UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
x Quarterly report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011
¨ Transition report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act
For the transition period from _______________ to ________________
Commission File Number: 0-24169
PEOPLES BANCORP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland
|
52-2027776
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
Incorporation or Organization)
|
Identification No.)
|
P.O. Box 210, 100 Spring Avenue, Chestertown, Maryland
|
21620
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
(Zip Code)
|
(410) 778-3500
Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter periods that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨ (Not Applicable)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer ¨
|
Accelerated filer ¨
|
Non-accelerated filer ¨
|
Smaller reporting company þ
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes ¨ No þ
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS
State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date: 779,512 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of May 1, 2011
PEOPLES BANCORP, INC.
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
Part I – Financial Information
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial Statements
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2011 (unaudited)
|
|
|
and December 31, 2010
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Income (unaudited) for the three months
|
|
|
ended March 31, 2011 and 2010
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (unaudited)
|
|
|
for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the three months
|
|
|
ended March 31, 2011 and 2010
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
|
8
|
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
|
|
|
and Results of Operations
|
22
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
|
31
|
Item 4.
|
Controls and Procedures
|
31
|
|
|
|
Part II – Other Information
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal Proceedings
|
31
|
Item 1A.
|
Risk Factors
|
31
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
32
|
Item 3.
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
|
32
|
Item 4.
|
(Removed and Reserved)
|
32
|
Item 5.
|
Other Information
|
32
|
Item 6.
|
Exhibits
|
32
|
|
|
|
Signatures
|
32
|
Exhibit Index
|
33
|
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
PEOPLES BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December, 31
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$ |
16,571,994 |
|
|
$ |
10,378,485 |
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
1,016,000 |
|
|
|
1,016,000 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
17,587,994 |
|
|
|
11,394,485 |
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
9,071,820 |
|
|
|
8,035,780 |
|
Securities held to maturity (approximate fair value of $1,527,317 and $3,554,315)
|
|
|
1,508,150 |
|
|
|
3,510,533 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank & CBB Financial Corp. stock, at cost
|
|
|
2,151,600 |
|
|
|
2,151,600 |
|
Loans, less allowance for loan losses of $3,988,150 and $5,656,788
|
|
|
204,731,970 |
|
|
|
207,295,877 |
|
Premises and equipment
|
|
|
6,352,830 |
|
|
|
6,389,781 |
|
Goodwill and intangible assets
|
|
|
587,070 |
|
|
|
603,988 |
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
1,012,580 |
|
|
|
1,360,708 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
2,369,494 |
|
|
|
2,367,847 |
|
Foreclosed real estate
|
|
|
1,370,000 |
|
|
|
1,201,600 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,903,318 |
|
|
|
1,480,216 |
|
Total Assets
|
|
$ |
248,646,826 |
|
|
$ |
245,792,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing
|
|
$ |
38,556,516 |
|
|
$ |
36,219,753 |
|
Interest-bearing
|
|
|
157,160,800 |
|
|
|
153,420,977 |
|
|
|
|
195,717,316 |
|
|
|
189,640,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold under repurchase agreements
|
|
|
2,179,654 |
|
|
|
2,754,321 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
|
|
|
22,000,000 |
|
|
|
24,000,000 |
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
303,301 |
|
|
|
414,758 |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
1,526,031 |
|
|
|
1,590,442 |
|
|
|
|
221,726,302 |
|
|
|
218,400,251 |
|
Stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $10 per share; authorized 1,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares; issued and outstanding 779,512 shares
|
|
|
7,795,120 |
|
|
|
7,795,120 |
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
2,920,866 |
|
|
|
2,920,866 |
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
16,619,629 |
|
|
|
17,088,742 |
|
|
|
|
27,335,615 |
|
|
|
27,804,728 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on available for sale securities
|
|
|
8,947 |
|
|
|
11,474 |
|
Unfunded liability of defined benefit plan
|
|
|
(424,038 |
) |
|
|
(424,038 |
) |
|
|
|
26,920,524 |
|
|
|
27,392,164 |
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
$ |
248,646,826 |
|
|
$ |
245,792,415 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
PEOPLES BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Income (unaudited)
|
|
