Form 10-Q

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “accelerated filer,” “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

OfficeMax Incorporated (“OfficeMax,” the “Company” or “we”) is a leader in both business-to-business and retail office products distribution. The Company provides office supplies and paper, print and document services, technology products and solutions and furniture to large, medium and small businesses, government offices and consumers. OfficeMax customers are served by approximately 30,000 associates through direct sales, catalogs, the Internet and a network of retail stores throughout the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Mexico.

The accompanying quarterly consolidated financial statements include the accounts of OfficeMax and all majority-owned subsidiaries, except our 88%-owned subsidiary that formerly owned assets in Cuba that were confiscated by the Cuban government in the 1960s, which is accounted for as an investment due to various asset restrictions. We also consolidate the variable interest entities in which the Company is the primary beneficiary. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. These financial statements are for the thirteen-week and thirty-nine-week periods ended on September 24, 2011 (also referred to as the “third quarter of 2011” or the “three months ended September 24, 2011” and the “first nine months of 2011” or the “nine months ended September 24, 2011,” respectively) and the thirteen-week and thirty-nine-week periods ended on September 25, 2010 (also referred to as the “third quarter of 2010” or the “three months ended September 25, 2010” and “first nine months of 2010” or the “nine months ended September 25, 2010,” respectively). The Company’s fiscal year ends on the last Saturday in December. Due primarily to statutory reporting requirements, the Company’s international businesses maintain December 31 year-ends and end their quarters on the last calendar day of the month, with our majority-owned joint venture in Mexico reporting one month in arrears. Fiscal year 2010 included 52 weeks for all reportable segments and businesses. Fiscal year 2011 will include 53 weeks for our U.S. businesses.

The Company manages its business using three reportable segments: OfficeMax, Contract (“Contract segment” or “Contract”); OfficeMax, Retail (“Retail segment” or “Retail”); and Corporate and Other. Management reviews the performance of the Company based on these segments. We present information pertaining to our segments in Note 10, “Segment Information”.

The Company has prepared the quarterly consolidated financial statements included herein pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Some information and note disclosures, which would normally be included in comprehensive annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations. These quarterly consolidated financial statements should be read together with the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 25, 2010.

The quarterly consolidated financial statements included herein have not been audited by an independent registered public accounting firm but, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments necessary to present fairly the results for the periods indicated. Except as disclosed within these “Notes to Quarterly Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited),” the adjustments made were of a normal, recurring nature. Quarterly results are not necessarily indicative of results which may be expected for a full year.

In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued guidance which establishes disclosure requirements for other comprehensive income. The guidance requires the reporting of components of other comprehensive income and components of net income together as components of total comprehensive income, and is effective for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The guidance requires retrospective

Notes to Quarterly Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)—(Continued)

application and earlier application is permitted. The Company anticipates that adoption of this guidance will affect the presentation of certain elements of the Company’s financial statements, but these changes in presentation will not have a material impact on our financial statements.

We conduct regular reviews of our real estate portfolio to identify underperforming facilities and close those facilities that are no longer strategically or economically beneficial. We record a liability for the cost associated with a facility closure at its fair value in the period in which the liability is incurred, primarily the location’s cease-use date. Upon closure, unrecoverable costs are included in facility closure reserves and include provisions for the present value of future lease obligations, less contractual or estimated sublease income. Accretion expense is recognized over the life of the required payments. These charges are recorded in other operating expenses, net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

During the first nine months of 2011, the Company recorded facility closure charges of $5.6 million in its Retail segment associated with closing six underperforming domestic stores prior to the end of their lease terms, of which $5.4 million was related to the lease liability and $0.2 million was related to asset impairments. None of these charges were recorded in the third quarter of 2011.

During the first nine months of 2010, the Company recorded facility closure charges of $14.4 million in its Retail segment associated with closing eight underperforming domestic stores prior to the end of their lease terms, of which $13.0 million was related to the lease liability and other costs and $1.4 million was related to asset impairments and other items. None of these charges were recorded in the third quarter of 2010.

Facility closure reserve account activity during the first nine months of 2011 was as follows:

Notes to Quarterly Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)—(Continued)

In addition, we were the lessee of a legacy building materials manufacturing facility near Elma, Washington until the fourth quarter of 2010. During 2006, we ceased operations at the facility, fully impaired the assets and recorded a reserve for the related lease payments and other contract termination and closure costs. This reserve balance was not included in the facilities closure reserve described above. During the second quarter of 2010, the Company signed an agreement with the lessor to terminate the lease and recorded income of $3.9 million to adjust the associated reserve. During the fourth quarter of 2010, we sold the facility’s equipment and recorded a final adjustment of $5.5 million to reduce the reserve balance. This income was reported in other operating expenses, net in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The first nine months of 2011 included severance charges recorded in the second quarter of $8.3 million ($8.0 million in Contract and $0.3 million in Retail) related to reorganizations in Canada ($3.6 million), Australia ($1.4 million) and the U.S. sales and supply chain organizations ($3.3 million). The first nine months of 2010 included a severance charge recorded in the first quarter in our Contract segment of $0.8 million related to a reorganization of our U.S. Contract customer service centers. These charges were included in other operating expenses, net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

As of September 24, 2011, $5.0 million of severance charges remain to be paid and are included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

In October 2004, we sold our timberland assets in exchange for $15 million in cash plus credit-enhanced timber installment notes in the amount of $1,635 million (the “Installment Notes”). The Installment Notes were issued by single-member limited liability companies formed by affiliates of Boise Cascade, L.L.C. (the “Note Issuers”). The Installment Notes are 15-year non-amortizing obligations and were issued in two equal $817.5 million tranches bearing interest at 5.11% and 4.98%, respectively. In order to support the issuance of the Installment Notes, the Note Issuers transferred a total of $1,635 million in cash to Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (“Lehman”) and Wachovia Corporation (“Wachovia”) (which was later purchased by Wells Fargo & Company) ($817.5 million to each of Lehman and Wachovia). Lehman and Wachovia issued collateral notes (the “Collateral Notes”) to the Note Issuers. Concurrently with the issuance of the Installment and Collateral Notes, Lehman and Wachovia guaranteed the respective Installment Notes and the Note Issuers pledged the Collateral Notes as security for the performance of the Installment Note obligations. The Installment Notes are reported as timber notes receivable in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

In December 2004, we completed a securitization transaction in which the Company’s interests in the Installment Notes and related guarantees were transferred to wholly-owned bankruptcy remote subsidiaries. The subsidiaries pledged the Installment Notes and related guarantees and issued securitized notes (the “Securitization Notes”) in the amount of $1,470 million ($735 million through the structure supported by the Lehman guaranty and $735 million through the structure supported by the Wachovia guaranty). As a result of

Notes to Quarterly Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)—(Continued)

these transactions, we received $1,470 million in cash. Recourse on the Securitization Notes is limited to the proceeds of the applicable pledged Installment Notes and underlying Lehman or Wachovia guaranty, and therefore there is no recourse against OfficeMax. The Securitization Notes are 15-year non-amortizing and were issued in two equal $735 million tranches paying interest of 5.54% and 5.42%, respectively. The Securitization Notes are reported as non-recourse debt in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

On September 15, 2008, Lehman, the guarantor of half of the Installment Notes and the Securitization Notes, filed a petition in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York seeking relief under chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. Lehman’s bankruptcy filing constituted an event of default under the $817.5 million Installment Note guaranteed by Lehman (the “Lehman Guaranteed Installment Note”).

We are required for accounting purposes to assess the carrying value of assets whenever circumstances indicate that a decline in value may have occurred. In 2008, we evaluated the carrying value of the Lehman Guaranteed Installment Note and reduced it to the estimated amount we then expected to collect ($81.8 million) by recording a non-cash impairment charge of $735.8 million, pre-tax. The ultimate amount to be realized on the Lehman Guaranteed Installment Note depends on the proceeds from the Lehman bankruptcy estate. On June 30, 2011, Lehman filed an amended Disclosure Statement (the “Disclosure Statement”) on its Chapter 11 plan (the “Chapter 11 Plan”) with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York. The Disclosure Statement provides a range of estimated recoveries for various classes of unsecured creditors of Lehman. Based on the category descriptions, we, together with the indenture trustee for the Securitization Note holders (the “Indenture Trustee”), argued at a hearing on the Disclosure Statement that our claim should be treated as a class 3 senior unsecured claim (estimated to recover at a rate of approximately 21.1% under the Chapter 11 Plan) rather than falling into any other class of guarantee claims (estimated to recover at a rate of approximately 11%-13% depending on the class under the Chapter 11 Plan). Following negotiation, on October 7, 2011, we entered into a stipulation with Lehman and the Indenture Trustee that categorized our claim as a class 3 senior unsecured claim. Due to this categorization, provisions of the stipulation that make certain funds unavailable to our claim that would otherwise be available to class 3 senior unsecured claimants, the status of the bankruptcy proceedings, and based on information in the Disclosure Statement, it appears that our claim may recover at a potential rate within the range of 17% to 20%. However, uncertainties exist as to the actual recovery that will ultimately be received on the claim. The confirmation of the Chapter 11 Plan is not expected to occur until the next Bankruptcy court hearing, currently scheduled for December 6, 2011; the disposition of our claim and a related claim filed by the Note Issuers must be determined; and the funds available for claimants will depend on the value of the assets Lehman is able to liquidate. Due to these uncertainties and other factors, we have not increased our assumed recovery rate or the carrying value of the Lehman Guaranteed Installment Note. Following the confirmation hearing on the Chapter 11 Plan scheduled for December 6, 2011, an initial distribution may be made on our claim as early as March 30, 2012, assuming that all other issues in the claim have been resolved prior to or at the confirmation hearing. Further distributions are expected to occur over a several-year period. Going forward, we intend to adjust the carrying value of the Lehman Guaranteed Installment Note as further information regarding our share of the proceeds, if any, from the Lehman bankruptcy estate becomes available. Any proceeds we receive from the bankruptcy will be distributed to the Securitization Note Holders.

