10-Q 1 ipcm-2015331x10q.htm 10-Q IPCM-2015.3.31-10Q
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549 
 
 
 
 
 
FORM 10-Q
 
 
 
 
 
 
(Mark one)
ý    QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2015.
OR
¨    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _________ to __________
Commission file number: 001-33930
 
 
 
 
 
IPC HEALTHCARE, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) 
 
 
 
 
 
Delaware
95-4562058
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 
 
4605 Lankershim Boulevard, Suite 617
North Hollywood, California
91602
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (888) 447-2362 
 
 
 
 
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ý    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ý    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
 
ý
Accelerated filer
 
¨
 
 
 
 
Non-accelerated filer
 
¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company
 
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ¨    No  ý
As of April 23, 2015, there were 17,387,489 shares of the registrant’s common stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding.
 



IPC HEALTHCARE, INC.
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
Note: Items 1A, 2, 3, 4 and 5 of Part II are omitted because they are not applicable.
 

2


PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

IPC Healthcare, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(dollars in thousands, except for share data)
 
 
March 31,
2015
 
December 31,
2014
 
(Unaudited)
 
 
Assets
 
 
 
Current assets:
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
10,020

 
$
14,913

Accounts receivable, net
133,710

 
122,092

Insurance receivable for malpractice claims, current portion
13,038

 
12,564

Prepaid expenses and other current assets
15,702

 
20,876

Total current assets
172,470

 
170,445

Property and equipment, net
9,038

 
8,798

Goodwill
429,793

 
408,988

Other intangible assets, net
4,725

 
4,957

Insurance receivable for malpractice claims, less current portion
22,409

 
21,574

Total assets
$
638,435

 
$
614,762

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
 
 
 
Current liabilities:
 
 
 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
$
9,864

 
$
8,388

Accrued compensation
44,757

 
40,907

Payable for practice acquisitions, current portion
44,636

 
35,411

Medical malpractice and self-insurance reserves, current portion
13,618

 
13,079

Deferred tax liabilities, current portion
584

 
584

Total current liabilities
113,459

 
98,369

Long-term debt
75,000

 
80,000

Medical malpractice and self-insurance reserves, less current portion
48,659

 
47,239

Payable for practice acquisitions, less current portion
11,672

 
9,500

Deferred tax liabilities, less current portion
11,737

 
11,737

Total liabilities
260,527

 
246,845

Stockholders’ equity:
 
 
 
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 15,000,000 shares authorized, none issued

 

Common stock. $0.001 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized, 17,384,739 and 17,242,209 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively
17

 
17

Additional paid-in capital
185,422

 
181,841

Retained earnings
192,469

 
186,059

Total stockholders’ equity
377,908

 
367,917

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$
638,435

 
$
614,762

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


3


IPC Healthcare, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Income
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data)
(unaudited)
 
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2015
 
2014
Net revenue
$
180,771

 
$
172,726

Operating expenses:
 
 
 
Cost of services—physician practice salaries, benefits and other
134,167

 
127,273

General and administrative
29,792

 
27,607

Net change in fair value of contingent consideration
4,684

 
(383
)
Depreciation and amortization
1,515

 
1,265

Total operating expenses
170,158

 
155,762

Income from operations
10,613

 
16,964

Investment income
1

 
1

Interest expense
(277
)
 
(314
)
Income before income taxes
10,337

 
16,651

Income tax provision
3,927

 
6,377

Net income
$
6,410

 
$
10,274

Net income per share:
 
 
 
Basic
$
0.37

 
$
0.60

Diluted
$
0.36

 
$
0.58

 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


4


IPC Healthcare, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
 
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2015
 
2014
Operating activities
 
 
 
Net income
$
6,410

 
$
10,274

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
1,515

 
1,265

Stock-based compensation expense
1,904

 
1,965

Changes in assets and liabilities:
 
 
 
Accounts receivable
(11,618
)
 
(14,064
)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
5,104

 
4,270

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
1,939

 
4,260

Accrued compensation
3,850

 
2,770

Medical malpractice and self-insurance reserves, net
650

 
623

Accrued contingent consideration
4,379

 
(1,189
)
Net cash provided by operating activities
14,133

 
10,174

Investing activities
 
 
 
Acquisitions of physician practices
(13,908
)
 
(8,740
)
Purchase of property and equipment
(1,865
)
 
(750
)
Net cash used in investing activities
(15,773
)
 
(9,490
)
Financing activities
 
 
 
Proceeds from long-term debt
15,000

 

Repayments of long-term debt
(20,000
)
 
(5,000
)
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock
1,580

 
2,160

Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
167

 
420

Net cash used in financing activities
(3,253
)
 
(2,420
)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
(4,893
)
 
(1,736
)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
14,913

 
25,010

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
$
10,020

 
$
23,274

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
 
 
 
Cash paid for:
 
 
 
Interest
$
270

 
$
102

Income taxes
$
777

 
$
635

 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


5


IPC Healthcare, Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
March 31, 2015
Note 1. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
IPC Healthcare, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the “Company,” “IPC,” “we,” “us,” and “our”) is a national physician group practice company that operates and manages full-time hospitalist and post-acute physician practices. We prepared the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on the same basis as our audited annual financial statements. The consolidated financial statements include all accounts of IPC Healthcare, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries and consolidated professional medical corporations (Professional Medical Corporations) managed under long-term management agreements.
Through the management agreements and our relationship with the stockholders of the Professional Medical Corporations, we have exclusive authority over all non-medical decision making related to the ongoing business operations of the Professional Medical Corporations. Further, our rights under the management agreements are unilaterally salable or transferable. Based on the provisions of the agreements, we have determined that the Professional Medical Corporations are variable interest entities (VIE’s), and that we are the primary beneficiary because we have control over the operations of these VIE’s, provide full financial and management support to them, and take all residual benefits and bear all residual losses from their operations. Consequently, we consolidate the revenue and expenses of the Professional Medical Corporations from the date of execution of the agreements. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
In our opinion, these consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial information set forth therein. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in complete financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to GAAP and SEC rules and regulations, which are applicable to interim financial statements. As a result, the following disclosures should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto as of December 31, 2014 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 filed with the SEC on February 23, 2015.
Revenue
Net revenue consists of fees for medical services provided by our affiliated hospitalists under fee-for-service, case rate and other professional fee arrangements with various payors including Medicare, Medicaid, managed care organizations, insurance companies and hospitals. Net revenue is reported in the period in which services are provided at amounts expected to be collected, which excludes contractual discounts and an estimate of uncollectible accounts.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions of the fair value of certain reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses at the date and for the periods that the financial statements are prepared. Significant estimates include the estimated net realizable value of accounts receivable, medical malpractice insurance receivable and payable for known claims, liabilities for claims incurred but not reported (IBNR) related to medical malpractice, fair value of contingent consideration related to business combinations and the analysis of goodwill for impairment. The process of estimating these assets and liabilities involves judgment, which is subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The results of operations for the current interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results for the entire year ending December 31, 2015.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Our consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 included the following financial instruments: cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, payable for practice acquisitions and long-term debt. We consider the carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable and accrued liabilities to approximate their fair value because of the relatively short period of time between the origination of these instruments and their expected realization. The carrying amount of our long-term debt borrowed from our line of credit approximated its fair value at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014. Pursuant to GAAP, we determine the