For the three months ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Interest and dividend revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, including fees
|
|
$ |
2,888,493 |
|
|
$ |
3,219,351 |
|
U.S. government agency securities
|
|
|
41,713 |
|
|
|
108,470 |
|
Deposit in other banks
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
693 |
|
|
|
696 |
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
4,245 |
|
|
|
1,593 |
|
Total interest and dividend revenue
|
|
|
2,935,152 |
|
|
|
3,330,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
672,450 |
|
|
|
739,813 |
|
Borrowed funds
|
|
|
181,131 |
|
|
|
245,149 |
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
853,581 |
|
|
|
984,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
2,081,571 |
|
|
|
2,345,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
|
475,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts
|
|
|
245,185 |
|
|
|
214,802 |
|
Insurance commissions
|
|
|
375,314 |
|
|
|
333,608 |
|
Gain (loss) on sale of foreclosed real estate
|
|
|
(17,352 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Other noninterest revenue
|
|
|
61,185 |
|
|
|
64,190 |
|
Total noninterest revenue
|
|
|
664,332 |
|
|
|
612,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
|
1,024,359 |
|
|
|
1,065,009 |
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
120,798 |
|
|
|
127,715 |
|
Furniture and equipment
|
|
|
84,702 |
|
|
|
89,155 |
|
Other operating
|
|
|
576,031 |
|
|
|
572,673 |
|
Total noninterest expense
|
|
|
1,805,890 |
|
|
|
1,854,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(559,987 |
) |
|
|
628,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
(262,367 |
) |
|
|
226,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(297,620 |
) |
|
$ |
401,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share - basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
(0.38 |
) |
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
PEOPLES BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (unaudited)
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2011 and 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
paid-in
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
comprehensive
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Par value
|
|
|
capital
|
|
|
earnings
|
|
|
income
|
|
|
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2009
|
|
$ |
7,795,120 |
|
|
$ |
2,920,866 |
|
|
$ |
18,865,399 |
|
|
$ |
(691,637 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
401,256 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
401,256 |
|
Unrealized loss on investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
securities available for sale net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of income taxes of $587
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(902 |
) |
|
|
(902 |
) |
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
400,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividend, $.45 per share
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(350,780 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2010
|
|
$ |
7,795,120 |
|
|
$ |
2,920,866 |
|
|
$ |
18,671,133 |
|
|
$ |
(667,753 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2010
|
|
$ |
7,795,120 |
|
|
$ |
2,920,866 |
|
|
$ |
17,088,742 |
|
|
$ |
(412,564 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(297,620 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
(297,620 |
) |
Unrealized loss on investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
securities available for sale net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of income taxes of $1,646
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(2,527 |
) |
|
|
(2,527 |
) |
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(300,147 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividend, $.22 per share
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(171,493 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2011
|
|
$ |
7,795,120 |
|
|
$ |
2,920,866 |
|
|
$ |
16,619,629 |
|
|
$ |
(415,091 |
) |
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
PEOPLES BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)
|
|
For the three months ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest received
|
|
$ |
3,305,576 |
|
|
$ |
3,548,116 |
|
Fees and commissions received
|
|
|
681,684 |
|
|
|
612,600 |
|
Cash paid to suppliers and employees
|
|
|
(2,191,494 |
) |
|
|
(1,546,735 |
) |
Interest paid
|
|
|
(965,038 |
) |
|
|
(1,088,969 |
) |
Taxes paid
|
|
|
262,367 |
|
|
|
(226,534 |
) |
|
|
|
1,093,095 |
|
|
|
1,298,478 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for premises, equipment, and software
|
|
|
(48,040 |
) |
|
|
(69,544 |
) |
Loans made, net of principal collected
|
|
|
703,240 |
|
|
|
(2,694,290 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed real estate
|
|
|
164,248 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Proceeds from maturities and calls of securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Held to maturity
|
|
|
2,000,194 |
|
|
|
1,500,188 |
|
Purchase of securities available for sale
|
|
|
(4,049,654 |
) |
|
|
(4,003,873 |
) |
Purchase of securities held to maturity
