UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number 333-123747

KRATON POLYMERS LLC

(Exact name of Register as specified in its Charter)

Delaware	26-3739386
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

15710 John F. Kennedy Blvd. Suite 300, Houston, TX 77032

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

281-504-4700

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ¨    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer:  ¨    Accelerated filer:  ¨    Non-accelerated filer:  x    Smaller reporting company:  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

KRATON POLYMERS LLC

FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED

June 30, 2009

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)	4
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008	5
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008	6
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	7
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	30
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	40
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	41
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	42
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	42
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	42
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	42
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	42
Item 5.	Other Information	42
Item 6.	Exhibits	43
	Signatures	44

2

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes “forward-looking statements,” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We may also make forward-looking statements in our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, other Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K, in press releases and other written materials, and in oral statements made by our officers, directors or employees to third parties. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, included or incorporated in this Form 10-Q are forward-looking statements, particularly statements about our plans, strategies and prospects under the headings “Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Forward-looking statements are often characterized by the use of words such as “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “projects,” “may,” “will,” “intends,” “plans” or “anticipates,” or by discussions of strategy, plans or intentions. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other important factors that could cause our actual results, performance or achievements, or industry results, to differ materially from historical results or any future results, performance or achievements expressed, suggested or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:

• a downturn in overall economic conditions or changes in levels of consumer spending or preferences,

• our dependence on LyondellBasell Industries, Shell Chemicals and other suppliers to perform their obligations to us,

• failure of our suppliers to perform their obligations under long-term supply agreements, or our inability to replace or renew these agreements when they expire, could increase our cost for these materials and interrupt production,

• limited availability or increases in prices of raw materials used in our business,

• our substantial level of indebtedness,

• competitive pressures in the specialty chemicals industry,

• our ability to continue technological innovation and successful commercial introduction of new products,

• losses due to lawsuits arising out of environmental damage or personal injuries associated with chemical manufacturing,

• compliance with extensive environmental, health and safety laws, including regulation of our employees’ exposure to butadiene, could require material expenditures or changes in our operations,

• the risk of accidents that could disrupt our operations or expose us to significant losses or liabilities,

• governmental regulations and trade restrictions, including any changes thereto or enhanced enforcement thereof in the future

• exposure to interest rate and currency fluctuations,

• acts of war or terrorism in the United States or worldwide, political or financial instability in the countries where our goods are manufactured and sold, and

• other risks and uncertainties described in this report and Kraton’s other reports and documents.

These statements are based on current plans, estimates, beliefs and projections, and therefore you should not place undue reliance on them. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update them publicly in light of new information or future events.

You should carefully consider the “Risk Factors” described in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and subsequent public statements, or reports filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission, before making any investment decision with respect to our securities. If any of these trends, risks or uncertainties actually occurs or continues, our business, financial condition or operating results could be materially adversely affected, the trading prices of our securities could decline and you could lose all or part of your investment. All forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement.

3

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

KRATON POLYMERS LLC

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

	June 30, 2009		December 31, 2008
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	17,710	$	101,396
Receivables, net of allowances of $1,945 and $2,512		126,447		95,443
Inventories of products, net		231,355		324,193
Inventories of materials and supplies, net		11,369		11,055
Deferred income taxes		14,778		14,778
Other current assets		12,574		6,769
Total current assets		414,233		553,634
Property, plant and equipment, less accumulated depreciation of $202,490 and $182,252		376,720		372,008
Identifiable intangible assets, less accumulated amortization of $39,456 and $36,169		63,765		67,051
Investment in unconsolidated joint venture		11,550		12,371
Deferred financing costs		6,602		8,184
Other long-term assets		22,114		18,626
Total Assets	$	894,984	$	1,031,874
LIABILITIES AND MEMBER’S EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Current portion of long-term debt	$	3,343	$	3,343
Accounts payable-trade		76,930		75,177
Other payables and accruals		49,879		69,349
Due to related party		9,355		25,585
Insurance note payable		3,019		—
Total current liabilities		142,526		173,454
Long-term debt, net of current portion		483,057		571,728
Deferred income taxes		30,604		34,985
Long-term liabilities		62,916		63,117
Total Liabilities		719,103		843,284
Commitments and contingencies (note 11)
Member’s equity
Common equity		165,860		182,767
Accumulated other comprehensive income		10,021		5,823
Total member’s equity		175,881		188,590
Total Liabilities and Member’s Equity	$	894,984	$	1,031,874

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

4

KRATON POLYMERS LLC

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008		2009			2008
Operating Revenues
Sales	$	233,741		$	328,362	$	411,607		$	584,650
Other		10,080			17,007		17,172			27,580
Total operating revenues		243,821			345,369		428,779			612,230
Cost of Goods Sold		208,060			282,823		384,085			500,899
Gross Profit		35,761			62,546		44,694			111,331
Operating Expenses
Research and development		5,071			7,403		10,040			15,321
Selling, general and administrative		18,052			19,909		36,303			45,364
Depreciation and amortization		12,542			13,110		25,106			27,762
Total operating expenses		35,665			40,422		71,449			88,447
Gain on Extinguishment of Debt		4,340			—		23,831			—
Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Joint Venture		102			159		176			220
Interest Expense, net		7,825			9,418		16,733			19,803
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes		(3,287	)		12,865		(19,481	)		3,301
Income Tax Expense		891			2,649		1,163			2,495
Net Income (Loss)	$	(4,178	)	$	10,216	$	(20,644	)	$	806

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

5

KRATON POLYMERS LLC

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net Income (Loss)	$	(20,644	)	$	806
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		25,106			27,762
Lower-of-cost-or-market inventory adjustment		669			—
Gain on extinguishment of debt		(23,831	)		—
Amortization of deferred financing costs		1,582			1,156
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment		431			(8	)
Change in fair value of interest rate swaps		(842	)		—
Earnings in unconsolidated joint venture		257			821
Deferred income tax benefit		(907	)		(1,269	)
Non-cash compensation related to equity awards		1,237			749
Decrease (increase) in
Accounts receivable		(29,542	)		(30,194	)
Inventories of products, materials and supplies		90,670			(12,483	)
Other assets		(1,112	)		(2,729	)
Increase (decrease) in
Accounts payable-trade, other payables and accruals, and other long-term liabilities		(23,817	)		9,263
Due to related party		(14,550	)		(7,737	)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		4,707			(13,863	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchase of property, plant and equipment		(26,657	)		(9,686	)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment		3,833			17
Net cash used in investing activities		(22,824	)		(9,669	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from debt		53,000			154,750
Repayment of debt		(115,341	)		(166,472	)
Cash contribution from member		—			10,000
Proceeds from (repayment of) insurance note payable		3,019			(494	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(59,322	)		(2,216	)
Effect of exchange rate differences on cash and cash equivalents		(6,247	)		(1,177	)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(83,686	)		(26,925	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		101,396			48,277
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	17,710		$	21,352
Supplemental Disclosures
Cash paid during the period for income taxes, net of refunds received	$	7,455		$	5,451
Cash paid during the period for interest	$	16,489		$	20,453

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

6

KRATON POLYMERS LLC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1. General

Organization and Description of Business. Kraton Polymers LLC, together with its direct and indirect subsidiaries, are, unless the context requires otherwise, collectively referred to herein as “we,” “our,” “ours,” “us” or “Kraton.” Kraton Polymers LLC is the parent of Elastomers Holdings LLC (holding company of Kraton’s United States (U.S.) operations), K.P. Global Holdings C.V. (holding company of the remainder of our global operations) and Kraton Polymers Capital Corporation (a company with no obligations). Polymer Holdings LLC, or “Polymer Holdings,” owns 100% of the equity interests of Kraton, either directly or indirectly. TJ Chemical Holdings LLC, or “TJ Chemical,” owns 100% of the equity interests of Polymers Holdings. TJ Chemical is owned by TPG Partners III, L.P., TPG Partners IV, L.P. and certain entities affiliated with said parties, entities affiliated with or managed by J.P. Morgan Partners, LLC, and affiliates, and Kraton Management LLC.

We produce styrenic block copolymers (SBCs), a family of specialty chemical products whose chemistry we pioneered over 40 years ago. SBCs are highly engineered synthetic elastomers, which enhance the performance of numerous products by delivering a variety of performance characteristics, including greater flexibility, resilience, strength, durability and processability. Our specialty polymers are typically processed with other products to achieve customer specific performance characteristics in a variety of applications. The versatility of our portfolio of polymers is due to a wide range of distinctive molecular structures, which can be precisely controlled and tailored to unique design and performance characteristics. Each polymer requires a significant amount of testing and certification, which, combined with our proprietary chemistry, encourages strong customer loyalty.

We operate six plants globally, including our flagship Belpre, Ohio plant in the United States, the largest SBC plant in the world, as well as plants in Germany, France, The Netherlands, Brazil and Japan. The plant in Japan is operated by an unconsolidated manufacturing joint venture.

We generally sell our products to customers for use in industrial and consumer applications. Based on our management approach, we believe that all material operations revolve around the manufacturing and sales of SBCs and we currently report our operations, both internally and externally, as a single business segment.

Basis of Presentation. The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements presented herein are for Kraton and its consolidated subsidiaries, each of which is a wholly-owned subsidiary.

These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, and reflect all normal recurring adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary to fairly present Kraton’s results of operations and financial position. Amounts reported in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations are not necessarily indicative of amounts expected for the respective annual periods due to the effect of seasonal changes and weather conditions which typically affect our polymer product sales into our Paving and Roofing end-use market.

Use of Estimates. To conform with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the U.S., management makes estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Although these estimates are based on management’s best available knowledge at the time, actual results could differ.

7

Income Tax in Interim Periods. Our business operations are global in nature, and we are subject to taxes in numerous jurisdictions. Tax laws and tax rates vary substantially in these jurisdictions and are subject to change given the political and economic climate in those countries. We file our tax returns in accordance with our interpretations of each jurisdiction’s tax laws. We record our tax provision or benefit on an interim basis using the estimated annual effective tax rate. This rate is applied to the current period ordinary income or loss to determine the income tax provision or benefit allocated to the interim period. Losses from jurisdictions for which no benefit can be realized and the income tax effects of unusual and infrequent items are excluded from the estimated annual effective tax rate. Valuation allowances are provided against the future tax benefits that arise from the losses in jurisdictions for which no benefit can be realized. In addition, the effects of the unusual and infrequent items are recognized in the impacted interim period as discrete items. The estimated annual effective tax rate may be significantly impacted by nondeductible expenses and our projected earnings mix by tax jurisdiction. Adjustments to the estimated annual effective income tax rate are recognized in the period when such estimates are revised. Additionally, we have established valuation allowances against a variety of deferred tax assets, including net operating loss carry-forwards, foreign tax credits, and other income tax credits. Valuation allowances take into consideration our ability to use these deferred tax assets and reduce the value of such items to the amount that is deemed more likely than not to be recoverable. Our ability to utilize these deferred tax assets is dependent on achieving our forecast of future taxable operating income over an extended period of time. We review our forecast in relation to actual results and expected trends on a quarterly basis. Failure to achieve our operating income targets may change our assessment regarding the recoverability of our net deferred tax assets and such change could result in a valuation allowance being recorded against some or all of our net deferred tax assets. An increase in a valuation allowance would result in additional income tax expense, lower member’s equity and could have a significant impact on our earnings in future periods. The release of valuation allowances in periods when these tax attributes become realizable would reduce our effective tax rate.

