S-1/A

Approximate Date Of Commencement Of Proposed Sale To The Public: As soon as practicable after the effective date of this Registration Statement.

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) check the following box. x

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

Superfund Green, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Fund”), is offering two separate series of limited partnership units (“Units”), designated Series A and Series B (the “Series”), in an aggregate offering amount of up to $506,704,051 for both Series A and Series B together. The two Series are traded and managed the same way except for the degree of leverage. The assets of each Series are segregated from the other Series and each Series is offered separately.

Superfund USA, LLC and additional selling agents, which serve as underwriters, are offering the Series’ Units on the last day of each month at a price of month-end net asset value per Unit. As of February 28, 2013, the net asset value of a Series A Unit was $1,182.75 and the net asset value of a Series B Unit was $1,230.76. No up-front underwriting discount or commissions apply. The selling agents will use their best efforts to sell the Units offered. The offering will be conducted on a continuous basis until all Units have been sold. This offering is scheduled to terminate on May [ ], 2016 provided, however, that it may terminate earlier if all of the Units registered pursuant to the registration statement of which this Prospectus is part have been sold and it may be extended for up to six months beyond May [ ], 2016 pursuant to the rules of the Securities Act of 1933. Subscription proceeds are held in escrow at HSBC Bank USA until released to the Series. There is no minimum number of Units that must be sold for Units to be issued at the end of each month. Regardless of the net asset value at which Units are issued, the initial aggregate net asset value of an investor’s Units will equal the dollar amount of the investor’s subscription, and no up-front underwriting discount or commission will be taken, although, as described herein, certain Units will pay an installment selling commission of up to 10% of the gross offering proceeds of the Units in monthly installments of 1/12 of 4.0% of the month-end net asset value of such Units.

These are speculative securities. BEFORE YOU DECIDE WHETHER TO INVEST, READ THIS ENTIRE PROSPECTUS CAREFULLY AND CONSIDER “THE RISKS YOU FACE” ON PAGE 11.

To invest, you will be required to represent and warrant, among other things, that you have received a copy of this Prospectus and that you satisfy the minimum net worth and income requirements for residents of your state to invest in a Series. You are encouraged to discuss your investment decision with your individual financial, tax and legal advisors.

These securities have not been approved or disapproved by the Securities and Exchange Commission or any state securities commission nor has the Securities and Exchange Commission or any state securities commission passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of this Prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

This Prospectus is in two parts: a disclosure document and a statement of additional information. These parts are bound together, and both contain important information.

THE COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION HAS NOT PASSED UPON THE MERITS OF PARTICIPATING IN THIS POOL NOR HAS THE COMMISSION PASSED ON THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THIS DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT.

YOU SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER WHETHER YOUR FINANCIAL CONDITION PERMITS YOU TO PARTICIPATE IN A COMMODITY POOL. IN SO DOING, YOU SHOULD BE AWARE THAT COMMODITY INTEREST TRADING CAN QUICKLY LEAD TO LARGE LOSSES AS WELL AS GAINS. SUCH TRADING LOSSES CAN SHARPLY REDUCE THE NET ASSET VALUE OF THE POOL AND CONSEQUENTLY THE VALUE OF YOUR INTEREST IN THE POOL. IN ADDITION, RESTRICTIONS ON REDEMPTIONS MAY AFFECT YOUR ABILITY TO WITHDRAW YOUR PARTICIPATION IN THE POOL.

FURTHER, COMMODITY POOLS MAY BE SUBJECT TO SUBSTANTIAL CHARGES FOR MANAGEMENT, AND ADVISORY AND BROKERAGE FEES. IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR THOSE POOLS THAT ARE SUBJECT TO THESE CHARGES TO MAKE SUBSTANTIAL TRADING PROFITS TO AVOID DEPLETION OR EXHAUSTION OF THEIR ASSETS. THIS DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT CONTAINS A COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF EACH EXPENSE TO BE CHARGED THIS POOL AT PAGES 4 THROUGH 8 AND 46 THROUGH 49 AND A STATEMENT OF THE PERCENTAGE RETURN NECESSARY TO BREAK EVEN, THAT IS, TO RECOVER THE AMOUNT OF YOUR INITIAL INVESTMENT, AT PAGES 6, 7 AND 8.

THIS BRIEF STATEMENT CANNOT DISCLOSE ALL THE RISKS AND OTHER FACTORS NECESSARY TO EVALUATE YOUR PARTICIPATION IN THIS COMMODITY POOL. THEREFORE, BEFORE YOU DECIDE TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS COMMODITY POOL, YOU SHOULD CAREFULLY STUDY THIS DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT, INCLUDING A DESCRIPTION OF THE PRINCIPAL RISK FACTORS OF THIS INVESTMENT, AT PAGE 11.

YOU SHOULD ALSO BE AWARE THAT THIS COMMODITY POOL MAY TRADE FOREIGN FUTURES OR OPTIONS CONTRACTS. TRANSACTIONS ON MARKETS LOCATED OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES, INCLUDING MARKETS FORMALLY LINKED TO A UNITED STATES MARKET, MAY BE SUBJECT TO REGULATIONS WHICH OFFER DIFFERENT OR DIMINISHED PROTECTION TO THE POOL AND ITS PARTICIPANTS. FURTHER, UNITED STATES REGULATORY AUTHORITIES MAY BE UNABLE TO COMPEL THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE RULES OF REGULATORY AUTHORITIES OR MARKETS IN NON-UNITED STATES JURISDICTIONS WHERE TRANSACTIONS FOR THE POOL MAY BE EFFECTED.

SWAPS TRANSACTIONS, LIKE OTHER FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS, INVOLVE A VARIETY OF SIGNIFICANT RISKS. THE SPECIFIC RISKS PRESENTED BY A PARTICULAR SWAP TRANSACTION NECESSARILY DEPEND UPON THE TERMS OF THE TRANSACTION AND YOUR CIRCUMSTANCES. IN GENERAL, HOWEVER, ALL SWAPS TRANSACTIONS INVOLVE SOME COMBINATION OF MARKET RISK, CREDIT RISK, COUNTERPARTY CREDIT RISK, FUNDING RISK, LIQUIDITY RISK, AND OPERATIONAL RISK.

HIGHLY CUSTOMIZED SWAPS TRANSACTIONS IN PARTICULAR MAY INCREASE LIQUIDITY RISK, WHICH MAY RESULT IN A SUSPENSION OF REDEMPTIONS. HIGHLY LEVERAGED TRANSACTIONS MAY EXPERIENCE SUBSTANTIAL GAINS OR LOSSES IN VALUE AS A RESULT OF RELATIVELY SMALL CHANGES IN THE VALUE OR LEVEL OF AN UNDERLYING OR RELATED MARKET FACTOR.

IN EVALUATING THE RISKS AND CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH A PARTICULAR SWAP TRANSACTION, IT IS IMPORTANT TO CONSIDER THAT A SWAP TRANSACTION MAY BE MODIFIED OR TERMINATED ONLY BY MUTUAL CONSENT OF THE ORIGINAL PARTIES AND SUBJECT TO AGREEMENT ON INDIVIDUALLY NEGOTIATED TERMS. THEREFORE, IT MAY NOT BE POSSIBLE FOR THE COMMODITY POOL OPERATOR TO MODIFY, TERMINATE, OR OFFSET THE POOL’S OBLIGATIONS OR THE POOL’S EXPOSURE TO THE RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH A TRANSACTION PRIOR TO ITS SCHEDULED TERMINATION DATE.

THIS PROSPECTUS DOES NOT INCLUDE ALL OF THE INFORMATION OR EXHIBITS IN SUPERFUND GREEN, L.P.’S REGISTRATION STATEMENT. YOU CAN READ AND COPY THE ENTIRE

REGISTRATION STATEMENT AT THE PUBLIC REFERENCE FACILITIES MAINTAINED BY THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (“SEC”) IN WASHINGTON, D.C. SUPERFUND GREEN, L.P. FILES QUARTERLY AND ANNUAL REPORTS WITH THE SEC. YOU CAN READ AND COPY THESE REPORTS AT THE SEC PUBLIC REFERENCE FACILITY AT 100 F STREET, N.E., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549. PLEASE CALL THE SEC AT 1-800-SEC-0300 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. SUPERFUND GREEN, L.P.’S FILINGS WILL BE POSTED AT THE SEC WEBSITE AT HTTP://WWW.SEC.GOV.

An electronic version of this Prospectus and the subscription materials are available on a dedicated web site (http://www.superfund.net) being maintained by Superfund USA, LLC

SUMMARY

General

Superfund Green, L.P. (the “Fund”), is offering two separate series of limited partnership units (“Units”): Superfund Green, L.P. Series A and Superfund Green, L.P. Series B (each, a “Series”). Each Series trades speculatively in the U.S. and international futures and cash foreign currency markets. Specifically, each Series trades in a portfolio of more than 120 futures and forward contracts using fully automated, proprietary, computerized trading systems. The Superfund trading systems are licensed to Superfund Capital Management, Inc., the Fund’s general partner and a Grenada corporation (“Superfund Capital Management”) on a non-exclusive basis. These systems automatically initiate buy and sell trading signals and monitor relevant technical indicators on over 120 contracts traded in the United States, Canada, Europe and Asia. Each Series’ strategy is based on the implementation of a four-point philosophy consisting of (i) market diversification, (ii) technical analysis, (iii) systematic, primarily trend-following, trading models, and (iv) money management. Superfund Capital Management may also formulate new approaches to carry out the overall investment objective of each Series. Superfund Capital Management reserves the right to trade other pools and/or funds.

The leverage and trading methodology employed with respect to Series A is the same as that for Superfund Q-AG, a private non-U.S. fund managed by Superfund Trading Management, Inc., an affiliate of Superfund Capital Management. The leverage and trading methodology employed with respect to Series B is the same as that for Superfund GCT, a private non-U.S. fund managed by Superfund Asset Management GmbH, an affiliate of Superfund Capital Management. Series B is leveraged approximately 1.5 times Series A. Performance information for each Series is shown beginning on page 21 and for these private, non-U.S. funds beginning on page 121 of the Prospectus.

Each Series trades in more than 120 futures and forward contracts globally, including both commodity and financial futures. The primary sectors that each Series may trade are: currencies, interest rates, bonds, stock indices, metals, energy, grains and agricultural markets. Each Series will emphasize instruments with low correlation to each other and high liquidity for order execution. Notwithstanding each Series’ philosophy of diversification among markets traded, a majority of each Series’ market exposure may be concentrated in only one or two market sectors from time to time.

The proprietary software technology embodied in Superfund’s trading systems examines a broad array of investments around the world to identify possible opportunities that fit within a narrow selection criteria. This methodology primarily uses trend-following technical trading strategies. The holding period for positions can vary from less than one day to months. The technology is designed to isolate market patterns that offer high reward to risk potential based on historical data. Once potential trades are identified, the systems apply additional filters such as overall risk capital and portfolio volatility prior to generating definite buy or sell signals. All transactions are then executed using a fully automated computerized system.

Superfund Capital Management integrates a systematic, technical short-term trading strategy into the Fund’s primary trend-following methodology. This short-term strategy seeks trading opportunities arising out of short term changes in futures and forward market prices, with trades lasting from less than a day to more than a week, and has exhibited low correlation to the trend-following methodology historically utilized by the Fund.

The following summary provides a review in outline form of certain important aspects of an investment in each Series.

How to Subscribe for Units

•

Investors must submit subscriptions at least five business days prior to the applicable month-end closing date. Approved subscriptions will be accepted once payments are received and cleared at the applicable month-end net asset value for the respective Series. Pursuant to an addendum to the Subscription Agreement, investors may subscribe for Units and receive them, and pay for them in

equal installments, over a period of time to achieve an average price for the Units acquired; provided, however, that no Units will be issued until such Units have been fully paid for by the investor.

•

Each Series will accept subscriptions throughout the continuing offering period, which can be terminated by Superfund Capital Management at any time. The offering is scheduled to terminate on May [ ], 2016, provided, however, that it may terminate earlier if all of the Units registered pursuant to the registration statement of which this Prospectus is part have been sold and it may be extended for up to six months beyond May [ ], 2016 pursuant to the rules of the Securities Act of 1933. Additional registration statements may also be filed in the future offering additional Units for sale to the public.

•

The selling agents serve as underwriters and will use their best efforts to sell the Units offered, without any firm underwriting commitment. Superfund Capital Management is also offering Units, through Superfund USA, LLC (“Superfund USA”), which also serves as an underwriter, to potential investors by distributing this Prospectus and making it available on a dedicated internet website (http://www.superfund.net). Superfund Capital Management intends to engage in marketing efforts through media including but not limited to third-party websites, newspapers, magazines, other periodicals, television, radio, seminars, conferences, workshops, and sporting and charity events. Investors are required to make representations and warranties regarding their suitability to purchase the Units in the Subscription Agreement. Read the Subscription Agreement, which accompanies this Prospectus, as well as this Prospectus carefully before you decide whether to invest.

Minimum Investment in Each Series

The minimum initial investment is $10,000 per Series. Persons that become limited partners by holding Units in a particular Series may make additional investments in that same Series of at least $1,000.

Is Superfund Green, L.P. a Suitable Investment for You?

The primary objective of the Units is to achieve substantial capital appreciation over time. An investment in the Units may fit within your portfolio allocation strategy if you are interested in the Units’ potential to produce returns that are generally unrelated to traditional securities investments. An investment in each Series is speculative and involves a high degree of risk. Each Series is not a complete investment program. Superfund Capital Management offers each Series as a diversification opportunity for an investor’s entire investment portfolio, and therefore an investment in each Series should only be a limited portion of the investor’s portfolio. You must, at a minimum, have:

(1) a net worth of at least $250,000, exclusive of home, furnishings and automobiles; or

(2) a net worth, similarly calculated, of at least $70,000 and an annual gross income of at least $70,000.

A number of jurisdictions in which the Units are offered impose higher minimum suitability standards on prospective investors. More information regarding these minimum suitability standards is found in the subscription materials, which accompany this Prospectus. These suitability standards are, in each case, regulatory minimums only, and merely because you meet such standards does not mean that an investment in the Units is suitable for you. YOU MAY NOT INVEST MORE THAN 10% OF YOUR NET WORTH, EXCLUSIVE OF HOME, FURNISHINGS AND AUTOMOBILES, IN THE FUND.

Risk Factors You Should Consider Before Investing in Either Series

•

Each Series is a highly volatile and speculative investment. There can be no assurance that each Series will achieve its objectives or avoid substantial losses. You must be prepared to lose all or substantially all of your investment.

•

For every gain made in a futures, forward or swap transaction, the opposing side of that transaction will have an equal and offsetting loss. Each Series has from time to time in the past experienced drawdowns. Investments managed by Superfund Capital Management, including the Series, will likely experience drawdowns in the future.

•

Each Series trades in futures and forward contracts and may trade swap contracts. Therefore, each Series is a party to financial instruments with elements of off-balance sheet market risk, including market volatility and possible illiquidity. There is also a credit risk that a counterparty will not be able to meet its obligations to each Series.

•

There is no secondary market for Units of each Series and it is not anticipated that any such market will develop.

•

Each Series is subject to numerous conflicts of interest including the following:

(1) Superfund Capital Management is both the general partner and trading advisor of each Series and its fees and services have not been negotiated at arm’s length. Superfund Capital Management has a disincentive to replace itself as trading advisor, even if doing so may be in the best interests of each Series;

(2) Superfund Capital Management, each Series’ clearing brokers and their respective principals and affiliates, may trade in the futures, forward and swaps markets for their own accounts and may take positions opposite or ahead of those taken for each Series; and

(3) Superfund Capital Management’s principals are not obligated to devote any minimum amount of time to the Fund.

•

Owners of Units (“Limited Partners”) take no part in the management of each Series, and the past performance of Superfund Capital Management or each Series is not necessarily indicative of future results of a Series.

•

Superfund Capital Management will be paid a monthly management fee of 1/12 of 1.85% of the monthly net asset value (1.85% annually) for each Series, regardless of profitability. Superfund Capital Management will also be paid monthly performance fees equal to 25% of aggregate cumulative net appreciation (if any) of each Series above its previous highest value, excluding interest income.

•

Each Series is a single-advisor fund which may be inherently more volatile than multi-advisor managed futures products.

•

Although each Series is liquid compared to other “alternative” investments such as real estate or venture capital, liquidity is restricted, as the Units may only be redeemed on a monthly basis, upon five business days’ written notice. You may transfer or assign your Units after 30 days’ advance notice, and only with the consent of Superfund Capital Management which may not be given if such transfer may result in adverse legal or tax consequences for a Series.

•

Even though Superfund Capital Management does not presently intend to make distributions from either Series, you will be liable for taxes on your share of trading profits and other income of the Series in which you invest.

•

Each Series must experience certain levels of trading profits in order for you to break even on your investment. Based on an initial investment of $10,000 (and assuming no changes in net asset value and interest income of 0.02%), the break even points for each Series are as follows: Series A — 8.98% ($898.00); Series A not subject to selling commissions — 4.98% ($498.00); Series B — 9.98% ($998.00); Series B not subject to selling commissions — 5.98% ($598.00). A more detailed break even analysis begins at page 6.

Investment Factors You Should Consider Before Investing in Either Series

•

Each Series is a leveraged investment fund managed by an experienced, professional trading advisor and it trades in a wide range of futures and forward markets.

•

Superfund Capital Management utilizes proprietary, systematic trading systems for each Series.

•

Each Series has the potential to help diversify traditional securities portfolios. A diverse portfolio consisting of assets that perform in an unrelated manner, or non-correlated assets, may increase overall return and/or reduce the volatility (a primary measure of risk) of a portfolio. However, non-correlation will not provide any diversification advantages unless the non-correlated assets are outperforming other portfolio assets, and there is no guarantee that either Series will outperform other sectors of an investor’s portfolio or not produce losses. Each Series’ profitability also depends on the success of Superfund Capital Management’s trading techniques. If a Series is unprofitable, then the Series will not increase the return on an investor’s portfolio or achieve its diversification objectives.

•

Investors in each Series get the advantage of limited liability in highly leveraged trading.

Superfund Capital Management

Superfund Capital Management, the general partner and trading advisor for each Series, is responsible for the administration and trading of each Series. Superfund Capital Management serves as the general partner and trading adviser for other investment funds with a similar strategy to that of each Series. Moreover, affiliates of Superfund Capital Management manage various offshore investment funds with strategies substantially similar to that of each Series.

Charges to Each Series

Each Series’ charges are substantial and must be offset by trading gains and interest income in order to avoid depletion of each Series’ assets.

Superfund Capital Management

•

1.85% annual management fee (1/12 of 1.85% payable monthly) for each Series.

•

25% of new appreciation (if any) in each Series’ net assets computed on a monthly basis and excluding interest income and as adjusted for subscriptions and redemptions.

•

Up to 1% of net assets in each Series per year (up to 1/12 of 1% payable monthly) for ongoing offering expenses (including the costs of updating this Prospectus and registering additional Units for sale to the public), such as legal, auditing, administration, printing and postage costs, not to exceed the amount of actual expenses incurred. Ongoing offering expenses will not exceed 0.1479% of the gross offering proceeds of the Units registered pursuant to the registration statement of which this Prospectus is part. Superfund Capital Management will assume liability for ongoing offering expenses in excess of 1% of average month-end net assets per year of each Series.

•

Up to 0.15% of net assets in each Series per year (1/12 of 0.15% payable monthly) for operating expenses such as legal, auditing, administration, printing and postage, not to exceed the amount of actual expense incurred.

Selling Agents and Others

•

An annual selling commission will be paid to Superfund USA, an affiliate of Superfund Capital Management. The Units pay a commission of 4% of the month-end net asset value per Unit (1/12 of 4% per month) in the initial year after purchase. The Units pay additional selling commissions of 4% per annum of the month-end net asset value per Unit thereafter. Each Series and Superfund USA may retain additional selling agents to assist with the placement of the Units. Superfund USA will pay all or a portion of the selling commission described above which it receives in respect of the Units sold by the additional selling agents to the additional selling agents effecting the sales. If the selling commission paid in the initial year after purchase is less than 4% of proceeds due to a decrease in the net asset value per Unit, the maximum additional selling commissions paid will exceed 6% of the proceeds. If the selling commission paid in the initial year after purchase is more than 4% of the proceeds due to an increase in the net asset value per Unit, the maximum additional selling commissions paid will be less than 6% of the proceeds. In either case, the maximum cumulative selling commission per Unit sold pursuant to this Prospectus is 10% of the gross offering proceeds price for such Unit (which is equal to $50,670,405 out of the $506,704,051 in Units offered pursuant to this Prospectus).

•

If you participate in a registered investment adviser’s asset-based fee or fixed fee advisory program and your investment adviser recommends a portfolio allocation to the Fund or if the Units are purchased by commodity pools operated by commodity pool operators registered as such with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”), your Units purchased through Superfund USA will not be subject to the selling commissions described above.

•

$9.00 brokerage commission per round-turn transaction plus applicable regulatory and exchange fees, where brokerage commissions are charged in U.S. dollars, a portion of which will be paid to the clearing brokers for execution and clearing costs and the balance of which will be paid to Superfund Capital Management for providing services akin to those provided by an introducing broker. Brokerage commissions for certain foreign futures contracts to be traded by the Fund are charged in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Commission rates for brokerage commissions charged in foreign currencies will be reset on the first day of each calendar month to the foreign currency equivalent of $9.00 based on the then current U.S. dollar exchange rate for the applicable foreign currencies. Daily fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates will, however, cause the actual commissions charged to the Fund for certain foreign futures contracts to be more or less than $9.00.

•

There are no penalties or charges applied upon the redemption of Units.

Breakeven Analysis

The following tables show the fees and expenses that an investor would incur on an initial investment of $10,000 in each Series and the amount that such investment must earn to break even after one year.

Series A


Routine Expenses	Percentage Return Required Initial Twelve Months of Investment			Dollar Return Required ($10,000 Initial Investment) Initial Twelve Months of Investment
Management Fees		1.85	%	$	185.00
General Partner Performance Fees(1)		0.00	%	$	0.00
Selling Commissions(2)		4.00	%	$	400.00
Ongoing Offering Expenses(3)		1.00	%	$	100.00
Operating Expenses(3)		0.15	%	$	15.00
Brokerage Fees(4)		2.00	%	$	200.00
Less Interest Income(5)		0.02	%	$	2.00
TWELVE-MONTH BREAKEVEN		8.98	%	$	898.00

Series A for Investors Not Subject to Selling Commissions(6)


Routine Expenses	Percentage Return Required Initial Twelve Months of Investment			Dollar Return Required ($10,000 Initial Investment) Initial Twelve Months of Investment
Management Fees		1.85	%	$	185.00
General Partner Performance Fees(1)		0.00	%	$	0.00
Selling Commissions(2)		0.00	%	$	0.00
Ongoing Offering Expenses(3)		1.00	%	$	100.00
Operating Expenses(3)		0.15	%	$	15.00
Brokerage Fees(4)		2.00	%	$	200.00
Less Interest Income(5)		0.02	%	$	2.00
TWELVE-MONTH BREAKEVEN		4.98	%	$	498.00

Series B


Routine Expenses	Percentage Return Required Initial Twelve Months of Investment			Dollar Return Required ($10,000 Initial Investment) Initial Twelve Months of Investment
Management Fees		1.85	%	$	185.00
General Partner Performance Fees(1)		0.00	%	$	0.00
Selling Commissions(2)		4.00	%	$	400.00
Ongoing Offering Expenses(3)		1.00	%	$	100.00
Operating Expenses(3)		0.15	%	$	15.00
Brokerage Fees(4)		3.00	%	$	300.00
Less Interest Income(5)		0.02	%	$	2.00
TWELVE-MONTH BREAKEVEN		9.98	%	$	998.00

Series B for Investors Not Subject to Selling Commissions(6)


Routine Expenses	Percentage Return Required Initial Twelve Months of Investment			Dollar Return Required ($10,000 Initial Investment) Initial Twelve Months of Investment
Management Fees		1.85	%	$	185.00
General Partner Performance Fees(1)		0.00	%	$	0.00
Selling Commissions(2)		0.00	%	$	0.00
Ongoing Offering Expenses(3)		1.00	%	$	100.00
Operating Expenses(3)		0.15	%	$	15.00
Brokerage Fees(4)		3.00	%	$	300.00
Less Interest Income(5)		0.02	%	$	2.00
TWELVE-MONTH BREAKEVEN		5.98	%	$	598.00

(1)

No performance fees will be charged until breakeven costs are met. However, because Superfund Capital Management’s performance fee is payable monthly, it is possible for Superfund Capital Management to earn a performance fee during a break-even or losing year if, after payment of a performance fee, a Series incurs losses resulting in a break-even or losing year. It is impossible to predict what performance fee, if any, could be paid during a break-even or losing year, thus none is shown.

(2)	The maximum cumulative selling commission per Unit sold pursuant to this Prospectus is 10% of the gross offering proceeds for such Unit.

(3)	Not to exceed the amount of actual expenses incurred.

(4)

Assumes 1,720 round-turn transactions for Series A and 2,585 round-turn transactions for Series B per million dollars per year at a rate of $9 per round-turn transaction.* These assumptions are based on the average number of round-turn transactions per million dollars per year over the last three years traded on behalf of the Series. The Superfund Green, L.P. Sixth Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement (the “Partnership Agreement”) provides that brokerage commission costs borne by the Fund shall not exceed 5% (Series A) and 7% (Series B) annually of average annual net assets of the Series.

(5)	Estimated. Interest income includes the assumed interest rate of 0.04% per annum based on current cash market information and the fact that less than half of the Fund’s assets are currently held in interest bearing accounts.

The twelve-month break-even points shown are dependent on interest income of 0.02% per annum. If interest income earned is less, the Series will have to earn trading profits greater than the amounts shown to cover their costs. Actual interest to be earned by the Fund will be at the prevailing rates for the period being measured which may be less than or greater than 0.02% over any twelve month period.

(6)

Certain Units are not subject to selling commissions: (i) Units purchased through Superfund USA by investors that participate in a registered investment adviser’s asset-based fee or fixed fee advisory program; (ii) Units purchased through Superfund USA by investors who are commodity pools operated by commodity pool operators registered as such with the National Futures Association (“NFA”); and (iii) Units for which the investor has paid the maximum cumulative selling commissions of 10% of the original purchase price.

*	In no instance will the total of all fees computed on a net asset basis exceed 20% per annum for either Series A or Series B.

Distributions and Redemptions

Each Series is intended to be a medium-to long-term, i.e., 3- to 5-year, investment. Units are transferable, but no market exists for their sale and none is expected to develop. Monthly redemptions are permitted upon five business days’ written notice to Superfund Capital Management; provided, however, that the payment of redemption proceeds may be delayed in special circumstances, including, but not limited to, inability to liquidate dealers’ positions as of a redemption date or default or delay in payments due to each Series from clearing brokers, banks, or other persons or entities. If the net asset value per Unit within a Series as of the end of any business day declines by 50% or more from either the prior year-end or the prior month-end Unit value of such Series, Superfund Capital Management will suspend trading activities, notify all Limited Partners within such Series of the relevant facts within seven business days and declare a special redemption period. Superfund Capital Management may deny a request to transfer if it determines that the transfer may result in adverse legal or tax consequences for either Series but not a redemption request submitted in good form and in a timely manner. Superfund Capital Management does not intend to make any distributions from either Series. Upon written request, an investment in either Series may be exchanged for an investment in the other Series by a simultaneous redemption and subscription at the then applicable respective net asset values of each Series.

Federal Income Tax Aspects

The Fund will be classified as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. As such, you will be taxed each year on your share of the Fund’s income whether or not you redeem Units or receive distributions from the Fund.

To the extent the Fund invests in futures and other commodity contracts, gain or loss on such investments will, depending on the contracts traded, consist of a mixture of: (1) ordinary income or loss; and/or (2) capital gain or loss. Forty percent (40%) of trading profits, if any, on U.S. exchange-traded futures contracts and certain foreign currency forward contracts are taxed as short-term capital gains at ordinary income rates and the remaining sixty percent (60%) are taxed as long-term capital gains at a lower maximum rate for non-corporate investors. Trading gains or losses from other contracts will be primarily short-term capital gains or losses, and interest income is taxed at ordinary income rates.

Capital losses on the Units may be deducted against capital gains but may only be deducted by non-corporate investors against ordinary income to the extent of $3,000 per year. Therefore, you could pay tax on your share of the Fund’s interest income even though your overall investment in the Fund has been unprofitable.

Reports

Within 30 calendar days after the end of each month, Superfund Capital Management will distribute to investors a monthly report of the Fund. Superfund Capital Management will also distribute an annual report of the Fund within 90 calendar days after the end of the Fund’s fiscal year and will provide investors with federal income tax information for the Fund before April 15 of each year.

CFTC rules require that this Prospectus be accompanied by summary financial information, which may be a recent monthly report of the Fund, current within 60 calendar days.

Organizational Chart

The organizational chart below illustrates the relationships among the various service providers of this offering. Superfund Capital Management is both the general partner and trading advisor for each Series. The selling agents (other than Superfund USA) and clearing brokers are not affiliated with Superfund Capital Management or each Series.

LOGO

(1)

Superfund Capital Management will maintain an investment in each Series of at least 1% of the net asset value of each such Series including Superfund Capital Management, Inc.’s investment. As of February 28, 2013, the value of Superfund Capital Management’s investment in Series A was $457,487 and in Series B was $670,672.

Descriptions of the dealings between Superfund Capital Management and its affiliates and the Fund are set forth below under “Conflicts of Interest” and “Charges to Each Series.”

Futures and forward contracts have a high degree of price variability and are subject to occasional rapid and substantial changes. Consequently, you could lose all or substantially all of your investment in each Series.

Because the amount of margin funds necessary to be deposited with a clearing broker in order to enter into a futures or forward contract position is typically about 2% to 10% of the total value of the contract, each Series will be able to hold positions with face values equal to several times each Series’ net assets. Over the long term, for periods of several years, the average ratio of margin to equity for Series A is targeted to be approximately 20% and approximately 30% for Series B, but over shorter time periods the average ratio of margin to equity for each Series can range from 0% to more than 50% due to factors such as market volatility and changes in margin requirements, and there can be no assurance that targeted margin to equity ratios will be met. As a result of this leveraging, even a small movement in the price of a contract can cause major losses. Superfund Capital Management will monitor the leverage of each Series regularly but is not limited by the amount of leverage it may employ, except that Series A will be leveraged less than Series B.

The Performance of the Fund Is Expected To Be Volatile; Volatile Performances Can Result in Sudden Large Losses

Superfund Capital Management expects the performance of each Series to be volatile. Futures and forward contract prices have a high degree of variability and are subject to occasional rapid and substantial changes, and the value of the Units may suffer substantial loss from time to time. The net asset value per Unit may change substantially between the date on which you subscribe for Units and the date on which your Units are issued or the date on which you request a redemption and the month-end redemption date. Since its inception in October 2002 through February 2013, monthly returns have ranged from up 19.45% to down 20.12% for Series A Units and from up 27.33% to down 29.11% for Series B Units.

Various factors may influence the price movements of commodity interests, such as: changing supply and demand relationships; weather; agricultural, trade, fiscal, monetary and exchange control programs and policies of governments; United States and foreign political and economic events and policies; changes in national and international interest rates and rates of inflation; currency devaluations and revaluations; and emotions of the marketplace. None of these factors can be controlled by Superfund Capital Management and no assurance can be given that Superfund Capital Management’s advice will result in profitable trades for a participating customer or that a customer will not incur substantial losses.

There is no secondary market for the Units. While the Units have redemption rights, there are restrictions. For example, redemptions can occur only at the end of a month. If a large number of redemption requests were to be received at one time, each Series might have to liquidate positions to satisfy the requests. Such a forced liquidation could adversely affect each Series and consequently your investment. Transfers of the Units are subject to limitations, such as 30 days’ advance written notice of any intent to transfer. Also, Superfund Capital Management may deny a request to transfer if it determines that the transfer may result in adverse legal or tax consequences for each Series. Because Units cannot be readily liquidated, it will not be possible for you to limit losses or realize accrued profits, if any, except at a month-end in accordance with the Fund’s redemption provisions. See “Superfund Green, L.P. Sixth Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement — Dispositions.”

In illiquid markets, the Fund could be unable to close out positions to limit losses or to take positions in order to execute the trading strategies employed by the Fund. There are too many different factors that can contribute to market illiquidity to predict when or where illiquid markets may occur.

Unexpected market illiquidity has caused major losses for some traders in recent years in such market sectors as emerging market currencies. There can be no assurance that the same will not happen in the markets traded by the Fund. In addition, the large size of the positions the Fund may take increases the risk of illiquidity by both making its positions more difficult to liquidate and increasing the losses incurred while trying to do so.

United States commodity exchanges impose limits on the amount the price of some, but not all, futures contracts may change on a single day. Once a futures contract has reached its daily limit, it may be impossible for the Fund to liquidate a position in that contract, if the market has moved adversely to the Fund, until the limit is either raised by the exchange or the contract begins to trade away from the limit price.