Notes to Quarterly Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)—(Continued)

this will occur when the assets of Lehman are currently projected to be distributed and the bankruptcy is finalized. Accordingly, we expect to recognize a non-cash gain equal to the difference between the carrying amount of the Securitization Notes guaranteed by Lehman ($735.0 million at September 24, 2011) and the carrying value of the Lehman Guaranteed Installment Note ($81.8 million at September 24, 2011) in a later period when the liability is legally extinguished. The actual gain to be recognized in the future will be measured based on the carrying amounts of the Lehman Guaranteed Installment Note and the Securitization Notes guaranteed by Lehman at the date of settlement.

Any discussion of the Lehman bankruptcy in this document is strictly based on factual observations from the bankruptcy cases and should not be interpreted as constituting legal analysis of or admission as to the ultimate allowances of our claim based on the Lehman Guaranteed Installment Note or any Note Issuers’ claim based on Collateral Notes, or the interplay thereof.

Through September 24, 2011, we have received all payments due under the Installment Notes guaranteed by Wachovia (the “Wachovia Guaranteed Installment Notes”), which have consisted only of interest due on the notes, and have made all payments due on the related Securitization Notes guaranteed by Wachovia, again consisting only of interest due. As all amounts due on the Wachovia Guaranteed Installment Notes are current and we have no reason to believe that we will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the Wachovia Guaranteed Installment Notes, the notes are stated in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at their original principal amount of $817.5 million. The Installment Notes and Securitization Notes are scheduled to mature in 2020 and 2019, respectively. The Securitization Notes have an initial term that is approximately three months shorter than the Installment Notes.

At the time of the sale of the timberlands in 2004, we generated a tax gain and recognized the related deferred tax liability. The timber installment notes structure allowed the Company to defer the resulting tax liability of $543 million until 2020, the maturity date for the Installment Notes. Due to the Lehman bankruptcy and note defaults, the recognition of the Lehman portion of the gain will be triggered when the Lehman Guaranteed Installment Note is transferred to the Securitization Note holders as payment and/or when the Lehman bankruptcy is resolved. At that time, we expect to reduce the estimated tax payment due by utilizing our available alternative minimum tax credits.

On July 12, 2007, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement (the “U.S. Credit Agreement”) with a group of banks. The U.S. Credit Agreement permitted the Company to borrow up to a maximum of $700 million subject to a borrowing base calculation that limited availability to a percentage of eligible accounts receivable plus a percentage of the value of eligible inventory less certain reserves. The U.S. Credit Agreement could be increased (up to a maximum of $800 million) at the Company’s request or reduced from time to time, in each case according to the terms detailed in the U.S. Credit Agreement. Letters of credit, which could be issued under the U.S. Credit Agreement up to a maximum of $250 million, reduced available borrowing capacity. At the end of the third quarter of 2011, the Company was in compliance with all covenants under the U.S. Credit Agreement. On October 7, 2011, the U.S. Credit Agreement, which was scheduled to expire on July 12, 2012, was amended by a new agreement, discussed below.

Borrowings under the U.S. Credit Agreement were subject to interest at rates based on either the prime rate or the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”). An additional percentage, which varied depending on the level of average borrowing availability, was added to the applicable borrowing rates under the U.S. Credit Agreement. Fees on letters of credit issued under the U.S. Credit

Notes to Quarterly Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)—(Continued)

Agreement were charged at a weighted average rate of 0.875% for all periods presented. The Company was also charged an unused line fee of 0.25% for all periods presented on the amount by which the maximum available credit exceeded the average daily outstanding borrowings and letters of credit.

On September 30, 2009, Grand & Toy Limited, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary in Canada, entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the “Canadian Credit Agreement”) with a group of banks. The Canadian Credit Agreement permitted Grand & Toy Limited to borrow up to a maximum of C$60 million subject to a borrowing base calculation that limited availability to a percentage of eligible accounts receivable plus a percentage of the value of eligible inventory less certain reserves. The Canadian Credit Agreement could be increased (up to a maximum of C$80 million) at Grand & Toy Limited’s request or reduced from time to time, in each case according to the terms detailed in the Canadian Credit Agreement. Letters of credit, which could be issued under the Canadian Credit Agreement up to a maximum of C$10 million, reduced available borrowing capacity under the Canadian Credit Agreement. At the end of the third quarter of 2011, Grand & Toy Limited was in compliance with all covenants under the Canadian Credit Agreement. On October 7, 2011, the Canadian Credit Agreement, which was scheduled to expire on July 12, 2012, was amended by a new agreement, discussed below.

Availability under the Company’s credit agreements at the end of the third quarter of 2011 was as follows:

On October 7, 2011, the Company entered into a Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement (the “North American Credit Agreement”) with a group of banks. The North American Credit Agreement amended both the U.S. Credit Agreement and the Canadian Credit Agreement and consolidated them into a single credit agreement. The North American Credit Agreement permits the Company to borrow up to a maximum of $650 million, of which $50 million (U.S. dollars) is allocated to Grand and Toy Limited and $600 million is allocated to the Company and its other participating North American subsidiaries, in each case subject to a borrowing base calculation that limits availability to a percentage of eligible trade and credit card receivables plus a percentage of the value of eligible inventory less certain reserves. The North American Credit Agreement may be increased (up to a maximum of $850 million) at the Company’s request and the approval of lenders participating in the increase, or may be reduced from time to time at the Company’s request, in each case according to the terms detailed in the North American Credit Agreement. Letters of credit, which may be issued

Notes to Quarterly Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)—(Continued)

under the North American Credit Agreement up to a maximum of $250 million, reduce available borrowing capacity. The North American Credit Agreement expires on October 7, 2016.

Borrowings under the North American Credit Agreement will be subject to interest at rates based on either the prime rate, the federal funds rate, LIBOR or the Canadian Dollar Offered Rate. An additional percentage, which varies depending on the level of average borrowing availability, will be added to the applicable rates. Fees on letters of credit issued under the North American Credit Agreement will be charged at rates between 1.25% and 2.25% depending on the type of letter of credit (i.e., stand-by or commercial) and the level of average borrowing availability. The Company will also be charged an unused line fee of between 0.375% and 0.5% on the amount by which the maximum available credit (i.e. $650 million) exceeds the average daily outstanding borrowings and letters of credit. The unused line fee will be 0.5% until January 1, 2012, and thereafter will vary depending on the average outstanding borrowings and letters of credit.

Availability under the Company’s North American Credit Agreement at the end of the third quarter, if the agreement had been in effect at that time, would have been as follows:

At the end of the first nine months of 2011, Grupo OfficeMax, our 51%-owned joint venture in Mexico, had total outstanding borrowings of $10.3 million. This included $6.0 million outstanding under a 60-month installment note due in the first quarter of 2014 and $4.3 million outstanding under a 54-month installment note due in the third quarter of 2014. Payments on the installment loans are made monthly. Recourse on the Grupo OfficeMax loans is limited to Grupo OfficeMax. The installment loan maturing in the third quarter of 2014 is secured by certain owned property of Grupo OfficeMax. All other Grupo OfficeMax loan facilities are unsecured.

Cash payments for interest, net of interest capitalized, were $38.4 million and $40.2 million for the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, respectively, and included interest payments related to the Securitization Notes of $19.9 million and $19.9 million for the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. Cash interest payments made on the Securitization Notes are completely offset by interest payments received on the Installment Notes.

In connection with the sale of the paper, forest products and timberland assets in 2004, the Company invested $175 million in affiliates of Boise Cascade, L.L.C. Due to restructurings conducted by those affiliates, our investment is currently in Boise Cascade Holdings, L.L.C. (the “Boise Investment”), a building products company.

A portion of the securities received in exchange for the Company’s investment carry no voting rights. This investment is accounted for under the cost method as Boise Cascade Holdings, L.L.C. does not maintain separate ownership accounts for its affiliate’s members, and the Company does not have the ability to significantly influence its operating and financial policies.

Notes to Quarterly Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)—(Continued)

The Boise Investment represented a continuing involvement in the operations of the business we sold in 2004. Therefore, approximately $180 million of gain realized from the sale was deferred. This gain is expected to be recognized in earnings as the Company’s investment is reduced.

The non-voting securities of Boise Cascade Holdings, L.L.C. accrue dividends daily at the rate of 8% per annum on the liquidation value plus accumulated dividends. Dividends accumulate semiannually to the extent not paid in cash on the last day of June and December. The Company recognized dividend income on this investment of $2.0 million and $1.9 million in the third quarters of 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $5.8 million and $5.4 million in the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. The dividend receivable was $36.0 million at September 24, 2011, and was recorded in other non-current assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable, other assets (non-derivatives), short-term borrowings and trade accounts payable approximate fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments. The following table presents the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company’s other financial instruments at September 24, 2011 and December 25, 2010. The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties.

Notes to Quarterly Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)—(Continued)

In establishing a fair value, there is a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The basis of the fair value measurement is categorized in three levels, in order of priority, described as follows:

Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or financial instruments for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly.

Level 3: Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable, thus reflecting assumptions about the market participants.

The carrying amounts shown in the table are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets under the indicated captions. The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments:

During the first nine months of 2011, there was no change in assets and liabilities measured at estimated fair value using Level 3 inputs.

Changes in foreign currency exchange rates expose the Company to financial market risk. The Company occasionally uses derivative financial instruments, such as forward exchange contracts, to manage its exposure associated with commercial transactions and certain liabilities that are denominated in a currency other than the currency of the operating unit entering into the underlying transaction. The Company does not enter into derivative instruments for any other purpose. The Company does not speculate using derivative instruments. The fair values of derivative financial instruments were not material at the end of the third quarter of 2011 or at the end of fiscal year 2010.

Notes to Quarterly Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)—(Continued)

The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. Federal jurisdiction, and multiple state and foreign jurisdictions. Years prior to 2006 are no longer subject to U.S. Federal income tax examination. The Company is no longer subject to state income tax examinations by tax authorities in its major state jurisdictions for years before 2003, and the Company is no longer subject to income tax examinations prior to 2005 for its major foreign jurisdictions.

