UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-QSB

(Mark One)
[X] Quarterly report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

[ ] Transition report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 For the transition period from _____ to _____

Commission file number: 000-26095

ENVIROKARE TECH, INC.

(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)

Nevada		88-0412549

(State of incorporation)		(IRS Employer Identification Number)

641 Lexington Avenue, 14^th Floor
New York, New York 10022

(Address of principal executive office)

(212) 634-6333

(Issuer's telephone number)

APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY
PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS

Check whether the issuer filed all documents and reports required to be filed by
Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act after the distribution of securities
under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes [ ] No [ ] NOT APPLICABLE

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common
equity, as of the latest practicable date: The total number of shares of Common
Stock, par value $.001 per share, outstanding as of June 30, 2006, was
45,556,174.

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check one): Yes [ ] No [X]

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements:
        Consolidated Balance Sheets
        Consolidated Statements of Operations
        Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
        Condensed Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operations
Item 3. Control and Procedures

Part II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Item 2. Changes in Securities
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Item 5. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

SIGNATURES

CAUTIONARY INFORMATION ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This document contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in or incorporated by reference into this Form 10-QSB which address activities, events or developments which Envirokare Tech Inc., ("Envirokare" or the "Company") expects, believes or anticipates will or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements. The words "believes," "intends," "expects," "anticipates," "projects," "estimates," "predicts" and similar expressions are also intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include, among others, statements concerning: expectations, anticipations, beliefs, estimations, projections, and other similar matters that are not historical facts, including such matters as future capital and development expenditures and expansion and growth of business operations.

These statements are based on certain assumptions and analysis made by the management of Envirokare in light of its experience and its perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments as well as other factors it believes are appropriate in the circumstances.

Envirokare cautions the reader that these forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, including those associated with: the financial environment, general economic, market and business conditions, the regulatory environment, business opportunities that may be presented to and pursued by Envirokare, changes in laws or regulations, availability to obtain additional financing on favorable conditions, trend projections, and other factors, many of which are beyond the Company's control that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the statements. Such risks and uncertainties include those risks and uncertainties identified in the Description of the Business and Management's Discussion and Analysis sections of this document and risk factors discussed from time to time in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Significant factors that could prevent Envirokare from achieving its stated goals include: the inability of Envirokare to obtain financing for capital expenditures and acquisitions, declines or failure to develop in the market for the Company's products, development of superior products by competition, and adverse changes in the regulatory environment affecting the Company.

The cautionary statements contained or referred to in this document should be considered in connection with any subsequent written or oral forward-looking statements that may be issued by Envirokare or persons acting on its or their behalf.

Envirokare undertakes no obligation to release publicly any revisions to any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION


ENVIROKARE TECH, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS


					June 30,		December 31,
					2006		2005
					(unaudited)

A S S E T S
	CURRENT ASSETS
		Cash and cash equivalents		$	703,791	$	1,897,604
		Restricted cash			266,441		296,000
		Accounts receivable			133,400		421,286
		Inventory			147,707		-
		Deposits and retainers			57,547		78,252
		Prepaid expenses			712,810		722,851

			TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS		2,021,697		3,415,993


	PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
		Equipment			1,285,723		507,429
		Leasehold improvements			130,226		-
		Molds			16,000		16,000
		Real estate and building			400,000		400,000
		Less accumulated depreciation			(71,171)		(47,663)

			TOTAL PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT		1,760,778		875,766

	OTHER ASSETS
		Prepaid expenses - long term			261,141		327,397
		Patents, net			6,880,885		7,089,966

			TOTAL OTHER ASSETS		7,142,026		7,417,363


		TOTAL ASSETS		$	10,924,501	$	11,709,122


L I A B I L I T I E S & S T O C K H O L D E R S ' E Q U I T Y (DEFICIT)
	CURRENT LIABILITIES
		Accounts payable		$	892,878	$	316,900
		Accrued compensation			91,163		104,186
		Accrued interest			1,109,883		722,896
		Capital equipment lease payable, current portion			342,434		84,248
		Loans payable, current portion			100,000		-
		Notes payable, current portion			61,965		61,965
		Notes payable to shareholders, current portion			1,438,340		1,490,812
		Discount on notes payable - other			(332,661)		(231,972)

			TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES		3,704,001		2,549,034


	LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
		Capital equipment lease payable, net of current portion			263,566		323,455
		Notes payable, net of current portion			6,162,058		5,683,972

			TOTAL LONG-TERM LIABILITIES		6,425,624		6,007,427


	MINORITY INTEREST IN SUBSIDIARY				5,164,782		5,721,169


	COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES				-		-


	STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
		Convertible preferred stock, 10,000,000 shares authorized,
			$0.001 par value; no shares issued and outstanding		-		-
		Common stock, 200,000,000 shares authorized,
			$0.001 par value; 45,556,174 and 44,247,032 shares
			issued and outstanding, respectively		45,556		44,247
		Additional paid-in capital			8,824,816		7,866,584
		Stock options and warrants			9,119,978		8,969,157
		Accumulated deficit			(22,360,256)		(19,448,496)

			TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)		(4,369,906)		(2,568,508)


		TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)		$	10,924,501	$	11,709,122

The accompanying condensed notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-1

ENVIROKARE TECH, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS


				Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended

						June 30,				June 30,
				June 30,		2005		June 30,		2005
				2006		(Restated)		2006		(Restated)
				(unaudited)		(unaudited)		(unaudited)		(unaudited)



REVENUES			$	31,825	$	214,696	$	72,047	$	214,696

COST OF GOODS SOLD				(5,666)		(160,931)		(29,689)		(160,931)


GROSS PROFIT				26,159		53,765		42,358		53,765


E X P E N S E S
	Consulting fees - related parties			842,843		4,947,869		863,880		5,002,401
	Consulting fees - other			22,470		97,078		44,940		97,078
	Board of directors fees			19,582		-		26,250		-
	Rent			69,659		16,676		85,328		45,839
	General and administrative			225,596		255,738		382,377		351,992
	Depreciation and amortization			115,560		160,225		232,590		198,821
	Professional fees			485,097		(33,420)		646,644		126,833
	Research and development			125,233		116,240		209,234		117,617
	Wages and salaries			184,861		5,129		436,235		19,617

		TOTAL EXPENSES		2,090,902		5,565,534		2,927,479		5,960,197


LOSS FROM OPERATIONS				(2,064,742)		(5,511,769)		(2,885,120)		(5,906,431)

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES)
	Gain on exclusivity agreement			-		-		-		280,000
	Other income			5,525		-		18,986		-
	Interest expense			(304,716)		(336,650)		(602,012)		(368,555)

		TOTAL OTHER EXPENSE		(299,191)		(336,650)		(583,026)		(88,555)


LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES				(2,363,934)		(5,848,419)		(3,468,147)		(5,994,986)

INCOME TAXES				-		-		-		-


MINORITY INTEREST ALLOCATION				281,841		163,668		556,387		167,904


NET LOSS			$	(2,082,092)	$	(5,684,751)	$	(2,911,759)	$	(5,827,082)



	BASIC AND DILUTED NET LOSS
	PER COMMON SHARE		$	(0.05)	$	(0.14)	$	(0.06)	$	(0.15)


	WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER
	OF BASIC AND DILUTED COMMON
	STOCK SHARES OUTSTANDING			44,961,411		39,643,618		44,834,911		39,577,457

The accompanying condensed notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-2

ENVIROKARE TECH, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS


					Six Months Ended		Six Months Ended
					June 30,		June 30,
					2006		2005
					(unaudited)		(unaudited and restated)

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
	Net loss			$	(2,911,759)	$	(5,827,082)

	Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities:
		Loss allocated to minority interest			(556,387)		(167,904)
		Depreciation and amortization			232,590		198,821
		Amortization of debt discount			(100,689)
		Stock options issued for consulting fees			413,880		4,747,500
		Common stock issued for payment of expenses			142,749		-
		Common stock issued for payment of accrued wages			294,000		-
	Changes in assets and liabilities:						-
		Accounts receivable			287,886		(61,111)
		Inventory			(147,707)		43,216
		Deposits and retainers			20,704		(6,954)
		Employee and related party receivables			-		-
		Intangible asset expensed			-		39,825
		Prepaid expenses			76,297		-
		Accounts payable			575,979		25,545
		Accrued compensation			(13,023)		11,924
		Accrued interest payable			386,987		275,659
		Deposit on exclusivity agreement			-		(280,000)

		Net cash used by operating activities			(1,298,494)		(1,000,561)


CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
		Patent costs			-		(6,356)
		Purchase of equipment			(520,128)		(569)
		Leasehold improvements			(130,226)		-

		Net cash used in investing activities			(650,354)		(6,925)


CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
		Payment of capital equipment lease			(59,889)		-
		Payment of notes payable			(74,386)		(61,520)
		Proceeds from borrowing			700,000		-
		Proceeds from sale of common stock			159,752		181,327
		Proceeds from investor deposits			-		217,617
		Proceeds from minority interest capital contribution			-		5,000,000
		Payment on acquisition agreement			-		(2,500,000)