The Fund Trades Extensively in Foreign Markets Which May Not Be Subject to the Same Level of Regulatory Oversight as Trading in Domestic Markets

A substantial portion of the Fund’s trades take place on markets or exchanges outside the United States. The risk of loss in trading foreign futures contracts and foreign options can be substantial. Non-U.S. markets may not be subject to the same degree of regulation as their U.S. counterparts. None of the CFTC, NFA or any domestic exchange regulates activities of any foreign boards of trade or has the power to compel enforcement of the rules of a foreign board of trade or any applicable foreign laws. In addition, some foreign exchanges are “principals’ markets” in which performance is the responsibility only of the individual exchange member counterparty, not of the exchange or a clearing facility. In such cases, the Fund will be subject to the risk that the member with whom the Fund has traded is unable or unwilling to perform its obligations under the transaction.

Trading on foreign exchanges also presents the risk of loss due to the possible imposition of exchange controls (making it difficult or impossible for the Fund to repatriate some or all of the Series’ assets held by foreign counterparties), government expropriation of assets, taxation, government intervention in markets, limited rights in the event of bankruptcy of a foreign counterparty or exchange and variances in foreign exchange rates between the time a position is entered and the time it is exited.

Each Series, as an eligible contract participant, trades forward contracts in foreign currencies. Forward contracts are typically traded through the over-the-counter dealer market which is dominated by major money center banks. Each Series faces the risk of non-performance by the counterparties to the forward contracts and such non-performance may cause some or all of your gain to be unrealized.

The interbank currency markets have recently become subject to regulation under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Reform Act”), a development which may entail increased costs and result in burdensome reporting requirements. The imposition of credit controls by governmental authorities or the implementation of regulations pursuant to the Reform Act might limit such forward trading to less than that which Superfund Capital Management would otherwise recommend, to the possible detriment of the Fund. In its forward trading, the Fund will be subject to the risk of the failure of, or the inability or refusal to perform with respect to its forward contracts by, the principals with which the Fund trades. Assets on deposit with such principals will also generally not be protected by the same segregation requirements imposed on CFTC-regulated commodity brokers in respect of customer funds on deposit with them. Accordingly, the insolvency or bankruptcy of such parties could also subject the Fund to the risk of loss.

Price movements in currency forward markets are caused by many unpredictable factors including general economic and financial conditions, governmental policies, national and international political and economic events, and changes in interest rates. Such factors could expose each Series to significant losses which they might otherwise have avoided.

Currency forward positions can be established using less margin than is typical for futures contracts. Thus, a small movement in the price of the underlying currency can result in a substantial price movement relative to the margin deposit. In addition, cash foreign currencies are traded through a dealer market and not on an exchange. This presents the risks of both counterparty creditworthiness and possible default or bankruptcy by the counterparty.

Historically, managed futures have been generally non-correlated to the performance of other asset classes such as stocks and bonds. Non-correlation means that there is no statistically valid relationship between the past performance of futures and forward contracts on the one hand and stocks or bonds on the other hand. Non-correlation should not be confused with negative correlation, where the performance of two asset classes would be exactly opposite. Because of this non-correlation, each Series cannot be expected to be automatically profitable during unfavorable periods for the stock market, or vice versa. The futures, forward and swap markets are fundamentally different from the securities markets in that for every gain made in a futures, forward or swap transaction, the opposing side of that transaction will have an equal and off-setting loss. If a Series does not perform in a manner non-correlated with the general financial markets or does not perform successfully, you will obtain no diversification benefits by investing in the Units of such Series and such Series may have no gains to offset your losses from other investments.

Superfund Capital Management Analyzes Only Technical Market Data, Not Any Economic Factors External to Market Prices

The trading systems used by Superfund Capital Management for each Series are primarily technical, trend-following methods involving instruments that are not historically correlated with each other. The profitability of trading under these systems generally depends on, among other things, the occurrence of significant price trends which are sustained movements, up or down, in futures and forward prices. Such trends may not develop; there have been periods in the past without price trends in certain markets. The likelihood of the Units being profitable could be materially diminished during periods when events external to the markets themselves have an important impact on prices. During such periods, Superfund Capital Management’s historic price analysis could establish positions on the wrong side of the price movements caused by such events.

Superfund Capital Management’s Trading Methodology is Subject to Change Over Time

Superfund Capital Management may periodically modify its trading methodology without approval by or notice to Limited Partners, provided, however, that Limited Partners will be notified of any material changes in Superfund Capital Management’s trading methodology in accordance with applicable regulations. Modifications may include changes in or substitution of technical trading systems, risk control overlays, money management principles and markets traded as well as the incorporation of non-trend-following systems within Superfund Capital Management’s primary trend-following methodology and the inclusion of non-technical methods of analysis.

The CFTC has established limits on the maximum net long or net short positions which any person may hold or control in certain futures contracts. Exchanges also have established such limits. In November 2011, the CFTC adopted a new position limits regime for 28 so-called “exempt” (i.e. metals and energy) and agricultural

futures and options contracts and their economically equivalent swap contracts. These position limits are not yet effective and there is considerable uncertainty surrounding their application. All accounts controlled by Superfund Capital Management, including the account of each Series, are combined for speculative position limit purposes. If positions in those accounts were to approach the level of the particular speculative position limit, such limits could cause a modification of Superfund Capital Management’s trading decisions for each Series or force liquidation of certain futures positions, possibly resulting in losses.

The more assets Superfund Capital Management manages, the more difficult it may be for Superfund Capital Management to trade profitably because of the difficulty of trading larger positions without adversely affecting prices and performance. Accordingly, such increases in equity under management may require Superfund Capital Management to modify its trading decisions for each Series which could have a detrimental effect on your investment.

Superfund Capital Management makes each Series’ trading decisions. While Superfund Capital Management receives daily trade confirmations from the clearing brokers, only a Series’ net trading results are reported to Limited Partners and only on a monthly basis. Accordingly, an investment in each Series does not offer Limited Partners the same transparency, i.e., an ability to review all investment positions daily, that a personal trading account offers.

It will rarely be possible for Superfund Capital Management to buy or sell futures and forward contracts at the target prices specified by the trading systems it uses. Numerous factors impede Superfund Capital Management’s ability to trade at the target price in any market. Such factors include, for example, the total number of positions the systems are taking at a given time, the extent to which there are buyers or sellers ready and willing to take the opposite sides of these positions (and the trading strategies of these buyers and sellers), and the inherent volatility of the market at the time of trading due to other known and unknown circumstances. Moreover, new factors that can impede the ability of Superfund Capital Management to trade at target prices may appear from time to time and Superfund Capital Management may not be aware of the new factors when it trades. Although Superfund Capital Management and its affiliates will act in good faith to attempt to execute orders to buy and sell futures and forward contracts at or close to the target prices, they will not necessarily be able to do so. Managing order execution to attempt to address any one factor is likely to increase each Series’ exposure to risks associated with other factors. There can be no assurance that the inability of Superfund Capital Management or its affiliates to execute orders for the purchase or sale of futures and forward contracts at the prices desired by the trading systems will not, in fact, result in losses for the Fund.

Investors are taxed each year on their share of Fund profits, if any, irrespective of whether they redeem any Units or receive any cash distributions from the Fund. All performance information included in this Prospectus is presented on a pre-tax basis; investors who experience such performance may have to redeem Units or pay the related taxes from other sources.

Tax Could Be Due From Investors on Their Share of the Fund’s Ordinary Income Despite Overall Losses

Investors may be required to pay tax on their allocable share of the Fund’s ordinary income, which in the case of the Fund is the Fund’s interest income and gain on some foreign futures contracts, even though the Fund incurs overall losses. Capital losses can be used only to offset capital gains and up to $3,000 of ordinary income each year for non-corporate investors. Consequently, if a non-corporate investor were allocated $5,000 of ordinary income and $10,000 of capital losses, the investor would owe tax on $2,000 of ordinary income even though the investor would have a $5,000 loss for the year. The $7,000 capital loss carry forward could be used in subsequent years to offset capital gain and ordinary income, but subject to the same annual limitation on its deductibility against ordinary income.

Although the Fund treats the management fees and performance fees paid and other expenses of the Fund as ordinary and necessary business expenses, upon audit the Fund may be required to treat such fees as “investment advisory fees” if the Fund’s trading activities were determined to not constitute a trade or business for tax purposes. If the expenses were determined to be investment advisory fees, a Limited Partner’s tax liability would likely increase. In addition, upon audit, a portion of the management and performance fees might be treated as a non-deductible syndication cost or might be treated as a reduction in the Fund’s capital gain or as an increase in the Fund’s capital loss. If the management and performance fees were so treated, a Limited Partner’s tax liability would likely increase.

Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes May Have Effects on the Periodic Calculations of Net Asset Value

Accounting Standards Codification Topic No. 740, “Income Taxes” (in part formerly known as “FIN 48”) (“ASC 740”), provides guidance on the recognition of uncertain tax positions. ASC 740 prescribes the minimum recognition threshold that a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in an entity’s financial statements. It also provides guidance on recognition, measurement, classification and interest and penalties with respect to tax positions. A prospective investor should be aware that, among other things, ASC 740 could have a material adverse effect on the periodic calculations of the Net Asset Value of the Fund, including reducing the Net Asset Value of the Fund to reflect reserves for income taxes, such as foreign withholding taxes, that may be payable by the Fund. This could cause benefits or detriments to certain investors, depending upon the timing of their entry and exit from the Fund.

Each Series is subject to substantial charges payable irrespective of profitability in addition to performance fees which are payable based on each Series’ profitability. Included in these charges are management, ongoing offering, and brokerage fees and operating expenses. On each Series’ forward and swap trading, “bid-ask” spreads are incorporated into the pricing of each Series’ forward and swap contracts by the counterparties in addition to the brokerage fees paid by each Series. It is not possible to quantify the “bid-ask” spreads paid by each Series because each Series cannot determine the profit its counterparty is making on its forward and swap transactions. Such spreads can at times represent significant profits to the counterparty.

The Commodity Exchange Act requires a clearing broker to segregate all funds received from customers from such broker’s proprietary assets. If any of the clearing brokers fails to do so, the assets of each Series might not be fully protected in the event of the bankruptcy of the clearing broker. Furthermore, in the event of a clearing broker’s bankruptcy, each Series could be limited to recovering only a pro rata share, which may be zero, of all available funds segregated on behalf of any such clearing broker’s combined customer accounts, even though certain property specifically traceable to each Series (for example, Treasury Bills deposited by each Series with the clearing broker as margin) was held by the clearing broker. The clearing brokers have been the subject of certain regulatory and private causes of action in the past and may be again in the future. Such actions could affect the ability of a clearing firm to conduct its business. See “The Clearing Brokers.” Furthermore, dealers in forward and swap contracts are not currently obligated to segregate customer assets in respect of uncleared swaps and forward transactions (including forward currency contracts). As a result, you do not have such basic protections in such forward and swap contracts.

Investors Must Not Rely on Past Performance of the Series or Superfund Capital Management in Deciding Whether to Buy Units

The future performance of each Series is not predictable, and no assurance can be given that each Series will perform successfully in the future. Past performance of a trading program is not necessarily indicative of future results.

The Fund is subject to numerous actual and potential conflicts of interest, including: (1) Superfund Capital Management will not select any other trading advisor for the Fund even if doing so would be beneficial to the Fund; (2) the commission sharing arrangements between Superfund Capital Management and the Fund’s clearing brokers creates an incentive for Superfund Capital Management to trade more frequently than it otherwise might; (3) the proprietary trading of Superfund Capital Management or its principals or of the Fund’s clearing brokers and their affiliates and personnel may increase competition for positions sought to be entered by the Fund making it more

difficult for the Fund to enter positions at favorable prices; and (4) the compensation that the selling agents, including Superfund USA, receive gives them an incentive to promote the sale of Units as well as to discourage redemptions. See “Conflicts of Interest.”

Because Superfund Capital Management has not established any formal procedures for resolving conflicts of interest and because there is no independent control over how conflicts of interest are resolved, you will be dependent on the good faith of the parties with conflicts to resolve the conflicts equitably. Superfund Capital Management cannot assure that conflicts of interest will not result in losses for the Fund.

Superfund Capital Management has consulted with counsel, accountants and other experts regarding the formation and operation of each Series. No counsel has been appointed to represent the Limited Partners in connection with the offering of the Units. Accordingly, each prospective investor should consult his own legal, tax and financial advisers regarding the desirability of an investment in each Series.

Each Series is structured as a single-advisor managed futures fund. Many managed futures funds are structured as multi-advisor funds to attempt to control risk and reduce volatility through combining advisors whose historical performance records have exhibited a significant degree of non-correlation with each other. As a single-advisor managed futures fund, the Series may have greater volatility and a higher risk of loss than investment vehicles employing multiple advisors, but may also have increased performance volatility and a higher risk of loss. Superfund Capital Management may retain additional trading advisors on behalf of each Series in the future.

The incapacity of one or more of Superfund Capital Management’s principals could have a material and adverse effect on its ability to discharge its obligations under the Partnership Agreement. Additionally, Superfund Capital Management may withdraw as general partner with respect to a Series, or the Fund as a whole, upon 120 days’ notice, which would cause such Series, or the Fund, to terminate unless a substitute general partner was obtained. Neither Superfund Capital Management nor its principals are under any obligation to devote a minimum amount of time to the operation of the Fund.

Possibility of Termination of Each Series Before Expiration of its Stated Term

As general partner, Superfund Capital Management may withdraw from each Series upon 120 days’ notice, which would cause each Series to terminate unless a substitute general partner were obtained. Other events, such as a long-term substantial loss suffered by each Series, could also cause each Series to terminate before the expiration of its stated term. This could cause you to liquidate your investments and upset the overall maturity and timing of your investment portfolio. If the registrations with the CFTC or memberships in the NFA of Superfund Capital Management or the clearing brokers were revoked or suspended, such entity would no longer be able to provide services to each Series.

Although Superfund Capital Management is subject to regulation by the CFTC, each Series is not an investment company subject to the Investment Company Act of 1940. Accordingly, you do not have the protections afforded by that statute which, for example, require investment companies to have a majority of disinterested directors and regulate the relationship between the adviser and the investment company.

A Bankruptcy Court Could Find the Assets of One Series to be Available to Offset the Liabilities of the Other Series

The Fund is organized as a series limited partnership pursuant to Section 17-218 (“Section 17-218”) of the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act (the “Act”), with separate series of limited partnership interests

and assets. Section 17-218 provides that, if certain conditions (as set forth in Section 17-218) are met, the debts, liabilities, obligations and expenses incurred, contracted for or otherwise existing with respect to a particular series will be enforceable only against the assets of such series and not against the assets of the limited partnership generally or any other series. Accordingly, the assets of one Series of the Fund include only those funds and other assets that are paid to, held by or distributed to the Fund on account of and for the benefit of that Series, including, without limitation, funds delivered to the Fund for the purchase of Units in that Series. However, the limitations on inter-series liability provided by Section 17-218 have never been tested in court. Thus there is a risk that a court, and in particular, a Bankruptcy Court, could determine that the assets of one Series should be applied to meet the liabilities of the other Series or the liabilities of the Fund generally where the assets of such other Series or of the Fund generally are insufficient to meet its liabilities.

The futures markets are subject to comprehensive statutes, regulations and margin requirements. In addition, the CFTC and the exchanges are authorized to take extraordinary actions in the event of a market emergency, including, for example, the retroactive implementation of speculative position limits or higher margin requirements, the establishment of daily price limits and the suspension of trading. The regulation of futures and forward transactions in the United States is a rapidly changing area of law and is subject to modification by government and judicial action. In addition, various national governments have expressed concern regarding the disruptive effects of speculative trading in the currency markets and the need to regulate the “derivatives” markets in general. The effect of any future regulatory change on each Series is impossible to predict, but could be substantial and adverse.

Forwards, Swaps, Hybrids and Other Derivatives are Subject to Varying CFTC Regulation

Each Series may trade foreign exchange contracts in the interbank market. In addition to swaps, each Series may also trade hybrid instruments and other off-exchange contracts. Swap agreements involve trading income streams such as fixed rate for floating rate interest. Hybrids are instruments which combine features of a security with those of a futures contract. Currently, there is no exchange and there is a limited usage of clearinghouses for these contracts and traders must generally rely on the creditworthiness of the counterparty to fulfill the obligations of the transaction.

The Reform Act includes provisions that comprehensively regulate the over-the-counter derivatives markets for the first time. The Reform Act mandates a substantial portion of over-the-counter derivatives to be executed in regulated markets and submitted for clearing to regulated clearinghouses. The mandates imposed by the Reform Act may result in the Fund bearing higher upfront and mark-to-market margin, less favorable trade pricing, and the possible imposition of new or increased fees.

In the future, options on futures contracts may be used by each Series to generate premium income or capital gains. Futures options involve risks similar to futures in that options are speculative and highly leveraged. The buyer of an option risks losing the entire purchase price (the premium) of the option. The writer (seller) of an option risks losing the difference between the premium received for the option and the price of the commodity or futures contract underlying the option which the writer must purchase or deliver upon exercise of the option (which losses can be unlimited). Specific market movements of the commodities or futures contracts underlying an option cannot accurately be predicted.

Each Series may commit up to 60% of its assets as margin for positions held by the clearing brokers. Because such commitment typically represents only a small percentage of the total value of such positions, adverse price movements can cause losses in excess of such commitment and potentially in excess of the total assets of a Series.

A Computer System’s Failure Could Result in Losses or Delays in Reporting

Superfund Capital Management’s strategies are dependent to a significant degree on the proper functioning of its internal computer systems. Accordingly, systems failures, whether due to third-party failures upon which such systems are dependent or the failure of Superfund Capital Management’s hardware or software, could disrupt trading or make trading impossible until such failure is remedied. Such failures may result from events including “acts of God” and domestic or international terrorism. Any such failure, and consequential inability to trade (even for a short time), could, in certain market conditions, cause the Fund to experience significant trading losses or to miss opportunities for profitable trading. Lastly, any such failures could cause a temporary delay in reports to investors.

Superfund Capital Management is the general partner and commodity trading advisor of each Series. It is a Grenada corporation with offices located at Superfund Office Building, P.O. Box 1479, Grand Anse, St. George’s, Grenada West Indies, and its telephone number is (473) 439-2418. The firm’s books and records are maintained at this location and are available there for inspection. Its sole business is the trading and management of discretionary futures accounts, including commodity pools. It has been registered with the CFTC as a commodity pool operator since May 9, 2001, and has been a member of the NFA in that capacity since January 7, 2003. As of February 28, 2013, Superfund Capital Management and its affiliates had approximately $660 million in assets under management in the futures and forward markets. Christian Baha owns 100% of Superfund Capital Management and its affiliates, Superfund USA Holdings, Inc. and Superfund Trading Management, Inc.

The principals of Superfund Capital Management are Nigel James, Martin Schneider, Gizela Benedek, and Christian Baha. As discussed below, Mr. James is responsible for the firm’s trading decisions through the implementation of proprietary, computerized trading systems. The principals of Superfund Capital Management have not purchased and do not intend to purchase Units. Superfund Capital Management has agreed that its capital account as general partner of each Series at all times will equal at least 1% of the net aggregate capital contributions of all Limited Partners in each such Series. There have never been any material administrative, civil or criminal proceedings brought against Superfund Capital Management or its principals, whether pending, on appeal or concluded. The firm maintains any required past performance information for itself and its trading principals at the address shown above in this section.

Nigel James, age 32, was appointed as President of Superfund Capital Management on July 13, 2006, and was listed as a principal and registered as an associated person with Superfund Capital Management on November 28, 2006 and May 23, 2007, respectively. Mr. James has been an employee of various members of the Superfund group of affiliated companies since July 2003 when he became a software developer for Superfund Trading Management, Inc., an affiliate of Superfund Capital Management that acts as a commodity trading advisor to non-U.S. funds. In May 2005, he was promoted to the role of Intellectual Technology Project Manager for Superfund Trading Management, Inc. where he managed a team focused on conceptual analysis and design of trading software. Mr. James graduated from the University of the West Indies in Barbados with a Bachelor’s Degree in Computer Science and Management in May 2003 and began his employment in July 2003. Mr. James is a citizen of Grenada.

Martin Schneider, age 46, was appointed Vice President, Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and sole Director of Superfund Capital Management on July 28, 2010. Mr. Schneider was listed as a principal of Superfund Capital Management on August 19, 2010. From May 1997 to June 2001, Mr. Schneider served as Sales Director for Nike, Inc., an international retailer, in the company’s European divisions. From July 2001 to July 2002, Mr. Schneider held the position of Commercial Director for FC Tirol Innsbruck, a former Austrian football club. In this position, Mr. Schneider was responsible for the promotional activities of the organization. Mr. Schneider spent August 2002 preparing for his transition to the Superfund group of financial companies. From September 2002 to March 2005, Mr. Schneider functioned as the sports marketing director for Quadriga Asset Management GmbH, a financial services company, and as the Executive Vice President of the

successor company, Superfund Marketing and Sports Sponsoring Inc., a marketing services company. In April 2005, Mr. Schneider assumed the role of Operating Manager for Superfund Group Monaco, a financial services company, a position he held until his appointment to Superfund Capital Management in June 2010. In the position of Operating Manager, Mr. Schneider conducted internal operational and financial audits of members of the Superfund group of affiliated financial companies. Mr. Schneider is a graduate of TGM Technical School in Vienna, Austria, with a degree in mechanical engineering. Mr. Schneider is a citizen of Austria.

Gizela Benedek, age 34, was appointed Treasurer of Superfund Capital Management on July 28, 2010. Ms. Benedek will also serve as Audit Committee Financial Expert for the Fund. Ms. Benedek was listed as a principal of Superfund Capital Management on September 10, 2010. From June 2000 to September 2005, Ms. Benedek served as an Associate of PricewaterhouseCoopers, an international accounting firm, in its tax consulting group in Vienna, Austria. In this position, Ms. Benedek provided tax consulting services to investment companies. From October 2005 to December 2005, Ms. Benedek conducted intensive research in connection with her master thesis. From January 2006 to July 2008, Ms. Benedek held the position of Auditing Associate in the auditing group of RSM Exacta Wirtschaftsprufung AG, an Austrian auditing and tax consultancy firm. In this position, Ms. Benedek provided auditing services to private foundations and mid-market companies. From August 2008 through August 2009, she was granted educational leave sponsored by the Austrian government to study for the U.S. CPA exam. Since September 2009, Ms. Benedek has held the role of Financial Counsel for Superfund Distribution and Investment, Inc., a financial services company located in Grenada, West Indies. In this role, Ms. Benedek engages in various internal accounting and auditing functions. Ms. Benedek is a graduate of The University of Economics and Business Administration in Vienna, Austria and is a certified public accountant. Ms. Benedek is a citizen of Austria.

Christian Baha, age 44, is Superfund Capital Management’s founder and sole owner. By December 1991, Mr. Baha began working independently to develop software for the technical analysis of financial data in Austria. In January 1995, Mr. Baha founded the first members of the Superfund group of affiliated companies specializing in managed futures funds and began to develop a worldwide distribution network. With profit sharing rights certificates, Mr. Baha launched an alternative investment vehicle for private investors. Launched on March 8, 1996, this product is called the Superfund Unternehmens-Beteiligungs-Aktiengesellschaft (Superfund Q-AG), and was formerly known as Quadriga Beteiligungs & Vermögens AG (Quadriga AG). In March 2003, a new generation of managed futures funds was internationally launched under the brand name “Superfund” and previously existing products have since been re-branded under this name. Simultaneously with the development of the Quadriga/Superfund group of affiliated companies, Mr. Baha founded the software company TeleTrader AG, which has been listed on the Vienna Stock Exchange since March 2001. He was listed as a principal of Superfund Advisors, Inc., a CFTC registered commodity pool operator, on November 20, 2009, however, such listing was withdrawn as of November 26, 2011. He was registered as an associated person and listed as a principal of Superfund Asset Management, Inc., a CFTC registered introducing broker, effective as of July 23, 1999 and June 24, 1997, respectively, until it withdrew its registration on July 12, 2012. He is registered as an associated person and listed as a principal of Superfund Asset Management LLC, a CFTC registered introducing broker, positions which he has held since June 11, 2012 and April 26, 2012. He has also been listed as a principal of Superfund Capital Management since May 9, 2001. He was registered as an associated person of Superfund Capital Management on May 9, 2001 as well, however, such registration was subsequently withdrawn on February 17, 2009. Mr. Baha is listed as a principal of Superfund Capital Management because he is its sole owner. Mr. Baha was also listed as a principal of Superfund USA, Inc., a former broker dealer that was previously registered as a commodity pool operator with the CFTC from August 14, 2009 through September 4, 2010, from August 13, 2009 through September 4, 2010 because he is the sole owner of the foregoing entity. He is a graduate of the police academy in Vienna, Austria and studied at the Business University of Vienna, Austria. Mr. Baha is a citizen of Austria.

Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, Superfund Capital Management has the sole authority and responsibility for managing the Fund and for directing the investment and reinvestment of each Series’ assets. Although Superfund Capital Management currently serves as the sole trading advisor of each Series, it may, in the future, retain other trading advisors to manage a portion of the assets of each Series. Limited Partners will receive prior notice, in the monthly report from each Series or otherwise, in the event that additional trading advisors are to be retained on behalf of each Series.

Superfund Capital Management makes each Series’ trading decisions using proprietary, fully-automated computerized trading systems, which trade in more than 120 futures and forward contracts, which automatically generate buy and sell signals, and constantly monitor relevant technical indicators on the traded futures markets in the U.S., Canada, Europe and Asia and on the off-exchange foreign currency markets. By using fully-automated trading systems, human emotions are removed from the capital management process.

Superfund Capital Management and its affiliates trade in more than 120 futures and forward contracts globally, although not in all markets at all times and in only a few markets from time to time, including both commodity and financial futures and foreign currencies. The primary sectors that each Series may trade are: currencies, interest rates, bonds, stock indices, metals, energy, grains and agriculture markets. Superfund’s proprietary trading systems emphasize instruments with low correlation to each other and high liquidity for order execution.

Superfund Capital Management’s strategy is based primarily on the implementation of a four-point philosophy consisting of (i) market diversification, (ii) technical analysis, (iii) systematic, primarily trend-following, trading systems, and (iv) money management. The Superfund trading systems scan more than 120 different futures and forward contracts worldwide on a daily basis and make the following decisions: whether to establish new positions (long or short), whether to adjust or place stop orders, whether to make a change in position size based on volatility or change in correlation between markets, and whether to exit open positions. The decision to establish new positions is generally based on a proprietary algorithm that seeks to identify market trends at an early stage of formation. These trends can last from days to months. Trend identification is done by analyzing technical indicators and parameters such as moving averages, Bollinger Bands, which are technical channel indicators calculated as multiples of the standard deviation above and below a moving average and other technical indicators. Once potential trades are identified, the systems apply additional filters at the trade level with respect to trend and volatility analysis and, before generating definite buy or sell signals, taking into consideration macro variables such as overall risk capital available for trading and portfolio volatility.

Superfund Capital Management also integrates a systematic, technical short-term trading strategy into the Fund’s primary trend-following methodology. This short-term strategy seeks to capitalize on short-term changes in futures and forward market prices, with trades lasting from less than a day to more than a week, and has exhibited low correlation to the trend-following methodology historically utilized by the Fund. Trading decisions are based on proprietary algorithms that seek to identify short-term trading opportunities, whether within a larger market trend or other market pattern or otherwise, through an analysis of technical indicators, and are generated on a fully automated basis without human emotional bias.

With respect to money management, before entering new positions the Superfund trading systems define the maximum open risk per position based on market correlation and market volatility. This money management filter is applied after positions have been established on a daily basis per market and adjusts existing stop order levels or reduces position size if proprietary pre-defined risk measures are met or exceeded due to market volatility or changes in market correlation. Finally, positions are exited either by being stopped out or adjusted as a result of the changes in volatility or market correlation. Once finally determined, Superfund Capital Management causes the trade instructions to be executed through the Fund’s executing and clearing brokers.

The trading method, systems, and money management techniques employed by Superfund Capital Management are proprietary and confidential. The foregoing description is general and is not intended to be complete. There can be no assurance that Superfund Capital Management’s trading systems will successfully identify trades that the Fund can capitalize on or produce results similar to those produced in the past for other funds managed by Superfund Capital Management or its affiliates.

Set forth below and on the following page are the performance records of the Fund for the period January 2008 through February 2013. Effective July 1, 2010, Superfund Capital Management integrated a systematic, technical short-term trading strategy into the Fund’s primary trend-following methodology. This short-term strategy seeks trading opportunities arising out of short term changes in futures and forward market prices, with trades lasting from less than a day to more than a week, and has exhibited low correlation to the trend-following methodology historically utilized by the Fund. PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.

Total gross capital subscriptions made to a pool or account from inception through the date indicated.

Greatest cumulative percentage decline in month-end net asset value due to losses sustained by a pool or account during any period in which the initial month-end net asset value is not equaled or exceeded by a subsequent month-end net asset value.

Net Asset Value of each Series is that Series’ assets less liabilities determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

Total gross capital subscriptions made to a pool or account from inception through the date indicated.

Net Asset Value of each Series is that Series’ assets less liabilities determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

The Fund commenced the offering of its Units on October 22, 2002. The initial offering terminated on October 31, 2002 and the Fund commenced operations on November 5, 2002. The continuing offering period commenced at the termination of the initial offering period and is ongoing. The Fund changed its name from “Quadriga Superfund, L.P.” to “Superfund Green, L.P.” effective December 1, 2009. From inception through the period ended February 28, 2013, subscriptions totaling $229,921,295 have been accepted and redemptions over the same period totaled $277,057,610.

Most United States commodity exchanges limit fluctuations in futures contracts prices during a single day by regulations referred to as “daily price fluctuation limits” or “daily limits.” During a single trading day, no trades may be executed at prices beyond the daily limit. This may affect the Fund’s ability to initiate new positions or close existing ones or may prevent it from having orders executed. Futures prices have occasionally moved the daily limit for several consecutive days with little or no trading. Similar occurrences could prevent the Fund from promptly liquidating unfavorable positions and subject the Fund to substantial losses, which could exceed the margin initially committed to such trades. In addition, even if futures prices have not moved the daily limit, the Fund may not be able to execute futures trades at favorable prices if little trading in such contracts is taking place.

Trading in forward contracts introduces a possible further impact on liquidity. Because such contracts are executed “off exchange” between private parties, the time required to offset or “unwind” these positions may be greater than that for regulated instruments. This potential delay could be exacerbated to the extent a counterparty is not a U.S. person.

Other than these limitations on liquidity, which are inherent in the Fund’s futures and forward trading operations, the Fund’s assets are expected to be highly liquid.

The Fund will raise additional capital only through the sale of Units offered pursuant to the continuing offering and does not intend to raise any capital through borrowings. Due to the nature of the Fund’s business, it will make no capital expenditures and will have no capital assets which are not operating capital or assets.

Net results for the year ended December 31, 2012 were a loss of 13.4% in net asset value compared to the preceding year. In this period, Series A experienced a net decrease in net assets from operations of $3,138,973. The 2012 results consisted of interest income of $5,629, other income of $675, trading losses of $950,156 and total expenses of $2,195,121. Expenses included $455,240 in management fees, $246,076 in ongoing offering expenses, $36,912 in operating expenses, $984,302 in selling commissions, $501,855 in brokerage commissions and $12,253 in other expenses. At December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the net asset value per Unit of Series A was $1,130.49 and $1,306.48, respectively.

Net results for the year ended December 31, 2012 were a loss of 18.2% in net asset value compared to the preceding year. In this period, Series B experienced a net decrease in net assets from operations of $4,814,078. The 2012 results consisted of interest income of $5,647, other income of $1,199, trading losses of $2,154,966 and total expenses of $2,665,958. Expenses included $486,724 in management fees, $263,093 in ongoing offering expenses, $39,464 in operating expenses, $1,052,374 in selling commissions, $778,655 in brokerage commissions and $12,548 in other expenses. At December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the net asset value per Unit of Series B was $1,138.65 and $1,391.44, respectively.