As discussed in Note 4, “Timber Notes/Non-Recourse Debt,” at the time of the sale of the timberlands in 2004, we generated a tax gain and recognized the related deferred tax liability. The timber installment notes structure allowed the Company to defer the resulting tax liability of $543 million until 2020, the maturity date for the Installment Notes. Due to the Lehman bankruptcy and note defaults, the recognition of the Lehman portion of the gain will be triggered when the Lehman Guaranteed Installment Note is transferred to the Securitization Note holders as payment and/or when the Lehman bankruptcy is resolved. At that time, we expect to reduce the estimated tax payment due by utilizing our available alternative minimum tax credits.

As of September 24, 2011, the Company had $21.2 million of total gross unrecognized tax benefits, $7.1 million of which would affect the Company’s effective tax rate if recognized and would result from the effective settlement of tax positions with various tax authorities. The Company does not anticipate the settlement of these items to occur within the next twelve months.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:

During the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, the Company made cash payments for income taxes, net of refunds received, as follows:

Notes to Quarterly Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)—(Continued)

The following represents the components of net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit costs (income) which are recorded in operating, selling and general and administrative expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations:

The Company expects to fund the minimum pension contribution requirement for 2011 of approximately $3.7 million with cash. As of September 24, 2011, $2.5 million in cash has been contributed.

The Company manages its business using three reportable segments: Contract, Retail, and Corporate and Other. Management reviews the performance of the Company based on these segments.

Contract distributes a broad line of items for the office, including office supplies and paper, technology products and solutions, print and document services and office furniture. Contract sells directly to large corporate and government offices, as well as to small and medium-sized offices in the United States, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. This segment markets and sells through field salespeople, outbound telesales, catalogs, the Internet and in some markets, including Canada, Australia and New Zealand, through office products stores. Substantially all products sold by Contract are purchased from third-party manufacturers or industry wholesalers. Contract purchases office papers primarily from Boise White Paper, L.L.C., under a paper supply contract. See Note 15, “Commitments”, for information regarding the paper supply contract.

Notes to Quarterly Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)—(Continued)

Retail is a retail distributor of office supplies and paper, print and document services, technology products and solutions and office furniture. In addition, this segment contracts with large national retail chains to supply office and school supplies to be sold in their stores. Retail office supply stores feature OfficeMax ImPress, an in-store module devoted to print-for-pay and related services. Retail has operations in the United States, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. The retail segment also operates office products stores in Mexico through a 51%-owned joint venture. Substantially all products sold by Retail are purchased from third-party manufacturers or industry wholesalers. Retail purchases office papers primarily from Boise White Paper, L.L.C., under the paper supply contract described above.

Corporate and Other includes corporate support staff services and certain other legacy expenses as well as the related assets and liabilities. The income and expense related to certain assets and liabilities that are reported in the Corporate and Other segment have been allocated to the Contract and Retail segments.

Management evaluates the segments’ performances using segment income (loss) which is based on operating income (loss) after eliminating the effect of certain operating items that are not indicative of our core operations such as severances, facility closures and adjustments, and asset impairments. These certain operating items are reported on the other operating expenses, net line in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Interest expense, interest income, and other income (expense), net are not recorded by segments.

Notes to Quarterly Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)—(Continued)

The Company sponsors several share-based compensation plans. The Company recognizes compensation expense from all share-based payment transactions with employees in the consolidated financial statements based on grant date fair value. Pre-tax compensation expense related to the Company’s share-based plans was $3.6 million and $2.5 million for the third quarters of 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $12.3 million and $8.4 million for the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. Compensation expense is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of grants. The total income tax benefit recognized in the consolidated statement of operations for share-based compensation arrangements was $1.4 million and $1.0 million for the third quarters of 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $4.8 million and $3.3 million for the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, respectively.

The Company recognizes compensation expense related to restricted stock and Restricted Stock Unit (“RSU”) awards over the vesting periods based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the grant dates. The Company calculates the grant date fair value of the RSU awards by multiplying the number of RSU awards by the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date. If these awards contain performance criteria, the grant date fair value is estimated assuming performance at target, and management periodically reviews actual performance against the criteria and adjusts compensation expense accordingly. Pre-tax compensation expense related to restricted stock and RSU awards was $0.5 million and $1.7 million for the third quarters of 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $3.7 million and $5.1 million for the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. The remaining compensation expense to be recognized related to outstanding restricted stock and RSUs, net of estimated forfeitures, is approximately $3.2 million. The remaining compensation expense will be recognized through the second quarter of 2014.

A summary of restricted stock and RSU activity for the first nine months of 2011 is presented in the following table:

The Company’s stock options are issued at an exercise price equal to fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the grant date and typically expire within seven years of the grant date. Stock options granted under the OfficeMax Incentive and Performance Plan generally vest over a three year period. The grant date fair value used to calculate compensation expense related to stock option awards is based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Pre-tax compensation expense related to stock option awards was $3.1 million and $0.8 million for the third quarters of 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $8.6 million and $3.3 million for the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. The remaining compensation expense to be recognized related to outstanding stock options net of estimated forfeitures is approximately $11.2 million. The majority of the remaining compensation expense will be recognized through the second quarter of 2014.

Notes to Quarterly Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)—(Continued)

A summary of stock option activity for the first nine months of 2011 is presented in the following table:

The following table provides summarized information about stock options outstanding at September 24, 2011:

At September 24, 2011, the aggregate intrinsic value was $0.1 million for outstanding stock options and $0.1 million for exercisable stock options. The aggregate intrinsic value represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (i.e., the difference between the Company’s closing stock price on the last trading day of the third quarter of 2011 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money stock options at the end of the quarter).

During the first nine months of 2011, the Company granted stock options for 1,227,280 shares of our common stock and estimated the fair value of each stock option award on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 2.00%, expected life of 4.5 years and expected stock price volatility of 64.89%. The risk-free interest rate assumptions are based on the applicable Treasury bill rates over the stock options’ expected lives; the expected life assumptions are based on the time period stock options are expected to be outstanding based on historical experience; and the expected stock price volatility assumptions are based on the historical and implied volatility of the Company’s common stock.

Notes to Quarterly Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)—(Continued)

The following table reflects changes in shareholders’ equity and noncontrolling interest for the first nine months of 2011.

In accordance with an amended and restated joint venture agreement, the minority owner of Grupo OfficeMax, our joint-venture in Mexico, can elect to require OfficeMax to purchase the minority owner’s 49% interest in the joint venture if certain earnings targets are achieved. Earnings targets are calculated quarterly on a rolling four-quarter basis. Accordingly, the targets may be achieved in one quarter but not in the next. If the earnings targets are achieved and the minority owner elects to require OfficeMax to purchase the minority owner’s interest, the purchase price is based on the joint venture’s earnings and the current market multiples of similar companies. At the end of the third quarter of 2011, Grupo OfficeMax met the earnings targets and the estimated purchase price was $28.5 million. The decrease in the estimated purchase price from the second quarter is attributable to lower market multiples for similar companies as of the measurement date. As the estimated purchase price was less than the carrying value of the noncontrolling interest as of the end of the third quarter, the Company reduced the noncontrolling interest to the carrying value, with the offset recorded to additional paid-in capital. There is no impairment relating to the assets of the joint venture as the estimated future cash flows support the overall carrying value of its assets.

Notes to Quarterly Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)—(Continued)

Basic net income per share is calculated using net income available to holders of our common stock divided by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the year. Diluted net income per share is similar to basic net income per share except that the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding is increased to include, if their inclusion is dilutive, the number of additional shares of common stock that would have been outstanding assuming the issuance of all potentially dilutive shares, such as common stock to be issued upon exercise of options and the vesting of non-vested restricted shares, and the conversion of outstanding preferred stock. Net income per common share was determined by dividing net income, as adjusted, by weighted average shares outstanding as follows:

Notes to Quarterly Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)—(Continued)

During the second quarter of 2011, we entered into a new paper supply contract with Boise White Paper, L.L.C. (“Boise”), under which we have agreed to purchase office papers from Boise, and Boise has agreed to supply office papers to us, subject to the terms and conditions of the paper supply contract. The new paper supply contract replaced the previous supply contract executed in 2004 with Boise.

The paper supply contract requires us to purchase from Boise and Boise to sell to us virtually all of our North American requirements for office paper, subject to certain conditions. After 2012, the paper supply contract provides us more flexibility to purchase paper from paper producers other than Boise. The paper supply contract’s term will expire on December 31, 2017, followed by a gradual reduction of the Company’s purchase requirements over a two year period thereafter. However, if certain circumstances occur, the term may be terminated earlier, beginning as early as December 31, 2012. If the term ends December 31, 2012, it will be followed by a gradual reduction of the Company’s purchase requirements over a four year period. If the term ends on a later date, the gradual reduction period will last two years.

The following discussion contains statements about our future financial performance. These statements are only predictions. Our actual results may differ materially from these predictions. In evaluating these statements, you should review “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of our annual report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 25, 2010, including “Cautionary and Forward-Looking Statements.”

Sales for the third quarter of 2011 decreased 2.1% year-over-year to $1,774.8 million, while sales of $5,285.4 million for the first nine months of 2011 decreased 1.8% year-over-year. On a local currency basis, sales for the third quarter of 2011 declined 4.0% compared to the third quarter of 2010 and sales for the first nine months of 2011 declined 3.6% compared to the first nine months of 2010. In our segments, for the third quarter of 2011 compared to the third quarter of 2010, Retail sales declined while Contract sales increased (Contract sales declined 2.6% on a local currency basis). Gross profit margin of 25.9% of sales in the third quarter of 2011 was flat compared to the third quarter of 2010 as higher customer margins were offset by increased delivery and freight expenses due to higher fuel costs. In the first nine months of 2011, gross profit margin declined 0.4% of sales (40 basis points) to 25.7% of sales compared to the same period of 2010 due to increased delivery and freight expenses from higher fuel costs, an unfavorable mix shift and higher import duties associated with purchases in prior periods. Operating, selling and general and administrative expenses decreased $11.1 million and $2.5 million for the third quarter and the first nine months of 2011, respectively. Both periods were impacted by lower incentive compensation and advertising expenses, as well as lower store fixture and equipment-related costs, which were partially offset by the impact of foreign currency exchange rates in our international operations (approximately $8 million and $21 million for the third quarter and first nine months of 2011, respectively) and the impact of favorable sales/use tax settlements recorded in the third quarter of 2010. In addition, the first nine months of 2010 were also impacted by a favorable legal settlement, while the first nine months of 2011 were also impacted by unfavorable trends in health and workers’ compensation benefits. Incentive compensation expense was $20.4 million lower in the third quarter of 2011 than the third quarter of 2010 and $39.0 million lower in the first nine months of 2011 than in the first nine months of 2010. We reported operating income of $41.3 million and $73.9 million for the third quarter and first nine months of 2011, respectively, compared to operating income of $40.9 million and $118.4 million for the third quarter of 2010 and the first nine months of 2010, respectively.