Correction of immaterial errors. We have corrected immaterial errors in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations related to cost of goods sold for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The correction increased cost of goods sold by $2.1 million. The correction is not material to our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009.

2. New Accounting Pronouncements.

The following new accounting pronouncements were adopted during the six months ended June 30, 2009:

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141R, “Business Combinations.” In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 141R which replaces SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations.” SFAS No. 141R requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize all and only the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction, establishes the acquisition date fair value as the measurement objective for all assets acquired and liabilities assumed, and requires the acquirer to disclose to investors and other users all of the information they need to evaluate and understand the nature and financial effect of the business combination. SFAS No. 141R applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008 and cannot be early adopted. Currently this statement has had no impact to our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. A significant impact may, however be realized on any future acquisitions by us. The amount of such impact will depend on the nature and terms of such future acquisition, if any.

SFAS No. 161 “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133.” In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161 which amends and expands the disclosure requirements for SFAS No. 133 with the intent to provide users of financial statements an enhanced understanding of how and why derivative instruments are used, how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is

8

effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after November 15, 2008. For Kraton, SFAS No. 161 was effective as of January 1, 2009.

FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. FAS 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets.” In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 142-3 which amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” FSP No. FAS 142-3 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. For Kraton, FSP No. FAS 142-3 is effective as of January 1, 2009. The adoption of FSP No. FAS 142-3 did not materially affect Kraton’s consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events.” In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, which, absent related provisions contained in existing authoritative guidance, establishes general standards for the accounting for and disclosure of events that occur subsequent to the balance sheet date but before the financial statements of an entity are issued or are available to be issued. The adoption of the provisions of SFAS No. 165 by us effective June 30, 2009 did not have any impact on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

The following new accounting pronouncements have been issued, but have not yet been adopted as of June 30, 2009:

FSP No. FAS 132(R)-1, “Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets.” In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 132(R)-1 which provides guidance on an employer’s disclosures about plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan and requires employers to provide more transparency about the assets held by the retirement plan and the concentrations of risk in those plans. FSP No. FAS 132(R)-1 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2009, and interim periods within those fiscal years. For Kraton, FSP No. FAS 132(R)-1 is effective as of January 1, 2010. Kraton is currently evaluating the effect of adopting FSP No. FAS 132(R)-1.

3. Share-Based Compensation

We account for share-based awards under the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” which established the accounting for share-based awards exchanged for employee services. Accordingly, share-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period. We record non-cash compensation expense for the restricted membership units, notional membership units and option awards over the vesting period using the straight-line method. See Note 12 for further discussion.

Information pertaining to option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2009 is as follows:

	Options		Weighted - Average Exercise Price
	(in thousands)
Outstanding at December 31, 2008	22,101		$	1.00
Granted	—			—
Exercised	—			—
Forfeited	(512	)		1.00
Outstanding at June 30, 2009	21,589		$	1.00

9

4. Restructuring and Restructuring-Related Costs

As part of our ongoing efforts to improve efficiencies and increase productivity, we have implemented a number of restructuring initiatives in recent years.

In 2008 we restructured our research and technical service organizations to better align our research and product development capabilities with our customers’ needs and market requirements and to focus on our core capabilities and incurred $1.7 million and $0.5 million of severance and other staffing-related costs which were recorded in research and development expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations in the three month periods ended March 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008, respectively. Substantially all of the cash expenditures related to these restructurings were paid as of the end of the first quarter of 2009.

As of June 30, 2009, there was a total liability for restructuring costs of approximately $1.2 million, of which $1.0 million is related to severance costs to be paid by the end of the third quarter of 2009. The exit activity cost of approximately $0.2 million is associated with the closure of our office in London, United Kingdom and is expected to be paid over the next several years ending in the second quarter of 2011.

5. Detail of Certain Balance Sheet Accounts

The components of inventories of products and other payables and accruals are as follows:

	June 30, 2009		December 31, 2008
	(in thousands)
Inventories of products, net:
Finished products	$	191,269	$	271,449
Work in progress		2,871		1,781
Raw materials		37,215		50,963
	$	231,355	$	324,193
Other payables and accruals:
Employee related	$	7,717	$	25,418
Interest		9,927		10,316
Property and other taxes		2,268		—
Customer rebates		3,586		4,402
Income taxes payable		4,102		8,538
Derivative liabilities		6,013		5,483
Other		16,266		15,192
	$	49,879	$	69,349

6. Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income includes net income (loss) and all other non-owner changes in equity. Components of comprehensive income are as follows:

	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008		2009			2008
	(in thousands)					(in thousands)
Net Income (Loss)	$	(4,178	)	$	10,216	$	(20,644	)	$	806
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Foreign currency translation adjustments		22,464			2,968		5,398			21,881
Reclassification of interest rate swaps into earnings, net of tax		(421	)		—		(842	)		—
Net unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swaps, net of tax		(211	)		4,345		(358	)		2,935
Total Comprehensive Income (Loss)	$	17,654		$	17,529	$	(16,446	)	$	25,622

10

Accumulated other comprehensive income consists of the following:

	June 30, 2009			December 31, 2008
	(in thousands)
Foreign currency translation adjustments	$	47,140		$	41,742
Net unrealized loss on interest rate swaps, net of tax		(3,311	)		(2,111	)
Pension adjustment, net of tax		(33,808	)		(33,808	)
Total Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income	$	10,021		$	5,823

7. Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt consists of the following:

	June 30, 2009			December 31, 2008
	(in thousands)
Senior Secured Credit Facilities:
Revolving loans	$	—		$	50,000
Term loans		323,400			325,071
8.125% Notes		170,000			200,000
Less 8.125% Notes Held as Treasury Bonds		(7,000	)		—
Total debt		486,400			575,071
Less current portion of long-term debt		3,343			3,343
Total long-term debt	$	483,057		$	571,728

(a) Term Loans and Revolving Loans. We entered into a senior secured credit agreement dated as of December 23, 2003. The agreement and subsequent amendments to the agreement are defined herein as the Credit Agreement.

The Credit Agreement provides for a term facility (the “Term Facility”) of $385 million, and a revolving facility (the “Revolving Facility”), of $80.0 million of which $75.5 million is currently committed by lenders. In these notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, the loans made under the Revolving Facility are referred to as the Revolving Loans, and the loans made under the Term Facility are referred to as the Term Loans.

Three of our subsidiaries, Kraton Polymers U.S. LLC, Elastomers Holdings LLC, and Kraton Polymers Capital Corporation, along with Polymer Holdings, have guaranteed the Credit Agreement. The guarantors, together with us, are referred to as the Loan Parties. The Credit Agreement is secured by a perfected first priority security interest in all of each Loan Party’s tangible and intangible assets, including intellectual property, real property, all of our capital stock and the capital stock of our domestic subsidiaries and 65% of the capital stock of the direct foreign subsidiaries of each Loan Party.

Maturity. The Term Loans are payable in quarterly installments in an amount approximating 0.25% of the principal amount through June 30, 2012 with the balance payable in four equal quarterly installments commencing on September 30, 2012 and ending on May 12, 2013. The Revolving Loans outstanding are payable in a single maturity on May 12, 2011.

Interest. The Term Loans bear interest at a rate equal to the adjusted Eurodollar rate plus 2.00% per annum or, at our option, the base rate plus 1.00% per annum. In general, interest is payable quarterly, subject to the interest period selected by us, per the terms of the Credit Agreement. The weighted average effective interest rates on the Term Loans for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was 4.3% compared to 4.9% for the six months

11

ended June 30, 2008. The average effective interest rates include the additional income statement effects of Kraton’s highly effective interest rate swaps for both periods. See Note 9(a) for a description of the interest rate swap agreements.

The Revolving Loans bear interest at a rate equal to the adjusted Eurodollar rate plus a margin of between 2.00% and 2.50% per annum, depending on our leverage ratio, or at our option, the base rate plus a margin of between 1.00% and 1.50% per annum, also depending on our leverage ratio. The weighted average effective interest rates on the Revolving Loans for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was 4.3%. A commitment fee equal to 0.5% per annum times the daily average undrawn portion of the Revolving Facility accrues and is payable quarterly in arrears.

Mandatory Prepayments. The Term Facility is subject to mandatory prepayment with, in general: (1) 100% of the net cash proceeds of certain asset sales, subject to certain reinvestment rights; (2) 100% of the net cash proceeds of certain insurance and condemnation payments, subject to certain reinvestment rights; (3) 50% of the net cash proceeds of equity offerings (declining to 25%, if a leverage ratio is met); (4) 100% of the net cash proceeds of debt incurrences (other than debt incurrences permitted under the Credit Agreement); and (5) 50% of our excess cash flow, as defined in the Credit Agreement (declining to 25%, if a leverage ratio is met and to 0% if a further leverage ratio is met). Any such prepayment is applied first to the Term Facility and thereafter to the Revolving Facility.

Covenants. The Credit Agreement contains certain affirmative covenants including, among others, covenants to furnish the Lenders with financial statements and other financial information and to provide the Lenders notice of material events and information regarding collateral.

The Credit Agreement contains certain negative covenants that, among other things, restrict our ability, subject to certain exceptions, to incur additional indebtedness, grant liens on our assets, undergo fundamental changes, make investments, sell assets, make acquisitions, engage in sale and leaseback transactions, make restricted payments, engage in transactions with our affiliates, amend or modify certain agreements and charter documents and change our fiscal year. We are required to maintain a fiscal quarter end interest coverage ratio of 2.75:1.00 beginning March 31, 2009 and 3.00:1.00 beginning March 31, 2010 and continuing thereafter. In addition, we are required to maintain a fiscal quarter end leverage ratio not to exceed 4.45 beginning March 31, 2009 through September 30, 2009 and 4.00 beginning December 31, 2009 and continuing thereafter. As of June 30, 2009, we were in compliance with the applicable financial ratios in the senior secured credit facility and the other covenants contained in the senior secured credit facility and the indentures governing the 8.125% Notes. The maintenance of these financial ratios is based on our level of profitability. If the current global economic environment worsens or other factors arise which negatively impact our profitability, we may not be able to satisfy our covenants. If we are unable to satisfy such covenants or other provisions at any future time we would need to seek an amendment or waiver of such financial covenants or other provisions. The respective lenders under the senior secured credit facility may not consent to any amendment or waiver requests that we may make in the future, and, if they do consent, they may not do so on terms which are favorable to us. In the event that we were unable to obtain any such waiver or amendment and we were not able to refinance or repay our debt instruments, our inability to meet the financial covenants or other provisions of the senior secured credit facility would constitute an event of default under our Credit Agreement, including the senior secured credit facility, which would permit the bank lenders to accelerate the senior secured credit facility.

On January 14, 2008, we received an equity investment of $10 million, of which $9.6 million was included in the financial covenant calculation for the twelve-month period ending December 31, 2007 and was included in the fiscal quarter covenant calculations through the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2008 pursuant to the equity cure provisions included in the Credit Agreement.

(b) Senior Subordinated 8.125% Notes Due January 15, 2014. On December 23, 2003, Kraton and Kraton Polymers Capital Corporation issued the 8.125% Notes in an aggregate principal amount of $200.0 million. The 8.125% Notes are subject to the provisions for mandatory and optional prepayment and acceleration and are

12

payable in full on January 15, 2014. Polymer Holdings and each of Kraton Polymers U.S. LLC and Elastomers Holdings LLC, which we refer to collectively as the Guarantor Subsidiaries, have guaranteed the 8.125% Notes. The amount of 8.125% Notes outstanding at June 30, 2009 was $170.0 million less $ 7.0 million held as treasury bonds and $200 million at December 31, 2008.

