20-F

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 2, 2006

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.

FORM 20-F

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO

SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006

Commission file number 1-15252

Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

N/A

(Translation of Registrant’s name into English)

The Republic of India

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

12th Floor, Jeevan Bharati Tower-1

124 Connaught Circus

New Delhi 110 001

India

(Address of principal executive offices)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act.

Title of each class	Name of each exchange on which registered
American Depositary Shares, each representing two equity shares. Equity Shares (Not for trading, but only in connection with the registration of the American Depositary Shares)	New York Stock Exchange, Inc.

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act.

None

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act.

None

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.

630,000,000 Equity Shares

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405

of the Securities Act of 1933, or the Securities Act.

YES   o      NO   x

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

YES   o        NO   x.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

YES   x        NO   o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer Non-accelerated filer

Indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.

Item 17  oItem 18  x

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION		1
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS		1
Item 1.	Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers	1
Item 2.	Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable	1
Item 3.	Key Information	2
	SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA	2
	EXCHANGE RATES	4
	RISK FACTORS	5
Item 4.	Information on the Company	11
	HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPANY	11
	BUSINESS OVERVIEW	18
	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	30
	ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE	34
	PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT	34
	TELECOMMUNICATIONS REGULATION IN INDIA	38
Item 5.	Operating and Financial Review and Prospects	45
	OPERATING RESULTS	45
	LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES	59
	RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT	61
	TREND INFORMATION	61
Item 6.	Directors, Senior Management and Employees	61
	DIRECTORS AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT	61
	AUDIT COMMITTEE	63
	COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS	64
	EMPLOYEES	64
	TRAINING	65
	SHARE OWNERSHIP	65
Item 7.	Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions	65
	MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS	65
	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS	66
Item 8.	Financial Information	67
	CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION	67
	SIGNIFICANT CHANGES	68
Item 9.	The Offer and Listing	68
	MARKET PRICE INFORMATION	68
	THE INDIAN SECURITIES MARKET	69
Item 10.	Additional Information	75
	MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION	75
	MATERIAL CONTRACTS	80
	INDIAN FOREIGN EXCHANGE CONTROLS AND SECURITIES REGULATIONS	80
	TAXATION	83
	DOCUMENTS ON DISPLAY	87
Item 11.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	87
Item 12.	Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities	88
Item 13.	Defaults, Dividend Arrearage and Delinquencies.	88
Item 14.	Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds	88
Item 15.	Controls and Procedures	88
Item 16A.	Audit Committee Financial Expert	89
Item 16B.	Code of Ethics	89
Item 16C.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	89
Item 16D.	Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees	89
Item 16E.	Purchase of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers	90
Item 17.	Financial Statements	90
Item 18.	Financial Statements	90
Item 19.	Exhibits	90
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-1

i

PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The financial information in this report has been prepared in accordance with US GAAP with respect to our consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and cash flow for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 and our balance sheets as of March 31, 2005 and 2006. Our fiscal year ends on March 31 of each year, so all references to a particular fiscal year are to the year ended March 31 of that year. The consolidated financial statements, including the notes to those financial statements, are set forth at the end of this report.

Although we have translated in this report certain rupee amounts into dollars for convenience, this does not mean that the rupee amounts referred could have been, or could be, converted into dollars at any particular rate, the rates stated below, or at all. All translations from rupees to dollars with respect to financial data as of March 31, 2006 are based on the noon buying rate in the City of New York for cable transfers in rupees on such date. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York certifies this rate for customs purposes on each date the rate is given. The noon buying rate on March 31, 2006 was Rs.44.48 per US$1.00.

Information contained in our website,www.mtnl.net.in, is not part of this annual report.

Reference to “we,” “us,” “our,” “MTNL,” and the “Company” refer to Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited.

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report contains “forward-looking statements”, as defined in Section 27A of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that are based on our current expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections about our company and our industry. The forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties. Generally, these forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “will likely result,” “believe,” “expect,” “will continue,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” “contemplate,” “seek to,” “future,” “objective,” “goal,” “project,” “should,” and similar expressions or variations of these expressions. We caution you that reliance on any forward-looking statement involves risks and uncertainties, and that although we believe that the assumptions on which our forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, any of those assumptions could prove to be inaccurate, and, as a result, the forward-looking statements based on those assumptions could be incorrect. The uncertainties in this regard include, but are not limited to, those identified in the risk factors discussed elsewhere in this report. See “Key Information—Risk Factors.” In light of these and other uncertainties, you should not conclude that we will necessarily achieve any plans and objectives or projected financial results referred to in any of the forward-looking statements. We do not undertake to release the results of any revisions of these forward-looking statements to reflect future events or circumstances.

Item 1.Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers

Not applicable.

Item 2.Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable

Not applicable.

1

Item 3.Key Information

SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA

You should read the following selected financial and operating data in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes, and Item 5 “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and the other financial information included elsewhere in this report and our other reports filed with the SEC.

Our selected financial and operating data included in this report are presented in Indian rupees and are derived from our consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States of America (US GAAP) for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006.

The selected statement of operations data and cash flow data for the three years ended March 31, 2006, and the selected balance sheet data as of March 31, 2005 and 2006 under US GAAP have been extracted or derived from our consolidated audited US GAAP financial statements which are included elsewhere in this report. The selected statement of operations data and cash flow data for the years ended March 31, 2002 and 2003, and the selected balance sheet data as of March 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 under US GAAP are derived from our consolidated audited US GAAP financial statements not included in this report.

Consolidated financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2006 have been translated for convenience into US dollars (although we have translated certain rupee amounts in this report into US dollars for convenience, this does not mean that the rupee amounts referred to could have been, or could be, converted into US dollars at any particular rate, the rates stated below, or at all). All translations from rupees to dollars with respect to financial data as of March 31, 2006 are based on the noon buying rate in the City of New York for cable transfers in rupees on such date. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York certifies this rate for customs purposes on each date the rate is given. The noon buying rate on March 31, 2006 was Rs.44.48 per US$1.00.

2

Under US GAAP

			Fiscal Years Ended March 31,
	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2006
Statement of Income Data	(Rs. in millions except per share data)					Convenience translation into millions of US$ (Unaudited)
Revenues	Rs.58,735	Rs.55,251	Rs.61,084	Rs.50,156	Rs. 46,668	$1,049
Total costs and expense	(46,205)	(48,057)	(55,850)	(47,229)	(47,480)	1,068
Operating income	12,530	7,194	5,234	2,927	(812)	(18)
Other income / (expense), net	1,827	1,962	1,714	2,670	2,388	54
Income before income taxes	14,357	9,156	6,948	5,597	1,576	35
Income taxes	(5,457)	(3,951)	(2,570)	(2,124)	(437)	(10)
Equity in (losses) of affiliate	(4)	(4)	(20)	(67)	(73)	(2)
Net Income	Rs.8,896	Rs.5,201	Rs.4,358	Rs.3,406	Rs.1,066	$24
Weighted average equity shares outstanding	630	630	630	630	630
EPS - Basic & diluted	Rs.14.12	Rs.8.26	Rs.6.92	Rs.5.41	Rs.1.69	$0.04
Basic and diluted earnings per GDR/ADS	Rs.28.24	Rs.16.52	Rs.13.84	Rs.10.82	Rs.3.38	$0.08
Dividends paid per equity share	Rs.4.5	Rs.4.5	Rs.4.5	Rs.6.5	Rs.6.21	$0.14
Dividends paid per equity share	$0.09	$0.10	$0.10	$0.15	$0.14
Dividends paid per GDR/ADS	Rs.9.0	Rs.9.0	Rs.9.0	Rs.13.0	Rs.12.42	$0.28
Dividends paid per GDR/ADS	$0.18	$0.20	$0.20	$0.30	$0.28

			As of March 31,
	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2006
Balance Sheet Data	(Rs. in millions except per share data)					Convenience translation into millions of US$ (Unaudited)
Cash and Cash equivalents	Rs.19,466	Rs.9,910	Rs.9,891	Rs.7,561	Rs.1,641	$37
Investment in bank deposits	5,000	8,260	15,654	17,732	19,020	428
Dues from Related Parties	38,241	29,644	23,588	27,789	23,818	535
Total Assets	166,149	160,666	168,023	177,172	170,151	3,829
Dues to Related Parties	9,016	18,885	12,084	11,339	6,091	137
Total Liabilities	85,118	77,269	83,466	93,839	89,703	2,020
Total Shareholders equity	Rs.81,031	Rs.83,397	Rs.84,557	Rs.83,333	Rs.80,448	$1,809
Capital Stock1	Rs.12,949	Rs.12,949	Rs.12,949	Rs.12,949	Rs.12,949	$291

____________________

¹ Includes capital stock and additional paid-in capital.

3

			Fiscal Years Ended March 31,
	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2006
Cash flow data:	(Rs. in millions except per share data)					Convenience translation into millions of US$ (Unaudited)
Net cash from operating activities	Rs.17,164	Rs.23,456	Rs.19,885	Rs.15,006	Rs.6,006	$135
Net cash used in investing activities	Rs.(14,945)	Rs.(18,001)	Rs. (16,706)	Rs. (12,706)	Rs.(7,976)	$(179 )
Net cash from financing activities	Rs.(7,591)	Rs.(15,011)	Rs. (3,198)	Rs. (4,630)	Rs.(3,951)	$(89)

EXCHANGE RATES

The following table sets forth, for the fiscal years indicated, information concerning the number of Indian rupees for which one US dollar would be exchanged based on the noon buying rate in the City of New York for cable transfers of Indian rupees, as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

Year Ended March 31,	At end of period	Average rate (1)	High	Low
2002	48.83	47.82	48.83	46.58
2003	47.53	48.36	49.07	47.53
2004	43.40	45.78	47.46	43.40
2005	43.62	44.86	46.45	43.27
2006	44.48	44.21	46.26	43.05
2007 (through September 22, 2006)	45.77	45.95	46.83	44.39

(1)The average rate is the average of the exchange rates on the last business day of each month during the period.

The following table sets forth the high and low exchange rates for the previous six months and is based on the noon buying rate in the City of New York during the period for cable transfers in Indian rupees as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York:

Month	High	Low
April 2006	45.09	44.39
May 2006	46.22	44.69
June 2006	46.25	45.50
July 2006	46.83	45.84
August 2006	46.61	46.32
September 2006 (through September 22, 2006)	46.38	45.74

On September 22, 2006, the noon buying rate was Rs. 45.77 = US$1.00.

4

RISK FACTORS

You should carefully consider the following risk factors as well as the other information contained in this report in evaluating us and our business. The market price of our equity shares or ADSs could decline due to any of these risks.

Risks Relating to Our Business

We expect to continue to encounter increased competition in each of our markets, which could reduce our revenues.

The Indian government is rapidly liberalizing the telecommunications industry in India. The Department of Telecommunications (DOT) may license, at its discretion, multiple additional service providers in any service area, with respect to both basic telecommunications services and cellular services. In November 2003, the Department issued guidelines for Unified Access Licenses, which cover both basic and cellular services within a service area. In the Indian context, “basic telecommunications services” or “basic services” include basic fixed-line access service and a number of other telecommunications services, other than long distance services, cellular service and Internet access. Basic services also include CDMA-based fixed wireless and mobile services (without roaming). Tata Teleservices Limited and Reliance Infocomm Limited are currently competing with us in the market for basic services in both Mumbai and Delhi, and Bharti Tele-Ventures Limited is also competing with us in the basic services market in Delhi. All of these companies already have significant telecommunications infrastructure in Delhi and Mumbai, including, with respect to Tata Teleservices and Reliance Infocom, low-cost CDMA mobile and fixed wireless technology. With approximately 62.52% of our call units having come from approximately 18.39% of our access lines in service, we are particularly vulnerable to losing market share if these or other new operators aggressively target our largest subscribers. Some of our largest customers have already migrated to other basic service operators.

We experience significant and growing competition in the market for GSM cellular and Internet services. Many of these service providers enjoy significant penetration in these markets, have established brand names and have more experience operating a cellular network than we do. Cellular operators also face competition from rapidly growing CDMA-based mobile services, which are priced considerably lower than GSM cellular services.

Increased competition has kept and will likely continue to keep downward pressure on prices and has required and will likely continue to require us to increase our capital investment to improve and expand our services. These developments, in turn, have had and may continue to have a negative impact on our profitability.

Our Business is Subject to Substantial Regulation by the Government.

The DOT retains the right to revoke our license after giving one month’s notice to us. The DOT also retains the right, after giving notice to us, to modify the terms and conditions of our license at any time if in their opinion it is necessary or expedient to do so in the interest of the general public or for the proper operation of the telecommunications sector. A revocation of the license or a change in significant terms of the license, such as its duration, the amount of license fee payable, the range of services permitted and the scope of exclusivity could limit our ability to operate particular lines of our business or result in increased costs in the form of increased license fees or costs associated with applying for new licenses, or contesting limitations on our licenses.

Regulations applicable to public sector enterprises in India governing certain personnel matters, procurement, capital expenditure and the issuance of securities may affect our ability to compete effectively.

As long as the Indian government’s shareholding in us equals or exceeds 51%, we are deemed to be an Indian government company. As such, we are subject to laws and regulations generally applicable to public sector enterprises in India. These laws and regulations govern, among other things, personnel matters, procurement, budgeting and capital expenditures and the generation of funds through the issuance of securities.

5

Under our articles of association, the President of India, on behalf of the Indian government, may also issue directives with respect to the conduct of our business and affairs, and certain matters with respect to our business, including the appointment and remuneration of our Chairman-cum-Managing Director and the declaration of dividends. None of our shareholders, management or board of directors may take action in respect of any matter reserved for the President of India without his approval. If the President of India does not allow us to make capital expenditures pursuant to our business plan, we may be unable to compete effectively or maintain profitability. Government formalities, including requirements that many of our purchases be made through a competitive bidding process, often cause delays in our equipment and product procurement; these delays can place us at a disadvantage relative to private sector competitors.

The Indian government, our controlling shareholder, when considering matters pertaining to us, often also considers the interests of the largest government-owned telecommunications company, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL). The Indian government is evaluating the possibility of a merger of our Company with BSNL.

The Indian government, through the DOT, holds 56.25% of our outstanding equity shares and 100% of BSNL’s equity shares. Consequently, the DOT controls both of us. The DOT has the power to determine the outcome of most actions requiring approval of our board of directors or shareholders, including proposed expansion of our basic and cellular services into new areas in which we may compete with BSNL, transactions with BSNL or the assertion of claims against BSNL. When considering many of these matters, the DOT may also take into account the interests of BSNL. Failure by the DOT to resolve conflicts involving us and BSNL in an equitable manner could have a material adverse effect on our business prospects.

India’s Ministry of Communications has appointed private sector banks to act as consultants to advise on restructuring BSNL and us. We understand that these consultants have submitted their reports. There have been media reports about consideration of a merger of our companies or the transfer by the DOT of their shares in us to BSNL or to a holding company that would control both us and BSNL. There are no further announcements on this. We cannot assess the likelihood of such a transaction, or the impact of such a transaction on our business or the value of our shares or ADSs.

We have significant related party transactions.

The Indian Government is the controlling shareholder in MTNL and hence the Company is deemed to be an Indian government company. As such, the Company is subject to laws and regulations generally applicable to public sector enterprises in India. These laws and regulations govern, among other things, personnel matters, procurement, budgeting and capital expenditures and the generation of funds through the issuance of securities. We have extensive commercial and regulatory relationships with the DOT, BSNL and VSNL, most of which were established at the time when there was no corporate separation between the DOT, BSNL and MTNL. Also the Indian Government when considering matters pertaining to the Company, often also considers the interests of the largest government-owned telecommunications company, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL). We have significant amounts due from related party and our inability to collect them or change in the terms of our arrangements with our related parties could adversely affect our revenues and profitability. See notes 3, 4, 19 and 25 of our consolidated financial statements.

We do not have title to property, and we cannot sell our properties without payment of stamp duties and registering properties in our name.

In 1987, the assets and properties of the DOT located in Delhi and Mumbai were transferred to us by an order of the Government of India (the "Government") and a deed of sale was executed by the Government in our favor representing an irrevocable transfer. Indian law generally requires that to perfect the transfer or lease of real property, the transfer should be evidenced by a formal, duly stamped deed of transfer and registered with the Central Land Registrar within a specified period after the execution of the deed of transfer or lease. A formal transfer deed for real property of the DOT, transferred by the Government to us has been executed but has not been registered with the appropriate municipal authorities. The formal transfer deed and physical delivery of possession of the DOT's non-real estate assets has resulted in the transfer of such non-real estate assets of the DOT to MTNL in Delhi and Mumbai.

6

Indian law also requires payment of stamp duty (at rates which vary among states) on instruments, which effect transfer of title to real estate or in respect of leases of real estate. MTNL has not paid stamp duty in respect of any of the acquired or leased properties. Accordingly, MTNL may be liable for stamp duty and penalties thereon if a deed is registered by MTNL in the future (other than with respect to the DOT properties acquired from the Government as at March 30, 1987). All liabilities for stamp duties in respect of the DOT properties acquired by MTNL from the Government as at March 30, 1987 are to be borne by the Government. The Company has been advised by its counsel that although the Company has valid possession including the risks and rewards of ownership and title to all of its property, to enable MTNL to perfect and thereby acquire marketable title to real property in its possession, it would need to have relevant documents relating to transfer or lease of real property duly registered and stamped. Accordingly, MTNL cannot sell its properties without payment of stamp duties and registering the properties in its name.

Compliance with new and changing corporate governance and public disclosure requirements adds uncertainty to our compliance policies and increases our costs of compliance.

Changing laws, regulations and standards relating to accounting, corporate governance and public disclosure, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, new U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, regulations, the NYSE, rules, Securities and Exchange Board of India, or SEBI, rules, and Indian stock market listing regulations are creating uncertainty for companies like ours. These new or changed laws, regulations and standards may lack specificity and are subject to varying interpretations. Their application in practice may evolve over time, as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. This could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs of compliance as a result of ongoing revisions to such corporate governance standards.

In particular, our efforts to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the related regulations regarding our required assessment of our internal controls over financial reporting and our external auditors’ audit of that assessment requires the commitment of significant financial and managerial resources. We consistently assess the adequacy of our internal controls over financial reporting, remediate any control deficiencies that may be identified, and validate through testing that our controls are functioning as documented. As of March 31, 2006, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective due to material weaknesses related to our inadequate knowledge and experience in application of U.S. GAAP, commensurate with our financial reporting requirements, which had led to the restatement of our financial statements for year ended March 31, 2005. We will need to improve our internal controls over financial reporting and have consulted with our audit committee and board of directors, and are planning to undertake remedial measures to make improvements as soon as practicable. However considering the above our independent auditors may be unable to issue unqualified attestation reports on management’s assessment on the operating effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting, which would adversely impact the Company’s operations, reputation and profitability.

We have received a demand to pay sales tax in respect of certain historical telecommunications revenues, mainly telephone rental charges. We are not yet able to estimate our potential aggregate liability, but it could be large and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flow.

We have received a demand from the state government of Maharashtra, of which Mumbai is a part, for payment of Rs.3.2 billion in sales tax for fiscal 1989-2000 on certain telecommunications revenues, mainly telephone rental charges, and received notice from the Delhi state government seeking further information in aid of an investigation into whether a similar demand should be made upon us. The amount at issue in Delhi is significantly less.

MTNL has challenged the demands raised before the respective high courts and the Company has been granted interim stays against enforcement of the demands. However this stay order is subject to the outcome of the Supreme Court judgment on the issue. During the year ended March 31, 2006, the Supreme Court of India has concluded in the BSNL Vs Union of India case that rendering basic services does not amount to a "transfer of right to use the telephone system". Hence the imposition of the sales tax on any facility of the telecommunication services is untenable in law. Based on opinion received from legal counsel and drawing reference to the judgment of the Supreme Court of India in the abovementioned case, management believes that the sales tax departments

7

would have to withdraw their demands of sales tax on basic telephony and that an adverse outcome in respect of the above is remote.

If we were required to pay sales tax in respect of certain historical revenues, including telephone rentals, such payments could have a material adverse effect upon our results of operations, financial condition and cash flow. At this time, we cannot estimate potential aggregate actual liability associated with sales tax.

We haveand may continue to implement Voluntary Retirement Schemes that will affect our profitability.

We have and continue to offer voluntary retirement to certain of our employees with a view to reducing our workforce. While we believe the long-term effect to our financial performance will be beneficial, the cost of such programs will affect our profitability over the next few years.

Risks Relating to Investments in Indian Companies

There are Risks of Political Uncertainty in India that could affect our business.

During the past decade, the government of India has pursued policies of economic liberalization, including significantly relaxing restrictions on the private sector. Nevertheless, the role of the Indian central and state governments in the Indian economy as producers, consumers and regulators has remained significant. A coalition government is in power. We cannot assure that these liberalization policies will continue in the future. The rate of economic liberalization could change, and specific laws and policies affecting foreign investment, currency exchange rates and other matters affecting investment in our securities could change as well. A significant change in India’s economic liberalization and deregulation policies could disrupt business and economic conditions in India generally and could adversely affect the telecommunications licensing and regulatory framework in which we operate our business.

Financial instability in other countries, particularly emerging market countries in Asia, could adversely affect the Indian economy and cause our business and the market for our equity shares and ADSs to suffer.

Financial turmoil in Asia, Russia and elsewhere in the world in the late 1990s affected different sectors of the Indian economy in varying degrees. Although economic conditions are different in each country, investors’ reactions to developments in one country can have adverse effects on the securities of companies in other countries, including India. A loss of investor confidence in the financial systems of other emerging markets may cause increased volatility in Indian financial markets and, indirectly, in the Indian economy in general. Any worldwide financial instability could influence the Indian economy and could have a material adverse effect on the market for securities of Indian companies, including our equity shares and ADSs.

Social conflict, terrorism and related military activity may adversely affect the Indian economy or world economic activity, either of which could adversely affect our business and the prices of our equity shares and ADSs.

India and other parts of the world have recently experienced significant social conflict and/or terrorist acts, . In India, social conflict, including religious and regional/separatist conflicts, has been an ongoing problem, which occasionally includes significant acts of terrorism. To the extent that the Indian economy is adversely affected by such conflict, terrorism or military activity, our business may also be adversely affected, resulting in a decline in revenue, and the prices of our equity shares and ADSs may decline.

8

Risks Relating to the ADSs and Equity Shares

Ability to withdraw equity shares from the depositary facility is uncertain and may be subject to delays.

India’s restrictions on foreign ownership of Indian companies limit the number of shares that may be owned by foreign investors and generally require government approval for foreign ownership. The maximum foreign ownership permitted in us without prior governmental approval is 49% under the sectoral caps currently provided for by the government of India and the Reserve Bank of India. Investors who withdraw equity shares from the depositary facility will be subject to Indian regulatory restrictions on foreign ownership of equity shares upon withdrawal. It is possible that this withdrawal process may be subject to delays.

Ability to sell in India any equity shares withdrawn from the depositary facility may be subject to delays.

Persons seeking to sell in India any equity shares withdrawn upon surrender of an ADS will require Reserve Bank of India approval for each such transaction. Because of possible delays in obtaining necessary approvals, holders of equity shares may be prevented from realizing gains during periods of price increases or limiting losses during periods of price declines.

Ability to withdraw and redeposit shares in the depositary facility is limited, which may cause our equity shares to trade at a discount or premium to the market price of our ADSs.

Because of Indian legal restrictions, despite recent relaxations, the supply of ADSs may be limited. Under procedures recently adopted by the Reserve Bank of India, the depositary will be permitted to accept deposits of our outstanding equity shares and deliver ADSs representing the deposited equity shares to the extent, and limited to the number, of ADSs that have previously been converted into underlying equity shares. Under these new procedures, if you elect to surrender your ADSs and receive equity shares, you may be unable to re-deposit those outstanding equity shares with our depositary and receive ADSs because the number of new ADSs that can be issued cannot, at any time, exceed the number of ADSs converted into underlying equity shares or result in foreign equity in us exceeding 49%. This may restrict your ability to re-convert the equity shares obtained by you to ADSs. Also, investors who exchange ADSs for the underlying equity shares and are not holders of record will be required to declare to us details of the holder of record. Any investor who fails to comply may be liable for a fine of up to Rs.1,000 for each day such failure continues. See “Additional Information—Indian Foreign Exchange Controls and Securities Regulations.”

The restrictions described above may cause our equity shares to trade at a discount or premium to our ADSs.

Conditions in the Indian securities market may affect the price or liquidity of the equity shares and the ADSs.

The Indian securities markets are generally smaller and more volatile than securities markets in the world’s major financial centers. Indian stock exchanges have also experienced problems that have affected the market price and liquidity of the securities of Indian companies. These problems have included temporary exchange closures, the suspension of stock exchange administration, broker defaults, settlement delays and strikes by brokers. In addition, the governing bodies of the Indian stock exchanges have from time to time imposed restrictions on trading in certain securities, limitations on price movements and margin requirements. Further, from time to time, disputes have occurred between listed companies and stock exchanges and other regulatory bodies, which, in some cases, may have had a negative effect on market sentiment. Similar problems could happen in the future and, if they do, they could affect the market price and liquidity of our equity shares and our ADSs.

Because there may be less company information available in Indian securities markets than securities markets in more developed countries, the price of our equity shares could fluctuate unexpectedly.

There is a difference between the level of regulation and monitoring of the Indian securities market and the activities of investors, brokers and other participants and that of markets in the United States and other developed economies. The Securities and Exchange Board of India is responsible for improving disclosure and other regulatory standards for the Indian securities markets. The Securities and Exchange Board of India has issued regulations and guidelines on disclosure requirements, insider trading and other matters. There may, however, be less publicly available information about Indian companies than is regularly made available by public companies in

9

developed economies. As a result, shareholders could act on incomplete information and cause the price of our equity shares to fluctuate unexpectedly.

ADS holders may be unable to exercise preemptive rights available to shareholders and therefore may suffer future dilution of their ownership position.

A company incorporated in India must offer its holders of equity shares preemptive rights to subscribe and pay for a proportionate number of shares to maintain their existing ownership percentages prior to the issuance of any new equity shares, unless these rights have been waived by at least 75% of the company’s shareholders present and voting at a shareholders’ general meeting. Holders of our ADSs as well as our shareholders located in the United States may be unable to exercise preemptive rights for our equity shares underlying our ADSs unless a registration statement under the Securities Act is effective with respect to those rights or an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act is available. Our decision to file a registration statement will depend on the costs and potential liabilities associated with any such registration statement, as well as the perceived benefits of enabling investors in our ADSs to exercise their preemptive rights and any other factors we consider appropriate at the time. We do not commit that we would file a registration statement under these circumstances. If we issue any such rights in the future, the rights would be issued to the depositary, which may sell the rights in the securities markets in India for the benefit of the holders of our ADSs. There can be no assurance as to the value, if any, the depositary would receive upon the sale of the rights. To the extent that holders of our ADSs as well as our shareholders located in the United States are unable to exercise preemptive rights, their proportional interests in us would be reduced.

ADS holders may be subject to potential losses arising out of exchange rate risk on the Indian rupee and risks associated with the conversion of rupee proceeds into foreign currency.

Holders of ADSs as well as our shareholders located outside India will be subject to currency fluctuation risks and convertibility risks, since our equity shares are quoted in rupees on the Indian stock exchanges on which they are listed. Dividends on our equity shares will also be paid in rupees, and then converted into US dollars for distribution to ADS holders. Holders that seek to convert the rupee proceeds of a sale of equity shares withdrawn upon surrender of ADSs into foreign currency and export the foreign currency will need to obtain the approval of the Reserve Bank of India for each transaction. In addition, holders that seek to sell equity shares withdrawn from the depositary facility will have to obtain approval from the Reserve Bank of India, unless the sale is made on a stock exchange or in connection with an offer made under the regulations regarding takeovers. Holders of rupees in India may also generally not purchase foreign currency without general or special approval from the Reserve Bank of India.

ADS holders may be subject to Indian taxes arising out of capital gains.

Generally, capital gains, whether short-term or long-term, arising on the sale of the underlying equity shares in India are subject to Indian capital gains tax. For the purpose of computing the amount of capital gains subject to tax, Indian law specifies that the cost of acquisition of the equity shares will be deemed to be the share price prevailing on The Stock Exchange, Mumbai or the National Stock Exchange on the date the depositary advises the custodian to deliver equity shares upon surrender of ADSs. The period of holding of equity shares, for determining whether the gain is long-term or short-term, commences on the date of the giving of such notice by the depositary to the custodian.

Investors are advised to consult their own tax advisers and to consider carefully the potential tax consequences of an investment in our ADSs.

ADS holders may not be able to enforce a judgment of a foreign court against us.

We are a limited liability company incorporated under the laws of India. All our directors and executive officers are residents of India and almost all of our assets and the assets of such persons are located in India. India is not a party to any international treaty in relation to the recognition or enforcement of foreign judgments. We have

10

been advised by counsel that recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments is provided for on a statutory basis and that foreign judgments shall be conclusive regarding any matter directly adjudicated upon except where:

·   the judgment has not been pronounced by a court of competent jurisdiction;

·   the judgment has not been given on the merits of the case;

·   it appears on the face of the proceedings that the judgment is founded on an incorrect view of international law or a refusal to recognize the law of India in cases in which Indian law is applicable;

·   the proceedings in which the judgment was obtained were opposed to natural justice;

·   the judgment has been obtained by fraud; or

·   the judgment sustains a claim founded on a breach of any law in force in India.

    It may not be possible for holders of our ADSs or our shareholders to effect service of process upon us or our directors and executive officers and experts named in the report that are residents of India outside India or to enforce judgments obtained against us or them in foreign courts predicated upon the liability provisions of foreign countries, including the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States.

Moreover, it is unlikely that a court in India would award damages on the same basis as a foreign court if an action is brought in India. Furthermore, it is unlikely that an Indian court would enforce foreign judgments if it viewed the amount of damages as excessive or inconsistent with Indian practice. An Indian court may not enforce a foreign judgment involving more than actual and quantifiable damages.

Although announced policy indicates there is no intention to do so, possible sales of our equity shares by the government of India could affect the value of our ADSs.

The government of India holds approximately 56.25% of our outstanding equity shares. There have been no indications that the current government of India plans to further reduce its shareholding in us through a sale of equity.

Any future disposal of equity shares by the Indian government could adversely affect the trading price of our equity shares and ADSs.

Item 4.Information on the Company

HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPANY

History and Development of the Indian Telecommunications Industry

Until the mid-1980s, the telecommunications sector in India was a monopoly controlled by the government of India through the Department of Posts and Telegraphs of the Ministry of Communications, providing all telecommunications services, both domestic and international. The Indian Telegraph Act of 1885 established the government of India’s monopoly in the sector and, together with the Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act of 1933, provided the legal framework for the regulation of the Indian telecommunications industry.

Development of the telecommunications sector historically was seen as a relatively low priority and received limited budgetary support from the government of India. As a result, the telecommunications infrastructure in India grew relatively slowly. In the mid-1980s, faced with rapidly increasing demand for telecommunications services and equipment, the government of India commenced a reorganization of the sector designed to facilitate the rapid introduction of new technology, stimulate the growth of the telecommunications industry and tap the resources of the private sector in facilitating such technological innovation and growth. The reorganization included the division of the Department of Posts and Telegraphs into the DOT and the Department of Posts.

11

As part of the reorganization, we were incorporated on February 28, 1986 under the Companies Act as a wholly-owned government of India company and, on April 1, 1986, assumed responsibility for the control, management and operation of the telecommunications networks in Delhi and Mumbai, two of the largest metropolitan areas in India. VSNL was established at the same time to provide international telecommunications services and the DOT retained responsibility for providing all other telecommunications services throughout India. The DOT also assumed regulatory authority over the Indian telecommunications industry. Simultaneously, the Telecom Commission was established in 1986 as an executive body under the Ministry of Communications to make policy decisions and to accelerate the development of all aspects of the telecommunications sector and the implementation of new telecommunications policies.

In December 1991, with a view to fulfilling its objective of facilitating the rapid introduction of new services and technology, the DOT invited bids from Indian companies with a maximum of 49% foreign ownership for two non-exclusive GSM cellular licenses in each of the cities of Kolkata (formerly called Calcutta), Chennai (formerly called Madras), Delhi and Mumbai. The private operators commenced cellular services in late 1995. In October 1997 we were permitted to provide GSM cellular service in Mumbai and Delhi. Beginning in 1995, the DOT also invited tenders and awarded cellular licenses for the regional “circles” established for the purpose of licensing cellular services in the rest of India. We believe that as of July 31, 2006, there were approximately 82.4 million cellular subscribers in India.

Since 1992, as part of its general policy of gradually reducing its holdings in public sector enterprises, the Indian government sold a portion of its equity holdings in us and VSNL to certain mutual funds, banks and financial institutions controlled by the government of India. In our 1997 global depositary receipt offering, the Indian government sold 40 million of our equity shares represented by 20 million global depositary receipts, constituting 6.3% of our then outstanding equity shares. Additionally, in 1997 and 1999, the Indian government sold additional equity shares of VSNL in the form of global depositary receipts, thereby reducing its equity interest in the company to 51%. In February 2002, the government of India divested an additional 25% interest in VSNL to the Tata Group through a competitive bidding process.

In May 1994, the government of India announced its National Telecom Policy, which was aimed at achieving accelerated telecommunications growth and network expansion. The broad objectives of this policy were higher national telephone penetration, reduction of waiting lists, improvement in the quality of networks, improved rural access to telecommunications services, introduction of value-added services and private sector participation in the provision of basic and cellular services.

In order to achieve these objectives, the Indian government decided to permit private sector involvement in basic telecommunications services, which, in the Indian context, includes basic fixed-line access service and a number of other telecommunications services (including CDMA-based fixed wireless and mobile services (without roaming)), other than long distance services, cellular service and Internet access. Accordingly, in September 1994 the Indian government announced its “Guidelines for Private Sector Entry into Basic Telecom Services,” and beginning in 1995 began to invite tenders from companies with no more than 49% foreign ownership for basic service licenses for the regional “circles” established for licensing basic telecommunications services. After a period of consolidation, the most prominent private-sector providers of basic telecommunications services currently include Bharti Tele-Ventures Limited, Tata Teleservices and Reliance Infocomm, each of which operates in multiple circles. Tata Teleservices and Reliance Infocomm both operate in the circles that include Mumbai and Delhi, and hence now compete with us in those areas. Bharti Tele-Ventures Limited also provides basic services in Delhi.

In February 1997, a multilateral agreement on basic telecommunications services was agreed to among member governments of the World Trade Organization. As part of this agreement, the Indian government has reaffirmed its commitment to further liberalize the Indian telecommunications sector through the licensing of new basic and cellular service providers.

In March 1997, the government established the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI), an independent regulatory authority with broad regulatory powers over the telecommunications industry in India, including the power to set rates on domestic and international telecommunications services and determine the terms and conditions of interconnect arrangements between service providers. These regulatory powers had previously

12

been vested in the DOT, which controls us and is part of the Ministry of Communications. However, the power to grant, renew or revoke licenses remains with the DOT.

In November 1998, the government of India announced its Internet policy, which aims to increase Internet usage by, among other things, allowing up to 49% foreign ownership of Internet service providers (ISPs) and declaring a license fee moratorium for five years (Currently the foreign ownership limit for ISPs is up to 74% in most cases.)

In March 1999, the government of India announced its New Telecom Policy 1999 which sets forth as one of its central goals the fostering of increased competition in the Indian telecommunications industry and the liberalization of government telecommunications regulation.

Additionally, effective May 1, 1999, the TRAI implemented the 1999 tariff order pursuant to which the TRAI seeks to align tariffs charged by service providers with the corresponding costs associated with such services so as to limit cross-subsidization of services by a provider while allowing providers to set tariffs at any level below certain maximum levels. The TRAI has since adjusted tariffs several times under the tariff order.

In October 1999, the DOT, which had both performed the role of licensor and policy maker for the Ministry of Communications and operated as India’s domestic long distance service provider and basic service provider (except for the areas of Delhi and Mumbai, which are covered by us), was bifurcated into two departments. The DOT/Telecom Commission, or the DOT, now performs the role of licensor and policy maker, and the Department of Telecom Services, functions as the government of India’s local and long distance network service provider. In October 2000, the Department of Telecom Services’ local and long distance business was corporatized into a new company named BSNL. The Indian government has also recently established an independent Information Technology Department within the Ministry of Communications (now formally known as the Ministry of Communications and Information Technology). The IT department will, among other things, promote the Internet, e-commerce and knowledge based industries. Internet licensing functions will remain with the DOT. The DOT controls the equity shares in us that are held by the Indian government and appoints all of the directors on our 12-seat board. Two of our board seats are for DOT officers.

The following chart illustrates the current operational and regulatory structure of India’s telecommunications services industry:

13

In November 2003, the DOT issued guidelines for Unified Access License which cover within a service area both basic telecommunications services and cellular services. In the Indian context, “basic telecommunications services” or “basic services” include basic fixed-lined access service and a number of other telecommunications services, other than long distance services, cellular service and Internet access. Basic services also include CDMA-based fixed wireless and mobile services (without roaming). We have not made a decision as to whether to secure a Unified Access License.  For more information on regulation of the Indian telecommunications industry, see “ - -Telecommunications Regulation in India” below.

14

Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited

Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited is the principal provider of fixed-line and other basic telecommunications services in Delhi and Mumbai. Delhi and Mumbai are two of the largest, most densely populated and wealthiest metropolitan areas in India. At the end of fiscal 2006 our fixed-line telecommunications networks in Delhi and Mumbai had an aggregate of approximately 3.83 million working lines, or access lines in service. In February 2001, we launched our cellular services using global system for mobile communications, or GSM, technology in Delhi and Mumbai and had approximately 1.94 million subscribers as of March 31, 2006. GSM is the European and Asian standard for digital mobile telephone networks. We launched CDMA-based services in 1997, and at the end of fiscal 2006 had approximately 105,665 limited mobile subscribers in Mumbai and Delhi. CDMA is a digital wireless technology that increases network capacity by allowing more than one user to simultaneously occupy a single radio frequency band with reduced interference. We began providing Internet service in both Delhi and Mumbai in February 1999 and had approximately 1.19 million Internet access subscribers at the end of fiscal 2006. We obtained a national long distance license in May 2006 and began to carry our own traffic between Mumbai and Delhi.

We believe that the size of the markets in Delhi and Mumbai, the economic environment, the Indian government’s ongoing liberalization of the telecommunications industry and the low level of penetration of fixed-line, mobile and cellular services in these two areas and the low level of penetration of Internet services in India provide opportunities for future industry growth.

The number of our access lines in service grew at a compound annual growth rate of 22.14% from March 31, 2000 to March 31, 2006. In fiscal 2006 these lines increased by 14.96%, primarily due to cellular services. At March 31, 2006, our network included approximately 1.62 million access lines in service in Delhi and approximately 2.26 million access lines in service in Mumbai. In addition, our access lines in service per employee increased from 66 at March 31, 2000 to 116 at March 31, 2006.

We derive our revenue primarily from local, domestic long distance and international calls that originate on our network. In fiscal 2006, approximately 36% of our revenue was derived from call revenue, 43% from rentals of telephones, access lines and other telecommunications equipment and use of our value-added services and 13% from public call offices. Interconnect revenue, which is revenue derived from other telecommunications service providers for calls made into our network, accounted for 8% of our revenues in fiscal 2006. Local calls are carried on our network, unless the termination point is in the network of one of the cellular operators or one of the new private-sector basic service providers in the locality. We carry our own traffic between Delhi and Mumbai since May 2006. Other domestic long distance calls continue to be passed from our network to the domestic telecommunications network operated by BSNL, although we have entered into interconnect agreements with the new private-sector domestic long distance service providers and intend to pass such domestic long distance calls also through such other providers. In addition, currently all international outgoing calls continue to be passed from our network to international gateways operated by VSNL, India’s former government-controlled international long distance carrier, although we have entered into interconnect agreements with other private-sector international long distance carriers and have plans for joint development with BSNL of submarine cable to connect the east and west coasts of India with Malaysia and the Middle East (and ultimately Europe and the USA).

We expect competition to continue to increase in all major sectors of the Indian telecommunications industry, as both government and private-sector companies continue to invest in capacity expansion and seize opportunities to enter new geographical areas and lines of business. See “— Business Overview—Competition” below.

Our principal executive offices are located at 12th floor, Jeevan Bharati Tower—1, 124 Connaught Circus, New Delhi—110001, India, and our telephone number is +91-11-2374-2212.

Licenses/License Areas

We provide all of our telecommunications services, other than Internet, under a single, general, non-exclusive license. The license initially granted to us in 1986 was effective for a five-year period ended March 31, 1991. The term of the license has been extended for a 25-year period ending March 31, 2013 for basic services.

15

In October 1997, our license was amended to explicitly include cellular services and radio paging, and our license for such additional services currently extends to October 2017. The license is not specific as to the type of cellular technology that we may use. The license covers areas within the territorial jurisdiction of the State of Delhi and the areas covered by the municipalities of Mumbai, Navi Mumbai and Thane. The DOT has extended the scope of our license to allow us to provide cellular services in certain surrounding areas of Delhi and Mumbai covered by other cellular operators in those cities. The license specifies that we may provide local, domestic long distance access (through interconnection with domestic long distance operators) and international long distance access (through interconnection with networks of international long distance operators), as well as telex and leased line services. Specifically, our license permits us to originate, terminate and transit domestic and international long distance calls. However, we believe that our license would need to be amended if we wanted to enter the market for domestic long distance utilizing our network. We expect to be licensed to provide for full international long distance service in the near future.

The DOT retains the right to revoke our license after giving one month’s notice to us. The DOT also retains the right, after giving notice to us, to modify the terms and conditions of our license at any time if in their opinion it is necessary or expedient to do so in the interest of the general public or for the proper operation of the telecommunications sector. A revocation of the license or a change in significant terms of the license, such as its duration, the amount of license fee payable, the range of services permitted and the scope of exclusivity could limit our ability to operate particular lines of our business or result in increased costs in the form of increased license fees or costs associated with applying for new licenses, or contesting limitations on our licenses.

We provide our Internet services in Delhi and Mumbai under separate non-exclusive license agreements. These licenses were granted in November 1998, and currently extend to September 7, 2017. In addition, our wholly owned subsidiary, Millennium Telecom Limited, provides Internet access services throughout India under a license granted in 2000 for an initial period of 15 years.

Delhi. According to the government of India’s provisional 2001 population census data, Delhi had a total population of approximately 12.8 million. In addition to being India’s political capital, Delhi has the highest per capita income of all the states in India. Delhi has a high concentration of service and manufacturing industries and houses the central government, the head offices for many major public sector enterprises, embassies, high commissions and various government missions and development agencies.

Mumbai. The city of Mumbai, the financial capital of India and the capital of the State of Maharashtra, is India’s most populous city, with a population of approximately 16.4 million according to the 2001 census data. Mumbai accounted for 36% of India’s income tax contributions in fiscal 2000.

Strategy

Key elements of our strategy include the following:

·   Expand GSM Cellular and CDMA Mobile Services in Delhi and Mumbai. We launched our cellular services using GSM technology in Delhi and Mumbai in February 2001, currently have an installed capacity of 1,750,000 GSM cellular connections in each of those cities. We believe that current penetration rates in Mumbai and Delhi remain attractive for continued high growth in subscriber base. MTNL this year has floated a tender offer further adding 2 million lines of GSM based on 2G/3G in each of Mumbai and Delhi. In addition, we have launched lower-cost CDMA-based limited mobility mobile services in each of Mumbai and Delhi, currently have 105,665 subscribers and have awarded contracts to achieve an installed capacity of 998,230 CDMA connections (most of which are to employ the more advanced CDMA 2000 1X technology) in each city. We believe that this newlimited mobile service enables us to target a wider customer base that is more price sensitive than GSM customers and that does not require India-wide and international roaming facilities. We intend to compete effectively in these growing markets by providing high quality service at affordable rates.

16

·   Focus on Customer Service. In order to strengthen the loyalty of our customers, attract cellular subscribers and improve our competitive position, we have a program to improve customer service and become more responsive to the needs of our subscribers. We have introduced improved bill collection and payment procedures (including bill payment over the Internet and via credit card), opened Tele-marts at which most subscriber services are available, introduced telephone directories on the Internet and on CD-ROM and implemented a customer service management system. Our customer service management system enables our staff to provide customers with access to a range of “on-line” services, including registration for new telephone lines, changes of address and issuances of bills, and allows us to monitor complaints from a single point of contact. We have identified high usage “commercially important persons” and are employing efforts to strengthen our relationship with these subscribers.