		Net cash provided by financing activities			725,477		2,837,424


Net increase (decrease) in cash (including restricted cash)					(1,223,372)		1,829,938

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period					2,193,604		432,155


Cash and cash equivalents, end of period				$	970,232	$	2,262,093


SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
		Interest paid		$	-	$	40,706

		Income taxes paid		$	-	$	-


NON-CASH TRANSACTIONS:
		Stock options issued for consulting fees		$	-	$	4,747,500
		Common stock issued for accrued compensation		$	44,000	$	-
		Equipment acquired via capital lease		$	15,612	$	-
		Relocation costs		$	47,000	$	-
		Debt incurred in acquisition of subsidiary's property
			and patents	$	-	$	8,157,208
		Stock options issued in acquistion		$	-	$	741,000
		Interest imputed on Note to merger entity shareholders		$	-	$	271,546
		Receivable due to LRM (services in kind from NOVA)		$	-	$	1,000,000
		Stock issued in settlement of accounts payable		$	12,125	$	-

The accompanying condensed notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-3

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION, DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Envirokare Tech, Inc. (hereinafter, "the Company" or "Envirokare") was incorporated in June 1998 under the laws of the State of Nevada. In December 1998, the Company acquired assets of a business engaged in developing a rubber mold technology and patent rights potentially applicable to future development of a pallet made of recycled materials. The Company believes the early-stage rubber mold technology to be of marginal commercial value.

During 2001, the Company acquired the licensing rights to a proprietary thermoplastic processing technology, the TPF ThermoPlastic Flowforming™ process. The Company utilized the license to design and develop early stage product prototypes, primarily applications within the materials handling industry.

Subsequent to obtaining licensing rights for the TPF ThermoPlastic Flowforming technology, in March, 2005, the Company announced that it had executed a definitive merger agreement with the developer of the TPF ThermoPlastic Flowforming technology, in which Thermoplastic Composite Design (hereinafter, "TCD") merged with and into the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, Envirokare Composites Corp. (hereinafter, "ECC"). The transaction combined all of TCD's business, including its intellectual property, assets and contracts, with ECC. The merger agreement provides for an initial payment of $2.5 million to TCD shareholders and a subsequent schedule of payments over a seven-year period which, in total, will amount to $15 million. See Note 13.

Also in March, 2005, the Company announced that ECC had executed a 50:50 joint venture agreement with Nova Chemicals, Inc. ("Nova"), to create a new company, LRM Industries, LLC ("LRM"), to commercialize the Company's TPF ThermoPlastic Flowforming technology. The Company contributed its intellectual property rights, technology, manufacturing equipment and all TPF ThermoPlastic Flowforming business activities which were acquired through the merger with TCD into the joint venture, while Nova contributed certain specified capital and services. The joint venture is being accounted for as a majority control subsidiary, with Nova's interest treated as a minority interest. See Note 13.

The Company's joint venture interest has a current operating strategy that is based on developing products to be manufactured by the TPF ThermoPlastic Flowforming process, as well as marketing the TPF ThermoPlastic Flowforming technology to potential sublicensees. The Company maintains offices in New York, New York. The Company has elected a fiscal year-end of December 31.

The Company's consolidated financial statements include the following entities: Envirokare Composite Corp., Thermoplastic Composite Designs, Inc., and LRM Industries, LLC.

All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidation.

The foregoing unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-QSB and Regulation S-B as promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Accordingly, these financial statements do not include all of the disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America for complete financial statements. These unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005. In the opinion of management, the unaudited interim financial statements furnished herein include all adjustments, all of which are of a normal recurring nature, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim period presented.

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities known to exist as of the date the financial statements are published, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Uncertainties with respect to such estimates and assumptions are inherent in the preparation of the Company's financial statements; accordingly, it is possible that the actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions and could have a material effect on the reported amounts of the Company's financial position and results of operations.

Operating results for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2006.

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Earnings Per Share

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, "Earnings Per Share", requires the reporting of basic and diluted earnings/loss per share. Basic loss per share is calculated by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of outstanding common shares during the year. Outstanding options and warrants have been excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share as they would have been antidilutive. Accordingly, the basic and diluted net loss per share amount is the same.

For the six month period ended June 30, 2006 and the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company had the following outstanding options and warrants that are considered anti-dilutive:

	Outstanding Six Months ended June 30, 2006	Outstanding December 31, 2005

Stock options	17,693,307	17,414,449
Stock warrants	13,066,250	16,816,250

Total outstanding options and warrants	30,759,557	34,230,699

Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern.

As shown in the accompanying financial statements, as amended and restated, the Company has incurred an accumulated deficit of $22,360,256 which includes a net loss of $2,082,092 and $2,911,759 for the three months and six months, respectively, ended June 30, 2006, and has a working capital deficit and revenues of $31,825 and $72,047, for the respective periods. The Company is currently marketing the TPF ThermoPlastic Flowforming technology which will, if successful, mitigate these factors which raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management plans to fund operations from sales of its debt and equity in the near-term and from product sales, product development agreements and proceeds realized from licensing the TPF ThermoPlastic Flowforming technology on an ongoing basis. The Company has historically raised equity capital through the sale of its common and preferred stock. The Company has also raised debt capital through private placement offerings and borrowings. Management has proceeded as planned in the ongoing development of numerous products composed of long-fiber reinforced and unreinforced thermoplastic composite, through its 50% interest in its joint venture, LRM. LRM management is also marketing the TPF ThermoPlastic Flowforming technology to various potential clients with the intent of establishing product development agreements, with the agreements to include provisions for manufacturing and marketing successfully developed products. LRM management anticipates that the joint venture company will realize licensing fee revenues in the near future. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary in the event the Company cannot continue in its present form.

Guarantees and Restricted Cash

In November 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB Interpretation ("FIN") No. 45, "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others" ("hereinafter" FIN 45 or Interpretation"). FIN 45 expands the disclosure requirements to be made by a guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about its obligations under certain guarantees that it has issued. The Interpretation also clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. Certain guarantees, including (i) an original lessee's guarantee of the lease payments when the lessee remains secondarily liable in conjunction with being relieved from being the primary obligor and (ii) a parent's guarantee of a subsidiary's debt to a third party, and a subsidiary's guarantee of debt owed to a third party by either its parent or another subsidiary of that parent, are excluded from the provisions related to liability recognition. These guarantees, however, are subject to the disclosure requirements of the Interpretation. Although there is a capital lease in place which was executed by LRM, Envirokare, as a parent has not guaranteed this debt which is owed to a third party, and in fact has a third party position, with respect to the capital lease obligation, which is excluded from the disclosure requirements of the Interpretation, and the Company is not required to recognize a liability for the guarantee by its subsidiary. Although a Company subsidiary (LRM) has guaranteed debt owed to a third party, this guarantee is excluded from the provisions of FIN 45 related to liability recognition. The Company has elected to disclose the transaction for purposes of providing additional clarity to its subsidiary's operations.

During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company's joint venture interest, LRM, secured a capital lease for purposes of acquiring a key component of production line equipment. The Company borrowed the funds required to acquire the equipment and began making payments on this obligation over a five year period, commencing in January 2006. The Company shows the cash received from this financing as Restricted cash and in its Prepaid expense accounts on its consolidated balance sheets. See Note 12.

Inventories

The Company records inventories at the lower of cost or market on a first-in, first-out basis. See Note 3.

NOTE 3 – INVENTORY

The cost of finished goods includes the cost of raw material, direct and indirect labor, and other indirect manufacturing costs. As of June 30, 2006, the Company has not incurred losses from write-downs to market. For the six month period ended June 30, 2006, LRM was in the process of relocating its operations from Mims, Florida to Rockledge, Florida. LRM experienced idle facility costs as a consequence of this relocation activity, and expensed certain plant operating costs for the period ended to the general and administrative and rent accounts to reflect these idle facility costs.

Inventories at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 consist of the following:

		June 30, 2006		December 31, 2005

Materials	$	3,768	$	-
Work-In-Process		143,939		-
Finished goods		-		-

	$	147,707	$	-

NOTE 4 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is provided using the straight line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from three to ten years. Molds will be depreciated over their estimated useful lives once placed in service. During the quarter ended June 30, 2005, the Company deemed that pallet molds valued at $43,000 were of no commercial value and expensed the value of these molds. Additionally, during the quarter ended September 30, 2005, the Company expensed the value of a top cap and pallet mold valued at $112,912. None of the molds expensed during the year ended December 31, 2005, or the molds previously deemed to be of no commercial value, are carried in valuations of the Company's assets. The costs included in molds as of December 31, 2005 are comprised of design, machining, manufacturing and delivery and relate to the Beam mold and are valued at $16,000. This mold is being depreciated over a five year period. Depreciation expense for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 is $11,019, $23,509 and $10,287, respectively.

