Asia, creating a higher demand for both new and existing units in the first and fourth quarters of the year.

The dry container market is affected by currency fluctuations and GDP growth as well as other factors. The dry container market is also subject to macroeconomic trends over time. As much of this cargo consists of consumer goods, the demand for transportation of these goods is propelled by the need for manufacturers to supply stock to retailers in time for holiday demand. As just-in-time inventory management techniques have improved, the supply of cargo flows has tended to start later in summer and fall months, although stress on congested port facilities and inland transportation modes such as railroad lines, has restricted the shippers’ ability to push this schedule further back in the year.

According to Containerisation International, there are over 23 million TEU of marine shipping containers and one million North American containers with a total cash replacement cost of $62.8 billion as of mid 2007. According to Containerisation International, dry freight and refrigerated containers make up 91% and 6% of the total TEU count, respectively. However, since refrigerated containers cost 8-10 times as much as standard dry freight containers, they make up over 21% of the world fleet by asset value.

According to Containerisation International, container lessors’ ownership was approximately 10.2 million TEU or 41.8% of the total worldwide container fleet of 24.5 million TEU as of mid-2007. Since mid-2000, the percentage of leased versus owned containers utilized by shipping lines has been fairly stable, ranging from a low of 42% to a high of 47% also cited by Containerisation International. It is common for the shipping lines to utilize several container lessors to meet their container equipment needs.

Container leasing rates are typically a function of, among other things, new container prices, interest rates, leasing company infrastructure costs and the container supply and demand balance at a particular time and location. Average leasing rates on an entire portfolio of leases respond more gradually to changes in new equipment prices, because lease agreements can only be re-priced upon the expiration of the lease. In addition, the value that lessors receive for resale of equipment is closely related to the cost of new equipment. From 1980 to 2000, container leasing rates generally decreased due to a trend toward lower new container prices, a reduction in U.S. dollar interest rates and a decrease in leasing company infrastructure costs as a result of improved information systems. With the exception of the expansion in leasing rates between mid-2004 to mid-2005 that was facilitated by a substantial increase in standard dry freight container prices, leasing rates have been fairly stable since 2000.

According to Clarkson Research, as of August 2007, the fully cellular containership fleet numbered 4,187 vessels with approximately 10.2 million TEU of capacity. By the end of 2007, the fleet is expected to have grown to support almost 11 million TEU of capacity with an additional 1.5 million TEU expected to be added during 2008. The fully cellular containership fleet is made up of a wide range of ships from below 500 TEU in capacity to 10,000 TEU and above. At the top end of the scale are the ‘‘Deep Sea’’ containerships of 3,000 TEU and above which are generally responsible for servicing the mainlane east-west trades. These are designated as Panamax or Post-Panamax according to their capability to transit the Panama Canal given their physical dimensions. ‘‘Intermediate’’ containerships are between 1,000 TEU and 2,999 TEU in capacity and generally serve intermediate, north-south and in some cases intra-regional trade. Below 1,000 TEU in capacity are the ‘‘Feeder’’ containerships generally operated on an intra-regional basis, often relaying or ‘‘feeding’’ cargo within a region from or to main port hubs served by mainlane trades. A large proportion of the growth in containership capacity in recent years has been in the Panamax and Post-Panamax ‘‘Deep Sea’’.

The containership charter market is playing an increasingly important role in the container shipping industry as a whole. Historically, a significant share of the world’s containership capacity has been owned by the liner companies operating container shipping services. More recently these operators have chosen to charter a larger proportion of the capacity that they operate as they add to and establish new trade routes. From 1993 to 2006, the percent of total container capacity operated by the top ten liner companies which was chartered in grew from 15% to over 50%. According to Clarkson Research, at the beginning of August 2007, charter owners accounted for 47.7% of the global fully-cellular containership capacity.

Seacastle Inc. was formed in June 2007 through the combination of Carlisle and the containership leasing business recently started by Seacastle Holdings LLC. Prior to this combination, Carlisle had operated its business as a single reportable segment referred to as Containers and related equipment. Carlisle managed the business through a single set of product metrics and profitability measures that did not seek to allocate costs amongst the individual products. Carlisle employed a single sales force that sold each product and the back office functions were not allocable in total or in part to a single product.

On June 29, 2007, the Carlisle business was combined with the Seacastle Holdings LLC containership leasing business, which included two fully-chartered containerships. During the third quarter 2007, we acquired five additional containerships, one of which had an existing charter contract. We intend to continue to grow this business substantially through the acquisition of additional containerships. In July 2007, we entered into a contract with Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering Co., Ltd. for the construction and purchase of four 4,400 TEU containerships, which are scheduled to be delivered by 2010.

On July 19, 2007, Seacastle Inc. purchased all of the outstanding common stock of Interpool, a publicly traded entity listed on the NYSE. Interpool operated its business in two reportable segments: Container leasing and Domestic Intermodal Equipment Leasing.

Subsequent to these acquisitions, we began operating our business in three reportable business segments: Container leasing (including the container and related equipment leasing activities of Interpool and Carlisle), Chassis leasing (which Interpool referred to as Domestic Intermodal Equipment Leasing) and Containership leasing.

Our primary sources of equipment leasing revenue are derived from operating leases and revenue earned on direct finance leases.

We generate equipment leasing revenue through short-term and long-term leases with shipping lines, North American rail and trucking companies and ocean carriers. In the majority of our

transactions, we act as the lessor of leasing equipment for a specified period of time and at a specified per diem rate. Revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the life of the respective lease.

We enter into finance leases as lessor of equipment that we own. In most instances, the leases include a bargain purchase option to purchase the leased equipment at the end of the lease term. The net investment in finance leases represents the receivables due from lessees, net of unearned income. The lease payments are segregated into principal and interest components similar to a loan. Unearned income, which represents the interest component, is recognized on an effective interest basis over the life of the lease term and is recorded as Finance revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The principal component of the lease payment is reflected as a reduction to the net investment in the direct finance lease.

Other revenue includes fee income earned for third party positioning of equipment and income earned on lessee paid repairs and maintenance. In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (‘‘EITF’’) No. 99-19, Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an Agent (‘‘EITF No. 99-19’’), we recognize billings to customers for damages incurred and certain other pass-through costs as revenue. We recognize gross revenues from these pass-through costs as we are the primary obligor with respect to purchasing goods and services from third parties; we generally have the discretion in selection of the repair service provider; and we generally have the credit risk because the services are purchased prior to reimbursement being received.

Other revenue also includes fees earned from the management of container equipment for third party investors and fees earned for providing chassis pool management services. These revenues are recognized as services are rendered.

Direct operating expenses are primarily related to costs incurred in relation to leasing equipment that is not being leased, or chartered, with respect to our containerships, to a third party (‘‘off-hire equipment’’). These expenses primarily consist of our costs to repair and maintain the equipment, to store the equipment when it is not on lease, to reposition the equipment for pick-up by a customer and in the case of our containerships, brokerage commissions, crew costs, supplies, insurance, engine lubricants and other amortized drydocking costs. Repositioning costs incurred prior to the initial lease of containers and chassis are capitalized as a cost of the asset acquisition. Drydocking costs, once incurred, are amortized over the time periods between drydockings. In our containership business, we incur management fees to third-party technical management companies that include such services as the day-to-day management of our containerships, including performing routine maintenance, attending to containership operations and arranging for crews and supplies.

Selling and general expenses primarily consist of costs associated with marketing and sales. Administrative expenses include management, accounting, office rent, and professional services costs such as audit and legal fees and other expenses.

We determine the provision for doubtful accounts based on our assessment of the collectibility of our receivables. We identify those accounts based on two methods: (1) a customer-by-customer basis

and (2) an allowance method. In the first method, we review certain accounts and place a likelihood of default percentage on each account individually. For the remaining receivable balance, we apply a delinquency factor to the unallocated balance. This delinquency factor is based on prior history and represents our best estimate of those accounts that will become uncollectible. Changes in economic conditions may require a re-assessment of the risk and could result in increases or decreases in the allowance for doubtful accounts.

Leasing equipment is reported at cost less accumulated depreciation, which is generally provided using a straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets decreasing the net book value of the asset down to its residual value. We capitalize the costs incurred with placing new equipment into service, betterments and major overhauls. We have estimated the following useful lives and residual values:

We have entered into derivative instruments in the form of interest rate swaps, which are used to reduce our interest rate risk. Through these interest rate swaps, we receive floating rate payments in exchange for fixed rate payments, effectively converting our floating debt borrowings to a fixed rate.

The manner in which a derivative instrument is recorded depends on whether it qualifies for hedge accounting. In our Predecessor periods, we did not qualify for hedge accounting under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (‘‘SFAS’’) No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (‘‘SFAS No. 133’’). In our Successor periods, we began applying hedge accounting on our derivative instruments.

In the Predecessor period, interest rate swaps have been marked to market with changes in fair value recorded in earnings in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005 and the period from January 1, 2006 through February 14, 2006.

In the Successor period, beginning on February 15, 2006, we began applying hedge accounting and designated and accounted for our interest rate swap contracts as cash flow hedges. For effective cash flow hedges, changes in fair value are recorded in Other comprehensive income in the Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity. The ineffective portion of cash flow hedges is recorded in earnings in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

In accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (‘‘SFAS No. 144’’), we recognize assets held for sale at the lower of carrying value or fair value less estimated costs to sell. As such, we evaluate the carrying values of our leasing equipment designated as held for sale and record an impairment loss in the Consolidated Statements of Operations if the ultimate sales value is expected to be below the current carrying value.

We pay interest expense on our debt obligations, which include term loans, revolving lines of credit, asset securitizations, and bank debt, based on variable rates of interest stated in the debt

agreements. We enter into interest rate swaps for purposes other than trading as part of our overall market risk management practices. As a result of our variable rate indebtedness, our earnings are affected by changes in interest rates. However, we hedge the majority of our outstanding debt via interest rate swap agreements to manage the market risk associated with fluctuations in interest rates. We include the amortization of capitalized financing fees in interest expense. Interest costs on our advances for containerships under construction are capitalized and depreciated when the asset is placed in service. The amortization of discounts and premiums on our debt resulting from fair value adjustments are recorded as increases or reductions of interest expense.

We earn interest income primarily from restricted and unrestricted cash balances, which are invested in money market mutual funds. Restricted cash consists of cash that is held by the Company in the form of maintenance deposits and security deposits received from lessees pursuant to the terms of various lease agreements and rent collections held in lockbox accounts pursuant to the Company’s credit facilities and asset-backed securitization agreements.

In the third quarter of 2006, we simplified our debt structure and retired our revolving credit facility, term loan and Series 2003 Asset-Backed Securitization. As a result of these transactions, the Company recognized a loss on retirement of debt.

Other expense, net includes foreign currency gains and losses, equity in joint venture income and/or loss, impairment charges on long-lived assets, gains and losses on the sale of long-lived assets and expenses shared with a third-party under a cost-sharing agreement.

In the Predecessor period we were organized as a partnership and were not subject to income taxes in the United States. In the Successor period, income taxes have been provided based upon the tax laws and rates in countries in which our operations are conducted and income is earned. We are a Marshall Islands corporation, and we are not subject to income tax in Marshall Islands. The provision for income taxes recorded relates to the income earned by certain of our subsidiaries, which are located in or have earned income in jurisdictions that impose income taxes, primarily in the United States. As a result of the Interpool Acquisition we are also subject to income tax in Canada and additionally in Barbados based upon investment income earned.

The acquisition of Carlisle on February 15, 2006 was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. As a result, the financial information presented for 2006 include a Predecessor period from January 1, 2006 through February 14, 2006 and Successor periods from February 15, 2006 through December 31, 2006 and February 15, 2006 through September 30, 2006. As a result of the acquisition of Carlisle by funds managed by Fortress, which we refer to as the Carlisle Acquisition, the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Successor period includes interest and amortization expense resulting from the notes and revolving credit facility and depreciation of leasing equipment and other property, plant and equipment assumed and acquired through the Carlisle Acquisition. Further, as a result of purchase accounting, the fair values of our assets on the date of the Carlisle Acquisition became their new cost basis. The results of operations for the successor period are affected by the newly established cost basis of these assets. We allocated the purchase price in the Carlisle Acquisition based on the fair values of assets and liabilities as of the date of the acquisition, which resulted in a change in our annual depreciation and amortization expenses. The accompanying consolidated financial statements for the periods prior to the Carlisle Acquisition are labeled as ‘‘Predecessor’’ and the period subsequent to the Carlisle Acquisition are labeled as ‘‘Successor.’’

The consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005 and for the period from January 1, 2006 to February 14, 2006 include the accounts and activities of the Predecessor. The Predecessor was a limited liability company owned by Marubeni America Corporation, or Marubeni, a global equipment manufacturer, MAC Lease Holdings, Inc.

Seacastle became the parent company of Seacastle Operating Company on June 29, 2007. Our consolidated financial statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 include the accounts of Seacastle and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. Our consolidated financial statements for the periods from February 15, 2006 through December 31, 2006 and from February 15, 2006 through September 30, 2006 include the accounts of Seacastle Operating Company, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. Included in these periods are fair value adjustments to assets and liabilities including goodwill, leasing equipment and other property, plant and equipment in accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations (‘‘SFAS No. 141’’). Also included is the corresponding effect that these adjustments had to operating, depreciation and amortization expense.

On July 19, 2007, we acquired 100% of the outstanding common shares of Interpool for $27.10 (or a total purchase of approximately $980 million) per share. As such, the results of operations of Interpool from July 19, 2007 to September 30, 2007 are included in our consolidated financial statements.

Our acquisition of Interpool was accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 141, using the purchase method of accounting. Under the purchase method of accounting, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed from Interpool were recorded at the date of acquisition, at their respective fair values. The purchase price plus acquisition costs exceeded the fair values of acquired assets and assumed liabilities resulting in the recognition of goodwill in the amount of $252.4 million.

Comparison of the Nine Month Period Ended September 30, 2006 (Combined) to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007.

The following table presents combined revenue and expense information for the nine month period ended September 30, 2006 and nine months ended September 30, 2007. The information was derived from the revenue and expense accounts of Carlisle as Predecessor for the period from January 1, 2006 through February 14, 2006 and from the unaudited consolidated financial statements of Seacastle as Successor for the period from February 15, 2006 through September 30, 2006, and from the unaudited consolidated financial statements of Seacastle Inc. for the nine months ended September 30, 2007.

The Combined Statements of Operations for the nine month period ended September 30, 2006 is being presented solely to assist comparisons across the years. The Successor period for 2006 in the combined Statements of Operations includes the effect of fair value purchase accounting adjustments resulting from the Carlisle Acquisition on February 15, 2006. Due to the change in the basis of accounting resulting from the application of purchase accounting, the Predecessor’s consolidated financial statements and the Successor’s consolidated financial statements are not necessarily comparable.

The combined information is a non-US GAAP financial measure and should not be used in isolation or substitution of the Predecessor or Successor results. Such data is being presented for informational purposes only and does not purport to represent or be indicative of the results that actually would have been obtained had the Carlisle Acquisition occurred on January 1, 2006 or that may be obtained for any future period.


	Predecessor				Successor				Combined				Successor				Prior Period Change
	Period from January 1, 2006 through February 14, 2006				Period from February 15, 2006 through September 30, 2006				Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006				Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007				$ Change				% Change
	(dollars in thousands)
Revenue:
Equipment leasing revenue		$	15,962			$	85,554			$	101,516			$	189,785			$	88,269			87	%
Finance revenue			2,088				9,973				12,061				21,945				9,884			82
Other revenue			155				1,552				1,707				10,629				8,922			523
Total revenue		$	18,205			$	97,079			$	115,284			$	222,359			$	107,075			93	%
Expenses:
Direct operating expenses			790				4,442				5,232				30,039				24,807			474
Selling, general and administrative expenses			3,627				12,759				16,386				28,216				11,830			72
Provision for doubtful accounts			—				—				—				137				137			N/A
Depreciation of leasing equipment			6,812				39,411				46,223				69,543				23,320			50
Fair value adjustments for derivative instruments			(3,527	)			—				(3,527	)			—				3,527			N/A
Impairment on assets held for sale			—				—				—				557				557			N/A
Interest expense			5,196				29,352				34,548				65,248				30,700			89
Interest (income)			(80	)			(572	)			(652	)			(5,010	)			(4,358	)		668
Loss on retirement of debt			—				7,631				7,631				—				(7,631	)		N/A
Other expense/(income), net			581				2,021				2,602				2,337				(265	)		(10	)
Total expenses		$	13,399			$	95,044			$	108,443			$	191,067			$	82,624			76	%
Income before provision for income taxes			4,806				2,035				6,841				31,292				24,451			357
Provision for income taxes			—				23				23				4,695				4,672			N/A
Net Income		$	4,806			$	2,012			$	6,818			$	26,597			$	19,779			290	%

Total revenue was $115.3 million for the combined nine month period ended September 30, 2006 compared to $222.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, an increase of $107.1 million or 93%. Equipment leasing revenue increased $88.3 million or 87%, Finance revenue increased $9.9 million or 82% and Other revenue increased $8.9 million.

$57.8 million of the increase in Equipment leasing revenue relates to the Interpool Acquisition and $13.4 million of the increase in Equipment leasing revenue relates to the new containerships acquired. In addition, Equipment leasing revenue increased $1.2 million due to the consolidation of two joint ventures previously accounted for under the equity method of accounting. The remaining increase of $15.8 million was attributable to a $37.6 million increase due to a 39% increase in the size of the container fleet on hire, offset by a $21.8 million decrease due to a 16% decrease in average daily rates for containers. The introduction of the rental of dry containers in September 2006 accounted for 58% of the increase in the average on-hire fleet while at the same time, lowering the average per diem rates. Dry container rates were approximately 14% of the per diem rates that were received on refrigerated containers reflecting their lower capital cost versus refrigerated containers.

Finance revenue increased by $10.0 million as a result of the Interpool Acquisition. Excluding the impact of the acquisition, Finance revenue declined $0.1 million due to a 16% increase in the number of direct finance lease assets, offset by the mix of products under finance leases and the rate of amortization of unearned income.

Other revenue increased by $8.9 million. $6.7 million of the increase in Other revenue is attributable to the Interpool Acquisition. The remaining increase of $2.2 million was due to the increase in maintenance and repair revenue charged to our lessees in 2007.

Direct operating expenses were $5.2 million for the combined nine month period ended September 30, 2006 compared to $30.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, an increase of $24.8 million. $24.6 million of the increase is attributable to the Seacastle and Interpool Acquisitions. Excluding the impact of these acquisitions, the remaining $0.2 million net increase in costs is attributable to a $0.6 million increase in storage and movement charges from depots, a $0.2 increase in repairs and maintenance, offset by a $0.2 decrease in refurbishments and a $0.4 million decrease in repositioning charges.

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $16.4 million in the combined nine month period ended September 30, 2006 compared to $28.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, an increase of $11.8 million or 72%. An increase of $12.2 million is attributable to the Seacastle and Interpool Acquisitions. Included in the impact of the acquisition is $0.5 million of compensation costs for employees that are no longer with the company. Excluding the impact of these acquisitions, the remaining $0.4 million decrease in costs was primarily driven by a $1.6 million decrease in rental expense of leasing equipment. In February 2006, $108.7 million of leasing equipment was recorded in conjunction with the Carlisle Acquisition. These assets previously qualified for operating lease treatment and payments to the lessor were recorded as rental expense. Due to the amended terms of the lease agreements, which required the Company to purchase the assets at the end of the term, the Company was required to record a capital lease asset and liability and the resultant depreciation expense. As a result, we recognized a capital lease asset and liability on our Consolidated Balance Sheet and the resultant depreciation expense in our Consolidated Statement of Operations. In addition, fees paid to financial institutions were $1.5 million higher in the nine months ended September 30, 2006 versus the same period in 2007. These decreases were offset by increases in employee related costs of $2.2 million primarily consisting of salaries and travel expenses and a $0.5 increase in audit and information technology costs.

The Provision for doubtful accounts increased by $0.1 million. We recorded a $0.5 million provision for doubtful accounts in the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The Company recognized the provision when a customer account was deemed uncollectible. No such provision was required in the combined nine month period ended September 30, 2006. This provision was offset by a decrease of $0.4 million due to improved collections at Interpool.

Depreciation of leasing equipment was $46.2 million in the combined nine month period ended September 30, 2006 compared to $69.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, an increase of $23.3 million or 50%. $13.0 million of the increase is attributable to the Interpool Acquisition and $3.2 million of the increase is attributable to the new containerships placed into service in 2007. In addition, $0.4 million of the increase was due to the consolidation of two joint ventures previously accounted for under the equity method of accounting. An increase of $6.2 million was driven by the purchase of $123.0 million in leasing equipment in 2007 in addition to $94.0 million

of leasing equipment purchased during the fourth quarter of 2006. An additional $108.7 million of leasing equipment was recorded in February 2006, in conjunction with the Carlisle Acquisition. These assets previously qualified for operating lease treatment and payments to the lessor were recorded as rental expense. Due to the amended terms of the lease agreements, which required the Company to purchase the assets at the end of the term, the Company was required to record a capital lease asset and liability and the resultant depreciation expense. This transaction resulted in a $0.8 million increase in depreciation expense. These increases were offset by a $0.3 million decrease in depreciation expense resulting from a write-down of Leasing equipment in connection with the Carlisle Acquisition.

In the Predecessor period, we did not qualify for hedge accounting on our interest rate swaps and accordingly we recorded a $3.5 million fair value adjustment gain in the period from January 1, 2006 through February 14, 2006. However, in the Successor period, we did qualify for hedge accounting on our interest rate swaps and, accordingly recorded the fair value adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

We recorded an impairment of assets held for sale of $0.6 million in the combined nine months ended September 30, 2007. We evaluate the recovery of our containers and complementary equipment designated for sale and record a loss if the ultimate sales value is expected to be below the current carrying cost. No such impairment charge was required in the nine month period ended September 30, 2006.

Interest expense was $34.5 million in the combined nine month period ended September 30, 2006 compared to $65.2 million for the same period in 2007, an increase of $30.7 million. $25.0 million of the increase is attributable to debt assumed and new debt entered into as part of the Interpool Acquisition and $3.7 million of the increase is attributable to financing entered into in relation to the new containerships placed into service in 2007. The remaining increase is attributable to higher average outstanding debt levels, which caused interest expense to increase by $6.8 million. Included in this increase is $0.6 million of additional interest expense on debt incurred in connection with the Carlisle Acquisition. This increase in interest expense was offset by a lower cost of funding, which reduced interest expense by $4.8 million.

Interest income was $0.7 million in the combined nine month period ended September 30, 2006 compared to $5.0 million for the same period in 2007, an increase of $4.3 million. $3.5 million of the increase is attributable to the Interpool Acquisition whereby the Company has $225.0 million of restricted cash in an interest bearing account in Barbados. The remainder of the increase is primarily attributable to increased restricted cash balances and unrestricted cash and cash equivalents held in interest-bearing accounts.

In the third quarter of 2006, we took steps to simplify our debt structure and retired our revolving credit facility, term loan and Series 2003-1 and Series 2003-2 Notes. As a result, we recognized a loss on retirement of debt of $7.6 million related to these facilities.

Other expense, net was $2.6 million for the combined nine month period ended September 30, 2006 compared to $2.3 million for the same period in 2007, a decrease in net expense of $0.3 million. A $0.4 million increase is attributable to the Interpool Acquisition, whereas a

$0.2 million decrease is attributable to new containerships acquired in 2007. Excluding the impact of the Interpool Acquisition and the containerships acquired, the remaining decrease in other expense, is attributable to actions taken by the Company in 2006 to simplify its debt structure through which it incurred $0.9 million in prepayment fees. These reductions in other expense, net were offset by the absence of equity in income of joint ventures that were acquired in 2006 of $0.2 million, the absence of $0.2 million of cost sharing from an agreement that expired in 2006, and $0.1 million of greater losses on sales of equipment in the nine months ended September 30, 2007.

Income before provision for income taxes was $6.8 million in the combined nine month period ended September 30, 2006 compared to $31.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, an increase of $24.5 million. The change was attributable to all of the items listed above.

Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2005 to the Year Ended December 31, 2006 (Combined)

The following table presents combined revenue and expense information for year ended December 31, 2005 and 2006. The information was derived from the Consolidated Statements of Operations of Carlisle as Predecessor for the period from January 1, 2006 through February 14, 2006, and from the Consolidated Statements of Operations of Seacastle as Successor for the period from February 15, 2006 through December 31, 2006.

The Combined Statements of Operations are being presented solely to assist comparisons across the years. The Successor period for 2006 in the Combined Statements of Operations includes the effect of fair value purchase accounting adjustments resulting from the Carlisle Acquisition on February 15, 2006. Due to the change in the basis of accounting resulting from the application of purchase accounting, the Predecessor’s consolidated financial statements and the Successor’s consolidated financial statements are not necessarily comparable.

The combined information is a non-US GAAP financial measure and should not be used in isolation or substitution of the Predecessor or Successor results. Such data is being presented for information purposes only and does not purport to represent or be indicative of the results that actually would have been obtained had the Carlisle Acquisition occurred on January 1, 2006 or that may be obtained for any future period.


	Predecessor								Successor				Combined				Prior Period Change
	Year Ended December 31, 2005				Period from January 1, 2006 through February 14, 2006				Period from February 15, 2006 through December 31, 2006				Year Ended December 31, 2006				$ Change				% Change
					(dollars in thousands)
Revenue:
Equipment leasing revenue		$	130,714			$	15,962			$	122,342			$	138,304			$	7,590			6	%
Finance revenue			16,692				2,088				14,027				16,115				(577	)		(3	)
Other revenue			3,283				155				2,053				2,208				(1,075	)		(33	)
Total revenue		$	150,689			$	18,205			$	138,422			$	156,627			$	5,938			4	%
Expenses:
Direct operating expenses			7,934				790				5,889				6,679				(1,255	)		(16	)
Selling, general and administrative expenses			37,390				3,627				20,021				23,648				(13,742	)		(37	)
Depreciation of leasing equipment			48,461				6,812				55,723				62,535				14,074			29
Fair value adjustment on derivative instruments			(10,434	)			(3,527	)			—				(3,527	)			6,907		*
Impairment on assets held for sale			557				—				3,912				3,912				3,355			602
Goodwill impairment			38,900				—				—				—				(38,900	)	*
Interest expense			36,920				5,196				39,490				44,686				7,766			21
Interest income			(339	)			(80	)			(862	)			(942	)			(603	)		(178	)
Loss on retirement of debt			—				—				7,631				7,631				7,631		*
Other expense/(income), net			(4,069	)			581				2,966				3,547				7,616			187
Total expenses		$	155,320			$	13,399			$	134,770			$	148,169			$	(7,151	)		(5	)%
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes			(4,631	)			4,806				3,652				8,458				13,089			283
Provision for income taxes			—				—				38				38				38		*
Net Income (loss)		$	(4,631	)		$	4,806			$	3,614			$	8,420			$	13,051			282	%

Total revenues were $150.7 million for year ended December 31, 2005 compared to $156.6 million in the combined year ended December 31, 2006, an increase of $5.9 million or 4%. Equipment leasing revenue increased $7.6 million or 6% while Finance revenue decreased $0.6 million or 3%, and Other revenue decreased $1.1 million or 33%. $18.3 million of the increase in Equipment leasing revenue was attributable to a 14% increase in the size of the fleet on hire, offset by a 7% decrease in average daily rates resulting in a $10.7 million decrease in Equipment leasing revenue. The introduction of the rental of dry containers in late 2006 accounted for 21% of the increase in the average on-hire fleet while at the same time, lowering the average per diem rates. Dry container rates are approximately 14% of the per diem rates that were received on refrigerated containers. The number of direct finance lease assets increased by 6%, although revenue decreased on a year-over-year basis. The decrease was due to the mix of products under finance leases and the rate of amortization of unearned income. Other revenue decreased by $1.1 million primarily due to the decline in repair and maintenance revenues charged to our lessees. Included in the increases in Total revenue and in Equipment leasing revenue is $8.5 million due to the consolidation of two joint ventures previously accounted for under the equity method of accounting.

Direct operating expenses were $8.0 million in 2005 compared to $6.7 million in the combined year 2006, a decrease of $1.3 million or 16%. The decrease is attributable to lower levels of our portion of repairs, maintenance and refurbishment costs on refrigerated containers.

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $37.4 million in 2005 compared to $23.6 million in the combined year 2006, a decrease of $13.8 million or 37%. The decrease in costs was primarily driven by a $16.4 million decrease in rental expense of leasing equipment. In February 2006, $108.7 million of leasing equipment was recorded in conjunction with the Carlisle Acquisition. These assets previously qualified for operating lease treatment and payments to the lessor were recorded as rental expense. Due to the amended terms of the lease agreements, which requires the Company to purchase the assets at the end of the term, the Company was required to record a capital lease asset and liability and the resultant depreciation expense. The decrease in expenses was driven by the absence of $16.4 million of rental expense related to the aforementioned operating leases. The Company also recorded $1.5 million in severance charges related to executive management exit costs in 2006 and increased fees paid to financial institutions of $1.3 million.

Depreciation of leasing equipment was $48.5 million in 2005 compared to $62.5 million in the combined year 2006. The increase of $14.0 million or 29% was driven by a net increase of $250.4 million in leasing equipment. In February 2006, $108.7 million of leasing equipment was recorded in conjunction with the Carlisle Acquisition. These assets previously qualified for operating lease treatment and payments to the lessor were recorded as rental expense. Due to an amendment in the terms of the lease agreements, which required us to purchase the assets at the end of the lease term, we were required to record a capital lease asset and liability. This transaction accounted for $8.2 million of the total increase in depreciation expense. Also included in the overall increase in depreciation expense was a $3.3 million increase attributable to the consolidation of two joint ventures previously accounted for under the equity method of accounting. This increase was offset by a $1.6 million decrease in depreciation expense resulting from a write-down of Leasing equipment in connection with the Carlisle Acquisition.

In 2005, the Company recorded $10.4 million fair value gains on interest rate swaps. In the combined year 2006, the Company recorded a gain of $3.5 million related to fair value adjustments of the Company’s interest rate swaps. The decrease is due to the different accounting treatment for our interest rate swaps in our Predecessor and Successor periods. In the Successor period we began to apply hedge accounting, whereas in the Predecessor period we did not qualify for hedge accounting.

In 2005, we recorded a $0.6 million impairment charge as 133 refrigerated containers were designated as assets held for sale. Similarly, in the combined year 2006, impairment charges on 1,477 containers were $3.9 million resulting in a year over year increase in impairment charges of $3.3 million. Accordingly, we recorded an impairment charge to recognize the difference between the book value of the containers and the ultimate cash proceeds that we expect to receive in the period that these assets were designated as held for sale.

On December 30, 2005, Marubeni accepted an offer from funds managed by an affiliate of Fortress to sell all of the assets of the Company for $216.0 million subject to certain purchase price adjustments. The transaction closed on February 15, 2006 at a purchase price of $214.5 million. We

considered the acceptance of the offer to be a triggering event under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (‘‘SFAS No. 142’’) and accordingly performed a test to determine whether or not an impairment of goodwill should be recognized. As a result of the test, we recognized a goodwill impairment of $38.9 million in our Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2005.

Interest expense was $36.9 million in 2005 compared to $44.7 million in 2006, an increase of $7.8 million or 21.1%. The increase in average debt outstanding led to a $6.9 million increase in interest expense. Included in this increase is $3.7 million of interest expense on debt incurred in connection with the Carlisle Acquisition. The remaining increase of $0.9 million is primarily due to the increase in our weighted average interest rates.

Interest income was $0.3 million in 2005 compared to $0.9 million in 2006, an increase of $0.6 million primarily attributable to increased restricted cash balances and unrestricted cash and cash equivalents in interest bearing accounts.

In 2006, we took actions to simplify our debt structure and retired our revolving credit facility, term loan and Series 2003-1 and Series 2003-2 notes. As a result, we recognized a loss on retirement of debt of $7.6 million related to these facilities.

Other expense/(income), net was $(4.1) million in 2005 compared to $3.5 million in 2006, an increase in net expense of $7.6 million. During 2006, the Company took actions to simplify its debt structure and incurred $1.0 million in prepayment fees for credit facilities that were repaid. The remainder of the increase in net expense was attributable to a $2.5 million increase in loss on disposal of containers, the absence of $2.2 million of a cost sharing agreement in 2005 with a former affiliate, a $0.2 million decrease in asset management fees and $1.4 million less in equity in income of joint ventures that became fully consolidated in 2006.

Loss before provision for income taxes was $(4.6) million in 2005 compared to income of $8.5 million in 2006, an increase of $13.1 million. The change resulted from all of the items noted above.

Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2004 to the Year Ended December 31, 2005.

The following table presents consolidated revenue and expenses for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005.


	Year ended December 31,								Prior Period Change
	2004				2005				$ Change				% Change
	(dollars in thousands)
Revenue:
Equipment leasing revenue		$	125,900			$	130,714			$	4,814			4	%
Finance revenue			14,529				16,692				2,163			15
Other revenue			4,053				3,283				(770	)		(19	)
Total revenue		$	144,482			$	150,689			$	6,207			4	%
Expenses:
Direct operating expenses			5,320				7,934				2,614			49
Selling, general and administrative expenses			36,554				37,390				836			2
Depreciation of leasing equipment			42,348				48,461				6,113			14
Impairment on assets held for sale			—				557				557		*
Fair value adjustment on derivative instruments			(12,755	)			(10,434	)			2,321			18
Goodwill impairment			—				38,900				38,900		*
Interest expense			32,243				36,920				4,677			15
Interest income			(65	)			(339	)			(274	)		422
Other expense/(income), net			(3,113	)			(4,069	)			(956	)		31
Total expenses		$	100,532			$	155,320			$	54,788			54	%
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes			43,950				(4,631	)			(48,581	)		(111	)
Provision for income taxes			—				—				—		*
Net Income (loss)		$	43,950			$	(4,631	)		$	(48,581	)		(111	)%

Total revenue was $144.5 million for 2004 compared to $150.7 million in 2005, an increase of $6.2 million or 4%. Equipment leasing revenue increased $4.8 million or 4%, Finance revenue increased $2.2 million or 15% and Other revenue decreased $0.8 million or 19%. The increase in Equipment leasing revenue was attributable to a 9% increase in the size of the fleet on hire, offset by a 5% decrease in average daily rates. The increase in Finance revenue was due to the 25% increase in the number of assets under finance leases, the mix of products and the rate of amortization of unearned income. Other income decreased due to lower amounts received from lessors for repairs and maintenance fees.

Direct operating expenses were $5.3 million in 2004 compared to $7.9 million in 2005, an increase of $2.6 million or 49%. The increase is attributable to higher levels of the Company’s portion of repairs, maintenance and refurbishment costs on refrigerated containers.

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $36.6 million in 2004 compared to $37.4 million in 2005, an increase of $0.8 million or 2%. The increase in costs were driven by a $1.7 million increase in employee-related costs offset by a reduction in legal and professional fees of $0.9 million.

Depreciation of leasing equipment was $42.3 million in 2004 compared to $48.4 million in 2005. The increase of $6.1 million or 14% was driven by a net increase of $22.6 million in leasing equipment.

We did not record an impairment on assets held for sale in 2004. In 2005, we recorded a $0.6 million impairment charge on 133 containers that were designated for sale.

In 2004 and 2005, we did not qualify for hedge accounting and accordingly recognized fair value adjustment gains on our interest rate swaps of $12.8 million and $10.4 million, respectively.

On December 30, 2005, Marubeni accepted an offer from funds managed by an affiliated of Fortress to sell all of the assets of the Company for $216 million subject to certain purchase price adjustments. The transaction closed on February 15, 2006 at a purchase price of $214.5 million. We considered the acceptance of the offer to be a triggering event under SFAS No. 142, and accordingly performed a test to determine whether or not an impairment of goodwill should be recognized. As a result of the test, we recognized a goodwill impairment of $38.9 million in our Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2005.

Interest expense was $32.2 million in 2004 compared to $36.9 million in 2005, an increase of $4.7 million or 15%. The entire increase was driven by an increased average debt level in 2005 compared to 2004. The proceeds from the increase in debt were used to fund our investment in rental equipment and our net investment in finance leases.

Interest income was $0.1 million in 2004 compared to $0.3 million in 2005, an increase of $0.2 primarily attributable to increased restricted cash balances and unrestricted cash and cash equivalents held in interest bearing accounts.

Other expense/(income), net was ($3.1) million in 2004 compared to $(4.1) million in 2005, an increased of $1.0 million or 31%. The decrease in the net expense was primarily attributable to a greater level of costs shared with a third party affiliate under a cost sharing agreement.

Income (loss) before provision for income taxes was $44.0 million in 2004 compared to a loss of $(4.6) million in 2005, a decrease of $48.6 million. The change resulted from all of the items noted above.

We have historically met our liquidity requirements primarily from the following sources:

Our total Liabilities have increased by 308% from $853.2 million at December 31, 2006 to $3,479.6 million at September 30, 2007, which is consistent with the increase in our total assets by 308% from $1,098.4 million to $4,475.3 million during the same period.

As of September 30, 2007, we had approximately $1.7 billion of debt that will mature by September 30, 2009, including approximately $795.4 million (the ‘‘Current Debt’’) and $902.2 million of debt maturing by September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2009, respectively. These amounts do not include $284.6 million and $240.7 million of other contractual obligations existing as of September 30, 2007 maturing by September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2009, respectively. We expect that our cash flows from our operations, existing facilities and sales of older equipment, together with the proceeds from this offering and our future financing activities, will be sufficient to meet our liquidity needs. We will need to borrow funds to refinance a substantial portion of our outstanding debt that matures over the next year and thereafter. In addition, we will need to borrow substantial amounts to finance the purchases of new assets that we intend to make in order to expand our business in the next few years. We have not obtained commitments to provide all the funds we will need to refinance our maturing debt, or to finance potential new asset purchases, and no assurance can be made that we will be able to meet our financing and other liquidity needs as currently contemplated. See ‘‘Risk Factors – Our inability to service our debt obligations or to obtain additional financing as needed would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.’’

Since September 30, 2007, we have taken the following steps with regard to the amounts outstanding under our existing facilities:

On October 22, 2007, we refinanced $390.6 million of borrowings under the Chassis Securitization Facility (which constitutes a portion of the Current Debt) with the proceeds from borrowings under a new $362.7 million facility, the Chassis Funding Floating Rate Asset-Backed Notes, Series 2007-1, which mature in October 2008. This refinancing reduced the near-term amortization payments due under this financing.

We currently intend to refinance both the Chassis Funding Floating Rate Asset-Backed Notes, Series 2007-1 and the Interpool Chassis Funding II Floating Rate Asset-Backed Notes, Series 2007-1 with one or more long-term financings, although we have not yet obtained commitments. The Interpool Chassis Funding II Floating Rate Asset-Backed Notes, Series 2007-1 do not constitute a portion of the Current Debt and, as of September 30, 2007, $295.1 million would be due under this facility when it matures in January 2009.

On October 31, 2007, we entered into a $300.0 million senior secured credit facility through CLI Funding III LLC (the ‘‘CLI Funding III Credit Facility’’) to finance both new and existing container finance leases.

In addition, on November 30, 2007, we increased the amount of availability under the 2006-2 Notes under our Carlisle Asset-Backed Securitizations from $250.0 million to $375.0 million, thereby increasing our liquidity available to finance both new and existing container assets, including container finance leases.

We may use a portion of the amounts available under the CLI Funding III Credit Facility and the increased amounts available under the 2006-2 Notes to refinance a portion of the debt currently outstanding under the CLI Funding II Credit Facility (under which $398.1 million of debt (less amortization payments) matures in January 2009).

We intend to use a portion of the proceeds from this offering to repay all amounts outstanding under the Seacastle Revolving Credit Facility, under which $141.9 million was outstanding as of September 30, 2007. $250.0 million would be available until July 2008 under the Seacastle Revolving Credit Facility if we repay all outstanding amounts under this facility.

As of December 31, 2007, approximately $970 million and $751 million of our currently outstanding debt obligations will mature by December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2009, respectively. These amounts do not include outstanding contractual obligations existing as of December 31, 2007, some of which are described below, or the application of the net proceeds of this offering. The foregoing discussion of our financing needs does not reflect the additional borrowing we will need to finance purchases of additional assets, including containerships, that we may make in the future.

The acquisition of leasing assets, including chassis, containers and containerships, fuels our growth. As a result, we expect to spend substantial funds to acquire chassis, containers and containerships, although there can be no assurances as to the timing and amount of such acquisitions. Since the beginning of 2006, we have acquired or committed to acquire, either directly or through our newly-acquired subsidiaries, a total of $2 billion in total intermodal assets including more than $1 billion in containerships, approximately $700 million in shipping containers and approximately $300 million in intermodal chassis. It is our intention to continue buying leasing equipment and funding such purchases through cash flow from our operations, new issuances of equity and debt securities and new and existing lines of credit.

We expect that our largest single cash expenditure over the next several years will be the purchase of containerships. In July 2007, we entered into contracts with Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering Co., Ltd. for the construction and purchase of four 4,400 TEU containerships, which are scheduled to be delivered to us during 2010. The cost of these newbuild ships is $280.8 million in the aggregate of which $28.1 million was paid in the third quarter of 2007. In October 2007, we entered into an agreement with a third party for the purchase of two additional newbuild containerships for an aggregate purchase price of $176.0 million. In November 2007, the Company paid a 10% deposit and the remainder of the commitment, $158.4 million, is due upon the delivery expected in 2009. We have commitments in place to finance these acquisitions.

Depending upon the volume of demand in the market for new chassis, containers and containership leasing, we will actively seek new debt facilities with greater borrowing capacity to expand and/or replace our existing facilities, although there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain any additional facilities. We believe that we will be able to generate or otherwise obtain sufficient capital to support our growth strategy that will enable us to pay dividends to shareholders of our common stock as contemplated by our dividend policy. However, deterioration in our performance, the credit markets or our inability to obtain additional financing on attractive terms, or at all, could limit our access to funding or drive the cost of capital higher than our current cost. Both of those factors, as well as numerous other factors detailed above in ‘‘Risk Factors,’’ could limit our ability to raise funds, further the growth of our business or pay dividends.

Cash Flow Information for the Nine Month Period Ended September 30, 2006 (Combined) and the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007

The following table presents combined cash flow information for the combined nine month period ended September 30, 2006 and the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The information was derived from the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows of Carlisle for the period from January 1, 2006 through February 14, 2006, as Predecessor, and from the unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the period from February 15, 2006 through September 30, 2006, and from the unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 of Seacastle as Successor.

The combined cash flow information is being presented solely to assist comparisons across the years. The Successor period for 2006 in the combined cash flow information includes the effect of fair value purchase accounting adjustments resulting from the Carlisle Acquisition on February 15, 2006. Due to the change in the basis of accounting resulting from the application of purchase accounting, the Predecessor’s consolidated financial statements and the Successor’s consolidated financial statements are not necessarily comparable.

Comparison of the Nine Month Period Ended September 30, 2006 (Combined) to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007.

Net cash flows provided by operating activities was $53.3 million and $88.1 million for the combined nine month period ended September 30, 2006 and the nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively. The increase in cash from operations was due to the increased number of leasing assets on-hire, the majority of which were acquired through the Interpool and Seacastle Acquisitions. Net income increased in total by $19.8 million and by $6.7 million due to the Interpool and Seacastle Acquisitions. Offsetting the increased income was an increased use of working capital of $4.0 million in addition to $8.2 million incurred in connection with new debt agreements.

Net cash used in investing activities was $233.5 million and $1,478.4 million for the combined nine month period ended September 30, 2006 and the nine month period ended September 30, 2007, respectively. The increase in cash used in investing activities was attributable to the acquisition of Interpool for $604.2 million net of cash acquired, acquisition related payments of $19.2 million, an increase in restricted cash of $235.3 million due to the pledging of $225.0 million as security for the ING financing and increased cash restrictions due to the increase in the borrowings under asset backed securities. Also included in the increase in cash used was additional containerships purchased and advance payments on newbuild containerships for a combined $465.6 million. The remaining increase in purchases of leasing assets of $179.9 million is primarily related to the purchase of containers in 2007 in comparison to lower levels of spending in the combined nine month period ending September 2006 due to a general slowdown in demand at that time. In the combined nine month period ended September 30, 2006, the company had spent $201.1 million related to the Carlisle Acquisition. The Seacastle Acquisition was a source of cash provided by investing activities as the company had $24.2 million in cash on the balance sheet when it was acquired with an issuance of the Company’s common stock.

Net cash flows provided by financing activities was $191.6 million and $1,440.2 million for the combined nine month period ended September 30, 2006 and the nine month period ended September 30, 2007, respectively. In the combined nine month period ended September 30, 2006, we received $225.0 million from funds managed by an affiliate of Fortress, which we used to purchase the partnership interest from Marubeni (the Carlisle Acquisition). In addition, the funds managed by an affiliate of Fortress made capital contributions of $15.0 million which was used in part to reduce overall debt levels by $48.4 million in the combined nine months ended September 30, 2006. In the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company issued common stock to Fortress Investment Fund IV for $675.0 million of proceeds which was used to purchase Interpool. The Company also received $768.1 million in net cash proceeds from debt financing transactions that it used to acquire leasing assets and for general operating purposes. Offsetting the cash provided by financing activities was a cash use of $3.1 million for expenses incurred in the S-1 registration process.

As of September 30, 2007, we had unrestricted cash balances totaling $62.2 million.

The following table presents combined cash flow information for December 31, 2006. The information was derived from the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows of Carlisle for the period from January 1, 2006 through February 14, 2006 as ‘‘Predecessor’’ and from the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows of Seacastle for the period from February 15, 2006 through December 31, 2006 as ‘‘Successor.’’

The combined information is a non-US GAAP financial measure and should not be used in isolation or substitution of the Predecessor or Successor results. Such data is being presented for

informational purposes only and does not purport to represent or be indicative of the results that actually would have been obtained had the Carlisle Acquisition occurred on January 1, 2006.

The following table sets forth certain historical cash flow information for the years ended December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2005 and the combined year ended December 31, 2006.


	Predecessor												Successor				Combined
Cash Flows:	Year Ended December 31, 2004				Year Ended December 31, 2005				Period From January 1, 2006 to February 14, 2006				Period From February 15, 2006 to December 31, 2006				Year Ended December 31, 2006
	(dollars in thousands)
Net cash provided by operating activities		$	75,463			$	66,130			$	5,839			$	69,821			$	75,660
Net cash used in investing activities			(149,602	)			(120,971	)			(5,775	)			(318,107	)			(323,882	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities			72,982				62,141				(3,535	)			260,340				256,805
Effect of changes in exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents			—				—				(4	)			34				30
Net cash flow		$	(1,157	)		$	7,300			$	(3,475	)		$	12,088			$	8,613

Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2005 to the Combined Year Ended December 31, 2006

Net cash provided by operating activities was $66.1 million and $75.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 and the combined year ended December 31, 2006, respectively, a $9.5 million increase. Net income for the combined year ended December 31, 2006 was higher by $13.1 million. The net cash flows provided by operations for the combined year end December 31, 2006 benefited from the absence of a 2005 liquidation of a long-term incentive program for certain employees for approximately $9.9 million after tax. In 2006, we paid $4.2 million in deferred financing costs on a new revolving credit facility and also restructured its securitization program.