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Redemption of FHLB stock, net of purchases
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
1,769,988 |
|
|
|
(5,267,519 |
) |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
736,878 |
|
|
|
1,041,256 |
|
Other deposits
|
|
|
5,339,708 |
|
|
|
(5,801,949 |
) |
Securities sold under repurchase agreements
|
|
|
(574,667 |
) |
|
|
(1,295,742 |
) |
Advances under (repayments of) notes payable, net
|
|
|
(2,000,000 |
) |
|
|
(2,000,000 |
) |
Repayments of other borrowings
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(171,493 |
) |
|
|
(350,780 |
) |
|
|
|
3,330,426 |
|
|
|
(8,407,215 |
) |
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH
|
|
|
6,193,509 |
|
|
|
(12,376,256 |
) |
CASH AND EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
|
|
11,394,485 |
|
|
|
23,004,550 |
|
CASH AND EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD
|
|
$ |
17,587,994 |
|
|
$ |
10,628,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON CASH TRANSACTIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer of foreclosed real estate
|
|
$ |
350,000 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
PEOPLES BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, Continued (unaudited)
|
|
For the three months ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RECONCILIATION OF NET INCOME TO NET CASH PROVIDED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
(297,620 |
) |
|
$ |
401,256 |
|
ADJUSTMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
80,281 |
|
|
|
83,791 |
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
|
475,000 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
411 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
16,918 |
|
|
|
16,918 |
|
Security discount accretion, net of premium amortization
|
|
|
11,629 |
|
|
|
10,353 |
|
Gain of sale of foreclosed real estate
|
|
|
17,352 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Decrease (increase) in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
348,128 |
|
|
|
181,451 |
|
Income Tax refund receivable
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(418,392 |
) |
|
|
175,037 |
|
Increase (decrease) in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred origination fees and costs, net
|
|
|
10,667 |
|
|
|
26,197 |
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
(111,457 |
) |
|
|
(104,007 |
) |
Other Liabilities
|
|
|
(64,411 |
) |
|
|
32,071 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,093,095 |
|
|
$ |
1,298,478 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Peoples Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Peoples Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiaries, The Peoples Bank, a Maryland-chartered bank (the “Bank”), and Fleetwood, Athey, Macbeth & McCown, Inc., a Maryland insurance agency (the “Insurance Agency”), have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Regulation S-X of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Accordingly, they do not include all the information and notes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring entries) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2011 or any other future interim period. The consolidated financial statements contained herein should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in the Annual Report of Peoples Bancorp, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. When used in these notes, the term “Company” refers to Peoples Bancorp, Inc. and, unless the context requires otherwise, its consolidated subsidiaries.
The Account Standards Codification (the “ASC”) of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) became effective on July 1, 2009. At that date, the ASC became FASB’s officially recognized source of authoritative U. S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) applicable to all public and non-public non-governmental entities, superseding existing FASB, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“AICPA”), Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) and related literature. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under the authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. All other accounting literature is considered non-authoritative. The switch to the ASC affects the way companies refer to GAAP in financial statements and accounting policies. Citing particular content in the ASC involves specifying the unique numeric path to the content through the Topic, Subtopic, Section and Paragraph structure.
The Company evaluated subsequent events after the balance sheet date through May 14, 2011. No significant subsequent events were identified which would affect the presentation of the financial information.
For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, amounts due from banks and overnight investments in federal funds sold.
3.
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2011, total comprehensive loss, net of taxes, was $300,147, compared to comprehensive income, net of taxes, of $400,354 for the same period of 2010. Comprehensive income (loss) is the sum of net income (loss) and the change in the unrealized gain or loss on securities available for sale, net of income taxes.