Interest. The 8.125% Notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 8.125% per annum. Interest is payable semi-annually on January 15 and July 15 each year. The $ 7.0 million 8.125% Notes held as treasury bonds do not bear interest.

Optional Redemption. Prior to January 15, 2007, we had the option to redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the 8.125% Notes at a redemption price equal to 108.125% of the principal amount of the 8.125% Notes being redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest. Between January 15, 2007 and January 15, 2009, we could not elect to redeem the 8.125% Notes at predetermined redemption prices. After January 15, 2009, we can elect to redeem all or a part of the 8.125% Notes at certain predetermined redemption prices, plus accrued and unpaid interest.

Extinguishment of Debt. In March 2009, we purchased and extinguished $30 million face value of our 8.125% Notes for cash consideration of $10.9 million, which included accrued interest of $0.4 million. We recorded a gain of approximately $19.5 million in the quarter ended March 31, 2009 related to the purchase and extinguishment of these 8.125% Notes. In April 2009, TJ Chemical, purchased approximately $6.3 million face value of our 8.125% Notes for cash consideration of $2.5 million, which included accrued interest of $0.1 million. Immediately upon purchasing our Notes, TJ Chemical contributed the purchased Notes to Polymer Holdings which in turn contributed the Notes to us. We are holding the Notes as treasury bonds. Also in April 2009, we purchased approximately $0.7 million face value of our 8.125% Notes for cash consideration of $0.3 million which we are holding as treasury bonds. We recorded a gain of approximately $4.3 million on the extinguishment of debt in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations in the quarter ended June 30, 2009.

We capitalize financing fees and other related costs and amortize them to interest expense over the term of the related debt instrument. In the quarter ended June 30, 2009 we amortized to interest expense $0.1 million of remaining deferred financing costs associated with the extinguishment of the $7.0 million face value of our 8.125% Notes.

Covenants. The 8.125% Notes contain certain affirmative covenants including, among others, covenants to furnish the holders of the 8.125% Notes with financial statements and other financial information and to provide the holders of the 8.125% Notes notice of material events.

The 8.125% Notes contain certain negative covenants including limitations on indebtedness, limitations on restricted payments, limitations or restrictions on distributions from certain subsidiaries, limitations on lines of businesses and mergers and consolidations. As of June 30, 2009, we were in compliance with all covenants under the 8.125% Notes.

8. Fair Value Measurements

Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” for financial assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure requirements about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 requires entities to, among other things, maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.

SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.

13

SFAS No. 157 specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect our market assumptions. In accordance with SFAS No. 157, these two types of inputs have created the following fair value hierarchy:

• Level 1—Quoted unadjusted prices for identical instruments in active markets.

• Level 2—Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets.

• Level 3—Model-derived valuations in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.

From time to time, we enter into derivative financial instruments that are measured at fair value. See Note 9 for further discussion.

9. Financial Instruments, Hedging Activities and Credit Risk

Financial Instruments

(a) Interest Rate Swap Agreements. In February 2008, we entered into a $325 million notional amount interest rate swap agreement to hedge or otherwise protect against Eurodollar interest rate fluctuations on a portion of our variable rate debt. The agreement had a fixed rate of 2.77%, with a margin of 2.0%, which resulted in a total cost of 4.77%, and a term through April 1, 2010. This agreement was designated as a cash flow hedge on the exposure of the variability of future cash flows subject to the variable quarterly interest rates on $325 million of the term loan portion of the Term Facility. We settled the swap early in June 2008 and realized cash proceeds of $4.6 million, resulting in a gain on the sale of $4.6 million. The gain is deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income and is being reclassified as a reduction in interest expense through March 31, 2010 using the effective interest method, unless we determine that the forecasted interest payments under the Term Facility are probable not to occur, in which case the remaining portion of the gain would then be reclassified immediately to interest expense. We reclassified $0.7 million into earnings for the quarter ended June 30, 2009.

In October 2008, we entered into a $320 million notional amount interest rate swap agreement to hedge or otherwise protect against Eurodollar interest rate fluctuations on a portion of our variable rate debt. The agreement had a fixed rate of 2.99%, with a margin of 2.0%, which resulted in a total cost of 4.99%, and a term through December 31, 2009. This agreement was designated as a cash flow hedge on the exposure of the variability of future cash flows subject to the variable quarterly interest rates on $320 million of the term loan portion of the Term Facility. We recorded a unrealized gain of $0.3 million in accumulated other comprehensive income related to the effective portion of the hedge for the quarter ended June 30, 2009.

In May 2009, we entered into a $310 million notional amount interest rate swap agreement to hedge or otherwise protect against Eurodollar interest rate fluctuations on a portion of our variable rate debt. This agreement is effective on January 4, 2010 and expires on January 3, 2011 and has a fixed rate of 1.53%, with a margin of 2.0%, which resulted in a total cost of 3.53%. We recorded a unrealized loss of $0.5 million in accumulated other comprehensive income related to the effective portion of this hedge for the quarter ended June 30, 2009.

Foreign Currency Hedge. On February 18, 2009 we entered into a foreign currency option contract to reduce our exposure to fluctuations in the Euro to U.S. dollar exchange rate for a notional amount of €47.3 million which expires on December 29, 2009. The option contract does not qualify for hedge accounting. During the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, we recorded gains of $0.5 million and $0.3 million, respectively, which represented the mark-to-market impact of the purchased option contract. The gains were recorded in selling, general, and administrative expense on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

14

The financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are included below:

				Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
	Balance Sheet Location	June 30, 2009		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(in thousands)
Derivative assets— Foreign currency option	Other current assets	$	1,810	$	—	$	1,810	$	—
Derivative liabilities— Interest rate swap	Other payables and accruals	$	5,243	$	—	$	5,243	$	—
Derivative liabilities— Interest rate swap	Other payables and accruals	$	770	$	—	$	770	$	—
				Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
	Balance Sheet Location	December 31, 2008		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(in thousands)
Derivative liabilities— Interest rate swap	Other payables and accruals	$	5,483	$	—	$	5,483	$	—

The use of derivatives creates exposure to credit risk relating to potential losses that could be recognized in the event that the counterparties to these instruments fail to perform their obligations under the contracts. We minimize this risk by limiting our counterparties to major financial institutions with acceptable credit ratings and monitoring positions with individual counterparties. In the event of a default by one of our counterparties, we may not receive payments provided for under the terms of our derivatives. We do not anticipate any defaults by our derivative instrument contract counterparties.

(b) Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following table presents the carrying values and approximate fair values of our long-term debt at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:

	June 30, 2009				December 31, 2008
	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Carrying Value		Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Revolving loans	$	—	$	—	$	50,000	$	50,000
Term loans		323,400		323,400		325,071		325,071
Bonds Payable 8.125% Notes		163,000		103,709		200,000		79,250
8.125% Notes Held as Treasury Bonds		7,000		4,454		—		—

The Term Loans and Revolving Loans are variable interest rate securities, and as such, the fair value approximates their carrying value.

Credit Risk. Kraton’s customers are diversified by industry and geography with approximately 700 customers in approximately 60 countries worldwide. We do not have concentrations of receivables from these industry sectors throughout these countries. The recent global economic downturn may affect our overall credit risk. Where exposed to credit risk, Kraton analyzes the counterparties’ financial condition prior to entering into an agreement, establishes

15

credit limits and monitors the appropriateness of those limits on an ongoing basis. We also obtain cash, letters of credit or other acceptable forms of security from customers to provide credit support, where appropriate, based on our financial analysis of the customer and the contractual terms and conditions applicable to each transaction.

10. Income Taxes

The effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was approximately (6.0)% compared to a rate of 75.6% in the six months ended June 30, 2008. Our effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was lower than our statutory rate primarily due to a pretax loss, along with not recording a tax benefit for certain net operating losses generated during that period and changes in where our income is earned. Our effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was higher than our statutory rate primarily due to pre-tax income, along with not recording a tax benefit for certain net operating losses generated during that period and changes in where our income is earned.

As of June 30, 2009, we had total unrecognized tax benefits of $1.4 million. As of June 30, 2009, we believe that no current tax positions that have resulted in unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease within one year, and no material changes have occurred in our estimates or are expected to occur in events related to anticipated changes in our unrecognized tax benefits.

Kraton files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and various state and foreign jurisdictions. As of June 30, 2009, our 2005 through 2007 U.S. federal income tax returns remain open to examination. In addition, open tax years to state and foreign jurisdictions remain subject to examination.

11. Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Proceedings

Pursuant to the sale agreements between us and Shell Chemicals relating to the separation from Shell Chemicals in 2001, Shell Chemicals has agreed to indemnify us for certain liabilities and obligations to third parties or claims against us by a third party relating to matters arising prior to the closing of the acquisition by Ripplewood Chemical, subject to certain time limitations. Shell Chemicals has been named in several lawsuits relating to the elastomers business that we have acquired. In particular, claims have been filed against Shell Chemicals alleging workplace asbestos exposure at the Belpre, Ohio facility. We are indemnified by Shell Chemicals with respect to these claims, subject to certain time limitations. In addition, we and Shell Chemicals have entered into a consent order relating to certain environmental remediation at the Belpre, Ohio facility.

While we are involved from time to time in litigation and governmental actions arising in the ordinary course of business, we are not aware of any actions which we believe would individually or in the aggregate materially adversely affect our business, consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

12. Employee Benefits

(a) Investment in Kraton Management LLC (Management LLC). We provided certain key employees who held interests in us prior to the acquisition the opportunity to roll over their interests into membership units of Management LLC, which owns a corresponding number of membership units in TJ Chemical. Additional employees have also been given the opportunity to purchase membership units in TJ Chemical through Management LLC at the original buy-in price. The membership units are subject to customary tag-along and drag-along rights, as well as a company call right in the event of termination of employment. As of June 30, 2009, there were 1,706,000 membership units of Management LLC issued and outstanding.

(b) TJ Chemical Holdings LLC 2004 Option Plan. On September 9, 2004, TJ Chemical adopted an option plan, or the Option Plan, which allows for the grant to key employees, consultants, members and service providers of TJ Chemical and its affiliates, including us, of non-qualified options to purchase TJ Chemical

16

membership units. As of June 30, 2009 there were 21,589,118 options granted and outstanding. The exercise price per membership unit shall be equal to the fair market value of a membership unit on the date of grant. All options granted in fiscal 2008, fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2006 had an exercise price of $1 per membership unit, which is equal to or in excess of the fair value of the membership unit on the date of grant. The Options generally vest in 20% annual increments from the date of grant. However, the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) determined that a shorter vesting period was appropriate for grants made during the 2008 fiscal year and therefore Options granted in 2008 were set to vest in increments of 1/3 over 3 years. With respect to directors, previous to 2008 options were exercisable in 50% increments annually on each of the first two anniversaries of the grant date, so long as the holder of the option is still a director on the vesting date. In 2008, Options granted to directors were granted in increments of 1/3 over 3 years, except the Chairman who has a one year vesting. Upon a change in control, the options will become 100% vested if the participant’s employment is terminated without cause or by the participant for good reason (as each term is defined in the Option Plan) within the 2-year period immediately following such change in control.