6


fair value of our long-term borrowing using observable inputs, which are defined as Level 2 inputs under GAAP on fair value measures. See Note 3 for the definition of Level 2 inputs under GAAP.
Our payable for practice acquisitions consisted of accrued contingent consideration for practice acquisitions. The accrued contingent consideration is carried at fair value largely determined using the income approach with unobservable inputs defined as Level 3 inputs under GAAP. See Note 3 for the definition of Level 3 inputs under GAAP and more information.
Goodwill
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the three months ended March 31, 2015 are as follows (in thousands):
Goodwill - beginning balance at January 1, 2015
$
408,988

Goodwill acquired during 2015
21,088

Adjustment for prior year transactions
(283
)
Goodwill - ending balance at March 31, 2015
$
429,793


The valuation studies related to the practice acquisitions that occurred in the fourth quarter of 2014 were completed in early 2015, and as a result, the value of contingent consideration liability related to these acquisitions as of the acquisition dates was decreased by $283,000, along with a corresponding decrease in our goodwill.
Medical Malpractice Liability Insurance
We record our medical malpractice reserves, on an undiscounted basis, for claims incurred and reported and claims incurred but not reported (IBNR) during the policy period, based on actuarial loss projections using historical loss patterns. For claims incurred and reported, an insurance receivable from our carrier has been recorded pursuant to GAAP. Total accrued medical malpractice reserves and related insurance receivables were as follows (in thousands):
 
March 31, 2015
 
December 31, 2014
 
Assets
 
Liabilities
 
Assets
 
Liabilities
 
Insurance
Receivable
 
Claims
Reserve
 
IBNR
Reserve
 
Total
Liabilities
 
Insurance
Receivable
 
Claims
Reserve
 
IBNR
Reserve
 
Total
Liabilities
Current Portion
$
13,038

 
$
13,038

 
$
580

 
$
13,618

 
$
12,564

 
$
12,564

 
$
515

 
$
13,079

Long-term Portion
22,409

 
22,409

 
26,250

 
48,659

 
21,574

 
21,574

 
25,665

 
47,239

Total
$
35,447

 
$
35,447

 
$
26,830

 
$
62,277

 
$
34,138

 
$
34,138

 
$
26,180

 
$
60,318


New Accounting Principles
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued a GAAP update "Revenue from Contracts with Customers". This GAAP update requires entities to recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects what it expects in exchange for the goods or services. This GAAP update also requires more detailed disclosures to enable users of the financial statements to understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The GAAP update is effective for fiscal years (and interim reporting periods within fiscal years) beginning after December 15, 2016. We are currently evaluating the impact of the GAAP update on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Note 2. Business Acquisitions
For practice acquisitions, we recognize all of the assets acquired, liabilities assumed and any contingent consideration at the acquisition-date fair value and expense all transaction related costs.
During the three months ended March 31, 2015, we completed the acquisition of six hospitalist physician practices. In connection with these acquisitions, we recorded goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets consisting of physician and hospital agreements.
Goodwill represents the potential business synergy from the combined operations of our existing and acquired practices through an expanded national network of providers, improved managed care contracting, improved collections, identification of growth initiatives and cost savings based upon the significant infrastructure we have developed. Amounts recorded as goodwill

7


and identifiable intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortizable for GAAP financial reporting purposes but are amortized for tax purposes over 15 years.
In addition to the initial consideration paid at the close of each transaction, the asset purchase agreements for the six acquisitions completed during the three months ended March 31, 2015 provide for contingent consideration to be paid, which is generally based upon the achievement of certain operating results of the acquired practices as of certain measurement dates. These additional payments are not contingent upon the future employment of the sellers. The contingent consideration for the six acquisitions completed during the three months ended March 31, 2015 was recorded on a provisional basis pending completion of the valuation studies as of the acquisition dates.
We estimate the fair value of contingent consideration to be paid based on discounted projected earnings of the acquired practices as of certain measurement dates. The discount rate that we use consists of a risk-free U.S. Treasury bond yield plus a Company specific credit spread which we believe is acceptable by willing market participants.
The following table summarizes the total amounts recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2015 related to the acquisition of hospitalist practices (in thousands):
Acquired assets, net of assumed liabilities – paid and accrued:
 
Goodwill - current year transactions
$
21,088

Other intangible assets
114

Fixed Assets
7

Total acquired assets - current year
21,209

Goodwill - adjustment for prior year transactions
(283
)
 
20,926

Cash paid for acquisitions:
 
Current year transactions
(13,170
)
Contingent consideration
(699
)
Other - prior year transactions
(39
)
Total cash paid for acquisitions
(13,908
)
 
 
Change in accrued contingent consideration
4,379

Net change in payable for practice acquisitions
11,397

Payable for practice acquisitions, beginning of period
44,911

Payable for practice acquisitions, end of period
$
56,308

Note 3. Fair Value Measurement
Some of our liabilities are measured and recorded at fair value, which is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price). The established fair value hierarchy distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (Levels 1 and 2) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (Level 3). This hierarchy is used to measure fair value as follows:
 
Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices in markets that are not active; and other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for the asset or liability.
Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability that are supported by little or no market activity.