Net cash used in investing activities was $121.0 million and $323.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 and the combined year ended December 31, 2006, respectively, a $202.9 million increase. Cash flows used in investing activities for the combined year ended December 31, 2006 includes $201.1 million of cash distributed to partners in connection with the sale of the Company to funds managed by an affiliate of Fortress. Our restricted cash flow balance grew by $8.1 million over 2005 as more of our cash was held by a trustee as part of our securitization agreements. Net cash used in investing activities also excluded $9.9 million of proceeds from the sale of investments used to liquidate a long-term incentive program. Proceeds from sales of leasing equipment increased by $4.4 million over prior year levels. Finally, purchases of leasing equipment, including assets to be leased under direct finance leases was $148.7 million in 2005 versus $131.8 million in 2006. The decreased level of spending in 2006 was due to a general slowdown in the industry in the fourth quarter of 2005 leading to more leasing equipment on hand thus reducing the need to purchase assets in 2006.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $62.1 million and $256.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 and the combined year ended December 31, 2006, respectively, a $194.7 million increase. During 2006, we replaced our revolving credit facility with a new revolving credit facility and greatly reduced the level of borrowing on the facility by $97.0 million. We also liquidated our outstanding term loan which served to reduce cash flow by $28.6 million and also liquidated our capital lease obligations of $241.4 million. These decreases in borrowings were more than offset by a net increase in our asset-backed securitizations of $272.2 million and an equity contribution of $15.0 million from funds managed by an affiliate of Fortress in 2006. The increase in borrowing levels was augmented by $225.0 million of proceeds from the issuance of common shares to funds managed by an affiliate of Fortress.

We ended the combined period ended December 31, 2006 with unrestricted cash balances of $12.1 million.

Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2004 to the Year Ended December 31, 2005

Net cash provided by operating activities was $75.5 million and $66.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005, respectively, a $9.4 million decrease. The decrease in net cash from operating activities was primarily attributable to lower levels of accrued expenses and other liabilities in 2005 due to the liquidation of a long term incentive program for certain employees, which had a year over year impact of approximately $3.5 million, net of tax, and higher repairs and maintenance payments of $1.9 million. Another contributing factor was the absence of $1.5 million of cash received from non-consolidated affiliates in the normal course of business.

Net cash used in investing activities was $149.6 million and $121.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005, respectively, a $28.6 million decrease. In 2005, the net use in cash flow used in investing activities included $9.9 million of proceeds from the sale of investments used to liquidate the aforementioned long-term incentive program. Proceeds from the sales of leasing equipment increased by $2.3 million over prior year levels and cash collected from direct finance lease arrangements increased $7.4 million. This increase was directly attributable to the 25% increase in the number of assets under direct finance lease agreements versus 2004. Finally, purchases of leasing equipment, including assets to be leased under direct finance leases, were $161.9 million in 2004 versus $148.7 million in 2005. The decreased level of spending was due to a general slowdown in the industry in the fourth quarter of 2005.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $73.0 million and $62.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005, respectively, a $10.9 million decrease. The year over year change in net cash flow provided by financing activities was entirely due to changes in borrowing levels against our available facilities.

Our overall cash position increased by $7.3 million in 2005 as a result of the items discussed above.

The following table summarizes our various contractual obligations in order of their maturity dates as of September 30, 2007. For a discussion of certain financing activities and containership purchase commitments since September 30, 2007, which affect the amounts shown in the table below, see ‘‘– Liquidity and Capital Resources’’ above.


				Maturity in Years
	As of September 30, 2007			Less than 1 Year				2 Years			3 Years			4 Years			5 Years			Thereafter
	(dollars in thousands)
Seacastle Revolving Credit Facility⁽¹⁾		$	141,850		$	141,850				—			—			—			—			—
National City Bank Credit Facility			37,492			—				37,492			—			—			—			—
ING Loan			225,000			—				—			—			—			—			225,000
Chassis Securitization Facility⁽²⁾			390,569			390,569				—			—			—			—			—
Interpool Chassis Funding II Floating Rate Asset-Backed Notes, Series 2007-1			295,116			—				295,116			—			—			—			—
Capital Lease Obligations			398,847			45,864				67,212			44,170			26,419			27,939			187,243
Notes and Loans Payable			4,159			781				56			3,322			—			—			—
Carlisle Revolving Credit Facility			18,000			18,000				—			—			—			—			—
Carlisle Asset-Backed Securitizations⁽³⁾			860,791			70,583				93,500			93,500			93,500			93,500			416,208
CLI Funding II Credit Facility⁽⁴⁾			398,110			—				398,110			—			—			—			—
HSH Nordbank Facility			375,506			127,749	⁽⁵⁾			10,748			18,738			18,737			18,738			180,796
Lease Asset Purchase Commitments			300,378			124,248				119,570			56,560
Interest Payments			692,433			144,103				105,218			84,404			83,232			74,778			200,698
Operating Leases			64,456			16,244				15,929			13,248			7,691			7,343			4,001
Total		$	4,202,707		$	1,079,991			$	1,142,951		$	313,942		$	229,579		$	222,298		$	1,213,946

The following table summarizes our various contractual obligations in order of their maturity dates as of December 31, 2006:

Our contractual obligations consist of principal and interest payments related to our revolving credit facilities and our asset-backed securitizations, containership purchase financing, and operating lease payments for our facilities in the United States, Singapore, Denmark, China, Belgium and the Netherlands. Interest payments are based upon the net effect of swapping our variable interest rate payments for fixed rate payments consistently applied and in accordance with our policy. We also have obligations to purchase chassis of $14.5 million, containers and related equipment of $33.2 million and containerships of $252.7 million at September 30, 2007.

Through our acquisition of Seacastle Holdings LLC on June 29, 2007, we acquired two containerships and acquired five additional containerships during the third quarter of 2007. We plan to continue to grow our containership fleet in the future. In the third quarter of 2007, we entered into contracts with a third party for the construction and purchase of four additional containerships, which are scheduled to be delivered by 2010. In addition, in October 2007, we entered into an agreement with a third party for the purchase of two additional newbuild containerships, which are scheduled to be delivered in 2009. We drydock our containerships for major repairs and maintenance every 30 to 60 months. Some of the costs we will incur when drydocking containerships are: (a) actual repair and maintenance costs incurred at the drydocking yard; (b) cost of parts; (c) costs to hire third party project managers if necessary. For details on the accounting policies for these expenses, see ‘‘Critical Accounting Policies.’’

On July 26, 2007, we entered into a $250.0 million credit agreement with Citicorp North America, Inc., Bear Stearns Corporate Lending Inc and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as lenders, and Citicorp North America, Inc. as agent consisting of a $250.0 million revolving credit facility with a $25.0 million letters of credit sublimit (the ‘‘Seacastle Revolving Credit Facility’’). In connection with the Seacastle Revolving Credit Facility, certain of our wholly-owned subsidiaries executed a pledge agreement in favor of Citicorp North America, Inc., pursuant to which each have pledged certain assets for the benefit of the secured parties as collateral security for the payment and performance of our obligations under the Seacastle Revolving Credit Facility. The pledged assets include, among other things, equity interests in certain of our subsidiaries and all proceeds therefrom. The commitments of the lenders under the Seacastle Revolving Credit Facility are scheduled to expire on July 25, 2008. Subject to certain conditions, we have the option of extending the maturity date of the loan for an additional six months. At our option, amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility bear interest at either (i) the greater of (a) the prime lending rate as set forth by the applicable reference bank plus a margin and (b) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus ½ of 1% plus a margin, or (ii) the Eurodollar rate plus a margin. In connection with this revolving credit facility, we pay an annual commitment fee on the average daily amount of undrawn funds. The commitment fee varies depending on the average daily amount of loans outstanding. At September 30, 2007, $141.9 million

was outstanding under this facility with $108.1 million of additional borrowing capacity. The weighted average interest rate for the period from July 26, 2007 through September 30, 2007 was 7.22%. At December 31, 2007, approximately $149 million was outstanding.

On July 19, 2007, we entered into a $100.0 million Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with National City Bank and a group of lenders, with National City Bank acting as the agent, consisting of a $100.0 million revolving credit facility with a $10.0 million letters of credit sublimit (the ‘‘National City Bank Credit Facility’’). On August 31, 2007, this facility was increased to $120.0 million. In connection with the National City Bank Credit Facility, we pledged certain chassis, domestic containers, gensets, leases and related assets for the benefit of the lenders as collateral security for the payment and performance of its obligations under the agreement. The revolving credit facility and the letters of credit commitment are each scheduled to expire on July 17, 2009. At our option, amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility bears interest at either (i) the greater of (a) the prime lending rate publicly announced by National City Bank and (b) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus a margin, or (ii) the Eurodollar rate plus a margin. In connection with the revolving credit facility commitment, we will pay a commitment fee of 0.25% per annum on daily balance of the unused portion. Under the terms of the agreement, the outstanding loans (including any letters of credit and related unreimbursed obligations) may not at any time exceed the lesser of the aggregate commitments of the lenders and the borrowing base, which is, at any time, the sum of (i) 90% of the sum of the values of the borrowers’ eligible finance leases, plus (ii) 90% of the sum of the net book values of all of the borrowers’ eligible equipment not then subject to a finance lease. If at any time the amount of outstanding loans exceeds the lesser of the aggregate commitments of the lenders and the borrowing base, then the borrowers immediately will be required to repay loans and furnish cash collateral for, or repay, the letters of credit in an aggregate amount equal to such excess. At September 30, 2007, $37.5 million was outstanding under this facility. The weighted average interest rate for the period from July 19, 2007 through September 30, 2007 was 6.60%. At December 31, 2007, approximately $37 million was outstanding.

On July 19, 2007, we entered into a $225.0 million term loan agreement (the ‘‘ING Loan’’), with ING Capital LLC (‘‘ING’’). In connection with the ING Loan, certain of our subsidiaries pledged certain securities and financial instruments, including $225.0 million deposited in a collateral account, for the benefit of ING as collateral security for the payment and performance of our obligations under the ING Loan. In the event the value of the collateral is (i) lower than $224.0 million for more than ten consecutive business days or (ii) lower than $220.0 million at any time, we are required to deposit additional funds or other eligible assets or securities (as determined by ING in its discretion) into the collateral account in order to ensure that the value of the collateral becomes equal to or higher than $225.0 million. The ING Loan is scheduled to expire on July 19, 2014 and bears interest at LIBOR plus a margin. At September 30, 2007, $225.0 million was outstanding under this facility. The weighted average interest rate for the period from July 19, 2007 through September 30, 2007 was 5.73%. At December 31, 2007, approximately $225 million remained outstanding.

Our chassis securitization facility was established in September 2002. This facility initially had total debt and capital lease obligations outstanding of $541.0 million. The total amount outstanding under our chassis securitization facility at September 30, 2007 was $390.6 million. The weighted average interest rate for the period from July 19, 2007 through September 30, 2007 was 5.34%. In September 2007, the Company gave irrevocable notice to repay 100% of this facility in accordance with the terms of the facility. This repayment was made on October 22, 2007.

On October 22, 2007, the Company settled its obligations under the Chassis Securitization Facility in accordance with the buyout terms of the facility agreement. The Company paid its net obligations

of $358.5 million, which consisted of the settlement of a receivable of $30.3 million that was outstanding with the lender in connection with the securitization, The Company settled the obligation using the proceeds from a new securitization facility, the Chassis Funding Floating Rate Asset-Backed Notes, Series 2007-1, entered into on the same day with Citibank for $362.7 million. The new facility matures on October 20, 2008 and bears interest at a rate equal to one-month LIBOR plus a margin. At December 31, 2007, approximately $363 million remained outstanding.

On July 19, 2007, we conveyed additional assets to a titling trust. In connection therewith, the titling trust issued to Interpool Chassis Funding II, LLC (‘‘ICF II’’), our wholly-owned subsidiary, the 2007-A SUBI Certificate (the ‘‘ICF II SUBI Certificate’’). ICF II acquired the financing for the ICF II SUBI Certificate by its issuance of the Interpool Chassis Funding II Floating Rate Asset-Backed Notes, Series 2007-1 (the ‘‘ICF II Notes’’) in the principal amount of $297.2 million pursuant to that certain Indenture (the ‘‘ICF II Indenture’’), among ICF II, the Company as servicer (in such capacity, the ‘‘Servicer’’) and initial custodian, U.S. Bank National Association, a national banking association, as Indenture Trustee (the ‘‘ICF II Indenture Trustee’’), and Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp., a New York corporation, as administrative agent.

The ICF II Notes are secured by a lien, in favor of the ICF II Indenture Trustee, on the ICF II SUBI Certificate. Ownership of the ICF II SUBI Certificate represents ICF II’s beneficial interest in, to and under the related transferred assets.

In connection with the ICF II Indenture, ICF II, the Servicer and the ICF II Indenture Trustee entered into the servicing agreement (the ‘‘ICF II Servicing Agreement’’) for the administration and servicing of the Transferred Assets. The legal maturity date of the ICF II Notes is January 19, 2009.

The ICF II Notes bear interest at a rate equal to One-Month LIBOR, plus 1.0%; provided, that, after the occurrence and during the continuance of an event of default, the ICF II Notes bear interest at a rate equal to the sum of (x) the higher of (a) the prime lending rate as set forth by the applicable reference bank and (b) the sum of (i) the Federal Funds Effective Rate and (ii) 1.50% per annum, and (y) 1.0%. At September 30, 2007, $295.1 million was outstanding under this facility. The weighted average interest rate for the period from July 19, 2007 through September 30, 2007 was 6.79%. At December 31, 2007, approximately $294 million was outstanding.

We have entered into a series of capital leases with various financial institutions to finance the purchase of equipment. The total capital lease obligation was $398.8 million at September 30, 2007. Chassis-related capital lease obligations were $361.9 million and container-related capital lease obligations were $36.9 million. The weighted average interest rate for the period from July 19, 2007 through September 30, 2007 was 5.65%. At December 31, 2007, total capital lease obligations were approximately $388 million of which $353 million was related to chassis and $35 million was related to containers.

We have outstanding notes and loans payable with various financial institutions, the proceeds of which were used to finance assets. The total amount outstanding in relation to notes and loans payable was $4.2 million at September 30, 2007. The weighted average interest rate for the period from July 19, 2007 through September 30, 2007 was 5.99%. The total amount outstanding at December 31, 2007 was approximately $4 million.

We have a two-year senior secured revolving credit facility, which we refer to as the Carlisle Revolving Credit Facility, that allows for maximum borrowings of $100.0 million. The agreement

includes a $10.0 million sub-limit for letters of credit. Under this facility, $18.0 million was outstanding as of September 30, 2007 and $77.0 million was outstanding as of December 31, 2006. The $59.0 million reduction in the revolving credit balance was a result of payments made from funds provided by the asset-backed securitizations. At December 31, 2007, approximately $58 million was outstanding.

On August 24, 2006, we terminated our asset backed securitization facility and entered into a new facility, which we refer to as the Carlisle Asset-Backed Securitizations. We contributed certain eligible containers, together with related leases to a special purpose entity (‘‘SPE’’) whose primary business activity is to issue asset-backed notes. The SPE is one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries. These borrowings are an obligation of the SPE, and the lenders’ recourse in respect of the borrowings is generally limited to the collections that the 2006 SPE receives on the assets. The maximum aggregate borrowings under this facility is $860.8 million as of September 30, 2007. Under this facility, $860.8 million was outstanding as of September 30, 2007 and $712.2 million was outstanding as of December 31, 2006. Under this facility, there was no additional capacity to borrow as of September 30, 2007. On November 30, 2007, we increased the amount available under this facility by $125 million, which amount is available to refinance existing debt or to finance new assets. At December 31, 2007, approximately $869 million was outstanding on this facility.

On July 19, 2007, we entered into a $405.0 million term loan credit agreement (the ‘‘CLI Funding II Credit Facility’’) with Bear Stearns Corporate Lending Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas. In connection with this agreement, we pledged certain assets including containers and generator sets as collateral security for the payment and performance of our obligations under the CLI Funding II Credit Facility. The pledged assets include, among other things, marine and intermodal container and generator sets owned by us. The CLI Funding II Credit Facility is scheduled to mature on January 16, 2009. The loans under the CLI Funding II Credit Facility bear interest, at our option, at the rate per annum equal to either (i) the greater of (a) the prime lending rate as set forth by the agent under the agreement, plus a margin and (b) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus ½ of 1% plus a margin or (ii) the LIBOR Rate determined for the applicable interest period, plus a margin. At September 30, 2007, $398.1 million was outstanding under this facility. The weighted average interest rate for the period from July 19, 2007 through September 30, 2007 was 7.58%. The weighted average rate was significantly impacted by the acceleration of amortized debt costs as we expect to liquidate this facility within six months. At December 31, 2007, approximately $384 million was outstanding.

On October 31, 2007, the Company’s subsidiary, CLI Funding III LLC, a special purpose vehicle incorporated under the laws of Delaware, entered into a $300 million senior secured credit facility to finance a portfolio of container finance leases and certain new container finance leases acquired in the future. The facility has a two year revolving period, during which additional finance leases can be added to the portfolio, followed by a term-out period not to exceed ten years during which the facility amortizes. Borrowings under the facility are limited to a maximum of 85% of the present value of finance lease receivables throughout the facility’s 12-year term and bear interest at a rate equal to a LIBOR rate or a Cost of Funds rate (as defined in the agreement) plus a margin. Pursuant to a Guaranty dated October 31, 2007, the Company has guaranteed the payment obligations of CLI Funding III LLC under the credit facility documents. At December 31, 2007, approximately $23 million was outstanding.

We entered into a loan agreement with HSH Nordbank on May 18, 2007 (as amended on August 3, 2007, the ‘‘HSH Nordbank Facility’’). Under the HSH Nordbank Facility the lenders agree

to loan up to $500.0 million for our purchases of approved containerships meeting predetermined criteria including the size of the containership, the length of the charter party agreement, the age of the containership, classification of the containership and its flag. The lenders will fund up to 65% of the lesser of each approved containerships appraised value or of the purchase price. In connection with the HSH Nordbank Facility, certain of our subsidiaries have pledged assets totaling $553.0 million at September 30, 2007, which include the containerships financed with the proceeds of the loan. The rate of interest on the facility is LIBOR, plus a margin plus an additional amount calculated by the member banks effectively passing through their costs to comply with the minimum reserve requirements of the European Central Bank. The HSH Nordbank Facility amortizes quarterly according to a schedule set forth in the loan agreement. Amounts borrowed under this facility must be repaid at the earlier of 10 years after the drawdown date or when the corresponding ship reaches 20 years of age. As of September 30, 2007, $376.7 million, excluding a $1.2 million discount due to a fair value adjustment in the Seacastle Acquisition, was outstanding under this agreement including $18.3 million relating to newbuild purchase orders, with approximately $123 million of additional borrowing capacity. The weighted average interest rate for period June 29, 2007 through September 30, 2007 was 5.90%. The Company currently expects to repay approximately $117 million of debt outstanding under this facility that was drawn down to finance the purchase of two containerships by March 31, 2008. At December 31, 2007, approximately $373 million was outstanding.

We entered into a loan agreement with United Overseas Bank (‘‘UOB’’) as agent and security trustee, and the banks and financial institutions listed in the loan agreement on December 21, 2007 (the ‘‘UOB Facility’’). Under the UOB Facility the lenders agree to loan up to $115.3 million (65% of the purchase price) for our purchases of two newbuild containerships, which we are committed to purchase upon their delivery, expected in 2009. In connection with the UOB Facility, certain of our subsidiaries have pledged assets in favor of UOB, including the vessels financed with the proceeds of the loan and certain contracts, accounts and vessel charters related thereto. The rate of interest on the facility is LIBOR plus a margin. The UOB Facility amortizes monthly according to a schedule set forth in the loan agreement. Amounts borrowed under this facility must be repaid on the tenth anniversary of the final drawdown date. On December 27, 2007, SCT Containers III Pte. Ltd. borrowed $8.8 million to fund 50% of the pre-delivery deposit required in connection with the purchase of the two newbuild containerships.

The chassis purchase commitments are related to purchase orders we place for chassis in the normal course of business. We do not bear the risks and rewards of ownership and therefore have not recorded an asset or a liability related to these commitments. We had commitments for the purchase of chassis of $14.5 million as of September 30, 2007.

The container purchase commitments are related to purchase orders we place for containers, both refrigerated and dry, and complementary equipment in the normal course of business. We do not bear the risks and rewards of ownership and therefore have not recorded an asset or a liability related to these commitments. We had commitments for the purchase of containers of $33.2 million as of September 30, 2007.

As of September 30, 2007, we had entered into contracts with Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering Co., Ltd. for the construction and purchase of four 4,400 TEU containerships, which are scheduled to be delivered to us in 2010. We do not bear the risks and rewards of ownership and therefore have not recorded an asset or liability with the exception of our progress payments. During the third quarter 2007, we paid $28.1 million in advances for containerships construction in relation to these containerships. We have $252.7 million remaining to be paid in relation to this commitment after giving effect to the advances for construction.

In October 2007, the Company entered into an agreement with a third party for the purchase of two additional newbuild containerships for an aggregate purchase price of $176.0 million. In November, the Company paid a 10% deposit and the remainder of this commitment, $158.4 million, is due upon delivery expected in 2009.

As of December 31, 2007, our containership purchase commitments totalled $411.1 million.

We are a party to various operating leases relating to office facilities, transportation vehicles and certain other equipment with various expiration dates through 2012. Minimum rent payments under our material leases were $2.8 million as of December 31, 2006 and $64.5 million as of September 30, 2007.

During the third and fourth quarters of 2007, certain of our Initial Shareholders entered into novation agreements with the Company pursuant to which the obligations under nineteen swap agreements to which the Initial Shareholders were a party were transferred to the Company. These swaps were originally executed by these Initial Shareholders for the purpose of hedging variable rate debt. It is consistent with the Initial Shareholders’ risk management policies to hedge debt at the time of commitment rather than at the time of funding which is the Company’s policy. As such, the novations took place after the Company had received the committed funds under the debt facilities. Each of the novated swap agreements was directly related to obligations of the Company. In certain of the swap agreements, the Initial Shareholders had access to derivative markets that would likely not have been available to the Company at that time. At the time of these novations, the value of the swaps was $17.7 million and $8.3 million of liabilities during the third and fourth quarters, respectively. No consideration was paid by the Initial Shareholders for the assumption by the Company of these liabilities. The Company also recorded a corresponding reduction of retained earnings.

Management believes that inflation has not had a material adverse effect on the results of our operations. In the past, the effects of inflation on administrative and operating expenses have been largely offset through economies of scale achieved through expansion of the business.

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which require us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts and disclosures reported therein. Several of the estimates and assumptions required relate to matters that are inherently uncertain as they pertain to future events. We believe that the estimates and assumptions used when preparing the financial statements were the most appropriate at the time. Our estimates are based on historical experience and currently available information. If there is a significant change to conditions on which our assumptions are based, actual results could differ from such estimates. The following paragraphs summarize those accounting policies that we believe require subjective and complex judgments that could potentially affect reported results. Although we believe the policies summarized below to be the most critical, other accounting policies also have significant effect on our financial statements and certain of these policies also require the use of estimates and assumptions.

Our primary sources of equipment leasing revenue are derived from operating leases and revenue earned on direct finance leases.

We generate equipment leasing revenue through short-term and long-term leases with shipping lines, North American rail and trucking companies and ocean carriers. In the majority of our

We also generate revenue from time charter agreements. A time charter involves placing a containership at the charterer’s disposal for a set period of time during which the charterer may use the containership in return for the payment by the charterer of a specified daily hire rate. In time charters, operating costs including crews, maintenance and insurance are typically paid by the owner of the containership and specified voyage costs such as fuel and port charges are paid by the charterer. There are certain other non-specified voyage expenses such as commissions which are borne by us. We recognize time charter revenues on a straight-line basis over the term of the charter agreement.

We enter into finance leases as lessor of equipment that we own. In most instances, the leases include a bargain purchase option to purchase the leased equipment at the end of the lease term. The Net investment in finance leases represents the receivables due from lessees, net of unearned income. The lease payments are segregated into principal and interest components similar to a loan. Unearned income is recognized on an effective interest basis over the life of the lease term and is recorded as finance revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The principal component of the lease payment is reflected as a reduction to the Net investment in finance leases.

Other Revenue includes fee income earned for third party positioning of equipment and income earned on lessee paid repairs and maintenance. In accordance with EITF No. 99-19 we recognize billings to customers for damages incurred and certain other pass-through costs as revenue. We recognize gross revenues from these pass-through costs as we are the primary obligor with respect to purchasing goods and services from third parties; we generally have the discretion in selection of the repair service provider; and we generally have the credit risk because the services are purchased prior to reimbursement being received.

Other revenue includes fees earned on the management of container equipment for third party investors and fees earned for providing chassis pool management services.

As of September 30, 2007, Leasing equipment includes containerships, containers and complementary equipment and chassis, which are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Residual values are evaluated annually or sooner if market conditions cause our estimates to change significantly. The Company estimates residual values based on fair market values and prior history.

Chassis are recorded at cost and depreciated to an estimated residual value on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the equipment. The estimated useful lives for our chassis range from 17.5 to 22.5 years from the date of service depending upon the chassis frame. Residual values are based on stated values at the time of acquisition. We recognize repair and maintenance costs that do not extend the lives of our assets as incurred and include them in Direct operating expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

Containers are recorded at cost and depreciated to an estimated residual value on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the equipment. The estimated useful lives for our refrigerated containers is 15 years from the date of service and 12.5 years for dry containers. Residual values for refrigerated containers are estimated to be 10% of their original cost and dry containers residual values are estimated to be 37% of their original cost. Cost incurred to place the new equipment into

service, including costs to transport the equipment to its initial on-hire location, are capitalized. We recognize repair and maintenance costs that do not extend the lives of our assets as incurred and include them in Direct operating expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Complementary container equipment includes generator sets, which are recorded at cost and depreciated to an estimated residual value on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the equipment. Generator sets are depreciated over a 12 year life from the date of service. Residual values for generator sets are estimated to be 10% if their original cost.

Containerships are recorded at cost plus acquisition costs directly attributable to the acquisition of the containership and expenditures made to prepare the containership for its initial voyage. Containerships are depreciated on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, determined to be 30 years from the date of initial delivery. Depreciation expense is calculated based on cost less the estimated residual scrap value. We estimate the residual scrap value based upon the scrap value of steel. The costs of significant replacements, renewals and betterments are capitalized and depreciated over the shorter of the containership’s remaining estimated useful life or the estimated life of the renewal or betterment. Expenditures for routine maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred and included in Direct operating expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

We account for initial direct costs in the acquisition of leases in accordance with SFAS No. 13, Accounting for Leases. In certain circumstances, we will prepay commissions to sales people when new lease agreements are executed. We capitalize those prepayments and amortize them over the shorter of the initial lease term or the earliest point that the lease may be terminated.

When the Company enters into an acquisition transaction, it determines whether the acquisition transaction was the purchase of an asset or a business based on the facts and circumstances of the transaction. In the shipping industry, the purchase of a containership is normally treated as a purchase of an asset as the historical operating data for the containership is not reviewed nor is material to the decision to make such acquisition.

Direct financing leases are recorded at the aggregated future minimum lease payments, including any bargain or economically compelled purchase options granted to the customer, less unearned income. Management performs annual reviews of the estimated residual values which can vary depending on a number of factors.

Our containerships are required to be drydocked approximately every 30 to 60 months for major repairs and maintenance that cannot be performed while the containerships are in service. We capitalize the costs associated with the drydockings as they occur and depreciate these costs on a straight-line basis over the period between drydockings. Some of these costs include: (a) actual costs incurred at the drydocking yard; (b) cost of parts; (c) cost to hire third party project managers when required.

We have sought to reduce credit risk by maintaining insurance against loss of equipment (and to a limited extent, loss of lease revenue) due to customer insolvency. We cease the recognition of lease revenues for amounts billable to the lessee after the lease default date at the time we determine that such amounts are not probable of collection from the lessee. In connection with the accounting for the insurance policy, we record a receivable which is limited to the actual costs incurred or losses recognized that would have been billable to the lessee pursuant to the lease contract (to the extent also covered by the insurance contracts). Items that are covered under the insurance contracts, for amounts billable to the lessee in accordance with the lease, that are in excess of costs incurred and losses recognized by us, are considered a gain contingency.

In accordance with the SFAS No. 144, assets held for sale are stated at the lower of carrying value or fair value less estimated costs to sell. Assets held for sale are not depreciated and related deferred costs are not amortized. Subsequent changes to an asset’s fair value, either increases or decreases, are recorded as adjustments to the carrying value of the asset held for sale; however, any such adjustment will not exceed the original carrying value of the asset held for use at the time it was classified as an asset held for sale.

The Company records the gains and losses from the sales of leasing equipment as part of Other expense, net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. Gains and losses are recognized upon completion of the sale based upon the sales price and the book value of the equipment.

In accordance with SFAS No. 144, we review our long-lived assets for impairment when indicators of impairment exist. Impairment exists when the carrying value of a long-lived asset group exceeds the sum of the related undiscounted cash flows. Our review for impairment includes considering the existence of impairment indicators including third party appraisals of our equipment, adverse changes in market conditions for specific long-lived assets and the occurrence of significant adverse changes in general industry and market conditions that could affect the fair value of our equipment. When indicators of impairment suggest that the carrying value of our long-lived assets may not be recoverable, we determine whether SFAS No. 144’s impairment recognition criteria have been met by evaluating whether the carrying value of the asset group exceeds the related undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset group. The preparation of the related undiscounted cash flows requires the use of assumptions and estimates, including the level of future rents, the residual value expected to be realized upon disposition of the assets estimated downtime between re-leasing events and the amount of re-leasing costs.

If we determine that the carrying value may not be recoverable, we will assess the fair values of the assets. In determining the fair value of the assets, we consider market trends, published values for similar assets, recent transactions of similar assets and quotes from third party appraisers. If the carrying amount of an asset group exceeds its fair value, an impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset group exceeds the fair value of the asset group.

Our allowance for doubtful accounts is based upon a periodic review of the collectibility of our receivables on a customer-by-customer basis for those accounts which we believe may be experiencing difficulties in meeting their payment terms or have had such difficulties in the past. The determination of the amount of the allowance for the doubtful account for each of these customers is based upon several factors including: their Dynamar rating, their prior payment history, discussions with the customers’ management, and current events we are involved in that could have financial implications. For all remaining accounts, we apply a delinquency factor based upon prior history to the total amount due in order to determine the allowance for doubtful accounts. Allowances are estimated net of potential insurance recoveries (if applicable). The delinquency factor represents the best estimate of those accounts that will become uncollectible. Changes in economic conditions may require a reassessment of the risk and could result in additions or deductions to the allowance for doubtful accounts. We believe our allowance for doubtful accounts is adequate to provide for credit losses inherent in our existing receivables. However, actual losses could exceed the amounts provided for in certain periods.

As the Successor, we provide for income taxes for our taxable subsidiaries, under the provisions of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (‘‘SFAS No. 109’’). SFAS No. 109 requires an asset

and liability based approach in accounting for income taxes. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributed to differences between the US GAAP and tax basis of existing assets and liabilities using enacted rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. A valuation allowance is established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount we estimated to be realizable.

As the Predecessor, we were treated as a partnership for US tax purposes. We did not provide for US or foreign income taxes since all partnership income, losses and credits were allocated to the partners for inclusion in their individual corporate income tax returns.

The Company records any interest and penalties related to income tax returns in its provision for income taxes.

A component of our growth strategy has been to acquire and integrate businesses that complement our existing operations. We account for business combinations in accordance with SFAS No. 141. Under SFAS No. 141, we allocate the purchase price of acquired companies to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair value at the date of purchase. The difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill.

The fair value of acquired businesses is determined based on valuations performed by independent valuation specialists under management’s supervision, if necessary. We believe the estimated fair values determined for our acquisitions and allocated to assets acquired and liabilities assumed are based on reasonable assumptions. Such assumptions are not certain and may not be indicative of actual performance. Therefore, actual results could differ from those estimates.

On June 29, 2007, we acquired Seacastle Operating Company, including its containerships with existing time charters in effect. A time charter involves placing a containership at the charterer’s disposal for a set period of time during which the charterer may use the containership in return for the payment by the charterer of a specified daily hire rate. We believe that Seacastle Operating Company charters contained unfavorable rates and thus represent unfavorable contracts when compared to market rates at the time of the acquisition of Seacastle Operating Company.

When we enter into an acquisition transaction, we determine whether the acquisition transaction was the purchase of an asset or a business based on the facts and circumstances of the transaction. In the shipping industry, the purchase of a containership is normally treated as a purchase of an asset as the historical operating data for the containership is not reviewed nor is material to our decision to make such acquisition.

The acquisition of Seacastle Operating Company was accounted for as a business combination in accordance with SFAS No. 141. Under SFAS No. 141, we allocated the purchase price of Seacastle Operating Company to assets acquired and liabilities assumed, accordingly to their estimated fair value on the date of acquisition. The fair value of each time charter was based on a present value calculation based on: (a) cash flows consisting of the difference between the contractual amounts to be paid under the charter and management’s estimate of the fair market value for the charter, (b) a period of time equal to the remaining term of the charter and (c) a discount rate appropriate for the risk associated with the acquired charter. We capitalize above-market (assets) and below-market (liabilities) charters and amortizes them on a straight-line basis over the remaining term of the charter as a reduction or increase, respectively, to charter revenues.

We have significant goodwill on our balance sheet. We account for goodwill in accordance with SFAS No. 142. SFAS No. 142 requires goodwill to be reviewed for impairment annually or more frequently if circumstances indicate a possible impairment.

We account for derivative instruments in accordance with SFAS No. 133. SFAS No. 133 requires that all derivative instruments be recorded on the balance sheet at their fair value and establishes criteria for both the designation and effectiveness of hedging activities.

In order to reduce interest rate risk, we have and may enter into interest rate swap agreements from time to time where we would receive floating rate payments in exchange for fixed rate payments, effectively converting a floating rate borrowing to fixed rate. We intend to hedge only the risk related to changes in the benchmark interest rate (LIBOR). We do not enter into other derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

We face credit risk if the counterparties to these transactions are unable to perform their obligations. However, we seek to minimize this risk by entering into transactions with counterparties that are major financial institutions with high credit ratings.

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the ‘‘FASB’’) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 Fair Value Measurements. (‘‘SFAS No. 157’’). The Statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and expands additional disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 clarifies that fair value is the amount that would be exchanged to sell an asset or transfer a liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants. The Statement nullifies the consensus reached in EITF Issue No. 02-3 prohibiting the recognition of day one gain or loss on derivative contracts (and hybrid instruments measured at fair value under SFAS No. 133 as modified by SFAS No. 155) where the Company cannot verify all of the significant model inputs to observable market data and verify the model to market transactions. However, SFAS No. 157 requires that a fair value measurement technique include an adjustment for risks inherent in a particular valuation technique (such as a pricing model) and/or the risks inherent in the inputs to the model if market participants would also include such an adjustment. SFAS No. 157 will require the Company to consider the effect of its own credit standing in determining the fair value of its liabilities. In addition, SFAS No. 157 prohibits the recognition of ‘‘block discounts’’ for large holdings of unrestricted financial instruments where quoted prices are readily and regularly available in an active market. The requirements of SFAS No. 157 are to be applied prospectively, except for changes in fair value measurements that result from the initial application of SFAS No. 157 to existing derivative financial instruments measured under EITF Issue No. 02-3, existing hybrid instruments measured at fair value, and block discounts, which are to be recorded as an adjustment to opening retained earnings in the year of adoption. The Company expects to adopt SFAS No. 157 on January 1, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS No. 157.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Options for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (‘‘SFAS No. 159’’), which permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. SFAS No. 159 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating if it will elect the fair value option for any of its eligible financial instruments and other items.

As of January 1, 2007, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (‘‘FIN No. 48’’). FIN No. 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertain tax positions in accordance with SFAS No. 109. FIN No. 48 requires that a tax position meet a ‘‘more-likely-than-not threshold’’ for the benefit of the uncertain tax position to be recognized in the financial statements. A tax position that fails to meet a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold will result in either a reduction of current or deferred tax assets, and/or recording of current or deferred tax liabilities. The impact of adoption on January 1, 2007 is not material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In the ordinary course of business, we execute contracts involving indemnifications standard in the industry and indemnifications specific to a transaction such as an assignment and assumption agreement. These indemnifications might include claims related to any of the following: tax matters

and governmental regulations, and contractual relationships. Performance under these indemnities would generally be triggered by a breach of terms of the contract or by a third party claim. We regularly evaluate the probability of having to incur costs associated with these indemnifications and have accrued for any expected losses that are probable. The types of indemnifications for which payment are possible are as follows:

In the ordinary course of business, we provide various tax-related indemnifications as part of transactions. The indemnified party typically is protected from certain events that result in a tax treatment different from that originally anticipated. Our liability typically is fixed when a final determination of the indemnified party’s tax liability is made. In some cases, a payment under a tax indemnification may be offset in whole or in part by refunds from the applicable governmental taxing authority. We are party to numerous tax indemnifications and many of these indemnities do not limit potential payment; therefore, we are unable to estimate a maximum amount of potential future payments that could result from claims made under these indemnities.

During the second quarter of 2003, Interpool arranged a leasing transaction between one of our major customers and a financial institution for up to 3,000 containers. As part of this transaction, Interpool received initial fees and agreed to provide certain guarantees related to the fair value of the equipment if the lessee terminated the lease or if the lessee was unable to meet its obligations under the terms of the lease. In addition, if the lessee agreed to extend the lease, Interpool agreed to purchase the equipment from the financial institution at a stated value and lease it to the lessee for this additional period at a stated lease rate. Interpool further agreed to provide the lessee with a purchase option at the end of the extended lease period that would be less than the fair market value of the equipment at the date the lessee could exercise its option (the ‘‘Bargain Purchase Option’’).

The estimated fair value at the end of the lease term guaranteed by Interpool for these containers amounts to approximately $4.4 million. Interpool has estimated that our potential liability related to these guarantees is less than the estimated potential liability related to the Bargain Purchase Option granted to the lessee. As such, Interpool has accrued for the estimated value of our liability for this Bargain Purchase Option amounting to $1.0 million that could be due in greater than 5 years. All initial fees collected from the lessor have been deferred and included in Accrued expenses and other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. We are recognizing the fees received from the lessor, net of the estimated liability for the Bargain Purchase Option, over the term of the residual guarantee.

While our leasing fees are paid to us in U.S. dollars, we are subject to exchange gains and losses for local currency expenditures. We record the effect of non-U.S. dollar currency transactions when we translate the non-U.S. subsidiaries’ financial statements into U.S. dollars using exchange rates as they exist at the end of each month.

We have a foreign subsidiary and a foreign division with material foreign currency transactions, located in Denmark, Canada and Singapore with functional currencies of the Danish Krone, the Canadian Dollar and the Singapore Dollar, respectively. The effect of fluctuations in these currencies were not material in any period presented.

We have long-term debt obligations that accrue interest at variable rates. Interest rate changes may therefore impact the amount of interest payments, future earnings and cash flows. We have entered into financial instruments to mitigate the impact of changes in interest rates that may result from fluctuations in the variable rates of interest accrued by our long-term debt obligations. Based on

the debt obligation payable as of September 30, 2007, we estimate that interest expense relating to variable rate debt would increase by approximately $2.6 million on an annual basis in the event interest rates were to increase by 10%.

Our credit policy sets different maximum exposure limits for each customer. Credit criteria may include, but are not limited to, customer trade route, country, social and political climate, assessments of net worth, asset ownership, bank and trade credit references, credit bureau reports, operational history and financial strength.

We seek to reduce credit risk by maintaining insurance coverage against customer insolvency and related equipment losses. We maintain contingent physical damage, recovery and loss of revenue insurance, which provides coverage in the event of a customer’s insolvency, bankruptcy or default giving rise to our demand for return of all of our equipment. The policy covers the cost of recovering our equipment, damage to the equipment, loss of equipment and, in some cases, lost revenues. This coverage automatically renews for at least two additional one-year terms on each anniversary of the commencement date subject to maintaining a certain claim experience rate.

We also maintain credit insurance which provides complementary coverage upon the occurrence of a customer’s insolvency, bankruptcy or default giving rise to our demand for return of all our equipment. The policy covers a portion of the equipment leasing revenues we might lose as a result of the customer’s default. The policy has a two-year term which currently expires on January 31, 2009.

Our hedging transactions using derivative instruments have counterparty credit risk. The counterparties to our derivative arrangements and repurchase agreements are major financial institutions with high credit ratings. As a result, we do not anticipate that any of these counterparties will fail to meet their obligations. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to adequately protect against this risk and will ultimately realize an economic benefit from our hedging strategies or recover the full value of the securities underlying our repurchase agreements in the event of a default by a counterparty.

The allowance for doubtful accounts includes our estimate of allowances necessary for receivables on both operating and direct financing lease receivables. The allowance for doubtful accounts is developed based on two key components (1) specific reserves for receivables which are impaired for which management believes full collection is doubtful and (2) reserves for estimated losses inherent in the receivables based upon historical trends. We believe our allowance for doubtful accounts is adequate to provide for credit losses inherent in our accounts receivable. The allowance for doubtful accounts requires the application of estimates and judgments as to the outcome of collection efforts and the realization of collateral, among other things. In addition, changes in economic conditions or other events may necessitate additions or deductions to the allowance for doubtful accounts. Direct financing leases are evaluated on a case-by-case basis. When evaluating our operating and direct financing lease receivables for impairment, we consider, among other things, the level of past due amounts of the respective receivable, the borrower’s financial condition, credit quality indicators of the borrower, the value of underlying collateral and third party credit enhancements such as guarantees and insurance policies. Once a direct financing lease is determined to be non-performing, our procedures provide for the following events to take place in order to evaluate collectibility:

The adequacy of our allowance for doubtful accounts is provided based upon a quarterly review of the collectibility of our receivables. This review is based on the risk profile of the receivables, credit quality indicators such as the level of past-due amounts and economic conditions, as well as the value of underlying collateral in the case of direct financing lease receivables.

We obtained the information in this prospectus about the shipping industry from several independent sources, including Clarkson Research Services Limited, or Clarkson Research, Containerisation International, Drewry Shipping Consultants Limited and the U.S. Department of Transportation. Clarkson Research has advised that (i) some information in Clarkson Research’s database is derived from estimates or subjective judgments, (ii) the information in the databases of other maritime data collection agencies may differ from the information in Clarkson Research’s database and (iii) while Clarkson Research has taken reasonable care in the compilation of the statistical and graphical information and believes it to be accurate and correct, data compilation is subject to limited audit and validation procedures. Container trade growth projections use assumptions about the world economy and trade flows based on available information at the start of November 2007. We do not have any knowledge that the information provided by Clarkson Research, Containerisation International, Drewry Shipping Consultants Limited and the U.S. Department of Transportation is inaccurate in any material respect.

Containerized trade is an increasingly important method of moving goods through the global economy. According to Clarkson Research, containerized trade accounts for more than 15% of international seaborne trade in terms of volume and is one of the fastest growing sectors in international shipping. Containers provide a secure, efficient and cost-effective way to transport raw materials, finished goods and perishable products over multiple modes of transport, thereby reducing freight and labor costs. By limiting the number of times the cargo is handled, shippers reduce transit times, improve asset utilization and provide the safest form of cargo transport. In addition, a sophisticated port and intermodal industry exists to support automated handling of containers which facilitates the onshore movements of containerized cargo at points of origin, around container ports, staging or storage areas and at final destinations. Participants in the container shipping industry include shippers, who require the movement of containerized cargo, global ‘‘liner’’ companies, who operate container shipping services, and North American domestic rail and trucking companies.

According to Clarkson Research, worldwide container activity grew every year from 1980 through 2006. Over the last ten years, global container trade volume has grown from 47 million TEU to 117 million TEU, representing a compound growth rate of 9.6%. This growth is influenced by developments in the world economy and has ranged from a low of 2.5% in 2001 to a high of 13.4% in 2004. Furthermore, as of November 2007, Clarkson Research projected that global loaded container trade will grow by 10.7% in 2007 and 9.3% in 2008. The table below shows the detail of global container trade growth since 1996 and projected through 2008.

For more than twenty years, global container trade has grown at an average multiple of world GDP of 2.6x. The table below shows the historical relationship as well as the average for the period.

We believe that this rapid growth is due to several factors including the overall growth and liberalization of global trade, the shift in manufacturing to lower cost production areas such as China and India, greater development of container and port transportation infrastructure, the conversion of bulk cargoes to containerized cargoes for greater transport efficiency and the continued integration of developing economies into global trade patterns.

According to Clarkson Research, Asia accounts for the largest volume of trade as measured by million TEU with approximately 44% of total TEU of exports and imports. Europe and North America make up approximately 22% and 14%, respectively. The table below lays out the volume of exports and imports by region and the relative contribution of each region to the total.

There are three primary trade routes in the container shipping industry: the Transpacific, Transatlantic and Asia-Europe. These are known as East/West trade routes, and principally involve trade between Asia and North America, North America and Europe and Asia and Europe. In addition, there is significant North/South trading activity between countries in the southern hemisphere and the northern hemisphere. In addition to these routes there are various intra-regional routes that include trades such as the intra-Asia container trade, Europe/Mediterranean and United

States/Caribbean. This intra-regional trade is the single largest category of container trade and is dominated by the intra-Asia trade. The table below lays out the detail of the various main trade routes and their historical growth.


	Actual
	2004			2005			2006(e)			2007(f)
Transpacific Eastbound		11.4			13.0			14.4			15.2
% Growth		17.3	%		14.1	%		10.8	%		5.9	%
Transpacific Westbound		4.9			5.4			5.8			6.4
% Growth		6.8	%		10.2	%		7.5	%		10.9	%
Far East-Europe Eastbound		3.6			3.7			4.0			4.4
% Growth		14.1	%		5.1	%		8.2	%		8.8	%
Far East-Europe Westbound		7.6			8.5			10.7			12.8
% Growth		16.8	%		13.0	%		24.8	%		19.8	%
Transatlantic Eastbound		2.5			2.6			2.7			3.1
% Growth		7.2	%		6.4	%		3.8	%		12.8	%
Transatlantic Westbound		3.2			3.3			3.4			3.3
% Growth		5.0	%		2.3	%		2.9	%		−2.2	%
Other East-West		8.5			9.7			10.8			11.9
% Growth		12.7	%		14.5	%		11.1	%		10.3	%
North-South		16.6			17.6			18.7			20.1
% Growth		9.0	%		5.9	%		6.2	%		7.2	%
Intra-Regional		37.4			41.8			46.6			52.4
% Growth		15.8	%		11.7	%		11.3	%		12.6	%
Global Container Trade		95.6			105.7			117.0			129.5
% Growth		13.4	%		10.5	%		10.7	%		10.7	%

Due to the many financial and operational benefits of leasing and the continued strong growth in demand for capacity, operating lessors are playing an increasingly important role in providing shipping lines and other transportation companies with the equipment they need to move containerized cargo. The principal benefits that operating lessors provide include:

The primary equipment used in intermodal containerized trade includes chassis, containers and containerships. When a containership arrives in a port, containers are either loaded onto chassis for over-the-road transport or onto railcars for transport to their ultimate destination.

