Form 10-K

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulations S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer” and “large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates based on the closing sale price of common stock as reported on the American Stock Exchange on September 30, 2005, the last business day of the second fiscal quarter was $28,489,556.

There were 54,244,383 shares of the registrant’s common stock issued and outstanding as of June 15, 2006.

Part III incorporates information by reference from the registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the solicitation of proxies for the Registrant’s 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

This Annual Report on Form 10-K and the documents incorporated by reference herein, contain forward-looking statements, including forward looking statements as defined in the Ontario Securities Act, which are prospective and reflect management’s expectations regarding our business, operations, financial performance and business prospects and opportunities. Forward-looking statements are often, but not always, identified by the use of words such as “seek”, “anticipate,” “plan,” “estimate,” “expect” and “intend” and statements that an event or result “may,” “will,” “should,” “could” or “might” occur or be achieved and other similar expressions. These forward-looking statements reflect management’s current beliefs and expectations and are based on information currently available to management. Forward-looking statements are subject to significant risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors, any of which could cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from the results discussed or implied in the forward-looking statements. More detailed information about these risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors is provided under Item 1A “Risk Factors”. Investors should not place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. We assume no obligation to update or alter such forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Mad Catz, the Mad Catz logo and GameShark are registered trademarks of Mad Catz, Inc.

In this annual report on Form 10-K, “Mad Catz Interactive, Inc.,” “Mad Catz,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Mad Catz Interactive, Inc. and all of our consolidated subsidiaries.

Mad Catz Interactive, Inc. was incorporated under the Canada Business Corporations Act on August 25, 1993 under the name Patch Ventures Inc. (“Patch”). In 1994, Patch acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of Legacy Manufacturing Corporation and changed its name to Legacy Storage Systems International Inc. In 1996, our Company changed its name to Tecmar Technologies International Inc. At that time, our principal business consisted of designing and developing data storage systems for networks and workstations and marketing such systems to computer original equipment manufacturers and distributors through several operating subsidiaries.

In 1998, we completed the sale of our operating business, Tecmar Technologies International, Inc., and changed our name to Xencet Investments Inc. To meet the listing requirements of the Toronto Stock Exchange, we acquired all of the outstanding securities of Games Trader Inc. (“Games Trader”), a corporation incorporated under the laws of the Ontario, Canada. Games Trader sold previously played video games, and, in connection with the acquisition, we changed our name to Games Trader Inc. We later changed our name to GTR Group Inc. in 1999.

Effective August 31, 1999, we completed the acquisition of Mad Catz, Inc. (“MCI”), a corporation incorporated under the laws of Delaware that designs, manufactures, markets and distributes video game accessories. MCI and its predecessor company have been involved in the video game industry since approximately 1991. In September 2001, we changed our name from GTR Group Inc. to Mad Catz Interactive, Inc. In January 2003, we acquired the intellectual property associated with the GameShark brand of products.

We have several operating subsidiaries: (i) MCI, (ii) 1328158 Ontario Inc. (“MCC”), a corporation incorporated under the laws of Canada that sells our Mad Catz and GameShark product lines in Canada under the name Mad Catz Canada, and (iii) Mad Catz Europe, Limited (“MCE”), a corporation incorporated under the laws of England and Wales that sells our Mad Catz product lines in Europe. We also beneficially own, directly or indirectly, all of the issued and outstanding shares of Mad Catz Interactive Asia Limited (“MCIA”), a corporation incorporated under the laws of Hong Kong that provides procurement services related to the manufacture of Mad Catz products. We also beneficially own, directly or indirectly, all of the issued and outstanding shares of the following inactive companies: FX Unlimited Inc., a corporation incorporated under the laws of Delaware, Mad Catz (Asia) Limited, a corporation incorporated under the laws of Hong Kong, Xencet USA, Inc., a corporation incorporated under the laws of Delaware, Singapore Holdings Inc., a corporation incorporated under the laws of Delaware and Mad Catz Limited, a corporation incorporated under the laws of England and Wales.

Our common stock trades on the Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”) and the American Stock Exchange (“AMEX”) under the symbol “MCZ.” Our registered office is located at 181 Bay Street, Suite 2500, Toronto, Ontario, M5J 2T7, and our telephone number is (416) 360-8600. MCI, our primary operating subsidiary and our operational headquarters is located at 7480 Mission Valley Road, Suite 101, San Diego, California, 92108, and our telephone number is (619) 683-9830.

We design, manufacture (primarily through third parties in Asia), market and distribute accessories for all major video game platforms, including the Microsoft Xbox and Xbox 360; Nintendo GameCube, Game Boy Advance, Game Boy Advance SP, DS, N64 and Micro; and Sony PlayStation, PlayStation 2 and PSP. In

addition, we design, manufacture (primarily through third parties in Asia), market and distribute accessories for the Apple iPod. Our accessories are marketed under the Mad Catz and GameShark brands. Our products include video game accessories of all types, such as control pads, steering wheels, joysticks, memory cards, video cables, light guns, dance pads, microphones, car adapters and carry cases. We also market game enhancement software, distribute video game software and publish video game titles.

The typical life cycle of successful video game accessories is similar to the life cycle of video game consoles, which generally ranges from two to ten years. Factors such as competition for access to retail shelf space, changing technology, consumer preferences and seasonality could result in shortening the life cycle for older products, increasing the importance of our ability to release new products on a timely basis. We must continuously introduce new products in order to generate new revenues and/or to replace declining revenues from older products. The complexity of new video game systems has resulted in longer development cycles and the need to carefully monitor and manage the product development process.

In fiscal 2006, approximately 32% of our gross sales were derived from products designed for use with Sony’s PlayStation 2 video game console. Sony launched the PlayStation 2 in the United States in late 2000, and is expected to launch its successor, the PlayStation 3, in November 2006. Sony has made public statements that it will continue to manufacture and market the PlayStation 2 after the PlayStation 3 is launched, and expects the PlayStation 2 to have a life cycle of 10 years in line with the original PlayStation video game console. Sony launched the PlayStation in the United States in 1995 and continues to market it today. In fiscal 2006, products designed for use with the PlayStation accounted for approximately 2% of our gross sales. Analysts have attributed the longevity of the PlayStation video game console in part to the reverse compatibility of the PlayStation 2 console. Reverse compatibility means that PlayStation games and some accessories can be used on the PlayStation 2 console. In March 2005, Sony entered the North American handheld market with the launch of the Sony PSP handheld video game system, MP3 player and movie player. The PSP launched in Europe in September 2005. In fiscal 2006, approximately 8% of our gross sales were derived from products designed for use with the PSP.

Microsoft’s Xbox console was launched in the United States in late 2001. The Xbox was Microsoft’s first video game console, and sales of Xbox-compatible products accounted for approximately 22% of our gross sales in fiscal 2006. The Xbox 360, the successor system to the Xbox launched in November 2005 and sales of Xbox 360-compatible products accounted for approximately 4% of our gross sales in fiscal 2006. We expect Microsoft will discontinue marketing the Xbox during 2006. The Xbox 360 is reverse compatible for some games but not accessories. As such, we have entered into a license agreement (titled Xenon Game Peripheral) to produce accessories for the Xbox 360, in anticipation of the incremental demand for Xbox 360 accessories.

Nintendo’s GameCube console was also launched in the United States in late 2001. The GameCube console was the successor to Nintendo’s N64 console, launched in the United States in 1996. In fiscal 2006, approximately 12% of our gross sales were derived from the sale of products designed for use with the GameCube console. While we continued to sell products for the N64 console in fiscal 2005 and 2006, such sales were not significant. Nintendo’s Wii console, the successor to the GameCube console, is expected to be launched in the United States in late 2006. Nintendo has announced that the new system will be reverse compatible for GameCube games; however, no announcement has been made as to whether the new system will be reverse compatible for accessories or whether Nintendo will continue to market the GameCube system after the launch of the new system. Nintendo’s latest generation of its Game Boy handheld product, the Game Boy Advance, was launched in 2001. Nintendo launched an improved version, the Game Boy Advance SP, in 2003. Both versions continue to be available in the market and gross sales of our products designed for these systems accounted for approximately 3% of our gross sales in fiscal 2006. The original Game Boy Advance system was discontinued in 2006. Nintendo launched an additional version, the Game Boy Advance Micro in 2005. In 2004, Nintendo launched a new handheld system, the Nintendo DS, which accounted for approximately 3% of our gross sales in fiscal 2006.

The United States market has been transitioning from the current consoles into the next generation consoles since the launch of the Microsoft Xbox 360 in November 2005 and will continue this transition through late 2006. Based on experience from prior transitions, it is expected that the industry’s transition period will result in a challenging and competitive business environment because of the delay in consumer spending due to the anticipation of the new console offerings in addition to the reduction in new software titles for the current systems.

Video game console prices typically reduce as the products mature in the market place and as the launch of new consoles is anticipated. In the United States, the PlayStation 2 and Xbox game consoles launched with a retail price of $299 and GameCube launched with a retail price of $199. After successive price decreases, the PlayStation 2 system currently retails for $129, Xbox for $149 and GameCube’s current retail price is $99. Lower console prices usually result in higher unit sales of console systems. Management believes that the more price sensitive “late adopter” consumer, that waits for these price reductions before purchasing a system, is also more likely to purchase value-priced accessories.

The European launches of the video game console systems have historically lagged approximately six months behind launches in the United States, which means that the European market is at an earlier stage in the products’ lifecycles. However, in the current transition, Microsoft’s launch of its Xbox 360 console was a global launch in North America, Europe and Japan; and Sony recently announced that in November 2006 the PlayStation 3 will also be a global launch.

During fiscal 2006, Mad Catz, along with the entire video game industry, encountered an even more difficult transition year than had been expected by any of the industry experts. Particularly hard hit were sales in the North American markets. Although previous strategic initiatives of building a portfolio of licensed products, publishing and distributing video games and software products and expanding further into the European market were somewhat successful, this proved to be insufficient to offset the severe decline in consumer spending in North America during fiscal 2006. We therefore focused our efforts on reducing our investment in inventories and accounts receivable and using the cash generated to reduce the bank debt.

Historically, a majority of our revenue has come from video game accessories that are reverse engineered to work with video game platforms sold by Sony, Nintendo and Microsoft. Some, but not all, of our products compatible with these video game platforms have been produced under license agreements pursuant to which we received proprietary and other useful information, as well as the right to use first party logos. Some of these license agreements have expired and others are about to expire.

We currently do not have any license agreements with Sony. The absence of license agreements with Sony could result in our Company being unable to efficiently and cost effectively design future generations of compatible accessories. In the event that the Playstation 3 and other future Sony video game platforms are developed as “closed systems” that cannot be reversed engineered, we would not be able to produce, manufacture and market accessories for those platforms without access to proprietary information from Sony. Moreover, in the event Sony enters into license agreements with companies other than us for these new “closed systems,” we would be placed at a substantial competitive disadvantage.

We currently have a non-exclusive license, which will expire in April 2008, to use the intellectual property rights of Nintendo related to the Nintendo GameCube platform and a non-exclusive license, which will expire in November 2008, to employ the Nintendo intellectual properties in connection with our Nintendo Beat Pad product. We do not have a license to produce next generation accessories for Nintendo. In the event that future video game platforms from Nintendo are developed as “closed systems” that cannot be reversed engineered, we would not be able to produce, manufacture and market accessories for those platforms without access to proprietary information from Nintendo. Moreover, in the event Nintendo enters into license agreements with companies other than us for these new “closed systems,” we would be placed at a substantial competitive disadvantage.

We have a peripheral and compatibility license from Microsoft covering products relating to Microsoft’s Xbox video game console. This license will expire on February 28, 2007. Unless either Microsoft or we provide notice of a desire to terminate the license at least 90 days prior to that date, the agreement will automatically renew for an additional one-year period. While we have no intention to terminate the agreement and have not received any indication from Microsoft that it desires to terminate the agreement, no assurance can be given that the agreement will not expire in accordance with its terms. We are uncertain whether we will be able to renew or replace the Microsoft license. Nonetheless, this license only relates to the use of Microsoft’s logo on our products, so even without the license, we would be able to continue producing and selling similar products, which do not contain the logo.

We also have a peripheral and compatibility license from Microsoft covering specific product categories, including wired control pads, steering wheels, arcades sticks, flight sticks and dance mats for the Xbox 360 console. This license will expire in May 2007. In addition, we have an Xbox publisher license agreement with Microsoft which authorizes MCI as an official software publisher for the Xbox video game system. This license will expire in November 2007.

In May 2006 we entered into a license agreement with Apple Computer, Inc. to distribute iPod products and use the Made for iPod logo. The license has a two-year term and automatically renews for successive one-year periods unless either party provides written notice of its intention to terminate the license at least 60 days prior to the end of the current term.

We develop products using a group of concept design, production and technical professionals, in coordination with our marketing and finance departments, with responsibility for the entire development and production process including the supervision and coordination of internal and external resources. Our hardware products are typically conceived and designed by our internal teams in San Diego and Hong Kong. For these products we own the industrial design, and in most cases the tools, dies and molds used for production. From time to time, we also acquire the rights to produce and distribute products that are, or will be, independently created by third parties.

In addition, we seek out and engage independent third party developers to create software products on our behalf. Such products are sometimes owned by us, and usually we have unlimited rights to commercially exploit these products. In other circumstances, the third party developer may retain ownership of the intellectual property

and/or technology included in the product and reserve certain exploitation rights. We typically select these independent third party developers based on their expertise in developing products in a specific category. Each of our third party developers is under contract with us for specific products. From time to time, we also acquire the license rights to distribute software products that are or will be independently created by third party publishers. In such cases, the agreements with such publishers provide us with exclusive distribution rights for a specific period of time, often for specified platforms and territories.

In consideration for their services, the independent third party developer usually receives a royalty, generally based on the net sales of the product that it has developed. Typically, the developer also receives an advance, which we recoup from the royalties otherwise payable to the developer. The advance generally is paid in “milestone” stages. The payment at each stage is tied to the completion and delivery of a detailed performance milestone. Working with an independent developer allows us to reduce our fixed development costs, share development risks with the third party developer, take advantage of the third party developer’s expertise in connection with certain categories of products or certain platforms, and gain access to proprietary development technologies.

Our accessory products are manufactured to our specifications by outsourced factories located predominantly in Shenzhen, China. The use of outsourced manufacturing facilities is designed to take advantage of specific expertise and allow for flexibility and scalability to respond to seasonality and changing demands for our products. Our software products are manufactured by outsourced replication companies in the United States, Hong Kong and Europe. In some instances, packaging and final assembly is performed at our distribution facility in California or by outsourced suppliers in the United States or Europe.

Our products are sold to many of the world’s largest retailers of interactive entertainment products on a direct basis without the use of intermediaries or distributors. We also appoint distributors in certain territories to service retail accounts not dealt with on a direct basis. We maintain a direct sales force in the United States, Canada and Europe. We operate a leased 95,000 square foot distribution center in Mira Loma, California which services North American customers and utilize an outsourced logistics solution for the European market. All freight is handled by outsourced transportation companies. We operate information systems, including electronic data interchange (EDI) and integrated warehouse management systems, to remain compliant with the requirements of our mass market retailers.

The Company operates as one business segment, which is the design, manufacture, marketing and distribution of video game accessories and software. In fiscal 2006, approximately 72% of our gross sales were generated in the United States, 9% in Canada, 19% in Europe, and less than 1% in other countries, including Australia, Japan, Korea, New Zealand, and Singapore. In fiscal 2005, approximately 82% of our gross sales were generated in the United States, 8% in Canada, 10% in Europe, and less than 1% in other countries. In fiscal 2004, approximately 80% of our gross sales were generated in the United States, 7% in Canada, 9% in Europe, and 4% in other countries.

Our products are sold by many of the largest video game retailers in the world including Army-Air Force Exchange Service (AAFES), Best Buy, Blockbuster Video, Circuit City, GameStop/EB Games (which merged in October 2005), Hollywood Video, Kmart, Meijer, Target and Wal-Mart in the United States; Best Buy, Blockbuster Video, GameStop/EB Games, Future Shop, Multimicro, RadioShack, Rogers Video, Sam’s Club,

Toys R Us and Wal-Mart in Canada; and ASDA, Argos, Auchan, Blockbuster Video, Carrefour, Curry’s, Dixons, FNAC, Game, GameStation, GameStop, Karstadt, Media Markt, Micromania, PC World, ProMarkt, Saturn, and Toys R Us in Europe.

In fiscal 2006, three of our customers individually accounted for at least 10% of our gross sales. These customers, Wal-Mart, GameStop (representing sales to both GameStop and EB Games prior to their merger, and to the combined company after the merger) and Target accounted for approximately 52% of our gross sales in fiscal 2006. In fiscal 2005, three of our customers individually accounted for at least 10% of our gross sales. These customers accounted for approximately 47% of our gross sales in fiscal 2005. In fiscal 2004, two of our customers individually accounted for at least 10% of our gross sales. These customers accounted for 39% of our gross sales in fiscal 2004. Our top 10 customers accounted for 75% of gross sales in fiscal 2006, 78% in fiscal 2005 and 79% in fiscal 2004.

The primary markets in which we sell our products are the United States, Canada and Europe. These markets are highly competitive, and we expect that we may face increased competition if additional companies enter these markets. Historically, price has been a significant competitive factor for interactive video game accessories. We believe that the other principal competitive factors that historically have affected retailer and consumer choice include value, product features, ease of use and installation, realism in simulation, name brand recognition, product styling and whether the product is licensed. Additional competitive factors from the perspective of the major retailers include margins, service, support, merchandising and promotional support, reliable and timely delivery, track record and electronic data interchange capability. We seek to differentiate our products through superior product design, packaging, product innovation and branding. In addition, we aim to provide a higher level of sales service to retailers through our category management capability.

Our principal competitors for video game accessories include first party manufacturers Microsoft, Nintendo and Sony, and other third party manufacturers including Accessories 4 Technology Ltd., Big Ben InterActive UK Ltd., Datel Design & Development Limited, Electro Source, LLC, Intec, Inc., Joytech Europe Ltd., Logitech International S.A., NYKO Technologies, Inc., Radica Games Ltd., SpectraVideo plc. and Thrustmaster, Inc.