The following is a summary of the Company's equipment and related accumulated depreciation at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005:

		June 30,		December 31,
		2006		2005

Office equipment	$	24,300	$	25,292
Molds		16,000		16,000
Equipment		1,261,423		482,137
Leasehold improvements		130,226		-
Buildings		50,000		50,000
Land		350,000		350,000
		1,831,949		923,429
Less: Accumulated depreciation		(71,171)		(47,663)

	$	1,760,778	$	875,766

Subsequent to the period ended June 30, 2006, the Company closed the sale of property that it held through its wholly-owned interest in Envirokare Composites Corp. ("ECC"). The sale includes all land, buildings and lease rights for the Company property located in Mims, Florida. The property was sold to a private interest, and the property is no longer used in the Company's business. See Note 6, Note 7, Note 12 and Note 15.

NOTE 5 – INTANGIBLE ASSETS

In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, "Business Combinations" (hereinafter "SFAS No. 141") and Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" (hereinafter "SFAS No. 142"). SFAS No. 141 provides for the elimination of the pooling-of-interest method of accounting for business combinations with an acquisition date of July 1, 2001 or later. SFAS No. 142 prohibits the amortization of goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives and requires periodic reassessment of the underlying value of such assets for impairment. SFAS No. 142 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. The Company adopted SFAS No. 142. Application of the nonamortization provision of SFAS No. 142 is expected to result in no change to the Company's reported results of operations.

Intangible assets are tested for impairment on an annual basis. At June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the Company has determined that the carrying value of its intangible assets are fully recoverable, as more fully described below.

Patent Acquisition Costs and Technology Rights

In March, 2005, the Company announced that it had executed a definitive merger agreement in which TCD merged with and into the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, Envirokare Composites Corp. (hereinafter, "ECC"). The transaction combined all of TCD's business, including its intellectual property, property, plant and other assets, including contracts with ECC. Upon completion of the merger with TCD into the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, ECC, the intellectual property rights, technology, manufacturing equipment and all TPF ThermoPlastic Flowforming business activities of TCD were assigned to LRM, through ECC. The intangible asset obtained in the acquisition of TCD was incorporated into and recorded as patent value, in conjunction with the purchase price for TCD, including the real property and equipment of TCD. The value ascribed to the intangible asset is an amount of $7,394,708. The Company amortizes this patent value over a twenty year period and utilizes a discount rate of 12% in ascribing the value to the intangible asset obtained. See Note 13.

NOTE 6 – NOTES PAYABLE TO SHAREHOLDERS

During the six month period ended June 30, 2006, the Company and Nova Chemicals, Inc., a shareholder, entered into a promissory note arrangement in the principal amount of $500,000. The note bears an interest rate of 9% per annum with interest payment payable in 24 equal monthly installments of $3,750 commencing June 15, 2006, payable in arrears. Principal and any unpaid interest are payable in full two years from the date of the promissory note issuance. Principal (and any interest) due to the note holder may be prepaid or paid in advance, in whole or in part, at any time without premium or penalty. Nova, at its sole discretion, may convert the loan proceeds and accrued interest into common stock of the Company, at an exercise price of $0.45 per share, with each warrant being valued at $0.206 per share. These warrants are fully exercisable for up to two years from the dates of the note agreement. The Company used the assumptions of a 9% interest rate, volatility of 74.66% and a two-year period to calculate the warrant value. The calculated fair value of the warrants on the note and accrued interest for the six month period ended June 30, 2006, in the amounts of $228,889 and $1,717, respectively, has been recorded as a discount on the debt issued and is being amortized over the life of the debt. During the six month period ended June 30, 2006, the Company has amortized this discount on debt, in the amount of $12,109. The accumulated amortization for the discount on debt relating to this promissory note for the period ended June 30, 2006 is $12,109. The amortization previously described is reflected in the financial statements as a charge to interest for the period ended. During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company has accrued interest on the loan payable in an amount of $3,750. The Company has pledged its interest in LRM Industries, LLC as security for repayment of the loan principal, including accrued interest. See Note 7 and Note 9.

During the six month period ended June 30, 2006, the Company entered into a promissory note arrangement with a Company shareholder, in the principal amount of $100,000. The note bears an interest rate of 8.5% per annum with interest payment payable in 24 equal monthly installments of $708 commencing March 10, 2006, payable in arrears. Principal and any unpaid interest are payable in full two years from the date of the promissory note issuance. Principal (and any interest) due to the note holder may be prepaid or paid in advance, in whole or in part, at any time without premium or penalty. The loan is secured by a mortgage on property owned by the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, ECC. Subsequent to the period ended June 30, 2006, the Company closed the sale of property that it held through its wholly-owned interest in ECC. The sale includes all land, buildings and lease rights for the Company property located in Mims, Florida. The Company satisfied the mortgage held on the property, as discussed herein, upon closing of the property sale. See Note 7 and Note 15.

During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company entered into a promissory note arrangement with two Company shareholders, in the principal amount of $100,000. The note bears an interest rate of 15% per annum with principal and interest payment payable in 36 equal monthly installments of $3,467 commencing September 1, 2003. Three common stock warrants are attached to each dollar of debt, with an exercise price of $0.20 per share, with each warrant being valued at $0.11 per share. These warrants are fully exercisable for up to three years from the dates of issuance. The Company used the assumptions of a 4% interest rate, volatility of 69% and a three-year period to calculate the warrant value. The calculated fair value of the warrants, in the amount of $32,810, has been recorded as a discount on the debt issued and is being amortized over the life of the debt. During the years ended December 31 2003, 2004 and 2005, the Company has amortized this discount on debt, in the amounts of $3,646 $10,938 and $10,938, respectively. The accumulated amortization for the respective years is $3,646, $14584 and $25,520. During the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2006, the Company has amortized this discount on debt in an amount of $2,734 and $5,469, respectively. The accumulated amortization for the discount on debt relating to this promissory note for the period ended June 30, 2006 is $30,990. The amortization previously described is reflected in the financial statements as a charge to interest for the respective periods. See Note 7 and Note 9.

During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company entered into a promissory note with a director and shareholder, in the principal amount of $200,000. The note bears an interest rate of 15% per annum, with principal and interest payment payable in 36 equal monthly installments of $6,933, commencing January 1, 2003. Three common stock warrants are attached to each dollar of debt, with an exercise price of $0.20 per share, with each warrant being valued at $0.13 per share. These warrants are fully exercisable for up to three years. The Company used the assumptions of a 4% interest rate, volatility of 69% and a three-year period to calculate the warrant value. The calculated fair value of the warrants, in the amount of $78,000, has been recorded as a discount on the debt issued and is being amortized over the life of the debt. During the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company has amortized this discount on debt, in an amount of $26,000 for each year. This amortized amount increased accumulated amortization for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 in the amount of $26,000, in each respective year. During the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2006, the Company has amortized this discount on debt in an amount of $6,500 and $13,000, respectively. The accumulated amortization for the discount on debt relating to this promissory note is $65,000. The amortization previously described is reflected in the financial statements as a charge to interest for the respective periods. See Note 7 and Note 9.

In December 2003, with the exception of the notes discussed in the two paragraphs above, the Company rolled all of its remaining outstanding notes payable and accrued interest to related parties into new notes. These notes bear an interest rate of 12% per annum, with interest payments made in equal monthly installments of varying amounts, commencing on January 1, 2004. Common stock warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 5,125,000 shares of Company common stock were attached to these loans, with an exercise price of $0.24 per share. The Company calculated a fair value for these warrants, in the amount of $138,888. The Company used the assumptions of a 4% interest rate, volatility of .69% and a three-year term to calculate the warrant value. Subsequent to reporting the original transaction as previously described, the Company discovered a defect in the assumptions utilized to calculate the fair value of the newly issued and extended warrants. The revised assumptions utilized to calculate the warrant value are a 4% interest rate, volatility of 69% and a three-year term. The restated warrant valuation of $596,038 has been recorded as a discount on the debt issued and is being amortized over the life of the debt. During the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company has amortized this discount on debt, in an amount of $198,679 in each respective year. During the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2006, the Company has amortized this discount on debt, in an amount of $49,670 and $99,340, respectively. During the six month period ended June 30, 2006, this amortized amount increased accumulated amortization pertaining to this promissory note to $496,698. The amortization previously described is reflected in the financial statements as a charge to interest for the respective periods. See Note 7 and Note 9.