A chassis is a rectangular, wheeled steel frame, generally 23½, 40 or 45 feet in length, built specifically for the purpose of transporting a container over the road. Longer chassis, designed solely to accommodate North American domestic containers, can be up to 53 feet in length. Once mounted, the chassis and container are the functional equivalent of a trailer. When mounted on a chassis, the container may be trucked either to its final destination or to a railroad terminal for loading onto a railcar. Similarly, a container shipped by rail may be transferred to a chassis to travel over-the-road to its final destination. A chassis seldom travels permanently with a single container, but instead serves as a transport vehicle for containers that are loaded or unloaded at ports or railroad terminals. As a result, chassis are essential for the domestic segment of the intermodal journey. Because of differing international road regulations and non-uniformity of international standards for chassis, chassis used in the United States are seldom used in other countries.

We believe that the North American marine and domestic chassis fleet totals approximately 890,000 and is worth in excess of $6 billion. Of the total, 760,000 chassis are ‘‘international ISO’’ or marine chassis for ocean shipping with lengths of 20 feet, 40 feet, and 45 feet. The remaining 130,000 chassis are domestic chassis for domestic containers with lengths of 48 feet and 53 feet. In the past, these chassis have been leased by railroads as well as supplied to shippers under a variety of business terms.

The demand for chassis is influenced primarily by the volume of containerized international and domestic trade. According to the U.S. Department of Transportation, one container in every nine carrying global trade is bound for or is coming from the United States, comprising 11 percent of worldwide container traffic. On a typical day in 2005, U.S. container ports handled an average of 71,000 TEUs, up from 37,000 TEUs per day in 1995 according to the USDOT. According to the Port Import Export Reporting Service (PIERS), over the last ten years, container traffic to and from the United States has grown at an average rate of 7.1%. The table below lays out the annual TEUs of trade flows from 1997 through 2006.

This rapid growth in container traffic has resulted in increased vessel, truck, and rail services in and around port regions.

In recent years, domestic railroads and trucking lines located in North America have begun actively marketing intermodal services for the domestic transportation of freight. According to the Association of American Railroads, intermodal container traffic on U.S. railroads has grown from 5.2 million containers originated in 1997 to 9.4 million in 2006, or an average annual growth rate of 6.7%. For the forty-three weeks ended Oct. 27, 2007, intermodal container traffic on U.S. railroads was up 0.6% over the similar period in 2006. The table below lays out the annual figures from in more detail.

We believe that this trend should serve to accelerate the growth of intermodal transportation resulting in increased chassis and container demand. In addition, due to the increased volume of cargo movement in and out of railroad terminals, the railroads are reconfiguring the patterns of container and chassis activity on the terminals. In a growing number of locations they are requiring empty containers to be moved off of the terminal, a process that requires additional chassis to service the additional container movements. Railroads are also increasing the use of chassis pools operated by leasing companies to aid efficiency.

Leasing companies own approximately half of North America’s chassis and the balance are owned by shipping lines, railroads and other operators. Leasing companies lease their chassis to the liner companies, railroads and truckers under long-term lease arrangements or through chassis pools. Chassis pools are locations where a pool operator provides a group of chassis in a single port or

railroad terminal location to be rented on a daily basis. Chassis for international containers have been leased in pooled arrangements at marine ports since the mid-1980s and at rail ramps since the late 1990s. A shipping line notifies a trucker to pick up a chassis from the pool. The trucker then proceeds to pick up the designated container for movement. The chassis is returned by the trucker to the pool when the move is complete. The shipping line or other customer pays only for the number of days it uses the chassis. Chassis pool rates are higher than term lease rates as customers pay only when the chassis is in use and generally do not pay for maintenance and repair. Due to the efficiencies created in asset utilization by the chassis pools, the growth in demand for chassis over the last several years has been slightly lower than the overall growth in domestic intermodal activity.

We believe that we are the largest owner and lessor of chassis in North America. There is one other large competitor in the leasing market and the balance of the chassis are owned by small leasing companies or the shipping lines, railroads or trucking companies. Over the last twenty-five years, asset utilization, chassis prices and lease rates have remained fairly stable. The chart below lays out our average chassis utilization and long-term lease rates indexed to the start year for the last twenty-five years.

Historically, most chassis used in North America have been manufactured in North America. China started producing ISO standard chassis for the U.S. market in 2003, and in 2006 it accounted for approximately 60% of new chassis in place. A new chassis currently costs approximately $7,500 and has historically ranged between $7,500-$9,000 for the most common chassis and as much as $18,000 for the more specialized types. Chassis are long-lived assets with an economic useful life in excess of twenty years. Furthermore, at the end of its useful life, a chassis can be totally remanufactured using some of the existing parts including the axle, creating essentially a new chassis for lower cost.

Intermodal containers are designed to meet a number of criteria outlined by ISO. The standard criteria include the size of the container and the gross weight rating of the container. This standardization ensures that containers can be used by the widest possible number of transporters and facilitates container and vessel slot sharing by shipping lines. Containers are generally usable for 10-15 years in the shipping business and then they are often sold for use in the domestic storage markets.

A standard marine container is essentially a steel box with a set of doors on one end. Containers come in standard lengths of 20’, 40’ or 45’. They are 8’ wide, and either 8’6’’ or 9’6’’ tall (containers which are 9’6’’ tall are also referred to as ‘‘high cube’’). The most common kind of container is a standard ‘‘dry freight’’ container, used to transport all types of dry freight. In addition to standard dry freight containers, the world fleet also consists of various types of specialized containers, including refrigerated containers (also known as ‘‘reefers’’), which are used to transport temperature sensitive cargos. The table below sets forth the major types of container equipment.


Equipment type	Size	Primary Use
Standard Dry freight	20 and 40 foot standard 40 and 45 foot high cube	Transport of all types of dry freight (e.g., electronics, appliances, clothes, toys, etc.)
Refrigerated	20 and 40 foot standard 40 foot high cube	Transport of temperature sensitive products (e.g. fresh and frozen perishable goods)
Open Top	20 and 40 foot	Transport of irregularly shaped or sized items which may need specialized loading (i.e. from above)
Flatrack	20 and 40 foot	Transport of irregularly shaped or sized items
Tank	20 and 40 foot	Transport of liquids and/or chemicals
Domestic Intermodal and European Swapbodies	20, 40, 45, 48 and 53 foot	Transport across land

According to Containerisation International, there are over 23 million TEU of marine shipping containers and one million North American domestic containers with a total cash replacement cost of $62.8 billion as of mid-2007. According to Containerisation International, dry freight and refrigerated containers make up 91% and 6% of the total TEU count, respectively. However, since refrigerated containers cost 8-10x as much as standard dry freight containers, they make up over 21% of the world fleet by value.

The demand for containers is principally a function of the growth in worldwide containerized trade and the growth in containership supply. According to Clarkson Research, the global containership fleet has grown from slightly over 1 million TEU of capacity in 1985 to 9.5 million TEU at the start of 2007, or a compound growth rate of 10.5%. This rapid growth has led to increased demand for marine containers, with approximately two marine containers required for every TEU slot of total containership fleet capacity. Containerisation International expects that over the next few years more than 3.3 million TEU in annual container fleet additions will be required to match the growth in global container trade including approximately 1.3 million TEU in capacity required for replacement equipment.

Container leasing rates are typically a function of, among other things, new container prices, interest rates, leasing company infrastructure costs and the container supply and demand balance at a particular time and location. Average leasing rates on an entire portfolio of leases respond more gradually to changes in new equipment prices, because lease agreements can only be re-priced upon the expiration of the lease. In addition, the value that lessors receive upon resale of equipment is closely related to the cost of new equipment. From 1980 to 2000, container leasing rates generally decreased due to a trend toward lower new container prices, a reduction in U.S. dollar interest rates and a decrease in leasing company infrastructure costs as a result of improved information systems. With the exception of the expansion in leasing rates between mid-2004 to mid-2005 that was facilitated by a substantial increase in container prices, leasing rates have been fairly stable since 2000.

Container leasing companies are partially insulated from the impacts of shipping cycles due to the large percentage of containers on long-term leases and the relatively short production time associated with the manufacture of new containers. Lead-times for new container orders are typically only a few

months (compared to the multi-year ordering and production cycle for new vessels), so the rate of new container ordering can be quickly adjusted to reflect unexpected market changes.

Container lessors compete in a variety of ways, including pricing, lease flexibility, supply reliability and customer service. It is common for the shipping lines to utilize several container lessors to meet their container needs. The table below sets forth the major competitors in the container leasing industry in terms of fleet replacement cost and TEU as of mid-2006.

The market for leasing refrigerated containers is somewhat more concentrated than the market for standard dry freight containers, with the top five lessors accounting for over 90% of the TEUs. We have the largest share of the refrigerated container leasing market, with more than 30% of the total TEUs. The table below sets forth the major competitors in the refrigerated container leasing market in terms of TEU.

Top Ranking Lessors of Integral Reefer Containers and Their Operating Fleets – Mid-2006 and Projected Mid-2007
(Fleet Figures are Rounded TEU)

Over the last several years, utilization rates for the most common type of refrigerated container has been very stable. According to Containerisation International, since 1994, the annual utilization rate for 40 foot high cube refrigerated containers has averaged 94% and ranged between 96% and 92%.

In the 1960s and 1970s, containers were manufactured predominantly in Europe and Japan. As labor costs in those regions increased by the mid-1980s and as import/export trade patterns shifted, container manufacturing shifted to Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Indonesia and China. According to the Containerisation International, China continues to be the world’s leading container producing country, originating nearly 94% of all dry container production and over 88% of reefer production. The increasing dominant position occupied by key Chinese firms, led by CIMC Group, has largely streamlined the container production process by driving down costs and enabling extra capacity to be created or removed relatively rapidly. Today, new 20 foot standard dry containers cost approximately $1,900 (a 40 foot high cube dry container typically costs 1.7 times as much as a 20 foot standard dry container), a new 40 foot high cube reefer costs approximately $17,000, depending on specifications and a generator set costs approximately $9,000.

According to Containerisation International, over the last several years, the average price for refrigerated containers has been somewhat more stable than the price for standard dry freight containers. The chart below lays out the average unit price for a 40 foot high cube refrigerated container and a 20 foot standard dry container since 1990.

Global container trade is served by a large fleet of container carrying vessels. At the start of August 2007, the overall container capable fleet had a total capacity of 12.3 million TEU. The most significant part of this fleet is fully cellular containerships, which, with 10.2 million TEU, comprise more than 80% of global available TEU capacity. The remainder of the container capable fleet is made up of a range of non-fully cellular ship types including Multi-purpose vessels, Roll-on Roll-off ships (Ro-Ros) and general cargo ships, which often have container carrying capacity. We believe that the total market value of the existing world containership fleet including newbuild orders is in excess of $200 billion.

According to Clarkson Research, as of August 2007, the fully cellular containership fleet on the water numbered 4,187 vessels with approximately 10.2 million TEU of capacity and an average age of 11 years as of August 2007. The fully cellular containership fleet is made up of a wide range of ships from below 500 TEU in capacity to 10,000 TEU and above. At the top end of the scale are the ‘‘Deep Sea’’ containerships of 3,000 TEU and above, which have been traditionally responsible for servicing

the mainlane east-west trades. These are designated as Panamax or Post-Panamax according to their capability to transit the Panama Canal given their physical dimensions. ‘‘Intermediate’’ containerships are between 1,000 TEU and 2,999 TEU in capacity and generally serve intermediate, north-south and in some cases intra-regional trade. Below 1,000 TEU in capacity are the ‘‘Feeder’’ containerships generally operated on an intra-regional basis, often relaying or ‘‘feeding’’ cargo within a region from or to main port hubs served by mainlane trades. A large proportion of the growth in containership capacity in recent years has been in the Panamax and Post-Panamax ‘‘Deep Sea’’ segments.

According to Clarkson Research, the containership orderbook stands at a total of 1,367 ships and 5.7 million TEU as of August 2007 and represented 56% of the fleet in terms of capacity. Clarkson Research expects 0.7 million TEU of capacity to be delivered during the remainder of 2007 and 1.5 million TEU of capacity to be delivered in 2008, with the balance of the orderbook to be delivered in 2009 and onwards. Over 80% of this capacity to be delivered is made up of ships that are 3,000 TEU and larger. Over the next four years, this growth in the containership fleet equates to approximately 12% per annum which is close to recent growth rates in global containerized trade. However, the size of the current containership orderbook may put some downward pressure on container freight and containership charter rates in the future, particularly if trade growth declines as a result of an economic slow down.

The containership charter market is playing an increasingly important role in the container shipping industry as a whole. Historically, a significant share of the world’s containership capacity has been owned by the liner companies operating container shipping services. More recently these operators have chosen to charter a larger proportion of the capacity that they operate as they add to and establish new trade routes. From 1993 to 2007, the percent of total container capable capacity operated by the top ten liner companies which was chartered in grew from 15% to over 50%. According to Clarkson Research, at the beginning of August 2007, charter owners accounted for 47.7% of the global fully-cellular containership capacity. The table below shows the increase in chartered-in capacity by the top ten liner companies.

Containership ownership by independent owners remains fragmented with the largest collection of owners consisting of German shipowners, many of which have been financed through the German ‘‘Kommanditgesellschaft,’’ or ‘‘KG’’ system. Other significant owners include private shipowners and some publicly held companies. The table below lays out the top ten charter owners and their fleets as of August 2007 according to Clarkson Research.

Containership charter rates depend on the supply of, and demand for, containership capacity, and can vary significantly. According to Clarkson Research, total container capable capacity was 7.4 million TEU at the end of 2001 and is projected to reach 14.6 million TEU by the end of 2008. The table below lays out the historical growth of total container capable capacity and the forecast through 2008.

Containership charter rates have reflected the relationship between demand and this capacity growth. For example, in 2001, the container capable fleet grew by 8.6% in terms of capacity, while in the same year demand grew by only 2.5%. The impact of the differential between growth in supply and demand on the container freight market and the containership charter market was sharply negative, pushing charter rates acutely downward in both cases. From the start of 2002 until the middle of 2005, however, the containership charter market saw a significant upward movement in time charter rates. Demand for containership capacity driven by increases in global container trade underpinned upward market movements, and the market recovered from the falls seen in 2001 to levels beyond previous market highs in certain sectors. Mid way through 2005, as the rate of capacity growth increased, containership charter rates began to fall before stabilizing in the first half of 2006. Rates dipped significantly near the end of 2006 but have staged a recovery during the first half of 2007, which has been sustained through July and August.

The containership sector is also subject to the development of containership newbuilding prices, which reflect the cost of the acquisition of new containerships by owners from the shipyards. The graph below shows the development of containership newbuilding prices for three sizes of containerships, expressed in dollars per TEU. Since early 2003 newbuilding prices have risen substantially. The total newbuilding price for a theoretical 2,750 TEU containership increased from $29.5 million at the start of 2003 to $52.5 million as of August 2007. Over the same period, for a theoretical 4,600 TEU containership the newbuilding price rose from $45.0 million to $77.0 million, while the newbuilding price for a theoretical 6,200 TEU containership increased from $60.0 million to $106.0 million. Economies of scale in containership building mean that the cost per TEU involved in building larger containerships is smaller than for ships with smaller TEU capacity.

Newbuilding prices are primarily determined by the balance of the supply of shipbuilding berths to the market and the demand for new vessels to fill them and over the last twenty years, prices have shown significant movement up and down. Other factors, such as steel prices and currency movements can also have an impact. It is important to note that newbuilding prices for different ship types move, to a large extent, in parallel with one another. This means that reduced demand in one sector (for example tankers) may reduce prices in another sector (for example containerships). This is because the newbuilding price is a function of the supply of berths to the whole market and not just to individual fleet sectors.

We own or manage 247,000 intermodal chassis, 985,000 TEUs of dry freight and refrigerated shipping containers and seven containerships aggregating 32,770 TEUs. In addition, we have newbuild purchase agreements to acquire six containerships aggregating 27,320 TEUs to be delivered in 2009 and 2010. We have long-term relationships with an extensive group of customers in the intermodal shipping industry. As of September 30, 2007, we employed 341 people in 36 offices in seven countries.

We believe that the key competitive strengths that will enable us to execute our strategy include:

We plan to grow our assets and dividends per share by employing the following business strategies:

We were formed in June 2007 for the purpose of combining under a single holding company the refrigerated container and related equipment leasing business operated by Carlisle with the containership leasing business that had recently been started by SHL and, following that combination, acquiring Interpool through the merger of a newly-formed subsidiary of Seacastle with Interpool in July 2007. Carlisle was founded in 1993 and was acquired by certain of our Initial Shareholders in 2006. SHL was formed in 2006 by certain of our Initial Shareholders for the purpose of engaging in the business of acquiring and leasing containerships. Prior to the Interpool Acquisition, Interpool was listed on the NYSE and had been operating since it was established in 1968.

Our fleet of equipment consists of three types of intermodal assets: chassis, containers and containerships. These assets are either owned or managed by us on behalf of other third party equipment owners. We lease our equipment to a diversified customer base of over 500 international shipping lines and North American rail and trucking companies.

We focus on leasing our equipment on long-term leases as we believe that this enables us to maintain high utilization rates for our equipment, achieve more stable and predictable operating results and concentrate on the expansion of the asset base through the investment in new equipment.

We believe that we are the only integrated intermodal asset leasing company offering chassis, containers and containerships. Several of our customers lease more than one asset type from us. In addition, we believe that we are the largest lessor of intermodal chassis in North America and the largest lessor of refrigerated shipping containers in the world.

Our chassis fleet totaled approximately 247,000 chassis as of September 30, 2007. Our chassis fleet increased at a CAGR of 5.3% for the period from December 2000 through September 30, 2007. The average utilization for our chassis fleet since December 2002 has been 93% and is currently 90%. As of September 30, 2007, the average age of our chassis fleet is 9.7 years.

The chassis that we lease are either owned outright by us or leased-in from third parties. The table below summarizes the composition of our fleet by the type of unit as of September 30, 2007:

We concentrate on leasing our chassis on a long-term basis. Substantially all of our new equipment is initially leased for terms of five to eight years and approximately 64% of the total chassis

fleet is currently on long term or direct finance lease. Approximately 4% of our chassis are leased on a short-term basis to satisfy customers’ peak or seasonal requirements, generally at higher rates than under long-term leases to reflect the added flexibility that short-term leases provide. For customers who require daily or weekly chassis rentals, we operate chassis pools at major intermodal transportation points including domestic shipping ports and rail terminals. These pools can consist of both our chassis as well as those of our customers. Approximately 23% of our chassis are leased in chassis pools. As of September 30, 2007, the average remaining duration of our leases was 3.2 years and our existing leases provided for total contractual cash flow of $484 million (assuming early terminations only for which there are no penalties and no renewals).

We offer our chassis customers both long-term operating leases as well as ‘‘direct finance’’ leases. Under an operating lease, the lessee commits to a fixed lease term, typically from five to eight years, and we retain the benefit and bear the risk of re-leasing and the residual value of the asset. Long-term operating leases can contain an early termination provision allowing the lessee to return equipment prior to expiration of the lease upon payment of an early termination fee or a retroactively applied increase in lease payments. In the past, we experienced minimal early returns of our equipment under our long-term leases, primarily because of the penalties involved. Additionally, customers may bear substantial costs related to repositioning and repair upon return of the equipment.

Frequently, a lessee will retain long-term leased equipment well beyond the initial lease term. In these cases, long-term leases will be renewed at the then prevailing market rate, for one to five- year periods, or as a direct finance lease. We estimate that over the last three years, the average operating lease renewal rate has been approximately 80%.

Under a direct finance lease, the customer commits to a fixed lease term and typically receives a bargain purchase option at the expiration of the lease. Under this arrangement, the substantive risks and rewards of equipment ownership are passed on to the lessee. The lease payments are segregated into principal and interest components similar to a loan. The interest component, calculated using the effective interest method over the term of the lease, is recognized by us in our statement of operations as equipment leasing revenue. The principal component of the lease, is reflected as a reduction to the net investment in the direct financing lease in our cash flow statement.

We operate cooperative, or ‘‘Co-op’’, chassis pools at many of the same ports and terminals. The difference between neutral pools and Co-op pools is that rather than providing our chassis, the customers contribute the chassis to the pools and we manage them. The contributed chassis may be used by other members of the pool or leased on a short-term basis by third parties when the pool does not need them. At the end of the month, we, as the pool manager, bill the pool members based on their utilization net of their contribution and receive a fee for our services. We have a highly developed proprietary software system, known as ‘‘PoolStat^®’’ to enable the management of both

neutral and Co-op pools. This software provides us with fee business and, more importantly, as more customers participate in chassis pools, they look to us for chassis management and additional leased equipment.

We lease our chassis to a diverse group of shipping lines and North American rail and trucking companies. Our chassis customers include a large number of North American lessees, many of which are subsidiaries or branches of international shipping lines to which we also lease containers and containerships.

Our chassis customers are turning to outside service companies to help them manage chassis that they own and lease. We offer management services under the trademarked name ‘‘PoolStat’’^®. PoolStat^® aggregates chassis activity data from over 500 locations around the country and reports on this activity, processing more than 4 million transactions monthly. Customers contract with us to track their chassis nationally and determine usage patterns, ongoing requirements, and overall fleet efficiencies. Reports are provided using a PoolStat^® proprietary Internet-based report generator. PoolStat^® services also include the use of field staff under contract where field management of chassis operations is involved. A major chassis management service requested by our customers is assistance in the formation and running of cooperative chassis pools.

Our PoolStat^® software compiles data from each location and reports on levels of chassis contribution as compared to the levels of chassis usage by each shipping line in the cooperative pool. Each participating line is required to supply a fair share of equipment relative to its usage. The management services we provide for cooperative chassis pools often involves field staff assisting in the repositioning of chassis as well as overseeing the maintenance and repair process. Benefits to the participants in this program include:

By providing the PoolStat^® service, we are able to forge closer relationships with our customers for both short- and long-term leasing opportunities. There are now over 250,000 chassis covered by various Trac Lease Inc. (‘‘Trac Lease’’) / PoolStat^® management contracts, and we are continuing to seek opportunities to increase its level of business. We believe that we are the leading provider of chassis management services in North America.

Equipment Tracking and Billing. We primarily use PoolStat^® to enable sophisticated chassis tracking and billing and to provide a central operating database that coordinates the chassis leasing activities. The system electronically records the movement and status of each chassis and links that information with the complex data comprising the specific lease terms in order to generate billings to customers. The system also generates a wide range of management reports containing information on all aspects of our chassis leasing activities.

Logistics Support. Our North American network of offices and relationships and our industry experience enables us to provide logistics services in order to facilitate the movement of chassis to meet our customers’ needs while at the same time optimizing our asset utilization.

Maintenance, Repairs and Remanufacturing. As with all over-the-road assets, chassis require maintenance and repair over time. Our customers are generally responsible for maintenance and repairs of equipment other than normal wear and tear. Older chassis are generally remanufactured

rather than replaced by new equipment. The cost of remanufacturing is approximately two-thirds the cost of purchasing a new chassis and can transform an aged chassis into ‘‘as new’’ condition. Therefore, chassis are typically remanufactured and not sold. We believe that over the next ten years the average number of units that will be eligible for remanufacture is between 6,000 and 8,000 chassis per year and a remanufactured chassis has a service life of more than 20 years.

Historically, most chassis used in North America have been manufactured in North America; however, China began producing chassis for the North American market in 2003 and by 2006 accounted for 60% of new chassis placed in service. We purchase most of our chassis in China. There are four principal manufactures who produce chassis for export to the U.S. We are involved in a joint venture with two of the four, providing us with a price advantage. For the other two Chinese manufacturers for the U.S., we believe that our market position and buying power provides us with a competitive advantage when sourcing new chassis.

We believe that we are the largest owner and lessor of chassis in North America with one significant leasing competitor. We believe that our share of the marine and North American domestic chassis leasing markets is 53% and 50%, respectively. Our largest competitor is FLEXI-VAN Leasing, Inc. We also compete with other smaller lessors, banks and capital providers on the basis of pricing, product quality and availability, lease flexibility and customer service. We believe that our fleet size and quality as well as our proprietary systems give us a competitive advantage.

Lessees and storage depots generally must either carry physical damage and liability insurance providing primary insurance coverage for loss and damage to the chassis, cargo, and third parties while the chassis are in their care, custody and control or provide proof of creditworthiness to self insure. In addition, we maintain liability coverage, including contingent liability coverage for any claims or losses, including while the chassis are on-hire to a lessee or otherwise in the possession of a third party.

Existing insurance guidelines for lessees are explicitly stated in each lease and we require certificates evidencing lessees’ insurance prior to delivery of chassis. Minimum insurance guidelines generally requested in most of the lease agreements are as follows:

The insurance companies from which the policies are purchased must be acceptable to us. To the extent any claim is not recovered by the policy, the lessee remains liable for the full amount of the claim. We do not offer any insurance product except, in limited instances, a Damage Protection Plan (DPP) which covers certain damages to the chassis. The precise nature and amount of such insurance may vary from lessee to lessee. Some lessees may also be self-insured.

As of September 30, 2007, we operated approximately 985,000 TEU of containers and generator sets. The average utilization rate for our owned container fleet since December 2002 has been 97% and is currently 94% as measured in TEUs. As of September 30, 2007, the average age of our

container fleet is 4.5 years. Our fleet principally consists of three types of assets – refrigerated and dry containers and generator sets. The Container segment had revenues of $144.5 million, $150.7 million and $156.6 million in 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively. Adjusted EBITDA for the Container segment was $108.7 million, $111.8 million and $121.0 million in 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively. Total assets for the Container segment at December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 were $830.5 million, $857.9 million and $1,098.4 million, respectively.

Refrigerated Containers. Refrigerated containers (‘‘Reefers’’) are insulated containers that include an integrated cooling machine. These containers are typically used to carry perishable cargo such as fresh and frozen produce, meat, poultry, fish and other temperature sensitive products. As of September 30, 2007, our fleet included approximately 85,000 refrigerated containers, which accounted for 13% of our fleet by units. As of September 30, 2007, the utilization for our owned reefers was 90.4%.

Dry Containers. A dry container is essentially a steel box with a set of doors on one end. Dry containers are the least-expensive type of intermodal container and are used to carry most types of freight. As of September 30, 2007, our fleet included approximately 551,000 dry containers, which accounted for 85% of our fleet by units. As of September 30, 2007, the utilization for our owned dry containers was 96.0%.

Generator Sets. Generator sets (‘‘Gensets’’) are portable diesel fueled generators used to power refrigerated containers. They can be used when reefers are carried on chassis as well as railcars. When a reefer is carried on a containership, it is usually plugged in to the containerships main power supply. As of September 30, 2007, our fleet included approximately 7,000 generator sets, which accounted for 1% of our fleet by units. As of September 30, 2007, the utilization for our owned gensets was 91.7%.

The containers that we lease are either owned outright by us, leased-in from third parties, or owned by third-parties and managed by us. The table below summarizes the composition of our fleet by the type of unit:

Similar to our chassis segment, we concentrate on leasing our containers on long-term leases. Substantially all of our new equipment is initially leased for terms of five to eight years and approximately 91% of the total container fleet as measured in TEUs are currently on long-term or direct finance lease. Approximately 5% of our containers as measured in TEUs are leased on a short-term basis to satisfy customers’ peak or seasonal requirements, generally at higher rates than under long-term leases to reflect the added flexibility that short-term leases provide to our customers. As of September 30, 2007, the average remaining duration of our leases was 3.6 years and our existing leases provided for total contractual cash flow of $1.2 billion (assuming early terminations only for which there are no penalties and no renewals).

We offer our container customers both long-term operating leases as well as direct finance leases. Similar to our chassis leases, long-term operating leases for our containers can contain an early termination provision allowing the lessee to return equipment prior to expiration of the lease upon payment of an early termination fee or a retroactively applied increase in lease payments. We experience minimal early returns of our equipment under our long-term leases, primarily because of the penalties involved. Additionally, customers may bear substantial costs related to repositioning and repair upon return of the equipment.

The following chart summarizes the gross equipment leasing revenue by product for the combined Seacastle fleet for the month ended September 30, 2007.

Frequently, a lessee will retain long-term leased equipment well beyond the initial lease term. In these cases, long-term leases will be renewed at the then prevailing market rate, for one to five- year periods or as a direct finance lease. We estimate that over the last three years, the average renewal rate for our leases has been approximately 80%.

Similar to the chassis leases, lease rentals are typically calculated on a per diem basis, regardless of the term of the lease. Our leases generally provide for monthly billing and require payment by the lessee within 60 days after presentation of an invoice. Typically, the lessee is responsible for payment of all taxes, handling charges and other charges arising out of use of the equipment and must carry specified amounts of insurance to cover physical damage to and loss of equipment, as well as bodily injury and property damage to third parties. In addition, our leases usually require lessees to repair any damage to the containers other than normal wear and tear. Lessees are also required to indemnify the owner of the equipment against our losses arising from accidents and other occurrences involving the leased equipment. All of our operating leases, both short-term and long-term, generally set forth a list of locations where lessees may return equipment, along with any monthly quantity return limits. In addition, our containers typically remain on-hire at the contractual per diem rate for an additional six to twelve months beyond the end of the contractual lease term due to the logistical requirements of our customers having to return containers to specific drop-off locations.

We lease our containers to a diversified customer base of over 150 shipping lines throughout the world, including all of the world’s 20 largest international container-shipping lines. Our global sales and customer service force is responsible for developing and maintaining relationships with senior operations staff at our shipping line customers, negotiating lease contracts and maintaining day-to-day coordination with operating level staff at our customers. This close customer communication allows us to negotiate lease contracts that satisfy both our financial return requirements and our customers’ operating needs and ensures that we are aware of our customers’ potential equipment shortages and that they are aware of our available container inventories.

All container equipment, whether owned or managed, is operated as a single fleet. We are responsible for providing marketing, billing and collection services as well as arranging for the repair of all equipment in the fleet that is not on lease. To the extent that equipment is managed for other third party investors, these investors take on the risks of equipment ownership. We remit the revenues earned by their equipment, net of any operating expenses and bad debts related to their equipment. In addition, they receive the proceeds from the sale of their equipment at the end of its useful life. In return for these management services, we earn management fees based on the net operating income of the fleet.

Depots. We have relationships with 166 depot facilities and operate in all major containerized transportation markets throughout the world. Depots are facilities owned by third parties at which containers, chassis and other items of transportation equipment are stored, maintained and repaired. We utilize independent agents/depots to handle and inspect containers delivered to, or returned by lessees, as well as to store containers that are not leased and to perform maintenance and repairs. Some agents are paid a fixed monthly retainer to defray recurring operating expenses and some are paid a minimum level of commission income. In addition, we generally reimburse our agents for incidental expenses.

Repositioning and Other Operating Expenses. If lessees return a large number of units to a location with a larger supply than demand, we, as the owner of equipment may incur additional expenses in repositioning the equipment to a more favorable location. In addition, there are other operating expenses associated with the containers, such as costs of maintenance and repairs not required to be made by lessees, agent fees, depot expenses for handling, inspection and storage, and insurance coverage in excess of that maintained by the lessee.

Maintenance, Repairs and Refurbishment. As containers age, the need for maintenance increases. Our customers are generally responsible for maintenance and repairs of equipment other than normal wear and tear. For containers, when normal wear and tear or other damage is extensive, the container is usually sold or scrapped since major repairs are typically not cost effective.

Redeployment and Disposition of Containers. Containers that were previously leased are generally redeployed by us after their leases terminate, or sold by us to shipping or transportation companies for continued use in the intermodal transportation industry or to secondary market buyers, such as wholesalers, depot operators, mini storage operators, construction companies and others, for use as storage sheds and similar structures. The decision to sell depends on the equipment’s condition, remaining useful life and suitability for continued leasing or for other uses, as well as prevailing local market resale prices and an assessment of the economic benefits of repairing and continuing to lease the equipment compared to the benefits of selling. Historically, we generally sell our refrigerated containers after approximately twelve years of service life.

We believe that over the next several years, we will need to acquire approximately 3,250 refrigerated containers, 3,000 standard dry containers (or 4,500 TEUs) and 500 gensets to maintain the existing size of our total container fleet.

The selling price of a container will depend upon, among other factors, its mechanical or economic obsolescence, its physical condition and its location. While there have been no major technological advances in the history of dry freight containerization that have made active dry freight equipment obsolete, several changes in standards have decreased the demand for older equipment, such as the increase in the standard height of containers from 8 feet to 8½ feet in the early 1970s, and for 20 foot long containers, an increase in the gross weight rating to 30 tons from 24 tons. In addition, 40 foot long containers are manufactured to a standard height of 8½ feet as well as to a height of 9½ feet (also referred to as a ‘‘high cube’’). While containers of both heights continue to be manufactured, 40 foot long high cube containers have become more popular recently.

We purchase most of our containers in China. We primarily use three large manufacturers of dry containers and three large manufacturers of refrigerated containers. Three companies are active in manufacturing the refrigeration units for refrigerated containers. Our engineering operations staff review the designs for our containers and periodically audit the production facilities of our suppliers. In addition, we use our Asian operations group and third-party inspectors to visit factories when our containers are being produced to provide an extra layer of quality control. We have long relationships with all of our major container suppliers.

We are the largest lessor of refrigerated containers in the world with over 30% market share. We believe that our share of the dry container market is approximately 7%. We compete with several other major container leasing companies, many smaller lessors, manufacturers of container equipment, financial institutions such as banks promoters of container ownership and leasing as a tax shelter investment, shipping lines, which sometimes lease their excess container stock, and suppliers of alternative types of equipment for freight transport. The top ten container leasing companies control approximately 90%, and the top five container leasing companies control approximately 65%, of the total equipment held by all container leasing companies. It is also common for the shipping lines that are our customers to utilize several leasing companies to meet their container needs. Based on recently available data, the top five container leasing companies by TEUs include GESeaCO, Triton Container, Textainer Group, Florens Group and TAL International.

Our competitors compete with us in many ways, including pricing, lease flexibility, supply reliability and customer service. While we are forced to compete aggressively on price, our supply reliability, in-depth customer knowledge and high level of customer service to our customers are often defining factors to win business over price. We invest heavily to ensure adequate container availability in high demand locations, dedicate large portions of our organization to building customer relationships, maintain close day-to-day coordination with customers’ operating staffs and have developed powerful and user-friendly systems that allow our customers to transact with us through the Internet. We believe that our close customer relationships, experienced staff, reputation for market leadership, scale efficiencies and proprietary systems provide important competitive advantages.

We are subject to federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment, including those governing the discharge of pollutants to air and water, the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes and the cleanup of contaminated sites. Under some environmental laws in the United States and certain other countries, the owner or operator of a container may be liable for environmental damage, cleanup or other costs in the event of a spill or discharge of material from the container without regard to the fault of the owner or operator. We could incur substantial costs, including cleanup costs, fines and third-party claims for property or natural resource damage and personal injury, as a result of violations of or liabilities under environmental laws and regulations in connection with our or our lessees’s current or historical operations. While we typically maintain liability insurance coverage and typically require our lessees to provide us with indemnity against certain losses, the insurance coverage is subject to large deductibles, limits on maximum coverage and significant exclusions and may not be sufficient or available to protect against any or all liabilities and such indemnities may not cover or be sufficient to protect us against losses arising from environmental damage.

Many countries, including the United States, restrict, prohibit or otherwise regulate the use of certain kinds of refrigerants. The refrigerant specified by virtually all reefer box operators is R134a (also known as HFC134a). R134a is used in substantially all of our refrigerated containers. Regulation of refrigerants may become stricter in the future and R134a may, at some point, become due for replacement and phase-out. Market pressure or government regulation of refrigerants and synthetic insulation materials may require refrigerated containers using non-conforming substances to be retrofitted with refrigerants deemed to be less destructive to atmosphere ozone at substantial cost to us. In addition, refrigerated containers that are not retrofitted may command lower prices in the market for used containers once we retire these containers from our fleet.

Lessees and storage depots generally must either carry physical damage and liability insurance providing primary insurance coverage for loss and damage to the containers, cargo, and third parties while the containers are in their care, custody and control or provide proof of creditworthiness to self insure. In addition, we maintain liability coverage, including contingent liability coverage for any claims or losses, including while the containers are on-hire to a lessee or otherwise in the possession of a third party.

Existing insurance guidelines for lessees are explicitly stated in each lease and we require certificates evidencing lessees’ insurance prior to delivery of containers. Minimum insurance guidelines generally requested in most of the lease agreements are as follows:

The insurance companies from which the policies are purchased must be acceptable to us. To the extent any claim is not recovered by the policy, the lessee remains liable for the full amount of the claim. We do not offer any insurance product except, in limited instances, a Damage Protection Plan (DPP) which covers certain damages to the containers. The precise nature and amount of such insurance may vary from lessee to lessee. Some lessees may also be self-insured.

Our containership fleet includes seven vessels as of September 30, 2007. In addition, we have entered into contracts with Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering Co., Ltd. for the construction and purchase of four 4,400 TEU containerships which are scheduled to be delivered to us during 2010 and purchase agreements with a third party to take delivery of two 4,860 TEU containerships, which are scheduled to be delivered to us during 2009. All of our vessels are currently chartered, with an average remaining term of 3.6 years (weighted by TEU capacity) for ‘‘on the water’’ vessels as of September 30, 2007. The average lease term of our newbuilds is 5.7 years. The average age (weighted by TEU capacity) of the seven vessels in our containership fleet is approximately 2.8 years as of September 30, 2007. Our containership segment currently has four customers. The loss of any of these customers may have a material adverse effect on our containership segment.

The table below summarizes the composition of our fleet of containerships as of
October 31, 2007:


Vessel Name	Year Built		Size (TEU)		Remaining Time Charter (Yrs)			Charter Commencement	Charterer
On the Water
APL Beijing		2004		5,028		4.1		November 2004⁽²⁾		APL
APL Vietnam		2005		5,028		4.5		March 2005⁽²⁾		APL
CSAV Peru		1998		2,474		2.9		September 2005⁽²⁾		CSAV
MSC Mara		2006		5,060		3.7	⁽¹⁾	July 2007		MSC
MSC Benedetta		2006		5,060		2.8	⁽¹⁾	August 2007		MSC
MSC Debra		2006		5,060		2.8	⁽¹⁾	August 2007		MSC
MSC Olga		2006		5,060		3.8	⁽¹⁾	August 2007		MSC
Subtotal				32,770
Newbuilds								Delivery Date
TBN #1		2010		4,400		5.0		February 2010		MOL
TBN #2		2010		4,400		5.0		April 2010		MOL
TBN #3		2010		4,400		5.0		May 2010		MOL
TBN #4		2010		4,400		5.0		July 2010		MOL
TBN #5		2009		4,860		7.0		March 2009		APL
TBN #6		2009		4,860		7.0		September 2009		APL
Subtotal				27,320
Total				60,090

All of our containerships are leased out under time charter contracts. A time charter is a contract for the use of a vessel for a fixed period of time at a specified daily rate. Under a time charter, the vessel owner provides crewing and other services related to the vessel’s operation, the cost of which is

included in the daily rate; the charterer is responsible for substantially all of the vessel voyage costs. As of September 30, 2007, the average time charter rate on our 2,500 TEU and 5,000 TEU vessels was approximately $21,000 per day and $29,000 per day, respectively.

We may also lease out vessels under bareboat charters which, like a time charter agreement, provide for a lease of a fixed period of time at a specific daily rate. Under bareboat charters, however, the lessee is responsible for crewing and other services related to the operation of the vessel including periodic maintenance. Bareboat charters are typically longer than time charter agreements.

As of September 30, 2007 but including the three August deliveries, our existing charters provided for total contractual cash flow of $256.0 million.

We source our containership acquisitions through direct relationships with the top liner companies, other shipowners and through an extensive network of shipbrokers around the world. We are currently focused on buying larger, modern containerships in the secondhand market through third-party transactions and sale/leasebacks as well as contracting for newbuild containerships. In both cases, we focus on investing in ships that have some level of existing charter coverage. We expect to acquire newbuild containerships through re-sale contracts as well as directly with shipbuilding yards principally in Korea, Japan, China and Europe. The lead time to obtain newbuild containerships can be anywhere from a few months for re-sale contracts to several years for vessels that we acquire directly from shipbuilders. We believe that by sourcing acquisition opportunities through multiple channels, we can maximize our ability to identify and execute attractive investments.

We have an experienced acquisitions team based in Singapore that maintains strong relationships with our potential transaction sources throughout the world. Potential investment opportunities are evaluated first on the technical merits including the type of vessel, the condition, the class records, the shipyard and operating history. If the vessel appears to be technically sound, the opportunity will be considered from a commercial standpoint including a detailed review of the charter terms, the financial condition and creditworthiness of the charterer, the future lease potential of the vessel, among other factors. While we have not focused on a particular vessel design, yard or size, we have thus far invested only in the mid-size containership segment. We believe that these vessels represent attractive assets due to their marketability, the breadth of their userbase and the liquidity of the second-hand market for them. There are currently over 4,000 containerships in the world fleet, over 1,200 of which are over 3,000 TEU in size.

We plan to develop and maintain a diverse portfolio of containership types, charterers and lease term expirations in order to minimize our exposure to one particular segment of the containership sector. Furthermore, we maintain a long-term investment approach rather than a short-term trading approach.

Under each of our time charters, we are responsible for the operation and management of each vessel including technical management, crewing, repairs and maintenance, insurance, stores, lube oils, communication expenses, periodic dry docking, cleaning and painting and performing work required by regulations. The charterer generally pays the voyage expenses which include all expenses relating to particular voyages such as bunker fuel expenses, port fees, cargo loading and unloading expenses, canal tolls, garbage fees, agency fees and commissions.

Our shipmanagement activities are run out of our shipmanagement office based in Singapore. The technical team is responsible for the initial due diligence on our vessel purchases as well as the oversight of our third party shipmanagers who provide the daily operating services required under our time charter contracts. Currently, we have engaged three independent third party shipmanagers including Neptune Shipmanagement, Barber Shipmanagement and Eurasia International.

We operate in markets that are highly competitive and based primarily on supply and demand. Generally, we compete for charters based upon price, customer relationships, operating expertise,

professional reputation and size, age and condition of the vessel. Competition for providing containership services comes from a number of experienced shipping companies including several that have been financed by the German KG (Kommanditgesellschaft) system, which makes up the largest single segment of competitors. Historically, the German KG system was based on tax benefits provided to private investors. While the German tax law was amended to significantly restrict the tax benefits available to taxpayers who invest after November 5, 2005, the tax benefits afforded to all investors in the German KG-financed entities will continue to be significant and such entities will continue to be attractive investments. These tax benefits allow these German KG-financed entities to be more flexible in offering lower charter rates to liner companies. We also compete with several large private owners as well as a number of publicly held companies.

We are required by various governmental and other agencies to obtain certain permits, licenses and certificates with respect to our vessels. The kinds of permits, licenses and certificates required by governmental and other agencies depend upon several factors, including the commodity being transported, the waters in which the vessel operates, the nationality of the vessel’s crew and the age of the vessel. All permits, licenses and certificates currently required to permit our vessels to operate have been obtained. Additional laws and regulations, environmental and otherwise, may be adopted which could limit our ability to do business or increase the cost of doing business.

Government regulation significantly affects the ownership and operation of our vessels. We are subject to international conventions, national, state and local laws, regulations, convention and standards in force in international waters and the countries in which our vessels may operate or are registered, including those governing the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes, health and safety, the cleanup of oil spills and other contamination, air emissions, water discharges, certain operational practices and ballast water management. These laws and regulations include the U.S. Oil Pollution Act of 1990, the U.S. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), the U.S. Clean Water Act, the International Convention for Prevention of Pollution from Ships, regulations adopted by the International Maritime Organization, or ‘‘IMO’’ and the European Union, various volatile organic compound air emission requirements and various Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) amendments, as well as other regulations described below. Compliance with these laws, regulations and other requirements entails significant expense, including vessel modifications and implementation of certain operating procedures.

A variety of governmental and private entities subject our vessels to both scheduled and unscheduled inspections. These entities include the local port authorities (U.S. Coast Guard, harbor master or equivalent), classification societies, flag state administration (country of registry), charterers and terminal operators. Certain of these entities require us to obtain permits, licenses and certificates for the operation of our vessels. Failure to maintain necessary permits or approvals could require us to incur substantial costs or temporarily suspend operation of one or more of our vessels.

We believe that the heightened level of environmental and quality concerns among insurance underwriters, regulators and charterers is leading to greater inspection and safety requirements on all vessels and may accelerate the scrapping of older vessels throughout the industry. Increasing environmental concerns have created a demand for vessels that conform to the stricter environmental standards. We are required to maintain operating standards for all of our vessels that will emphasize operational safety, quality maintenance, continuous training of our officers and crews and compliance with U.S. and international regulations. We believe that the operation of our vessels is in substantial compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations; however, because such laws and regulations are frequently changed and tend to impose increasingly stricter requirements, such future requirements may limit our ability to do business, increase our operating costs, force the early retirement of our vessels, and/or affect their resale value, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Environmental Regulation — International Maritime Organization (‘‘IMO’’)

Our vessels are subject to standards imposed by the IMO (the United Nations agency for maritime safety and the prevention of pollution by ships). The IMO has adopted regulations that are designed to reduce pollution in international waters, both from accidents and from routine operations. These regulations address oil discharges, ballasting and unloading operations, sewage, garbage, and air emissions. For example, Annex III of the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (‘‘MARPOL’’) regulates the transportation of marine pollutants, and imposes standards on packing, marking, labeling, documentation, stowage, quantity limitations and pollution prevention. These requirements have been expanded by the International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code, which imposes additional standards for all aspects of the transportation of dangerous goods and marine pollutants by sea.

In September 1997, the IMO adopted Annex VI to the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships to address air pollution from vessels. Annex VI, which came into effect on May 19, 2005, sets limits on sulfur oxide and nitrogen oxide emissions from vessel exhausts and prohibits deliberate emissions of ozone depleting substances, such as chlorofluorocarbons.

Annex VI also includes a global cap on the sulfur content of fuel oil and allows for special areas to be established with more stringent controls on sulfur emissions. Annex VI has been ratified by some, but not all IMO member states, including the Marshall Islands. Pursuant to a Marine Notice issued by the Marshall Islands Maritime Administrator as revised in March 2005, vessels flagged by the Marshall Islands that are subject to Annex VI must, if built before the effective date, obtain an International Air Pollution Prevention Certificate evidencing compliance with Annex VI not later than either the first dry docking after May 19, 2005, but no later than May 19, 2008. All vessels subject to Annex VI and built after May 19, 2005 must also have this Certificate. We have obtained International Oil Pollution Prevention certificates for all of our vessels, and believe that maintaining compliance with Annex VI will not have an adverse financial impact on the operation of our vessels. Additional or new conventions, laws and regulations may be adopted that could adversely affect our ability to manage our vessels.

The operation of our vessels is also affected by the requirements set forth in the ISM Code. The ISM Code requires shipowners and bareboat charterers to develop and maintain an extensive ‘‘Safety Management System’’ that includes the adoption of a safety and environmental protection policy setting forth instructions and procedures for safe operation and describing procedures for dealing with emergencies. The ISM Code requires that vessel operators obtain a Safety Management Certificate for each vessel they operate. This certificate evidences compliance by a vessel’s management with code requirements for a Safety Management System. No vessel can obtain a certificate unless its operator has been awarded a document of compliance, issued by each flag state, under the ISM Code. The failure of a shipowner or bareboat charterer to comply with the ISM Code may subject such party to increased liability, decrease available insurance coverage for the affected vessels and result in a denial of access to, or detention in, certain ports. Currently, each of the vessels in our fleet is ISM code-certified. However, there can be no assurance that such certification will be maintained indefinitely.