We believe that our products are targeted to a broad demographic group, and are complementary with consumers of Microsoft, Nintendo and Sony video game consoles. We believe that the major factors that will provide us with continued viability and competitive edge are low cost products, quality, service, brands and retail relationships.

Temporary employees are used in our distribution center in California during the peak shipping months of October through December. Temporary employees during this period generally range between 10 and 20 hourly employees. Our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel is essential to our continued success. None of our employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement, nor have we ever experienced any work stoppage.

Darren Richardson has been our President and Chief Executive Officer since April 2004 and was elected to our Board of Directors in August 2005. Prior to his appointment as our President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Richardson served as our Executive Vice President since October 1997 and President and Chief Operating Officer of MCI since August 1999. Mr. Richardson also served in several senior management capacities with Games Trader, including Chief Operating Officer, and Vice President of Business Development, responsible for sales and marketing with a focus on new account development. He has a Master of Business Administration degree from Trinity College, Dublin (1993) and a Bachelor of Commerce degree from the University of Wollongong, Australia (1984).

Cyril Talbot III has been our Chief Financial Officer since March 2003. Prior to joining us, Mr. Talbot served as Senior Vice President-Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary at DJ Orthopedics, Inc., a publicly traded orthopedic sports medicine company. During his eleven years as DJ Orthopedics’ principal financial officer, he oversaw the company’s initial public offering and listing on the New York Stock Exchange and was responsible for merger and acquisition analysis and strategic planning. From 1981 to 1991, he held several management positions at American Hospital Supply Corporation and McGaw, Inc. Prior to that time, he was an Audit Manager and a Certified Public Accountant at Miller, Cooper & Co. Ltd. Mr. Talbot earned his Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting/Finance at Miami University in Oxford, Ohio.

Warren Cook has been Senior Vice President Sales for MCI since February 1997. His emphasis is on servicing and developing MCI’s existing customers as well as the development of new accounts. Previously, during the period between August 1991 and February 1997, Mr. Cook fulfilled the role of Manager, Accounts Sales at Mark’s Work Warehouse, with a focus on the development of corporate business. Prior to this, Mr. Cook worked from 1988 to 1991 for Grants, a small privately held textile company as National Sales Manager. Mr. Cook graduated from Ryerson Polytechnic University with a Bachelor of Business Administration in 1986.

Whitney Peterson has been Vice President Corporate Development and General Counsel for MCI since July 1998. Prior to joining MCI, Mr. Peterson spent seven years working at the international law firm of Latham & Watkins, where he represented and consulted with numerous Fortune 500 companies. Mr. Peterson received his law degree from the J. Rueben Clark School of Law at Brigham Young University, where he graduated Magna Cum Laude. Mr. Peterson also served as an Articles Editor on the BYU Law Review in which he was published. Following law school, Mr. Peterson clerked for the Honorable Bruce S. Jenkins, Chief Judge of the Federal District Court in Utah.

Jon Middleton has been Vice President Business Development for MCI since April 2004. Prior to joining MCI, Mr. Middleton was founder and Chief Executive Officer of Eight Cylinders, Inc., a videogame developer and broadband tools designer which was acquired by On2 Technologies in 2000. At On2 Technologies, Mr. Middleton led all international business development. Prior to founding Eight Cylinders, Mr. Middleton led business development and game publishing activities for Pulse Entertainment, a PC games publisher. Mr. Middleton graduated from Boston College with a dual Bachelor of English and Communication in 1994.

We provide our Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports free of charge under “Investor Relations” on our website at www.madcatz.com as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file this material with, or furnish this material to, the SEC. The information contained on our website is not part of this Annual Report. You may also read and copy the documents to which we refer at the Public Reference Room maintained by the SEC at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains a web site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding registrants that file electronically with the SEC at www.sec.gov.

We are required to file reports and other information with the securities commission in the province of Ontario, Canada. You are invited to read and copy any reports, statements or other information, other than confidential filings, that we file with the provincial securities commissions. These filings are also electronically available from the Canadian System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR) (http://www.sedar.com), the Canadian equivalent of the SEC’s electronic document gathering and retrieval system, as well as on our website at www.madcatz.com under “Investor Relations.”

You should consider each of the following factors, as well as the other information in this Annual Report, and in our other filings with the SEC, before deciding whether to invest in or continue to hold our common stock. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently consider immaterial may also impair our business operations. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business and financial results could be harmed. In that case, the trading price of our common shares could decline. You should also refer to the other information set forth in this Annual Report, including our financial statements and the related notes.

A significant portion of our revenue is derived from a few large customers.

The vast majority of our sales are generated from a small number of customers. Our top three customers accounted for approximately 52% and 47% of our gross sales in fiscal 2006 and 2005, respectively and our top two customers accounted for approximately 39% in fiscal 2004. In fiscal 2006, our three largest customers were Wal-Mart, GameStop, and Target. Our top ten customers accounted for approximately 75% of gross sales in fiscal 2006, 78% in fiscal 2005 and 79% in fiscal 2004.

We do not have long-term agreements with these or other significant customers and our agreements with these customers do not require them to purchase any specific number or amount of our products. As a result, agreements with respect to pricing, shelf space, cooperative advertising or special promotions, among other things, are subject to periodic negotiation with each customer. No assurance can be given that these or other customers will continue to do business with us or that they will maintain their historical levels of business. The loss of any of our significant customers could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. In addition, the uncertainty of product orders can make it difficult to forecast our sales and allocate our resources in a manner consistent with actual sales, and our expense levels are based in part on our expectations of future sales. If our expectations regarding future sales are inaccurate, we may be unable to reduce costs in a timely manner to adjust for sales shortfalls.

One or more of our largest customers may directly import or private-label products that are identical or very similar to our products. This could cause a significant decline in our sales and profitability.

Video game accessories are widely available from manufacturers and other suppliers around the world. Each of our largest customers has substantially greater resources than we do, and has the ability to directly import or private-label video game accessories from manufacturers and other suppliers, including from some of our own subcontract manufacturers and suppliers. Our customers may believe that higher profit margins can be achieved if they implement a direct import or private-label program, reducing sales of our products. As a consequence, our sales and profitability could decline significantly.

A significant portion of our revenue is derived from a few core product categories.

We are dependent on a small number of core product categories to generate a significant proportion of our revenues. No assurance can be given that these or other products will continue to have consumer acceptance or that they will maintain their historical levels of sales. The loss of one or more of these products could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.

We must constantly change our product mix to respond to changes in the market. If we fail to introduce new products, our sales and profitability could be harmed.

We generate our revenues from a number of continuously updated and enhanced “active products.” We define active products as products that have maintained a minimum level of average gross sales per quarter. Each product may be configured and sold in a number of different stock keeping units. Each year we introduce new products and discontinue a similar number of products to maintain an optimal number of active products that we believe best supports our customers and the market. If we do not introduce new products in a timely and efficient manner and in accordance with our operating plans, our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity could be negatively and materially affected.

Our financial results are dependent on timely introduction of new products, and any failure to introduce new products to the marketplace may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. Our product mix constantly changes.

There are numerous steps required to develop a product from conception to commercial introduction and to ensure timely shipment to retail customers, including designing, sourcing and testing the electronic components, receiving approval of hardware and other third party licensors, factory availability and manufacturing and designing the graphics and packaging. Any difficulties or delays in the product development process will likely result in delays in the contemplated product introduction schedule. It is common in new product introductions or product updates to encounter technical and other difficulties affecting manufacturing efficiency and, at times, the ability to manufacture the product at all. Although these difficulties can be corrected or improved over time with continued manufacturing experience and engineering efforts, if one or more aspects necessary for the introduction of products are not completed as scheduled, or if technical difficulties take longer than anticipated to overcome, the product introductions will be delayed, or in some cases may be terminated. No assurances can be given that products will be introduced in a timely fashion, and if new products are delayed, our sales and revenue growth may be limited or impaired.

The typical life cycle of successful video game accessories and titles is similar to the life cycle of video game consoles, which historically has ranged from two to ten years. Factors such as competition for access to retail shelf space, consumer preferences and seasonality could result in the shortening of the life cycle for older products and increase the importance of our ability to release new products on a timely basis. We must introduce new products in order to generate new revenues and/or to replace declining revenues from older products. The complexity of new video game systems has resulted in higher development expenses, longer development cycles, and the need to carefully monitor and plan the product development process.

Some of our products have been only recently introduced and although they may experience strong initial market acceptance, no assurance can be given that any initial acceptance will result in future sales. As a general matter, we expect that sales of these products will decline over the product’s life cycle. We cannot predict the length of the life cycle for any particular product. In order to control costs, and take advantage of the limited shelf space provided to us, we must periodically discontinue some of our product offerings. Our long-term operating results will therefore depend largely upon our continued ability to conceive, develop and introduce new appealing products at competitive prices.

Our business is dependent upon the continued development of new and enhanced video game platforms by first party manufacturers, such as Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo, and video games by software publishers, such as Electronic Arts, Activision, THQ and Take-Two Interactive Software. Our business could suffer if any of these parties fail to develop new or enhanced video game platforms or popular game and entertainment titles for current or future generation platforms. If a platform is withdrawn from the market or fails to sell, we may be forced to liquidate our inventories or accept returns resulting in significant losses.

During 2005, Microsoft introduced the Xbox 360 and Sony and Nintendo announced plans to introduce new versions of their respective PlayStation and GameCube platforms. As a result of limited availability of Microsoft’s Xbox 360 in the fall of 2005, the demand for accessories was also restricted. There is no guarantee that the new platforms from Sony and Nintendo will create a demand for related accessories.

New video game platforms and development for multiple consoles create additional technical and business model uncertainties that could impact our business.

Our revenues are derived primarily from the sale of video game accessories for use with proprietary video game platforms, such as the Sony PlayStation, PlayStation 2 and PSP; the Microsoft Xbox and Xbox 360; the Nintendo GameCube, Game Boy Advance, Game Boy Advance SP, DS; N64 and Micro and the Nokia N-Gage QD. The success of our products is significantly affected by commercial acceptance of new video game platforms and the life cycle of older platforms. In addition, we anticipate that the research and development expenses incurred to develop compatible accessories for new and updated video game platforms may impact our profitability.

If first party manufacturers choose to design video game systems that do not operate with third party accessories and are successful in implementing technological barriers that prevent us from developing, manufacturing, marketing and distributing products for these new video game platforms, our ability to continue our current business would be severely limited and our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity would be harmed.

Changes to current video game platforms or introductions of new video game platforms may result in our products becoming inoperable on some video game platforms, which would reduce sales of our products and adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.

A significant proportion of our revenues are derived from products that are reverse engineered. First party manufacturers continually update their video game platforms to correct problems in the operating systems and reduce costs. These manufacturers also expend significant resources to create next generation video game platforms. During the development of such product updates and new video game platforms, manufacturers may implement changes to the design of the new video game platforms that render our products inoperable. If our products become inoperable on one or more video game platforms, our sales may be significantly reduced. Moreover, we may have excess inventories of products that do not operate properly with new gaming platforms, which would limit our growth and harm our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.

We are subject to various environmental laws and regulations that could impose substantial costs upon us and may adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

Our operations and some of our products are regulated under various federal, state, local and international environmental laws, including those governing the discharge of pollutants into the air and water, the management, disposal and labeling of, and exposure to, hazardous substances and wastes and the cleanup of contaminated sites. We could incur costs, fines and civil or criminal sanctions, third-party property damage or personal injury claims, or could be required to incur substantial investigation or remediation costs, if we were to violate or become liable under environmental laws. Liability under environmental laws can be joint and several and without regard to comparative fault. The ultimate costs under environmental laws and the timing of these costs are difficult to predict.

We also expect that our manufacturing operations will be affected by other new environmental laws and regulations on an ongoing basis. Although we cannot predict the ultimate impact of any such new laws and regulations, they will likely result in additional costs or decreased revenue, and could require that we re-design or change how we manufacture our products, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business. For example, the European Union Directive 2002/96/EC on waste electrical and electronic equipment, known as the WEEE Directive, requires producers of certain electrical and electronic equipment, including RFID readers, to be financially responsible for specified collection, recycling, treatment and disposal of past and present covered products placed on the market in the European Union. The European Union Directive 2002/95/EC on the restriction of the use of hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment, known as the RoHS Directive, restricts the use of certain hazardous substances, including lead, in covered products that are put on the market by July 1, 2006. Although individual European member states are required to enact legislation to implement these two Directives, not all countries have done so. Pursuant to WEEE legislation to be enacted by individual countries, we may be required to register as a WEEE producer in some European Union countries. With respect to the RoHS Directive, we continue to work with our suppliers to design and manufacture products for sale in the European Union that comply with the RoHS Directive.

Failure to comply with existing laws or future laws could have a material adverse affect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. In addition, compliance with these and other environmental laws and regulations may be costly, thereby increasing the cost of manufacturing and significantly reducing our margins and profitability. To the extent that our competitors choose not to abide by these environmental laws and regulations, we will be at a cost disadvantage, thereby hindering our ability to effectively compete in the market place.

Errors or defects contained in our products, failure to comply with applicable safety standards or a product recall could result in delayed shipments or rejection of our products, damage to our reputation and expose us to regulatory or other legal action.

Any defects or errors in the operation of our products may result in delays in their introduction. In addition, errors or defects may be uncovered after commercial shipments have begun, which could result in the rejection of our products by our customers, damage to our reputation, lost sales, diverted development resources and increased customer service and support costs and warranty claims, any of which could harm our business. Adults and children could sustain injuries from our products, and we may be subject to claims or lawsuits resulting from such injuries. There is a risk that these claims or liabilities may exceed, or fall outside the scope of, our insurance coverage. We may also be unable to obtain adequate liability insurance in the future. Because we are a small company, a product recall would be particularly harmful to us because we have limited financial and administrative resources to effectively manage a product recall and it would detract management’s attention from implementing our core business strategies. A significant product defect or product recall could materially and adversely affect our brand image, causing a decline in our sales, and could reduce or deplete our financial resources.

If we do not correctly anticipate demand for particular products, we could incur additional costs or experience manufacturing delays, which would reduce our gross margins or cause us to lose sales.

Demand for our products depends on many factors such as consumer preferences and the introduction or adoption of video game platforms and related content, and can be difficult to forecast. Demand for our products may remain stagnant or decrease. We expect that it will become more difficult to forecast demand for specific products as we introduce and support additional products, enter additional markets and as competition in our markets intensifies. If we misjudge the demand for our products, we could face the following problems in our operations, each of which could harm our operating results:

Our pricing and product return policies and other promotional activities may negatively impact our sales and profitability and harm our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.

Many of our products are value-priced or feature-enhanced versions of products offered by first party manufacturers. Sales of products that compete with a similar first party product generally comprise nearly half of our gross sales. In the event a first party manufacturer or other competitor reduces its prices, we could be forced to respond by lowering our prices to remain competitive. If we are forced to lower prices, we may be required to “price protect” the products that remain unsold in our customers’ inventories at the time of the price reduction. Price protection results in us issuing a credit to our customers in the amount of the price reduction for each unsold unit in the customer’s inventory. Our price protection policies, which are customary in the video game industry, can have a major impact on our sales and profitability if we are forced to reduce the price of products for which a large inventory exists. It is also likely that we will experience additional price competition, which may lead to price protection, as we continue to introduce new and enhanced products.

To the extent we introduce new versions of products or change our product sales mix, the rate of product returns may also increase above historical levels. Although we established allowances for anticipated product returns and believe our existing policies have resulted in allowances that are adequate, there can be no assurance that such product return obligations will not exceed our allowances in the future, which would have a material adverse effect on our future operating results and financial condition.

Some of our license agreements with video game console developers have expired or may expire within the next fiscal year, which could limit our product offerings and significantly reduce our revenues.

Historically, a majority of our revenues have come from the sale of video game accessories for use with video game consoles sold by first party manufacturers. Some of these products have been produced under license agreements with these first party manufacturers. Some of these licenses are necessary in order for us to actually produce and sell the products (“license dependent products”), while other licenses have some perceived or actual marketing or sales benefit, but do not dictate whether we can produce the product (“marketing licenses”). Some of these license agreements have expired and others may expire, which could limit our product offerings and significantly reduce our revenues.

On May 12, 2005, we entered into a license agreement with Microsoft Corporation under which we were granted the right to manufacture, market and sell certain peripheral products for the upcoming Xbox 360 video game console (“Xbox 360 Agreement”). The products produced pursuant to the Xbox 360 Agreement are license dependent products. The Xbox 360 Agreement has a term of two years. Should the Xbox 360 Agreement expire, be terminated for cause or fail to be renewed, our product offerings may be limited thereby significantly reducing our revenues.

We have a peripheral and compatibility license from Microsoft covering products relating to Microsoft’s Xbox video game console. This license expires on February 28, 2007. Unless either Microsoft or our Company provides notice of its desire to terminate the license at least 90 days prior to that date, the agreement will automatically renew for an additional one-year period. While we do not intend to terminate the agreement and we have not received any indication from Microsoft that it desires to terminate the agreement, no assurance can be given that the agreement will not expire in accordance with its terms. We are uncertain whether we will be able to renew or replace the Microsoft license. Nonetheless, this license only relates to the use of Microsoft’s logo on our Company’s products, so even without the license, we would be able to continue producing and selling similar products which do not contain the logo. There can be no assurance, however, that sales of unlicensed products will be equivalent to sales of the licensed products. Any decline in the sale of such products could significantly reduce our revenues and have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our success depends on the continued viability and financial stability of our retailers and distributors.

We sell our products through a network of domestic and international retailers, as well as some distributors, and our success depends on the continued viability and financial stability of these customers. The retail industry has historically been characterized by rapid change, including periods of widespread financial difficulties and consolidations, and the emergence of alternative distribution channels.