·   Further Develop and Modernize our Network. We intend to continue to invest in expanding and upgrading our network to improve the quality of service. MTNL has floated a tender to add 24K tandem capacity based on NGN - next generation network, in Delhi & Mumbai each. Also, MTNL is installing state of the art IP-MPLS Core in its network so as to give MPLS enabled data service with better quality of service to its esteemed customers. This MPLS core network will also aggregate all the next generation network switching, data broadband and video traffic so as to enable MTNL to have an efficient utilization of its bandwidth. Further, MTNL is replacing its old PDH transmission network with synchronous digital hierarchy technology. MTNL is also planning to introduce DWDM technology to further increase the capacity of our optical fiber in network. We are continuing to implement fiber-in-local-loop and wireless-in-local-loop technologies where appropriate. We have introduced broadband technology based on ADSL2+, capable of providing triple play services (video broadcast, video-on-demand, voice over IP), in a significant way. Through expansion and modernization of our network, we seek to improve the capacity of our network, reduce network failure rates, improve call completion rates and decrease average waiting time for new lines as well as support our Internet and value-added services.

·   Selectively Target International Opportunities. We plan to selectively target expansion opportunities outside India where we can leverage our expertise and relationships. Our Nepal joint venture, United Telecom Limited, in which we hold a 26.7% interest, has commenced wireless in local loop services as the first private-sector telecommunications operator in that country. We have also been awarded licenses to provide basic, mobile and international long distance service in Mauritius. We launched international long distance services in Mauritius in the current fiscal year. We have also launched a fixed wireless service in Mauritius. As of August 31, 2006 we have approximately 10,400 fixed mobile customers and 4700 international long distance customers. We are examining other international opportunities.

·   Enter the Market for International Long Distance Services .We have obtained a letter of intent from the Indian licensor for a license to provide international long distance service. Once the license is received, we will have roll-out obligations requiring rapid deployment, and intend to deploy the services as rapidly as possible. We intend, subject to satisfactory completion of our analyses and Board approval, to lay submarine cable jointly with BSNL from both the east and west coasts of India to Malaysia and the Middle East, respectively, to carry voice and data traffic with the intent to further extend to USA and Europe.

·   Expand Internet Services. We commenced our Internet service provider operations in February 1999 with an initial network capacity to support up to 5,000 subscribers in each of Delhi and Mumbai. As of March 31, 2006, we had approximately 1.19 million Internet access users. We have also started providing high speed internet services on broadband.

·   Enhance Value-added Services. We provide our subscribers with value-added services such as call-waiting, call-forwarding, wake-up calls, absent subscriber service and caller identification at no charge or for a nominal fee. We also provide our Intelligent Network services to subscribers, which include our calling card services, a toll-free calling service, a premium rate “0900” number service and a

17

televoting service. We also provide high speed data transmission services using integrated services digital network technology, which allows simultaneous high speed transmission of voice, data and images. We expect that our value-added service offerings will increase use of our network, enhance overall customer satisfaction and provide new sources of revenue.

MTNL has launched Wi-Fi service and has also floated a tender of Wi Max so as to enable it to give wireless broadband and connectivity to its customers.

MTNL has further added fibre in its access network and is introducing FTTH based on PON so as to provide all of its important customers with fiber connectivity to their homes in order to meet their further increased bandwidth requirement to both data and video applications.

BUSINESS OVERVIEW

Services

Our primary business is providing basic telecommunications services in Delhi and Mumbai, which include:

·   basic fixed-line access (including phone plus facilities) in Mumbai and Delhi;

·   public call offices, which consist of both manned offices where people can make local, long distance and international calls, and coin operated telephone booths;

·   value-added telephone in GSM cellular services such as call-waiting, call-forwarding, wake-up calls, absent subscriber service (informing callers that the subscriber is unavailable) and caller identification, friends & family, night talk, VMS call conference and WAP;

·   phone plus facilities in basic fixed-line such as abbreviated dialing, call transfer, hotline facility, three party conferencing, absentee facility, CLIP facility, call hunting, call alert, morning alarm. These facilities are free;

·   mobile and fixed-wireless services based on CDMA technology;

·   high speed data transmission;

·   interconnection with domestic international long distance carriers and with basic and cellular operators in Delhi and Mumbai;

·   leased line services;

·   telex; and

·   Intelligent Network services.

We also provide:

·   GSM cellular services (including value-added services) in Delhi and Mumbai;

·   Internet access services; and

·   Broadband services.

Basic Access. Our subscribers are provided basic fixed-line access, which consists of installation and provision of basic voice telephony services. Rental charges include maintenance of connections between a

18

subscriber’s premises and our network, 60 pulses of calls per month as well as the use of a basic handset (although subscribers may elect to buy their own handset and have their installation charges reduced accordingly).

Local, Domestic Long Distance and International Calls. We provide local telephone services in Delhi and Mumbai as well as domestic and international long distance through our connectivity with BSNL’s domestic long distance network and VSNL’s international gateways. We carry our own traffic between Delhi and Mumbai since May 2006. We derive revenues from tariffs we collect on local, domestic long distance and international calls that originate on our network. Tariffs, or usage charges, consist of charges for local, domestic long distance and international calls. Usage is measured by pulses, which are time-based units of measure, metered at the relevant exchanges. A set of pulse durations is established for each category of calls (i.e., local, domestic long distance or international long distance), and within each category, pulse durations vary depending on one or more of the following factors: call distance; time of day; type of network on which the call is terminating (i.e., fixed, GSM cellular or CDMA mobile); destination country (for international long distance only); subscriber plan (for local calls only); and whether the call is within a circle or between two different circles (for domestic long distance only). We estimate that, based on recent sample data, local calls constitute approximately 78% of our total pulses, while domestic long distance and international calls constitute approximately 17% and 5% of our pulses, respectively. We are focused on increasing call volumes by promoting use of our value-added services and the use of long distance services. We have received a letter of intent for a license to enter the international long distance service market and intend to launch this service as soon as the license is finalized. We intend, subject to satisfactory completion of our analyses and Board approval, to lay submarine cable jointly with BSNL from both the east and west coasts of India to Malaysia and the Middle East, respectively, to carry voice and data traffic.

Public Call Offices. In addition, we provide both coin-operated and franchised public call offices. At March 31, 2006, public call offices accounted for 4.71% of our total wire lines in service. The coin-operated public call offices offer only local call service, while the franchised public call offices offer local, domestic long distance and international call services. We pay a commission to the franchisees amounting to 40.0% of the tariffs charged by the franchisee on local calls and 20-30% of the tariffs charged by the franchisee on domestic long distance depending on the number of calls per fortnight and international calls. The franchisees charge the same tariffs we do for these services. For coin-operated public call offices, our tariff for local calls is fixed at Rs. 1.0 per pulse, which is lower than our highest rate of Rs.1.20 per pulse charged to our fixed-line customers. We plan to continue to increase the number of public call offices in the future.

Value-Added and Other Services. We provide our subscribers with value-added services such as:

·   call-waiting (for free);

·   voice mail (for free);

·   call-forwarding (for a monthly charge);

·   wake-up calls (for a per-call charge);

·   absent subscriber services (for a monthly charge);

·   caller identification;

·   voice mail (for a monthly charge or per message charge);

·   call conference (for a monthly charge);

·   WAP (for free);

·   friends & family (for a monthly charge or per message); and

·   night talk (for a monthly charge or per message charge)

19

These services are available over approximately 95% of our network. We also earn revenues from:

·   the transfer of registration of a telephone connection from one subscriber to another;

·   shifting a subscriber’s telephone connection upon a change of address;

·   reconnecting a subscriber’s telephone connection that had been disconnected;

·   operator-assisted calls; and

·   directory services on CD-ROM.

We have been introducing our Intelligent Network services over our entire network which, at present, include:

·   calling card services;

·   a toll-free calling service;

·   a premium rate “0900” number service; and

·   a televoting service.

GSM Cellular Services. In February 2001, we launched our cellular mobile services using GSM technology (the European and Asian standard for digital cellular telephony) in Delhi and Mumbai under the brand name Dolphin. In 2002 we introduced our prepaid cellular services under the brand name Trump. As of March 31, 2006 we had 1,941,155 GSM cellular subscribers. We provide national roaming facilities for our GSM cellular customers through the networks of BSNL outside Mumbai and Delhi and international roaming facilities with 45 operators in around 40 countries, and we have established roaming facilities for our customers in a total of around 200 countries. As of March 31, 2006 we had installed networks with a capacity of 1.75 million GSM cellular connections in each of Delhi and Mumbai. MTNL this year has floated a tender offer further adding 2 million lines of GSM based on 2G/3G in each of Mumbai and Delhi .

CDMA Fixed Wireless and Mobile Services. In May 1997, we began implementing wireless-in-local-loop services using CDMA technology for fixed wireless and mobile operations on a commercially experimental basis with a single exchange and capacity for 1,000 subscribers in Delhi. Wireless-in-local-loop services use wireless links from a local exchange in place of conventional cables. Two types of service are provided. One type employs a handset that is fixed to a subscriber’s premises for “fixed wireless” service, while the other employs a mobile telephone for “mobile” or “limited mobility” services.

We have since upgraded our CDMA equipment and receiving stations and, in October 1999, we opened subscriptions for up to an additional 9,000 CDMA mobile and fixed wireless connections in Delhi and dedicated 40% of these connections for fixed wireless. The capacity was subsequently increased to approximately 150,000 lines in each of Delhi and Mumbai. At March 31, 2006, we had approximately 105,665 operational CDMA mobile connections and approximately 26,306 operational fixed wireless connections. We have awarded contracts to expand our CDMA capacity by an additional 400,000 in each of Delhi and Mumbai. These new connections will employ the more advanced CDMA 2000 1X technology, which can provide subscribers high-speed data transmission capabilities and greater access to value-added services. Our CDMA mobile service offers only limited mobility within Delhi and Mumbai, and currently we are not permitted to offer roaming facilities on this service. If we obtain the newly-available Unified Access License we will be able to offer full mobility.

CDMA fixed wireless is a substitute for fixed-line access. Fixed wireless allows us to enhance basic service penetration, provide quicker installation and cover areas where the installation of cable would not be economical.

20

Our CDMA mobile service is marketed under the brand name Garuda. We believe that our GSM cellular and CDMA mobile services businesses currently complement each other more than they conflict with each other. Our GSM cellular subscribers are able to use their mobile phone throughout India and much of Asia and Europe. Our CDMA mobile services are targeted at a different group of subscribers, who seek only limited mobility and few if any value-added services. Because usage charges for CDMA mobile services are generally significantly lower than for GSM services, we believe that our CDMA mobile services allow us to capture the market for subscribers that benefit from limited mobility but that are unwilling or unable to pay the higher GSM fees for wider roaming privileges and access to value-added services.

There is currently a dispute between TRAI and the providers of CDMA fixed wireless service (including us). TRAI is seeking to classify the service as a mobile rather than fixed line service, with the effect of adding charges to the cost of calls, reducing the price advantage that the CDMA service currently offers over the GSM service.

In November 2003, the government issued guidelines for unified access licensing. We have not made a decision as to whether to secure a Unified Access License.

Internet Services. We commenced our Internet service provider operations in February 1999 with initial equipment capacity to support up to 5,000 subscribers in each of Delhi and Mumbai. We experienced significant demand for this service and have since expanded our Internet services capacity to support additional subscribers in each of Delhi and Mumbai. We plan to expand our capacity in each city in fiscal 2006. As of March 31, 2006, we provided our Internet services to a total of approximately 1.19 million subscribers in Delhi and Mumbai.

We also enable our customers to access the Internet without having to subscribe for Internet service. They can access the service and later be billed on the basis of calling line identification usage. The number of customers who use this service is much higher than the number of Internet subscribers we have.

We have formed a subsidiary, Millennium Telecom Limited, which was granted a license to provide Internet access services throughout India for an initial period of 15 years.

High Speed Data Transmission. We provide narrow-band ISDN services that allow subscribers to send high speed data, make telephone calls with high quality voice transmission and hold desktop video conferences over a single line. In the past, the development of independent networks for a variety of services (such as voice, telex, packet-switched data and leased lines) made each of them relatively expensive. ISDN technology allows a wide range of data services to be made available to the subscriber through a single connection and at a reduced cost. We believe these high speed data transmission products will help us to attract high usage subscribers. We introduced narrow-band ISDN services in August 1996, and, at March 31, 2006, we had approximately 14,335 subscribers to this service.

We also offer data communications services through our packet switched data network. This service allows the transmission of data on standard international data protocols and access via dedicated lines or dial-up facilities. We plan to expand broadband services on a large scale, based on the ADSL technology. The services include triple play of video (which we are just beginning to test), data and voice. Further, we plan to commission, an MPLS (Multi Protocol Label Switching) based core network to provide VPN (virtual private network) services to corporate users across the country”. ADSL means asymmetric digital subscriber loop, a technology that allows combinations of services including voice, data technology and one-way full motion video to be compressed and delivered over existing copper cables. We expect to experience significant demand for these high speed data services from large corporate, financial, media, public service and educational institutions. We launched broadband services using ADSL 2+ in January 2005. High speed internet access, video on demand and IPTV services shall be offered to broadband customers. The customer base as on March 31, 2006 is 211,935. The installed capacity to broadband ports as on March 31, 2006 is 458,380. MTNL has plans to install additional 500,000 broadband ports in fiscal 2007.

Additional plans include- deploying broadband DLC 100 each in Delhi and Mumbai in the 2007 fiscal year; deploying FTTH (fiber to the home) in Delhi and Mumbai in the 2007 fiscal year; and deploying DWDM (dense wave division multiplex) system in Delhi and Mumbai.

21

Interconnection. We connect our network with BSNL and have entered into interconnect agreements with certain other licensed domestic long distance service carriers to provide our customers with domestic long distance service and intend to pass traffic to these other providers also (we carry our own traffic between Delhi and Mumbai since May 2006). We connect our network with VSNL and have entered into interconnect agreements with certain other licensed international long distance carriers to provide our customers with international long distance service. We connect our network with the other basic and cellular operators in Mumbai and Delhi to offer our customers comprehensive access in our coverage areas. The terms and conditions of our interconnect arrangements are governed by regulations of the TRAI and interconnect agreements that we have with many of these other operators. The TRAI is also responsible for ensuring technical compatibility among operators. Effective May 1, 2003, under the authority’s interconnection usage charges regulation, interconnect charges have been established for all major types of interconnection based on a “calling party pays” principle. See “—License Fees and Network Utilization/Interconnection Arrangements” and “—Telecommunications Regulation in India.”

Leased Line Services. We provide point-to-point leased line services for local, domestic long distance and international connectivity. Subscribers can use our leased lines to assemble their own private networks between offices within Delhi and Mumbai or together with BSNL, between Delhi and Mumbai and to other Indian cities. Leased line services can be used for voice and data transmission at various bandwidths. In addition, we earn revenues from leasing circuits to cellular operators in Delhi and Mumbai to interconnect their networks to our network. At March 31, 2006, we had approximately 49,685 leased line subscribers. We have experienced increased demand for these services and expect demand to increase further in the near future.

Recently Introduced Services

·   MTNL launched broadband service in ADSL2+ state-of-art technology, capable of providing triple-play services (video broadcast, video-on-demand, VOIP).

·   We have launched a “Certification Authority” business under the brand name “MTNL Trustline” with a capacity to issue 500,000 Certificates. With this, MTNL has become an important public key infrastructure service provider.

·   Wi-fi based [wi-fine] service launched to provide internet connectivity to inaccessible and hot spots in the Delhi area.

·   MTNL expanded its GSM network by 400,000 lines in each city of Delhi and Mumbai.

·   Since May 2006 we carry our own national long distance traffic between Delhi and Mumbai.

Services Under Development. MTNL has set a target to start its international long distance operations this fiscal year with a budgetary support of Rs.300 million. Further, MTNL would be adding one million lines in net switching capacity including capacity for WLL and GSM and 18,000 Kms. of optical fiber in Delhi and Mumbai. MTNL’s other plans include offering corporate networking MPLS-VPN services, setting up 300-seater unified call center and deploy next generation network of 24,000 lines in Delhi and Mumbai each.

We are in the process of installing enhanced billing systems supplied by Covergence.

Telecommunications Services in Other Countries

We are selectively targeting expansion opportunities outside India where we can leverage our expertise and relationships. MTNL is keen in expanding its overseas operations, currently it is in the process of exploring the potential in a few Asian and African countries. United Telecom Limited, a joint venture involving us (26.68%), Telecommunications Consultants India Limited (26.66%), VSNL (26.66%) and Nepal Ventures Private Limited (20%), commenced wireless in local loop services as the first private-sector telecommunications operator in Nepal. We have also been awarded licenses to provide basic and international long distance service as well as mobile services in Mauritius. Through a Mauritius subsidiary, we have begun to offer ILD services and fixed wireless services. We intend to begin the build out of our network there to provide additional services.

22

Tariffs and Other Customer Charges

Fixed-Line Services. Tariffs, or usage charges, consist of charges for local, domestic long distance and international calls. Usage is measured by pulses, which are time-based units of measure, metered at the relevant exchanges. Pulses vary, depending on one or more factors. Local call pulse duration depends upon the type of network on which the call is terminating (i.e., fixed, GSM cellular or CDMA mobile) and the subscriber plan chosen, while domestic long distance call pulse duration depends upon the call distance, time of day, type of network on which the call is terminating and whether the call is within a regional circle or between two circles. International call pulse duration varies depending upon the country of destination. For operator assisted domestic and international calls, a slab system of tariffs applies which differs depending upon the speed at which the call is completed. The subscriber is billed at a fixed price per pulse that depends upon the subscriber plan chosen and usage volume (low usage customers are offered a lower price per pulse). We currently offer several fixed-line plans, tailored to meet the needs of different user profiles. One of the plans is the standard plan, which, under TRAI regulations, we are required to offer all customers and the terms of which the authority establishes.

For fixed-line services, customers also pay access charges consisting of a one-time refundable security deposit, installation charges and monthly subscription/rental charges.

We have adopted a policy not to reduce our basic tariffs and related charges unless in a response to tariff reductions by competitors. However, since the 1999 tariff order, the TRAI has in several stages significantly reduced tariffs on domestic and international long distance calls. Effective July 20, 2002, international long distance call rates were reduced by about 40% and effective October 2, 2004 national long distance call rates were reduced varying up to 60% for various designations Because we retain the remainder of prices of domestic and international long distance calls originating on our network, net of interconnect charges, by lowering long distance rates the tariff reductions have reduced the revenue we receive per call. While these rate reductions have been part of a “rebalancing” effort aimed at reducing cross-subsidization between long distance (historically priced at a premium) and local calls (historically subsidized) by at the same time phasing out subsidization of local calls, the negative impact of the long distance rate reductions have to date outweighed any positive impact of other aspects of the tariff rebalancing effort. Also effective May 1, 2003, as part of its effort to reduce subsidies, the TRAI changed the standard plan that we must offer all customers by increasing monthly rentals for basic services by 12% from Rs. 250 to Rs.280, reduced the local call pulse duration (for calls made to fixed and fixed wireless lines) from three minutes to two minutes and the number of free monthly call pulses.

GSM Cellular Services. We offer our GSM cellular subscribers in Delhi and Mumbai a choice of several plans, tailored to meet the needs of different user profiles. One of the plans is the standard plan, which, under TRAI regulations, we are required to offer all customers and the terms of which the authority establishes. Generally, in addition to call charges for local and long distance calls, our plans include the following types of charges: refundable, non-interest bearing security deposit; installation charges; monthly rental charges; and airtime charges. Effective February 1, 2004, with the adoption by the TRAI of the interconnection usage charge regulation and the “calling party pays” principle, charges for incoming cellular calls (other than any roaming charges) have been eliminated. In addition, we provide the following value-added services free to all our GSM cellular subscribers:

·   roaming between Delhi and Mumbai;

·   call forwarding/divert;

·   call hold;

·   call waiting;

·   caller identification;

23

However, airtime charges on use apply to these services. In addition, we offer our GSM cellular subscribers the following value-added services for a fee.

·   national roaming;

·   WAP (for Rs. 0.80 per minute through circuits switch Data)

·   voice mail (for Rs. 0.50 per minute on message retrieval);

·   Short Message Service;

·   charges for outgoing messages - Rs.0.50.

·   charges for incoming messages - free

·   charges to other Services/National - Rs.1.00 per message

·   charges to other Services/International - Rs.2.50 per message

·   SMS Package (for Rs. 30/- per month and outgoing SMS local mobile no. Rs. 0.10 per message between 10 PM to 10AM)

·   content-based Short Message Service (Rs.1.00 per message for regular service);

·   content-based Short Message Service (Rs.1.00 per message for regular service);

·   call conference (for Rs.50 per month; free for corporate booking);

GPRS & MMS Service

GPRS	Option - I	Option - II	Option - III (Zero Rental)
Activation charges (one time only)	Rs.50/-	Rs.50/-	Rs.50/-
Monthly Rental (Rs)	Rs. 199/- (GPRS only)	Rs. 349/- (GPRS + MMS)	Nil
Free usage up to	50 MB	Unlimited	Nil
Volume based usage charges beyond Free usage (rupees per Kilo Bits)	0.01 per KB	Free	0.02 per KB
MMS
i) P2P (calling party or sender to pay (Rs. Per MMS)	3/-	3/-	3/-
ii) M2P (Down loader to pay)	As per rate fixed by the content provider	As per rate fixed by the content provider	As per rate fixed by the content provider

(i)  Three Optional plans are also available: (i) for local calls to any Cellular numbers (for Rs.49/- per month and charges Rs. 0.60 per minute);

(ii)  Free Number Plan (maximum three Dolphin or Trump nos.) (for Rs.50 per month and local call charges NIL to Free number); and

(iiii)  Night talk Plan Local call to any network (10 p.m. to 9 a.m.) (for Rs.49 per month and local call charges Rs. 0.60).

Itemized bill for Rs.50 per month (free for corporate booking)

In fiscal 2002, we introduced pre-paid GSM cellular services under the brand name “Trump” in Delhi and Mumbai. This market is also highly competitive, with rates changing with market conditions.

MTNL launched “One India Tariff” in January 2006 @Rs. 1.00 per minute for all India on all network. However, calls from fixed line/CDMA to fixed lined/CDMA within own network are @Rs. 1.00 for three minutes.

24

Broadband Service: We started offering Broadband service in January 2005 to subscribers in Delhi and Mumbai with choice of several plans, tailored to meet the needs of different user profiles. Generally, in addition to usage charges for usage and data download, our plans include the following types of charges: non-interest bearing security deposit; installation & testing charges; monthly DSL usage charges, monthly rental for modem, if provided by us.

MTNL implemented Leased line tariff at par with BSNL in May 2005 under revised tariff ceilings prescribed by TRAI.

CDMA Services. For CDMA mobile services, including the use of a CDMA handset, our subscribers are charged a refundable security deposit, a monthly charge and a monthly handset rental, in addition to airtime charges. We have not charged users for incoming calls. We offer our CDMA mobile subscribers a choice of several plans, tailored to meet the needs of different user profiles. Following commissioning in July 2006 of CDMA 20001X system in Mumbai, which has mobility between Mumbai & Navi Mumbai, other value added services are provided such as:

·   SMS: Local Rs.0.40 per message and national Rs. 0.80 per message

·   VMS: Rs. 1.20 per 3 minute

·   Internet Access: Rs. 0.30 per 100 KB

In addition, we provide the following value added services free to all our CDMA subscribers:

·   Call Hunting;

·   Call Waiting;

·   Caller Identification;

·   STD./ISD Dynamic Lock;

·   Call Forwarding;

·   Three-party Conference;

·   Abbreviated Dialing

Other Services

For access to narrow-band ISDN services, we charge our subscribers a monthly rental and no registration fee. Subscribers can also have primary rate access for an initial fee of Rs.15,000. Usage charges for local, domestic long distance and international calls are the same as for the basic fixed-line telephone.

Tariffs charged by public telephone operators for telephone usage are at a fixed rate ofRs.1.00 per pulse, of 60 seconds for local calls and long distance pulse durations varying depending upon the distance.

We do not charge any registration fees for our Internet access services. Our Internet access fees have been falling considerably in response to competitive pressures. Internet users do not have to subscribe for Internet services. They can access the service and later be billed on the basis of calling line identification usage.

Subscribers for point-to-point leased line services are charged an annual fee based on the type of service offered, the distance between the points and the duration of the lease entered into by the subscriber.

25

License Fees and Network Utilization/Interconnection Arrangements

License Fees and Network Utilization Charges. Under our previous arrangement with the DOT, the license fees for providing basic services was fixed at Rs.900 per access line in service. This arrangement expired on March 31, 2000. In the absence of any new arrangement with the DOT, we continued to pay license fees during fiscal 2001 on the same terms as our previous arrangement. On April 9, 2001, the DOT communicated that the annual license fees will be revised and shall be payable at 12% of adjusted gross revenue from basic telephone service effective from August 1, 1999, as applicable to private operators from that date. On September 5, 2001, the DOT amended its position and indicated that the date from which the revised license fees will be payable will be notified later. However, in the absence of an agreement for payment of license fees and any clarification from DOT to date, we have paid license fees on the revised basis communicated by DOT for fiscal 2002 and 2003. Further subsequent to the year ended March 31, 2004, in a meeting held between DOT, BSNL and the Company to resolve the ambiguity with respect to license fees and networking charges it was agreed that the license fees were payable at 12% of AGR and networking charges as per TRAI regulations with effect from August 1, 1999.Also, the revenue sharing percentages earlier agreed to between MTNL and BSNL, other than those governed by TRAI regulations, were revised with retrospective effect. This resulted in an incremental charge of Rs. 3,520 million in the consolidated statements of income on account of license fee and a benefit of Rs 1,515 million on account of networking charges during the year ended March 31, 2004, in respect of periods upto March 31, 2003. Further license fee has been revised at 10% of Adjusted Gross Revenue with effect from April 1, 2004. The license fee for the NLD (national long distance) service license which the company has obtained is 6% of AGR. A license fee on internet services of 6% of AGR is in effect since January 1, 2006.

Cellular License Fees and Spectrum Allocation Charges. Each Indian cellular service provider operating in top-tier circles, including us, currently pays a cellular license fee of 10% of adjusted gross revenues received from its cellular services plus spectrum charges of 2% of adjusted gross revenues for up to 4.4 MHz of spectrum allocation and 3% of adjusted gross revenues for spectrum allocation of up to 6.2 MHz and 4% of Adjusted Gross Revenue for spectrum allocation of up to 8 MHz. License fee has been revised from April 01, 2004 at 10% of adjusted gross revenue.

Unified Access License. In November 2003, the DOT issued guidelines for Unified Access Licenses which cover within a service area both basic telecommunications services and cellular services. In the Indian context, “basic telecommunications services” or “basic services” include basic fixed-lined access service and a number of other telecommunications services, other than long distance services, cellular service and Internet access. Basic services also include CDMA-based fixed wireless and mobile services (without roaming). We have not made a decision as to whether to secure a Unified Access License.

New Interconnection Usage Charges Regulation. Effective May 1, 2003, under the TRAI’s new interconnection usage charges regulation, and further amended and implemented since February 1, 2004, interconnect charges have been established for all major types of interconnection. Under this regulation, we are entitled to specified interconnection revenues with respect to incoming calls from operators that are linked to our network, and are required to make specified payments in respect of outgoing calls from our network into another operator’s network. For this reason, this regulation is said to be based on the “calling party pays” principle. As a result of this regulation, we are accruing interconnect fees payable by BSNL in respect of the domestic long distance calls that come into our network from that company’s network. In addition, as a result of related tariff changes, we no longer charge cellular or CDMA-based mobile users for incoming calls, as we are now entitled to interconnect payments from the caller’s service provider. The terms of all interconnect agreements are subject to the interconnect charges specified in the regulation. The TRAI has issued IUC Regulation (1 of 2005) dated 6th January 2005 and implemented from 1st February 2005. In this IUC amendment, the authority emphasized lower tariffs and linked high sustained subscriber growth. Plans for consistent decline in tariffs to give sustained boost to subscriber growth and teledensity. Methodology of imposing ADC per minute charge kept unchanged. Only the Access Deficit Charge has been changed, ADC on long distance calls & international calls has been reduced. Further, in the amended IUC regulation, BSNL only, and not the other fixed lines operators, will receive ADC on all incoming international calls and outgoing calls from Mobile/WLL (M). The TRAI has issued IUC Regulation (1 of 2006) dated 28th February, 2006 and implemented from 1st March 2006. In this IUC amendment, methodology of imposing ADC per minute charge changed with AGR (adjusted gross revenue) basis @ 1.5%. ADC on international calls has been reduced on the basis of per minute charge in addition to 1.5% of AGR.

26

Network Utilization—Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited. Under our previous arrangement with BSNL, we paid network utilization charges to that company as a fixed percentage of the amount of usage and other charges billed to our customers for our services. Our network utilization arrangement with BSNL expired on March 31, 2001. For fiscal 2002 the interconnection charges on domestic long distance and international long distance calls were accrued on the basis of the rates payable by other basic service operators in the country, and for fiscal 2003 the interconnection charges on domestic long distance calls were again accrued on the basis of the rates payable by the other basic service operators in the country. Since beginning of fiscal 2003, we have been accruing international long distance calls on the basis of interconnect agreements that we signed with VSNL and others. Since the beginning of fiscal 2004, the Telecommunication Interconnect Usage Charges (IUC) Regulation (2 of 2003) 2003 covers arrangements among Service Providers for Payment of Interconnection Usage Charges for Telecommunication Services, Covering Basic Service which includes WLL(M) Services, Cellular Mobile Service Providers and Long Distance Operators throughout the territory of India. The IUC Regulation (1 of 2005) effective from 1st February 2005 has only reduced the ADC on Domestic Long Distance calls and International calls keeping all other components of IUC unchanged. Further the ADC on incoming terminating calls on fixed network from mobiles and international long distance has also been made payable to BSNL only.

We are in the process of negotiating network utilization and domestic long distance agreements with BSNL. We are responsible for collecting payments for calls from our subscribers and bear the risk of non-collection of these charges. Until the May 1, 2003 effectiveness of the interconnection usage charges regulation, we did not receive any payments for calls coming into our network from BSNL’s network. We have also signed interconnect agreements with several private-sector domestic long distance service providers, but to date still rely on BSNL for substantially all of our domestic long distance interconnection. BSNL has also established its Trunk Automatic Exchanges (TAXs) at Delhi and Mumbai. All the other private operators of Delhi and Mumbai have established interconnection with these TAXs and consequently MTNL has stopped transiting their long distance calls to minimize the risk of bad debts.

International Long Distance Interconnect Arrangements. Although we have signed interconnect agreements with several international long distance carriers, we continue to rely on VSNL for substantially all of our outgoing international long distance traffic.

Interconnect Arrangements with Other Cellular and Basic Service Providers in Mumbai and Delhi. We have entered into interconnect agreements with the other cellular, Unified Access and basic service providers in Mumbai and Delhi to formalize our network integration with them. In addition to usage-based interconnect charges, each cellular/unified/basic service operator in Delhi and Mumbai pays us an annual fee for lines leased from us to connect to our network.For the establishment of interconnection between operators, a model Reference Interconnect Offer (RIO) was circulated by TRAI asking BSNL, MTNL to frame their own interconnect offer which was proposed to be signed with other operators for establishing new interconnections. Several changes were desired by TRAI in the Interconnect Offer document of BSNL, MTNL and both the operators challenged the proposed changes in TDSAT. As per directions of TDSAT, several rounds of talks were held by TRAI with MTNL and BSNL and most of the issues were resolved. TDSAT has now given judgment and accordingly MTNL has posted its interconnect offer on the website incorporating the changes already agreed with TRAI during discussions.

Customers and Customer Service. We classify our subscribers by use level and estimate that in the last three months of fiscal 2006, approximately 18.39% of our access lines in service accounted for 62.52% of our call units. The following table sets forth certain information with respect to our subscribers for the final three months of fiscal 2006:

27

	Average number of subscribers per segment as a percentage of total subscribers	Average call units per segment as a percentage of all metered calls
Subscriber segments
(use of pulses on a bi-monthly basis)
0-100	25.43	0.80
101-500	36.36	15.73
501-1,000	19.81	20.94
1,001-2,000	12.01	24.68
2,001-5,000	5.38	23.32
Greater than 5,000	1.01	14.53

Our general marketing strategy is to stimulate demand for telephone services in order to increase average usage and revenue per line in service. We have identified high usage subscribers as “commercially important persons” and are taking initiatives to strengthen our relationship with these individuals. These initiatives include regular visits and conducting surveys to obtain feedback and determine client-specific needs and introduce value-added services tailored to commercially important persons. Also, in certain areas we have constructed a digital local loop network with better quality transmission dedicated for use by commercially important persons. Some of the commercially important persons are also being connected to our network via fiber-in-local-loop technology. We also use print advertising to educate the general public about our telephone services and other value-added services.

No single subscriber accounted for more than 5% of our revenues in fiscal 2004, 2005 or 2006. Government of India entities in the aggregate constitute the largest user of our services. We deal, however, with the various departments and agencies of the government of India as separate subscribers and the provision of services to any one department or agency does not constitute a material part of our revenue.

Our subscribers are billed by mail or courier once every billing period. Subscribers with access to long distance service are billed monthly; subscribers with access to local services only are billed bi-monthly. We have introduced four billing cycles in respect of each billing period which enables us to bill different subscribers at different times in the billing period. Cycle billing reduces the burden on the billing system at any particular time of the month and provides more consistent cash flow.

Billing is computerized and processing takes place at decentralized bill processing facilities in Delhi and Mumbai for ease of operation and better handling of customer complaints. A subscriber can inquire by an automated telephone service or at one of our customer service centers to determine the amount of his bill. Payment may be made by mail or at a collection center such as a national bank, a customer service center. Payments may also be made under our voluntary deposit scheme, where customers set up an interest bearing deposit with us, or under our electronic clearance system, where payment is directly debited from the subscriber’s bank account. We have also introduced a program through which subscribers can pay bills through the Internet or at any of our Tele-mart centers. We allow subscribers to pay bills using a credit card and at the post office, and plan to allow subscribers to pay bills at local merchants and through other mechanisms to improve bill collection and remittance. MTNL has also introduced a loyalty scheme where incentive points are earned by its customers for redemption against assured gifts.

We have developed our billing system jointly with Tata Consultancy Services in Delhi and Mumbai. This billing system is a part of a customized software program known as a “customer service management system.” The billing system is an integrated revenue billing system, which includes pre-connection and post-connection services, accounting, billing collection and access to subscriber records. Other benefits of this system are one point data capture for all subscribers, increased efficiency and reduction of lead time to process queries. This system enables our staff to handle, at a single point of contact, various activities “on-line such as registration of a new telephone connection, change of address and category, issuance of work orders, issuance of duplicate bills, requests for transfer of telephone for domestic long distance and international connectivity, collection of payments of bills, status of outstanding bills, and monitoring of subscriber complaints.

Payment is due within 21 days from the date of issue of the bill. If the charges are not paid on time, we generally give a reminder by telephone after the due date, cut off all services after 35 days from the date of issue of the bill. Subscribers with large amounts overdue may have their telecommunications services terminated earlier. Subscribers are charged a surcharge on amounts overdue after 21 days (with maximum surcharge being Rs.4,000) and a reinstatement fee of Rs.100.

We provide operator assisted services, including value-added products such as wake-up calls, as well as operator connected and reverse charge calls to all of our subscribers. In addition, we provide free operator assisted directory services. Our strategy is to continue to enhance the level of subscriber satisfaction by increasing access to

28

operators and improving the quality of subscriber interface, while also improving operational efficiency and productivity. In March 1999, we published a Delhi directory, and we published a Mumbai directory in February 2000. Both of these directories are available free of charge on our website. We have recently introduced directory information on CD-ROMs, which are available for Rs.50 each, as well as an on-line directory inquiry service which is available to telephone users with personal computers and communication software.

In order to address subscriber disputes more quickly, we regularly hold telephone “adalats,” or courts. These adalats are presided over by our senior management and, although their judgments are non-binding, we have resolved a large number of disputes at these adalats. We also hold “open house” sessions to obtain feedback from subscribers, enabling us to take steps to improve customer service. Our service centers also provide various types of services such as registration for new connections, shifting telephone connections, billing information and collection of bill payments. We have customer service centers in many locations in both Delhi and in Mumbai. Generally, three to five employees provide these services in each center.

Insurance

We maintain comprehensive insurance for our assets, primarily buildings and equipment and the market value of our inventories. Our insurance is held under policies, which are renewable annually. The majority of our insurance policies are renewed in April of each year. We do not anticipate having any difficulty in renewing our insurance policies and believe our insurance coverage is reasonable and consistent with industry standards in India.

Competition

One of the primary objectives of the 1999 telecom policy is to encourage competition within India’s telecommunications industry. Accordingly, we will encounter increased competition in each of our markets as existing and additional service providers actively seek to penetrate these markets through the introduction of high quality products and services.

The 1999 telecom policy allows the DOT to license, at its discretion, multiple additional basic and cellular service providers in any service area. Under a Unified Access Service License, such competitors as Reliance Infocom, Bharti Airtel, Tata Teleservices Limited, etc., are currently competing with us in the market for basic services in both Mumbai and Delhi. All of these companies already have significant telecommunications infrastructure in Delhi and Mumbai, including, with respect to Tata Teleservices and Reliance Infocom, low-cost CDMA mobile and fixed wireless technology. With approximately 62.52% of our call units having been derived from approximately 18.39% of our access lines in service (last three months of fiscal 2006), we are particularly vulnerable to losing market share if these or other new operators aggressively target our largest subscribers.

We experience significant competition in the market for GSM cellular services. As of March 2006 we had approximately 16.3% and 18% of the mobile subscribers in Delhi and in Mumbai respectively. Our largest competitors in Delhi are Bharti AirTel, Idea Cellular and Hutchinson Essar (Hutch). In Mumbai, BPL Mobile acquired by Hutchinson and Bharti (AirTel) have the largest share in the market. Cellular operators also face significant competition from rapidly growing CDMA-based mobile services, which are priced considerably lower than GSM cellular services.

We commenced providing our Internet services in Delhi and Mumbai in February 1999. The competition among Internet service providers throughout India is intense with approximately 395 licenses for providing Internet services issued as of January 31, 2006.

There has been significant consolidation in the telecommunications industry in India. For example, the Birla Group, the Tata Group and AT&T have combined their interests in GSM cellular operators into one business, and the Tata Group, which controls Tata Teleservices, acquired a controlling interest in India’s dominant international long distance carrier, VSNL, and Tata Teleservices has acquired Hughes Tele.com, a basic service provider in Mumbai. We expect the trend toward consolidation to continue, resulting in larger, more diversified competitors in the Indian market. Hutch has acquired BPL, another one of the telecom operators in India; however, this takeover is disputed in Court.

29

Our revenues from international calls are adversely affected by competition from “call-back” services. Call-back services were officially declared illegal by the Ministry of Communications in July 1995. Nevertheless, the volume of international calls made from India through call-back services has continued to grow.

We have also applied for a license to enter the international long distance business and the licensor has acted by issuing us a letter of intent to license us for that service. In consultation with DOT, Millenium Telecom Limited (MTL), a subsidiary of MTNL, has been entrusted with the work of laying international under-sea cables for use by both the PSUs, viz. MTNL and BSNL with joint ownership of MTL. We intend, subject to satisfactory completion of our analyses and Board approval, to lay submarine cable jointly with BSNL from both the east and west coasts of India to Malaysia and the Middle East, respectively, to carry voice and data traffic.

Increased competition has kept and will likely continue to keep downward pressure on prices and has required and will likely continue to require us to increase our capital investment to improve and expand our services. These developments, in turn, have had and may continue to have a negative impact on our profitability. In the tariff order, no minimum tariff levels are specified and service providers have the flexibility to determine the tariff below the maximum levels. Our board of directors has determined not to reduce fixed line tariffs unless such a reduction is in response to a tariff reduction by a competitor. However, the TRAI may prescribe minimum tariffs or prohibit providers from reducing tariffs in response to competition. Additionally, the tariff order prescribes tariffs based on the estimated cost to provide particular services. These estimates and corresponding tariffs may not accurately reflect our actual costs.

In order to compete with other basic and cellular operators and Internet service providers, we are increasingly focused on the timely introduction of new and improved products and services and pay increased attention to customer service. An inability to compete effectively would also damage our longer-term business prospects through loss of customers and market share.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Except as described below and except with respect to regulatory proceedings described elsewhere, we are not currently a party to any material legal or arbitration proceedings or disputes.

Deductibility of License Fees

The Central Income Tax Authority of India (“CIT”) had historically disallowed the license fee paid by the Company to DOT for the years ended March 31, 1994 till March 31, 2005 as a tax deductible expense and had raised a demand for payment of taxes on increased taxable income relating to such expenses. These demands had been contested by the Company. As part of the appeals process, the Company had paid deposits under protest, amounting to Rs 13,427 million as of March 31, 2005. These deposits have been classified as part of restricted assets on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets

During the year ended March 31, 2005, the Company had obtained favorable decisions from the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (“ITAT”) with respect to the license fee disallowed for the assessment years 1997-98 and 2001-2002. Further in respect of assessment years 1995-96 and 1996-97, the Committee of Disputes (“COD”), on the recommendations of the Ministry of Law, decided not to give clearance to either the Central Board of Direct Taxes or the Company to file appeals in the Hon’able High Court, making the decision of the ITAT binding on both the parties. Subsequent to the COD’s decision, the Company has applied to ITAT to restore the appeal and decide in favor of the Company.

During the current year ended March 31, 2006, based on the judgments passed in the previous years, ITAT has allowed deduction of license fees as a tax deductible item for assessment years 1998-99 to 2000-01 and 2002-03. License fees have also been allowed as a deduction by CIT (A) for assessment year 2004-05. Management believes that ITAT following its favourable judgments of earlier years will eventually decide in favour of the Company for the years in dispute. Based on the above stated favourable Orders, the Company has not accrued the tax charge on the license fee in the financial statements. The Company will receive interest on deposits paid under protest to the tax authorities and the refunds against the years decided in favour of the Company. In the absence of detailed

30

calculations from the ITAT the refunds and the interest thereon have not been recognized in the statement of income for the year ended March 31, 2006.

Sales Tax

The Company has received a demand to pay sales tax in respect of certain historical telecommunications revenues, mainly telephone rental charges. The Company has received a demand from the state government of Maharashtra, of which Mumbai is a part, for payment of Rs. 3.2 billion in sales tax for fiscal 1989-2000. Further MTNL has also received notice from the Delhi state government seeking further information in aid of an investigation into whether a similar demand should be made upon the Company. The amount at issue in Delhi is significantly less. In furtherance of the notice issued by the Delhi government for payment of sales tax on certain telecommunications devices, the matter was taken up in the apex court to decide the question of legal validity of such attempts by the Delhi government in matters which are under the jurisdiction of central government and for which license was issued by the Government of India. In view of this, no demand or order has been passed by the Delhi tax department.

The department made these demands based on a recent case involving the Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Department (UPTTD) and the DOT, wherein the Supreme Court of India ruled that a telephone connection along with a telephone set provided by a company rendering basic services amounts to a "transfer of right to use the telephone system" and the rentals collected by DOT towards this right to use should suffer sales tax. Subsequent to the passing of this order, both the cellular and basic operators filed a petition before the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution in respect of the above. The Hon’ble Supreme Court admitted the Petitions, in spite of its own judgment, and vide orders dated September 25, 2003 referred the matter to a larger bench for determination of dispute on merits and further directed that in future there shall be no coercion for recovery of any dues. The Hon’ble Supreme Court further directed that the operators should file statutory appeals against the assessment orders for assessments already completed as on September 25, 2003. Following the Supreme Court order in the UPTTD case the sales tax departments across the country, have raised demands on basic and cellular mobile operators.