Environmental Regulation — The U.S. Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (‘‘OPA’’)

The U.S. Oil Pollution Act of 1990, or OPA, established an extensive regulatory and liability regime for the protection and cleanup of the environment from oil spills. OPA applies to discharges of any oil from a vessel, including discharges of fuel and lubricants. OPA affects all owners and operators whose vessels trade in the United States, its territories and possessions or whose vessels operate in U.S. waters, which includes the United States’ territorial sea and its two hundred nautical mile exclusive economic zone. While we do not carry oil as cargo, we do carry fuel oil (or ‘‘bunker’’) in our vessels, making our vessels subject to the OPA requirements.

Under OPA, vessel owners, operators and bareboat charterers are ‘‘responsible parties’’ and can be held jointly, severally and strictly liable (unless the discharge of pollutants results solely from the act or omission of a third party, an act of God or an act of war) for all containment and clean-up costs

and other damages arising from discharges or threatened discharges of pollutants from their vessels. OPA defines these other damages broadly to include:

Amendments to OPA, effective as of July 11, 2006 increased the limits of the liability of responsible parties to the greater of $950 per gross ton or $800,000 per non-tank vessel (subject to periodic adjustment for inflation). These limits of liability do not apply if an incident was directly caused by violation of applicable U.S. federal safety, construction or operating regulations or by a responsible party’s gross negligence or willful misconduct, or if the responsible party fails or refuses to report the incident or to cooperate and assist in connection with oil removal activities.

We currently maintain, for each of our vessels, oil pollution liability coverage insurance in the amount of $1 billion per incident. In addition, we carry hull and machinery and protection and indemnity insurance to cover the risks of fire and explosion. Given the relatively small amount of bunkers our vessels carry, we believe that a spill of oil from the vessels would not be catastrophic. However, under certain circumstances, fire and explosion could result in a catastrophic loss. While we believe that our present insurance coverage is adequate, not all risks can be insured, and there can be no guarantee that any specific claim will be paid, or that we will always be able to obtain adequate insurance coverage at reasonable rates. If the damages from a catastrophic spill exceeded our insurance coverage, it would have a severe effect on us and could possibly result in our insolvency.

OPA requires owners and operators of vessels to establish and maintain with the United States Coast Guard evidence of financial responsibility sufficient to meet their potential liabilities under the OPA. Current U.S. Coast Guard regulations require evidence of financial responsibility in the amount of $1,250 per gross ton, which includes the then-applicable OPA limitation on liability of $950 per gross ton and the U.S. CERCLA liability limit of $300 per gross ton. Under the U.S. Coast Guard regulations implementing OPA, vessel owners and operators may evidence their financial responsibility by showing proof of insurance, surety bond, self-insurance, or guaranty. Under the OPA regulations, an owner or operator of a fleet of vessels is required only to demonstrate evidence of financial responsibility in an amount sufficient to cover the vessels in the fleet having the greatest maximum liability under OPA.

The U.S. Coast Guard’s regulations concerning certificates of financial responsibility provide, in accordance with OPA, that claimants may bring suit directly against an insurer or guarantor that furnishes certificates of financial responsibility. In the event that such insurer or guarantor is sued directly, it is prohibited from asserting any contractual defense that it may have had against the responsible party and is limited to asserting those defenses available to the responsible party and the defense that the incident was caused by the willful misconduct of the responsible party. Certain organizations, which had typically provided certificates of financial responsibility under pre-OPA 90 laws, including the major protection and indemnity organizations, have declined to furnish evidence of insurance for vessel owners and operators if they are subject to direct actions or required to waive insurance policy defenses. This requirement may have the effect of limiting the availability of the type of coverage required by the Coast Guard and could increase the costs of obtaining this insurance for us and our competitors.

The U.S. Coast Guard’s financial responsibility regulations may also be satisfied by evidence of surety bond, guaranty or by self-insurance. Under the self-insurance provisions, the shipowner or operator must have a net worth and working capital, measured in assets located in the United States against liabilities located anywhere in the world, that exceeds the applicable amount of financial

responsibility. We have complied with the U.S. Coast Guard regulations by providing a financial guaranty evidencing sufficient self-insurance.

Title VII of the Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation Act of 2004 (the ‘‘CGMTA’’) recently amended OPA to require the owner or operator of any non-tank vessel of 400 gross tons or more, that carries oil of any kind as a fuel for main propulsion, including Bunkers, to prepare and submit a response plan for each vessel on or before August 8, 2005. Previous law was limited to vessels that carry oil in bulk as cargo. The vessel response plans include detailed information on actions to be taken by vessel personnel to prevent or mitigate any discharge or substantial threat of such a discharge of oil from the vessel due to operational activities or casualties.

OPA specifically permits individual states to impose their own liability regimes with regard to oil pollution incidents occurring within their boundaries, and some states have enacted legislation providing for unlimited liability for oil spills. In some cases, states, which have enacted such legislation, have not yet issued implementing regulations defining vessels owners’ responsibilities under these laws. We intend to comply with all applicable state regulations in the ports where our vessels call.

The U.S. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, or CERCLA, governs spills or releases of hazardous substances other than petroleum or petroleum products. CERCLA imposes joint and several liability, without regard to fault, on the owner or operator of a ship, vehicle or facility from which there has been a release, along with other specified parties. Costs recoverable under CERCLA include cleanup and removal costs, natural resource damages and governmental oversight costs. Liability under CERCLA is generally limited to the greater of $300 per gross ton or $0.5 million per vessel carrying non-hazardous substances ($5.0 million for vessels carrying hazardous substances), unless the incident is caused by gross negligence, willful misconduct or a violation of certain regulations, in which case liability is unlimited.

The U.S. Clean Water Act, or CWA, prohibits the discharge of oil or hazardous substances in navigable waters and imposes strict liability in the form of penalties for any unauthorized discharges. The CWA also imposes substantial liability for the costs of removal, remediation and damages and compliments the remedies available under the more recent OPA and CERCLA, discussed above. Currently, under U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, regulations that have been in place since 1978, vessels are exempt from the requirement to obtain CWA permits for the discharge in U.S. ports of ballast water and other substances incidental to the normal operation of vessels. However, on March 30, 2005, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California ruled in Northwest Environmental Advocate v. EPA , 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5373, that EPA exceeded its authority in creating an exemption for ballast water. On September 18, 2006, the court issued an order granting permanent injunctive relief to the plaintiffs, invalidating the blanket exemption in EPA’s regulations for all discharges incidental to the normal operation of a vessel as of September 30, 2008, and directing EPA to develop a system for regulating all discharges from vessels by that date. Under the court’s ruling, owners and operators of vessels visiting U.S. ports would be required to comply with the CWA permitting program to be developed by EPA or face penalties. Although EPA will likely appeal this decision, if the court’s order is ultimately upheld, we will incur certain costs to obtain CWA permits for our vessels. While we do not believe that the costs associated with obtaining such permits would be material, it is difficult to predict the overall impact of CWA permitting requirements on the business.

The European Union is considering legislation that will affect the operation of vessels and the liability of owners for oil pollution. It is difficult to predict what legislation, if any, may be promulgated by the European Union or any other country or authority.

The U.S. National Invasive Species Act, or NISA, was enacted in 1996 in response to growing reports of harmful organisms being released into U.S. ports through ballast water taken on by vessels in foreign ports. Under NISA, the U.S. Coast Guard adopted regulations in July 2004 imposing mandatory ballast water management practices for all vessels equipped with ballast water tanks entering U.S. waters. These requirements can be met by performing mid-ocean ballast exchange, by retaining ballast water on board the vessel, or by using environmentally sound alternative ballast water management methods approved by the U.S. Coast Guard. (However, mid-ocean ballast exchange is mandatory for vessels heading to the Great Lakes or Hudson Bay, or vessels engaged in the foreign export of Alaskan North Slope crude oil.) Mid-ocean ballast exchange is the primary method for compliance with the Coast Guard regulations, since holding ballast water can prevent vessels from performing cargo operations upon arrival in the United States, and alternative methods are still under development. Vessels that are unable to conduct mid-ocean ballast exchange due to voyage or safety concerns may discharge minimum amounts of ballast water (in areas other than the Great Lakes and the Hudson River), provided that they comply with record keeping requirements and document the reasons they could not follow the required ballast water management requirements. The Coast Guard is developing a proposal to establish ballast water discharge standards, which could set maximum acceptable discharge limits for various invasive species, and/or lead to requirements for active treatment of ballast water.

At the international level, the IMO adopted an International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments in February 2004 (the ‘‘BWM Convention’’). The Convention’s implementing regulations call for a phased introduction of mandatory ballast water exchange requirements (beginning in 2009), to be replaced in time with mandatory concentration limits. The BWM Convention will not enter into force until 12 months after it has been adopted by 30 states, the combined merchant fleets of which represent not less than 35% of the gross tonnage of the world’s merchant shipping.

If the mid-ocean ballast exchange is made mandatory throughout the United States or at the international level, or if water treatment requirements or options are instituted, the cost of compliance could increase for ocean carriers. Although we do not believe that the costs of compliance with a mandatory mid-ocean ballast exchange would be material, it is difficult to predict the overall impact of such a requirement on the business.

Since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, there have been a variety of initiatives intended to enhance vessel security. On November 25, 2002, the U.S. Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002 (MTSA) came into effect. To implement certain portions of the MTSA, in July 2003, the U.S. Coast Guard issued regulations requiring the implementation of certain security requirements aboard vessels operating in waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. Similarly, in December 2002, amendments to SOLAS created a new chapter of the convention dealing specifically with maritime security. The new chapter went into effect in July 2004 and imposes various detailed security obligations on vessels and port authorities, most of which are contained in the newly created International Ship and Port Facilities Security (ISPS) Code. We are in compliance with the ISPS Code. Among the various requirements are:

The U.S. Coast Guard regulations intended to align with international maritime security standards, exempt non-U.S. vessels from MTSA vessel security measures provided such vessels have on board, by July 1, 2004, a valid International Ship Security Certificate that attests to the vessel’s compliance with SOLAS security requirements and the ISPS Code. We will implement the various

security measures addressed by the MTSA, SOLAS and the ISPS Code and ensure that our vessels attain compliance with all applicable security requirements within the prescribed time periods. We do not believe these additional requirements will require us to expend any significant funds with respect to our existing fleet or have a material financial impact on our operations.

Every seagoing vessel must be ‘‘classed’’ by a classification society. The classification society certifies that the vessel is ‘‘in class,’’ signifying that the vessel has been built and maintained in accordance with the rules of the classification society and complies with applicable rules and regulations of the vessel’s country of registry and the international conventions of which that country is a member. In addition, where surveys are required by international conventions and corresponding laws and ordinances of a flag state, the classification society will undertake them on application or by official order, acting on behalf of the authorities concerned.

The classification society also undertakes on request other surveys and checks that are required by regulations and requirements of the flag state. These surveys are subject to agreements made in each individual case and/or to the regulations of the country concerned.

For maintenance of the class, regular and extraordinary surveys of hull, machinery, including the electrical plant, and any special equipment classed are required to be performed as follows:

All areas subject to survey as defined by the classification society are required to be surveyed at least once per class period, unless shorter intervals between surveys are prescribed elsewhere. The period between two subsequent surveys of each area must not exceed five years.

Most insurance underwriters make it a condition for insurance coverage that a vessel be certified as ‘‘in class’’ by a classification society that is a member of the International Association of

Classification Societies. Our lenders have a similar requirement. All of our vessels are certified as being ‘‘in class’’ by American Bureau of Shipping, Germanishcer Lloyd or Lloyd’s Register. All new and secondhand vessels that we purchase must be certified prior to their delivery under our standard purchase contracts. If the vessel is not certified on the date of completion of the vessel, we have no obligation to take delivery of the vessel.

The operation of any container vessel includes risks such as mechanical failure, collision, property loss, cargo loss or damage and business interruption due to political circumstances in foreign countries, hostilities and labor strikes. In addition, there is always an inherent possibility of marine disaster, including oil spills and other environmental mishaps, and the liabilities arising from owning and operating vessels in international trade. OPA, which imposes virtually unlimited liability upon owners, operators and demise charterers of vessels trading in the United States exclusive economic zone for certain oil pollution accidents in the United States, has made liability insurance more expensive for ship owners and operators trading in the United States market.

While we maintain hull and machinery insurance, war risks insurance, protection and indemnity cover, increased value insurance and freight, demurrage and defense cover for our contracted fleet in amounts that we believe to be prudent to cover normal risks in our operations, we may not be able to achieve or maintain this level of coverage throughout a vessel’s useful life. Furthermore, while we believe that our insurance coverage is adequate, not all risks can be insured, and there can be no guarantee that any specific claim will be paid, or that we will always be able to obtain adequate insurance coverage at reasonable rates.

We maintain marine hull and machinery and war risks insurance, which covers the risk of actual or constructive total loss, for all of our vessels. Our vessels are covered up to at least fair market value with certain deductibles per vessel per incident. We will also maintain increased value coverage for each of our vessels. Under this increased value coverage, in the event of total loss of a vessel, we will be entitled to recover amounts not recoverable under our hull and machinery policy due to under-insurance. Under the terms of our credit facility, we have assigned these insurance policies to our lenders and will be subject to restrictions on our use of any proceeds therefrom.

We will not obtain loss-of-hire insurance covering the loss of revenue during extended off-hire periods. We believe that this type of coverage is not economical and is of limited value to us. However, we evaluate the need for such coverage on an ongoing basis, taking into account insurance market conditions and the employment of our vessels.

Protection and indemnity insurance is provided by mutual protection and indemnity associations, or P&I associations, which insure our third-party and crew liabilities in connection with our shipping activities. This includes third-party liability, crew liability and other related expenses resulting from the injury or death of crew, passengers and other third parties, the loss or damage to cargo, claims arising from collisions with other vessels, damage to other third-party property, pollution arising from oil or other substances and salvage, towing and other related costs, including wreck removal. Protection and indemnity insurance is a form of mutual indemnity insurance, extended by protection and indemnity mutual associations. Subject to the ‘‘capping’’ discussed below, our coverage, except for pollution, will be unlimited.

Our protection and indemnity insurance coverage for pollution is $1.0 billion per vessel per incident. The fourteen P&I associations that comprise the International Group insure approximately 90% of the world’s commercial blue-water tonnage and have entered into a pooling agreement to reinsure each association’s liabilities. As a member of a P&I association, which is a member of the International Group, we will be subject to calls payable to the associations based on the International Group’s claim records as well as the claim records of all other members of the individual associations.

We maintain detailed customer credit records. Our credit policy sets different maximum exposure limits for each customer across all three of our equipment segments. Credit criteria may include, but are not limited to financial strength, customer trade route, country, social and political climate, assessments of net worth, asset ownership, bank and trade credit references, credit bureau reports, operational history and payment history with us.

We have benefited from strong credit performance. Since 2004, net write offs of our customer receivables have averaged 0.5% of our billings over the same period.

In some cases, we seek to reduce credit risk by maintaining insurance coverage against customer insolvency and related equipment losses. For a portion of our container business, we maintain contingent physical damage, recovery and loss of revenue insurance, which provides coverage upon the occurrence of a customer’s insolvency, bankruptcy or default giving rise to our demand for return of all of our equipment. The policy covers the cost of recovering our equipment from the customer, including repositioning cost, damage to the equipment and the value of equipment which could not be located or was uneconomical to recover. It also covers a portion of the equipment leasing revenues that we might lose as a result of the customer’s default (i.e., up to 180 days of lease payments following an occurrence under the policy).

For a portion of our container business, we also currently maintain credit insurance which provides additional coverage upon the occurrence of a customer’s insolvency, bankruptcy or default giving rise to our demand for return of all our equipment. The policy covers a portion of the equipment leasing revenues we might lose as a result of the customer’s default (i.e., up to 90 days of lease payments that accrue prior to an occurrence under the policy).

These insurance policies provide coverage for both the equipment owned by us and the equipment we manage for third party investors. We are reimbursed for the premiums related to the portion of the coverage related to the managed equipment. Any losses related to managed equipment in excess of the amounts due from the insurance coverage are the responsibility of the third party investor.

Revenue from our ten largest customers represented 57% of revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, with revenue from CSAV, our single largest customer accounting for 10% of revenue. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007 customers from Asia, Europe, North America, South America and the Middle East represented 31%, 31%, 24%, 12% and 2% of our revenues, respectively.

We have fully integrated equipment fleet management systems. Our systems track all of our assets individually by unit number, provide design specifications for the equipment, track on-hire and off-hire transactions, matches each on-hire asset to a lease contract and each off-hire asset to a depot contract, maintain the major terms for each lease contract, track accumulated depreciation, calculate the monthly bill for each customer and track bills for equipment repairs. Our systems are EDI capable, which means they can receive and process container activity transactions electronically.

Interpool owns a 39,000 square foot building located at 211 College Road East, Princeton, New Jersey and occupies 80% of the space in that building. In addition, Interpool owns 18,000 square feet of condominium office space on the 24^th Floor of 633 Third Avenue, New York, New York, and occupies 49% of that space, with the remainder leased to third parties. All of Seacastle’s other commercial office space is leased.

As of September 30, 2007, we employed 341 people, in 36 offices, in seven countries. We believe that our relations with our employees are good. We are not a party to any collective bargaining agreements.

We have been, are currently and may from time to time be involved in litigation and claims incidental to the conduct of our business comparable to other companies in the intermodal asset leasing industry. Our industry is also subject to scrutiny by government regulators, which could result in enforcement proceedings or litigation related to regulatory compliance matters. We maintain insurance policies in amounts and with the coverage and deductibles we believe are adequate, based on the nature and risks of our business, historical experience and industry standards. We believe that the cost of defending any pending litigation or challenging any pending regulatory compliance matter will not have a material adverse effect on our business.

The following table sets forth the name, age and position of our directors and executive officers. Each of our executive officers holds office until his or her successor is elected or appointed and qualified or until his or her death, resignation, retirement or removal, if earlier. Each director holds office until his or her successor is duly elected or appointed and qualified or until his or her earlier death, retirement, disqualification, resignation or removal. Upon completion of this offering, our board will consist of eight members, a majority of which will be ‘‘independent’’ as defined under the rules of the NYSE. Mr. Nardone will resign as a director upon the completion of this offering.

Wesley R. Edens is the Chairman of our board of directors and has served as a director since our formation in June 2007. Mr. Edens is the Chairman of the board of directors and the Chief Executive Officer of each of Fortress and FIG LLC (‘‘FIG’’). Mr. Edens has been a principal and the Chairman of the Management Committee of Fortress since co-founding Fortress in May 1998. Mr. Edens is responsible for the Fortress private equity and publicly traded alternative investment businesses. Mr. Edens is the Chairman of the board of directors of each of Aircastle Limited, Brookdale Senior Living Inc., Eurocastle Investment Limited, GateHouse Media, Inc., Mapeley Limited and Newcastle Investment Corp. and a director of GAGFAH S.A. Mr. Edens served as the Chief Executive Officer of Newcastle Investment Corp. since inception until February 2007. Mr. Edens was the Chief Executive Officer of Global Signal Inc. from February 2004 to April 2006 and Chairman of the board of directors of Global Signal from October 2002 to January 2007. Mr. Edens was a director of Crown Castle International Corp from January 2007 to July 2007. Mr. Edens serves in various capacities in the following five registered investment companies: Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Trustee of Fortress Registered Investment Trust and Fortress Investment Trust II; Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Fortress Brookdale Investment Fund LLC and Fortress Pinnacle Investment Fund LLC and Chief Executive Officer of RIC Coinvestment Fund GP LLC. Prior to forming Fortress, Mr. Edens was a partner and managing director of BlackRock Financial Management Inc., where he headed BlackRock Asset Investors, a private equity fund. In addition, Mr. Edens was formerly a partner and managing director of Lehman Brothers. Mr. Edens received a BS in Finance from Oregon State University.

Joseph P. Adams, Jr. is the Deputy Chairman of our board of directors and has served as a director since our formation in June 2007. He is a managing director of Fortress, which he joined in April 2004, and focuses on the acquisitions area. He is also the Deputy Chairman of the board of directors of Aircastle Limited. Previously, Mr. Adams was a partner at Brera Capital Partners from 2001 until joining Fortress and at Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette (later Credit Suisse First Boston) from 1996 until 2001 where he was in the transportation industry group and later in the restructuring group. Mr. Adams was the first Executive Director of the Air Transportation Stabilization Board for 2002. Mr. Adams received a BS in Engineering from the University of Cincinnati and an MBA from Harvard Business School.

Randal A. Nardone is a member of our board of directors and has served as a director since our formation in June 2007. Mr. Nardone is the Chief Operating Officer and a member of the board of directors of Fortress Investment Group LLC. Mr. Nardone has been a principal and a member of the Management Committee of Fortress since co-founding Fortress in 1998. Mr. Nardone is a member of the board of directors of Alea Group Holdings (Bermuda) Ltd, GAGFAH S.A. and Eurocastle Investment Limited. Mr. Nardone was previously a managing director of UBS from May 1997 to May 1998. Prior to joining UBS in 1997, Mr. Nardone was a principal of BlackRock Financial Management, Inc. Prior to joining BlackRock, Mr. Nardone was a partner and a member of the executive committee at the law firm of Thacher Proffitt & Wood. Mr. Nardone received a B.A. in English and Biology from the University of Connecticut and a J.D. from Boston University School of Law.

Paul R. Goodwin will be appointed to our board of directors prior to the completion of this offering. Mr. Goodwin is currently, and has been since April 2003, a member of the board of directors of Manhattan Associates, Inc. From June 2003 through 2004, Mr. Goodwin served as a consultant to CSX Corporation, which, through its subsidiaries, operates the largest rail network in the eastern United States. Mr. Goodwin also served on the Board of the National Railroad Retirement Investment Trust from 2003 through 2006. From April 2000 until June 2003, Mr. Goodwin served as Vice-Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of CSX Corporation. Mr. Goodwin started with CSX Corporation in 1965 and held various senior management positions with entities affiliated with CSX Corporation group, including executive vice president and chief financial officer, senior vice president finance and planning and executive vice president of finance and administration. Mr. Goodwin graduated from Cornell University with a Bachelor of Civil Engineering and received an MBA from George Washington University.

Michael D. Malone will be appointed to our board of directors prior to the completion of this offering. From 1986 to November 2007, Mr. Malone worked with Bank of America and its predecessors in various capacities, including executive positions in Investment Banking and the Financial Sponsors Business. From 2000 to 2002, he ran the Financial Sponsors Business and from 2003 to 2007 he was the Global Head of Gaming and had responsibility for senior client development. Mr. Malone received a BS degree in General Studies from the University of Kentucky.

Ronald L. Merriman will be appointed to our board of directors prior to the completion of this offering. Mr. Merriman is a managing director of Merriman Partners, a consulting and family investment firm. He served as Managing Director of O’Melveny & Myers LLP, a global law firm, from 2000 to 2003. From 1999 to 2000, Mr. Merriman served as Executive Vice President of Carlson Wagonlit Travel, a global travel management firm. Mr. Merriman also served as Executive Vice President of Ambassadors International, a publicly-traded travel services business, from 1997 to 1999. From 1967 to 1997, Mr. Merriman was employed by KPMG, a global accounting and consulting firm, where he ultimately served as a Vice Chair and member of the Executive Committee. He is also a director of Aircastle Limited, Realty Income Corporation, Haemonetics Corporation and Pentair, Inc. and serves on the Audit Committee of each company.

Timothy J. Rhein will be appointed to our board of directors prior to the completion of this offering. Mr. Rhein is currently retired. From 2002 to 2005, Mr. Rhein served as a member of the board of directors of Neptune Orient Lines Group (NOL), an international shipping company traded on the Singapore Stock Exchange. He previously served as a director of NOL from 1998 to 2001, and he served as chairman of the board of American President Lines, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of NOL, from 2002 to 2005, and as a director of APL Logistics from 2001-2004. From 1995 to 2001, he served as Chief Executive Officer of APL Ltd., which was a member of the Fortune 500 and listed on the NYSE until 1997 when it was sold to NOL. From 1997 to 2001, he remained Chief Executive Officer of APL Ltd., as a wholly-owned subsidiary of NOL. In 2001, he became Chief Executive Officer of APL Logistics, another wholly-owned subsidiary of NOL, and held that position until 2002. Prior to 2002, he worked for approximately 40 years in various senior management and director roles with entities affiliated with NOL and American President Lines. He also served as a director of Pacer International from 1998 to 2002, and the World Shipping Council, a shipping industry lobbying group based in Washington D.C., from 1997 to 2004. Mr. Rhein graduated from Santa Clara University in

1962 with a Bachelor of Science in Commerce, was awarded the Bronze Star for service in Vietnam in 1967, and received the National Transportation Award from the National Defense Transportation Association in 2000.

Joseph J. Ueberroth will be appointed to our board of directors prior to the completion of this offering. Mr. Ueberroth is currently, and has been since 2003, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Ambassadors International, Inc., a cruise, marine, and travel company. He has served as chairman of the board of directors of Ambassadors International, Inc. since August 2006 and has been a director since 2001. From 1998 to 2003, Mr. Ueberroth served as co-chairman and president of the BellPort Group, an international marina company. He also serves as a director of Ambassadors Group, Enwisen and Melones Internacional and as a general partner and managing member of CGI Opportunity Fund I and II, a venture capital operating company focused on early stage, high growth companies. Mr. Ueberroth received a BA from Dartmouth College.

Joseph Kwok has been our Chief Executive Officer since June 1, 2007. From October 1, 2006 until the Seacastle Combination, Mr. Kwok was Chief Executive Officer of SHL, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Seacastle and from January 1, 2007 until the Seacastle Combination, Mr. Kwok was Chief Executive Officer of Carlisle, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Seacastle. Mr. Kwok was Group Advisor of AET (formerly known as American Eagle Tankers, Inc.) from April 2005 until March 2007 and Chief Executive Officer of AET from 1994 until March 2005, including following the sale of AET by Neptune Orient Lines Ltd., a global transportation company and parent of the container carrier, APL, to MISC Group. Previously, Mr. Kwok spent more than twenty years at Neptune Orient Lines Ltd., a global transportation company and parent of the container carrier, APL. While at Neptune Orient Lines Ltd., in addition to serving as CEO of AET, from 1997 to 2003, Mr. Kwok served as Group Chief Operating Officer of NOL, and Chief Executive Officer of NOL’s Chartering and Enterprises Division and Chairman of Neptune Shipmanagement Services (Pte), Ltd., NOL’s ship operating arm. Mr. Kwok received a Naval Architecture degree from Hamburg Fachhockshule and a MS from MIT in Ocean Systems Management.

Stephen N. Gray became our Chief Financial Officer in August of 2007. Prior to joining Seacastle, Mr. Gray was Assistant Vice President Supply Management of Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company from 2006 and Chief Financial Officer for Resun Leasing Corporation from 2004 to 2006. Prior to that, Mr. Gray was divisional Chief Financial Officer of Boeing Capital’s commercial finance group from 2001 to 2004 and Mellon Bank’s middle market leasing group prior thereto. Mr. Gray has over 20 years experience in the finance, leasing and shipping industries including 9 years in various finance and operating roles at Matson Navigation Company. Mr. Gray graduated with a BA in Economics from Stanford University and an MBA from the Amos Tuck School at Dartmouth College.

Arthur L. Burns has been our General Counsel since September 5, 2007. Prior to that, he served as a director of Interpool since January 1990. He was Interpool’s General Counsel and Secretary from January 1990 until 1996 and continued to serve as non-employee General Counsel until February 2003. Mr. Burns rejoined Interpool as General Counsel and Executive Vice President in October 2003. Mr. Burns was Senior Vice President of Law and Administration of Interpool Limited from 1980 until June 1996. Prior to joining Interpool Limited, Mr. Burns served as Assistant General Counsel to GATX Leasing Corp. between 1975 and 1980, and as an associate attorney at the law firm of Cahill, Gordon & Reindel from 1969 to 1974. Mr. Burns holds a bachelors degree in economics from Holy Cross College and a law degree from Fordham University School of Law.

Our bylaws provide that our board shall consist of not less than three and not more than nine directors as the board of directors may from time to time determine. Our board of directors will initially consist of eight directors. Our board of directors is divided into three classes that are, as nearly as possible, of equal size. Each class of directors is elected for a three-year term of office, but the terms are staggered so that the term of only one class of directors expires at each annual general meeting. The initial terms of the Class I, Class II and Class III directors will expire in 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively. Messrs. Malone and Ueberroth will each serve as a Class I director, Messrs. Adams, Kwok and Goodwin will each serve as a Class II director and Messrs. Edens, Merriman and Rhein

will each serve as a Class III director. All officers serve at the discretion of the board of directors. Under our Shareholders Agreement, which we and the Initial Shareholders will execute prior to the completion of this offering, we are required to take all reasonable actions within our control (including nominating as directors the individuals designated by FIG that otherwise meet our reasonable standards for board nominations) so that up to a majority (depending upon the level of ownership of the Initial Shareholders) of the members of our board of directors are individuals designated by FIG. Upon completion of this offering, we will have eight directors, five of whom we believe will be determined to be independent as defined under the rules of the NYSE. Our board of directors has determined that Messrs. Goodwin, Malone, Merriman, Rhein and Ueberroth will be our independent directors.

Our articles of incorporation do not provide for cumulative voting in the election of directors, which means that the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock can elect all of the directors standing for election, and the holders of the remaining shares will not be able to elect any directors; provided, however, that pursuant to the Shareholders Agreement that we will enter into with the Initial Shareholders prior to the completion of this offering, we will be required to take all reasonable actions within our control (including nominating as directors the individuals designated by FIG that otherwise meet our reasonable standards for board nominations) so that up to a majority (depending upon the level of ownership of the Initial Shareholders) of the members of our board of directors are individuals designated by FIG.

Upon completion of this offering, we will establish the following committees of our board of directors:

We intend to appoint Mr. Merriman, as chair, and Mr. Malone and Mr. Goodwin as our audit committee members. All three members are expected to be determined to be ‘‘independent’’ as defined under NYSE rules and Rule 10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the ‘‘Exchange Act’’). Each of these directors will be determined to be financially literate by our board, and one will be our audit committee financial expert.

We intend to appoint Mr. Goodwin, as chair, and Mr. Rhein and Mr. Ueberroth as our nominating, corporate governance and conflicts committee members. All three members are expected to be determined to be ‘‘independent’’ directors as defined under NYSE rules.

We intend to appoint Mr. Malone, as chair, and Mr. Rhein and Mr. Ueberroth as our compensation committee members. All three members are expected to be determined to be ‘‘independent’’ directors as defined under the NYSE rules, ‘‘non-employee’’ directors as defined in Rule 16b-3(b)(3) under the Exchange Act and ‘‘outside’’ directors within the meaning of Section 162(m)(4)(c)(i) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the ‘‘Internal Revenue Code’’).

We have not yet paid any compensation to our directors. Following completion of this offering, we will pay an annual fee to each independent director equal to $30,000, payable semi-annually. In addition, an annual fee of $5,000 will be paid to the chairs of each of the audit and compensation committees of the board of directors. Fees to independent directors may be made by issuance of common stock, based on the value of such common stock at the date of issuance, rather than in cash, provided that any such issuance does not prevent such director from being determined to be independent and such shares are granted pursuant to a shareholder-approved plan or the issuance is otherwise exempt from NYSE listing requirements. Affiliated directors, however, will not be separately compensated by us. All members of the board of directors will be reimbursed for reasonable costs and expenses incurred in attending meetings of our board of directors. Following the completion of this offering, each independent director will be eligible to receive awards of our common stock as described in ‘‘Equity Incentive Plan.’’

Messrs. Goodwin, Malone, Merriman, Rhein and Ueberroth will each be granted a number of restricted shares of common stock immediately prior to the completion of this offering, equal in value to $300,000, based on the fair market value of our shares on the date of grant. These restricted shares will become vested in three equal portions on the last day of each of our fiscal years 2008, 2009 and 2010, provided the director is still serving as of the applicable vesting date. The directors holding these restricted shares will be entitled to any dividends that become payable on such shares during the restricted period.

Except as otherwise provided by the plan administrator, on the first business day after our annual general meeting of shareholders in 2009 and each such annual general meeting thereafter during the term of the Seacastle Inc. Equity Incentive Plan, each of our independent directors who is serving following such annual general meeting will automatically be granted under the Seacastle Inc. Equity Incentive Plan a number of unrestricted shares of common stock having a fair market value of $15,000 as of the date of grant; however, those of our directors who are granted the restricted shares of

common stock described above immediately prior to the completion of this offering will not be eligible to receive these automatic annual grants. See ‘‘Equity Incentive Plan.’’

Because we are a newly formed company, we do not have a history of executive officer compensation practices. The compensation paid to an executive officer for 2006 or 2007 is not necessarily indicative of how we will compensate our executive officers. Set forth below is a description of how we expect to compensate our executives.

Our primary executive compensation goals are to attract, motivate and retain the most talented and dedicated executives and to align annual and long-term incentives with enhancing shareholder value. To achieve these goals we intend to implement and maintain compensation plans that:

The compensation committee of our board of directors will evaluate individual executive performance with a goal of setting overall compensation at levels that the compensation committee believes are appropriate in view of our performance, including achievement of key investment and capital raising goals, and in view of the individual performance of the executive. Our executive officers are not in any way directly responsible for determining our chief executive officer’s compensation, although our executive officers will regularly provide information to the compensation committee that will be relevant to its evaluation of our chief executive officer’s compensation (for instance in terms of our performance against established compensation goals and otherwise). By contrast, the chief executive officer will play a more active role in determining the compensation of the other executive officers, who are his subordinates. He will regularly advise the compensation committee of his own evaluation of their job performance and, from time to time, offer for consideration by the compensation committee his own recommendations for their compensation levels. The compensation committee remains free to disregard those recommendations.

We have not retained a compensation consultant to review our policies and procedures with respect to executive compensation, although the compensation committee may elect in the future to retain a compensation consultant if it determines that doing so would assist it in implementing and maintaining compensation plans.

Our executive compensation will consist of the elements set forth below. Determinations regarding any one element of compensation will affect determinations regarding each other element of compensation because the goal of the compensation committee is to set overall compensation at an appropriate level. The compensation committee will take into account in this regard the extent to which different compensation elements are at risk. Accordingly, for example, the amount of salary paid to an executive officer will be considered by the compensation committee in determining the amount of any cash bonus or restricted stock award, but we do not expect the relation among the elements to be formulaic because of the need to balance the likelihood that the at risk components of the compensation will actually be paid at any particular level.

Base Salary. Base salaries for our executives will be established based upon the scope of their responsibilities, taking into account the compensation levels from their recent prior employment. Base salaries will be reviewed annually and adjusted from time to time in view of individual responsibilities,

performance and experience. The compensation committee intends to conduct annual salary reviews in December of each year. The current base salary for our principal executive officer (‘‘CEO’’), principal financial officer (‘‘CFO’’) and our other most highly-compensated executive officer (referred to in this prospectus as ‘‘named executive officers’’ or ‘‘NEOs’’) is as follows:

These base salaries are intended to complement the at-risk components of the Company’s compensation program by assuring that executives will receive an appropriate minimum level of compensation.

Discretionary Cash and Restricted Share Bonus and Grants. The compensation committee has the authority to award discretionary annual bonuses to our executive officers in the form of cash and/or restricted share grants or other share-based awards. The annual incentive bonuses are intended to compensate officers for individual performance achievements, for our overall financial performance and for achieving important milestones. Bonus levels will vary depending on the individual executive and will not be formulaic, but generally will include such factors as our overall financial performance, quality and amount of new investments, enhancing our dividend paying capability and improving our operations. The compensation committee intends to make annual discretionary bonus determinations in December of each year. Cash bonuses ordinarily will be determined in December (commencing in December 2007) and paid in a single installment in January of the year following determination, and bonus restricted share grants or other share-based awards ordinarily will be made in December immediately following determination by the compensation committee. In addition to bonus restricted share grants, the compensation committee has the authority to award special restricted share grants to our executive officers. These awards would be made only to certain executives, reflecting exceptional performance, to provide additional retention benefits and performance incentives through additional restricted share ownership. Additional information regarding certain contemplated restricted share grants are set out below in the section entitled ‘‘Equity Incentive Plan.’’

Dividends. A key component of our executive compensation consists of dividends paid on restricted shares, whether such shares are vested or unvested. Under our Equity Incentive Plan, restricted shares will pay dividends prior to vesting, and because growing our dividends per share over time is an important goal for us, we believe that payment of dividends on vested and unvested shares aligns the interests of our executives with the interests of our shareholders.

Severance Benefits. We have entered into employment agreements and restricted share grant letters with our executive officers which provide severance benefits to such officers in the circumstances described in greater detail below in the section entitled ‘‘Management Shareholder, Employment and Other Agreements.’’ We believe that these severance and change in control benefits are essential elements of our executive compensation and assist us in recruiting and retaining talented executives.

Other Compensation. All of our executive officers are eligible to participate in our employee benefit plans, including medical, dental, life insurance and 401(k) plans. These plans are available to all employees and do not discriminate in favor of executive officers. Certain of our executive officers are also eligible for reimbursements for relocation expenses, legal costs associated with negotiating employment agreements, tax advisory services and/or commuting expenses. We do not view perquisites as a significant element of our comprehensive compensation structure.

We have entered into management shareholder agreements and other employment or severance agreements with our NEOs. These agreements, which are summarized below, provide for certain terms and conditions of employment. The agreements do not provide for a specified period of employment and the officers are employees ‘‘at will.’’

Agreements with Joseph Kwok. Mr. Kwok has entered into management shareholder agreements with Seacastle Operating Company and with SCT Holdings Inc. (sometimes referred to in this prospectus as ‘‘SCT Holdings’’). In connection with the Seacastle Combination, Seacastle became a party to these management shareholder agreements, and the agreements were amended such that references therein to Seacastle Operating Company or to SCT Holdings or to their respective ‘‘Common Stock’’ now refer to Seacastle Inc. and shares of our common stock, respectively. These management shareholder agreements, as so modified, provide that Mr. Kwok serves as our Chief Executive Officer. Under these agreements, he receives an aggregate annual base salary of $300,000, and an annual performance bonus of between $175,000 and $325,000 as determined by the Board of Directors (of which, and in the sole discretion of the Company, up to 50% may be paid in restricted shares that vest pro-rata over a three year period). He also participates in benefit plans and programs maintained from time to time for employees generally. If Mr. Kwok’s employment is terminated by us without cause or he terminates his employment for good reason (as such terms are defined in his agreements), and a release reasonably acceptable to us is executed, Mr. Kwok will be paid an amount equal to his then base salary either in lump sum or in twelve monthly installments.

Mr. Kwok received cash bonuses for 2006 of $56,712 from Seacastle Operating Company and $56,250 from SCT Holdings, as pro-rated for his period of employment during 2006. Mr. Kwok received a cash bonus for 2007 of $600,000 from Seacastle Operating Company. Mr. Kwok will receive cash bonuses for 2008 and subsequent years of between $350,000 to $650,000. We may pay up to half of any such bonuses in restricted shares of our common stock. The stock portion of any annual bonus will vest over a three-year period, one-third on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date. If his employment is terminated by us without cause or he terminates his employment for good reason (as such terms are defined in the agreements), the stock which would ordinarily vest on the next anniversary of the grant date will vest upon his termination. If his employment is terminated by us without cause or he terminates his employment for good reason within the twelve-month period following a change in control, all of the restricted shares which were received as part of an annual bonus will vest upon his termination. In addition, with respect to any cash bonus award, upon termination of employment by us without cause or termination of employment by Mr. Kwok for good reason, if such termination occurs between July 1 and December 31 of 2008, and a release reasonably acceptable to us is executed, Mr. Kwok will receive cash equal to the midpoint of the range of the performance bonus that would otherwise be payable during 2008, pro-rated for the number of days during 2008 before such termination.

Mr. Kwok purchased 750 shares from each of Seacastle Operating Company and SCT Holdings at $1,000 per share, and received initial restricted stock grants of 2,500 shares from each of Seacastle Operating Company and SCT Holdings. In connection with the Seacastle Combination, all of these shares were converted into shares (or restricted shares, as applicable) of our common stock. The initial restricted stock grants will vest 20% each year on each of the five anniversaries of the agreements. In addition, on December 31, 2007, Mr. Kwok received a discretionary bonus of 50,000 shares of our common stock, 10,000 of which vested on the date of grant and the remainder of which will vest ratably on October 1, 2008 and the next three anniversaries thereof. If his employment is terminated without cause or he terminates his employment with good reason, the stock which would ordinarily vest on the next vesting date will vest upon his termination. If his employment is terminated without cause or he terminates his employment with good reason within the twelve month period following a change in control of the company, all of the restricted stock grant described above that had not yet vested will vest. The value of these restricted stock grant shares as of December 31, 2007 is set out below in the chart entitled ‘‘Outstanding Equity Awards at 2007 Year End.’’

To the extent that dividends are paid, Mr. Kwok will receive the dividends on all his shares, including the restricted shares.

Mr. Kwok is subject to a continuing covenant of confidentiality with respect to all secret and confidential information, knowledge or data relating to us and our affiliates. During employment and for one year thereafter, he must not compete with any business of Seacastle or any of our subsidiaries.

During the same period he must not solicit nonclerical employees of Seacastle to terminate their employment with us, or solicit any agent, supplier or customer of Seacastle to terminate the relationship.

Agreement with Stephen N. Gray. Mr. Gray’s agreement provides that he will serve as the Chief Financial Officer of Seacastle. He will receive an annual base salary of $250,000, and participate in benefit plans and programs maintained from time to time for Seacastle’s employees generally. If his employment is terminated by us without cause or he terminates his employment for good reason (as such terms are defined in his agreement) and such termination is a ‘‘separation from service’’ under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, he will be paid an amount equal to his then base salary in twelve monthly installments.

Mr. Gray will receive a cash bonus for 2007 of $250,000, pro-rated for his period of employment during 2007 (which commenced August 1, 2007). His annual bonuses for subsequent years will be discretionarily determined by Seacastle, which may pay up to half of any such bonus in restricted shares of our common stock. The stock portion of any annual bonus will vest over a three-year period, one-third on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date. If his employment is terminated by us without cause or if he terminates his employment with good reason, the stock which would ordinarily vest on the next anniversary of the grant date will vest upon his termination. If his employment is terminated by us without cause or he terminates his employment with good reason within the twelve-month period following a change in control of Seacastle, all of the restricted shares which were received as part of an annual bonus will vest upon his termination.

Mr. Gray has received an initial restricted stock grant of 60,000 shares of our common stock, contingent upon his purchasing 12,000 shares of our common stock at a cost of $10 per share. The initial restricted stock grant will vest 20% each year, with the first vesting date being January 1, 2009, and an additional 20% vesting on each of the next four anniversaries thereof. If his employment is terminated by us without cause or he terminates his employment with good reason, the stock which would ordinarily vest on the next vesting date will vest upon his termination. If his employment is terminated by us without cause or he terminates his employment with good reason within the twelve month period following a change in control of Seacastle, all of the initial restricted stock grant that had not yet vested will vest.

To the extent that dividends are paid by Seacastle, Mr. Gray will receive the dividends on all his shares, including the restricted shares.

Mr. Gray is subject to a continuing covenant of confidentiality with respect to all secret and confidential information, knowledge or data relating to Seacastle and its affiliates, and their respective businesses. During employment and for one year thereafter, he must not compete with any business of Seacastle or any of its subsidiaries, including the business of owning, leasing or managing containerships, shipping containers or intermodal chassis. During the same period he must not solicit nonclerical employees of Seacastle to terminate their employment with Seacastle or solicit any agent, supplier or customer of Seacastle to terminate the relationship.

Agreement with Arthur L. Burns. Mr. Burns has entered into a Shareholder Agreement with us, which was amended on December 28, 2007. The agreement as amended provides that he will serve as General Counsel of the Company. Mr. Burns’ employment with Seacastle may be terminated by either Mr. Burns or the Company upon thirty days written notice of intent to terminate delivered by either party. He will receive an annual base salary of $416,000, and participate in benefit plans and programs maintained from time to time for Seacastle’s employees generally.

Upon Mr. Burns’ termination, Seacastle will pay Mr. Burns earned but unpaid salary through the termination date and, subject to his executing and not revoking a release of claims, an additional $25,000. In addition, Seacastle will reimburse Mr. Burns for all business expenses incurred by him on behalf of Seacastle, in accordance with Seacastle’s policies. Following the termination of his employment, Mr. Burns agrees to make himself available to assist or consult with us at reasonable times, and Mr. Burns agrees to cooperate in all reasonable respects with us in connection with existing or future litigation, actions or proceedings brought by or against Seacastle, to the extent Mr. Burns’ cooperation is necessary.

Pursuant to the agreement, in 2007 we paid the sum of $1,000,000 to Mr. Burns and granted to him 100,000 shares of common stock of Seacastle, based upon his purchase for $1,000,000 of an additional 100,000 shares of our common stock, or a per share purchase price of $10. An additional payment of $300,000 was made to Mr. Burns on January 2, 2008 pursuant to the amendment to the Shareholder Agreement, with respect to his performance of services through December 31, 2007.

Mr. Burns is subject to a continuing covenant of confidentiality with respect to all secret and confidential information, knowledge or data relating to us and our affiliates, and their respective businesses. During his employment with us, and for three years thereafter, he must not compete with any business of Seacastle or any of our subsidiaries, including the business of owning, leasing or managing containerships, shipping containers or intermodal chassis. During the same period he must not solicit nonclerical employees of Seacastle to terminate their employment with us, or solicit any agent, supplier or customer of Seacastle to terminate the relationship.

Prior to the completion of this offering, we will adopt an equity incentive plan for our employees, the Seacastle Inc. Equity Incentive Plan, or the Plan. The purposes of the Plan are to provide additional incentive to selected employees and directors of, and consultants, to Seacastle or its subsidiaries, to strengthen their commitment, motivate them to faithfully and diligently perform their responsibilities and to attract and retain competent and dedicated persons who are essential to the success of our business and whose efforts will impact our long-term growth and profitability. To accomplish such purposes, the Plan will provide for the issuance of options, share appreciation rights, restricted shares, deferred shares, performance shares, unrestricted shares and other share-based awards.

While we intend to issue restricted shares and other share-based awards in the future to employees as a recruiting and retention tool, we have not established specific parameters regarding future grants. Our board of directors (or the compensation committee of the board of directors, after it has been appointed) will determine the specific criteria surrounding other equity issuances under the Plan. The following description summarizes the expected features of the Plan.

A total of 4,000,000 shares of common stock is reserved and available for issuance under the Plan, subject to annual increases of 100,000 shares of common stock per year, beginning in 2009 through and including 2017. When Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code becomes applicable to us, the maximum aggregate awards that may be granted during any fiscal year to any individual who is likely to be a covered employee, as defined under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, will be 2,500,000 shares.

The Plan will initially be administered by our board of directors, although it may be administered by either our board of directors or any committee of our board of directors, including a committee that complies with the applicable requirements of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, Section 16 of the Exchange Act and any other applicable legal or stock exchange listing requirements (the board or committee being sometimes referred to as the plan administrator). The plan administrator may interpret the Plan and may prescribe, amend and rescind rules and make all other determinations necessary or desirable for the administration of the Plan.