The Committee of Kraton Polymers administers the Option Plan on behalf of TJ Chemical, including, without limitation, the determination of the individuals to whom grants will be made, the number of membership units subject to each grant and the various terms of such grants. The Committee will have the right to terminate all of the outstanding options at any time and pay the participants an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of a membership unit as of such date over the exercise price with respect to such option, or the spread. Generally, in the event of a merger (except a merger where membership unit holders receive securities of another corporation), the options will pertain to and apply to the securities that the option holder would have received in the merger; and in the event of a dissolution, liquidation, sale of assets or any other merger, the Committee has the discretion to: (1) provide for an “exchange” of the options for new options on all or some of the property for which the membership units are exchanged (as may be adjusted by the Committee); (2) cancel and cash out the options (whether or not then vested) at the spread; or (3) provide for a combination of both. Generally, the Committee may make appropriate adjustments with respect to the number of membership units covered by outstanding options and the exercise price in the event of any increase or decrease in the number of membership units or any other corporate transaction not described in the preceding sentence.

On a termination of a participant’s employment (other than without cause or by the participant for good reason within the 2-year period immediately following a change in control), unvested options automatically expire and vested options expire on the earlier of: (1) the commencement of business on the date the employment is terminated for cause; (2) 90 days after the date employment is terminated for any reason other than cause, death or disability; (3) 1-year after the date employment is terminated by reason of death or disability; or (4) the 10th anniversary of the grant date for such option.

Generally, pursuant to TJ Chemical’s operating agreement, membership units acquired pursuant to the Option Plan are subject to customary tag-along and drag-along rights for the 180-day period following the later of a termination of employment and 6 months and 1-day following the date that units were acquired pursuant to the exercise of the option, TJ Chemical has the right to repurchase each membership unit then owned by the participant at fair value, as determined in good faith by the Board of Directors of TJ Chemical. See Note 12(e) for further discussion.

(c) Profits Units of Kraton Management, LLC (Management, LLC). We provided certain key employees with a grant of profits units (subject to the 8.7% pool limitation described in Note 12(d)). Profits units are economically equivalent to an option, except that they provide the recipient/employee with an opportunity to recognize capital gains in the appreciation of TJ Chemical and its affiliates and TJ Chemical and its affiliates does not receive any deduction at the time of grant or disposition of the profits unit by the employee. Generally, pursuant to the applicable grant agreements, 50% of such profits units will vest when the fair value of TJ Chemical’s assets equals or exceeds two times the Threshold Amount, i.e., the first tranche, and the remaining 50% will vest when the fair value of TJ Chemical’s assets equals or exceeds three times the threshold amount, i.e., the second tranche, in each case, as determined by the Board of TJ Chemical, provided that the executive

17

remains employed through the applicable vesting date. Additionally, 100% of the profits units shall vest upon the effective date of a disposition by the initial investors of 51% or more of their aggregate interests in Kraton. If at the time TJ Chemical makes a determination as to whether an individual is entitled to any appreciation with respect to the profits units, the value of the assets is more than two times, but less than three times the Threshold Amount, a pro rata portion of the second tranche will vest based on the appreciation above the two times Threshold Amount. Compensation expense will be recorded in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for this difference at the time it becomes probable the profits units will become vested. If an employees’ employment terminates prior to any applicable vesting date, such employee shall automatically forfeit all rights to any unvested profits units. As of June 30, 2009, there were 900,000 profits units granted and not yet vested. See Note 12(e) for further discussion.

(d) Options and Profits Units Outstanding. As of August 2008, the Option Plan was amended to provide for an increase in the number of options and profit units from 21,740,802 to 23,740,802, or 8.7% of the outstanding membership units and profits units of TJ Chemical on March 31, 2004, on a fully diluted basis.

In the second quarter of 2009, no options were granted and 185,000 options were forfeited. As of June 30, 2009, the total options granted under the Option Plan amounted to 21,589,118. In addition, as of June 30, 2009, there were 900,000 profits units granted under the Option Plan and not yet vested. See Note 12(c) for further discussion.

(e) Kraton Polymers LLC Executive Deferred Compensation Plan. On September 9, 2004, the Board of Directors adopted the Kraton Deferred Compensation Plan. Under the plan, certain employees will be permitted to elect to defer a portion (generally up to 50%) of their annual incentive bonus with respect to each bonus period. Participating employees will be credited with a notional number of membership units based on the fair value of TJ Chemical membership units as of the date of deferral, although the distribution of membership units in such accounts may be made indirectly through Management LLC. Such membership units will be distributed upon termination of the participant’s employment subject to a call right or upon a change in control. We reserved 2,000,000 membership units for issuance pursuant to the Kraton Deferred Compensation Plan as of December 31, 2006, and currently, there are 1,800,504 membership units available for issuance pursuant to the Kraton Deferred Compensation Plan.

(f) 2009 Incentive Compensation Plan. On February 13, 2009, the Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Kraton approved and adopted the 2009 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”), including the performance-based criteria by which potential bonus payouts to participants in the Plan (“Participants”) will be determined. The Plan is designed to attract, retain, motivate and reward officers, including named executive officers, and certain other employees that have been deemed eligible to participate in the Plan. For the bonus year that ends December 31, 2009, the Board established a common bonus pool based upon performance calculations, in accordance with Plan provisions. The potential range for this bonus pool is from zero to $15 million, depending on Kraton’s and individual performance factors, including performance criteria to be established by the Committee. Based on additional performance criteria such as our safety performance, innovation as a percent of total revenue, productivity, specific cost out and pricing initiatives, the Committee may add up to $1 million to the bonus pool. Kraton’s 2009 performance will be the most significant factor in determining the size of the bonus pool. As of June 30, 2009, we recorded a total liability for incentive compensation of approximately $0.5 million.

18

(g) Retirement Plans. The components of net periodic benefit cost related to pension benefits and other postretirement benefits for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008, are as follows:

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
Pension Benefits
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
Service cost	$	709		$	603		$	1,418		$	1,206
Interest cost		1,186			1,059			2,372			2,118
Expected return on plan assets		(1,170	)		(1,032	)		(2,340	)		(2,064	)
Amortization of prior service cost		135			—			271			—
Net periodic benefit cost	$	860		$	630		$	1,721		$	1,260
	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
Service cost	$	100		$	88		$	200		$	176
Interest cost		230			212			460			424
Amortization of prior service cost		18			—			35			—
Net periodic benefit cost	$	348		$	300		$	695		$	600

Contributions. We made a $1.2 million and $0.8 million contribution to our pension plan in the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively, and expect to contribute $4.2 million in total in 2009.

13. Industry Segment and Foreign Operations

We operate in one segment for the manufacture and marketing of styrenic block copolymers. In accordance with SFAS No. 131, Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, our chief operating decision-maker has been identified as the President and Chief Executive Officer, who regularly reviews financial information to make decisions about allocating resources and assessing performance for the entire company. Since we operate in one segment and in one group of similar products, all financial segment and product line information required by SFAS 131 can be found in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

19

For geographic reporting, revenues are attributed to the geographic location in which the customers’ facilities are located. Long-lived assets consist primarily of property, plant, and equipment, which are attributed to the geographic location in which they are located. Net revenues and long-lived assets by geographic region were as follows:

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009		2008		2009		2008
	(in thousands)				(in thousands)
Total Operating Revenues:
United States	$	78,641	$	111,113	$	139,188	$	192,834
Germany		29,072		40,888		50,642		75,737
The Netherlands		16,057		12,951		24,702		42,656
Japan		16,040		16,168		26,969		31,549
Italy		9,168		25,433		16,049		25,798
China		8,826		3,141		12,443		18,726
Brazil		7,937		10,665		14,335		18,604
United Kingdom		7,672		13,201		13,987		20,948
Thailand		6,704		5,841		12,513		9,267
France		6,569		11,933		14,304		21,104
Taiwan		5,111		3,422		7,655		10,794
Poland		4,943		11,240		5,602		11,029
Canada		4,100		3,941		7,828		14,595
Sweden		3,730		3,152		6,181		7,535
Mexico		3,584		8,487		5,806		6,266
Turkey		3,568		6,176		5,680		9,425
Denmark		3,276		2,797		6,079		5,835
Korea, Republic of		2,706		4,509		4,600		5,341
Argentina		2,657		4,387		5,303		7,465
Australia		2,346		3,791		3,202		8,175
Austria		2,227		3,937		2,938		5,230
Norway		1,875		1,758		1,969		1,927
Belgium		1,677		7,056		14,659		12,264
Switzerland		1,357		1,382		2,952		2,396
Malaysia		1,337		1,580		2,400		2,913
India		1,162		1,077		2,263		1,945
Czech Republic		1,157		1,171		2,264		2,424
Other		10,322		24,172		16,266		39,448
	$	243,821	$	345,369	$	428,779	$	612,230

	June 30, 2009			December 31, 2008
Long-Lived Assets:
United States	$	324,686		$	303,278
France		108,776			108,665
Brazil		57,752			48,237
Germany		39,937			39,361
The Netherlands		34,058			34,018
China		2,320			2,317
Japan		(59	)		6,699
Other		11,740			11,685
	$	579,210		$	554,260

20

14. Supplemental Guarantor Information

Kraton and Kraton Polymers Capital Corporation, a financing subsidiary, collectively, the Issuers, are co-issuers of the 8.125% Notes. The Guarantor Subsidiaries fully and unconditionally guarantee, on a joint and several basis, the Issuers’ obligations under the 8.125% Notes. Kraton’s remaining subsidiaries are not guarantors of the 8.125% Notes. We do not believe that separate financial statements and other disclosures concerning the Guarantor Subsidiaries would provide any additional information that would be material to investors in making an investment decision.

21

Kraton Polymers LLC

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet

June 30, 2009

(In thousands)

	Issuers(1)			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	—		$	2,486		$	15,224	$	—		$	17,710
Receivables, net		24,425			63,875			87,390		(49,243	)		126,447
Inventories of products, net		—			96,915			146,525		(12,085	)		231,355
Inventories of materials and supplies		—			6,852			4,517		—			11,369
Deferred income taxes		—			14,778			—		—			14,778
Other current assets		6,786			1,714			4,074		—			12,574
Total current assets		31,211			186,620			257,730		(61,328	)		414,233
Property, plant and equipment, less accumulated depreciation		95,896			175,619			105,205		—			376,720
Identifiable intangible assets, less accumulated amortization		16,827			—			46,938		—			63,765
Investment in consolidated subsidiaries		909,479			—			—		(909,479	)		—
Investment in unconsolidated joint venture		813			—			10,737		—			11,550
Deferred financing costs		6,602			—			—		—			6,602
Deferred income taxes		21,020			6,698			622		(28,340	)		—
Other long-term assets		116,708			472,429			15,405		(582,428	)		22,114
Total Assets	$	1,198,556		$	841,366		$	436,637	$	(1,581,575	)	$	894,984
LIABILITIES AND MEMBER’S EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Current portion of long-term debt	$	3,343		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	3,343
Accounts payable-trade		2,700			32,258			41,972		—			76,930
Other payables and accruals		15,940			37,877			20,277		(24,215	)		49,879
Due to related party		—			8,501			25,882		(25,028	)		9,355
Insurance note payable		3,019			—			—		—			3,019
Total current liabilities		25,002			78,636			88,131		(49,243	)		142,526
Long-term debt, net of current portion		483,057			—			—		—			483,057
Deferred income taxes		58,944			—			—		(28,340	)		30,604
Long-term liabilities		469,004			53,960			122,380		(582,428	)		62,916
Total liabilities		1,036,007			132,596			210,511		(660,011	)		719,103
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)
Member’s equity
Common equity		165,860			742,578			178,986		(921,564	)		165,860
Accumulated other comprehensive income		(3,311	)		(33,808	)		47,140		—			10,021
Total member’s equity		162,549			708,770			226,126		(921,564	)		175,881
Total Liabilities and Member’s Equity	$	1,198,556		$	841,366		$	436,637	$	(1,581,575	)	$	894,984

(1) Kraton Polymers Capital Corporation has minimal assets and income. We do not believe that separate financial information concerning the Issuers would provide additional information that would be useful.