The loss of one or more of our major retailers or distributors could significantly harm our business, financial condition and operating results. In addition, because of our sales to large high-volume customers, we maintain individually significant accounts receivable balances with these customers. As of March 31, 2006, our two largest accounts receivable balances accounted for 57% of total accounts receivable. We generally do not require any collateral from our customers to secure payment of these accounts receivable. However, we do seek to control credit risk through ongoing credit evaluations of our customers’ financial condition and by purchasing credit insurance on European retail accounts receivable balances. If any of our major customers were to default in the payment of their obligations to us, our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows could be adversely affected.

The manufacture and supply of our products is dependent upon a limited number of third parties, and our success is dependent upon the ability of these parties to manufacture and supply us with sufficient quantities of our products and on the continued viability and financial stability of these third party suppliers.

We rely on a limited number of manufacturers and suppliers for our products. There can be no assurance that these manufacturers and suppliers will be able to manufacture or supply us with sufficient quantities of products to ensure consumer availability. In addition, these parties may not be able to obtain the raw materials or to obtain the energy or oil supply required to manufacture sufficient quantities of our products. Moreover, there can be no assurance that such manufacturers and suppliers will not refuse to supply us with products, and independently market their own competing products in the future, or will not otherwise discontinue their relationships with or support of our Company. Our failure to maintain our existing manufacturing and supplier relationships, or to establish new relationships in the future, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. If our suppliers are unable or unwilling for any reason to supply us with a sufficient quantity of our products, our business, revenues, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity would be materially adversely affected. We obtain our GameShark products from third

party suppliers, for which an alternative source may not be available. If any of our key suppliers became financially unstable, our access to these products might be jeopardized, thereby adversely affecting our business, cash flow, financial condition and operational results.

Production levels that do not match demand for our products could result in lost sales or a reduction in our gross margins.

The video game accessories industry is characterized by rapid technological change, frequent new product introductions, short-term customer commitments and rapid changes in demand. We determine production levels based on forecasts of the demand for our products. Actual demand for our products is difficult to forecast. If the actual demand for our products does not match the manufacture of our products, a number of problems could occur, including the loss of potential sales if production cannot be increased to match demand, and additional expenditures necessary to accelerate the production of some products, resulting in lower gross margins. Additionally, if customers find alternative sources of supply to meet their needs, our revenues, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

Any disruption of shipping and product delivery operations globally could harm our business.

We rely on contract ocean carriers to ship virtually all of our products from Hong Kong to our primary distribution centers in California and the United Kingdom. Retailers and distributors that take delivery of our products in Hong Kong rely on a variety of carriers to ship those products to their distribution centers and retail outlets. We also rely on a number of sources of ground transportation to deliver our products from our primary distribution centers to our retail customers’ and distributors’ distribution centers and retail outlets. Any disruption or delay in the importation of our products, in the operation of our distribution centers or in the delivery of our products from our primary distribution centers to our retail customers’ and distributors’ distribution centers and retail outlets for any reason, including labor strikes or other labor disputes, terrorism, international incidents or lack of available shipping containers or vehicles, could significantly harm our business and reputation.

Any loss of China’s Normal Trade Relations “NTR” with the United States, or any changes in tariffs or trade policies, could increase our manufacturing expenses and make it more difficult for us to manufacture our products in China, if at all.

The majority of our products are manufactured in China and exported from Hong Kong and China to the United States and worldwide. Our products sold in the United States are currently not subject to United States import duties. However, as a result of opposition to policies of the Chinese government and China’s growing trade surpluses with the United States, there has been, and in the future may be, opposition to the extension of NTR status for China. The loss of NTR status for China, changes in current tariff structures or adoption in the United States of other trade policies adverse to China could increase our manufacturing expenses and make it more difficult for us to manufacture our products in China, if at all.

Our manufacturing relationships in China may be adversely affected by changes in the political, economic and legal environment in China.

We maintain offices in Hong Kong and in China. The success of our operations in Hong Kong and China is highly dependent on the Chinese government’s continued support of economic reform programs that encourage private investment, and particularly foreign private investment. A change in these policies by the Chinese government could adversely affect us by, among other things, imposing confiscatory taxation, restricting currency conversion, imports and sources of supplies, prohibiting us from manufacturing our products in China or restricting our ability to ship products from China into Hong Kong or to ship finished products out of Hong Kong or otherwise shutting down our offices in Hong Kong and China. Although the Chinese government has

chosen economic reform policies to date, no assurance can be given that it will continue to pursue such policies or that such policies will not be significantly altered, especially in the event of a change in leadership or other social or political disruption.

Our sources of manufacturing and distribution capabilities could be adversely affected by ongoing tensions between the Chinese and Taiwanese governments. If Taiwan does not adopt a plan for unifying with China, the Chinese government has threatened military action against Taiwan. As of yet, Taiwan has not indicated that it intends to propose or adopt a reunification plan. If an invasion were to occur, the supply of components from Taiwanese suppliers that are used in our products could be interrupted, potentially limiting the production of our products. Invasion could also lead to sanctions or military action by the United States and/or European countries, which could materially affect our sales to those countries.

China does not have a comprehensive system of laws. Enforcement of existing laws may be sporadic and implementation and interpretation thereof inconsistent. The Chinese judiciary is relatively inexperienced in enforcing the laws that exist, leading to a higher than usual degree of uncertainty as to the outcome of any litigation. Even where adequate laws exist in China, it may be impossible to obtain swift and equitable enforcement of such laws, or to obtain enforcement of a judgment by a court in a different jurisdiction. The Chinese tax system is subject to substantial uncertainties and has been subject to recently enacted changes, the interpretation and enforcement of which are also uncertain. There can be no assurance that changes in Chinese tax laws or their interpretation or their application will not subject us to substantial Chinese taxes in the future.

There are numerous risks associated with our international operations, any number of which could harm our business.

We have offices and sales throughout the world. Our registered office and a sales office are in Canada. Our operational headquarters is in San Diego, California. We also have offices in the United Kingdom, China and Hong Kong. Approximately 81% of our gross sales in fiscal year 2006 were generated in North America, and a substantial majority of our products are manufactured by third parties in Hong Kong and China. The geographical distances between our operations create a number of logistical and communications challenges. These challenges include managing operations across multiple time zones, directing the manufacture and delivery of products across long distances, coordinating procurement of components and raw materials and their delivery to multiple locations, and coordinating the activities and decisions of the management team, which is based in a number of different countries.

In addition, there are other risks inherent in international operations, which could result in disruption or termination of supply of our products available for sale. These risks include:

These factors could materially and adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial condition.

We may be faced with legal challenges related to our products, including that our products infringe third parties’ intellectual property rights of others. These challenges could cause us to incur significant litigation or licensing expenses or could prohibit us from producing or marketing some or all of our products entirely.

Although we do not believe that our products infringe the proprietary rights of any third parties, there can be no assurance that infringement or other legal claims will not be asserted against us or that any such claims will not materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations. Regardless of their validity or success, such claims may result in costly litigation, divert management’s time and attention, cause product shipment delays or require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements, which may not be available on terms acceptable to us, or at all. If licensing arrangements are required but unavailable, we may be prohibited from marketing and distributing these products. In addition, we could also incur substantial costs to redesign our products to comply with legal orders or contractual arrangements. Any of these costs or outcomes could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. For information regarding lawsuits filed against the Company claiming that our products infringe third party intellectual property rights, see Item 3. “Legal Proceedings” below.

Our intellectual property rights may not prevent our competitors from using our technologies or similar technologies to develop competing products, which could weaken our competitive position and harm our financial results.

Our success depends in part on the use of proprietary technologies. We rely, and plan to continue to rely, on a combination of patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets, confidentiality provisions and licensing arrangements to establish and protect our proprietary rights. We have entered into confidentiality and invention assignment agreements with our employees and contractors, and nondisclosure agreements with selected parties with whom we conduct business to limit access to and disclosure of our proprietary information. These contractual arrangements and the other steps we have taken to protect our intellectual property may not prevent misappropriation of that intellectual property or deter independent third party development of similar technologies. Monitoring the unauthorized use of proprietary technology and trademarks is costly, and any dispute or other litigation, regardless of outcome, may be costly and time consuming and may divert our management and key personnel from our business operations. The steps taken by us may not prevent unauthorized use of our proprietary technology or trademarks. Many features of our products are not protected by patents, and, as a consequence, we may not have the legal right to prevent others from reverse engineering or otherwise copying and using these features in competitive products. If we fail to protect or to enforce our intellectual property rights successfully, our competitive position could suffer, which could adversely affect our financial results.

We may not be able to comply with the terms of our license agreements, which may result in the loss of one or more of the licenses.

We have entered into license and royalty agreements with various parties in which we pay fees in exchange for rights to use product inventions or trademarked names, shapes and likenesses in our products. The agreements often include minimum fee guarantees based on a reasonable expectation of the product sales to be generated throughout the life of the agreement. We cannot assure you that we will be able to meet these expectations and may be obligated to pay unearned fees as a result. Some of our license agreements also contain stringent requirements regarding the use of the licensor’s trademarks. Our license and royalty agreements are for fixed terms. We cannot assure you that we will be able to comply with all of the requirements contained in our licenses or that we will be able to maintain or extend the rights to our existing licenses.

If our products are copied or “knocked-off” our sales of these products may be materially reduced and our profitability may be negatively affected.

Occasionally in the video game accessories industry, successful products are “knocked-off” or copied by competitors. While we strive to protect our intellectual property we cannot guarantee that knock-offs will not

occur or that they will not have a significant effect on our business. The costs incurred in protecting our intellectual property rights could be significant and there is no assurance that we will be able to successfully protect our rights.

We depend upon the availability of capital under our credit facility to finance our operations. Any additional financing that we may need may not be available on favorable terms, or at all.

In addition to revenue generated from sales of our products, we finance our operations with a $35.0 million Credit Facility (the “Credit Facility”) provided by Wachovia Capital Finance Corporation (Central) (“Wachovia”), formerly Congress Financial Corporation (Central), an unrelated party. The Credit Facility is scheduled to expire on September 25, 2006. The Credit Facility will automatically renew for an additional one-year period unless either party gives written notice to the other party seeking to terminate the Credit Facility at least 60 days prior to the expiration date. Although Wachovia agreed to extend the expiration date of the Credit Facility in each of our last two fiscal years, we do not know the likelihood that they will agree to further extend the expiration of the Credit Facility following September 25, 2006. If Wachovia is unwilling to extend the expiration of the Credit Facility beyond September 25, 2006 on terms acceptable to the Company, or if we are unable to comply with the restrictive and financial covenants contained in the Credit Facility, Wachovia may declare the outstanding borrowings under the facility immediately due and payable. In such an event, our liquidity will be materially adversely affected, which could in turn have a material adverse impact on our future financial position and results of operations. We would be required to obtain additional financing from other sources. We cannot predict whether or on what terms additional financing might be available. If we are required to seek additional financing and are unable to obtain it, we may have to change our business and capital expenditure plans, which would have a materially adverse affect our future results of operations.

The Credit Facility contains financial and other covenants that we are obligated to maintain. If we violate any of these covenants, we will be in default under the Credit Facility. If a default occurs and is not timely cured or waived by Wachovia, Wachovia could seek remedies against us, including: (1) penalty rates of interest, (2) immediate repayment of the debt or (3) foreclosure on assets securing the Credit Facility. No assurance can be given that we will maintain compliance with these covenants in the future. The Credit Facility is asset based and can only be drawn down in an amount to which eligible collateral exists and can be negatively impacted by extended collection of accounts receivable, unexpectedly high returns and slow moving inventory, among other factors.

If we need to obtain additional funds for any reason, including the termination of the Credit Facility or acceleration of amount due there under, increased working capital requirements, possible acquisitions or otherwise, there can be no assurance that alternative financing can be obtained on substantially similar or acceptable terms, or at all. The failure of our Company to promptly obtain alternate financing could limit our ability to implement our business plan and have an immediate, severe and adverse impact on our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. In the event that no alternative financing is available, we would be forced to drastically curtail operations, or dispose of assets, or cease operations altogether.

Accounts receivable represent a large portion of our assets, a large portion of which are owed by a few customers. If these accounts receivable are not paid, we could suffer a significant decline in cash flow and liquidity which, in turn, could limit our ability pay liabilities and purchase an adequate amount of inventory.

Our accounts receivable represented 17%, 22% and 25% of our total assets as of March 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. As a result of the substantial amount and concentration of our accounts receivable, if any of our major customers fails to timely pay us amounts owed, we could suffer a significant decline in cash flow and liquidity which would negatively affect our ability to make payments under our Credit Facility and which, in turn, could adversely affect our ability to borrow funds to purchase inventory to sustain or expand our current sales volume. Accordingly, if any of our major customers fails to timely pay us amounts owed, our sales and profitability may decline.

Increases in interest rates may increase our interest expense and adversely affect our profitability and cash flow and our ability to service indebtedness.

We depend, in a significant part, on borrowings under the Credit Facility to finance our operations. At March 31, 2006, the outstanding balance under the Credit Facility was $8.6 million. The interest rate applicable to the Credit Facility varies based on the U.S. prime rate plus 0.25%. The variable rate debt outstanding under the Credit Facility had a weighted average annual interest rate of approximately 7.3% for the year ended March 31, 2006. Increases in the interest rate under the Credit Facility will increase our interest expense, which could harm our profitability and cash flow. For example, if the interest rate under the Credit Facility increases by 100 basis points, the increase in interest expense would decrease our future earnings and cash flows by approximately $169,000 annually.

We must stay at the forefront of technology and any inability to do so would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.

The video game accessories industry is characterized by rapid technological advances, evolving industry standards, frequent new product introductions and enhancements and changing customer requirements. Much of the development of our new product offerings is dependent upon our ability to reverse engineer first party products as they are introduced by the manufacturers, and the introduction of products that prevent or delay our ability to effectively develop products through reverse engineering could prevent us from developing new products, which would harm our business operations, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity. The introduction of products embodying or based upon new technologies and the emergence of new industry standards could render our existing inventory of products obsolete, incompatible with new consoles and unmarketable. We believe that any future success will depend upon our ability to reverse engineer new video game systems, introduce new products that keep pace with technological developments, respond to evolving end-user requirements and achieve market acceptance. If we cannot reverse engineer the next generation video game platforms or fail to develop and introduce new enhancements or new products for existing platforms, or if changes to existing video game platforms render our products out of date or obsolete, or if our intended customers do not accept these products, our business would be materially harmed.

Natural disasters or other events outside of our control may damage our facilities or the facilities of third parties on which we depend for the manufacture and distribution of our products.

Our North American distribution center and operational headquarters are located in California near major earthquake faults that have experienced earthquakes in the past. All of our facilities may be subject to a variety of natural or man-made disasters. An earthquake or other event outside our control, such as power shortages, floods, fires, monsoons, other severe weather conditions, terrorism or other similar events, could disrupt our operations or damage or destroy our facilities. Any of these disruptions could impair the manufacture or distribution of products, damage inventory, interrupt critical functions or otherwise affect our business negatively, harming our business operations and future financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. In addition, if the facilities of our third party product manufacturers are affected by similar activities beyond our control, our ability to obtain sufficient manufactured products could suffer or be impaired.

Our operations are vulnerable because we have limited redundancy and backup systems. Any failure of our data information systems could negatively impact our financial results.

Our internal order, inventory and product data management system is an electronic system through which we manage customer orders and product pricing, shipment, returns, among other matters. The continued and uninterrupted performance of our information systems is critical to our day-to-day business operations. Despite our precautions, unanticipated interruptions in our computer and telecommunications systems have, in the past, caused problems or stoppages in this electronic system. These interruptions, and resulting problems, could occur

in the future. We have extremely limited ability and personnel to process purchase orders and manage product pricing and other matters in any manner other than through this electronic system. Any interruption or delay in the operation of this electronic system could cause a significant decline in our sales and profitability.

If we fail to maintain an adequate system of internal controls, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results, which could cause current and potential shareholders to lose confidence in our financial reporting and in turn affect the trading price of our common stock.

We are in the process of reviewing and evaluating our internal control over financial reporting in order to satisfy the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the related regulations, which require annual management assessments of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting and a report by our independent registered public accounting firm addressing these assessments. We cannot be certain that the measures we have taken to assess, document, improve and validate through testing the adequacy of our internal control process over financial reporting will ensure that we maintain such adequate controls over our financial reporting process in the future. Failure to implement required new controls could cause us to fail to meet reporting obligations, which in turn could cause current and potential shareholders to lose confidence in our financial reporting.

Our business is seasonal and our financial results vary from period to period.

The video game and video game accessory industry is highly seasonal and our operating results vary substantially from period to period. We generate a substantial portion of our sales during the holiday season. The high level of seasonality causes us to take significant risks in the purchase of inventory for the holiday season. There can be no guarantee that our customers or we will sell all of our inventories. Excess inventory at year-end may result in financial losses from obsolescence, reserves, returns and markdowns.

Moreover, if expenses remain relatively fixed, but our revenues are less than anticipated in any quarter, our operating results would be adversely affected for that quarter. In addition, incurring unexpected expenses could adversely affect operating results for the period in which such expenses are incurred. Failure to achieve periodic revenue, earnings and other operating and financial results as anticipated by brokerage firms or industry analysts could result in an immediate and adverse effect on the market price of our common shares. We may not discover, or be able to confirm, revenue or earnings shortfalls until the end of a quarter, which could result in a greater immediate and adverse effect on the share price.

We cannot assure that we will continue to grow in future periods at the levels we have in the past or at all.

Our current business strategy emphasizes the continued addition of new retail accounts, increasing product penetration within existing accounts, introduction of new products and entry into new product categories while focusing on maximizing the profitability of each sale. Sales to customers that did not have recorded sales in the prior 12 months accounted for approximately 5% of gross sales in fiscal 2006, 3% in fiscal 2005 and 3% in fiscal 2004. North American sales represented approximately 81% of our total gross sales in fiscal 2006, 90% in fiscal 2005 and 87% in fiscal 2004. European sales accounted for approximately 19% of gross sales in fiscal 2006, 10% in fiscal 2005, and 9% in fiscal 2004. There can be no assurance that we will achieve future growth in net sales or that we will be able to maintain our present levels of net sales or profitability.