4.
|
Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses
|
Major classifications of loans as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
December 31,2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$ |
74,186,183 |
|
|
$ |
75,206,074 |
|
Commercial
|
|
|
89,132,895 |
|
|
|
89,617,135 |
|
Construction
|
|
|
13,450,751 |
|
|
|
13,403,765 |
|
Commercial
|
|
|
26,690,460 |
|
|
|
29,052,413 |
|
Consumer
|
|
|
5,186,050 |
|
|
|
5,588,830 |
|
|
|
|
208,646,339 |
|
|
|
212,868,217 |
|
Deferred costs, net of deferred fees
|
|
|
73,781 |
|
|
|
84,448 |
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(3,988,150 |
) |
|
|
(5,656,788 |
) |
|
|
$ |
204,731,970 |
|
|
$ |
207,295,877 |
|
The rate repricing and maturity distribution of the loan portfolio is as follows:
Within ninety days
|
|
$ |
44,630,667 |
|
|
$ |
41,653,284 |
|
Over ninety days to one year
|
|
|
85,806,933 |
|
|
|
96,362,940 |
|
Over one year to five years
|
|
|
77,460,282 |
|
|
|
74,464,702 |
|
Over five years
|
|
|
748,457 |
|
|
|
387,291 |
|
|
|
$ |
208,646,339 |
|
|
$ |
212,868,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable rate loans included in above
|
|
$ |
48,939,041 |
|
|
$ |
51,208,677 |
|
A table of the recorded investment in loans that were impaired and risk rated at March 31, 2011 follows:
Impaired and Risk Rated Loans at March 31, 2011
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
Unpaid
|
|
|
Investment for
|
|
|
Investment for
|
|
|
|
Investment in
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
which there
|
|
|
which there
|
|
Description of Loans
|
|
Impaired Loans
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
is related ALLL
|
|
|
is no Related ALLL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate
|
|
$ |
2,571,014 |
|
|
$ |
2,571,014 |
|
|
$ |
1,605,699 |
|
|
$ |
965,315 |
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
5,011,092 |
|
|
|
5,011,092 |
|
|
|
4,360,951 |
|
|
|
650,141 |
|
Other real estate
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Construction and land development
|
|
|
4,537,599 |
|
|
|
4,537,599 |
|
|
|
3,911,632 |
|
|
|
625,967 |
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
101,523 |
|
|
|
101,523 |
|
|
|
26,523 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total impaired loans
|
|
$ |
12,221,228 |
|
|
$ |
12,221,228 |
|
|
$ |
9,904,805 |
|
|
$ |
2,316,423 |
|
The following tables illustrate total impaired loans segmented by those with and without a related allowance as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010. Comparable information is not available for March 31, 2010.
Total Impaired Loans Segmented by With and Without a Related Allowance Recorded
March 31, 2011
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in
|
|
|
Loan
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Description of Loans
|
|
Impaired Loans
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With Related Allowance recorded
|
|
Residential real estate
|
|
$ |
1,605,699 |
|
|
$ |
1,605,699 |
|
|
$ |
794,111 |
|
|
$ |
367,514 |
|
|
$ |
1,609,815 |
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
4,360,951 |
|
|
|
4,360,951 |
|
|
|
594,952 |
|
|
|
2,893,290 |
|
|
|
4,369,670 |
|
Other real estate
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Construction and land development
|
|
|
3,966,355 |
|
|
|
3,966,355 |
|
|
|
546,957 |
|
|
|
832,566 |
|
|
|
4,169,626 |
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
26,523 |
|
|
|
26,523 |
|
|
|
26,523 |
|
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
26,821 |
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total impaired loans
|
|
$ |
9,959,528 |
|
|
$ |
9,959,528 |
|
|
$ |
1,962,543 |
|
|
$ |
4,094,365 |
|
|
$ |
10,175,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With No Related Allowance recorded
|
|
Residential real estate
|
|
$ |
965,315 |
|
|
$ |
965,315 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
316,575 |
|
|
$ |
1,020,772 |
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
650,141 |
|
|
|
650,141 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
250,454 |
|
|
|
650,141 |
|
Other real estate
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Construction and land development
|
|
|
625,967 |
|
|
|
625,967 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
191,308 |
|
|
|
625,968 |
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
8,441 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total impaired loans
|
|
$ |
2,316,423 |
|
|
$ |