MTNL has challenged the demands raised before the respective high courts and the Company has been granted interim stays against enforcement of the demands. However this stay order is subject to the outcome of the Supreme Court judgment on the issue. During the year ended March 31, 2006, the Supreme Court of India has concluded in the BSNL Vs Union of India case that rendering basic services does not amount to a "transfer of right to use the telephone system". Hence the imposition of the sales tax on any facility of the telecommunication services is untenable in law. Based on opinion received from legal counsel and drawing reference to the judgment of the Supreme Court of India in the abovementioned case, management believes that the sales tax departments would have to withdraw their demands of sales tax on basic telephony and that an adverse outcome in respect of the above is remote.

Disputes with BSNL

In accordance with the Inter Connect Usages Regulations, the Company has accounted for networking charges payable to BSNL amounting to Rs.6,924 million and Rs. 3,627 million for the years ended March 31, 2004 and 2005 respectively (also refer note 4). However BSNL had raised a bill for the interconnection charges for the calls originating from MTNL’s network and terminating/transiting at/from BSNL amounting to Rs.12,165 million and Rs. 8,030 million for the years ended March 31, 2004 and 2005 respectively. The Company’s contention was that the claim was not adequately supported by BSNL and hence not accepted by the Company.

In the absence of an interconnection agreement, MTNL had provided NLD/ILD access charges for the period ended March 31, 2002 at the rates lower than those demanded by BSNL . Subsequent to the year ended March 31, 2004, in a meeting held between DOT, BSNL and the Company the rates for NLD calls for the year ended March 31, 2002 were agreed and accordingly the Company has accounted additional liability of Rs. 233 million during the year ended March 31, 2004. The Company may be required to pay ILD access charges amounting to Rs. 195 million for the period April 1, 2001 to January 31, 2002 on the settlement of the dispute with BSNL in this regard.

31

During the year ended March 31, 2006, the DOT had constituted a three member committee from its Telecommunications Department comprising the Member (Production), Member (Finance), and Deputy Director General (Business Solution)to resolve the issues relating to networking charges. Based on the recommendations of the Committee vide their minutes dated January 2006, the networking charges payable to BSNL for the years March 31, 2004 and March 31, 2005 have been settled at Rs.14,078 million as against Rs.10,551 million. Further, the Committee has also settled networking charges for the years 2000 to 2003 in the meeting held in January 2006. Accordingly, an amount of Rs. 3,809 million (including the incremental charge of Rs. 3,527 million for the years 2004 and 2005) has been accounted as networking charges in the statement of operations for the year ended March 31, 2006.

Subsequent to the year end March 31, 2006, meetings have been held between BSNL and MTNL wherein BSNL has raised additional claims for the year upto March 31, 2005 aggregating Rs.2,678 million and claims amounting to Rs.5,256 million for the year ended March 31, 2006 on account of networking and others charges. As against these claim for the year ended March 31, 2006 the Company has accounted Rs. 4,040 million for networking charges payable to BSNL.

The Company’s contention is that since all claims relating to networking and other charges for the period upto March 31, 2005 have already been settled in accordance with the minutes of DOT committee held on January 2006 and the claims for the year ended March 31, 2006, are not adequately supported by the BSNL and hence not accepted by the Company. Further, as the Company is in the process of discussing/reconciling their claims for the year ended March 31,2006 with BSNL and may be required to pay an additional amount based on the final settlement, however such payments will not have a material adverse effect upon the Company’s results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. Management believes that an adverse outcome in respect of the above is not probable.

During the year ended March 31, 2006, MTNL has raised claims on BSNL for duct charges, TAX claims and reciprocal service claims amounting to Rs.2,116 million, Rs.2,482 million and Rs.320 million respectively. The duct charges pertain to annual usage of infrastructure (ducts) for the period October 1, 2000 to March 31, 2006, the TAX claims pertain to the Company’s Trunk Automatic Exchange (“TAX”) used by BSNL for the period from February 1, 2004 to March 31, 2006 and the reciprocal service claims are on account of Reciprocal Service Connections provided to BSNL employees. Management has not recognized these claims as income in the statement of operations considering the history of other disputed claims with BSNL the fact that currently there is no separate agreement for these services, and that BSNL has not accepted these claims.

32

Disputes with DOT

On the formation of the Company, employees were deputed to MTNL on deemed deputation status from DOT and the Company was required to contribute for the Leave Salary and Pension Contribution (“LSPC”) as per the rates prescribed by the Government (11% for leave salary and 14% for pension contribution). The Company had accrued for these expenses amounting to Rs 2,884.74 million for the period 1986 to 1998 and subsequently paid them to DOT.

During the year ended March 31, 2006, a Committee was set up to examine the amount of LSPC contributions payable by MTNL to DOT. The Committee concluded that an additional amount of Rs.656 million was payable on account of short payment of the LSPC contribution and an amount of Rs.1,738 million is payable on account of interest payable on delayed payment of the LSPC contributions. The Company has accepted the claim of DOT for Rs.656 million and has expensed it in its statement of income for the year ended March 31, 2006. In respect of Rs.1,738 million, the Company has contested the claim from DOT on the contention the MTNL has abided by DOT’s decision at all stages and deposited substantial sums as required. Management believes that an adverse outcome in respect of the above is not probable.

Other Disputes

In 1998, M&N Publication made claims for Rs. 5,415 million against the Company. These claims arise out of contracts for the printing of telephone directories for Delhi and Mumbai. Each of these claims includes claims for loss of reputation and loss of business opportunities aggregating Rs. 2,000 million. The Company has made claims of Rs. 4,169 million against M&N Publications for failure to perform the contracts. These claims are pending before a sole arbitrator. The Company believes that it has valid defenses to these claims and based on opinion received from legal counsel, management believes that an adverse outcome is not probable.

In the year 2004-2005, Alcatel brought claims aggregating to Rs. 121.21 million (including interest from 1997 till date on the claims made Rs 79.91 million) against the Company. These claims arise out of contract for supply of digital local telephone exchange equipment. These claims include claims for loss of reputation and loss of business opportunity aggregating to Rs. 20 million. The Company believes it has a valid defense to these claims and based on opinion received from legal counsel, management believes that an adverse outcome is not probable.

The Company has received claims aggregating Rs. 308.6 million (March 2005 Rs. 279 million) from various PRM service providers (World Phone, Voice Infotech and ITC). These claims arise from the contract for PRM services which were started in the year 1999-2000. MTNL has not paid commission payable for these services to these providers as the amount was subsequently not recovered from the subscribers. The claims include Rs. 119 million towards loss of profit and wasteful expenditure incurred by the parties. The Company believes it has a valid defense against these claims and based on opinion received from legal counsel, management believes that an adverse outcome is not probable.

The Company has received claims from CMC limited aggregating to Rs.40 million and Rs.452.52 million as of March 31, 2005 and 2006 respectively (including interest arising during the course of proceedings amounting to Rs.157 million). These claims arise out of usage of leased circuits for which MTNL has charged them rental for CUG services as per the revised tariff plan which is disputed by CMC Limited. These claims include claims for loss of reputation, business opportunity and undue harassment aggregating Rs.220 million. The Company believes it has a valid defense to these claims and based on opinion received from legal counsel, management believes that an adverse outcome is not probable. .

Additionally the Company is also involved in law suits and claims amounting to Rs.1,190 million pending at various authorities which arise in the ordinary course of the business. Management believes that it has a valid defense against these claims and an adverse outcome is not probable. These would not have a material adverse effect upon the Company’s results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

33

Dispute with Other Operator

During the year ended March 31, 2005, MTNL noticed that a very large number of calls were received from certain levels of another operator’s network. On further investigation/analysis, it came to the Company’s notice that these were actually ILD calls, which were being received on Local/NLD trunks and that the CLIs (Caller line Identification) of these calls had been tampered by the other operator. MTNL raised a demand on the other operator based on the relevant penal clauses of its agreement aggregating Rs.3,412 million for a period of six months beginning April 2004. The other operator has disputed the above claim and under repeated threats of disconnection, obtained a stay order from High Court of Delhi. In the year ended March 31, 2005 during the course of the hearings, the honorable High Court directed the other operator to pay Rs.2,368 million to MTNL. During the year ended March 31, 2006, the other operator under directions from the High Court has further deposited Rs.1,040 millon with MTNL. Management believes that it is remote that it will have to refund these amounts; however, pending the final resolution from a court of law these amounts have not been recognized as income.

ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

We are controlled by the Indian government and are not part of any group.

We have no subsidiaries, which are considered “significant subsidiaries”.

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Infrastructure

We believe that we have created one of the most technologically advanced networks in India. Our network capacity has grown rapidly in the ten-year period ended March 31, 2006 by 3.878 million additional access lines in service.

We operate entirely separate but similar networks in each of Delhi and Mumbai. Each network comprises a switching and transmission network, which we refer to as our “switching network” and a local loop network. The local loop network principally consists of copper wire based lines, connecting subscribers to the main exchanges or the remote line units. A number of subscribers are connected to the switching network via fiber-optic cable and wireless-in-local-loop technology. The switching network includes the trunk automatic exchanges, which are used for routing domestic long distance and international calls, the main switching exchanges, through which all calls are routed, and remote line units, which are connected to the main exchanges. The local loop network comprises all connections between the main exchanges or the remote line units and the subscriber. Subscribers are either connected directly to the main exchanges or, depending upon the distance from the main exchanges, via remote line units. All domestic long distance traffic, including traffic between Delhi and Mumbai, is routed through BSNL’s network.

Switching Equipment

All of our exchanges are fully automated and our switching capacity is 100% digital. Our switching network consisted of 336 nodes in Delhi and 193 nodes in Mumbai as of March 31, 2006. Each node consists of either one or more remote line units or exchanges, or a combination of the two. Each node has a capacity of between 1,000 and 100,000 lines.

At March 31, 2006, there were 93 main exchanges and 243 remote line units in Delhi and 85 main exchanges and 108 remote line units in Mumbai. Because one or more main exchanges in each node are connected

34

to one or more main exchanges in every other node, traffic is routed in a “mesh” configuration. We have also installed high capacity tandem switches in Delhi and Mumbai to more efficiently route traffic between exchanges. A majority of calls to our main exchanges are now being routed through the tandem switch to another node. This has resulted in a more integrated network and has reduced the amount of capital expenditure required to install additional capacity in our switching network.

Each node is connected to each trunk automatic exchange. Interconnection to basic service providers, private cellular operators and Internet service providers is provided by dedicated access to the main exchanges or tandem switches. Our entire switching network is connected by fiber optic links.

Overview of Our Network

	At March 31,
	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006
Delhi
Access lines in service (access lines in service) (thousands)	2,065	2,155	2,003	1,719	1,621
Equipped capacity (thousands) (1)	2,775	2,967	3,154	3,737	4,219
Number of exchanges:
TAXs (2)	3	4	4	4	4
Main exchanges and RLUs (3)	251	309	329	339	336
Digital lines (thousands) (1)	2,775	2,967	3,154	3,737	4,219
Digitalization rate (4)	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
Mumbai
Access lines in service (access lines in service) (thousands)	2,431	2,445	2,408	2,355	2,256
Equipped capacity (thousands) (1)	2,876	2,886	2,806	3,657	4,217
Number of exchanges:
TAXs (2)	4	4	4	4	4
Main exchanges and RLUs (3)	180	183	183	183	193
Digital lines (in thousands) (1)	2,876	2,886	2,806	3,657	4,217
Digitalization rate (4)	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%

(1) Represents lines that are connected to digital switches.

(2) TAX means trunk automatic exchange, a switch that routes calls to BSNL’s domestic fixed-line network and VSNL’s international gateways.

(3) RLU means remote line units, which are switches that connect a subscriber to the main exchange.

(4) Percentage of total equipped capacity that consists of digital lines.

Our modernization and expansion program has been funded primarily from cash flow from operations.

Transmission

Our transmission network consists largely of plesiochronous digital hierarchy, or PDH, and synchronous digital hierarchy, or SDH, optical fiber. PDH and SDH are transmission standards for digital signal transmission. We plan to continue to deploy SDH optical fiber and synchronous transfer mode terminals to improve network efficiency. We also plan to deploy wave length division multiplexing, or WDM, technology to further increase the capacity of our transmission network. WDM is the next generation standard for digital signal transmission.

Access Network

We construct our access network with copper cable, which is extended to distribution points to terminate connections. We have commenced deploying five pair underground cable into subscribers’ premises where an internal distribution point is installed. We believe this access network will reduce the number of telephone poles and improve reliability of the service.

35

We have also implemented fiber-to-the-curb/building access and offer increased bandwidth for business and high usage subscribers. Fiber-to-the-curb/building is also intended to supplement existing copper wire with optic fiber. We have provided digital loop carriers, or DLCs, for this purpose. In fiscal 2006, we added 48 access terminals in our network.

We have installed wireless-in-local-loop services using CDMA technology where feasible in Delhi and Mumbai as a substitute for fixed-line access to enhance basic service penetration, provide quicker installation and cover areas where the installation of cable would not be economical.

Quality of Our Network

We are conducting an ongoing program to improve the quality of services offered. Our principal quality measures are call completion rate and fault rate. The table below shows the quality improvements we have made since our inception in 1986. We achieved this primarily by focusing on improvements to our switching network. Part of our local loop network is comprised of old paper core copper cables, which are a principal cause of network faults. We are in the process of upgrading and replacing copper access lines and believe that this will have a positive impact on call completion rates and fault rates.

	Year Ended March 31,
	1986	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006
	(inception)
Fault rate/100 (1) Telephones/month:
Delhi	34.9	21.4	18.7	12.3	11.1	10.7
Mumbai	21.2	11.80	9.8	8.8	9.0	8.4
Call completion rate (2)
Delhi
Local calls	77.3%	51.0	52.25	57.0	57.6	47.3
Domestic long distance calls	30.0%	41.07	28.0	28.0	30.0	33.6
Mumbai
Local calls	93.0%	58.15	58.0	50..3	58.3	55.1
Domestic long distance calls	23.9%	45.9	33.94	36.6	37.4	36..6

(1) The fault rate is calculated by dividing the total number of verified customer complaints of malfunctioning telephone equipment and services by the total number of access lines in service and multiplying the result by 100.

(2) For dates covering years after 1986, the call completion rate was measured on the basis of actual calls completed. Call completion rates measured on this basis are lower than if measured on a free-to-free test basis since calls that are not answered because the recipient’s line is engaged or where the network cannot complete the call because of congestion are deemed incomplete. Call completion rates measured on different bases are not comparable.

Suppliers

In carrying out our development program, we have used a core group of international equipment suppliers to purchase key switching equipment in order to maintain technological compatibility while simultaneously decreasing dependence on any one vendor. We believe that we have developed stable relationships with our suppliers.

Development Activities

Development activities are carried out by a planning group in each of the Delhi and Mumbai operations, with overall planning activity coordinated at the corporate office in Delhi. The main focus of each planning group is the expansion of existing services, the development of new services and the introduction of new technologies that are tested for their reliability, compliance with internal and DOT technical specifications and compatibility with our network.

36

GSM Cellular and CDMA Networks

In order to build out our GSM cellular service infrastructure, we have purchased, on an installed turn-key basis, mobile switching centers and mobile base stations. We have had to upgrade and modify our customer service and support operations to support these services and have incurred additional costs in the form of rent for the placement of base stations, employee training expenses and other operating and installation costs. In fiscal 2006, we have installed infrastructure providing for an additional 200,000 GSM cellular connections in each of Mumbai and Delhi, to be deployed upon completion of testing.

We have similarly built out our CDMA network through purchases, on an installed turn-key basis, of wireless base stations and associated network elements. We have incurred other expenditures related to the establishment and operation of our CDMA wireless in local loop network. We have awarded contracts for infrastructure providing for an additional 400,000 connections in each of Mumbai and Delhi employing the more advanced CDMA 2000 1X technology, which can provide subscribers high-speed data transmission capabilities and greater access to value-added services. We are expecting deployment of these connections by December 2005. Our CDMA network supports both CDMA fixed wireless services and CDMA mobile services, and a CDMA connection can be employed for either service.

Network Modernization

We have historically planned our capital expenditures on five-year programs that are subject to approval by the DOT and the Planning Commission of the Indian government. The Ninth MTNL Plan was the five-year investment plan covering the period from April 1, 1997 to March 31, 2002, and the Tenth MTNL Plan covers the five-year period from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2007. Generally, five-year plan investment targets are much higher than actual investment levels. Additionally, rapid changes in communications technology and customer preferences render detailed investment planning for five years impossible.

Our current estimate for capital expenditures for fiscal 2007 is 22,980 million Rs.; however, based on our experience in past years, we expect that the actual amount of capital expenditures for the year will be less than our estimate.

The following table shows our network-related capital expenditures for the periods indicated.

	(Rs. in millions) Year Ended March 31,
		2004	2005	2006
Local switching and access lines (including CDMA)/ Transmission/Network Modernization/Expansion Abroad		7,227	5,748	4,241
Information technology		98	426	124
Land, buildings and vehicles		1,511	1,143	881
Build-out of GSM cellular networks		824	3,068	1,608
Total		9,660	10,385	6,854

We have funded our recent capital expenditures to the extent incurred, and intend to fund the remaining capital expenditures, primarily from cash flow from operations and existing cash balances. Our capital expenditures may be higher as we introduce international long distance service, if demand for our GSM cellular service or CDMA-based mobile service is higher than anticipated or if we otherwise enter new markets or provide additional services.

Properties

Our principal executive offices are located in Delhi and are leased from the Life Insurance Corporation of India. We have interests in various properties in Delhi and Mumbai that consist of land and buildings for offices, administrative centers and technical facilities. We believe that all of our owned and leased properties are well maintained and adequate for their present use.

37

In 1987, the assets and properties of the DOT located in Delhi and Mumbai were transferred to us by an order of the government of India and a deed of sale. Indian law generally requires that to perfect the transfer or lease of real property, the transfer should be evidenced by a formal duly stamped deed of transfer and registered with the Central Land Registrar within a specified period after the execution of the deed of transfer or lease. A formal transfer deed for real property of the DOT transferred by the government of India to us has been executed but has not been registered with the appropriate authorities. The formal transfer deed and the physical delivery of possession of the DOT’s non-real estate assets has resulted in the transfer of these non-real estate assets of the DOT to us in Delhi and Mumbai. We believe that our use of these properties is not affected by the fact that this deed has not been registered with the appropriate authorities.

Indian law requires payment of stamp duty (at rates which vary among states) on instruments, which effect transfer of title to real estate or in respect of leases of real estate. Applicable stamp duty has not been paid in respect of any of the properties acquired or leased by us. Accordingly, we may be liable for stamp duty and related penalties if a deed is executed by us in the future under the applicable rates of stamp duty and penalty payable in the state where the property is located (other than with respect to the DOT properties acquired from the government of India as at March 30, 1987). All liabilities for stamp duties in respect of the DOT properties acquired by us from the government of India as at March 30, 1987 are to be borne by the government of India. We have been advised by our counsel that although we have valid possession to all of the property, including the risks and rewards of ownership and title, to enable us to perfect and thereby acquire marketable title to real property in our possession, we would need to have relevant documents relating to transfer or lease of real property duly stamped and registered. In preparing our financial statements, the provision for this stamp duty has been made on a best estimate basis.

TELECOMMUNICATIONS REGULATION IN INDIA

The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India

In March 1997, the Indian government established the TRAI, an independent regulatory authority under the provisions of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act. The TRAI is an autonomous body comprised of a chairperson and not more than two full-time members and not more than two part-time members appointed by the Central government, and has primary responsibility for:

·   making non-binding recommendations to the DOT, either at the request of the DOT or on its own, as to:

·   the need for and the timing of the introduction of new service providers;

·   the terms and conditions of licenses to new or existing service providers;

·   revocation of existing licenses for non-compliance

·   measures to facilitate competition and promote efficiency to facilitate growth in the industry;

·   technology and equipment improvements in providers’ infrastructures and in the industry generally;

·   ensuring compliance of providers with license terms;

·   ensuring technical compatibility between providers;

·   regulating revenue sharing between providers;

·   establishing quality standards and ensuring compliance through periodic reviews of providers; and

38

·   determining time schedules pursuant to which providers will establish inter-connection between their networks.

The TRAI also has the authority to, from time to time, set the rates at which domestic and international telecommunications services are provided in India. The TRAI does not have authority to grant licenses to service providers or renew licenses (those functions remain with the DOT). The TRAI, however, has the power to:

·   call upon service providers to furnish information relating to their operations;

·   appoint persons to make official inquiries;

·   inspect books, and

·   issue directions to service providers to ensure their proper functioning.

Failure to follow TRAI directives may lead to the imposition of fines.

The TRAI had previously acted in both a regulatory and an adjudicatory role. The Indian government has amended the provisions of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act providing a separate adjudicative body called the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal, also known as the Appellate Tribunal, to adjudicate disputes between

·   a licensor (i.e., the DOT) and a licensee;

·   regulator and service providers;

·   two or more service providers; and

·   between a service provider and consumer advocacy groups.

Additionally, the government of India, any Indian state or local government or any person may apply to the Appellate Tribunal for adjudication of any of the disputes listed above or appeal any order of the TRAI to the Appellate Tribunal.

Unified License

In July 2003, the TRAI issued a consultation paper on, among other things, introduction of a unified telecommunications license, under which it would be possible for a telecommunications service provider to provide both basic services and cellular services. The consultation paper also addresses the possibility of licensing the provision of international and national long distance services and internet services under this one unified license.

On October 27, 2003, the TRAI recommended that considering the vision of the government of India through various policies (e.g., NTP94, NTP99, Convergence Bill), technological development, market trends, international trends, the need to accelerate growth of telephone density, public interest and for the proper conduct of the Service/telegraphs, it is recommended that within six months “Unified Licensing” regime should be initiated for all services covering all geographical areas using any technology.

On November 15, 2003, the TRAI’s recommendations on unified licensing were accepted by the Government of India. They provide for implementing Unified Licensing for all telecom services within a time bound manner, starting with Unified Access Licensing. Based upon the TRAI’s recommendations, the DOT has issued guidelines for Unified Access (Basic and Cellular) Service License through their letter No.808-26/2003-VAS dated November 11, 2003.

39

New Telecom Policy 1999 and Subsequent Developments

In March 1999, the Indian government introduced its 1999 telecom policy, which sets forth a new policy framework for telecommunications regulation in India. One of the stated goals of the 1999 telecom policy is to foster greater competition in the telecommunications industry. To that end, the 1999 telecom policy liberalizes the regulation of the industry by allowing multiple basic service providers in any service area, with the number of new entrants and their mode of service to be determined by the government of India. The 1999 telecom policy allows direct interconnectivity and sharing of infrastructure between a basic service provider and any other type of service provider in its area of operations. Such service providers must negotiate the terms of any interconnection.

In addition, the 1999 telecom policy provides that either the DOT (now operating through BSNL) or Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited may be licensed as an additional cellular operator in any service area it wishes to enter. Additional cellular service operators may be licensed in the future, based on the recommendation of the TRAI, following its ongoing review (to occur at a minimum of at least once every two years) of frequency spectrum utilization by existing providers, the optimal use of available spectrum and the requirements of the market, competition and the public interest.

Further, the 1999 telecom policy states that competition in the international long distance market would be reviewed and VSNL would no longer have monopoly in this field. The Indian government opened this market for competition beginning April 1, 2002. Licenses have recently been granted to a few companies like the Reliance Infocomm Limited, Bharti Tele-Ventures Limited, Data Access (India) Limited and BSNL for provision of international long distance services. We have obtained a letter of intent from the DOT for, and complied with various formalities to obtain, such a license and intend to deploy this service as soon as the license is issued.

The 1999 telecom policy states that the Indian telecommunications industry must expand at a significantly greater pace and the Indian government must liberalize regulation commensurate with worldwide trends in order for the Indian telecommunications industry to fully develop in terms of technology, services, quality and market penetration. As the teledensity in India has reached a level of over 10% as of August, 2005, the industry has achieved a major requirement of the country in terms of policy objectives.

The TRAI has issued the IUC regulation 2 of 2003, dated October 29, 2003. The IUC Regulation (2 of 2003) covers arrangements among service providers for payment of Interconnection Usage Charges for Telecommunication Services, covering Basic Service, which includes WLL (M) services, Cellular Mobile Service Providers and Long Distance Operators throughout the territory of India & ILD operators. The TRAI has issued IUC Regulation (1 of 2005) dated January 6, 2005 and implemented from February 1, 2005. In this IUC amendment, the authority emphasized lower tariffs and linked high sustained subscriber growth. Plans for consistent decline in tariffs to give sustained boost to subscriber growth and teledensity. Methodology of imposing ADC per minute charge kept unchanged. Only the Access Deficit Charge has been changed, ADC on long distance calls & international calls has been reduced. Further, in the amended IUC regulation, BSNL only, and not the other fixed lines operators, will receive ADC on all incoming international calls and outgoing calls from Mobile/WLL(M). This regulation, however also envisages that all the operators will continue to receive the same ADC as per earlier regime but the receipts of MTNL on account of ADC will reduce drastically after the implementation of this amended regulation. Accordingly, MTNL had challenged the regulation in TDSAT and the case was under consideration. The TDSAT did not grant any stay and the regulation has been implemented from 1st February 2005. TDSAT on July 27, 2006 dismissed the same with no orders as to costs. The TRAI has issued IUC Regulation (1 of 2006) dated 28^th February, 2006 which was implemented from 1^st March 2006. In this IUC amendment, methodology of imposing ADC was changed from a 'per minute basis' charge to a '% of AGR basis' charge.  The ADC is now payable by MTNL @ of 1.5% of the AGR for Mobile services only.  In addition, the ADC on international calls has also been reduced on a per minute basis.

40

The recommendations of the 1999 telecom policy, and certain important subsequent developments, are as follows:

Basic Services, including CDMA-based Fixed Wireless and Mobile Services

The 1999 telecom policy permits direct interconnectivity between basic service providers and any other type of service provider (including another basic service provider or a cellular service provider) in their areas of operation and sharing of infrastructure with any type of service provider. It allows the basic service providers to directly interconnect with VSNL after the opening up of national long distance service from January 1, 2000. The basic service providers have been permitted to utilize last mile linkages or transmission links within its service area made available by other service providers.

In accordance with the 1999 telecom policy, the TRAI undertook a review of interconnectivity between providers in different service areas. In July 2002 the authority adopted a reference interconnect offer regulation which includes the model reference interconnect offer/draft agreement and the reference interconnect offer guidelines. Pursuant to this, service providers are permitted to interconnect with other service providers on the basis that they shall not discriminate as to the terms and conditions offered to different service providers. Effective May 1, 2003, the authority implemented a regulation providing a complete set of interconnect usage charges. The regulation adopts a calling party pays principle, so that the operator responsible for origination of a call bears liability for payment of the interconnect fees for transmission and/or termination.

In January 2001 the DOT issued guidelines for basic services, including provisions for wireless access systems limited within the local area. In April 2001, the Indian government announced that all basic licensees, including us, may offer wireless-in-local loop services under their basic service licenses. On August 26, 2005 the DOT clarified that Fixed wireless Service has the character of limited mobile service and, therefore, is categorized into limited mobile service within the scope of a basic service license.

Cellular Service

The 1999 telecom policy also provides for greater competition among cellular service providers. The government of India proposes to review spectrum utilization from time to time in view of emerging spectrum availability, optimal use of spectrum, market requirements, competition and the public interest. The TRAI will provide recommendations to the government of India with respect to new licenses at least every two years.

The 1999 telecom policy permits direct interconnectivity between licensed cellular service providers and any other type of service provider (including another cellular service provider) in their area of operation including sharing of infrastructure with any other type of service provider. The cellular service providers have been allowed to directly interconnect with the VSNL after opening of national long distance from January 1, 2000. Interconnectivity between service providers in different service areas is now governed by the July 2002 reference interconnect offer regulation and the May 2003 interconnection usage charges regulation. With the interconnection usage charges regulation and related tariff changes, the TRAI introduced the calling party pays principle, resulting in the elimination of customer charges (other than roaming charges) for incoming cellular calls.

Unified Access License

In November 2003, the DOT issued guidelines for the Unified Access (Basic and Cellular) Services License; which permit the provision of both basic and cellular services (with mobility) within a service area.  We have not made a decision as to whether to secure a Unified Access License.

Domestic Long Distance

On August 13, 2000, the Indian government published guidelines for the liberalization of the domestic long distance market subsequent to which applications were received for domestic long distance licenses. The Bharti Group and Reliance Group have been awarded domestic long distance licenses. These guidelines do not restrict the number of new entrants into this market, but entrants must satisfy a number of requirements.

In addition, entrants into the domestic long distance market must pay a one time entry fee of Rs.1 billion and provide bank guarantees of Rs.4 billion which will be refunded upon completion of their network obligations.

41

On May 10, 2006 MTNL was awarded a license for providing National Long distance (NLD) service. Since then we carry our own domestic long distance service between Mumbai and Delhi.

International Long Distance

The Indian government has recently issued licenses to several private sector companies for the provision of international long distance services. In addition, the Tata Group, which controls Tata Teleservices, acquired a controlling interest in VSNL, which had been government-controlled.

On our application, the government of India has issued us a letter of intent for an international Long Distance Service License. As desired by the licensor, insertion of certain clauses in our Memorandum and Articles of Association and Shareholders Agreement is in process. We have submitted our papers and required Bank Guarantee in this regard. In consultation with DOT, our subsidiary MTL has been entrusted the work of laying submarine cable for international traffic for use by both BSNL and MTNL, with joint ownership.

Internet Policy

In November 1998, the government of India announced a new Internet policy, to increase the usage of the Internet.

Effective April 1, 2002, the Indian government adopted guidelines under which internet service providers could provide internet telephony services.

The government of India passed the Information Technology Act, 2000 to facilitate the development of a secure environment for electronic commerce. This Act establishes a regulatory authority for electronic commerce, provides legal validity to information in the form of electronic records and permits, unless otherwise agreed, an acceptance of a contract to be expressed by electronic means of communication. It facilitates electronic intercourse in trade and commerce by providing the legal framework for authentication and origin of electronic record/communication through digital signature and eliminates uncertainties over writing and signature requirements.

We believe that as of January 31, 2006 there were approximately 395 licenses for providing Internet services issued in India.

The Tariff Order

Effective May 1, 1999, the TRAI, implemented The Telecommunications Tariff Order 1999. The intention of the tariff order was to protect consumers by aligning tariffs that telecommunications providers may charge for the service provided while ensuring the commercial viability of the various service providers and so encouraging the expansion of the Indian telecommunications industry. This “rebalancing” of tariffs is to take place in stages. The first stage of tariff rebalancing in May 1999 reduced the charge per pulse from Rs.1.40 to Rs.1.20, decreased local call pulse durations from five to three minutes (effectively increasing local call charges), increased domestic and international call pulse durations (effectively reducing domestic long distance and international call charges) and increased monthly line rental rates for subscribers that generate more than 200 pulses per month from Rs.190 to Rs.250. The second stage of tariff rebalance further reduced domestic long distance and international call charges effective October 1, 2000 and increased monthly line rental rates to Rs.250 for all subscribers effective February 1, 2001. Domestic long distance call charges were further reduced significantly with effect from January 14, 2002, March 7, 2003 and May 1, 2004, and international long distance call charges were subject to further significant reduction with effect from July 20, 2002, October 21, 2003 and April 10, 2004. Effective May 1, 2003, as part of its effort to balance the effects of prior tariff reductions, the TRAI changed the standard plan that we must offer all customers by increasing monthly rentals for basic services from Rs. 250 to Rs.280, reduced the local call pulse duration (for calls made to fixed and fixed wireless lines) from three minutes to two minutes and the number of free monthly call pulses.

42

MTNL has reduced drastically the ISD tariff with effect from October 2, 2004.MTNL is offering different STD rates for different locations. Call from Mumbai to Maharashtra & Goa @Rs. 1.65 per minute. MTNL has increased the pulse rate between Delhi & Mumbai for Basic to Basic of MTNL network from 37.8 sec. to 180 sec. uniform for all plans excluding One India Plan. For all other places STD rate is flat Rs. 2.40 per minute from Fixed, WLL(M) & Cellular service. ISD rates in two category as under:

Uniform pulse rates (per minute) across all Plans

Country	From Basic & WLL (M)		From Cellular Postpaid	From Cellular Prepaid
	Delhi	Mumbai
USA, UK, Canada and all countries with 001 access, Singapore, Malaysia, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Thailand	Rs. 8.00	Rs. 9.00	Rs. 9.00	Rs. 6.67
Europe, Gulf, Asia, SAARC & Africa	Rs. 12.00	Rs. 18.00	Rs. 18.00	Rs. 10.00
Rest of World	Rs. 36.00	Rs. 18.00	Rs. 18.00	Rs. 30.00

The TRAI has issued the Telecommunication Tariff (28 amendments) (5 of 2003) dated July 5, 2003.

A tariff plan once offered by an Access Provider shall be available to a subscriber for a minimum period of 6 months from the date of enrollment of the subscriber to that tariff plan.

Because we retain the remainder of prices of domestic and international long distance calls originating on our network, net of interconnect charges, by lowering long distance rates the tariff reductions have reduced the revenue we receive per call. We believe that, to date, the tariff order has not resulted in significantly higher long distance usage and that, accordingly, the tariff order has had a negative impact on our revenues and earnings as the lower charges have not been offset by higher usage.

The tariff order prescribes a reporting requirement such that a service provider must report any change in tariff to the TRAI within seven days from implementation.

The TRAI has issued the Telecommunication Tariff (36 amendments) Order, 2005 (3 of 2005) dated April 21, 2005 regarding revised ceiling tariff for different capacities reduced by 3 to 70% - for higher capacities 70% less than existing market rate.

Briefly, the Authority has fixed revised ceiling tariff for the most commonly used capacities/speed i.e. 64 kbps, 128 kbps, 256 kbps, E1 (speed of 2 Mega bits per second), DS-3 (speed of 45 Mega bits per second) and STM-1 (speed of 155 Mega bits per second). The revised ceiling tariffs (for distance slab above 500 Km) in respect of DLC are summarized in the Table given below:

Capacity / Speed	Ceiling Tariff (Rs. in lakhs)
64 Kbps	0.44
128 Kbps	0.79
256 Kbps	1.36
E1 (2 Mbps)	8.50
DS-3 (45 Mbps)	62
STM-1 (155 Mbps)	165

43

Foreign Direct Investment Controls.

Following is the current Indian government policy on foreign direct investment (FDI) in the telecom sector:

(i) in basic Cellular, Value Added Services and Global Mobile Personal Communications by Satellite, FDI is permitted up to 49%, subject to licensing and security requirements and adherence by the companies (who are investing and the companies in which the investment is being made) to the license conditions for foreign equity cap and lock-in period for transfer and addition of equity and other license provisions.

(ii) For ISPs with gateways, radio paging and end-to-end bandwidth, FDI is permitted up to 74% with FDI beyond 49% requiring Government approval. These services would be subject to licensing and security requirements.

(iii) No equity cap is applicable to manufacturing activities.

(iv) FDI up to 100% is allowed for the following activities in the telecom sector:

(a) ISPs not providing gateways (both for satellite and submarine cables).

(b) Infrastructure Providers providing dark fibre (IP Category I);

(c) Electronic Mail, and

(d) Voice Mail.

The above would be subject to the following conditions:

(a) FDI up to 100% is allowed subject to the condition that such companies would divest 26% of their equity in favour of Indian public in 5 years, if these companies are listed in other parts of the world;

(b) The above services would be subject to licensing and security requirements, wherever required;

(c) Proposal for FDI beyond 49% shall be considered by FIPB on case to case basis.

Item 4A. Unresolved Staff Comments

Not applicable.

Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

You should read the following discussion in conjunction with the “Selected Financial and Operating Data” and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes, which appear elsewhere in this report. Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

44

OPERATING RESULTS

Overview

A number of developments have significantly affected our results of operations. These developments and a number of potential developments may affect our results of operations, liquidity, capital resources and capital expenditures in future periods. These developments include:

·   recent regulatory changes such as the May 1999 tariff order and several further reductions in long distance call charges;

·   adoption of the comprehensive interconnection usage charges regulation based on the calling party pays principle, with effect from May 1, 2003;

·   our expansion into new businesses such as providing cellular and CDMA-based fixed wireless and mobile services and the rapid introduction by several other operators of low-cost CDMA-based technologies that can be used for both fixed wireless and mobile services;

·   growing competition;

·   our expansion into foreign markets - to date Nepal and Mauritius;

·   new interconnect arrangements with international long distance carriers, including revenue sharing on incoming calls;

·   industry consolidation;

·   our investment programs to expand and modernize our network; and

·   revised basis of calculation of license fee and networking charges with effect from April 1, 2001.

Potential future developments include:

·   increased competition from basic and cellular operators, including the continued rapid introduction by several operators of low-cost CDMA-based technologies that can be used for both fixed wireless and mobile services;

·   continued consolidation in the industry;

·   further rate reductions as a result of intensifying competition or tariff reductions;

·   new interconnect agreements, including with BSNL;

·   license fee revisions, including revisions that may be applied retroactively;

·   our procuring a unified license regime;

·   the benefits of our new National Long Distance License obtained in May, 2006;

·   our laying a submarine cable jointly with BSNL from both the east and west coasts of India to Malaysia and the Middle East, respectively, to carry voice and data traffic with the intent to further extend to USA and Europe

·   possible direct or reverse merger with BSNL;

45

·   the implementation of voluntary retirement schemes for our employees;

·   transfer of our trunk auto exchanges to BSNL on the directions of DOT; and

·   further regulatory changes.

Our future results of operations are also likely to be affected by macroeconomic trends such as the rate of growth of the Indian economy, particularly in Delhi and Mumbai, and the introduction of new technologies and products by our competitors and us. Many of these factors are beyond our control.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

For fiscal year 2006, we have prepared the consolidated financial statements in accordance with US GAAP, and the financial statements for the years ended March 31, 2004 and March 31, 2005 are also so presented.

Our accounting policies are described in Note 2 of the Notes to our consolidated financial statements. Our consolidated financial statements which are part of this Annual Report are prepared in conformity with US GAAP, which require us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the year. Actual results could differ from those estimates. We consider the following policies to be most critical in understanding the judgments that are involved in preparing our financial statements and the uncertainties that could impact our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Recognition of Revenues. Revenues include amounts invoiced for call revenue, fixed monthly rental charges, roaming charges, activation fees, internet services, access and interconnection revenue and fees for value added services (‘VAS’). Revenues for fixed line and cellular telephonic services are recognized based upon metered call units (MCU) of traffic processed. Rental revenues and leased circuits rentals are recognized based upon contracted fees schedule. Revenues from internet services are recognized based on usage by subscribers. Revenues associated with access and interconnection for usage of the Company’s telephone network by other operators for local, national long distance and international long distance calls are recognized in accordance with the Interconnect Usage Charges Regulation released by TRAI. TRAI regulation specifies per minute rates for metered call units (MCU) of traffic terminated on the Company’s network. Revenues are shown net of service tax and applicable discounts and allowance. Unbilled receivables represent revenues recognized in respect of services provided from the last bill cycle date to the end of the year. These are billed in subsequent periods as per the terms of the billing plans. Billings in advance for services to be rendered and amounts charged for new connections are classified in current liabilities under the heading “Deferred income”. Amounts charged for new connections are recognized over the average life of the customer relationship. A significant portion of our revenue is derived from interconnect and access charges for calls terminating at our network. The related rules and telecommunication industry related policies are framed and determined by the Government of India through its departments and regulatory authorities such as DOT and TRAI. Since, interconnect and access charges are presently governed by IUC regime, the Company has not entered into separate agreements with certain other operators. Any subsequent amendment to the presently applicable guidelines with retrospective effect relating to tariff and interconnect/ access charges will impact our revenues significantly.

For the year ended March 31, 2006, a 10% increase or decrease in the rates for call revenue, including public call office revenue, would have increased or decreased the total revenue by approximately Rs.2,874 million. A 2% increase or decrease in metered call units in respect of fixed line call revenue, including public call office revenue, would have increased or decreased the total revenue by approximately Rs.513 million for the year ended March 31, 2006 respectively. Further, a 5% increase or decrease in rental charges would have increased or decreased the total revenue by approximately Rs.845 million, as applicable, while a 5% increase or decrease in rates for interconnection services would have increased or decreased the total revenue by approximately Rs.14 million.

46

License Fees. We are paying license fee and spectrum charges to DOT in accordance with conditions governing license fee for Basic Telephone Service and Cellular Telephone Service prescribed by DOT under the Revenues Sharing Regime, whereby license fee is computed at a specified percentage of adjusted gross revenue. The license fee is expensed as incurred. In view of the uncertain political environment and the fact that the license fee is determined on the basis of guidelines prescribed by regulatory authorities, the license fees is subject to change in the event any of these guidelines are modified subsequently with retrospective effect. During the year ended March 31, 2006, the applicable percentage of license fee was 10%. A change in the specified percentage to 12% or 8% would have increased or decreased the license fee charges by approximately Rs.714 million and Rs.793 million, respectively. During the year ended March 31, 2006, the Company has accounted for a reversal of license fees amounting to Rs 3,408 million. Refer discussion in the ‘Comparison of Year Ended March 31, 2006 with Year Ended March 31, 2005’ under analysis of Results of Operation below.

Network Charges. Charges associated with access to and interconnection to other operators’ network by the Company for local, national long distance and international long distance calls are recognized in accordance with the Interconnect Usage Charges Regulation released by TRAI, where applicable, and in accordance with the terms of agreements entered into with other operators. TRAI regulation specifies per minute charges for metered call units (MCU) of traffic terminated on the other operators’ network. In view of the uncertain political environment and the fact that the network charges are determined on the basis of guidelines prescribed by regulatory authorities, the network charges are subject to change in the event any of these guidelines are modified subsequently with retrospective effect. An additional amount of Rs.3,809 million has been accounted as networking charges in the statement of income as part of cost of revenues for the year ended March 31, 2006. Refer discussion in the ‘Comparison of Year Ended March 31, 2006 with Year Ended March 31, 2005’ under analysis of Results of Operation below.

Pension and Other Retirement Benefits. We sponsor pension and other retirement plans in various forms covering substantially all employees who meet eligibility requirements. Several statistical and other factors, which attempt to anticipate future events, are used in calculating the expense and liability related to the plans. These factors include assumptions about the discount rate, expected return on plan assets and rate of future compensation increases as determined by us, within certain guidelines. In addition, we also use subjective factors such as withdrawal and mortality rates to estimate these factors. The actuarial assumptions used by us may differ materially from actual results due to changing market and economic conditions, higher or lower withdrawal rates or longer or shorter life spans of participants. These differences and the fact we have not invested pension and other retirement benefit funds to cover retirement liability may result in a significant impact to the amount of pension and other retirement benefit expense recorded by us. Holding all other factors constant, a 100 basis point decrease or increase in the discount rate would increase or decrease the projected pension and postretirement benefit obligations by approximately Rs.7,418 million and Rs. 5,709 million respectively.

Income Taxes. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the statements of income in the period such changes are enacted. We assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and to the extent we believe that recovery is not likely, we establish a valuation allowance. The valuation allowance is based on our estimates of taxable income and the period over which our deferred tax assets will be recoverable. Significant management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against our net deferred tax assets. In the event that actual results differ from these estimates or we adjust these estimates in future periods we may need to establish an additional valuation allowance which could materially impact our financial position and results of operations. The enacted tax rate applicable to the Company was 33.66% during the year ended March 31, 2006. A 1% increase or decrease in the tax rate to 34.66% or 32.66% would have increased or decreased the income tax expense for the year by Rs. 42million.

Legal Contingencies. As discussed in Note 22 to the consolidated financial statements, legal proceedings covering a wide range of matters are pending or threatened against us. We have accrued amounts as appropriate that

47

represent our estimate of the probable outcome of these matters. The judgments we make with regard to whether to establish a reserve are based on an evaluation of all relevant factors by internal and external legal counsel, as well as subject matter experts and is based upon an analysis of potential results, assuming a combination of litigation and settlement strategies. Claims are continually monitored and reevaluated as new information is obtained. We may not establish a liability for a particular matter until long after the litigation is filed, once a liability becomes probable and estimable. The actual settlement of such matters could differ from the judgments made in determining how much, if any, to accrue. We do not believe these proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position. While we believe that our accruals for these matters are adequate, if the actual loss from a loss contingency is significantly different than the estimated loss, our results of operations may be over or understated.