Historically, the video game industry has been cyclical with many consumers delaying the purchase of new video game systems for one to two years following the launch of a new system. Sony’s continued support of older systems and reverse compatibility has reduced the cyclical impact. However, following the launch of Microsoft’s new Xbox 360 video game console, the industry entered a transitional period that we expect to continue at least until the launch of Sony’s PlayStation 3 and Nintendo’s Wii in late 2006. We expect this transition period to be a challenging sales environment. The general decline in the video game industry that typically occurs during these transition periods may adversely impact our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity, and if the decline is longer or deeper than expected, the impact on our business will be more severe.

We are constantly looking for opportunities to grow our business and diversify our product line. We cannot assure that any of our new endeavors will be successful.

The industry in which we compete is highly competitive. As a result we look for opportunities to grow our business. From time to time, we expand into related or new revenue streams to diversify and grow our business. Examples include the distribution of non-video game related accessories, such as iPod, and the development and publishing of new software titles. No assurance can be given that we will be successful in developing or growing these products lines or that we will be successful in such ventures.

If we fail to successfully manage the expansion of our business, our sales may not increase commensurately with our capital investments, which would cause our profitability to decline.

We are expanding our product offerings and plan to continue the diversification of our product line. Our new product offerings, including our complete lines of products for each of the next generation gaming systems and our new video game software title, have required and will continue to require significant resources and management’s close attention. In offering new products, our resources are likely to be strained because we have less experience in the new product categories. Our failure to successfully manage our planned product expansion could result in our sales not increasing commensurately with our capital investments, causing a decline in our profitability.

We may pursue acquisitions, which would subject our business to additional risks.

We may expand our operations or product offerings through the acquisition of additional businesses, products or technologies. A recent example is the acquisition of GameShark intellectual property. There can be no assurance that we will be able to identify, acquire or profitably manage additional businesses or successfully integrate any acquired businesses, products or technologies into our Company without substantial expenses, delays or other operational or financial problems. Acquisitions involve a number of risks, including:

Some or all of these risks could have a material adverse effect on our acquired businesses, products or technologies. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that any acquired business, product, or technology will be profitable or achieve anticipated revenues and income. The failure by our Company to manage our acquisition strategy successfully could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We have net monetary asset and liability balances in foreign currencies other than the U.S. dollar, including the Pound Sterling, the Euro, the Canadian dollar, the Hong Kong dollar and the Chinese Yuan Renminbi (“CNY”). International sales primarily are generated by our subsidiaries in the United Kingdom and Canada, and are denominated typically in their local currency. The expenses incurred by these subsidiaries are also denominated in the local currency. As a result, our operating results are exposed to change in exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and the Pound Sterling, the Euro, the Canadian dollar, the Hong Kong dollar and the

CNY. We do not currently hedge our foreign exchange risk, which historically has not been significant. We will continue to monitor our exposure to currency fluctuations, and, where appropriate, may use financial hedging techniques in the future to minimize the effect of these fluctuations, which may be significant from time to time.

Possible increase in value to Chinese currency vis-à-vis U.S. currency would have a material impact on the cost of our products.

Historically China’s currency, the CNY, has been pegged to the U.S. dollar. On July 21, 2005 the government of China announced that the exchange rate of the CNY was appreciating against the U.S. dollar and that the CNY would thereafter have a more flexible exchange rate within a 0.3% band that would float against a basket of unidentified foreign currencies. The Chinese government may decide to change or abandon this new policy at its sole discretion at any time in the future. The recent appreciation of the CNY against the U.S. dollar and any additional appreciation in the exchange rate of the CNY against the U.S. dollar will increase our factory and production costs, including labor and certain raw materials that could have a material impact on the cost of our products and our results of operations.

Failure to attract, retain and motivate skilled personnel would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.

Our ability to achieve our revenue and operating performance objectives will depend in large part on our ability to attract and retain qualified and highly skilled sales, marketing, operations, logistics, management, engineering and finance personnel. We compete for our personnel with other companies, and competition for such personnel is intense and is expected to remain so for the foreseeable future, particularly for those with relevant technical expertise. Failure to retain and expand our key employee population could adversely affect our business and operating results.

We are heavily dependent upon our senior management team. The continued availability of this team will be a major contributing factor to our future growth. In the event that any member of senior management becomes unavailable for any reason, we could be materially and adversely affected. We do not maintain key-man life insurance on our senior management.

Competition for market acceptance and retail shelf space and pricing competition affects our revenue and profitability.

The video game accessory market is highly competitive and the barriers to entry are low. Only a small percentage of products introduced in the market achieve any degree of sustained market acceptance. If our products are not successful, our operations and profitability will be negatively impacted. Competition in the video game accessory industry is based primarily upon:

Some of our competitors, particularly the first party manufacturers, enjoy competitive advantages over us, such as longer operating histories, larger technical staffs, more established and larger sales and marketing

organizations, significantly greater financial and other resources, ability to respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements or ability to establish or strengthen cooperative relationships with retailers, distributors and other marketers.

Increased competition from these and other sources could require us to respond to competitive pressures by establishing pricing, marketing and other programs or seeking out additional acquisitions that may be less favorable than what we could otherwise establish or obtain, and thus could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. No assurance can be given that we will be able to compete effectively in our markets.

Any future terrorist attacks and other acts of violence or war may affect the demand for video game accessories, which may negatively affect our operations and financial results.

The continued threat of terrorism within the United States, Europe and the Middle East and the military action and heightened security measures in response to such threat may cause significant disruption to commerce throughout the world. To the extent that such disruptions result in delays or cancellations of customer orders, a general decrease in the demand for video game accessories, or our inability to effectively market our products, our business and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. We are unable to predict whether the threat of terrorism or the responses thereto will result in any long-term commercial disruptions or if such activities or responses will have a long-term material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.

Our taxes are subject to audit, and as such, additional taxes may be payable by our Company.

We cannot predict whether our tax rates will remain as low as they have been in the past as tax regulations and the application or interpretation in the various jurisdictions in which we operate are always subject to change. Our taxes are subject to audit. We cannot guarantee that additional taxes will not be due as a result of audits or other factors.

Volatility in the mass-market retail sector could have a material adverse effect on our sales.

Most of our sales are made to mass-market retailers. The mass-market retail channel in the U.S. has experienced significant shifts in the market share among competitors in recent years, causing several of our customers to experience liquidity problems. Additionally, this has caused several customers to file for bankruptcy during the past two years. While we attempt to minimize our credit exposure, there is always a risk that our customers will not pay or that they will delay payment, subjecting us to exposure to bad debt losses. In addition, if these customers were to cease doing business as a result of bankruptcy, it could have a material adverse effect on our sales.

Penny stock rules may negatively impact the liquidity of our common stock.

Our common stock is subject to rules promulgated by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) relating to “penny stocks,” which apply to certain companies whose shares trade at less than $5.00 per share and which do not meet certain other financial requirements specified by the SEC. These rules require brokers who sell “penny stocks” to persons other than established customers and “accredited investors” to complete certain documentation, make suitability inquiries of investors, and provide investors with certain information concerning the risks of trading in such penny stocks. These rules may discourage or restrict the ability of brokers to sell our common stock and may affect the secondary market for our common stock. These rules could also have a detrimental effect upon our ability to raise funds through an offering of our common stock.

The market price of our common stock has been and is likely to be highly volatile. Many factors could have a significant adverse impact on the market price of our common stock, including:

We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

There can be no assurance that the holders or purchasers of our common stock will be able to resell their shares at prices equal to or greater than their cost.

The market price of our common stock could be subject to significant fluctuations in response to quarterly variations in our operating results, announcements of technological innovations through new products by us or our competitors, changes in financial estimates by securities analysts or other events or factors, many of which are beyond our control. In addition, the stock markets have experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that have particularly affected the market prices of equity securities of many companies whose businesses are dependent on technology and that often have been unrelated to the operating performance of such companies. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of our common stock. There can be no assurance that the holders or purchasers of our common stock will be able to resell their shares at prices equal to or greater than their cost.

Investors may not be able to secure foreign enforcement of civil liabilities against management.

The enforcement by investors of civil liabilities under the federal securities laws of the United States may be adversely affected by the fact that we are organized under the laws of Canada, that some of our officers and directors are residents of a foreign country and that all, or a substantial portion, of such persons’ assets are

located outside of the United States. As a result, it may be difficult for holders of our common stock to affect service of process on such persons within the United States or to realize in the United States upon judgments rendered against them.

MCI leases office space for its headquarters at 7480 Mission Valley Road, Ste. 101, San Diego, California, 92108-4406. The lease was amended on August 3, 2005 to add approximately 2,000 square feet – bringing the total office space to 16,000 square feet. Concurrent with taking the additional space, MCI extended the lease by three years. The lease will expire on August 31, 2008.

MCI also leases a 95,000 square foot warehouse located at 12160 Philadelphia Street, Mira Loma, California, 91752-1188. On February 21, 2006, MCI amended the lease to extend the term through June 30, 2009.

MCI leases business premises for MCC located at 2425 Matheson Blvd. E., 8^thFloor, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L4W 5K4. The lease was renewed on February 24, 2006 and will expire on May 31, 2007; however, if neither party gives notice of the intent to terminate, the agreement will renew automatically for an additional year.

MCE leases business premises in the United Kingdom located at Office Unit 31 Shenley Pavilions, Shenley Wood, Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire MK5 6LB. The lease will terminate on August 21, 2008.

MCE also leases business premises in France located at ZAC Paris Rive Gauche, 118-122, avenue de France, France 75013. The lease expires on March 30, 2007.

MCIA leases business premises located at 138 ShaTin Rural Committee Road, Unit 1717-19 and 1720-1721, 17^th Floor, Grand Central Plaza, Tower 2, ShaTin, New Territories, Hong Kong. The lease will expire on September 30, 2006.

MCIA also leases space at Unit No. 1709, 17^th Floor, Grand Central Plaza, Tower 2, ShaTin, New Territories, Hong Kong. The lease expires on September 30, 2006.

MCIA leases business premises in China located at Unit A, 7^th Floor, Guang Fa Building, 218 Ji Hua Road, Buji Town, Longgang District, Shenzhen, PRC. The lease expires on March 1, 2007.

Management believes that our leased facilities are adequate for the near term. At present management is unaware of any environmental issues affecting any of our premises.

On February 10, 2003, Electro Source filed a complaint against MCI, and Fire International, Ltd. (“Fire”), as well as other defendants, in the Superior Court in Los Angeles County, California entitled, Electro Source, LLC v. Fire International, Ltd., et al., Case No. BC 290076. On or about November 18, 2003, Electro Source amended its complaint to add us as a defendant. In its amended complaint, Electro Source asserted claims against us and MCI alleging misappropriation of trade secrets, conspiracy to defraud, interference with contractual relationship and interference with prospective economic advantage in connection with Fire’s agreement to supply MCI with product to be marketed under our GameShark brand and for the termination of Fire’s alleged prior business relationship with Electro Source.

Electro Source moved for a temporary restraining order to prevent MCI from marketing or otherwise distributing the GameShark products. After a hearing on the matter, the Court denied Electro Source’s motion

and refused to enter the temporary restraining order. The parties have engaged in written and oral discovery, including depositions. On February 17, 2005, MCI filed a cross-complaint against Electro Source alleging false advertising, state and federal unfair competition, libel per se, and trade libel arising out of certain advertisements and internet statements. Discovery is proceeding on the cross-complaint. On July 29, 2005, the Court denied the Company’s motions for summary judgment, and on August 26, 2005, the Court denied the Company’s motion for summary adjudication as to the plaintiff’s claim for intentional interference with contract. Trial in this matter commenced on May 15, 2006 and closing arguments were completed on June 9, 2006. On June 19, 2006, the jury rendered a verdict on MCI’s cross-complaint finding that the advertisement and other statements in question did not satisfy the legal elements of defamation. On June 21, 2006, the jury rendered a verdict finding that MCI was not liable for any alleged misappropriation of trade secrets. On June 23, 2006 the jury rendered a verdict finding that MCI was not liable for conspiracy to defraud or intentional interference with prospective economic advantage. The only remaining claim left against MCI is a claim for interference with contract, which claim could not be decided because the jury deadlocked on the issue of whether there was a contract between Fire and Electro Source. The judge declared a mistrial with respect to this breach of claim against Fire. A status conference has been set for July 25, 2006 to discuss, among other things, post trial motions and motions for new trial. Unless there is a settlement on the breach of contract claim against Fire and the intentional interference with contract claim against MCI, a new trial will be ordered on those issues at some point in the future. While we intend to vigorously defend this matter, there can be no guarantee that we will ultimately prevail or that damages will not be assessed against us. An adverse determination by the Court or jury could require payment of damages and seriously impact our revenues and our ability to continue to distribute the GameShark products.

On or about May 2, 2005, MCI was served with a lawsuit filed by Freedom Wave LLC in the United States District Court for the Central District of California entitled, Freedom Wave LLC. v. Mad Catz, Inc. et al., Case No CV5 2954NM (PLAx). The complaint alleges that certain MCI products infringe U.S. patent numbers 6,878,066 and 6,280,327 (‘327 Patent”). MCI answered, denying the allegation in the complaint. The 6,280,327 patent is under reexamination by the patent and trademark office. The parties have agreed that until the ‘327 Patent comes out of reexamination, the case should be dismissed, without prejudice to Freedom Wave refilling its claims at a later date.

On July 14, 2005, the Company was served with a lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the District of Texas, Marshall Division entitled Konami Corporation v. Roxor Games, Inc., Case No. 02-05cv-173. The complaint alleges that the Company’s MC Groovz Dance Craze product violates U.S. patent number 6,410,835. Trial has been set for January 16, 2007. Discovery continues. On January 10, 2006, the Company received a letter from Konami Corporation asserting that Pump It Up:Exceed, which the Company distributes on behalf of Mastiff, LLC, also infringes the claims of the 6,410,835 patent and demanded that the Company cease all sales and offers to sell Pump It Up:Exceed. While we intend to vigorously defend the allegations of the complaint and if necessary to seek indemnification from the manufacturers of Pump It Up:Exceed, there can be no guarantee that we will ultimately prevail, that damages will not be assessed against us, or that we will not be prohibited from producing or marketing certain of our products.

No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006.

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The Company’s common stock commenced trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”) in December 1995 under the symbol “GTR.” Our common stock began trading on the American Stock Exchange (“AMEX”) in the United States in September 1999 under the symbol “GIG.” In September 2001, our common stock began trading on both the AMEX and the TSX under the symbol “MCZ” to reflect our name change to Mad Catz Interactive, Inc. The following table sets forth, for the fiscal quarters indicated, the high and low market prices for the Company’s common stock on the AMEX and TSX:

As of June 19, 2006, there were approximately 233 shareholders of record of our common stock with 54,244,383 shares outstanding.

We have never declared or paid any dividends and do not expect to pay any dividends in the foreseeable future.

Neither our Company nor any affiliated purchaser repurchased any of our equity securities during fiscal 2006.

The summary of financial information set forth below is derived from and should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We report our financial statements in thousands of U.S. dollars, and have prepared our financial statements contained in this Form 10-K in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States, which vary in certain significant respects from GAAP in Canada. See Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, elsewhere in this Form 10-K, for a

reconciliation of net income for fiscal years ended March 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, determined in accordance with GAAP in the United States to the net income determined in accordance with GAAP in Canada.

EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, represents net income before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. EBITDA is not intended to represent cash flows for the period, nor is it being presented as an alternative to operating or net income as an indicator of operating performance and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. As defined, EBITDA is not necessarily comparable to other similarly titled captions of other companies due to potential inconsistencies in the method of calculation. We believe, however, that in addition to the performance measures found in our financial statements, EBITDA is a useful financial performance measurement for assessing our Company’s operating performance. Our management uses EBITDA as a measurement of operating performance in comparing our performance on a consistent basis over prior periods, as it removes from operating results the impact of our capital structure, including the interest expense resulting from our outstanding debt, and our asset base, including depreciation and amortization of our capital and intangible assets.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This section contains forward-looking statements involving risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors including those set out in Part I General Information, Item 1A Risk Factors elsewhere in this Annual Report. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes contained elsewhere in this Annual Report.

We are a leading provider of video game accessories and software marketed under the Mad Catz and GameShark brands. We design, manufacture (primarily through third parties in Asia), market and distribute accessories for all major video game platforms, including the Microsoft Xbox and Xbox 360; Nintendo GameCube, Game Boy Advance, Game Boy Advance SP, DS, N64 and Micro; Sony PlayStation, PlayStation 2 and PSP; and Nokia N-Gage QD. In addition, we design, manufacture (primarily through third parties in Asia), market and distribute accessories for the Apple iPod. Our products include video game accessories of all types, such as control pads, steering wheels, joysticks, memory cards, video cables, light guns, dance pads, microphones, car adapters and carry cases. We also market game enhancement software, distribute video game software and publish video game titles.

We generate a substantial percentage of our net sales in the last three months of every calendar year, our fiscal third quarter. Our quarterly results of operations can be expected to fluctuate significantly in the future, as a result of many factors, including: seasonal influences on our sales; unpredictable consumer preferences and

spending trends; the introduction of new video game platforms; the need to increase inventories in advance of our primary selling season; and timing of introductions of new products. See further discussion and sales by quarter under “Net Sales” below.

Our industry is cyclical and we believe it is now in a transition stage entering into the next cycle. Beginning with the release of Microsoft’s Xbox 360 in November 2005 and continuing with releases by Sony and Nintendo by the end of 2006, we expect two new video game consoles to be introduced into the market. Upon release of the Xbox 360 we were a licensee with rights to officially market a full range of accessories compatible with the Xbox 360. Continuing through this transition, we also intend to develop and market a range of accessories that are compatible with the new console systems to be introduced by Sony and Nintendo, as well as continue to provide accessories to the significant installed base of current consoles in the marketplace. The transition of consoles provides an opportunity for us to market products to the value-oriented consumer. Until we have had an opportunity to fully evaluate the technology used by the first party manufacturers, we will be unable to determine the extent to which we will be able to design and manufacture accessories that are compatible with all of the new video game consoles.