NOTE 7 – LONG-TERM DEBT

Summarized information about the Company's long-term debt at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, is as follows:

		Six Months ended June 30, 2006		December 31, 2005

Note payable, interest payable at 9%, loan maturing in May 2008 (see Note 7 and Note 9)	$	500,000	$	-

Note payable, interest payable at 8.5%, loan maturing in February 2008, mortgage provided on ECC property (see Note 6 and Note 15)		100,000		-

Shareholder notes, monthly principal and
interest payments at 15%, maturing July and December, 2006, uncollateralized		49,184		124,795

Shareholder notes, monthly interest
payments at 12%, maturing December,
2006, uncollateralized (see Note 6)		1,375,890		1,375,890

Note payable, interest accrued at 10%,
payable at an undetermined date
(see Note 12), uncollateralized		61,965		61,965

Capital lease agreements, maturing at
various date in 2006, 2007, and in 2010
collateralized by equipment (see Note 12)		606,000		323,455

Note payable, monthly principal
and interest payments at 12%, maturing
October, 2008, uncollateralized		8,363		10,144

Note payable to TCD shareholders, (Net Present Value), 12% discount rate, maturing at various dates until 2013		5,657,208		5,683,972

Less: Current portion		(1,932,986)		(1,572,794)

	$	6,425,624	$	6,007,427

Loan maturities for each of the five years following June 30, 2006 are as follows:

2006	$	1,202,303
2007		111,694
2008		1,204,581
2009		96,288
2010		96,288

	$	2,711,154

During the six month period ended June 30, 2006, LRM Industries, LLC, the Company's joint venture company with NOVA Chemicals, Inc., entered into three Loan Agreements with SunTrust Bank that provide for borrowings of up to $2.24 million, $560,000 and $500,000, respectively, with the loan proceeds to be used for the installation of a new production line in its Rockledge, Florida facilities. These respective agreements generally provide for interest at the rate of LIBOR plus 2%, LIBOR plus 1.25% and LIBOR plus 1.25% with interest payments commencing July 2006 and principal repayments commencing November 2006, with respect to the $2.24 and $560,000 million borrowings. The $550,000 loan facility provides funds in the form of a Revolving Master Borrowing Loan, with principal and interest due and payable in May 2007, based on the outstanding loan balance at that time. For the period ended June 30, 2006, LRM had borrowed $225,000 against the available loan facilities described herein, and this amount in reflected in the Capital Lease Agreements disclosure in the above table.

NOTE 8 – COMMON STOCK

During the six month period ended June 30, 2006, the Company issued 88,000 shares of its common stock when warrants were exercised at a price of $0.50 per share for a total of $44,000 set off against accrued wages payable. Additionally, 797,826 shares were issued when stock options were exercised at a price of $0.23 per share for a total of $159,751 in cash proceeds, $12,125 set off against accounts payable for expenses and $11,000 set off against compensation payable. An additional 123,316 shares were issued when stock options were exercised at a price of $0.965 per share for a total of $119,000 and 300,000 shares were issued when stock options were exercised at a price of $0.40 per share for a total of $120,000 with both respective stock issuances set off against compensation payable. See Note 9.

During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company issued 3,612,500 shares of its common stock when warrants were exercised at prices ranging between $0.25 and $0.50 per share for a total of $920,317 in cash proceeds and $300,629 set off against accrued wages payable. Additionally, 1,076,086 shares were issued when stock options were exercised at prices ranging between $0.23 and $0.30 per share for a total of $362,358 in cash proceeds and $47,000 set off to accounts payable for legal services. In addition, the Company issued 614,465 shares of its common stock when options were exercised by a former Company executive at $0.23 per share, with payment set off against severance owing to the former executive. See Note 9.

During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company received $780,750 from the private sale of 3,903,750 shares of its common stock at an average of $0.23 per share. In addition, these purchasers received warrants to purchase additional shares of common stock, exercisable at $0.40 per share for a period of two to three years. The warrants were valued at $238,560. Additionally, 647,836 shares were issued in consideration for $34,000 in accounts payable debt and $100,000 in related party debt. The fair market value of the shares issued for accounts payable and related party debt were $0.23 and $0.18, respectively. Also during 2004, the Company issued 1,400,000 shares of its common stock upon the exercise of warrants by Nova Chemicals, Inc.

NOTE 9 – STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS

Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" (hereinafter "SFAS No. 123"), defines a fair value-based method of accounting for stock options and other equity instruments. The Company has adopted this method, which measures compensation costs based on the estimated fair value of the award and recognizes that cost over the service period. In accordance with SFAS No. 123, the fair value of stock options and warrants granted are estimated using the Black-Scholes Option Price Calculation. In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued a revision to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), "Share-Based Payments" (hereinafter "SFAS No. 123 (R)"). This statement replaces FASB Statement No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation", and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees". SFAS No. 123 (R) establishes standards for the accounting for share-based payment transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. It also addresses transactions in which an entity incurs liabilities in exchange for goods or services that are based on the fair value of the entity's equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of those equity instruments. This statement covers a wide range of share-based compensation arrangements including share options, restricted share plans, performance-based award, share appreciation rights and employee share purchase plans. SFAS No. 123 (R) requires a public entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the fair value of the award on the grant date ( with limited exceptions). That cost will be recognized in the entity's financial statements over the period during which the employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award. The Company does not expect an impact on its overall results from operations and financial position from adopting the provisions as provided for under SFAS No. 123R.

The following assumptions were made to value the stock options and warrants for the six months ended June 30, 2006: risk-free interest rate of 8-9%, volatility of 74.66%, and terms ranging from two to ten years. The following assumptions were made to value the stock options and warrants for the year ended December 31, 2005: risk-free interest rate of 3 to 4%, volatility ranging from 72% to 94%, and terms of three to ten years. The following assumptions were made to value the stock options and warrants for the year ended December 31, 2004: risk-free interest rate of 4%, volatility of 53%, and terms of three to nine years.

Stock Options

Summarized information about stock options outstanding and exercisable at June 30, 2006 is as follows:

	Options Outstanding					Options Exercisable

	Exercise Price	Number of Shares Under Options Outstanding	Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)		Weighted Average Exercise Price	Number of Shares Under Options Exercisable		Weighted Average Exercise Price

$	0.23	5,336,623	7.36	$	0.23	5,336,623	$	0.23
	0.30	50,000	3.50		0.30	50,000		0.30
	0.40	250,000	3.50		0.40	250,000		0.40
	0.575	250,000	3.50		0.575	250,000		0.575
	0.75	600,000	9.75		0.75	0		0.75
	0.94	1,300,000	1.95		0.94	1,300,000		0.94
	0.965	9,906,684	8.83		0.965	7,406,684		0.965

$	0.23 - 0.965	17,693,307	7.66	$	0.72	14,593,307	$	0.69

Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Shareholders	Shares Issuable Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options	Weighted Average Exercise Price	Shares Available for Issuance

1999 Equity Incentive Plan	550,000	$0.47	2,598,570

Following is a summary of the Company's stock option activity during the six months ended June 30, 2006:

	Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price

Options outstanding at December 31, 2005	17,414,449	$	0.68
Exercised	(921,142)		0.33
Granted	1,200,000		0.965

Options outstanding at June 30, 2006	17,693,307	$	0.72

During the six month period ended June 30, 2006, with respect to pending litigation between the parties, the Company and Mr. Steve Pappas entered into a settlement agreement, dated April 14, 2006, wherein Mr. Steve Pappas: (i) received an option to purchase 1,200,000 shares of Company common stock at a strike price of $0.965 per share, such option exercisable for a ten year period, and subject to other restrictions as contained in the option agreement, (ii) received a credit to exercise Company options and/or warrants held in his name, in an amount of $200,000, which credit represents an approximate exercise of up to 930,000 shares of common stock (iii) entered into a Standstill Agreement that generally provides that Mr. Pappas, and/or his assigns, may not vote Company shares held in his name for a period of five years, and (iv) entered into a Release Agreement to end the voting trust created in his name, in order to facilitate the establishment of the Standstill Agreement. The assumptions used to calculate the fair value of the options issued to Mr. Steve Pappas are presently contained in this Note 9 as, a risk-free interest rate of 8%, volatility of 74.66% and a term of ten years. The expense recorded during the period ended June 30, 2006 is allocated to Professional fees – related parties in an amount of $413,880. See Note 10 and Note 12.

Options issued, for the year ended December 31, 2005, by the Company totaled 10,730,000 and include the number of shares under options outstanding of 1,300,000 shares issued to LRM employees and consultants, at a strike price of $0.94 per share and a three year exercise period with immediate vesting of the option grants, and 8,830,000 shares issued to the Company's management team and consultants, at a strike price of $0.965 per share and a ten year exercise period. Of the grants issued to Company's management team and consultants, 2,500,000 shares are not included in the options exercisable section of the tabular format above but are included in the options issued section of the tabular format, as the vesting of these options is subject to certain performance criteria that must be met by LRM Industries prior to vesting, with these options being issued to two Company management team members. The Company has calculated the future value of these non-vested option grants to be $1,875,000 and will recognize the effect of this valuation in its financial statements as the vesting criteria are achieved and the option grants become vested. These non-vested options previously discussed are exercisable only if LRM achieves: (i) $40,000,000 in annual revenue or (ii) has 17% profit based on pre tax income, in any 4 calendar years ending December 31, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008. In connection with the 1,300,000 options issued to LRM employees and consultants, these options were issued as a part of their respective employment and consulting agreements to retain their services for the newly created joint venture entity, LRM Industries. The fair value ascribed to the option grants is $741,000, which amount has been recorded as a compensation expense at the time of the grants. See Note 13.