Recoverability of DOT Receivables. We are a Government Company under the Indian Companies Act. As of March 31, 2006, the Government owned 56.25% of our issued share capital. Consequently, the Government, acting through the DOT, continues to control us and will have the power to determine the outcome of transactions with the DOT or the assertion of claims against the DOT. We also provide and receive services to/from other Governmental departments and other public sector organizations on normal commercial terms. [Refer Notes 3, 19, 22 and 25] to the consolidated financial statements for a further discussion on our related party transactions and significant risks and uncertainties. The receivables from DOT constitute a significant portion of our assets and our assessment of the recoverability of these assets involves critical accounting estimates. The assessments reflect management’s best assumptions and estimates. Significant management judgment is involved in estimating these factors, and they include inherent uncertainties. Management periodically evaluates and updates the estimates based on the conditions that influence these factors. The variability of these factors depends on a number of conditions, including uncertainty about future events, and thus our accounting estimates may change from period to period. If other assumptions and estimates had been used in the current period, the balances for these assets could have been materially impacted. Furthermore, if management uses different assumptions or if different conditions occur in future periods, future operating results could be materially impacted.

Allowance for Accounts Receivable. We estimate the amount of uncollectible receivables each period and establish an allowance for uncollectible amounts. The amount of the allowance is based on the age of unpaid amounts, information about the creditworthiness of customers, and other relevant information. Estimates of uncollectible amounts are revised each period, and changes are recorded in the period they become known.

Estimated Useful Lives of Property And Equipment. We estimate the useful lives of plant and equipment in order to determine the amount of depreciation expense to be recorded during any reporting period. If technological changes were to occur more rapidly than anticipated or in a different form than anticipated, the useful lives assigned to these assets may need to be shortened, resulting in the recognition of increased depreciation expense in future periods. Likewise, if the anticipated technological or other changes occur more slowly than expected, the useful lives could be extended. This could result in a reduction of depreciation expense in future periods. Further, property and equipment are being depreciated over their useful lives which exceed the license term since the Company believes that its licenses will be extended beyond their current term. A one-year decrease or increase in the useful life of these assets would have increased or decreased depreciation expense by approximately Rs.297 million and Rs.412 million, respectively.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets," we review these types of assets for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable over the remaining life of the asset or asset group. In order to determine if the asset or asset group is recoverable, we determine if the expected future undiscounted cash flows directly related to the asset or asset group are less than the carrying amount of the asset or asset group. If so, we then determine if the carrying amount of the asset or asset group exceeds its fair value. We determine fair value using estimated discounted cash flows. If impairment is indicated, the asset or asset group is written down to its fair value. Assets to be disposed are reported at the lower of the carrying value or the fair value less cost to sell. The discounted cash flows calculation uses various assumptions and estimates regarding future revenue - which is a factor of the future subscriber base and the average revenue per subscriber, expenses, terminal values of the assets and the cash flows projections over the estimated remaining useful life of the asset or asset group. These forecasts are subject to changes in external factors including adverse regulatory and legal rulings. We carried out an impairment review of our long lived assets in 2006 triggered by reduction in our revenues and increased competition. Based on our review, the expected future cash flows directly

48

associated with the asset groups exceed their carrying amount and hence there is no impairment of long lived assets in 2006.

Impairment of Held to Maturity Securities. We have invested Rs. 1,000 million in 8.75% cumulative preference shares of ITI Limited (“ITI”) and Rs 2,500 million in bonds issued by Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation (“MKVDC”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Government of Maharashtra.

The ITI share purchase agreement includes a provision for a letter of comfort from Department of Telecommunication (Government of India) to MTNL endorsing the investment and also provides MTNL a right to set off amounts receivable in respect of principal outstanding from the dues payable to ITI in connection with MTNL’s purchase of exchanges and cable supplies.

As of September 30, 2005, ITI had not redeemed the first tranche amounting to Rs. 200 million as per the repayment schedule and ITI had requested MTNL for an extension on the redemption dates. However MTNL had not accepted ITI’s request and has looked to the DOT's letter of comfort and requested settlement of the first repayment tranche of Rs. 200.

As of September 30, 2006, ITI has not redeemed both the first and second tranches amounting to Rs. 200 million each as per the original repayment schedule.

Management has evaluated the investment in ITI for impairment, on the basis that the first and second tranches for repayment have not been settled by ITI.  Management has evaluated the financial condition and business outlook of ITI including the new purchase orders received by ITI for supply of GSM equipment from BSNL and the Company.  The Company currently has account payable to ITI of Rs.321 million as at March 31, 2006 which, pursuant to the share agreement, the Company can legally settle against the repayments owing under the cumulative preference shares.  In addition, the Company has the intend and ability to retain the debt security for a period of time sufficient to allow for anticipated recovery in value.

Based on this evaluation and specifically considering that the share purchase agreement includes a provision for a letter of comfort from Department of Telecommunication (Government of India) to MTNL endorsing the investment and also provides MTNL a right to set off amounts receivable in respect of principal outstanding from the dues payable to ITI, management has concluded that the debt security is not impaired.

The MKVDC bonds have a coupon rate of 11.5% per annum and are redeemable at the end of the 10th year from the date of allotment (May 31, 2002). The repayment of these bonds is guaranteed by the Government of Mahrashtra. Based on our assessment of carrying value of investment in MKVDC bonds we believe that there is no impairment of investments as of March 31, 2006.

Revenue

We derive a substantial portion of our revenue from local, domestic long distance and international calls that originate on our network and from telephone rentals. We realize revenue in the form of installation charges, ongoing subscription/rental charges and usage charges. We also derive revenues from providing Internet services, our Intelligent Network services, public call office or public payphone services, interconnection with basic service, long distance service and cellular operators, narrow-band ISDN services, leased-line services, telex services, GSM cellular services in Delhi and Mumbai, those value-added services for which we charge a fee and, since December 2001, CDMA-based mobile and fixed wireless services in Delhi and in Mumbai.

We only began receiving interconnect payments in respect of incoming international long distance calls since April 1, 2002, when several interconnect agreements, including our agreement with VSNL, took effect. In fiscal 2006, revenue sharing with BSNL and other operators for incoming and outgoing domestic long distance or subscriber trunk dialing calls was done on the basis of TRAI’s Interconnect Usage Charges Regulation 2003 (1 of 2003) implemented from May 1, 2003 and modified by Interconnect Usage Charges Regulation 2003 (2 of 2003) effective February 1, 2004. For April 2003, these charges were accounted per the earlier arrangement. Call revenue is generally a function of the number of access lines in service, the volume of traffic carried and the level of call charges. Telephone and other rental revenue is a function of the number of access lines in service and the rental tariffs we charge. Public call office revenue is driven by the number of MTNL public call offices, the volume of traffic carried and the level of call charges. Interconnect revenue is a function of the contractual and legal/regulatory rates prescribed for interconnection and the level of call volumes originating from sources that pay interconnect fees. From March 31, 2000 to March 31, 2006 growth in our call office revenue, telephone and other rentals and public call revenue was driven primarily by growth in the number of access lines in service, the increased rental per line with effect from February 1, 2001, and the number of public call offices in operation. While the volume of traffic we have been carrying has been increasing, the increase in certain periods has been more than offset by declining tariffs. Growth in interconnect revenue was driven primarily by growth in the number of access lines in service and the volume of traffic coming into our network.

49

The May 1999 tariff order provided for a “rebalancing” of tariffs in stages to reduce subsidization of local calls by long distance users. The first stage of tariff rebalancing in May 1999 reduced the charge per pulse from Rs.1.40 to Rs.1.20, decreased local call pulse durations from five to three minutes (effectively increasing local call charges), increased domestic and international call pulse durations (effectively reducing domestic long distance and international call charges) and increased monthly line rental rates for subscribers that generate more than 200 pulses per month from Rs.190 to Rs.250. The second stage of tariff rebalancing further reduced domestic long distance and international call charges effective October 1, 2000 and increased monthly line rental rates to Rs.250 for all subscribers effective February 1, 2001. Domestic long distance call charges were further reduced significantly with effect from January 14, 2002, March 7, 2003, May 1, 2004, and October 2, 2004, and international long distance call charges were subject to further significant reduction with effect from July 20, 2002, October 21, 2003 and April 10, 2004. Primarily as a result of these tariff reductions, excluding termination revenues, our average revenue per access line in service has been declining. Any further tariff rebalancing may result in lower call charges, particularly for domestic long distance and international calls, which might be offset by an increase in rental tariffs. We are not able to assess at this time the full long-term impact that the tariff order will have on subscriber calling patterns or on revenues. As competition intensifies, we expect call charges will likely decline and, to the extent that call volumes do not increase as a result of lower call charges, excluding termination revenues, our revenue per access line in service may continue to decline.

We expect that call revenue and revenue from public call offices will decline as a percentage of total revenue as demand for our other products and services, particularly our GSM cellular services, increases and if rental charges increase as a result of further tariff rebalancing.

Cost of Revenues

Our operating costs include staff costs, license fees and network utilization charges, depreciation expenses, maintenance costs and commissions paid to public call office franchise operators.

Staff costs. In general, employees receive a base salary and salary-related housing and other allowances, productivity-based incentive payments and certain benefits, including a pension/gratuity plan, medical benefits for themselves and certain members of their immediate families and post-retirement medical benefits for retired employees. The increase in our staff costs was primarily due to the enhancement of post-retirement medical benefits and an increase in retirement benefit charges on account of a fall in the discount rate used to value our post retirement obligations to employees. This is in line with the general fall in interest rates in the economy over the same period. The increase is also attributable to a rise in average pay as a result of a rise in annual increments and accrual of cost for executives who have opted to become our employees on higher revised pay and also due to charge on absorption of Group B employees (executive employees) into the company with retroactive effect from October 1, 2000.

In fiscal 2000, substantially all of our non-executive employees originally employed by the DOT decided to terminate their services with the department and accept employment with us effective November 1998. Under the option given to them for pension benefits, most of our absorbed employees have opted for retaining pension benefits in accordance with the Central government pension rules. Some other employees have opted for retirement rules which are applicable to our directly recruited employees, and opted to draw pro rata monthly pension until their absorption. Accordingly, with effect from November 1, 1998 we started accruing for pension and gratuity for these employees. In August/September 2002, the DOT indicated that the government would pay for the pension benefits of the government employees absorbed by us who opted for either the Central government scheme of pension or for the pro rata pension scheme for the period served with the DOT. However, the terms of such payments are in the process of finalization. Once these terms are finalized and the payments are made to DOT for the period of employment of these employees with us, we expect that our liability for post retirement obligations would be limited to monthly contributions on the basis of the rules to be prescribed by the government of India. Presently, in the absence of any further movement from the Government, MTNL is discharging all such liabilities.

Approximately 97% of our executive employees have accepted absorption into our company and are now our direct employees. These employees are entitled to certain pension and gratuity benefits from the government of India.

50

We have finalized a new compensation structure for our senior executive employees. The new structure provides for higher salaries and benefits for our senior executive employees upon exercise of their option for MTNL absorption.

As a public sector enterprise, we abide by general DOT and Department of Public Sector Enterprises personnel policies that, among other things, limit our ability to reduce employment levels and control the amount of salaries and other remuneration that we may pay to our employees. Our employee productivity measured by access lines in service per employee has been increasing steadily but remains significantly lower than the Asian and global averages. During the year ended March 31, 2005, MTNL implemented a Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) for executive as well as non-executive employees. Under the scheme, the eligible employees were given an option to voluntarilty take retirement from service and make their choice within the specified period of time. The scheme provided for ex gratia payments to eligible employees opting for voluntary retirement based on the respective employee’s salary and term of employment. As of March 31, 2006, a total of 3,947 employees retired under this scheme.

During the year ended March 31, 2006, MTNL implemented two more Voluntary Retirement Schemes for executives and non executives respectively. Under the schemes, the eligible employees were given an option to voluntarily take retirement from service and make their choice within the specified period of time. The schemes provide for ex-gratia payments to eligible employees opting for voluntary retirement based on the respective employee’s salary and term of employment.

The Executive employees exercised their options during the year ended March 31, 2006. Under this scheme, MTNL’s obligation amounted to Rs. 677 million for the year ended March 31, 2006. In addition, the curtailment loss in the gratuity and pension plan on account of the VRS amounted to Rs.48 million and Rs.136 million respectively for the year ended March 31, 2006. The Non executive employees were to exercise their options from March 20, 2006 to April 10, 2006. Under the scheme 312 employees exercised their options till March 31, 2006 and 1,069 subsequent to March 31, 2006. MTNL’s obligation amounted to Rs. 227 million for those who exercised their option before March 31, 2006. In addition, the curtailment loss in the gratuity and pension plan on account of the VRS amounted to Rs. 17 million and Rs. 49 million respectively for the year ended March 31, 2006.

License fees and network utilization charges. Under our previous arrangement with the DOT, the license fee for providing basic services was fixed at Rs.900 per access line in service. This arrangement expired on March 31, 2000. In the absence of any new arrangement with the DOT, we continued to pay license fees during fiscal 2001 on the same terms as our previous arrangement. On April 9, 2001, the DOT communicated that the annual license fee will be revised and shall be payable at 12% of adjusted gross revenue from basic telephone service effective from August 1, 1999, as applicable to private operators from that date. On September 5, 2001, the DOT amended its position and indicated that the date from which the revised license fees will be payable will be notified later. Accordingly, the Company paid license fees based on the earlier arrangement up to the year ended March 31, 2001 and on the revised basis from April 1, 2001 onwards. Subsequent to the year ended March 31, 2004 in a meeting with DOT it has been agreed that the license fee is payable at 12% of the adjusted gross revenue with effect from August 1, 1999 and the charges for the same have been accrued in the year ended March 31, 2004. Further, license fee has been revised at 10% of Adjusted Gross Revenue with effect from April 1, 2004. Under our previous arrangement with BSNL, we paid network utilization charges to BSNL as a fixed percentage of the amount of usage and other charges billed to our customers for our services. Our network utilization arrangement with BSNL expired on March 31, 2001. To date no agreement for networking charges has been entered into which determines the basis of revenue sharing for incoming or outgoing domestic long distance or subscriber trunk dialing calls through interconnection with BSNL’s network. In absence of the same, for fiscal 2003, the interconnection charges on domestic long distance calls have been accrued on the basis of the rates that were payable by other basic service operators in the country. We are in the process of finalizing a new agreement with BSNL.

In fiscal 2004, revenue sharing with BSNL and other operators for incoming and outgoing domestic long distance or subscriber trunk dialing calls was done on the basis of TRAI’s Interconnect Usage Charges Regulation 2003 (1 of 2003) implemented from May 1, 2003 and modified by Interconnect Usage Charges Regulation 2003 (2 of 2003) effective February 1, 2004. For April 2003, these charges were accounted per the earlier arrangement.

51

In fiscal 2005, TRAI’s IUC regulation (1 of 2003) as modified by IUC regulation 2003 (1 of 2004) was applicable till January 2005, for February and March 2005, regulation as modified by amendment (1 of 2005) was applicable.

Until the end of fiscal 2002, all outgoing international long distance calls originating from our network were subject to interconnection fees payable to BSNL, and we received no revenue from incoming international long distance calls into our network. We paid interconnect fees to BSNL in respect of outgoing international long distance calls pursuant to the network utilization arrangement with BSNL until March 31, 2001 and for fiscal 2002 on the basis of the rates that were payable by other basic service operators in the country. Beginning April 1, 2002, we recorded incoming and outgoing international long distance traffic pursuant to interconnect agreements we have signed with several international carriers, most importantly, VSNL. As a result of these agreements, we no longer make payments to BSNL in respect of international long distance traffic. In addition, our agreements with the international carriers provide for income in respect of incoming calls, in addition to payments in respect of outgoing calls originating from our networks.

For more information on license fees and network utilization charges, please see “Information on the Company—Business Overview.”

52

Inflation

Inflation in India, as measured by the Indian consumer price index, was 4.1% in fiscal 2003, 5.5% in fiscal 2004 and 5.01% in 2005. Energy price spikes may affect this in the current year. We do not believe that inflation in India has had a material impact on our results of operations in recent years. However, the TRAI has been granted the authority to determine tariffs, and we are therefore restricted in our ability to increase tariffs to compensate for inflation. As a result, inflation could adversely affect our results of operations. See “Information on the Company—Business Overview—Tariffs and Other Charges.”

Effect of New Accounting Pronouncements

There are a number of new accounting standards that have been issued that will affect our information presented in accordance with US GAAP. For a description of these recent pronouncements, please see Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this form.

Other Matters

See “Information on the Company—Business Overview—Legal Proceedings” and Note 22 to our consolidated financial statements for information on our contingent liabilities.

We are selectively targeting expansion opportunities outside India where we can leverage our expertise and relationships. We have investments in Nepal and Mauritius and are currently examining several other opportunities. We invested Rs.33.35 million in fiscal 2004 on the Nepal venture, and in respect of the Mauritius operations, Rs.167.71 million in fiscal 2005 and Rs.212.59 million in fiscal 2006.

We have obtained a letter of intent from the Department of Telecommunication to provide international long distance service and we intend to deploy these services as soon as a license is issued. We cannot determine at this time what impact entry into these markets will have on our revenues and results of operations.

Segment Information

We have identified basic and cellular as the two operating segments of MTNL. Basic services segment consists of voice, data through local calls, domestic long distance and international long distance calls on fixed line services in the cities of Delhi and Mumbai in India. Further, it includes revenues from Code Division Multiple Access, or CDMA, based cellular services and internet access services. Cellular consists of providing cellular services in cities of Delhi and Mumbai using Global System for Mobile communications, or GSM, technology.

During the years ended March 31, 2004 and 2005, we had not considered cellular services to be a reportable segment since it did not meet the thresholds of significance. However as the cellular services have met the thresholds of significance during the year ended March 31, 2006, we have disclosed the segment information for the year ended March 31, 2006 as well as for the prior years.

During the current year the Company has started operations in Mauritius. However, as the operations are insignificant as compared to the overall business of the Company, the same have not been considered for separate segment disclosure. During the year ended March 31, 2005, and March 31, 2006 no single customer has contributed for revenue in excess of 10% of total revenue.

The amounts reviewed by the CODM are based on internal accounting policies of the Company which are different from US GAAP.

53

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth selected income statement data expressed as a percentage of revenue for the period indicated, derived from financial statements that are prepared in accordance with US GAAP, included on pages F-1 to F-33 of this annual report.

	Fiscal Years Ended March 31,
	2004			2005		2006
Revenues		100	%	100	%	100	%
Cost of revenues (excluding depreciation shown separately below)		(62.7	%)	(62.8	%)	(69.1	%)
Selling, general and administrative expenses (excluding depreciation shown separately below)		(16.4	%)	(18.5	%)	(17.2	%)
Depreciation		(14.2	%)	(15.4	%)	(17.1	%)
Excess liabilities written back		1.8	%	2.6	%	1.7	%
Income / (loss) from operations		8.5	%	5.9	%	(1.7	%)
Interest and other income, net		2.8	%	5.3	%	5.1	%
Income before income taxes and share of losses from affiliate		11.3	%	11.2	%	3.4	%
Income taxes		(4.2	%)	(4.2	%)	(1.0	%)
Equity in (losses) of affiliate		-		(0.1	%)	(0.1	%)
Net income		7.1	%	6.9	%	2.3	%

54

Comparison of Year Ended March 31, 2006 with Year Ended March 31, 2005

Revenues: Basic services: Our revenues from basic services decreased by 13% from Rs. 47,269 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs.41,219 million for the year ended March 31, 2006. The decrease was primarily driven by a decrease in fixed line call revenue, including public call office (PCO) revenue, by 12 % from Rs 26,024 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs.22,637 million for the year ended March 31, 2006 and a decrease in interconnect revenue by 41% from Rs. 4,729 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs.2,809 million for the year ended March 31, 2006 and a 1.5% decrease in telephone and other rentals and broadband revenue from Rs.15,557 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs.15,338 million for the year ended March 31, 2006.

Call revenue has gone down as a result of decrease in average number of connections from 4,372,862 connections during the year ended March 31, 2005 to 4,127,530 connections during the year ended March 31, 2006. There was also net decrease of 2,855 million units in billed Metered Call Units (“MCU”), from 30,087 million units during the year ended March 31, 2005 to 29,006 million units during the year ended March 31, 2006. Further, the call tariff rates were reduced during the current year due to increased competition in the market, resulting in a fall in average revenue per connection per month from Rs.819 during the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs.805 during the current year, a decrease of Rs.14 per connection per month.

The interconnect revenue has declined due to reduction of Access deficit charges (ADC) w.e.f February 2005, ADC regime has changed and ADC payments to MTNL were discontinued in the year 2005-06.

Cellular services: Our revenues from cellular services increased by 89% from Rs. 2,874 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs.5,449 million for the year ended March 31, 2006. The increase was primarily driven by an increase of 790,302 in the average number of cellular subscribers from 621,123 as of March 31, 2005 to 1,411,425 as of March 31, 2006. Due to increase in subscribers, our income from roaming and prepaid trump also increases by Rs.1,986 million from Rs.1,861 million for the year ended March 2005 to Rs.3,847 million for the year ended March 2006.

Cost of Revenues: Basic services: Our cost of revenues has decreased from Rs.30,128 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs.29,595 million for the year ended March 31, 2006. The decrease is due to a decrease in license fees by 100% from Rs.4,665 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs.62 million for the year ended March 31, 2006 and a decrease in the staff cost by 7% from Rs.14,806 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs.13,828 million for the year ended March 31, 2006. The decrease is offset by an increase in interconnect charges by 66% from Rs.7,321 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs.12,173 million for the year ended March 31, 2006.

The interconnect charges have increased during the current year mainly on account of the settlement reached with BSNL for the periods up to and including March 31, 2005 In the earlier years we had disputed the interconnect charges claimed by BSNL on account of being not adequately supported. However, during the year ended March 31, 2006, the DOT had constituted a three member committee from its Telecommunications Department comprised of the Member (Production), Member (Finance), and Deputy Director General (Business Solutions) to resolve the various disputes relating to networking charges. Based on the recommendations of the Committee vide their minutes dated January 2006, DOT has settled the disputes on the networking charges for the period from 2000 to 2005. Accordingly, an amount of Rs.3,809 million has been accounted as networking charges in the statement of income for the year ended March 31, 2006.

The license fee as discussed earlier is a factor of the Adjusted Gross Revenues (“AGR”) which in turn is affected by the revenues for the year and the interconnect charges which are allowed as one of the deductions from the revenue to arrive at AGR. Thus the decrease in license fee is directly correlated to the increased interconnect charges which we have accrued during the year as part of the settlement with BSNL and DOT. An 7% decrease in the revenue for the year has decreased the AGR by 24%.Further, during the year we have received an NLD license from the DOT.One of the prerequisites for obtaining an NLD license is the absence of any dues towards DOT on account of License fees for one’s existing services. We have also received a provisional assessment letter from DOT confirming that all amounts demanded as of and for the periods upto March 31, 2005 have been received from MTNL In view of the above we have reversed excess license fees accrued in years upto March 2005.,amounting to Rs 3,408 which accounts for over 90% of the variation in the License fees.

55

The decrease in staff cost by 7% is a direct result of the VRS schemes offered by the Company. Approx.imately 2,000 employees had opted for VRS during the year ended March 31, 2005 resulting in a charge of Rs 1,381 million. A further 1000 employees have opted for VRS during the current year. The charge for the current year is Rs 666 million thus leading to a 5% downward variation as compared to last year Also during the current year approximately 950 employees have retired due to normal age retirement. All these factors have resulted in a lower wage/salary outgo and also entailed lower charges for the current year viz-a-viz last year.The expense for medical benefits has reduced from Rs 2605 million to Rs 2,043 million for the current year accounting for 3% of the total variation in the staff cost

Cellular services: Our cost of revenues has increased by Rs.1,280 million from Rs.1,393 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs.2,673 million for the year ended March 31, 2006. The increase is due to a increase in interconnect charges by Rs.798 million from Rs.545 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs.1,343 million for the year ended March 31, 2006, increase in license fees by Rs.182 million from Rs.309 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs.491 million for the year ended March 31, 2006 and increase in the staff cost by Rs 148 million from Rs.71 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs.219 million for the year ended March 31, 2006.

As regards license fees payable as a percentage of the Adjusted Gross Revenues (“AGR”), the increase is basically due to 100% increase in cellular revenue as compared to the last year.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (SG&A)

Basic services: Our selling, general and administrative expenses have gone down by 25% from Rs.8,715 million during the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs.6,529 million during the year ended March 31, 2006. The decrease is mainly on account of decrease in the charge accrued for provision required against potential bad debt. This accounts for 22% of the overall the 25% fall in SG&A expenses. Company reassessed its provision against doubtful debtos and concluded that we had been proactive in our doubtful debtor’s provisioning in the previous years .During the current year the Company has written back Rs 248 million of this provision as against a charge of Rs 1,137million last year. The fall in the staff cost from Rs 6,405 million to Rs 5,792 million accounts further for a 7% fall in the SG&A.expenses.

Cellular Services: Our selling, general and administrative expenses have gone up by Rs 712 million from Rs.446 million during the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs.1,158 million during the year ended March 31, 2006. The increase is primarily on account of a increase in charge accrued for provision required against potential bad debt by Rs 589 million from Rs 191 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs.780 million for the year ended March 31, 2006, increase in the staff cost by Rs 42 million from Rs.37 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs.79 million for the year ended March 31, 2006 and increase in advertisement expenses by Rs.52 million from Rs.30 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs.82 million for the year ended March 31, 2006.

Income from Operations

Basic Services: Our income from operations has fallen by Rs.3,985 from income from operation of Rs.2,559 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to loss from operation of Rs.1,426 million for the year ended March 31, 2006. The decrease is mainly attributable to a 12% decrease in revenue from Rs.47,269 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs.41,219 million for the year ended March 31, 2006, increase in the cost of revenues from Rs.30,128 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs.29,595 million for the year ended March 31, 2006. There has also been decrease in the selling, general and administrative expenses by 25% from Rs.8,715 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs.6,529 million for the year ended March 31, 2006. As against the 12% reduction in revenues, our selling, general and administrative expenses have gone down by 25%. Further excess liability written back has declined by Rs. 470 million from Rs.1,291 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs. 821 for the year ended March 31, 2006.

56

Cellular Services: Our income from operations has increased by 88% from Rs.510 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs.963 million for the year ended March 31, 2006. The increase is mainly attributable to 99% increase in revenue from Rs.2,874 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs.5,449 million for the year ended March 31, 2006, offset by increase in the cost of revenues from Rs.1,393 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs.2,673 million for the year ended March 31, 2006. As against the 99% increase in revenues, our selling, general and administrative expenses have gone up by 159% from Rs.446 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs.1,158 million for the year ended March 31, 2006.

Interest and Other Income: During the year ended March 31, 2006, our interest and other income has decreased by 11% from Rs.2,670 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs.2,388 million for the year ended March 31, 2006. The decrease is attributable to a 41% decrease in interest and other income from Rs.1,329 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs.787 million for the year ended March 31, 2006, offset by 19% increase in interest from bank deposit from Rs.1,341 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs.1,601 million for the year ended March 31, 2006.

The decrease in interest and other income was mainly due to an recognition of interest on income tax for the year ended march 31, 2005 amounting to Rs. 665 million as compare to the nil for the year ended March 31, 2006.

Income Taxes: The income tax expense has reduced by 79% from Rs.2124 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs.437 million for the year ended March 31, 2006. The decline is attributable to a decrease in the current tax expense by 171% from Rs.3,400 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs.1,253 million for the year ended March 31, 2006, further deferred tax income decreased by 88% from Rs.1,276 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs.861 million for the year ended March 31, 2006.

The current tax expense has fallen due to a 60% reduction in the taxable income (as per the applicable tax laws) from Rs.9,278 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs.3,722 million for the year ended March 31, 2006, which resulted in an equivalent 37% reduction in the expense. Further applicable tax rate in India which has decreased resulted in a 8% decrease in the current tax expense.

The decrease in the deferred tax income during the current year is driven by a decrease in deductible temporary differences by 125% as compared to the previous year, which has resulted in an equivalent 125% reduction in deferred tax income, and further by a decrease in the applicable tax rate in India which has resulted in a 8% decrease in the deferred tax income.

Comparison of Year Ended March 31, 2005 with Year Ended March 31, 2004

The following comparison of our results of between 2005 and 2004 has not been provided on a segment basis since the results of our celluar segment for both the years were immaterial to our consolidated results of operation.

Revenues: Our total revenues decreased 18% from Rs. 61,084 million for the year ended March 31, 2004 to Rs. 50,156 million for the year ended March 31, 2005. The decrease was primarily driven by a decrease in fixed line call revenue, including public call office (PCO) revenue, by 16% from Rs.29,926 million for the year ended March 31, 2004 to Rs.25,677 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 and a decrease in interconnect revenue by 64% from Rs. 13,105 million for the year ended March 31, 2004 to Rs. 4,729 million for the year ended March 31, 2005, offset by a 54% increase in mobile and wireless local loop (WLL) revenue from Rs.2,604 million for the year ended March 31, 2004 to Rs.3,994 million for the year ended March 31, 2005.

Call revenue has gone down as a result of decrease in average number of connections from 4,570,452 connections during the year ended March 31, 2004 to 4,508,886 connections during the year ended March 31, 2005. There was a net decrease of 2,279 million units in billed Metered Call Units (“MCU”), from 32,367 million units during the year ended March 31, 2004 to 30,087 million units during the year ended March 31, 2005. Further, the call tariff rates were reduced during the current year due to increased competition in the market, resulting in a fall in

57

average revenue per connection per annum from Rs.7,100 during the year ended March 31, 2004 to Rs.6,350 during the current year, a decrease of Rs.760 per connection per annum.

The reduction in the interconnect revenue is comprised of a decline in the Access and Call Charges from Mobile Operators by Rs.1,484 million, decrease in revenue from Basic/ILD/NLD operators Rs.6,848 million, and a decrease in revenue in case of Dolphin by Rs.43 million, as compared to the previous year. The reduction was on account of a decrease in the IUC rates from an average of Rs.0.60 per minute during the year ended March 31, 2004 to an average of Rs.0.30 per minute during the year ended March 31, 2005. Further, there has been a decrease in the transit charges during the current year as compared to the previous year.

Cost of Revenues: Our total cost of revenues has reduced by 18% from Rs.38,282 million for the year ended March 31, 2004 to Rs.31,521 million for the year ended March 31, 2005. The reduction is due to a decrease in interconnect charges by 26% from Rs.10,627 million for the year ended March 31, 2004 to Rs.7,866 for the year ended March 31, 2005, a decrease in license fees by 50% from Rs.9,978 million for the year ended March 31, 2004 to Rs.4,974 million for the year ended March 31, 2005, offset by an increase in the staff cost by 10% from Rs.13,531 million for the year ended March 31, 2004 to Rs.14,874 million for the year ended March 31, 2005.

The decline in interconnect charges was on account of a reduction in the charge rates from Rs.3.1 per minute during the year ended March 31, 2004 to Rs 1.4 per minute during the year ended March 31, 2005 in respect of national long distance calls. Also the total number of MCUs on which revenue sharing charges have been paid by the Company have gone down as compared to last year. Further, there has been a decrease in the transit charges during the year ended March 31, 2005 as compared to the year ended March 31, 2004, since till the previous year, the originator was liable to pay the whole amount of revenue share to the transitor who in turn was liable to pay the share of destination party as a result of which our transit costs were higher in case of arrangements where we were the transitor. However, from the current year, the originator is directly liable to pay the share of transitor as well as the destination party as a consequence of which the revenue share payable to the destination party did not get reflected in our costs during the current year. As against this reduction, during the last year, a benefit of Rs. 1,515 million was recognized as a result of reduction in rates between MTNL and BSNL with retrospective effect from April 1, 1999 till March 31, 2003, an agreement which was reached during the last year.

As regards license fees payable as a percentage of the Adjusted Gross Revenues (“AGR”), the percentage has been reduced by the regulatory authorities from 12% of AGR for the year ended March 31, 2004 to 10% of AGR for the year ended March 31, 2005. Further, consequent to the reduction in revenue by 18% during the current year, AGR has gone down by 7% during the current year. Both these factors have resulted in a 23% reduction in expense as compared to the last year. Further, during the last year, Rs. 3,520 million was accrued as incremental license fee for the period beginning April 1, 1999 till March 31, 2003, as a result of resolution of ambiguity in the license fee rates, which has resulted in 27% variation in the expense as compared to the last year.

The increase in the staff costs was on account of normal salary increments and with regard to post retirement benefits, on account of reduction in the rate applied to discount the obligation from 8.35% during the last year to 8% during the current year. In addition to this, approximately 1,000 Group B employees were absorbed into the Company during the current year, due to which the total staff costs have gone up as compared to the last year. Additionally, during the year ended March 31, 2005, a liability towards Voluntary Retirement Scheme amounting to Rs.967 million has been recognized by the Company as cost of revenues.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses: Our selling, general and administrative expenses have gone down by 8% from Rs.10,023 million during the year ended March 31, 2004 to Rs.9,275 million during the year ended March 31, 2005. The decrease is primarily on account of a decrease in the provision for bad and doubtful debts by 53% from Rs.2,415 million for the year ended March 31, 2004 to Rs.1,137 million for the year ended March 31, 2005, offset by an increase in the staff costs by 10% from Rs.5,798 million for the year ended March 31, 2004 to Rs.6,375 million for the year ended March 31, 2005.

The increase in staff costs was primarily on account of normal salary increments and with regard to post retirement benefits, on account of reduction in the rate applied to discount the obligation from 8.35% during the last year to 8% during the current year. In addition to this, approximately 1,000 Group B employees were absorbed into the Company during the current year, due to which the total staff costs have gone up as compared to the last year.

58

Additionally, during the year ended March 31, 2005, a liability towards Voluntary Retirement Scheme amounting to Rs.414 million has been recognized by the Company as selling, general and administrative expenses.

The decrease in the provision for bad and doubtful debts was on account of a reduction in the gross balance of accounts receivables from Rs.11,613 million as at March 31, 2004 to Rs.9,431 million as at March 31, 2005.

Income from Operations: Our income from operations has fallen by 44% from Rs.5,234 million for the year ended March 31, 2004 to Rs.2,927 million for the year ended March 31, 2005. The decrease is mainly attributable to a 18% decrease in revenue from Rs.61,084 million for the year ended March 31, 2004 to Rs.50,156 million for the year ended March 31, 2005, offset by a 18% reduction in the cost of revenues from Rs.38,282 million for the year ended March 31, 2004 to Rs.31,521 million for the year ended March 31, 2005. Though there has been a decrease in the selling, general and administrative expenses during the year ended March 31, 2005 as compared to the year ended March 31, 2004, but the reduction has not been in proportion to the reduction in revenue. As against the 18% reduction in revenues, our selling, general and administrative expenses have gone down by 8% from Rs.10,023 million during the year ended March 31, 2004 to Rs.9,275 million during the year ended March 31, 2005.

Interest and Other Income: During the year ended March 31, 2005, our interest and other income has increased by 56% from Rs.1,714 million for the year ended March 31, 2004 to Rs.2,670 million for the year ended March 31, 2005. The increase is attributable to a 52% increase in interest income from Rs.1,390 million for the year ended March 31, 2004 to Rs.2,119 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 and 70% increase in other income from Rs.324 million for the year ended March 31, 2004 to Rs.552 million for the year ended March 31, 2005.

The increase in interest income was mainly due to an increase of Rs.47.34 million in interest on employee loans as compared to the year ended March 31, 2004, driven by an increase in the amount of employee loans, and Rs.664 million being interest on income tax refund admitted by the income tax department during the year ended March 31, 2005.

Other income has increasedprimarily on account of an increase in the amounts of liquidated damages received by the Company from Rs.77 million during the year ended March 31, 2004 to Rs.201 million during the year ended March 31, 2005.

Income Taxes: The income tax expense has reduced by 18% from Rs.2,570 million for the year ended March 31, 2004 to Rs.2,124 million for the year ended March 31, 2005. The decline is attributable to a decrease in the current tax expense by 36% from Rs.5,309 million for the year ended March 31, 2004 to Rs.3,399 million for the year ended March 31, 2005, offset by a decrease in the deferred tax income by 54% from Rs.2,739 million for the year ended March 31, 2004 to Rs.1,275 million for the year ended March 31, 2005.

The current tax expense has fallen due to a 37% reduction in the taxable income (as per the applicable tax laws) from Rs.14,798 million for the year ended March 31, 2004 to Rs.9,278 million for the year ended March 31, 2005, which resulted in an equivalent 37% reduction in the expense. The same is offset by an increase in the applicable tax rate in India which has resulted in a 1% increase in the current tax expense.

The decrease in the deferred tax income during the current year is driven by a decrease in deductible temporary differences by 53% as compared to the previous year, which has resulted in an equivalent 53% reduction in deferred tax income, and further by an increase in the applicable tax rate in India which has resulted in a 1% decrease in the deferred tax income.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

A summary of our cash flows appears below:

	(in millions of Rs.)
	Year Ended March 31
	2004			2005			2006
Net cash provided by the operating activities		19,885			15,006			6,006
Net cash used in investing activities		(16,706	)		(12,706	)		(7,975	)
Net cash from financing activities		(3,198	)		(4,630	)		(3,951	)
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(19	)		(2,330	)		(5,920	)
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year		9,910			9,891			7,561
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year		9,891			7,561			1,641

59

We have historically met our working capital and capital expenditure requirements principally from cash flows generated from operations. We have also from time to time undertaken external borrowings. As of March 31, 2006, we had no borrowings. We expect to meet our planned capital requirements for the next two years primarily from cash flow generated from operations, together with existing cash balances and supplemented by market borrowings, whenever required. At March 31, 2006, we had cash and cash equivalents of Rs.1.64 billion and liquid short term investments in bank deposits of Rs. 19.02 billion. We anticipate capital expenditures of approximately Rs.3,923 million in fiscal 2007. We do not expect to have any liquidity problem in regard of possible adverse results in our pending litigations as we would expect to discharge any obligations from cash on hand. We have significant amounts due from related parties, which if not settled, would significantly impact cash flow from operations. We believe that existing cash and cash equivalents and funds generated from operations will be sufficient to meet these requirements. However, we may significantly alter our proposed capital expenditures plans and accordingly, may require additional financing to meet our requirements. In either case, we cannot assure you that additional financing will be available at all or, if available, that such financing will be obtained on terms favorable to us or that any additional financing will not be dilutive to our shareholders.

Operating Activities

Net cash flow from operating activities was Rs.15.01 billion in fiscal 2005 and Rs 6.06 billion in fiscal 2006. The decrease in cash generation from operating activities during the current year is primarily attributable to a decrease in the net income from Rs.3.41 billion for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs.1.07 billion for the year ended March 31, 2006, a decrease in the amounts due to related parties from Rs.11.33 billion as at March 31, 2005 to Rs.6.09 billion as at March 31, 2006, an increase in the other receivables from Rs.4.05 as at March 31, 2005 to Rs.8.8 billion as at March 31, 2006. Net cash flow from operating activities was Rs.19.9 billion in fiscal 2004 and Rs.15.01 billion in fiscal 2005. The decrease in cash generation from operating activities during the year ended March 31, 2005 was primarily attributable to a decrease in the net income from Rs.4.35 billion for the year ended March 31, 2004 to Rs.3.41 billion for the year ended March 31, 2005, an increase in amounts due from related parties from Rs.23.58 billion as at March 31, 2004 to Rs.27.79 billion as at March 31, 2005, a lesser increase in the accrued employee costs from Rs.10.51 billion during the year ended March 31, 2004 to Rs.5.47 billion during the year ended March 31, 2005, as offset by a lesser increase in gross accounts receivable balances and unbilled revenues from Rs.11.19 billion during the year ended March 31, 2004 to Rs.0.34 billion during the year ended March 31, 2005.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities decreased from Rs.12.71 billion for fiscal 2005 to Rs.7.98 billion for fiscal 2006. This is mostly due to a decrease in the investment made in short term bank deposits from Rs.2.08 billion during the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs.1.29 billion during the year ended March 31, 2006 and a decrease in the purchase of fixed assets from Rs.10.71 billion during the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs.6.72 billion during the year ended March 31, 2006. Net cash used in investing activities decreased from Rs.16.71 billion for fiscal 2004 to Rs.12.71 billion for fiscal 2005. This was mostly due to a decrease in the investment made in short term bank deposits from Rs.7.39 billion during the year ended March 31, 2004 to Rs.2.07 billion during the year ended March 31, 2005 and offset by an increase in the purchase of fixed assets from Rs.9.34 billion during the year ended March 31, 2004 to Rs.10.71 billion during the year ended March 31, 2005.

Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities has decreased from Rs.4.63 billion for fiscal 2005 to Rs.3.95 billion for fiscal 2006. This decrease is on account of a decrease in the amounts of cash dividends paid from Rs.4.63 billion during the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs.3.95 billion during the year ended March 31, 2006. Net cash used in financing activities had increased from Rs.3.19 billion for fiscal 2004 to Rs.4.63 billion for fiscal 2005. This increase was on account of an increase in the amounts of cash dividends paid from Rs.3.19 billion during the year ended March 31, 2004 to Rs.4.63 billion during the year ended March 31, 2005.

60

Contractual Obligations

The following table shows our contractual payment obligations for the specified future periods:

	(in millions of Rs.) Payments due by period
	Total	Less than 1 year	1-3 years	3-5 years	More than 5 years
Purchase obligations (capital commitments)	3,923	3,923	—	—	—
Pension and other post-retirement obligations	31,119	2,425	2,176	2,879	23,639
Total	35,042	6,348	2,176	2,879	23,639

MTNL is obligated to pay license fees and spectrum charges to DOT in accordance with conditions governing license fees for Basic Telephone Service and Cellular Telephone Service under the Revenue Sharing Regime. The specified percentage for license fees on fixed line services and cellular services were 12%, 10%, 10% of the Adjusted Gross Revenue (“AGR”) for the years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 respectively.

We do not expect to have any difficulty repaying such amounts, and may do so entirely from cash flow generated from operations. As of March 31, 2006, we had no debt outstanding and no credit facilities.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of March 31, 2006, we were not a financial guarantor of obligations of any unconsolidated entity, and we were not a party to any similar off-balance sheet obligation or arrangement.

Capital Expenditure

See “Property, Plant and Equipment - Network Modernization” for a discussion of our capital requirements for capital expenditures.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

We did not incur research and development expenditures in the last three fiscal years.

TREND INFORMATION

For a discussion of other important trends affecting us, see “—Operating Results—Overview” above.

Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees

DIRECTORS AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT

The government of India controls us and has the power to elect all of our directors and to determine the outcome of almost all actions requiring approval of our board of directors or shareholders. The Department of Telecommunications, as the representative of our majority shareholder, the government of India, also has the authority to exercise the special powers granted to the President of India under our articles of association. These include the right to appoint our Chairman-cum-Managing Director and to issue directives with respect to our business. See "Additional Information- Memorandum and Articles of Association-Powers of the President of India".

61

Directors

The Board of Directors has ultimate responsibility for the administration and management of our affairs, except for certain matters that are reserved by our articles of association for the approval of the President of India. Our articles of association provide for a board of not less than four and not more than 18 directors. The directors are appointed by the government of India. The President of India is empowered by Article 66A of our articles of association to appoint one-third of the total number of our directors sitting at any time for an indefinite term and to designate our Chairman-cum-Managing Director. Our remaining directors are also appointed by the Govt. of India and non-official part time directors serve for three-year terms . As per the provisions of the Indian Companies Act, one-third of these set term directors retire each year at our annual general meeting.

We currently have seven directors, four of whom are our most senior officers. We refer to these directors as "full-time directors". Our Executive Director, Mumbai and our Executive Director, Delhi are ex-officio members of the Board. Two of our directors are officers of the DOT. Finally, there is one director who is neither our employee nor employee of the DOT. We refer to these directors as "part-time" directors". All of our directors were appointed by the DOT. Five board seats are currently vacant i.e. two ex-officio director and three part-time directors.