Approximately 28% of our annual sales are transacted outside the United States. The majority of our international business is presently conducted in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses arising from normal business operations are credited to or charged against earnings in the period incurred. As a result, fluctuations in the value of the currencies in which we conduct our business relative to the U.S. dollar will cause currency transaction gains and losses, which we have experienced in the past and continue to experience. Due to the substantial volatility of currency exchange rates, among other factors, we cannot predict the effect of exchange rate fluctuations upon future operating results. There can be no assurances that we will not experience currency losses in the future. In fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005, we did not hedge against foreign currency exposure and we cannot predict the effect foreign currency fluctuations will have on us during fiscal 2007.

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, contingent assets and liabilities, and revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. The policies discussed below are considered by management to be critical because they are not only important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations but also because application and interpretation of these policies requires both judgment and estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain and unknown. As a result, actual results may differ materially from our estimates.

We generate revenue from the sale of our products, including interactive software licensed from third party developers. We recognize revenue based on the applicable provisions of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, “Revenue Recognition” and on the criteria set forth in Statement of Position 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition.” Accordingly, we recognize revenue when each of the following have occurred (1) there is persuasive evidence that an arrangement with our customer exists, which is generally a customer purchase order, (2) the products are delivered, which occurs when the products are shipped and risk of loss has been transferred to the customer, (3) the selling price is fixed or determinable and (4) collection of the customer receivable is deemed probable. Our payment arrangements with customers typically provide net 30 and 60-day terms.

Revenues from sales to authorized resellers are subject to terms allowing price protection, certain rights of return and allowances for customer marketing programs. Reserves for price protection are recorded when the price protection program is approved. Allowances for estimated future returns and customer marketing programs are provided for upon revenue recognition. Such amounts are estimated and periodically adjusted based on historical and anticipated rates of returns, inventory levels and other factors and are recorded as a reduction of revenue or operating expense in accordance with EITF 01-9.

We record allowances for customer marketing programs, including certain rights of return, price protection, volume-based cash incentives and cooperative advertising. The estimated cost of these programs is accrued as a reduction to revenue or as an operating expense in the period we have sold the product or committed to the program. Significant management judgments and estimates must be used to determine the cost of these programs in any accounting period.

We grant limited rights of return for certain products. Estimates of expected future product returns are based on analyses of historical returns and information regarding inventory levels and the demand and acceptance of our products by the end consumer.

Consistent with industry standards and practices, on a product-by-product basis by customer, we allow price protection credits to be issued to retailers in the event of a subsequent price reduction. In general, price protection refers to the circumstances when we elect to decrease the price of a product as a result of reduction in competitive prices and issue credits to our customers to protect the customers from lower profit margins on their then current inventory of the product. The decision to effect price reductions is influenced by retailer inventory levels, product lifecycle stage, market acceptance, competitive environment and new product introductions. Credits are issued based upon the number of units that customers have on hand at the date of the price reduction. Upon approval of a price protection program, reserves for the estimated amounts to be reimbursed to qualifying customers are established. Reserves are estimated based on analyses of qualified inventories on hand with retailers and distributors.

We enter into cooperative advertising arrangements with many of our customers allowing customers to receive a credit for various advertising programs. The amounts of the credits are based on specific dollar-value programs or a percentage of sales, depending on the terms of the program negotiated with the individual customer. The objective of these programs is to encourage advertising and promotional events to increase sales of our products. Accruals for the estimated costs of these advertising programs are recorded based on the specific negotiations with individual customers in the period in which the revenue is recognized. We regularly evaluate the adequacy of these cooperative advertising program accruals.

We also offer volume rebates to several of our customers and record reserves for such rebates as a reduction of revenue at the time revenue is recognized. Estimates of required reserves are determined based on programs negotiated with the specific customers.

Future market conditions and product transitions may require us to take action to increase customer programs and incentive offerings that could result in incremental reductions to revenue or increased operating expenses at the time the incentive is offered.

We sell our products in the United States and internationally primarily through retailers. We generally do not require any collateral from our customers. However, we seek to control our credit risk through ongoing credit evaluations of our customers’ financial condition and by purchasing credit insurance on European accounts receivable balances.

We regularly evaluate the collectibility of our accounts receivable and we maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts which we believe is adequate. The allowance is based on management’s assessment of the collectibility of specific customer accounts, including their credit worthiness and financial condition, as well as historical experience with bad debts, receivables aging and current economic trends.

Our customer base is highly concentrated and a deterioration of a significant customer’s financial condition, or a decline in the general economic conditions could cause actual write-offs to be materially different from the estimated allowance. As of March 31, 2006, one customer (formerly two customers who merged during the year) represented 40% and another customer represented 17% of total accounts receivable. The customers comprising the eight highest outstanding trade receivable balances accounted for approximately 94% of total accounts receivables as of March 31, 2006. If any of these customer’s receivable balances should be deemed uncollectible, we would have to make adjustments to our allowance for doubtful accounts, which could have an adverse affect on our financial condition and results of operations in the period the adjustments are made.

We value inventories at the lower of cost or market value and we regularly review inventory quantities on hand and in the retail channel in order to recognize any loss of utility in the period incurred.

Software development costs primarily consist of payments made to independent software developers under development agreements. We account for software development costs in accordance with SFAS No. 86, “Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to Be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed,” which provides for the capitalization of certain software development costs incurred after technological feasibility of the software is established or for development costs that have alternative future uses. Under our current practice of developing new products, the technological feasibility of the underlying software is not established until substantially all product development is complete and the first playable version is delivered. The software development costs that have been capitalized to date have been insignificant.

Royalty and license expenses consist of royalties and license fees paid to intellectual property rights holders for use of their trademarks, copyrights, software, technology or other intellectual property or proprietary rights in the development or sale of our products. Royalty payments to independent software developers are payments for the development of intellectual property related to our video game titles.

Royalty-based payments that are paid in advance are generally capitalized and expensed to cost of sales at the greater of the contractual or effective royalty rate based on net product sales. With regard to payments made to independent software developers and co-publishing affiliates, the Company is generally subject to development risk prior to the general release of the product. Accordingly, payments that are due prior to completion of the product are generally expensed as research and development as the services are incurred. Payments due after the general release of the product (primarily royalty-based in nature) are generally expensed as cost of sales at the higher of the contractual or effective royalty rate based on net product sales.

We have recorded goodwill in connection with acquisitions completed in prior periods. SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” prohibits amortization of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives but instead requires testing for impairment at least annually. We review goodwill for impairment as of April 1^st of each fiscal year or when an event or a change in facts and or circumstances indicates the fair value of a reporting unit may be below its carrying amount. We have completed our annual assessment of impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 142, which did not indicate any impairment of goodwill as of March 31, 2006 and 2005.

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2006 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2005

From a geographical perspective, our net sales for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 were as follows (in thousands):

Net sales in fiscal 2006 decreased 10.1% from fiscal 2005. Net sales in the United States decreased $19.3 million over the prior year due primarily to a decline of core product sales (non-licensed control pads and steering wheels) because of slowed demand and competitive pricing, offset by the sale of new licensed products. The net sales decrease in Canada of $0.5 million was primarily due to a decline in core product sales (primarily non-licensed control pads) to existing customers. Net sales in Europe increased $8.4 million due to product expansion within existing customers, software not offered in the prior year and the continued expansion into the French marketplace.

In fiscal 2006 second quarter sales included the launch of the licensed NFL control pads and third quarter sales included the European release of the Real World Golf video game and accessory. In fiscal 2005, third quarter sales included the release of our first published software title, MC Groovz Dance Craze for the Nintendo GameCube and the launch of our Incredibles licensed accessory line and our Nintendo DS accessories.

Gross profit is defined as net sales less cost of sales. Cost of sales consists of product costs, cost of licenses and royalties, cost of freight-in and freight-out and distribution center costs, including depreciation and other overhead.

The following table presents net sales, cost of sales and gross profit for fiscal years ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 (in thousands):

Gross profit in fiscal 2006 decreased 51.4% from fiscal 2005, and gross profit as a percentage of net sales, or gross profit margin, decreased to 13.3% in fiscal 2006 from 24.7% in fiscal 2005. The decrease in gross profit margin was due in part to a $2 million payment in the third quarter of fiscal 2006 for the early termination of a long-term purchase commitment, the write-down of certain United States inventory to market value, including exclusively distributed software and non-core product bundles and price protection on specific products as agreed with certain customers in the United States, inventory adjustments, additional customer discounts granted in an effort to expand our European customer base, competitive pricing and additional product costs due to royalties and licensing.

Operating expenses for fiscal years ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 were as follows (in thousands):

Sales and Marketing Expenses. Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of payroll, commissions, participation at trade shows and travel costs for our worldwide sales and marketing staff, advertising and costs of operating our GameShark.com website. The increase in sales and marketing expenses is primarily due to approximately $1.5 million of additional co-op advertising expense and severance of approximately $200,000 resulting from a reduction in workforce in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006. Other increases in sales and marketing expenses in fiscal 2006 were due to salaries and benefits resulting from additional headcount hired earlier in the fiscal year, increased trade show costs, travel costs and increased costs related to product samples.

General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses include salaries and benefits for our executive and administrative personnel and other expenses, such as facilities costs and professional services, such as legal and accounting. The increase in general and administrative expenses is primarily due to additional legal expenses of approximately $400,000 related to the progression of existing cases and severance of approximately $250,000 resulting from a reduction in workforce in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006. General and administrative expenses in fiscal 2006 also increased due to salaries and benefits related to additional headcount hired earlier the fiscal year, increased travel, increased audit fees associated with the Company’s prior year change in status from a foreign private issuer to a U.S. filer and consulting costs associated with Sarbanes-Oxley compliance.

Research and Development. Research and development expenses include the costs of developing and enhancing new and existing products in addition to the costs of developing software products. The increase in research and development of is primarily a result of an increase in product development costs in support of the first party console changes that began in the fall of calendar 2005, development of new video game titles and increased salaries and travel resulting from additional headcount.

Amortization of Intangible Assets. Amortization of intangible assets results from our acquisition of GameShark in January 2003. Intangible assets with defined useful lives are being amortized over the estimated useful life of the assets ranging from three to seven years.

Interest expense, foreign exchange loss and other income for fiscal years ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 was as follows (in thousands):

Interest expense in fiscal 2006 increased from the prior year due to rising interest rates and higher bank loan balances during the year. The primary reason for the foreign exchange losses in fiscal 2006 and 2005 was the impact of the international sales in Europe and Canada leading to exchange rate exposure from the currency fluctuations against the U.S. dollar during the year. Other income primarily consists of advertising income from our GameShark.com website and royalties paid by an unrelated third party to distribute our products in Australia. The increase in other income is primarily due to increased sales to the unrelated third party distributor.

Income tax expense (benefit) for fiscal years ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 was as follows (in thousands):

The income tax benefit in fiscal 2006 is a result of the annual loss generated by reduced sales and increased costs primarily in the United States. The effective tax rate is a blended rate for different jurisdictions in which the Company operates.

Net income (loss) for fiscal years ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 was as follows (in thousands):

Net loss per share for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 was $0.12, compared to net income per diluted share for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005 of $0.08 ($0.09 per basic share). Net income (loss) per share is calculated using the weighted average number of basic and diluted shares outstanding during the fiscal year, which were 54,244,383 in fiscal 2006, compared to 53,506,289 basic and 54,481,162 diluted shares in fiscal 2005.

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2005 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2004

From a geographical perspective, our net sales for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 were as follows (in thousands):

Net sales in fiscal 2005 increased 9.7% from fiscal 2004. This increase was primarily due to new product introductions of $17.3 million, offset by a decrease of $8.0 million in accessories and other products. Net sales in the United States increased $10.0 million over the prior year due primarily to sales of new controllers of $10.3 million and sales of our first published software title of $2.9 million, offset by a decrease in sales of $3.2 million related to game enhancement software and $2.0 million related to other products, such as Game Boy Advance accessories. Net sales in Canada increased $2.8 million primarily due to sales of new controllers of $1.0 million and additional product sales at a majority of our existing customer base. The net sales increase in Europe of $0.9 million was due to additional product sales of approximately $2.5 million at two existing customers, offset by the loss of revenue due to console shortages and lower holiday sales at one existing customer. The net sales decrease in other countries was due to non-recurring OEM sales in the second and third quarters of fiscal 2004.

In fiscal 2005, third quarter sales included the release of our first published software title, MC Groovz Dance Craze for the Nintendo GameCube and the launch of our Incredibles licensed accessory line and our Nintendo DS accessories. In fiscal 2004, first quarter sales included the launch of the GameShark line of products, followed in the second quarter by new product sales to Microsoft of the music mixer microphone and slower sales in the third and fourth quarters, consistent with slower industry results.

The following table presents net sales, cost of sales and gross profit for fiscal years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 (in thousands):

Gross profit in fiscal 2005 increased 23.8% from fiscal 2004 while gross profit as a percentage of net sales, or gross profit margin, increased from 21.9% in fiscal 2004 to 24.7% in fiscal 2005. The increase in gross profit and margin is due to the addition of software and licensed products, which have higher average selling prices and margins than our other products, as well as improved manufacturing costs and lower freight costs in fiscal 2005.

Operating expenses for fiscal years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 were as follows (in thousands):

Sales and Marketing Expenses. Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of payroll, commissions, participation at trade shows and travel costs for our worldwide sales and marketing staff, advertising and costs of operating our GameShark.com website. The decrease in sales and marketing expenses is primarily due to reduction in costs of operating our GameShark.com website due to bringing the hosting in-house, reduction in costs related to the E3 trade show and decreased cooperative advertising by customers during fiscal 2005.

Research and Development. Research and development expenses include the costs of developing and enhancing new and existing products in addition to the costs of developing software products. The decrease in research and development expenses is primarily a result of reduced product enhancement research due to the impending new console releases and the utilization of external software developers for the development of our first software product.

Interest expense, foreign exchange gain (loss) and other income for fiscal years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 was as follows (in thousands):

The decrease in interest expense is attributed to lower bank loan balances during fiscal 2005. The primary reason for the foreign exchange loss in fiscal 2005 was the impact of the international sales in Europe and Canada leading to exchange rate exposure from the currency fluctuations against the U.S. dollar during the year. Other income primarily consists of advertising income from our GameShark.com website and royalties paid by an unrelated third party to distribute our products in Australia. The increase in other income is primarily due to increased advertising income on the GameShark.com website.

Income tax expense for fiscal years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 was as follows (in thousands):

Income tax expense increased due to the increase in income generated by increased sales and reduced costs primarily in the United States. The effective tax rate is a blended rate for different jurisdictions in which the Company operates.

Net income for fiscal years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 was as follows (in thousands):

Net income in fiscal 2005 was increased primarily due to the reasons discussed above. Net income per diluted share for the fiscal year ended 2005 was $0.08 ($0.09 per basic share), compared to basic and diluted net income per share of $0.02 for the fiscal year ended 2004. Net income per share is calculated using the weighted average number of basic and diluted shares outstanding during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005, which were 53,506,289 basic and 54,481,162 diluted shares, compared to 53,286,248 basic and 53,983,127 diluted shares during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004.

In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs—an Amendment of ARB 43, Chapter 4,” to provide clarification that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material be recognized as current-period charges. In addition, SFAS No. 151 requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. The provisions of this standard are effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 151 to have a material impact on our operating results or financial condition.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, “Exchange of Non-monetary Assets—an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29.” SFAS No. 153 amends APB No. 29, “Accounting for Non-monetary Transactions” to eliminate the exception for non-monetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of non-monetary assets that do not have commercial substance. SFAS No. 153 is effective for non-monetary exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 153 to have a material impact on our operating results or financial condition.

In March 2005, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 47 (“FIN 47”), “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143.” FIN 47 requires the recognition of a

liability for the fair value of a legally-required conditional asset retirement obligation when incurred, if the liability’s fair value can be reasonably estimated. FIN 47 also clarifies when an entity would have sufficient information to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation. FIN 47 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. The adoption of FIN 47 did not impact our operating results or financial condition.

In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No.154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections,” which replaces APB Opinion No.20, “Accounting Changes,” and supersedes FASB Statement No.3, “Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements—an amendment of APB Opinion No. 28.” SFAS No.154 requires retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements of changes in accounting principle, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. When it is impracticable to determine the period-specific effects of an accounting change on one or more individual prior periods presented, SFAS No.154 requires that the new accounting principle be applied to the balances of assets and liabilities as of the beginning of the earliest period for which retrospective application is practicable and that a corresponding adjustment be made to the opening balance of retained earnings for that period rather than being reported in an income statement. When it is impracticable to determine the cumulative effect of applying a change in accounting principle to all prior periods, SFAS No.154 requires that the new accounting principle be applied as if it were adopted prospectively from the earliest date practicable. SFAS No.154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No.154 to have a material impact on our operating results or financial condition.

At March 31, 2006, available cash was approximately $1.6 million compared to cash of approximately $1.1 million at March 31, 2005. Over the last two fiscal years, our primary sources of liquidity have included a revolving line of credit (as discussed below under Cash Flows from Financing Activities), cash on hand at the beginning of the year and cash flows generated from operations. In the prior year, we also generated cash flows from the issuance of our common stock to employees through the exercise of options.

Our cash flows from operating activities have typically included the collection of customer receivables generated by the sale of our products, offset by payments to vendors for materials and manufacture of our products. For the year ended March 31, 2006, cash flows from operating activities were $6.6 million compared to $3.8 million for the year ended March 31, 2005. The principal components comprising cash flows from operating activities for fiscal 2006 included a decrease in accounts receivable, other receivables and inventories, and increases in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, partially offset by increases in income taxes receivable.

During the two most recent fiscal years, investing activities have consisted of capital expenditures to support our operations. Cash used in investing activities was $1.7 million in fiscal 2006 and $1.4 million in fiscal 2005.