8


The following table presents our liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2015 (in thousands):
 
Quoted Price In
Active Markets for
Identical Instruments
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Total Balance
Accrued contingent consideration for practice acquisitions (included in payable for practice acquisitions)
$

 
$

 
$
56,308

 
$
56,308

The following table presents a rollforward of our liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the three months ended March 31, 2015 (in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended 
 March 31, 2015
Accrued contingent consideration for practice acquisitions
 
Beginning balance
$
44,911

Addition through acquisition transactions
8,039

Adjustment for prior year transactions
(283
)
Change in accrued contingent consideration
4,379

Payments
(738
)
Ending balance
$
56,308

The fair value of our accrued contingent consideration is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques, which include the income approach for estimating future consideration to be paid based on projected earnings of our acquired practices as of specified measurement dates. The income approach involves the use of a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model based on significant inputs not observable in the market. The significant inputs include discount rates of 1.31% to 1.84% and 100% probability of achieving the estimated projected earnings or the achievement of certain other objectives.
Because our accrued contingent consideration is generally based on a certain multiple of earnings of the acquired practices during a specified measurement period, a moderate change in such projected earnings may result in a material change to the fair value of such contingent consideration liability with a corresponding adjustment to income from operations. We reassess our projected earnings and the related fair value of our accrued contingent consideration for practice acquisitions on a quarterly basis.
Note 4. Debt
Our secured revolving credit agreement (Credit Facility) provides a revolving line of credit of $125.0 million and contains an “accordion” feature that allows an increase of up to $25.0 million to the Credit Facility with lender approval. The Credit Facility has a maturity date of August 4, 2016 and is available for working capital, practice acquisitions, capital expenditures and general business expenses. As of March 31, 2015, we had borrowings of $75.0 million and letters of credit of $0.3 million outstanding, and $49.7 million available under the Credit Facility.
The revolving line of credit is limited by a formula based on a certain multiple times the trailing twelve months of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and certain non-cash items. Interest rate options for each borrowing under the Credit Facility, to be selected by us at the time of each borrowing, include either LIBOR plus 0.75% to 1.75%, or the lender’s prime rate plus 0% to 0.75%, both based on a leverage ratio. We pay an unused commitment fee equal to 0.25% per annum on the difference between the revolving line capacity and the average balance outstanding during the year. Outstanding amounts advanced to us under the revolving line of credit are repayable on or before the maturity date. The interest rate for our borrowings under the Credit Facility at March 31, 2015 was 0.9375% per annum.
The Credit Facility is guaranteed by our subsidiaries and affiliated Professional Medical Corporations and limited liability companies, and is secured by substantially all of our and our guarantors’ tangible and intangible assets. The Credit Facility includes various customary financial covenants and restrictions, as well as customary remedies for our lenders following an event of default. As of March 31, 2015, we were in compliance with such financial covenants and restrictions.

9


Note 5. Income Taxes
The following table sets forth our income tax provisions and effective tax rates for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 (dollars in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2015
 
2014
Income tax provision
$
3,927

 
$
6,377

Effective tax rate
38.0
%
 
38.3
%
The effective tax rates differ from the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of 35.0% due primarily to state income taxes.
Our accounting policy is to include interest and penalties related to income tax liabilities in income tax expense. As of March 31, 2015, we did not have any estimated interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions.
The tax years 2009 to 2013 remain open to examination by the major taxing jurisdictions to which we are subject. The statute of limitations for tax years 1999 to 2008 has expired, except that the tax year 1999 is subject to adjustment of net operating losses by the Internal Revenue Service. We are subject to taxation in the United States and various state jurisdictions. We are currently subject to one state tax examination for the tax year of 2009. The outcome of the examination cannot be predicted with certainty; however, we believe that the ultimate resolution will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
We make our best estimate of the tax rate expected to be applicable for the full fiscal year. The rate so determined is used to compute our income tax expense for an interim period.
Note 6. Stock-Based Compensation
At March 31, 2015, we had a stock-based employee compensation program, for which we had reserved a total of 4,943,170 common shares for issuance. Under our 2012 Equity Participation Plan (Equity Plan), which was approved by our stockholders on June 7, 2012, a total of 1,422,130 shares of our common stock were available for issuance and no new awards will be issued under any previous equity participation plans. As of March 31, 2015, there were 552,234 shares of our common stock available for future grants under our Equity Plan, which included the canceled and forfeited shares issued under previous equity participation plans.
All option awards previously granted were issued with exercise prices equal to the closing price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on the dates of the grant. The options under the Equity Plan generally vest over a four-year period from date of grant, and options terminate on the 10th anniversary of the agreement date for all grants issued before January 1, 2013 and on the 7th anniversary of the agreement date for all grants issued after December 31, 2012. Restricted stock awards generally vest over a four-year period from date of the award. Performance stock units granted prior to 2015 generally vest over two to three years from date of the award based on the expected level of achievement of certain operational goals that will be obtained and adjusted as appropriate to reflect actual shares issued. Performance stock units granted in 2015 generally vest over three to four years from date of the award based on the expected level of achievement of certain market conditions that will be obtained and adjusted as appropriate to reflect actual shares issued.
Stock-based compensation expense is recognized over the period when the options, restricted stock awards, performance stock awards and our employee stock purchase plan shares vest, which is included in total general and administrative expenses as follows (in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2015
 
2014
Total stock-based compensation expense
$
1,904

 
$
1,965

Tax benefit from stock-based compensation expense
(724
)
 
(753
)
Total stock-based compensation expense, net of tax
$
1,180

 
$
1,212


10


As of March 31, 2015, total unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested stock-based compensation arrangements granted under our Equity Plan and previous equity participation plans and the weighted-average period of years expected to recognize those costs are as follows (dollars in thousands):
 
Total Unrecognized
Compensation
Cost
 
Weighted -average
Remaining Recognition
Period
 
 
 
(Years)
Stock option
$
1,165

 
1.59
Restricted/Performance stock
$
12,764

 
2.02
The grant date fair value of each restricted stock award or performance stock units with operational goals is based on the closing stock price on the grant date of the award as reported by NASDAQ Global Select Market. The grant date fair value of each performance stock units with market conditions is determined using a Monte-Carlo simulation model. Key assumptions for Monte-Carlo simulation model are the risk-free interest rate, expected volatility and correlation coefficient.
The following table summarizes the stock option activities in our Equity Plan during the three months ended March 31, 2015:
 