As noted in the discussion and analysis that follows, our operating results in certain applicable periods were impacted by significant items such as charges for store closures and severance, as well as favorable adjustments to legacy reserves. These items were recorded in other operating expenses, net. If we eliminate these items, of which there were none in the third quarters of 2011 and 2010, our adjusted operating income was $87.8 million for the first nine months of 2011 and $129.7 million for the first nine months of 2010.

The reported net income available to OfficeMax common shareholders was $21.5 million, or $0.25 per diluted share, in the third quarter of 2011 compared to $20.0 million, or $0.23 per diluted share, in the third quarter of 2010. The reported net income available to OfficeMax common shareholders was $29.9 million, or $0.34 per diluted share, in the first nine months of 2011 compared to $56.5 million, or $0.65 per diluted share, in the first nine months of 2010. If we eliminate the impact of the significant items described above, our adjusted net income available to OfficeMax common shareholders was $38.9 million, or $0.45 per diluted share, for the first nine months of 2011 and $63.5 million, or $0.73 per diluted share, for the first nine months of 2010.

In addition to assessing our operating performance as reported under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), we evaluate our results of operations before non-operating legacy items and certain operating items that are not indicative of our core operating activities such as severance, facility closures and adjustments, and asset impairments. We believe our presentation of financial measures before, or excluding, these items, which are non-GAAP measures, enhances our investors’ overall understanding of our recurring operational performance and provides useful information to both investors and management to evaluate the ongoing operations and prospects of OfficeMax by providing better comparisons. Whenever we use non-GAAP financial measures, we designate these measures as “adjusted” and provide a reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measures to the most closely applicable GAAP financial measure. Investors are encouraged to review the related GAAP financial measures and the reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to their most directly comparable GAAP financial measure. In the following tables, we reconcile our non-GAAP financial measures to our reported GAAP financial results.

Although we believe the non-GAAP financial measures enhance an investor’s understanding of our performance, our management does not itself, nor does it suggest that investors should, consider such non-GAAP financial measures in isolation from, or as a substitute for, financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP. The non-GAAP financial measures we use may not be consistent with the presentation of similar companies in our industry. However, we present such non-GAAP financial measures in reporting our financial results to provide investors with an additional tool to evaluate our operating results in a manner that focuses on what we believe to be our ongoing business operations.

These items are described in more detail in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

At the end of the third quarter of 2011, we had $485.4 million in cash and cash equivalents and $557.9 million in available (unused) borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facilities. The combination of cash and cash equivalents and available borrowing capacity yields $1,043.3 million of overall liquidity. At the end of the third quarter of 2011, we had outstanding recourse debt of $270.0 million (both current and long-term) and non-recourse obligations of $1,470.0 million related to the timber securitization notes. There is no recourse against OfficeMax on the securitized timber notes payable as recourse is limited to proceeds from the applicable pledged installment notes receivable and underlying guarantees. There were no borrowings on our revolving credit facilities during the first nine months in 2011.

For the first nine months of 2011, operations provided $78.7 million of cash with the majority realized in the third quarter. Capital expenditures for the first nine months of 2011 totaled $41.4 million and included systems and infrastructure investments.

We continue to experience lower sales as a result of the difficult macroeconomic environment. Based on these trends, we anticipate that total company sales for the fourth quarter of 2011 will be slightly higher than the fourth quarter of 2010, including the favorable impact of foreign currency translation and the benefit of the additional fiscal week in the fourth quarter of 2011. For the full year 2011, we anticipate that total company sales will be slightly lower than the prior year, including the favorable impact of foreign currency translation and the benefit of the additional fiscal week in the fourth quarter of 2011. Additionally, OfficeMax anticipates that for both the fourth quarter and full year 2011, the adjusted operating income margin rate will be in line with the 1.7% rate for the first nine months of 2011. We anticipate capital expenditures for the full year of 2011 to be approximately $75 million, primarily related to technology, ecommerce and infrastructure investments and upgrades. In addition, we expect cash flow from operations to be in excess of capital expenditures for the full year of 2011.

Gross profit margin of 25.9% of sales in the third quarter of 2011 was flat compared to the third quarter of 2010 as higher customer margins were offset by increased delivery and freight expenses due to higher fuel costs. Gross profit margin of 25.7% of sales in the first nine months of 2011 decreased 0.4% of sales (40 basis points) compared to the same period of 2010 due to increased delivery and freight expenses resulting from higher fuel costs, lower customer margins, an unfavorable mix shift and higher import duties associated with purchases in prior periods.

Operating, selling and general and administrative expenses decreased $11.1 million and $2.5 million for the third quarter and the first nine months of 2011, respectively. As a percentage of sales, operating, selling and general and administrative expenses were flat in the third quarter of 2011 compared to the third quarter of 2010 and increased 0.3% of sales to 24.0% of sales in the first nine months of 2011 from 23.7% of sales in the first nine months of 2010, as the expense reductions were not enough to offset the delevering impact of the lower sales. Decreases in the operating, selling and general and administrative expenses occurred in all segments for the third quarter of 2011 and were the result of lower incentive compensation and advertising expenses, as well as lower store fixture and equipment-related costs, which were partially offset by the impact of foreign currency exchange rates in our international operations (approximately $8 million) and the impact of favorable sales/use tax settlements recorded in the third quarter of 2010. Operating, selling and general and administrative expenses decreased, on a local currency basis, for the first nine months of 2011 in all segments, as lower incentive compensation expense, lower store fixture and equipment-related costs and lower advertising expenses, were partially offset by the impact of favorable legal and tax settlements recorded in the first nine months of 2010 and the impact of unfavorable trends in health and workers’ compensation benefits. The impact of foreign currency exchange rates in our international operations increased operating, selling and general and administrative expenses by approximately $21 million for the first nine months of 2011, primarily in our Contract segment, resulting in an increase in Contract segment operating, selling and general and administrative expenses in U.S. dollars for the first nine months of 2011. Incentive compensation expense was $20.4 million lower in the third quarter of 2011 than the third quarter of 2010 and $39.0 million lower in the first nine months of 2011 than in the first nine months of 2010.

As noted above, our results for the first nine months of 2011 and 2010 include several significant items, as follows:

Interest income was $11.0 million and $10.6 million for the third quarters of 2011 and 2010, respectively. For the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, interest income was $32.9 million and $31.9 million, respectively.

Interest expense was $17.8 million in the third quarter of 2011 compared to $18.4 million in the third quarter of 2010 and was $54.7 million in the first nine months of 2011 compared to $55.1 million in the first nine months of 2010.

For the third quarter of 2011, we recognized income tax expense of $11.1 million on pre-tax income of $34.6 million (effective tax expense rate of 32.3%) compared to income tax expense of $11.7 million on pre-tax income of $33.1 million (effective tax expense rate of 35.3%) for the third quarter of 2010. For the first nine months of 2011, we recognized income tax expense of $17.8 million on pre-tax income of $52.4 million (effective tax expense rate of 34.0%) compared to income tax expense of $34.4 million on pre-tax income of $95.1 million (effective tax expense rate of 36.2%) for the first nine months of 2010. The effective tax rate in both years was impacted by the effects of state income taxes, income items not subject to tax, non-deductible expenses and the mix of domestic and foreign sources of income.

We reported net income attributable to OfficeMax and noncontrolling interest of $23.5 million and $34.6 million for the third quarter and the first nine months of 2011, respectively. After adjusting for joint venture earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest and preferred dividends, we reported net income available to OfficeMax common shareholders of $21.5 million, or $0.25 per diluted share, for the third quarter and $29.9 million, or $0.34 per diluted share, for the first nine months of 2011, respectively. Adjusted net income available to OfficeMax common shareholders, as discussed above, was $38.9 million, or $0.45 per diluted share, for the first nine months of 2011 compared to $63.5 million, or $0.73 per diluted share, for the first nine months of 2010.

We report our results using three reportable segments: Contract; Retail; and Corporate and Other.

Our Contract segment distributes a broad line of items for the office, including office supplies and paper, technology products and solutions, office furniture and print and document services. Contract sells directly to large corporate and government offices, as well as to small and medium-sized offices in the United States, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. This segment markets and sells through field salespeople, outbound telesales, catalogs, the Internet and in some markets, including Canada, Australia and New Zealand, through office products stores.

Our Retail segment is a retail distributor of office supplies and paper, print and document services, technology products and solutions and office furniture. In addition, this segment contracts with large national retail chains to supply office and school supplies to be sold in their stores. Our retail office supply stores feature OfficeMax ImPress, an in-store module devoted to print-for-pay and related services. Retail has operations in the United States, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Retail also operates office products stores in Mexico through a 51%-owned joint venture.

Our Corporate and Other segment includes support staff services and certain other legacy expenses as well as the related assets and liabilities. The income and expense related to certain assets and liabilities that are reported in the Corporate and Other segment have been allocated to the Contract and Retail segments.