Cash used in financing activities during fiscal 2006 and 2005 was a result of repayments of our line of credit, offset in part by proceeds from the issuance of our common stock upon the exercise of stock options in fiscal 2005. For the year ended March 31, 2006, cash used in financing activities was $3.5 million compared to $2.5 million in fiscal 2005. We are focused on effectively managing our overall liquidity position by continuously monitoring expenses and managing our accounts receivable collection efforts.

We maintain a Credit Facility (the “Credit Facility”) with Wachovia Capital Finance Corporation (Central) (“Wachovia”), which allows us to borrow up to $35 million under a revolving line of credit, subject to the availability of eligible collateral (accounts receivable and inventory), which changes throughout the year. The line of credit accrues interest on the daily outstanding balance at the U.S. prime rate plus 0.25% per annum, and must be repaid in United States dollars. In addition, the Company is required to pay a monthly service fee of $2,000 and an unused line fee equal to 0.25%. The Credit Facility is secured by a first priority security interest in MCI’s inventories, equipment, accounts receivable and investment properties and a pledge in favor of Wachovia of all of the shares of capital stock of our subsidiaries. The Credit Facility is guaranteed by the Company and requires us to adhere to specified financial operating guidelines. See Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

The Credit Facility is scheduled to expire on September 25, 2006 and will automatically renew for an additional one-year period unless either party gives written notice to the other party seeking to terminate the Credit Facility at least 60 days prior to the expiration date. Although Wachovia agreed to extend the expiration date of the Credit Facility in each of our last two fiscal years, we do not know the likelihood that they will agree to further extend the expiration of the Credit Facility following September 25, 2006. If Wachovia is unwilling to extend the expiration of the Credit Facility beyond September 25, 2006 on terms acceptable to us, or if we are unable to comply with the restrictive and financial covenants contained in the Credit Facility, Wachovia may declare the outstanding borrowings under the facility immediately due and payable. In such an event, our liquidity will be materially adversely affected, which could in turn have a material adverse impact on our future financial position and results of operations. We expect to renew or obtain new financing in the ordinary course of business.

We also established a separate credit line under the Credit Facility of $10.0 million, which may be utilized, with Wachovia’s consent, for acquisitions. To date, we have not drawn against this line of credit.

At March 31, 2006 the outstanding balance on our line of credit was $8.6 million and our weighted average annual interest rate during fiscal 2006 was 7.3%. We must meet an adjusted tangible net worth covenant to access the line of credit. At March 31, 2006, we were in compliance with this loan covenant.

We believe that our available cash balances, anticipated cash flows from operations and available line of credit will be sufficient to satisfy our operating needs for at least the next twelve months. However, we operate in a rapidly evolving and often unpredictable business environment that may change the timing or amount of expected future cash receipts and expenditures. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we may not be required to raise additional funds through the sale of equity or debt securities or from additional credit facilities. Additional capital, if needed, may not be available on satisfactory terms, if at all. Furthermore, additional debt financing may contain more restrictive covenants than our existing debt.

As of March 31, 2006 and 2005, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial parties, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. As such, we are not exposed to any financing, liquidity, market, or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in such relationships.

Market risk is the potential loss arising from changes in market rates and market prices. Our market risk exposure results primarily from fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and interest rates. Our views on market risk are not necessarily indicative of actual results that may occur and do not represent the maximum possible gains and losses that may occur, since actual gains and losses will differ from those estimated, based upon actual fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates and the timing of transactions.

A majority of our international business is presently conducted in currencies other than the U.S. dollar and may be exposed to financial market risk resulting from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, particularly the CNY, the Pound Sterling, the Euro and the Canadian dollar. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses arising from normal business operations are credited to or charged against earnings in the period incurred. As a result, fluctuations in the value of the currencies in which we conduct our business relative to the U.S. dollar will cause currency transaction gains and losses, which we have experienced in the past and continue to experience. Due to the difficulty in determining and obtaining predictable cash flow forecasts in our foreign operations based on the overall challenging economic environment and associated contract structures, we do not currently utilize any derivative financial instruments to hedge foreign currency risks. The volatility of the CNY, the Pound Sterling, the Euro and the Canadian dollar (and any other applicable currencies) will be monitored frequently throughout the coming year. If appropriate, we may enter into hedging transactions in order to mitigate our risk from foreign currency fluctuations. Due to the substantial volatility of currency exchange rates, among other factors, we cannot predict the effect of exchange rate fluctuations upon future operating results. There can be no assurances that we will not experience currency losses in the future. We estimate that an immediate 10% change in foreign exchange rates would not materially impact reported results of operations for the year ended March 31, 2006. This was estimated using a 10% deterioration factor to the average monthly exchange rates applied to net income or loss for each of the related subsidiaries in the respective period.

We are exposed to interest rate risk on borrowings under the Credit Facility. Funds advanced to us pursuant to the Credit Facility bear interest at the U.S. prime rate plus 0.25%. We do not hedge our exposures to interest rate risk. We estimate that an increase of 100 basis points in the interest rate under our Credit Facility would not materially impact reported results of operations for the year ended March 31, 2006.

The Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data required by this Item, together with the reports of our independent registered public accounting firm, are set forth at the pages indicated on the Index to the Financial Statements on Page F-l included in Item 15 of this report.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

As required by Securities and Exchange Commission Rules 13a-15(a) and 13a-15(e), we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (who is also the Chief Accounting Officer), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

There has been no change in our internal controls over financial reporting during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal controls over financial reporting.

Certain information with respect to the executive officers of the Company is set forth in the section entitled “Executive Officers of the Registrant” in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The information required by this item with respect to the directors of the Company is incorporated herein by reference to the information under the caption “Election of Directors” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” contained in the Company’s Management Proxy Circular for the Company’s 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Proxy Statement”).

We have adopted and maintain a code of business conduct and ethics that all executive officers and management employees must review and abide by (including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer), which we refer to as our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on our website at http://www.madcatz.com in the Investor Information section under the heading “Corporate Governance.”

The information required by Item 11 is incorporated herein by reference to the information in the Proxy Statement under the caption “Executive Compensation” specifically excluding the “Report of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors on Executive Compensation.”

The information required by Item 12 is incorporated herein by reference to the information in the Proxy Statement under the captions “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information.”

The information required by Item 13 is incorporated herein by reference to the information in the Proxy Statement under the caption “Certain Transactions.”

The information required by Item 14 is incorporated herein by reference to the information in the Proxy Statement under the caption “Principal Accountant Fees and Services.”

The financial statements of the Company are included herein as required under Item 8 of this report. See Index to Financial Statements on page F-1.

Years ended March 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004—Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

Schedules not listed above have been omitted because information required to be set forth therein is not applicable or is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


MAD CATZ INTERACTIVE INT.

By:		/S/ DARREN RICHARDSON
		Darren Richardson President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Mad Catz Interactive, Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2006 and 2005 and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2006. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we have also audited financial statement Schedule II. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits. We did not audit the financial statements of Mad Catz Europe, Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary, which statements reflect total assets constituting 10 percent and total revenues constituting 19 percent in 2006, of the related consolidated totals. Those statements were audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it related to the 2006 amounts included for Mad Catz Europe, Limited, is based solely on the report of the other auditors.

In our opinion, based on our audits and the report of other auditors, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Mad Catz Interactive, Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2006 and 2005 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2006 in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement Schedule II, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Mad Catz Europe Limited as of March 31, 2006 and 2005 and the related statements of income for each of the 2 years in the period ended March 31, 2006. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Mad Catz Europe Limited at March 31, 2006 and 2005, and the results of its operations for each of the 2 years in the period ended March 31, 2006, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United Kingdom.

Mad Catz Interactive, Inc. (the “Company”) is a corporation incorporated under the Canada Business Corporations Act. The Company has the following operating subsidiaries: (i) Mad Catz, Inc. (“MCI”), a corporation incorporated under the laws of Delaware that acts as the Company’s primary subsidiary (ii) 1328158 Ontario Inc. (“MCC”), a corporation incorporated under the laws of Canada that sells the Company’s Mad Catz and GameShark product lines in Canada under the name Mad Catz Canada (iii) Mad Catz Europe, Limited (“MCE”), a corporation incorporated under the laws of England and Wales that sells the Company’s Mad Catz product lines in Europe. The Company also beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, all of the issued and outstanding shares of Mad Catz Interactive Asia Limited (“MCIA”), a corporation incorporated under the laws of Hong Kong that provides procurement services related to the manufacture of Mad Catz products. The Company also beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, all of the issued and outstanding shares of the following companies that are currently inactive: FX Unlimited Inc., a corporation incorporated under the laws of Delaware, Mad Catz (Asia) Limited, a corporation incorporated under the laws of Hong Kong, Xencet USA, Inc., a corporation incorporated under the laws of Delaware, Singapore Holdings Inc., a corporation incorporated under the laws of Delaware and Mad Catz Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales.

The Company’s products are designed, manufactured (primarily through third parties), marketed and distributed for all major console based video game systems. The Company’s products include video game accessories of all types, such as control pads, steering wheels, joysticks, memory cards, video cables, light guns, dance pads, microphones, car adapters and carry cases. The Company also markets game enhancement software, distributes video game software and publishes video game titles.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the year. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Credit risk is primarily concentrated in accounts receivable. The Company generally does not require collateral on accounts receivable because a majority of its customers are large, well capitalized, established retail entities with operations throughout the United States, Canada and Europe. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts. For the year ended March 31, 2006 sales to the three largest customers constituted 52% of gross sales and represented 64% of accounts receivable at March 31, 2006. For the year ended March 31, 2005 sales to the three largest customers constituted 47% of gross sales and represented 60% of accounts receivable at March 31, 2005. Accounts receivable balances generally are in proportion to the net sales percentages for the Company’s largest customers.

The carrying values of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash, accounts receivable, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair values due to the short maturity of these instruments. The carrying value of the bank loan approximates its fair value as the interest rate and other terms are that which is currently available to the Company.

The Company evaluates the recognition of revenue based on the applicable provisions of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, “Revenue Recognition” and on the criteria set forth in Statement of Position 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition.” Accordingly, the Company recognizes revenue when (1) there is persuasive evidence that an arrangement with the customer exists, which is generally a customer purchase order, (2) the products are delivered, which occurs when the products are shipped and risk of loss has been transferred to the customer, (3) the selling price is fixed or determinable and (4) collection of the customer receivable is deemed probable. Our payment arrangements with customers typically provide net 30 and 60-day terms.

Revenues from sales to authorized resellers are subject to terms allowing price protection, certain rights of return and allowances for volume rebates and cooperative advertising. Allowances for price protection are recorded when the price protection program is approved. Allowances for estimated future returns, cooperative advertising and volume rebates are provided for upon recognition of revenue. Such amounts are estimated and periodically adjusted based on historical and anticipated rates of returns, inventory levels and other factors and are recorded as operating expenses or as a reduction of sales in accordance with EITF 01-9.

Accounts receivable are recorded net of an allowance for doubtful accounts and other allowances. When evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts, the Company analyzes known uncollectible accounts, the aging of accounts receivable, historical bad debts, customer credit-worthiness and current economic trends.

Other allowances include those for sales returns, price protection, volume rebates and cooperative advertising. When estimating future product returns, the Company makes an assessment of the rate by which customers will return the Company’s products by considering historical trends and information regarding inventory levels and demand and acceptance of the Company’s products by the end consumer. Allowances for price protection, cooperative advertising and volume rebates are based upon programs negotiated with specific customers.

Raw materials, packaging materials and accessories are valued at the lower of cost, determined by the first-in, first-out method, or market. Finished goods are valued at the lower of cost or market, with cost being determined on an average cost basis using the first-in, first-out method. The Company regularly reviews inventory quantities on hand and in the retail channel in order to recognize any loss of utility in the period incurred.

Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Property and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:

Intangible assets are stated at cost less accumulated amortization and are amortized over the estimated useful lives of the assets on a straight-line basis.

The Company has recorded goodwill in connection with the acquisitions it has completed in prior periods. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” prohibits amortization of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives but instead requires testing for impairment at least annually. The Company reviews its goodwill for impairment as of April 1^st of each fiscal year or when an event or a change in facts and or circumstances indicates the fair value of a reporting unit may be below its carrying amount. The Company has completed its annual assessment of impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 142, which did not indicate any impairment of goodwill as of March 31, 2006 and 2005.

In accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” long-lived assets, such as property and equipment and purchased intangibles subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Assets to be disposed of would be separately presented in the balance sheet and reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell, and are no longer depreciated. The assets and liabilities of a disposal group classified as held for sale would be presented separately in the appropriate asset and liability sections of the balance sheet.

Software development costs primarily consist of payments made to independent software developers under development agreements. The Company accounts for software development costs in accordance with SFAS No. 86, “Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to Be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed,” which provides for the capitalization of certain software development costs incurred after technological feasibility of the software is established or for development costs that have alternative future uses. Under the Company’s current practice of developing new products, the technological feasibility of the underlying software is not established until substantially all product development is complete and the first playable version is delivered. Software development costs of approximately $215,000 are included in other current assets as of March 31, 2006 and will be amortized over the estimated lives of the products, beginning when the products are released for sale.

Royalty and license expenses consist of royalties and license fees paid to intellectual property rights holders for use of their trademarks, copyrights, software, technology or other intellectual property or proprietary rights in the development or sale of our products. Royalty-based payments that are paid in advance are generally capitalized and expensed to cost of sales at the greater of the contractual or effective royalty rate based on net product sales.

Royalty payments to independent software developers and co-publishing affiliates are payments for the development of intellectual property related to the Company’s video game titles. Payments made prior to the establishment of technological feasibility are expensed as research and development. Once technological feasibility has been established, payments made are capitalized and amortized upon release of the product. Additional royalty payments due after the general release of the product are typically expensed as cost of sales at the higher of the contractual or effective royalty rate based on net product sales.

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and amounted to $5,836,000, $4,385,000 and $5,046,000 in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Cooperative advertising with distributors and retailers is recorded when revenue is recognized and such amounts are included in sales and marketing expense if there is a separate identifiable benefit with an estimable fair value. Otherwise, such costs are recognized as a reduction of sales.

Income taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability method. Under the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and tax basis of assets and liabilities and for tax loss carryforwards.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. To the extent that it is not “more likely than not” that a deferred tax asset will be realized, a valuation allowance is provided. Significant management judgment is required in assessing the realizability of the Company’s deferred tax assets. In performing this assessment, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon generation of future taxable income in each tax jurisdiction during the periods in which the temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment.

For each of the Company’s foreign operating subsidiaries the functional currency is its local currency. Assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated into U.S. dollars using month-end exchange rates, and revenue and expenses are translated into U.S. dollars using monthly average exchange rates. The effects of foreign currency translation adjustments are included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in shareholders’ equity.

Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are a result of the effect of exchange rate changes on transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency.

Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net income for the period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income for the period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, increased by potentially dilutive securities. Potentially dilutive securities are calculated using the treasury stock method and represent incremental shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options. However, potentially dilutive securities are not included in the denominator of the diluted earnings per share calculation when inclusion of such shares would be anti-dilutive.

The following table sets forth the computation of diluted weighted average common and potential common shares outstanding for the years ended March 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004:

Because the Company incurred a loss for the year ended March 31, 2006, the effect of dilutive securities totaling 289,949 shares have been excluded from the loss per share computation as their impact would be antidilutive. As of March 31, 2005 and 2004, options to purchase 300,651 and 850,651 shares of common stock, respectively, were outstanding but were not included in the computation of diluted net income per share, as the effect would be antidilutive.

The Company accounts for its employee stock option plan using the intrinsic value method under the recognition and measurement principles of APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” Accordingly, compensation cost for stock options issued to employees is measured as the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of the Company’s stock at the date of the grant over the exercise price of the underlying stock options. Had compensation expense for these plans been determined based on the fair value of the awards at the grant date, consistent with the methodology prescribed under SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” the Company would have recorded net income (loss) and basic and diluted net income (loss) per share for the years ended March 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 as follows (in thousands):

The pro forma effect on net income (loss) as shown above is not necessarily indicative of potential effects on results for future years. No options were granted during fiscal 2006. The weighted average estimated fair value of employee stock options granted during fiscal 2005 ranged from $0.44 to $0.45 and the weighted average estimated fair value of employee stock options granted during fiscal 2004 ranged from $0.42 to $0.78. The fair value of the options was calculated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions for the years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004: no dividend yield, volatility of 79% and 73% in fiscal 2005 and 2004, respectively; risk-free interest rates ranging from 2.9% to 4.0% for fiscal 2005 and 2.6% to 3.2% for fiscal 2004; and an expected life of three years. For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the options is amortized to expense over the options’ vesting periods.

On December 16, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), or SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” which is a revision of SFAS No. 123. SFAS No. 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, and amends SFAS No. 95, “Statement of Cash Flows.” Generally, the approach in SFAS No. 123(R) is similar to the approach described in SFAS No. 123. However, SFAS No. 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values and pro forma disclosure will no longer be an alternative. SFAS No. 123(R) is required to be implemented no later than the first interim period beginning after December 15, 2005. The Company is required to adopt SFAS No. 123(R) effective in its fiscal quarter beginning April 1, 2006. The Company has not determined the number of options, if any, that will be granted during fiscal 2007 and therefore, the impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) will have on the Company’s results of operations cannot be determined at this time. The impact of the adoption of this statement for options granted prior to March 31, 2006 will not be material.

SFAS No. 130, “Reporting Comprehensive Income,” requires classification of other comprehensive income in a financial statement and display of other comprehensive income separately from retained earnings and additional paid-in capital. Other comprehensive income consists of primarily foreign currency translation adjustments.

In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs—an Amendment of ARB 43, Chapter 4,” to provide clarification that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material be recognized as current-period charges. In addition, SFAS No. 151 requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. The provisions of this standard are effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 151 to have a material impact on its operating results or financial condition.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, “Exchange of Non-monetary Assets—an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29.” SFAS No. 153 amends APB No. 29, “Accounting for Non-monetary Transactions” to eliminate the exception for non-monetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of non-monetary assets that do not have commercial substance. SFAS No. 153 is effective for non-monetary exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 153 to have a material impact on its operating results or financial condition.

liability for the fair value of a legally-required conditional asset retirement obligation when incurred, if the liability’s fair value can be reasonably estimated. FIN 47 also clarifies when an entity would have sufficient information to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation. FIN 47 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. The adoption of FIN 47 did not have any impact on the Company’s operating results or financial condition.