Shares
 
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 
Weighted-
Average 
Fair
Value
 
 
 
 
 
(Years)
 
(in 000s)
 
 
Options outstanding as of December 31, 2014
1,234,530

 
$
31.10

 
 
 
 
 
$
12.75

Changes during period:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Granted

 

 
 
 
 
 

Exercised
(17,062
)
 
26.40

 
 
 
 
 
10.94

Cancelled
(1,245
)
 
35.23

 
 
 
 
 
14.46

Options outstanding as of March 31, 2015
1,216,223

 
$
31.16

 
4.94
 
$
19,178

 
$
12.77

Options exercisable as of March 31, 2015
1,135,076

 
$
30.45

 
4.83
 
$
18,641

 
$
12.59

The following table summarizes the restricted stock award and performance stock award activities in our Equity Plan during the three months ended March 31, 2015:
 
Shares
 
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 
Weighted-
Average
Fair
Value
 
 
 
(Years)
 
(in 000s)
 
 
Restricted/performance stock awards outstanding as of December 31, 2014
265,219

 
 
 
 
 
$
45.69

Changes during period:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Granted
183,214

 
 
 
 
 
44.01

Vested
(105,194
)
 
 
 
 
 
41.89

Forfeited
(1,136
)
 
 
 
 
 
47.69

Restricted/performance stock awards outstanding as of March 31, 2015
342,103

 
2.02
 
$
15,956

 
$
46.86

Note 7. Earnings Per Share
Basic net income per share is calculated by dividing net income for the period by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is calculated by dividing net income for the period by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period plus the dilutive effect of our outstanding stock awards and shares issuable under our employee stock purchase plan using the treasury stock method.

11


The calculations of basic and diluted net income per share for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 are as follows (dollars in thousands, except for per share data):
 
Three Months Ended 
 March 31,
 
2015
 
2014
Basic:
 
 
 
Net income attributable to common stockholders
$
6,410

 
$
10,274

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
17,302,522

 
17,054,598

Basic net income per share attributable to common stockholders
$
0.37

 
$
0.60

Diluted:
 
 
 
Net income attributable to common stockholders
$
6,410

 
$
10,274

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
17,302,522

 
17,054,598

Weighted average number of dilutive common share equivalents from options to purchase common stock
412,891

 
512,985

Common shares and common share equivalents
17,715,413

 
17,567,583

Diluted net income per share
$
0.36

 
$
0.58

Outstanding stock options and performance stock units that have an above-market exercise price or that are anti-dilutive under the treasury stock method, are excluded from our diluted computation. As of March 31, 2015, the total number of excluded stock options and performance stock units was 349,117.
Note 8. Commitments and Contingencies
Legal
In the ordinary course of our business, we become involved in pending and threatened legal actions and proceedings, most of which involve claims of medical malpractice related to medical services provided by our affiliated clinicians. We may also become subject to other lawsuits, which could involve significant claims and/or significant defense costs.
We believe, based upon our review of pending actions and proceedings, that the outcome of such legal actions and proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. The outcome of such actions and proceedings, however, cannot be predicted with certainty and an unfavorable resolution of one or more of them could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows in a future period.
Government Claim
On June 7, 2010, we received a civil investigative demand (CID) issued by the Department of Justice (DOJ), U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Illinois. The CID requested information concerning claims that we have submitted to Medicare and Medicaid. The CID covered the period from January 1, 2003, through June 4, 2010, and requested production of a range of documents relating to our Medicare and Medicaid participation, physician arrangements, operations, billings and compliance programs. We believe we have a strong compliance focus, and that we operate with appropriate billing policies, procedures, provider training, and compliance programs and controls. We produced responsive documents and were in contact with representatives of the DOJ who informed us that the inquiry related to a qui tam whistleblower action filed under court seal in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (Chicago). We also were informed that several state attorneys general were examining our Medicaid claims in coordination with the DOJ.
Though we cooperated with the government’s investigation and would welcome a resolution to this matter, we are now in active litigation with the federal government regarding this matter and intend to contest the case vigorously. On December 6, 2013, the U.S. District Court partially lifted the seal on the civil False Claims Act case related to this investigation. The unsealed portions of the Court docket include the whistleblower’s Complaint, which contains allegations of improper billing to Medicare and Medicaid, a Notice of Election to Intervene filed by the federal government and a Notice of Election to Decline Intervention filed by the State of Illinois and 12 other states that participated in the investigation. On June 16, 2014, the federal government filed its Complaint in Intervention against IPC and several of its subsidiaries in the U.S. District Court. The Complaint in Intervention contains allegations of improper billing to Medicare, Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs from January 1, 2003 to the present, seeks to recover treble damages and civil penalties under the civil False Claims Act, and

12


seeks to recover damages under the common law theories of payment by mistake and unjust enrichment. On August 13, 2014, IPC and the IPC subsidiary defendants filed a joint motion to dismiss the Complaint in Intervention or, in the alternative, to sever claims against the defendants. The federal government filed its response on September 18, 2014, to which the defendants replied on September 25, 2014. The court’s decision, which was filed on February 17, 2015, granted the motion to dismiss in part and denied it in part. The Court’s Opinion and Order dismissed the 29 IPC subsidiary and affiliate defendants without prejudice, but the Court denied the request to dismiss IPC, which remains the sole defendant in the lawsuit. The parties have begun active discovery.
It is not possible to predict when this matter may be resolved, the time or resources that we will need to devote to this litigation, or what impact, if any, the outcome of this matter might have on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
Derivative Lawsuit
Although the underlying government lawsuit is still in an early stage and no liability has been found by a court, on October 20 and 24, 2014, shareholder derivative lawsuits were filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware against certain of our current and former directors and officers.  We are named as a nominal defendant in both suits.  The actions both assert alleged breaches of fiduciary duties related to our billing practices, and incorporate allegations from the False Claims Act case.  The lawsuits seek a variety of relief, including monetary damages and injunctive relief.  On December 4, 2014, the derivative lawsuits were consolidated into one lawsuit. The litigation is in an early stage and it is not possible to predict when this matter may be resolved, the time or resources that we will need to devote to this litigation, or what impact, if any, the outcome of this matter might have on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