In December, the Fund’s strategies ended 2012 on a positive note with gains despite the uncertainty resulting from U.S. budgetary negotiations. As the year-end deadline approached, U.S. political leaders struggled to avert the so-called fiscal cliff, a term used to describe the deadlock over $607 billion in tax increases and cuts to government spending. Meanwhile the U.S. Federal Reserve (the “Fed”) announced $45 billion in monthly treasury purchases while also linking its key interest rate to unemployment and inflation for the first time. U.S. equities finished nearly unchanged despite optimistic economic data while European and Asian stocks gained ground. Japanese stocks and commodities were lifted by the plummeting yen as newly elected Prime Minister Shinzo Abe pushed for bold monetary easing. Gold and silver fell below 200-day moving averages while base metals and energies fluctuated on fiscal cliff related demand prospects. The Fund’s short-term strategies produced mixed returns with gains in stocks and metals and losses in energies. The Fund’s models generated positive returns in global equity indices in December as tensions over European finances eased. The DAX gained ground on encouraging factory orders and inflation-free consumer price index and producer price index figures while the IBEX35 and MIB40 climbed in-spite of economic weakness. The Japanese Nikkei soared as the tumbling yen boosted export demand expectation while Chinese H-Shares profited on strong industrial production and retail sales data. In the U.S., the Dow Jones Industrial Average (the “Dow”) and the Standard & Poor’s 500 index (“S&P 500”) declined on the fiscal cliff deadlock before reaching positive territory on the last day of trading as political parties closed in on a budgetary resolution. The Nasdaq Stock Market (the “Nasdaq”) fell as shares of the influential Apple Inc. continued to come under pressure. The Fund’s positions in the bond sector resulted in loss in December as U.S. fiscal cliff negotiations continued to drive market movement. Fiscal cliff uncertainty, expectations for poor U.S. employment data, and downbeat euro-zone forecasts drove global yields lower at the start of December. The addition of 146,000 jobs and the Fed’s expansion of the third round of quantitative easing (“QE3”) reversed the trend as investors turned to risk. Renewed optimism for a budget resolution pushed U.S. 10-year Treasury yields to a 7-week high of 1.85% before investment turned to safety once again. German bund yields approached record lows on expectations for a rate cut by the European Central Bank (“ECB”) before Greece reached a deal to repurchase some of its sovereign securities and the ECB left rates unchanged, diminishing demand for Europe’s safest asset. The Fund’s allocations to currency markets profited in December as trends in the euro and yen persisted. The U.S. dollar was lower against major currencies due to the increasing threat of fiscal cliff tax increases and spending cuts. The euro remained relatively strong as the ECB again held the line on interest rates and the recent recovery in equity markets boosted confidence. The British pound also gained despite the relative weakness of the United Kingdom (“U.K.”) economy. The U.S. dollar lost value against most South American currencies including the Columbian peso and Brazilian real. The Japanese yen fell drastically, reaching a 28-month low, as the Bank of Japan (“BOJ”) continued its attempts to weaken its currency. The Australian dollar was modestly weaker in the face of soft commodity demand. The Fund’s grain positions generated losses in December after China canceled U.S. soybean purchases and favorable weather in South America increased harvest expectations. Soybeans and soybean by-products initially climbed to a one-month high, aided by solid exports and crush data. Soybean markets were then abruptly sent lower as China canceled purchases totaling 840,000 metric tons. Soybeans fell to a one-month low of $13.97 ³/₄ before settling down just 1.6%.

In November, the Fund’s strategies produced disappointing results as U.S. budgetary negotiations injected headline risk and volatility across market sectors. World indices fell dramatically following the U.S. presidential election as congressional leaders grappled with how to avert the so-called fiscal cliff. Fears that such drastic measures would send the U.S., and potentially the world economy, back into recession drove investment towards safety. Concern turned to optimism later in the month as lawmakers seemed to make progress, lifting U.S., European

and Asian equities. Energies, supported by tensions in the Middle East, also benefited from the hopes for budgetary resolution. Base metals gained ground, aided by signs that the Chinese economy is once again accelerating. The Fund’s short-term strategies yielded positive returns in interest rates and equities while underperforming in energies. The Fund’s allocation to long-term interest rates generated positive results in November as U.S. budgetary concerns lifted bond prices. Immediately following the U.S. presidential election, focus turned to the fiscal cliff as politicians publicly debated the merits of their positions, leading to reactionary market movement. Fiscal cliff anxieties drove U.S. 30-year Treasury bonds to all-time highs, settling up 1.2%. German bunds, Europe’s preeminent safe-haven instrument, also reached all-time highs. Japanese 10-yr bonds reached a 9 ¹/₂ year high amid expectations for aggressive easing after the country’s December election. The Fund’s allocation to currencies produced positive returns in November as U.S. dollar weakness continued with the Fed intent on keeping interest rates extremely low. The euro fell versus the U.S. dollar before rebounding late as the ECB kept rates unchanged and European equities strengthened. Steady support for the euro from regional leaders and the ECB stabilized fears of an eminent euro-zone breakup. The Japanese yen (-3.2%) fell sharply as the BOJ provided more signals that easing is on the horizon. The Australian dollar (+0.7%) rose as its economy continued to avoid the problems affecting the rest of the globe. The Canadian dollar (+0.8%) also strengthened against the U.S. dollar while the Mexican Peso (+1.4%) gained on positive industrial production and retail sales. The Fund’s positions in metals resulted in loss in November as bearish trends reversed on hopes for additional fiscal stimulus, alternative investment demand and accelerating growth in China. Gold and silver fell sharply to start November after better-than-expected U.S. unemployment figures were seen as alleviating pressure on the Fed to implement additional stimulus measures. The dip was short-lived as post-election optimism grew for a resolution to the U.S. budget impasse. After falling to an 8-week low on November 2, COMEX silver climbed a robust 7.6% to close 2.8% higher. Base metals copper and aluminum, after falling 13.4% and 9.7% respectively since mid-September, both climbed steadily on prospects for increased demand from China. The Fund’s energies positions produced negative results in November, as crude prices edged up after the breakout of hostilities between Israel and Hamas and ongoing political tensions in Syria and Iran injected risk premium into energies. NYMEX crude (+3.1%) rose sharply in reaction to the conflict while IPE Brent crude (+2.3%) was modestly higher. Lack of global economic growth, increasing production rates and high levels of inventories kept West Texas Intermediate (“WTI”) prices contained. Reformulated Blendstock for Oxygenate Blending (“RBOB”) gasoline (+4.1%) gained significant ground as inventories slipped after two straight gains. After climbing as much as 5.6%, natural gas plummeted late on an unexpected gain in U.S. stockpiles due to unusually mild winter weather in the northern hemisphere. Natural gas finished down 6.8% in volatile trade.

In October, the Fund’s strategies produced disappointing results as encouraging economic data supported equities while commodity demand remained tepid. Investors looking for signs of additional economic stimulus were let down as central bankers were generally quiet. In China, direct foreign investment fell for the 10^thtime in 11 months, contrasting with improvements in exports and retail sales. U.S. housing starts hit a 4-year high and unemployment unexpectedly fell below 8.0%, lifting stocks and pressuring safe-haven debt instruments. Moody’s maintained Spain’s credit rating at investment grade, citing the ECB’s willingness to buy sovereign debt. Growing stockpiles of crude oil and distillate fuels met head-on with diminishing demand. RBOB gasoline fell for nine straight sessions, its longest slump in 25 years. The Fund’s short-term strategies yielded mixed returns with gains in currencies and losses in metals and interest rates. The Fund’s equity index positions generated mixed results in October. While economic conditions remained challenging across Europe, equities finished modestly higher on improved economic data. The Italian MIB (+1.9%) and French CAC40 (+2.2%) both finished with gains as industrial production improved. The London FTSE (+0.9%) rose modestly as gross domestic product (“GDP”) growth beat forecasts while the German DAX (+0.5%) was slightly higher despite declining factory orders. Equities in the east were mixed as uncertainty drove investor sentiment. Chinese H-Shares (+7.6%) rose as GDP and retail sales surpassed expectations. The South Korean Kospi (-5.2%) fell as growth remained sluggish while the Nikkei (+0.5%) rose on anticipated government stimulus. Weakness in the U.S. technology sector sent the Nasdaq down 5.4%. The Fund’s allocations to long-term interest rates underperformed in October as European peripheral woes created a risk-on, risk-off environment, while economic data in the U.S. pressured treasury futures. German bunds dropped 0.7% after Moody’s affirmed Spain’s investment grade credit rating at just above junk. Moody’s subsequently lowered the ratings of five Spanish regional economies. The localized downgrades along with an 11% tumble in Spanish retail sales drove assets back into the safety of bunds. Bund yields climbed as high as 1.66% before falling back to 1.46%. U.S. bonds experienced consistent declines, influenced by a drastic dip in the unemployment rate and significant increases in new housing starts. The Fund’s positions in the metals sector underperformed in October as prospects for additional stimulus measures diminished and the U.S. dollar firmed.

Expectations for another round of growth initiatives in China receded as September exports climbed 9.9% and industrial production accelerated. The Fed avoided addressing the approaching expiration of their Operation Twist program, reducing demand for gold and silver as inflation hedges. COMEX copper and LME aluminum declined 6.4% and 9.8% respectively as the debt crisis continued to weigh on world economies. The Fund’s energy portfolio underperformed in October as markets gave back recent gains. Crude oil fell another 7% as the global economy remained weak. North American crude output swelled to a 17-year high while consumption fell to a 4-year low. Earning misses by economic heavyweights Microsoft and General Electric signaled further demand reduction while Chinese imports remained depressed. European benchmark Brent crude (-3.3%) held up well relative to the WTI contract as the spread between the two widened to as much $24.87. Natural gas (+2.2%) rose to a 2012 high ($3.97 per million British thermal units (“btu”)) as storage levels were unchanged even though production rates remain high. The Fund’s allocations to foreign exchange markets generated moderate gains as the U.S. dollar fluctuated relative to world currencies. The British pound was steady against the U.S. dollar as GDP rose 1.0%, taking the U.K. out of recessionary territory. The Euro (+0.7%) rose modestly as the ECB took no action, citing elevated but acceptable levels of inflation. The Australian dollar weakened as the Reserve Bank of Australia (“RBA”) unexpectedly cut rates by 25 bps to 3.25% before a sharp climb in consumer prices (+1.4%) dampened expectations for further easing. The Canadian dollar (-1.6%) fell as a Bank of Canada (“BOC”) governor’s discouraging economic outlook doused expectations of near-term tightening.

For the fourth quarter of 2012, the most profitable market group overall was the currencies sector while the greatest losses were attributable to positions in the metals sector.

In September, the Fund’s trading strategies produced negative results as the expansion of accommodative policies by central bankers led investors to add risk. Optimism that followed the ECB’s decision to buy Spanish and Italian bonds was amplified by the Fed’s announcement of QE3, lifting equities worldwide. The Fed revealed an open-ended plan to buy mortgage-backed securities while holding the federal funds rate near zero through at least mid-2015. The BOJ’s move to add 10 trillion yen to their asset purchase program and China’s openness to stimulus further supported stocks. Base metals climbed on hopes for increased demand while gold and silver benefited as inflation hedges. NY crude topped $100/bbl before growing stockpiles and the end of the summer driving season helped to reverse the trend. Natural gas rallied to a 2012 high on below normal gains in inventory ahead of the winter heating season. The Fund’s short-term strategies posted mixed results with gains in metals and losses in currencies. The Fund’s bond positions produced moderate losses in September as central bank intervention drove market movement. German bund yields climbed sharply as the ECB’s plan to purchase Italian and Spanish debt reduced safe-haven demand. Bund futures reached 3-month lows before concern over austerity measures within Spain’s 2013 budget and its ability to cooperate with the ECB sparked anxieties and reversed the move. After dipping 1.5%, U.S. 10-year note futures recovered to nearly unchanged on higher than expected U.S. jobless claims. The BOJ also eased, adding 10 trillion yen to its existing asset purchase program, suppressing Japanese Government Bonds (“JGB”) yields. The Fund’s allocation to currencies underperformed in September as the U.S. dollar lost ground against all major currencies in response to the Fed stimulus. Market expectations for QE3 proved to be correct as a weak employment data prompted further injections of liquidity. The Fed moved its focus to the mortgage market, announcing open-ended monthly purchases of $40 billion in mortgage backed securities. The ECB implemented a broad bond purchase program but stopped short of lowering interest rates. These moves prompted a decline in the U.S. dollar versus the euro (+2.2%) and the British pound versus the U.S. dollar (+1.6%). The Canadian dollar (+0.3%) strengthened versus the U.S. dollar as jobs data was better-than-expected. In Japan, the expansion of the BOJ’s bond purchase program led to volatile month for the yen (+0.5% versus the U.S. dollar). The Fund’s positions in the metals sector generated positive results in September as plans for open-ended asset purchases by U.S. and European central bankers and new infrastructure spending in China lifted both precious and base metal alike. Disappointing U.S. jobs data fueled growing expectations for monetary stimulus while China’s approval of new infrastructure spending supported metals early. Metals spiked higher following the announcement of QE3 with London Metal Exchange (“LME”) Aluminum (+11.3%) posting 11 consecutive gains, its longest rally in 25 years. LME and COMEX copper gained 7.7% and 8.7% respectively on anticipated raw material demand. Labor unrest in South Africa forced the closure of mines owned by Anglo American Platinum, the world’s top producer. Platinum was up 19.2% since August 16. The Fund’s allocations to the energies sector yielded disappointing results in September as the 30% climb in crude since June abruptly reversed on demand concerns and a build in supplies.

Saudi Arabia’s commitment to increase production, concern over a Spanish bailout and a reduced profit outlook from economic bellwether Fedex sent prices lower. The September 19 inventory report showed a build of +8.53M bbl, culminating in a 4.4% decline for crude. Gasoline strengthened against crude, climbing 1.2%, as refining capacity remained constrained. Heating oil also gained as the winter heating season draws near. Natural gas (+12.1%) finished at 2012 highs on news that stockpiles will fall short of capacity prior to winter.

In August, apart from its perpetual long gold position, the Fund’s strategies produced moderately disappointing results as guidance from central bankers increased investor appetite for risk. ECB president Mario Draghi’s late July statement that the he would do “whatever it takes” to preserve the euro proved to be the driving force behind a rally in European equity markets. German Chancellor Angela Merkel reaffirmed her country’s support for the ECB’s approach, increasing expectations for monetary stimulus. U.S. equities rallied in tandem with Europe, aided by a series of positive economic data, with the S&P 500 reaching a four-year high. Fed minutes released in advance of the highly anticipated Jackson Hole symposium revealed the Federal Open Market Committee’s (“FOMC”) intention to implement QE3 unless the strength and pace of economic recovery improves soon. Energy markets rallied markedly, lifted by U.S. and euro-zone optimism, heightened tensions in the Middle East, and the falling U.S. dollar. The drought gripping the U.S. Midwest drove corn and soybean to all-time highs. The Fund’s short-term strategies underperformed with losses in equities, energies and currencies. The Fund’s positions in equities underperformed in August as European leaders worked to improve the region’s fiscal position, reducing anxiety over euro-zone debt issues. Yields in Spain and Italy fell back on increasing expectations that the ECB will take action to avoid default. Equities in the U.K. (+1.8%), Italy (+8.9%) and Spain (+10.5%) all finished with gains in spite of weak economic data. France (+3.6%) and Germany (+2.7%) managed to avoid recession during the second quarter, outperforming their neighbors in the European Union (the “EU”). In the U.S., the S&P 500 (+2.2%) also gained, posting a four-year high. Asian equities in Japan (+1.6%) and Taiwan (+3.3%) finished on the plus side while stocks in China (-4.3%) fell as exports slowed. The Fund’s bond positions posted disappointing results in August as U.S. treasuries sold off steadily throughout the first half of the month in response to positive economic data and euro-zone optimism. Retail sales rose for the first time in four months while an encouraging 1.8% gain in housing prices signaled a strengthening economy. Reduced demand for safe-haven assets lifted U.S. 10-year note yields to an intraday three-month high of 1.86% before falling after Fed minutes alluded to the possible need for further stimulus. Positive economic news in Europe also contributed to risk appetite with better-than-expected GDP data from Germany (+0.3%) and France (unchanged), pressuring German bunds. The Fund’s positions in the energies sector benefited in August as the uptrend in the crude oil complex that began in July continued. Stronger employment data in the U.S. and an easing of European economic fears boosted the crude market early on expectations for increased demand. Inventory reports showed both crude and heating oil shrunk with heating oil inventories falling to a seasonally adjusted 4-year low. Tensions in the Middle East showed no signs of abating as hostilities continued to escalate in Syria. Crude prices climbed 9.6% while heating oil rose 11.5%. Natural gas prices fell back sharply, -12.8% to $2.799 per million btu, as the supply glut rose still further and temperatures moderated. The Fund’s allocation to currencies produced negative results in August. High expectations on the latest ECB meeting went unmet as little new information was revealed and rates were left unchanged. Germany’s firm support of the euro and Greece’s reaffirmed dedication to meeting bailout targets, bolstered confidence. As a result, both the euro (+2.2%) and British pound (+1.3%) gained ground versus the U.S. dollar. The U.S. dollar (-1.8%) was mostly weaker as the slow pace of U.S. growth prompted the FOMC to suggest that additional stimulus might be necessary to spur a sustainable recovery. The Australian dollar (-1.5%) fell as weakening Chinese demand threatened to dampen exports. The Japanese yen (-0.3%) lost ground early on weak economic data but quickly rebounded.

In July, the Fund’s trading strategies returned to positive territory as capital preservation was the primary goal for investors. Unsustainable debt in Spain had government officials considering all options including bailout, default, or even leaving the euro while Greece’s troika of creditors found the country to be falling short of budgetary targets required for their 240 billion euro rescue package. China’s growth slowed to 7.6%, a three-year low, prompting two rate cuts so far this year. Investors seeking refuge redirected cash into safe haven debt instruments, pushing yields to record lows. In the U.S., the Great Plains growing region is facing the worst drought since 1956. Less than one-third of the U.S. corn and soybean crop is in good condition, propelling both markets to all-time highs. The Fund’s short-term strategies produced mixed results with gains in interest rates and losses in metals. The Fund’s equity positions underperformed in July. Volatility persisted as the overhang of European economic difficulties and slowing global growth continued to weigh on markets. Spain’s Ibex35 (-4.0%) fell to its lowest point

since 2003 while the Italian Mib40 (-3.0%) reached an all-time low, prompting regulators to reinstitute short-sale bans in both countries. In the U.S., the Dow (+1.1%) was supported by a drop in jobless claims and encouraging durable goods data. In China (+1.1%), slowing growth prompted a second cut to its key lending rate while Japanese stocks (-3.7%) lost ground, pressured by the yen’s appreciation. The Fund’s bond positions were profitable in July as investors poured money into safe-haven debt instruments despite record low yields. Spain remains at the center of Europe’s economic woes with 10-year bond yields reaching 7.75%, a euro-era record. In response, investment into German bunds increased, which twice touched a record low yield of 1.127%. British Long Gilts (+2.3%) also benefited from safe-haven inflows as Bank of England officials announced another 50 billion pounds in quantitative easing. Robust demand for the safety of U.S. debt drove 10-year and 30-year yields to record lows as well, at 1.379% and 2.4405% respectively. The Fund’s allocation to short-term interest rates generated positive returns in July as markets welcomed action from the ECB while looking to the Fed to follow suit. The ECB cut its benchmark lending rate to a record low of 0.75% and its overnight deposit rate to 0% in an effort to stave off recession. Speculation for further cuts drove the Euribor rate to a record low of 0.401%. Markets expected that the Fed may reconsider cutting the IOER (interest on excess reserves) from 0.25% in order to incentivize banks to reallocate reserves away from the Fed and into higher yielding areas. Anticipation for an IOER cut, coordinated with additional Fed tools, lifted Eurodollar futures. The Fund’s allocation to currencies produced moderate gains in July as global economic uncertainly drove money flows into safe-haven sovereign currencies at the expense of the euro. A permanent solution to the debt issues that plague southern Europe remained elusive, pushing the euro to a two-year low versus the U.S. dollar ($1.2043/euro). The yen maintained its favored status, up 7.2% since mid-March, while the Aussie dollar (+2.9%) also remained strong. The Canadian dollar (+1.5%) approached parity with its U.S. counterpart on relative economic outperformance. The Fund’s strategies produced strong returns in grains in July as the U.S. Midwest is experiencing its worst drought in nearly six decades. As of July 30^th, only 25% of the crop was in good condition, the lowest since 1988. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) lowered yield estimates 12% to and was expected to make another significant cut in August. December corn gained 27% in July and is 59% higher since mid-June. It is likely that later maturing soybeans will be equally affected by the drought. The most active corn and soybean contracts posted all-time highs of $8.20 ¹/₂ and 16.91 ¹/₂ a bushel respectively. The Fund’s positions in the metals sector underperformed in July as COMEX gold continued to trade in a narrow range and global instability hurt base metal demand. LME warehouse zinc (-1.9%) supplies surpassed one million metric tons for the first time in 17 years while copper imports to China fell to a 10-month low. COMEX copper declined 2.1%, closing at $341.75/lb. Gold was confined to a 4.6% range as traders awaited signals from central bankers towards easing policies. The Fund’s allocation to the energy sector yielded disappointing results in July as crude oil mounted a rally from the dramatic decline over the last several months. Short-covering helped to start prices moving up early in the month as speculators sought to lock in gains. Rising political tensions between Israel and Iran helped to reinforce the rally with unrest in Syria increasing the likelihood of a near-term supply disruption. RBOB gasoline (+6.9%) and heating oil (+5.4%) moved up sharply in step with crude, in spite of ample supplies. Natural gas (+13.6%) rebounded further from lows as hot weather drove up cooling demand from utilities.

For the third quarter of 2012, the most profitable market group overall was the money market sector while the greatest losses were attributable to positions in the currencies sector.

In June, the Fund’s trading strategies yielded disappointing results as market sensitivity to European debt crisis news led to choppy market conditions. Investor focus remained on troubled European economies, with eyes turned to faltering Spain. Moody’s downgrade of Spanish sovereign debt was followed by rating reductions for numerous Spanish lenders. Depressed European indices reacted positively to EU summit agreements to reduce funding costs for Spain and Italy. U.S. stocks rallied in anticipation of QE3 but were disappointed as the Fed offered only an extension of the Operation Twist program. Commodity demand remains weak as supplies build in base metals and energies. U.S. crude inventories are at their highest since 1990 as growth in consumption is met with greater gains in production. The Fund’s short-term trading strategies also underperformed. The Fund’s allocation to equities underperformed in June due to volatile and directionless trading as European economic conditions weighed on global markets. Uncertainty over Greek elections eased as pro-EU moderates prevailed while business confidence in Germany hit a two-year low. European equities rose at the end of the month, as EU summit leaders eased repayment terms for Spanish banks. In the U.S., the Dow rose 3.4% but gains were tempered by poor unemployment and weak consumer confidence. China reacted to slowing growth by cutting its key interest rate. The Australian SPI

fell 0.4% despite surprise gains in GDP and employment, while the Japanese Nikkei climbed 5.6% on expectations for further stimulus. The Fund’s bond portfolio experienced losses in June as the recent rally stagnated due to a lack of substantial central bank stimulus. Investors hoping for new asset purchases from the Fed were disappointed as they chose only to expand their Operation Twist program by $267 billion. Europe’s bond rally also retreated as area-wide interest rates climbed in response to the increasingly insolvent Spanish banking sector. While bond rallies in the U.S. and Europe cooled, Japanese 10-year bond futures continued higher with yields reaching 0.79%, the lowest since 2003. The Fund’s allocation to currencies produced negative results in June as the U.S. dollar declined versus major currencies. The euro (+2.4% against the U.S. dollar) finished in positive territory while remaining under pressure due to the unresolved debt crisis. Spanish bank insolvency and unsustainable sovereign debt had sent the euro to 23-month low before regaining ground. The Swiss franc (+2.5%) gained against the dollar while holding steady against the euro. The British pound (+1.7%) rose versus the dollar after May’s sharp decline while also gaining favor versus the euro. The Fund’s grain allocations generated moderate losses in June as hot and dry conditions in the U.S. threatened to damage the largest projected corn crop since 1937. December corn surged 21.6% as the market digested rapidly deteriorating crop conditions. Soybeans (+12.4%) trailed corn higher, tempered by hopes that the later developing crop still has time to recover. The Fund’s positions in the metals sector generated moderately negative results in June as gains in short base metal positions were offset by losses in range-bound COMEX gold (-0.4%). Demand for base metals has suffered as Chinese growth has slowed and the broader world economy has failed to show significant signs of recovery. After spending nearly the entire month in negative territory, however, base metals took part in a global rally spurred by European leaders’ agreement on short-term measures to assist Spanish banks. The Fund’s allocation to the energy sector produced gains in June as weak demand and ample supplies pushed prices lower. Global economic weakness continues to be the key driver of prices near-term as slowing global growth has hurt overall energy demand. Crude oil touched an eight-month low of $77.28/bbl with supplies reaching 22-year highs. Gasoline (-3.5%) fell as U.S. supplies rose more than expected and demand remains soft. Heating oil (-0.4%) also suffered from a rise in inventories and warm temperatures.

In May, the Fund’s trading strategies produced strong results as uncertainty and eroding optimism dominated market sentiment, sending investors on a broad-based flight to safety. Falling business confidence in Germany, rising euro-zone unemployment, and a shrinking manufacturing sector led to dramatic risk reduction across all sectors. The euro decreased to a nearly two-year low as investors sought the safety of the U.S. dollar, pressuring commodities. The S&P GSCI index of 24 commodities plunged 13%, its worst month since the recession of 2008. Demand for capital preservation drove yields of safe-haven debt instruments to all-time lows. The Fund’s short-term models enhanced monthly gains with profitable positions in CME Australian dollar, COMEX gold and CBT U.S. T-Bonds. The Fund’s equity positions excelled in May as markets fell sharply on weakening economic conditions. European economies continued to soften with negative quarterly GDP and falling indices in the U.K. (-7.5%), Italy (-10.4%), Spain (-11.8%), and Greece (-30.6%). Even though Germany managed to show slight positive GDP growth of .5%, Dax futures fell 7.9%. The possibility of a Greek departure from the euro-zone increased as economic and political pressures mount. In the U.S., the Dow slipped 5.3% as factory orders fell 1.5% and leading indicators slipped 0.1%, leaving only modest growth expectations for the near-term. The U.S. added 115,000 jobs in April, the fewest since October, 2011. Shares across Asia were decidedly weak with the Hang Seng (-11.5%), Nikkei (-10.2%), and MSCI Taiwan (-3.5%) sinking on weakening export demand. The Fund’s bond exposure returned substantial profits in May as the risk-off trade prevailed in response to the unresolved debt crisis in Europe. Elevated fears that Greece may leave the euro-zone and an increasingly troubled Spanish banking sector combined to lift borrowing costs for at-risk sovereigns. Fear-driven investment poured into safe-haven assets in Germany, the U.S., and Australia. German 10-year bund futures (+3.5%) rose to all-time highs. In the U.S., strong demand for safety pushed the benchmark 10-year note to a record low of 1.5309% with 30-year yields approaching their 2008 bottom. The Fund’s allocations to currencies yielded strong results in May as the U.S. dollar advanced sharply in a general flight to safety. Heightened European instability and slowing global growth hurt equity markets while driving the Dollar Index to a 5.4% gain and a 21-month high. The euro slid 6.6% against the U.S. dollar as regional unemployment hit 10.9%, a 15-year high. U.K. retail sales dropped the most over two years, pushing the British pound 5.0% lower versus the U.S. dollar. The Australian dollar fell 6.2% as the RBA unexpectedly cut its key lending rate 50 basis points to 3.75%. Only the Japanese yen (+1.8%) managed to rise against the U.S. dollar in relatively quiet trade. The Fund’s positions in the metals sector generated significant gains in May. Precious and industrial metals fell as a risk-off mentality began to permeate futures markets once again on renewed fears of a global economic recession. Euro-zone service and manufacturing sector data showed contraction for the ninth consecutive month, adding to concerns about the health of the global economy. Manufacturing data in China

continued to reveal slowing growth, pushing down industrial metal. LME and COMEX copper fell for four consecutive weeks while LME aluminum slumped 5.9%. All base metals, with the exception of zinc, established new lows for 2012 in May, as did COMEX gold (-6.1%) and silver (-10.3%). The Fund’s allocation to the energy sector produced robust gains, benefitting from the sharp decline in the petroleum complex as ample supply and slack demand pressured prices. After several months of consolidation in crude, technical breaks below support levels led to a significant decline in both NYMEX and Brent futures, dropping 17.5% and 14.7% respectively. In natural gas, the well-established down-trend was finally broken as multi-year lows spurred buying interest. Mild spring weather and warm near-term forecasts helped support prices on increased cooling needs. Also during this time, an active market developed for MF Global claims similar to the Fund’s. The Fund closed on the sale of its MF Global claims in the amount of $940,087 for Series A and $1,736,710 for Series B on June 11, 2012, recognized prior to closing the Fund’s books effective May 31, 2012. Because the sale price did not match the amount of the Fund’s assets on deposit at MF Global as reduced by the reserve, each Series recognized a change in value as of May 31, 2012 as a result of the sale.

In April, the Fund’s trading strategies produced mixed results as markets digested signs of moderating growth and concerns over European sovereign debt. Minutes from a meeting of the Fed revealed the U.S. central bank will refrain from additional stimulus unless the economy wavers, sparking concern over growth and demand for raw materials. Upticks in weekly jobless claims and weak sales of previously-owned homes added to bearish sentiment. Chinese GDP grew 8.1%, the slowest pace in nearly three years as the country seeks to rebalance its economy away from exports and towards domestic consumption. Tenuous optimism in Europe gave way to increasing instability as austerity measures and ECB efforts to spur growth have yet to solve the regions debt woes, punctuated by S&P’s downgrade of Spanish debt. Investment flowed into safe-haven debt instruments of the U.S., Germany, and Australia in response to the weakness. The Fund’s bond exposure produced robust returns in April as investment poured into safe-haven assets on renewed euro-zone weakness and concerns over slowing growth. Spain’s soaring unemployment (24.4%), contracting GDP (-0.3%), and alarming spike in non-performing loans led to poor debt auctions as their 10-year yield climbed back above 6%. Resurging peripheral debt woes sent investors flocking to the security of German bunds (+1.9%). British Long Gilts also benefited from safe-haven inflows but performance was muted due to negative GDP growth in the U.K. Despite mixed economic signals and signs of stagnation, the U.S. maintained its favored position relative to struggling European economies, driving demand for U.S. debt. Australian debt yields fell to record lows as easing inflation data is widely expected to prompt a rate cut from the RBA at its next meeting. The Fund’s allocation to foreign exchange markets underperformed in April as markets ended little changed in volatile trade. Concerns over sovereign debt and slowing economic growth left European currencies seeking solid direction. The euro (-0.7%) fell modestly as economic indicators softened and Spain’s debt was downgraded. The Swiss franc (-0.5%) fell against the U.S. dollar after reversing early month gains. The British pound (+1.5%) gained against the U.S. dollar and the euro (+2.2%) on expectations the Bank of England will not pursue further stimulus. The Australian dollar (+1.0%) continued its position as a favored currency with the RBA keeping rates unchanged as their economy sustains growth. The Canadian dollar (1.1%) also appreciated as unemployment there fell to 7.2%. The Japanese yen (+3.8%) regained ground from its recent decline as the Bank of Japan remains focused on easing in an effort to strengthen growth prospects. The Mexican peso (-1.5%) fell back on worries global growth concerns will dampen exports. The Fund’s positions in the metals sector generated moderate losses in April due to sharp reversals in the LME and COMEX copper markets. Poor U.S. monthly payroll and industrial production figures, slowing Chinese growth and heightened euro-zone debt concerns drove copper 6.6% lower to 3-month lows before being turned markedly higher on falling inventories. LME copper stockpiles dropped to 241,550 tons, the lowest level since November of 2008 and down 30% since January as miners struggle to keep pace with consumption. COMEX copper posted five consecutive gains at month’s end, its longest rally since August, to close nearly unchanged. Short positions in COMEX silver (-4.7%) helped to offset losses while COMEX gold (-0.3%) had its smallest monthly change since March of 2010 as traders waited for clarity on global economic conditions. The Fund’s allocation to the energy sector yielded losses in April as encouraging U.S. manufacturing and consumer spending supported energy markets despite reduced geopolitical risk, slowing growth in China, and renewed recession fears in Europe. NYMEX crude posted its least volatile month in 17 years, trading in a 4.8% range, tightly bound by its 100 and 50-day moving averages. Weekly inventories (373 million barrels) reached an 11-month high as Chinese manufacturing contracted for the sixth straight month. Brent crude’s premium over WTI shrunk to as little as $13.61, the smallest margin since January, as Spain and the U.K. slid back into recession and negotiations with Iran showed promise.

For the second quarter of 2012, the most profitable market group overall was the bonds sector while the greatest losses were attributable to positions in the grains sector.