2,316,423 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
766,778 |
|
|
$ |
2,371,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
Residential real estate
|
|
$ |
2,571,014 |
|
|
$ |
2,571,014 |
|
|
$ |
794,111 |
|
|
$ |
684,089 |
|
|
$ |
2,630,587 |
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
5,011,092 |
|
|
|
5,011,092 |
|
|
|
594,952 |
|
|
|
3,143,744 |
|
|
|
5,019,811 |
|
Other real estate
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Construction and land development
|
|
|
4,592,322 |
|
|
|
4,592,322 |
|
|
|
546,957 |
|
|
|
1,023,873 |
|
|
|
4,795,593 |
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
101,523 |
|
|
|
101,523 |
|
|
|
26,523 |
|
|
|
9,436 |
|
|
|
101,821 |
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total impaired loans
|
|
$ |
12,275,951 |
|
|
$ |
12,275,951 |
|
|
$ |
1,962,543 |
|
|
$ |
4,861,142 |
|
|
$ |
12,547,812 |
|
Total Impaired Loans Segmented by With and Without a Related Allowance Recorded
December 31, 2010
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in
|
|
|
Loan
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Description of Loans
|
|
Impaired Loans
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With Related Allowance recorded
|
|
Residential real estate
|
|
$ |
1,092,458 |
|
|
$ |
1,092,458 |
|
|
$ |
217,644 |
|
|
$ |
16,091 |
|
|
$ |
1,109,176 |
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
1,670,505 |
|
|
|
1,670,505 |
|
|
|
535,044 |
|
|
|
72,645 |
|
|
|
1,589,338 |
|
Other real estate
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Construction and land development
|
|
|
5,169,481 |
|
|
|
5,169,481 |
|
|
|
2,494,682 |
|
|
|
239,506 |
|
|
|
4,726,734 |
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
160,283 |
|
|
|
160,283 |
|
|
|
46,126 |
|
|
|
1,511 |
|
|
|
138,065 |
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total impaired loans
|
|
$ |
8,092,727 |
|
|
$ |
8,092,727 |
|
|
$ |
3,293,496 |
|
|
$ |
329,753 |
|
|
$ |
7,563,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With No Related Allowance recorded
|
|
Residential real estate
|
|
$ |
1,080,353 |
|
|
$ |
1,080,353 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
33,360 |
|
|
$ |
1,105,548 |
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
1,441,244 |
|
|
|
1,441,244 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
24,395 |
|
|
|
2,032,234 |
|
Other real estate
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Construction and land development
|
|
|
625,967 |
|
|
|
625,967 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,552 |
|
|
|
617,399 |
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
385,221 |
|
|
|
385,221 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
385,221 |
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total impaired loans
|
|
$ |
3,532,785 |
|
|
$ |
3,532,785 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
61,307 |
|
|
$ |
4,140,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
Residential real estate
|
|
$ |
2,172,811 |
|
|
$ |
2,172,811 |
|
|
$ |
217,644 |
|
|
$ |
49,451 |
|
|
$ |
2,214,724 |
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
3,111,749 |
|
|
|
3,111,749 |
|
|
|
535,044 |
|
|
|
97,040 |
|
|
|
3,621,572 |
|
Other real estate
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Construction and land development
|
|
|
5,795,448 |
|
|
|
5,795,448 |
|
|
|
2,494,682 |
|
|
|
243,058 |
|
|
|
5,344,133 |
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
545,504 |
|
|
|
545,504 |
|
|
|
46,126 |
|
|
|
1,511 |
|
|
|
523,286 |
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total impaired loans
|
|
$ |
11,625,512 |
|
|
$ |
11,625,512 |
|
|
$ |
3,293,496 |
|
|
$ |
391,060 |
|
|
$ |
11,703,715 |
|
Transactions in the allowance for loan losses were as follows:
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$ |
5,656,788 |
|
|
$ |
2,845,364 |
|
|
$ |
2,845,364 |
|
Provision charged to operations
|
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
|
4,910,000 |
|
|
|
475,000 |
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
26,477 |
|
|
|
19,677 |
|
|
|
2,280 |
|
|
|
|
7,183,265 |
|
|
|
7,775,041 |
|
|
|
3,322,644 |
|
Loans charged off
|
|
|
3,195,115 |
|
|
|
2,118,253 |
|
|
|
623,006 |
|
Ending balance
|
|
$ |
3,988,150 |
|
|
$ |
5,656,788 |
|
|
$ |
2,699,638 |
|
The following table represents the allowance for loan losses and loan balances that are individually evaluated for impairment and loan balances collectively evaluated for possible impairment.