Additionally, the Company granted 600,000 options to Board members during the year ended December 31, 2005, at a strike price of $0.75 per share. These options vest ½ after one year from the date of issue and ½ two years after the date of issue, given that the Board members remain in their capacities with the Company. Due to the vesting criteria established for these Board members, the Company will not recognize the effect of the compensation, until such time as the options vest. The assumptions used to calculate the fair value of the options issued to former TCD shareholders are, a risk-free interest rate of 4%, volatility of 94% and a term of three years. The options granted to Company management and consultants were rewards for efforts expended and achievements made by virtue of completion of the merger agreement of TCD into the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary ECC, formation of the joint venture with an established plastics industry partner, Nova Chemicals, Inc. and for various additional management services provided to the Company since 2003 and as incentive for services to be provided to the Company in future years. The assumptions used to calculate the fair value of the options issued to management and consultants are presently contained in this Note 9 as, a risk-free interest rate of 3%, volatility of 72% and a term of ten years. The expense recorded during the period ended June 30, 2005 is $4,747,500 and allocated to Professional fees – related parties and Professional fees – other, in the amounts of $4,653,900 and $93,600, respectively. Any deferred expense will be recorded when it appears likely that the LRM operating performance criteria, as previously set out, will be achieved.

The weighted average fair market value of stock options granted for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and the year ended December 31, 2005 was $0.72 and $0.34, respectively.

Common Stock Warrants

Summarized information about common stock warrants outstanding and exercisable at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 is as follows:

	Common Shares Under Warrants	Exercise Price Per Share	Weighted Average Fair Value Per Share At Grant Date	Expiration Date

Balance, December 31, 2005	16,816,250	$0.20 - $0.75	$0.37	2/05 - 9/14

Exercise of warrants	(388,000)	$0.40 - $0.50	$0.42	1/06-11/08

Expiration of warrants	(3,362,000)	$0.40 - $0.75	$0.55	1/06-05/06

Balance, June 30, 2006	13,066,250	$0.20 - $0.75	$0.32	6/06 - 9/14

During the six month period ended June 30, 2006, 388,000 shares of Company common stock were issued when common stock warrants were exercised at prices ranging from $0.40 to $0.50 per share, subject to terms as contained within the respective warrant holder agreements. An additional 3,362,000 warrants expired during the six month period ended June 30, 2006.

During the six month period ended June 30, 2006, the Company and Nova Chemicals, Inc., a shareholder, entered into a promissory note arrangement in the principal amount of $500,000. The note bears an interest rate of 9% per annum with interest payment payable in 24 equal monthly installments of $3,750 commencing June 15, 2006, payable in arrears. Principal and any unpaid interest are payable in full two years from the date of the promissory note issuance. Principal (and any interest) due to the note holder may be prepaid or paid in advance, in whole or in part, at any time without premium or penalty. Nova, at its sole discretion, may convert the loan proceeds and accrued interest into common stock of the Company, at an exercise price of $0.45 per share, with each warrant being valued at $0.206 per share. These warrants are fully exercisable for up to two years from the dates of the note agreement. The Company used the assumptions of a 9% interest rate, volatility of 74.66% and a two-year period to calculate the warrant value. The calculated fair value of the warrants on the note and accrued interest for the six month period ended June 30, 2006, in the amounts of $228,889 and $1,717, respectively, has been recorded as a discount on the debt issued and is being amortized over the life of the debt. During the six month period ended June 30, 2006, the Company has amortized this discount on debt, in the amount of $12,109. The accumulated amortization for the discount on debt relating to this promissory note for the period ended June 30, 2006 is $12,109. During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company has accrued interest on the loan payable in an amount of $3,750. The amortization previously described is reflected in the financial statements as a charge to interest for the period ended. The convertible warrant has not been included as an outstanding amount in the warrant table included herein, as a reasonable probability exists that the Company may make payment on the loan principal and interest at or prior to the end of the loan term and that the stock conversion rights may not be exercised by Nova. The Company has pledged its interest in LRM Industries, LLC as security for repayment of the loan principal, including accrued interest. See Note 6 and Note 7.

During the year ended December 31, 2005, 3,612,500 shares of Company common stock were issued when common stock warrants were exercised at prices ranging from $0.25 - $0.50 per share, subject to terms as contained within the respective warrant holder agreements. An additional 561,250 warrants expired during the year ended December 31, 2005.

The Company has issued warrants associated with debt financings undertaken by the Company during the year ended December 31, 2003. See note 6.

NOTE 10 – RELATED PARTIES

During the six month period ended June 30, 2006, options issued by the Company totaled 1,200,000 and were issued to a Company director as a part of a settlement agreement between the parties. See Note 9 and Note 12.

During the year ended December 31, 2005, options issued by the Company totaled 10,730,000 and include the number of shares under options outstanding of 1,300,000 shares issued to LRM employees and consultants and 8,830,000 shares issued to the Company's management team and consultants. Of the grants issued to Company's management team and consultants, 2,500,000 shares are not included in the options exercisable section of the tabular format above but are included in the options issued section of the tabular format, as the vesting of these options is subject to certain performance criteria that must be met by LRM Industries prior to vesting, with these options being issued to two Company management team members. See Note 9.

Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company granted 600,000 options to Board members during the period year ended December 31, 2005. These options vest ½ after one year from the date of issue and ½ two years after the date of issue, given that the Board members remain in their capacities with the Company. Due to the vesting criteria established for these Board members, the Company will not recognize the effect of the compensation, until such time as the options vest.

NOTE 11 – INCOME TAXES

At June 30, 2006, the Company had net deferred tax assets of approximately $4,015,000, principally arising from net operating loss carryforwards for income tax purposes. The Company calculates its deferred tax asset using a combined State and Federal tax rate of 39.5%. As the Company's management cannot determine that it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefit of the net deferred tax asset, a valuation allowance equal to the net deferred tax asset has been established at June 30, 2006.

The significant components of the deferred tax asset at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 are as follows:

		June 30,		December 31,
		2006		2005

Net operating loss carryforward	$	10,768,000	$	8,300,000

Deferred tax asset	$	4,015,000	$	2,800,000

Deferred tax asset valuation allowance	$	(4,015,000)	$	(2,800,000)

At June 30, 2006, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $4,015,000, which expire in the years 2018 through 2026. The change in the allowance account from December 31, 2005 to June 30, 2006 was $1,215,000.

The Company recognized $413,880 and $5,488,500 of losses from the issuance of stock options during the six month period ended June 30, 2006 and the year ended December 31, 2005, respectively, which were not deductible for tax purposes.

NOTE 12 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Operating Lease Agreements

The Company entered into a lease of office space in New York, New York on July 1, 2005 for a period of 24 months. Lease payments are currently $4,542 per month, with additional charges for common area services. The lease payment includes a provision for certain specific telephone and secretarial services. A security deposit was paid in the amount of $8,303. Total payments under the lease for the six months ended June 30, 2006 were $27,252.

The Company entered into a lease for office space in Orlando, Florida on September 16, 2002 for a period of 36 months. The lease ended during the current reporting period. A security deposit was paid in the amount of $2,600, and the return of this deposit was recognized during the six month period ended June 30, 2006. Total payments under this lease for the year ended December 31, 2005 were $24,192.

The Company entered into a lease for office space in Boca Raton, Florida on February 7, 2001 for sixty months. Lease payments, including charges for common area, are currently $4,942. A security deposit and last month's rent were paid in the amount of $8,412. A portion of this space was being subleased, with the sublessee reimbursing the Company $3,000 per month. The Company's net lease payments amounted to $2,121. Total net lease payments for the year ended December 31, 2005 were $27,940. This lease completed during February 2006. The security deposit previously provided by the Company was set off against the final lease payment due, and during the six month period ended June 30, 2006 the Company made a final lease payment in an amount of $2,610.

The Company also records as rent expense, payments to officers and directors for lodging reimbursement, but the Company is not contractually bound by lease agreements to make such payments. For the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company recorded payments in amounts of $14,034 related to these transactions.

Future annual minimum operating lease payments for the terms of the New York lease agreements are as follows for the years ending December 31:

		New York Office

2006	$	27,252
2007	$	31,794

The Company leases its facility in Mims, Florida, which was acquired in the acquisition of TCD, to its joint venture entity, LRM Industries, LLC. The two-year agreement provides for rents of $7,000 per month, which lease completes in March 2007. These transactions have been eliminated in the consolidation of these financial statements. Due to the sale of the Mims property as discussed herein, the Company anticipates termination of the lease with LRM for the Mims property.

During the six month period ended June 30, 2006, LRM relocated its operations to a Rockledge, Florida facility. Subsequent to the period ended June 30, 2006, the Company closed the sale of property that it held through its wholly-owned interest in ECC. The sale includes all land, buildings and lease rights for the Company property located in Mims, Florida. See Note 4, Note 6, Note 7 and Note 15.

Capital Leases Agreements

During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company's joint venture interest, LRM, secured a capital lease for purposes of acquiring a key component of production line equipment. The equipment is valued at $392,200 and LRM had not taken delivery of the equipment as of the year ended December 31, 2005. The Company recorded the equipment in its property, plant and equipment, upon delivery, during the period ended June 30, 2006. LRM borrowed the funds required to acquire the equipment and makes monthly payments on this obligation, in an amount of $8,024, over a five year period, commencing January 2006. For the period ended June 30, 2006, the Company shows the cash received from this financing, including interest, in an amount of $266,441 as Restricted cash and an amount of $96,290 as a Prepaid expense on its consolidated balance sheets. See Note 2.