22

Kraton Polymers LLC

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet

December 31, 2008

(In thousands)

	Issuers(1)			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	—		$	65,460		$	35,936	$	—		$	101,396
Receivables, net		944			45,322			68,148		(18,971	)		95,443
Inventories of products, net		—			145,654			187,396		(8,857	)		324,193
Inventories of materials and supplies		—			6,816			4,239		—			11,055
Deferred income taxes		—			14,778			—		—			14,778
Other current assets		2,905			720			3,144		—			6,769
Total current assets		3,849			278,750			298,863		(27,828	)		553,634
Property, plant and equipment, less accumulated depreciation		93,782			164,396			113,830		—			372,008
Identifiable intangible assets, less accumulated amortization		20,113			—			46,938		—			67,051
Investment in consolidated subsidiaries		898,565			—			—		(898,565	)		—
Investment in unconsolidated joint venture		813			—			11,558		—			12,371
Deferred financing costs		8,184			—			—		—			8,184
Deferred income taxes		20,131			—			—		(20,131	)		—
Other long-term assets		137,954			411,841			11,739		(542,908	)		18,626
Total Assets	$	1,183,391		$	854,987		$	482,928	$	(1,489,432	)	$	1,031,874
LIABILITIES AND MEMBER’S EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Current portion of long-term debt	$	3,343		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	3,343
Accounts payable-trade		2,700			36,806			35,671		—			75,177
Other payables and accruals		15,815			26,184			27,350		—			69,349
Due to related party		—			9,546			35,010		(18,971	)		25,585
Total current liabilities		21,858			72,536			98,031		(18,971	)		173,454
Long-term debt, net of current portion		571,728			—			—		—			571,728
Deferred income taxes		—			53,435			1,681		(20,131	)		34,985
Long-term liabilities		408,416			53,626			143,983		(542,908	)		63,117
Total liabilities		1,002,002			179,597			243,695		(582,010	)		843,284
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)
Member’s equity
Common equity		182,767			694,170			213,252		(907,422	)		182,767
Accumulated other comprehensive income		(1,378	)		(18,780	)		25,981		—			5,823
Total member’s equity		181,389			675,390			239,233		(907,422	)		188,590
Total Liabilities and Member’s Equity	$	1,183,391		$	854,987		$	482,928	$	(1,489,432	)	$	1,031,874

(1) Kraton Polymers Capital Corporation has minimal assets and income. We do not believe that separate financial information concerning the Issuers would provide additional information that would be useful.

23

Kraton Polymers LLC

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations

Three Months Ended June 30, 2009

(In thousands)

	Issuers(1)			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
	(Unaudited)
Operating Revenues
Sales	$	—		$	122,112		$	151,539		$	(39,910	)	$	233,741
Other		—			—			10,080			—			10,080
Total operating revenues		—			122,112			161,619			(39,910	)		243,821
Cost of Goods Sold		5,449			95,779			146,742			(39,910	)		208,060
Gross Profit		(5,449	)		26,333			14,877			—			35,761
Operating Expenses
Research and development		—			3,485			1,586			—			5,071
Selling, general, and administrative		(272	)		9,123			9,201			—			18,052
Depreciation and amortization		3,973			5,522			3,047			—			12,542
Total operating expenses		3,701			18,130			13,834			—			35,665
Gain on Extinguishment of Debt		4,340			—			—			—			4,340
Equity in Earnings of Consolidated Subsidiaries		12,781			—			—			(12,781	)		—
Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Joint Venture		—			—			102			—			102
Interest Expense, net		9,725			(2,746	)		846			—			7,825
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes		(1,754	)		10,949			299			(12,781	)		(3,287	)
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)		2,424			33			(1,566	)		—			891
Net Income (Loss)	$	(4,178	)	$	10,916		$	1,865		$	(12,781	)	$	(4,178	)

(1) Kraton Polymers Capital Corporation has minimal assets and income. We do not believe that separate financial information concerning the Issuers would provide additional information that would be useful.

24

Kraton Polymers LLC

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations

Three Months Ended June 30, 2008

(In thousands)

	Issuers(1)			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated
Operating Revenues
Sales	$	—		$	173,152		$	201,984	$	(46,774	)	$	328,362
Other		—			—			17,007		—			17,007
Total operating revenues		—			173,152			218,991		(46,774	)		345,369
Cost of Goods Sold		(1,457	)		139,801			191,253		(46,774	)		282,823
Gross Profit		1,457			33,351			27,738		—			62,546
Operating Expenses
Research and development		—			4,186			3,217		—			7,403
Selling, general, and administrative		235			8,643			11,031		—			19,909
Depreciation and amortization		4,169			5,379			3,562		—			13,110
Total operating expenses		4,404			18,208			17,810		—			40,422
Equity in Earnings of Consolidated Subsidiaries		21,902			—			—		(21,902	)		—
Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Joint Venture		—			—			159		—			159
Interest Expense, net		10,046			(2,489	)		1,861		—			9,418
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes		8,909			17,632			8,226		(21,902	)		12,865
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)		(1,307	)		15			3,941		—			2,649
Net Income (Loss)	$	10,216		$	17,617		$	4,285	$	(21,902	)	$	10,216

(1) Kraton Polymers Capital Corporation has minimal assets and income. We do not believe that separate financial information concerning the Issuers would provide additional information that would be useful.

25

Kraton Polymers LLC

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations

Six Months Ended June 30, 2009

(In thousands)

	Issuers(1)			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
	(Unaudited)
Operating Revenues
Sales	$	—		$	218,973		$	273,425		$	(80,791	)	$	411,607
Other		—			—			17,172			—			17,172
Total operating revenues		—			218,973			290,597			(80,791	)		428,779
Cost of Goods Sold		(3,706	)		191,552			277,030			(80,791	)		384,085
Gross Profit		3,706			27,421			13,567			—			44,694
Operating Expenses
Research and development		—			6,060			3,980			—			10,040
Selling, general, and administrative		(625	)		19,354			17,574			—			36,303
Depreciation and amortization		8,141			11,025			5,940			—			25,106
Total operating expenses		7,516			36,439			27,494			—			71,449
Gain on Extinguishment of Debt		23,831			—			—			—			23,831
Equity in Earnings of Consolidated Subsidiaries		(18,948	)		—			—			18,948			—
Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Joint Venture		—			—			176			—			176
Interest Expense, net		19,858			(5,471	)		2,346			—			16,733
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes		(18,785	)		(3,547	)		(16,097	)		18,948			(19,481	)
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)		1,859			67			(763	)		—			1,163
Net Income (Loss)	$	(20,644	)	$	(3,614	)	$	(15,334	)	$	18,948		$	(20,644	)

(1) Kraton Polymers Capital Corporation has minimal assets and income. We do not believe that separate financial information concerning the Issuers would provide additional information that would be useful.

26

Kraton Polymers LLC

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations

Six Months Ended June 30, 2008

(In thousands)

	Issuers(1)			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated
Operating Revenues
Sales	$	—		$	304,120		$	370,187	$	(89,657	)	$	584,650
Other		—			—			27,580		—			27,580
Total operating revenues		—			304,120			397,767		(89,657	)		612,230
Cost of Goods Sold		(67	)		238,315			352,308		(89,657	)		500,899
Gross Profit		67			65,805			45,459		—			111,331
Operating Expenses
Research and development		—			9,630			5,691		—			15,321
Selling, general, and administrative		252			24,190			20,922		—			45,364
Depreciation and amortization		9,790			10,761			7,211		—			27,762
Total operating expenses		10,042			44,581			33,824		—			88,447
Equity in Earnings of Consolidated Subsidiaries		29,565			—			—		(29,565	)		—
Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Joint Venture		—			—			220		—			220
Interest Expense, net		21,020			(5,065	)		3,848		—			19,803
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes		(1,430	)		26,289			8,007		(29,565	)		3,301
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)		(2,236	)		15			4,716		—			2,495
Net Income (Loss)	$	806		$	26,274		$	3,291	$	(29,565	)	$	806

(1) Kraton Polymers Capital Corporation has minimal assets and income. We do not believe that separate financial information concerning the Issuers would provide additional information that would be useful.

27

Kraton Polymers LLC

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

Six Months Ended June 30, 2009

(In thousands)

	Issuers(1)			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations		Consolidated
	(Unaudited)
Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities	$	(22,334	)	$	19,861		$	7,180		$	—	$	4,707
Cash flows used in investing activities
Purchase of property, plant and equipment net of proceeds from sales of equipment		—			(22,247	)		(577	)		—		(22,824	)
Net cash used in investing activities		—			(22,247	)		(577	)		—		(22,824	)
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities
Borrowings under debt obligations		53,000			—			—			—		53,000
Repayment of debt obligations		(115,341	)		—			—			—		(115,341	)
Proceeds from (payments on) intercompany loan		81,656			(60,588	)		(21,068	)		—		—
Proceeds from insurance note payable		3,019			—			—			—		3,019
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		22,334			(60,588	)		(21,068	)		—		(59,322	)
Effect of exchange rate difference on cash and cash equivalents		—			—			(6,247	)		—		(6,247	)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		—			(62,974	)		(20,712	)		—		(83,686	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		—			65,460			35,936			—		101,396
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	—		$	2,486		$	15,224		$	—	$	17,710

(1) Kraton Polymers Capital Corporation has minimal assets and income. We do not believe that separate financial information concerning the Issuers would provide additional information that would be useful.

28

Kraton Polymers LLC

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

Six Months Ended June 30, 2008

(In thousands)

	Issuers(1)			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations		Consolidated
Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities	$	(15,370	)	$	18,770		$	(17,263	)	$	—	$	(13,863	)
Cash flows used in investing activities
Purchase of property, plant and equipment net of proceeds from sales of equipment		—			(7,811	)		(1,858	)		—		(9,669	)
Net cash used in investing activities		—			(7,811	)		(1,858	)		—		(9,669	)
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities
Borrowings under debt obligations		154,750			—			—			—		154,750
Repayment of debt obligations		(166,472	)		—			—			—		(166,472	)
Proceeds from cash contribution from member		10,000			—			—			—		10,000
Proceeds from (payments on) intercompany loan		17,586			(19,040	)		1,454			—		—
Payment of insurance note payable		(494	)		—			—			—		(494	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		15,370			(19,040	)		1,454			—		(2,216	)
Effect of exchange rate difference on cash and cash equivalents		—			—			(1,177	)		—		(1,177	)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		—			(8,081	)		(18,844	)		—		(26,925	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		—			11,152			37,125			—		48,277
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	—		$	3,071		$	18,281		$	—	$	21,352

(1) Kraton Polymers Capital Corporation has minimal assets and income. We do not believe that separate financial information concerning the Issuers would provide additional information that would be useful.

15. Subsequent Event

We have evaluated significant events and transactions that occurred from July 1, 2009 through the date of this report and have determined that there were no events or transactions other than those disclosed in this report, if any, that would require recognition or disclosure in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009.