The business address of each of the directors is our registered office. The names of our current directors, their ages and their positions as at the date of this report appear below:

Name	Age	Position
R.S.P. Sinha	55	Director(1) / Chairman-cum-Managing Director
V. Shivkumar	57	Director(1) / Director(Personnel)
Kuldeep Singh	52	Director(1) / Director (Technical)
Anita Soni (Ms.)	53	Director(1) / Director (Finance)
M. Sahu	52	Joint Secretary (3), Department of Telecommunications
Annie Moraes (Ms.)	50	Director (3) / Dy. Director General, Department of Telecommunications
S. Balasubramaniam	63	Director(4)

(1) Full-time director; (2) Director ex-officio; (3) Government director; (4) part-time directors

Other Principal Executive Officers

The business address of each of our principal executive officers is our registered office. In addition to those officers who are members of the board of directors, our principal executive officers and their ages and positions as at the date of this report are as follows:

Name	Age	Position
K.C. Gupta	57	Executive Director, Operation
S.C. Ahuja	59	Company Secretary

Mr. R.S.P. Sinha has been our Chairman and Managing Director since November 2003 and a member of our board as Director (Fin) since April, 2002. Prior to joining us, he was Director (Finance) of Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. He is a Fellow Member of the Institute of Cost & Works Accountants of India. Mr. Sinha has 22 years experience in senior financial positions both in the private sector and the public sector, including 11 years experience as full-time director of the board of Public Sector Undertakings. Mr. Sinha worked as Director (Finance) on the board of VSNL from January 1999 to February 2002 and Director (Finance), MTNL from April, 2002 to October 2003.

Mr. V. Shivkumar has been our Director (Human Resources) and a member of our board since April, 2002. He has a Post Graduate Degree in Personnel Management & Industrial Relations, a Post Graduate Diploma in Industrial Engineering & Management and Bachelor of Law Degree from Jabalpur University. Prior to joining us he served as the Executive Director (HR) at Bharat Earth Movers Ltd.

62

Mr. Kuldeep Singh has been our Director (Technical) and a member of our Board since December 9, 2004. He is an Engineering graduate with master in business administration. Mr. Singh joined the Indian telecom services in 1979. He has more than 31 years experience in the field of computers & telecommunications. Before being appointed as Director (T) on the board of MTNL, he worked as GM in MTNL for more than 4 years. Prior to this, he worked in DOT, Overseas Communication Services and National Informatic Centre in various responsible positions.

Ms. Anita Soni has been our Director (Finance) since April 26, 2005. Mrs. Soni joined Indian Postal Telecommunications finance services of the Government of India in 1977. She has Master of Arts (Economics Honours) from Punjab University. She has more than 28 years experience as a senior finance Executive in Indian P & T (Finance & Accounts) Service. Before joining MTNL as Director (Finance), she held positions in DOT, MTNL, and BSNL and has experience in all aspects of telecom finance. She is on the panel of experts of the International Telecom Union (ITU), and has participated in various ITU projects.

Mr. M. Sahu has been a member of our Board since September 16, 2005, and is presently working as Joint Secretary in the Department of Telecommunications. After obtaining the degree of Bachelor of Electrical Engineering in 1977, Mr. Sahu has done Post-Graduation Degree in Development Administration from the University of Birmingham, U.K. in 1993-94 with focus on Industrial Development and re-location of Industries. Prior to this, Shi Sahu worked in UNIDO as Project Director. He was working as Joint Secretary in Ministry of Environment & Forests and worked in different departments in Government of Gujarat in various capacities. He has more than 24 years of experience in Civil Service and 15 years practical experience in industries including that of more than 6 years in Government of India.

Mrs. Annie Moraes has been a member of MTNL board since April 25, 2006 and is presently working as DDG (FEB), Dept. of Telecom. She joined the Indian Post and Telecom Accounts and Finance Service in 1979. She has worked in various capacities in the Dept of Telecom and in the Public sector telecom companies. She is presently Dy. Director General (Finance and Budget) in the Dept of Telecom. Prior to this she has worked as General Manager (Finance) in MTNL. She is post graduate in Economics from Jawaharal Nehru Univesity, New Delhi. She also holds an MBA (Exec) from the University of Queensland in Brisbane, Australia.

Dr. S. Balasubramanian has been a member of MTNL Board since November 25, 2005 as Non Official part time Director. He holds an M.A. (Economics) degree, M. Phil (Economics) degree, Ph.D. (Eco.) and DDS from University of Madras. He served as professor of Economics in madras University for 28 years as well as Head of Dept of Economics for 15 years in Pfresidency college, Chennai. He has published several publications in Socio-Economics thoughts, etc. He has also served as a member of Tamilnadu Public Service Commission.

Mr. K.C. Gupta has been our Executive Director, Operation, since December 2004. Mr. Gupta joined the Indian Telecommunication Service in 1972 and has held various posts in different parts of India including service with Telecommunications Consultants India Limited from 1996-2000. Mr. Gupta holds an engineering degree from Delhi College of Engineering, Delhi.

Mr. S.C. Ahuja has been our company secretary since October, 1988. Prior to joining us, Mr. Ahuja was a Dy. Comp. Secretary at Engineers India Ltd., a Government enterprise. Mr. Ahuja is a Fellow Member of the Institute of Company Secretaries of India. Mr. Ahuja has a Master of Arts (English) degree from Himachal Pradesh University and a Bachelor of Laws degree from Kurukshetra University.

AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Audit Committee of the board of directors reviews, acts on and reports to the board of directors with respect to the various auditing and accounting matters, including the recommendation of our independent auditors,  the scope of the annual audits, fees to be paid to the independent auditors, the performance of our independent auditors and our accounting practices. Effective April 25, 2006, the Board reconstituted the Audit Committee, now comprised of Dr. Balasubramanian, Chairman, Mr. Sahu and Mrs. Moraes. Mr. Sahu and Mrs. Moraes are Government of India employeesand are not considered independent under Indian standards but under US standards we avail ourselves of an exemption from certain independence standards (See Item 16D to this Report). We are following up regularly with the DOT for early appointment of additional directors onthe board so that we may

63

reconstitute our Audit Committee to include only persons who are not MTNL or government employees and qualify as independent under Indian standards.

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

The total remuneration and benefits in kind paid by us to all of our directors and executive officers as a group in fiscal 2006 was approximately Rs. 3.81 million.

There are no outstanding loans, advances or guarantees of any amounts to our directors or principal officers. There have been no transactions effected by us during the current or immediately preceding fiscal year, and there were no transactions effected during an earlier financial year that remain in any respect outstanding or unperformed, between us and any of our directors or principal officers which were unusual in their nature or conditions or significant to our business.

EMPLOYEES

Employees

At June 30, 2006, we had 49,347 employees, of whom 6,701 were executive and 42,646 were non-executive employees. We seek to improve employee productivity through continuing education and training and by emphasizing the importance of quality of service and subscriber satisfaction. We have placed a special emphasis on retraining our workforce to meet the demands of modernizing our network and improving customer satisfaction.

In general, employees receive a base salary and salary-related housing and other allowances, productivity based incentive payments and certain benefits, including a pension plan, medical benefits for themselves and certain members of their immediate families and post-retirement medical benefits for retired employees with 10 years of service and certain members of their immediate families. Substantially all of our non-executive employees have opted to terminate their services with the DOT and to continue as our employees, effective November 1, 1998. We believe that this was the result of employee expectations of increased wages and improved benefits and a desire to remain in Delhi or Mumbai, as the case may be. In July 2000, we entered into a new 10 year wage agreement with our non-executive employees, which provided for substantial wage increases retroactive to November 1998 for wages and November 1999 for perquisites.

Under the option given to them for pension benefits, most of our absorbed employees have opted for retaining pension benefits in accordance with the Central government pension rules and some other employees have opted for retirement rules which as applicable to our directly recruited employees, and opt to draw pro rata monthly pension until their absorption. Accordingly, with effect from November 1, 1998 we started accruing for pension and gratuity for these employees. In August/September 2002, the DOT indicated that the government would pay for the pension benefits of the government employees absorbed by us who opted for either the Central government scheme of pension or for the pro rata pension scheme for the period served with the DOT. However, the terms of such payments are in the process of finalization. Once these terms are finalized and the payments are made to DOT for the period of employment of these employees with us, we expect that our liability for post retirement obligations would be limited to monthly contributions on the basis of the rules to be prescribed by the government of India. Presently, in the absence of any further movement from the Government, MTNL is discharging all such liabilities.

Approximately 97% of our executive employees have accepted absorption by us, becoming our permanent employees. These employees are entitled to certain pension and gratuity benefits from the government of India.

We have finalized a new compensation structure for our senior executive employees. The new structure provides for higher salaries and benefits for our senior executive employees who are yet to exercise their option for MTNL.  As a public sector enterprise, we abide by general DOT and Department of Public Sector Enterprises personnel policies, which, among other things, limit our ability to reduce employment levels and control the amount of salaries and other remuneration that we may pay to our employees. Our employee productivity measured by

64

access lines in service per employee has been increasing steadily but remains significantly lower than the Asian and global averages. MTNL had also launched Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) for its executive as well as non-executives in the financial year 2004-05/2005-06 and a total of 3947 employees were relieved under this scheme.

The mandatory retirement age for all employees is 60 years of age. Upon retirement, employees and their dependents are entitled to a pension under a defined benefit plan. The pension amount is based on the employee’s years of service and salary level upon retirement and, in a reduced amount, is transferable to dependents upon the employee’s death. We also provide post-retirement health care benefits to retired employees and their dependents.

Almost all of our non-executive employees are members of local unions organized in each of Delhi and Mumbai. Our executive employees seconded from DOT are members of national officers’ associations, which act as an informal consultative mechanism for conveying management staff’s views regarding personnel policies to our senior executives.

TRAINING

In order to deal with the new realities of competitive marketplace, MTNL has launched a massive training effort to train its workforce. Training design has been so modified to tilt the balance of training from knowledge to skill and attitude, which are key to succeed in a customer-driven marketplace. During financial year 2005-06 a total number of 3,024 non-executives and 968 executives were trained in subjects related to customer care, leadership, management and supervisory training. On IT and technology related fields, 2,808 non-executives and 1,287 executives were trained.

In addition to this, highly specialized training on GSM, CDMA and Broadband also took place for MTNL staff both in India and abroad.

In addition to already existing District Telecom Training Centres (DTTC), MTNL has created state-of-the-art training facility in the form of Centre for Excellence in Telecom Technology and Management (CETTM) at Powai, Mumbai. Apart from catering to the in-house training needs of MTNL, CETTM shall provide telecom training to other organizations also. Recently an agreement has been reached between MTNL, TCIL and the Ministry of External Affairs. Under the agreement, training on telecom technology shall be provided to the candidates from foreign countries in the CETTM premises.

SHARE OWNERSHIP

None of our directors or connected persons or our principal executive officers owned any of our equity shares as of the date of this report.

On January 7, 2000, the Indian government offered to sell up to 14 million equity shares, representing approximately 2.2% of our outstanding equity shares, to our employees at a discount as compensation in connection with the restructuring of DOT. Because the terms were not viewed as favorable, none of our employees accepted this offer before it expired on December 31, 2000. In a recent communication DOT has indicated for closure of the issue but MTNL has again taken up the matter with the government.

65

Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions

MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS

The following table sets forth information about the shareholders holding 5% or more of our outstanding equity shares as of March 31, 2006, according to our register of shareholders:

Name of Owner	Number of Shares	Percentage
Government of India (1)	354,372,740	56.25%
Life Insurance Corporation of India (2)	75,263,167	11.95%
The Bank of New York (3)	45,656,964	7.24%

(1) The equity shares owned by the government of India are registered in the name of the President of India or his nominees in our register of shareholders.

(2) Life Insurance Corporation of India is also controlled by the government of India.

(3) These equity shares are held by The Bank of New York as custodian for the holders of our ADSs.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

We have a number of distinct relationships with the government of India as outlined below:

Government of India as Shareholder

The government of India currently owns 56.25% of our outstanding equity shares. Accordingly, the government of India will continue to have the ability to control us, elect all of our directors and determine the outcome of substantially all actions requiring the approval of our board of directors or shareholders.

The government of India has announced its intention to divest its shareholdings in a number of government companies by offering significant equity stakes in those companies to strategic partners through a competitive bidding process. To date, there have been no announcements that the government of India plans to reduce its shareholding in us through this process.

The DOT acts as representative of our majority shareholder, the government of India. The DOT also has the authority to exercise the special powers granted to the President of India under our articles of association. These include the right to appoint our Chairman-cum-Managing Director and to issue directives with respect to our business. See “Additional Information— Memorandum and Articles of Association—Powers of the President of India.”

Government of India as Regulator

Our business is subject to comprehensive regulation by the Ministry of Communications through the Telecom Commission and the DOT pursuant to the provisions of the Telegraph Act and the terms of the licenses under which we operate. While the Telegraph Act sets the legal framework for regulation of the telecommunications sector, much of our supervision and regulation is implemented more informally through the general administrative powers of the DOT, including those reserved to the DOT under our license, and of other government of India agencies. In March 1997, an autonomous body, the TRAI, was established with quasi-judicial powers to regulate telecommunications services in India. See “Information on the Company— Telecommunications Regulation in India—The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India.”

We operate all of our services under licenses granted by the DOT. The licenses identify the services that we are permitted to provide, which we believe covers all of the services that we currently do provide. A license for

66

any additional service requires the approval of the DOT. The DOT retains the right, however, after giving us appropriate notice, to modify the terms and conditions of our license at any time if, in its opinion, it is necessary or expedient to do so in the interest of the general public or for the proper operation of the telecommunications sector. The DOT may also terminate our license before its scheduled expiration upon our breach of any of its terms. Under the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, the Telecom TRAI has been granted the authority to determine tariffs.

So long as the government of India’s shareholding in us equals or exceeds 51%, we are deemed to be an Indian government company under the Companies Act and are subject to regulations generally applicable to public sector enterprises in India. These regulations concern personnel matters, including appointment of key management personnel and the hiring, dismissal and compensation of employees, as well as procurement, capital expenditures and the generation of funds through the issuance of securities. For example, all appointments to our board of directors must first be recommended by the Public Enterprises Selection Board, a government agency, and its recommendations are reviewed by the government of India, although until recently all appointments to our board have been recommended only by the government of India. All appointments to our board of directors are also approved by our shareholders. Disputes between government of India enterprises (such as us) and government of India departments generally must be referred to the Committee on Disputes of the government of India for mediation before either party may bring a claim in a court of law. A single government of India ministry or department is designated as the primary supervisor of each public sector enterprise and the DOT has been designated as our primary supervisor. Our activities are also subject to review by India’s Parliament, and the DOT must submit an annual report to Parliament regarding our business activities.

The government of India plays an important role in the preparation of our financial statements. Under Indian regulations, as a government of India company, our annual accounts are audited by statutory auditors and branch auditors which are independent chartered accountants appointed each year by the government of India at the direction of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India. See “Additional Information—Memorandum and Articles of Association—Audit and Annual Report.” In accordance with the government of India’s practice with respect to government of India companies, auditors have generally not been permitted to serve as our branch or statutory auditors for more than three consecutive years. In addition, the Comptroller and Auditor General conducts an independent review of our financial statements that are audited by the statutory and branch auditors. The annual report submitted to the Parliament includes a copy of our audit report and any comments upon or supplements to the audit report made by the Comptroller and Auditor General.

The Government of India as Customer

The government of India purchases our services on a commercial basis, and government entities, in the aggregate, constitute the single largest user of our services. The DOT sets the tariffs for these services, which are the same as our tariffs to our other customers. However, certain limited categories of high-level government of India officials may not have their telephone connections disconnected for non-payment of bills.

Our Financing of the Department of Telecommunications

As a department of the government of India, the DOT cannot raise funds through external borrowings from non-government of India entities, and has historically depended on us to raise funds on its behalf for use in its telecommunications business. By restructuring us as a corporation, the DOT was able to create a company, which could raise debt in the capital markets to be used to fund its telecommunications operations. The Indian government guaranteed these borrowings and we on-lent the proceeds of the borrowings on terms substantially similar to the terms of the original loan. As a result of the corporatization of the Department of Telecom Services into BSNL in October 2000, we no longer borrow funds on behalf of the DOT. All external borrowings that had made on behalf of the DOT/BSNL have been repaid by us.

67

Related Party Transactions

In addition to the transactions and circumstances described above in this Item 7, we enter into numerous business relationships with entities that have varying degrees of government control, as well as with the government itself and subdivisions of the government. For example, as discussed elsewhere in this report, our principal interconnect arrangements are with BSNL. For more information on our relationships and transactions with the government of India and its subdivisions and entities controlled by the government, see Note 4 and Note 19 to our consolidated financial statements, which appear elsewhere in this report.

Item 8. Financial Information

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION

See “Item 18. Financial Statements” and pages F-1 through F-33.

SIGNIFICANT CHANGES

Recent Developments

Dividends. Under Indian law, a company pays dividends upon a recommendation by its board of directors and approval of a majority of the shareholders at the annual general meeting of shareholders held within six months of the end of each fiscal year. Shareholders have the right to decrease but not increase the dividend amount recommended by the board of directors. Dividends may be paid out of company profits for the fiscal year in which the dividend is declared after transfer to the reserves of a percentage of our profits for that year of not less than 2.5%. The Companies Act further provides that, in the event of inadequacy or absence of profits in any year, a dividend may be declared for that year out of our accumulated profits, subject to certain limitations.

In February 2006, our Board of Directors recommended the payment of interim divided of Rs. 3.00 per share, amounting to a total of Rs. 1890 million to record holders of equity shares on February 21, 2006.

In June 2006, our board of directors recommended the payment of a dividend of Rs.4.0 per share, amounting to a total of Rs.2520 million, including interim dividend of Rs. 3/- per share, to record holders of equity shares on September 20, 2006. This dividend has been approved by our shareholders at our annual general meeting held on September 26, 2006. We must pay a “dividend distribution tax” at the rate of 12.5% (plus a surcharge of 10% and an add-on tax at the rate of 2% of the total dividend distribution tax and surcharge) on the total amount distributed as dividend. Currently, there is no Indian tax payable by shareholders in respect of dividends received.

For a description of the tax consequences of dividends paid to our shareholders, see “Additional Information—Taxation—Indian Taxation—Taxation of Distributions.”

Item 9. The Offer and Listing

MARKET PRICE INFORMATION

Equity Shares

Our outstanding equity shares are listed on several Indian stock exchanges and were first quoted on The Stock Exchange, Mumbai on May 13, 1993. Our equity shares are also traded on the National Stock Exchange in India. The following table sets forth the high and low closing prices and average daily trading volume on The Stock Exchange, Mumbai for our equity shares for the periods indicated:

68

	Share price (Rs.)
Calendar period	High	Low	Average daily trading volume
2003
First Quarter	119.10	81.05	12,971,589
Second Quarter	115.40	85.00	8,489,312
Third Quarter	137	98.50	20,804,253
Fourth Quarter	141	105.80	18,238,816
2004
First Quarter	157.15	121.25	1,426,035
Second Quarter	166.45	92.90	23,242,184
Third Quarter	142.00	117.80	15,787,985
Fourth Quarter	165.10	120.00	11,633,506

2005
First Quarter	170.05	110.25	13,424,191
Second Quarter	127.00	110.00	5,379,978
Third Quarter	142.40	116.20	9,053,279
Fourth Quarter	150.35	108.00	7,890,609
2006
April 2006	228.85	181.00	7,489,140
May 2006	226.00	128.80	5,562,732
June 2006	166.95	132.75	3,680,440
July 2006	157.40	133.50	1,930,216
August 2006	163.00	138.00	1,813,443

On September 26, 2006, the closing price of our equity shares on The Stock Exchange, Mumbai was Rs.154.75.

Our global depositary receipts were listed on the London Stock Exchange and quoted on SEAQ International until we terminated our global depositary receipt program following the completion of our exchange offer in which we exchanged global depositary receipts of tendering holders for New York Stock Exchange-listed American Depositary Shares, or ADSs. The commencement of our ADS program and the termination of our global depositary receipt program both occurred in the fourth quarter of calendar year 2001.

The table below shows the high and low closing prices on the New York Stock Exchange for our ADSs for the period indicated.

	ADS price
Calendar period	High		Low
2002		US$7.50		US$3.63
2003		6.25		3.33
2004		9.27		5.40
2005		8.44		5.41
First Quarter		8.36		6.24
Second Quarter		6.99		6.00
Third Quarter		8.44		6.31
Fourth Quarter		7.25		5.41
2006
First Quarter		8.80		6.65
Second Quarter		9.75		8.04
April		9.55		8.04
May		9.75		6.66
June		7.63		6.19
July		7.03		5.61
August		6.81		5.95
September (through September 28, 2006)		6.91		6.45

69

On September 26, 2006, the closing price of our ADSs on the New York Stock Exchange was US$6.64 per ADS.

THE INDIAN SECURITIES MARKET

The information in this section has been extracted from publicly available documents from various sources, including officially prepared materials from the Securities and Exchange Board of India, The Stock Exchange, Mumbai and the National Stock Exchange, and has not been prepared or independently verified by us or any of our affiliates or advisers.

The Indian Securities Market

India has a long history of organized securities trading. In 1875, the first stock exchange was established in Mumbai.

The Securities and Exchange Board of India

India’s stock exchanges are regulated by the Securities and Exchange Board of India under the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956, and the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Rules, 1957. The Securities Contracts (Regulation) Rules regulate the recognition of stock exchanges, the qualifications for membership and the manner in which contracts are entered into and enforced between members.

The main objective of the Securities and Exchange Board of India, which was established by the government of India in February 1992, is to promote the development of and regulate the Indian securities markets and protect the interests of investors. The Securities and Exchange Board of India may make or amend an exchange’s by-laws and rules, overrule an exchange’s governing body and withdraw recognition of an exchange. In the past, the Securities and Exchange Board of India’s regulation of market practices was limited. The Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 granted the Securities and Exchange Board of India powers to regulate the business of Indian securities markets, including stock exchanges and other financial intermediaries, promote and monitor self-regulatory organizations, prohibit fraudulent and unfair trade practices and insider trading, and regulate substantial acquisitions of shares and takeovers of companies. The Securities and Exchange Board of India has also issued:

·   guidelines concerning minimum disclosure requirements by public companies;

·   rules and regulations concerning:

·   investor protection, insider trading, substantial acquisitions of shares and takeovers of companies, buybacks of securities, employee stock option schemes, foreign capital market issues, derivative instruments and sweat equity; and

·   debenture trustees, depositaries, development financial institutions, venture capital funds, foreign institutional investors, stockbrokers, underwriters, merchant bankers, portfolio managers, mutual funds, credit rating agencies and other capital market participants; and

·   rules and regulations regarding the prohibition of fraudulent and unfair trade practices relating to the securities market.

The Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act has been amended to include derivatives of securities and instruments of collective investment in the definition of “securities.” This has been done with a view to develop and regulate the markets for derivatives. Trading in index-linked futures currently takes place on the National Stock Exchange and The Stock Exchange, Mumbai. Trading in individual stock futures that have been notified by Securities and Exchange Board of India is now permitted. The Securities and Exchange Board of India also set up a

70

committee for the review of Indian securities laws, which has proposed a draft Securities Bill. The draft Securities Bill, if accepted, will result in a substantial revision in the laws relating to securities in India.

Public Company Regulation

Under the Companies Act, a public offering of securities in India must generally be made by means of a prospectus, which must contain information specified in the Companies Act and be filed with the Registrar of Companies having jurisdiction over the place where a company’s registered office is situated. A company’s directors and promoters may be subject to civil and criminal liability for misstatements in a prospectus. The Companies Act also sets forth procedures for the acceptance of subscriptions and the allotment of securities among subscribers and establishes maximum commission rates for the sale of securities.

The Securities and Exchange Board of India has issued detailed guidelines concerning disclosures by public companies and investor protection. Prior to the repeal of certain rules in mid-1992, the Controller of Capital Issues of the government of India regulated the prices at which companies could issue securities. The Securities and Exchange Board of India guidelines now permit existing listed companies to price freely their issues of securities, though the pricing of initial public offerings is subject to certain restrictions. All new issues governed by the Securities and Exchange Board of India guidelines are conditional upon a minimum subscription requirement of 90.0% of the securities being issued. Promoters of companies are required to retain a certain minimum certified holding of equity share capital, which is subject to a lock-in for three years. Further, existing shareholders of the company, who are not promoters, are subject to a lock-in of one year from the date of the initial public offering. No issuance of bonus shares is permitted within 12 months of any public issue or rights issue.

Public limited companies are required under the Companies Act to prepare, file with the Registrar of Companies and circulate to their shareholders audited annual accounts, which comply with the Companies Act’s disclosure requirements and regulations governing their manner of presentation. In addition, a listed company is subject to continuing disclosure requirements pursuant to the terms of its listing agreement with the relevant stock exchange. Listed companies are now required to publish quarterly unaudited financial results that are reviewed by an outside auditor in accordance with a prescribed standard for non-audit reviews. The Securities and Exchange Board of India has recently notified amendments to the listing agreement tightening the continual disclosure standards by corporations and corporate governance measures to be adopted by listed companies.

Listing

The listing of securities on a recognized Indian stock exchange is regulated by the Securities Contract Rules.

Under the standard terms of stock exchange listing agreements, the governing body of each stock exchange is empowered to suspend trading of or dealing in a listed security for breach of the company’s obligations under such agreement, subject to the company receiving prior notice of the intent of the exchange. In the event that a suspension of a company’s securities continues for a period in excess of three months, the company may appeal to the Securities and Exchange Board of India to set aside the suspension. The Securities and Exchange Board of India has the power to veto stock exchange decisions in this regard.

The Securities and Exchange Board of India has issued the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Delisting of Securities) Guidelines, 2003, which sets forth the procedure for delisting of securities in the following circumstances:

·   voluntary delisting sought by the promoters of a company;

·   any acquisition of shares of the company or a scheme or arrangement, by whatever name referred to, consequent to which the public shareholding falls below the minimum limit specified in the listing conditions or listing agreement that may result in delisting of securities;

71

·   promoters of the company who voluntary seek to delist their securities from all or some of the stock exchanges;

·   cases where a person in control of management is seeking to consolidate his holdings in a company, in a manner which would result in the public shareholding in the company falling below the limit specified in the listing conditions or in a listing agreement that may have the effect of the company being delisted; and

·   compulsory delisting by stock exchanges (e.g., upon failure by a company to pay required listing fees).

Indian Stock Exchanges

There are 24 stock exchanges in India. Most of the stock exchanges have their own governing board for self-regulation.

It is estimated that the six major exchanges, The Stock Exchange, Mumbai, the stock exchanges at Ahmedabad, Calcutta, Chennai and Delhi, and the National Stock Exchange, account for more than 90.0% of the market capitalization of listed Indian companies. The Stock Exchange, Mumbai and the National Stock Exchange account for a majority of trading volumes of securities in India. The Stock Exchange, Mumbai and National Stock Exchange together hold a dominant position among the stock exchanges in terms of number of listed companies, market capitalization and trading activity.

There are generally no restrictions on price movements of any security on any given day. However, to restrict abnormal price volatility, the Securities and Exchange Board of India has instructed stock exchanges to apply daily circuit breakers, which do not allow transactions at prices different by more than 8.0% of the previous closing price for shares quoted at Rs.20 or more. The Securities and Exchange Board of India has instructed stock exchanges to relax the circuit breakers by a further 8.0% after half an hour from the time prices reach the limit of 8.0%. It has allowed stock exchanges to fix circuit breakers for shares quoted at prices up to Rs.20. There is no circuit filter applicable for trading in shares on rolling settlement and for which derivative instruments are available. There is, however, a dummy circuit filter applicable in case of a 20% movement on share prices in order to prevent accidental trades. There is a 20% circuit filter applicable for trading in shares on rolling settlement and for which derivative instruments are not available. There is also an index based circuit filter based on the BSE SENSEX and NSE S&P CNX Fifty indices wherein trading in the entire market is halted for a specific period depending upon whether the index fluctuates in excess of 10%, 15% or 20%. Further, margin requirements are also imposed by stock exchanges that are required to be paid at rates fixed by the stock exchanges. The Indian stock exchanges can also exercise the power to suspend trading during periods of market volatility.

A settlement cycle is an account period for the securities traded on a stock exchange. At the end of the period, obligations are settled, i.e., buyers of securities pay for and receive securities while sellers give securities and receive payment for them. The obligations are settled on a net basis, i.e., if some security is both purchased and sold in the same settlement cycle then only the net quantity of securities is delivered or received and the net amount of funds paid or received. Typically, the length of the settlement period is two business days. The Securities and Exchange Board of India has specified certain shares to be settled by rolling settlement. Under rolling settlement, the length of the settlement period is one day. All stocks trading under the rolling settlement system are settled on a T+2-day basis; trades executed on a Monday are typically settled on the following Monday. Stocks that are not under the rolling settlement system follow the account period settlement system.

In December 1993, the Securities and Exchange Board of India announced a ban on forward trading on the Ahmedabad, Calcutta and Delhi stock exchanges and The Stock Exchange, Mumbai in order to contain excessive speculation, protect the interests of investors and regulate the stock market. All transactions thereafter were required to be for payment and delivery.

In October 1995, the Securities and Exchange Board of India announced the introduction of a modified forward trading system to enable buyers and sellers to defer the settlement of their obligations to the following settlement cycle. This system began on The Stock Exchange, Mumbai in January 1996 for select shares. The new

72

system segregates trades into different categories, namely, carry-forward, delivery and jobbing, with different identification numbers of the various trades. The Securities and Exchange Board of India has appointed a committee to recommend modalities for a carry forward mechanism under the rolling settlement. Once the revised carry forward mechanism is approved, rolling settlement will be applicable also for shares in the carry forward list.

In May 2001, the Securities and Exchange Board of India announced that all shares included in the new system will trade only in the compulsory rolling settlement system from July 2, 2001. All outstanding deferred positions under the earlier system would have to be compulsorily liquidated by September 3, 2001.

In 1992, the Securities and Exchange Board of India promulgated rules and regulations that prescribe conditions for registration of stockbrokers. A stockbroker may not buy, sell or deal in securities except pursuant to a certificate granted by the Securities and Exchange Board of India. The regulations also prescribe a broker code of conduct and rules for the fair treatment of investors by brokers, the procedures for registration, the payment of registration fees, maintenance of appropriate books and records and the right of inspection of the books of the stockbrokers by the Securities and Exchange Board of India. Broker liability in cases of default extends to suspension or cancellation of the broker’s registration. The Securities and Exchange Board of India has issued registration certificates to over 9,000 stockbrokers who are members of various stock exchanges in India. Before these regulations, stockbrokers were required to be registered only with the stock exchanges of which they were members. The Securities and Exchange Board of India regulations introduced the concept of dual registration of stockbrokers with the Securities and Exchange Board of India and the stock exchanges, and brought the brokers under regulation for the first time.

The Securities and Exchange Board of India has enforcement powers over secondary market participants for violation of any provisions of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Board of India, the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956, or the rules and regulations made thereunder. The Securities and Exchange Board of India may also take enforcement actions for violations of the Securities Contract Act or rules made thereunder and rules, regulations and by-laws of the stock exchanges.

The Securities and Exchange Board of India has also announced SEBI Regularization Scheme, 2002, under which parties who are guilty of violating the SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997, will be granted general amnesty on the payment of a fine for each default during the prescribed period of time.

Internet-Based Securities Trading and Services

The Securities and Exchange Board of India has recently allowed Internet-based securities trading under the existing legal framework. The regulations seek to allow the Internet to be used as an order routing system through stock brokers registered with the Securities and Exchange Board of India on behalf of clients for executing trades on a recognized stock exchange in India. Stock brokers interested in providing this service are required to apply for permission to the respective stock exchange and also have to comply with certain minimum conditions stipulated by the Securities and Exchange Board of India. Given the limited life of these new regulations to date, it is possible that these regulations will continue to evolve in the future.

Takeover Code

Disclosure and mandatory bid obligations under Indian law are governed by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 (Takeover Code) which prescribes certain thresholds or trigger points that give rise to these obligations. The Takeover Code is under constant review by the Securities and Exchange Board of India and was most recently amended in December 2002.

The most important features of the Takeover Code, as amended, are as follows:

·   Any acquirer (meaning a person who, directly or indirectly, acquires or agrees to acquire shares or voting rights in a company, either by himself or with any person acting in concert) who acquires shares or voting rights that would entitle him to more than 5.0% of the shares or voting rights in a company is

73

·   required to disclose the aggregate of his shareholding or voting rights in that company to the company (which in turn is required to disclose the same to each of the stock exchanges on which the company’s shares are listed) within two working days of (a) the receipt of allotment information; or (b) the acquisition of shares or voting rights, as the case may be.

·   A person has to make a three-stage disclosure when he acquires 5%, 10% and 14% of the shares and/or voting rights in a company, of his holdings to that company (which in turn is required to disclose the same to each of the stock exchanges on which the company’s shares are listed).

·   Promoters or persons in control of a company are also required to make annual disclosure of their holdings in the same manner.

·   An acquirer cannot acquire shares or voting rights which (taken together with existing shares or voting rights, if any, held by him or by persons acting in concert with him) would entitle such acquirer to exercise 15.0% or more of the voting rights in a company, unless such acquirer makes a public announcement offering to acquire a further 20.0% of the shares of the company.

·   An acquirer who, together with persons acting in concert with him, holds between 15.0% and 75.0% of the shares cannot acquire additional shares or voting rights that would entitle him to exercise a further 5.0% of the voting rights in the period of a financial year unless such acquirer makes a public announcement offering to acquire a further 20.0% of the shares of the company.

·   Any further acquisition of shares or voting rights by an acquirer who holds 75.0% of the shares or voting rights in a company triggers the same public announcement requirements.

·   In addition, regardless of whether there has been any acquisition of shares or voting rights in a company, an acquirer acting in concert cannot directly or indirectly acquire control over a company (for example, by way of acquiring the right to appoint a majority of the directors or to control the management or the policy decisions of the company) unless such acquirer makes a public announcement offering to acquire a minimum of 20.0% of the shares of the company.

The Takeover Code sets out the contents of the required public announcements as well as the minimum offer price.

The Takeover Code permits conditional offers and provides specific guidelines for the gradual acquisition of shares or voting rights. Specific obligations of the acquirer and the board of directors of the target company in the offer process have also been set out. Acquirers making a public offer are also required to deposit in an escrow account a percentage of the total consideration which amount will be forfeited in the event that the acquirer does not fulfill his obligations. In addition, the Takeover Code introduces the “chain principle” by which the acquisition of a company will obligate the acquirer to make a public offer to the shareholders of each subsidiary company which is listed.

The general requirements to make such a public announcement do not, however, apply entirely to bailout takeovers when a promoter (i.e., a person or persons in control of the company, persons named in any offer document as promoters and certain specified corporate bodies and individuals) is taking over a financially weak company but not a “sick industrial company” pursuant to a rehabilitation scheme approved by a public financial institution or a scheduled bank. A “financially weak company” is a company which has at the end of the previous financial year accumulated losses, which have resulted in erosion of more than 50.0% but less than 100.0% of the total sum of its paid up capital and free reserves at the end of the previous financial year. A “sick industrial company” is a company registered for more than five years which has at the end of any financial year accumulated losses equal to or exceeding its entire net worth.

The Takeover Code does not apply to certain specified acquisitions including the acquisition of shares (1) by allotment in a public and rights issue, (2) pursuant to an underwriting agreement, (3) by registered stockbrokers in the ordinary course of business on behalf of clients, (4) in unlisted companies, (5) pursuant to a scheme of

74

reconstruction or amalgamation or (6) pursuant to a scheme under Section 18 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985. Certain exemptions have also been provided for acquisition of shares pursuant to exercise of a put option or call option in the subsequent stage of a disinvestment, subject to the prior existence of such put option or call option having been disclosed in the open offer document. The Takeover Code does not apply to acquisitions in the ordinary course of business by public financial institutions either on their own account or as a pledge. In addition, the Takeover Code does not apply to the acquisition of ADSs so long as they are not converted into equity shares.

In case of creeping acquisitions/consolidations of holdings, the ceiling has been reduced from 10% to 5% of equity shareholding of the target company with effect from October 1, 2002. No exemptions are available to inter se transfers among promoters, in the event that the transfers take place at 25% premium to the market price of equity shares of the company. Change in control is, however, allowed in the event a special resolution is passed (in addition to the filing of the postal ballots).

Insider Trading

The Securities and Exchange Board of India has recently adopted the new Insider Trading Regulations which require significantly greater disclosure by the company with regard to the trading of the company’s shares.

Under the Insider Trading Regulations, an insider is as a person who is or was connected with the company or is deemed to have been connected with the company, and who is reasonably expected to have access, by virtue of such connection, to unpublished price sensitive information in respect of securities of the company, or who has received or has had access to such unpublished price sensitive information.

Further, under the Regulations, no insider may, either on his own behalf or on behalf of any other person, deal in securities of a company listed on a stock exchange on the basis of any unpublished price sensitive information, or communicate any unpublished price sensitive information to any person, with or without his request for such information, except as required in the ordinary course of business or under any law, or counsel or procure any other person to deal in securities of any company on the basis of unpublished price sensitive information.

In accordance with Regulations, the company has promulgated an internal code of conduct which is applicable to the directors and designated employees of the company for dealings in shares of the company by the directors and designated employees of the company, and with regard to access to unpublished price sensitive information that the directors or the designated employees might have. The Regulations also require the company to follow strict information disclosure requirements on a need to know basis.

Depositories

In August 1996, the Indian Parliament enacted the Depositaries Act, 1996 which provides a legal framework for the establishment of depositaries to record ownership details and effectuate transfers in book entry form. The Securities and Exchange Board of India passed the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Depositories and Participants) Regulations, 1996 which provides for the formation of such depositaries, the registration of participants as well as the rights and obligations of the depositaries, participants and the issuers. Every depositary has to register with the Securities and Exchange Board of India. Pursuant to the Depositories Act, the National Securities Depository Limited was established by the Unit Trust of India, the Industrial Development Bank of India and the National Stock Exchange in 1996 to provide electronic depositary facilities for trading in equity and debt securities. The National Securities Depository Limited, which commenced operations in November 1996, was the first depositary in India. Another depositary, the Central Depository Services (India) Limited, established by The Stock Exchange, Mumbai has commenced operations since July 15, 1999. The depositary system has significantly improved the operations of the Indian securities markets.

75

Item 10. Additional Information

MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION

Set forth below is certain information relating to our share capital, including certain provisions of our articles of association and the Companies Act. The information is not complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to our articles of association.

General

Our authorized share capital is Rs.8,000,000,000, divided into 800,000,000 equity shares with a par value of Rs.10 each. At the date of this report, 630,000,000 shares were issued and fully paid.

Our equity shares are in registered form. The shares are the only class of share capital currently outstanding. There are no convertible debentures or warrants currently in existence.

Dividends

Our shareholders, acting at the annual general meeting, may declare a dividend upon the recommendation of the board of directors. The amount of the dividend declared may not exceed the amount recommended by the board of directors, although a lesser amount may be declared. Dividends are distributed and paid within 30 days of the declaration by the shareholders. Our board of directors also is authorized under our articles of association to declare and pay interim dividends to shareholders.

If any dividend remains unclaimed at the end of 30 days, the amount of the dividend will be transferred to a separate account belonging to us. If it still remains unclaimed at the end of seven years, this amount will be transferred to government of India and cannot be claimed by the relevant shareholder. Dividends are payable only in cash to registered holders on a record date fixed prior to the relevant annual general meeting.

Dividends may be paid only out of our profits for the relevant year, after transfer to our reserves of a percentage of our profits for that year of not less than 2.5%. The Companies Act further provides that, in the event of inadequacy or absence of profits in any year, a dividend may be declared for that year out of our accumulated profits, subject to certain limitations. A dividend tax of approximately 14.25% (inclusive of Education surcharge) of distributed profit for a relevant period is payable by us.

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the dividend per equity share and per global depositary receipt and the total amount of dividends paid on the equity shares, both exclusive of dividend tax.

For fiscal year	Dividend per equity share	Dividend per ADS/GDR	Total amount of dividends paid
	(Rs.)	(Rs.)	(millions of Rupees)
2006	4.0	8.0	2,520
2005	4.5	9.0	2,835
2004	4.5	9.0	2,835
2003	4.5	9.0	2,835
2002	4.5	9.0	2,835

The Ministry of Finance has adopted non-binding guidelines regarding the payment of dividends by “public sector undertakings (PSUs) ” which apply to us. According to the guidelines, profit-making public sector undertakings which are commercial enterprises should generally declare a minimum dividend each fiscal year of 20% of the higher of paid-up share capital as of year-end or profit after tax for the year. In the case of telecommunications, oil, petroleum, chemical and other infrastructure industries, profit making PSUs should declare

76

a minimum dividend for each fiscal year of 30% of profit after tax for the year or 30% on equity, whichever is higher.

Future dividends will depend upon our revenues, cash flow, financial condition and other factors. As an owner of ADSs, holders will be entitled to receive dividends payable in respect of the equity shares represented by our ADSs. The equity shares represented by our ADSs rank equally with our existing shares. At present, we have equity shares issued in India.

Free Distribution of Equity Shares

In addition to permitting dividends to be paid out of current or retained earnings, the Companies Act permits us to distribute bonus shares to shareholders. Upon any distribution of bonus shares, an amount equal to the face value of the bonus shares to be distributed is transferred from the general reserve or share premium account to share capital. The bonus shares must be distributed to shareholders in proportion to the number of equity shares owned by them.

Preemptive Rights and Issue of Additional Shares

Subject to the approval of the President of India, we may by ordinary resolution increase our share capital by the issue of new shares or create a new class of shares. In addition, the rights attached to the shares of any class may be varied with the consent of not less than three-fourths of the issued shares of that class. The Companies Act gives shareholders the right to subscribe for new shares in proportion to their existing shareholdings unless otherwise determined by a special resolution to that effect adopted at a general meeting of shareholders. Such a resolution was adopted with respect to the equity shares offered by us in the global depositary receipt offering at an extraordinary general meeting held on November 19, 1997. We must offer shares to existing shareholders by notice specifying the number of shares offered and the date, within 30 days from the date of offer, by which the offer must be accepted. The board of directors is entitled to distribute the shares in respect of which preemptive rights have not been exercised in the manner that it deems most beneficial to us.

General Meetings of Shareholders

We are required to convene an annual general meeting of our shareholders within six months after the end of each financial year (subject to extensions which may be granted by the competent authorities) and may convene an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders when necessary or at the request of a shareholder or shareholders holding not less than 10% of our paid-up capital on the date of the request. The annual general meeting of the shareholders is generally convened by the Company Secretary in accordance with a resolution of the board of directors. Written notice setting out the agenda of the meeting must be given at least 21 days (excluding the day of service) prior to the date of the general meeting to the shareholders whose names are on the register at the record date. Those shareholders who are registered as shareholders on the date of the general meeting are entitled to attend or vote at such meeting.

The annual general meeting of shareholders must be held at our registered office or at such other place within the city in which the registered office is located; meetings other than the annual general meeting may be held at any other place determined by the board of directors.

Our articles of association provide that a quorum for a general meeting is the presence of at least five shareholders, including a representative of the President of India.

This year’s annual general meeting is scheduled for September 26, 2006.

Voting Rights

At any general meeting, voting is by show of hands (where each shareholder has one vote) unless a poll is demanded by at least 10% of those entitled to vote on the resolution or those holding shares with a paid-up value of at least Rs.50,000. Upon a poll, every shareholder entitled to vote and present in person or by proxy has one vote

77

for every share held by the shareholder. The Chairman has a deciding vote in the case of any tie. Our articles of association do not allow shareholders to cumulate their votes.

Any shareholder may appoint a proxy. The instrument appointing a proxy must be lodged with us at least 48 hours before the time of the meeting. A corporate shareholder may appoint an authorized representative who may vote in all respects as if a shareholder, both on a show of hands and upon a poll.

Ordinary resolutions may be passed by simple majority of those present and voting at any general meeting for which the required period of notice has been given. However, certain resolutions such as those relating to the alteration of our articles of association, the commencement of a new line of business, the issue of further shares without preemptive rights and a reduction of share capital require a three-fourth majority of the votes cast in favor of the resolution (whether by show of hands or upon a poll). The Companies Act has been amended to require that certain shareholder resolutions only be passed through postal ballot.