Management evaluates the segments’ performances using segment income which is based on operating income after eliminating the effect of certain operating items that are not indicative of our core operations such as severances, facility closures and adjustments, and asset impairments. These certain operating items are reported on the other operating expenses, net line in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Contract segment sales for the third quarter of 2011 of $883.3 million increased 0.7% compared to sales of $877.3 million for the third quarter of 2010. For the first nine months of 2011, sales decreased 1.2% to $2,689.3 million from $2,720.8 million for the first nine months of 2010. Contract segment sales decreased 2.6% and 4.1%, on a local currency basis, for the third quarter and first nine months of 2011, respectively. U.S. Contract sales decreased 2.4% in the third quarter of 2011 which was a slight improvement from the decline in the second quarter of 2011 as the increased favorable impact of sales to newly acquired customers outpacing the reduction in sales due to lost customers was mostly offset by a larger percentage decline in sales to existing customers, including a significant decline in sales to the U.S. federal government. International sales increased 7.7% in the third quarter of 2011, but declined 3.0% on a local currency basis in the third quarter of 2011 compared to declines of 5.5% and 7.4% on a local currency basis in the second and first quarters of 2011, respectively. The declines are the result of decreased sales to existing customers and several large customers that were not retained in both Canada and Australia.

Contract segment gross profit margin decreased 0.1% of sales (10 basis points) to 22.7% of sales for the third quarter of 2011 and 0.3% of sales (30 basis points) to 22.4% for the first nine months of 2011 compared to the same periods of 2010. Gross profit margin declines occurred in our U.S. Contract business for both the third quarter and first nine months of 2011 and in our international Contract businesses for the first nine months of 2011. The gross profit margin declines for the third quarter of 2011 were the result of higher delivery expenses from increased fuel costs and slightly lower customer margins in the U.S., which were partially offset by higher international customer margins. The gross profit margin declines for first nine months of 2011 were the result of lower international customer margins due to increased competitive market conditions in Canada in the first half of the year and higher delivery expenses from increased fuel costs, which were partially offset by lower inventory shrinkage expense and lower occupancy expense.

As a percentage of sales, Contract segment operating, selling and general and administrative expenses decreased 0.5% of sales to 20.1% of sales for the third quarter of 2011 from 20.6% of sales in the third quarter of 2010. Contract segment operating, selling and general and administrative expenses for the third quarter of 2011 decreased $2.8 million from the third quarter of 2010, primarily due to lower incentive compensation expense ($6.6 million) and lower advertising expenses which were partially offset by the unfavorable impact of foreign currency exchange rates (approximately $7 million). For the first nine months of 2011, Contract segment

operating, selling and general and administrative expenses increased 0.6% of sales to 20.6% of sales from 20.0% of sales for the first nine months of 2010. This was a $6.9 million increase reflecting the unfavorable impact of foreign currency exchange rates (approximately $19 million), offset by lower incentive compensation expense ($15.2 million) and lower payroll expense.

Contract segment income was $23.3 million, or 2.6% of sales, and $19.5 million, or 2.2% of sales, for the third quarters of 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $49.7 million, or 1.8% of sales, and $72.6 million, or 2.7% of sales, for the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. The decrease in segment income for both periods was attributable to the lower sales and lower gross margin rates, which were partially offset by the lower incentive compensation expense. Additionally, operating, selling and general and administrative expenses were lower in the third quarter, benefiting segment income, but higher for the first nine months, unfavorably impacting segment income.

Retail segment sales decreased 4.8% (5.3% on a local currency basis) to $891.5 million for the third quarter of 2011 and decreased 2.5% (3.0% on a local currency basis) to $2,596.1 million for the first nine months of 2011 reflecting challenging economic conditions, an increased competitive environment and a significant decline in certain technology categories. Same-store sales declined by 4.3% in the third quarter of 2011 which included a U.S. same-store sales decline of 5.8% partially offset by an 8.2% same-store sales increase in Mexico on a local currency basis. The U.S. same-store sales decline reflected weaker back-to-school sales characterized by continued weakness in store traffic and slightly lower average ticket. We ended the third quarter of 2011 with 983 stores. In the U.S., we closed four retail stores during the third quarter of 2011 (eighteen during the first nine months of 2011) and opened none, ending the quarter with 900 retail stores, while Grupo OfficeMax, our majority-owned joint venture in Mexico, opened four stores during the first nine months of 2011, all in the third quarter, ending the quarter with 83 retail stores.

Retail segment gross profit margin increased 0.1% of sales (10 basis points) to 29.0% of sales for the third quarter of 2011 compared to 28.9% of sales for the previous year, reflecting increases in both the U.S. and Mexico, and decreased 0.3% of sales (30 basis points) to 29.2% of sales for the first nine months of 2011 from 29.5% of sales for the first nine months of 2010, reflecting declines in both the U.S. and Mexico. The gross profit margin increases for the third quarter of 2011 were the result of higher customer margins in both the U.S. and Mexico helped by a mix shift to the supplies category, which were partially offset by higher delivery and freight expenses from increased fuel costs as well as occupancy expenses, which were lower but delevered due to the decreased sales. The gross profit margin declines for the first nine months of 2011 were the result of lower customer margins in Mexico, higher freight expense from increased fuel costs and lower occupancy expenses that delevered due to the decreased sales, all of which were partially offset by higher customer margins in the U.S.

Retail segment operating, selling and general and administrative expenses increased 0.4% of sales to 25.8% of sales for the third quarter of 2011 and increased 0.5% to 26.8% of sales for the first nine months of 2011, due to the deleveraging impact of lower sales. Retail segment operating, selling and general and administrative expenses decreased $7.8 million for the third quarter of 2011 compared to the third quarter of 2010 as lower incentive compensation expense ($12.3 million), lower advertising expenses and lower store fixture and equipment-related costs were partially offset by the impact of favorable sales/use tax settlements recorded in the third quarter of 2010. Retail segment operating, selling and general and administrative expenses decreased $5.4 million for the first nine months of 2011 compared to the first nine months of 2010 as lower incentive compensation expenses ($21.4 million), lower store fixture and equipment-related costs and lower advertising expenses, were partially offset by the impact of favorable legal and tax settlements recorded in the first nine months of 2010, higher payroll expenses and the impact of unfavorable trends in health and workers’ compensation benefits.

Retail segment income was $28.5 million, or 3.2% of sales, for the third quarter of 2011, compared to $32.4 million, or 3.5% of sales, for the third quarter of 2010. Retail segment income was $62.1 million, or 2.4% of sales, for the first nine months of 2011, compared to $85.1 million, or 3.2% of sales, for the first nine months of 2010. The decrease in segment income for both periods was attributable to the lower sales. Gross profit margins improved in the third quarter of 2011 compared to the third quarter of 2010, but declined for the first nine months of 2011 compared to the first nine months of 2010, as the third quarter improvement was not enough to offset the large decline in the first quarter. Sales and income from our Mexican joint venture were improved for the third quarter and the first nine months of 2011 compared to the same periods of 2010.

Corporate and Other segment loss was $10.5 million and $24.0 million for the third quarter and first nine months of 2011, respectively, compared to $11.0 million and $28.0 million for the third quarter and first nine months of 2010, respectively. For both periods of 2011, reduced incentive compensation expense ($1.5 million and $2.4 million for the third quarter and first nine months of 2011, respectively) was partially offset by increased pension expense. In addition, the first nine months of 2011 included $3.8 million of income related to a non-recurring, favorable adjustment in the cash surrender value of our company-owned life insurance policies recorded in the first quarter of 2011.

At the end of the third quarter of 2011, the total liquidity available for OfficeMax was $1,043.3 million. This includes cash and cash equivalents of $485.4 million and borrowing availability of $557.9 million. The borrowing availability included $459.7 million and $41.3 million relating to our U.S. and Canadian revolving credit agreements, respectively, as well as $56.9 million relating to our credit agreement associated with our subsidiaries in Australia and New Zealand. At the end of the third quarter of 2011, the Company was in compliance with all covenants under the three credit agreements. The U.S. and Canadian credit agreements were

scheduled to expire on July 12, 2012 and subsequent to the end of the third quarter were amended and consolidated into a single North American credit agreement, which will expire on October 7, 2016. The credit agreement associated with our subsidiaries in Australia and New Zealand expires on March 15, 2013. At the end of the third quarter of 2011, we had $270.0 million of short-term and long-term debt and $1,470.0 million of non-recourse timber securitization notes outstanding.

Our primary ongoing cash requirements relate to working capital, expenditures for property and equipment, technology enhancements and upgrades, lease obligations, pension funding and debt service. We expect to fund these requirements through a combination of available cash balance and cash flow from operations. We also have revolving credit facilities as additional liquidity if needed. The following sections of this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations discuss in more detail our operating, investing, and financing activities, as well as our financing arrangements.

Our operating activities provided cash of $78.7 million in the first nine months of 2011 compared to $156.0 million in the first nine months of 2010. Cash from operations for the first nine months of 2011 was lower than for the first nine months of the prior year primarily reflecting a lower level of earnings and the unfavorable working capital impact from a significantly reduced accrual for incentive compensation expense. Inventory levels were reduced from year end due to the seasonality of our business, while the ratio of payables to inventory remained consistent with the prior year end ratio. Receivables increased due to increased promotional activity in collaboration with our vendors. In addition, cash from operations in the first nine months of 2011 and 2010 included the impact of approximately $54 million and $58 million, respectively, of incentive compensation payments made associated with the achievement of incentive plan performance targets for 2010 and 2009, respectively.

We sponsor noncontributory defined benefit pension plans covering certain terminated employees, vested employees, retirees, and some active employees, primarily in Contract. Pension expense was $3.2 million and $1.7 million for the third quarters of 2011 and 2010, respectively and $8.1 million and $5.4 million for the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. In the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, we made contributions to our pension plans totaling $2.5 million and $2.6 million, respectively. For the full year, the estimated minimum required funding contribution is approximately $3.7 million and the expense is projected to be approximately $10.8 million. We intend to fully fund our qualified defined benefit plans over the next several years.