In March, the Fund’s trading strategies produced disappointing returns as rapidly shifting macroeconomic factors led to trendless and choppy market conditions. The U.S. economy sustained momentum, adding another 227,000 jobs for its best six-month streak since May of 2006. Retail sales climbed 1.1%, the most in five months, reflecting consumer confidence despite rising gas prices. In contrast, commodity-driven economies such as Australia felt the effects of reduced base-metal demand, while euro-zone GDP unexpectedly contracted as the region struggled to contain its debt crisis. Crude oil declined as the impact of Iranian tensions receded when compared to slowing global demand and ample supplies. The Fund’s short-term strategies produced mixed to slightly negative results. The Fund’s allocation to currency markets yielded poor results in March. The U.S. dollar (+0.5%) advanced early as improvements in the U.S. economy and positive investor sentiment drove up equities and sent interest rates modestly higher. Later in the month Chairman Bernanke of the Fed reiterated his commitment to low interest rates, pressuring the U.S. dollar and erasing previous gains. The ECB continued to hold the line on interest rates, keeping its discount rate at 1%. The euro and British pound finished unchanged versus the U.S. dollar after declines of 2%. The Australian dollar (-4.4%) fell on weak GDP, an unexpected rise in unemployment, as well as softening commodity exports. The Fund’s bond exposure experienced losses during a turbulent March as U.S. and European bonds sold off precipitously only to rebound later in the month. JGB came under pressure as the BOJ resisted calls to increase asset purchases beyond the 30 trillion yen committed at their February meeting. JGB yields rose to 1.056%, the highest since December 2011. The Fund experienced negative results in the global equity markets in March. European stocks fell sharply on euro-zone GDP contraction (-0.3%) before optimistic U.S. data helped lift futures to 8-month highs. Markets quickly reversed on China’s shrinking economy and the possible need for further Greek debt restructuring. The FTSE (-2.1%), Amsterdam EOE Index (-1.2%), and Euro Stoxx (-4.5%) all finished lower. The Dow (+1.2%) and the S&P 500 (+2.5%) rose to four-year highs. Asian shares were mostly lower, pressured by the slowdown in China. China’s H-Shares (-10.9%) sank on weaker-than-expected housing and auto data with stocks in Singapore (-1.1%), Taiwan (-2.5%) and India (-2.3%) also lower. The Nikkei (+1.5%) managed to gain as the BOJ continued to ease in an effort to boost growth and weaken the yen. The Fund’s grains positions experienced moderate losses for the month. Directionless trading led to losses in corn and wheat while trending soybeans benefited long soybean meal positions. The Fund’s exposure to the metals sectors generated moderate losses as precious metals declined on increasingly positive sentiment surrounding the stability of the global economy. The Fund’s allocation to money market futures also produced negative results. Short-rate price movement closely mirrored the volatility seen in longer-term maturities as central banks continued to hold overnight lending rates between 0 and 25 basis points. Although targeted rates are expected to remain near zero for an extended period, the strength of the equity rally precipitated a decline in global short-rate prices, negatively impacting the Fund’s long positions.

In February, the Fund’s trading strategies generated solid returns as geopolitical and economic forces pushed energies and equities decidedly higher. Intensifying tensions with Iran over their nuclear program injected risk premium into oil markets, driving crude prices to multi-month highs. Meanwhile, a wave of hopeful economic data and the long-awaited second Greek bailout lifted stocks. U.S. unemployment fell for a fifth straight month, adding 234,000 jobs while U.S. consumer confidence posted its longest streak of gains since 1997. The Nasdaq hit 11-year highs and the Dow closed above 13,000 for the first time since 2008. The BOJ revealed plans to inject 10 trillion yen into the Japanese economy in an effort to suppress deflation while the ECB sought to stabilize euro-zone banks and stimulate the economy by issuing €529.5 billion of low interest loans. Chicago Board of Trade corn slid sideways awaiting spring plantings, while soybeans soared on expected crop damage in Brazil. Short-term strategies enhanced overall performance with gains in currencies, stocks, metals, and energies. The Fund’s allocation to the energy sector produced significant returns in February as economic optimism, escalating Iranian tensions, and reduced refinery capacity led to robust returns for long energy positions. Extreme cold in Europe in the midst of heavy refinery maintenance drove IPE gas oil (+6.3%) to a nine-month high. New York heating oil (+6.0%), also used in home heating, was pulled higher on anticipated demand shift to the U.S. Brent crude gained 10.9%, its best month since May of 2009, while NY crude (+8.6%) reached a nine-month high. Despite poor U.S. gasoline demand, RBOB futures extended an impressive rally, gaining 5.4%, aided by permanent, unplanned, and seasonal refinery closures. Promising U.S. employment data and the Greek bailout approval lifted energies universally on hopes of

economic growth. The Fund experienced positive results in global equity markets as stocks rose on continued economic improvement. While Europe worked its way towards the second bailout of Greece, equity markets across the continent were higher as fears of an imminent euro-zone collapse subsided. The ECB eased monetary policy significantly in an effort to support markets, stepping away from its traditional mandate of inflation stability. Markets responded with the CAC40 (+4.5%), FTSE (+3.7%) and DAX (+6.0%) all finishing the month higher. Only the Greek index finished lower with a 9.1% loss. Investor optimism drove up markets across Asia with the Nikkei (+10.2%) climbing sharply as the yen fell. Improvements in the outlook for exports also boosted shares in Hong Kong (+6.6%), Korea (+3.5%) and Taiwan (+7.6%). The U.S. markets rose as unemployment fell to 8.3%, jobless claims hit a four-year low, and modest growth was seen in manufacturing and housing. The S&P 500 (+4.3%) is off to its best start in 21 years. The Fund’s allocation to currencies generated moderate losses due to the sharp reversal in the Japanese yen. The U.S. dollar was weaker against most global currencies as the Fed reiterated its highly accommodative stance in spite of improving economic conditions. The BOJ, which has struggled with deflation for more than a decade, announced it would target a 1% annual inflation rate, adding 10 trillion yen to the economy in the process. Traders took the news seriously and sent the yen (-6.2%) to a seven-month low. The euro (+1.9%) strengthened against the U.S. dollar as fears over a Greek debt disaster abated and expectations rose for increased lending activity. The Swiss franc (+1.8%) and British pound (+1.1%) also gained while better-than-expected economic data in Australia drove the AUD/USD rate to a six-month high (1.0795 $/AUD). South American currencies continued to climb with the Mexican peso (+1.4%), Colombian peso (+2.4%), and the Brazilian real (+1.7%) all gaining. The Fund’s bond portfolio produced negative results in February. U.S. bond prices retreated slightly from January highs as positive economic data continued to foster the strongest equity rally in two decades. U.S. unemployment dropped to 8.3%, returning to a level not seen since February 2009. U.S. 10-year notes retreated on the news and ended the month down 0.8%. The ECB implemented phase two of their long term refinancing operation liquidity program on February 27, injecting 530 billion euros of short-term liquidity into the region. The 1% loan offering was taken up by 800 euro-zone banks. The monetary infusion is expected to make its way into longer-term maturities as seen by the resulting rally in bunds and 10-year Swap Notes. The Fund’s strategies underperformed in the metals sector after bullish trends in precious metals radically corrected as Fed Chairman Bernanke quelled hopes for QE3. Immediately prior to the plunge, gold and silver each hit multi-month highs as investors placed hedges against rising consumer prices and a weakening U.S. dollar. Following Mr. Bernanke’s testimony, gold (-1.7%) and silver (-6.9%) decreased significantly. Fears of reduced euro-zone base metal demand abated as leaders came to agreement on a second aid package for Greece. LME aluminum (+4.0%), assisted by record canceled warrants (orders to withdraw stockpiles), reversed early losses in the broad-based rally. Rising confidence levels on both sides of the Atlantic and falling inventories worked in tandem to elevate COMEX (+2.1%) and LME copper (+2.2%).

In January, the Fund’s strategies produced mixed results as optimism toward a European debt resolution and positive economic growth indicators led investors to add risk. The U.S. dollar declined against major currencies as the “safety trade” unwound, accelerated by the Fed’s stated willingness to purchase additional bonds. Gold benefited from the dollar’s decline, posting a +10% gain, climbing solidly back above its 200-day moving average while base-metals surged on production cutbacks and anticipated Chinese demand. EU negotiations with Greece, initially promising, weighed on equity markets towards month-end as leaders debated terms of a second rescue package worth 500 billion euro. NYMEX gasoline trended higher throughout the month as supply concerns intensified due to multiple refinery closures while natural gas plummeted to a 10-year low on unseasonably warm winter temperatures and overabundant supply. The Fund’s short-term strategies contributed positively to performance with gains in bonds, stocks, and metals, while the Fund’s perpetual long gold position produced significant gains for the month. The Fund’s allocation to money market futures yielded robust returns as central banks universally maintained accommodative monetary policies. In the United States, minutes from the FOMC revealed the Fed’s commitment to maintain interest rates at or near zero through 2014. The ECB, having cut rates twice in the last three months, maintained rates at a record low of 1%, citing signs of stabilization. In the U.K., the Bank of England also maintained a record low benchmark of 0.5%. The Fund’s allocation to currency markets yielded negative returns as the U.S. dollar reversed its recent uptrend as global economic concerns began to subside. What had been a flight to safety in the U.S. dollar in late 2011 reversed as investors chose risk exposure and yield over conservation. The euro reached a 17-month low before recovering on perceived EU debt negotiation progress. The Australian dollar sustained its climb on relative economic outperformance, attractive interest rates, and strength in commodity prices. South American currencies, which lost significant ground in 2011, advanced considerably against the U.S. dollar. The Japanese yen rallied sharply late, closing at a three-month high, as investors flocked to

the currency given the short-term U.S. interest rate outlook. The Fund’s grain positions experienced moderate losses for the month. Lingering concerns over South American corn and soybean yields drove grains to multi-week highs before surprisingly bearish USDA figures abruptly reversed trends. The highly anticipated January USDA report caused significant declines mid-month on unexpected increases in corn production and inventories, resulting in losses for the Fund’s corn positions. Wheat traded in tandem with corn, pressured by weak exports, ample supply, and favorable winter crop conditions. The Fund’s exposure to the energy sector generated positive returns, led by long gasoline and short natural gas positions. Gasoline ended up (+7.3%) for the month, while an unusually warm winter and continued supply glut pushed natural gas to $2.231/btu, a 10-year low. The Fund experienced losses in NYMEX crude oil amid a directionless trade as prices were range-bound between $98 and $103 per barrel.

For the first quarter of 2012, the most profitable market group overall was the energy sector while the greatest losses were attributable to positions in the currency sector.

Net results for the year ended December 31, 2011 were a loss of 15.7% in net asset value compared to the preceding year. In this period, Series A experienced a net decrease in net assets from operations of $6,022,225. This net decrease consisted of interest income of $20,663, trading losses of $2,517,097 and total expenses of $3,525,791. Expenses included $693,659 in management fees, $374,951 in ongoing offering expenses, $56,243 in operating expenses, $1,499,588 in selling commissions, $544,421 in brokerage commissions, $337,063 attributable to the MF Global reserve and $19,866 in other expenses. At December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the net asset value per Unit of Series A was $1,306.48 and $1,550.72, respectively.

Net results for the year ended December 31, 2011 were a loss of 21.5% in net asset value compared to the preceding year. In this period, Series B experienced a net decrease in net assets from operations of $9,410,149. This net increase consisted of interest income of $23,699, trading losses of $4,389,015 and total expenses of $5,044,833. Expenses included $904,883 in management fees, $489,121 in ongoing offering expenses, $73,370 in operating expenses, $1,956,503 in selling commissions, $1,060,080 in brokerage commissions, $529,613 attributable to the MF Global reserve and $31,263 in other expenses. At December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the net asset value per Unit of Series B was $1,391.44 and $1,773.52, respectively.

In December, the Fund’s trading strategies posted disappointing results as macroeconomic factors continued to shake markets, resulting in another volatile month of trading. Equities finished the year on a small upswing as positive economic news from the U.S. elevated markets from their intra-month lows despite the European debt crisis continuing to weigh heavily on global markets. The U.S. dollar trended higher to the detriment of gold, with gold futures trading below the 200-day moving average. Grains rallied as reduced yields for soybeans and corn drove prices higher while soft commodities’ values remained suppressed on steady output. Meanwhile, base metals lagged as stockpiles of aluminum increased to record highs while demand for copper decreased. Crude oil experienced a volatile trade with growing tensions between the U.S. and Iran threatening to disrupt the oil supply. The Fund’s allocation to the energy sector yielded losses in December as conflicting macroeconomic factors injected volatility into the markets. A modest improvement in U.S. economic data, including positive job reports, supported energy prices and helped sustain crude to just above the $100 per barrel. These increases, however, were reversed as proposed EU summit resolutions were viewed as insufficient to produce significant growth in Europe, resulting in multi-week lows. Calls for sanctions against Iran and the potential interruption to Middle Eastern supplies abruptly halted the slide and sent crude markets higher at the end of the month. For the month, natural gas (-16.5%) remained heavily bearish as a result of above-normal temperatures across the upper Midwest and East Coast and reported inventories significantly above the five-year average. The Fund experienced negative results in the metals markets in December as gains made in base metals were offset by losses in gold. The European debt crisis and related demand concerns significantly impacted metals prices over the second half of the year. Short positions in

aluminum (-4.27%) prospered as fears of a recession in the euro-zone weakened demand for the base metal and as aluminum inventories increased to record levels. Copper also suffered from similar demand concerns as data out of China, the world’s largest user of the metal, indicated stockpiles increased while industrial output slowed. Silver (-14.9%) hit a four-month low after a sell-off spurred by Euro concerns. Meanwhile, gold (-10.5%) dropped below its 200-day moving average mid-month for the first time in over two years. The Fund’s money market positions yielded negative returns in December. Short-term interest rates remained on the decline as investors continued to favor the safety of money markets. Rates rose slightly from their lows throughout December as the ECB continued attempting to add liquidity to the markets by increasing access to its lending facilities. The U.S. also maintained its own easy monetary policy in order to boost liquidity and support economic recovery. The Fund’s money market positions declined slightly as money markets fell back near the end of the month. The Fund’s bond portfolio produced modest losses in December as external factors disrupted prices. While a mid-month auction of U.S. notes displayed its strongest demand since 1993, European political and central bank decisions drove prices lower. U.S. 10-year T-Note futures (+1.4%) gained on the month while 2-year T-Notes remained flat. In Europe, German bund prices dipped after the ECB’s decision to lend €489 billion to capitalize insolvent European banks. In Asia, Korean T-Bonds trended higher in December before dropping significantly after Kim Jong-Il’s death, ending nearly flat on the month.

In November, the Fund’s trading strategies underperformed as the continuing euro-zone debt crisis resulted in high market volatility and left investors searching for safe haven investments. Indices pared early heavy losses by month’s end as a coordinated effort by central banks in the euro-zone, the U.S., Canada, Switzerland, the U.K., and Japan to lower the cost of dollar funding gave much needed optimism to the markets. Bond yields rose significantly higher in Europe and Japan, with Germany unable to sell nearly a third of its bund offering and the Japanese benchmark 10-year Japanese Government Bond’s high yields making borrowing potentially unsustainable. The U.S. dollar resumed its status as a safe haven currency in November as investors reallocated from gold and the Swiss franc. Overall, the metals sector moved lower to the benefit of the Fund’s positions as global demand concerns from the euro-zone debt crisis along with slowing Chinese economic growth suppressed prices. Strong U.S. Thanksgiving retail sales and an increase in consumer confidence drove crude oil to over $100 per barrel. The Fund’s short-term strategies performed poorly as gains in energies were offset by losses in currencies and short rates. The Fund’s allocation to currencies experienced significant losses in November as the U.S. dollar reversed sharply as investors sought a safe haven currency in the face of global market turmoil. The U.S. dollar rose sharply against almost every global currency as uncertainty over the sovereign debt of some European nations continued to shake markets. The euro, Swiss franc, Canadian dollar and Brazilian real all finished with losses against the U.S. dollar with only the Japanese yen finishing with a modest gain as that currency drifted higher after last month’s late intervention. The Fund experienced strong gains in the global energy markets in November with long crude oil and short natural gas positions leading the way. Both NYMEX and Brent Crude rallied into month-end on record U.S. Thanksgiving retail sales, strong consumer confidence and a proposed ban on EU imports of Iranian oil. U.S. domestic crude stocks fell to 330.8 million barrels in November, the lowest level since January 2010, propelling crude 32% higher since early October while reaching $100 a barrel for the first time since July. The Fund’s bond portfolio produced losses in November as uncertainty over the euro-zone’s credit worthiness drove European yields to significant highs. Euro-zone uncertainty also lowered yields in the U.S. for most of November before a decision by central banks around the world to cut the U.S. dollar overnight index-swap rate reversed some of the U.S. 30-year note’s price increases in November. Japanese yields spiked at the end of November just days before a critical 2-year, 2.7 trillion Japanese yen offering. The Fund’s allocation to global equity markets yielded modest negative returns in November. Equity markets around the globe declined sharply early in the month as policy makers continued to search for solutions to growing economic tensions. Global markets moved up sharply late in the month, however, punctuated by news of a 6-nation coordinated central bank action aimed at easing strains within the banking system. As a result, significant early-month negative returns in Italy, Spain, Germany and Japan were pared, while the U.S. experienced positive returns for November despite large early-November losses.

In October, the Fund’s trading strategies posted disappointing results as renewed optimism precipitated a return to risk after September’s historic liquidation. Indices led the way higher, posting impressive gains as strong U.S. corporate earnings and GDP figures and a preliminary debt crisis agreement in Europe sent values higher. While central bank statements remained downbeat, bonds sold off as the bold action in Europe in dealing with the debt crisis inspired optimism. Crude oil and base metals also rallied as September’s losses appeared to have attracted renewed physical demand. Gold futures recovered from recent slides as weakening in the U.S. dollar and prospects for easy money in the U.S. and Europe for the foreseeable future supported values. Currencies reversed as yield- seeking

investors redeployed capital after the euro-zone averted disaster, Japanese authorities intervened, and commodity currencies rose. Agricultural products finished mixed as a weaker U.S. dollar was offset by higher production. The Fund’s short-term strategies were unable to keep pace with the velocity of the change in direction as losses in bonds, currencies, energies and stocks offset gains in metals trading. The Fund experienced significant losses in bonds markets in October. Losses in bond markets arose as optimism over the economic outlook strengthened as the month progressed. U.S. bond and German bund yields rallied from their lows even as consumer confidence remained depressed as European policy makers tackled their sovereign debt issue in a comprehensive manner. The Fund’s allocation to currencies produced losses in October as the risk on/risk off dynamic that has prevailed in 2011 continued with a dramatic return to risk. September’s U.S. dollar liquidity operations and substantial progress between European sovereigns, banks and bond holders on a way forward out of the debt crisis combined to send the euro 3.7% higher. The late-month debt agreement prompted a temporary return to risk, sending capital flowing back into European regions such as Norway, Russia, Sweden and Poland. Commodity currencies also benefitted as macroeconomic risks receded with strong U.S. corporate earnings and a 2.5% rise in third quarter U.S. GDP. The Australian dollar, Canadian dollar and Brazilian real moved sharply higher in yet another extreme move. The Japanese government intervened for the fourth time in just over a year, sending the yen to intra-day declines of 4.7% after reaching post-war highs against the dollar earlier in the month. Allocations to stock and global energy markets also yielded negative returns in October. The Fund’s strategies in global equity markets suffered as markets reversed higher in volatile trade. U.S. equities led the way with the S&P 500 rising 11% for the month. Although consumer confidence and employment figures remained weak, investors gained confidence on impressive corporate earnings and U.S. GDP growth. In Europe, concerns over sovereign debt issues abated as the late-month summit finally yielded some tangible solutions to the crisis. The Fund’s allocations to global energy markets underperformed as encouraging economic news out of the U.S. and increasing optimism from European policy makers caused a sharp reversal from September’s liquidation. On October 31, 2011, MF Global, one of the Fund’s clearing brokers at the time, reported to the SEC and the CFTC possible deficiencies in customer segregated accounts held at the firm. As a result, the SEC and CFTC determined that a liquidation proceeding led by the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (“SIPC”) would be the safest and most prudent course of action to protect customer accounts and assets, and SIPC initiated the liquidation of MF Global under the Securities Investor Protection Act. On November 21, 2011, the SIPC liquidation Trustee announced that the shortfall in the customer segregated funds account could be as much as 22% or more. After consideration of the Fund’s exposure, Superfund Capital Management caused the Fund to take a reserve to account for the Fund’s estimated exposure to such 22% shortfall as of October 31, 2011. The reserve taken reduced the net asset value of Series A by approximately 0.95% and Series B by approximately 1.29%.

For the fourth quarter of 2011, the most profitable market group overall was the energy sector, while the greatest losses were attributable to positions in the currencies sector.

In September, the Fund’s trading strategies posted disappointing results as economic uncertainty spiked, precipitating a severe bout of commodity market liquidation and corresponding flight to the U.S. dollar and treasuries. Equities came under pressure early as poor U.S. unemployment data and growing dysfunction in European money markets prompted liquidation. Values remained under duress for the balance of the month as the International Monetary Fund (the “IMF”), the Fed and the ECB offered bearish assessments of downside risks to global growth. The U.S. dollar gained along with U.S. and European treasuries as investors flocked to safe haven assets while awaiting further clarity from European authorities. Gold and silver reversed August’s gains on a stronger U.S. dollar, increased margin requirements and collateral damage from commodity and equity market liquidation. Grains and soft commodities were hit particularly hard amid the fundamental reassessment of demand, a stronger U.S. dollar and improved production prospects. The Fund’s short-term strategies further detracted from overall performance as losses in currencies and energies offset gains in bonds, metals and stocks. The Fund experienced significant losses in grains and agricultural markets in September. Losses were seen in grain market trades amid global economic concerns, weakening demand, seasonal harvest pressure and a strong U.S. dollar. Positions in agricultural products underperformed as the combination of excellent production and the increasing likelihood of a global recession resulted in heavy liquidation. Allocations to currencies and money markets also yielded negative returns in September. Losses in currency markets resulted from a massive flight out of risk assets, including commodities, commodity currencies and emerging market equities, which propelled the U.S. dollar

sharply higher against a global basket of currencies. Positions in global money markets lost ground in September as continued instability in financial markets led to choppy action at the top of the recent range. Pressure continued to mount on European officials as major bank shares fell amid reports of rising dysfunction in the inter-bank lending market. This prompted the major central banks to coordinate funding and stability to the system. The Fund’s models produced gains in metals and bonds in September. Metals markets saw positive results overall as the seemingly intractable European debt crisis escalated pessimism regarding industrial metal demand. The Fund’s bond portfolio continued to perform well during September as fear and central bank intervention drove major sovereign debt prices higher. As world commodity and equity prices fell, investors invested into the safe haven assets of medium and long-term sovereign debt. Other markets, relative to those discussed above, did not have a substantial impact on the month’s overall negative performance.

In August, the Fund’s trading strategies yielded mixed results as volatility continued to rise in conjunction with political and economic uncertainty. Global contagion fears escalated to new levels during the month following the downgrade of U.S. debt and heightened fears of a downgrade of French debt. The Fund’s trend following models produced gains in bonds and money markets as safe haven capital flooded to sovereign debt. The Fund’s short-term strategies also contributed positively to overall performance as gains in bonds, metals and energies offset losses in stocks and currencies. The Fund’s allocation to bond markets outperformed once again in August as the fear trade picked up momentum amid flagging consumer sentiment as governments continued to fail to address long-term deficit challenges. U.S. bonds increased over 7% as safe haven demand surged with the S&P downgrade of U.S. debt and subsequent heavy liquidation in global equity markets. The trading strategies also produced gains from short-term interest rate futures positions in August as the uptrend remained firmly entrenched. Short-term rate futures around the world spiked higher early in the month as equities sold off in response to uncertainty surrounding the debt of both sovereigns as well as major financial institutions. Somewhat paradoxically this led to a flight to safety to some of the very sovereigns that were coming under fire, most notably the U.S. Allocations to equities markets yielded negative results in August as global markets collapsed under the weight of fears surrounding the stability of major international banks. Equity market volatility increased as S&P’s downgrade of U.S. debt was followed by fears of a French downgrade due to exposure to Italy. Global growth expectations contracted quickly sending Italian (-15.7%), Spanish (-8.9%) and French (-11.4%) indices sharply lower, prompting regulators to establish short-selling bans. Short sellers responded by attacking Europe’s leading economy, sending Germany’s DAX to a loss of 19.4%. Asian markets also suffered amid global contagion fears, as Japan (-9%), Korea (-13%) and Singapore (-9.7%) witnessed declines. Late month news that Warren Buffet was investing $5 billion in embattled Bank of America shares along with a surprisingly strong U.S. durable goods number and a Greek bank merger restored some measure of confidence while limiting losses in the Dow to 4.1%. The Fund’s currencies positions also yielded negative returns in August as the euro and U.S. dollar settled into tight ranges while risk currencies reversed lower. Other market sectors, relative to those discussed above, did not have a substantial influence on the Fund’s relatively flat performance in the month of August.

In July, the Fund’s trading strategies bounced back to produce strong returns as global contagion fears resulted in strong moves for safe haven assets at the expense of risk. The Fund’s short-term strategies contributed positively to overall performance as gains in bonds and stocks offset small losses in currencies, metals and energies. The strongest performing sectors on the month were bonds, metals and currencies, with bonds having the most substantial returns. Meanwhile, stock indices and grains produced moderate losses. The Fund’s bond positions performed well in July on speculation that there was an increasing likelihood of a debt-related slowdown in Europe and the U.S. German bunds rallied on demand for safe haven assets as Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) figures remained muted despite factory orders and exports easily surpassing expectations. The health of major banks in Italy and Spain came into question forcing Spanish and Italian yield to soar amid increasing loan losses for private banks. In the U.S., the combination of a disappointing early month jobs report and debt ceiling related slowdown fears supported the steady trend higher. Allocations to metals produced positive results on the month as policy maker deadlocks in Europe and the U.S. drove investors to the perceived safety of gold and silver. December gold finished 8.4% higher, surpassing the $1,637 level, while September silver added 15.2% to finish just over the $40 mark. London copper added 4.5% due to strong U.S. corporate earnings and a 20% increase in Chinese refined copper imports following May’s domestic stocks drawdown. An early month Chinese rate hike and a somewhat disappointing GDP report did little to slow the advance. The Fund’s currency market positions yielded positive results in July as early U.S. dollar strength reversed mid-month, giving way to concern over the risks associated with a failure to raise the U.S. debt ceiling. The first half of the month saw significant euro weakness amid conflicting

signals from various euro-zone officials as to the ultimate fate of their heavily indebted members and the monetary union itself. The U.S. dollar rallied over 2% while the euro gave up over 3% amid Greek default talk and heightening Italian solvency concerns. From there, the U.S. dollar reversed as global investors sought protection from a potential U.S. default as debt ceiling negotiations faltered. The Fund yielded slightly negative results in the stock indices sector in July as global markets continued to retrace from spring highs amid debt worries. Grain positions also experienced moderate losses in July on weather related yield uncertainty.

For the third quarter of 2011, the most profitable market group overall was the bonds sector, while the greatest losses were attributable to positions in the currencies sector.

In June, the Fund’s trading strategies yielded negative results as the correction in stocks and commodities that began in May continued, only to reverse late in the month. The Fund’s short-term strategies contributed positively to overall performance as gains in bonds, metals and stocks offset losses in currencies and energies. The Fund underperformed in equities futures trading in June as stagnating growth and European sovereign debt worries sent indices sharply lower. European equities plummeted as EU officials, private creditors and the Greek government struggled to find a workable solution to the crisis. Meanwhile, the Fund’s bond strategies outperformed across the board in June, responding in a classic inverse manner to the factors affecting equities. German bunds moved steadily higher early as uncertainty over the status of Greek debt intensified. Lower than expected German factory orders and industrial production supported values as well. Australian bonds rallied, due in part to the attractive yield differential versus the U.S., Europe and Japan. The Fund’s allocation to global energy markets produced losses as the recent correction continued in June, reflecting increasing pessimism for economic prospects. Energy markets and commodity currencies sold off while treasuries gained on safe haven flows as softening manufacturing data prompted the ECB and the Fed to lower their longer term inflation estimates. However, with a late month agreement on a new aid package, equities and other risk assets reversed higher, while treasuries gave back earlier gains. Late month losses in previous metals and choppy action in base metals led to negative performance in that sector. The Fund’s trading models also produced losses in grains in June as improving weather and declining demand prospects associated with macroeconomic concerns led to sharp reversals. Gold and silver finished lower on the inflation outlook while grains sold off as excellent weather and an uncertain demand outlook led to higher inventory estimates.

In May, the Fund’s medium to long term trading strategies underperformed as investors temporarily abandoned risk assets in favor of safe haven alternatives. The Fund’s short-term strategies also contributed negatively to overall performance as losses in equities, metals and currencies offset gains in bonds and energies. Equities reversed as declines in U.S. employment, housing and GDP combined with disappointing German factory orders to unnerve bullish investors. The Fund’s allocation to global stock indices underperformed despite a late recovery as the European debt crisis and a slowdown in manufacturing heightened fears of stagnant growth. The Fund’s bond strategies produced positive results across the board in May as safe haven assets pressed higher amid uncertainty concerning the sustainability of global economic growth. Treasuries rallied as bond yields in peripheral European states soared amid growing concern that a Greek default or restructuring was a real possibility. Allocations to currencies yielded poor results for the Fund in May as the U.S. dollar and euro reversed April’s action following the ECB’s unexpected removal of the “strong vigilance” on higher prices language from their May policy statement. The growing focus on the European sovereign debt situation prompted a flight out of risk assets and into the U.S. dollar and the Swiss franc, which established a new record high against the euro. Energies and base metals saw sharp declines as a bearish Goldman Sachs commodity call, along with heightened volatility in forex markets tied to the problems in Europe, spurred liquidation. The Fund’s performance in the metals sector reversed as gold futures opened the month retracing over 6% from all-time highs established on May 2nd. The weakness stemmed from massive liquidation in silver and receding inflation fears as European sovereign debt instability delayed near term prospects for an ECB rate hike. April gains turned into May losses for the Fund in energies as recent upward trends in crude oil, heating oil and gasoline gave way to significant declines. Grains endured more volatile action as extreme weather in the Northern Hemisphere continued to threaten production prospects. The Fund’s position in grains suffered due to continued volatility from broad based commodity selling, a reversal in the U.S. dollar and a surprise 8% upward revision in 2010-11 USDA corn ending stocks.

In April, the Fund’s allocation to global stock indices performed well in April as the uptrend in equities continued. The Dow rose 4.4%, reaching mid-2008 highs on excellent quarterly earnings. Late-month results from Apple and IBM easily offset the downgrade of the U.S. credit outlook by S&P. European equities generally ignored sovereign debt worries, finishing broadly higher as surging Germany factory orders and industrial production set a positive tone. However, Greece’s ASE-20 moved back to its lows as debt restructuring rumors rattled investors. Asian indices tracked steadily higher, continuing to capitalize on China’s dynamic growth. Japan’s Nikkei (+1.3%) broke higher late as disaster recovery efforts progressed. The Fund yielded negative results in global bond markets in April as a mid-month reversal produced losses. German bunds continued their recent trend lower early in the month as strong economic data at home combined with sovereign debt fears on the periphery to drive yields higher. Ongoing inflation fears ahead of the ECB’s 25 basis point rate hike also exerted pressure. Values then recovered somewhat before vaulting higher in conjunction with the downgrade of the U.S. credit outlook by S&P as investors received a sobering reminder of the potential long-term risks to global growth prospects. The Fund experienced minor gains from its allocation to short-term interest rate futures in April in mixed action. Eurodollar futures trended higher as the Fed officially reiterated its commitment to completing the second round of quantitative easing (“QE2”) after some doubts were expressed last month. Euribor futures finished mixed as the ECB maintained its vigilant stance on inflation by raising their discount rate 25 basis points as expected. Allocations to currency markets yielded strong results in April as recent trends extended amid accelerating U.S. dollar weakness. The euro surged to its highest level since December of 2009 as an S&P downgrade of the U.S. credit outlook prompted severe U.S. dollar weakness as the month came to a close. The Australian dollar marched 6.2% higher amid excellent export growth, while the New Zealand dollar rose by approximately the same percentage on a rising appetite for yield and risk as global investors sought to offset asset deterioration linked to inflation. The Colombian peso added another 5.5% amid heavy foreign direct investment flows into the oil and mining industries. Sweden’s krona and Brazil’s real also gained significantly as rate hikes attracted yield hungry investors. The Fund’s grain positions suffered losses in April amid heightened volatility as values fluctuated along with uncertain weather. Soybeans finished lower on the prospect of U.S. corn acres shifting to soybeans due to an excessively wet spring. A potentially record breaking South American crop led China to cancel U.S. purchases, while a bearish commodity call by Goldman Sachs pressured values as well. Wheat sold off late, losing 7% of its value as forecasts for badly needed rains in winter wheat areas offset the bullish effects of excessive moisture in spring wheat regions. Corn traded to all-time highs above $7.80 per bushel as poor planting progress threatened to exacerbate historically tight supplies. The Fund’s allocation to agricultural markets also resulted in losses for April as growing supplies offset the weaker U.S. dollar. June cattle (-6.2%) fell throughout the month after establishing record highs on April 4th as the USDA reported that commercial red-meat production reached a record high. June hogs also reversed to finish 8.4% lower after a reported 12% increase in frozen pork stocks versus last year. Cotton fell sharply on concern that China’s attempts to slow inflation using higher interest rates and reserve rate requirements would cut into demand. Meanwhile, July NY coffee established 14-year highs amid poor weather in South America. Allocations to metals outperformed in April as exceptional U.S. dollar weakness and rising inflation throughout the world propelled precious metals sharply higher. Gold saw an 8.1% gain, surpassing the $1,550 per ounce mark. July silver tacked on another 28%, pushing its year to date return to over 50% in frenzied action. Copper futures lost 3.4% as the U.S. credit downgrade and another reserve requirement hike in China dampened the growth outlook for the world’s two largest copper consumers.