The Plan permits the plan administrator to select the directors, employees and consultants who will receive awards, to determine the terms and conditions of those awards, including but not limited to the exercise price, the number of shares of common stock subject to awards, the term of the awards and the vesting schedule applicable to awards, and to amend the terms and conditions of outstanding awards.

We may issue incentive share options or non-qualified share options under the Plan. The incentive share options granted under the Plan are intended to qualify as ‘‘incentive stock options’’ within the meaning of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code and may only be granted to our

employees or any employee of any of our subsidiaries. The option exercise price of all share options granted under the Plan will be determined by the plan administrator, but in no event shall the exercise price be less than 100% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. Further, the exercise price of incentive share options granted to shareholders who own greater than 10% of the voting shares of common stock will not be less than 110% of the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. The term of all share options granted under the Plan will be determined by the plan administrator, but may not exceed ten years (or five years for incentive share options granted to shareholders who own greater than 10% of the voting shares of common stock). To the extent that the aggregate fair market value (as of the date the options were granted) of shares of common stock subject to incentive share options granted to an optionee that first become exercisable in any calendar year exceeds $100,000, the excess options will be treated as non-qualified share options. Each share option will be exercisable at such time and pursuant to such terms and conditions as determined by the plan administrator in the applicable share option agreement.

Unless the applicable share option agreement provides otherwise, in the event of an optionee’s termination of employment or service for any reason other than for cause, retirement, disability or death, such optionee’s share options (to the extent exercisable at the time of such termination) generally will remain exercisable until 90 days after such termination and then expire. Unless the applicable share option agreement provides otherwise, in the event of an optionee’s termination of employment or service due to retirement, disability or death, such optionee’s share options (to the extent exercisable at the time of such termination) generally will remain exercisable until one year after such termination and will then expire. Share options that were not exercisable on the date of termination for any reason other than for cause will expire at the close of business on the date of such termination. In the event of an optionee’s termination of employment or service for cause, such optionee’s outstanding share options will expire at the commencement of business on the date of such termination.

Share appreciation rights, or SARs, may be granted under the Plan either alone or in conjunction with all or part of any option granted under the Plan. A free-standing SAR granted under the Plan entitles its holder to receive, at the time of exercise, an amount per share equal to the excess of the fair market value (at the date of exercise) of a share of common stock over a specified price fixed by the plan administrator (which shall be no less than fair market value at the date of grant). An SAR granted in conjunction with all or part of an option under the Plan entitles its holder to receive, at the time of exercise of the SAR and surrender of such all or part of the related option, an amount per share equal to the excess of the fair market value (at the date of exercise) of a share of common stock over the exercise price of the related share option. In the event of a participant’s termination of employment or service, free-standing SARs will be exercisable at such times and subject to such terms and conditions determined by the plan administrator on or after the date of grant, while SARs granted in conjunction with all or part of an option will be exercisable at such times and subject to terms and conditions as set forth for the related option.

Restricted shares, deferred shares and performance shares may be granted under the Plan. The plan administrator will determine the purchase price and performance objectives, if any, with respect to the grant of restricted shares, deferred shares and performance shares. Participants with restricted shares and performance shares generally have all of the rights of a shareholder. During the restricted period, deferred shares may be credited with dividend equivalent rights, if the award agreement so provides. If the performance goals and other restrictions are not satisfied, the restricted shares, deferred shares and/or performance shares will be subject to Seacastle’s right of repurchase of such shares. Subject to the provisions of the Plan and applicable award agreement, the plan administrator has sole discretion to provide for the lapse of restrictions in installments or the acceleration or waiver of restrictions (in whole or part) under certain circumstances, including, without limitation, the attainment of certain performance goals, a participant’s termination of employment or service or a participant’s death or disability.

will become vested in three equal portions on the last day of each of our fiscal years 2008, 2009 and 2010, provided the director is still serving as of the applicable vesting date. The directors holding these restricted shares will be entitled to any dividends that become payable on such shares during the restricted period.

Except as otherwise provided by the plan administrator, on the first business day after our annual general meeting of shareholders in 2009 and each such annual general meeting thereafter during the term of the Plan, each of our independent directors will automatically be granted under the Plan a number of unrestricted shares of common stock having a fair market value of $15,000 as of the date of grant; however, those of our directors who are granted the restricted shares of common stock described above immediately prior to the consummation of this offering will not be eligible to receive these automatic annual grants.

In the event of a merger, consolidation, reorganization, recapitalization, share dividend or other change in corporate structure affecting the shares of common stock, an equitable substitution or proportionate adjustment shall be made, as may be determined by the plan administrator, in (i) the aggregate number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the Plan, (ii) the maximum number of shares of common stock that may be subject to awards granted to any participant in any calendar year, (iii) the kind, number and exercise price subject to outstanding share options and SARs granted under the Plan, and (iv) the kind, number and purchase price of shares of common stock subject to outstanding awards of restricted shares, deferred shares, performance shares or other share-based awards granted under the Plan. In addition, the plan administrator, in its discretion, may terminate all awards (other than fully vested restricted shares, deferred shares and performance shares) with the payment of cash or in-kind consideration. However, no adjustment or payment may cause any award under the Plan that is or becomes subject to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code to fail to comply with the requirements of that section.

Unless otherwise determined by the plan administrator and evidenced in an award agreement, in the event that a change in control occurs and a participant’s employment is terminated without cause on or after the effective date of the change in control but prior to 12 months following the change in control, then any unvested or unexercisable portion of any award carrying a right to exercise shall become fully vested and exercisable, and the restrictions, deferral limitations, payment conditions and forfeiture conditions applicable to an award granted under the Plan will lapse and such unvested awards will be deemed fully vested and any performance conditions imposed with respect to such awards will be deemed to be fully achieved. The term change in control generally means: (i) any person or entity (other than (a) an affiliate of Fortress or any managing director, general partner, director, limited partner, officer or employee of any such affiliate of Fortress or (b) any investment fund or other entity managed directly or indirectly by Fortress or any general partner, limited partner, managing member or person occupying a similar role of or with respect to any such fund or entity) becomes the beneficial owner of securities of Seacastle representing 50% or more of Seacastle’s then outstanding voting power; (ii) the consummation of a merger of Seacastle or any subsidiary of Seacastle with any other corporation, other than a merger immediately following which the board of directors of Seacastle immediately prior to the merger constitute at least a majority of the directors of the company surviving or continuing after the merger or, if the surviving company is a subsidiary, the ultimate parent; (iii) a change in the majority of the membership of the board of directors without approval of two-thirds of the directors who constituted the board of directors at the time this offering is consummated, or whose election was previously so approved; or (iv) Seacastle’s shareholders approve a plan of complete liquidation or dissolution of Seacastle or there is consummated an agreement for the sale or disposition of all or substantially all of Seacastle’s assets, other than (a) a sale of such assets to an entity, at least 50% of the voting power of which is held by Seacastle shareholders following the transaction in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of Seacastle immediately prior to the transaction or (b) a sale or disposition of such assets immediately following which the board of directors of Seacastle immediately prior to such sale constitute at least a majority of the board of directors of the entity to which the assets are sold or disposed, or, if that entity is a subsidiary, the ultimate parent thereof. The completion of this offering will not be a change of control under the Plan.

The Plan provides that our board of directors may amend, alter or terminate the Plan, but no such action may impair the rights of any participant with respect to outstanding awards without the participant’s consent. The plan administrator may amend an award, prospectively or retroactively, but no such amendment may impair the rights of any participant without the participant’s consent. Unless the board of directors determines otherwise, shareholder approval of any such action will be obtained if required to comply with applicable law. The Plan will terminate on the tenth anniversary of the effective date of the Plan (although awards granted before that time will remain outstanding in accordance with their terms).

We intend to file with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-8 covering the shares issuable under the Plan.

The following is a summary of certain Federal income tax consequences of awards under the Plan. It does not purport to be a complete description of all applicable rules, and those rules (including those summarized here) are subject to change.

An optionee generally will not recognize taxable income upon the grant of a non-qualified stock option. Rather, at the time of exercise of such non-qualified stock option, the optionee will recognize ordinary income for income tax purposes in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares purchased over the exercise price. We generally will be entitled to a tax deduction at such time and in the same amount that the optionee recognizes ordinary income. If shares acquired upon exercise of a non-qualified stock option are later sold or exchanged, then the difference between the amount received upon such sale or exchange and the fair market value of such stock on the date of such exercise will generally be taxable as long-term or short-term capital gain or loss (if the stock is a capital asset of the optionee) depending upon the length of time such shares were held by the optionee.

An optionee will not recognize any ordinary income upon the grant or timely exercise of an incentive stock option. However, the amount by which the fair market value of the common stock on the exercise date of an incentive stock option exceeds the purchase price generally will constitute an item which increases the optionee’s ‘‘alternative minimum taxable income.’’ Exercise of an incentive stock option will be timely if made during its term and if the optionee remains an employee at all times during the period beginning on the date of grant of the incentive stock option and ending on the date three months before the date of exercise (or one year before the date of exercise in the case of a disabled optionee). If stock acquired pursuant to the timely exercise of an incentive stock option is later disposed of, and if the stock is a capital asset of the optionee, the optionee will, except as noted below, recognize capital gain or loss equal to the difference between the amount realized upon such sale and the exercise price. Under these circumstances, we will not be entitled to any income tax deduction in connection with either the exercise of the incentive stock option or the sale of such stock by the optionee. If, however, stock acquired pursuant to the exercise of an incentive stock option is disposed of by the optionee prior to the expiration of two years from the date of grant of the incentive stock option or within one year from the date such stock is transferred to him or her upon exercise (a ‘‘disqualifying disposition’’), any gain realized by the optionee generally will be taxable at the time of such disqualifying disposition as follows: (i) at ordinary income rates to the extent of the difference between the exercise price and the lesser of the fair market value of the stock on the date the incentive stock option is exercised or the amount realized on such disqualifying disposition and (ii) if the stock is a capital asset of the optionee, as short-term or long-term capital gain (depending upon the length of time such shares were held by the optionee) to the extent of any excess of the amount realized on such disqualifying disposition over the sum of the exercise price and any ordinary income recognized by the optionee. In such case, we may claim an income tax deduction at the time of such disqualifying disposition for the amount taxable to the optionee as ordinary income.

A participant who is granted a share appreciation right will not recognize ordinary income upon receipt of the stock appreciation right. At the time of exercise, however, the participant will recognize compensation income equal to the value of any cash received and the fair market value on the date of

exercise of any shares of stock received. We will not be entitled to a deduction upon the grant of a share appreciation right, but generally will be entitled to a compensation deduction for the amount of compensation income the participant recognizes upon the participant’s exercise of the share appreciation right. The participant’s tax basis in any shares of stock received will be the fair market value on the date of exercise and, if the shares are later sold or exchanged, then the difference between the amount received upon such sale or exchange and the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise will generally be taxable as long-term or short-term capital gain or loss (if the stock is a capital asset of the participant) depending upon the length of time such shares were held by the participant.

A participant generally will not be taxed upon the grant of a restricted stock or performance award, but rather will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the fair market value of the stock at the time the shares are no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture (within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code). We generally will be entitled to a deduction at the time when, and in the amount that, the participant recognizes ordinary income on account of the lapse of the restrictions. A participant’s tax basis in the shares will equal their fair market value at the time the restrictions lapse, and the participant’s holding period for capital gains purposes will begin at that time. Any cash dividends paid on the shares before the restrictions lapse will be taxable to the participant as additional compensation (and not as dividend income). Under Section 83(b) of the Internal Revenue Code, a participant may elect to recognize ordinary income at the time the restricted or performance shares are awarded in an amount equal to their fair market value at that time, notwithstanding the fact that such shares are subject to restrictions and a substantial risk of forfeiture. If such an election is made, no additional taxable income will be recognized by such participant at the time the restrictions lapse, the participant will have a tax basis in the shares equal to their fair market value on the date of their award, and the participant’s holding period for capital gains purposes will begin at that time. We generally will be entitled to a tax deduction at the time when, and to the extent that, ordinary income is recognized by such participant.

In general, the grant of deferred shares will not result in income for the participant or in a tax deduction for us. Upon the settlement of such an award, the participant will recognize ordinary income equal to the aggregate value of the payment received, and we generally will be entitled to a tax deduction in the same amount.

Set forth below is information concerning the cash and non-cash compensation earned by, awarded to or paid to our named executive officers for fiscal years 2006 and 2007 by us (or, before our formation, by Seacastle Operating Company and SCT Holdings). During 2006 and 2007, our named executive officers received cash salary and bonus and restricted stock grants all as set forth below. They did not participate in or have account balances under any pension or nonqualified deferred compensation plans. The potential payments to be made to a named executive officer upon a termination of employment or change in control of the Company are described in the section of this prospectus entitled ‘‘Management Shareholder, Employment and Other Agreements.’’

The amount and form of compensation reported below does not necessarily reflect the compensation that our named executive officers will receive following completion of this offering because compensation levels after this offering will be determined based on compensation policies, programs and procedures not yet established by the compensation committee of our board of directors. Accordingly, the compensation of our named executive officers following completion of this offering could be more or less than that reported below.

As noted below, certain references in the following tables to equity awards refer to shares of stock granted by Seacastle Operating Company and SCT Holdings, as subsequently exchanged for shares of our common stock in connection with the Seacastle Combination.

The following table summarizes incentive compensation awards made in 2007 to our named executive officers:

The following table summarizes stock-based compensation awards outstanding at the end of 2007 for our named executive officers:

The following is a summary of material provisions of various transactions we have entered into with our executive officers, directors (including nominees), 5% or greater shareholders and any of their immediate family members since our formation in June 2007. We believe the terms and conditions set forth in such agreements are reasonable and customary for transactions of this type.

Seacastle was incorporated by Fortress in the Marshall Islands in June 2007, to combine the business operated by Carlisle and SHL and to consummate the contemplated acquisition of Interpool. Wesley R. Edens, Chairman of our board of directors, is the Chairman of the board of directors and Chief Executive Officer of Fortress, and Joseph P. Adams, Jr., also a member of our board of directors, is a Managing Director of an affiliate of Fortress Investment Group LLC.

Prior to the completion of this offering, we will enter into a shareholders agreement, or the Shareholders Agreement, with Fortress Investment Fund III LP, Fortress Investment Fund III (Fund B) LP, Fortress Investment Fund III (Fund C) LP, Fortress Investment Fund III (Fund D) L.P., Fortress Investment Fund III (Fund E) L.P., Fortress Investment Fund III (Coinvestment Fund A) LP, Fortress Investment Fund III (Coinvestment Fund B) LP, Fortress Investment Fund III (Coinvestment Fund C) LP, Fortress Investment Fund III (Coinvestment Fund D) L.P., Fortress Investment Fund IV (Fund A) L.P., Fortress Investment Fund IV (Fund B) L.P., Fortress Investment Fund IV (Fund C) L.P., Fortress Investment Fund IV (Fund D) L.P., Fortress Investment Fund IV (Fund E) L.P., Fortress Investment Fund IV (Fund F) L.P., Fortress Investment Fund IV (Fund G) L.P., and SCT Chassis Holdings LLC, which we refer to, collectively, as the Initial Shareholders.

As discussed further below, the Shareholders Agreement that we will enter into prior to completion of this offering provides certain rights to the Initial Shareholders with respect to the designation of directors for nomination and election to our board of directors, as well as registration rights for certain of our securities owned by the Initial Shareholders.

Our Shareholders Agreement will provide that the Initial Shareholders and their respective affiliates and permitted transferees will use their respective reasonable efforts (including voting or causing to be voted all of our voting shares beneficially owned by each) so that no amendment is made to our articles of incorporation or bylaws in effect as of the date of the Shareholders Agreement that would add restrictions to the transferability of our shares by an Initial Shareholder or its permitted transferee which are beyond those provided for in our articles of incorporation, bylaws, the Shareholders Agreement or applicable securities laws, or that nullify the rights set out in the Shareholders Agreement of any Initial Shareholder or their permitted transferee unless such amendment is approved by such shareholder.

Our Shareholders Agreement will provide that, for so long as the Shareholders Agreement is in effect, we and each Initial Shareholder shall take all reasonable actions within their respective control (including, with respect to each Initial Shareholder, voting or causing to be voted all of the securities entitled to vote generally in the election of our directors of the Company held of record or beneficially owned by such shareholder, and, with respect to the Company, nominating as directors the individuals designated by FIG that otherwise meet our reasonable standards for board nominations) so as to elect to the board, and to cause to continue in office, not more than seven (7) directors (or such other number as FIG may agree in writing), of whom, at any given time:

In accordance with the Shareholders Agreement, FIG will designate Paul R. Goodwin, Michael D. Malone, Ronald D. Merriman, Timothy J. Rhein and Joseph J. Ueberroth for election to our board of directors prior to the completion of this offering.

Demand Rights. Under our Shareholders Agreement, each Initial Shareholder will have, for so long as such shareholder individually or collectively with one or more other Initial Shareholders, beneficially owns an amount of our common stock (whether owned at the time of this offering or subsequently acquired) equal to or greater than 5% of our shares of common stock issued and outstanding immediately after the consummation of this offering (a ‘‘Registrable Amount’’), ‘‘demand’’ registration rights that allow such Initial Shareholder, at any time after 120 days following the consummation of this offering, to request that we register under the Securities Act an amount equal to or greater than a Registrable Amount. Each of the Initial Shareholders will be entitled to an aggregate of four demand registrations. We are also not required to effect any demand registration within six months of a ‘‘firm commitment’’ underwritten offering to which the requestor held ‘‘piggyback’’ rights, described below, and which included at least 50% of the shares of common stock requested by the requestor to be included. We are not obligated to grant a request for a demand registration within four months of any other demand registration, and may refuse a request for demand registration if in our reasonable judgment, it is not feasible for us to proceed with the registration because of the unavailability of audited financial statements.

Piggyback Rights. For so long as an Initial Shareholder beneficially owns an amount of our common stock equal to or greater than 1% of our common stock issued and outstanding immediately after the consummation of this offering, such Initial Shareholder will also have ‘‘piggyback’’ registration rights that allow it to include the common stock that it owns in any public offering of equity securities initiated by us (other than those public offerings pursuant to registration statements on Forms S-4 or S-8) or by any of our other shareholders that have registration rights. The ‘‘piggyback’’ registration rights of the Initial Shareholders are subject to proportional cutbacks based on the manner of the offering and the identity of the party initiating such offering.

Shelf Registration. Under our Shareholders Agreement, we will grant to each Initial Shareholder or any of its respective permitted transferees, for so long as it beneficially owns a Registrable Amount, the right to request a shelf registration on Form S-3 providing for offerings of our common stock to be made on a continuous basis until all shares covered by such registration have been sold, subject to our right to suspend the use of the shelf registration prospectuses for a reasonable period of time (not exceeding 60 days in succession or 90 days in the aggregate in any 12 month period) if we determine that certain disclosures required by the shelf registration statements would be detrimental to us or our shareholders. In addition, the Initial Shareholders may elect to participate in such shelf registrations within ten days after notice of the registration is given.

Indemnification; Expenses. Under our Shareholders Agreement, we will agree to indemnify each of the Initial Shareholders and their respective officers, directors, employees, managers, partners, agents and controlling persons against any losses or damages resulting from any untrue statement or omission of material fact in any registration statement or prospectus pursuant to which they sell shares of our common stock, unless such liability arose from such shareholder’s misstatement or omission, and each such shareholder has agreed to indemnify us against all losses caused by its misstatements or omissions. We will pay all registration expenses incidental to our performance under the Shareholders Agreement, and the Initial Shareholders will pay their respective portions of all underwriting discounts, commissions and transfer taxes, if any, relating to the sale of their shares of common stock under the Shareholders Agreement.

On February 1, 2007, Seacastle Singapore Pte. Ltd. (‘‘Seacastle Singapore’’), one of our indirect, wholly-owned subsidiaries, entered into separate ship management agreements with SEACT Holdco I LLC and SEACT Holdco II LLC (the ‘‘Owners’’), Marshall Islands limited liability companies owned indirectly by certain of the Initial Shareholders. Under each of these ship management agreements, Seacastle Singapore is, among other things, responsible for the operational, technical, commercial and freight management of the vessels, as well as crewing, provisions, insurance, records keeping, budgeting, tax and regulatory compliance, and vessel acquisition and disposition. Under each of these agreements, Seacastle Singapore receives an annual management fee not to exceed its annual overhead costs plus five percent, less any amounts allocable to the respective Owner’s vessel paid to Seacastle Singapore by the Owner’s direct and indirect holders under respective management agreements. For the nine month period ended September 30, 2007, management fees earned under these contracts with SEACT Holdco I LLC and SEACT Holdco II LLC were $373,721.54 and $79,090.67 respectively. These management agreements can be terminated by either party upon three months written notice.

Pursuant to the Company’s written policies and procedures with respect to transactions with persons related to us (referred to as ‘‘Related Party Transactions’’), a Related Party Transaction may only be taken by the Company if the following steps are taken:

Prior to this offering, substantially all of the ownership interests in Seacastle were beneficially owned by certain private equity funds managed by an affiliate of Fortress Investment Group LLC and our employees.

The following table sets forth the total number of shares of common stock beneficially owned, and the percent so owned, prior to this offering and as adjusted to reflect the sale of the shares offered hereby, by (i) each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of five percent or more of our outstanding common stock, (ii) each of our directors and named executive officers and (iii) all directors and executive officers as a group.

The percentage of beneficial ownership of our common stock before this offering is based on 110,599,773 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of January 14, 2008. The percentage of beneficial ownership of our common stock after this offering is based on 130,693,523 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. The table assumes that the underwriters will not exercise their over-allotment option.


Name of Beneficial Owner⁽¹⁾	Number of Shares Beneficially Owned Prior to the Offering⁽¹⁾						Number of Shares Beneficially Owned After the Offering⁽¹⁾
	Number of Shares⁽³⁾			Percent⁽⁴⁾			Number of Shares⁽³⁾			Percent⁽⁴⁾
Executive Officers and Directors⁽²⁾
Wesley R. Edens		107,727,647	⁽⁵⁾		97.4	%		107,727,647	⁽⁵⁾		82.4	%
Joseph P. Adams, Jr.		0		*				0		*
Paul R. Goodwin		0		*				18,750		*
Michael D. Malone		0		*				18,750		*
Ronald L. Merriman		0		*				18,750		*
Timothy J. Rhein		0		*				18,750		*
Joseph J. Ueberroth		0		*				18,750		*
Joseph Kwok		825,908		*				825,908		*
Stephen N. Gray		72,000		*				72,000		*
Arthur L. Burns		100,000		*				100,000		*
All directors and executive officers as a group (10 persons)		108,725,555			98.3	%		108,819,305			83.3	%
5% Shareholders
Fortress Investment Group LLC		107,727,647	⁽⁵⁾		97.4	%		107,727,647	⁽⁵⁾		82.4	%

On July 26, 2007, we and Seacastle Operating Company, our wholly-owned subsidiary, entered into a $250 million credit agreement (the ‘‘Seacastle Revolving Credit Facility’’), consisting of a $250 million revolving credit facility (with a $25 million letters of credit sublimit), with the lenders from time to time parties thereto including Citicorp North America, Inc., Bear Stearns Corporate Lending Inc and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as lenders, and Citicorp North America, Inc. as agent, each of which is an affiliate of an underwriter for this offering.

In connection with the Seacastle Revolving Credit Facility, we, SCT Chassis Inc. (‘‘SCT Chassis’’) and SHL (collectively, the ‘‘Guarantors’’) executed a Guaranty Agreement (the ‘‘Guaranty Agreement’’) in favor of Citicorp North America, Inc., as agent for each of the lenders, pursuant to which the Guarantors guaranty the prompt and complete payment and performance when due by Seacastle Operating Company of its obligations under the Seacastle Revolving Credit Facility. In addition, the Company and Seacastle Operating Company executed a pledge agreement in favor of Citicorp North America, Inc., as agent, pursuant to which each has pledged certain assets for the benefit of the secured parties as collateral security for the payment and performance of Seacastle Operating Company’s obligations under the Seacastle Revolving Credit Facility and the Guarantors’ obligations under the Guaranty Agreement. The pledged assets include, among other things, equity interests in certain of our subsidiaries and all proceeds therefrom.

The commitments of the lenders under the Seacastle Revolving Credit Facility are scheduled to expire on July 25, 2008. Subject to certain conditions, Seacastle Operating Company has the option of extending the maturity date of the loan for an additional six months.

At Seacastle Operating Company’s option, amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility bear interest at either (i) the greater of (a) the prime lending rate as set forth by the applicable reference bank plus a margin and (b) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus ½ of 1% plus a margin, or (ii) the Eurodollar rate plus a margin. In connection with this revolving credit facility, Seacastle Operating Company pays an annual commitment fee on the average daily amount of undrawn funds. The commitment fee varies depending on the average daily amount of loans outstanding.

The proceeds of the loans under the Seacastle Revolving Credit Facility will be used for working capital and other general corporate purposes.

The Seacastle Revolving Credit Facility contains typical representations and covenants for loans of this type. Seacastle Operating Company has agreed for itself and its subsidiaries (i) to maintain a tangible net worth of not less than $500 million, (ii) subject to certain exceptions, not to incur indebtedness and/or liens against its assets and/or to make investments, (iii) not to dispose of certain assets, except on fair market terms or to a special purpose entity in connection with the incurrence of permitted indebtedness, (iv) not to merge or consolidate with any other person unless the surviving entity is Seacastle Operating Company or one of its subsidiaries, or such surviving entity assumes the obligations of Seacastle Operating Company and with respect to Seacastle Operating Company only, not to liquidate or dissolve, (v) not to engage in transactions with affiliates except pursuant to a comparable arm’s-length transaction by and between unrelated persons, (vi) not to agree to certain restrictions or prohibitions on granting liens and/or making distributions, dividends or similar payments, (vii) after our primary public offering, if an event of default exists or would result therefrom, not to make any distributions, dividends or similar payments, and (viii) not to permit any change of control of us or Seacastle Operating Company as such term is defined in the Seacastle Revolving Credit Facility. A violation of any of these covenants could result in an event of default under the Seacastle Revolving Credit Facility, which would result in termination of all commitments and loans under the Seacastle Revolving Credit Facility and all other amounts owing under the Seacastle Revolving Credit Facility and other loan documents to become immediately due and payable.

On July 19, 2007, Interpool and Trac Lease, as borrowers, entered into a $100 million Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with the lenders referenced therein and National City Bank, as agent (the ‘‘National City Credit Agreement’’), consisting of a $100 million revolving credit facility (with a $10 million letters of credit sublimit). On August 31, 2007, this facility was increased to $120 million.

In connection with the National City Credit Agreement, the borrowers pledged certain chassis, domestic containers, gensets, leases and related assets for the benefit of the lenders as collateral security for the payment and performance of their obligations under the agreement.

The revolving credit facility and the letters of credit commitment are each scheduled to expire on July 17, 2009.

At the borrowers’ option, amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility bears interest at either (i) the greater of (a) the prime lending rate publicly announced by National City Bank and (b) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus a margin, or (ii) the Eurodollar rate plus a margin. In connection with the revolving credit facility commitment, the borrowers will pay a commitment fee per annum on the average daily amount of undrawn funds.

The proceeds of the loans under the National City Credit Agreement will be used for working capital and general corporate requirements of the borrowers thereunder.

Under the terms of the agreement, the outstanding loans (including any letters of credit and related unreimbursed obligations) may not at any time exceed the lesser of the aggregate commitments of the lenders and the borrowing base, which is, at any time, the sum of (i) 90% of the sum of the values of the borrowers’ eligible finance leases, plus (ii) 90% of the sum of the net book values of all of the borrowers’ eligible equipment not then subject to a finance lease. If at any time the amount of outstanding loans exceeds the lesser of the aggregate commitments of the lenders and the borrowing base, then the borrowers immediately will be required to repay loans and furnish cash collateral for, or repay, the letters of credit in an aggregate amount equal to such excess.

The National City Credit Agreement contains typical representations and covenants for loans of this type. At the end of each fiscal quarter during the term of the loan, Interpool and Trac Lease shall not permit (i) funded debt to tangible net worth to exceed a ratio of 4.0 to 1; (ii) the tangible net worth of Interpool and its consolidated subsidiaries to be less than $300 million; and (iii) the ratio of (a) for the rolling four quarter period ending on the last day of such quarter, the sum of (1) earnings available for fixed charges (the sum of fixed charges for such period plus net income for such period before income taxes plus interest expenses for such period relating to any subordinated debt of Interpool and its consolidated subsidiaries), plus (2) depreciation expense to (b) fixed charges for such period, to be less than 1.5 to 1. Furthermore, the borrowers may not incur, or permit any of their subsidiaries to incur, additional indebtedness or amend or permit any of their subsidiaries to amend, the documentation for any indebtedness that was outstanding as of July 19, 2007 so as to either (x) require or incorporate additional financial covenants on any borrower (beyond those set forth in the National City Credit Agreement), or (y) amend the financial covenants of the type set forth above in such a way as to make any such covenant more restrictive, unless the borrowers promptly notify the agent and each lender and, at the election of the lenders, such revised and/or financial covenants are automatically incorporated by reference into the National City Credit Agreement without the need for further action by any party.

In addition to the foregoing, each of the borrowers has agreed for itself and its subsidiaries (i) not to permit any liens against the collateral or the disposition of the collateral subject to certain exceptions, (ii) not to liquidate or dissolve, and not to merge or consolidate with any other person unless the surviving entity is the borrower or such surviving entity assumes the obligations of the borrower and, in the lenders’ and agent’s reasonable opinion, is of the same creditworthiness as the borrowers with at least the same level of lease servicing experience or such surviving entity provides

to the lenders alternative security acceptable to the lenders, (iii) not to engage in transactions with affiliates of the borrowers except pursuant to a comparable arm’s-length transaction by and between unrelated persons, and (iv) not to make any distributions, dividends or similar payments during the existence of specified events of default. A violation of any of these covenants could result in a default under the National City Credit Agreement. In addition, a change of control, as such term is defined by the agreement, will also be an event of default. An event of default would result in termination of all commitments and loans under the National City Credit Agreement and all other amounts owing under the National City Credit Agreement and other loan documents to become immediately due and payable.

On July 19, 2007, Interpool entered into a $225.0 million term loan agreement (the ‘‘ING Loan’’), with ING Capital LLC (‘‘ING’’) as lender.

In connection with the ING Loan, Interpool Containers Limited (‘‘ICL’’), a subsidiary of Interpool, executed a guaranty (the ‘‘ING Guaranty’’) in favor of ING, pursuant to which ICL guarantees Interpool’s obligations under the ING Loan. ICL executed a pledge agreement in favor of ING, pursuant to which ICL pledged certain securities and financial instruments, including $225 million deposited in a collateral account, for the benefit of ING as collateral security for the payment and performance of Interpool’s obligations under the ING Loan and ICL’s obligations under the ING Guaranty. In the event the value of the collateral is (i) lower than $224 million for more than ten consecutive business days or (ii) lower than $220 million at any time, ICL is required to deposit additional funds or other eligible assets or securities (as determined by ING in its discretion) into the collateral account in order to ensure that the value of the collateral becomes equal to or higher than $225 million.

The ING Loan is scheduled to expire on July 19, 2014 and bears interest at LIBOR plus a margin.

The proceeds of the loans under the ING Loan were used for the Interpool Acquisition and may be used for any general corporate purposes.

Each of the ING Loan and the ING Guaranty contains typical representations and covenants for loans of this type. Pursuant to the terms of the ING Loan, Interpool has agreed to (i) subject to certain exceptions, not permit the existence of any lien on any of the collateral or any other property or assets of ICL or the equity interests in ICL, (ii) not liquidate, dissolve or acquire (in one transaction or a series of related transactions) any assets, property or business of any person or otherwise merge or consolidate with or into any other person, and (iii) not dispose of or permit the sale, assignment, transfer or other disposition of any equity interests in ICL as a result of which Interpool would fail to own, either directly or indirectly, 100% of the issued and outstanding equity interests in ICL. Pursuant to the terms of the Guaranty, ICL has agreed to (i) not incur any indebtedness other than under the Guaranty or previously existing obligations, (ii) subject to certain exceptions, not permit to exist any lien on any of the collateral or any other property or assets of ICL, (iii) not liquidate or dissolve or acquire (in one transaction or a series of related transactions) any assets, property or business of any person or otherwise merge or consolidate with or into any other person, (iv) subject to certain exceptions, not declare any dividend or other distribution, (v) not make any investment other than the investment in the collateral, (vi) not guaranty the obligation of any other person except as permitted by the Guaranty, and (vii) not dispose of its assets except for interest income earned on the collateral. A violation of any of these covenants could result in a default under the ING Loan, which would result in termination of all loans under the ING Loan and all other amounts owing under the ING Loan and other loan documents to become immediately due and payable.

Pursuant to a Trust Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2000, as amended and restated as of March 1, 2002 (the ‘‘Titling Trust Agreement’’), among Interpool, Interpool Chassis Funding, LLC and U.S.

Bank National Association (as successor in interest to Wachovia Trust Company, National Association), as UTI Trustee (the ‘‘UTI Trustee’’) and Delaware Trustee (the ‘‘Delaware Trustee’’), Interpool created Interpool Titling Trust (the ‘‘Titling Trust’’). The primary business purpose of the Titling Trust is to take assignments of, and serve as record holder of title to, certain chassis, other equipment and related assets (which includes any underlying contract, to the extent related to the equipment) and proceeds thereof (such assets, once transferred to the Titling Trust pursuant to a Transfer Agreement, the ‘‘Transferred Assets’’).

Pursuant to certain transfer agreements, including (i) the Fourth Amended and Restated Transfer Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2000 (as amended and restated as of March 1, 2002, September 1, 2002, September 30, 2002, October 22, 2007, and as further amended, supplemented and otherwise modified from time to time, the ‘‘Original Interpool Transfer Agreement’’), by and among Interpool and the Titling Trust, (ii) the Third Amended and Restated Transfer Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2000 (as amended and restated as of March 1, 2002, September 1, 2002, October 22, 2007 and as amended, supplemented and otherwise modified from time to time, the ‘‘Original TLI Transfer Agreement’’), by and among Trac Lease, a wholly owned subsidiary of Interpool, and collectively with Interpool (the ‘‘Securitization Sellers’’) and the Titling Trust, (iii) the Transfer Agreement, dated as of July 19, 2007 (as amended, supplemented and otherwise modified from time to time, the ‘‘2007 Interpool Transfer Agreement’’), by and among Interpool and the Titling Trust, and (iv) the Transfer Agreement, dated as of July 19, 2007 (as amended, supplemented and otherwise modified from time to time, the ‘‘2007 TLI Transfer Agreement’’ and, together with the Original Transfer Agreement, the Original TLI Transfer Agreement, the 2007 Interpool Transfer Agreement and any other transfer agreement entered into in accordance with the terms of the Titling Trust Agreement, the ‘‘Transfer Agreements’’), by and among Trac Lease and the Titling Trust, the Securitization Sellers have sold certain Transferred Assets to the Titling Trust and may, from time to time, sell additional Transferred Assets to the Titling Trust for a consideration amount agreed upon by the Securitization Seller and the Titling Trust (which consideration may include a capital contribution to a wholly-owned bankruptcy remote entity of Interpool who will receive beneficial ownership of, in the form of a SUBI, such Transferred Assets). Each Securitization Seller and the Titling Trust have stated in the respective Transfer Agreements their intention that each sale of Transferred Assets pursuant thereto shall constitute a valid sale and conveyance by such Securitization Seller of such Transferred Assets, and that such Transferred Assets not be part of a Securitization Seller’s estate in the event of the insolvency or bankruptcy of a Securitization Seller.

The Trust Agreement and the Transfer Agreements contain typical representations and covenants for transactions of this type. In the event that any of the representations and warranties made with respect to the Transferred Assets were untrue on the transfer date, the related Securitization Seller has an obligation to repurchase those assets from the Titling Trust.

On March 28, 2002, the Securitization Sellers sold to the Titling Trust certain Transferred Assets. In connection therewith, the Titling Trust issued a certificate representing a special unit of beneficial interest (a ‘‘SUBI’’) in the Titling Trust to Interpool Chassis Funding, LLC (the ‘‘2002-A SUBI Certificate’’). As of September 30, 2002, Interpool Chassis Funding, LLC had pledged its interest in the 2002-A SUBI Certificate to the indenture trustee (currently, the indenture trustee is The Bank of New York, who assumed that role as successor in interest to JPMorgan Chase Bank) (the ‘‘ICF Indenture Trustee’’), pursuant to the Third Amended and Restated Indenture, dated as of September 30, 2002 (the ‘‘ICF Indenture’’), by and among Interpool Chassis Funding, LLC, Interpool, as servicer (the ‘‘Servicer’’), the ICF Indenture Trustee and Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, as administrative agent (the ‘‘Administrative Agent’’), and issued certain notes (the ‘‘ICF Notes’’). As of September 30, 2002, the ICF Notes were held by Intermodal Chassis Issuance, LLC), a bankruptcy-remote entity independent of Interpool and all other parties. The ICF Notes represent the obligations solely of Interpool Chassis Funding, LLC and do not constitute the obligation of Interpool or any other person (except to the extent expressly guaranteed by any person). As of October 20, 2006, Interpool Chassis Funding, LLC had paid in full the ICF Notes. The ICF Indenture, however,

will not terminate, nor shall the Lien on the 2002-A SUBI Certificate be released, until the termination of the ICI Indenture (as hereinafter defined).

On September 30, 2002, the Securitization Sellers conveyed additional assets to the Titling Trust. In connection therewith, the Titling Trust issued to Interpool Chassis Funding, LLC two additional SUBI Certificates (the ‘‘2002-B SUBI Certificate’’ and the ‘‘2002-C SUBI Certificate’’). Simultaneously, Interpool Chassis Funding, LLC entered into a sale/leaseback transaction with the related owner participants pursuant to which Interpool Chassis Funding, LLC sold to each of two trusts (the ‘‘Owner Trusts’’), and each, an ‘‘Owner Participant’’ with respect to the ILFT-B Owner and the ILFT-C Owner), the 2002-B SUBI Certificate and the 2002-C SUBI Certificate, respectively, and subsequently leased-back such certificates from the respective Owner Trusts (the lease with respect to the ILFT-B Owner Trust, the ‘‘ILFT-B Lease’’ and the lease with respect to the ILFT-C Owner Trust, the ‘‘ILFT-C Lease’’). The ILFT-B Lease has a basic term ending on September 20, 2020, and the ILFT-C Lease has a basic term ending on September 20, 2022, unless earlier terminated or extended pursuant to the relevant ILFT Lease, or unless ICF exercises either of two early buyout options (the ‘‘EBOs’’) under either or both of the ILFT Leases (the first EBO may be exercised on October 22, 2007, and the second EBO, with respect to the ILFT-B Lease on January 20, 2014 and, with respect to the ILFT-C Lease, on January 20, 2018).

The Owner Trusts issued notes to Intermodal Chassis Issuance on September 30, 2002, the proceeds of which were used by ILFT-B and ILFT-C to acquire their respective SUBIs, and which notes are collateralized (the ‘‘ILFT Collateral’’) by assets owned by ILFT-B and ILFT-C (collectively, the ‘‘ILFT Notes’’), pursuant to the related indentures (collectively, the ‘‘ILFT Indentures’’). The ILFT Leases represent the obligations solely of Interpool Chassis Funding, LLC and do not constitute the obligation of Interpool, any Owner Trust or any other person (except to the extent expressly guaranteed by any person). The ILFT Notes represent the obligations solely of the respective Owner Trusts and do not constitute the obligation of Interpool, Interpool Chassis Funding, LLC, ICI or any other Person or entity (except to the extent expressly guaranteed by any Person).

The sale/lease back transaction, at the outset, had a total of $540.9 million outstanding, of which $129.3 million was a debt obligation and $411.6 million was a capital lease obligation under the sale/leaseback transaction. As of September 30, 2007, the capital lease obligation outstanding under the sale/leaseback totaled $390.6 million. As of September 30, 2007, the interest rate on this facility was 5.34%, taking into account the effect of interest rate swap contracts in place as of September 30, 2007.

In connection with the issuance of the ILFT Notes and the ICF Notes to Intermodal Chassis Issuance, LLC pursuant to the related indentures, Intermodal Chassis Issuance, LLC issued a series of notes pursuant to an indenture (the ‘‘ICI Indenture’’), by and among Intermodal Chassis Issuance, LLC, the Servicer, the Administrative Agent and an indenture trustee (The Bank of New York assumed the role of indenture trustee as successor in interest to JPMorgan Chase Bank) (the ‘‘ICI Indenture Trustee’’). Intermodal Chassis Issuance, LLC subsequently paid off such notes in connection with a 144-A private offering whereby Intermodal Chassis Issuance, LLC issued a new series of notes on February 11, 2003 (the ‘‘ICI Notes’’) in an amount totaling $411,917,356, which ICI Notes are collateralized by the ICF Notes and related collateral and the ILFT Notes and related collateral, among other things (the ‘‘ICI Collateral’’), pursuant to the ICI Indenture. The ICI Notes represent the obligations solely of Intermodal Chassis Issuance, LLC and do not constitute the obligations of Interpool, ICF, any Owner Trust or any other Person (except to the extent expressly guaranteed by any Person).

The legal maturity date of the ICI Notes is January 20, 2018, provided that to the extent Interpool Chassis Funding, LLC exercises an EBO with respect to both ILFT Leases, Intermodal Chassis Issuance, LLC may prepay the ICI Notes.

Interpool Chassis Funding, LLC exercised its EBO with respect to both ILFT Leases on October 22, 2007 and the ICI Notes were prepaid in full. In connection with such, the ICI Indenture, ICF Indenture and other relevant documents were terminated, and all liens with respect to the 2002-A SUBI Certificate, the 2002-B SUBI Certificate and the 2002-C SUBI Certificate were released.

On July 19, 2007, the Securitization Sellers conveyed additional assets to the Titling Trust. In connection therewith, the Titling Trust issued to Interpool Chassis Funding II, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Interpool, the 2007-A SUBI Certificate (the ‘‘ICF II SUBI Certificate’’). Interpool Chassis Funding II, LLC acquired the financing for the ICF II SUBI Certificate by its issuance of the Interpool Chassis Funding II Floating Rate Asset-Backed Notes, Series 2007-1 (the ‘‘ICF II Notes’’) in the principal amount of $297,184,951 pursuant to an Indenture (the ‘‘ICF II Indenture’’), among Interpool Chassis Funding II, LLC, Interpool, as servicer (in such capacity, the ‘‘ICF II Servicer’’) and initial custodian, U.S. Bank National Association, a national banking association, as Indenture Trustee (the ‘‘ICF II Indenture Trustee’’), and Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp., a New York corporation, as administrative agent.

The ICF II Notes are secured by a lien in favor of the ICF II Indenture Trustee, on the ICF II SUBI Certificate. Ownership of the ICF II SUBI Certificate represents Interpool Chassis Funding II, LLC’s beneficial interest in, to and under the related Transferred Assets.

In connection with the ICF II Indenture, Interpool Chassis Funding II, LLC, the ICF II Servicer and the ICF II Indenture Trustee entered into the servicing agreement (the ‘‘ICF II Servicing Agreement’’) for the administration and servicing of the Transferred Assets.

The legal maturity date of the ICF II Notes is January 19, 2009. The ICF II Notes bear interest at a rate equal to One-Month LIBOR, plus a margin. Interpool used the proceeds from the ICF II transaction for working capital and other general corporate purposes.

At no time shall the outstanding principal balance of the ICF II Notes exceed the borrowing base, which is an amount equal to (i) 100.0%, or 85% after appraisals are delivered of the net book value of all items of eligible equipment which are not subject to a finance lease as of such date, plus (ii) the discounted contract balance of all contracts related to any items of eligible equipment which are subject to a finance lease as of such date, minus (iii) the amount of all security deposits required to be and not transferred to or on deposit in the security deposit account, minus (iv) the value of any eligible equipment or finance leases that exceed the concentration limits as of such date. If the outstanding principal balance exceeds the borrowing base, then, on the next payment date, Interpool Chassis Funding II, LLC is required to immediately prepay the principal balance in an aggregate amount equal to such excess.

Each of the ICF II Indenture and the ICF II Servicing Agreement contains typical representations and covenants for transactions of this type. With respect to the ICF II Indenture, Interpool Chassis Funding II, LLC has agreed (i) to maintain a positive minimum net worth measured at the end of each fiscal quarter, (ii) not to incur indebtedness (including pursuant to any guaranty) and/or permit to exist any liens against the collateral except to the extent permitted by the ICF II Indenture, (iii) not to dispose of the collateral except as permitted by the ICF II Indenture, (iv) not to merge or consolidate with any other person except as permitted by the ICF II Indenture, (v) except as otherwise permitted by the ICF II Indenture, not to engage in transactions with affiliates except on an arm’s-length basis in the ordinary course of business, (vi) not to become party to any agreements or instruments other than the ICF II Indenture and the related documents, and (vii) not to make any expenditure for capital assets except as authorized by the ICF II Indenture, (viii) not to make investments or create any subsidiary other than as permitted by the ICF II Indenture and related documents, (ix) not to impair the collateral or permit the validity and effectiveness of the ICF II Indenture and the related documents to be impaired. A violation of any of these covenants could result in an event of default under the ICF II Indenture. It shall also be an event of default if (i) the aggregate outstanding obligations shall exceed the borrowing base, and such condition continues for a period of 60 days; provided, however, that only a ten day cure period shall apply if the outstanding obligations shall exceed the borrowing base due to the failure of a seller to repurchase or substitute transferred assets in accordance with the provisions of the applicable transfer agreement, and (ii) as of the last day of any calendar month, the Interpool fleet utilization shall be less than 60%; provided that such event of default shall thereafter be deemed to be automatically cured to the extent such

Interpool fleet utilization percentage is greater than 60% as of the end of any subsequent month. An event of default will result in acceleration of the entire principal balance of the ICF II Notes.

With respect to the ICF II Servicing Agreement, Interpool has agreed (i) to maintain a minimum net worth of not less than $300.0 million, as measured at the end of each fiscal quarter, (ii) not to merge or consolidate with any other person except as permitted by the ICF II Servicing Agreement and the other related documents, (iii) to repurchase serviced assets to the extent it breaches its obligations in a material manner with respect to such serviced assets as such obligations are set forth in the Servicing Agreement, (iv) to operate in a manner such that ICF II and the Trust will not be substantively consolidated with Interpool in the event of a bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding of any such person, (v) not to permit a change of control, as contemplated by the ICF II Servicing Agreement, of Interpool, (vi) not to make any distributions of dividends or other payments if an event of default exists or would result therefrom, (vii) to continue in the chassis leasing business, and (viii) not to impair the rights in any material respect of any secured party with respect to any of the related serviced assets (which includes the collateral subject to the lien of the ICF II Indenture) or permit the validity and effectiveness of the ICF II Servicing Agreement and the related documents to be impaired. A violation of any of these covenants could result in a servicer default under the ICF II Servicing Agreement which would allow the parties to remove Interpool as servicer, and result in an event of default under the ICF II Indenture, which would result in acceleration of the entire principal balance of the ICF II Notes.