13



ITEM 2.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following management’s discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in this Quarterly Report. In addition, reference is made to our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and related Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on February 23, 2015.
The following discussion contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 regarding future events and the future results of IPC that are based on management’s current expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions about our business. Words such as “may,” “will,” “could,” “should,” “target,” “potential,” “project,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “sees,” “estimates” and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in such forward-looking statements due to numerous factors, including, but not limited to, those discussed in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the section entitled “Risk Factors,” as well as those discussed from time to time in the Company’s other SEC filings and reports. In addition, such statements could be affected by general industry and market conditions. Such forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report or, in the case of any document incorporated by reference, the date of that document, and we do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Quarterly Report, or for changes made to this document by wire services or internet service providers. If we update or correct one or more forward-looking statements, investors and others should not conclude that we will make additional updates or corrections with respect to other forward-looking statements.
Company Overview and Recent Developments
We are a leading national acute hospitalist and post-acute care provider group practice in the United States. Hospitalist medicine is organized around inpatient care, primarily delivered in hospitals, and our services in post-acute care are primarily delivered in skilled nursing facilities. Our services are focused on providing, managing and coordinating the care of patients at inpatient facilities. We believe we are the largest dedicated provider of these clinical services in the United States based on revenues, patient encounters and number of affiliated clinicians. Our early entry into the emerging hospitalist industry has permitted us to establish a reputation and leadership position that we believe is closely identified with hospitalist medicine.
Business Acquisitions
During the three months ended March 31, 2015, we acquired six hospitalist physician practices for a total estimated purchase price of $21,209,000. In connection with these acquisitions, we recorded goodwill of $21,088,000, identifiable intangible assets of $114,000 and fixed assets of $7,000. Total transaction costs of $22,000 for our acquisition activities during the three months ended March 31, 2015 were expensed as incurred.
In connection with these six acquisitions, we recorded liabilities of $8,039,000 representing the fair value of future contingent consideration to be paid based upon the estimated achievement of certain operating results of the acquired practices as of certain measurement dates. The contingent consideration for the six acquisitions completed during the three months ended March 31, 2015 was recorded on a provisional basis pending completion of the valuation studies as of the acquisition dates. The finalized fair value of contingent considerations is re-evaluated on a quarterly basis based on changes in our estimate of the operating results of future periods. The changes in fair value, if any, are recognized in our results of operations. Because the fair value of contingent consideration is generally based on a certain multiple of operating results of the acquired practices during a measurement period, a moderate change in projected operating results can result in a large change to the fair value of such contingent consideration.
The net change in fair value of contingent consideration (“net change in fair value”) for acquisitions was an increase to expense of $4.7 million and a reduction to expense of $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Diluted earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2015, which includes the net change in fair value, was $0.36 diluted earnings per share, compared with $0.58 diluted earnings per share for the same period in the prior year.

14


Excluding the net change in fair value, diluted earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2015 was $0.53 diluted earnings per share, compared with $0.57 diluted earnings per share for the same period in the prior year.
Rate Changes by Government Sponsored Programs
Until recently, the Medicare program reimbursed for our services based upon the rates set forth in the annually updated Medicare Physician Fee Schedule, which relied, in part, on a target-setting formula system called the Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR). Many private payors use the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule to determine their own reimbursement rates. Effective January 1, 2015, the Medicare update resulted in a slight increase in our net patient revenue per encounter.
The annual Medicare Physician Fee Schedule update, based on the SGR, was adjusted to reflect the comparison of actual expenditures to target expenditures. Because one of the factors for calculating the SGR was linked to the growth in the U.S. gross domestic product (GDP), the SGR formula often resulted in a negative payment update when growth in Medicare beneficiaries’ use of services exceeded GDP growth, a situation which has occurred every year since 2002 and the reoccurrence of which we cannot predict.
Congress has repeatedly intervened to delay the implementation of the negative SGR payment update. For example, on April 1, 2014, with the enactment of the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014, Congress prevented the 24 percent cut that was to occur by continuing the previously implemented 0.5 percent payment increase through December 31, 2014 and maintaining a zero percent payment update from January 1, 2015 through March 31, 2015. On November 13, 2014, CMS published the calendar year 2015 Physician Fee Schedule final rule, which, consistent with the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014, called for a 0% update from January 1, 2015 through March 31, 2015 and a negative 21.2% update under the statutory SGR formula for April 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015. However, on April 14, 2015, Congress passed the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015, which was signed into law by President Obama on April 16, 2015. This law repeals the SGR methodology from the physician payment formula, institutes a 0% update to the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule for the January 1 to July 1, 2015 period, a 0.5% payment update for July 2015 through the end of 2019, and a 0% payment update for 2020 through 2025. For 2026 and subsequent years, the payment update will be either 0.75% or 0.25%, depending on which Alternate Payment Model (APM) the physician participates. Given that the APMs have yet to take effect, we cannot determine the impact of such payments models on our business at this time.
Another provision that affects physician payments is an adjustment under the Medicare statute to reflect the geographic variation in the cost of delivering physician services, by comparing those costs to the national average. This concerns the “work” component of the Geographic Practice Cost Indices (GPCI). If Congress does not block this adjustment, payments would be decreased to any geographic area with an index of less than 1.0. Although Congress has delayed the GPCI payment adjustment several times, most recently in the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015, which blocks the GPCI payment adjustment until January 1, 2018, there is no guarantee that Congress will block the adjustment in the future, which could result in a decrease in the payments we receive for physician services.
In addition, in recent years, the U.S. Congress has enacted various laws seeking to reduce the federal debt level and contain healthcare expenditures. For example, the Budget Control Act of 2011 (BCA) called for the establishment of a Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction, tasked with reducing the federal debt level. However, because the Committee did not draft a proposal by the BCA’s deadline, President Obama issued an initial sequestration order on March 1, 2013 that imposed automatic spending cuts on various federal programs.  Under the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 and a bill signed by the President on February 15, 2014, sequestration has been extended through fiscal year 2024. Medicare payments to providers are subject to such cuts, although the BCA generally limited the Medicare cuts to two percent. For fiscal year 2024, however, Medicare sequestration amounts will be realigned such that there will be a 4.0 percent sequester for the first six months and a zero percent sequester for the second six months.  Thus far, this 2.0 percent net reduction in Medicare reimbursement rates for the codes applicable to the services performed by our affiliated clinicians reduced our net patient revenue per encounter by approximately 1.0.
Moreover, the instability of the federal budget may lead to legislation that could result in further cuts in Medicare and Medicaid payments to providers. In recent years, the government has enacted a patchwork of appropriations legislation to temporarily suspend the debt ceiling and continue government operations. Most recently, on December 9, 2014, Congress passed the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act of 2015, which funds the government through September 30, 2015. However, this new law is a temporary measure that does not resolve the debt ceiling issue. Many Members of Congress have made public statements indicating that some or all of these budget-related deadlines should be used as leverage to negotiate additional cuts in federal spending. The Medicare program is frequently mentioned as a target for spending cuts.