During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company acquired computer equipment through two capital leases. The Company recognizes the value of the equipment in property, plant and equipment in the financial statements and the lease liability in both current liabilities and long-term liabilities on the financial statements. The leases, totaling $9,463, are for 36 months, with interest and principal payments of $345 per month.

During year ended December 31, 2004, the Company acquired additional computer equipment under capital lease agreements. These leases, totaling $6,132, are for 36 months, with interest and principal payments of $222 per month.

Litigation

The Company is a named defendant in an action filed by Mr. Real Morel in May 2000 in the Supreme Court of British Columbia, Canada. In this action, Mr. Morel alleges non-payment by the Company of amounts due pursuant to demand promissory notes. After consultation with British Columbia legal counsel and a review of the circumstances surrounding the issuance of the notes, the Company has resolved to dispute this liability. Management of the Company believes that the outcome will not have a material adverse effect on the financial position of the Company. Although no further action has been taken with respect to this dispute, the Company intends to proceed to seek a dismissal of this matter through the Supreme Court of British Columbia, and pursue its legal options. Company management believes that it will prevail in this matter and that the outcome of the action will not have a material adverse affect on the Company's operations. Since the creation of the promissory notes as previously described, the Company has accrued interest on the notes. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, the accrued interest balance on these promissory notes is $47,104, and this amount is shown in the Company's Balance Sheet under the accrued interest account.

The Company was a named defendant along with others including a director of the Company in a proceeding filed in the Superior Court of Cumberland County, Maine by former employees of Sports Quest of New England LLC ("Sports Quest"), for back wages and penalties, which could have totaled more than $300,000. The Company denied all liability, ownership, or other involvement with Sport Quest LLC. During the period ended September 30, 2005, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with Sports Quest, wherein the Company made payment in the amount of $20,000 to Sports Quest, without admitting to any wrongful actions with respect to allegations as set forth in the proceeding as filed in the Maine court.

On August 7, 2003, Mr. Steve Pappas, one of the Company directors and major shareholders, created a voting trust with certain of his Company shares. Although by its terms the voting trust was to remain in full force and effect until August 7, 2006, on or about May 2005, Mr. Steve Pappas made demand upon both the Company and his trustee to immediately terminate the trust and charged both the Company and certain of its other directors with, among other things, having acted improperly in the issuance by the Company of certain stock options.

By reason of the foregoing, on or about June 10, 2005 the Company filed its complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York seeking a declaratory judgment affirming the validity of the voting trust. The Company complaint was subsequently amended to correct a technical defect in its jurisdictional statement and to add multiple claims that while Mr. Steve Pappas, the Defendant, was President, CEO and Chairman of the Company he violated his fiduciary duties and subjected the Company to certain unnecessary and undue costs and expenses for which the Company is entitled to be reimbursed. Mr. Steve Pappas, has denied all of the Company claims and has filed counterclaims seeking affirmative relief by (1) requesting that the voting trust be declared invalid; (2) alleging that the trustee of the voting trust has breached his fiduciary duties; (3) seeking to void two recent awards of Company stock options that were approved by the Board of Directors; (4) seeking to force the Company to indemnify him for expenses he incurred as a result certain business ventures; (5) seeking to force the Company to indemnify him for legal fees incurred in connection with defending the claims asserted against him in the Company's amended Complaint; and (6) seeking to recover unpaid compensation that was allegedly promised to him by the Company representatives for services performed on behalf of the Company. Subsequent to the period ended March 31, 2006, with respect to the pending litigation between the parties, the Company and Mr. Steve Pappas entered into a settlement agreement, dated April 14, 2006.

With respect to the previous discussion concerning the pending litigation between the parties, during the six month period ended June 30, 2006, the Company and Mr. Steve Pappas entered into a settlement agreement, dated April 14, 2006, wherein Mr. Steve Pappas: (i) received an option to purchase 1,200,000 shares of Company common stock at a strike price of $0.965 per share, such option exercisable for a ten year period, and subject to other restrictions as contained in the option agreement, (ii) received a credit to exercise Company options and/or warrants held in his name, in an amount of $200,000, which credit represents an approximate exercise of up to 930,000 shares of common stock (iii) entered into a Standstill Agreement that generally provides that Mr. Pappas, and/or his assigns, may not vote Company shares held in his name for a period of five years, and (iv) entered into a Release Agreement to end the voting trust created in his name, in order to facilitate the establishment of the Standstill Agreement. See Note 9 and Note 10.

The Company was the defendant in an action commenced by its former law firm for unpaid legal services in the amount of $18,952. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the action, and during the period ended September 30, 2005 the Company entered into a settlement agreement with its former law firm to resolve the dispute for payment of legal services provided. The Company made payment in the amount of $10,000 to resolve this matter. This payment is offset in the accompanying financial statements against the previously recorded liability amount of $18,952.

Schaefer Systems International, Inc.

On March 28, 2003, the Company entered into a product development agreement with Schaefer Systems International, Inc., (hereinafter "SSI") wherein the Company would design, develop and produce a quantity of prototypes for field testing. An initial payment of $61,215 was made by SSI to the Company to facilitate the development of a proprietary product.

The Company has delivered part of the first run of development parts. The initial period of the development contract has expired. Due to changes from both SSI and the company that is constructing the prototypes, the final product has not been finished. The Company believes that the first generation molds produced for SSI under the product development agreement are of no commercial value. Accordingly, the initial payment, previously held as a deposit on account, was recognized by the Company as an expense and charged to research and development costs during the period ended September 30, 2005.

NOTE 13 – ACQUISITIONS

In March, 2005, the Company announced that it had executed a definitive merger agreement in which TCD merged with and into the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, Envirokare Composites Corp. The transaction combined all of TCD's business, including its intellectual property, property, plant and other assets, including contracts with ECC. Upon completion of the merger with TCD into the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, ECC, the operating assets in TCD were assigned to LRM, through ECC. TCD, as such, has no operations and LRM is the operating entity. Accordingly, the Company consolidates LRM's operations in its reporting. As a result of the structure as previously described, there are no operating results for TCD to report. LRM reports its financial activities on a quarterly basis and has elected a year end of December 31. The operating activities of LRM are consolidated in the Company's periodic financial reports. The merger agreement provided for an initial payment of $2.5 million to TCD shareholders and a subsequent schedule of payments over a seven-year period totaling $15 million. The current value of this note was determined by applying a discount rate of 12%. The original note value under this discount was $8,157,208, of which $2,500,000 was paid during the quarter ended March 31, 2005.

The intangible asset obtained in the acquisition of TCD was incorporated into and recorded as patent value, in conjunction with the purchase price for TCD and the real property and equipment, as previously discussed. The audit of TCD's books and records for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004 was completed and it was determined that in-process research and development, that realized gross margin profits in an approximate amount of $12,500, existed at the close of the merger. This amount has been included as a component of the assets acquired in the merger with TCD.

Following is a summary of the assets acquired under the TCD merger agreement:

Equipment	$	350,000
Real property		400,000
Contracts in-process		12,500
Patents		7,394,708

Assets acquired	$	8,157,208

Also in March, 2005, the Company announced that ECC executed a 50/50 joint venture agreement with Nova Chemicals, Inc., and created a new company, LRM, to commercialize the Company's TPF ThermoPlastic Flowforming technology and process. The Company has contributed its intellectual property rights, technology, manufacturing equipment and all TPF ThermoPlastic Flowforming business activities which were acquired through the merger with TCD into the joint venture, while Nova Chemicals has contributed $5,000,000 in cash and has agreed to contribute future services valued at $1,000,000. The joint venture is accounted for as a subsidiary of the Company.

Following is a summary of the net assets contributed to LRM by the Company:

Equipment	$	350,000
Contracts in-process		12,500
Patents		7,394,708

Net assets contributed	$	7,757,208

The Company issued 1,300,000 options to employees and consultants of LRM (former employees of TCD), in connection with the acquisition of TCD. Aspects of this issuance were previously discussed in Note 9, above. The fair value ascribed to the option grants is $741,000. This amount was expensed during the year ended December 31, 2005 in the consolidation of the Company's financial statements and reported as a charge to compensation expense. The Black-Scholes model was utilized to calculate the value of these options and the assumptions used to calculate the fair value of the options issued to former TCD shareholders were a risk-free interest rate of 4%, volatility of 94% and a term of three years. The calculated value for these option shares was $0.57 per share and the options were granted at an exercise price of $0.94 per share. The Company has also contributed equipment and in-process contracts to LRM, in the amounts of $350,000 and $12,500 respectively.

NOTE 14 – DEVELOPMENT STAGE REPORTING

During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company recognized significant revenues from its consolidated joint venture entity, LRM Industries, LLC. As a result, the Company has discontinued its reporting as a development stage enterprise.