29

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

INTRODUCTION

You should read the following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations with our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto, included in Kraton’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008. This discussion contains forward-looking statements and involves numerous risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the risk factors discussed in the “Risk Factors” section of our most recent Form 10-K and in “Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations” and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. Actual results may differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements.

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

We believe we are the world’s leading producer (in terms of both 2008 sales revenues and sales volumes) of styrenic block copolymers (SBCs), a family of specialty chemical products whose chemistry we pioneered over 40 years ago. SBCs are highly engineered synthetic elastomers which enhance the performance of numerous products by delivering a variety of performance characteristics, including greater flexibility, resilience, strength, durability and processability, and are a fast growing subset of the elastomers industry. Our specialty polymers are typically processed with other products to achieve customer specific performance characteristics in a variety of applications. Each polymer is highly customized to each application and is usually a critical component to the performance of our customer’s product, yet represents a small fraction of the overall cost of the customer’s finished product. The versatility of our portfolio of polymers is due to a wide range of distinctive molecular structures, which can be precisely controlled and tailored to unique design and performance characteristics. Each polymer requires a significant amount of testing and certification, which, when combined with our proprietary chemistry encourages strong customer loyalty. We believe that our global scale, broad product offerings, superior technical expertise, strong customer relationships and well-recognized KRATON^® brand name have allowed us to maintain our leading global position in SBCs.

We serve a large number of customers across a diverse set of end-use markets in many regions of the world. As a result, we believe our sales are less sensitive to conditions in any one particular end-use market or region. We currently offer over 800 products to more than 700 customers in over 60 countries worldwide. We are the only SBC producer with manufacturing and service capabilities on four continents, enabling our multinational customers to meet their global needs. We manufacture products at six plants globally, including our flagship Belpre, Ohio plant in the United States, the largest SBC plant in the world, as well as plants in Germany, France, The Netherlands, Brazil and Japan. The plant in Japan is operated by an unconsolidated manufacturing joint venture.

We serve three core end-use markets: (1) Advanced Materials; (2) Adhesives, Sealants and Coatings; and (3) Paving and Roofing. We also serve an emerging business category which includes our IR Latex activity. Other markets include footwear; lubricant and fuel additive applications; and high styrenics.

Each of our end-uses has its own dedicated management, sales force and market development. In addition, each end-use is linked directly to the Research, Development and Technical Services (“RTS”) function and, via this link, sponsors the creation and commercialization of new products in addition to servicing its customers’ technical needs. We believe we hold the number one market position, based on 2008 sales, in each of our core end-use markets.

Recent Developments

New Innovations. Consistent with our strategy, we believe that we continue to lead SBC innovation as evidenced by numerous developments announced across several of our core end-use markets throughout the second quarter of 2009. Below are our most recently announced product innovations.

In April 2009 we announced a series of new formulations designed to support lower Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) requirements and reduce costs associated with contact adhesives. The unique structure of the

30

styrenic block copolymers provides key advantages to formulators. The end block enables cohesion, good load bearing properties and temperature resistance, while the center block promotes adhesion and elongation.

In April 2009 we announced an innovation with proven ability to double styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS) modification levels in pre-modified asphalt emulsions. These new high polymer content or “HPC” emulsions are a result of Kraton utilizing our latest development in high vinyl products. The effects of the enhanced mechanical properties can enable a transformation of traditional modified asphalt emulsion applications as well as open the door to new opportunities.

In May 2009 we announced our recent commercialization of Kraton G1645, a polymer that creates new opportunities to replace PVC in medical applications. In recent years there has been increased demand for eco-friendly, better performing products versus conventional elastomers. We have delivered breakthrough technology offering a clear, sterilizable, strong elastomer that offers a broad formulating window without the need for phthalate plasticizers. Our technology provides a solution that is eco-friendly and ultra-clear in comparison to PVC or silicone.

In June 2009 we announced our newly commercialized Nexar^™ polymer product family. The Nexar polymer family is uniquely designed for high performance breathable fabrics, water transport, filtration and separation applications.

In June 2009 we announced new advances in pressure sensitive adhesives for the tape market. We have determined it is now possible to blend Kraton styrene-isoprene-butadiene-styrene (SIBS) and styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS) polymers with rosin ester tackifying resins. The initial testing indicates the unique combination of Kraton SIBS and SBS with a rosin ester can produce a tape with properties similar to a traditional SIS and C5 hydrocarbon resin formulation, resulting in a system cost savings of 10% to 20%. The SIBS product is more compatible with the SBS, allowing higher concentrations of the lower cost SBS in tape formulations while maintaining excellent pressure sensitive performance.

Kraton Innovation Center. In June 2009 we announced the grand opening of our state-of-the-art Kraton Innovation Center located in the West Houston Energy Corridor. The world-class technology facility allows Kraton to upgrade and expand its current capabilities in ways that we believe will build on existing synergies and significantly improve process efficiencies for the ultimate benefit of our customers.

Purchase of a portion of our 8.125% Notes. In April 2009, TJ Chemical Holdings LLC, or “TJ Chemical,” purchased approximately $6.3 million face value of our 8.125% Notes for cash consideration of $2.5 million, which included accrued interest of $0.1 million. Immediately upon purchasing our Notes, TJ Chemical contributed the purchased Notes to Polymer Holdings which in turn contributed the Notes to us. We are holding the Notes as treasury bonds. Also in April 2009, we purchased approximately $0.7 million face value of our 8.125% Notes for cash consideration of $0.3 million which we are holding as treasury bonds. We recorded a gain of approximately $4.3 million on the extinguishment of debt in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations in the quarter ended June 30, 2009.

Pricing. In July 2009 we announced the implementation of a series of global price increases which were generally broad-based across our end-use markets and in response to the increase in raw material and energy costs. These announced global price increases were effective August 1, 2009.

Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations

Raw Materials. Our results of operations are directly affected by the cost of raw materials. We use three monomers as our primary raw materials in the manufacture of our products: styrene, butadiene, and isoprene. These monomers together represented approximately 52%, 45% and 49% of our total cost of goods sold for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, and the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Other raw materials used in our production process include catalysts, solvents, stabilizers and various process control chemicals. The cost of these monomers has generally been correlated to changes in crude prices and affected by global supply and demand and global economic conditions. The market prices for these monomers declined

31

significantly late in 2008 and into the first quarter of 2009. During the second quarter of 2009 certain monomer costs increased from the first quarter of 2009.

We believe that through our contractual arrangements with suppliers, or through other arrangements, we can presently source adequate supplies of styrene, butadiene and isoprene at competitive, market-based prices. We can provide no assurances, however, that our suppliers of raw materials will not terminate applicable contracts at the expiration of their terms or that we will be able to obtain substitute contractual arrangements on comparable terms, or that we generally will be able to source raw materials on an economic basis in the future. Our U.S. butadiene supply agreement with Shell Chemical expired as of April 30, 2009. We currently have access to adequate butadiene supplies at competitive market rates, and we are currently engaged in efforts with various suppliers and potential suppliers to purchase ongoing and continuing supplies of butadiene for our U.S operations.

Styrene, butadiene and isoprene used by our U.S. and European facilities are primarily supplied by Shell Chemicals or its affiliates, LyondellBasell Industries, and other suppliers under long-term supply contracts with various expiration dates. Our Isoprene Sales Contract with Shell Chemical ends on December 31, 2009, subject to termination as of that date or any date thereafter, on not less than four (4) months written notice given by either party.

In Japan, butadiene and isoprene supplies for our joint venture plant are supplied under our joint venture agreement, where our partner supplies our necessary requirements. Styrene in Japan is sourced from local third-party suppliers. Our facility in Paulinia, Brazil generally purchases all of its raw materials from local third-party suppliers.

International Operations and Currency Fluctuations. We operate a geographically diverse business serving customers in more than 60 countries from six manufacturing plants in six countries. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, 41% of net product sales were generated from customers located in the Americas, 40% in Europe and 17% in the Asia Pacific region.

Although we sell and manufacture our products in many countries, our sales and production costs are mainly denominated in U.S. dollars, Euros, Japanese Yen and Brazilian Real.

Our financial results are subject to gains and losses on currency transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the relevant operations. Any gains and losses are included in operating income, but have historically not been material. On February 18, 2009 we entered into a foreign currency option contract to reduce our exposure to fluctuations in the Euro to U.S. dollar exchange rate for a notional amount of €47.3 million which expires on December 29, 2009. See Note 9(a) of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.

In addition, our financial results are subject to gains and losses on currency translations, which occur when the financial statements of foreign operations are translated into U.S. dollars. The financial statements of operations outside the U.S. where the local currency is considered to be the functional currency are translated into U.S. dollars using the exchange rate at each balance sheet date for assets and liabilities and the average exchange rate for each period for revenues, expenses, gains and losses and cash flows. The effect of translating the balance sheet into U.S. dollars is included as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) in member’s equity. Any appreciation of the functional currencies against the U.S. dollar will increase the U.S. dollar equivalent of amounts of revenues, expenses, gains and losses and cash flows, and any depreciation of the functional currencies will decrease the U.S. dollar amounts reported.

Outlook

The effects of the global economic slowdown on Kraton’s business appeared to begin to shift to recovery in the second quarter of 2009 as evidenced by our quarterly sales volume, as compared to the previous year’s comparable quarter, which improved from a 39% decline in the first quarter of 2009 to a 24% decline in the second quarter of 2009, with our June 2009 sales volume narrowing to a 12% decline compared to June 2008.

32

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table summarizes certain information relating to our operating results that has been derived from our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008		2009			2008
Operating Revenues
Sales	$	233,741		$	328,362	$	411,607		$	584,650
Other		10,080			17,007		17,172			27,580
Total operating revenues		243,821			345,369		428,779			612,230
Cost of Goods Sold		208,060			282,823		384,085			500,899
Gross Profit		35,761			62,546		44,694			111,331
Operating Expenses
Research and development		5,071			7,403		10,040			15,321
Selling, general and administrative		18,052			19,909		36,303			45,364
Depreciation and amortization		12,542			13,110		25,106			27,762
Total operating expenses		35,665			40,422		71,449			88,447
Gain on Extinguishment of Debt		4,340			—		23,831			—
Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Joint Venture		102			159		176			220
Interest Expense, net		7,825			9,418		16,733			19,803
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes		(3,287	)		12,865		(19,481	)		3,301
Income Tax Expense		891			2,649		1,163			2,495
Net Income (Loss)	$	(4,178	)	$	10,216	$	(20,664	)	$	806

Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 Compared to Same Period in 2008

Operating Revenues

Operating revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2009 decreased $101.5 million or 29.4% compared to the same period in 2008. The decrease was driven primarily by:

Sales decreased $94.6 million or 28.8%. Sales volume amounted to 71.4 kT in 2009 compared to 94.2 kT in 2008. The 22.8 kT or 24.0% decline in sales volume reduced sales by $77.5 million. The impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates reduced sales by $17.7 million.

The following are the primary factors influencing our sales volume:

• In our Adhesives, Sealants and Coatings end-use market, we experienced a decrease in sales volume due to weakness in demand for commercial packaging tape applications, which began in the second-half of 2008 and continued into the second quarter of 2009. In addition, non-woven and construction applications sales volume have been negatively impacted by deteriorating global economic conditions.