Further, each of the following shall constitute an amortization event under the ICF II Indenture and its supplements: (i) the aggregate outstanding obligations shall exceed the borrowing base, and such condition continues for a period of 10 days; provided, however, that only a 5 day cure period shall apply if the outstanding obligations shall exceed the borrowing base due to the failure of a seller to repurchase or substitute transferred assets as required by the applicable transfer agreement; (ii) as of the last day of any calendar month, the Interpool fleet utilization shall be less than, for any date prior to November 1, 2007, 65%, and for any date on or after November 1, 2007, 70%; provided that such amortization event shall thereafter be deemed to be automatically cured to the extent such Interpool fleet utilization percentage is greater than, for any date prior to November 1, 2007, 65%, and for any date on or after November 1, 2007, 70%, as of the end of any subsequent month; and (iii) the interest coverage ratio (measured as of the end of each fiscal quarter as a rolling average for the four immediately preceding fiscal quarters) shall be less than 1.6. During an amortization event, among other things, available funds of Interpool Chassis Funding II, LLC shall be used to prepay the unpaid principal balance of the loans.

Interpool and Trac Lease are party to various unconditional, absolute and non-cancellable TRAC lease agreements, or master agreements (‘‘TRAC leases’’), pursuant to which such entities, as lessee, lease certain chassis. The obligations of Interpool and Trac Lease under the TRAC leases are treated as debt on such entities’ financial statements. The aggregate outstanding balance of such obligations as of September 30, 2007 was $361.9 million.

Pursuant to the terms of such TRAC leases, the lessee has agreed not to pledge or encumber the chassis subject to such TRAC leases and all maintenance and repair obligations and the risk of loss with respect to such chassis are borne solely by the lessee. In addition, generally with respect to the TRAC leases, each of Interpool and Trac Lease has agreed to maintain the following financial covenants measured (at the end of each fiscal quarter): (i) maximum funded debt to tangible net worth not to exceed 4.0 to 1; (ii) minimum tangible net worth not to be less than $300 million; and (iii) fixed charge coverage ratio (the ratio (a) for the rolling four quarter period ending on the last day of such quarter, the sum of (x) earnings available for fixed charges, plus (y) depreciation expense to (b) fixed charges, for such period, not to be less than 1.5 to 1. At the end of the term of a TRAC lease, the lessee has the option to purchase the equipment for the residual value of the equipment.

On October 22, 2007, in connection with the exercise of the EBO option under the ILFT Leases, Interpool Chassis Funding, LLC directed the Titling Trust to cancel the 2002-A SUBI Certificate, the

2002-B SUBI Certificate and the 2002-C SUBI Certificate and reallocate such assets to a newly issued 2007-B SUBI Certificate (the ‘‘ICF SUBI Certificate’’). In connection therewith, Interpool Chassis Funding, LLC acquired financing for the ICF SUBI Certificate by its issuance of the Interpool Chassis Funding, LLC Floating Rate Asset-Backed Notes, Series 2007-1 (together with any supplements thereto, the ‘‘2007 ICF Notes’’) in the principal amount of $362,680,866.62 pursuant to an Indenture (the ‘‘2007 ICF Indenture’’), among Interpool Chassis Funding, LLC, Interpool, as servicer (in such capacity, the ‘‘ICF Servicer’’) and initial custodian, U.S. Bank National Association, a national banking association, as Indenture Trustee (the ‘‘2007 ICF Indenture Trustee’’), and Citibank, N.A.,, a New York corporation, as administrative agent.

The 2007 ICF Notes are secured by a lien in favor of the 2007 ICF Indenture Trustee, on the ICF SUBI Certificate. Ownership of the ICF SUBI Certificate represents Interpool Chassis Funding, LLC’s beneficial interest in, to and under the assets allocated to the ICF SUBI Certificate (the ‘‘ICF Transferred Assets’’).

In connection with the 2007 ICF Indenture, Interpool Chassis Funding, LLC, the ICF Servicer and the 2007 ICF Indenture Trustee entered into the servicing agreement (the ‘‘2007 ICF Servicing Agreement’’) for the administration and servicing of the ICF Transferred Assets. Under the 2007 ICF Servicing Agreement, Interpool acts as servicer with respect to all of the ICF Transferred Assets and all other collateral pledged pursuant to the 2007 ICF Indenture. The Servicer is responsible for servicing, managing and administering such ICF Transferred Assets and enforcing the Titling Trust rights in such assets.

The legal maturity date of the 2007 ICF Notes is October 20, 2008. The 2007 ICF Notes bear interest at a rate equal to One-Month LIBOR, plus a margin. The proceeds from the ICF transaction were used to exercise the EBO under the ILFT Leases.

At no time shall the outstanding principal balance of the 2007 ICF Notes exceed the borrowing base, which is an amount equal to (i) 100.0%, or 85% after appraisals are delivered, of the net book value of all items of eligible equipment which are not subject to a finance lease as of such date, plus (ii) the discounted contract balance of all contracts related to any items of eligible equipment which are subject to a finance lease as of such date, minus (iii) the amount of all security deposits required to be and not transferred to or on deposit in the security deposit account, minus (iv) the value of any eligible equipment or finance leases that exceed the concentration limits as of such date. If the outstanding principal balance exceeds the borrowing base, then, on the next payment date, Interpool Chassis Funding, LLC is required to immediately prepay the principal balance in an aggregate amount equal to such excess.

Each of the 2007 ICF Indenture and the 2007 ICF Servicing Agreement contains typical representations and covenants for transactions of this type. With respect to the 2007 ICF Indenture, Interpool Chassis Funding, LLC has agreed (i) to maintain a positive minimum net worth measured at the end of each fiscal quarter, (ii) not to incur indebtedness (including pursuant to any guaranty) and/or permit to exist any liens against the collateral except to the extent permitted by the 2007 ICF Indenture, (iii) not to dispose of the collateral except as permitted by the 2007 ICF Indenture, (iv) not to merge or consolidate with any other person except as permitted by the 2007 ICF Indenture, (v) except as otherwise permitted by the 2007 ICF Indenture, not to engage in transactions with affiliates except on an arm’s-length basis in the ordinary course of business, (vi) not to become party to any agreements or instruments other than the 2007 ICF Indenture and the related documents, (vii) not to make any expenditure for capital assets except as authorized by the 2007 ICF Indenture, (viii) not to make investments or create any subsidiary other than as permitted by the 2007 ICF Indenture and related documents, and (ix) not to impair the collateral or permit the validity and effectiveness of the 2007 ICF Indenture and the related documents to be impaired. A violation of any of these covenants could result in an event of default under the 2007 ICF Indenture. It shall also be an event of default if (i) the aggregate outstanding obligations shall exceed the borrowing base, and such condition continues for a period of 60 days; provided, however, that only a ten day cure period shall apply if the outstanding obligations shall exceed the borrowing base due to the failure of a seller to repurchase or substitute transferred assets in accordance with the provisions of the applicable transfer agreement;

(ii) as of the last day of any calendar month, the Interpool fleet utilization shall be less than 60%; provided that such event of default shall thereafter be deemed to be automatically cured to the extent such Interpool fleet utilization percentage is greater than 60% as of the end of any subsequent month; or (iii) the borrower fails to transfer all required contracts and related documentation to an approved custodian within six (6) months of the closing date of this facility. An event of default will result in acceleration of the entire principal balance of the 2007 ICF Notes.

With respect to the 2007 ICF Servicing Agreement, Interpool has agreed (i) to maintain a minimum net worth of not less than $300.0 million, as measured at the end of each fiscal quarter, (ii) not to merge or consolidate with any other person except as permitted by the 2007 ICF Servicing Agreement and the other related documents, (iii) to repurchase serviced assets to the extent it breaches its obligations in a material manner with respect to such serviced assets as such obligations are set forth in the Servicing Agreement, (iv) to operate in a manner such that Interpool Chassis Funding, LLC and the Titling Trust will not be substantively consolidated with Interpool in the event of a bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding of any such person, (v) not to permit a change of control, as contemplated by the 2007 ICF Servicing Agreement, of Interpool, (vi) not to make any distributions of dividends or other payments if an event of default or amortization event exists or would result therefrom, (viii) not to permit the fixed charge ratio of Interpool and its subsidiaries to be less than 1.60 to 1 on a rolling four quarter basis (vii) to continue in the chassis leasing business, and (viii) not to impair the rights in any material respect of any secured party with respect to any of the related serviced assets (which includes the collateral subject to the lien of the 2007 ICF Indenture) or permit the validity and effectiveness of the 2007 ICF Servicing Agreement and the related documents to be impaired. A violation of any of these covenants could result in a servicer default under the 2007 ICF Servicing Agreement which would allow the parties to remove Interpool as servicer, and result in an event of default under the 2007 ICF Indenture, which would result in acceleration of the entire principal balance of the 2007 ICF Notes.

Further, each of the following shall constitute an amortization event under the 2007 ICF Indenture and its supplements: (i) the aggregate outstanding obligations shall exceed the borrowing base, and such condition continues for a period of 10 days; provided, however, that only a 5 day cure period shall apply if the outstanding obligations shall exceed the borrowing base due to the failure of a seller to repurchase or substitute transferred assets as required by the applicable transfer agreement; and (ii) as of the last day of any calendar month, the Interpool fleet utilization shall be less than 65%; provided that such amortization event shall thereafter be deemed to be automatically cured to the extent such Interpool fleet utilization percentage is greater than 65% as of the end of any subsequent month. During an amortization event, among other things, available funds of Interpool Chassis Funding, LLC shall be used to prepay the unpaid principal balance of the loans.

On August 24, 2006, Carlisle entered into a $100 million credit agreement (the ‘‘Carlisle Revolving Credit Facility’’) consisting of a $100 million revolving credit facility (with a $10 million letters of credit sublimit), with lenders including Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas and Wachovia Bank, National Association, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as administrative agent.

The proceeds of the loans under the Carlisle Revolving Credit Facility are used for refinancing existing indebtedness of Carlisle and to pay associated fees and expenses and for working capital and general corporate purposes.

In connection with the Carlisle Revolving Credit Facility, certain subsidiaries of Carlisle have executed a Guaranty in favor of the lenders and the administrative agent, pursuant to which the guarantors guaranty the obligations of Carlisle under the credit agreement. In addition, Carlisle has entered into a Security Agreement and a Stock Pledge Agreement with the administrative agent, and certain subsidiaries of Carlisle have entered into a Restricted Subsidiary Security Agreement with the

administrative agent, pursuant to which Carlisle and its subsidiaries have pledged certain assets for the benefit of the secured parties as collateral security for the payment and performance of Carlisle’s obligations under the Carlisle Revolving Credit Facility and the other loan documents and such subsidiaries’ obligations under the guaranty. The pledged assets include, among other things, marine and intermodal containers, gensets and equity interests in certain of Carlisle’s subsidiaries and all proceeds of any and all of the foregoing.

The commitments of the lenders under the Carlisle Revolving Credit Facility are scheduled to expire on August 24, 2008.

The loans under the Carlisle Revolving Credit Facility bear interest, at Carlisle’s option, at the rate per annum equal to either (i) the greater of (a) the prime lending rate as set forth by the administrative agent, plus a margin based upon the advance rate and (b) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus ½ of 1% plus a margin based upon the advance rate or (ii) the LIBOR Rate determined for the applicable interest period, plus a margin based upon the advance rate.

In connection with the Carlisle Revolving Credit Facility, Carlisle will pay a commitment fee per annum based on the average daily amount of undrawn funds.

At no time shall the outstanding loans (including the aggregate face amount of any letters of credit and related unreimbursed obligations) exceed the lesser of the aggregate commitments of the lenders and the borrowing base, which is, at any time, the sum in the aggregate of 100% of the net book value of eligible containers, the eligible generators, the eligible refrigeration units and the eligible chassis, plus 100% of the net present value of the direct finance lease receivables (other than those arising from containers, generators or chassis that are included in the prior portion of the calculation). If the outstanding loans exceed the lesser of the aggregate commitments of the lenders and the borrowing base, then Carlisle is required to immediately repay the excess to the agent for application to the loans.

The Carlisle Revolving Credit Facility contains typical representations and covenants for loans of this type. Carlisle shall not permit the tangible net worth of Carlisle and its subsidiaries at any time to be less than $200 million. Additionally, Carlisle has agreed for itself and certain restricted subsidiaries (i) subject to certain exceptions, not to incur indebtedness and/or liens against its assets and/or to make investments, (ii) subject to certain exceptions, not to dispose of assets, (iii) not to merge or consolidate with any other person or effect any asset acquisition of a facility, division or line or business or acquisition of a majority of the voting stock of any person, (iv) except as otherwise permitted by the Carlisle Revolving Credit Facility, not to engage in transactions with affiliates except on an arm’s-length basis in the ordinary course of business, (v) not to agree to certain restrictions or prohibitions on granting liens and/or making distributions, dividends or similar payments, (vi) not to enter into any sale/leaseback transactions with respect to assets in the aggregate in excess of $40 million; (vii) not permit to exist any lien on the tracking and billing system used by Carlisle and its affiliates; (viii) not dispose of or permit to exist any lien on its equity interest in CLI Funding LLC and not permit to exist any lien on the equity interest in any other unrestricted subsidiary except in each case as permitted by the Carlisle Revolving Credit Facility, (ix) to restrict the aggregate amount of indebtedness of CLI Funding LLC at any time outstanding and (x) except for certain exceptions set forth in the Carlisle Revolving Credit Facility, not to make any dividend or distribution if a default or event of default shall exist or would result therefrom. A violation of any of these covenants could result in a default under the Carlisle Revolving Credit Facility. In addition, a change of control of Carlisle, as contemplated by the Carlisle Revolving Credit Facility, is event of default. Any event of default would result in termination of all commitments and loans under the Carlisle Revolving Credit Facility and all other amounts owing under the Carlisle Revolving Credit Facility and other loan documents to become immediately due and payable.

On August 24, 2006, CLI Funding LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Carlisle, entered into a Second Amended and Restated Indenture (as amended, the ‘‘CLI Funding Indenture’’) with U.S. Bank National Association, as indenture trustee. The CLI Funding Indenture was supplemented by

the Series 2006-1 Supplement, dated as of August 24, 2006 (the ‘‘Series 2006-1 Supplement’’), pursuant to which CLI Funding LLC Floating Rate Asset Backed Notes, Series 2006-1 (the ‘‘Series 2006-1 Notes’’) were issued in the initial principal amount of $685.0 million. In connection therewith, CLI Funding LLC executed a Series 2006-1 Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 16, 2006 (as amended, the ‘‘Series 2006-1 Note Purchase Agreement’’), with Carlisle, as Manager, Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., an underwriter for this offering. In addition, the CLI Funding Indenture was further supplemented by the Series 2006-2 Supplement, dated as of August 24, 2006 (the ‘‘Series 2006-2 Supplement’’ and together with the Series 2006-1 Supplement, the ‘‘Supplements’’), pursuant to which CLI Funding Floating Rate Asset Backed Notes, Series 2006-2 (the ‘‘Series 2006-2 Notes,’’ and together with the Series 2006-1 Notes, the ‘‘Series 2006 Notes’’) were issued in the initial principal balance of $50.0 million. In connection therewith, CLI Funding LLC executed a Series 2006-2 Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 24, 2006 (as amended, the ‘‘Series 2006-2 Note Purchase Agreement’’), with Carlisle and the other parties thereto. The Series 2006-2 Note Purchase Agreement was subsequently modified to increase up to $375.0 million the maximum amount of advances thereunder that may be funded to CLI Funding. The CLI Funding Indenture, the Supplements, the 2006-1 Note Purchase Agreement, the 2006-2 Note Purchase Agreement and the related transaction documents are collectively referred to in this prospectus as the ‘‘Carlisle Securitization Documents.’’

The obligations of CLI Funding LLC under the CLI Funding Indenture (including, without limitation, with respect to the Series 2006 Notes) are secured by a pledge by CLI Funding LLC of a first priority perfected security interest in and to all assets of CLI Funding LLC including, without limitation, refrigerated and other types of marine or intermodal containers and any generator sets owned by CLI Funding LLC and all other equipment, leases, contracts, accounts and all proceeds relating thereto (collectively, the ‘‘CLI Funding Containers’’).

The unpaid principal amount of the Series 2006-1 Notes, together with interest and all other related amounts, is scheduled to be repaid in full in August 2016, and is otherwise due and payable in full in August 2021. The unpaid principal amount of the Series 2006-2 Notes, together with interest and all other related amounts, is scheduled to be repaid in full on August 21, 2018 (subject to an extension election by CLI Funding LLC for a period of 364 days), and is otherwise due and payable in full on August 21, 2023.

The Series 2006-1 Notes bear interest at the rate of one-month LIBOR plus a margin. The Series 2006-2 Notes bear interest at (i) a rate equal to the sum of the CP rate (determined in accordance with the Series 2006-2 Supplement) and a margin, if the advance has been funded through the issuance of commercial paper, (ii) a rate equal to the quotient of (a) LIBOR divided by (b) the Federal Reserve’s Eurodollar Reserve Rate plus a margin, if the advance is funded utilizing a source of funds for which interest is determined by reference to LIBOR or (iii) the greater of (a) the prime rate as set forth by the agent under the agreement plus a margin or (b) the Federal Funds Rate plus a margin, if the advance is funded utilizing a source of funds for which interest is determined by reference to some rate other than LIBOR and is not funded with commercial paper. CLI Funding LLC will pay a commitment fee in connection with the Series 2006-2 Notes to each noteholder on the total available commitments of such noteholder.

Ambac Assurance Corporation, a financial guarantee company, has issued insurance policies providing credit enhancement on the Series 2006 Notes. Those policies are non-cancellable and guarantee the payment of the principal and interest on the Series 2006 Notes.

At no time shall the outstanding amount of the Series 2006 Notes exceed the asset base, which at any time is the sum in the aggregate of 85% of the net present book value of eligible containers that are not then subject to a direct finance lease, plus 85% of the net present value of the direct finance lease receivables of all eligible containers that are then subject to a direct finance lease, plus the amount then on deposit in the restricted cash account. If the outstanding loans exceed the asset base at any time, then CLI Funding LLC will be required to repay the excess for application toward repayment of the amount of the Series 2006 Notes. Failure by CLI Funding LLC to repay such excess amount within 90 days is an event of default.

The Carlisle Securitization Documents contain typical representations and covenants for indebtedness of this type. CLI Funding LLC has agreed (i) subject to certain exceptions, not to incur indebtedness (including pursuant to any guaranty) and/or liens against the collateral and/or to make investments, (ii) subject to certain exceptions, not to dispose of the collateral, (iii) not to merge or consolidate with any other person except for the lease of containers in accordance with the management agreement with Carlisle and as otherwise permitted by the CLI Funding Indenture, (iv) not to become party to any other agreements or instruments, other than permitted agreements for the disposition of sold assets and permitted agreements for the sale or re-lease of containers made in accordance with the terms of the management agreement with Carlisle; (v) not to make any capital expenditure except for the acquisition of additional containers and capital improvements to the containers made in the ordinary course of business; (vi) not to create any subsidiaries; (vii) not to amend or modify its depreciation policy; (viii) not to claim any credit on or make any deduction for or assert any claim against any noteholder by reason of the payment of any taxes levied or assessed against the collateral; (ix) not to impair the collateral or permit the validity and effectiveness of the CLI Funding Indenture and the related documents to be impaired; and (x) not operate in such a manner that it shall be substantively consolidated with the trust estate of any other person in the event of a bankruptcy or similar proceeding. A violation of any of these covenants could result in a default under the Carlisle Securitization Documents. In addition, it is an event of default if Carlisle at any time owns less than all of the equity interests in CLI Funding LLC or fails to have sole control of CLI Funding LLC and legally and beneficially own less than a majority of all equity and voting interest in CLI Funding LLC. An event of default would result in termination of all commitments and loans under the Carlisle Securitization Documents and all other amounts owing thereunder becoming immediately due and payable.

Further, each of the following shall constitute an early amortization event under the CLI Funding Indenture: (i) an event of default shall exist, (ii) a manager default shall exist, (iii) the long-term interest coverage ratio of CLI Funding LLC is less than two hundred twenty-five percent (225%); (iv) the short term interest coverage ratio of CLI Funding LLC is less than one hundred ten percent (110%) for four consecutive record dates, (v) on any record date, the average age of all of the containers shall exceed 8.5 years; (v) the aggregate note principal balance exceeds the borrowing base and such condition continues unremedied for ten days; or (vi) any law is adopted which prohibits or limits in any material respect the usage of the containers and is reasonably likely to materially and adversely effect the revenue-generating activities or operations of CLI Funding LLC. During an early amortization event, among other things, revenues of CLI Funding LLC shall be used to prepay the unpaid principal balance of the loans.

CLI Funding LLC or if the outstanding balance of the loans at any time exceeds the borrowing base and such default continue unremedied for a period of 90 days. was established as a bankruptcy-remote entity whose assets are isolated from those of Carlisle. The obligations under the Series 2006 Notes are full recourse obligations of CLI Funding LLC only and are not obligations of any other person.

On July 19, 2007, CLI Funding II LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Carlisle, entered into a $405 million term loan credit agreement (the ‘‘CLI Funding II Credit Facility’’) with Bear Stearns Corporate Lending Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as lenders, and Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp., as agent, each an affiliate of an underwriter for this offering.

In connection with this agreement, CLI Funding II LLC has entered into a security agreement with the agent, pursuant to which it has pledged certain assets including, among other things, marine and intermodal containers, gensets, direct finance lease receivables associated with certain container assets, the proceeds therefrom and related assets. These pledged assets are collateral security for the payment and performance of CLI Fund II LLC’s obligations under the CLI Funding II Credit Facility and the other loan documents.

Additionally, pursuant to a Management Agreement, Carlisle is the manager of such assets and Carlisle and Interpool Container Services, Inc., as sub-servicer, have entered into a Sub-Servicing Agreement pursuant to which Interpool Container Services, Inc. was retained for the administration and servicing of such assets during a certain transition period. During such transition period, the sub-servicer shall manage, market, lease and maintain such assets on behalf of the manager.

The loans under the CLI Funding II Credit Facility bear interest, at CLI Funding II LLC’s option, at the rate per annum equal to either (i) the greater of (a) the prime lending rate as set forth by the agent under the agreement, plus a margin and (b) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus ½ of 1% plus a margin or (ii) the LIBOR Rate determined for the applicable interest period, plus a margin.

The proceeds of the loans under the CLI Funding II Credit Facility may be used for the acquisition by CLI Funding II LLC of the collateral securing the loans and for other general working capital purposes.

At no time shall the outstanding loans exceed the borrowing base, which is based upon the most recent borrowing base report provided by CLI Funding II LLC and which at any time is the sum in the aggregate of 85% of the net book value of the eligible containers that are not then subject to a direct finance lease, plus 85% of the net present value of the direct finance lease receivables of all eligible containers that are then subject to a direct finance lease. If the outstanding loans exceed the borrowing base, then CLI Funding II LLC shall immediately repay the excess to the agent for the lenders to reduce the unpaid principal balance of the loans.

Each of the CLI Funding II Credit Facility, the Management Agreement and the Sub-Servicing Agreement contains typical representations and covenants for loans of this type. With respect to the CLI Funding II Credit Facility, CLI Funding II LLC has agreed (i) not to incur indebtedness and/or liens against its assets and/or to make investments except to the extent permitted by the CLI Funding II Credit Facility, (ii) not to dispose of assets except as permitted by the CLI Funding II Credit Facility, (iii) not to merge or consolidate with any other person or effect any asset acquisition of a facility, division or line or business or acquisition of a majority of the voting stock of any person, (iv) except as otherwise permitted by the CLI Funding II Credit Facility, not to engage in transactions with affiliates except on an arm’s-length basis in the ordinary course of business, (v) not to enter into any sale/leaseback transactions; (vi) not to become party to any agreements or instruments other than the CLI Funding II loan documents, agreements for the disposition of containers and leases as permitted by the CLI Funding II loan documents and agreements for the sale or re-lease of a container made in accordance with the terms of the management agreement with Carlisle; (vii) not to make any expenditure for capital assets except for the acquisition of additional containers in accordance with the terms of the CLI Funding II loan documents and capital improvements to the containers made in the ordinary course of business and in accordance with the terms of the management agreement; (viii) not to create any subsidiaries; (ix) not to amend or modify its depreciation policy in a manner that is less conservative or otherwise not in accordance with GAAP; (x) not to make any dividend or distribution if a default or event of default or early amortization event shall exist or would result therefrom except that any such payments may be made to affiliates for services provided or products delivered pursuant to permitted affiliate transactions; (xi) to keep the assets purchased with proceeds from this facility in good repair and working order and in use according to good operating practices; and (xii) to enter into an interest rate hedging agreement. A violation of any of these covenants could result in a default under the CLI Funding II Credit Facility.

With respect to the Management Agreement, Carlisle has agreed to (i) not become a party to or permit any of its subsidiaries to become a party to, any merger, amalgamation or consolidation, except as permitted by the Management Agreement, (ii) not be a party to any asset acquisition or stock acquisition (except in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice) unless the manager shall derive at least two-thirds (2/3) of its consolidated revenue from the ownership or management of marine containers or any ancillary, related or complementary business and no default shall result

therefrom; (iii) not dispose of, or permit its subsidiaries to dispose of, assets, except as permitted by the CLI Funding II Credit Facility and related documents; and (iv) maintain a consolidated tangible net worth of at least $200 million.

Among other things, it shall be a default under the Management Agreement if a change of control, as contemplated by the Management Agreement, of Carlisle shall occur or if Carlisle ceases to carry on the whole, or substantially the whole, of its container leasing business. Additionally, among other things, it shall be a default if (i) unless waived by the lenders, Carlisle shall own less than all of the capital stock of CLI Funding II LLC or fail to have sole control of CLI Funding II LLC and legally and beneficially own less than 51% of the capital stock of CLI Funding II LLC, (ii) the outstanding balance of the loans at any time exceeds the borrowing base and such default is not remedied within 60 days or (iii) the utilization rate (which is a fraction, the numerator of which is the aggregate number of all containers which are then subject to a lease which is not a defaulted lease and the denominator is the aggregate number of all containers) is less than 60%. An event of default would result in termination of all loans under the CLI Funding II Credit Facility and all other amounts owing under the CLI Funding II Credit Facility and other loan documents to become immediately due and payable.

Further, each of the following shall constitute an early amortization event under the CLI Funding II Credit Facility: (i) an event of default shall exist, (ii) a manager default shall exist, (iii) the interest coverage ratio of the CLI Funding II, LLC is less than two hundred percent (200%); (iv) the three month average utilization rate is less than seventy percent (70%); the consolidated tangible net worth of Carlisle and its subsidiaries shall be less than $200 million; or (v) the aggregate note principal balance exceeds the borrowing base and such condition continues unremedied for ten days. During an early amortization event, among other things, revenues of CLI Funding II, LLC shall be used to prepay the unpaid principal balance of the loans.

On October 31, 2007, CLI Funding III LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Carlisle, entered into a $300 million revolving loan credit agreement (the ‘‘CLI Funding III Credit Facility’’) with ING Bank N.V., DVB Bank N.V. and NIBC Bank N.V., as lenders, and ING Bank N.V., as administrative agent and collateral agent (the ‘‘Agent’’).

In connection with the CLI Funding III Credit Facility, Carlisle executed a guaranty, pursuant to which Carlisle guaranteed the punctual payment and performance when due by CLI Funding III LLC of its obligations under the CLI Funding III Credit Facility and the other related loan documents.

Pursuant to the terms of the CLI Funding III Credit Facility, CLI Funding III, LLC, as the borrower, entered into a Security Agreement with the Agent, pursuant to which the borrower pledged certain assets for the benefit of the secured parties as collateral security for the payment and performance of its obligations under the CLI Funding III Credit Facility and the other loan documents. The pledged assets include, among other things, direct finance lease receivables associated with certain container assets, the proceeds therefrom and certain related assets.

Additionally, pursuant to a Management Agreement, Carlisle is the manager of such assets and Carlisle and Interpool Container Services, Inc., as sub-servicer, have entered into a Sub-Servicing Agreement pursuant to which Interpool Container Services, Inc. was retained for the administration and servicing of such assets during a certain transition period. During such period, the sub-servicer has agreed to manage, market, lease and maintain such assets on behalf of the manager.

The facility has a two year commitment period, during which time CLI Funding III LLC may drawn down loans, followed by a term period, during which time the draw down amounts must be repaid prior to October 31, 2019.

The loans under the CLI Funding III Credit Facility bear interest at the LIBOR rate (as calculated by the administrative agent) determined for the applicable interest period, plus a margin. CLI Funding III LLC has also agreed to pay during the commitment period a 0.3% per annum commitment fee on the portion of the CLI Funding III Credit Facility that is available but not drawn down.

The proceeds of the loans under the CLI Funding III Credit Facility are to be used for the acquisition by the borrower of the collateral securing the loans and for other general business purposes.

At no time may the outstanding loans exceed the lesser of the aggregate commitments of the lenders and the borrowing base, which is based upon the most recent borrowing base report provided by CLI Funding III LLC and which at any time is equal to the sum in the aggregate of 85% of the net book value of the eligible containers that are not then subject to a defaulted finance lease. If the outstanding loans exceed the lesser of the aggregate commitments of the lenders and the borrowing base, then CLI Funding III LLC shall immediately repay the excess to the Agent for the lenders to reduce the unpaid principal balance of the loans or acquire additional finance leases, in each case to the extent necessary to cure such deficiency. If such amount is not paid in full within 45 days, it will constitute a default under the CLI Funding III Credit Facility.

Each of the CLI Funding III loan documents described above contains typical representations and covenants for loans of this type. With respect to the CLI Funding III Credit Facility, CLI Funding III LLC has agreed (i) not to incur indebtedness and/or liens against its assets and/or to make investments except to the extent permitted by the CLI Funding III Credit Facility, (ii) not to dispose of assets except as permitted by the CLI Funding III Credit Facility, (iii) not to merge or consolidate with any other person or effect any asset acquisition of a facility, division or line or business or acquisition of a majority of the voting stock of any person, except for ordinary course transactions, (iv) except as otherwise permitted by the CLI Funding III Credit Facility, not to engage in transactions with affiliates except on an arm’s-length basis in the ordinary course of business, (v) not to enter into any sale/leaseback transactions; and (vi) not to become party to any agreements or instruments other than the CLI Funding III loan documents, agreements for the disposition of containers and leases as permitted by the CLI Funding III loan documents and agreements for the sale or re-lease of a container made in accordance with the terms of the Management Agreement with Carlisle; (vii) not to make any expenditure for capital assets except for the acquisition of additional containers in accordance with the terms of the CLI Funding III loan documents and capital improvements to the containers made in the ordinary course of business and in accordance with the terms of the management agreement; (viii) not to create any subsidiaries; (ix) not to make any dividend or distribution if a default or event of default shall exist or would result therefrom, except that any such payments may be made to affiliates for services provided or products delivered pursuant to permitted affiliate transactions; (x) to keep the assets purchased with proceeds from this facility in good repair and working order and in use according to good operating practices; and (xi) to enter into an interest rate hedging agreement. A violation of any of these covenants could result in a default under the CLI Funding III Credit Facility.

A default under the Management Agreement shall be deemed to have occurred if, among other things, a change of control, as defined in the Management Agreement, of Carlisle occurs or if Carlisle ceases to carry on, or is restricted by any governmental authority from conducting, its container leasing business.

On May 18, 2007, SCT Containers Inc., our indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary, entered into a loan agreement (as amended on August 3, 2007, the ‘‘HSH Nordbank Facility’’) with the banks and

financial institutions listed in the loan agreement and HSH Nordbank AG, as agent and security trustee, consisting of a $500 million loan facility to enable SCT Containers Inc. and its subsidiaries to finance or refinance the purchase price of certain containerships.

In connection with the HSH Nordbank Facility, certain subsidiaries of SCT Containers Inc. that own containerships, financed with the proceeds of the loan, have executed guarantees in favor of HSH Nordbank AG, pursuant to which they guarantee all of the obligations of SCT Containers Inc. under the HSH Nordbank Facility and other related loan documents. In addition, as security for the performance of its obligations, SCT Containers Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries have pledged assets in favor of HSH Nordbank AG, as the security trustee, including, among other things, the vessels financed with the proceeds of the loan and certain contracts, accounts and vessel charters relating thereto.

The HSH Nordbank Facility amortizes quarterly according to a schedule set forth in the loan agreement. Amounts outstanding under the HSH Nordbank Facility must be repaid on the earlier of the tenth anniversary of the final drawdown date (as calculated in accordance with the agreement) or when the corresponding ship reaches 20 years of age. However, SCT Containers Inc. is required to prepay the loan in full at the election of the lenders if there is a change of control, as defined in the HSH Nordbank Facility, with respect to SCT Holdings or SCT Containers Inc. In addition, the Company currently expects to repay approximately $117 million of debt outstanding under this facility that was drawn down to finance the purchase of two containerships by March 31, 2008.

The loans under the HSH Nordbank Facility bear interest at LIBOR plus a margin plus a mandatory cost rate calculated in accordance with the loan agreement by HSH Nordbank AG, as agent, designed to compensate lenders for certain compliance costs. SCT Containers Inc. is required by the loan agreement to pay a commitment fee pro rata to the lenders each year on the total available commitments.

The borrower may borrow funds under the HSH Nordbank Facility until August 2, 2008. The HSH Nordbank Facility contains typical representations and covenants for loans of this type. SCT Containers Inc. has agreed to, during the term of the loan, (i) maintain freely available cash, that is free of liens other than those created by the HSH Nordbank loan documents, in an amount not less than $250,000 for each containership which is the subject of a mortgage and not subject to a bareboat charter (subject to a maximum of $1.5 million or such lower amount approved by the agent), (ii) not charter in any containerships where the relevant bareboat charter would be for more than 12 months without the agent’s consent, (iii) own the entire beneficial interest of each containership owner free from any lien other than those created by the HSH Nordbank loan documents and not permit any liens over any other assets other than in the ordinary course of owning the containership owners, (iv) not dispose of its assets other than for full consideration in the ordinary course of business and otherwise in accordance with the HSH Nordbank Facility, (v) subject to certain exceptions, not incur any indebtedness and (vi) not pay any dividend if an event of default exists or would result therefrom. A violation of any of these covenants could result in a default, which would result in termination of all commitments and loans under the HSH Nordbank Facility and all other amounts owing thereunder and under the other loan documents becoming immediately due and payable.

In the event that the ratio of the amount of the loan outstanding to the aggregate appraised market value of the containerships then subject to a mortgage plus any additional security provided to the lenders and any cash sale proceeds or insurance proceeds in connection with a loss, taking or hijacking or theft of a containership then held in a security account is greater than 0.85 to 1.0, SCT Containers Inc. shall be required to provide additional security acceptable to the lenders, or prepay such part of the loan required to reduce such ratio to be equal to or less than 0.85 to 1.0. The appraised market value of each containership then subject to a mortgage shall be ascertained annually or at such other times as the agent may require. The foregoing minimum security covenant shall not apply in circumstances where (i) the aggregate number of actual contracted days for which each such containership is subject to a charter weighted according to the amount of the advance relating to such containership, less any drydockings, is greater than 18 months and (ii) the ratio of (a) the aggregate amount of charter hire payable to the relevant containership owners under all charters over the then

next 12 month period, less operating costs and reasonable allowance for maintenance reserves, to (b) all projected interest and loan repayments accruing over the then next 12 month period based on the then current interest rate fixing projected forward, is greater than 1.2 to 1.0. Such ratios will be tested twice annually.

On December 21, 2007, SCT Containers III Pte. Ltd., our indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary, entered into a loan agreement (the ‘‘UOB Facility’’) with the banks and financial institutions listed in the loan agreement and United Overseas Bank Limited (‘‘UOB’’), as agent and security trustee, consisting of a $115.3 million loan facility to enable SCT Containers III Pte. Ltd. and its subsidiaries to finance the purchase price of two newbuild containerships for an aggregate purchase price of $176.0 million. There are two tranches of debt under the UOB Facility, a senior tranche totaling $88.7 million and a junior tranche, totaling $26.6 million.

In connection with the UOB Facility, SCT Holdings Inc., the parent of SCT Containers III Pte. Ltd., has provided a guarantee of the debt thereunder. Moreover, SCT Containers III Pte. Ltd. and certain of its shipowning subsidiaries have pledged assets in favor of UOB, as the security trustee, including, among other things, the vessels financed with the proceeds of the loan and certain contracts, accounts and vessel charters relating thereto.

The UOB Facility amortizes monthly according to a schedule set forth in the loan agreement. Amounts outstanding under the UOB Facility must be repaid on the tenth anniversary of the final drawdown date (as calculated in accordance with the agreement). However, SCT Containers III Pte. Ltd. is required to prepay the loan in full upon certain events and may be required to prepay the loan in full at the election of the lenders upon certain events, including, if there is a change of control, as defined in the UOB Facility, with respect to SCT Holdings or SCT Containers III Pte. Ltd.

The loans under the UOB Facility bear interest at LIBOR plus a margin applicable to each of the senior and junior tranches of debt. SCT Containers III Pte. Ltd. is required by the loan agreement to pay, commencing six months after the date of the agreement, a commitment fee pro rata to the lenders on each drawdown date on the total undrawn commitments.

The borrower may borrow funds under the UOB Facility until three months following the contractual delivery date of the newbuild containerships. The UOB Facility contains typical representations and covenants for loans of this type. SCT Containers III Pte. Ltd. has agreed to, among other things, during the term of the loan, (i) maintain freely available cash, that is free of liens other than those created by the UOB Facility loan documents, in an amount not less than $300,000 for each containership, (ii) maintain positive net worth, (iii) own the entire beneficial interest of each containership owner free from any lien other than those created by the UOB Facility loan documents and not permit any liens over any other assets other than in the ordinary course of owning the containership owners, (iv) not dispose of its assets other than for full consideration in the ordinary course of business and otherwise in accordance with the UOB Facility, (v) subject to certain exceptions, not incur any indebtedness, (vi) not pay any dividend if an event of default exists or would result therefrom and (vii) pay and discharge its obligations in respect of all its indebtedness when due. A violation of any of these covenants could result in a default, which would result in termination of all commitments and loans under the UOB Facility and all other amounts owing thereunder and under the other loan documents becoming immediately due and payable.

In the event that the ratio of the amount of the loan outstanding to the aggregate appraised market value of the containerships then subject to a mortgage plus any additional security provided to the lenders and any cash then held in a security account is greater than 0.80 to 1.0 for the first three years of the loan, 0.75 to 1.0 for the next three years and 0.70 to 1.0 thereafter, SCT Containers III Pte. Ltd. shall be required to provide additional security acceptable to the lenders, or prepay such part of the loan required to reduce such ratio to be equal to or less than the applicable ratio. The appraised market value of each containership then subject to a mortgage shall be ascertained annually or at such other times as the agent may require. The foregoing minimum security covenant shall not apply in circumstances where (i) the aggregate number of actual contracted days for which each such

containership is subject to a charter weighted according to the amount of the advance relating to such containership, less any drydockings, is greater than 18 months and (ii) the ratio of (a) the aggregate amount of charter hire payable to the relevant containership owners under all charters over the then next 12 month period, less operating costs and reasonable allowance for maintenance reserves, to (b) all projected interest and loan repayments accruing over the then next 12 month period based on the then current interest rate fixing projected forward, is greater than 1.2 to 1.0. Such ratios will be tested twice annually.

On December 27, 2007, SCT Containers III Pte. Ltd. borrowed $8.8 million to fund 50% of the pre-delivery deposit required in connection with the purchase of the two newbuild containerships.

The following descriptions are summaries of the material terms of our articles of incorporation and bylaws as will be in effect upon the consummation of this offering. These descriptions may not contain all of the information that is important to you. To understand them fully, you should read our articles and bylaws, copies of which are filed with the SEC as exhibits to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.

Please note that, with respect to any of our shares held in book-entry form through The Depository Trust Company or any other share depository, the depository or its nominee will be the sole registered and legal owner of those shares, and references in this prospectus to any ‘‘shareholder’’ or ‘‘holder’’ of those shares means only the depository or its nominee. Persons who hold beneficial interests in our shares through a depository will not be registered or legal owners of those shares and will not be recognized as such for any purpose. For example, only the depository or its nominee will be entitled to vote the shares held through it, and any dividends or other distributions to be paid, and any notices to be given, in respect of those shares will be paid or given only to the depository or its nominee. Owners of beneficial interests in those shares will have to look solely to the depository with respect to any benefits of share ownership, and any rights they may have with respect to those shares will be governed by the rules of the depository, which are subject to change from time to time. We have no responsibility for those rules or their application to any interests held through the depository.

Prior to completion of this offering, our articles of incorporation will be amended so that our authorized capital stock will consist of:

Upon completion of this offering, there will be outstanding 130,693,523 shares of common stock (assuming no exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option and an initial public offering price of $16.00, the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus) and no outstanding shares of preferred stock.

The following is a description of the material terms of our articles of incorporation and bylaws. We refer you to our articles of incorporation and bylaws, copies of which have been filed with the SEC as exhibits to our registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.

Each holder of common stock is entitled to one vote for each share of common stock held on all matters submitted to a vote of shareholders. Except as provided with respect to any other class or series of stock, the holders of our common stock will possess the exclusive right to vote for the election of directors and for all other purposes. Our articles of incorporation do not provide for cumulative voting in the election of directors, which means that the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock can elect all of the directors standing for election, and the holders of the remaining shares will not be able to elect any directors; provided, however, that pursuant to the Shareholders Agreement that we will enter into with the Initial Shareholders prior to the completion of this offering, we will be required to take all reasonable actions within our control (including nominating as directors the individuals designated by FIG that otherwise meet our reasonable standards for board nominations) so that up to a majority (depending upon the level of ownership of the Initial Shareholders) of the members of our board of directors are individuals designated by FIG.

Subject to any preference rights of holders of any preferred stock that we may issue in the future, holders of our common stock are entitled to receive dividends, if any, declared from time to time by our board of directors out of legally available funds. In the event of our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the holders of our common stock are entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining after the payment of liabilities, subject to any rights of holders of our preferred stock to prior distribution.

Holders of our common stock have no preemptive, subscription, redemption or conversion rights. Any shares of common stock sold under this prospectus will be validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable upon issuance against full payment of the purchase price for such shares.

Our board of directors has the authority, without action by our shareholders, to issue preferred stock and to fix voting powers for each class or series of preferred stock, and to provide that any class or series may be subject to redemption, entitled to receive dividends, entitled to rights upon dissolution, or convertible or exchangeable for shares of any other class or classes of capital stock. The rights with respect to a series or class of preferred stock may be greater than the rights attached to our common stock. It is not possible to state the actual effect of the issuance of any shares of our preferred stock on the rights of holders of our common stock until our board of directors determines the specific rights attached to that preferred stock. The effect of issuing preferred stock could include, among other things, one or more of the following:

Our articles of incorporation and bylaws provide that we have the option, but not the obligation, to require a shareholder that is not a U.S. citizen or a qualified resident of the U.S. or of the other contracting state of an income tax treaty applicable to us or any of our subsidiaries (as determined for purposes of the relevant provision of the limitation on benefits article of such treaty) owning more than 5% of our issued and outstanding common stock to sell its shares of common stock for their fair market value to us, to other shareholders or to third parties if we determine, that failure to exercise our option would result in adverse tax consequences to us or any of our subsidiaries. Our right to require a shareholder to sell its shares will be limited to the purchase of a number of shares that our directors in the reasonable exercise of their discretion, determine is necessary to permit avoidance of those adverse tax consequences.

For a description of the Shareholders Agreement that we will enter into with the Initial Shareholders prior to the completion of this offering, see ‘‘Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions – Shareholders Agreement.’’

The following is a summary of certain provisions of our articles of incorporation and bylaws that may be deemed to have an anti-takeover effect and may delay, deter or prevent a tender offer or takeover attempt that a shareholder might consider to be in its best interest, including those attempts that might result in a premium over the market price for the shares held by shareholders.

The authorized but unissued shares of our common stock and our preferred stock will be available for future issuance without obtaining shareholder approval. These additional shares may be utilized for a variety of corporate purposes, including future public offerings to raise additional capital, corporate acquisitions and employee benefit plans. The existence of authorized but unissued shares of our common stock and preferred stock could render more difficult or discourage an attempt to obtain control over us by means of a proxy contest, tender offer, merger or otherwise.

Our articles of incorporation provide for a staggered board of directors consisting of three classes of directors. Directors of each class are chosen for three-year terms upon the expiration of their current terms and each year one class of our directors will be elected by our shareholders. The terms of the first, second and third classes will expire in 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively. We believe that classification of our board of directors will help to assure the continuity and stability of our business strategies and policies as determined by our board of directors. Additionally, the BCA provides that shareholders are not entitled to cumulative votes in the election of directors unless our articles of incorporation provide otherwise. Our articles of incorporation do not provide for cumulative voting in the election of directors, and, in accordance with our bylaws the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock can elect all of the directors then standing for election, and the holders of the remaining shares will not be able to elect any directors. This classified board provision could have the effect of making the replacement of incumbent directors more time consuming and difficult. At least two annual meetings of shareholders, instead of one, will generally be required to effect a change in a majority of our board of directors. Thus, the classified board provision could increase the likelihood that incumbent directors will retain their positions. The staggered terms of directors may delay, defer or prevent a tender offer or an attempt to change control of us, even though a tender offer or change in control might be believed by our shareholders to be in their best interest. In addition, our bylaws provide that directors may be removed only for cause and only with the affirmative vote of at least 80% percent of the voting interest of shareholders entitled to vote; provided, however, that for so long as the Initial Shareholders own a majority of our issued and outstanding common stock, directors may be removed with or without cause with the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting interest of shareholders entitled to vote.

Pursuant to our articles of incorporation, shares or our preferred stock may be issued from time to time, and board of directors is authorized to determine and alter all rights, preferences, privileges, qualifications, limitations and restrictions without limitation. See ‘‘— Preferred Stock.’’ Our bylaws also provide that our shareholders are specifically denied the ability to call a special meeting of the shareholders; provided, however, that for so long as the Initial Shareholders own at least 40% of our issued and outstanding common stock, any shareholders that collectively beneficially own at least 40% of our issued and outstanding common stock may call special meetings of our shareholders.

Our articles of incorporation and bylaws do not permit our shareholders to call special shareholders meetings; provided, however, that for so long as the Initial Shareholder own at least 40% of our issued and outstanding common stock, any shareholders that collectively beneficially own at least 40% of our issued and outstanding common stock may call special meetings of our shareholders. Written notice of any special meeting so called shall be given to each shareholder of record entitled to vote at such meeting not less than 15 or more than 60 days before the date of such meeting, unless otherwise required by law.

Our articles of incorporation and bylaws allow any action required by the BCA to be taken by a meeting of our shareholders, and any action which may be taken at a meeting of our shareholders, may be taken without a meeting by unanimous written consent of all of our shareholders.

Our bylaws provide that nominations of persons for election to our board of directors may be made at any annual meeting of our shareholders, or at any special meeting of our shareholders called for the purpose of electing directors, (a) by or at the direction of our board of directors or (b) by any of our shareholders. In addition to any other applicable requirements, for business to be properly brought before an annual meeting by a shareholder, such shareholder must have given timely notice thereof in proper written form to our Secretary of the Company. To be timely, a shareholder’s notice must be delivered to or mailed and received at our principal executive offices not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting of shareholders; provided, however, that in the event that the annual meeting is called for a date that is not within 25 days before or after such anniversary date, notice by a shareholder in order to be timely must be so received not later than the close of business on the fifteenth day following the day on which such notice of the date of the annual meeting was mailed or such public disclosure of the date of the annual meeting was made, whichever first occurs.