Register of Shareholders, Record Dates and Transfer of Shares

Our share transfer agents maintain registers of our shareholders and beneficial owners of shares held through depositaries. For the purpose of determining equity shares entitled to annual dividends, the register is closed for a specified period prior to the annual general meeting. The Companies Act and our listing agreement with The Stock Exchange, Mumbai (and the other Indian Stock Exchanges) permit us, according to a resolution of the Board and upon at least 15 days’ advance notice to The Stock Exchange, Mumbai (and such other stock exchanges), to set the record date and upon seven days’ public notice to close the register of shareholders for not more than 30 days at a time, and not more than 45 days in a year, in order for us to determine which shareholders are entitled to certain rights relating to the shares. Trading of shares may, however, continue while the register of shareholders is closed.

Following introduction of the Depositories Act, 1996, and the repeal of Section 22A of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956, which enabled companies to refuse to register transfers of shares in certain circumstances, the shares of a company are freely transferable, subject only to the provisions of Section 111A of the Companies Act. Pursuant to Section 111A, if the transfer of shares is in contravention of any of the provisions of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 or the regulations issued thereunder or the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, the Company Law Board (a statutory body which administers the Companies Act) may, on application made by an investor, the Securities and Exchange Board of India or certain other parties, direct the rectification of the register of members. The Company Law Board may, in its discretion, issue an interim order suspending the voting rights attached to the relevant shares, before making or completing its inquiry into the alleged contravention. Pending the inquiry, the rights of a holder to transfer the shares would not be restricted, although the voting rights attached to the shares may remain suspended by an order of the Company Law Board.

The Indian Companies Act, 1956, has been recently amended to provide for the constitution of a National Company Law Tribunal and dissolution of the Company Law Board. The National Company Law Tribunal shall exercise all powers that had been conferred on the Company Law Board or the High Courts by the Indian Companies Act, 1956. This amendment has not yet been brought into force.

Shares held through depositories are transferred in the form of book entries or in electronic form in accordance with the rules and procedures laid down by Securities and Exchange Board of India. These regulations provide the regime for the functioning of the depositaries and the participants and set out the manner in which the records are to be kept and maintained and the safeguards to be followed in this system. Transfers of beneficial ownership of shares held through a depositary are exempt from stamp duty.

The Securities and Exchange Board of India has notified our equity shares for trading and settlement only in book-entry form for all investors, except for transactions made outside and which are not required to be reported to the stock exchange. Transfers of equity shares in book-entry form require both the seller and the purchaser of the equity shares to establish accounts with depositary participants appointed by depositaries established under the Depositaries Act, 1996. Charges for opening an account with a depositary participant, transaction charges for each trade and custodian charges for securities held in each account vary depending upon the practice of each depositary

78

participant. Upon delivery, the equity shares shall be registered in the name of the relevant depositary on our books in book-entry form and this depositary shall enter the name of the investor in its records as the beneficial owner. The transfer of beneficial ownership shall be effected through the records of the depositary. The beneficial owner shall be entitled to all rights and benefits and subject to all liabilities in respect of his securities held by a depositary.

The requirement to hold our equity shares in book-entry form will apply to the ADS holders when the equity shares are withdrawn from the depositary facility upon surrender of the global depositary receipts. In order to trade our equity shares in the Indian market, the withdrawing ADS holder will be required to comply with the procedures described above.

We have entered into a listing agreement with each of the other Indian stock exchanges on which the shares are listed. Clause 40A of the listing agreements provides that if an acquisition of a listed company’s equity shares results in the acquirer and its associates holding 5% or more of the company’s outstanding equity shares, the acquirer must report its holding to the relevant stock exchanges. If an acquisition would result in the acquirer and its associates holding equity shares which carry 10% or more of the voting rights, then the acquirer must notify the relevant stock exchanges. If an acquisition is deemed a takeover, the acquirer must, before acquiring shares, offer (in accordance with Clause 40B of the listing agreements) on a uniform basis to all remaining shareholders of the company to acquire a minimum of a further 20% of the total shares of the company at a prescribed price. The acquisition of shares of a company listed on an Indian stock exchange beyond certain threshold amounts is subject to regulations governing takeovers of Indian companies. See “The Offer and Listing—The Indian Securities Market—Takeover Code.” Clauses 40A and 40B and such regulations will not apply to shares so long as they are represented by ADSs.

Shareholder Access to Corporate Records

Under the Companies Act, the shareholder register and index, the register and index of debenture holders and copies of all annual returns together with copies of certificates and documents required to be annexed thereto, must be kept at our registered office for inspection by any share or debenture holder free of charge and by any other person on payment of a fee. The minute books of the general meetings of our shareholders must be kept at our registered office and be made available for inspection by our shareholders regardless of the size of their shareholding.

Disclosure of Ownership Interest

Section 187C of the Companies Act generally requires beneficial owners of shares of Indian companies who are not holders of record to declare to the company details of the holder of record and holders of record to declare details of the beneficial owner. While it is unclear whether Section 187C applies to holders of ADSs of a company, investors who exchange ADSs for shares are subject to this Section. Failure to comply with Section 187C would not affect the obligation of a company to register a transfer of shares or to pay any dividends to the registered holder of any shares in respect of which such declaration has not been made, but any person who fails to make the required declaration may be liable for a fine of up to Rs.1,000 for each day the failure continues. Furthermore, any charge, promissory note or any other collateral agreement created, executed or entered into by the registered owner of any share in respect of which a declaration required under Section 187C has not been made is not enforceable by the beneficial owner or any person claiming through him.

So long as the government of India’s shareholding equals or exceeds 51%, Section 187C will not apply to holders of our equity securities, including holders of our ADSs or equity shares.

Audit and Annual Report

At least 21 days before the annual general meeting of shareholders, we must circulate either a detailed or an abridged version of our audited balance sheet and profit and loss account and the related reports of our board of directors and our auditors. We are also required under the Companies Act to make available upon request of any shareholder a complete balance sheet and profit and loss account in the case of circulation of abridged accounts.

79

The Comptroller and Auditor General of India, has the power to direct the manner in which our accounts are audited by the auditors appointed pursuant to Section 619(2) of the Companies Act, to give the auditors instructions in regard to any matter relating to the performance of their functions and to conduct a supplementary or test audit of our accounts by such auditors. The Comptroller and Auditor General also has the right to comment on or supplement the audit report to the Comptroller and Auditor General which must be placed before our annual general meeting at the same time and in the same manner as the audit report.

Powers of the President of India

Under Articles 66A and 66B of our articles of association, the President of India is entitled to appoint one third of our total number of directors including our Chairman-cum-Managing Director as well as our whole time directors. Article 69(i) requires the Chairman to reserve for the decision of the President of India all proposals, decisions or matters which raise in the opinion of the Chairman any important issue and which are, on that account, fit to be reserved for the decision of the President of India. No decision on these important issues may be taken in

the absence of the Chairman appointed by the President of India. Article 69(ii) lists the matters in respect of which prior approval of the President of India must be obtained, which include issuance of debentures and the sale, lease or disposal of any land or building with an original book value in excess of Rs.1 million. Under Article 71, we may not take action in respect of any proposal or decision of the board of directors reserved for approval of the President until his approval is obtained. The President may modify the board of directors’ proposals or decisions.

Article 70 grants the President of India the power to issue directives in regard to the conduct of our business and affairs, which are binding on our board of directors. These powers include the power to give directives to us as to the exercise and performance of our functions in matters involving national security or substantial public interest, power to call for returns, accounts and other information with respect to our properties and activities and to determine in consultation with the board of directors our financial and economic objectives.

Acquisition by Us of Our Own Shares

Until 1998, the Companies Act did not permit a company to acquire its own equity shares because of the resulting reduction in the company’s capital. However, the government of India amended the Companies Act to allow a repurchase of shares in certain circumstances. A buy-back requires compliance with specific buy-back guidelines specified in the Companies Act and by the Securities and Exchange Board of India.

Holders of ADSs will be eligible to participate in a buy-back in certain cases. An ADS holder may acquire shares by withdrawing from the depositary facility and then selling those shares back to us.

There can be no assurance that the shares offered by an ADS holder in any buy-back of shares by us will be accepted by us. Investors are advised to consult Indian legal advisers prior to participating in any buyback by us, including in relation to any tax issues relating to such buy-back.

Liquidation Rights

Subject to the rights of employees, creditors and of the holders of any other shares entitled by their terms to preferential repayment over the shares, in the event of our winding up, the holders of our shares are entitled to be repaid the amount of capital paid up or credited as paid up on their shares. All surplus assets after payments due to the holders of any preference shares belong to the holders of the shares in proportion to the amount paid up or credited as paid up on such shares, respectively, at the commencement of the winding up.

American Depositary Shares

Our ADSs were originally issued in an exchange offer during October 2001 in which we offered ADSs for our global depositary receipts on a one-for-one basis. Our global depositary receipt program was cancelled and the receipts delisted from the London Stock Exchange in December 2001. At the end of October 2001, our ADSs were listed and began trading on the New York Stock Exchange. There have been no changes to the depositary agreement governing our ADSs since the exchange offer.

80

MATERIAL CONTRACTS

Since April 1, 2006, we have not entered into any material contracts that were not in the ordinary course of business.

INDIAN FOREIGN EXCHANGE CONTROLS AND SECURITIES REGULATIONS

Restrictions on Conversion of Rupees

There are restrictions on the conversion of rupees into dollars. Before February 29, 1992, the Reserve Bank of India determined the official value of the rupee in relation to a weighted basket of currencies of India’s major trading partners. In the February 1992 budget, a new dual exchange rate mechanism was introduced by allowing conversion of 60.0% of the foreign exchange received on trade or current account at a market-determined rate and the remaining 40.0% at the official rate. All importers were, however, required to buy foreign exchange at the market rate except for certain specified priority imports. In March 1993, the exchange rate was unified and allowed to float. In February 1994 and again in August 1994, the Reserve Bank of India announced relaxations in payment restrictions in the case of a number of transactions. Since August 1994, the government of India has substantially complied with its obligations owed to the International Monetary Fund, under which India is committed to refrain from using exchange restrictions on current international transactions as an instrument in managing the balance of payments. Effective July 1995, the process of current account convertibility was advanced by relaxing restrictions on foreign exchange for various purposes, such as foreign business travel, travel for education, travel for pilgrimage, medical treatment and others.

Restrictions on Sale of the Equity Shares Underlying the ADSs and for Repatriation of Sale Proceeds

ADSs issued by Indian companies to non-residents have free transferability outside India. However, under Indian regulations and practice, the approval of the Reserve Bank of India is required for the sale of equity shares underlying the ADSs (other than a sale on a stock exchange or in connection with an offer made under the takeover regulations) by a non-resident of India to a resident of India as well as for renunciation of rights to a resident of India. Investors who seek to sell in India any equity shares (other than a sale on a stock exchange or in connection with an offer made under the takeover regulations) withdrawn from the depositary facility and to convert the rupee proceeds from such sale into foreign currency and repatriate such foreign currency from India will, subject to the foregoing, have to obtain Reserve Bank of India approval for each such transaction.

Limitations on Deposits of Equity Shares into the ADS Program

Under procedures recently adopted by the Reserve Bank of India, the depositary will be permitted to accept deposits of our outstanding equity shares and deliver ADSs representing the deposited equity shares to the extent, and limited to the number, of ADSs that have previously been converted into underlying equity shares. Under these new procedures, if you elect to surrender your ADSs and receive equity shares, you may be unable to re-deposit those outstanding equity shares with our depositary and receive ADSs because the number of new ADSs that can be issued cannot, at any time, exceed the number of ADSs converted into underlying equity shares or result in foreign equity in us exceeding 49%.

Specifically, in February 2002, the Reserve Bank of India issued operative guidelines for “limited two-way fungibility.” Under the guidelines, a registered broker in India is now permitted to purchase equity shares of an Indian company on behalf of persons resident outside India for the purpose of converting the equity shares so purchased into ADRs or GDRs, provided that (i) the equity shares are purchased on a recognized stock exchange, (ii) the Indian company has issued ADRs or GDRs, (iii) the equity shares are purchased with the permission of the custodian of the ADRs or GDRs of the Indian company, and are deposited with such custodian, (iv) the number of equity shares so purchased to be converted into ADRs or GDRs do not exceed the ADRs or GDRs previously converted into underlying equity shares (the number of equity shares available for conversion into

ADRs or GDRs is dependent upon the number of equity shares arrived at after conversion of ADRs into equity shares will have to be checked with the custodian) and (v) the number of equity shares so purchased to be

81

converted shall be subject to sectoral caps as applicable and all the concerned parties shall comply with the Issue of Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds and Ordinary Shares (Through Depository Receipt Mechanism) Scheme, 1993 and the guidelines issued thereunder.

Further, paragraph (v) of the guidelines states that the company should not be involved in the process and the process should be demand driven upon the request for ADRs or GDRs emanating from overseas investors, and expenses involved in the overseas transaction would be borne by the investors themselves.

Restrictions On Foreign Ownership Of Indian Securities

The government of India regulates ownership of Indian companies by foreigners. Foreign investment in Indian securities, including the equity shares represented by the ADSs, is generally regulated by the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, which permits transactions including the inflow or outflow of foreign exchange and empowers the Reserve Bank of India to prohibit or regulate such transactions.

The Foreign Exchange Management Act permits most transactions involving foreign exchange except those prohibited or restricted by the Reserve Bank of India. The extent of control exercised over transactions involving foreign exchange depends upon the type of transaction involved. Transactions that alter the assets or liabilities, including contingent liabilities, outside India of persons resident in India or the assets and liabilities in India of persons resident outside India are known as capital account transactions. Transactions other than capital account transactions are known as current account transactions.

The Foreign Exchange Management Act has eased restrictions on current account transactions. However, the Reserve Bank of India continues to exercise control over capital account transactions. The Reserve Bank of India has issued regulations under the Foreign Exchange Management Act to regulate various capital account transactions, including certain aspects of the purchase and issuance of shares by Indian companies.

The Reserve Bank of India has issued a notification under the provisions of the Foreign Exchange Management Act relaxing the requirement of prior approval for an Indian company making an ADS issue provided that the issuer is eligible to issue ADSs pursuant to guidelines issued by the Ministry of Finance and has the necessary approval from the Foreign Investment Promotion Board.

Under the foreign investment rules, the following restrictions are applicable on foreign ownership:

·   under the “foreign direct investment” scheme, foreign individuals may own more than 49% of the equity shares of an Indian telecommunications company only with the approval of the Foreign Investment Promotion Board; this approval is granted on a case-by-case basis. However, ISPs with gateways, radio paging, and end to end bandwidth permitted up to 74% with FDI beyond 49% requiring government approval.

·   under the “depositary” scheme, foreign investors may purchase ADSs or global depositary receipts, subject to the receipt of all necessary government approvals at the time the depositary receipt program is set up;

·   under the “portfolio investment” scheme, foreign institutional investors, subject to registration with the Securities and Exchange Board of India and the Reserve Bank of India, may be permitted to own, in the aggregate, up to an additional 24.0% of our equity shares that are not represented by ADSs or global depositary receipts (and up to 49.0% with the approval of our shareholders); no single foreign institutional investor may own more than 10.0% of our equity shares; and

·   under the “portfolio investment” scheme, non resident Indians may own up to an aggregate or 10.0% of our equity shares; no single non-resident Indian may own more than 5.0% of our total equity shares.

We had obtained approvals from the Ministry of Finance, the Foreign Investment Promotion Board, the DOT and special permission from the Reserve Bank of India for the offering of our global depositary receipts.

82

Various tax concessions were also made available with respect to the existing global depositary receipt offering in accordance with the provisions of Section 115AC of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1961. Since no new shares were issued or offered in our exchange offer and the exchange offer was related to a change in the form of depository receipts, the original approvals needed merely to be taken on file, noted and recorded for modification. We obtained from the Ministry of Finance, Reserve Bank of India, the Foreign Investment Promotion Board and the DOT, modifications to the original approvals/special permission given by them, for our exchange offer.

As of June 30, 2006 foreign direct investment in us was 17.19% of our equity shares.

An investor in ADSs does not need to seek the specific approval from the government of India to purchase, hold or dispose of its ADSs. However, foreign investment in our ADSs may not exceed 49% without prior government approval.

Our outstanding equity shares, including the equity shares underlying the ADSs, are listed and traded on the Calcutta, Delhi and Chennai Stock Exchanges, The Stock Exchange, Mumbai and the National Stock Exchange. The prices for equity shares as quoted in the official list of each of the Indian stock exchanges are in Indian rupees. The ADS are listed on the New York Stock Exchange.

Equity shares which have been withdrawn from the depositary facility and transferred on our register of shareholders to a person other than the depositary or its nominee may be voted by that person. However, an ADS holder may not receive sufficient advance notice of shareholder meetings to enable you to withdraw the underlying equity shares and vote at such meetings.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a foreign institutional investor, non-resident Indian or non-Indian corporation were to withdraw its equity shares from the ADS program, its investment in the equity shares would be subject to the general restrictions on foreign ownership noted above and may be subject to the portfolio investment restrictions, including the 10-24% portfolio investment limitations, and the 5-10% non-resident Indian limitation. The application of these limitations, however, is not clear. Secondary purchases of securities of Indian companies in India by foreign direct investors or investments by non-resident Indians, persons of Indian origin and foreign institutional investors above the ownership levels set forth above, require government of India approval on a case-by-case basis. It is unclear whether similar case-by-case approvals of ownership of equity shares withdrawn from the depositary facility by foreign institutional investors and non-resident Indians would be required.

Further, if an ADS holder withdraws equity shares from the ADS program and its direct or indirect holding in us exceeds 15.0% of our total equity (under the Takeover Code), such holder would be required to make a public offer to the remaining shareholders. If one withdraws equity shares from the depositary facility, one will not be able to redeposit them with the depositary.

If one wishes to sell the equity shares withdrawn from the depositary facility, they will be required to receive the prior approval of the Reserve Bank of India.

Under procedures approved by the Reserve Bank of India, the custodian will be permitted to accept deposits of our outstanding equity shares purchased on a recognized stock exchange by registered brokers in India on behalf of a foreign investor. The depositary may issue ADRs evidencing ADSs representing the deposited equity shares to the extent, and limited to the number, of ADSs that have previously been converted into underlying equity shares, subject to applicable foreign ownership restrictions. See “— Limitations on Deposits of Equity Shares into the ADS Program” above for more details on these procedures.

Other Regulations

For more information on relevant securities and related regulations, please see “The Offer and Listing—The Indian Securities Market.”

83

TAXATION

Indian Taxation

The following is a summary of the material Indian tax consequences for holders of ADSs and equity shares received upon withdrawal of such equity shares who are not resident in India, whether of Indian origin or not. This discussion is based on the provisions of the Indian Income-Tax Act, 1961, including the special tax regime for ADSs contained in Section 115AC, which has been extended to cover additional ADSs that an investor may acquire in an amalgamation or restructuring of the company, and certain regulations implementing the Section 115AC regime. The Indian Income Tax Act is amended every year by the Finance Act of the relevant year. Some or all of the tax consequences of the Section 115AC regime may be amended or modified by future amendments to the Indian Income Tax Act. Amendments to Section 115AC extend the special tax regime of Section 115AC to ADSs re-issued, in accordance with procedures established by the Indian government (operative guidelines issued under the Foreign Exchange Management notification dated February 13, 2002), against existing shares of an Indian company purchased by a non-resident investor in foreign currency through an approved intermediary. Under these guidelines re-issuance of ADSs would be permitted to the extent of ADSs which have been converted into underlying shares.

The summary is not intended to constitute a complete analysis of the tax consequences under Indian law of the acquisition, ownership and sale of ADSs and equity shares by non-resident investors. Potential investors should, therefore, consult their own tax advisers on the tax consequences of such acquisition, ownership and sale, including specifically the tax consequences under Indian law, the law of the jurisdiction of their residence, any tax treaty between India and their country of residence, and in particular the application of the regulations implementing the section 115AC regime.

Residence

For the purpose of the Income Tax Act, an individual is a resident of India during any fiscal year, if he (1) is in India in that year for 182 days or more or (2) having within the four years preceding that year been in India for a period or periods amounting in all to 365 days or more, is in India for period or periods amounting in all to 60 days or more in that year. The period of 60 days is substituted by 182 days in case of an Indian citizen or a person of Indian origin who being resident outside India visits India during the financial year or an Indian citizen who leaves India for the purposes of his employment during the financial year. A company is resident in India in any fiscal year if it is registered in India or the control and management of its affairs is situated wholly in India in that year. A firm or other association of persons is resident in India except where the control and the management of its affairs are situated wholly outside India.

Taxation of Distributions

Dividends distributed by an Indian company after March 31, 2002 are not subject to tax in the hands of shareholders. We must pay a “dividend distribution tax” at the rate of 12.5% (plus a surcharge of 10% and an add-on tax at the rate of 2% of the total dividend distribution tax and surcharge) on the total amount distributed as dividend.

Taxation on Redemption of ADSs

The acquisition of equity shares upon a redemption of ADSs by a non-resident investor will not give rise to a taxable event for Indian tax purposes.

Taxation on Sale of Equity Shares or ADSs

Any transfer of ADSs or equity shares outside India by a non-resident investor to another non-resident investor does not give rise to Indian capital gains tax.

Subject to any relief under any relevant double taxation treaty, a gain arising on the sale of an equity share to a resident of India or where the sale is made inside India will generally give rise to a liability for Indian capital

84

gains tax. Such tax is required to be withheld at source. Where the equity share has been held for more than 12 months (measured from the date of advice of redemption of the ADSs by the Depositary), the rate of tax is 10.46% (inclusive of surcharge). Where the equity share has been held for 12 months or less, the rate of tax varies and will be subject to tax at normal rates of income-tax applicable to non-residents under the provisions of the Indian Income Tax Act, subject to a maximum of 41.82% (inclusive of surcharge) in the case of foreign companies. The actual rate depends on a number of factors, including without limitation the nature of the non-resident investor. During the period the underlying equity shares are held by non-resident investors on a transfer from the Depositary upon redemption of ADRs, the provisions of the Avoidance of Double Taxation Agreement entered into by the government of India with the country of residence of the non-resident investors will be applicable in the matter of taxation of any capital gain arising on a transfer of the equity shares. The double taxation treaty between the United States and India does not provide U.S. residents with any relief from Indian tax on capital gains.

For purposes of determining the amount of capital gains arising on a sale of an equity share for Indian tax purposes, the cost of acquisition of an equity share received upon redemption of an ADS will be the price of the share prevailing on The Stock Exchange, Mumbai or the National Stock Exchange on the date on which the depositary advises the custodian of such redemption, not the acquisition cost of the ADS being redeemed. The holding period of an equity share received upon redemption of an ADS will commence from the date of advice of redemption by the depositary. The exact procedures for the computation and collection of Indian capital gains tax are not settled.

Rights

A distribution to non-resident holders of additional ADSs or equity shares or rights to subscribe for equity shares made with respect to ADSs or equity shares is not subject to tax in the hands of the non-resident holder.

It is unclear as to whether capital gain derived from the sale of rights by a non-resident holder not entitled to exemption under a tax treaty to another non-resident holder outside India will be subject to Indian capital gains tax. If rights are deemed by the Indian tax authorities to be situated within India, as our situs is in India, the gains realized on the sale of rights will be subject to customary Indian taxation as discussed above.

Stamp Duty

A transfer of ADSs is not subject to Indian stamp duty. Normally, upon the acquisition of equity shares from the depositary in exchange for ADSs representing such equity shares in physical form, an investor would be liable for Indian stamp duty at the rate of 0.5% of the market value of the equity shares at the date of registration. Similarly, a sale of equity shares by an investor would be also subject to Indian stamp duty at the rate of 0.5% of the market value of the equity shares on the trade date, although customarily such tax is borne by the transferee, that is, the purchaser. However, our equity shares are mandatorily deliverable in uncertificated form and under Indian stamp law, no stamp duty is payable on the acquisition or transfer of equity shares in uncertificated/dematerialized form.

Other Taxes

At present, there are no taxes on wealth, gifts and inheritance which may apply to the ADSs and underlying equity shares.

Service Tax

Brokerage or commission paid to stockbrokers in connection with the sale or purchase of shares is subject to a service tax of 10.2%. The stockbroker is responsible for collecting the service tax and paying it to the relevant authority.

85

United States Federal Income Taxation

The following is a summary of certain United States federal income tax considerations for U.S. Holders (as defined below) of ADSs or equity shares who hold ADSs or equity shares as of the date hereof. This summary is based upon existing United States federal income tax law which is subject to change, possibly on a retroactive basis. This summary does not discuss all aspects of United States federal income taxation which may be important to particular holders in light of their individual investment circumstances, such as ADSs or equity shares held by holders subject to special tax rules ( e.g., financial institutions, insurance companies, broker-dealers, tax-exempt organizations, and non-U.S. Holders) or to persons that will hold ADSs or equity shares as part of a straddle, hedge, conversion, or other integrated transactions for United States federal income tax purposes or that have a functional currency other than the United States dollar, all of whom may be subject to tax rules that differ significantly from those summarized below. In addition, this summary does not discuss any state, local, or foreign tax considerations. This summary assumes that investors hold, and will continue to hold, their ADSs or equity shares as “capital assets” (generally, property held for investment) under the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (Code). Holders are urged to consult their tax advisers regarding the United States federal, state, local, and foreign income tax considerations, including the “passive foreign investment company” rules described below, of the ownership and disposition of ADSs or equity shares.

For purposes of this summary, a “U.S. Holder” is a beneficial owner of ADSs or equity shares that is for United States federal income tax purposes (i) an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States, (ii) a corporation, partnership, or other entity created or organized in or under the law of the United States or any State or political subdivision thereof, (iii) an estate the income of which is includible in gross income for United States federal income tax purposes regardless of its source, or (iv) a trust (A) the administration of which is subject to the primary supervision of a United States court and which has one or more United States persons who have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust, or (B) that was in existence on August 20, 1996, was treated as a United States person under the Code on the previous day, and properly elected to continue to be so treated. The tax treatment of persons who hold their ADSs or equity shares through a partnership (including an entity treated as a partnership for United States federal income tax purposes) will generally depend on the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership.

General

For purposes of United States federal income taxation, a holder of ADSs will be treated as the owner of his proportionate interest in the underlying equity shares held by the depositary. Accordingly, no gain or loss will be recognized upon the exchange of ADSs for the holder’s proportionate interest in equity shares, a holder’s tax basis in the withdrawn equity shares will be the same as his tax basis in the ADSs surrendered in exchange therefor, and such holder’s holding period in the withdrawn equity shares will include the period during which the holder held the surrendered ADSs.

A foreign corporation will be classified as a “passive foreign investment company” (PFIC), for United States federal income tax purposes, if 75% or more of its gross income or 50% or more of its assets are “passive” as determined under the PFIC rules. The determination of whether a foreign corporation is a PFIC is a factual determination and may entail the resolution of certain legal issues such as the tax treatment of on-lending transactions involving related parties under the PFIC rules. In addition, such determination is made on an annual basis and, accordingly, is subject to change from year to year. The following discussion assumes that we will not be classified as a PFIC for United States federal income tax purposes. For further PFIC considerations, see “—PFIC Considerations” below.

U.S. Holders

Taxation of Dividends. Any cash distributions paid by us out of our earnings and profits, as determined under United States federal income tax principles, will be subject to tax as ordinary dividend income and will be includible in the gross income of a U.S. Holder upon receipt. Cash distributions paid by us in excess of our earnings and profits will be treated as a tax-free return of capital to the extent of the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in his ADSs or equity shares, and thereafter as gain from the sale or exchange of a capital asset. Dividends paid in Indian rupees will be includible in income in a United States dollar amount based on the United States dollar—

86

Indian rupee exchange rate prevailing at the time of receipt of such dividends by the depositary. Dividends received on the ADSs or equity shares will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction allowed to corporations, but generally will qualify for the reduced income tax rate for qualified dividend income, provided certain holding period requirements are met.

Dividends paid on ADSs or equity shares will be treated, for United States federal income tax purposes, as foreign source income. A U.S. Holder may be eligible, subject to a number of complex limitations, to claim a foreign tax credit in respect of any Indian income tax imposed on dividends received on the ADSs or equity shares. U.S. Holders who do not elect to claim a foreign tax credit for Indian income tax withheld may instead claim the Indian income tax withheld as a deduction for United States federal income tax purposes, but only for a year in which the U.S. Holder elects to do so for all creditable foreign taxes. In certain circumstances, a U.S. Holder may not claim a foreign tax credit (and instead may claim a deduction) for foreign taxes imposed on a dividend if the U.S. Holder (i) has not held the ADSs or equity shares for at least 16 days in the 30-day period beginning 15 days before the ex-dividend date during which it is not protected from risk of loss, (ii) is obligated to make certain payments related to such dividend, or (iii) subject to the promulgation of future Treasury regulations that are anticipated to be retroactively applied, holds the ADSs or equity shares in an arrangement in which the expected economic profit of the U.S. Holder is insubstantial compared to the value of the foreign tax credit expected to be obtained as a result of the arrangement.

A distribution of additional shares issued by us to U.S. Holders with respect to their ADSs or equity shares that is pro rata to all of our shareholders may not be subject to United States federal income tax. In the case of such a non-taxable stock dividend, such a distribution will not give rise to foreign source income and a U.S. Holder will not be able to use the foreign tax credit arising from any Indian withholding tax imposed in connection with such distribution unless the foreign tax credit can be applied (subject to applicable limitations) against United States federal income tax due on other foreign source income of the U.S. Holder. The tax basis of such additional shares will be determined by allocating the U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the ADSs or equity shares between the ADSs or equity shares and the additional shares, based on their relative fair market values on the date of distribution.

Sale or Other Disposition of ADSs or Ordinary Shares. A U.S. Holder will generally recognize capital gain or loss upon the sale or other disposition of ADSs or equity shares in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized upon the disposition and the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in such ADSs or equity shares. Any capital gain or loss will be long-term if the ADSs or equity shares have been held for more than one year and will generally be United States source gain or loss. The claim for a deduction in respect of a capital loss is subject to limitations.

PFIC Considerations. If we were to be classified as a PFIC in any taxable year, a U.S. Holder would be subject to special rules generally intended to reduce or eliminate any benefits from the deferral of United States federal income tax that a U.S. Holder could derive from investing in a foreign corporation that does not distribute all of its earnings on a current basis. In such event, a U.S. Holder of ADSs or equity shares may be subject to tax at ordinary income tax rates on (i) any gain recognized on the sale of the ADSs or equity shares and (ii) any “excess distribution” paid on the ADSs or equity shares (generally, a distribution in excess of 125% of the average annual distributions paid by us in the three preceding taxable years). In addition, a U.S. Holder may be subject to an interest charge on such gain or excess distribution.

DOCUMENTS ON DISPLAY

We file reports, including annual reports on Form 20-F, and other information with the SEC pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC that apply to foreign private issuers. One may read and copy any materials filed with the SEC at the Public Reference Room at 100 F Street N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20459. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Since November 4, 2002, subject to some exceptions, we have been required to file our periodic reports electronically through the SEC’s EDGAR system. Any filings we make electronically are available to the public over the Internet at the SEC’s Website at http://www.sec.gov.

87

In addition, in accordance with the requirements of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), we have disclosed on our website significant ways in which our corporate governance standards differ from those followed by United States domestic issuers under NYSE standards is available at http://mtnl.net.in/nyse-india.doc.

Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Credit Risk

Financial instruments which potentially subject MTNL to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of periodic temporary investments of excess cash, trade receivables, and investments in ITI Limited preference shares and MKVDC bonds. The Company places its temporary excess cash in short term deposits. By their nature, all such financial instruments involve risk including the credit risk of non-performance by counter parties. In management’s opinion, as of March 31, 2005 and 2006, there was no significant risk of loss in the event of non-performance of the counter parties to these financial instruments, other than the amounts already provided for in the financial statements. To reduce credit risk, MTNL performs ongoing credit evaluation of customers. As of March 31, 2005 and 2006, BSNL and DOT accounted for more than 10% of total receivables.

The risk in relation to investment in ITI Limited is offset by clause relating to MTNL’s entitlement to set off the amounts receivable in respect of principal outstanding from the dues payable to ITI Limited. The clause is built into the share purchase agreement.

The credit risk for the investment in bonds issued by MKVDC is minimized due to the payment mechanism envisaged in the prospectus, which states that any shortfall is to be met by the Maharashtra State Government that has undertaken to earmark an amount equal to interest and principal repayments out of its annual budget for the respective corporation. In the event of such amount not being transferred the trustees would be entitled to invoke the guarantee given by the state government.

Exchange Rate and Interest Rate Risk

We are not exposed to any material foreign currency exchange risk since our revenues and expenses are primarily in Indian rupees. We are not exposed to any material interest rate risk since we do not rely on borrowings to meet our working capital and capital expenditure requirements. As of March 31, 2006, we had no debt.

Fair Value

The fair value of MTNL’s current assets and current liabilities approximate their carrying values because of their short-term maturity. Such financial instruments are classified as current and are expected to be settled within the next twelve months.

The approximate fair value of investments in held to maturity securities, as determined by using current interest as of March 31, 2006 is Rs.3,601 million as compared to their carrying amount of Rs.3,500 million.

The approximate fair value of loans to employees, as determined by using current interest as of March 31, 2006 is Rs.2,208 million as compared to their carrying amount of Rs.2,406 million.

Due to the uncertainties attached to the timing of ultimate realization of restricted assets, it is not practicable to determine their fair values. The fair value of amounts due to and from related parties cannot be determined given that the amounts are with related parties. The terms of settlement are not normal commercial terms.

Item 12. Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities

Not applicable.

88

Item 13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearage and Delinquencies.

None.

Item 14. Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 15. Controls and Procedures

(a)  Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our management, under the supervision of and with the participation of our Chairman-cum-Managing Director, as Chief Executive Officer and our Director of Finance, acting as Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) on March 31, 2006, the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluations, our Chairman-cum-Managing Director and Director of Finance have concluded that as of March 31, 2006, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective.  There are significant material weaknesses related to management’s inadequate knowledge and experience in application of U.S. GAAP, commensurate with our financial reporting requirements, which had led to the restatement of our financial statements for year ended March 31, 2005.

In October 2005, the Company restated its financial statements as a result of errors in its opening shareholders’ equity as at March 31, 2002, and shareholders’ equity and net income for the years ended March 31, 2003 and 2004. The errors were considered to be the result of deficiencies in our financial reporting process, and our lack of knowledge and expertise in the application of U.S. GAAP. These significant control deficiencies constituted material weaknesses in the financial statement reporting process which have not yet been remediated during the year ended March 31, 2006. We are planning to take steps to remedy the matters referred to above, which include, among other things, implementation of more detailed financial statement review procedures, documentation of information technology-related controls, documentation of internal controls as part of the implementation of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and strengthening of U.S. GAAP skills of our accounting staff on a regional basis and at the Corporate Center.

We have consulted with our audit committee and board of directors, and are planning to undertake remedial measures to make improvements as soon as practicable.

(b)  Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Except as discussed above, there have been no significant changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act) during the period to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. We are currently in the process of taking the steps described above to remediate the material weaknesses. In addition, we will continue to evaluate the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and may make such changes from time to time as we consider appropriate.

There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of such controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their controls objectives. Acknowledging this, we have designed our disclosure controls and procedures to provide such reasonable assurance.

Beginning with the year ended March 31, 2007, Section 404 of the U.S. Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 will require us to include an internal control report by management with our Annual Report on Form 20-F. The internal control report must contain: (1) a statement of management’s responsibility for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial reporting; (2) a statement identifying the framework used by management to conduct the required evaluation of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting; (3) management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of the end of its most recent fiscal year, including a statement as to whether or not its internal control over financial reporting is

89

effective; and (4) a statement that its independent auditors have issued an attestation report on management’s assessment of its internal control over financial reporting. We have retained consultants to assist us in this process.

Item 16A. Audit Committee Financial Expert

The Board of Directors has identified Ms. Anita Soni, member of the Audit Committee, as a “financial expert”.

Item 16B. Code of Ethics

The Company has a Code of Ethics as part of its Rules of Conduct. A copy of the Code of Ethics may be obtained upon request addressed to the Company Secretary at the Company’s principal office, indicated on the cover of this report.

Item 16C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Price Waterhouse, Bangalore (New Delhi office) (“Price Waterhouse”) served as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year^,ended March 31, 2005 and 2006 in connection with the audit of the consolidated financial statements being filed with this annual report on Form 20-F.

The following table sets forth the remuneration that we paid to Price Waterhouse and its associated entities in 2005 and 2006 in Million Rs.:

	2005	2006
Audit Fees	3.25	5.00
All Other Fees	-	-
Total	3.25	5.00

Audit fees

Audit fees represent fees for professional services rendered for the audit of the consolidated financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries prepared in accordance with US GAAP. Audit fees are fees agreed upon with Price Waterhouse for the fiscal years 2005 and 2006 (including related expenses) for the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements.

Audit committee pre-approval policies and procedures

Our board of directors requires management to obtain the board's approval before engaging independent outside auditors to provide any audit or permitted non-audit services to us. Pursuant to this policy, our board of directors pre-approves all audit and non-audit services provided by Price Waterhouse, our principal auditor, and its associated entities. Pursuant to the board's pre-approval process, each year, Price Waterhouse prepares a detailed list of services that it proposes to perform during the coming year. These proposed services are presented to the board of directors, which considers and approves the services. Management is not permitted to engage our outside auditors for any audit or non-audit service that is not on the list of services approved by the board of directors without first returning the board of directors for approval of such additional services.

Item 16D. Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees

Two members of our Audit Committee (Ms. Anita Soni and Mr. M. Sahu) are employees of the government of India, our majority shareholder. We rely on the exemption from the independence requirements of Rule 10A-3(b)(1)(ii)(B) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, provided by Section (b)(1)(iv)(E) of such rule, to comply with the listing requirements of the New York Stock Exchange. We meet the requirements for this exemption as we are a foreign private issuer and neither Ms. Soni nor Mr. Sahu are executive officers of the Company. We do not believe that reliance on this exemption from independence requirements affects the ability of the Audit Committee to function independently.

90

Item 16E. Purchase of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

Not applicable

Item 17. Financial Statements

Not applicable.

Item 18. Financial Statements

See pages F-1 through F-33.

Item 19. Exhibits

Number	Description of Exhibit
1.1	Memorandum and Articles of Association of the Registrant, as amended on January 31, 2002. *
2.1	Form of Deposit Agreement among the Registrant, The Bank of New York, as depositary, and the holders from time to time to American Depositary Shares issued thereunder, including as an exhibit, the form of American Depositary Receipt.**
4.1	Lease Agreement dated January 16, 1996 between Life Insurance Corporation of India and the Registrant.**

4.2	License Agreement for provision of Internet Services in Delhi dated November 6, 1998 between President of India acting through Assistant Director General, Ministry of Communications and the Registrant.**
4.3	License Agreement for provision of Internet Services in Mumbai dated November 6, 1998 between President of India acting through Assistant Director General, Ministry of Communications and the Registrant.**
4.4	License Agreement for provision of Internet Services dated October 6, 2000 between President of India acting through Assistant Director General, Ministry of Communications and Millennium Telecom Limited.**
12.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer
12.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer
13.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer
13.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer

*Previously filed on September 30, 2002, as exhibits to Annual Report on Form 20-F for fiscal 2002.

**Previously filed on September 27, 2001, as exhibits to Registration Statement on Form F-4 (file number 333-13944).

91

Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited

INDEX TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

	Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-1
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2005 and 2006	F-2
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006	F-3
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006	F-4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006	F-5
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements	F-6

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of

Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited:

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of operations, of shareholders' equity and of cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited and its subsidiaries at March 31, 2006 and 2005, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended March 31, 2006, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

As discussed in Note 3, 4, 19, 22 and 25, the Company has significant transactions with its parent company, the Department of Telecommunication, and other agencies and companies controlled by the Indian Government, all of which are related parties.

Price Waterhouse

/s/ PRICE WATERHOUSE

New Delhi, India

September 30, 2006

Page F-1

MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED

Consolidated Balance Sheets

	As of March 31,
	2005	2006	2006
	Indian Rupees in millions, except per share data and as stated otherwise		Convenience translation into million of US $ (Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	Rs.7,561	Rs.1,641	$  37
Short term investment in bank deposits	17,732	19,020	428
Accounts receivable, net	2,637	2,779	62
Due from related parties	8,250	2,551	57
Inventories	1,866	1,448	33
Unbilled revenue	5,002	4,361	98
Deferred income taxes	7,288	8,202	184
Other receivables	4,052	8,759	197
Total current assets	54,388	48,761	1,096
Investments in held to maturity securities	3,500	3,500	79
Investment in affiliate	138	66	1
Due from related parties	19,539	21,267	478
Property and equipment, net	82,369	80,965	1820
Restricted assets	14,733	13,427	302
Other assets	2,505	2,165	49
Total assets	177,172	170,151	3,825
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	12,568	12,129	273
Due to related parties	10,594	5,377	121
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities	24,209	22,254	500
Total current liabilities	47,371	39,760	894
			0
Accrued employee cost	27,434	31,378	705
Due to related parties	745	714	16
Deferred income taxes	7,952	8,050	181
Non current portion of customer deposits	10,337	9,801	220
Total liabilities	93,839	89,703	2,016
Contingencies and commitments (refer note 22)
Shareholders’ equity
Equity shares, 800,000,000 shares authorized, par value Rs.10 per share, issued and outstanding - 630,000,000 shares as of March 31, 2005 and 2006	6,300	6,300	142
Additional paid-in capital	6,649	6,649	149
Retained earnings	70,076	67,191	1511
Research and development reserve	308	308	7
Total shareholders' equity	83,333	80,448	1,809
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	Rs.177,172	Rs.170,151	$3,825

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Page F-2

MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED

Consolidated Statements of Operations

	Years ended March 31,
	2004	2005	2006	2006
	Indian Rupees in millions, except per share data and as stated otherwise			Convenience translation into million of US$ (Unaudited)
Revenues, net	Rs.61,084	Rs.50,156	Rs.46,668	$1049
Cost of revenues (excluding depreciation     shown separately below)	(38,282)	(31,521)	(32,268)	(725)
Selling, general and administrative expenses	(10,023)	(9,275)	(8,034)	(181)
Depreciation	(8,675)	(7,724)	(7,999)	(180)
Excess liabilities written back	1,130	1,291	821	18
Income/(loss) from operations	5,234	2,927	(812)	(19)
Interest from short term bank deposit	1,.322	1,341	1,601	36
Interest and other income, net	392	1,329	787	18
Income/ before income taxes,     and share of losses from affiliate	6,948	5,597	1,576	35
Income tax expense	(2,570)	(2,124)	(437)	(10)
Equity in (losses) of affiliate	(20)	(67)	(73)	(1)
Net income	Rs.4,358	Rs.3,406	Rs.1,066	$24
Earnings per equity share
-Basic and diluted	Rs.6.92	Rs.5.41	Rs.1.69	$0.04
Weighted average number of equity     shares used in computing earnings     per equity share (in million)	630	630	630	630

The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Page F-3

MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity

	Common Stock       No. of Par Value      Shares		Additional paid-in capital	Retained earnings	Research and development reserve	Total Shareholders' Equity
	Indian Rupees in millions except per share data and as stated otherwise
Balance as of March 31, 2003	630,000,000	Rs.6,300	Rs.6,649	Rs.70,140	Rs.308	Rs.83,397
Net income	-	-	-	4,358	-	4,358
Cash dividend paid at the rate of Rs.4.50 per share	-	-	-	(3,198)	-	(3,198)
Balance as of March 31, 2004	630,000,000	Rs.6,300	Rs.6,649	Rs.71,300	Rs.308	Rs.84,557
Net income	-	-	-	3,406	-	3,406
Cash dividend paid at the rate of Rs.6.50 per share	-	-	-	(4,630)	-	(4,630)
Balance as of March 31, 2005	630,000,000	Rs.6,300	Rs.6,649	Rs.70,076	Rs.308	Rs.83,333
Net Income	-	-	-	1,066	-	1,066
Cash dividend paid at the rate of Rs.6.27 per share	-	-	-	(3,951)	-	(3,951)
Balance as of March 31, 2006	630,000,000	Rs.6,300	Rs.6,649	Rs.67,191	Rs.308	Rs.80,448
Balance as of March 31, 2006 - Convenience translation into million of US$ (unaudited)	630,000,000	$142	$149	$1,511	$7	$1,809

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Page F-4

MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

	Year ended March 31,
	2004	2005	2006	2006
	Indian Rupees in millions except per share data and as stated otherwise			Convenience translation into million of US $ (Unaudited)
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income	Rs.4,358	Rs.3,406	Rs.1,066	$ 24
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:				-
Depreciation	8,675	7,724	7,999	180
Loss on sale of fixed assets	107	197	93	2
Deferred taxes	(2,739)	(1,276)	(816)	(18)
Excess liabilities written back	(1,130)	(1,291)	(821)	(18)
Allowances for accounts receivables	2,425	1,137	(248)	(6)
Equity in losses of equity affiliate	20	67	73	2
Changes in assets and liabilities				-
(Increase)/ decrease in accounts receivables, net and unbilled revenues	(11,188)	(345)	748	17
(Increase)/ decrease in inventories	425	(875)	418	9
(Increase)/ decrease due from related parties	6,056	(4,201)	3971	89
(Increase)/ decrease in other receivables	1,100	70	(4,368)	(98)
(Increase)/ decrease in restricted assets	(3,973)	(1,690)	1,306	29
Increase/(decrease) in accounts payable	9,985	3,942	(439)	(10)
(Increase)/ decrease due to related parties	(6,801)	(745)	(5,249)	(118)
Increase/ (decrease) in accrued employee costs	10,519	4,128	3,944	89
Increase/ (decrease) in accrued expenses and other payables	2,046	4,758	(1,671)	(38)
Net cash provided by operating activities	19,885	15,006	6,006	135
Cash flows from investing activities				-
Investments in short term bank deposits, net	(7,394)	(2,078)	(1,288)	(29)
Purchase of property and equipment	(9,337)	(10,707)	(6,713)	(151)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment	58	79	26	1
Investment in affiliate	(33)	-	-	-
Net cash used in investing activities	(16,706)	(12,706)	(7,975)	(179)
Cash flows from financing activities				-
Cash dividends paid ( including dividend tax)	(3,198)	(4,630)	(3,951)	(89)
Net cash used in financing activities	(3,198)	(4,630)	(3,951)	(89)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(19)	(2,330)	(5,920)	(133)
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year	9,910	9,891	7,561	170
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year	Rs.9,891	Rs.7,561	Rs.1,641	$37
Supplementary information
Cash paid during the year for interest	Rs.331	Rs.361	Rs.244	$ 5
Cash paid during the year for income taxes	Rs.8,327	Rs.4,732	Rs.2,475	$56

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Page F-5

MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

1. Description of Business

Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (“MTNL" or “the Company”) was incorporated in New Delhi, India as a limited liability company under the Indian Companies Act, 1956. MTNL is the principal provider of basic or fixed line telecommunications services in Delhi and Mumbai. MTNL also provides internet and cellular services in both Delhi and Mumbai. MTNL’s license for fixed line services which covers the state of Delhi and the municipalities of Mumbai, Navi Mumbai and Thane (which are in the state of Maharashtra) is valid up to March 31, 2013 and MTNL’s licenses for internet and cellular services are valid up to September 7, 2017 and October 9, 2017 respectively. With effect from May 10, 2006 MTNL has obtained a National Long Distance License for Delhi and the municipalities of Mumbai, Navi Mumbai and Thane valid up to May 9, 2026.