33

• In our Advanced Materials end-use market, our sales volume into automotive, consumer electronics/appliances, and personal care applications declined commensurate with deteriorating global economic conditions.

• In our Paving and Roofing end-use market, roofing applications were lower due to the overall decline in construction activity. We also experienced a decline in asphalt modification volume, largely due to delays associated with the uncertainty around the impact of the U.S. Government economic stimulus spending.

Other revenue decreased $6.9 million or 40.7%. Other revenue primarily consists of the sales of small quantities of by-products resulting from the manufacturing process of isoprene rubber, which is offset by a corresponding cost included in cost of goods sold.

Cost of Goods Sold

Cost of goods sold for three months ended June 30, 2009 decreased $74.8 million or 26.4% compared to the same period in 2008. The decrease was driven primarily by:

• $53.6 million related to the decline in sales volume,

• $13.2 million from changes in foreign currency exchange rates,

• $6.9 million due to lower by-product costs and

• $1.1 million in monomer and other production costs.

As a percentage of operating revenues, cost of goods sold increased to 85.3% from 81.9%.

Gross Profit

Gross profit for the three months ended June 30, 2009 decreased $26.8 million or 42.8% compared to the same period in 2008. The decrease was driven primarily by a decrease in sales volume. As a percentage of operating revenues, gross profit decreased to 14.7% from 18.1%.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2009 decreased $4.8 million or 11.8% compared to the same period in 2008. The decrease was driven primarily by:

Research and development decreased $2.3 million or 31.5%. The decrease was largely due to the costs associated with the realignment of our Research and Technology Service organization in 2008. As a percentage of operating revenues, research and development was unchanged at 2.1%.

Selling, general and administrative decreased $1.9 million or 9.3%. The decrease was primarily due to a reduction of our incentive compensation costs and lower restructuring costs. As a percentage of operating revenues, selling, general and administrative increased to 7.4% from 5.8%.

Interest Expense, net.

Interest expense, net for the three months ended June 30, 2009 decreased $1.6 million or 17.0% to $7.8 million compared to $9.4 million during the same period in 2008. The decrease was primarily due to lower interest rates and amortized gains from our interest rate swap that was settled in June 2008. The average debt balances outstanding were $532.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and $568.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008. The effective interest rates on our debt were 5.9% for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 6.6% for the three months ended June 30, 2008.

34

Income Tax Expense

Income tax expense was $0.9 million for three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $2.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008. The effective tax rate was (27.1)% for the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to 20.6% for the three months ended June 30, 2008. Our effective tax rate for the current period was less than our statutory rate primarily due to a decrease in pre-tax income, along with not recording a tax benefit for certain net operating losses generated during that period and a change in mix of pre-tax income between foreign and domestic tax jurisdictions. Our effective tax rate for the prior period was higher than our statutory rate primarily due to an increase in pre-tax income, along with not recording a tax benefit for certain net operating losses generated during that period and a change in mix of pre-tax income between foreign and domestic tax jurisdictions.

Net Income (Loss)

Net loss was $4.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease of $14.4 million compared to a net income of $10.2 million in the same period in 2008.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 Compared to Same Period in 2008

Operating Revenues

Operating revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2009 decreased $183.5 million or 30.0% compared to the same period in 2008. The decrease was driven primarily by:

Sales decreased $173.0 million or 29.6%. Sales volume amounted to 118.5 kT in 2009 compared to 171.0 kT in 2008. The 52.5 kT or 30.7% decline in sales volume reduced sales by $171.2 million. The impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates reduced sales by $31.2 million. Partially offsetting these decreases in sales was a $29.4 million increase in global product sales prices and changes in product mix.

The following are the primary factors influencing our sales volume:

• In our Adhesives, Sealants and Coatings end-use market, we experienced a decrease in sales volume due to weakness in demand for commercial packaging tape applications, which began in the second-half of 2008 and has continued into the first half of 2009. In addition, non-woven and construction applications sales volume have been negatively impacted by deteriorating global economic conditions.

• In our Advanced Materials end-use market, our sales volume into automotive, consumer electronics/appliances, and personal care applications declined commensurate with deteriorating global economic conditions.

• In our Paving and Roofing end-use market, roofing applications were lower due to the overall decline in construction activity. We also experienced a decline in asphalt modification volume, largely due to delays associated with the uncertainty around the impact of the U.S. Government economic stimulus spending.

Other revenue decreased $10.4 million or 37.7%. Other revenue primarily consists of the sales of small quantities of by-products resulting from the manufacturing process of isoprene rubber, which is offset by a corresponding cost included in cost of goods sold.

Cost of Goods Sold

Cost of goods sold for the six months ended June 30, 2009 decreased $116.8 million or 23.3% compared to the same period in 2008. The decrease was driven primarily by:

• $121.4 million related to the decline in sales volume,

35

• $23.8 million from changes in foreign currency exchange rates,

• $10.4 million due to lower by-product costs, partially offset by

• $38.8 million in monomer and other production costs.

As a percentage of operating revenues, cost of goods sold increased to 89.6% from 81.8%.

Gross Profit

Gross profit for the six months ended June 30, 2009 decreased $66.6 million or 59.9% compared to the same period in 2008. The decrease was driven primarily by a decrease in sales volume. As a percentage of operating revenues, gross profit decreased to 10.4% from 18.2%.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2009 decreased $17.0 million or 19.2% compared to the same period in 2008. The decrease was driven primarily by:

Research and development decreased $5.3 million or 34.5%. The decrease was largely due to the costs associated with the realignment of our Research and Technology Service organization in 2008. As a percentage of operating revenues, research and development decreased to 2.3% from 2.5%.

Selling, general and administrative decreased $9.1 million or 20%. The decrease was primarily due to lower restructuring costs and a reduction of our incentive compensation costs of $8.1 million. As a percentage of operating revenues, selling, general and administrative increased to 8.5% from 7.4%.

Interest Expense, net.

Interest expense, net for the six months ended June 30, 2009 decreased $3.1 million or 15.5% to $16.7 million compared to $19.8 million during the same period in 2008. The decrease was primarily due to lower interest rates and amortized gains from our interest rate swap that was settled in June 2008. The average debt balances outstanding were $549.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and $565.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The effective interest rates on our debt were 6.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 7.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2008.

Income Tax Expense

Income tax expense was $1.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $2.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The effective tax rate was (6.0)% for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to 75.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2008. Our effective tax rate for the current period was less than our statutory rate primarily due to a decrease in pre-tax income, along with not recording a tax benefit for certain net operating losses generated during that period and a change in mix of pre-tax income between foreign and domestic tax jurisdictions. Our effective tax rate for the prior period was higher than our statutory rate primarily due to an increase in pre-tax income, along with not recording a tax benefit for certain net operating losses generated during that period and a change in mix of pre-tax income between foreign and domestic tax jurisdictions.

Net Income (Loss)

Net loss was $20.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease of $21.4 million compared to a net income of $0.8 million in the same period in 2008.

36

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Known Trends and Uncertainties

We are a holding company without any operations or assets other than the operations of our subsidiaries. Our liquidity depends on distributions from our subsidiaries and we expect to continue to fund our liquidity requirements principally with cash derived from operations and existing cash balances.

Credit markets in the United States have experienced varying degrees of credit volatility and contraction that have limited and reduced our ability to explore financing options. This volatility has been caused by many factors, including concerns about creditworthiness in the overall market, especially the financial services sector, which has culminated in the failure or consolidation of several large financial and investment institutions. As a result of these market conditions, the cost and availability of credit has been and may continue to be adversely affected by illiquid credit markets and wider credit spreads. Concern about the stability of the markets generally and the strength of counterparties specifically has led many lenders and institutional investors to reduce, and in some cases, cease to provide funding to borrowers. Continued turbulence in the U.S. and international markets and economies may adversely affect our liquidity and financial condition, and the liquidity and financial condition of our customers, to timely replace maturing liabilities, and access the capital markets to meet liquidity needs, resulting in adverse effects on our financial condition and results of operations. During this credit contraction, we have been able to access borrowings available to us in amounts sufficient to fund liquidity needs.

Based upon current and anticipated levels of operations, we believe that cash flow from operations of our subsidiaries and borrowings available to us will be adequate for the foreseeable future for us to fund our working capital and capital expenditure requirements and to make required payments of principal and interest on our 8.125% Notes and senior secured credit facility. However, these cash flows are subject to a number of factors, including, but not limited to, earnings, sensitivities to the cost of raw materials, seasonality, currency transactions and currency translation. Since feedstock costs represent approximately 50% of our cost of production, in periods of rising feedstock costs, we consume cash in operating activities due to increases in accounts receivable and inventory, partially offset by increased value of accounts payable. Conversely, in periods where feedstock costs are declining, Kraton generates cash flow from decreases in working capital. We currently expect to have lower levels of working capital in 2009. There can be no assurance that continued or increased volatility and disruption in the global capital and credit markets will not impair our ability to access these markets on terms commercially acceptable to us or at all.

Going forward there can be no assurance that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations or that future borrowings will be available under our senior secured credit facility to fund liquidity needs in an amount sufficient to enable us to service our indebtedness. At June 30, 2009, we had $17.7 million of cash and cash equivalents. Our available cash and cash equivalents are held in accounts managed by third-party financial institutions and consist of cash invested in interest bearing funds and cash in our operating accounts. To date, we have experienced no loss or lack of access to our invested cash or cash equivalents; however, we can provide no assurances that access to our invested cash and cash equivalents will not be impacted by adverse conditions in the financial markets. We have available to us, upon compliance with customary conditions, the $75.5 million revolving portion of the senior secured credit facility of which we had borrowed $0.0 million at June 30, 2009. While we have met the conditions required to provide us full access to the revolving portion of our senior secured credit facility, we cannot guarantee that all of the counterparties contractually committed to fund a revolving credit draw request will actually fund future requests, although, based upon our present analysis, we currently believe that any such shortfall would not exceed 10% of the total amount of such revolver. Under the terms of our senior secured credit facility, as amended May 12, 2006, we are subject to certain financial covenants, including maintenance of a minimum interest rate coverage ratio and a maximum leverage ratio. We are required to maintain a fiscal quarter end interest coverage ratio of 2.75:1.00 beginning March 31, 2009 and 3.00:1.00 beginning March 31, 2010 and continuing thereafter. In addition, we are required to maintain a fiscal quarter end leverage ratio not to exceed 4.45 beginning March 31, 2009 through September 30, 2009 and 4.00 beginning December 31, 2009 and continuing thereafter.

37

Our failure to comply with any of these financial covenants would give rise to a default under the senior secured credit facility. As of June 30, 2009, we were in compliance with the applicable financial ratios in the senior secured credit facility and the other covenants contained in the senior secured credit facility and the indentures governing the 8.125% Notes. The maintenance of these financial ratios is based on our level of profitability. If the 2009 global economic environment worsens or other factors arise which negatively impact our profitability, we may not be able to satisfy our covenants. If we are unable to satisfy such covenants or other provisions at any future time we would need to seek an amendment or waiver of such financial covenants or other provisions. The respective lenders under the senior secured credit facility may not consent to any amendment or waiver requests that we may make in the future, and, if they do consent, they may not do so on terms which are favorable to us. In the event that we were unable to obtain any such waiver or amendment and we were not able to refinance or repay our debt instruments, our inability to meet the financial covenants or other provisions of the senior secured credit facility would constitute an event of default under our debt instruments, including the senior secured credit facility, which would permit the bank lenders to accelerate the senior secured credit facility.