The BCA does not contain specific provisions regarding ‘‘business combinations’’ between companies organized under the laws of the Marshall Islands and ‘‘interested shareholders.’’ In general, such provisions, including, for example, under Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, prohibit a publicly held corporation from engaging in a business combination with an interested shareholder for a period of three years after the date of the transaction by which that person became an interested shareholder, unless the business combination is approved in a prescribed manner. We have not chosen to include any such provisions in our governing documents. This may make it easier for a third party to acquire an interest in some or all of us with the approval of only some of our shareholders, even though our other shareholders may not deem such an acquisition beneficial to their interests.

Sales, Leases, Exchanges or Other Disposition of All or Substantially All of the Corporation’s Assets

The BCA provides that any sale, lease, exchange or other disposition of all or substantially all the assets of a corporation, if not made in the usual or regular course of business, must be approved by the board of directors and requires the affirmative vote of the holders of two-thirds of the shares of the corporation entitled to vote thereon (or if any class of shares is entitled to vote thereon as a class, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of each class of shares entitled to vote as a class thereon and of the total shares entitled to vote thereon). In such circumstances, the shareholders may also fix or may authorize the board to fix any or all terms and conditions of such disposition and the consideration to be received by the corporation therefor.

Under the BCA, our shareholders have the right to dissent from various corporate actions, including any merger or sale of all or substantially all of our assets not made in the usual course of our business, and to receive payment of the fair value of their shares. In the event of any further amendment of our articles of incorporation, a shareholder also has the right to dissent and receive payment for his or her shares if the amendment alters certain rights in respect of those shares. The dissenting shareholder must follow the procedures set forth in the BCA to receive payment. In the event that we and any dissenting shareholder fail to agree on a price for the shares, the BCA procedures involve, among other things, the institution of proceedings in the high court of the Republic of The Marshall Islands in which our Marshall Islands office is situated or in any appropriate jurisdiction outside the Marshall Islands in which our shares are primarily traded on a local or national securities exchange. The value of the shares of the dissenting shareholder is fixed by the court after reference, if the court so elects, to the recommendations of a court-appointed appraiser.

Under the BCA, any of our shareholders may bring an action in our name to procure a judgment in our favor, also known as a derivative action, provided that the shareholder bringing the action is a holder of common stock both at the time the derivative action is commenced and at the time of the transaction to which the action relates. Under Marshall Islands law, the Company may require such a shareholder plaintiff bringing a derivative suit to give security for reasonable expenses if the plaintiff owns less than 5% of any class of stock of the Company and the shares owned by the plaintiff have a value of less than $50,000.

Subject to certain limitations, the BCA authorizes corporations to limit or eliminate the personal liability of directors and officers to corporations and their shareholders for monetary damages for breaches of directors’ fiduciary duties. Our articles of incorporation include a provision that eliminates the personal liability of directors or officers for monetary damages for actions taken as a director or officer to the fullest extent permitted by law.

Our articles of incorporation provide that we must indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent authorized by law. We are also expressly authorized to advance certain expenses

(including attorneys’ fees and disbursements and court costs) to our directors and offices and carry directors’ and officers’ insurance providing indemnification for our directors and officers for some liabilities. We believe that these indemnification provisions and insurance are useful to attract and retain qualified directors and executive officers.

The limitation of liability and indemnification provisions in our articles of incorporation may discourage shareholders from bringing a lawsuit against directors for breach of their fiduciary duty. These provisions may also have the effect of reducing the likelihood of derivative litigation against directors and officers, even though such an action, if successful, might otherwise benefit us and our shareholders. In addition, your investment may be adversely affected to the extent we pay the costs of settlement and damage awards against directors and officers pursuant to these indemnification provisions.

Prior to completion of this offering, we intend to enter into separate indemnification agreements with each of our directors and officers. Each indemnification agreement will provide, among other things, for indemnification to the fullest extent permitted by law and our articles of incorporation against (i) any and all expenses and liabilities, including judgments, fines, penalties and amounts paid in settlement of any claim with our approval and counsel fees and disbursements, (ii) any liability pursuant to a loan guarantee, or otherwise, for any of our indebtedness, and (iii) any liabilities incurred as a result of acting on our behalf (as a fiduciary or otherwise) in connection with an employee benefit plan. The indemnification agreements will provide for the advancement or payment of all expenses to the indemnitee and for reimbursement to us if it is found that such indemnitee is not entitled to such indemnification under applicable law and our articles of incorporation. These agreements together with the provisions of the BCA and in our articles of incorporation described above, may have the practical effect in some cases of eliminating our shareholders’ ability to collect monetary damages from our directors and executive officers.

The registrar and transfer agent for our common stock is American Stock Transfer & Trust Company.

Our common stock has been approved for listing on the NYSE under the symbol ‘‘SC’’, subject to official notice of issuance.

Our corporate affairs are governed by our articles of incorporation and bylaws and by the Business Corporation Act of the Republic of The Marshall Islands, or the BCA. The provisions of the BCA resemble provisions of the corporation laws of a number of states in the United States. While the BCA provides that it is to be in interpreted according to the laws of the State of Delaware and other states with substantially similar legislative provisions, there have been few, if any, court cases interpreting the BCA in the Marshall Islands and we can not predict whether Marshall Islands courts would reach the same conclusions as United States courts. Thus, you may have more difficulty in protecting your interests in the face of actions by the management, directors or controlling shareholders than would shareholders of a corporation incorporated in a United States jurisdiction which has developed a substantial body of case law. The following table provides a comparison between the statutory provisions of the BCA and the Delaware General Corporation Law relating to shareholders’ rights:


Marshall Islands			Delaware
Shareholder Meetings
• Held at a time and place as designated in the bylaws.			• May be held at such time or place as designated in the certificate of incorporation or the bylaws, or if not so designated, as determined by the Board of Directors.
• May be held within or outside of the Marshall Islands.			• May be held within or outside of Delaware.
• Notice:			• Notice:
• Whenever shareholders are required to take action at a meeting, written notice shall state the place, date and hour of the meeting and indicate that it is being issued by or at the direction of the person calling the meeting.			• Whenever shareholders are required to take any action at a meeting, a written notice of the meeting shall be given which shall state the place, if any, date and hour of the meeting, and the means of remote communication, if any.
• A copy of the notice of any meeting shall be given personally or sent by mail not less than 15 nor more than 60 days before the meeting.			• Written notice shall be given not less than 10 nor more than 60 days before the meeting.


Marshall Islands			Delaware
Shareholder’s Voting Rights
• Any action required to be taken at a meeting of shareholders may be taken without a meeting if consent is in writing and is signed by all the shareholders entitled to vote.			• Any action which may be taken at meeting of shareholders may be taken without a meeting if a consent in writing, setting forth the action so taken, shall be signed by holders of outstanding stock having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting at which all shares entitle to vote thereon were present and voted.
• Any person authorized to vote may authorize another person to act for him by proxy.			• Any person authorized to vote may authorize another person or persons to act for him by proxy.
• Unless otherwise provided in the articles of incorporation, a majority of shares entitled to vote constitutes a quorum. In no event shall a quorum consist of fewer than one third of the shares entitled to vote at a meeting.			• For non-stock companies, certificate of incorporation or bylaws may specify the number of members to constitute a quorum. In the absence of this, one-third of the members shall constitute a quorum.
• When a quorum is once present to organize a meeting, it is not broken by the subsequent withdrawal of any shareholders.			• For stock corporations, certificate of incorporation or bylaws may specify the number to constitute a quorum but in no event shall a quorum consist of less than one-third of shares entitled to vote at a meeting. In the absence of such specifications, a majority of shares entitled to vote shall constitute a quorum.
• The articles of incorporation may provide for cumulative voting in the election of directors.			• The certificate of incorporation may provide for cumulative voting.
• Any two or more domestic corporations may merge into a single corporation if approved by the board and if authorized by a majority vote of the holders of outstanding shares at a shareholder meeting.			• Any two or more corporations existing under the laws of the state may merge into a single corporation pursuant to a board resolution and upon the majority vote by shareholders of each constituent corporation at an annual or special meeting.
• Any sale, lease, exchange or other disposition of all or substantially all the assets of a corporation, if not made in the corporation’s usual or regular course of business, once approved by the board, shall be authorized by the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the shares of those entitled to vote at a shareholder meeting.			• Every corporation may at any meeting of the board sell, lease or exchange all or substantially all of its property and assets as its board deems expedient and for the best interests of the corporation when so authorized by a resolution adopted by the holders of a majority of the outstanding stock of a corporation entitled to vote.


Marshall Islands			Delaware
• Any domestic corporation owning at least 90% of the outstanding shares of each class of another domestic corporation may merge such other corporation into itself without the authorization of the shareholders of any corporation.			• Any corporation owning at least 90% of the outstanding shares of each class of another corporation may merge the other corporation into itself and assume all of its obligations without the vote or consent of shareholders; however, in case the parent corporation is not the surviving corporation, the proposed merger shall be approved by a majority of the outstanding stock of the parent corporation entitled to vote at a duly called shareholder meeting.
• Any mortgage, pledge of or creation of a security interest in all or any part of the corporate property may be authorized without the vote or consent of the shareholders, unless otherwise provided for in the articles of incorporation or by law.			• Any mortgage or pledge of a corporation’s property and assets may be authorized without the vote or consent of shareholders, except to the extent that the certificate of incorporation otherwise provides.
Directors
• Board must consist of at least one member.			• Board must consist of at least one member.
• Number of members can be changed by an amendment to the bylaws, by the shareholders, or by, if so authorized by the bylaws, action of the board under the specific provisions of a bylaw.			• Number of board members shall be fixed by the bylaws, unless the certificate of incorporation fixes the number of directors.
• If the board is authorized to change the number of directors, it can only do so by a majority of the entire board and so long as no decrease in the number shall shorten the term of any incumbent director.			• If the number of directors is fixed by the certificate of incorporation, a change in the number shall be made only by an amendment of the certificate.
• Removal:			Removal:
• Any or all of the directors may be removed for cause by vote of the shareholders.			• Any or all of the directors may be removed, with or without cause, by the holders of a majority of the shares entitled to vote unless the certificate of incorporation otherwise provides.
• If the articles of incorporation or the bylaws so provide, any or all of the directors may be removed without cause by vote of the shareholders.			• In the case of a classified board, shareholders may effect removal of any or all directors only for cause.
Dissenter’s Rights of Appraisal
• Shareholder’s have a right to dissent from a merger or sale of all or substantially all assets not made in the usual course of business, and receive payment of the fair value of their shares.			• With limited exceptions, appraisal rights are available for the shares of any class or series of stock of a corporation in a merger or consolidation.


Marshall Islands			Delaware
• A holder of any adversely affected shares who does not vote on or consent in writing to an amendment to the articles of incorporation has the right to dissent and to receive payment for such shares if the amendment:
• alters or abolishes any preferential right of any outstanding shares having preference; or
• creates, alters, or abolishes any provision or right in respect to the redemption of any outstanding shares; or
• alters or abolishes any preemptive right of such holder to acquire shares or other securities; or
• excludes or limits the right of such holder to vote on any matter, except as such right may be limited by the voting rights given to new shares then being authorized of any existing or new class.
Shareholder’s Derivative Actions
• An action may be brought in the right of a corporation to procure a judgment in its favor, by a holder of shares or of voting trust certificates or of a beneficial interest in such shares or certificates. It shall be made to appear that the plaintiff is such a holder at the time of bringing the action and that he was such a holder at the time of the transaction of which he complains, or that his shares or his interest therein devolved upon him by operation of law.			• In any derivative suit instituted by a shareholder or a corporation, it shall be averred in the complaint that the plaintiff was a shareholder of the corporation at the time of the transaction of which he complains or that such shareholder’s stock thereafter devolved upon such shareholder by operation of law.
• Complaint shall set forth with particularity the efforts of the plaintiff to secure the initiation of such action by the board or the reasons for not making such effort.
• Such action shall not be discontinued, compromised or settled, without the approval of the High Court of the Republic.
• Reasonable expenses including attorney’s fees may be awarded if the action is successful.

Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our common stock, and we cannot predict the effect, if any, that sales of shares or availability of any shares for sale will have on the market price of our common stock prevailing from time to time. Sales of substantial amounts of common stock (including shares issued on the exercise of options, warrants or convertible securities, if any) or the perception that such sales could occur, could adversely affect the market price of our common stock and our ability to raise additional capital through a future sale of securities.

Upon completion of this offering, we will have 130,693,523 shares of common stock issued and outstanding (133,693,523 shares if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full). All of the 20,000,000 shares of our common stock sold in this offering (or 23,000,000 shares if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full) will be freely tradable without restriction or further registration under the Securities Act unless such shares are purchased by ‘‘affiliates’’ as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act. Upon completion of this offering, approximately 84% of our outstanding common stock (or 82% if the underwriters’ over-allotment option is exercised in full) will be held by Fortress and members of our management and employees. These shares will be ‘‘restricted securities’’ as that phrase is defined in Rule 144. Subject to certain contractual restrictions, including the lock-up agreements described below, holders of restricted shares will be entitled to sell those shares in the public market if they qualify for an exemption from registration under Rule 144 or any other applicable exemption under the Securities Act. Subject to the lock-up agreements described below and the provisions of Rules 144 and 701, additional shares will be available for sale as set forth below.

In addition to the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock, we intend to file a registration statement on Form S-8 to register an aggregate of 4,000,000 shares of common stock reserved for issuance under our incentive programs. That registration statement will become effective upon filing, and shares of common stock covered by such registration statement are eligible for sale in the public market immediately after the effective date of such registration statement, subject to the lock-up agreements described above.

We and our officers and directors, the Initial Shareholders and the remaining holders of substantially all of our common stock have agreed with the underwriters, subject to certain exceptions, not to dispose of or hedge any of their shares of common stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable for shares during the period from the date of this prospectus continuing through the date 120 days after the date of this prospectus, except with the prior written consent of Citigroup Global Markets Inc. This agreement does not apply to any existing incentive programs.

The 120-day restricted period described in the preceding paragraph will be automatically extended if (1) during the last 17 days of the 120-day restricted period we issue an earnings release or announce material news or a material event relating to us occurs or (2) prior to the expiration of the 120-day restricted period, we announce that we will release earnings results during the 16-day period following the last day of the 120-day restricted period, in which case the restrictions described in the preceding paragraph will continue to apply until the expiration of the 18-day period beginning on the issuance of the earnings release or the announcement of the material news or material event, unless Citigroup Global Markets Inc. provides a written waiver of such extension. Citigroup Global Markets Inc. has no present intent or arrangement to release any of the securities subject to these lock-up agreements. The release of any lock-up is considered on a case by case basis. Factors in deciding whether to release shares may include the length of time before the lock-up expires, the number of shares involved, the reason for the requested release, market conditions, the trading price of our common stock, historical trading volumes of our common stock and whether the person seeking the release is an officer, director or affiliate of the Company.

All participants in the directed shares program described under ‘‘Underwriting’’ have also agreed to similar restrictions on the ability to sell their shares of common stock.

In general, under Rule 144 of the Securities Act as currently in effect, beginning 90 days after the date of this prospectus a person may sell within any three month period a number of shares of common stock that does not exceed the greater of:

subject to a requirement that any ‘‘restricted’’ shares have been beneficially owned for at least six months, including the holding period of any prior owner which was not an affiliate.

For purposes of applying this volume limit, sales by certain related persons and sales by persons acting in concert must be aggregated. In addition, sales under Rule 144 must be made in unsolicited brokers’ transactions and must be disclosed in a notice filing with the SEC. For an affiliate, some of these requirements would also apply to sales of unrestricted shares.

Sales under Rule 144 are also subject to manner of sale provisions and notice requirements and to the availability of current public information about us. An ‘‘affiliate’’ is a person that directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls or is controlled by, or is under common control with an issuer.

Under Rule 144, a person (or persons whose shares are aggregated) who is not deemed to have been our affiliate at any time during the three months preceding a sale, and who has beneficially owned the shares proposed to be sold for at least six months (including the holding period of any prior owner other than an affiliate), is entitled to sell these shares under Rule 144 without complying with the manner of sale, volume limitation or notice provisions of Rule 144. A non-affiliate who has held the shares proposed to be sold for at least one year is entitled to sell these shares with no Rule 144 requirements.

Securities issued in reliance on Rule 701, such as shares of our common stock acquired upon the exercise of options granted under our stock option plans, are also restricted and, beginning 90 days after the effective date of this prospectus, may be sold by shareholders other than our affiliates, subject only to the manner of sale provisions of Rule 144, and by affiliates under Rule 144 without compliance with its six months holding period requirement.

Pursuant to the Shareholders Agreement that we will enter into prior to completion of this offering, the Initial Shareholders and certain of their affiliates and permitted third-party transferees will have the right, in certain circumstances, to require us to register their shares of our common stock under the Securities Act for sale into the public markets at any time following the expiration of the lock-up period described above. The Initial Shareholders and certain of their affiliates and permitted third-party transferees will also be entitled to piggyback registration rights with respect to any future registration statement that we file for an underwritten public offering of our securities. Upon the effectiveness of such a registration statement, all shares covered by the registration statement will be freely transferable. If these rights are exercised and one or more Initial Shareholders sell a large number of shares of common stock, the market price of our common stock could decline. See ‘‘Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions – Shareholders Agreement’’ for a more detailed description of these registration rights.

The following is a discussion as to matters of the laws of the Marshall Islands, and the current laws of the Marshall Islands applicable to persons who do not reside in, maintain offices in or engage in business in the Marshall Islands.

Because we do not, and we do not expect that we will, conduct business or operations in the Marshall Islands, and because all documentation related to this offering will be executed outside of the Marshall Islands, under current Marshall Islands law we will not be subject to tax in the Marshall Islands (other than a tonnage tax imposed at a rate of US$0.20 per registered ton with respect to our ships registered in the Marshall Islands and certain other de minimis fees) and you will not be subject to Marshall Islands taxation or withholding on distributions, including upon a return of capital, we make to you as a shareholder. In addition, you will not be subject to Marshall Islands stamp, capital gains or other taxes on the purchase, ownership or disposition of our common stock, and you will not be required by the Marshall Islands to file a tax return relating to our common stock.

It is the responsibility of each shareholder to investigate the legal and tax consequences, under the laws of pertinent jurisdictions, including the Marshall Islands, of his or her investment in us. Accordingly, each prospective shareholder is urged to consult, and depend upon, his tax counsel or other advisor with regard to those matters. Further, it is the responsibility of each shareholder to file all state, local and non-US, as well as US federal tax returns that may be required of him or her.

The following is a discussion of the material U.S. federal income tax considerations applicable to the purchase, ownership and disposition of shares of common stock by U.S. Holders (as defined below) and Non-U.S. Holders (as defined below). This discussion deals only with our common stock held as capital assets by holders who purchase common stock in this offering. This discussion does not cover all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may be relevant to the purchase, ownership or disposition of our common stock by prospective investors in light of their particular circumstances. In particular, this discussion does not address all of the tax considerations that may be relevant to certain types of investors subject to special treatment under U.S. federal income tax laws, such as the following:

Furthermore, this discussion is based upon the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, the Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder and administrative and judicial interpretations thereof, all as of the date hereof. Such authorities may be repealed, revoked, modified or subject to differing interpretations, possibly on a retroactive basis, so as to result in U.S. federal income tax consequences different from those discussed below. This discussion does not address any state, local or non-U.S. tax considerations.

For purposes of this discussion, you will be considered a ‘‘U.S. Holder’’ if you beneficially own shares of our common stock and you are for U.S. federal income tax purposes one of the following:

You will be considered a ‘‘Non-U.S. Holder’’ if you beneficially own shares of our common stock and you are not a U.S. Holder or a partnership or an entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. If you are a partnership or other entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of your partners generally will depend upon the status of such partners and your activities.

If you are considering the purchase of shares of our common stock, we urge you to consult your own tax advisors concerning the particular U.S. federal income tax consequences to you of the purchase, ownership and disposition of our common stock, as well as any consequences to you arising under state, local and non-U.S. tax laws.

Seacastle expects that it will not be treated as engaged in a trade or business in the United States and thus will not be subject to U.S. federal income taxation. No assurances can be given, however, in this regard. Certain subsidiaries of Seacastle are, and certain other subsidiaries may be treated as engaged in a trade or business in the United States. Unless otherwise exempted by an applicable income tax treaty, a non-U.S. corporation that is engaged in a trade or business in the United States is generally subject to U.S. federal income taxation, at the graduated tax rates applicable to U.S. corporations, on the portion of such non-U.S. corporation’s income that is ‘‘effectively connected’’ with such trade or business. In addition, such non-U.S. corporation may be subject to the U.S. federal branch profits tax on its effectively connected earnings and profits at a rate of 30%, or at such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty.

We expect that our Luxembourg subsidiary will be eligible to claim the benefits of the Luxembourg Treaty. Accordingly, dividends paid by Interpool to our Luxembourg subsidiary are expected to be eligible for a reduced rate of U.S. withholding tax of 5% under the Luxembourg Treaty. No assurances can be given, however, that our Luxembourg subsidiary will qualify each year for the benefits of the Luxembourg Treaty.

Although SHL may be treated as engaged in a trade or business in the United States, we expect that SHL generally will not earn income that is treated as effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business. Accordingly, we expect that SHL generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income taxation on a net income basis. No assurances can be given, however, that SHL will be able to avoid generating income (unless exempt from tax pursuant to Section 883 of the Internal Revenue Code as

described below) that is effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business. We expect that SHL’s U.S. source leasing income with respect to bareboat charter and time charter leases generally will be subject to U.S. federal taxation, on a gross income basis, at a rate of not in excess of 4% as provided in Section 887 of the Internal Revenue Code. If, contrary to expectations, SHL were to be treated as having a fixed place of business in the United States involved in the earning of United States source gross transportation income and SHL did not comply with certain administrative guidelines of the IRS, such that 90% or more of SHL’s U.S. source leasing income with respect to bareboat charters were attributable to the activities of personnel based in the United States, SHL’s U.S. source leasing income with respect to bareboat leases could be treated as income effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States. Likewise, if, contrary to expectations, SHL were to be treated as having a fixed place of business in the United States involved in the earning of United States source gross transportation income and SHL did not comply with certain administrative guidelines of the IRS, such that 90% or more of SHL’s U.S. source leasing income with respect to time charter leases were attributable to regularly scheduled transportation, SHL’s U.S. source leasing income with respect to time charter leases could be treated as income effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States. In such case, SHL’s U.S. source leasing income with respect to bareboat leases, or time charter leases, as the case may be, would be subject to U.S. federal income taxation at a maximum rate of 35%. In addition, SHL would be subject to the U.S. federal branch profits tax on its effectively connected earnings and profits at a rate of 30%.

Section 883 of the Internal Revenue Code provides an exemption from U.S. federal income taxation for income derived from ships used in international traffic by certain foreign corporations. To qualify for this exemption in respect of rental income, the lessor of the ship must be organized in a country that grants a comparable exemption to U.S. lessors (Marshall Islands does), and the direct and indirect shareholders of the lessor must satisfy certain residency and other reporting requirements. We do not expect to be able to qualify for this exemption at the time of this offering but may be able to do so in the future.

Subject to the passive foreign investment company rules and the controlled foreign corporation rules discussed below, distributions of cash or property that we pay in respect of our common stock will constitute dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the extent paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes) and will be includible in your gross income upon receipt. Distributions to you in excess of our earnings and profits will be treated first as a return of capital (with a corresponding reduction in your tax basis in the shares of common stock) to the extent of your tax basis in the common stock on which the distribution was made, and then as capital gain from the sale or exchange of such shares of common stock. Subject to the passive foreign investment company rules discussed below, dividends received for taxable years beginning on or before December 31, 2010 by non-corporate U.S. Holders on shares of certain foreign corporations may be subject to United States federal income tax at lower rates of taxation applicable to long-term capital gains (i.e., gains from the sale of capital assets held for more than one year) if certain conditions are met, including certain holding period requirements and the absence of certain risk reduction transactions.

Subject to the passive foreign investment company rules and the controlled foreign corporation rules discussed below, upon the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of shares of common stock, you will recognize capital gain or loss equal to the difference between the amount realized on such sale, exchange or taxable disposition and your tax basis in the shares of common stock sold. Such gain or loss generally will be long-term capital gain or loss if your holding period with respect to such shares of common stock is more than one year at the time of its disposition. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations.

A non-U.S. corporation will be classified as a ‘‘passive foreign investment company’’, or a PFIC for United States federal income tax purposes in any taxable year in which, after applying certain look-through rules, either at least 75% of its gross income is ‘‘passive income’’; or at least 50% of the average value of its gross assets is attributable to assets that produce ‘‘passive income’’ or are held for the production of passive income. Passive income for this purpose generally includes dividends, interest, royalties, rents other than rents derived from the active conduct of a trade or business, and gains from commodities and securities transactions. Based on certain estimates of Seacastle’s gross income and gross assets and the nature of Seacastle’s business, Seacastle does not expect that it will be a PFIC for its taxable year ending 31 December 2007. However, because PFIC status is based on Seacastle’s income, assets and activities for the entire taxable year, it is not possible to determine whether Seacastle will become a PFIC for the 2007 taxable year until after the close of the taxable year. Moreover, Seacastle must determine its PFIC status annually based on tests which are factual in nature and Seacastle’s status in future years will depend on its income, assets and activities in those years. Although Seacastle does not expect that its income, assets or activities will change in a manner that would cause Seacastle to be classified as a PFIC in the future, there can be no assurance that Seacastle will not be a PFIC for any future taxable year. If Seacastle were a PFIC, a US Holder that is not a 10% U.S. Holder (defined below) for any year in which Seacastle was both a PFIC and a CFC generally would be subject to imputed interest charges and other disadvantageous tax treatment (including the denial of the taxation of such dividends at the lower rates applicable to long-term capital gains, as discussed above under ‘‘– Dividends’’) with respect to any gain from the sale, exchange or other disposition of, and certain distributions with respect to our common stock.

We expect that Seacastle and certain of its subsidiaries currently are CFCs for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Seacastle will be a CFC for any year in which U.S. Holders that each own (directly, indirectly or by attribution) at least 10% of Seacastle’s voting shares (each referred to in this prospectus as a ‘‘10% U.S. Holder’’) together own more than 50% of the total combined voting power of all classes of Seacastle’s voting shares or more than 50% of the total value of Seacastle’s shares. The classification of Seacastle as a CFC has many complex results, one of which is that if you are a 10% U.S. Holder on the last day of Seacastle’s taxable year, you will be required to recognize as ordinary income your pro rata share of certain income of Seacastle and its subsidiaries (including both ordinary earnings and capital gains) for the taxable year, whether or not you receive any distributions on your shares of common stock during that taxable year. In addition, special foreign tax credit rules would apply. Your adjusted tax basis in your shares of common stock would be increased to reflect any taxed but undistributed earnings and profits. Any distribution of earnings and profits that previously had been taxed would result in a corresponding reduction in your adjusted tax basis in your shares of common stock and would not be taxed again when you receive such distribution. Subject to a special limitation in the case of individual 10% U.S. Holders that have held their shares of common stock for more than one year, if you are a 10% U.S. Holder, any gain from disposition of your shares of common stock will be treated as dividend income to the extent of accumulated earnings attributable to such shares of common stock during the time you held such shares of common stock.

In general, information will be reported to the IRS each year regarding the amount of any dividends on our common stock and the proceeds of any sale of our common stock paid to you during such year unless you are an exempt recipient (such as a corporation). A backup withholding tax will apply to such payments if you fail to provide your taxpayer identification number or to make required certifications or you have been notified by the IRS that you are subject to backup withholding. Backup withholding is not an additional tax and any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules will be allowed as a refund or a credit against your U.S. federal income tax liability provided that you timely furnish the required information to the IRS.

If you are a U.S. Holder that owns more than 10% of the aggregate value of our common stock (or you are an officer or director of Seacastle and you are a United States citizen or resident) you may be required to file an information return on IRS Form 5471. A U.S. Holder that purchases common stock with cash generally will be required to file Form 926 with the IRS if (i) immediately after the transfers such investor holds, directly or indirectly, at least 10% of our voting shares, or (ii) the amount of cash transferred in exchange for shares of common stock during the 12-month period ending on the date of the transfer exceeds $100,000. In the event a U.S. Holder fails to file any such required form, such holder could be required to pay a substantial penalty. In addition, depending on your particular circumstances, you may be required to file certain other IRS information returns with respect to an investment in shares of common stock.

The following discussion applies to you only if you are a Non-U.S. Holder. Special rules may apply to you if you are a CFC or a PFIC or are otherwise subject to special treatment under the Internal Revenue Code. In such case, you should consult your own tax advisor to determine the U.S. federal, state, local and non-U.S. tax consequences that may be relevant to you with respect to an investment in shares of common stock.

You generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax or withholding tax on dividends received from us with respect to the shares of common stock, unless that income is effectively connected with your conduct of a trade or business in the United States. If you are entitled to the benefits of a U.S. income tax treaty with respect to those dividends, that income is generally taxable only if it is attributable to a permanent establishment maintained by you in the United States.

You generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax or withholding tax with respect to any gain recognized on a sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of shares of our common stock unless:

If you are an individual and are described in the first bullet above, you will be subject to tax on any gain derived from the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of shares of common stock under regular graduated U.S. federal income tax rates. If you are an individual and are described in the second bullet above, you will be subject to a flat 30% tax on any gain derived from the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of shares of common stock that may be offset by U.S. source capital losses (even though you are not considered a resident of the United States). If you are a corporation and are described in the first bullet above, you will be subject to tax on your gain under regular graduated U.S. federal income tax rates and, in addition, may be subject to the branch profits tax on your effectively connected earnings and profits for the taxable year, which would include such gain, at a rate of 30%, or at such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty.

You may be required to establish your exemption from information reporting and backup withholding by certifying your status on Internal Revenue Service Form W-8BEN, W-8ECI or W-8IMY, as applicable.

If you are a Non-U.S. Holder and you sell your shares of common stock to or through a U.S. office of a broker, the payment of the proceeds is subject to both U.S. backup withholding and information reporting unless you certify that you are a non-U.S. person, under penalties of perjury, or you otherwise establish an exemption. If you sell your shares of common stock through a non-U.S. office of a non-U.S. broker and the sales proceeds are paid to you outside the United States, then information reporting and backup withholding generally will not apply to that payment. However, U.S. information reporting requirements, but not backup withholding, will apply to a payment of sales proceeds, even if that payment is made to you outside the United States, if you sell your shares of common stock through a non-U.S. office of a broker that is a U.S. person or that has some other contacts with the United States. Such information reporting requirements will not apply, however, if the broker has documentary evidence in its records that you are a non-U.S. person and certain other conditions are met, or you otherwise establish an exemption.

The IRS may make information reported to you and the IRS available under the provisions of an applicable income tax treaty to the tax authorities in the country in which you reside. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules will be allowed as a refund or a credit against your U.S. federal income tax liability, if any, provided the required information is timely furnished by you to the IRS. You should consult your own tax advisors regarding the filing of a U.S. tax return for claiming a refund of any such backup withholding.

Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc., Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated are acting as joint bookrunning managers of the offering and as representatives of the underwriters named below. Subject to the terms and conditions stated in the underwriting agreement dated the date of this prospectus, each underwriter named below has agreed to purchase, and we have agreed to sell to that underwriter, the number of shares set forth opposite the underwriter’s name.

The underwriting agreement provides that the obligations of the underwriters to purchase the shares included in this offering are subject to approval of legal matters by counsel and to other conditions. The underwriters are obligated to purchase all the shares (other than those covered by the over-allotment option described below) if they purchase any of the shares.

The underwriters propose to offer some of the shares directly to the public at the public offering price set forth on the cover page of this prospectus and some of the shares to dealers at the public offering price less a concession not to exceed $ per share. The underwriters may allow, and dealers may reallow, a concession not to exceed $ per share on sales to other dealers. If all of the shares are not sold at the initial offering price, the representatives may change the public offering price and the other selling terms. The representatives have advised us that the underwriters do not intend sales to discretionary accounts to exceed five percent of the total number of shares of our common stock offered by them.

We have granted to the underwriters an option to purchase up to 3,000,000 additional shares of common stock, exercisable for 30 days from the date of this prospectus, at the public offering price less the underwriting discount. The underwriters may exercise the option solely for the purpose of covering over-allotments, if any, in connection with this offering. To the extent the over-allotment option is exercised, each underwriter must purchase a number of additional shares approximately proportionate to that underwriter’s initial purchase commitment.

We, our officers and directors, and certain of our other shareholders have agreed that, subject to certain exceptions, for a period of 120 days from the date of this prospectus, we and they will not, without the prior written consent of Citigroup Global Markets Inc., dispose of or hedge any shares of our common stock or any securities convertible into or exchangeable for our common stock. Citigroup Global Markets Inc. in its sole discretion may release any of the securities subject to these lock-up agreements at any time without notice.

At our request, the underwriters have reserved up to 10% of the shares of common stock for sale at the initial public offering price to persons who are directors, officers or employees, or who are otherwise associated with us through a directed share program. The number of shares of common stock available for sale to the general public will be reduced by the number of directed shares purchased by participants in the program. Any directed shares not purchased will be offered by the underwriters to the general public on the same basis as all other shares of common stock offered. We have agreed to indemnify the underwriters against certain liabilities and expenses, including liabilities under the Securities Act, in connection with the sales of the directed shares.

In relation to each member state of the European Economic Area that has implemented the Prospectus Directive (each, a relevant member state), with effect from and including the date on which the Prospectus Directive is implemented in that relevant member state (the relevant implementation date), an offer of the shares described in this prospectus may not be made to the public in that relevant member state prior to the publication of a prospectus in relation to the shares that has been approved by the competent authority in that relevant member state or, where appropriate, approved in another relevant member state and notified to the competent authority in that relevant member state, all in accordance with the Prospectus Directive, except that, with effect from and including the relevant implementation date, an offer of securities may be offered to the public in that relevant member state at any time:

Each purchaser of shares described in this prospectus located within a relevant member state will be deemed to have represented, acknowledged and agreed that it is a ‘‘qualified investor’’ within the meaning of Article 2(1)(e) of the Prospectus Directive.

For purposes of this provision, the expression an ‘‘offer to the public’’ in any relevant member state means the communication in any form and by any means of sufficient information on the terms of the offer and the securities to be offered so as to enable an investor to decide to purchase or subscribe the securities, as the expression may be varied in that member state by any measure implementing the Prospectus Directive in that member state, and the expression ‘‘Prospectus Directive’’ means Directive 2003/71/EC and includes any relevant implementing measure in each relevant member state.

The sellers of the shares have not authorized and do not authorize the making of any offer of shares through any financial intermediary on their behalf, other than offers made by the underwriters with a view to the final placement of the shares as contemplated in this prospectus. Accordingly, no purchaser of the shares, other than the underwriters, is authorized to make any further offer of the shares on behalf of the sellers or the underwriters.

This prospectus is only being distributed to, and is only directed at, persons in the United Kingdom that are qualified investors within the meaning of Article 2(1)(e) of the Prospectus Directive (‘‘Qualified Investors’’) that are also (i) investment professionals falling within Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (the ‘‘Order’’) or (ii) high net worth entities, and other persons to whom it may lawfully be communicated, falling within Article 49(2)(a) to (d) of the Order (all such persons together being referred to as ‘‘relevant persons’’). This prospectus and its contents are confidential and should not be distributed, published or reproduced (in whole or in part) or disclosed by recipients to any other persons in the United Kingdom. Any person in the United Kingdom that is not a relevant persons should not act or rely on this document or any of its contents.

Neither this prospectus nor any other offering material relating to the shares described in this prospectus has been submitted to the clearance procedures of the Autorité des Marchés Financiers or

by the competent authority of another member state of the European Economic Area and notified to the Autorité des Marchés Financiers. The shares have not been offered or sold and will not be offered or sold, directly or indirectly, to the public in France. Neither this prospectus nor any other offering material relating to the shares has been or will be:

The shares may be resold directly or indirectly, only in compliance with Articles L.411-1, L.411-2, L.412-1 and L.621-8 through L.621-8-3 of the French Code monétaire et financier.

No prospectus has been nor will be published in Italy in connection with the offering and such offering has not been cleared by the Italian Securities Exchange Commission (Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa, the ‘‘CONSOB’’) pursuant to Italian securities legislation and, accordingly, the shares may not and will not be offered, sold or delivered, nor may or will copies of the prospectus or any other documents relating to the shares be distributed in Italy, except (i) to professional investors (operatori qualificati), as defined in Article 31, second paragraph, of CONSOB Regulation No. 11522 of July 1, 1998, as amended, (the ‘‘Regulation No. 11522’’), or (ii) in other circumstances which are exempted from the rules on public securities offering pursuant to Article 100 of Legislative Decree No. 58 of February 24, 1998 (the ‘‘Italian Finance Law’’) and Article 33, first paragraph, of CONSOB Regulation No. 11971 of May 14, 1999, as amended.

Any offer, sale or delivery of the shares or distribution of copies of the prospectus or any other document relating to the shares in Italy may and will be effected in accordance with all Italian securities, tax, exchange control and other applicable laws and regulations, and, in particular, will be: (i) made by an investment firm, bank or financial intermediary permitted to conduct such activities in Italy in accordance with the Italian Finance Law, Legislative Decree No. 385 of September 1, 1993, as amended (the ‘‘Italian Banking Law’’), Regulation No. 11522, and any other applicable laws and regulations; (ii) in compliance with Article 129 of the Italian Banking Law and the implementing guidelines of the Bank of Italy; and (iii) in compliance with any other applicable notification requirement or limitation which may be imposed by CONSOB or the Bank of Italy.

Italy has only partially implemented the Prospectus Directive, and the provisions relating to the European Economic Area described above shall apply with respect to Italy only to the extent that the relevant provisions of the Prospectus Directive have already been implemented in Italy.

Insofar as the requirements above are based on laws which are superseded at any time pursuant to the implementation of the Prospectus Directive in Italy, such requirements shall be replaced by the applicable requirements under the relevant implementing measures of the Prospectus Directive in Italy.

The shares are not offered as a public offer of securities in Spain, but as a private placement under the exemptions available pursuant to article 30bis of Law 24/1988, of July 28, 1988 and in article 38.1 of Royal Decree 1310/2005, of November 4, 2005.

The shares may not be publicly offered in Switzerland. This offering and listing circular is not a prospectus within the meaning of art. 652a of the Swiss Code of Obligations or art. 32 et seq. of the SWX Listing Rules.

The underwriters have not offered or sold and will not offer or sell our common stock in Hong Kong SAR by means of this prospectus or any other document, other than to persons whose ordinary business involves buying or selling shares or debentures, whether as principal or agent or in circumstances which do not constitute an offer to the public within the meaning of the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32 of the Laws of Hong Kong SAR), and (2) unless it is a person who is permitted to do so under the securities laws of Hong Kong SAR, it has not issued or held for the purpose of issue in Hong Kong and will not issue or hold for the purpose of issue in Hong Kong SAR this prospectus, any other offering material or any advertisement, invitation or document relating to the common stock, otherwise than with respect to common stock intended to be disposed of to persons outside Hong Kong SAR or only to persons whose business involves the acquisition, disposal, or holding of securities, whether as principal or as agent.

The shares offered in this prospectus have not been registered under the Securities and Exchange Law of Japan, and it has not offered or sold and will not offer or sell, directly or indirectly, the common stock in Japan or to or for the account of any resident of Japan, except (1) pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities and Exchange Law and (2) in compliance with any other applicable requirements of Japanese law.

This prospectus has not been registered as a prospectus with the Monetary Authority of Singapore. Accordingly, this prospectus or any other document or material in connection with the offer or sale, or invitation for subscription or purchase, of the common stock, may not be circulated or distributed, nor may the common stock be offered or sold, or be made the subject of an invitation for subscription or purchase, whether directly or indirectly, to the public or any member of the public in Singapore other than (1) to an institutional investor or other person specified in Section 274 of the Securities and Futures Act, Chapter 289 of Singapore (the ‘‘SFA’’), (2) to a sophisticated investor, and in accordance with the conditions, specified in Section 275 of the SFA or (3) otherwise pursuant to, and in accordance with the conditions of, any other applicable provision of the SFA.

This document is not intended to constitute an offer, sale or delivery of shares or other securities under the laws of the United Arab Emirates (‘‘UAE’’). The shares have not been and will not be registered under Federal Law No. 4 of 2000 Concerning the Emirates Securities and Commodities Authority and the Emirates Security and Commodity Exchange, or with the UAE Central Bank, the Dubai Financial Market, the Abu Dhabi Securities market or with any other UAE exchange. The offer and the shares have not been approved or licensed by the UAE Central Bank or any other relevant licensing authorities in the UAE, and do not constitute a public offer of securities in the UAE in accordance with the Commercial Companies Law, Federal Law No. 8 of 1984 (as amended) or otherwise. This document is strictly private and confidential and is being distributed to a limited number of investors and must not be provided to any person other than the original recipient, and may not be reproduced or used for any other purpose. The interests in the shares may not be offered or sold directly or indirectly to the public in the UAE.

This statement relates to an ‘‘exempt offer’’ in accordance with the Offered Securities Rules of the Dubai Financial Services Authority. This statement is intended for distribution only to persons of a type specified in those rules. It must not be delivered to, or relied on by, any other person. The Dubai Financial Services Authority has no responsibility for reviewing or verifying any documents in connection with exempt offers. The Dubai Financial Services Authority has not approved this prospectus nor taken steps to verify the information set out in it, and has no responsibility for it. The shares to which this prospectus relates may be illiquid and/or subject to restrictions on their resale. Prospective purchasers of the shares offered should conduct their own due diligence on the shares. If you do not understand the contents of this prospectus you should consult an authorized financial adviser.

Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our common stock. Consequently, the initial public offering price for the shares was determined by negotiations among us, the Initial

Shareholders and the representatives. Among the factors considered in determining the initial public offering price were our record of operations, our current financial condition, our future prospects, our markets, the economic conditions in and future prospects for the industry in which we compete, our management, and currently prevailing general conditions in the equity securities markets, including current market valuations of publicly traded companies considered comparable to our company. We cannot assure you, however, that the prices at which the shares will sell in the public market after this offering will not be lower than the initial public offering price or that an active trading market in our common stock will develop and continue after this offering.

Our common stock has been approved for listing on the NYSE under the symbol ‘‘SC’’, subject to official notice of issuance. The underwriters have undertaken to sell shares of common stock to a minimum of 2,000 beneficial owners in lots of 100 or more shares to meet the NYSE distribution requirements for trading.

The following table shows the underwriting discounts and commissions that we are to pay to the underwriters in connection with this offering. These amounts are shown assuming both no exercise and full exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option.

In connection with the offering, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. on behalf of the underwriters, may purchase and sell shares of common stock in the open market. These transactions may include short sales, syndicate covering transactions and stabilizing transactions. Short sales involve syndicate sales of common stock in excess of the number of shares to be purchased by the underwriters in the offering, which creates a syndicate short position. ‘‘Covered’’ short sales are sales of shares made in an amount up to the number of shares represented by the underwriters’ over-allotment option. In determining the source of shares to close out the covered syndicate short position, the underwriters will consider, among other things, the price of shares available for purchase in the open market as compared to the price at which they may purchase shares through the over-allotment option. Transactions to close out the covered syndicate short involve either purchases of the common stock in the open market after the distribution has been completed or the exercise of the over-allotment option. The underwriters may also make ‘‘naked’’ short sales of shares in excess of the over-allotment option. The underwriters must close out any naked short position by purchasing shares of common stock in the open market. A naked short position is more likely to be created if the underwriters are concerned that there may be downward pressure on the price of the shares in the open market after pricing that could adversely affect investors who purchase in the offering. Stabilizing transactions consist of bids for or purchases of shares in the open market while the offering is in progress.

The underwriters also may impose a penalty bid. Penalty bids permit the underwriters to reclaim a selling concession from a syndicate member when the underwriters repurchase shares originally sold by that syndicate member in order to cover syndicate short positions or make stabilizing purchases.

Any of these activities may have the effect of preventing or retarding a decline in the market price of the common stock. They may also cause the price of the common stock to be higher than the price that would otherwise exist in the open market in the absence of these transactions. The underwriters may conduct these transactions on the NYSE or in the over-the-counter market, or otherwise. If the underwriters commence any of these transactions, they may discontinue them at any time.

We estimate that our portion of the total expenses of this offering will be $7,700,000.

Because affiliates of Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc. and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. are lenders under certain of our credit facilities and other debt agreements with the Company, and will receive more than 10% of the net proceeds of this offering when we repay indebtedness under the Seacastle Revolving Credit Facility, they may be deemed to have a ‘‘conflict of

interest’’ with us under Rule 2710(h) of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (‘‘FINRA’’). When a FINRA member with a conflict of interest participates as an underwriter in a public offering, that rule requires that the initial public offering price may be no higher than that recommended by a ‘‘qualified independent underwriter,’’ as defined by FINRA. In accordance with this rule, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated has assumed the responsibilities of acting as a qualified independent underwriter. In its role as a qualified independent underwriter, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated has performed a due diligence investigation and participated in the preparation of this prospectus and the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part. We have agreed to indemnify Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated against liabilities incurred in connection with acting as a qualified independent underwriter, including liabilities under the Securities Act.

The underwriters or their affiliates have performed investment banking and advisory services for us from time to time for which they have received customary fees and expenses. For example, affiliates of Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc., Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated are acting as lenders and, in some instances, agents under certain of our existing credit facilities. The underwriters may, from time to time, engage in transactions with and perform services for us in the ordinary course of their business.

Lazard Frères & Co. LLC referred this transaction to Lazard Capital Markets LLC and will receive a referral fee from Lazard Capital Markets LLC in connection herewith.

A prospectus in electronic format may be made available on the websites maintained by one or more of the underwriters. The representatives may agree to allocate a number of shares to underwriters for sale to their online brokerage account holders. The representatives will allocate shares to underwriters that may make Internet distributions on the same basis as other allocations. In addition, shares may be sold by the underwriters to securities dealers who resell shares to online brokerage account holders.

We have agreed to indemnify the underwriters against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, or to contribute to payments the underwriters may be required to make because of any of those liabilities.

Certain legal matters will be passed upon for us by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, New York, New York, and Reeder & Simpson, P.C. of the Marshall Islands will pass upon the validity of the common stock and certain other legal matters with respect to the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands. Sullivan & Cromwell LLP is representing the underwriters in this offering. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP and Sullivan & Cromwell LLP also represent Fortress on a variety of past and current matters.

The consolidated financial statements and schedules of Seacastle Inc. (formerly FIF III CLI Holding Ltd.) (as the successor company) at December 31, 2006 and for the period from February 15, 2006 through December 31, 2006, and the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Container Leasing International LLC (as the predecessor company) at December 31, 2005 and for the period from January 1, 2006 through February 14, 2006, and for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, appearing in the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as set forth in their report thereon appearing elsewhere herein, and are included in reliance upon such report given on the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing.

The consolidated financial statements of Interpool, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, have been included herein in reliance upon the report of KPMG LLP, independent registered public accounting firm appearing elsewhere herein, and upon the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing.

We have obtained certain information used in this prospectus from Containerisation International and we have included such information in reliance upon the authority of Containerisation International as the source of such data.