Capital spending for the first nine months of 2011 was $41.5 million, compared to $50.2 million for the first nine months of 2010, and consisted of information systems software enhancements, leasehold improvements and replacement maintenance, as well as spending on new stores to be opened later in the year in Mexico. We expect our capital investments in 2011 to be approximately $75.0 million primarily for maintenance and investment in our systems, infrastructure and growth and profitability initiatives.

Our financing activities used cash of $11.3 million in the first nine months of 2011 compared to $7.7 million in the first nine months of 2010. The increase was primarily associated with share-based compensation awards.

Our debt structure consists of credit agreements, note agreements, and other borrowings as described below. For more information, see the “Contractual Obligations” and “Disclosures of Financial Market Risks” sections of this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

On July 12, 2007, we entered into an Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement (the “U.S. Credit Agreement”) with a group of banks. The U.S. Credit Agreement permitted us to borrow up to a maximum of $700 million subject to a borrowing base calculation that limited availability to a percentage of eligible accounts receivable plus a percentage of the value of eligible inventory less certain reserves. The U.S. Credit Agreement could be increased (up to a maximum of $800 million) at our request or reduced from time to time, in each case according to the terms detailed in the U.S. Credit Agreement. There were no borrowings outstanding under our U.S. Credit Agreement at the end of the third quarter of 2011, and there were no borrowings outstanding under this facility during the first nine months of 2011. Letters of credit, which could be issued under the U.S. Credit Agreement up to a maximum of $250 million, reduced available borrowing capacity. Stand-by letters of credit issued under the U.S. Credit Agreement totaled $52.0 million at the end of the third quarter of 2011. At the end of the third quarter of 2011, the maximum aggregate borrowing amount available under the U.S. Credit Agreement was $511.7 million and availability under the U.S. Credit Agreement totaled $459.7 million. The U.S. Credit Agreement allowed the payment of dividends, subject to availability restrictions and if no default had occurred. At the end of the third quarter of 2011, we were in compliance with all covenants under the U.S. Credit Agreement. The U.S. Credit Agreement, which was scheduled to expire on July 12, 2012, was amended by a new agreement on October 7, 2011, as discussed below.

On September 30, 2009, Grand & Toy Limited, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary in Canada, entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the “Canadian Credit Agreement”) with a group of banks. The Canadian Credit Agreement permitted Grand & Toy Limited to borrow up to a maximum of C$60 million subject to a borrowing base calculation that limited availability to a percentage of eligible accounts receivable plus a percentage of the value of eligible inventory less certain reserves. The Canadian Credit Agreement could be increased (up to a maximum of C$80 million) at Grand & Toy Limited’s request or reduced from time to time, in each case according to the terms detailed in the Canadian Credit Agreement. There were no borrowings outstanding under the facility at the end of the third quarter of 2011, and there were no borrowings outstanding under this facility during the first nine months of 2011. Letters of credit, which could be issued under the Canadian Credit Agreement up to a maximum of C$10 million, reduced available borrowing capacity. There were no letters of credit outstanding under the Canadian Credit Agreement at the end of the third quarter of 2011. The maximum aggregate borrowing amount available under the Canadian Credit Agreement was $41.3 million (C$43.0 million) at the end of the third quarter of 2011. Grand & Toy Limited was in compliance with all covenants under the Canadian Credit Agreement at the end of the third quarter of 2011. The Canadian Credit Agreement, which was scheduled to expire on July 12, 2012, was amended by a new agreement on October 7, 2011 as discussed below.

On March 15, 2010, the Company’s five wholly-owned subsidiaries based in Australia and New Zealand entered into a Facility Agreement (the “Australia/New Zealand Credit Agreement”) with a financial institution based in those countries. The Australia/New Zealand Credit Agreement permits the subsidiaries in Australia and New Zealand to borrow up to a maximum of A$80 million subject to a borrowing base calculation that limits availability to a percentage of eligible accounts receivable plus a percentage of the value of certain owned properties, less certain reserves. There were no borrowings outstanding under the facility at the end of the third quarter of 2011, and there were no borrowings outstanding under this facility during the first nine months of 2011. The maximum aggregate borrowing amount available under the Australia/New Zealand Credit Agreement was $56.9 million (A$58.3 million) at the end of the third quarter of 2011. At the end of the third quarter of 2011, the subsidiaries in Australia and New Zealand were in compliance with all covenants under the Australia/New Zealand Credit Agreement. The Australia/New Zealand Credit Agreement expires on March 15, 2013.

On October 7, 2011, we entered into a Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement (the “North American Credit Agreement”) with a group of banks. The North American Credit Agreement amended the U.S. Credit Agreement and the Canadian Credit Agreement and consolidated them into a single credit agreement. The North American Credit Agreement permits us to borrow up to a maximum of $650 million, of

which $50 million (U.S. dollars) is allocated to Grand & Toy Limited, and $600 million is allocated to the Company and its other participating North American subsidiaries, subject to a borrowing base calculation that limits availability to a percentage of eligible trade and credit card receivables plus a percentage of the value of eligible inventory less certain reserves. The North American Credit Agreement may be increased (up to a maximum of $850 million) at our request and the approval of the lenders participating in the increase, or may be reduced from time to time at our request, in each case according to the terms detailed in the North American Credit Agreement. Letters of credit, which may be issued under the North American Credit Agreement up to a maximum of $250 million, reduce available borrowing capacity. The North American Credit Agreement expires on October 7, 2016 and allows the payment of dividends, subject to availability restrictions and if no default has occurred. If the North American Credit Agreement had been in effect at the end of the third quarter of 2011, the maximum aggregate borrowing amount available under the North American Credit Agreement would have been $618.6 million and, after deducting the $52.0 million of outstanding letters of credit, availability under the North American Credit Agreement would have been $566.6 million.

In October 2004, we sold our timberland assets in exchange for $15 million in cash plus credit-enhanced timber installment notes in the amount of $1,635 million (the “Installment Notes”). The Installment Notes were issued by single-member limited liability companies formed by affiliates of Boise Cascade, L.L.C (the “Note Issuers”). In order to support the Installment Notes, the Note Issuers transferred $1,635 million in cash to Lehman and Wachovia Corporation (“Wachovia”) ($817.5 million to each of Lehman and Wachovia) who issued collateral notes to the Note Issuers and guarantees on the performance of the Installment Notes. In December 2004, we completed a securitization transaction in which the Company’s interests in the Installment Notes and related guarantees were transferred to wholly-owned bankruptcy remote subsidiaries. The subsidiaries pledged the Installment Notes and related guarantees and issued securitized notes (the “Securitization Notes”) in the amount of $1,470 million. Recourse on the Securitization Notes is limited to the proceeds from the applicable pledged Installment Notes and underlying Lehman or Wachovia guaranty. As a result, there is no recourse against OfficeMax, and the Securitization Notes have been reported as non-recourse debt in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

On September 15, 2008, Lehman filed for bankruptcy. Lehman’s bankruptcy filing constituted an event of default under the $817.5 million Installment Note guaranteed by Lehman (the “Lehman Guaranteed Installment Note”). We are required for accounting purposes to assess the carrying value of assets whenever circumstances indicate that a decline in value may have occurred. After evaluating the situation, we concluded in late October 2008 that as a result of the Lehman bankruptcy, it was probable that we would be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the Lehman Guaranteed Installment Note. Accordingly, we evaluated the carrying value of the Lehman Guaranteed Installment Note and reduced it to the estimated amount we then expected to collect ($81.8 million) by recording a non-cash impairment charge of $735.8 million, pre-tax, in the third quarter of 2008.

Measuring impairment of a loan requires judgment and estimates, and the eventual outcome may differ from our estimate by a material amount. The Lehman Guaranteed Installment Note has been pledged as collateral for the related Securitization Notes, and therefore it may not freely be transferred to any party other than the Indenture Trustee. Accordingly, the ultimate amount to be realized on the Lehman Guaranteed Installment Note depends on the proceeds from the Lehman bankruptcy estate. On June 30, 2011, Lehman filed an amended Disclosure Statement on its Chapter 11 Plan with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York. The Disclosure Statement provides a range of estimated recoveries for various classes of unsecured creditors of Lehman. Based on the category descriptions, we, together with the Indenture Trustee, argued at a hearing on the Disclosure Statement that our claim should be treated as a class 3 senior unsecured claim (estimated to recover at a rate of approximately 21.1% under the Chapter 11 Plan) rather than falling into any other class of guarantee claims (estimated to recover at a rate of approximately 11%-13% depending on the class under the Chapter 11 Plan). Following negotiation, on October 7, 2011, we entered into a

stipulation with Lehman and the Indenture Trustee that categorized our claim as a class 3 senior unsecured claim. Due to this categorization, provisions of the stipulation that make certain funds unavailable to our claim that would otherwise be available to class 3 senior unsecured claimants, the status of the bankruptcy proceedings, and based on information in the Disclosure Statement, it appears that our claim may recover at a potential rate within the range of 17% to 20%. However, uncertainties exist as to the actual recovery that will ultimately be received on the claim. The confirmation of the Chapter 11 Plan is not expected to occur until the next Bankruptcy court hearing, currently scheduled for December 6, 2011; the disposition of our claim and a related claim filed by the Note Issuers must be determined; and the funds available for claimants will depend on the value of the assets Lehman is able to liquidate. Due to these uncertainties and other factors, we have not increased our assumed recovery rate or the carrying value of the Lehman Guaranteed Installment Note. Following the confirmation hearing on the Chapter 11 Plan scheduled for December 6, 2011, an initial distribution may be made on our claim as early as March 30, 2012, assuming that all other issues in the claim have been resolved prior to or at the confirmation hearing. Further distributions are expected to occur over a several-year period. Going forward, we intend to adjust the carrying value of the Lehman Guaranteed Installment Note as further information regarding our share of the proceeds, if any, from the Lehman bankruptcy estate becomes available. Any proceeds we receive from the bankruptcy will be distributed to the Securitization Noteholders.