NOTE 15 – SUBSEQUENT EVENT

Subsequent to the period ended June 30, 2006, the Company closed the sale of property that it held through its wholly-owned interest in ECC. The sale includes all land, buildings and lease rights for the Company property located in Mims, Florida. The property was sold to a private interest, and the property is no longer used in the Company's business. Net proceeds of sale to the Company, after satisfying a mortgage held on the property and additional closing costs, is in an amount of approximately $325,000. See Note 4, Note 6, Note 7 and Note 12.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

Envirokare Tech, Inc. (the "Company" or "Envirokare") is engaged in the application design, development and manufacturing, utilizing proprietary thermoplastic composite technologies including TPF ThermoPlastic Flowforming™. Upon the closing of the Merger Agreement between the Company's subsidiary Envirokare Composite Corp. ("ECC") and ThermoPlastic Composite Designs, Inc ("TCD") and of the Joint Venture Agreement (LRM Industries, LLC, or "LRM") between Envirokare Composite Corp. and NOVA Chemicals, Inc. ("NOVA") during March 2005, described below, the Company's TPF ThermoPlastic Flowforming business is being conducted through its position and interest in LRM.

Technology: TPF ThermoPlastic Flowforming™ is a new processing technology for the low pressure, fully automated molding of very large, long-fiber-reinforced or unreinforced thermoplastic structural parts providing enhanced isometric mechanical properties through the preservation of fiber length and the randomization of fiber orientation in molded components. The TPF ThermoPlastic Flowforming process is fully automated, whereby the polymer composition is laid down on the molding tool in a near net-shape of the final part, prior to the compression phase. Parts weighing hundreds of pounds and tens of feet in size are easily produced in a single molding operation to produce very large unitary structures. The process utilizes recycled or virgin resins and is designed to reuse its own production scrap, thereby eliminating production waste by-products. The Company and LRM believe that TPF ThermoPlastic Flowforming technology offers innovative, flexible solutions paired with lower investment and conversion costs for large complex components, with the option to use commodity or engineering polymers, synthetic and glass fibers or natural fibers, and recycled polymers. TPF ThermoPlastic Flowforming process patents have been issued under United States Patent and Trademark Office patent nos. 6,719,551, 6,869,558 and 6,900,547. These patents provide a system and method for forming an article from thermoplastic material and fiber.

LRM Services: Services offered by LRM, include: Product design, Development and Prototyping, Computer Assisted Design and Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) Part and Tool drawings, Tooling Design, Fabrication and Project Management, Material Selection Support, Toll Conversion (i.e. the process of custom molding products on behalf of customers), Licensing and Technical Support.

The TPF ThermoPlastic Flowforming process has application in a broad range of industries including: agriculture, aerospace, automotive, construction, communications, marine, materials handling, medical, military, transportation, and waste management. TPF ThermoPlastic Flowforming composite products are an advantaged replacement for many wood, aluminum, steel, other metal alloys, concrete, other plastic and fiberglass products, by providing products that have corrosion resistance, are lighter and cost less to manufacture. As a thermoplastic process, TPF ThermoPlastic Flowforming has an additional advantage in that it does not emit volatile organic contaminants (VOCs).

The Company entered into agreements acquiring specific application rights to this technology through license and merger agreements with TCD dated March 30, 2001, wherein the Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary ECC, was granted rights to commercially exploit the TPF ThermoPlastic Flowforming process in certain specific field-of-use applications.

On March 3, 2005, the Company completed a merger of TCD, a Florida corporation, into ECC resulting in the acquisition of TCD including the assets comprised of real property, plant, equipment and intellectual property, in exchange for cash and notes, as generally outlined below. These merger terms were modified from the March 30, 2001 merger agreement.

The "Merger Consideration" equaled the sum of (i) fifteen million dollars ($15,000,000) (the "Fixed Merger Consideration") and (ii) the aggregate amounts payable in accordance with Section (h) of the Merger Agreement: (the "Contingent Merger Consideration"). Following are the general payment terms to TCD Shareholders, as set forth in the Merger Agreement;

(a) At the Closing, ECC shall pay the Shareholders $2,500,000.

(b) The balance of the Merger Consideration shall be paid to the TCD Shareholders in eight (8) annual installments following the Closing with the first such payment due on or prior to January 31, 2006 and the last such payment due on or prior to January 31, 2013 (and such payments shall be deemed to be distributed to the Shareholders of TCD in complete liquidation), with each annual payment to be equal to 2.5% of the "Consolidated EBIDTA" of LRM Industries, LLC ("LRM") for each calendar year, commencing with the calendar year ending December 31, 2005, up to a maximum aggregate of $12,500,000 for all payments under this subsection (b). LRM is the Company's Joint Venture Company with NOVA Chemicals, Inc.

(c) In the event that 2.5% of the Consolidated EBIDTA of LRM during the first four years after the Closing Date (ending on December 31, 2008) is less than an aggregate of $2,000,000, ECC shall pay to the Shareholders any amount by which $2,000,000 exceeds 2.5% of the aggregate Consolidated EBIDTA of LRM during this period within 31 days after the end of the fourth year.

(d) In the event that 2.5% of the Consolidated EBIDTA of LRM during the years five, six and seven after the Closing Date (ending on December 31, 2011) total less than an aggregate of $3,000,000, ECC shall pay to the Shareholders any amount by which $3,000,000 exceeds 2.5% of the aggregate Consolidated EBIDTA of LRM during the period, within 31 days after the end of the seventh year.

(e) At the end of the eighth year (ending December 31, 2012), in the event that the TCD Shareholders have not been paid $15,000,000 by virtue of the payments set forth in Section 2.01 (a), (b), (d) and (e), ECC shall pay on or prior to January 31, 2013, any amount by which $15,000,000 exceeds all monies paid to the Shareholders to date under Section 2.01(a), (b), (d) and so that the total payments made aggregate $15,000,000.

(f) In the event that a cash payment is due the Shareholders pursuant to this paragraph, any TCD Shareholder may elect to receive this payment in four equal annual payments beginning at the end of the eighth year set out above. Unpaid but due balances will carry interest equal to LIBOR plus one percent but not to the extent a Shareholder elects a deferral under the provisions of the prior sentence.

(g) The assurance of any such payments to be made pursuant to this Section is provided only by ECC and guaranteed by LRM and Parent (Envirokare) as set forth below. The Parties acknowledge that no such assurance is being provided by NOVA or any of NOVA's affiliates or subsidiaries other than ECC, LRM and Parent.

(h) Ongoing Payments. As additional Merger Consideration (the "Contingent Merger Consideration"), beginning January 1, 2013, the Shareholders shall be entitled to receive from ECC payments annually equal to their pro rata share of 1% of the Net Income of LRM payable to the extent of and at the time of distribution of such Net Income to ECC or 90 days after the end of each year, whichever is sooner.

The obligations of ECC to pay the Fixed Merger Consideration and the Contingent Merger Consideration are guaranteed by LRM and the Company, and are evidenced by guaranties executed and delivered by the Company and LRM to the TCD shareholders.

As part of the transaction described above, ECC sold to LRM, under an Asset Purchase Agreement, equipment and other personal property located in Mims, Florida and intellectual property acquired in the merger transaction described in this section. Other than real estate owned and leased to LRM, these assets were substantially all of the assets of ECC sold to LRM as part of the transaction in which ECC acquired a 50% interest in the LRM, the joint venture company (see below).

On March the 3, 2005, the Company through, its wholly-owned subsidiary ECC, executed a Limited Liability Company Agreement with NOVA creating a Joint Venture Company, LRM, which is a Delaware limited liability company created for the purpose of commercializing the Company's TPF ThermoPlastic Flowforming technology, including but not limited to the manufacture, marketing, sales and/or licensing of the technology.

LRM is owned one half each by ECC and NOVA and is capitalized as generally set forth in the joint venture agreement between NOVA and ECC as follows:

1.1 Contribution of Envirokare. ECC shall make no Contributions to the Company, initially, and need not make any additional Contributions unless, in its sole discretion, it decides to do so, subject to approval. ECC is selling certain assets to the Company (i.e. LRM) pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement and ECC shall be paid the amounts specified below as consideration for such transfer.

1.2 Contributions of NOVA. NOVA has made and shall make Contributions to the Company as follows:

On the date of this Agreement, NOVA will contribute five million dollars ($5,000,000.00) to the Company (the "NOVA Investment"). In addition to the NOVA Investment, NOVA will also contribute one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) in services to the Company (i.e. LRM), pursuant to the NOVA Service Agreement, an exhibit to the Limited Liability Company Agreement.

As part of the Limited Liability Company Agreement, ECC entered into a lease agreement providing for the lease of the plant property in Mims, Florida to LRM for a period of two years with an option to renew for an additional two years. Lease payments payable to ECC equal $84,000 per year for the first two years and $91,200 per year for the two year renewal period. In addition, the property is subject to a cellular tower lease providing for additional payments, in the amount of $12,000 per year, to ECC as successor to TCD. During the six month period ended June 30, 2006, LRM relocated to a new operating facility in Rockledge, Florida. Subsequent to the period ended June 30, 2006, the Company closed the sale of property that it held through its wholly-owned interest in ECC. The sale includes all land, buildings and lease rights as previously described. The property was sold to a private interest, and the property is no longer used in the Company's business. The Company is in the process of terminating the lease with LRM due to the closing of the property sale.