Millennium Telecom Limited (hereinafter referred to as “MTL”), a wholly owned India based subsidiary of MTNL, is engaged in providing web based tendering portal solutions.

Mahanagar Telephone Mauritius Limited (hereinafter referred to as “MTML”), a wholly owned subsidiary of MTNL was registered in Mauritius in November 2003, MTML was granted a license by the Government of Mauritius on January 27, 2004 to provide public switched telecom services, public land mobile services and international long distance services for a period of 15 years with service obligation within 18 months of grant of license. MTML commenced operations during the year ended March 31, 2006.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

(a) Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include all controlled subsidiaries. In addition, we review our relationships with other entities to assess if we are the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. If the determination is made that we are the primary beneficiary, then that entity is consolidated. All significant inter-company balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.

MTNL’s investments in business entities in which it does not have control, but has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies (generally 20-50 percent ownership), are accounted for under the equity method of accounting.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles applicable in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) and presented in Indian rupees, the national currency of India which is also the functional currency of the Company. Solely for the convenience of the readers, these consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended March 31, 2006, have been translated into United States dollars at the noon buying rate in New York city on March 31, 2006, for cable transfers in Indian rupees, as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York of $1= Rs.44.48. No representation is made that the Indian rupee amounts have been, could have been or could be converted into United States dollars at such a rate or any other rate on March 31, 2006 or at any other date.

(b) Use of estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the results of operations during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates. Significant estimates and assumptions are used when accounting for certain items, such as but not limited to, allowances for uncollectible accounts receivable, future obligations under employee benefit plans, useful lives of property and equipment, valuation allowances for deferred taxes and contingencies.

(c) Foreign currency translation

The Indian rupee is the functional currency of MTNL and its domestic subsidiaries and equity affiliate. Transactions in foreign currency are recorded at the exchange rate prevailing on the date of transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are expressed in the functional currency at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Revenues, costs and expenses are recorded using average exchange rates prevailing during the reporting periods. Gains or losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are included in results of operations.

(d) Revenue recognition

Revenues include amounts invoiced for call revenue, fixed monthly rental charges, roaming charges, activation fees, internet and broadband services, access and interconnection revenue and fees for value added services.

Revenues for fixed line are recognized based upon metered call units (“MCU”) of traffic processed and cellular telephone services are recognized based on call data records (“CDR”) of traffic processed Rental revenues and leased circuits rentals are recognized based upon contracted fee schedules. Revenues from internet services are recognized based on usage by subscribers. Revenues associated with access and interconnection for usage of the Company’s network by other operators

Page F-6

MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

for local, national long distance and international long distance calls are recognized gross in accordance with the Interconnect Usage Charges Regulation released by Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (“TRAI”) and contracted fee schedules. TRAI regulation specifies the maximum per minute rates for traffic terminated on the Company’s network. Revenues are recorded net of applicable discounts, allowances and service tax.

Amounts included in the financial statements, which relate to services provided from the last billing cycle date upto the end of the reporting period, are classified in current assets as “Unbilled revenue”. These are billed in subsequent periods as per the terms of the billing plans.

Billings in advance for services to be rendered and amounts charged for new connections are included in Accrued expenses and other current liabilities’ under the caption Deferred income. Amounts charged for new connections are recognized over the average life of the customer relationship.

(e) License fee

MTNL is required to pay license fees and spectrum charges to Department Of Telecommunications (“DOT”) in accordance with conditions governing license fees for Basic Telephone Service and Cellular Telephone Service under the Revenue Sharing Regime. The license fees and spectrum charges are expensed as incurred and computed using specified percentages as prescribed by DOT. The specified percentage for license fees on fixed line services and cellular services were 12%, 10%, 10% of the Adjusted Gross Revenue (“AGR”) for the years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 respectively. With effect from January 1, 2006 the Company is required to pay license fee at the rate of 6% of the AGR even on the internet services (including internet telephony). License fees and spectrum charges charged to income as part of cost of revenues amounted to Rs.9,978 million, Rs.4,974 million and Rs. 552 million (including license fee on Internet services) for the years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 respectively. The license fees and spectrum charges for the year ended March 31, 2006 amounting to Rs.552 million are net of the reversal of Rs.3,408 million of excess license fees that the Company had accrued up to March 31, 2005, which are no longer due to be paid to DOT (Refer Note 4).

(f) Network charges

MTNL recognizes charges associated with access to and interconnection to other operators’ network for local, national long distance and international long distance calls in accordance with the Interconnect Usage Charges Regulation released by Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (“TRAI”), where applicable, or in accordance with the terms of agreements entered into with other operators. TRAI regulation specifies per minute charges for traffic terminated on the other operators’ network.

(g) Cash and cash equivalents

MTNL considers all highly liquid investments, with an original maturity or remaining maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are stated at cost, which approximates their fair value due to the short maturity of the investments.

(h) Investment in short term bank deposits

Investment in bank deposits represents term deposits placed with banks earning fixed rate of interest with maturities ranging from more than three months to one year. Interest on investment in bank deposits is recognized on accrual basis.

(i) Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value. Cost is determined using the weighted average method for all categories of inventories. Inventories comprise of handsets, cables, exchange equipment and other stores and spares which are used in operating and maintaining networks. MTNL reviews its inventories on a periodic basis to identify and provide for inventory obsolescence and inventories with carrying values in excess of realizable values based on its assessment of the future demands and market conditions. These write-downs are included in cost of revenues.

(j) Investment

MTNL has evaluated its investments in debt and equity securities in accordance with SFAS 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities” and determined that all of its debt securities are to be classified as held-to-maturity (“HTM”). Debt securities are classified as held-to-maturity since management has the positive intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity. Held-to-maturity investments are carried at amortized cost using the effective yield method, adjusted for the amortization or accretion of premiums or discounts, if any. Costs include transaction cost.Currently all the investments classified as HTM were acquired at face value, without paying any premium or discount or incurring any transaction cost. Realized gains and losses on sale of HTM securities are included in earnings. Dividends and interest on securities are recognized when earned and included in other income.

MTNL records an investment impairment charge on held-to-maturity securities when management believes an investment has experienced a decline in value that is judged to be other than temporary. For securities where quoted market prices are not available, fair value is determined using pricing techniques such as discounted cash flow analysis. In order to determine whether a decline in value is other than temporary, the Company evaluates, among other factors, the duration and extent to which the value has been less than the carrying value,

Page F-7

MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

the financial condition and business outlook of the investee including cash flow indicators, current market condition and trends in the industry or the ability of the Company to retain the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in value.

(k) Property and equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Assets acquired under capital leases are stated at the present value of minimum lease payments less accumulated depreciation.

Cost, in the case of the network, comprises all expenditure up to and including cabling and wiring within customers’ premises, contractor’s charges, materials and direct labor. Employees’ remuneration and benefits are capitalized based on technical assessment of actual staff costs directly related to such capital expenditure. Interest cost incurred for qualifying assets during construction period is capitalized based on actual investment and average cost of funds or specific rate of borrowings. Interest capitalized is included as a part of asset cost and is depreciated over the estimated useful life of the asset. Maintenance and repair costs are charged to expense as incurred. Major overhauls that extend the useful lives of existing assets are capitalized. The cost and the accumulated depreciation for property and equipment sold, retired or otherwise disposed off are removed from the stated values and the resulting gains and losses are included in the statement of income.

Advances paid towards the acquisition of property and equipment outstanding at each balance sheet date and expenditures for construction of network systems and other projects (prior to the asset being ready for its intended use) are reflected as Capital Work in Progress.

Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives. Assets under capital leases and leasehold improvements are amortized straight-line over their estimated useful life or the lease term, as appropriate. Property and equipment are being depreciated over their useful lives which exceed the license term since the Company believes that its licenses will be extended beyond their current term.

The Company has adopted the provisions of FASB statement no. 143 “Asset Retirement Obligations”. At present the Company does not have any material asset retirement obligation.

MTNL has established the estimated useful lives of assets for depreciation purposes as follows:

Land - leasehold	Over the period of the lease
Buildings	30 to 60 Years
Cable and related equipment	20 to 25 Years
Exchanges and related Equipment	10 Years
Other fixed assets	5 to 10 Years

(l) Impairment of long lived assets

MTNL has adopted the provisions of SFAS 144 “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”. MTNL reviews long-lived assets, for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate the carrying amount of assets may not be fully recoverable. Each impairment test is based on a comparison of the undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated from the use of the asset to its recorded value. If impairment is indicated, the asset is written down to its fair value. Assets to be disposed are reported at the lower of the carrying value or the fair value less cost to sell.

(m) Operating Leases

MTNL has certain cancelable operating leases for office premises. Rental expenses for operating leases are accounted for on a straight line method. Rental expense amounted to Rs. 645 million, Rs. 677 million and Rs. 612 million for the years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 respectively.

Page F-8

MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

(n) Retirement benefits

Company's employees

The Company has two sets of retirement schemes for its employees based on the option exercised by them. Under one scheme, the employees are eligible for provident fund, gratuity, leave encashment and medical benefits and in the other scheme, the employees are eligible for pension, general provident fund, gratuity, leave encashment and medical benefits.

Pension

The pension scheme is a defined benefit retirement plan (the “Pension Plan”). Under the pension plan, after retirement, employees are eligible for monthly payments including dearness allowance based on the last drawn salary. MTNL provides for the Pension Plan on the basis of an actuarial valuation. The entire Pension Plan of MTNL is unfunded.

Gratuity

MTNL has a defined benefit retirement plan (the “Gratuity Plan”) covering eligible employees. The Gratuity Plan provides a lump sum payment to vested employees at retirement or termination of employment based on the respective employee’s salary and years of employment. MTNL provides for the Gratuity Plan on the basis of actuarial valuation.

Medical

The medical scheme is a defined benefit retirement plan (the “Medical Plan”). In accordance with the Medical Plan, retirees are entitled to receive reimbursements limited to half of the monthly salary drawn by the employee on the date of retirement and reimbursement of hospitalization charges in any year.

Leave encashment

Leave encashment benefit comprises of encashment of leave balances accrued by employees. These balances can be accumulated and carried forward upto a maximum of 300 days and are encashable during the tenure of employment or on the employee leaving the Company or on retirement. Leave encashment is being provided for on the basis of actuarial valuation.

Provident fund

Under Indian law, employees are entitled to receive benefits under the Provident Fund, which is a defined contribution plan. Both, the employee and the employer make monthly contributions to the plan at a predetermined rate (presently 12.0%) of the employees’ salary (basic and dearness allowance). The contributions are paid to the Provident Fund Trust established by MTNL. MTNL is obligated to make contributions when there are shortfalls in statutorily assured rates of return on the assets of the trust. Currently, MTNL has no further obligation under the provident fund beyond its contribution, which is expensed when accrued.

General provident fund

The General Provident Fund scheme (the “GPF”) is a retirement scheme applicable to employees who have opted for the Government pension scheme. Under the scheme, employees contribute between 6% to 100% of their basic pay to GPF. The employer is not required to make any contributions towards the fund. The Scheme also allows participants to withdraw up to 90% of the amount contributed by them towards the GPF.

During the year ended March 31, 2005, the Company had set up an ‘MTNL GPF Trust’ (“GPF Trust”) and had applied to the Income Tax authorities for the recognition of the said Trust. During the year ended March 31, 2006, the GPF Trust has been recognized by the Income Tax authorities and the Company has funded the GPF Trust by transferring the accumulated GPF contribution till the date of formation of the GPF Trust. The Company has also provided interest at the statutorily applicable rate of 8% per annum on the employee contributions upto the date of formation of the GPF Trust. MTNL is obligated to make contributions when there are shortfalls in statutorily assured rates of return on the assets of the GPF Trust. Currently, MTNL has no further obligation under the General Provident Fund.

Pension, gratuity, medical benefits and leave encashment are defined benefit retirement plans. The liability thereof is provided based on an actuarial valuation. All actuarial gains and losses are expensed off in the year, in which they arise. Prior service cost of medical benefits are being amortized over the average remaining service period. The gratuity plan is funded plan while medical, pension and leave encashment are unfunded plans.

Employees on secondment from DOT

The employees who are seconded from DOT are entitled to pension, gratuity and leave encashment from the Government. MTNL makes contributions, to fund the Government’s pension, gratuity and leave encashment liability in respect of seconded employees, in accordance with the rates prescribed by the Government. MTNL has no further liability in respect of these employees. Additionally, these employees are covered under eligible Government medical schemes.

(o) Income taxes 

In accordance with the provisions of SFAS 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the statements of income in the period such changes are enacted. Based on management’s judgment, a valuation allowance against any deferred tax asset is recognized when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of such deferred tax asset will not be realized.

Page F-9

MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

(p) Advertisement expenses

Advertising and business promotion costs are expensed as incurred and amounted to Rs. 257 million, Rs. 199 million and Rs.414 million for the years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 respectively.

(q) Dividends

Dividends are recorded in the consolidated financial statements in the period in which they are approved by the shareholders.

(r) Earnings per share

In accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share (EPS), basic earnings per share is computed using the weighted average number of equity shares outstanding during the period. MTNL does not have any dilutive securities and hence the basic and diluted earnings per share are the same.

(s) Recently issued accounting pronouncements

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, "Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets - an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29." APB Opinion No. 29 requires that nonmonetary exchanges of assets be recorded at fair value with an exception for exchanges of similar productive assets, which can be recorded on a carryover basis. SFAS No. 153 eliminates the current exception and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. A nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. SFAS No. 153 is effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges that take place in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005, which is April 1, 2006 for us; however, earlier application is permitted. The adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on MTNL’s consolidated financial statements.

In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (“FIN 48”). The Interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a Company's financial statements and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The Interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, which is April 1, 2007 for us. The differences, if any between the amounts recognized in the statements of financial position prior to the adoption of FIN 48 and the amounts reported after adoption will be accounted for as a cumulative-effect adjustment recorded to the beginning balance of retained earnings. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact this new standard will have on the Company’s financial position, results of operations and liquidity.

In September 2006, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108 ("SAB 108") to add Section N, "Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements," to Topic 1, Financial Statements, of the Staff Accounting Bulletin Series. Section N provides guidance on the consideration of the effects of prior year misstatements in quantifying current year misstatements for the purpose of a materiality assessment. Registrants electing not to restate prior periods should reflect the effects of initially applying the guidance in Topic 1N in their annual financial statements covering the first fiscal year ending after November 15, 2006. The cumulative effect of the initial application should be reported in the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities as of the beginning of that fiscal year, and the offsetting adjustment should be made to the opening balance of retained earnings for that year. Registrants should disclose the nature and amount of each individual error being corrected in the cumulative adjustment. The disclosure should also include when and how each error being corrected arose and the fact that the errors had previously been considered immaterial. Early application of the guidance in Topic 1N is encouraged in any report for an interim period of the first fiscal year ending after November 15, 2006, filed after the publication of this Staff Accounting Bulletin. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact SAB 108 will have on the Company’s financial position, results of operations and liquidity.

In September 2006, the FASB issued FAS 157, Fair Value Measurements, which establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. FAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, therefore the Company will begin to apply the standard in the fiscal year commending April 1, 2008. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact FAS 157 will have on the Company’s financial position, results of operations and liquidity and its related disclosures.

(t) Reclassifications

Certain items previously reported in specific financials statements captions have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation.

3. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DOT/BSNL/VSNL AND THE COMPANY (Also refer note 19)

The relationships between the Department of Telecommunication (“DOT”) / Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (“BSNL”) / Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited (“VSNL”) and MTNL are as follows:

(a) MTNL is a subsidiary of the Government of India which owns 56.25% of MTNL through DOT.DOT is a department of the Government of India. BSNL is an affiliate among common control with MTNL as the Government, acting through the DOT, holds 100% of the issued share capital of BSNL. VSNL is an equity investee of the Government of India.

Page F-10

MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

(b) DOT has granted licenses to MTNL to operate fixed line, cellular and internet services. The licenses for fixed line, cellular and internet services are valid until March 31, 2013, October 9, 2017 and September 7, 2017 respectively. DOT has also granted to MTNL, with effect from May 10, 2006 a National Long Distance License for Delhi and the municipalities of Mumbai, Navi Mumbai and Thane valid up to May 9, 2026. DOT retains the right to revoke these licenses after giving one month's notice to MTNL.

(c) In October 1999, the DOT which had performed the role of both licensor and policy maker for the Ministry of Communication and operated as India’s domestic long distance service provider and fixed-line service provider (except for the areas of Delhi and Mumbai), was split into two departments DOT and the Department of Telecom Services (DTS). DOT/ Telecom Commission, or DOT, now performs the role of licensor and policy maker. The Department of Telecom Services, or DTS, functioned as the Government of India's local and long distance network service provider till September 30, 2000. On October 1, 2000, DTS was incorporated as BSNL and carries out the functions of DTS including the determination of the networking charges payable for access to its network.

(d) Until March 31, 2001, BSNL was the sole service provider for carriage of NLD (National Long Distance) calls. Further it was also carrying ILD calls up to the gateway provided by VSNL, India’s former government-controlled international long distance carrier. However, carriage of NLD and ILD (International Long Distance) calls has been opened to other operators with effect from April 1, 2001 and April 1, 2002 respectively. MTNL continues to use BSNL network for the carriage of NLD calls, and has entered into arrangements with other ILD operators for carriage of ILD calls with effect from April 1, 2002. However, international calls continue to be passed from MTNL’s network to international gateways operated by VSNL. MTNL pays the negotiated per minute charge to VSNL for carriage and termination of international calls which varies depending on the country of destination. Subsequent to the year ended March 31, 2006, MTNL has started using its NLD license and has entered into a contract with VSNL for a lease line to carry MTNL’s call traffic between Delhi and Mumbai.

The following table gives details in respect of the Company’s revenues and (expenses) with the above mentioned related parties:

	For the years ended March 31,
	2004	2005	2006	2006
	(Million of Rupees)			(Million of US $) Unaudited
VSNL - Expenses for carriage of ILD calls originating on MTNL’s network	(1,206)	(684)	(583)	(13)
VSNL - Revenues for ILD calls terminating on MTNL’s network	1,015	516	46	1
DOT - License fees and spectrum charges (Refer note 4)	(9,978)	(4,974)	(552)	(13)
BSNL - Networking charges for NLD calls (Refer note 4)	(6,922)	(3,627)	(8,217)	(185)
BSNL - Revenues for interconnect usage charges as per TRAI Regulation	6,236	1,471	2,442	55

4. LICENSE FEES AND NETWORK CHARGES

On April 9, 2001, the DOT communicated that the annual license fee will be revised and shall be payable at 12% (same as the rate applicable to private operators) of Adjusted Gross Revenue (“AGR”) for Basic Telephone Service effective from August 1, 1999, (as against Rs. 900 per direct exchange line under the earlier arrangement). On September 5, 2001, the DOT, amended its position and informed MTNL that the date from which the revised license fees will be payable will be notified later. The DOT also informed the Company that the network charges payable to BSNL will also be revised, and the license fee and network charges would be reviewed with effect from the same date.

Accordingly, license fee and networking charges on revised basis were not to be paid till the DOT communicated the effective date for such revision. The earlier license fee and networking arrangement expired on March 31, 2000 and March 31, 2001 respectively. No agreement had been entered for payment of license fee and networking charges for the fiscal years ended March 31,2002, 2003 and 2004 . In the absence of any agreement, license fee and networking charges for these years have been accrued on the same basis as applicable to that of private operators. In the fiscal 2001, the Company paid license fee based on the earlier arrangement.

Page F-11

MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

Subsequent to the March 31, 2004, a meeting was held between DOT, BSNL and MTNL to resolve the ambiguity with respect to license fee and networking charges. The parties agreed that the license fees were payable at 12% of AGR and networking charges as per TRAI regulations with effect from August 1, 1999. Also, the revenue sharing percentages earlier agreed to between MTNL and BSNL, other than those governed by TRAI regulations, were revised with retrospective effect. This had resulted in an incremental charge of Rs.3,520 million on account of license fee and a benefit of Rs.1,515 million on account of networking charges for periods upto March 31, 2003, which had been accounted for in the year ended March 31, 2004.

During the year ended March 31, 2006, the Company has accounted for a reversal of license fees amounting to Rs 3,408 million. The Company has received a confirmation from DOT stating that provisional assessment of license fees upto the financial year 2004-05 in respect of MTNL has been completed and that MTNL has fully paid all license fee dues upto March 31, 2005. Subsequent to the year ended March 31, 2006, the Company has also received an NLD license from DOT. One of the prerequisites for obtaining an NLD license is the absence of any dues towards DOT on account of license fees. In view of the above and after obtaining an opinion from a legal counsel the Company has concluded that there is no longer any ambiguity regarding the license fees payable for the period upto March 31, 2003 (Rs.3,520 million) and for the years ended March 31, 2004 and 2005. The Company has accounted for Rs.3,408 million (net) the additional amounts accrued upto March 31, 2005 as a reduction in license fees in the statement of income as part of cost of revenues for the year ended March 31, 2006.

During the year ended March 31, 2006, the DOT had constituted a three member committee comprising of Member (Production), Telecommunications, Member (Finance), Telecommunications and Deputy Director General (Business Solutions) to resolve the various disputes relating to networking charges. Based on the recommendations of the Committee vide their minutes dated January 2006, DOT has settled the disputes on the networking charges for the period from 2000 to 2005. Accordingly, an additionalamount of Rs.3,809 million has been accounted as networking charges in the statement of income as part of cost of revenues for the year ended March 31, 2006.

5. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

The cost and fair values for cash and cash equivalents are as follows:

	As of March 31,
	2005	2006	2006
	(Million of Rupees)		(Million of US $) Unaudited
Cash and bank balances	Rs.1,918	Rs.1,641	$37
Cash equivalents	5,643	-	-
Cash and cash equivalents	Rs.7,561	Rs.1,641	$37

6. INVESTMENTS IN BANK DEPOSITS

Investments in bank deposits represents term deposits placed with banks earning fixed rate of interest and amounted to Rs.17,732 million and Rs.19,020 million as of March 31, 2005 and 2006 respectively with maturities from more than three months to one year . Interest on investments in bank deposits is recognized on accrual basis.

7. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

	As of March 31,
	2005	2006	2006
	(Million of Rupees)		(Million of US $) Unaudited
Land and buildings	Rs.12,687	Rs.13,890	$312
Cable and related equipment	71,752	73,129	1,644
Exchanges and related equipment	62,126	65,480	1,472
Other fixed assets	5,296	5,421	122
Capital work in progress	6,024	5,281	119
	157,885	163,201	3,669
Accumulated depreciation	(75,516)	(82,236)	(1,849)
Property and equipment, net	Rs.82,369	Rs.80,965	$1,820

Page F-12

MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

In 1987, the assets and properties of the DOT located in Delhi and Mumbai were transferred to MTNL by an order of the Government of India (the "Government") and a deed of sale was executed by the Government in favor of MTNL representing an irrevocable transfer. Indian law generally requires that to perfect the transfer or lease of real property, the transfer should be evidenced by a formal, duly stamped deed of transfer and registered with the Central Land Registrar within a specified period after the execution of the deed of transfer or lease. A formal transfer deed for real property of the DOT, transferred by the Government to MTNL has been executed but has not been registered with the appropriate municipal authorities. The formal transfer deed and physical delivery of possession of the DOT's non-real estate assets has resulted in the transfer of such non-real estate assets of the DOT to MTNL in Delhi and Mumbai.

Indian law also requires payment of stamp duty (at rates which vary among states) on instruments, which effect transfer of title to real estate or in respect of leases of real estate. MTNL has not paid stamp duty in respect of any of the acquired or leased properties. Accordingly, MTNL may be liable for stamp duty and penalties thereon if a deed is registered by MTNL in the future (other than with respect to the DOT properties acquired from the Government as at March 30, 1987). All liabilities for stamp duties in respect of the DOT properties acquired by MTNL from the Government as at March 30, 1987 are to be borne by the Government. The Company has been advised by its counsel that although the Company has valid possession including the risks and rewards of ownership and title to all of its property, to enable MTNL to perfect and thereby acquire marketable title to real property in its possession, it would need to have relevant documents relating to transfer or lease of real property duly registered and stamped. Accordingly, MTNL cannot sell its properties without payment of stamp duties and registering the properties in its name. In preparing these consolidated financial statements, MTNL has capitalized provision for stamp duty based on its best estimate amounting to Rs. 703 million and Rs.794million as of March 31, 2005 and 2006 respectively. MTNL does not intend to sell any of these properties. In terms of its Articles of Association MTNL has to obtain prior approval of the President of India in respect of sale or disposal of any land or building costing more than Rs.1 million.

8. INVESTMENTS IN HELD TO MATURITY SECURITIES

Investments of MTNL consist of held-to-maturity securities (“HTM”).

	As of March 31,
	2005	2006	2006
	(Million of Rupees)		(Million of US $) Unaudited
Held-to-maturity securities
8.75% Redeemable Cumulative Preference Shares of ITI Limited	Rs.1,000	Rs.1,000	$22
11.5% Bonds of Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation	2,500	2,500	57
Investments - Non-current	Rs.3,500	Rs.3,500	$79

8.75% Redeemable Cumulative Preference Shares of ITI Limited

On February 14, 2003, MTNL invested Rs. 1,000 million in 8.75% cumulative preference shares of ITI Limited (“ITI”) on a private placement basis. ITI is a government company in the telecommunication equipment and distribution business. ITI also supplies exchanges and cables to MTNL. These preference shares are redeemable in five equal annual installments commencing from March 30, 2005.

The share purchase agreement between ITI and MTNL includes a provision for a letter of comfort from Department of Telecommunication (DOT) to MTNL endorsing the investment and also provides MTNL a right to set off principal payments owing under the terms of these Cumulative Preference Shares against amounts payable to ITI, in connection with MTNL’s purchase of exchanges and cable supplies.

As of September 30, 2005, ITI had not redeemed the first tranche amounting to Rs. 200 million as per the repayment schedule and ITI had requested MTNL for an extension on the redemption dates. However MTNL had not accepted ITI’s request and has looked to the DOT’s letter of comfort and requested settlement of the first repayment tranche of Rs. 200.

As of September 30, 2006, ITI has not yet redeemed both the first and second tranches amounting to Rs. 200 million each as per the original repayment schedule.

Management has evaluated the investment in ITI for impairment, on the basis that the first and second tranches for repayment have not been settled by ITI. Management has evaluated the financial condition and business outlook of ITI

Page F-13

MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

including the new purchase orders received by ITI for supply of GSM equipment from BSNL and the Company. The Company currently has account payable to ITI of Rs. 312 million as at March 31, 2006 which, pursuant to the share agreement, the Company can legally settle against the repayments owing under the cumulative preference shares. In addition, the Company has the intend and ability to retain the debt security for a period of time sufficient to allow for anticipated recovery in value.

Based on this evaluation and specifically considering that the share purchase agreement includes a provision for a letter of comfort from Department of Telecommunication (Government of India) to MTNL endorsing the investment and also provides MTNL a right to set off amounts receivable in respect of principal outstanding from the dues payable to ITI, management has concluded that the debt security is not impaired.

11.5% Bonds issued by Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation

MTNL has also invested Rs. 2,500 million in bonds issued by Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation (“MKVDC”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Government of Maharashtra. MKVDC allotted these bonds to MTNL on May 31, 2002. The bonds have a coupon rate of 11.5% per annum and are redeemable at the end of the 10^th year from the date of allotment. The repayment of these bonds is guaranteed by the Government of Mahrashtra.

Interest income has been recognized and realized on the bonds held in MKVDC.

MTNL records an investment impairment charge when management believes an investment has experienced a decline in value that is judged to be other than temporary. MTNL monitors its investments for impairment by considering current factors including economic environment, market conditions and the operational performance and other specific factors relating to the business underlying the investment. Based on its assessment of its carrying values of the above investments, management believes that there is no impairment of investments as of March 31, 2006

9. INVESTMENT IN EQUITY AFFILIATE

On July 21, 2001 MTNL, in consortium with Telecommunications Consultants India Limited, VSNL and Nepal Venture Private Limited entered into a joint venture arrangement to form United Telecom Limited (UTL). UTL was formed to provide wireless in local loop (“WLL”) services in Nepal. As at March 31, 2003, MTNL had invested Rs. 200 million in UTL in proportion to its 26.7% holding. In 2004, MTNL further invested Rs. 33 million in UTL in proportion to its 26.7% holding MTNL’s equity in losses of the affiliate amounted to Rs. 20 million , Rs. 67 million and Rs.73 million for the years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 respectively. The carrying value of investment in UTL is Rs. 138 million and Rs.66 million as of March 31, 2005 and 2006 respectively.

10. INVENTORIES

Inventories are comprised of the following:

	As of March 31,
	2005	2006	2006
	(Million of Rupees)		(Million of US $) Unaudited
Cables	Rs.1,060	Rs.881	$20
Exchange equipment	495	347	8
Telephone and telex instruments	492	330	7
Others	177	261	6
Less: allowance for slow moving / obsolete stock	(358)	(371)	(8)
Inventories, net	Rs.1,866	Rs.1,448	$33

Page F-14

MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

Activity in allowance for slow moving / obsolete stock is as follows:

	For the years ended March 31,
	2004	2005	2006	2006
	(Million of Rupees)			(Million of US $) Unaudited
Balance at beginning of year	Rs.353	Rs.374	Rs.358	$8
Charged to expense	48	159	35	1
Less: amounts written off	(27)	(175)	(22)	(1)
Balance at end of year	Rs.374	Rs.358	Rs.371	$8

11. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AND ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL DEBTS

Accounts receivable are stated net of allowance for doubtful debts. Accounts receivable are not collateralized. The allowance for doubtful debts is determined principally on the basis of past credit loss experience and an evaluation of potential losses on the outstanding receivable balances. The activity in allowance for uncollectible accounts is given below:

	For the years ended March 31,
	2004	2005	2006	2006
	(Million of Rupees)			(Million of US $) Unaudited
Balance at beginning of year	Rs.6,144	Rs.8,561	Rs.6,794	$153
Charged to expense	2,425	1,137	(248)	(6)
Less: amounts written off	(8)	(2,904)	(1,555)	(35)
Balance at end of year	Rs.8,561	Rs.6,794	Rs.4,991	$112

12. RESTRICTED ASSETS

Restricted assets include the amount paid to income tax authorities under protest (refer note 22 (iii) (b) (i)).

13. OTHER RECEIVABLES

Other receivables consist of the following:

	As of March 31,
	2005	2006	2006
	(Million of Rupees)		(Million of US $) Unaudited
Loans to employees	Rs.2,654	Rs.2,406	$54
Advance tax	1,698	4,860	109
Accrued interest	843	936	21
Others	1,362	2,722	61
	6,557	10,924	246
Less: Other assets, non-current	(2,505)	(2,165)	(49)
Other receivables, current	Rs.4,052	Rs.8,759	$197

Advance tax balance is net of income tax liability amounting to Rs. 42,892 million and Rs. 44,183 million as of March 31, 2005 and 2006. Other assets includes the non current portion of loans given to employees and capital lease recievable.

Page F-15

MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

14. ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consist of the following:

	As of March 31,
	2005	2006	2006
	(Million of Rupees)		(Million of US $) Unaudited
Interest accrual	Rs.133	Rs.6	$-
General provident fund contribution, net	10,330	8,517	191
Deferred income	3,251	5,444	122
Advances from customers and others	778	697	16
Customers deposits	2,584	2,456	55
Accrued employee cost	3,294	3,718	84
Other payables and accruals	3,839	1,416	32
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities	Rs.24,209	Rs.22,254	$500

The General Provident Fund accrual represents amounts contributed by employees (who have opted for the Government pension rules), net of advances taken. Prior to the absorption (in the year 2000), this fund was being maintained by DOT. MTNL has raised claims amounting to Rs. 8,517 million on DOT upto March 31, 2006 (2005: Rs 6,426 million) in respect of employee contributions (pre absorption) together with the interest accrued. An offsetting amount has been included in the non-current portion of amounts due from related parties as disclosed in Note 19.

Subsequent to absorption, in the absence of any rules available for deposit of such employee contributions, the amounts of employee contributions have been retained by MTNL. These funds are not restricted and could be used to fund the activities of MTNL until such time that the funds must be transferred to the GPF Trust. During the current year, a GPF trust has been created and Rs 4,340 million has been transferred to the GPF Trust. The outstanding amount owing to the trust of Rs. 8,517 million continues to be a part of accured expenses and other current liabilities, as the amount is due to be recovered by the DOT.

15. INTEREST AND OTHER INCOME, NET

Interest and other income, net consist of the following:

	For the years ended March 31,
	2004	2005	2006	2006
	(Million of Rupees)			(Million of US $) Unaudited
Interest from investment in MKVDC	Rs.239	Rs.239	Rs.239	$5
Interest on loans to employees	134	182	173	4
Interest on advances and others, net	41	715	51	1
Interest paid on customers deposit	(36)	(28)	(25)	(1)
Interest paid on General provident fund	(310)	(330)	(207)	(4)
Other income	324	551	556	13
Interest and other income, net	Rs.392	Rs.1,329	Rs.787	$18

16. EXCESS LIABILITIES WRITTEN BACK

The excess liabilities written back includes accruals being reversed to income and relates to unmatched excess cash received in respect of debtors (which, as per The Limitation Act, after a period of three years become time barred and become property of the Company), amounting to Rs.322 million Rs. 297 million and Rs.49 million for the years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 respectively. This line item also includes other time barred liabilities outstanding for more than 3 years amounting to Rs.479 million, Rs. 630 million and Rs.674 million for the years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 respectively, and other provisions no longer required which have been written back amounting to Rs.329 million , Rs. 364 million and Rs.98 million for the years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 respectively.

Page F-16

MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

17. INCOME TAXES

Total income tax expense is attributable to income from continuing operations and consists of the following:

	For the years ended March 31,
	2004	2005	2006	2006
	(Million of Rupees)			(Million of US $) Unaudited
Current tax	Rs.5,309	Rs.3,400	Rs.1,253	$28
Deferred tax	(2,739)	(1,276)	(816)	(18)
Aggregate Taxes	Rs.2,570	Rs.2,124	Rs.437	$(10)

A reconciliation of the income tax expense to the amount computed by applying the statutory Indian income tax rate to income before income tax expense is summarized below:

	For the years ended March 31,
	2004	2005	2006	2006
	(Million of Rupees)			(Million of US $) Unaudited
Income before taxes and share from affiliates	Rs.6,948	Rs.5,597	Rs.1,576	$35
Average enacted tax rate in India	35.88%	36.59%	33.66%
Computed tax expense	2,493	2,048	531	12
Effect of tax assessed for earlier years	61	-	71	2
Effect of change in tax rates	(111)	39	(173)	(4)
Permanent differences	127	37	8	-
Income taxes recognized in the statement of income	Rs.2,570	Rs.2,124	Rs.437	$10

Permanent differences represent certain expenses, which are not allowed as deductible expenses under the Indian Income Tax Act, 1961.

As per section 80IA of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 a Company, which starts to operate telecommunication services at any time on or after April 1, 1995, but before March 31, 2000, is entitled to a tax holiday for a period of 10 years beginning with the year in which such services are started. As per the tax holiday, 100% of the profits derived from such services are exempt from tax in the first 5 years, and 30% of such profits are exempt from tax for the next 5 years. MTNL on the basis of advice from its legal counsel has historically claimed such benefit. The Company’s claim have been rejected at the first appellate level and the case has been referred to the Committee of Disputes, which is a body formed by the Government to settle disputes between Government controlled undertakings and the Government. The Committee has referred the case to the Tax appellate authorities for reconsideration. During the year ended March 31, 2006, the case has been set aside by the Income Tax Appellate Authority for the assessment years 1998-99, 1999-00, 2000-01 and 2002-03 and has referred the matter back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh assessment after hearing the case again. (Also refer note 22 iii (b) (ii)).

The benefit claimed by MTNL in the above years may ultimately not be allowed by the tax authorities and hence, the provision for current tax in these consolidated financial statements has been accounted on the basis of normal tax rates.

Page F-17

MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

Significant components of activities that gave rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities included in the financial statements are as follows:

	As of March 31,
	2005	2006	2006
	(Million of Rupees)		(Million of US $) Unaudited
Deferred tax assets:
Allowances for bad and doubtful debts	Rs. 2,486	Rs.1,681	$38
Deferred settlements amount not recognized in income	866	3,471	78
Post retirement benefits	5,901	4,362	98
Others	3,453	2,235	50
Total deferred tax assets	12,706	11,749	264
Deferred tax liabilities:
Excess of tax allowance over depreciation	(12,008)	(10,507)	(236)
Interest capitalized	(1,362)	(1,090)	(25)
Total deferred tax liabilities	(13,370)	(11,597)	(261)
Net deferred tax asset / (liability)	Rs.(664)	Rs.152	$3

Net deferred tax assets / (liabilities) included in the consolidated balance sheets are as follows:

	As of March 31,
	2005	2006	2006
	(Million of Rupees)		(Million of US $) Unaudited
Current:
Deferred tax assets	Rs.7,288	Rs.8,202	$184
Non-current:
Deferred tax assets	5,418	3,547	80
Deferred tax liabilities	(13,370)	(11,597)	(261)
Total non current	(7,952)	(8,050)	(181)
Net deferred tax asset / (liability)	Rs. (664)	Rs. 152	$3

Page F-18

MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

18. RETIREMENT BENEFITS

(a) Employees seconded from DOT

MTNL’s employees who are seconded from DOT are entitled to pension, gratuity benefits and leave encashment from the Government. MTNL makes contributions to the DOT to fund the liability in respect of these employees in accordance with the rates prescribed by the Government. MTNL’s contributions are charged to income in the period they are incurred. The amount for pension, gratuity and leave encashment recognized for such employees in the consolidated statements of income are as follows:

	For the years ended March 31,
	2004	2005	2006	2006
	(Million of Rupees)			(Million of US $) Unaudited
Pension (including gratuity)	Rs.113	Rs.25	Rs.9	$1
Leave encashment	55	13	8	-
	Rs.168	Rs.38	Rs.17	$1

(b) Employees of MTNL

i. Pension, Gratuity and Medical benefits

The pension and gratuity to the non-executives employees of MTNL are defined benefit plans, the cost and liability, for which are based on an actuarial valuation. Further MTNL introduced a ‘MTNL retired employees medical facility scheme’ for employees with effect from January 1, 2002. The scheme was initially introduced for a period of 12 weeks and was subsequently extended till such time a new medical scheme was introduced. The medical benefit scheme for its retired employees is a defined benefit plan, the cost and liability for which is based on an actuarial valuation.

  ii. Absorption of Executive employees

The Company had given an option to its executive employees (B category) for absorption with MTNL with effect from October 1, 2000, at a revised pay scale that is higher than the existing pay scale. The offer for absorption provided that in addition to getting post retirement benefits like gratuity and leave encashment, the employees would have to opt for pension based on the government rules.

During the year ended March 31, 2004, majority of employees had opted for absorption with MTNL. MTNL determined the incremental liability on account of revised pay scales and related retirement cost based on an actuarial valuation. MTNL has raised claims on DOT amounting to Rs. 2,784 million for the period upto the October 1, 2000, which represent amounts recoverable towards retirement benefits calculated at the rates prescribed by DOT for its employees on secondment. These have been included in Dues from related parties as disclosed in Note 19.

During the year ended March 31, 2005, an additional 1,108 executive employees opted for absorption with MTNL. MTNL has determined the incremental liability on account of revised pay scales and related retirement cost based on an actuarial valuation. In respect of these employees, MTNL has raised claims on DOT amounting to Rs. 541 million for the period upto the October 1, 2000,which represent amounts recoverable towards retirement benefits calculated at the rates prescribed by DOT for its employees on secondment. These have been included in Dues from related parties as disclosed in Note 19.

During the year ended March 31, 2006, the Company had given an option to its executive employees (Category A) for absorption with the Company with effect from October 1, 2000, at a revised pay scale that is higher than the existing pay scale. Out of approximately 1,218 Group A employees currently working in MTNL, 65 employees have exercised their option as at March 31, 2006 and have been absorbed in MTNL. The offer for absorption provided that in addition to getting the post retirement benefits like gratuity and leave encashment subsequent to absorption, the employee would have to opt for either pension based on the government rules or provident fund based on the company policy. A case has been filed by the Indian Telecom Service Association (acting on behalf of Group A officers) with the High court appealing for the stay order against absorption of Group A employees on the contention that terms and conditions of absorption are not clear. The High Court has subsequently passed a stay order against further absorption of Group A employees. Pending finalization of the terms of absorption, the Company, during the year ended March 31, 2006, has provisionally accrued a charge of amounting to Rs.25.39 million on account of revised pay scales for the executive employees who exercised the option upto that date. However, no claims have been raised by the Company on DOT for the related retirement costs pending finalization of terms of absorption and outcome of the court case.

Page F-19

MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

iii. The following tables sets forth the status of the pension, gratuity plan and medical benefits. The measurement date used is March 31, of the relevant fiscal year.