For the second quarter of 2011, the most profitable market group overall was the bonds sector, while the greatest losses were attributable to positions in the energy sector.

In March, the Fund’s allocation to global equity markets underperformed as a sharp countertrend reversal following the disaster in Japan produced losses for the Fund’s strategies. Equity markets opened the month moving sideways as the reemergence of sovereign debt and inflation worries in Europe offset steady expansion in global manufacturing. From there the Nikkei plunged 25.0% on panic-induced selling following the events of March 11th. Results for the Fund’s models experienced losses as most leading indices participated in the selloff as risk appetite abated. Equities quickly recovered as the focus shifted to the growth to be generated by rebuilding Japan. Nikkei futures finished only 7.7% lower on the month while shares in South Korea and Hong Kong finished 9.1% and 0.9% higher, respectively, on the belief that these markets are well positioned to fill the temporary void left by the decimated Japanese manufacturing sector. U.S. equity markets also experienced small gains as macroeconomic data

continued on a positive trajectory. A mixture of long and short positions in equity markets led the Fund to an overall loss. The Fund’s positions in the bond sector experienced gains in March despite volatile market conditions as geopolitical instability in Libya and Japan and financial instability in Europe led investors to the relative safety of treasuries. Positions in 10-year Japanese Government Bonds experienced gains as the market opened the month near unchanged before rallying sharply in response to a nearly 20.0% washout in equities following the disaster. The Fund experienced losses in German bund futures as the market finished lower on news of improving employment, factory orders and retail sales. Meanwhile, the sovereign debt situation continued to evolve amid several debt downgrades of peripheral states, prompting investors to demand more yield to hold German debt even as EU leaders agreed to an expanded bailout package for troubled states. Results in U.S. bonds also experienced losses in turbulent trading activity as strong economic prospects offset geopolitical safe haven buying. A mixture of long and short bond positions led the Fund to an overall gain on the month. The Fund’s currency positions experienced gains in March as interest rate expectations and unsettling geopolitical developments dominated trading activity. June euro futures advanced 2.9% despite debt downgrades of Greece, Portugal and Spain as the ECB chairman continued to express the need for extreme vigilance with respect to the growing threat of inflation. The Swiss franc benefitted as investors sought shelter from the U.S.’s quantitative easing and Europe’s sovereign debt troubles. The yen rose over 4.0% following the catastrophic earthquake, amid expectations for a massive repatriation of capital to rebuild the stricken nation. However, in the first coordinated G7 intervention since the 2000 support for the euro, central bankers crushed the rally on March 18th, leading to a loss of 1.6% on the month. The Mexican peso outperformed as the oil producing nation saw slowing inflation complimented by expectations for continuing strong GDP growth. A mixture of long and short currency positions led the Fund to an overall gain on the month.

In February, the Fund’s allocation to equity markets performed well as major indices in the U.S. and Europe continued to press higher on improving economic conditions and strong corporate results. Late in the month, European and U.S. equities were shaken as the political unrest in Egypt spread to Libya and Bahrain, where protesters were met with force. The outbreak of violence triggered a spike in energy markets, which, when combined with uncertainty surrounding the severity of the crisis, prompted liquidation. Most major U.S. and European indices recovered late amid reassuring comments that the Saudis would cover any oil supply shortfalls. Asian shares struggled as inflation took a toll on growth prospects. Chinese H-shares lagged, finishing unchanged as inflation and consequent fiscal tightening dominated the action. Spillover pressure also affected shares in Singapore and Taiwan, which finished 5.9% and 5.6% lower, respectively. Japan’s Nikkei and Australia’s SPI finished 3.7% and 2.1% higher, respectively, in relatively quiet trading. A mixture of long and short positions in equity markets led the Fund to an overall gain in February. The Fund experienced losses in the bond sector in February as existing positions suffered amid a reversal in investors’ perception of the current risk environment. After breaking lower early in the month on strong corporate earnings and forward guidance, U.S. 30-year bond futures surged to January highs as growing unrest across the Middle East unnerved investors, prompting a general flight to safety. Germany’s bund futures opened the month under pressure as anecdotal evidence of exceptional demand from China offset disappointing December factory orders and retail sales data. However, the deteriorating geopolitical situation and local election losses by the majority ruling party in Germany spurred a reversal that led to losses for the Fund. Trade in Australian bond futures was particularly volatile, to the Fund’s detriment, as weakness associated with a strong early month employment report faded as the Reserve Bank of Australia chief indicated that the central bank was not considering a rate hike at the current time. A mixture of long and short bond positions led the Fund to an overall loss on the month. The Fund obtained gains in currencies in February as the U.S. dollar continued to trend lower, extending January’s losses by another 0.7%. The Swiss franc and Japanese yen finished 1.5% and 0.3% higher, respectively, amid safe haven buying as the situation deteriorated in the Middle East. The Fund experienced gains in the British pound, which finished the month 1.5% higher, after CPI readings showed that prices were increasing at a 4.0% annualized rate, the highest level since fall of 2008. Meanwhile, central bankers in Peru, Colombia, Indonesia and Russia raised rates as they continued to battle inflation while also attempting to fend off the negative effects that massive currency inflows are having on domestic currency appreciation. Colombia extended its dollar purchase program for another three months, hoping to cap currency gains to protect its export prospects. The Australian dollar finished 2.5% higher against the U.S. dollar as strong commodity markets supported full employment. A mixture of long and short positions in the currency sector led the Fund to an overall gain on the month. The Fund’s allocation to global energy markets yielded gains as growing instability in the Middle East and Northern Africa sent prices significantly higher. Short positions in WTI crude oil performed well early in the month, falling over 5.0% following the Egyptian president’s resignation and total U.S. fuel supplies moving to twenty year highs at the Cushing, Oklahoma delivery point. From there, the Fund experienced gains on long positions in April gasoline,

heating oil and brent crude, which finished 9.8%, 7.6% and 10.9% higher, respectively, at the expense of the Fund’s WTI crude position as civil unrest spread to Bahrain, Libya and Oman. The markets gathered momentum as speculation surrounding the stability of the Saudi regime intensified. Short positions in April natural gas also performed well, falling 8.9% on the month as forecasts for mild weather contributed to a convincing breach of the $4 per million btu level. A mixture of long and short positions in the energy sector led the Fund to an overall gain on the month.

In January, the Fund’s allocation to global equities finished mixed as disappointing performances in several peripheral markets offset steady trends in major indices. In Europe, several past laggards, including Greece, Italy and Spain finished the month 13.9%, 9.2% and 10.2% higher, respectively, as heavy ECB participation in secondary market debt auctions and plans for a comprehensive debt relief structure reassured investors. Small gains on positions in Germany’s DAX, France’s CAC40 and the Amsterdam EOE Index, which finished 2.5%, 5.1% and 1.3% higher, respectively, offset losses in the sector as several core European economies improved. U.S. equities pressed higher as improving employment figures and solid consumer demand elevated corporate earnings. The Fund experienced early losses in Australia’s SPI as epic flooding cut into 2011 GDP prospects. Chinese H-Shares reversed lower late in the month to the Fund’s detriment as authorities continued to struggle with inflation. Overall, a mixture of long and short stock indices positions led the Fund to an overall loss. The Fund’s allocation to global bond markets underperformed in January as investors exited safe haven assets in response to improving global economic conditions. The Fund experienced losses in its Japanese government bond positions as large auctions and generally poor economic performance resulted in a ratings agency debt downgrade, encouraging investors to put money to work outside the country. In Europe, investors sold bund and bobl futures as Euro-zone industrial production readings easily surpassed expectations. Additionally, positive dialogue from various heads of state regarding a comprehensive crisis solution was backed up by aggressive ECB purchases of Italian, Portuguese and Spanish debt in secondary markets, ensuring successful auctions for the embattled countries. In the U.S., performance suffered in choppy countertrend action as bond and note futures moved sideways to slightly higher as QE2 persisted in spite of rising inflation concerns in the rest of the world. A mixture of long and short bond positions led the Fund to an overall loss on the month. The Fund experienced losses in the interest rates sector as European short rates reversed sharply from December’s strong close. While the ECB left rates unchanged in January, their policy minutes emphasized vigilance over price stability in the midst of rising commodity prices. Policy makers also noted that uncertainty remains elevated and some financial institutions still face the threat of balance sheet adjustments despite positive underlying momentum in the economy. They also stressed the need for Euro members to reduce debt-to-GDP ratios. Short rate futures in the U.S. finished near their highs as early weakness associated with a strong employment report was offset by staunchly accommodative Fed monetary policy. Their focus, in contrast to the ECB, continues to be focused on growth and full employment at the expense of inflation. Meanwhile, Australian short rate futures moved higher to the Fund’s benefit as epic flooding cut into 2011 GDP estimates, thereby reducing prospects for previously expected rate hikes. A mixture of long and short interest rate positions led the Fund to an overall loss on the month. The Fund’s allocation to currency markets underperformed in January as the euro and British pound finished 2.4% and 2.8% higher against the U.S. dollar, respectively, and euro-zone regionals reversed late 2010 losses. Early month news that Japan would buy distressed sovereign debt and strong ECB secondary market participation in Portuguese, Spanish and Italian bond auctions provided support to these economies. As confidence in the euro improved, investors moved out of the Swiss franc, which finished 0.9% lower against the U.S. dollar, and back into risk plays in Hungary and Poland, which finished 5.4% and 4.1% higher, respectively, resulting in losses for the Fund. The Australian dollar finished 2.1% lower against the U.S. dollar as flood damage triggered a one-time levy, which tempered 2011 growth estimates and rate hike expectations. The Fund experienced losses in the yen following a credit rating downgrade as Japan’s huge debt load and limited policy options unnerved investors. Gains in the Mexican peso, which finished 1.8% higher against the U.S. dollar offset some losses in the sector as the peso rallied on prospects for a sustained U.S. economic recovery. The Fund’s mixture of long and short currency positions led to an overall loss on the month. The Fund experienced losses in the metals sector in January as gold and silver futures traded sharply lower amid growing optimism that the global economic recovery is gaining momentum. April gold finished with a loss of 6.2% as strong early month U.S. employment figures and ebbing contagion fears in Europe limited investors’ appetite for the alternative asset. March silver finished the month 8.8% lower in correlated action. The Fund’s allocation to industrial metals also suffered. The Fund’s positions in March COMEX copper were stopped out after a 6.0% intra-month decline due to China raising its reserve requirement in response to elevated GDP and CPI reports. Fears that China would take more aggressive measures to limit growth led to losses in London aluminum, lead and zinc as

several Chinese banks were forced to cease lending for the remainder of the month. A mixture of long and short metals positions led the Fund to an overall loss on the month. The Fund’s allocation to global energy markets produced positive returns in January as economic, logistical and geopolitical factors underpinned values. Strong U.S. employment figures and a pipeline shutdown in Alaska supported the Fund’s New York crude oil positions early in the month. However, elevated Chinese GDP and CPI readings precipitated another reserve requirement hike while increasing expectations for additional measures to slow their economy. This scenario, along with a bearish U.S. inventory report, contributed to losses for the Fund amid an 8.0% drop from intra-month highs. Long positions in brent crude finished 6.6% higher, surpassing $100 per barrel following a reversal in European demand expectations, an accident in the North Sea which idled 200,000 barrels of production and heightening unrest in Egypt. Front-month heating oil surged as well, adding 7.4% as exceptionally cold weather gripped the northern hemisphere, providing excellent returns for the Fund. A mixture of long and short energy positions led the Fund to an overall gain on the month.

For the first quarter of 2011, the most profitable market group overall was the energy sector, while the greatest losses were attributable to positions in the bonds sector.

The term “off-balance sheet risk” refers to an unrecorded potential liability that, even though it does not appear on the balance sheet, may result in a future obligation or loss. The Fund trades in futures and forward contracts and is therefore a party to financial instruments with elements of off-balance sheet market and credit risk. In entering into these contracts, there exists a market risk that such contracts may be significantly influenced by conditions, such as interest rate volatility, resulting in such contracts being less valuable. If the markets should move against all of the futures positions of the Fund at the same time, and if Superfund Capital Management was unable to offset such positions, the Fund could experience substantial losses. Superfund Capital Management attempts to minimize market risk through real-time monitoring of open positions, diversification of the portfolio and maintenance of a margin-to-equity ratio in all but extreme instances not greater than 50%.

In addition to market risk, in entering into futures and forward contracts, there is a credit risk that a counterparty will not be able to meet its obligations to the Fund. The counterparty for futures contracts traded in the U.S. and on most foreign exchanges is the clearinghouse associated with such exchange. In general, clearinghouses are backed by the corporate members of the clearinghouse who are required to share any financial burden resulting from the non-performance by one of their members and, as such, should significantly reduce this credit risk. In cases where the clearinghouse is not backed by the clearing members, like some foreign exchanges, it is normally backed by a consortium of banks or other financial institutions.

On October 31, 2011, MF Global reported to the SEC and the CFTC possible deficiencies in customer segregated accounts held at the firm. As a result, the SEC and CFTC determined that a liquidation proceeding led by SIPC would be the safest and most prudent course of action to protect customer accounts and assets, and SIPC initiated the liquidation of MF Global under the Securities Investor Protection Act. Superfund Capital Management closely monitored MF Global in the weeks prior to October 31, 2011 and began reducing the Fund’s exposure to MF Global. In October, total trading positions and assets of the Fund held at MF Global were reduced and steps were initiated to transfer all remaining positions and assets from MF Global to other clearing brokers prior to the bankruptcy filing. In the fourth quarter of 2011, the SIPC liquidation Trustee announced that the shortfall in the customer segregated funds account could be as much as 22% or more. After consideration of the Fund’s exposure, Superfund Capital Management caused the Fund to take a reserve to account for the Fund’s estimated exposure to such 22% shortfall. Series A recorded a reserve that reduced the net asset value by approximately $337,000 and Series B recorded a reserve that reduced the net asset value by approximately $529,000.

the sale price did not match the amount of the Fund’s assets on deposit at MF Global as reduced by the reserve, each Series recognized a change in value as of May 31, 2012 as a result of the sale. Such change in reserve is presented as “Gain/Loss on MF Global” on the Statements of Operations. Due to the manner in which each Series’ assets were held at MF Global, the sale price for Series A’s claim was slightly more than the carrying amount of Series A’s assets on deposit at MF Global (as reduced by the amount the reserve taken, as described above), while the sales price for Series B’s claim was slightly less than the carrying amount of Series B’s assets on deposit at MF Global (as reduced by the amount of the reserve taken, as described above). As a result, on May 31, 2012, the net asset value of the Series A Units increased by approximately 0.13% (or approximately $1.82 per Unit) and the net asset value of the Series B Units was reduced by approximately 0.12% (or approximately $1.92 per Unit). Following this sale, the Fund no longer has any exposure to MF Global.

The Fund does not enter into contractual obligations or commercial commitments to make future payments of a type that would be typical for an operating company. The Fund’s sole business is trading futures, currency, forward and certain swap contracts, both long (contracts to buy) and short (contracts to sell). All such contracts are settled by offset, not delivery. Substantially all such contracts are for settlement within four months of the trade date and substantially all such contracts are held by the Fund for less than four months before being offset or rolled over into new contracts with similar maturities. The financial statements of Series A and Series B each present a Condensed Schedule of Investments setting forth net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of such Series’ open forward contracts as well as the fair value of the futures contracts purchased and sold by each Series at December 31, 2012, and December 31, 2011.

Superfund Capital Management believes that the accounting policies that are most critical to the Fund’s financial condition and results of operations relate to the valuation of the Fund’s positions. The Fund uses the amortized cost method for valuing U.S. Treasury bills. Superfund Capital Management believes the cost of securities plus accreted discount, or minus amortized premium, approximates fair value. The majority of the Fund’s positions are exchange-traded futures contracts, which are valued daily at settlement prices published by the exchanges. Any forward foreign currency contracts held by the Fund are valued at published daily settlement prices or at dealers’ quotes. Thus, Superfund Capital Management expects that under normal circumstances substantially all of the Fund’s assets are valued on a daily basis using objective measures.

In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-11, Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities (“ASU 2011-11”). ASU 2011-11 requires disclosures to make financial statements that are prepared under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) more comparable to those prepared under International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). The new disclosure requirements mandate that entities disclose both gross and net information about instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of assets and liabilities as well as instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. In addition, ASU 2011-11 requires disclosure of collateral received and posted in connection with master netting agreements or similar arrangements. New disclosures are required for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. Superfund Capital Management is evaluating the impact of ASU 2011-11 on the financial statements and disclosures.

In January 2013, the FASB issued guidance to clarify the scope of disclosures about offsetting assets and liabilities. The amendments clarify that the scope of guidance issued in December 2011 to enhance disclosures around financial instrument and derivative instruments that are either (a) offset, or (b) subject to a master netting agreement or similar agreement, irrespective of whether they are offset, applies to derivatives, including bifurcated embedded derivatives, repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements, and securities borrowing and securities lending transactions that are either offset or subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement. The amendments are effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. Adoption is not expected to have a material impact on the Funds’ financial statements.

In May 2011, FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04 “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs”. ASU 2011-04 includes common requirements for measurement of and disclosure about fair value between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. ASU 2011-04 will require reporting entities to disclose the following information for fair value measurements categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy: quantitative information about the unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement, the valuation processes used by the reporting entity and a narrative description of the sensitivity of the fair value measurement to changes in unobservable inputs and the interrelationships between those unobservable inputs. In addition, ASU 2011-04 will require reporting entities to make disclosures about amounts and reasons for all transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements. The new and revised disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Fund adopted ASU 2011-04 as of January 1, 2012. The adoption of the provisions of ASU 2011-04 has not had a material impact on the Fund’s financial statement disclosures.

Superfund Capital Management has not established any formal procedures to resolve the conflicts of interest described below. You should be aware that no such procedures have been established, and that, consequently, you will be dependent on the good faith of the respective parties subject to such conflicts to resolve such conflicts equitably. Although Superfund Capital Management will attempt to resolve conflicts in good faith, there can be no assurance that these conflicts will not, in fact, result in losses for the Fund.

Conflicts exist between Superfund Capital Management’s interests in and its responsibilities to each Series. The conflicts are inherent in Superfund Capital Management acting as general partner and as trading advisor to each Series. These conflicts and the potential detriments to the Limited Partners are described below. Superfund Capital Management’s selection of itself as trading advisor was not objective because it is also the general partner of the Fund and the general partner associated with each Series. Investors must recognize that Superfund Capital Management has established the Fund as an investment product to be managed by Superfund Capital Management implementing Superfund proprietary trading systems, and that it will not replace itself as the trading advisor even if doing so would be beneficial to the Fund. The advisory relationship between each Series and Superfund Capital Management, including the fee arrangement, was not negotiated at arm’s length, and the performance fee arrangement between the Fund and Superfund Capital Management may create an incentive for Superfund Capital Management to make trading decisions (or implement the Superfund proprietary trading system) in a manner that is more speculative or subject to a greater degree of loss than would be the case if no such arrangement existed. Investors should note, however, that Superfund Capital Management believes that the fee arrangements are fair and competitive with compensation arrangements in pools involving independent general partners and advisors. Superfund Capital Management will review its compensation terms annually to determine whether such terms continue to be competitive with other pools for similar services and will lower such fees if it concludes, in good faith, that its fees are no longer competitive.

Superfund Capital Management’s principals do not devote their time exclusively to each Series. Superfund Capital Management (or its principals or affiliates) may or do currently act as general partner to other commodity pools and trading advisor to other accounts which may compete with each Series for Superfund Capital

Management’s services. Thus, Superfund Capital Management (or its principals or affiliates) could have a conflict between its responsibilities to each Series and to those other pools and accounts. Superfund Capital Management believes that it has sufficient resources to discharge its responsibilities in this regard in a fair manner. Superfund Capital Management (or its principals or affiliates) may receive higher advisory fees from some of those other accounts than it receives from each Series. Superfund Capital Management and its affiliates, however, trade all accounts in a substantially similar manner, given the differences in size and timing of the capital additions and withdrawals.

In addition, Superfund Capital Management may find that futures positions established for the benefit of each Series, when aggregated with positions in other accounts of Superfund Capital Management (or its principals or affiliates) approach the speculative position limits in a particular commodity. Superfund Capital Management may decide to address this situation either by liquidating each Series’ positions in that futures contract and reapportioning the portfolio in other contracts or by trading contracts in other markets which do not have restrictive limits. Any principal of Superfund Capital Management may trade futures and related contracts for its own account. Trading records for any proprietary trading are not available for review by clients or investors. Employees of Superfund Capital Management are prohibited from trading futures and related contracts for their own accounts.

A conflict of interest exists if proprietary trades are executed and cleared at more favorable rates than trades cleared on behalf of each Series. A potential conflict also may occur when Superfund Capital Management or its principals trade their proprietary accounts more aggressively, or take positions in proprietary accounts which are opposite, or ahead of, the positions taken by each Series.

Superfund Capital Management receives a portion of the round-turn futures trading commissions paid by each Series. Therefore, Superfund Capital Management may have an incentive to trade more frequently than it otherwise might in order to generate commission income, and the round-turn brokerage commission paid by each Series was not negotiated at arm’s length. For purposes of evaluating this conflict of interest, Limited Partners may assume that Superfund Capital Management may receive up to the full amount of the round-turn futures trading commissions paid by each Series. Nevertheless, Superfund Capital Management does not intend to initiate trades for the Series other than the trades indicated by Superfund’s systematic, non-discretionary automated trading system and in accordance with its money management filters defining the maximum open risk per position taken. If the Superfund trading systems are proposed to be changed in a manner that Superfund Capital Management reasonably believes will cause the average annual trading volume to materially exceed 2,700 (Series A) and 3,850 (Series B) round-turn trades per year per million dollars in such Series, Superfund Capital Management will give the Limited Partners not less than 15 business days notice prior to implementing any such change and will not implement such change until after a month-end has passed since giving such notice. The excess between the round-turn futures trading commissions charged to each Series and the amount actually paid to each clearing broker is compensation to Superfund Capital Management for providing services akin to services provided by an introducing broker. Since Superfund Capital Management is responsible for selecting brokers for each Series, Superfund Capital Management is unlikely to replace itself with an unaffiliated introducing broker for the provision of these services, even if doing so is in the best interests of the Series.

The clearing brokers, currently ADM Investor Services, Inc. (“ADMIS”) and Barclays Capital Inc. (“BCI”), and the affiliates and personnel of such entities, may trade futures and forward contracts for their own accounts. This trading could give rise to conflicts of interest with each Series. The clearing brokers also may serve as brokers for other commodity pools, which could give rise to conflicts of interest between their responsibility to each Series and to those pools and clients. Any clearing broker that is also a selling agent of each Series could give rise to conflicts of interest because its compensation in each role is based on the net asset value of Units outstanding. Further, in making recommendations to redeem or purchase additional Units, employees of the clearing brokers may have a conflict of interest between acting in the best interest of their clients and assuring continued compensation to their employer.

The selling agents, including Superfund USA, an affiliate of Superfund Capital Management, receive substantial selling commissions on the sale of Units. Consequently the selling agents have a conflict of interest in advising their clients whether to invest in the Units. The selling agents receive initial selling commissions and ongoing selling commissions based on Units sold by them pursuant to this Prospectus equal to, in the aggregate, up to 10% of the gross offering proceeds for each Unit (which is equal to $50,670,405 out of the $506,704,051 in Units offered pursuant to this Prospectus). Consequently, until this maximum cumulative selling commission limit is reached, the selling agents have a disincentive to advise clients to redeem their Units even if doing so is in such clients’ best interests.

Subject to the provisions of the Partnership Agreement, a prospective investor should be aware that Superfund Capital Management, as general partner of a Series, has a responsibility to Limited Partners of that Series to exercise good faith and fairness in all dealings affecting such Series. The Partnership Agreement provisions limiting this responsibility are summarized below under “Indemnification and Standard of Liability.” The fiduciary responsibility of a general partner to the Limited Partners is a developing and changing area of the law and Limited Partners who have questions concerning the duties of Superfund Capital Management as general partner should consult with their counsel. In the event that a Limited Partner of a Series believes that Superfund Capital Management has violated its fiduciary duty to the Limited Partners of such Series, he may seek legal relief individually or on behalf of such Series under applicable laws, including under the Act and under commodities laws, to recover damages from or require an accounting by Superfund Capital Management. The Partnership Agreement is governed by Delaware law and any breach of Superfund Capital Management’s fiduciary duty under the Partnership Agreement will generally be governed by Delaware law.

The Partnership Agreement does not limit Superfund Capital Management’s fiduciary obligations under Delaware or common law; however, Superfund Capital Management may assert as a defense to claims of breach of fiduciary duty that the conflicts of interest and fees payable to Superfund Capital Management have been disclosed in this Prospectus. Limited Partners may also have the right, subject to applicable procedural and jurisdictional requirements, to bring class actions in federal court to enforce their rights under the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder by the SEC. Limited Partners who have suffered losses in connection with the purchase or sale of the Units may be able to recover such losses from Superfund Capital Management where the losses result from a violation by Superfund Capital Management of the federal securities laws. State securities laws may also provide certain remedies to Limited Partners. Limited Partners should be aware that performance by Superfund Capital Management of its fiduciary duty to each Series is measured by the terms of the Partnership Agreement as well as applicable law. Limited Partners are afforded certain rights to institute reparations proceedings under the Commodity Exchange Act for violations of the Commodity Exchange Act or of any rule, regulation or order of the CFTC by Superfund Capital Management.

Superfund Capital Management and its controlling persons may not be liable to each Series or any Limited Partner for errors in judgment or other acts or omissions not amounting to misconduct or negligence, as a consequence of the indemnification and exculpatory provisions described in the following paragraph. Purchasers of Units may have more limited rights of action than they would absent such provisions.

The Partnership Agreement provides that Superfund Capital Management and its controlling persons shall not have any liability to each Series or to any Limited Partner for any loss suffered by such Series which arises out of any action or inaction if Superfund Capital Management, in good faith, determined that such course of conduct was in the best interests of such Series and such course of conduct did not constitute negligence or misconduct of Superfund Capital Management. Each Series has agreed to indemnify Superfund Capital Management and its controlling persons against claims, losses or liabilities based on their conduct relating to such Series, provided that the conduct resulting in the claims, losses or liabilities for which indemnity is sought did not constitute negligence or misconduct or breach of any fiduciary obligation to such Series and was done in good faith and in a manner which

Superfund Capital Management, in good faith, determined to be in the best interests of such Series. Controlling persons of Superfund Capital Management are entitled to indemnity only for losses resulting from claims against such controlling persons due solely to their relationship with Superfund Capital Management or for losses incurred in performing the duties of Superfund Capital Management. See Section 17 of the Partnership Agreement, included as Exhibit A to this Prospectus. Each Series will not indemnify Superfund Capital Management or its controlling persons for any liability arising from securities law violations in connection with the offering of the Units of such Series unless Superfund Capital Management or its controlling persons prevails on the merits or obtains a court approved settlement (in accordance with Section 17 of the Partnership Agreement). The position of the SEC is that any such indemnification is contrary to the federal securities laws and therefore unenforceable.

The following list of fees and expenses includes all compensation, fees, profits and other benefits (including reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses) which Superfund Capital Management, the selling agents, the clearing brokers and the affiliates of those parties may earn or receive in connection with the offering and operation of each Series. Prospective investors should refer to the Breakeven Analysis for each Series starting on page 6 for an estimate of the break-even amount that is required for an investor to recoup such fees and expenses, or “break even” in the first year of trading.

Each Series will pay Superfund Capital Management a monthly management fee equal to one-twelfth of 1.85% (1.85% annually) of the month-end net asset value of such Series. This fee will be paid to Superfund Capital Management for providing ongoing advisory services and is payable regardless of whether or not the Series are profitable.

Each Series will pay Superfund Capital Management a monthly performance fee equal to 25% of the new appreciation (if any) in the net asset value of each Series. “New appreciation” means the total increase in net asset value of a Series from the end of the last period for which a performance fee was earned by Superfund Capital Management, after adjusting for subscriptions and redemptions, excluding interest income. New appreciation is not reduced by extraordinary expenses, if any, or by the performance fee itself. That is, Superfund Capital Management does not have to earn back the performance fee previously paid in order to generate new appreciation. If a performance fee payment is made by a Series, and that Series thereafter incurs net trading losses, Superfund Capital Management will retain the amount previously paid. Thus, Superfund Capital Management may be paid a performance fee during a year in which a Series incurred net losses. Trading losses will be carried forward and no further performance fees may be paid until the prior trading losses have been recovered; however, redemption of Units will result in a proportional decrease in any such trading loss carryforward.

For example, assume a Series paid a performance fee at the end of January in a given year and assume that such Series recognized trading profits (net of all brokerage fees, management fees, and operating and offering expenses but excluding interest income) of $200,000 during February of that year. The new appreciation for February would be $200,000 and Superfund Capital Management’s performance fee would be $50,000 (0.25 × $200,000). Alternatively, assume that such Series paid a performance fee at the end of November of a given year but did not pay a performance fee at the end of December of that year because it had trading losses of $100,000. If such Series recognized trading profits of $200,000 at the end of January the next year, the new appreciation (before interest earned) for January would be $100,000 ($200,000 – $100,000 loss carry forward) and Superfund Capital Management’s performance fee would be $25,000 (0.25 × $100,000). Please note that this simplified example assumes that no Limited Partners of such Series have added or redeemed Units within such Series during this sample time frame. Such capital changes require that the calculation be determined on a “per Unit” per Series basis. If the net asset value per Unit within a Series at the time when a particular investor acquires Units is lower than the net asset value per Unit within a Series as of the end of the most recent prior calendar month for which a performance fee was payable (due to losses incurred between such month-end and the subscription date), such Units might experience a substantial increase in value after the subscription date yet pay no performance fee as of the next calendar month-end because such Series as a whole has not experienced new appreciation. If a performance fee accrual is in effect at the time when particular Units are purchased (due to gains achieved prior to the applicable

subscription day), the net asset value per Unit reflects such accrual. In the event the net asset value of a Series declines after the subscription date, the incentive fee accrual is “reversed” and such reversal is credited to all Units within such Series equally, including the Units which were purchased at a net asset value per Unit which fully reflected such accrual.

Each Series will pay a monthly fee up to one twelfth of 1% (1% annually) of the month-end net asset value of that Series for ongoing offering expenses incurred in connection with the offering of the Units, not to exceed the actual amount of such expenses. The ongoing offering costs which the Series incur are legal costs associated with updating this Prospectus, escrow fees, Blue Sky filing fees and printing and postage costs associated with producing and mailing copies of the Prospectus. The ongoing offering costs will not exceed 0.1479% of the gross offering proceeds of the Units registered pursuant to the Registration Statement of which this Prospectus is part. When added to sales commissions discussed herein, the “organization and offering expenses” of the Fund, as defined by FINRA Rule 2310, will not exceed 10.1479% of the gross offering proceeds of the Units registered pursuant to the Registration Statement of which this Prospectus is part.

Each Series bears its operating expenses at a fixed rate of 1/12 of 0.15% of month-end net assets (0.15% annually), not to exceed the amount of actual expense incurred. The Fund’s operating costs include certain legal, auditing, accounting, administration and printing and postage costs relating to the day-to-day operations of the Fund, and are distinct from the Fund’s ongoing offering costs described above. Indirect operating expenses in connection with the administration of the Fund, such as salaries, rent, travel and overhead of Superfund Capital Management are borne by Superfund Capital Management, not the Fund or either Series.

Each Series will be charged brokerage fees of $9.00 per round-turn futures transaction plus applicable regulatory and exchange fees where brokerage commissions are charged in U.S. dollars. Brokerage commissions for certain foreign futures contracts to be traded by the Fund are charged in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Commission rates for brokerage commissions charged in foreign currencies will be reset on the first business day of each calendar month to the foreign currency equivalent of $9.00 based on the then current U.S. dollar exchange rate for the applicable foreign currencies. Daily fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates will, however, cause the actual commissions charged to the Fund for certain foreign futures contracts to be more or less than $9.00 per round-turn. The round-turn transaction fee for purchases and sales of foreign currency over-the-counter spot and forward transactions in each Series with an equivalent value of one hundred thousand dollars will likewise be charged at $9.00 per round-turn transaction. A portion of the Fund’s brokerage fees will be paid to the clearing brokers for execution and clearing costs and the balance will be paid to Superfund Capital Management for providing services akin to services provided by an introducing broker. Assuming 1,720 round-turn transactions per year per million dollars in Series A, and 2,585 round-turn transactions per year per million dollars in Series B, brokerage commissions are estimated at 2.00% (Series A) and 3.00% (Series B) annually of average annual net assets. The preceding assumptions are based on the average number of round-turn transactions per million dollars per year over the last three years traded on behalf of the Series. The Partnership Agreement provides that brokerage commission costs to be borne by the Fund shall not exceed 5% (Series A) and 7% (Series B) annually of the average annual net assets of the Series.