From time to time, on an ongoing basis, we continue to evaluate options with respect to our overall debt structure, including, without limitation, the possibility of cash purchases, in the open market, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, of Kraton indebtedness up to amounts permitted under our senior secured credit facility. Such repurchases, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. In March 2009, we purchased and extinguished $30 million face value of our 8.125% Notes for cash consideration of $10.9 million, which included accrued interest of $0.4 million. We recorded a gain of approximately $19.5 million in the quarter ended March 31, 2009 related to the purchase and extinguishment of these 8.125% Notes. In April 2009 TJ Chemical purchased approximately $6.3 million face value of our 8.125% Notes for cash consideration of $2.5 million, which included accrued interest of $0.1 million. Immediately upon purchasing our Notes, TJ Chemical contributed the purchased Notes to Polymer Holdings which in turn contributed the Notes to us. We are holding the Notes in treasury. Also in April 2009 we purchased approximately $0.7 million face value of our 8.125% Notes for cash consideration of $0.3 million which we are holding as treasury bonds. We recorded a gain of approximately $4.3 million on the extinguishment of debt in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations in the quarter ended June 30, 2009.

Operating Cash Flows

Net cash provided by operating activities increased $18.6 million to $4.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $13.9 million used in operating activities during the same period in 2008. This change was driven primarily by:

• Decreased working capital due to decreases in inventory and accounts receivable, partially offset by decreased accounts payable, other payables and accruals and related party balances primarily related to decreased costs of feedstocks and sales volume.

Investing Cash Flows

Net cash flows used in investing activities totaled $22.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to net cash flows used in investing activities of $9.7 million during the same period in 2008. This $13.1 million increase was primarily driven by timing of capital expenditures.

Expected Capital Expenditures. We are forecasting 2009 expenditures of approximately $50.0 million. Our minimum annual capital expenditure levels to maintain and achieve required improvements in our facilities in each of the next three to five years are expected to be approximately $12 million to $16 million. We are upgrading certain systems and operating controls at our Belpre, Ohio facility. This project is designed to significantly improve the effectiveness, competitiveness and operating efficiency of the Belpre plant. The project began in the second-half of 2008 and will be completed in distinct phases extending into

38

2012, with 2009 spending estimated at $9.0 million and the total project spending estimated at $40.0 million. We are also investing in a Global Enterprise Resource Plan (ERP) which began in January 2009 with a cost of approximately $15.0 million to be incurred in 2009. We have undertaken this project to upgrade to an ERP implementation utilizing a single global system and implementing best practices for our industry. This will result in Kraton having a world-class global ERP system. The ERP implementation is projected to be completed by January 2010.

Financing Cash Flows and Liquidity

Kraton’s consolidated capital structure as of June 30, 2009, was 73% debt and 27% member’s equity.

Net cash used in financing activities totaled $59.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $2.2 million during the same period in 2008. This change was driven primarily by:

• $10.5 million to purchase and extinguish $30 million face value of our 8.125% Notes,

• $50 million repayment on the Revolver in June 2009.

Description of Our Indebtedness. See Note 7 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of our debt facilities and related financial and other covenants.

Other Contingencies

As a chemicals manufacturer, our operations in the U.S. and abroad are subject to a wide range of environmental laws and regulations at both the national and local levels. These laws and regulations govern, among other things, air emissions, wastewater discharges, solid and hazardous waste management, site remediation programs and chemical use and management.

Pursuant to these laws and regulations, our facilities are required to obtain and comply with a wide variety of environmental permits for different aspects of their operations. Generally, many of these environmental laws and regulations are becoming increasingly stringent, and the cost of compliance with these various requirements can be expected to increase over time.

Management believes that we are in material compliance with all current environmental laws and regulations. We estimate that any expenses incurred in maintaining compliance with these requirements will not materially affect our results of operations or cause us to exceed our level of anticipated capital expenditures. However, we cannot give assurances that regulatory requirements or permit conditions will not change, and we cannot predict the aggregate costs of additional measures that may be required to maintain compliance as a result of such changes or expenses.

In the context of the separation in February 2001, Shell Chemicals agreed to indemnify us for specific categories of environmental claims brought with respect to matters occurring before the separation, subject to dollar and time limitations. Coverage under the indemnity also varies depending upon the nature of the environmental claim, the location giving rise to the claim and the manner in which the claim is triggered. Therefore, if claims arise in the future related to past operations, we cannot give assurances that those claims will be covered by the Shell Chemicals’ indemnity and also cannot be certain that any amounts recoverable will be sufficient to satisfy claims against us.

In addition, we may in the future be subject to claims that arise solely from events or circumstances occurring after February 2001, which would not, in any event, be covered by the Shell Chemicals’ indemnity. While we recognize that we may in the future be held liable with respect for remediation activities beyond those identified to date, at present we are not aware of any circumstances that are reasonably expected to give rise to remediation claims that would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or cause us to exceed our projected level of anticipated capital expenditures.

39

We had no material operating expenditures for environmental fines, penalties, government imposed remedial or corrective actions in the presented periods of 2009 and 2008.

Contractual Commitments

We have contractual obligations for long-term debt, operating leases and purchase obligations that were summarized in a table of contractual commitments in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K. There has been no material change since that date.

Off-Balance Sheet Transactions

We are not involved in any material off-balance sheet transactions as of June 30, 2009.

OTHER ISSUES

New Accounting Pronouncements

The following new accounting pronouncements have been issued, but have not yet been adopted as of June 30, 2009:

FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. FAS 132(R)-1, “Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets.” In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 132(R)-1 which provides guidance on an employer’s disclosures about plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan and requires employers to provide more transparency about the assets held by the retirement plan and the concentrations of risk in those plans. FSP No. FAS 132(R)-1 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2009, and interim periods within those fiscal years. For Kraton, FSP No. FAS 132(R)-1 is effective as of January 1, 2010. Kraton is currently evaluating the effect of adopting FSP No. FAS 132(R)-1.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, and commodity prices.

Interest Rate Risk. We have $323.4 million of variable rate debt outstanding under our senior secured credit facility as of June 30, 2009. The debt bears interest at the adjusted Eurodollar rate plus 2.00% per annum or at our option, the base rate plus 1.00% per annum. In February 2008, we entered into a $325 million notional amount interest rate swap agreement to hedge or otherwise protect against Eurodollar interest rate fluctuations on a portion of our variable rate debt. The agreement had a fixed rate of 2.77%, with a margin of 2.0%, which resulted in a total cost of 4.77%, and a term through April 1, 2010. This agreement was designated as a cash flow hedge on the exposure of the variability of future cash flows subject to the variable quarterly interest rates on $325 million of the term loan portion of the Term Facility. We settled the swap early in June 2008 and realized cash proceeds of $4.6 million, resulting in a gain on the sale of $4.6 million. The gain is deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income at June 30, 2009 and is being reclassified as a reduction in interest expense through March 31, 2010 using the effective interest method, unless we determine that the forecasted interest payments under the Term Facility are probable not to occur, in which case the gain would then be reclassified immediately to interest expense. In October 2008, we entered into a $320 million notional amount interest rate swap agreement to hedge or otherwise protect against Eurodollar interest rate fluctuations on a portion of our variable rate debt. The agreement had a fixed rate of 2.99%, with a margin of 2.0%, which resulted in a total cost of 4.99%, and a term through December 31, 2009. In May 2009, we entered into a $310 million notional amount interest rate swap agreement to hedge or otherwise protect against Eurodollar interest rate fluctuations on a portion of our variable rate debt. The agreement is effective on January 4, 2010 and expires on January 3, 2011 and has a fixed rate of 1.53%, with a margin of 2.0%, which resulted in a total cost of 3.53%. These agreements were designated as cash flow hedges on the exposure of the variability of future cash flows subject to the variable quarterly interest rates on the term loan portion of the Term Facility.

40

Foreign Currency Risk. We conduct operations in many countries around the world. Our results of operations are subject to both currency transaction risk and currency translation risk. We incur currency transaction risk whenever we enter into either a purchase or sale transaction using a currency other than the local currency of the transacting entity. With respect to currency translation risk, our financial condition and results of operations are measured and recorded in the relevant domestic currency and then translated into U.S. dollars for inclusion in our historical consolidated financial statements. In recent years, exchange rates between these currencies and U.S. dollars have fluctuated significantly and may do so in the future. Approximately, one-half of our revenue and costs are denominated in U.S. dollars. Euro-related currencies are also significant. In February, 2009 we entered into a foreign currency option contract to reduce our exposure to fluctuations in the Euro to U.S. dollar exchange rate for a notional amount of €47.3 million which expires on December 29, 2009.

Credit Risk. Our customers are diversified by industry and geography with approximately 700 customers in approximately 60 countries worldwide. We do not have concentrations of receivables from these industry sectors throughout these countries. The recent global economic downturn may affect our overall credit risk. Where exposed to credit risk, we analyze the counterparties’ financial condition prior to entering into an agreement, establish credit limits and monitor the appropriateness of those limits on an ongoing basis. We also obtain cash, letters of credit or other acceptable forms of security from customers to provide credit support, where appropriate, based on our financial analysis of the customer and the contractual terms and conditions applicable to each transaction.

Commodity Price Risk. We are subject to commodity price risk under agreements for the supply of our raw materials and energy. From time to time we may hedge our commodity price exposure.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

We have evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2009. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention of overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. Based upon our evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the applicable rules and forms, and that they are accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control reporting.

41

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

For information regarding legal proceedings, see Note 11 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Readers of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should carefully consider the risks described in our other reports filed with or furnished to the SEC, including our prior and subsequent reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q, and 8-K, in connection with any evaluation of Kraton’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

The risks and uncertainties described in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 26, 2009, are not the only ones facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known or those that are currently deemed immaterial may also affect our operations. Any of the risks, uncertainties, events or circumstances described therein could cause our future financial condition, results of operations or cash flows to be adversely affected.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

Not Applicable.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

Not Applicable.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

Not Applicable.

Item 5. Other Information.

42

Item 6. Exhibits.

Exhibit Number
10.1	Amendment Number 6 to Isoprene Sales Contract dated July 29, 2009 between Shell Chemical LP and Kraton Polymers U.S. LLC f/k/a Shell Elastomers LLC (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.1 to Kraton’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on July 31, 2009)
10.2	Amendment Number 5 to Isoprene Sales Contract dated June 26, 2009 between Shell Chemical LP and Kraton Polymers U.S. LLC f/k/a Shell Elastomers LLC (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.1 to Kraton’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on July 1, 2009)
10.3	Amendment Number 4 to Isoprene Sales Contract dated May 28, 2009 between Shell Chemical LP and Kraton Polymers U.S. LLC f/k/a Shell Elastomers LLC (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.1 to Kraton’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on May 29, 2009)
10.4	Amendment Number 3 to Isoprene Sales Contract dated April 24, 2009 between Shell Chemical LP and Kraton Polymers U.S. LLC f/k/a Shell Elastomers LLC (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.1 to Kraton’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on April 29, 2009)
*31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 302 of Sarbanes—Oxley Act of 2002
*31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 302 of Sarbanes—Oxley Act of 2002
*32.1	Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes—Oxley Act of 2002

* Filed herewith.

43

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	KRATON POLYMERS LLC
Date: August 11, 2009	/s/    KEVIN M. FOGARTY
	Kevin M. Fogarty President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: August 11, 2009	/s/    STEPHEN E. TREMBLAY
	Stephen E. Tremblay Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

44