  The Pension Plan

	As of March 31,
	2005	2006	2006
	(Million of Rupees)		(Million of US $) Unaudited
Accumulated benefit obligation	Rs.15,355	Rs.17,379	$391
Changes in projected benefit obligation:
Projected Benefit obligation at the beginning of the year	15,080	19,865	446
Service cost	878	896	20
Interest cost	1,384	1,689	38
Actuarial loss	1,900	1,314	30
Loss on curtailment	236	185	4
Actuarial obligation assumed on account of absorption	841	-	-
Benefits paid	(454)	(932)	(21)
Projected Benefit obligation at the end of the year	19,865	23,017	517
Changes in plan asset	-	-	-
Unfunded status	(19,865)	(23,017)	(517)
Accrued provision for pension	Rs.(19,865)	Rs.(23,017)	$(517)

	For the years ended March 31,
	2004	2005	2006	2006
	(Million of Rupees)			(Million of US $) Unaudited
The components of net pension costs are reflected below:
Current service cost	Rs.786	Rs.879	Rs.896	$20
Actuarial obligation assumed on account of absorption	551	426	-	-
Interest cost	1,147	1,384	1,689	38
Loss on curtailment	-	236	185	4
Actuarial loss	1,023	1,900	1,314	30
Net periodic pension cost	Rs.3,507	Rs.4,825	Rs.4,084	$92

Page F-20

MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

 Cash Flows

The Company expects to make the following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate:

For the financial year ended March 31,	Expected contribution
	(Million of Rupees)	(Million of US $) Unaudited
2007	Rs.998	$22
2008	739	17
2009	815	18
2010	941	21
2011	1,077	24
2012 - 2016	8,546	192

The Gratuity Plan

	As of March 31,
	2005	2006	2006
	(Million of Rupees)		(Million of US $) Unaudited
Accumulated benefit obligation	Rs.3,510	Rs.3,643	$82
Changes in projected benefit obligation:
Projected Benefit obligation at the beginning of the year	4,175	4,853	109
Service cost	296	283	6
Interest cost	349	379	9
Actuarial (gain) or loss	96	(92)	(2)
Curtailment Loss	40	65	1
Actuarial obligation assumed on account of absorption	174	-	-
Benefits paid	(277)	(490)	(11)
Projected Benefit obligation at the end of the year	4,853	4,998	112
Changes in plan asset			-
Fair value of the plan assets at the beginning of the Year	645	3,082	69
Actual return on plan assets	173	237	5
Employer contributions	2,264	299	7
Plan assets at the end of the year	3,082	3,618	81
Unfunded status	(1,771)	(1,380)	(31)
Accrued provision for gratuity	Rs.(1,771)	Rs.(1,380)	$(31)

Page F-21

MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

	For the years ended March 31,
	2004	2005	2006	2006
	(Million of Rupees)			(Million of US $) Unaudited
The components of net gratuity costs are reflected below:
Current service cost	Rs.289	Rs.296	Rs.283	$7
Actuarial obligation assumed on account of absorption	122	46	-	-
Interest cost	213	175	142	3
Actuarial (gain) or loss	92	96	(92)	(2)
Curtailment (Gain)/ Loss	-	40	65	1
Net periodic gratuity cost	Rs.716	Rs.653	Rs.398	$9

 

Cash Flows

The Company expects to make the following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate:

For the financial year ended March 31,	Expected contribution
	(Million of Rupees)	(Million of US $) Unaudited
2007	Rs.478	$11
2008	248	6
2009	258	6
2010	321	7
2011	375	8
2012 - 2016	3,016	68

The Medical Plan

	As of March 31,
	2005	2006	2006
	(Million of Rupees)		(Million of US $) Unaudited
Accumulated benefit obligation	Rs.9,109	Rs.9887	$222
Changes in projected benefit obligation:
Projected Benefit obligation at the beginning of the year	7,603	9109	205
Prior service cost	160	-	-
Service cost	423	402	9
Interest cost	668	760	17
Actuarial (gain) or loss	261	(360)	(8)
Benefits paid	(6)	(24)	(1)
Projected Benefit obligation at the end of the year	9,109	9,887	222
Changes in plan asset	-	-	-
Unfunded status	(9,109)	(9,887)	(222)
Unrecognised prior service cost	4,475	4,069	91
Accrued provision for medical benefits	Rs.(4,634)	Rs.(5,818)	$(131)

Page F-22

MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

	For the years ended March 31,
	2004	2005	2006	2006
	(Million of Rupees)			(Million of US $) Unaudited
The components of net medical costs are reflected below:
Current Service cost	Rs.289	Rs.423	Rs.402	$9
Interest cost	575	668	760	17
Actuarial (gain) or loss	472	261	(360)	(8)
Actuarial obligation assumed on account of absorption	-	-	-	-
Amortization of prior service cost	394	407	407	9
Net periodic medical benefit	Rs.1,730	Rs.1,759	Rs.1,209	$27

Cash Flows

The Company expects to make the following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate:

For the financial year ended March 31,	Expected contribution
	(Million of Rupees)	(Million of US $) Unaudited
2007	Rs.45	$1
2008	53	1
2009	63	1
2010	75	2
2011	90	2
2012 - 2016	798	18

The Company assesses these assumptions with its projected long-term plans of growth and prevalent industry standards.

The following table provides the assumed health care cost trend rates for postretirement benefit plans:

	As of March 31,
	2004	2005	2006
Health care cost trend rate assumed throughout	10%	10%	10%

Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the health care plans. A one-percentage point increase or decrease in the assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects:

	2005		2006
	(Million of Rupees)		(Million of Rupees)
	1 %Point Increase	1 %Point Decrease	1 %Point Increase	1 %Point Decrease
Effect on total of service and interest cost	Rs.338	Rs.(240)	Rs.290	Rs.(232)
Effect on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation	2,824	(2,004)	2,739	(2,056)

 iv. Leave Pay Obligation

Leave pay expenses amounted to Rs. 881 million, Rs. 551 million and Rs 235 million for the years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 respectively. Accrued employee costs include Rs. 2,267 million and Rs. 2,531 million leave pay obligation of MTNL as of March 31, 2005 and 2006 respectively.

Page F-23

MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

The weighted average actuarial assumptions used to determine benefit obligations and net periodic benefit cost were:

	2004	2005	2006
Discount rate	8.35%	8.00%	8.00%
Future salary increases	5%	5%	5%
Future pension increases	5%	5%	5%
Rate of return on plan assets	8.35%	7.50%	8.50%
Rate of hospitality incidence (% of mortality rate)	150%	150%	150%
Average hospitalization period per year	10 days	10 days	10 days
Average expenses per hospitalization	Rs. 50,000	Rs. 50,000	Rs. 50,000

   v. Provident fund

Provident fund, a defined contribution plan, is being administered through trustees and MTNL’s contributions are expensed each year. MTNL has recognized, Rs.191 million Rs 203 million and Rs.263 million for the years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 respectively in the consolidated statements of income.

 vi. Voluntary Retirement Scheme

During the year ended March 31, 2005, MTNL implemented a Voluntary Retirement Scheme for certain eligible employees. Under the scheme, the eligible employees were given an option to voluntarily take retirement from service and make their choice within the specified period of time (all prior to March 31, 2005). The scheme provided for ex-gratia payments to eligible employees opting for voluntary retirement based on the respective employee’s salary and term of employment. MTNL’s obligation amounted to Rs. 1,381 million for the year ended March 31, 2005. In addition, the curtailment loss in the gratuity and pension plan on account of the VRS amounted to Rs. 40 million and Rs. 236 million respectively for the year ended March 31, 2005. The Company has made actual payments amounting to 1,428 million as against the estimates of Rs 1381 million in respect of the VRS scheme implemented during the year and accordingly the additional charge of Rs. 47 million has been accounted in the year ended March 31, 2006.

During the year ended March 31, 2006, MTNL implemented two more Voluntary Retirement Schemes for executives and non executives respectively. Under the schemes, the eligible employees were given an option to voluntarily take retirement from service and make their choice within the specified period of time. The schemes provide for ex-gratia payments to eligible employees opting for voluntary retirement based on the respective employee’s salary and term of employment. The Non executive employees were to exercise their options from March 20, 2006 to April 10, 2006. Under the scheme 312 employees exercised their options till March 31, 2006 and 1,069 employees subsequent to March 31, 2006. MTNL’s obligation amounted to Rs. 227 million for those who exercised their option before March 31, 2006. In addition, the curtailment loss in the gratuity and pension plan on account of the VRS amounted to Rs. 17 million and Rs. 49 million respectively for the year ended March 31, 2006.

The Executive employees exercised their options during the year ended March 31, 2006. Under this scheme, MTNL’s obligation amounted to Rs. 677 million for the year ended March 31, 2006. In addition, the curtailment loss in the gratuity and pension plan on account of the VRS amounted to Rs.48 million and Rs.136 million respectively for the year ended March 31, 2006.

19. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

MTNL is a Government Company under the Indian Companies Act. MTNL is listed on the major stock exchanges in India and the New York Stock Exchange. As of March 31, 2006, the Government owns 56.25% of the issued share capital of MTNL, with the remaining balance owned by private investors’.Consequently, the Government, acting through the DOT, continues to control MTNL and will have the power to elect all of its Directors to determine the outcome of most actions requiring approval of the Board of Directors or Shareholders, including proposed expansions of MTNL's business (including into areas in which MTNL may compete with BSNL), transactions with the DOT or the assertion of claims against the DOT/BSNL.

In addition, under MTNL's Articles of Association, the President of India, on behalf of the Government, may issue directives with respect to the conduct of the business and affairs of MTNL, and certain matters with respect to its business including the appointment and remuneration of the Company's Chairman cum Managing Director and the declaration of dividends. MTNL may not take action in respect of any matter reserved for the President of India without his approval. BSNL is a 100% owned subsidiary of the Government of India, and therefore by virtue of common control, is an affiliated sister Company of MTNL VSNL is an equity investee of the Government of India.

As noted in Note 9, MTNL has a 26.7% holding in United Telecom Limited (UTL).

Note 3 describes in more detail the nature of the relationships between the DOT/BSNL/VSNL and the Company as well as transactions with these parties. Amounts due to and from the DOT/BSNL/VSNL are disclosed separately on the Company’s balance sheet as amounts due to/from related parties.

Page F-24

MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

 The balances receivable from and payable to related parties other than employees are summarized as follows:

	As of March 31,
	2005			2006
	Receivables		Payables		Receivables		Payables
	(Millions of rupees)
DOT (note i)		Rs.18,792	Rs.4,831			Rs.20,630		Rs.1,148
BSNL (note ii)		8,250	5,763			2,551		4,229
VSNL (note ii)		747	745			637		714
Due from / to Related Parties		Rs.27,789	Rs.11,339			Rs.23,818		Rs.6,091
Less: Current Portion		Rs.8,250	Rs.10,594			Rs.2,551		Rs.5,377
Due from / to Related Parties, non-current portion		Rs.19,539	Rs.745			Rs.21,267		Rs.714
Due from / to Related Parties - Current Million of US $ Unaudited	$	189	$243		$	57	$	121
Due from / to Related Parties - Non Current Million of US $ Unaudited	$	448	$17		$	478	$	16

Note i:

The amounts due from the DOT are primarily on account of pre-absorption retirement benefits which are recoverable by MTNL. Such retirement benefits (pre absorption) were calculated at the rates prescribed by DOT (Refer note 18). Furthermore, amounts recoverable for the General Provident Fund in respect of employee contributions (pre absorption) of Rs 8,517 million (2005: Rs 6,426 million) together with the interest accrued (Refer Note 14) is also included in this balance. Amounts due to the DOT represent license fees and spectrum charges to be paid by MTNL in accordance with conditions governing license fees for Basic Telephone Service and Cellular Telephone Service under the Revenue Sharing Regime (Refer Note 2(e) and 3).

Note ii:

Amounts due from BSNL and VSNL represent trade receivables related to interconnect usage charges as per TRAI Regulations and the payables are on account of networking charges for NLD calls. (Refer Note 3).

Management has classified the amounts due from the DOT and VSNL as non-current on the basis that there are no fixed terms for repayment from these related parties, and while management expects to negotiate settlement of the amounts within the next 12 months, there are no assurances that this will occur.

20. EQUITY SHARES

The Company has only one class of capital stock referred to herein as equity shares. Par value of each equity share outstanding as of March 31, 2005 and 2006 is Rs.10.

Voting

Each holder of equity shares is entitled to one vote per share.

Dividends

Final dividends proposed by the Board of Directors are payable when formally declared by the shareholders, who have the right to decrease but not increase the amount of the dividend recommended by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors declare interim dividends without the need for shareholders’ approval. Dividends payable to equity shareholders are based on the net income available for distribution as reported in MTNL’s unconsolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with Indian GAAP. Dividends are declared and paid in Indian rupees. Net income in accordance with US GAAP may, in certain years, either not be fully available or be additionally available for distribution to equity shareholders.

Under Indian GAAP the accumulated retained earnings available for distribution to equity shareholders, subject to certain restrictions was Rs.76,525 million, Rs.81,977 million and Rs.84,906 million as of March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 respectively.

Under the Indian Companies Act, dividends may be paid out of the profits of a company in the year in which the dividend is declared or out of the undistributed profits of previous fiscal years. Before declaring a dividend greater than 10.0% of the par value of its equity shares, a company is required to transfer to its reserves a minimum percentage of its profits for that year, ranging from 2.5% to 10.0% or higher , depending on the dividend percentage to be declared in such year.

Page F-25

MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

Liquidation

In the event of liquidation of the Company, the holders of equity shares shall be entitled to receive all of the remaining assets of the Company in proportion to the number of equity shares held, after distribution of all preferential amounts, if any.

Stock options

MTNL has not granted any stock options to any of its employees or to others.

21. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND CONCENTRATION OF RISK

Credit risk

Financial instruments which potentially subject MTNL to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of periodic temporary investments of excess cash, trade receivables, and investments in ITI Limited preference shares and MKVDC bonds. The Company places its temporary excess cash in short term deposits. By their nature, all such financial instruments involve risk including the credit risk of non-performance by counter parties. In management’s opinion, as of March 31, 2005and 2006, there was no significant risk of loss in the event of non-performance of the counter parties to these financial instruments, other than the amounts already provided for in the financial statements. To reduce credit risk, MTNL performs ongoing credit evaluation of customers. As of March 31, 2005 and 2006, BSNL and DOT accounted for more than 10% of total receivables, which has been reflected in Note 19.

The risk in relation to investment in ITI Limited is offset by clause relating to MTNL’s entitlement to set off the amounts receivable in respect of principal outstanding from the dues payable to ITI Limited. The clause is built into the share purchase agreement.

The credit risk for the investment in bonds issued by MKVDC is minimized due to the payment mechanism envisaged in the prospectus, which states that any shortfall is to be met by the Maharashtra State Government that has undertaken to earmark an amount equal to interest and principal repayments out of its annual budget for the respective corporation. In the event of such amount not being transferred the trustees would be entitled to invoke the guarantee given by the state government.

Fair value

The fair value of MTNL’s current assets and current liabilities approximate their carrying values because of their short-term maturity. Such financial instruments are classified as current and are expected to be liquidated within the next twelve months.

The approximate fair value of investments in held to maturity securities, as determined by using current interest as of March 31, 2006 is Rs. 3,601 million as compared to their carrying amount of Rs. 3,500 million.

The approximate fair value of loans to employees, as determined by using current interest as of March 31, 2006 is Rs.2,208 million as compared to their carrying amount of Rs. 2,406 million.

Due to the uncertainties attached to the timing of ultimate realization of restricted assets, it is not practicable to determine their fair values.

22. CONTIGENCIES AND COMMITMENTS

        i.CAPITAL COMMITMENTS

Contractual commitments for capital expenditure pending execution were Rs. 2,177 million and Rs. 3,923 million as of March 31, 2005 and 2006 respectively. Contractual commitments for capital expenditures are related to purchase of property and equipment.

        ii.GUARANTEES

MTNL has outstanding financial/performance bank guarantees of Rs. 459 million and Rs.771 million as of March 31, 2005 and 2006 respectively. The bank guarantees are essentially provided to the Government of India for financial and performance roll out obligations as prescribed in respective license agreements.

        iii.CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

MTNL is involved in tax and legal proceedings, claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. MTNL periodically assess its liabilities and contingencies in connection with these matters based upon the latest information available. For those matters where it is probable that MTNL could have incurred a loss and the loss or range of loss can be reasonably estimated, the Company has recorded reserves in its consolidated financial statements. In other instances, MTNL is unable to make a reasonable estimate of any liability because of the uncertainties related to both the probable outcome and amount or range of loss. As additional information becomes available, MTNL adjusts its assessment and estimates of such liabilities accordingly.

Page F-26

MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

Based on review of the latest information available, management believes that the ultimate liability in connection with pending tax and legal proceedings, claims and litigation will not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows or financial position, with the possible exception of the matters described below.

(a) Sales tax

The Company has received a demand to pay sales tax in respect of certain historical telecommunications revenues, mainly telephone rental charges. The Company has received a demand from the state government of Maharashtra, of which Mumbai is a part, for payment of Rs. 3,200 million in sales tax for fiscal 1989-2000. Further MTNL has also received notice from the Delhi state government seeking further information in aid of an investigation into whether a similar demand should be made upon the Company. The amount of issue in Delhi is significantly less.

The department made these demands based on a case involving the Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Department (UPTTD) and the DOT, wherein the Supreme Court of India ruled that a telephone connection along with a telephone set provided by a company rendering basic services amounts to a "transfer of right to use the telephone system" and the rentals collected by DOT towards this right to use should suffer sales tax. Subsequent to the passing of this order, both the cellular and basic operators filed a petition before the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution in respect of the above. The Hon’ble Supreme Court admitted the Petitions, inspite of its own judgment, and vide orders dated September 25, 2003 referred the matter to a larger bench for determination of dispute on merits and further directed that in future there shall be no coercion for recovery of any dues. The Hon’ble Supreme Court further directed that the operators should file statutory appeals against the assessment orders for assessments already completed as on September 25, 2003. Following the Supreme Court order in the UPTTD case the sales tax departments across the country, have raised demands on basic and cellular mobile operators.

MTNL has challenged the demands raised before the respective high courts and the Company has been granted interim stays against enforcement of the demands. However this stay order is subject to the outcome of the Supreme Court judgment on the issue. During the year ended March 31, 2006, the Supreme Court of India has concluded in the BSNL Vs Union of India case that rendering basic services does not amount to a "transfer of right to use the telephone system". Hence the imposition of the sales tax on any facility of the telecommunication services is untenable in law. Based on opinion received from legal counsel and drawing reference to the judgment of the Supreme Court of India in the abovementioned case, management believes that the sales tax departments would have to withdraw their demands of sales tax on basic telephony and that an adverse outcome in respect of the above is remote.

(b) Income taxes

i. The Central Income Tax Authority of India (“CIT”) had historically disallowed the license fee paid by the Company to DOT for the years ended March 31, 1994 till March 31, 2005 as a tax deductible expense and had raised a demand for payment of taxes on increased taxable income relating to such expenses. These demands had been contested by the Company. As part of the appeals process, the Company had paid deposits under protest, amounting to Rs 13,427 million as of March 31, 2005. These deposits have been classified as part of restricted assets on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets

During the year ended March 31, 2005, the Company had obtained favorable decisions from the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (“ITAT”) with respect to the license fee disallowed for the assessment years 1997-98 and 2001-2002. Further in respect of assessment years 1995-96 and 1996-97, the Committee of Disputes (“COD”), on the recommendations of the Ministry of Law, decided not to give clearance to either the Central Board of Direct Taxes or the Company to file appeals in the Hon’ able High Court, making the decision of the ITAT binding on both the parties. Subsequent to the COD’s decision, the Company has applied to ITAT to restore the appeal and decide in favor of the Company.

During the current year ended March 31, 2006, based on the judgments passed in the previous years, ITAT has allowed deduction of license fees as a tax deductible item for assessment years 1998-99 to 2000-01 and 2002-03. License fees have also been allowed as a deduction by CIT (A) for assessment year 2004-05. Management believes that ITAT following its favorable judgments of earlier years will eventually decide in favor of the Company for the years in dispute and an adverse outcome in respect of the above is not probable. Based on the above stated favorable orders, the Company has not accrued the tax charge on the license fee in the financial statements. The Company will receive interest on deposits paid under protest to the tax authorities and the refunds against the years decided in favor of the Company. In the absence of detailed calculations from the ITAT the refunds and the interest thereon have not been recognized in the statement of income for the year ended March 31, 2006.

ii. The Income Tax authorities have historically disallowed the Company’s claim for a tax holiday under section 80IA of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 (Also refer note 17). For assessment years 2001-02 to 2004-05, the income tax authorities have demanded Rs.10,677 million as penalties for the deduction claimed by the Company under Section 80 IA -Income Tax Act, 1961. The Company is contesting these disputes at various levels of income tax appellate authorities including the ITAT. During the current year, the Company’s appeal to determine the applicability of section 80 IA has also been admitted by the High Court. Under the Indian laws, High Courts only admit a case, pertaining to income taxes, if there is a ‘question of law’ involved in the litigation and not ‘a question of facts’. Under the Income tax

Page F-27

MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

laws no penalty can be levied if there is a ‘question of law’- interpretation involved. The Company has adequately disclosed in its income tax filings its claims under section 80IA and further since its appeal has also been admitted by the High Court, management believes that it is ‘a question of law’ on which no penalty can be levied by the income tax authorities. Based on opinion received from legal counsel and the facts above, management believes that an adverse outcome in respect of the above is remote.

iii General Provident Fund is a scheme applicable to the Company’s employees who have opted for the Government Pension rules. In the absence of any rules available for deposit of such contribution the amounts had been retained by the Company pending notification from the Government.

The CIT had considered the contributions made by the employees towards the General Provident Fund for the year ended March 31, 2001 to 2004, as taxable income of the Company. The amount of additional income tax demanded together with interest amounted to Rs. 1,652 million as of March 31, 2005. As a part of the appeals process the Company had deposited Rs. 1,306 million as of March 31,2005 under protest to the tax authorities. These deposits had been classified as part of restricted assets on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

During the year ended March 31, 2005, the Company had set up an ‘MTNL GPF Trust’ and had applied to the Income Tax authorities for the recognition of the said Trust. The Company believed that the entire GPF contribution till date will be allowed on payment of the same to the Trust. During the current year ended March 31, 2006 the GPF Trust has been recognized by the Income Tax authorities and the amount deposited in the Trust has been allowed as a deduction in the current year.

(c) Disputes with BSNL 

In accordance with the Inter Connect Usages Regulations, the Company has accounted for interconnection charges payable to BSNL amounting to Rs.6,924 million and Rs. 3,627 million for the years ended March 31, 2004 and 2005 respectively (also refer note 4). However BSNL had raised a bill for the interconnection charges for the calls originating from MTNL’s network and terminating/transiting at/from BSNL amounting to Rs.12,165 million and Rs. 8,030 million for the years ended March 31, 2004 and 2005 respectively. The Company’s contention was that the claim was not adequately supported by BSNL and hence not accepted by the Company.

In the absence of an interconnection agreement, MTNL had provided NLD/ILD access charges for the period ended March 31, 2002 at the rates lower than those demanded by BSNL . Subsequent to the year ended March 31, 2004, in a meeting held between DOT, BSNL and the Company the rates for NLD calls for the year ended March 31, 2002 were agreed and accordingly the Company has accounted additional liability of Rs. 233 million during the year ended March 31, 2004. The Company may be required to pay ILD access charges amounting to Rs. 195 million for the period April 1, 2001 to January 31, 2002 on the settlement of the dispute with BSNL in this regard.

During the year ended March 31, 2006, the DOT had constituted a three members committee comprising the Member (Production), Telecommunications, Member (Finance), Telecommunications and Deputy Director General (Business Solution) to resolve the issues relating to networking charges. Based on the recommendations of the Committee vide their minutes dated January 2006, the networking charges payable to BSNL for the years March 31, 2004 and March 31, 2005 have been settled at Rs.14,078 million as against Rs.10,551 million. Further, the Committee has also settled networking charges for the years 2000 to 2003 in the meeting held in January 2006. Accordingly, an amount of Rs. 3,809 million (including the incremental charge of Rs. 3,527 million for the years 2004 and 2005) has been accounted as networking charges in the statement of operations for the year ended March 31, 2006.

Subsequent to the year end March 31, 2006, meetings have been held between BSNL and MTNL wherein BSNL has raised additional claims for the year upto March 31, 2005 aggregating Rs.2,007 million and claims amounting to Rs.5,670 million for the year ended March 31, 2006 on account of networking and others charges. As against these claim for the year ended March 31, 2006 the Company has accounted Rs. 4,040 million for networking charges payable to BSNL.

The Company’s contention is that since all claims relating to networking and other charges for the period upto March 31, 2005 have already been settled in accordance with the minutes of DOT committee held on January 2006 and the claims for the year ended March 31, 2006, are not adequately supported by the BSNL and hence not accepted by the Company. Further, the Company is in the process of discussing/reconciling their claims for the year ended March 31,2006 with BSNL and may be required to pay an additional amount based on the final settlement, however such payments will not have a material adverse effect upon the Company’s results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. Management believes that an adverse outcome in respect of the above is not probable.

During the year ended March 31, 2006, MTNL has raised claims on BSNL for duct charges, TAX claims and reciprocal service claims amounting to Rs.2,116 million, Rs.2,482 million and Rs.320 million respectively. The duct charges pertain to annual usage of infrastructure (ducts) for the period October 1, 2000 to March 31, 2006, the TAX claims pertain to the Company’s Trunk Automatic Exchange (“TAX”) used by BSNL for the period from February 1, 2004 to March 31, 2006 and the reciprocal service claims are on account of Reciprocal Service Connections provided to BSNL employees. for the period October 1, 2000 to March 31, 2006. Management has not recognized these claims

Page F-28

MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

as income in the statement of operations considering the history of other disputed claims with BSNL the fact that currently there is no separate agreement for these services, and that BSNL has not accepted these claims.

(d) Disputes with DOT

On the formation of the Company, employees were deputed to MTNL on deemed deputation status from DOT and the Company was required to contribute for the Leave Salary and pension Contribution (“LSPC”) as per the rates prescribed by the Government. The Company had accrued for these expenses amounting to Rs 2,884.74 million for the period 1986 to 1998 and subsequently paid them to DOT.

During the year ended March 31, 2006, a Committee was set up to examine the amount of LSPC contributions payable by MTNL to DOT. The Committee concluded that an additional amount of Rs.656 million was payable on account of short payment of the LSPC contribution and an amount of Rs.1,738 million is payable on account of interest payable on delayed payment of the LSPC contributions. The Company has accepted the claim of DOT for Rs.656 million and has expensed it in its statement of income for the year ended March 31, 2006. In respect of Rs.1,738 million, the Company has contested the claim from DOT on the contention that MTNL has abided by DOT’s decision at all stages by depositing the amounts as required. Management believes that an adverse outcome in respect of the above is not probable.

(e) Others

  i. In 1998, M&N Publication made claims for Rs. 5,415 million against the Company. These claims arise out of contracts for the printing of telephone directories for Delhi and Mumbai. Each of these claims includes claims for loss of reputation and loss of business opportunities aggregating Rs. 2,000 million. The Company has made claims of Rs. 4,169 million against M&N Publications for failure to perform the contracts. These claims are pending before a sole arbitrator. The Company believes that it has valid defenses to these claims and based on opinion received from legal counsel, management believes that an adverse outcome is not probable.

 ii. In the year 2004-2005, Alcatel brought claims aggregating to Rs. 121.21 million (including interest from 1997 till date on the claims made Rs 79.91 million) against the Company. These claims arise out of contract for supply of digital local telephone exchange equipment. These claims include claims for loss of reputation and loss of business opportunity aggregating to Rs. 20 million. The Company believes it has a valid defense to these claims and based on opinion received from legal counsel, management believes that an adverse outcome is not probable.

iii. The Company has received claims aggregating Rs. 308.6 million (March 2005 Rs. 279 million) from various PRM service providers (World Phone, Voice Infotech and ITC). These claims arise from the contract for PRM services which were started in the year 1999-2000. MTNL has not paid commission payable for these services to these providers as the amount was subsequently not recovered from the subscribers. The claims include Rs. 119 million towards loss of profit and wasteful expenditure incurred by the parties. The Company believes it has a valid defense against these claims and based on opinion received from legal counsel, management believes that an adverse outcome is not probable. .

 iv. The Company has received claims from CMC limited aggregating to Rs.40 million and Rs.452.52 million as of March 31, 2005 and 2006 respectively (including interest arising during the course of proceedings amounting to Rs.157 million). These claims arise out of usage of leased circuits for which MTNL has charged them rental for CUG services as per the revised tariff plan which is disputed by CMC Limited. These claims include claims for loss of reputation, business opportunity and undue harassment aggregating Rs.220 million. The Company believes it has a valid defense to these claims and based on opinion received from legal counsel, management believes that an adverse outcome is not probable.

  v. Additionally the Company is also involved in law suits and claims amounting to Rs.1,190 million pending at various authorities which arise in the ordinary course of the business. Management believes that it has a valid defense against these claims and an adverse outcome is not probable. These would not have a material adverse effect upon the Company’s results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

iv. DISPUTE WITH OTHER OPERATOR

During the year ended March 31, 2005, MTNL noticed that a very large number of calls were received from certain levels of another operator’s network. On further investigation/analysis, it came to the Company’s notice that these were actually ILD calls, which were being received on Local/NLD trunks and that the CLIs (Caller line Identification) of these calls had been tampered by the other operator. MTNL raised a demand on the other operator based on the relevant penal clauses of its agreement aggregating Rs.3,412 million for a period of six months beginning April 2004. The other operator has disputed the above claim and under repeated threats of disconnection, obtained a stay order from High Court of Delhi. In the year ended March 31, 2005 during the course of the hearings, the honorable High Court directed the other operator to pay Rs.2,368 million to MTNL. During the year ended March 31, 2006, the other operator under directions from the High Court has further deposited Rs.1,040 million with MTNL. Management believes that it is remote that it will have to refund these amounts; however, pending the final resolution from a court of law these amounts have not been recognized as income.

Page F-29

MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

(f) Summary of above litigations

The following table summarizes the potential exposure (excluding interest and penalty) of the Company of March 31, 2006 with respect to above stated pending litigations in the event the same is settled against the Company:

		As of March 31,
	Also refer note:	2006	2006
		(Million of Rupees)	(Million of US $) Unaudited
Dispute relating to disallowance of license fee	22 (iii) (b) (i)	Rs.17,772	$400
Dispute relating to disallowance of 80 IA deduction	22 (iii) (b) (ii)	10,677	240
Disputes with BSNL	22 (iii) (c)	3,637	81
Disputes with DOT	22 (iii) (d)	1,738	39
Arbitration dispute with M & N Publications	22 (iii) (e) (i)	5,415	122
Arbitration dispute with Alcatel	22 (iii) (e) (ii)	121	3
PRM services	22 (iii) (e) (iii)	308	7
CMC Services	22 (iii) (e) (iv)	452	10
Other Lawsuits and claims	22(iii) (e) (v)	1,190	27
		Rs.41,311.	$929

23. SEGMENTAL INFORMATION

The Chairman and Managing Director (CMD) of the Company has been identified as the Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM) as defined by SFAS No. 131. The CODM of the Company determines its business segments based on the nature of services, the differing risks and returns and the organizational structure. These segments are basic (including CDMA) and cellular services. Basic services segment consists of voice, data through local calls, domestic long distance and international long distance calls on fixed line services in the cities of Delhi and Mumbai in India. Further, it includes revenues from Code Division Multiple Access, or CDMA, based cellular services and internet access services. Cellular consists of providing cellular services in cities of Delhi and Mumbai using Global System for Mobile communications, or GSM, technology. These services were launched in February 2001.

During the years ended March 31, 2004 and 2005, the Company had not considered cellular services to be a reportable segment since it did not meet the thresholds of significance. However as the cellular services have met the thresholds of significance during the year ended March 31, 2006, the Company has disclosed the segment information. MTNL has also disclosed segment information for the prior years.

During the current year the Company has started operations in Mauritius. However, as the operations are insignificant as compared to the overall business of the Company, the same have not been considered for separate segment disclosure. During the year ended March 31, 2005, and March 31, 2006 no single customer has contributed for revenue in excess of 10% of total revenue.

MTNL’s operating segment information for the years ended March 31, 2004. 2005 and 2006 are as follows. The table gives the amounts reviewed by the CODM reconciled to the consolidated US GAAP financial statements.

The amounts reviewed by the CODM are based on internal accounting policies of the Company which are different from US GAAP.

Page F-30

MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

	Basic	Cellular	Unallocated (Corporate)	Elimination	Total	Reconciling Adjustments	Consolidated Totals
	Millions of Rupees
For the year ended March 31, 2006
Revenue — External customers	49,883	5,727	-	-	55,610	(8, 942)	46,668
Revenue — Inter-segment	744	216	-	(960)	-
Total Revenues	50,627	5,943	-	(960)	55,610	(8,942)	46,668
Operating income / (loss)	4,696	1,808	(4,846)	-	1,658	(2,470)	(812)
Interest income/ (expense), net	(67)	1	3,831	-	3,765	(1,995)	1,770
Equity in earnings/(losses) of associated companies, net of taxes	-	-	-	-	-	(73)	(73)
Non Operating income, net	1,190	59	42	-	1,291	(673)	618
Net income / (loss)	5,819	1,868	(973)	-	6,714	(5,138)	1,576
Segment assets	113,195	7,749	83,519	-	204,463	(34,312)	170,151
Depreciation and amortization	5,916	544	7	-	6,467	1,532	7,999
Capital expenditures for long-lived assets	5,274	1,609	(28)	-	6,855	-	6,855
For the year ended March 31, 2005
Revenue — External customers	53,050	2,874	-	-	55,924	(5,768)	50,156
Revenue — Inter-segment	393	-	-	(393)	-	-	-
Total Revenues	53,443	2,874	-	(393)	55,924	(5,768)	50,156
Operating income / (loss)	6,450	637	511	-	7,598	(4,671)	2,927
Interest income/ (expense), net	(174)	1	2,293	-	2,120	-	2,120
Equity in earnings/(losses) of associated companies, net of taxes	-	-	-	-	-	(67)	(67)
Non Operating income, net	2,387	14	38	-	2,439	(1,889)	550
Net income / (loss)	8,663	652	2,842	-	12,157	(6,560)	5,597
Segment assets	111,729	6,358	99,797	-	217,885	(40,713)	177,172
Depreciation and amortization	5,533	337	10	-	5,880	1,844	7,724
Capital expenditures for long-lived assets	7,093	3,068	137	-	10,298	-	10,298
For the year ended March 31, 2004
Revenue — External customers	61,826	1,870	-	-	63,696	(2,612)	61,084
Revenue — Inter-segment	434	-	-	(434)	-	-	-
Total Revenues	62,260	1,870	-	(434)	63,696	(2,612)	61,084
Operating income / (loss)	13,944	36	82	-	14,062	(8,829)	5,234
Interest income/ (expense), net	(209)	1	1,610	-	1,402	9	1,412
Equity in earnings/(losses) of associated companies, net of taxes	-	-	-	-	-	(20)	(20)
Non Operating income, net	1,369	24	3		1,396	(1,094)	302
Net income / (loss)	15,104	61	1,695	-	16,860	(9,912)	6,948
Segment assets	105,663	3,319	97,216	-	206,199	(38,176)	168,023
Depreciation and amortization	5,219	212	7	-	5,438	3,237	8,675
Capital expenditures for long-lived assets	8,582	833	5	-	9,420	-	9,420

Page F-31

MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

There are material differences between segment information internally reviewed, by the CODM, and consolidated financial statements prepared under U.S. GAAP. The material differences that affect us are primarily attributable to U.S. GAAP requirements for:

· Revenue recognition

· Employee benefits - Accounting for gratuity and pension obligations; accounting for leave pay obligations and curtailment benefits arising from voluntary retirement scheme under US GAAP.

· Property, plant and equipment - Useful lives of assets, foreign exchange capitalized, interest capitalized and leases, and

· Deferred taxes - Accounting for deferred taxes under US GAAP.

More specifically, the reconciling items relate to the following:

· The reconciling items pertaining to revenues amounted to Rs.8,942 million, Rs.5,768 million and Rs.2,612 for the years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006. These reconciling items primarily pertain to non recognition of revenues under US GAAP (Refer notes 22(iii)(c) and 22(iv)) since the amounts are either disputed or collectibility is not reasonably possible and netting off of commissions from revenues under US GAAP.

· The reconciling items pertaining to operating income / (loss) amounted to Rs.2,470 million , Rs. 4,673 million and Rs. 8829 million for the years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006. These reconciling items are mainly attributable to US GAAP adjustments for revenues, cost of revenues and selling general and administrative expenses and reclassification of excess liability written back. The cost of revenues and selling, general and administrative expenses have reconciling items on account of accounting for employee benefits, depreciation, provision for doubtful debts and other adjustments on account of BSNL / DOT (Refer notes 3 and 4) under US GAAP.

· The reconciling item in respect of interest income / (expense), net for the year ended March 31, 2006 is on account of non recognition of a potential Income Tax refund under US GAAP since it is contingent (Refer note 22(iii)(b)(i)).

· The reconciling item in respect of non operating income / (loss) primarily pertain to reclassification of excess liability written back from non operating income / (loss) to operating income / (loss).

· The reconciling adjustments for segment assets pertain primarily to US GAAP adjustments in respect of useful lives of assets, foreign exchange capitalized, interest capitalized and depreciation expense.

24. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

a) The Board of Directors has recommended payment of final dividend at 10% on the paid up equity capital of Rs. 6,300 million on June 21, 2006. The Company would be required to pay dividend tax at the rate of 14.03% of the dividend distributed.

b) During the year ended March 31, 2006 the Company had introduced another VRS scheme called MTNL Non Executive Retirement Scheme 2006. The employees were to exercise their option from March 20, 2006 to April 10, 2006.. The Company received1,068 applications during April 2006. All the applications received after the year end were accepted. The cost to the Company under the said VRS scheme amounted to Rs. 785 million approximately.

25. SIGNIFICANT RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES

a) The telecommunication industry in India is subject to substantial regulation by the Government. The Company is subject to certain risks common to companies within the telecommunications industry in India. These include, but are not limited to, substantial regulation by the Government. Changes in the Government policies including a revocation of the license or a change in significant terms of the license, such as its duration, the amount of license fee payable, the range of services permitted and the scope of exclusivity may significantly affect management’s estimates and the Company’s performance. Further the Indian Government is the controlling shareholder in MTNL and hence the Company is deemed to be an Indian government company. As such, the Company is subject to laws and regulations generally applicable to public sector enterprises in India. These laws and regulations govern, among other things, personnel matters, procurement, budgeting and capital expenditures and the generation of funds through the issuance of securities. Also the Indian Government when considering matters pertaining to the Company, often also considers the interests of the largest government-owned telecommunications company, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL).

b) The Company operates the network under a license from the DOT that is valid until March 31, 2013 for fixed-line services and until October, 2017 for cellular services. The DOT retains the right, however, to revoke the license after giving one month's notice to the Company. The DOT also retains the right, after giving notice to the Company, to modify the terms and conditions of the license at any time if in its opinion it is necessary or expedient to do so in the interest of the general public or for the proper operation of the telecommunications sector. A revocation of the license or a change in significant terms of the license, such as its duration, the amount of license fee payable or the range of services permitted, would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

c) Most of the Company’s employees were on secondment from DOT. The non-executive employees were given the option to be absorbed in the Company with effect from November 1, 1998. Under the option for pensionary benefits, these employees could opt to retain pensionary benefits in accordance with the Central Government pension rules or in accordance with  

Page F-32

MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

MTNL retirement rules which were applicable to its directly recruited employees, and opt to draw pro rata monthly pension till their absorption in MTNL. Accordingly with effect from November 1, 1998, the Company started accruing for pension and gratuity for these employees.

Further, rules relating to settlement of pensionary terms in respect of Government employees transferred to public undertakings, required the company to create a pension fund and provided for the Government to discharge its pensionary liability by paying in lump sum as a one time payment, the pro rata pension and gratuity for the service up to the date of transfer (November 1, 1998) of government servants from the Government to the undertaking. Accordingly on January 8, 2002 the Company claimed an amount of Rs.11, 700 million from DOT as DOT’s share of the liability.

However the DOT vide their letter no. 40-29/2002 -Pen (T) on August 29, 2002 and September 4, 2002 has communicated that the pensionary benefits to the Government employees absorbed in MTNL and who have opted for either the Government Scheme of pension or for prorated pension scheme shall be paid by the Government. However, the terms of the settlement are yet to be finalized. In absence of details with regard to the basis required for determination of the amount payable by the company, no adjustment has been made in the cost of retirement benefits accrued in these financial statements for the above.

d) The Company had given an option to its executive employees (B category) for absorption with the Company with effect from October 1, 2000, at a revised pay scale that is higher than the existing pay scale. The offer for absorption provided that in addition to getting post retirement benefits like gratuity and leave encashment, subsequent to absorption, the employees would have to opt for pension based on the government rules. Pending the finalization of the terms of absorption and actuarial determination of incremental liability, the Company, during the year ended March 31, 2003, had accrued an additional charge amounting to Rs. 1,329 million on account of revised pay scales and related retirement costs for executive employees who exercised the option of absorption with the Company up to that date.

During the year ended March 31, 2004, majority of employees have opted for absorption with the Company. The Company has determined the incremental liability on account of revised pay scales and related retirement cost on the basis of actuarial valuation. The amount reduced from actuarially determined liability, as recoverable from DOT towards retirement benefits for the period upto the October 1, 2000, has been calculated at the rates prescribed by DOT for its employees on secondment. The amounts have not been finalized between the parties. Any consequent adjustment resulting from the same would be accounted at the time of final settlement.

e) The Company has been advised by its counsel that although the Company has valid possession including the risks and rewards of ownership and title to all of its property, to enable MTNL to perfect and thereby acquire marketable title to real property in its possession, it would need to have relevant documents relating to transfer or lease of real property duly registered and stamped. Accordingly, MTNL cannot sell its properties without payment of stamp duties and registering the properties in its name. (Also refer note 7).

Page F-33

SIGNATURES

The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.

Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited

By           /s/ Anita Soni

Name:    Anita Soni

Title:      Director - Finance

Date:      October 2, 2006

EXHIBIT INDEX

Number	Description of Exhibit
1.1	Memorandum and Articles of Association of the Registrant, as amended on January 31, 2002.*
2.1	Form of Deposit Agreement among the Registrant, The Bank of New York, as depositary, and the holders from time to time to American Depositary Shares issued thereunder, including as an exhibit, the form of American Depositary Receipt.**
4.1	Lease Agreement dated January 16, 1996 between Life Insurance Corporation of India and the Registrant.**
4.2	License Agreement for provision of Internet Services in Delhi dated November 6, 1998 between President of India acting through Assistant Director General, Ministry of Communications and the Registrant.**
4.3	License Agreement for provision of Internet Services in Mumbai dated November 6, 1998 between President of India acting through Assistant Director General, Ministry of Communications and the Registrant.**
4.4	License Agreement for provision of Internet Services dated October 6, 2000 between President of India acting through Assistant Director General, Ministry of Communications and Millennium Telecom Limited.**
12.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer
12.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer
13.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer
13.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer

*    Previously filed on September 30, 2002, as exhibits to Annual Report on Form 20-F for fiscal 2002.

**Previously filed on September 27, 2001, as exhibits to Registration Statement on Form F-4 (file number 333-13944).

EX-12.1

EX-12.2

Exhibit 12.2

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Anita Soni, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Reserved]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:October 2, 2006

/s/ Anita Soni

Name:    Anita Soni

Title:      Director (Finance)

EX-13.1

Exhibit 13.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (the “Company”) for the yearly period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, R.S.P. Sinha, Chairman-cum-Managing Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ R.S.P. Sinha

Name:     R.S.P. Sinha

Title:       Chairman-cum-Managing Director

Date:       October 2, 2006

The foregoing certificate is solely for the purposes of compliance with the aforementioned Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 and is not intended to be used or relied upon for any other purposes.

EX-13.2

Exhibit 13.2

Certification Pursuant to

8 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (the “Company”) for the yearly period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anita Soni, Director - Finance of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Anita Soni

Name:    Anita Soni

Title:      Director - Finance

Date:      October 2, 2006

The foregoing certificate is solely for the purposes of compliance with the aforementioned Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 and is not intended to be used or relied upon for any other purposes.