15


Healthcare Reform
In March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively the Affordable Care Act or ACA) was enacted. The ACA includes a number of provisions that may affect our Company, although the impact of many of the changes will be unknown until they are fully implemented, which in some cases will not occur for a couple of years. The impact of some of these provisions have already proven to be positive, such as the Primary Care Incentive Payment Program, which makes a ten percent Medicare bonus payment for primary care services (including outpatient and nursing home visits) furnished on or after January 1, 2011 and before January 1, 2016 to primary care practitioners for whom primary care services represented a minimum of 60 percent of Medicare allowed charges in a prior period, and the increase in Medicaid rates up to the level of Medicare rates (Medicaid parity) in 2013 and 2014 for primary care services. Another positive provision is the expansion in the number of individuals with health insurance, which increased in January 2014 with the expansion of Medicaid eligibility and the initiation of health coverage through plans purchased on the health exchanges.
The impact of other provisions is unknown at this time, such as the establishment of an Independent Payment Advisory Board (the IPA Board)-a fifteen-member board which is tasked with making proposals to Congress and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to reduce the per capita rate of growth in Medicare spending in years when that growth exceeds established targets. HHS generally will be required to implement these proposals unless Congress enacts superseding legislation. Pursuant to statute, the IPA Board’s first set of recommendations were due on January 15, 2014. However, as of early 2015, the President had yet to nominate anyone to serve on the IPA Board.
Fraud and abuse penalty increases and the expansion in the scope of the reach of the federal False Claims Act and other government enforcement tools may adversely impact entities in the healthcare industry, including our Company.
The impact of certain provisions will depend upon the ultimate method of implementation. For example, the ACA requires HHS to develop a budget neutral, value-based payment modifier that provides for differential payment under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule for physicians or groups of physicians that is linked to quality of care furnished compared to cost. CMS has continued to implement the modifier through the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule rulemaking for 2014, by, among other things, finalizing its proposal to apply the value-based payment modifier to groups of physicians with 10 or more eligible professionals in calendar year 2016 and to expand the modifier to all physicians in calendar year 2017. In the 2015 Physician Fee Schedule final rule, CMS continued to expand the impact of value-based payment methodologies, for example, effective calendar year 2017, the amount of payment at risk under the value-based payment modifier will increase from 2.0 percent to 4.0 percent. The impact of this payment modifier, if any, cannot be determined at this time.
In addition, certain provisions of the ACA authorize voluntary demonstration projects, which include the development of bundling payments for acute, inpatient hospital services, physician services, and post-acute care services for episodes of hospital care. The Medicare Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Initiative is currently underway and assesses four models of care linking payments for multiple services provided to beneficiaries during an episode of care. Although we have entered into an agreement to participate in this initiative, the impact of these projects on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows cannot be determined at this time.
Seasonality and Quarterly Fluctuations
We have historically experienced and expect to continue to experience quarterly fluctuations in net revenue and income from operations. Absent the impact and timing of acquisitions, our net revenue has historically been higher in the first and fourth quarters of the year primarily due to the following factors:
 
the number of physicians we have on staff during the quarter, which may fluctuate based upon the timing of hires due to the end of the academic year for graduating resident physicians, the schedule of the Internal Medicine Board exams and terminations in our existing practices; and

fluctuations in patient encounters, which are impacted by hospital census, which can be volatile, and physician productivity and often reflect seasonality due to the higher occurrence of illnesses such as flu and pneumonia in patient populations in the first quarter.
We have significant fixed operating costs, including physician practice salaries and benefits and, as a result, are highly dependent on patient encounters and the productivity of our affiliated hospitalists to sustain profitability. Additionally, quarterly results may be affected by the timing of practice acquisitions and the hiring and termination of our affiliated hospitalists.

16


Results of Operations and Operating Data
The following table sets forth operating data and selected consolidated statement of income information stated as a percentage of net revenue:
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2015
 
2014
Operating data – patient encounters
1,963,000

 
1,764,000

 
 
 
 
Net revenue
100.0
 %
 
100.0
 %
Operating expenses:
 
 
 