Allowance for Credit Losses and Loan Balances that are Individually and Collectively Evaluated for Possible Impairment
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
and land
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
Development
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
Overdraft
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Allowance for Credit Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning Balance
|
|
$ |
137,047 |
|
|
$ |
676,113 |
|
|
$ |
806,728 |
|
|
$ |
1,124,851 |
|
|
$ |
2,780,148 |
|
|
$ |
2,122 |
|
|
$ |
126,751 |
|
|
$ |
3,028 |
|
|
$ |
5,656,788 |
|
Charge-Offs
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(491,329 |
) |
|
|
(366,626 |
) |
|
|
(185,626 |
) |
|
|
(2,141,948 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(8,904 |
) |
|
|
(682 |
) |
|
|
(3,195,115 |
) |
Recoveries
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
1,575 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
24,084 |
|
|
|
608 |
|
|
|
26,477 |
|
Provision
|
|
|
(134,645 |
) |
|
|
350,135 |
|
|
|
995,276 |
|
|
|
276,093 |
|
|
|
38,425 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
(36,053 |
) |
|
|
10,678 |
|
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
Ending Balance
|
|
$ |
2,402 |
|
|
$ |
535,129 |
|
|
$ |
1,436,953 |
|
|
$ |
1,215,318 |
|
|
$ |
676,625 |
|
|
$ |
2,213 |
|
|
$ |
105,878 |
|
|
$ |
13,632 |
|
|
$ |
3,988,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance allocated to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans individually
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
evaluated for impairment
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
26,523 |
|
|
$ |
794,111 |
|
|
$ |
594,952 |
|
|
$ |
546,957 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
1,962,543 |
|
Loans collectively
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
evaluated for impairment
|
|
|
2,402 |
|
|
|
508,606 |
|
|
|
642,842 |
|
|
|
620,366 |
|
|
|
129,668 |
|
|
|
2,213 |
|
|
|
105,878 |
|
|
|
13,632 |
|
|
|
2,025,607 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,402 |
|
|
$ |
535,129 |
|
|
$ |
1,436,953 |
|
|
$ |
1,215,318 |
|
|
$ |
676,625 |
|
|
$ |
2,213 |
|
|
$ |
105,878 |
|
|
$ |
13,632 |
|
|
$ |
3,988,150 |
|
Allowance for Credit Losses and Loan Balances that are Individually and Collectively Evaluated for Possible Impairment
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
and land
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
Development
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
Overdraft
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Allowance for Credit Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning Balance
|
|
$ |
140,751 |
|
|
$ |
728,049 |
|
|
$ |
920,132 |
|
|
$ |
643,430 |
|
|
$ |
164,539 |
|
|
$ |
2,782 |
|
|
$ |
245,137 |
|
|
$ |
544 |
|
|
$ |
2,845,364 |
|
Charge-Offs
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(166,779 |
) |
|
|
(888,040 |
) |
|
|
(951,603 |
) |
|
|
(7,040 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(101,162 |
) |
|
|
(3,629 |
) |
|
|
(2,118,253 |
) |
Recoveries
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,660 |
|
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
15,113 |
|
|
|
1,530 |
|
|
|
19,677 |
|
Provision
|
|
|
(3,704 |
) |
|
|
112,183 |
|
|
|
774,262 |
|
|
|
1,433,024 |
|
|
|
2,622,649 |
|
|
|
(660 |
) |
|
|
(32,337 |
) |
|
|
4,583 |
|
|
|
4,910,000 |
|
Ending Balance
|
|
$ |
137,047 |
|
|
$ |
676,113 |