Currency dealers trade with a spread between the price at which they are prepared to buy or sell a particular currency. These “bid-ask” spreads are not a quantifiable expense of the Series but do represent a profit margin to the dealer for making a market in the currency. Superfund Capital Management cannot quantify the amount of dealer profit that is embedded in a price quoted by a dealer but does believe that the Fund will effect currency transactions at prevailing market prices. Dealer profit from the Series’ currency trading may, over time, be substantial.

Each Series will pay Superfund USA a selling commission of up to 10% of the gross offering proceeds of the Units by paying 4% of the average month-end net asset value of each outstanding Unit in monthly installments of 1/12 of 4% of the month-end net asset value of such Units. Thus, Units are charged a commission of 4% of the average month-end net asset value per Unit in the initial year after purchase. Units are charged additional selling commissions of 4% per annum of the average month-end net asset value per Unit thereafter; provided, however, that the maximum cumulative selling commission per Unit is limited to 10% of the gross offering proceeds for such Unit (maximum of $50,670,405 in respect of the $506,704,051 in Units registered in this offering). Superfund USA may retain additional selling agents to assist with the placement of the Units and will pay all or a portion of the annual selling commission it receives in respect of the Units sold by the additional selling agents to the additional selling agents effecting the sales.

Units held by the following types of investors are not subject to selling commissions: (i) investors participating in selling agent asset-based or fixed-fee investment programs or a registered investment adviser’s asset-based fee or fixed fee advisory program through which an investment adviser recommends a portfolio allocation to the Fund and for which Superfund USA serves as selling agent, (ii) investors who are commodity pools operated by commodity pool operators registered as such with the CFTC for which Superfund USA serves as selling agent, and (iii) investors who have paid the maximum selling commission on their Units.

If a Limited Partner’s Units are not subject to the selling commissions described above, as of the end of each month, the Limited Partner’s Units will be charged, as a Fund bookkeeping entry only, the same 1/12 of the 4% annual selling commission as other investors. However, the amount of that charge will not be taken from the Fund or paid to any person and, as of the beginning of the next month, that charge will be reversed and the Fund will issue that Limited Partner additional Units, calculated to three decimal places, at the then current Unit net asset value. Accordingly, the net asset value of that Limited Partner’s investment in the Fund will reflect the inapplicability of the annual selling commission to the Limited Partner’s Units and a somewhat higher performance fee, if applicable, as a result of the Limited Partner’s Units not paying the annual selling commission. The Fund will use this bookkeeping procedure and the issuance of additional Units to maintain a uniform net asset value across all Units.

The entire offering proceeds received from subscription for each Series will be credited to such Series’ bank and brokerage accounts for the purpose of engaging in trading activities and as reserves for that trading. Continuing fees and expenses such as operating and management will also be paid from funds in these accounts. Each Series meets its margin requirements by depositing U.S. government securities and cash, which is held in interest bearing accounts, with the clearing brokers. In this way, substantially all (i.e., 95% or more) of each Series’ assets, whether used as margin for trading purposes or as reserves for such trading, can be invested in U.S. government securities or interest bearing accounts. Investors should note that maintenance of each Series’ assets in U.S. government securities and banks does not reduce the risk of loss from trading futures and forward contracts. Each Series receives all interest earned on its assets. Up to 60% of each Series’ assets will be committed as margin for futures contracts and held by the clearing broker, although the amount committed may vary significantly. Such assets are maintained in segregated accounts with the clearing broker pursuant to the Commodity Exchange Act and regulations thereunder. The remaining Series assets will normally be invested in U.S. Treasury Bills or maintained in cash in deposit accounts, which may be interest bearing or non-interest bearing. Each Series’ assets are not and will not be, directly or indirectly, commingled with the property of any other Series, or any other person by Superfund Capital Management nor invested with or loaned to Superfund Capital Management or any affiliated entities.

ADMIS is a registered futures commission merchant and is a member of the NFA. Its main office is located at 141 West Jackson Blvd., Suite 1600A, Chicago, Illinois 60604. In the normal course of its business, ADMIS is involved in various legal actions incidental to its commodities business. None of these actions are expected either individually or in aggregate to have a material adverse impact on ADMIS.

Neither ADMIS nor any of its principals have been the subject of any material administrative, civil or criminal actions within the past five years, except the CFTC Order entered on March 26, 2009. In this order, the CFTC finds that during 2002 to 2004, ADMIS lacked adequate procedures concerning post execution allocation of bunched orders and that it allowed an account manager to carry out post-execution allocations from one or more days after the day the trades were executed and that it failed to maintain certain records to identify orders subject to post execution allocation. The order imposes a remedial sanction of $200,000 and requires ADMIS to implement enhanced procedures for post execution allocation of trades.

BCI is a registered securities broker-dealer and futures commission merchant. BCI is involved in a number of judicial and arbitration matters arising in connection with the conduct of its business.

On September 15, 2009, motions were filed in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Bankruptcy Court”) by Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (“LBHI”), the SIPA Trustee for Lehman Brothers Inc. (the “Trustee”) and the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (the “Committee”). All three motions challenged certain aspects of the transaction pursuant to which BCI, its parent Barclays Bank PLC (“BBPLC”) and other subsidiaries of Barclays Bank PLC (collectively, “Barclays”) acquired most of the assets of Lehman Brothers Inc. (“LBI”) in September 2008 and the court order approving such sale. The claimants sought an order voiding the transfer of certain assets to BCI; requiring BCI to return to the LBI estate alleged excess value BCI received; and declaring that BCI is not entitled to certain assets that it claims pursuant to the sale documents and order approving the sale (the “Rule 60 Claims”). On November 16, 2009, LBHI, the Trustee and the Committee filed separate complaints in the Bankruptcy Court asserting claims against BCI based on the same underlying allegations as the pending motions and seeking relief similar to that which is requested in the motions. On January 29, 2010, BCI filed its response to the Rule 60 Claims and also filed a motion seeking delivery of certain assets that LBHI and LBI have failed to deliver as required by the sale documents and the court order approving the sale (together with the Trustee’s competing claims to those assets, the “Contract Claims”).

On February 22, 2011, the Bankruptcy Court issued its Opinion in relation to these matters, rejecting the Rule 60 Claims and deciding some of the Contract Claims in the Trustee’s favor and some in favor of BCI. On July 15, 2011, the Bankruptcy Court entered final Orders implementing its Opinion. BCI and the Trustee each appealed the Bankruptcy Court’s adverse rulings on the Contract Claims to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “District Court”). LBHI and the Committee did not pursue an appeal from the Bankruptcy Court’s ruling on the Rule 60 Claims. After briefing and argument, the District Court issued its opinion on June 5, 2012 in which it reversed one of the Bankruptcy Court’s rulings on the Contract Claims that had been adverse to Barclays and the Company and affirmed the Bankruptcy Court’s other rulings on the Contract Claims. Barclays and the Trustee have each appealed the adverse rulings of the District Court to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

On September 2, 2011, the United States Federal Housing Finance Agency, acting for two U.S. government sponsored enterprises, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (collectively, the “GSEs”), filed lawsuits against 17 financial institutions in connection with the GSEs’ purchases of residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”). The lawsuits allege, among other things, that the RMBS offering materials contained materially false and misleading statements and/or omissions. BCI and certain of its former employees are named in two of these lawsuits, relating to sales between 2005 and 2007 of RMBS, in which BCI was lead or co-lead underwriter. Both lawsuits are currently in the discovery stage.

Both complaints demand, among other things: rescission and recovery of the consideration paid for the RMBS; and recovery for the GSEs’ alleged monetary losses arising out of their ownership of the RMBS. The complaints are similar to other civil actions filed against BCI by other plaintiffs, including the Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle, Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston, Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago, Cambridge Place Investment Management, Inc., HSH Nordbank AG (and affiliates) Stichting Pensioenfonds ABP, Prudential Insurance Company of America and the NCUA, relating to purchases of RMBS.

The CFTC, the SEC, the U.S. Department of Justice Fraud Section (the “DOJ-FS”) and Antitrust Division, the Financial Services Authority (FSA) and various state attorneys general are among various authorities conducting investigations (the Investigations) into submissions made by BBPLC and other panel members to the bodies that set various benchmark rates, such as the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) and the Euro Interbank Offered Rate (EURIBOR).

On June 27, 2012, BBPLC, BCI and BBPLC’s parent Barclays PLC (“BPLC”), announced that they had reached a settlement with the CFTC. A penalty of $200 million was paid by the Barclays entities in connection with the CFTC settlement. On June 27, 2012, BBPLC also announced that it had reached a settlement with the FSA and the DOJ-FS, and paid penalties of £59.5 million and $160 million, respectively, to those authorities. These three settlements were made by entry into a Settlement Order Agreement with the CFTC, a Non-Prosecution Agreement with the DOJ-FS and a Settlement Agreement with the FSA. Under the CFTC Settlement Order Agreement, BPLC, BBPLC and BCI neither admitted nor denied the CFTC’s findings, except that Barclays entities admitted the CFTC’s findings to the extent those findings were also admitted in any related governmental actions. The CFTC settlement found that BPLC, BBPLC and BCI, by and through their agents, attempted to manipulate and made false, misleading or knowingly inaccurate LIBOR and EURIBOR submissions to benefit Barclays’ derivatives trading positions by either increasing its profits or minimizing losses. The CFTC found that the conduct occurred regularly and was pervasive. In addition, the CFTC found that the attempts to manipulate included Barclays’ traders asking other banks to assist in manipulating EURIBOR, as well as Barclays aiding attempts by other banks to manipulate U.S. Dollar LIBOR and EURIBOR. The CFTC also found that throughout the global financial crisis in late August 2007 through early 2009, as a result of instructions from its senior management, Barclays routinely made artificially low LIBOR submissions to protect Barclays’ reputation from negative market and media perceptions concerning Barclays’ financial condition.

Under the CFTC Settlement Order Agreement, BPLC, BBPLC and BCI were also required to institute certain undertakings with the aim of improving the quality and supervision of Barclays’ submissions to various benchmark interest rates, including LIBOR and EURIBOR. In connection with the Non-Prosecution Agreement entered into with the DOJ-FS, BBPLC made certain factual admissions. None of the findings in the resolution with the FSA are deemed factual admissions by BBPLC. In addition, BBPLC has been granted conditional leniency from the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice in connection with potential U.S. antitrust law violations with respect to financial instruments that reference EURIBOR.

BCI, BPLC, BBPLC and other banks have been named as defendants in class action and non-class action lawsuits pending in United States Federal Courts in connection with their roles as contributor panel banks to U.S. Dollar LIBOR, the first of which was filed on April 15, 2011. The complaints are substantially similar and allege, among other things, that BCI, BPLC, BBPLC and the other banks individually and collectively violated various provisions of the Sherman Act, the Commodity Exchange Act, the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) and various state laws by suppressing or otherwise manipulating U.S. Dollar LIBOR rates. The lawsuits seek an unspecified amount of damages and trebling of damages under the Sherman and RICO Acts. The proposed class actions purport to be brought on behalf of (among others) plaintiffs that (i) engaged in U.S. Dollar LIBOR-linked over-the-counter transactions; (ii) purchased U.S. Dollar LIBOR-linked financial instruments on an exchange; (iii) purchased U.S. Dollar LIBOR-linked debt securities; (iv) purchased adjustable-rate mortgages linked to U.S. Dollar LIBOR; or (v) issued loans linked to U.S. Dollar LIBOR.

BCI, BPLC and BBPLC and certain other EURIBOR panel banks have been named as defendants in a class action lawsuit pending in United States Federal Court in connection with their roles as contributor panel banks to EURIBOR. The complaint alleges, among other things, violations of the Sherman Antitrust Act and state common law, and purports to be brought on behalf of all U.S. persons or entities that purchased or sold NYSE LIFFE EURIBOR futures contracts during the period of June 1, 2005 through June 30, 2010.

BCI, BPLC and BBPLC also have been named as defendants along with four current and former Barclays officers and directors in a proposed securities class action pending in the SDNY in connection with Barclays’ role as

a contributor panel bank to LIBOR. The complaint principally alleges that Barclays Annual Reports for the years 2006-2011 contained misstatements and omissions concerning (among other things) Barclays’ compliance with its operational risk management processes and certain laws and regulations. The complaint also alleges that Barclays’ daily U.S. Dollar LIBOR submissions themselves constituted false statements in violation of U.S. securities law. The complaint is brought on behalf of a proposed class consisting of all persons or entities (other than the defendants) that purchased Barclays sponsored American Depositary Receipts on an American securities exchange between July 10, 2007 and June 27, 2012. The complaint asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

There have been no other administrative, civil or criminal actions, whether pending or concluded, against BCI within the last 5 years that would be considered to be material as defined in Section 4.24(l)(2) of the Regulations under the Commodity Exchange Act.

Superfund Capital Management is not obligated to continue to use the clearing brokers identified above and may select others or additional dealers and counterparties in the future, provided Superfund Capital Management believes that their service and pricing are competitive.

No broker may pay, directly or indirectly, rebates or give-ups to any trading advisor or manager or to Superfund Capital Management or any of their respective affiliates in respect of sales of Units; and such prohibitions may not be circumvented by any reciprocal business arrangements.

SS&C Fund Services was appointed as the Fund’s administrator effective August 1, 2010. Pursuant to a Fund Administration Services Agreement entered into by and among the Fund, Superfund Capital Management and SS&C (the “Administration Agreement”), SS&C will be responsible for, among other things: (i) Fund accounting services, including the preparation and maintenance of the Fund’s accounting books and records; (ii) accounting services with respect to investor services, including the preparation and distribution of investor statements; (iii) financial reporting, including the preparation of financial statements to be included in the Fund’s Forms 10-Q and 10-K; and (iv) tax services.

The Administration Agreement provides that SS&C shall not be liable to a Series for any acts or omissions in connection with the services rendered to such Series under such agreement in the absence of gross negligence, bad faith, fraud, dishonesty or willful misconduct. In addition, the Fund has agreed to indemnify SS&C from and against any liabilities, obligations, losses, damages, penalties, actions, judgments, claims, demands, suits, costs, expenses or disbursements (a “Claim”) which may be imposed upon, incurred by or asserted against them arising in connection with the provision of services under the Administration Agreement provided that any such Claim does not arise out of or is not connected to SS&C’s material breach of the Administration Agreement or SS&C’s gross negligence, bad faith, fraud, dishonesty or willful misconduct. The Administration Agreement will automatically renew at the end of each calendar year for successive one year terms unless either party provides the other with written notice of termination at least sixty days prior to the end of any renewal term.

SS&C is a business unit of SS&C Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation. Its principal place of business is 80 Lamberton Road, Windsor, Connecticut 06095.

Each Series is not required to make any distributions to Limited Partners. While each Series has the authority to make such distributions, Superfund Capital Management does not intend to cause either Series to do so in the foreseeable future. Superfund Capital Management believes that distributions of Fund assets are not

necessary since Limited Partners may redeem any or all of their Units at the then current net asset value per Unit on a periodic basis. The amount and timing of future distributions is uncertain. Because of the potential volatility of the futures and forward contract markets, especially in the short-term, each Series is recommended for those seeking a medium- to long-term investment (i.e., three to five years). If each Series realizes profits for any fiscal year, such profits generally will constitute taxable income to the Limited Partners of such Series in accordance with their respective investments in such Series whether or not cash or other property has been distributed to Limited Partners. Any distributions, if made by a Series, may be inadequate to cover such taxes payable by the Limited Partners of such Series.

A Limited Partner of a Series may request any or all of his investment in such Series be redeemed by such Series at the net asset value per Unit within such Series as of the end of the month, subject to a minimum redemption of $1,000 and subject further to such Limited Partner having an investment in such Series, after giving effect to the requested redemption, at least equal to the minimum initial investment amount of $10,000 (or such minimum as was in effect at the time such Limited Partner initially acquired its Units). Limited Partners must transmit a written request of such redemption to Superfund Capital Management not less than five business days prior to the end of the month (or such shorter period as permitted by Superfund Capital Management) as of which redemption is to be effective. The request for redemption must specify the dollar amount for which redemption is sought. If the net asset value per Unit within a Series as of the end of any business day declines by 50% or more from either the prior year-end or the prior month-end Unit value of such Series, Superfund Capital Management will suspend trading activities, notify all Limited Partners within such Series of the relevant facts within seven business days and declare a special redemption period. Redemptions will generally be paid within 20 days after the date of redemption. However, in special circumstances, including, but not limited to, inability to liquidate dealers’ positions as of a redemption date or default or delay in payments due to each Series from clearing brokers, banks or other persons or entities, each Series may in turn delay payment to persons requesting redemption of the proportionate part of the net assets of each Series represented by the sums that are the subject of such default or delay. No such delays have been imposed to date by any pool sponsored by Superfund Capital Management. The federal income tax aspects of redemptions are described under “Federal Income Tax Aspects.”

A Limited Partner may exchange his or her investment in one Series for an investment in the other Series by simultaneously redeeming his or her Units in one Series and subscribing for new Units in the other Series at the then current net asset values of each Series.

The net asset value of a Unit within a Series as of any date is (i) the sum of all cash, plus U.S. Treasury Bills valued at cost plus accrued interest, and other securities of such Series valued at market, plus the market value of all open futures, forward and option positions maintained by such Series, less all liabilities of each Series and accrued performance fees payable by such Series, determined in accordance with the principles specified in the Partnership Agreement, divided by (ii) the number of Units of such Series outstanding as of the date of determination. Where no principle is specified in the Partnership Agreement, the net asset value of a Series is calculated in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America under the accrual basis of accounting.

The following is a summary of the Partnership Agreement, a form of which is attached as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference.

The Fund is organized under the Act. The Partnership Agreement provides that the Fund shall be organized as separate Series. Under the Partnership Agreement, Superfund Capital Management has created Series

A and Series B. Superfund Capital Management may create other Series under the Partnership Agreement as provided therein. In general, the liability of a Limited Partner within a Series under the Act is limited to the amount of his capital contribution to such Series and his share of any undistributed profits of such Series. (However, Limited Partners could be required, as a matter of bankruptcy law, to return to each Series’ estate any distribution which they received at a time when such Series was in fact insolvent or in violation of the Partnership Agreement.) The assets and estate of one Series are not liable for the liabilities of another Series.

The Partnership Agreement effectively gives Superfund Capital Management, as general partner, full control over the management and operations of each Series and the Partnership Agreement gives no management role to the Limited Partners. To facilitate matters for Superfund Capital Management, the Limited Partners must execute the Subscription Agreement that accompanies this Prospectus.

Registered Agents Legal Services, LLC will accept service of legal process on each Series in the State of Delaware. Only Superfund Capital Management has signed the Registration Statement of which this Prospectus is a part, and only the assets of each Series are subject to issuer liability under the federal securities laws for the information contained in this Prospectus and under federal and state laws with respect to the issuance and sale of the Units. Under the Partnership Agreement, the power and authority to manage, operate and control all aspects of the business of each Series are vested in Superfund Capital Management. In addition, Superfund Capital Management has been designated as the “tax matters partner” of each Series and of the Fund for purposes of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).

The Limited Partners have no voice in the operations of each Series, other than certain limited voting rights as set forth in the Partnership Agreement. In the course of its management, Superfund Capital Management may, in its sole and absolute discretion, appoint an affiliate or affiliates of Superfund Capital Management as additional general partners (except where Superfund Capital Management has been notified by the Limited Partners that it is to be replaced as the general partner) and retain such persons, including affiliates of Superfund Capital Management, as it deems necessary for the efficient operation of each Series.

Each Limited Partner within a Series has a capital account. Initially, a Limited Partner’s balance equals the amount paid for the Units in such Series. A Limited Partner’s balance is then proportionally adjusted monthly to reflect any additions or withdrawals by such Limited Partner and his portion of such Series’ gains or losses for the month as reflected by changes in the net asset value for such Series.

At year-end, each Series will determine its total taxable income or loss for the year. Subject to the special allocation of net capital gain or loss to redeeming Limited Partners, the taxable gain or loss is allocated to each Limited Partner within a Series in proportion to his capital account therein and each Limited Partner is responsible for his share of taxable income of such Series. See Section 8 of the Partnership Agreement, and “Federal Income Tax Aspects.” For net capital gain and loss, the gains and losses are first allocated to each Limited Partner who redeemed Units during the year. Remaining net capital gain or loss is then allocated among all Limited Partners to minimize the difference between each Limited Partner’s capital account and his Units’ allocation account. Finally, any excess net capital gain or loss is allocated to each Limited Partner in proportion to his capital account. Each Limited Partner’s tax basis in his Units is increased by the taxable income allocated to him and reduced by any distributions received and losses allocated to him. Upon each Series’ liquidation, each Limited Partner within such Series will receive his proportionate share of the assets of such Series.

A Limited Partner may transfer or assign his Units in a Series upon 30 days’ prior written notice to Superfund Capital Management and subject to approval by Superfund Capital Management of the assignee.

Superfund Capital Management will provide consent when it is satisfied that the transfer complies with applicable laws, and further would not result in the termination of such Series for federal income tax purposes. An assignee not admitted to a Series as a Limited Partner will have only limited rights to share the profits and capital of such Series and a limited redemption right. Assignees receive “carry-over” tax basis accounts and capital accounts from their assignors, irrespective of the amount paid for the assigned Units.

Each Series will be terminated and dissolved upon the happening of the earlier of: (1) the expiration of each Series’ stated term on December 31, 2050; (2) Limited Partners owning more than 50% of the outstanding Units of such Series vote to dissolve such Series; (3) Superfund Capital Management withdraws as general partner and no new general partner is appointed; (4) a decline in the aggregate net assets of such Series to less than $500,000; (5) the continued existence of such Series becomes unlawful; or (6) such Series is dissolved by operation of law.

The Partnership Agreement may be amended with the approval of more than 50% of the Units then owned by Limited Partners of each Series. Superfund Capital Management may make minor changes to the Partnership Agreement without the approval of the Limited Partners. These minor changes can be for clarifications of inaccuracies or ambiguities, modifications in response to changes in tax code or regulations or any other changes the managing owner deems advisable so long as they do not change the basic investment policy or structure of each Series. Limited Partners owning at least 10% of the outstanding Units of a Series can call a meeting of such Series. At that meeting, the Limited Partners, provided that Limited Partners owning a majority of the outstanding Units of such Series concur, can vote to: (1) amend the Partnership Agreement with respect to such Series without the consent of Superfund Capital Management; (2) dissolve such Series; (3) terminate contracts with Superfund Capital Management; (4) remove and replace Superfund Capital Management as general partner; and (5) approve the sale of the Fund’s assets.

Each Series agrees to indemnify Superfund Capital Management, as general partner, for actions taken on behalf of such Series, provided that Superfund Capital Management’s conduct was in the best interests of such Series and the conduct was not the result of negligence or misconduct. Indemnification by each Series for alleged violation of securities laws is only available if the following conditions are satisfied: (1) a successful adjudication on the merits of each count alleged has been obtained; or (2) such claims have been dismissed with prejudice on the merits by a court of competent jurisdiction; or (3) a court of competent jurisdiction approves a settlement of the claims and finds indemnification of the settlement and related costs should be made; and (4) in the case of (3), the court has been advised of the position of the SEC and certain states in which the Units were offered and sold as to indemnification for the violations.

The Limited Partners in a Series shall have access to and the right to copy such Series’ books and records. A Limited Partner may obtain a list of all Limited Partners within such Series together with the number of Units owned by each Limited Partner within such Series, provided such request is not for commercial purposes unrelated to such Limited Partner’s interest as a beneficial owner of such Series. Superfund Capital Management will provide various reports and statements to the Limited Partners within a Series including: (1) monthly, Superfund Capital Management will provide an unaudited income statement of the prior month’s Series’ activities; (2) annually, Superfund Capital Management will provide audited financial statements of such Series accompanied by a fiscal year-end summary of the monthly reports described above; and (3) annually, Superfund Capital Management will provide tax information necessary for the preparation of the Limited Partners’ annual federal income tax returns.

The following constitutes the opinion of Sidley Austin LLP and summarizes the material federal income tax consequences to individual investors in the Fund. The following is based upon interpretations of existing laws in effect on the date of this Prospectus, and no assurance can be given that courts or fiscal authorities responsible for the administration of such laws will agree with the interpretations or that changes in such laws will not occur.

Superfund Capital Management has not elected, and does not intend to elect, to classify the Fund as an association taxable as a corporation. Based on the foregoing, in the opinion of Sidley Austin LLP, the Fund will be classified as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. Superfund Capital Management has provided Sidley Austin LLP a list of contracts that it intends to trade on behalf of the Fund. On the basis thereof, in the opinion of Sidley Austin LLP, the Fund will not be treated as a publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation.

Each Limited Partner must pay tax on his share of the annual income and gains of the Fund, if any, even if the Fund does not make any cash distributions. The Fund generally allocates its gains and losses equally to each Unit in each Series. However, a Limited Partner who redeems any Units will be allocated his share of Fund gains and losses in order that the amount of cash the Limited Partner receives for a redeemed Unit equals the Limited Partner’s adjusted tax basis in the redeemed Unit less any offering or syndication expenses allocated to such Units. A Limited Partner’s adjusted tax basis in a redeemed Unit equals the amount originally paid for the Unit, increased by income or gains allocated to the Unit and decreased (but not below zero) by distributions, deductions or losses allocated to the Unit.

A Limited Partner may deduct Fund losses only to the extent of his tax basis in his Units in the Fund. Generally, a Limited Partner’s tax basis in a Unit is the amount paid for the Unit reduced (but not below zero) by his share of any Fund distributions, losses and expenses and increased by his share of Fund income and gains. However, a Limited Partner subject to “at-risk” limitations (generally, non-corporate taxpayers and closely-held corporations) can only deduct losses to the extent he is “at-risk.” The “at-risk” amount is similar to tax basis, except that it does not include any amount borrowed on a non-recourse basis or from someone with an interest in the Fund.

“Passive-Activity Loss Rules” and Their Effect on the Treatment of Income and Loss

The trading activities of the Fund are not a “passive activity.” Accordingly, a Limited Partner can deduct Fund losses against taxable income. However, a Limited Partner cannot offset losses from “passive activities” against Fund gains.

Cash received from the Fund by a Limited Partner as a distribution with respect to his Units or in redemption of less than all of his Units generally is not reportable as taxable income by a Limited Partner, except as described below. Rather, such distribution reduces (but not below zero) the total tax basis of the remaining Units held by the Limited Partner after the redemption. Any cash distribution the Fund in excess of a Limited Partner’s adjusted tax basis for his Units is taxable to him as gain from the sale or exchange of such Units. Because a Limited Partner’s tax basis in his Units is not increased on account of his distributive share of the Fund’s income until the end of the Fund’s taxable year, distributions during the taxable year could result in taxable gain to a Limited Partner even though no gain would result if the same distributions were made at the end of the taxable year. Furthermore, the share of Fund income allocable to a Limited Partner at the end of the Fund’s taxable year would also be includable in the Limited Partner’s taxable income and would increase his tax basis in his remaining Units as of the end of such taxable year.

Redemption for cash of all Units held by a Limited Partner will result in the recognition of gain or loss for federal income tax purposes. Such gain or loss will be equal to the difference, if any, between the amount of the cash distribution and the Limited Partner’s adjusted tax basis for such Units. A Limited Partner’s adjusted tax basis for his Units in the Fund includes for this purpose his distributive share of Fund income or loss for the year of such redemption.

If a Limited Partner receives a distribution of property in liquidation of his Units that would, if the Fund had a Code Section 754 election in effect, require the Fund to make a downward adjustment of more than $250,000 to the basis of its remaining assets, then even if the Fund does not have a Code Section 754 election in effect, the Fund will be required to make a downward adjustment to the basis of its remaining assets.

In addition, if immediately after the transfer of a Unit, the Fund’s adjusted basis in its property exceeds the fair market value of such property by more than $250,000, the Fund generally will be required to adjust the basis of its property with respect to the transferee Limited Partner.

Section 1256 Contracts include futures and most options traded on U.S. exchanges and certain foreign currency contracts. For tax purposes, Section 1256 Contracts that remain open at year-end are treated as if the position were closed at year-end. The gain or loss on Section 1256 Contracts is characterized as 60% long-term capital gain or loss and 40% short-term capital gain or loss regardless of how long the position was open. Non-Section 1256 Contracts include, among other things, certain foreign currency transactions such as transactions when the amount paid or received is in a foreign currency. Gain and loss from these Non-Section 1256 Contracts is generally short-term capital gain or loss or ordinary income or loss.

Long-term capital gains — net gain on capital assets held more than one year and 60% of the gain on Section 1256 Contracts — are currently taxed at a maximum rate of 20%. Short-term capital gains — net gain on capital assets held not more than one year and 40% of the gain on Section 1256 Contracts — are currently subject to tax at the same rates as ordinary income, with a maximum current tax rate of 39.6%. Individual taxpayers can deduct capital losses only to the extent of their capital gains plus $3,000 per year. Accordingly, the Fund could suffer significant losses and a Limited Partner could still be required to pay taxes on his share of the Fund’s interest income. An individual taxpayer can carry back net capital losses on Section 1256 Contracts three years to offset earlier gains on Section 1256 Contracts. To the extent the taxpayer cannot offset past Section 1256 Contract gains, he can carry forward such losses indefinitely as losses on Section 1256 Contracts.

Interest received by the Fund is taxed as ordinary income. Net capital losses can offset ordinary income only to the extent of $3,000 per year. See “— Tax on Capital Gains and Losses.”

Superfund Capital Management does not consider the management fees and the performance fees, as well as other ordinary expenses of the Fund, to be investment advisory expenses or other expenses of producing income. Accordingly, Superfund Capital Management treats these expenses as ordinary business deductions not subject to the material deductibility limitations which apply to investment advisory expenses. The Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) could contend otherwise and to the extent the IRS recharacterizes these expenses, a Limited Partner’s distributive share of income from the Fund would be increased accordingly (solely for tax purposes) and such expenses would be subject to material limitations as to their deductibility.

Neither the Fund nor any Limited Partner is entitled to any deduction for syndication expenses, if any, in the year they reduce net asset value, nor can these expenses be amortized by the Fund or any Limited Partner even though the payment of such expenses reduces net asset value.

Individual taxpayers can deduct “investment interest” — interest on indebtedness allocable to property held for investment — only to the extent that it does not exceed net investment income. Net investment income does not include adjusted net capital gain taxed at the lower rate.

A 3.8% tax is imposed on some or all of the net investment income of certain individuals with modified adjusted gross income of over $200,000 ($250,000 in the case of joint filers) and the undistributed net investment income of certain estates and trusts. For these purposes, it is expected that all or a substantial portion of a Limited Partner’s share of Fund income will be net investment income. In addition, certain Fund expenses may not be deducted in calculating a Limited Partner’s net investment income. Furthermore, because of netting rules, the tax on net investment income may be imposed on an amount of income that exceeds a Limited Partner’s economic income from its investment in the Fund.

Tax-exempt Limited Partners will not be required to pay tax on their share of income or gains of the Fund, provided that such Limited Partners do not purchase Units with borrowed funds and that Superfund Capital Management does not utilize leverage.

A Foreign Limited Partner generally is not subject to taxation by the United States on capital gains from commodity or derivatives trading, provided that such Foreign Limited Partner (in the case of an individual) does not spend more than 182 days in the United States during his or her taxable year, and provided further, that such Foreign Limited Partner is not engaged in a trade or business within the United States during a taxable year to which income, gain, loss or expense is treated as “effectively connected.” An investment in the Fund should not, by itself, cause a Foreign Limited Partner to be engaged in a trade or business within the United States for the foregoing purposes, assuming that the trading activities of the Fund will be conducted as described in this Prospectus. Pursuant to a “safe harbor” in the Code and proposed Treasury regulations, an investment fund whose United States business activities consist solely of trading commodities and derivatives for its own account should not be treated as engaged in a trade or business within the United States provided that such investment fund is not a dealer in commodities or derivatives and that the commodities traded are of a kind customarily dealt in on an organized commodity exchange and the transactions are of a kind customarily consummated at such place. Superfund Capital Management has advised Sidley Austin LLP of the contracts that the Fund will trade. Based on a review of such contracts as of the date of this Prospectus, Superfund Capital Management has been advised by its counsel, Sidley Austin LLP, that such contracts should satisfy the safe harbor. If the contracts traded by the Fund in the future were not covered by the safe harbor, there is a risk that the Fund would be treated as engaged in a trade or business within the United States. In the event that the Fund were found to be engaged in a United States trade or business, a Foreign Limited Partner would be required to file a United States federal income tax return for such year and pay tax at full United States rates. In the case of a Foreign Limited Partner which is a foreign corporation, an additional 30% “branch profits” tax might be imposed. Furthermore, in such event the Fund would be required to withhold taxes from the income or gain allocable to such a Foreign Limited Partner under Section 1446 of the Code.

A Foreign Limited Partner is not subject to United States tax on certain interest income, including income attributable to (i) original issue discount on Treasury bills having a maturity of 183 days or less or (ii) commercial bank deposits, provided, in either case, that such Foreign Limited Partner is not engaged in a trade or business within the United States during a taxable year. Additionally, a Foreign Limited Partner not engaged in a trade or business within the United States is not subject to United States tax on interest income (other than certain so-called “contingent interest”) attributable to obligations issued after July 18, 1984 that are in registered form if the Foreign Limited Partner provides the Fund with the appropriate Form W-8.

The Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment Act (the “HIRE Act”) requires certain foreign entities to enter into an agreement with the Secretary of the Treasury to disclose to the IRS the name, address and tax identification number of certain U.S. persons who own an interest in the foreign entity and require certain other foreign entities to provide certain other information to avoid a 30% withholding tax on certain payments of U.S. source income and certain payments of proceeds from the sale of property that could give rise to U.S. source interest or dividends. The IRS has released regulations that provide for the phased implementation of the foregoing withholding and reporting requirements. Accordingly, certain Foreign Limited Partners may be subject to a 30% withholding tax in respect of certain of the Fund’s investments if they fail to enter into an agreement with the Secretary of the Treasury or otherwise fail to satisfy their obligations under the legislation. Foreign Limited Partners are encouraged to consult with their own tax advisors regarding the possible implications of the HIRE Act on an investment in the Fund.

The IRS audits partnership-related items at the entity level rather than at the partner level. Superfund Capital Management acts as “tax matters partner” for the Fund, and has the authority to determine the Fund’s responses to an audit. If an audit results in an adjustment, all Limited Partners may be required to pay additional taxes, interest and penalties.

In addition to the federal income tax consequences described above, the Fund and the Limited Partners may be subject to various state and other taxes. PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS ARE URGED TO CONSULT THEIR TAX ADVISORS BEFORE DECIDING WHETHER TO INVEST.

The following section sets forth certain consequences under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), and the Code, which a fiduciary of an “employee benefit plan” as defined in, and subject to the fiduciary responsibility provisions of, ERISA or of a “plan” as defined in and subject to Section 4975 of the Code who has investment discretion should consider before deciding to invest the plan’s assets in a Series (such “employee benefit plans” and “plans” being referred to herein as “Plans,” and such fiduciaries with investment discretion being referred to herein as “Plan Fiduciaries”). The following summary is not intended to be complete, but only to address certain questions under ERISA and the Code which are likely to be raised by the Plan Fiduciary’s own counsel.

In general, the terms “employee benefit plan” as defined in ERISA and “plan” as defined in Section 4975 of the Code together refer to any plan or account of various types which provides retirement benefits or welfare benefits to an individual or to an employer’s employees and their beneficiaries. Such plans and accounts include, but are not limited to, corporate pension and profit-sharing plans, “simplified employee pension plans,” Keogh plans for self-employed individuals (including partners), individual retirement accounts described in Section 408 of the Code and medical benefit plans.

Each Plan Fiduciary must give appropriate consideration to the facts and circumstances that are relevant to an investment in a Series, including the role that an investment in a Series plays in the Plan’s overall investment

portfolio. Each Plan Fiduciary, before deciding to invest in a Series, must be satisfied that the investment in such Series is a prudent investment for the Plan, that the investments of the Plan, including the investment in such Series, are diversified so as to minimize the risk of large losses, that an investment in such Series complies with the terms of the Plan and related trust, and that an investment in a Series does not give rise to a transaction prohibited by Section 406 of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Code.

EACH PLAN FIDUCIARY CONSIDERING ACQUIRING UNITS OF A SERIES MUST CONSULT ITS OWN LEGAL AND TAX ADVISORS BEFORE DOING SO.

ERISA and a regulation issued thereunder (the “ERISA Regulation”) contain rules for determining when an investment by a Plan in an equity interest of an entity will result in the underlying assets of the entity being assets of the Plan for purposes of ERISA and Section 4975 of the Code (i.e., “plan assets”). Those rules provide in pertinent part that assets of an entity will not be plan assets of a Plan which purchases an equity interest in the entity if the equity interest purchased is a “publicly-offered security” (the “Publicly-Offered Security Exception”). If the underlying assets of an entity are considered to be assets of any Plan for purposes of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Code, the operations of such entity would be subject to and, in some cases, limited by, the provisions of ERISA and Section 4975 of the Code. The Publicly-Offered Security Exception applies if the equity interest acquired by Plans is a security that is: 1) “freely transferable” (as described below); 2) part of a class of securities that is “widely held” (meaning that the class of securities is owned by 100 or more investors independent of the issuer and of each other); and 3) either (a) part of a class of securities registered under Section 12(b) or 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or (b) sold to the Plan as part of a public offering pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933 and the class of which such security is a part is registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, within 120 days (or such later time as may be allowed by the SEC) after the end of the fiscal year of the issuer in which the offering of such security occurred. The ERISA Regulation states that the determination of whether a security is “freely transferable” is to be made based on all relevant facts and circumstances. The ERISA Regulation specifies that, in the case of a security that is part of an offering in which the minimum investment is $10,000 or less, the following requirements, alone or in combination, ordinarily will not affect a finding that the security is freely transferable: (i) a requirement that no transfer or assignment of the security or rights in respect thereof be made that would violate any federal or state law; (ii) a requirement that no transfer or assignment be made without advance written notice given to the entity that issued the security; and (iii) any restriction on substitution of an assignee as a limited partner of a partnership, including a general partner consent requirement, provided that the economic benefit of ownership of the assignor may be transferred or assigned without regard to such restriction or consent” (other than compliance with any of the foregoing restrictions).

Superfund Capital Management believes that the Publicly-Offered Security Exception applies to each Series for the following reasons. First, the Units are part of a class of securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Second, the Units are held by 100 or more investors that Superfund Capital Management believes are independent of a Series and of each other. Lastly, Superfund Capital Management believes that the Units should be considered to be “freely transferable” because the minimum investment for investors is $10,000 and Limited Partners may transfer their Units by providing 30 days’ prior written notice to Superfund Capital Management, provided that the transfer would not violate applicable federal or state securities laws. If Superfund Capital Management withholds consent, a transferee will be entitled to receive that share of capital or profits and to have that right of redemption to which the transferor would have been entitled and will remain subject to the other terms of the Partnership Agreement. Therefore, Superfund Capital Management believes that it is reasonable to take the position that the Units are freely transferable within the meaning of the ERISA Regulation. Accordingly, Superfund Capital Management believes that the underlying assets of each Series should not be considered to constitute assets of any Plan which purchases Units. This position has not been confirmed by, and is not binding on, the Department of Labor, which issued the ERISA Regulation and which has authority to issue opinion and information letters thereunder. Therefore, the Plan Fiduciary and each other potential investor should consult with his or her attorney on this matter.

In general, Units of a Series may not be purchased with the assets of a Plan if Superfund Capital Management, Superfund USA, any wholesaler, any other selling agent, any of their respective affiliates or any of their respective employees either: 1) has investment discretion with respect to the investment of such plan assets; 2) has authority or responsibility to give or regularly gives investment advice with respect to such plan assets, for a fee, and pursuant to an agreement or understanding that such advice will serve as a primary basis for investment decisions with respect to such plan assets and that such advice will be based on the particular investment needs of the Plan; or 3) is an employer maintaining or contributing to such Plan. A party that is described in clause 1) or 2) of the preceding sentence is a fiduciary under ERISA and the Code with respect to the Plan, and any such purchase might result in a “prohibited transaction” under ERISA and the Code.

Except as otherwise set forth, the foregoing statements regarding the consequences under ERISA and the Code of an investment in a Series are based on the provisions of the Code and ERISA as currently in effect, and the existing administrative and judicial interpretations thereunder. No assurance can be given that administrative, judicial, or legislative changes will not occur that may make the foregoing statements incorrect or incomplete.

ACCEPTANCE OF SUBSCRIPTIONS ON BEHALF OF PLANS IS IN NO RESPECT A REPRESENTATION BY SUPERFUND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT OR ANY OTHER PARTY RELATED TO THE FUND THAT THIS INVESTMENT MEETS THE RELEVANT LEGAL REQUIREMENTS WITH RESPECT TO INVESTMENTS BY ANY PARTICULAR PLAN OR THAT THIS INVESTMENT IS APPROPRIATE FOR ANY PARTICULAR PLAN. THE PERSON WITH INVESTMENT DISCRETION SHOULD CONSULT WITH HIS OR HER ATTORNEY AND FINANCIAL ADVISORS AS TO THE PROPRIETY OF AN INVESTMENT IN EACH SERIES IN LIGHT OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE PARTICULAR PLAN.

Each Series will offer the Units to the public during the continuing offering at the net asset value per Unit as of each month-end closing date on which subscriptions are accepted, subject to calculation of such month-end net asset value by the Administrator. Investors must submit subscriptions at least five (5) business days prior to the applicable month-end closing date and they will be accepted once payments are received and cleared. Investors may rescind their subscription agreement within five (5) business days of receipt of the Prospectus. Superfund Capital Management may suspend, limit or terminate the continuing offering period at any time. The Units are offered on a “best efforts” basis without any firm underwriting commitment through selling agents which are registered broker-dealers and members of FINRA and which serve as underwriters. Superfund Capital Management is also offering Units, through Superfund USA, which also serves as an underwriter, to potential investors by distributing this Prospectus and making it available on a special internet website (http://www.superfund.net). Superfund Capital Management intends to engage in marketing efforts through media including but not limited to third party websites, newspapers, magazines, other periodicals, television, radio, seminars, conferences, workshops, and sporting and charity events. Units are offered until such time as Superfund Capital Management terminates the continuing offering. Subscriptions received during the continuing offering period can be accepted on a monthly basis. Subscribers whose subscriptions are canceled or rejected will be notified of when their subscriptions will be returned, which shall be promptly after rejection. Subscribers whose subscriptions are accepted will be issued fractional Units, calculated to three decimal places. Each Series’ escrow account is maintained at the Escrow Agent, 452 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 10018. All subscription funds are required to be promptly transmitted to the Escrow Agent. Subscriptions must be accepted or rejected by Superfund Capital Management within five business days of receipt, and the settlement date for the deposit of subscription funds in escrow must be within five business days of acceptance. No fees or costs will be assessed on any subscription while held in escrow, irrespective of whether the subscription is accepted or subscription funds returned. Subscriptions from customers of any of the selling agents may also be made by authorizing such selling agent to debit the Limited Partner’s customer securities account at the selling agent. Promptly after debiting the customer’s securities account, the selling agent shall send payment to the Escrow Agent as described above, in the amount of the subscription so debited. Subscribers must

purchase Units for investment purposes only and not with a view toward resale. An investor who meets the suitability standards given below must complete, execute and deliver to the relevant selling agent a copy of the Subscription Agreement that accompanies this Prospectus. Prospective investors should retain a copy of any completed Subscription Agreement they submit. The form of Subscription Agreement and other subscription materials (as well as a form of redemption request) are available from the Selling Agents and on a special internet website (http://www.superfund.net). A Limited Partner can pay either by a check made payable to “Superfund Green, L.P. Series (A or B, as applicable), Escrow Account” or by authorizing his selling agent to debit his customer securities account. Superfund Capital Management will then accept or reject the subscription within five business days of receipt of the subscription. All subscriptions are irrevocable once subscription payments are deposited in escrow. Pursuant to an addendum to the Subscription Agreement, investors may subscribe for Units and receive them, and pay for them in equal installments, over a period of time to achieve an average price for the Units acquired; provided, however, that no Units will be issued until such Units have been fully paid for by the investor.

Superfund Capital Management and each person selling Units on behalf of the Fund may not complete a sale of the Units to prospective investors until at least five (5) business days after the date the prospective investor receives a final prospectus. This Prospectus is a final prospectus.

Investors are required to make representations and warranties in the Subscription Agreement. Each Series’ primary intention in requiring the investors to make representations and warranties is to ensure that only persons for whom an investment is suitable invest in each Series. Each Series is most likely to assert representations and warranties if it has reason to believe that the related investor may not be qualified to invest or remain invested in each Series. The representations and warranties made by investors in the Subscription Agreement may be summarized as relating to: 1) eligibility of investors to invest in each Series, including legal age, net worth and annual income; 2) representative capacity of investors; 3) information provided by investors; 4) information received by investors; and 5) investments made on behalf of employee benefit plans. Please see the Subscription Agreement accompanying this Prospectus for further detail.

The minimum investment is $10,000 in one Series. Limited Partners in one Series may increase their investment in that same Series with an additional investment of $1,000 or more. Prospective investors must be aware that the price per Unit of a Unit in a Series during the continuing offering period will vary depending upon the month-end net asset value per Unit of such Series. Under the federal securities laws and those of certain states, investors may be subject to special minimum purchase and/or investor suitability requirements.

There can be no assurance that each Series will achieve its objectives or avoid substantial losses. An investment in each Series is suitable only for a limited segment of the risk portion of an investor’s portfolio and no one should invest more in each Series than he can afford to lose. Superfund Capital Management and each person selling Units on behalf of the Fund will make every reasonable effort to determine the suitability of prospective investors through information received on the Subscription Agreement. At an absolute minimum, investors must have (i) a net worth of at least $250,000 (exclusive of home, furnishings and automobiles) or (ii) an annual gross income of at least $70,000 and a net worth (as calculated above) of at least $70,000. No one may invest more than 10% of his net worth (as calculated above) in the Fund. THESE STANDARDS (AND THE ADDITIONAL STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO RESIDENTS OF CERTAIN STATES AS SET FORTH IN THE SUBSCRIPTION MATERIALS ACCOMPANYING THIS PROSPECTUS) ARE REGULATORY MINIMUMS ONLY. QUALIFICATION UNDER SUCH STANDARDS DOES NOT NECESSARILY IMPLY THAT AN INVESTMENT IN EACH SERIES IS SUITABLE FOR A PARTICULAR INVESTOR. PROSPECTIVE LIMITED PARTNERS SHOULD REVIEW ALL OF THE SUBSCRIPTION MATERIALS ACCOMPANYING THIS PROSPECTUS AND CONSIDER THE HIGHLY SPECULATIVE AND ILLIQUID NATURE OF AN INVESTMENT IN EACH SERIES AS WELL AS THE HIGH RISK AND HIGHLY LEVERAGED NATURE OF THE FUTURES, FORWARD AND RELATED MARKETS IN DETERMINING WHETHER AN INVESTMENT IN EACH SERIES IS CONSISTENT WITH THEIR OVERALL PORTFOLIO OBJECTIVES.

The selling agents, the broker-dealers who offer the Units and serve as underwriters, offer the Units on a best efforts basis without any firm underwriting commitment. The selling agents, including Superfund USA, which also serves as an underwriter and is an affiliate of Superfund Capital Management, and certain foreign dealers who may elect to participate in the offering, are bound by their respective Selling Agreements with each Series. Subject to the limitations herein, Superfund USA and any additional selling agents will receive collectively an annual 4% selling commission (1/12 of 4% per month) of the month-end net asset value per Unit with respect to any Units they sell. Superfund Capital Management may also engage one or more registered broker-dealers to solicit other broker-dealers to become selling agents and to assist those selling agents with the offering and sale of Units, that is, to act as wholesalers. As compensation for its services, any such wholesaler will receive up to one-fourth of the selling commission that would otherwise be paid to the selling agents. Thus, the Units pay a commission of 4% of the month-end net asset value per Unit in the initial year after purchase. The Units pay additional selling commissions of 4% per annum of the month-end net asset value per Unit thereafter. Any wholesaler would receive up to 1% of the month-end net asset value per Unit (1/12 of 1% per month) in the initial year after purchase, and additional selling commissions of up to 1% per annum (1/12 of 1% per month) of the month-end net asset value per Unit thereafter (limited, when combined with payments in the first year, to 2.5% of the proceeds of the sale of the Units). If the selling commission paid (including payments to any wholesaler) in the initial year after purchase is less than 4% of proceeds due to a decrease in the net asset value per Unit, the maximum additional selling commissions paid will exceed 6% of the proceeds. If the selling commission paid (including payments to any wholesaler) in the initial year after purchase is more than 4% of the proceeds due to an increase in the net asset value per Unit, the maximum additional selling commissions paid will be less than 6% of the proceeds. In either case, the maximum cumulative sales commission per Unit is 10% of the gross offering proceeds price of such Unit (which is equal to $50,670,405 out of the $506,704,051 in Units) and in no event will the maximum amount of compensation to be paid to FINRA members in connection with this offering exceed such amount. Other than as described above, Superfund Capital Management will pay no person any commissions or other fees in connection with the solicitation of purchases for Units. In the Selling Agreement with each selling agent, Superfund Capital Management has agreed to indemnify the selling agents against certain liabilities that the selling agents may incur in connection with the offering and sale of the Units, including liabilities under the Securities Act. Units will be sold on a continuing basis at the net asset value per Unit as of the end of each month.

Superfund USA may pay its sales representatives an upfront fee of 0.1% of the net asset value of the Series A Units or Series B Units on the date such Units are issued. Superfund USA will pay its sales representatives out of the selling commissions it receives with respect to such Series A Units and Series B Units.

The selling agents will use their best efforts to sell the Units offered but are not required to sell any particular number of Units. The Units are also offered through Superfund USA to potential investors on a special internet website (http://www.superfund.net), maintained by Superfund USA.

Other than as described above, no person will pay any commissions or other compensation in connection with the solicitation or purchase of Units.

Units acquired through Superfund USA in conjunction with a registered investment adviser’s asset-based fee or fixed fee advisory program where the investment adviser recommends a portfolio allocation to the Fund, and Units acquired through Superfund USA by commodity pools operated by commodity pool operators registered as such with the CFTC, will not be subject to the selling commissions described above.

Under no circumstances will the maximum aggregate compensation paid to the selling agents, including Superfund USA, and wholesalers exceed 10% of the gross offering proceeds of the sale of the Units.

Sidley Austin LLP, Chicago, Illinois, served as legal counsel to Superfund Capital Management in connection with the preparation of this Prospectus. Sidley Austin LLP may continue to serve in such capacity in the future, but has not assumed any obligation to update this Prospectus. Sidley Austin LLP may advise Superfund Capital Management in matters relating to the operation of the Fund on an ongoing basis. Sidley Austin LLP does not represent and has not represented the prospective investors or the Fund in the course of the organization of the Fund, the negotiation of its business terms, the offering of the Units or in respect of its ongoing operations. Prospective investors must recognize that, as they have had no representation in the organization process, the terms of the Fund relating to themselves and the Units have not been negotiated at arm’s length.

Sidley Austin LLP’s engagement by Superfund Capital Management in respect of the Fund is limited to the specific matters as to which it is consulted by Superfund Capital Management and, therefore, there may exist facts or circumstances which could have a bearing on the Fund’s (or Superfund Capital Management’s) financial condition or operations with respect to which Sidley Austin LLP has not been consulted and for which Sidley Austin LLP expressly disclaims any responsibility. More specifically, Sidley Austin LLP does not undertake to monitor the compliance of Superfund Capital Management and its affiliates with the investment program, valuation procedures and other guidelines set forth herein, nor does it monitor compliance with applicable laws. In preparing this Prospectus, Sidley Austin LLP relied upon information furnished to it by the Fund and/or Superfund Capital Management, and did not investigate or verify the accuracy and completeness of information set forth herein concerning Superfund Capital Management, the Fund’s service providers and their affiliates and personnel.

The financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 of Superfund Green, L.P., Superfund Green, L.P. – Series A and Superfund Green, L.P. – Series B and the statement of financial condition as of December 31, 2012 of Superfund Capital Management, Inc. (which report expresses an unqualified opinion on the financial statement and includes an explanatory paragraph referring to conditions that may have existed had Superfund Capital Management, Inc. operated as an unaffiliated company), included in this Prospectus have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their reports appearing herein. Such financial statements and statement of financial condition have been included in reliance upon the reports of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.

To the Partners of Superfund Green, L.P. - Series A and Superfund Green, L.P. - Series B:

We have audited the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities of Superfund Green, L.P., Superfund Green, L.P. - Series A and Superfund Green, L.P. - Series B (collectively the “Funds”), including the condensed schedules of investments as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related statements of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2012. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Funds’ management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Funds are not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Funds’ internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 31, 2012, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Superfund Green, L.P., Superfund Green, L.P. - Series A and Superfund Green, L.P. - Series B as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the results of their operations, changes in net assets, and their cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2012, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

SUPERFUND GREEN, L.P., SUPERFUND GREEN, L.P. – SERIES A and SUPERFUND GREEN, L.P. – SERIES B

Superfund Green, L.P. (the “Fund”), a Delaware limited partnership, commenced operations on November 5, 2002. The Fund was organized to trade speculatively in the United States of America (“U.S.”) and international commodity futures markets using a fully-automated computerized trading system. The Fund has issued two classes of Units, Series A and Series B (the “Series”). The two Series are traded and managed the same way except for the degree of leverage.

The term of the Fund shall continue until December 31, 2050, unless terminated earlier by the Fund’s general partner, Superfund Capital Management, Inc. (“Superfund Capital Management”), or by operation of law or a decline in the aggregate net assets of such Series to less than $500,000.

Pursuant to rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), audited financial statements are prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) and presented for the Fund as a whole, as the SEC registrant, and for Series A and Series B individually. For the avoidance of doubt, the debts, liabilities, obligations and expenses incurred, contracted for or otherwise existing with respect to a particular Series shall be enforceable only against the assets of such Series and not against the assets of the Fund generally or any other Series. Accordingly, the assets of one Series of the Fund include only those funds and other assets that are paid to, held by or distributed to the Fund on account of and for the benefit of that Series, including, without limitation, funds delivered to the Fund for the purchase of Units in that Series.

All commodity interests (including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments) are used for trading purposes. The commodity interests are recorded on a trade date basis and open contracts are recorded in the statements of assets and liabilities at fair value on the last business day of the period, which represents market value for those commodity interests for which market quotes are readily available.

Exchange-traded futures contracts are valued at settlement prices published by the recognized exchange. Any spot and forward foreign currency contracts held by the Fund will be valued at published settlement prices or at dealers’ quotes. The Fund uses the amortized cost method for valuing U.S. Treasury Bills due to the short-term nature of such instruments; accordingly, the cost of securities plus accreted discount, or minus amortized premium, approximates fair value (See Note (2)(h) – Fair Value Measurements).

Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollar amounts at the period end exchange rates. Purchases and sales of investments and income and expenses that are denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollar amounts on the transaction date. Adjustments arising from foreign currency transactions are reflected in the statements of operations.

The Fund does not isolate that portion of the results of operations arising from the effect of changes in foreign exchange rates on investments from fluctuations from changes in market prices of investments held. Such fluctuations are included in net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments in the statements of operations.

Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade-date basis. Interest income and expenses are recognized on the accrual basis. The Fund uses the amortized cost method for valuing U.S. Treasury Bills. Operating expenses of the Fund are allocated to each Series in proportion to the net asset value of the Series at the beginning of each month. Expenses directly attributable to a particular Series are charged directly to that Series.

Gains or losses are realized when contracts are liquidated. Unrealized gains and losses on open contracts (the difference between contract trade price and market price) are reported in the statements of financial condition as a net gain or loss, as there exists a right of offset of unrealized gains or losses in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 210-20, Offsetting – Balance Sheet.

The Fund does not record a provision for U.S. income taxes because the partners report their share of the Fund’s income or loss on their returns. The financial statements reflect the Fund’s transactions without adjustment, if any, required for income tax purposes.

Superfund Capital Management has evaluated the application of ASC 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”) to the Fund, to determine whether or not there are uncertain tax positions that require financial statement recognition. Based on this evaluation, the Fund has determined no reserves for uncertain tax position are required to be recorded as a result of the application of ASC 740. The Fund is not aware of any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will change materially in the next twelve months. As a result, no income tax liability or expense has been recorded in the accompanying financial statements. The Fund files federal and various state tax returns. The 2009 through 2012 tax years generally remain subject to examination by the U.S. federal and most state tax authorities.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

In December 2011, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-11, Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities (“ASU 2011-11”). ASU 2011-11 requires disclosures to make financial statements that are prepared under U.S. GAAP more comparable to those prepared under International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). The new disclosure requirements mandate that entities disclose both gross and net information about instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of assets and liabilities as well as instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. In addition, ASU 2011-11 requires disclosure of collateral received and posted in connection with master netting agreements or similar arrangements. New disclosures are required for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. Superfund Capital Management is evaluating the impact of ASU 2011-11 on the financial statements and disclosures.

In May 2011, FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. ASU 2011-04 includes common requirements for measurement of and disclosure about fair value between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. ASU 2011-04 will require reporting entities to disclose the following information for fair value measurements categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy: quantitative information about the unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement, the valuation processes used by the reporting entity and a narrative description of the sensitivity of the fair value measurement to changes in unobservable inputs and the interrelationships between those unobservable inputs. In addition, ASU 2011-04 will require reporting entities to make disclosures about amounts and reasons for all transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements. The new and revised disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Fund adopted ASU 2011-04 as of January 1, 2012. The adoption of the provisions of ASU 2011-04 has not had a material impact on the Fund’s financial statement disclosures.

The Fund follows ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”). ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under ASC 820 are described below:

A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. In determining fair value, the Fund separates its financial instruments into two categories: U.S. government securities and derivative contracts.

U.S. Government Securities. The Fund’s only market exposure in instruments held other than for trading is in its U.S. Treasury Bill portfolio. As the Fund uses the amortized cost method for valuing its U.S. Treasury Bill portfolio, which approximates fair value, this portfolio is classified within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Derivative Contracts. Derivative contracts can be exchange-traded or over-the-counter (“OTC”). Exchange-traded derivatives typically fall within level 1 or level 2 of the fair value hierarchy depending on whether they are deemed to be actively traded or not. The Fund has exposure to exchange-traded derivative contracts through the Fund’s trading of exchange-traded futures contracts. The Fund’s exchange-traded futures contract positions are valued daily at settlement prices published by the applicable exchanges. In such cases, provided they are deemed to be actively traded, exchange-traded derivatives are classified within level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Less actively traded exchange-traded derivatives fall within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

OTC derivatives are valued using market transactions and other market evidence whenever possible, including market-based inputs to models, model calibration to market-clearing transactions, broker or dealer quotations, or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. Where models are used, the selection of a particular model to value an OTC derivative depends upon the contractual terms of, and specific risks inherent in, the instrument as well as the availability of pricing information in the market. For OTC derivatives that trade in liquid markets, such as generic forwards and swaps, model inputs can generally be verified and model selection does not involve significant management judgment. The OTC derivatives held by the Fund may include forwards and swaps. Spot and forward foreign currency contracts held by the Fund are valued at published daily settlement prices or at dealers’ quotes. The Fund’s forward and swap positions are typically classified within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Certain OTC derivatives traded in less liquid markets with limited pricing information, and the determination of fair value for these derivatives is inherently more difficult. Such instruments are classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Where the Fund does not have corroborating market evidence to support significant model inputs and cannot verify the model to market transactions, transaction price is initially used as the best estimate of fair value. Accordingly, when a pricing model is used to value such an instrument, the model is adjusted so that the model value at inception equals the transaction price. The valuations of these less liquid OTC derivatives are typically based on level 1 and/or level 2 inputs that can be observed in the market, as well as unobservable level 3 inputs. Subsequent to initial recognition, the Fund updates the level 1 and level 2 inputs to reflect observable market changes, with resulting gains and losses reflected within level 3. Level 3 inputs are only changed when corroborated by evidence such as similar market transactions, third-party pricing services and/or broker or dealer quotations, or other empirical market data. In circumstances where the Fund cannot verify the model value to market transactions, it is possible that a different valuation model could produce a materially different estimate of fair value. The Fund attempts to avoid holding less liquid OTC derivatives. However, once held, the market for any particular derivative contract could become less liquid during the holding period.

As of and during the years ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Fund held no investments or derivative contracts valued using level 3 inputs.

The following table summarizes the valuation of the Fund’s assets and liabilities by the ASC 820 fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2012:

The following table summarizes the valuation of the Fund’s assets and liabilities by the ASC 820 fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2011:

For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, there were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 assets and liabilities.

The Fund follows ASC 815, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. ASC 815 is intended to improve financial reporting for derivative instruments by requiring enhanced disclosure that enables investors to understand how and why an entity uses derivatives, how derivatives are accounted for, and how derivative instruments affect an entity’s results of operations and financial position.

Derivative instruments held by the Fund do not qualify as derivative instruments held as hedging instruments, as defined in ASC 815. Instead, the Fund includes derivative instruments in its trading activity. Per the requirements of ASC 815, the Fund discloses the gains and losses on its trading activities for both derivative and nonderivative instruments in the Statement of Operations for each Series.

The Fund engages in the speculative trading of forward contracts in currency and futures contracts in a wide range of commodities, including equity markets, interest rates, food and fiber, energy, livestock and metals. ASC 815 requires entities to recognize all derivatives instruments as either assets or liabilities at fair value in the statement of financial position. Investments in forward contracts and commodity futures contracts are recorded in the Statements of Assets and Liabilities as “unrealized appreciation or depreciation on open forward contracts and futures contracts purchased and futures contracts sold.” Since the derivatives held or sold by the Fund are for speculative trading purposes, the derivative instruments are not designated as hedging instruments under the provisions of ASC 815. Accordingly, all realized gains and losses, as well as any change in net unrealized gains or losses on open positions from the preceding period, are recognized as part of the Fund’s realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments in the Statements of Operations.

Superfund Capital Management believes futures and forward trading activity expressed as a percentage of net assets is indicative of trading activity. Information concerning the fair value of the Fund’s derivatives held long or sold short, as well as information related to the annual average volume of the Fund’s derivative activity, is as follows:

The fair value of the Fund’s derivatives by instrument type, as well as the location of those instruments on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities, as of December 31, 2012, is as follows:

The fair value of the Fund’s derivatives by instrument type, as well as the location of those instruments on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities, as of December 31, 2011, is as follows:

Effects of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2012:

Effects of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2011:

Superfund Green, L.P. gross and net unrealized gains and losses by long and short positions as of December 31, 2012:

Superfund Green, L.P. gross and net unrealized gains and losses by long and short positions as of December 31, 2011:

Superfund Green, L.P. average* contract volume by market sector for the Year Ended December 31, 2012:

Superfund Green, L.P. average* contract volume by market sector for the Year Ended December 31, 2011:

The fair value of the Fund’s derivatives by instrument type, as well as the location of those instruments on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities, as of December 31, 2012, is as follows:

The fair value of the Fund’s derivatives by instrument type, as well as the location of those instruments on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities, as of December 31, 2011, is as follows:

Effects of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2012:

Effects of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2011:

Superfund Green, L.P. – Series A gross and net unrealized gains and losses by long and short positions as of December 31, 2012:

Superfund Green, L.P. – Series A gross and net unrealized gains and losses by long and short positions as of December 31, 2011:

Series A average* contract volume by market sector for the Year Ended December 31, 2012:

Series A average* contract volume by market sector for the Year Ended December 31, 2011:

The fair value of the Fund’s derivatives by instrument type, as well as the location of those instruments on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities, as of December 31, 2012, is as follows:

The fair value of the Fund’s derivatives by instrument type, as well as the location of those instruments on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities, as of December 31, 2011, is as follows:

Effects of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2012:

Effects of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2011:

Superfund Green, L.P. – Series B gross and net unrealized gains and losses by long and short positions as of December 31, 2012:

Superfund Green, L.P. – Series B gross and net unrealized gains and losses by long and short positions as of December 31, 2011:

Series B average* contract volume by market sector for the Year Ended December 31, 2012:

Series B average* contract volume by market sector for the Year Ended December 31, 2011:

Due from brokers consist of proceeds from securities sold. Amounts due from brokers may be restricted to the extent that they serve as deposits for securities sold short. Amounts due to brokers represent margin borrowings that are collateralized by certain securities. As of December 31, 2012, there were no amounts due to brokers.

In the normal course of business, all of the Fund’s marketable securities transactions, money balances and marketable security positions are transacted with brokers. The Fund is subject to credit risk to the extent any broker with whom it conducts business is unable to fulfill contractual obligations on its behalf. On October 31, 2011, MF Global, one of the Fund’s former clearing brokers at the time, reported to the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) possible deficiencies in customer segregated accounts held at the firm. As a result, the SEC and CFTC determined that a liquidation proceeding led by the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (“SIPC”) would be the safest and most prudent course of action to protect customer accounts and assets, and SIPC initiated the liquidation of MF Global under the Securities Investor Protection Act. Superfund Capital Management closely monitored MF Global in the weeks prior to October 31, 2011 and began reducing the Fund’s exposure to MF Global. In October, total trading positions and assets of the Fund held at MF Global were reduced and steps were initiated to transfer all remaining positions and assets from MF Global to other clearing brokers prior to the bankruptcy filing. In the fourth quarter of 2011, the SIPC liquidation Trustee announced that the shortfall in the customer segregated funds account could be as much as 22% or more. After consideration of the Fund’s exposure, Superfund Capital Management caused the Fund to take a reserve to account for the Fund’s estimated exposure to such 22% shortfall. Series A recorded a reserve that reduced the net asset value by approximately $337,000 and Series B recorded a reserve that reduced the net asset value by approximately $529,000 as of December 31, 2011.