Cost of services—physician practice salaries, benefits and other
74.2
 %
 
73.7
 %
General and administrative
16.5
 %
 
16.0
 %
Net change in fair value of contingent consideration
2.6
 %
 
(0.2
)%
Depreciation and amortization
0.8
 %
 
0.7
 %
Total operating expenses
94.1
 %
 
90.2
 %
Income from operations
5.9
 %
 
9.8
 %
Investment income
                  –

 
 %
Interest expense
(0.2
)%
 
(0.2
)%
Income before income taxes
5.7
 %
 
9.6
 %
Income tax provision
2.2
 %
 
3.7
 %
Net income
3.5
 %
 
5.9
 %
Three months ended March 31, 2015 compared with three months ended March 31, 2014
Our patient encounters for the three months ended March 31, 2015 increased by 199,000 encounters or 11.3% to 1,963,000, compared with 1,764,000 for the same period in the prior year. Net revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2015 was $180.8 million, an increase of $8.0 million, or 4.7%, from $172.7 million for the same period in the prior year. The difference between revenue growth and encounter growth is principally related to Medicaid parity, which largely expired at the end of 2014, and the exiting of a few facility contracts during 2014. Of this $8.0 million increase, 55.6% was attributable to same-market area growth, including new hires and tuck-in acquisitions, and 44.4% was attributable to revenue generated from operations in new markets. Same-market encounters increased 8.7% and same-market net revenue increased 2.6%. Adjusting for Medicaid parity and the exiting of certain contracted facilities in 2014, same-market encounter growth and net revenue growth would have been approximately 10.6% and 10.5%, respectively. Same-market areas are those geographic areas in which we have had operations for the entire current period and the entire comparable prior period. Because in-market area acquisitions are often small practice groups which become subsumed within our existing practice groups and are managed by our existing regional management staff, we consider these as part of our same-market area growth.
Physician practice salaries, benefits and other expenses increased by $6.9 million or 5.4% to $134.2 million, or 74.2% of net revenue, for the three months ended March 31, 2015, as compared with $127.3 million, or 73.7% of net revenue, for the same period in the prior year. The 50 basis point increase in costs as a percentage of revenue is due to the acquisition of certain practices that are operating below the Company’s average gross margin. The dollar increase in cost of services is largely related to the increase in the number of hospitalists added through hiring and acquisitions during the period. Same-market area physician costs increased a total of $4.0 million, which was primarily the result of increased costs related to our new hires or acquired physician practices. In addition, $2.9 million of the $6.9 million overall cost increase is attributable to physician costs associated with our entrance into new markets.
General and administrative expenses include all salaries, benefits and operating expenses not specifically related to the day-to-day operations of our physician group practices, including billing and collections functions, our regional and market-area administrative offices and our corporate management and overhead. General and administrative expenses increased $2.2 million, or 7.9%, to $29.8 million, or 16.5% of net revenue, for the three months ended March 31, 2015, as compared with $27.6 million, or 16.0% of net revenue, for the same period in the prior year. Adjusting for the cessation of Medicaid parity, general and administrative expenses would have been 16.0% of net revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2015. The dollar increase in expense was primarily the result of increased costs to support the continuing growth of our operations.

17


Excluding stock based compensation, general and administrative expenses were 15.4% of net revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2015, as compared with 14.8% of net revenue for the same period in the prior year.
The net change in fair value of contingent consideration (“net change in fair value”) for acquisitions was an increase to expense of $4.7 million and a decrease to expense of $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The $4.7 million increase was largely associated with a practice acquired in 2013 in the post-acute setting in New York. Because the fair value of contingent consideration for this practice is based on a certain multiple of operating results, the recent moderate improvement in projected earnings resulted in a large increase to expense.
Income from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2015 decreased $6.4 million, or 37.4%, to $10.6 million from $17.0 million for the same period in the prior year. Our operating margin was 5.9% and 9.8% for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Excluding the net change in fair value, income from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2015 decreased 7.7% to $15.3 million, or an operating margin of 8.5%, compared with income from operations of $16.6 million, or an operating margin of 9.6% for the same period in the prior year.
Our effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 was 38.0% and 38.3%, respectively. The effective tax rate differs from the statutory U.S. federal rate of 35.0% due primarily to state income taxes.
Net income for the three months ended March 31, 2015 was $6.4 million, as compared with $10.3 million for the same period in the prior year, and our net income margin was 3.5% for the three months ended March 31, 2015, as compared with 5.9% for the same period in the prior year. Diluted earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2015 was $0.36, as compared with $0.58 for the same period in the prior year. Excluding the net change in fair value, net income for the three months ended March 31, 2015 was $9.3 million, or $0.53 diluted earnings per share, as compared with net income of $10.0 million, or $0.57 diluted earnings per share for the same period in the prior year.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of March 31, 2015, we had approximately $59.7 million in liquidity, which is composed of $10.0 million in cash and cash equivalents and an available line of credit of $49.7 million. We had borrowings of $75.0 million from our revolving line of credit outstanding at March 31, 2015, which was used to fund our practice acquisitions.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $14.1 million and $10.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The changes in working capital during the three months ended March 31, 2015 was largely related to an increase in accounts receivable of $11.6 million, a decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets of $5.1 million, an increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $1.9 million and an increase in accrued compensation of $3.9 million primarily related to timing of payrolls and physician bonus payments.
Our days sales outstanding (DSO), which we use to measure the effectiveness of our collections, was 64 DSO and 60 DSO as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. The four day increase in DSO was primarily related to the level of recent acquisitions made during the quarter. We calculate our DSO using a three-month rolling average of net revenues.
Net cash used in investing activities was $15.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015, as compared with $9.5 million for the same period in the prior year. Cash of $13.9 million was used in the three months ended March 31, 2015 for physician practice acquisitions and contingent consideration payments on prior acquisitions, as compared with $8.7 million for the same period in the prior year. The remainder of cash used in investing activities was for purchases of computer hardware and software, and office furnishings.
For the three months ended March 31, 2015, net cash used in financing activities was $3.3 million, as compared with $2.4 million for the same period in the prior year. During the three months ended March 31, 2015, we repaid $20.0 million of our outstanding revolving line of credit and borrowed $15.0 million under our revolving line of credit to fund our practice acquisitions. During the three months ended March 31, 2014, we repaid $5.0 million of our outstanding revolving line of credit.
Credit Facility and Liquidity
Our secured revolving credit agreement (Credit Facility) provides a revolving line of credit of $125.0 million and contains an “accordion” feature that allows an increase of up to $25.0 million to the Credit Facility with lender approval. The Credit Facility has a maturity date of August 4, 2016 and is available for working capital, practice acquisitions, capital expenditures and general business expenses. As of March 31, 2015, we had borrowings of $75.0 million and letters of credit of $0.3 million outstanding, and $49.7 million available under the Credit Facility.