|
|
$ |
806,728 |
|
|
$ |
1,124,851 |
|
|
$ |
2,780,148 |
|
|
$ |
2,122 |
|
|
$ |
126,751 |
|
|
$ |
3,028 |
|
|
$ |
5,656,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance allocated to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans individually
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
evaluated for impairment
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
46,126 |
|
|
$ |
217,644 |
|
|
$ |
535,044 |
|
|
$ |
2,494,664 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
3,293,478 |
|
Loans collectively
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
evaluated for impairment
|
|
|
137,047 |
|
|
|
629,987 |
|
|
|
589,084 |
|
|
|
589,807 |
|
|
|
285,484 |
|
|
|
2,122 |
|
|
|
126,751 |
|
|
|
3,028 |
|
|
|
2,363,310 |
|
|
|
$ |
137,047 |
|
|
$ |
676,113 |
|
|
$ |
806,728 |
|
|
$ |
1,124,851 |
|
|
$ |
2,780,148 |
|
|
$ |
2,122 |
|
|
$ |
126,751 |
|
|
$ |
3,028 |
|
|
$ |
5,656,788 |
|
Allowance for Credit Losses and Loan Balances that are Individually and Collectively Evaluated for Possible Impairment
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
and land
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
Development
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
Overdraft
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Allowance for Credit Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning Balance
|
|
$ |
140,751 |
|
|
$ |
728,049 |
|
|
$ |
920,132 |
|
|
$ |
643,430 |
|
|
$ |
164,539 |
|
|
$ |
2,782 |
|
|
$ |
245,137 |
|
|
$ |
544 |
|
|
$ |
2,845,364 |
|
Charge-Offs
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(29,442 |
) |
|
|
(489,267 |
) |
|
|
(92,457 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(10,531 |
) |
|
|
(1,309 |
) |
|
|
(623,006 |
) |
Recoveries
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
820 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
1,105 |
|
|
|
2,280 |
|
Provision
|
|
|
(138,362 |
) |
|
|
(12,150 |
) |
|
|
420,648 |
|
|
|
185,113 |
|
|
|
(3,986 |
) |
|
|
(1,125 |
) |
|
|
22,412 |
|
|
|
2,449 |
|
|
|
474,999 |
|
Ending Balance
|
|
$ |
2,389 |
|
|
$ |
687,277 |
|
|
$ |
851,513 |
|
|
$ |
736,086 |
|
|
$ |
160,553 |
|
|
$ |
1,657 |
|
|
$ |
257,373 |
|
|
$ |
2,789 |
|
|
$ |
2,699,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance allocated to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans individually
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
evaluated for impairment
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
164,257 |
|
|
$ |
383,442 |
|
|
$ |
672,576 |
|
|
$ |
40,756 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
1,578 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
1,262,609 |
|
Loans collectively
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
evaluated for impairment
|
|
|
2,389 |
|
|
|
523,020 |
|
|
|
468,071 |
|
|
|
63,510 |
|
|
|
119,797 |
|
|
|
1,657 |
|
|
|
255,795 |
|
|
|
2,789 |
|
|
|
1,437,028 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,389 |
|
|
$ |
687,277 |
|
|
$ |
851,513 |
|
|
$ |
736,086 |
|
|
$ |
160,553 |
|
|
$ |
1,657 |
|
|
$ |
257,373 |
|
|
$ |
2,789 |
|
|
$ |
2,699,637 |
|
Credit Quality Indicators. As part of the on-going monitoring of the quality of the Bank’s loan portfolio, management tracks certain credit quality indicators
The Bank does credit-score all loans. Loans are risk rated on the scale below:
Grades 1 through 4 – These grades include “pass grade” loans to borrowers of acceptable credit quality and risk.