Recourse on the Securitization Notes is limited to the proceeds from the applicable pledged Installment Notes and underlying Lehman or Wachovia guaranty. Accordingly, the Lehman Guaranteed Installment Note and underlying Lehman guaranty will be transferred to the holders of the Securitization Notes guaranteed by Lehman in order to settle and extinguish that liability. However, under current generally accepted accounting principles, we are required to continue to recognize the liability related to the Securitization Notes guaranteed by Lehman until such time as the liability has been extinguished. This will occur when the Lehman Guaranteed Installment Note and the related guaranty are transferred to and accepted by the Securitization Noteholders. We expect that this will occur when the assets of Lehman are currently projected to be distributed and the bankruptcy finalized. Accordingly, we expect to recognize a non-cash gain equal to the difference between the carrying amount of the Securitization Notes guaranteed by Lehman ($735.0 million at September 24, 2011) and the carrying value of the Lehman Guaranteed Installment Note ($81.8 million at September 24, 2011) in a later period when the liability is legally extinguished. The actual gain to be recognized in the future will be measured based on the carrying amounts of the Lehman Guaranteed Installment Note and the Securitization Notes guaranteed by Lehman at the date of settlement.

At the time of the sale of our timberland assets in 2004, we generated a significant tax gain. As the timber installment notes structure allowed the Company to defer the resulting tax liability of $543 million until 2020, the maturity date for the Installment Notes, we recognized a deferred tax liability related to this gain in connection with the sale. The recognition of the Lehman portion of the tax gain will be triggered when the Lehman Guaranteed Installment Note is transferred to the Securitization Noteholders as payment and/or when the Lehman bankruptcy is resolved. In estimating the cash taxes, we will consider our available alternative minimum tax credits to reduce the net tax payments.

Through September 24, 2011, we have received all payments due under the Installment Notes guaranteed by Wachovia (the “Wachovia Guaranteed Installment Notes”), which have consisted only of interest due on the notes, and have made all payments due on the related Securitization Notes guaranteed by Wachovia, again consisting only of interest due. As all amounts due on the Wachovia Guaranteed Installment Notes are current, and we have no reason to believe that we will not collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the Wachovia Guaranteed Installment Notes, the notes are stated in our Consolidated Balance Sheet at their original principal amount of $817.5 million. Wachovia was acquired by Wells Fargo & Company in a stock

transaction in 2008. An additional adverse impact on our financial results presentation could occur if Wells Fargo became unable to perform its obligations under the Wachovia Guaranteed Installment Notes, thereby resulting in a significant impairment impact.

The pledged Installment Notes and Securitization Notes are scheduled to mature in 2020 and 2019, respectively. The Securitization Notes have an initial term that is approximately three months shorter than the Installment Notes. We expect that if the Securitization Notes are still outstanding in 2019, we will refinance them with a short-term borrowing to bridge the period from initial maturity of the Securitization Notes to the maturity of the Installment Notes.

For information regarding contractual obligations, see the caption “Contractual Obligations” in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 25, 2010. At September 24, 2011, there had not been a material change to the information regarding contractual obligations disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 25, 2010.

For information regarding off-balance-sheet activities and guarantees, see “Off-Balance-Sheet Activities and Guarantees” in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 25, 2010. At September 24, 2011, there had not been a material change to the information regarding off-balance-sheet activities and guarantees disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 25, 2010.

Our business is seasonal, with Retail showing a more pronounced seasonal trend than Contract. Sales in the second quarter are historically the slowest of the year. Sales are stronger during the first, third and fourth quarters which include the important new-year office supply restocking month of January, the back-to-school period and the holiday selling season, respectively.

Our debt is predominantly fixed-rate. At September 24, 2011, the estimated current fair value of our debt, based on quoted market prices when available or then-current interest rates for similar obligations with like maturities, including the timber notes, was approximately $565.4 million less than the amount of debt reported in

the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As previously discussed, there is no recourse against OfficeMax on the securitized timber notes payable as recourse is limited to proceeds from the applicable pledged Installment Notes receivable and underlying guarantees. The debt and receivable related to the timber notes have fixed interest rates and the estimated fair values of the timber notes are reflected in the table below.

The following table provides information about our financial instruments outstanding at September 24, 2011. The following table does not include our obligations for pension plans and other post retirement benefits, although market risk also arises within our defined benefit pension plans to the extent that the obligations of the pension plans are not fully matched by assets with determinable cash flows. We sponsor noncontributory defined benefit pension plans covering certain terminated employees, vested employees, retirees, and some active OfficeMax employees. As our plans were frozen in 2003, our active employees and all inactive participants who are covered by the plans are no longer accruing additional benefits. However, the pension plan obligations are still subject to change due to fluctuations in long-term interest rates as well as factors impacting actuarial valuations, such as retirement rates and pension plan participants’ increased life expectancies. In addition to changes in pension plan obligations, the amount of plan assets available to pay benefits, contribution levels and expense are also impacted by the return on the pension plan assets. The pension plan assets include OfficeMax common stock, U.S. equities, international equities, global equities and fixed-income securities, the cash flows of which change as equity prices and interest rates vary. The risk is that market movements in equity prices and interest rates could result in assets that are insufficient over time to cover the level of projected obligations. This in turn could result in significant changes in pension expense and funded status, further impacting future required contributions. Management, together with the trustees who act on behalf of the pension plan beneficiaries, assess the level of this risk using reports prepared by independent external actuaries and take action, where appropriate, in terms of setting investment strategy and agreed contribution levels.

Changes in foreign currency exchange rates expose us to financial market risk. We occasionally use derivative financial instruments, such as forward exchange contracts, to manage our exposure associated with commercial transactions and certain liabilities that are denominated in a currency other than the currency of the operating unit entering into the underlying transaction. We do not enter into derivative instruments for any other purpose. We do not speculate using derivative instruments. We were not a party to any material derivative financial instruments during 2011.

We conduct regular reviews of our real estate portfolio to identify underperforming facilities, and close those facilities that are no longer strategically or economically beneficial. We record a liability for the cost associated with a facility closure at its estimated fair value in the period in which the liability is incurred, primarily the location’s cease-use date. Upon closure, unrecoverable costs are included in facility closure reserves and include provisions for the present value of future lease obligations, less contractual or estimated sublease income. Accretion expense is recognized over the life of the payments.

During the first nine months of 2011, we recorded pre-tax charges of $5.6 million (all in the second quarter) in our Retail segment related to the closing of six underperforming domestic stores prior to the end of their lease term. During the first nine months of 2010, we recorded pre-tax charges of $14.4 million in our Retail segment related to the closing of eight underperforming domestic stores prior to the end of their lease terms.

At September 24, 2011, the facility closure reserve was $53.8 million with $12.0 million included in current liabilities, and $41.8 million included in long-term liabilities. The reserve represents future lease obligations of $109.2 million, net of anticipated sublease income of approximately $55.4 million. Cash payments relating to the facility closures were $16.6 million and $16.4 million in the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, respectively.

For information regarding environmental issues, see the caption “Environmental” in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 25, 2010. At September 24, 2011, there has not been a material change to the information regarding environmental issues disclosed in the company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 25, 2010.

For information regarding critical accounting estimates, see the caption “Critical Accounting Estimates” in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 25, 2010. There have been no significant changes to the Company’s critical accounting estimates during the first nine months of 2011.

For information regarding market risk see the caption “Disclosures of Financial Market Risks” herein and in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 25, 2010. At September 24, 2011, except as disclosed herein in “Disclosures of Financial Market Risks,” there has not been a material change to the information regarding market risk disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 25, 2010.

As of the end of the period covered by this report, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer directed and supervised an evaluation of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)). The evaluation was conducted to determine whether the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective in bringing material information about the Company to the attention of senior management. Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective in alerting them in a timely manner to material information that the Company is required to disclose in its filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

There was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act, during the most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

We are involved in litigation and administrative proceedings arising in the normal course of our business. In the opinion of management, our recovery, if any, or our liability, if any, under pending litigation or administrative proceedings would not materially affect our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. For information concerning legal proceedings, see Note 16, “Legal Proceedings and Contingencies,” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 25, 2010.

For information regarding risk factors, see “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 25, 2010. There have been no material changes to the Company’s risk factors during the first nine months of 2011, except as previously reported in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our quarterly report on form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 25, 2011.

Information concerning our stock repurchases during the three months ended September 24, 2011 is below. All stock was withheld to satisfy tax withholding obligations upon vesting of restricted stock awards.

Required exhibits are listed in the Index to Exhibits and are incorporated by reference.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

OFFICEMAX INCORPORATED

/s/ BRUCE BESANKO

Bruce Besanko

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer
(As Duly Authorized Officer and Principal
Financial Officer)

Filed with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended September 24, 2011


Delaware		82-0100960
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S Employer Identification No.)