In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No.154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections,” which replaces APB Opinion No. 20, “Accounting Changes,” and supersedes FASB Statement No. 3, “Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements—an amendment of APB Opinion No. 28.” SFAS No.154 requires retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements of changes in accounting principle, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. When it is impracticable to determine the period-specific effects of an accounting change on one or more individual prior periods presented, SFAS No.154 requires that the new accounting principle be applied to the balances of assets and liabilities as of the beginning of the earliest period for which retrospective application is practicable and that a corresponding adjustment be made to the opening balance of retained earnings for that period rather than being reported in an income statement. When it is impracticable to determine the cumulative effect of applying a change in accounting principle to all prior periods, SFAS No.154 requires that the new accounting principle be applied as if it were adopted prospectively from the earliest date practicable. SFAS No.154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No.154 to have a material impact on its operating results or financial condition.

Depreciation and amortization expense totaled $1,100,000, $1,048,000, and $1,027,000 for the years ended March 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

In January 2003, the Company acquired the rights to the GameShark brand, intellectual property, and the www.gameshark.com web site from InterAct, a subsidiary of Recoton Corporation, for total cash consideration of $5,083,000. GameShark is an industry leader in video game enhancement software, which enables players to take full advantage of the secret codes, short cuts, hints and cheats incorporated by video game publishers into their game offerings. In connection with the GameShark acquisition, the Company entered into a five-year technology agreement with Fire International, Ltd. (“Fire”) to implement Fire’s technology in the GameShark brand of video game enhancements. The amounts of the intangible assets and their respective useful lives were determined based upon the allocation of the purchase price to the various categories of intellectual property as determined by an independent external valuation analysis completed in May 2003. In addition, the Company considered the eight year history of the GameShark brand prior to its acquisition and the lifecycle and installed base of the console systems on which GameShark products can be used. The acquired intangible assets are summarized as follows (in thousands):

For each of the years ended March 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, annual amortization of $804,000 was recorded with respect to these assets.

The Company has a Credit Facility with Wachovia Capital Finance Corporation (Central) (“Wachovia”), formerly Congress Financial Corporation (Central) to borrow up to $35 million under a revolving line of credit subject to the availability of eligible collateral (accounts receivable and inventory), which changes throughout the year. The line of credit accrues interest on the daily outstanding balance at the U.S. prime rate plus 0.25% per annum, and must be repaid in U.S. dollars. The interest rate at March 31, 2006 was 7.75%. In addition, the Company is required to pay a monthly service fee of $2,000 and an unused line fee equal to 0.25%. The Credit Facility is secured by a first priority interest in MCI’s inventories, equipment, accounts receivable and investment properties and by a pledge of all of the capital stock of Mad Catz’ subsidiaries and is guaranteed by the Company. The Company is required under the Credit Facility to meet a monthly consolidated tangible net worth covenant.

The Company has also been granted an additional $10 million line of credit from Wachovia to be used for acquisition purposes under the same conditions and terms as the lines of credit described above. At March 31, 2006, no portion of this line was outstanding.

The Credit Facility with Wachovia is scheduled to expire on September 25, 2006. The Credit Facility will automatically renew for an additional one-year period unless either party gives written notice to the other party

seeking to terminate the Credit Facility at least 60 days prior to the expiration date. Although Wachovia agreed to extend the expiration date of the Credit Facility in each of our last two fiscal years, the Company does not know the likelihood that Wachovia will agree to further extend the expiration of the Credit Facility following September 25, 2006. The Company expects to renew or obtain financing in the ordinary course of business.

Under the Company’s stock option plan (the “Plan”), options are granted to purchase shares of common stock and are exercisable over a period of up to five years. Director’s options vest immediately and other options generally vest over a period of two years with one-third vesting immediately. The Company has authorized 6,000,000 shares of common stock to be issued pursuant to options granted under the Plan. The Company’s options are denominated in Canadian dollars. For convenience, per share amounts stated below have been translated to U.S. dollars at the rate of exchange in effect at the balance sheet date.

The following director, officer, and employee stock options have been granted and are outstanding under the Plan:

The following summarizes information about stock options outstanding as of March 31, 2006:

At March 31, 2006, 3,926,123 shares of common stock are reserved for issuance under the Plan and 1,826,790 options are available for future grant.

Domestic and foreign income (loss) before income taxes and details of income tax expense (benefit) are as follows (amounts in thousands):

The difference between reported income tax expense (benefit) and the amount computed by multiplying income (loss) before income taxes by the Company’s applicable Canadian statutory tax rate of approximately 36% is reconciled as follows:

The sources of significant temporary differences that give rise to the deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

MCI has U.S. federal tax losses of approximately $8,224,000, which may be carried forward to reduce future years’ taxable income. These losses expire in 2026. The tax-effected losses are included in deferred tax assets—current and noncurrent.

MCI has U.S. federal Alternative Minimum Tax (“AMT”) credits of approximately $71,000, which may be carried forward to reduce future years’ taxable income. These credits are included in deferred tax assets— noncurrent and have an indefinite carry over period.

MCI also has California state losses of approximately $12,132,000 which may be carried forward to reduce future years’ taxable income. These losses expire in 2017. The tax-effected losses are included in deferred tax assets—current and noncurrent.

The valuation allowance for deferred tax assets as of March 31, 2006 and 2005 was $15,934,000 and $15,186,000, respectively. The net change in the total valuation allowance for the year ended March 31, 2006 was an increase of $748,000. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income in each tax jurisdiction during the periods in which temporary differences in those jurisdictions become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment.

The valuation allowance is entirely attributable to deferred tax assets of Mad Catz Interactive, Inc. (“MCII”), the Canadian holding company, and its Canadian subsidiary, MCC. The components of the valuation allowance are as follows:

MCII is a corporate entity, which has no revenue or other income, and incurs corporate-related expenses. Taxable losses are incurred each year and MCII has a history of operating losses. MCC is a sales office, which generated a minimal pre-tax book income in the current year, but has a history of losses in prior years, and is projected to generate minimal taxable income in future years. These circumstances are not anticipated to change and therefore we do not expect MCII or MCC to generate sufficient taxable income in the foreseeable future to enable either entity to utilize the tax loss carryforwards. Consequently, the realization of the deferred tax assets of MCII and MCC is unlikely, and as a result, valuation allowances are required.

The total capital and non-capital income tax losses of MCII and MCC as of March 31, 2006 of $13,996,000 included within the amount of the deferred tax assets—noncurrent, is based upon the total tax loss carry forward amount in Canadian dollars of Cdn. $45,227,000, translated into U.S. dollars at the March 31, 2006 exchange rate (1 Canadian Dollar = 0.85677 U.S. Dollar) and tax-effected at a 36.12% estimated rate.

MCII has non-capital income tax losses of approximately Cdn. $20,568,000, which may be carried forward to reduce future years’ taxable income. These losses expire as follows (in thousands):

MCC has non-capital income tax losses of approximately Cdn. $21,507,000, which may be carried forward to reduce future years’ taxable income. These losses expire as follows (in thousands):

MCII also has the following net capital tax losses of approximately Cdn. $3,152,000 (U.S. $2,700,000), which are available indefinitely to offset capital gains (in thousands):

MCII does not record deferred income taxes on the undistributed earnings of its non-Canadian subsidiaries based upon the Company’s intention to permanently reinvest undistributed earnings. MCII may be subject to income and withholding taxes if earnings of the non-Canadian subsidiaries were distributed.

The Company is obligated under certain non-cancelable operating leases, primarily for warehouses and office space. Rent expense for operating leases was approximately $1,159,000, $1,033,000 and $1,045,000 for the years ended March 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Annual future minimum rental payments required under operating leases as of March 31, 2006 are as follows (in thousands):

The Company has license agreements to utilize existing design and utility technology with its products. The Company also has royalty agreements for use of licensed trademarks and celebrity endorsements. These agreements have royalty and license fees based on different percentages of certain types of sales or a predetermined amount per unit. Royalty and license expenses were $2,802,000, $2,376,000 and $1,830,000 for the years ended March 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The minimum amount due under royalty and license agreements for fiscal year 2007 is approximately $1,608,000.

The Company had a five-year agreement with Fire under which the Company was required to purchase a minimum of $5 million of products per fiscal year, through March 31, 2008. Although the Company met the minimum purchase requirement during the first year of the agreement, the Company did not purchase the required $5 million dollars of product during fiscal 2005. On February 1, 2005, the Company entered into an agreement with the vendor providing that the minimum purchase requirement for the period from April 1, 2004 until March 31, 2005 would be waived for that year and deferred and made part of the minimum purchase requirement for the period from April 1, 2005 until March 31, 2006. On December 2, 2005, the Company entered a fourth amending agreement with Fire under which the minimum purchase requirement was eliminated in exchange for a $2,000,000 cash payment.

On February 10, 2003, Electro Source filed a complaint against MCI, and Fire, as well as other defendants, in the Superior Court in Los Angeles County, California entitled, Electro Source, LLC v. Fire International, Ltd., et al., Case No. BC 290076. On or about November 18, 2003, Electro Source amended its complaint to add Mad Catz Interactive, Inc. as a defendant. In its amended complaint, Electro Source asserted claims against the Company and MCI alleging misappropriation of trade secrets, conspiracy to defraud, interference with contractual relationship and interference with prospective economic advantage in connection with Fire’s agreement to supply MCI with product to be marketed under the Company’s GameShark brand and for the termination of Fire’s alleged prior business relationship with Electro Source.

refused to enter the temporary restraining order. The parties have engaged in written and oral discovery, including depositions. On February 17, 2005, MCI filed a cross-complaint against Electro Source alleging false advertising, state and federal unfair competition, libel per se, and trade libel arising out of certain advertisements and internet statements. Discovery is proceeding on the cross-complaint. On July 29, 2005, the Court denied the Company’s motions for summary judgment, and on August 26, 2005, the Court denied the Company’s motion for summary adjudication as to the plaintiff’s claim for intentional interference with contract. Trial in this matter commenced on May 15, 2006 and closing arguments were completed on June 9, 2006. On June 19, 2006, the jury rendered a verdict on MCI’s cross-complaint finding that the advertisement and other statements in question did not satisfy the legal elements of defamation. On June 21, 2006, the jury rendered a verdict finding that MCI was not liable for any alleged misappropriation of trade secrets. On June 23, 2006 the jury rendered a verdict finding that MCI was not liable for conspiracy to defraud or intentional interference with prospective economic advantage. The only remaining claim left against MCI is a claim for interference with contract, which claim could not be decided because the jury deadlocked on the issue of whether there was a contract between Fire and Electro Source. The judge declared a mistrial with respect to this breach of claim against Fire. A status conference has been set for July 25, 2006 to discuss, among other things, post trial motions and motions for new trial. Unless there is a settlement on the breach of contract claim against Fire and the intentional interference with contract claim against MCI, a new trial will be ordered on those issues at some point in the future. While the Company intends to vigorously defend this matter, there can be no guarantee that it will ultimately prevail or that damages will not be assessed against it. An adverse determination by the Court or jury could seriously impact the Company’s revenues and its ability to continue to distribute the GameShark products.

On July 14, 2005, the Company was served with a lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the District of Texas, Marshall Division entitled Konami Corporation v. Roxor Games, Inc., Case No. 02-05cv-173. The complaint alleges that the Company’s MC Groovz Dance Craze product violates U.S. patent number 6,410,835. Trial has been set for January 16, 2007. Discovery continues. On January 10, 2006, the Company received a letter from Konami Corporation asserting that Pump It Up:Exceed, which the Company distributes on behalf of Mastiff, LLC, also infringes the claims of the 6,410,835 patent and demanded that the Company cease all sales and offers to sell Pump It Up:Exceed. While the Company intends to vigorously defend the allegations of the complaint and if necessary to seek indemnification from the manufacturers of Pump It Up:Exceed, there can be no guarantee that it will ultimately prevail, that damages will not be assessed against the Company, or that the Company will not be prohibited from producing or marketing certain of its products.

MCI has an employee savings plan that permits eligible participants to make contributions by salary reduction pursuant to section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Company matches 50% of the first 8% of compensation that is contributed by each participating employee to the plan. The Company’s contributions to the plan were $134,000 in fiscal 2006, $114,000 in fiscal 2005 and $96,000 in fiscal 2004.

The Company’s sales are attributed to the following geographic regions (in thousands):

Revenue is attributed to geographic regions based on the location of the customer. During the years ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, three customers individually accounted for at least 10% of the Company’s gross sales, for a combined total of 52% and 47%, respectively, of gross sales. During the year ended March 31, 2004 two customers individually accounted for at least 10% of the Company’s gross sales, for a combined total of 39% of gross sales.

The Company’s property and equipment, goodwill and intangible assets are attributed to the following geographic regions (in thousands):

(13) Differences Between Accounting Principles Generally Accepted in the United States and in Canada

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. In certain respects, U.S. GAAP differs from Canadian GAAP. Reconciliation of net income determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP to net income determined under Canadian GAAP follows (in thousands):

The areas of material difference between United States and Canadian GAAP and their impact on the consolidated financial statements of the Company are described below.

Under U.S. GAAP, the Company accounts for its stock-based employee compensation plan using the intrinsic value method under the recognition and measurement principles of APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related Interpretations. For purposes of Canadian GAAP, under the transitional provisions of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA) Handbook Section 3870

(Section 3870), “Stock-based Compensation and Other Stock-based Payments,” the Company would have adopted the fair value method of accounting for stock options on a retroactive basis, with prior periods restated.

Under U.S. GAAP, the Company measures compensation using the intrinsic value method as specified by Accounting Principles Board Opinion 25. In September 2001, upon approval by the shareholders of the Company, an aggregate of 912,000 options with exercise prices ranging from Cdn. $0.94 to Cdn. $3.25 were repriced to Cdn. $0.84. An additional 100,000 options at Cdn. $2.00 were repriced to Cdn. $0.90. At March 31, 2006, all of the repriced options had been exercised or cancelled. At March 31, 2005 and 2004, the number of repriced options that had not been exercised or cancelled totaled 21,000 and 401,000, respectively. Under U.S. GAAP, subsequent to the repricing, these options are considered variable. Based on the March 31, 2005 and 2004 share prices, the Company reduced previously recorded expense by $12,000 and $16,000 in fiscal 2005 and 2004, respectively (initial expense of $517,000 was recognized for the year ended March 31, 2002), related to the repricing of the above noted options. Under Canadian GAAP there is no compensation expense recorded for the stock option repricing.

Under U.S. GAAP, the Company allocates depreciation and amortization expense related to property and equipment to cost of sales, sales and marketing, general and administrative and research and development expenses. Under Canadian GAAP, the Company presented depreciation and amortization, together with amortization of intangible assets, as a separate expense line item.


Canada		Not Applicable
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
7480 Mission Valley Road, Suite 101 San Diego, California		92108
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)


Title of each class		Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, no par value		American Stock Exchange Toronto Stock Exchange


		American Stock Exchange (U.S. $)				Toronto Stock Exchange (Canadian $)
		High		Low		High		Low
Fiscal 2006

	Fourth Quarter	$	0.79	$	0.51	$	0.91	$	0.57

	Third Quarter		0.99		0.64		1.18		0.75

	Second Quarter		1.17		0.64		1.44		0.75

	First Quarter		1.73		1.02		2.16		1.25
Fiscal 2005

	Fourth Quarter		1.83		0.81		2.21		0.99

	Third Quarter		0.86		0.49		1.09		0.62

	Second Quarter		0.61		0.43		0.80		0.57

	First Quarter		0.79		0.54		1.04		0.75


	Years Ended March 31,
	(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)
	2006			2005			2004			2003			2002
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
Net sales	$	100,768		$	112,071		$	102,143		$	91,658		$	83,337
Cost of sales		87,343			84,421			79,803			71,467			65,715

Gross profit		13,425			27,650			22,340			20,191			17,622
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing		12,252			10,053			11,166			8,835			7,544
General and administrative		7,915			6,998			6,459			6,160			4,548
Research and development		1,605			897			1,079			936			860
Amortization of intangible assets		804			804			804			36			—
Amortization of goodwill (1)		—			—			—			—			977

Total operating expenses		22,576			18,752			19,508			15,967			13,929

Operating income (loss)		(9,151	)		8,898			2,832			4,224			3,693
Interest expense, net		(1,395	)		(1,203	)		(1,330	)		(1,758	)		(1,232	)
Foreign exchange gain (loss), net		(765	)		(582	)		91			(94	)		61
Other income		484			202			98			47			—

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes		(10,827	)		7,315			1,691			2,419			2,522
Income tax expense (benefit)		(4,174	)		2,733			629			788			1,855

Income (loss) from continuing operations		(6,653	)		4,582			1,062			1,631			667
Income (loss) from discontinued operations		—			—			—			—			302

Net income (loss)	$	(6,653	)	$	4,582		$	1,062		$	1,631		$	969

Net income (loss) per share from continuing operations	$	(0.12	)	$	0.09		$	0.02		$	0.03		$	0.01

Net income (loss) per share from discontinued operations	$	—		$	—			—			—		$	0.01

Net income (loss) per share—basic	$	(0.12	)	$	0.09		$	0.02		$	0.03		$	0.02

Net income (loss) per share—diluted	$	(0.12	)	$	0.08		$	0.02		$	0.03		$	0.02

Shares used in calculation:
Basic		54,244,383			53,506,289			53,286,248			53,070,890			51,188,889
Diluted		54,244,383			54,481,162			53,983,127			53,689,972			51,956,695
Consolidated Selected Balance Sheet Data:
Cash	$	1,607		$	1,085		$	1,728		$	1,234		$	1,903
Working capital		6,089			15,601			9,959			7,758			10,630
Goodwill and intangible assets, net		24,997			24,893			24,206			22,784			16,362
Total assets		68,735			79,136			65,923			65,591			50,195
Bank loan		8,581			12,100			15,182			17,077			4,335
Total shareholders’ equity		36,852			42,903			36,056			32,424			29,617