18


The revolving line of credit is limited by a formula based on a certain multiple times the trailing twelve months of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and certain non-cash items. Interest rate options for each borrowing under the Credit Facility, to be selected by us at the time of each borrowing, include either LIBOR plus 0.75% to 1.75%, or the lender’s prime rate plus 0% to 0.75%, both based on a leverage ratio. We pay an unused commitment fee equal to 0.25% per annum on the difference between the revolving line capacity and the average balance outstanding during the year. Outstanding amounts advanced to us under the revolving line of credit are repayable on or before the maturity date. The interest rate for our borrowings under the Credit Facility at March 31, 2015 was 0.9375% per annum.
The Credit Facility is guaranteed by our subsidiaries and affiliated Professional Medical Corporations and limited liability companies, and is secured by substantially all of our and our guarantors’ tangible and intangible assets. The Credit Facility includes various customary financial covenants and restrictions, as well as customary remedies for our lenders following an event of default. As of March 31, 2015, we were in compliance with such financial covenants and restrictions.
We anticipate that funds generated from operations, together with our current cash on hand and funds available under our Credit Facility will be sufficient to finance our working capital requirements and fund anticipated acquisitions, contingent acquisition consideration and capital expenditures.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of March 31, 2015, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements.
ITEM 3.    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to changes in interest rate as a result of our Credit Facility. At our option, the interest rate on outstanding borrowings under our Credit Facility is either LIBOR plus 0.75% to 1.75% or the lender’s prime rate plus 0% to 0.75%, both based on a leverage ratio. The lender’s prime rate is a daily floating rate most recently announced by our lender, whether or not such announced rate is the lowest rate available from our lender. LIBOR is either the 30, 60, 90 or 180 day LIBOR. Historically, we have chosen not to use interest rate derivatives to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates. We had long-term borrowings of $75.0 million bearing an annual interest of 0.9375% under our Credit Facility at March 31, 2015. A 1.0% change in interest rate on our borrowings of $75.0 million would result in an impact to income before income taxes of approximately $750,000 on an annual basis.
Investments in both fixed rate and floating rate interest earning instruments carry a degree of interest rate risk. Fixed rate securities may have their fair market value adversely impacted due to a rise in interest rates, while floating rate securities with shorter maturities may produce less income if interest rates fall. As of March 31, 2015, all of our short-term investments were invested in money market funds with less than 90-day maturities and are classified as cash equivalents.
ITEM 4.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain controls and procedures designed to ensure that we are able to collect the information we are required to disclose in the reports we file with the SEC, and to process, summarize and disclose this information within the time periods specified in the rules of the SEC. Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, has conducted an evaluation of the design and operation of our “disclosure controls and procedures” as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the period covered by this report to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended March 31, 2015 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

19


PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Legal
In the ordinary course of our business, we become involved in pending and threatened legal actions and proceedings, most of which involve claims of medical malpractice related to medical services provided by our affiliated hospitalists. We may also become subject to other lawsuits, which could involve significant claims and/or significant defense costs.
We believe, based upon our review of pending actions and proceedings that the outcome of such legal actions and proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. The outcome of such actions and proceedings, however, cannot be predicted with certainty and an unfavorable resolution of one or more of them could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows in a future period.
Government Claim
On June 7, 2010, we received a civil investigative demand (CID) issued by the Department of Justice (DOJ), U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Illinois. The CID requested information concerning claims that we have submitted to Medicare and Medicaid. The CID covered the period from January 1, 2003, through June 4, 2010, and requested production of a range of documents relating to our Medicare and Medicaid participation, physician arrangements, operations, billings and compliance programs. We believe we have a strong compliance focus, and that we operate with appropriate billing policies, procedures, provider training, and compliance programs and controls. We produced responsive documents and were in contact with representatives of the DOJ who informed us that the inquiry related to a qui tam whistleblower action filed under court seal in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (Chicago). We also were informed that several state attorneys general were examining our Medicaid claims in coordination with the DOJ.
Though we cooperated with the government’s investigation and would welcome a resolution to this matter, we are now in active litigation with the federal government regarding this matter and intend to contest the case vigorously. On December 6, 2013, the U.S. District Court partially lifted the seal on the civil False Claims Act case related to this investigation. The unsealed portions of the Court docket include the whistleblower’s Complaint, which contains allegations of improper billing to Medicare and Medicaid, a Notice of Election to Intervene filed by the federal government and a Notice of Election to Decline Intervention filed by the State of Illinois and 12 other states that participated in the investigation. On June 16, 2014, the federal government filed its Complaint in Intervention against IPC and several of its subsidiaries in the U.S. District Court. The Complaint in Intervention contains allegations of improper billing to Medicare, Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs from January 1, 2003 to the present, seeks to recover treble damages and civil penalties under the civil False Claims Act, and seeks to recover damages under the common law theories of payment by mistake and unjust enrichment. On August 13, 2014, IPC and the IPC subsidiary defendants filed a joint motion to dismiss the Complaint in Intervention or, in the alternative, to sever claims against the defendants. The federal government filed its response on September 18, 2014, to which the defendants replied on September 25, 2014. The court’s decision, which was filed on February 17, 2015, granted the motion to dismiss in part and denied it in part. The Court’s Opinion and Order dismissed the 29 IPC subsidiary and affiliate defendants without prejudice, but the Court denied the request to dismiss IPC, which remains the sole defendant in the lawsuit. The parties have begun active discovery.
It is not possible to predict when this matter may be resolved, the time or resources that we will need to devote to this litigation, or what impact, if any, the outcome of this matter might have on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
Derivative Lawsuit
Although the underlying government lawsuit is still in an early stage and no liability has been found by a court, on October 20 and 24, 2014, shareholder derivative lawsuits were filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware against certain of our current and former directors and officers.  We are named as a nominal defendant in both suits.  The actions both assert alleged breaches of fiduciary duties related to our billing practices, and incorporate allegations from the False Claims Act case.  The lawsuits seek a variety of relief, including monetary damages and injunctive relief.  On December 4, 2014, the derivative lawsuits were consolidated into one lawsuit. The litigation is in an early stage and it is not possible to predict when this matter may be resolved, the time or resources that we will need to devote to this litigation, or what impact, if any, the outcome of this matter might have on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

20


ITEMS 1A, 2, 3, 4 AND 5 ARE NOT APPLICABLE
 
ITEM 6.    EXHIBITS
(a) Exhibits
Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed in the Exhibit Index on page 23 of this report.


21


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized on April 30, 2015.
 
 
 
 
IPC HEALTHCARE, INC.
 
 
By:
 
/s/ ADAM D. SINGER, M.D.
 
 
Adam D. Singer, M.D.
Chief Executive Officer
 
 
By:
 
/s/ RICK KLINE
 
 
Rick Kline
Chief Financial Officer


22


EXHIBIT INDEX
 
 
 
 
Exhibit
Number
  
Description of Document
 
 
31.1
  
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act.
 
 
31.2
  
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act.
 
 
32.1
  
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
 
 
32.2
  
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
 
 
101.INS
  
XBRL Instance Document
 
 
101.SCH
  
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
 
 
101.CAL
  
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
 
 
101.DEF
  
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
 
 
101.LAB
  
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
 
 
101.PRE
  
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document


23