Since the Fund’s initial reserve was taken, an active market developed for MF Global claims similar to the Fund’s. As a result, Superfund Capital Management received bids from third parties for the purchase of the Fund’s MF Global claims. Following this process, Superfund Capital Management determined it was in the best interests of the Fund to sell its MF Global claims, and the Fund closed on the sale in the amount of $904,087 for Series A and $1,736,710 for Series B on June 11, 2012. Although the sale did not close until June 11, 2012, Superfund Capital Management recognized the change in reserve prior to closing the Fund’s books effective May 31, 2012. Because the sale price did not match the amount of the Fund’s assets on deposit at MF Global as reduced by the reserve, each Series recognized a change in value as of May 31, 2012 as a result of the sale. Such change in reserve is presented as “Gain/Loss on MF Global” on the Statements of Operations. Due to the manner in which each Series’ assets were held at MF Global, the sale price for Series A’s claim was slightly more than the carrying amount of Series A’s assets on deposit at MF Global (as reduced by the amount the reserve taken, as described above), while the sales price for Series B’s claim was slightly less than the carrying amount of Series B’s assets on deposit at MF Global (as reduced by the amount of the reserve taken, as described above). As a result, on May 31, 2012, the net asset value of the Series A Units increased by approximately 0.13% (or approximately $1.82 per Unit) and the net asset value of the Series B Units was reduced by approximately 0.12% (or approximately $1.92 per Unit). Following this sale, the Fund no longer has any exposure to MF Global.

In accordance with the Sixth Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement, net profits and losses of the Fund are allocated to partners according to their respective interests in the Fund as of the beginning of each month.

Subscriptions received in advance, if any, represent cash received prior to December 31 for contributions of the subsequent month and do not participate in the earnings of the Fund until the following January.

Superfund Capital Management shall be paid a management fee equal to one-twelfth of 1.85% of month-end net assets (1.85% per annum) of net assets, ongoing offering expenses equal to one-twelfth of 1% of month-end net assets (1% per annum), not to exceed the amount of actual expenses incurred, and monthly operating expenses equal to one-twelfth of 0.15% of month-end net assets (0.15% per annum), not to exceed the amount of actual expenses incurred. Superfund Capital Management will also be paid a monthly performance/incentive fee equal to 25% of the new appreciation without respect to interest income. Trading losses will be carried forward and no further performance/incentive fee may be paid until the prior losses have been recovered. In addition, Superfund Asset Management, LLC, an affiliate of Superfund Capital Management, serves as the introducing broker for the Fund’s futures transactions and receives a portion of the brokerage commissions paid by the Fund in connection with its futures trading, Superfund USA, an entity related to Superfund Capital Management by common ownership, shall be paid monthly selling commissions equal to one-twelfth of 4% (4% per annum) of the month-end net asset value of the Fund. However, the maximum cumulative selling commission per Unit is limited to 10% of the initial public offering price of Units sold. Selling commissions charged as of the end of each month in excess of 10% of the initial public offering price of Units sold shall not be paid out to any selling agent but shall instead be held in a separate account. Accrued monthly performance fees, if any, will then be charged against both net assets of the Fund as of month-end, as well as against amounts held in the separate account. Any increase or decrease in net assets and any accrued interest will then be credited or charged to each investor (a “Limited Partner”) on a pro rata basis. The remainder of the

amounts held in the separate account, if any, shall then be reinvested in Units as of such month-end, at the current net asset value, for the benefit of the appropriate Limited Partner. The amount of any distribution to a Limited Partner, any amount paid to a Limited Partner on redemption of Units and any redemption fee paid to Superfund Capital Management upon the redemption of Units will be charged to that Limited Partner. Selling commissions are shown gross on the statement of operations and amounts over the 10% selling commission threshold are rebated to the Limited Partner by purchasing Units of the Fund. For the year ended December 31, 2012, rebated selling commissions amounted to $0 for Series A and $0 for Series B.

As of December 31, 2012, Superfund Capital Management owned 386.799 Units of Series A, representing 2.64% of the total issued Units of Series A, and 543.012 Units of Series B, representing 3.46% of the total issued Units of Series B, having a combined value of $1,057,576. Losses allocated to Units of Series A and Series B owned by Superfund Capital Management were $95,212 for the year ended December 31, 2012. Selling commissions over the 10% threshold in the amount of $14,605 were rebated to Superfund Capital Management during this period through the purchase of 11.235 Units of Series B. Superfund Capital Management did not make any other contributions to or withdrawals from either Series during this period. Superfund Capital Management’s ownership of Units of Series A and Series B is included in the overall changes in capital activity reported in the Statements of Changes in Net Assets.

In the normal course of its business, the Fund is party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk, including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments. The term “off-balance sheet risk” refers to an unrecorded potential liability that, even though it does not appear on the balance sheet, may result in a future obligation or loss. These financial instruments may include forwards, futures and options, whose values are based upon an underlying asset, index or reference rate, and generally represent future commitments to exchange currencies or cash flows, to purchase or sell other financial instruments at specific terms at specific future dates, or, in the case of derivative commodity instruments, to have a reasonable possibility to be settled in cash, through physical delivery or with another financial instrument. These instruments may be traded on an exchange or OTC. Exchange traded instruments are standardized and include futures and certain option contracts. OTC contracts are negotiated between contracting parties and include forwards and certain options. Each of these instruments is subject to various risks similar to those related to the underlying financial instruments including market and credit risk. In general, the risks associated with OTC contracts are greater than those associated with exchange traded instruments because of the greater risk of default by the counterparty to an OTC contract.

For the Fund, gross unrealized gains and losses related to exchange traded futures were $2,631,758 and $1,410,603, respectively, and gross unrealized gains and losses related to non-exchange traded forwards were $299,598 and $176,689, respectively, at December 31, 2012.

For Series A, gross unrealized gains and losses related to exchange traded futures were $975,717 and $542,263, respectively, and gross unrealized gains and losses related to non-exchange traded forwards were $89,246 and $62,254, respectively, at December 31, 2012.

For Series B, gross unrealized gains and losses related to exchange traded futures were $1,656,041 and $868,340, respectively, and gross unrealized gains and losses related to non-exchange traded forwards were $210,352 and $114,435, respectively, at December 31, 2012.

Market risk is the potential for changes in the value of the financial instruments traded by the Fund due to market changes, including interest and foreign exchange rate movements and fluctuations in commodity prices. In entering into these contracts, there exists a market risk that such contracts may be significantly influenced by conditions, such as interest rate volatility, resulting in such contracts being less valuable. If the markets should move against all of the futures interest positions at the same time, and Superfund Capital Management is unable to offset such positions, the Fund could experience substantial losses.

Credit risk is the possibility that a loss may occur due to the failure of a counterparty to perform according to the terms of a contract. Credit risk with respect to exchange-traded instruments is reduced to the extent that an exchange or clearing organization acts as a counterparty to the transactions. The Fund’s risk of loss in the event of counterparty default is typically limited to the amounts recognized in the statements of assets and liabilities and not represented by the contract or notional amounts of the instruments. As the Fund’s assets are held in segregated accounts with futures commission merchants, the Fund has credit risk and concentration risk. The Fund’s futures commission merchants are currently ADM Investor Services, Inc. and Barclays Capital Inc. Prior to its insolvency, the Fund used MF Global, Inc. as one of its futures commission merchants. See Note 4 for MF Global discussion.

Superfund Capital Management monitors and attempts to control the Fund’s risk exposure on a daily basis through financial, credit and risk management monitoring systems, and accordingly believes that it has effective procedures for evaluating and limiting the credit and market risks to which the Fund is subject. These monitoring systems allow Superfund Capital Management to statistically analyze actual trading results with risk adjusted performance indicators and correlation statistics. In addition, on-line monitoring systems provide account analysis of futures and forward positions by sector, margin requirements, gain and loss transactions and collateral positions.

The majority of these instruments mature within one year of December 31, 2012. However, due to the nature of the Fund’s business, these instruments may not be held to maturity.

Investors must submit subscriptions at least five business days prior to the applicable month-end closing date and they will be accepted once payments are received and cleared. All subscription funds are required to be promptly transmitted to the escrow agent, HSBC Bank USA. Subscriptions must be accepted or rejected by Superfund Capital Management within five business days of receipt, and the settlement date for the deposit of subscription funds in escrow must be within five business days of acceptance. No fees or costs will be assessed on any subscription while held in escrow, irrespective of whether the subscription is accepted or the subscription funds are returned.

A Limited Partner may request any or all of his investment in such Series be redeemed by such Series at the net asset value of a Unit within such Series as of the end of each month, subject to a minimum redemption of $1,000 and subject further to such Limited Partner having an investment in such Series, after giving effect to the requested redemption, at least equal to the minimum initial investment amount of $10,000. Limited Partners must transmit a written request of such withdrawal to Superfund Capital Management not less than five business days prior to the end of the month (or such shorter period as permitted by Superfund Capital Management) as of which redemption is to be effective. Redemptions will generally be paid within twenty days after the date of redemption. However, in special circumstances, including, but not limited to, inability to liquidate dealers’ positions as of a redemption date or default or delay in payments due to each Series from clearing brokers, banks or other persons or entities, each Series may in turn delay payment to persons requesting redemption of the proportionate part of the net assets of each Series represented by the sums that are the subject of such default or delay. The Fund’s prospectus provides “if the net asset value per Unit within a Series as of the end of any business day declines by 50% or more from either the prior year-end

or the prior month-end Unit value of such Series, Superfund Capital Management will suspend trading activities, notify all Limited Partners within such Series of the relevant facts within seven business days and declare a special redemption period.”

In the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts that provide general indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is dependent on future claims that may be made against the Fund, and therefore cannot be established; however, based on experience, the risk of loss from such claims is considered remote.

Superfund Capital Management has evaluated the impact of all subsequent events on the Fund through the date the financial statements were issued and has determined that there were no subsequent events requiring recognition or disclosure in the financial statements.

We have audited the accompanying statement of financial condition of Superfund Capital Management, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2012 (expressed in United States dollars). This financial statement is the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial statement based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statement is free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. An audit includes consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statement, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such financial statement presents fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Superfund Capital Management, Inc. as of December 31, 2012, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As discussed in Note 2, the accompanying financial statement has been prepared from the separate records maintained by the Company and may not necessarily be indicative of the conditions that would have existed if the Company had been operated as an unaffiliated company.

Superfund Capital Management Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in Grenada, West Indies, in March 2001. The Company’s business is the trading and management of discretionary futures trading accounts, including commodity pools which are domiciled in the United States of America. The Company presently serves as commodity pool operator for Superfund Green, L.P. (“Superfund Green”) (formerly Quadriga Superfund, L.P.) and Superfund Gold, L.P. (“Superfund Gold”). The Company is also the investment advisor for Superfund Blue Master SPC, Superfund Blue SPC, Superfund Garant SPC, Superfund Green Master SPC, Superfund Green SPC, Superfund Green Euro SPC, Superfund HF SPC Segregated Portfolio A, Superfund Green Gold Master SPC, Superfund Green Gold SPC, and Superfund Diversified Notes SPC. The Company has no investment in the above mentioned SPCs. Due to their liquidation, during the financial year the Company ceased to serve as investment advisor for Superfund HF SPC Segregated Portfolio C, Superfund Red SPC and Superfund Red Master SPC. The Company is wholly owned by one shareholder.

A summary of the significant accounting policies which have been followed in preparing the accompanying statement of financial condition is set forth below:

The accompanying statement of financial condition has been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of the statement of financial condition in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the statement of financial condition. Actual amounts could differ from such estimates.

Cash consists of cash on hand and balances held at banks. The Company has restricted cash at a local bank in the form of a certificate of deposit, which is held as security deposit for the Company’s credit card until the card is no longer needed or expires. Only minimum of the funds are at a local bank in order to cover local operational costs, the majority is at an interest-bearing bank account at a bank covered by the legislation of the European Union. In circumstances the Bank is unable to meet its obligations towards depositors, or has otherwise suspended payment, the Depositor Compensation Scheme a rescue fund for depositors of failed banks which are licensed by the local Authority - a scheme that is based on the EC directive 94/19 - guarantees to cover losses up to EUR 100,000 in Euro and currencies within European Economic Area countries. Other than that, there are no further insurances to cover potential losses which are limited to the amounts held at bank. Up to date, the Company has not experienced any losses and does not believe it has exposure to significant credit risk on the accounts.

The Company has invested in Superfund Gold, L.P. - Series A, Superfund Gold, L.P. - Series B, Superfund Green, L.P. - Series A and Superfund Green, L.P. - Series B, Delaware limited partnerships, organized to trade speculatively in the United States of America and international commodity equity markets using a strategy developed by the Company. The Company’s investments are recorded based upon the equity method of accounting.

Fixed assets are stated at cost net of accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is calculated utilizing the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, ranging from one to three years. When sold, proceeds and cost are set off and recorded as gain/loss on sale in other income/expenses.

The Company is incorporated and operates in Grenada, West Indies, which does not have corporate income taxes. Additionally, the Company has no income or loss that is effectively connected to trade or business carried on in the United States of America, and services are performed outside the United States. Therefore, the Company was not subject to income tax as of or for the year ended December 31, 2012.

The Company has evaluated the application of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”) to its statement of financial condition, and has determined whether or not there are uncertain tax positions that require financial statement recognition.

The Company is incorporated as an International Business Company (“IBC”) under the laws of Grenada in accordance with the International Companies Act Chapter 152 and thus income tax exempted. No reserves for uncertain tax position are required to be recorded as a result of the application of ASC 740.

The Company’s functional and reporting currency is the U.S. dollar (“USD”). This is due to the fact that the Company’s major business is carried out in USD and most of its income and expenditure are generated in USD. In addition to maintaining a bank account in the USD, the Company also has two cash accounts denominated in foreign currencies (Eastern Caribbean dollars and Euros) used for various operating expenses. Transactions denominated in these foreign currencies are translated to the USD as follows: the current exchange rate is used when translating transactions based in Euros to the USD and a fixed currency exchange rate of 2.6882 when translating transactions based in Eastern Caribbean dollar to the USD. Management believes that such exchange rate of the Eastern Caribbean dollar approximates the average exchange rate throughout 2012. At initial recording, any receivable or payable is recognized by translating the foreign currency into USD using the foreign exchange rate at the given date. At the end of the reporting period, all financial assets and liabilities are translated using the year-end foreign exchange rate, and any gain or loss resulting from a change in the foreign exchange rate between the date of recognition and year-end is recognized as a gain or loss.

In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-10, “Amendments to Certain Investment Funds” (“ASU 2010-10”), which deferred application of the guidance in ASU 2009-17 for reporting entities with interest in an entity for which it is industry practice to apply measurement principles for financial reporting purposes that are consistent with those followed by investment companies, provided that the reporting entity does not have an explicit or implicit obligation to fund actual losses that potentially could be significant to the legal entity.

Effective January 1, 2010, the Company adopted the amendments in ASU 2009-17 and ASU 2010-10, and determined that although the Company has an equity interest in both Superfund Green, L.P. and Superfund Gold, L.P. for which the Company serves as a general partner, the Company does not have an obligation to fund any losses attributable to these funds, and therefore qualifies for the deferral under ASU 2010-10. Similarly, the Company does not have an obligation to fund any losses attributable to the Cayman Island Exempted Limited Liability companies registered as Segregated Portfolio Companies (“SPCs”) for which the Company serves as investment adviser. The Company has therefore deferred adoption of ASU 2009-17. Consistent with the Company’s past analysis, the Company concludes that Superfund Green, L.P. and Superfund Gold, L.P. are not VIEs, and the Company is not required to consolidate the assets and liabilities of these partnerships with its own statement of financial condition. The Company has likewise concluded that the Company does not hold a variable interest in the SPCs, and the Company is not required to consolidate the assets and liabilities of these companies with its own statement of financial condition. The Company has not yet completed its assessment of the effect, if any, that the lapsing of the deferral period might have on the Company’s statement of financial condition.

The Company is the general partner and is responsible for the trading and management of Superfund Green, L.P. As general partner of Superfund Green, L.P., the Company receives an annual management fee at the rate of 1.85% of each Series’ net assets (1/12 of 1.85% payable monthly). In addition, the Company receives an incentive fee of 25% of new appreciation in each Series’ net assets computed on a monthly basis and excluding interest income and as adjusted for subscriptions and redemptions and one-twelfth of 1% of month end net assets (1% per annum), not to exceed the amount of actual expenses incurred, for ongoing organization and offering expenses. Any organization and offering costs above 1% of net assets per year will be borne by the Company. The Company also earns monthly operating fees equal to one-twelfth of 0.15% of month end net assets (0.15% per annum). At December 31, 2012, the Company had accrued management fee, ongoing organization and offering fee and operating fee revenue of $91,145, which is included in due from affiliates in the accompanying statement of financial condition.

The Company is also the general partner and is responsible for the trading and management of Superfund Gold, L.P. As general partner of Superfund Gold, the Company receives an annual management fee at the rate of 2.25% of each Series’ net assets (1/12 of 2.25% payable monthly). In addition, the Company receives an incentive fee of 25% of new appreciation in each Series’ net assets computed on a monthly basis and excluding interest income and changes in the Series’ dollar for dollar investment in gold and adjusted for subscriptions and redemptions. The Company is also reimbursed by Superfund Gold for actual ongoing offering and operating expenses. The General Partner is liable for ongoing offering and operating expenses which, when considered together, are in excess of 0.75% of average month-end net assets per year of each Series. At December 31, 2012, the Company had accrued management fee and operating fee revenue of $57,238, which is included in due from affiliates in the accompanying statement of financial condition.

The Company also acts as investment advisor for various Superfund Funds which are all Cayman Island Exempted Limited Liability companies registered as Segregated Portfolio Companies. As investment advisor, the Company provides investment advisory services and acts as investment advisor in the management of investment and re-investment of the funds’ assets in securities and other financial instruments. Therefore, the Company is entitled to receive management fees being a certain percentage of the net asset value of the respective share class per annum, 1/12 of it payable monthly to the Company.

Whenever applicable, the Company receives an incentive fee being a percentage of the increase of the net asset value of the respective share class as at each value date (as defined in the respective Offering Memorandum), with the increase of such shares calculated as being the increase (if any) of the net asset value as at each value date (before the payment of any incentive fee) above the previous net asset value of the shares after deduction of the incentive fees payable to the investment advisor (“high watermark”). An incentive fee will not be payable with respect to any share where the net asset value of such share is less than the previous highest net asset value of such share. The incentive fee will be calculated after all other fees and expenses are allocated.

An incentive fee will not be payable with respect to any share where the net asset value of such share is less than the previous highest net asset value of such share. The incentive fee will be calculated after all other fees and expenses are paid.

On “Master” Funds levels in general no management or incentive fees are charged as those fees are chargeable on the “Feeder” levels, unless otherwise stated.

An early redemption fee is payable whenever shares are redeemed before a certain period has expired. Percentages and periods vary based on the respective Offering Memorandum and are sometimes staggered.

Special fee arrangements for trading services payable to the Company are explicitly stated in the various Offering Memoranda and listed with the respective fund below.

No management or incentive fees have been charged to this “Master” fund. Also there has been no income from other fees for the current year. All shares have been redeemed from Superfund Red Master SPC, and the Fund is closed for new investments, and in liquidation.

Management fee chargeable is 3% p.a. Incentive fees range from 20% to 30% depending on the respective Class of shares. Also early redemption fees are charged for redemptions within the first 12 months of subscription date.

All shares have been redeemed and the Fund is closed for new investments since October 31, 2012 and in liquidation.

The Company charged management fees and incentive fees of 4.2% and 30% respectively. Early redemption fees of 2% are charged for redemption within the first 12 months of investment. No incentive or early redemption fees have been charged in the current year.

All shares have been redeemed and the Fund is closed for new investments since July 31, 2012 and in liquidation.

For advisory services the Company receives 3% management fees, 25% incentive fees and 2% early redemption fees for investments redeemed within the first 12 months.

For Class A (USD 2) the Company would receive management fees and incentive fees however this class is inactive at the moment.

No management or incentive fees are charged to other classes of this “Master” fund.

The Company charges management fees from 0.5% to 2% and incentive fees from 10% to 40% depending on the segregated portfolio and share class. For all portfolios and classes an early redemption fee of 2% is charged for redemptions within the first 12 months of investment.

On exceptional basis Superfund Green Master SPC offers share classes for direct investment and thus pays management fees and incentive fees amounting from 1% to 2.5% for management fees and 25% to 35% for incentive fees.

A subscription charge of up to 3% of the subscription price per share may, at the discretion of the Board of Directors of the Fund, be paid to the Company. In 2012 the Board did not approve such charges.

The Company receives 3% p.a. management fees for being the funds trading advisor. Depending on the respective share class, incentive fees range from 20% to 30%. Additionally, the Company receives 2% early redemption fee for redemptions within a 12 months period of subscription.

3% management fees are charged for all share classes by the Company as well as incentive fees between 20% and 30% depending on the share class. For all but one share class, an early redemption fee of 2% is payable to the Company for redemptions within 12 months of investment.

All shares have been redeemed from one share class, for which the Company received management fees of 5.004%, incentive fees of 20% and additionally 0.167% coordination fee. The Fund has been closed as of May 31, 2012. For the remaining share class 4.8% management fees and 20% incentive fees are payable by the Fund. 3% subscription fees are also payable to the trading advisor by that share class.

For Superfund Garant IV SPC the Company receives 6% management fees plus 1% of the Zero Coupon Notes USD Value multiplied by the number of Zero Coupon Notes USD outstanding and incentive fees of 35%. Early redemption fees are staggered and start from 4% when redeeming within 24 months and lower to 1% when redeeming within a 60 months period.

There are neither management fees to be charged by the Company nor any incentive fees. When redeeming within 36 months an early redemption fee of 2% is payable when redeeming within a 60 months period 1% is charged.

The Company was appointed portfolio advisor by Superfund Asset Management, GmbH to manage the net assets of Superfund Blue Marktneutral and Superfund Absolute Return I. For those services, the Company received a consultation fee of 1/4 of 0.5% of the net assets they managed on a quarterly basis. In addition, the Company is entitled to a performance fee bonus which is the arithmetic average value between the total net asset value of the funds minus all asset positions in the funds in bonds, certificates, domestic and foreign fund shares on the same last valuation day of the month compared to the net asset value of the funds as evidenced by the net asset value calculation of the custodian. No performance bonus was earned.

The Company is affiliated with the above mentioned companies by virtue of common (voting) shareholdership (more than 50% of voting shares owned by the same shareholder).

The Company utilizes an automated trading system provided by one or more affiliates. This trading system executes its commodity trades on behalf of Superfund Green, L.P., Superfund Gold, L.P., Superfund Blue Master SPC, Superfund Blue SPC, Superfund Garant SPC, Superfund Green Master SPC, Superfund Green SPC, Superfund Green Euro SPC, Superfund Green Gold Master SPC, Superfund Green Gold SPC, Superfund HF SPC, and Superfund Diversified Notes SPC, on a non–exclusive basis and at no cost.

The Company executes its trades through Superfund Asset Management, LLC. (“SAM”), an introducing broker located in Chicago, Illinois. The sole shareholder of the Company is also the sole beneficial owner of SAM. Brokerage costs are recognized in the account for which the Company is trading. No brokerage costs are incurred directly by the Company.

In executing generated trading orders in various derivative transactions the Company uses one or more prime brokers. Since January 1, 2012 the Company is assisted by Superfund Brokerage Services, Inc. (“SBS”) located in Grenada W.I. in processing and executing proper orders as well as in performing necessary and reasonable ongoing due diligence investigations on all and potential prime Brokers as well as banks and other relevant financial institutions with regards to Superfund Blue SPC and Superfund Blue Master SPC. For those broker services the Company is obliged to pay SBS a flat fee of $120,000 per year. At December 31, 2012, the Company accrued broker expense of $120,000 included in the accrued affiliated operating expenses on the accompanying statement of financial condition.

An exclusive independent contractor agreement was entered into as of July 1, 2012 with Superfund Distribution and Investment, Inc. (“SDI”) also located in Grenada W.I. to promote as well as generate additional assets for certain managed future funds for which the Company is the trading advisor to. For costs incurred in connection with these funds the Company remunerates SDI for running costs as well as running costs of the local Superfund affiliates and any commission and/or upfront fees for Intermediaries/Introducers with which SDI has correspondent agreements. At December 31, 2012, the Company accrued distribution expenses of $480,000 included in the accrued affiliated operating expenses on the statement of financial condition.

Since November 1, 2005 the Company has been using office space, provided by Quadriga Office Management Inc. (“Quadriga Office Management”), an affiliated company incorporated in Grenada W.I.

The accompanying statement of financial condition has been prepared from the separate records maintained by the Company and may not necessarily be indicative of the conditions or results of the cash flows that would have existed if the Company had been operated as an unaffiliated company.

(a) At December 31, 2012, Superfund Capital Management’s investment in Superfund Green, L.P. represents 2.64% of the total issued Units of Series A and 3.46% of the total issued Units of Series B. The following represents investments in Superfund Green, L.P. - Series A and Superfund Green, L.P. - Series B as of December 31, 2012:

The following represents the total investment cost in Superfund Green, L.P. – Series A and Superfund Green, L.P. – Series B as of December 31, 2012:

The summarized assets, liabilities, and net decrease in net assets from operations for Superfund Green L.P. as of December 31, 2012 are as follows:

(b) At December 31, 2012, Superfund Capital Management’s investment in Superfund Gold, L.P. represents 6.11% of the total issued Units of Series A and 13.33% of the total issued Units of Series B. The following represents investments in Superfund Gold, L.P. - Series A and Superfund Gold, L.P. - Series B as of December 31, 2012:

The following represents the total investment cost in Superfund Gold, L.P. - Series A and Superfund Gold, L.P. - Series B as of December 31, 2012:

The summarized assets, liabilities, and net decrease in net assets from operations for Superfund Gold L.P. as of December 31, 2012 are as follows:

In the normal course of business, the Company enters into contracts and agreements that contain a variety of representations and warranties and which provide general indemnifications. The Company’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Company that have not yet occurred. The Company expects the risk of any future obligation under these indemnifications to be remote.

Management has evaluated the impact of all subsequent events on the Company through the date the statement of financial condition was available to be issued, and has determined there are no subsequent events.

THIS IS A SPECULATIVE, LEVERAGED INVESTMENT WHICH INVOLVES THE RISK OF LOSS. PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. SEE “THE RISKS YOU FACE” BEGINNING AT PAGE 11 IN PART ONE.

THIS PROSPECTUS IS IN TWO PARTS: A DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT AND A STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. THESE PARTS ARE BOUND TOGETHER, AND BOTH CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION.

Superfund Capital Management, Inc. and its affiliates and members of the Superfund group of companies (collectively, “Superfund”) use proprietary trading systems designed to identify trading opportunities that are minimally correlated to traditional investments. The spectrum of instruments traded globally consists of more than 120 futures and forward contracts in both commodity and financial futures and currency forwards, although trading does not occur in all markets at all times. Superfund’s trading style emphasizes low correlation between different instruments traded and high liquidity for order execution.

The above chart is only an indication of the variety of markets traded or that may be traded by Superfund and is not indicative of relative allocations among these markets. The actual allocations among these markets change over time due to liquidity, volatility and risk considerations.

On February 28, 2013, the approximate allocations among market sectors traded on behalf of the Series, based on amounts committed as margin or collateral, were as follows: interest rates, 24%; metals, 16%; bonds, 15%; energy, 13%; stock indices, 13%; currencies, 9%; grains, 6%; and agricultural markets, 4%.

Positions are initiated using proprietary technical algorithms generally that attempt to identify price trends at their early stages. Most systematic trend following systems employ technical indicators such as moving averages or Bollinger Bands to identify trending markets. The Superfund trading strategy is based on the premise that the key to using such indicators successfully lies in the way they are interrelated and applied in combination.

Superfund Capital Management also integrates a systematic, technical short-term trading strategy into the Fund’s primary trend-following methodology. Similar to the Fund’s trend following strategy, this short-term strategy is based on proprietary algorithms and analyses of technical indicators.

Risk management plays a key role in the Superfund investment strategy. The proprietary program limits initial risk per trade to a theoretical maximum of 1.5 percent of total Fund assets. In addition, the systems continuously screen volatility and signal adjustments of portfolio exposure accordingly.

Certain Units are not subject to selling commissions: (1) Units purchased through Superfund USA by investors that participate in a registered investment adviser’s asset-based fee or fixed fee advisory program; (2) Units purchased through Superfund USA by investors who are commodity pools operated by commodity pool operators registered as such with the CFTC; and (3) Units for which the investor has paid the maximum cumulative selling commissions of 10% of the original purchase price. Series A Units not subject to selling commissions were first sold as of November 1, 2007, and Series B Units not subject to selling commissions were first sold as of December 1, 2006.

If a Limited Partner’s Units are not subject to the selling commissions described above (and further described in this Prospectus at CHARGES TO EACH SERIES — Sales Compensation), as of the end of each month, the Limited Partner’s Units will be charged, as a Fund bookkeeping entry only, the same 1/12 of the 4% annual selling commission as other investors. However, the amount of that charge will not be taken from the Fund or paid to any person and, as of the beginning of the next month, that charge will be reversed and the Fund will issue that Limited Partner additional Units, calculated to three decimal places, at the then current Unit net asset value. Accordingly, the net asset value of that Limited Partner’s investment in the Fund will reflect the inapplicability of the annual selling commission to the Limited Partner’s Units and a somewhat higher performance fee, if applicable, as a result of the Limited Partner’s Units not paying the annual selling commission. The Fund will use this bookkeeping procedure and the issuance of additional Units to maintain a uniform net asset value across all Units.

The following tables compare the historical performance of Series A Units to the historical performance of Series A Units for investors not subject to sales commissions since January 2008.

Historical Performance of Series A Units for Investors Not Subject to Sales Commissions

The following tables compare the historical performance of Series B Units to the historical performance of Series B Units for investors not subject to sales commissions since January 2008.

Historical Performance of Series B Units for Investors Not Subject to Sales Commissions

Annualized performance – the annual percentage return of a Series since the Series’ inception factoring in the effects of compounding.

Year-to-date – cumulative performance of a Series from January 1 in the current year to the date as of the report.

One year return – performance of a Series for the 12 month period immediately preceding the date of the report.

Three year return – performance of a Series for the 36 month period immediately preceding the date of the report.

Five year return – performance of a Series for the 60 month period immediately preceding the date of the report.

Average monthly – average monthly gain or loss experienced by a Series since the Series’ inception represented as a percentage.

Highest monthly – the single greatest monthly gain experienced by a Series represented as a percentage.

Lowest monthly – the single greatest monthly loss experienced by a Series represented as a percentage.

Annual standard deviation - a measurement of an investment’s historical volatility. The higher the percentage, the more likely an investment will deviate from an expected normal return.

Max. initial risk per trade - percentage of assets under management that will initially be invested in any one futures position or contract.

Typical margin to equity - percentage of a Series’ trading capital held as margin for trading activity at any particular time.

Maximum drawdown - the greatest cumulative percentage decline in month-end net asset value due to losses sustained by the Series during any period in which the initial month-end net asset value is not equaled or exceeded by a subsequent month-end net asset value.

Maximum time off peak – the total number of months during any period in which the initial month-end net asset value is not equaled or exceeded by a subsequent month-end net asset value.

Sharpe ratio - a formula used to measure risk-adjusted performance. The Sharpe Ratio is calculated by subtracting the risk-free rate from the rate of return for a portfolio and dividing the result by the standard deviation of the portfolio.

S&P 500 Total Return – a market value-weighted benchmark equity index consisting of 500 stocks chosen for market size, liquidity and industry grouping, that assumes cash distributions are reinvested back into the index.

CISDM - a hedge fund index that reflects the average performance of Commodity Trading Advisors (CTAs)

CS/Tremont HF - an asset-weighted benchmark that measures hedge fund performance across ten style-based sectors representative of the entire hedge fund industry.

This chart was prepared by Superfund Capital Management, Inc. See the glossary beginning on page 125 for information integral to this chart.

Superfund Q-AG is the Superfund group of companies’ flagship product and was introduced to the retail investor in Europe on March 8, 1996. Superfund Q-AG is not available for US investors. Superfund Green, L.P. – Series A employs a very similar strategy to Superfund Q-AG. But please understand, there is no guarantee of Superfund Green, L.P. – Series A achieving the same results as Superfund Q-AG as (i) Superfund Green, L.P. – Series A has higher fees than Superfund Q-AG, (ii) Superfund Green, L.P. – Series A may not trade certain futures contracts traded by Superfund Q-AG due to CFTC restrictions, (iii) Superfund Green, L.P. – Series A and Superfund Q-AG have different levels of net assets and (iv) Superfund Green, L.P. – Series A and Superfund Q-AG will not necessarily have the same entry and exit points and thus may execute similar trades at different times.

Annualized performance – the annual percentage return of a Series since the Series’ inception factoring in the effects of compounding.

Year-to-date – cumulative performance of a Series from January 1 in the current year to the date as of the report.

One year return– performance of a Series for the 12 month period immediately preceding the date of the report.