The section in this prospectus entitled ‘‘Industry’’ and the subsections entitled ‘‘Global Containerised Trade’’ and ‘‘Containerships’’ have been reviewed by Clarkson Research Services Ltd., who has confirmed to us that such sections accurately describe the international containership industry, as indicated in the consent of Clarkson Research Services Ltd. filed as an exhibit to the registration statement on Form S-1 under the Securities Act of which this prospectus is a part.

We have filed a registration statement, of which this prospectus is a part, on Form S-1 with the SEC relating to this offering. This prospectus does not contain all of the information in the registration statement and the exhibits included with the registration statement. References in this prospectus to any of our contracts, agreements or other documents are not necessarily complete, and you should refer to the exhibits attached to the registration statement for copies of the actual contracts, agreements or documents. You may read and copy the registration statement, the related exhibits and other material we file with the SEC at the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. at 100 F Street, Room 1580, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You can also request copies of those documents, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by writing to the SEC. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the operation of the public reference rooms. The SEC also maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file with the SEC. The website address is http://www.sec.gov.

Upon the effectiveness of the registration statement, we will be subject to the informational requirements of the Exchange Act, and, in accordance with the Exchange Act, will file reports, proxy and information statements and other information with the SEC. Such annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy and information statements and other information can be inspected and copied at the locations set forth above. We intend to make this information available on our website, www.seacastleinc.com.

The following are definitions of certain terms that are commonly used in the industry and in this prospectus.

Annual Survey. The annual inspection of a vessel by a classification society, on behalf of a flag state.

Bareboat charter. Also known as ‘‘demise charter.’’ The use of a vessel usually over longer periods of time ranging up to several years. All voyage related costs, including bunker and port dues as well as all vessel operating expenses, such as day-to-day operations, maintenance, crewing and insurance, are the charterer’s responsibility. The owner of the vessel receives monthly charter hire payments on a per day basis and is responsible only for the payment of capital costs related to the vessel.

Charter. The hire of a vessel for a specified period of time for a fixed fee or to carry a cargo in a single vessel for a fixed fee from a loading port to a discharging port.

Charter hire. A sum of money paid to the shipowner by a charterer for the use of a ship. Charter hire paid under an operating charter is also known as ‘‘freight.’’

Charter hire rate. A fixed sum of money paid to the shipowner by a charterer under a time charter for the use of a vessel.

Charter in. A lease of a vessel by which the owners of a vessel sublet or let the entire vessel, or some principal part of the vessel, to another party that uses the vessel for its own account under its charge.

Charter owner. Owners of containerships that charter vessels to shipping service operators, known as liner companies, rather than directly operating container shipping services for shippers.

Chassis. A rectangular, wheeled steel frame, generally 23½ or 40 feet in length, built specifically for the purpose of transporting a container over the road.

Chassis Pool. Location where a series of chassis are grouped or pooled to be available for rent on a daily basis.

Container. A metal box structure of standard design, used to carry cargo in units. The standard measure of a container is a TEU.

Containership. A ship specifically designed to carry containers that has cells into which the containers are lowered where they are held in place by uprights called cell guides.

Containerization. Shipping systems based on large cargo-carrying containers ranging up to 53 feet long that can be easily interchanged between trucks, trains and ships without rehandling the contents.

Depot. A location at which containers are stored and repaired by a third party. May also refer to the company that operates such a location.

Direct finance lease. A type of lease in which the lessee has a bargain purchase option. It is an alternative way of financing an equipment purchase.

Drydock. The removal of a ship for inspection and repair of those parts of a ship that are below the water line.

Feeder. A vessel which is part of a cargo network in which the larger and/or, faster vessels only call at the major ports at both ends of the area being covered and the smaller ports are served by the smaller feeder vessels which transfer the cargo to and from the major port terminals. This process keeps the larger vessels filled closer to capacity and spares them the expense and loss of time loading and unloading cargo in the smaller ports.

Flag. The nationality of a ship, that is the country in which the ship is registered.

Fully cellular containership. A vessel specifically designed to carry international standards organization, or ISO, standard containers, with cell-guides under deck and necessary fittings and equipment on deck.

General cargo ship. This older type of cargo ship generally has ‘tween decks for mixed general cargo, tanks for liquid cargo, and maybe some refrigerated capacity. Also has deep holds for bulk cargo. Usually the hatch openings are too small for below deck container stowage, but containers can be stacked on the deck. The general cargo ship often has its own cranes and derricks for loading and discharging cargo.

Generator Set. Portable diesel fueled generators used to power refrigerated containers.

High cube. A type of container that is taller than a standard container. A high cube is 9’ 6’’ tall as opposed to the 8’ 6’’ tall standard container.

IMO. International Maritime Organization, a United Nations agency that deals mainly with the safety of navigation and the prevention of pollution of the marine environment.

Intermodal transport. The movement of goods in one and the same loading unit or vehicle which uses successively several modes of transport without handling of the goods themselves in changing modes. For example, a container move that includes transport by both ship and road (via chassis).

KG. Stands for Kommanditgesellschaft and represents a German partnership entity that has been historically active in the investment in containers and ships as well as other businesses and asset classes.

Liner companies. A company that transports cargo to and from designated ports on a regular schedule.

Off-hire. The period in which a vessel is not available for service under a time charter and, accordingly, the charterer generally is not required to pay the hire rate. Off-hire periods can include days spent on repairs, drydocking and surveys, whether or not scheduled.

On-hire. The activity in which a customer receives a unit and puts the unit on its lease, beginning billing for the unit. An on-hire involves a customer physically picking up a unit from a depot. On-hire may also refer to the state of a unit that is currently leased out to a customer.

Post-Panamax. A vessel with a beam of more than 33 meters that cannot transit the Panama Canal.

Refrigerated container (‘‘Reefer’’). Controlled temperature container suitable for chilled or frozen cargoes. Also referred as reefer container. A reefer container can be a porthole (must be fitted with or to refrigerating equipment) or an integral (has built-in refrigeration equipment).

Replacement value. Financial asset TEU value multiplied by new-build container price annualized at the survey date.

Ro-Ro. Roll-On Roll-Off vessels. These vessels are designed for wheeled or tracked cargo that can load itself onboard. Cargo generally drives onto through decks via ramps, rather than being lifted through hatches.

TEU. Twenty-foot equivalent unit, the international standard measure for containers and containership capacity.

Time charter. The use of the vessel either for a number of months or years or for a trip between specific delivery and redelivery positions, known as a trip charter. The charterer pays all voyage related costs. The owner of the vessel receives semi-monthly charter hire payments on a per day basis and is responsible for the payment of all vessel operating expenses and capital costs of the vessel. Any delays at port or during the voyage are the responsibility of the charterer, save for certain specific exceptions such as loss of time arising from vessel breakdown and routine maintenance.

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
Seacastle Inc. (formerly FIF III CLI Holding, Ltd.)

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Seacastle Inc. (formerly FIF III CLI Holding, Ltd.) (the ‘‘Successor Company’’) as of December 31, 2006 and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the period from February 15, 2006 to December 31, 2006 and the consolidated balance sheet of Container Leasing International LLC (the ‘‘Predecessor Company’’) as of December 31, 2005 and the related consolidated statements of operations, members’ interest and cash flows for the period January 1, 2006 to February 14, 2006 and the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the index at F-1. These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Standards Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the Successor Company consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Seacastle Inc. at December 31, 2006, and the consolidated results of operations and cash flows for the period February 15, 2006 to December 31, 2006 in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Further, in our opinion the Predecessor Company consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects the consolidated financial position of Container Leasing International, LLC, at December 31, 2005 and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the period January 1, 2006 to February 14, 2006 and the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion the related financial statement schedule when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material resepects the information set forth therein.

Seacastle Inc. (formerly FIF III CLI Holding, Limited)
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(dollars in thousands, except for share amounts)


	Predecessor				Successor
	December 31, 2005				December 31, 2006
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents		$	15,697			$	12,088
Restricted cash			7,869				15,962
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,929 and $3,035			17,213				21,712
Net investment in finance leases			177,062				171,714
Leasing equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $258,437 and $54,027			593,035				843,401
Goodwill			16,876				15,309
Other assets			30,109				18,221
Total assets		$	857,861			$	1,098,407
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity/partnership interest
Liabilities
Trade payables		$	5,880			$	43,553
Accrued expenses and other liabilities			15,098				20,512
Debt and capital lease obligations:
Due within one year			71,002				68,500
Due after one year			546,633				720,667
Total liabilities		$	638,613			$	853,232
Shareholders’ equity/members’ interest
Members’ contribution			47,500				—
Common shares, $.01 par value, 331,348,558 shares authorized, 34,072,293 shares issued and outstanding, at December 31, 2006			—				341
Additional paid-in capital			—				241,547
Members’ interest			171,877				—
Retained earnings			—				3,614
Accumulated other comprehensive loss			(129	)			(327	)
Total shareholders’ equity/members’ interest			219,248				245,175
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity/members’ interest		$	857,861			$	1,098,407

Seacastle Inc. (formerly FIF III CLI Holding, Limited)
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(dollars in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)


	Predecessor												Successor
	Year ended December 31,								Period from January 1, 2006 through February 14, 2006				Period from February 15, 2006 through December 31, 2006
	2004				2005				Period from January 1, 2006 through February 14, 2006				Period from February 15, 2006 through December 31, 2006
Revenue:
Equipment leasing revenue		$	125,900			$	130,714			$	15,962			$	122,342
Finance revenue			14,529				16,692				2,088				14,027
Other revenue			4,053				3,283				155				2,053
Total revenue			144,482				150,689				18,205				138,422
Expenses:
Direct operating expenses			5,320				7,934				790				5,889
Selling, general and administrative expenses			36,554				37,390				3,627				20,021
Depreciation of leasing equipment			42,348				48,461				6,812				55,723
Impairment on assets held for sale			—				557				—				3,912
Fair value adjustment for derivative instruments			(12,755	)			(10,434	)			(3,527	)			—
Goodwill impairment			—				38,900				—				—
Interest expense			32,243				36,920				5,196				39,490
Interest (income)			(65	)			(339	)			(80	)			(862	)
Loss on retirement of debt			—				—				—				7,631
Other (income) expense, net			(3,113	)			(4,069	)			581				2,966
Total expenses			100,532				155,320				13,399				134,770
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes			43,950				(4,631	)			4,806				3,652
Provision for income taxes			—				—				—				38
Net income (loss)		$	43,950			$	(4,631	)		$	4,806			$	3,614
Net income per common share:
Basic														$	0.11
Diluted														$	0.11
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – Basic															33,404,368
Weighted average number of common hares outstanding – Diluted															33,404,368

Seacastle Inc. (formerly FIF III CLI Holding, Limited)
Consolidated Statements of
Changes in Members’ Interest (Predecessor)
(dollars in thousands, except for share amounts)


	Members’ Interest								Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)				Total Comprehensive Income (Loss)				Membership Interest Total
	Marubeni America Corp.				MAC Lease Holdings, Inc.				Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)				Total Comprehensive Income (Loss)				Membership Interest Total

Balance, January 1, 2004		$	188,653			$	1,905			$	—			$	—			$	190,558
Distribution to Members			(6,000	)			—				—				—				(6,000	)
Comprehensive income:
Net income			43,510				440				—			$	43,950				43,950
Balance, January 1, 2005			226,163				2,345				—								228,508
Distribution to Members			(4,500	)			—				—				—				(4,500	)
Comprehensive income:
Net (loss)			(4,585	)			(46	)			—				(4,631	)
Other comprehensive income/(loss):
Foreign currency translation											(129	)			(129	)
Total comprehensive income (loss)														$	(4,760	)			(4,760	)
Balance, January 1, 2006			217,078				2,299				(129	)							219,248
Comprehensive income:
Net income			4,758				48				—				4,806
Other comprehensive income:
Foreign currency translation											146				146
Total comprehensive income														$	4,952				4,952
Balance, February 14, 2006		$	221,836			$	2,347			$	17							$	224,200

Seacastle Inc. (formerly FIF III CLI Holding, Limited)
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity (Successor)
(dollars in thousands, except for share amounts)


	Common Shares						Additional Paid-In Capital				Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)				Total Comprehensive Income (Loss)				Total Shareholders’ Equity
	Shares			Amount			Additional Paid-In Capital				Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)				Total Comprehensive Income (Loss)				Total Shareholders’ Equity
Shareholders’ equity, February 15, 2006 (commencement of operations)		$	—		$	—		$	—			$	—		$	—			$	—			$	—
Issuance of shares of common shares			33,134,854			331			224,673				—			—				—				225,004
Capital contributions			—			—			14,996				—			—				—				14,996
Comprehensive income:
Net income			—			—			—				3,614			—				3,614				—
Other comprehensive (loss):
Net change in fair value of derivatives			—			—			—				—			(204	)			(204	)			—
Foreign currency translation			—			—			—				—			(123	)			(123	)			—
Total comprehensive income			—			—			—				—			—				3,287				3,287
Purchase of common shares by employees			185,001			2			1,338				—			—								1,340
Issuance of common share to employees			752,438			8			(8	)			—			—								—
Amortization of common share based payments			—			—			548				—			—								548
Balance, December 31, 2006			34,072,293		$	341		$	241,547			$	3,614		$	(327	)						$	245,175

Seacastle Inc. (formerly FIF III CLI Holding, Limited)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(dollars in thousands)


	Predecessor												Successor
	Year ended December 31,								Period from January 1, 2006 through February 14, 2006				Period from February 15, 2006 through December 31, 2006
	2004				2005				Period from January 1, 2006 through February 14, 2006				Period from February 15, 2006 through December 31, 2006
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income		$	43,950			$	(4,631	)		$	4,806			$	3,614
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities
Depreciation and amortization			45,316				51,369				7,208				57,492
Loss on retirement of debt			—				—				—				7,631
Fair value adjustments on derivative instruments			(12,755	)			(10,434	)			(3,527	)			—
Goodwill impairment			—				38,900				—
Loss (gain) on sale of leasing equipment			(321	)			898				(2	)			3,134
Impairment on assets held for sale			—				557				—				3,912
Common share based compensation charge			—				—				—				548
Deferred income taxes			—				—				—				47
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Lease receivable			(1,803	)			(2,779	)			(612	)			(397	)
Receivable from unconsolidated affiliates			1,482				(47	)			111				—
Other assets			1,404				(1,303	)			(131	)			(6,367	)
Trade payables			(168	)			328				(928	)			(12	)
Accrued expenses and other liabilities			(1,642	)			(6,728	)			(1,086	)			219
Net cash provided by operating activities		$	75,463			$	66,130			$	5,839			$	69,821
Cash flows from investing activities
Proceeds from sale of leasing equipment			1,807				4,095				582				7,888
Collections on net investment in direct financing leases, net of interest earned			14,569				19,829				603				18,383
Acquisition of Carlisle, net of cash acquired			—				—				—				(201,116	)
Purchase of investments			(783	)			(720	)			—				—
Investment in unconsolidated affiliates			(1,203	)			(1,601	)			(221	)			—
Increase in restricted cash			(2,059	)			(3,782	)			(2,206	)			(15,962	)
Proceeds from sale of investments			—				9,943				—				—
Purchase of leasing equipment			(131,800	)			(94,607	)			(4,505	)			(111,161	)
Investment in finance leases			(29,236	)			(53,169	)			—				(15,662	)
Purchase of fixed assets			(897	)			(959	)			(28	)			(477	)
Net cash used in investing activities		$	(149,602	)		$	(120,971	)		$	(5,775	)		$	(318,107	)
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from bank debt			200,500				164,800				118,000				1,248,000
Repayments of bank debt			(115,975	)			(92,169	)			(96,500	)			(1,112,619	)
Principal payments under capital lease obligations			(5,543	)			(5,990	)			(25,035	)			(116,381	)
Purchase of common shares by employees			—				—				—				1,340
Distribution to members			(6,000	)			(4,500	)			—				—
Capital contribution			—				—				—				14,996
Issuance of common shares			—				—				—				225,004
Net cash provided/(used) by financing activities		$	72,982			$	62,141			$	(3,535	)		$	260,340
Effect of changes in exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents			—				—				(4	)			34
Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents			(1,157	)			7,300				(3,475	)			12,088
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period			9,554				8,397				15,697				—
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period		$	8,397			$	15,697			$	12,222			$	12,088
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information
Interest paid		$	37,513			$	35,668			$	2,879			$	35,855

Seacastle Inc. (formerly FIF III CLI Holding, Limited)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except as otherwise noted and for share and per share amounts)

Seacastle Inc., a company incorporated on June 26, 2007 in the Marshall Islands and its subsidiaries (the ‘‘Company’’, or the ‘‘Successor’’), became the parent company of Seacastle Operating Company Ltd. on June 29, 2007 and is in the business of investing in intermodal containers used by shipping and transportation companies, both domestically and internationally. The majority of the Company’s business is derived from leasing its equipment to shipping line customers through a variety of long-term and short-term contractual leasing arrangements. The Company is owned by certain private equity funds, which are managed by an affiliate of Fortress Investment Group LLC, (the ‘‘Fortress Funds’’).

Container Leasing International LLC, also known as Carlisle Leasing International, LLC (‘‘Carlisle’’ or ‘‘Predecessor’’), is a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of New York. Prior to February 15, 2006, Marubeni America Corporation (‘‘MACC’’) and MAC Lease Holdings, Inc. (‘‘MACLH’’), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Marubeni America Corporation, were the owners of Carlisle. MACC and MACLH owned a 99% and 1% membership interest in Carlisle, respectively.

The Company received proceeds of $225 million from funds managed by an affiliate of Fortress in exchange for 33,134,854 shares of its common stock. On February 15, 2006, the Company used these proceeds to purchase the interests of MACC and MACLH in Carlisle. The acquisition of Carlisle is referred to as the ‘‘Carlisle Acquisition.’’ The Carlisle Acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting, and, accordingly, the consideration paid has been allocated based on the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The excess of the consideration paid over the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired and liabilities assumed of $15,309 was allocated to goodwill of which $5,000 will not be deductible for income tax purposes. There are no contingent payments, options or commitments specified in the acquisition agreements. All purchase price allocations are final. The following table sets forth the final allocation of the purchase price in connection with the Carlisle Acquisition:

The following unaudited pro forma information presents the results of operations of the Company as if the Carlisle Acquisition had taken place at the beginning of each respective period. The pro forma financial information is not necessarily indicative of the actual results of operations had

Seacastle Inc. (formerly FIF III CLI Holding, Limited)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except as otherwise noted and for share and per share amounts)

the transaction been effected on the assumed dates. The following is the unaudited pro forma information for the periods indicated:

The pro forma net income amounts reflect the following items: (i) adjustments to depreciation expense arising from the valuation of the leasing equipment as a result of the purchase price allocation from the Carlisle Acquisition, (ii) increase in net loss (gain) on sale of leasing equipment associated with the fair value adjustments to leasing equipment under the purchase method of accounting and (iii) adjustments relating to the purchase of an additional 50% interest in two 50%-owned joint venture companies, including the elimination of equity interest income and the inclusion of 100% of the results of operations for the joint ventures.

Seacastle Inc. was formed on June 26, 2007 for the purpose of becoming the parent company of Seacastle Operating Company Ltd., formerly FIF III CLI Holding Ltd. (‘‘Seacastle Operating’’), the parent company of Container Leasing International LLC (see Note 18 Subsequent Events). On June 29, 2007, Seacastle Operating acquired two subsidiaries of certain Fortress Funds. Subsequently, the shareholders of Seacastle Operating transferred their respective ownership interests in Seacastle Operating to Seacastle Inc. in exchange for shares of Seacastle Inc. Fortress Funds respective ownership percentages in Seacastle Inc. immediately after the exchange of shares was the same as their respective ownership percentages immediately prior to the exchange. Prior to the transfer, Seacastle Inc. was a shell holding company, with no operations or assets. The transfer of shares of Seacastle Inc. for Seacastle Operating was accounted for as an acquisition under common control and an equity recapitalization and therefore, Seacastle Inc.’s equity structure has been retroactively applied to the historical periods of Seacastle Operating in these financial statements. In addition, for presentation purposes, the financial statements presented for Seacastle Operating have been renamed ‘‘Seacastle Inc.’’ to reflect the name of the ongoing entity.

The nature of operations and the significant accounting policies used by the Company and its subsidiaries in the preparation of the accompanying consolidated financial statements are summarized below. The Company’s accounting records are maintained in United States dollars and the consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (‘‘US GAAP’’).

As a result of the Carlisle Acquisition, the financial information for the period after February 14, 2006 represents that of the Successor. Prior to and including February 14, 2006, the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Predecessor. Due to the change in the basis of accounting resulting from the application of purchase accounting, the Predecessor consolidated financial statements and the Successor’s consolidated financial statements are not necessarily comparable.

The Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and subsidiaries more than 50% owned or otherwise controlled by the Company. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Seacastle Inc. (formerly FIF III CLI Holding, Limited)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except as otherwise noted and for share and per share amounts)

Certain investments in which the Company does not own a majority interest or otherwise control are accounted for using the equity method of accounting.

A component of our growth strategy has been to acquire and integrate businesses that complement our existing operations. We account for business combinations in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 141, Business Combinations (‘‘SFAS No. 141’’). Under SFAS No. 141, we allocate the purchase price of acquired companies to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair value at the date of purchase. The difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill.

The fair value of an acquired business is determined based on valuations performed if necessary. We believe the estimated fair value determined for our acquisitions and allocated to assets acquired and liabilities assumed are based on reasonable assumptions. Such assumptions are not certain and may not be indicative of actual performance. Therefore, actual results could differ from those estimates.

The Company accounts for goodwill in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (‘‘SFAS No. 142’’). SFAS No. 142 requires goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives to be reviewed for impairment annually or more frequently if circumstances indicate a possible impairment. In December 2005, the Company (Predecessor) accepted an offer from the Fortress Investment Group to sell all of the assets of the Company for $216 million subject to certain purchase price adjustments. The transaction closed on February 15, 2006 at a purchase price of $214.5 million. The Company considered the acceptance of the offer to be a triggering event under SFAS No. 142 and accordingly performed a test to determine whether or not an impairment of goodwill should be recongized. As a result of the test, the Company recognized a goodwill impairment of $38.9 million in its Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2005. The annual impairment test was performed by the Company (Successor) at September 30, 2006. The Company’s review of goodwill as of September 30, 2006 indicated that no impairment of goodwill had occurred.

The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results may differ from those estimates.

Cash and cash equivalents includes all cash balances and highly liquid investments having original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase.

Restricted cash consists of cash that is held by the Company in the form of maintenance deposits and security deposits received from lessees pursuant to the terms of various lease agreements and rent collections held in lockbox accounts pursuant to the Company’s credit facilities and asset-backed securitization agreements.

Seacastle Inc. (formerly FIF III CLI Holding, Limited)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except as otherwise noted and for share and per share amounts)

Leasing equipment consists of containers and complementary equipment. Leasing equipment is recorded at cost and depreciated to an estimated residual value on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the equipment. The estimated useful lives for the Company’s leasing equipment are 12 years for generators sets, 15 years for containers and 20 years for other complementary equipment from the date of service for both Predecessor and Successor. The Company arrives at the residual values of its leasing equipment as a percentage of the original book value of the equipment. The residual percentage of 10% for containers and complementary equipment represents the Company’s best estimate of the future fair market value of the asset at the end of its useful economic life and is based in part on its prior history. Leasing equipment includes components of containers that are to be assembled for their intended use and are accounted for using the specific identification method. Such components amounted to $16.0 million and $89.9 million at December 31, 2005 and 2006, respectively. Cost incurred to place the new equipment into service, including costs to transport the equipment to its initial on-hire location, are capitalized. The Company recognizes repair and maintenance costs that do not extend the lives of the assets as incurred and includes them in direct operating expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The amounts reported as net investment in finance leases are recorded at the aggregate future lease payments, including any purchase options granted to customers, less unearned income. Interest from these leases is recognized over the term of the lease using the effective interest method as a component of leasing revenue.

Leasehold improvements are capitalized and amortized over a term that is the lesser of the useful economic life of the improvement or the expected duration of the lease term. Other fixed assets, which include computer hardware and software are depreciated and amortized at useful lives ranging from 3 to 5 years.

In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (‘‘SFAS No. 144’’), assets held for sale are stated at the lower of carrying value or fair value less estimated costs to sell.

Assets held for sale are not depreciated and related deferred costs are not amortized. Subsequent changes to the asset’s fair value, either increases or decreases, are recorded as adjustments to the carrying value of the leasing equipment; however, any such adjustment would not exceed the original carrying value of the assets held for sale. At December 31, 2005 and 2006, $430 and $4,339 of assets held for sale are included in Other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The Company records the gains and losses from the sales of leasing equipment as part of Other (income) expense, net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. Gains and losses are recognized upon completion of the sale based upon the sales price and the book value of the equipment. Gains and (losses) on sales of leasing assets was $321, $(898), $2, and $(3,134) for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005 and the periods January 1, 2006 through February 14, and the period February 15, 2006 through December 31, 2006, respectively.

In accordance with SFAS No. 144, the Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment when indicators of impairment exist. Impairment exists when the carrying value of a long-lived asset group

Seacastle Inc. (formerly FIF III CLI Holding, Limited)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except as otherwise noted and for share and per share amounts)

exceeds the sum of the related undiscounted cash flows. The Company’s review for impairment includes considering the existence of impairment indicators including third party appraisals of the Company’s equipment, adverse changes in market conditions for specific long-lived assets and the occurrence of significant adverse changes in general industry and market conditions that could affect the fair value of the Company’s equipment. When indicators of impairment suggest that the carrying value of long-lived assets may not be recoverable, the Company determines whether SFAS No. 144’s impairment recognition criteria have been met by evaluating whether the carrying value of the asset group exceeds the related undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset group. The preparation of the related undiscounted cash flows requires the use of assumptions and estimates, including the level of future rents, the residual value expected to be realized upon disposition of the assets, estimated downtime between re-leasing events and the amount of re-leasing costs.

If the Company determines that the carrying value may not be recoverable, the Company will assess the fair values of the assets. In determining the fair value of the assets, the Company considers market trends, published values for similar assets, recent transactions of similar assets and quotes from third party appraisers. If the carrying amount of an asset group exceeds its fair value, an impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset group exceeds the fair value of the asset group.

The Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts is determined based upon a review of the collectibility of its receivables on a customer-by-customer basis. The determination of the amount of the allowance for the doubtful accounts of each of these customers is based upon several factors including: their Dynamar rating, their prior payment history, discussions with their management, and current events involving the customer that could have financial implication. For all remaining accounts, we apply a delinquency factor, based upon prior history, to the total amount due in order to determine the allowance for doubtful accounts. The delinquency factor represents our best estimate of those accounts that will become uncollectible. Changes in economic conditions may require a re-assessment of the risk and could result in additions or deductions to the allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company believes that the allowance for doubtful accounts is adequate to provide for credit losses inherent in its existing receivables portfolio.

Equipment leases and trade receivables subject the Company to potential credit risk. The Company extends credit to its customers based upon an evaluation of the customer’s financial condition and credit history. During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company’s top 10 customers represented approximately 74% of its consolidated billings of customers. Also, as of December 31, 2006, approximately 8% of accounts receivable and 9% of the net investment in finance leases were from customers outside of the United States.

The Company accounts for derivative instruments in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (‘‘SFAS No. 133’’). SFAS No. 133 requires that all derivative instruments be recorded on the balance sheet at their fair value and establishes criteria for both the designation and effectiveness of hedging activities.

In order to reduce interest rate risk, the Company has and may enter into interest rate swap agreements from time to time, whereby the Company receives floating rate payments in exchange for fixed rate payments, effectively converting a floating rate borrowing to a fixed rate. The Company

Seacastle Inc. (formerly FIF III CLI Holding, Limited)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except as otherwise noted and for share and per share amounts)

intends to mitigate only the risk related to changes in the benchmark interest rate (LIBOR). The Company does not enter into derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

The Company faces credit risk if the counterparties to these transactions are unable to perform their obligations. However, the Company seeks to minimize this risk by entering into transactions with counterparties that are major financial institutions with high credit ratings.

In the Predecessor period, the Company did not qualify for hedge accounting in recognizing gains and losses on its interest rate swaps. As such, for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005 and for the period from January 1, 2006 through February 14, 2006, interest rate swap contracts used by the Company to economically hedge its interest rate risks were marked to market through earnings in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

In the Successor period, the Company began applying hedge accounting on its interest rate swaps. As such, as of February 15, 2006, for interest rate swap contracts that are designated and then qualify as cash flow hedges for the period, the effective portion of the derivatives gain or loss is reported as a component of and marked to market through Accumulated other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. The remaining gain or loss on the derivative is reported in current earnings in the Company’s Statements of Operations.

To qualify for cash flow hedge accounting, interest rate swaps must meet certain criteria, including (1) the items to be hedged expose the Company to interest rate risk, (2) the interest rate swaps or caps are highly effective in reducing the Company’s exposure to interest rate risk, and (3) with respect to an anticipated transaction, the transaction is probable. In addition, the hedging relationship must be properly documented. Effectiveness is periodically assessed based upon a comparison of the relative changes in the fair values or cash flows of the interest rate swaps and the items being hedged.

Accumulated other comprehensive income consists of net income and other gains and losses, net of income taxes, if any, affecting shareholder’s equity that, under US GAAP, are excluded from net income. At December 31, 2006, such amounts consisted of the effective portion of fluctuations in the fair value of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges and at December 31, 2005 and 2006 other comprehensive income included foreign currency translation gains and losses relating to the Company’s foreign subsidiaries.

Deferred financing costs represent the fees incurred in connection with the financing of the Company’s debt obligations and are amortized over the estimated term of the obligations using the straight-line method.

The Company enters into long-term leases primarily with ocean carriers. In the majority of its transactions with ocean carriers the Company acts as the lessor of containers for a specified period of time and at a specified per diem rate. Revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the life of the respective lease.

Seacastle Inc. (formerly FIF III CLI Holding, Limited)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except as otherwise noted and for share and per share amounts)

The Company enters into finance leases as lessor of equipment that it owns. In most instances, the leases include a bargain purchase option to purchase the leased equipment at the end of the lease term. The net investment in finance leases represents the receivables due from lessees, net of unearned income. Unearned income is recognized on an effective interest basis over the life of the lease term and is recorded as finance revenues in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Other Revenues includes fee income earned for third party positioning of equipment and income earned on lessee paid repairs and maintenance. In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (the ‘‘EITF’’) No. 99-19, Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an Agent (‘‘EITF No. 99-19’’), the Company recognizes billings to customers for damages incurred and certain other pass-through costs as other revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company recognizes gross revenues from these pass-through costs as the Company is the primary obligor with respect to purchasing goods and services from third parties; the Company generally has the discretion in selection of the repair service provider; and the Company generally has the credit risk because the services are purchased prior to reimbursement being received.

The Company accounts for initial direct costs in the acquisition of leases in accordance with SFAS No. 13 Accounting for Leases (‘‘SFAS No. 13’’). In certain circumstances the Company will prepay commissions to salespeople when new lease agreements are executed. The Company amortizes those prepayments over the shorter of the initial lease term or the earliest point that the lease may be terminated.

The Company accounts for share-based compensation in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment (‘‘SFAS No. 123(R)’’). Pursuant to SFAS No. 123(R), the Company recognizes compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions in the consolidated financial statements based on the fair value of the equity instruments issued. The Company uses the straight-line method of accounting for compensation cost on share-based payment awards that contain pro-rata vesting provisions.

The Predecessor was treated as a partnership for US tax purposes. The Predecessor did not provide for US or foreign income taxes since all partnership income losses and credits were allocated to the members for inclusion in their individual corporate income tax returns.

The Company provides for income taxes of its taxable subsidiaries under the provisions of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (‘‘SFAS No. 109’’). SFAS No. 109 requires an asset and liability based approach in accounting for income taxes. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributed to differences between the US GAAP and tax basis of existing assets and liabilities using enacted rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. A valuation allowance is established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount estimated by the Company to be realizable.

The net assets and results of operations of foreign subsidiaries included in the consolidated financial statements are primarily attributable to the Company’s European and Asian operations. The

Seacastle Inc. (formerly FIF III CLI Holding, Limited)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except as otherwise noted and for share and per share amounts)

accounts of these subsidiaries have been translated at the rates of exchange in effect at the respective period ends for the balance sheets and at a weighted average of the exchange rates for the respective periods for the income statements. The effects of changes in exchange rates in translating foreign subsidiaries’ financial statements are included within accumulated other comprehensive income on the Consoldiated Balance Sheets.

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 Fair Value Measurements. (‘‘SFAS No. 157’’). The Statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and expands additional disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 clarifies that fair value is the amount that would be exchanged to sell an asset or transfer a liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants. The Statement nullifies the consensus reached in EITF Issue No. 02-3 prohibiting the recognition of day one gain or loss on derivative contracts (and hybrid instruments measured at fair value under SFAS No. 133 as modified by SFAS No. 155) where the Company cannot verify all of the significant model inputs to observable market data and verify the model to market transactions. However, SFAS No. 157 requires that a fair value measurement technique include an adjustment for risks inherent in a particular valuation technique (such as a pricing model) and/or the risks inherent in the inputs to the model if market participants would also include such an adjustment. SFAS No. 157 will require the Company to consider the effect of its own credit standing in determining the fair value of its liabilities. In addition, SFAS No. 157 prohibits the recognition of ‘‘block discounts’’ for large holdings of unrestricted financial instruments where quoted prices are readily and regularly available in an active market. The requirements of SFAS No. 157 are to be applied prospectively, except for changes in fair value measurements that result from the initial application of SFAS No. 157 to existing derivative financial instruments measured under EITF Issue No. 02-3 (‘‘EITF No. 02-3’’), existing hybrid instruments measured at fair value, and block discounts, which are to be recorded as an adjustment to opening retained earnings in the year of adoption. The Company expects to adopt SFAS No. 157 on January 1, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS No. 157.

In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, The Fair Value Options for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (‘‘SFAS No. 159’’), which permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. SFAS No. 159 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating if it will elect the fair value option for any of its eligible financial instruments and other items.

Our container leases are ‘‘triple net’’, requiring the lessee to maintain, insure and pay taxes on the equipment until return, at no cost to the lessor. Typical lease provisions allocate all risk of loss to the lessee, requiring the lessee to indemnify the lessor against all risks, claims, or causes of actions

Seacastle Inc. (formerly FIF III CLI Holding, Limited)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except as otherwise noted and for share and per share amounts)

arising from the leasing, operation, maintenance, repair, possession or control of the equipment. The lessee is responsible for compliance with all laws and regulations, including all environmental risk. The lessee is further responsible for loss or damage to the equipment, however caused, subject to normal wear or tear. The Lessee must defend and hold harmless the lessor in the event of any claims for loss or damage to the equipment, cargo, or third parties occurring while leased. The lease terms that are variable, and can change based on the lease type, are the per diem rates, the length of the lease and the redelivery locations and quantities that may be redelivered to such locations. However, the general governing terms and conditions of the lease remain the same whether the lease is short-term, long-term or a direct finance lease, and whether the lease is for the initial term or a renewal. The Company had no amounts of contingent rental in any periods presented.

The Company has noncancelable operating leases relating to leasing equipment, under which it will receive future minimum rental payments as follows:

Our leases do not include step rent provisions nor do they include escalation clauses, capital improvement funding or other concessions.

The Company enters into finance leases. These leases generally provide that, after a stated lease term, the lessee has the option to purchase the equipment, typically for amounts below the estimated fair market value of the equipment, at the time the purchase option becomes exercisable. Unguaranteed residual values are included in the Company’s Net investment in finance leases on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Under the terms of these leases, the substantive risks and rewards of equipment ownership are passed to the lessee. The lease payments are segregated into principal and interest components similar to a loan. The principal component is equal to the cost or carrying amount of the leased property. The interest component is equal to the gross cash flows charged to the lessee less the principal component. The Company recognizes the interest component, which is calculated using the effective interest method over the term of the lease as finance revenue. The principal component of the lease payment is reflected as a reduction to the net investment in the finance leases. As of December 31, 2005 and 2006, the Company had unguaranteed residual values for leasing equipment on direct finance leases of $201 and $6,774, respectively.

Seacastle Inc. (formerly FIF III CLI Holding, Limited)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except as otherwise noted and for share and per share amounts)

The following is a summary of the components of the Company’s net investment in finance leases as of December 31, 2005 and 2006:

Containers and complementary equipment primarily consist of container assets that are being or will be leased to third parties. Leasing equipment also includes components of containers that once assembled are to be leased to third parties in the amount of $15,953 and $89,914 at December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2006, respectively.

In trade payables at December 31, 2005 and 2006 are $5,049 and $41,893, respectively, due on purchases of leasing equipment. There is an additional accrual for leasing equipment purchases in accrued expenses and other liabilities of $1,477 and $12,272 at December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2006, respectively.

As of December 31, 2006, the Company has no assets under capital lease as the capital leases held by the Predecessor were terminated as part of the Carlisle Acquisition. As of December 31, 2005, the Predecessor held leasing equipment with a book value of $31,515, which was under a capital lease.

In February 2006, $108.7 million of leasing equipment was recorded by the Company in conjunction with the Fortress acquisition. These assets previously qualified for operating lease treatment and payments to the lessor were recorded as rental expense. Due to the amended terms of the lease agreement requiring the Company to purchase the assets at the end of the term, the Company recorded a capital lease asset and liability.

As mentioned in Note 5, the Company has debt obligations that are collateralized by the Company’s leasing equipment. As of December 31, 2005 and 2006, net assets pledged to back the debt was $341,602 and $669,458, respectively.

Seacastle Inc. (formerly FIF III CLI Holding, Limited)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except as otherwise noted and for share and per share amounts)

The following is a summary of the Company’s borrowings as of the dates indicated:


	As of December 31,
	2005			2006
Revolving Credit Facility (RCF I)
Interest rate of LIBOR/Term Federal Funds plus 1.75%, terminated in August 2006		$	174,000		$	—
Revolving Credit Facility (RCF II)
Maturing on August 24, 2008 at interest rate of LIBOR/Term Federal Funds plus 0.75%			—			77,000
Term Loan
Maturing on various dates through March 31, 2006 at interest rate of LIBOR/Term Federal Funds plus 1.25%			28,600			—
2003 Asset Backed Securitization
Series 2003-1 Notes: Maturing on various dates through December 2018 at interest rate of 30 day LIBOR plus 0.46%, terminated in August 2006			240,000			—
Series 2003-2 Notes: Maturing on various dates through December 2021 at interest rate of 30 day LIBOR plus 0.38%, terminated in August 2006			150,000			—
2006 Asset Backed Securitization


Republic of the Marshall Islands	7359	98-0542094
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)	(Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)


	Per Share	Total
Public Offering Price	$	$
Underwriting Discount	$	$
Proceeds to Seacastle (before expenses)	$	$


	Shares Purchased				(in thousands) Total Contribution				Average Price Per Share
	Number		Percent		Amount		Percent		Average Price Per Share
Existing Shareholders		110,693,523		84.7		1,001,801		75.8		$	9.05
New investors		20,000,000		15.3		320,000		24.2			16.00
Total		130,693,523		100.0		1,321,801		100.0		$	10.11


	Year Ended December 31, 2006				Period from January 1, 2007 through July 18, 2007
Pro forma finance revenue		$	38,669			$	24,356
Less historical finance lease revenue			(38,845	)			(24,415	)
Pro forma adjustment		$	(176	)		$	(59	)


Period:	Pre-acquisition Accounting Policy			Post-acquisition Accounting Policy			Pro forma Adjustment
Year ended December 31, 2006		$	8,557		$	7,331		$	(1,226	)
For the period from January 1, 2007 through July 18, 2007			8,702			3,834			(4,868	)


Joseph A. Coco, Esq. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP Four Times Square New York, New York 10036-6522 (212) 735-3000			David B. Harms, Esq. Sullivan & Cromwell LLP 125 Broad Street New York, New York 10004-2498 (212) 558-4000


Citi			Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc.			Deutsche Bank Securities			Merrill Lynch & Co.


	Page
Prospectus Summary		3
Risk Factors		12
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements		34
Market and Industry Data and Forecasts		35
Use of Proceeds		36
Dividend Policy		37
Capitalization		38
Dilution		39
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Financial Information		40
Selected Historical Consolidated Financial Data		54
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		57
Industry		96
Business		108
Management		129
Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions		145
Principal Shareholders		149
Description of Indebtedness		151
Description of Capital Stock		169
Marshall Islands Company Considerations		174
Shares Eligible for Future Sale		179
Material Tax Considerations		181
Underwriting		187
Legal Matters		193
Experts		193
Where You Can Find More Information		194
Glossary		195
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-1


	•	Strong Market Position. We are one of the largest operating lessors of intermodal equipment in the world. We are the largest lessor of chassis in North America with approximately 50% market share. Furthermore, we are the largest lessor of refrigerated shipping containers in the world with over 30% market share. Finally, we have a rapidly growing position as a lessor of containerships. We believe that our strength in these market segments will provide us with certain cost and capability advantages relative to smaller asset leasing companies.


	•	Strength of Cash Flows and Long-Term Lease Portfolio. As of September 30, 2007, over 83% of our leasing assets in units, including our containerships, were on long-term lease to our customers. The average remaining term of our existing lease portfolio, including both short- and long-term leases, was approximately 3.5 years and included $1.93 billion of contracted cash flow (assuming early terminations only for which there are no penalties and no renewals). The strength of our cash flow and long-term lease portfolio provides us with highly predictable revenue and operating cash flow, enabling us to manage and grow our business more effectively.


	•	Strong Customer Relationships. We have an extensive history with a large group of customers which provides us with strong relationships at senior levels of management. Our top customers in the container liner industry include APL-NOL, Mediterranean Shipping Company, Maersk Line and CSAV, in the U.S. rail industry include BNSF and CSX and in the cargo logistics market include Schneider and Pacer. We believe that our customer relationships are some of the best in the industry and will enable us to continue to grow our business.


	•	Breadth of Product Offering. We own over $4 billion in total assets and offer a variety of products to our customers across three different intermodal asset classes – chassis, containers and containerships. Many of our customers lease multiple types of our intermodal equipment for their transportation needs. The breadth of our product offering provides us a variety of markets and equipment in which to invest capital at attractive returns.


	•	Scaleable Business Platform. We operate globally through offices in nine countries using modern asset management systems designed for intermodal asset lessors and capable of handling a significantly larger intermodal asset portfolio. We believe that our facilities, systems and personnel currently in place are capable of supporting an increase in our revenue base and asset base without a proportional increase in overhead costs.


	•	Experienced Management Team. Our management team has extensive experience in the acquisition, leasing, financing, technical management and sale of intermodal assets. Our key officers have an average of 24 years of related industry experience.


	•	Continue to Invest Capital into Intermodal Assets. We believe that the market for containerized trade will continue to support opportunities to invest in new assets, particularly in the containership market. Since the beginning of 2006, we have acquired or committed to acquire a total of $2 billion in total intermodal assets including more than $1 billion in containerships, approximately $700 million in shipping containers and approximately $300 million in intermodal chassis. We plan to continue to acquire additional assets and grow our overall fleet.


	•	Focus on Long-Term Leases. We plan to continue our focus of placing our assets on long-term operating and finance leases which provides us with high asset utilization and stable cash flows and minimizes direct operating expenses associated with shorter term operating leases.


	•	Opportunistically Pursue Strategic Acquisitions. We plan to selectively pursue strategic acquisitions of companies and intermodal equipment fleets and assets that are complementary to our existing intermodal asset portfolio. We believe that our existing management platform can support more assets without significant increases to our infrastructure due to the scalable nature of our operations.


	•	Steady and Rapid Growth in our Markets. Containerized trade is an increasingly important component of the movement of goods through the global economy. According to Clarkson Research, worldwide container activity grew each year from 1980 through 2006, achieving a compounded annual growth rate of 9.8% during that 26 year period. Clarkson Research estimates that worldwide containerized trade will continue to grow approximately 9% per year through 2008. We believe that this rapid growth is due to several factors including the overall growth and liberalization of global trade, the shift in manufacturing to lower cost production areas such as China and India, greater development of container and port transportation infrastructure, the conversion of bulk cargoes to containerized cargoes for greater transport efficiency and the continued integration of developing economies into global trade patterns. This growth in containerized trade has led to significant growth in the intermodal transport network as containers need to be placed on a truck or rail for transport.


	•	Significant Use of Operating Leases. Operating equipment lessors play a significant role in the market for intermodal assets. For example, in the containership market, the share of capacity operated by the top ten liner companies that was chartered-in has grown from approximately 15% in 1993 to 50% today. Similarly, in the chassis and container markets, approximately 40% to 50% of the assets in use are leased. We believe that this reliance on operating lessors will remain as our customers continue to require operational flexibility and alternative sources of financing for their equipment.


	•	Consolidation. Over the last few years, there have been several large shipping line acquisitions that have resulted in some consolidation within the container shipping industry, including among some of our customers. This has resulted in a reduction of the number of large shipping lines and also in an increase in concentration of business in a smaller number of larger customers.


	•	combining under a single holding company the refrigerated container and related equipment leasing business operated by Container Leasing International LLC (d/b/a Carlisle Leasing International LLC) and its subsidiaries (referred to in this prospectus collectively as ‘‘Carlisle’’), with the containership leasing business that recently had been started by Seacastle Holdings LLC and its subsidiaries (referred to in this prospectus collectively as ‘‘SHL,’’ and the combination of Carlisle and SHL is referred to in this prospectus as the ‘‘Seacastle Combination’’), and


	•	following the Seacastle Combination, acquiring Interpool, Inc. and its subsidiaries (referred to in this prospectus collectively as ‘‘Interpool’’) by consummating the acquisition of Interpool by the Company pursuant to the previously announced merger of a newly-formed subsidiary with Interpool. This merger transaction was consummated in July 2007 and is referred to in this prospectus as the ‘‘Interpool Acquisition.’’


Common stock offered by us in this offering		20,000,000 shares


Common stock to be issued and outstanding after this offering		130,693,523 shares


Use of proceeds		We intend to use the net proceeds from this offering for working capital and other general corporate purposes, which will include the repayment or refinancing of a portion of outstanding indebtedness, including indebtedness owed to affiliates of some of the underwriters. See ‘‘Use of Proceeds.’’ We may use a portion of the net proceeds from this offering to repay indebtedness incurred to pay the dividend declared on January 11, 2008, as described in ‘‘Dividend Policy.’’


		We are a holding company and, as such, our ability to pay dividends to shareholders of our common stock will be subject to the ability of our subsidiaries to provide cash to us. The declaration and payment of dividends by us will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on, among other things, cash available for distributions,


		general economic and business conditions, our strategic plans and prospects, our financial results and condition, contractual, legal and regulatory restrictions on the payment of distributions by us or our subsidiaries, and such other factors as our board of directors considers to be relevant. See ‘‘Dividend Policy.’’


Risk factors		Please read the section entitled ‘‘Risk Factors’’ and all other information set forth in this prospectus beginning on page 12 for a discussion of some of the factors you should carefully consider before deciding to invest in our common stock.


	•	assumes an initial public offering price of $16.00 per share, the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus;


	•	assumes no exercise by the underwriters of their option to purchase an additional 3,000,000 shares of common stock from us to cover over-allotments; and


	•	assumes 93,750 shares will be issued to certain of our directors after January 14, 2008 but prior to completion of the offering.


	•	prices of new and used chassis, containers and containerships;


	•	the availability and terms of equipment leasing and containership financing;


	•	fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currency values;


	•	economic conditions and competitive pressures in the shipping, rail and trucking industries;