Financial Position:

The Company consolidates its activities for all financial reporting purposes. For the six month period ended June 30, 2006, the Company had a cash balance of $970,232 compared to a cash balance of $2,193,604 for the period ended December 31, 2005. The decrease in cash was primarily due to funds expended by the Company's joint venture interest, LRM, to acquire operating equipment for its new operating facility in Rockledge, Florida. For the six months ended June 30, 2006 the Company reported property and equipment in the amounts of $400,000 and $1,415,949, respectively, compared to property and equipment in the amounts of $400,000 and $507,429, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2005. The increase in the property and equipment amounts is attributed to the acquisition of TCD Inc., by merger, during the six months ended June 30, 2005, as well as additional equipment purchases, including $130,226 in leasehold improvements for its Rockledge, Florida operating facility, during the six month period ended. For the six month period ended June 30, 2006, patents were valued at $6,880,885 compared to $7,089,966 for the year ended December 31, 2005. The decrease in patent values is due to amortization recognized during six month period ended. For the same respective periods, the Company reported $892,878 in accounts payable compared to $316,900 during the 2005 reporting period. The Company accrued compensation for the six month period ended June 30, 2006, in an amount of $91,163 compared to $104,186 for the year ended December 31, 2005. The decrease was due to payments made on account during the current six month period ended. The current portion of the notes payable to shareholders was $1,438,340 and $1,490,812 for the six month period ended June 30, 2006 and the year ended December 31, 2005, respectively. The decrease in the current portion of notes payable are due to payments made on account to certain notes that mature and became payable by the Company during the six month period ended. For the six month period ended June 30, 2006 and the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company has accrued interest payable on promissory notes due, in the amounts of $50,854 and $44,031, respectively, in which an amount of $47,104 is currently a subject of legal dispute (see Part II, Item 1, below). The Company also reported a minority interest in a subsidiary during the six months ended June 30, 2006, in the amount of $5,164,782. This amount represents the Company's 50% interest in its joint venture with NOVA Chemicals, Inc.

During the period ended June 30, 2006, LRM entered into a contract to lease operating facilities located in Rockledge, Florida. The lease provides a manufacturing site with additional available space for expansion to accommodate three operating lines. As of June 30, 2006, LRM was in the process of completing relocation from the Company owned Mims, Florida facilities to the newly acquired Rockledge facilities. Subsequent to the period ended June 30, 2006, the Company closed the sale of property that it held through its wholly-owned interest in ECC. The sale includes all land, buildings and lease rights for the Company property located in Mims, Florida. The property was sold to a private interest, and the property is no longer used in the Company's business. Net proceeds of sale to the Company, after satisfying a mortgage held on the property and additional closing costs, is in an amount of approximately $325,000.

As of December 31, 2005, LRM contracted for the acquisition of a new custom manufactured press to be delivered during the third quarter of 2006. The cost of this press is approximately $392,000, and LRM procured a capital lease to acquire the press. LRM determined that, in order to meet anticipated production requests from customers during Fiscal 2006, additional production and operating equipment is required. Subsequent to the six month period ended June 30, 2006, LRM entered into agreements to acquire additional production equipment, including two 1,500 ton presses and two 6” in-line extruders. The acquired equipment will make up a significant portion of a new production line, and this new line is anticipated to be operational during the last quarter of Fiscal 2006 and commissioned at a capital cost of approximately $2,200,000.

Results from Operations:

Revenues reported for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 are $31,825 and $72,047, respectively, compared to revenues of $1,073,538 for the year ended December 31, 2005. The current period revenues were realized from a partial period of operations from the joint venture entity, LRM, and resulted in a Gross Profit of $42,358 for the six month period ended June 30, 2006. LRM was in the process of relocating to its new operating facilities in Rockledge, Florida and was unable to operate at normal capacity during the six months ended June 30, 2006. Total expenses reported by the Company for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2006 and the years ended December 31, 2005 were $2,090,902, $2,927,479 and $8,495,072, respectively, resulting in a respective Loss From Operations of $2,064,742 and $2,885,120 compared to a Loss From Operations of $7,985,593 for the year ended December 31, 2005. The comparative 4 fold decrease in expenses for the six month period ended was primarily due to interim operating results, as compared to results from a full year of operations, and to recognition of a one time expense of $4,947,869 for the issuance of market price options to executives and others granted after the closing of the ECC/TCD merger and recognizing interest expense, as amortized on a note payable to former TCD shareholders, with the note payable being a primary component of the merger consideration provided in the acquisition of TCD by merger during the year ended December 31, 2005. The period covered by this report also represents the initial operations of LRM, with operations conducted at the facility acquired through the Company's merger with TCD and, as discussed elsewhere herein, LRM has recently relocated to new operating facilities located in Rockledge, Florida.

Liquidity:

The Company has budgeted expenditures of $780,000 for the 12 months ending June 30, 2007. During the six month period ended June 30, 2006, the Company raised $159,752 from the exercise of stock options. The Company had cash remaining at June 30, 2006, in the amount of $970,232, which includes cash balances in LRM, in the amount of $811,154, of which $266,441 is restricted cash. LRM was initially capitalized with a $2,500,000 contribution in cash and $1,000,000 in services to be provided by NOVA. The significant changes in assets during the six month period ended June 30, 2006 were due to (i) the increase in accrued interest by $380,164 due to the imputation of interest payable on the net present value of the note payable to TCD shareholders, (ii) the acquisition of additional operating equipment by the Company's joint venture interest, LRM, (iii) a change in the net patent amount, as a result of amortization of the patent value during the three month period ended, (iv) decrease in accounts receivable, in an amount of $287,886, (v) establishment of an initial inventory, in an amount of $147,707 at LRM, and (vi) the increase in accrued interest due to notes payable to a former director and officer, such payments that are in legal dispute by the Company. The Company expects to raise any required additional operating funds by sales of shares of its common stock conducted through private placement offerings, through funds received from individuals exercising warrants or options and through borrowings. Although management believes these capital sources to be sufficient to meet the needs of its operations, there is no assurance that the Company will be successful in raising additional capital to fund its operations.

ITEM 3. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Our management evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a - 15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB. Based on this evaluation, the Company's management, including the CEO and CFO, concluded at that time that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information the Company is required to disclose in reports it files or submits, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, and that such information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.

Changes in internal control over financial reporting. There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company is a defendant in an action filed by Mr. Real Morel in the Supreme Court of British Columbia, Canada under which the Company was served in May 2000. Mr. Morel alleges non-payment by the Company of amounts due pursuant to demand promissory notes made by the Company to Mr. Morel during 1998. The amount claimed is approximately $69,600 including interest. After consultation with British Columbia legal counsel and a review of the circumstances surrounding the issuance of the notes, the Company has resolved to dispute liability and to advance a set-off and counterclaim. Management of the Company believes that the outcome will not have a material adverse effect on the financial position of the Company. Since the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, no further action has been taken with respect to this matter, by either the Company or Mr. Morel.

The Company was a defendant along with others, including Steve Pappas, a Director of the Company, in a proceeding filed in the Superior Court of Cumberland County, Maine by former employees of Sports Quest of New England LLC, for back wages and penalties. The Company denied all liability, ownership or other involvement with Sport Quest, LLC. The Company entered into a settlement agreement with the Plaintiffs in the case which has been fully executed. The result was not material to the Company.

The Company has filed a Declaratory Judgment action in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against Steve Pappas, a director of the Company. Envirokare is asking that the Voting Trust and Trust Agreement signed by Mr. Pappas on August 7, 2003 be declared valid and in full force and effect until August 7, 2006. Mr. Pappas filed certain claims in response thereto. The docket number of this action is 1:05cv-05515-LAK. The Company and Mr. Steve Pappas entered into a settlement agreement covering the respective claims in this matter, dated April 14, 2006, wherein Mr. Steve Pappas: (i) received an option to purchase 1,200,000 shares of Company common stock at a strike price of $0.965 per share, such option exercisable for a ten year period, and subject to other restrictions as contained in the option agreement, (ii) received a credit to exercise Company options and/or warrants held in his name, in an amount of $200,000, which credit represents an approximate exercise of up to 930,000 shares of common stock (iii) entered into a Standstill Agreement that generally provides that Mr. Pappas, and/or his assigns, may not vote Company shares held in his name for a period of five years, and (iv) entered into a Release Agreement to end the voting trust created in his name, in order to facilitate the establishment of the Standstill Agreement.

ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Number Description of Document

(a) Exhibits

None

(b) Reports on Form 8-K

               A report on Form 8-K regarding Item 4.02 was filed by the Company on January 17, 2006.
               A report on Form 8-K regarding Item 9.01 was filed by the Company on March 10, 2006.
               A report on Form 8-K regarding Item 7.01 was filed by the Company on March 20, 2006.
               A report on Form 8-K regarding Item 8.01 was filed by the Company on April 14, 2006.
               A report on Form 8-K regarding Item 2.03 was filed by the Company on May 25, 2006.

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the Registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on August 10, 2006.

Registrant:		ENVIROKARE TECH, INC.


By:		/s/ Nicholas Pappas

Name: Title:		Nicholas Pappas Chairman and CEO

By:		/s/ George Kazantzis

Name: Title:		George Kazantzis President and Principal Financial Officer