	Years Ended March 31, (in thousands of US dollars)
	2006			2005		2004		2003		2002
Net income (loss)	$	(6,653	)	$	4,582	$	1,062	$	1,631	$	969
Adjustments:
Interest expense		1,395			1,203		1,330		1,758		1,232
Income tax expense (benefit)		(4,174	)		2,733		629		788		1,855
Depreciation and amortization of capital assets		1,100			1,048		1,027		1,137		1,010
Amortization of intangible assets and goodwill		804			804		804		36		977

EBITDA	$	(7,528	)	$	10,370	$	4,852	$	5,350	$	6,043


		Page
PART I

Item 1.	Business	2

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	9

Item 2.	Properties	25

Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	25

Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	26

PART II

Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	27

Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	27

Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	29

Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	42

Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	43

Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	43

Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	43

Item 9B.	Other Information	43

PART III

Item 10.	Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant	44

Item 11.	Executive Compensation	44

Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	44

Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions	44

Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	44

PART IV

Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	45


Location
United States		76
United Kingdom		9
Canada		2
Hong Kong		30
China		21

Total		138


Name	Position	Age
Darren Richardson	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Mad Catz Interactive, Inc. and MCI	45
Cyril Talbot III	Chief Financial Officer of Mad Catz Interactive, Inc. and MCI	50
Warren Cook	Senior Vice President Sales of MCI	45
Whitney Peterson	Vice President Corporate Development and General Counsel of MCI	40
Jon Middleton	Vice President Business Development of MCI	34


	Year Ended March 31, 2006				Year Ended March 31, 2005				$ Change			% Change
	Net sales		% of total		Net sales		% of total		$ Change			% Change
United States	$	72,172	72	%	$	91,436	82	%	$	(19,264	)	(21.1	)%
Canada		8,892	9	%		9,419	8	%		(527	)	(5.6	)%
Europe		19,373	19	%		10,981	10	%		8,392		76.4	%
Other countries		331	0	%		235	0	%		96		40.9	%

Consolidated net sales	$	100,768	100	%	$	112,071	100	%	$	(11,303	)	(10.1	)%


	Year Ended March 31,
	2006		2005
PlayStation 2	32	%	30	%
Xbox	22	%	23	%
GameCube	12	%	15	%
Handheld Consoles(a)	15	%	12	%
Xbox 360	4	%	0	%
PlayStation	2	%	4	%
All others	13	%	16	%

Total	100	%	100	%


	March 31, 2006		% of Net Sales		March 31, 2005		% of Net Sales		$ Change		% Change
Sales and marketing	$	12,252	12.1	%	$	10,053	9.0	%	$	2,199	21.9	%
General and administrative		7,915	7.9	%		6,998	6.2	%		917	13.1	%
Research and development		1,605	1.6	%		897	0.8	%		708	78.9	%
Amortization of intangible assets		804	0.8	%		804	0.7	%		0	0	%

Total operating expenses	$	22,576	22.4	%	$	18,752	16.7	%	$	3,824	20.4	%


	March 31, 2006		% of Net Sales		March 31, 2005		% of Net Sales		$ Change		% Change
Interest expense	$	1,395	1.4	%	$	1,203	1.1	%	$	192	16.0	%
Foreign exchange loss	$	765	0.8	%	$	582	0.5	%	$	183	31.4	%
Other income	$	484	0.5	%	$	202	0.2	%	$	282	139.6	%


	Year Ended March 31, 2005				Year Ended March 31, 2004				$ Change			% Change
	Net sales		% of total		Net sales		% of total		$ Change			% Change
United States	$	91,436	82	%	$	81,434	80	%	$	10,002		12.3	%
Canada		9,419	8	%		6,644	7	%		2,775		41.8	%
Europe		10,981	10	%		10,128	9	%		853		8.4	%
Other countries		235	0	%		3,937	4	%		(3,702	)	(94.0	)%

Consolidated net sales	$	112,071	100	%	$	102,143	100	%	$	9,928		9.7	%


	March 31, 2005		% of Net Sales		March 31, 2004		% of Net Sales		$ Change			% Change
Sales and marketing	$	10,053	9.0	%	$	11,166	10.9	%	$	(1,113	)	(10.0	)%
General and administrative		6,998	6.2	%		6,459	6.3	%		539		8.3	%
Research and development		897	0.8	%		1,079	1.1	%		(182	)	(16.9	)%
Amortization of intangible assets		804	0.7	%		804	0.8	%		0		0	%

Total operating expenses	$	18,752	16.7	%	$	19,508	19.1	%	$	(756	)	(3.9	)%


	As of and for the Year ended March 31,						Change
(in thousands)	2006			2005			Change
Cash	$	1,607		$	1,085		$	522

Percentage of total assets		2.3%			1.4%
Cash provided by operating activities	$	6,568		$	3,837		$	2,731
Cash used in investing activities		(1,703	)		(1,402	)		(301	)
Cash used in financing activities		(3,519	)		(2,524	)		(995	)
Effect of foreign exchange on cash		(824	)		(554	)		(270	)

Net increase (decrease) in cash	$	522		$	(643	)


	Payments Due ($000’s)
	Total		Less Than 1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years
Bank loan (excludes interest)	$	8,581	$	8,581	$	—	$	—
Operating leases		2,534		983		1,551		—
Royalty & license guaranteed commitments		1,743		1,608		135		—

Total	$	12,858	$	11,172	$	1,686	$	—


3.1		Articles of Incorporation and Amendments thereto. (1)

3.2		By-Laws of the Company, as amended to date. (2)

10.1		Loan Agreement between Congress Financial Corporation (Canada) and 1328158 Ontario Inc., dated September 25, 2000. (3)

10.2		Loan Agreement between Congress Corporation (Central) and Mad Catz, Inc., dated September 25, 2000. (3)

10.3		Guarantee from 1328158 Ontario Inc, to Congress Financial Corporation (Canada), dated September 25, 2000. (3)

10.4		General Security Agreement among and between Mad Catz, Inc., FX Unlimited, Inc., and Congress Financial Corporation (Central), dated September 25, 2000. (3)

10.5		Guarantee from Mad Catz, Inc. to Congress Financial Corporation (Central), dated September 25, 2000. (3)

10.6		First Amended and Restated Loan Agreement between Congress Financial Corporation (Central) and Mad Catz, Inc., dated as of September 5, 2001. (4)

10.7		Amended and Restated General Security Agreement by and among Mad Catz Inc., FX Unlimited, Inc. and Congress Financial Corporation (Central), dated as of November 30, 2001. (4)

10.8		Amending Agreement between Mad Catz, Inc. and Congress Financial Corporation (Central), dated as of June 18, 2002. (4)

10.9*		Amended and Restated Incentive Stock Option Plan of Mad Catz Interactive, Inc. (4)

10.10	*	Form of Incentive Stock Option Plan. (4)

10.11		Letter Agreement, dated January 21, 2003, between and Mad Catz Interactive, Inc., Mad Catz, Inc. and InterAct Accessories, Inc. (5)

10.12		Second Amending Agreement made as of the 22nd day of January 2003 between Mad Catz, Inc. and Congress Financial Corporation (Central). (5)



10.13		First Amending Agreement dated as of the 14th day of February 2003 between Mad Catz Interactive, Inc. and Fire International Ltd. and its related companies. Portions of this exhibit (indicated by asterisks) have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. (5)

10.14	*	Employment Agreement between Mad Catz, Inc. and Darren Richardson, dated May 18, 2000. (5)

10.15	*	Amendment to Employment Agreement between Mad Catz Interactive, Inc. and Darren Richardson, dated April 1, 2004. Portions of this exhibit (indicated by asterisks) have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. (6)

10.16	*	Employment Agreement between Mad Catz Interactive, Inc., Mad Catz, Inc. and Cyril Talbot III, dated July 23, 2003. (6)

10.17		Third Amending Agreement between the Company and Fire International, Ltd. and its related companies, dated February 1, 2005. Portions of this exhibit (indicated by asterisks) have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. (7)

10.18		Xenon Game Peripheral Licensing Certification Agreement, made and entered into on May 12, 2005, by and between the Company and Microsoft Corporation. Portions of this exhibit (indicated by asterisks) have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. (7)

10.19		Letter Agreement dated September 2, 2005 between Wachovia Capital Finance Corporation (Central), Mad Catz, Inc., Mad Catz Interactive, Inc. and certain other direct and indirect subsidiaries of Mad Catz Interactive, Inc. (8)

10.20		Fourth Amending Agreement between the Company and Fire International, Ltd. and its related companies, dated December 2, 2005.

21.1		Subsidiaries of the Company. (7)

23.1		Consent of KPMG LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

23.2		Consent of BDO Stoy Hayward LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

31.1		Certifications of Registrant’s Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2		Certifications of Registrant’s Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1		Certifications of Registrant’s Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. These certifications are being furnished solely to accompany this Annual Report on Form 10-K and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company.

32.2		Certifications of Registrant’s Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. These certifications are being furnished solely to accompany this Annual Report on Form 10-K and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company.


Signature	Title	Date

/S/ DARREN RICHARDSON Darren Richardson	President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)	June 27, 2006

/S/ CYRIL TALBOT III Cyril Talbot III	Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)	June 27, 2006

/S/ GEOFREY MYERS Geofrey Myers	Director	June 27, 2006

/S/ DONALD LENZ Donald Lenz	Director	June 27, 2006

/S/ THOMAS BROWN Thomas Brown	Director	June 27, 2006

Robert Molyneux	Director

William Woodward	Director


Index to Financial Statements		F-1

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms		F-2

Consolidated Balance Sheets		F-4

Consolidated Statements of Operations		F-5

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income		F-6

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows		F-7

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-8


	2006			2005
Assets
Current assets:
Cash	$	1,607		$	1,085
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $5,198 and $6,329 at March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively		12,024			17,549
Other receivables		429			1,804
Inventories		18,390			26,865
Income taxes receivable		1,275			—
Deferred tax assets		2,586			3,636
Other current assets		1,661			895

Total current assets		37,972			51,834

Deferred tax assets		3,339			578
Property and equipment, net		2,427			1,831
Intangible assets, net		2,634			3,438
Goodwill		22,363			21,455

Total assets	$	68,735		$	79,136

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Bank loan	$	8,581		$	12,100
Accounts payable		19,502			19,209
Accrued liabilities		3,800			3,434
Accrued taxes payable		—			1,490

Total current liabilities		31,883			36,233

Shareholders’ equity:
Common stock, no par value, unlimited shares authorized; 54,244,383 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2006 and 2005		46,746			46,746
Accumulated other comprehensive income		7,116			6,514
Accumulated deficit		(17,010	)		(10,357	)

Total shareholders’ equity		36,852			42,903

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	68,735		$	79,136


	Common Stock				Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income		Accumulated Deficit			Total Shareholders’ Equity
	Shares	Amount			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income		Accumulated Deficit			Total Shareholders’ Equity
BALANCE, March 31, 2003	53,206,719	$	45,890		$	2,535	$	(16,001	)	$	32,424
Stock option exercises	255,997		164			—		—			164
Stock-based compensation	—		(16	)		—		—			(16	)
Comprehensive income:
Net income	—		—			—		1,062			1,062
Foreign currency translation adjustment	—		—			2,422		—			2,422

Total comprehensive income											3,484

BALANCE, March 31, 2004	53,462,716		46,038			4,957		(14,939	)		36,056
Stock option exercises	781,667		603			—		—			603
Stock-based compensation	—		(12	)		—		—			(12	)
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options	—		117			—		—			117
Comprehensive income:
Net income	—		—			—		4,582			4,582
Foreign currency translation adjustment	—		—			1,557		—			1,557

Total comprehensive income											6,139

BALANCE, March 31, 2005	54,244,383		46,746			6,514		(10,357	)		42,903
Comprehensive income:
Net loss	—		—			—		(6,653	)		(6,653	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment	—		—			602		—			602

Total comprehensive income											(6,051	)

BALANCE, March 31, 2006	54,244,383	$	46,746		$	7,116	$	(17,010	)	$	36,852


Molds		3 years
Computer equipment and software		3 years
Manufacturing and office equipment		3 – 5 years
Furniture and fixtures		5 years
Leasehold improvements		Shorter of estimated useful life or remaining life of lease


	March 31,
	2006		2005
Raw materials	$	1,078	$	2,228
Finished goods		17,311		24,635
Packaging materials and accessories		1		2

Inventories	$	18,390	$	26,865


	Cost		Accumulated Amortization		2006 Net Book Value		2005 Net Book Value		Useful life (years)
Trademarks	$	4,112	$	1,762	$	2,350	$	2,937	7
Copyrights		514		326		188		291	5
Website		457		361		96		210	4

Intangible assets	$	5,083	$	2,449	$	2,634	$	3,438


	Options outstanding				Options exercisable
Range of exercise price	Number outstanding	Weighted average remaining contractual life in years	Weighted average exercise price		Number exercisable	Weighted average exercise price
$0.72-0.79	975,832	2.1	$	0.77	775,832	$	0.77
$0.99-1.11	418,500	1.5		1.10	418,500		1.10
$1.17-1.24	530,000	0.9		1.18	530,000		1.18
$1.37-1.65	175,001	2.3		1.41	175,001		1.41

	2,099,333	1.7	$	0.99	1,899,333	$	1.00


	Canadian $		U.S. $
2007	$	2,522	$	2,161
2008		5,818		4,984
2009		3,512		3,009
2010		3,842		3,291
2011		—		—
2012		—		—
2013		—		—
2014		2,591		2,220
2015		1,188		1,018
2016		1,095		939

	$	20,568	$	17,622


	Canadian $			U.S. $
	$	3,152		$	2,700

Total loss carryforwards	$	45,227		$	38,749
Tax-effected rate		36.12	%		36.12	%

Deferred tax asset—noncurrent – tax loss carryforwards	$	16,336		$	13,996


	2006		2005
Property and equipment:
United States	$	2,224	$	1,721
International		198		101
Canada		5		9

		2,427		1,831

Goodwill and intangible assets:
United States		2,634		3,438
Canada		22,363		21,455

		24,997		24,893

	$	27,424	$	26,724


	Quarter Ended
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)	June 30			Sept. 30			Dec. 31			Mar 31
Fiscal 2006 Consolidated:
Net sales	$	14,792		$	23,744		$	44,989		$	17,243
Gross profit		2,318			4,058			6,666			383
Operating income (loss)		(2,496	)		(1,513	)		(119	)		(5,023	)
Net income (loss)		(2,112	)		(1,221	)		5			(3,325	)
Net income (loss) per share—basic		(0.04	)		(0.02	)		0.00			(0.06	)
Net income (loss) per share—diluted		(0.04	)		(0.02	)		0.00			(0.06	)
Common stock price per share:
High		1.73			1.17			0.99			0.79
Low		1.02			0.64			0.64			0.51
Fiscal 2005 Consolidated:
Net sales	$	16,719		$	20,670		$	52,844		$	21,838
Gross profit		4,114			5,042			13,248			5,246
Operating income (loss)		58			805			6,127			1,908
Net income (loss)		(221	)		333			3,866			604
Net income (loss) per share—basic		(0.01	)		0.01			0.07			0.02
Net income (loss) per share—diluted		(0.01	)		0.01			0.07			0.02
Common stock price per share:
High		0.79			0.61			0.86			1.83
Low		0.54			0.43			0.49			0.81


	2006											2005
	U.S. GAAP (as reported)			Differences			Notes		Canadian GAAP			U.S. GAAP (as reported)			Differences			Notes		Canadian GAAP
Assets
Current assets:
Cash	$	1,607		$	—				$	1,607		$	1,085		$	—				$	1,085
Accounts receivable, net		12,024			—					12,024			17,549			—					17,549
Other receivables		429			—					429			1,804			—					1,804
Inventories		18,390			—					18,390			26,865			—					26,865
Income taxes receivable		1,275			—					1,275			—			—					—
Deferred tax assets		2,586			—					2,586			3,636			—					3,636
Other current assets		1,661			—					1,661			895			—					895

Total current assets		37,972			—					37,972			51,834			—					51,834
Deferred tax assets		3,339			—					3,339			578			—					578
Property and equipment, net		2,427			—					2,427			1,831			—					1,831
Intangible assets, net		2,634			—					2,634			3,438			—					3,438
Goodwill		22,363			—					22,363			21,455			—					21,455

Total assets	$	68,735		$	—				$	68,735		$	79,136		$	—				$	79,136

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Bank loan	$	8,581		$	—				$	8,581		$	12,100		$	—				$	12,100
Accounts payable		19,502			—					19,502			19,209			—					19,209
Accrued liabilities		3,800			—					3,800			3,434			—					3,434
Accrued taxes payable		—			—					—			1,490			—					1,490

Total current liabilities		31,883			—					31,833			36,233			—					36,233
Shareholders’ equity:
Common stock		46,746			752		(1	)		47,498			46,746			631		(1	)		47,377
Accumulated other comprehensive income		7,116			—					7,116			6,514			—					6,514
Accumulated deficit		(17,010	)		(752	)	(1	)		(17,762	)		(10,357	)		(631	)	(1	)		(10,988	)

Total shareholders’ equity		36,852			—					36,852			42,903			—					42,903

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	68,735		$	—				$	68,735		$	79,136		$	—				$	79,136


	Additions
Description	Balance at Beginning of Period			Revenue Reductions (A)			Expenses and Other Costs (B)			Deductions (C)		Balance at End of Period
Year Ended March 31, 2006
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts, Cooperative Advertising, Price Protection and Sales Returns	$	(6,329	)	$	(10,017	)	$	(5,742	)	$	16,890	$	(5,198	)
Year Ended March 31, 2005
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts, Cooperative Advertising, Price Protection and Sales Returns	$	(5,971	)	$	(13,525	)	$	(4,337	)	$	17,504	$	(6,329	)
Year Ended March 31, 2004
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts, Cooperative Advertising, Price Protection and Sales Returns	$	(5,711	)	$	(13,730	)	$	(4,939	)	$	18,409	$	(5,971	)