263 Shuman Boulevard Naperville, Illinois		60563
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)


Class		Shares Outstanding as of October 26, 2011
Common Stock, $2.50 par value		86,123,472


	PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements	3
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	25
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	39
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	39

	PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	40
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	40
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	40
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	40
Item 4.	(Removed and Reserved)	40
Item 5.	Other Information	40
Item 6.	Exhibits	40


	Three Months Ended
	September 24, 2011			September 25, 2010
	(unaudited)
Sales	$	1,774,767		$	1,813,366
Cost of goods sold and occupancy costs		1,315,106			1,342,944

Gross profit		459,661			470,422
Operating expenses
Operating, selling and general and administrative expenses		418,365			429,498

Operating income		41,296			40,924
Interest expense		(17,827	)		(18,444	)
Interest income		10,984			10,646
Other income (expense), net		173			(23	)

Pre-tax income		34,626			33,103
Income tax expense		(11,167	)		(11,678	)

Net income attributable to OfficeMax and noncontrolling interest		23,459			21,425
Joint venture results attributable to noncontrolling interest		(1,426	)		(886	)

Net income attributable to OfficeMax		22,033			20,539
Preferred dividends		(515	)		(573	)

Net income available to OfficeMax common shareholders	$	21,518		$	19,966

Net income per common share
Basic	$	0.25		$	0.23
Diluted	$	0.25		$	0.23


	Nine Months Ended
	September 24, 2011			September 25, 2010
	(unaudited)
Sales	$	5,285,384		$	5,383,794
Cost of goods sold and occupancy costs		3,926,148			3,980,171

Gross profit		1,359,236			1,403,623
Operating expenses
Operating, selling and general and administrative expenses		1,271,391			1,273,886
Other operating expenses, net		13,916			11,348

Operating income		73,929			118,389
Interest expense		(54,721	)		(55,132	)
Interest income		32,913			31,850
Other income (expense), net		307			(57	)

Pre-tax income		52,428			95,050
Income tax expense		(17,837	)		(34,374	)

Net income attributable to OfficeMax and noncontrolling interest		34,591			60,676
Joint venture results attributable to noncontrolling interest		(3,113	)		(2,249	)

Net income attributable to OfficeMax		31,478			58,427
Preferred dividends		(1,614	)		(1,921	)

Net income available to OfficeMax common shareholders	$	29,864		$	56,506

Net income per common share
Basic	$	0.35		$	0.67
Diluted	$	0.34		$	0.65


	September 24, 2011			December 25, 2010
	(unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	485,426		$	462,326
Receivables, net		568,055			546,885
Inventories		765,353			846,463
Deferred income taxes and receivables		74,085			99,613
Other current assets		58,077			58,999

Total current assets		1,950,996			2,014,286

Property and equipment:
Land and land improvements		40,248			41,317
Buildings and improvements		487,539			487,160
Machinery and equipment		770,321			818,081

Total property and equipment		1,298,108			1,346,558
Accumulated depreciation		(924,341	)		(949,269	)

Net property and equipment		373,767			397,289

Intangible assets, net		81,700			83,231
Investment in Boise Cascade Holdings, L.L.C.		175,000			175,000
Timber notes receivable		899,250			899,250
Deferred income taxes		290,468			284,529
Other non-current assets		231,800			225,344

Total assets	$	4,002,981		$	4,078,929


	(thousands)
Balance at December 25, 2010	$	61,673
Charges related to stores closed in 2011		5,406
Transfer of deferred rent balance		928
Changes to estimated costs included in income		(1	)
Cash payments		(16,643	)
Accretion		2,393

Balance at September 24, 2011	$	53,756


	September 24, 2011
	(thousands)
Other accrued liabilities	$	11,939
Other long-term liabilities		41,817

Total	$	53,756


	September 24, 2011
	(thousands)
Estimated future lease obligations	$	109,222
Less: anticipated sublease income		(55,466	)

Total	$	53,756


	U.S. Credit Agreement			Canadian Credit Agreement		Australia/ New Zealand Credit Agreement		Total
	(millions of U.S. dollars)
Maximum aggregate available borrowing amount	$	511.7		$	41.3	$	56.9	$	609.9
Less: Stand-by letters of credit		(52.0	)		—		—		(52.0	)

Amount available for borrowing	$	459.7		$	41.3	$	56.9	$	557.9


	North American Credit Agreement
	(millions of U.S. dollars)
Maximum aggregate available borrowing amount	$	618.6
Less: Stand-by letters of credit		(52.0	)

Amount available for borrowing	$	566.6


	September 24, 2011
	Fair Value								Carrying Amount
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Carrying Amount
	(thousands)
Financial assets:
Timber notes receivable
Wachovia	$	—	$	933,483	$	—	$	933,483	$	817,500
Lehman	$	—	$	—	$	81,750	$	81,750	$	81,750

Financial liabilities:
Recourse debt	$	79,236	$	163,467	$	—	$	242,703	$	270,044
Non-recourse debt
Wachovia	$	—	$	850,195	$	—	$	850,195	$	735,000
Lehman	$	—	$	—	$	81,750	$	81,750	$	735,000


	December 25, 2010
	Fair Value								Carrying Amount
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Carrying Amount
	(thousands)
Financial assets:
Timber notes receivable
Wachovia	$	—	$	888,288	$	—	$	888,288	$	817,500
Lehman	$	—	$	—	$	81,750	$	81,750	$	81,750

Financial liabilities:
Recourse debt	$	—	$	255,519	$	—	$	255,519	$	274,995
Non-recourse debt
Wachovia	$	—	$	811,093	$	—	$	811,093	$	735,000
Lehman	$	—	$	—	$	81,750	$	81,750	$	735,000


	(thousands)
Balance at December 25, 2010	$	20,863
Increase related to prior year tax positions		388
Settlement		(8	)

Balance at September 24, 2011	$	21,243


	2011		2010
	(thousands)
Cash tax payments, net	$	12,087	$	5,900


	Shares			Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share
Nonvested, December 25, 2010		2,111,135		$	13.89
Granted		608,204			12.65
Vested		(964,913	)		15.73
Forfeited		(135,652	)		12.62

Nonvested, September 24, 2011		1,618,774		$	12.43


	Shares			Weighted-Average Exercise Price
Balance at December 25, 2010		4,313,290		$	16.52
Options granted		1,227,280			14.84
Options exercised		(405,988	)		4.80
Options forfeited and expired		(309,356	)		16.41

Balance at September 24, 2011		4,825,226		$	17.09

Exercisable at September 24, 2011		1,800,815
Per-share weighted average fair value of options granted (Black-Scholes)	$	7.86


	Options Outstanding						Options Exercisable
Range of Exercise Prices	Options Outstanding		Weighted Average Contractual Life (Years)		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Options Exercisable		Weighted Average Exercise Price
$2.50 – $3.00		11,171		—	$	2.50		11,171	$	2.50
$4.00 – $7.00		1,095,759		4.8		5.04		506,227		4.72
$10.00 – $16.00		862,996		5.5		14.15		264,317		14.51
$16.00 – $17.00		861,200		6.4		16.86		—		—
$18.00 – $19.00		975,000		6.1		18.15		—		—
$24.00 – $37.00		1,019,100		1.2		31.88		1,019,100		31.88


	Three Months Ended
	Pension Benefits						Other Benefits
	September 24, 2011			September 25, 2010			September 24, 2011			September 25, 2010
	(thousands)
Service cost	$	636		$	691		$	57		$	65
Interest cost		17,544			18,553			253			301
Expected return on plan assets		(19,264	)		(20,873	)		—			—
Recognized actuarial loss		4,309			3,310			55			56
Amortization of prior service costs		—			—			(1,002	)		(1,001	)

Net periodic benefit cost (income)	$	3,225		$	1,681		$	(637	)	$	(579	)


	Sales		Segment income (loss)			Other operating, income (expense)		Operating income (loss)
	(thousands)
Three months ended September 24, 2011
Contract	$	883,300	$	23,277		$	—	$	23,277
Retail		891,467		28,499			—		28,499
Corporate and Other		—		(10,480	)		—		(10,480	)

Total	$	1,774,767	$	41,296		$	—	$	41,296

Three months ended September 25, 2010
Contract	$	877,262	$	19,541		$	—	$	19,541
Retail		936,104		32,399			—		32,399
Corporate and Other		—		(11,016	)		—		(11,016	)

Total	$	1,813,366	$	40,924		$	—	$	40,924


	Shareholders’ Equity			Noncontrolling Interest
	(thousands)
Balance at December 25, 2010	$	600,765		$	49,246

Comprehensive income:
Net income attributable to OfficeMax and noncontrolling interest		31,478			3,113
Other comprehensive income:
Foreign currency translation adjustments		(8,964	)		53
Amortization of unrecognized retirement and benefit costs, net of tax		9,070			—
Unrealized hedge gain adjustment, net of tax		1,272			—

Comprehensive income attributable to OfficeMax and noncontrolling interest		32,856			3,166
Preferred stock dividends		(2,126	)		—
Stock-based compensation		12,317			—
Noncontrolling interest fair value adjustment		17,763			(17,763	)
Other		(3,939	)		(17	)

Balance at September 24, 2011	$	657,636		$	34,632


	Non-GAAP Reconciliation
	Nine Months Ended September 24, 2011
	Operating income		Net income available to OfficeMax common shareholders		Diluted income per common share
	(millions, except per-share amounts)
As reported	$	73.9	$	29.9	$	0.34
Store closure charges		5.6		3.4		0.04
Severance charges		8.3		5.6		0.07

As adjusted	$	87.8	$	38.9	$	0.45


	Non-GAAP Reconciliation
	Nine Months Ended September 25, 2010
	Operating income			Net income available to OfficeMax common shareholders			Diluted income per common share
	(millions, except per-share amounts)
As reported	$	118.4		$	56.5		$	0.65
Store closure charges		14.4			8.9			0.10
Severance charges		0.8			0.5			0.01
Reserve adjustment related to legacy facility		(3.9	)		(2.4	)		(0.03	)

As adjusted	$	129.7		$	63.5		$	0.73


Period	Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased		Average Price Paid Per Share (or Unit)		Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
June 26 – July 23, 2011		22	$	8.23		—		—
July 24 – August 20, 2011		36,988		5.75		—		—
August 21 – September 24, 2011		22,024		5.68		—		—

Total		59,034	$	5.73		—		—


Exhibit Number		Exhibit Description

3.1(1)		Conformed Restated Certificate of Incorporation, reflecting all amendments to date.

3.2(2)		Amended and Restated Bylaws, as amended February 12, 2009.

10.1(3)		Form of 2011 Director Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement.

10.2(4)		Change in Control Agreement dated as of August 17, 2011 between OfficeMax Incorporated and Mr. Michael MacDonald.

10.3(5)		Nondisclosure and Fair Competition Agreement dated as of August 15, 2011 between OfficeMax Incorporated and Mr. Michael MacDonald.

10.4*		Change in Control Agreement dated as of July 26, 2011 between OfficeMax Incorporated and Mr. Steve Parsons.

10.5*		Nondisclosure and Fair Competition Agreement dated as of July 25, 2011 between OfficeMax Incorporated and Mr. Steve Parsons.

31.1*		CEO Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2*		CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32*		Section 906 Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of OfficeMax Incorporated.

101.INS(6)*		XBRL Instance Document.

101.SCH(6)*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

101.CAL(6)*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

101.DEF(6)*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

101.LAB(6)*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

101.PRE(6)*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.