Grade 5 – This grade includes loans that are on Management’s “watch list” and is intended to be utilized on a temporary basis for pass grade borrowers where a significant risk-modifying action is anticipated in the near future.
Grade 6 – This grade is for “Other Assets Especially Mentioned” or “Special Mention” in accordance with regulatory guidelines. This grade is intended to be temporary and includes loans to borrowers whose credit quality has clearly deteriorated and are at risk of further decline unless active measures are taken to correct the situation. This grade may include loans not fully secured where a specific valuation allowance may be necessary.
Grades 7 through 9 – These grades include “Substandard” loans, in accordance with regulatory guidelines, for which accrual of interest may have stopped. These grades include loans that are past due or not fully secured where a specific valuation allowance may be necessary.
The following table illustrates classified loans by class. Classified loans include loans in Risk Grades 5, 6, and 7 through 9.
March 31, 2011
|
|
Pass Watch
|
|
|
Special Mention
|
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$ |
218,242 |
|
|
$ |
39,681 |
|
|
$ |
1,847,224 |
|
|
$ |
2,105,147 |
|
Residential real estate
|
|
|
2,225,967 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,509,823 |
|
|
|
6,735,790 |
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
592,398 |
|
|
|
1,828,743 |
|
|
|
7,225,936 |
|
|
|
9,647,077 |
|
Construction and land development
|
|
|
1,067,251 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
6,449,966 |
|
|
|
7,517,217 |
|
Other real estate
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
43,318 |
|
|
|
43,318 |
|
Consumer
|
|
|
11,569 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
37,390 |
|
|
|
48,959 |
|
|
|
$ |
4,115,427 |
|
|
$ |
1,868,424 |
|
|
$ |
20,113,657 |
|
|
$ |
26,097,508 |
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
Pass Watch
|
|
|
Special Mention
|
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$ |
159,817 |
|
|
$ |
39,722 |
|
|
$ |
2,673,725 |
|
|
$ |
2,873,264 |
|
Residential real estate
|
|
|
1,975,178 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,448,109 |
|
|
|
6,423,287 |
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
3,255,868 |
|
|
|
1,833,303 |
|
|
|
4,834,487 |
|
|
|
9,923,658 |
|
Construction and land development
|
|
|
301,009 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
10,012,172 |
|
|
|
10,313,181 |
|
Other real estate
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
43,646 |
|
|
|
43,646 |
|
Consumer
|
|
|
11,695 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
10,417 |
|
|
|
22,112 |
|
|
|
$ |
5,703,567 |
|
|
$ |
1,873,025 |
|
|
$ |
22,022,556 |
|
|
$ |
29,599,148 |
|
The following table analyzes the age of past due and nonaccruing loans for the years ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30-59 Days
|
|
|
60-89 Days
|
|
|
90 Days or
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Loans 90 Days
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
Past Due
|
|
|
Past Due
|
|
|
Nonaccruing
|
|
|
Past Due
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
and Accruing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate
|
|
$ |
4,355,588 |
|
|
$ |
897,789 |
|
|
$ |
4,496,886 |
|
|
$ |
9,750,263 |
|
|
$ |
64,435,920 |
|
|
$ |
74,186,183 |
|
|
$ |
1,813,757 |
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
964,532 |
|
|
|
163,584 |
|
|
|
5,206,757 |
|
|
|
6,334,873 |
|
|
|
58,538,075 |
|
|
|
64,872,948 |
|
|
|
1,386,885 |
|
Other real estate
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
43,318 |
|
|
|
43,318 |
|
|
|
24,216,629 |
|
|
|
24,259,947 |
|
|
|
43,318 |
|
Construction and land development
|
|
|
465,120 |
|
|
|
240,609 |
|
|
|
4,100,296 |
|
|
|
4,806,025 |
|
|
|
8,644,726 |
|
|
|
13,450,751 |
|
|
|
1,022,686 |
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
509,101 |
|
|
|
35,236 |
|
|
|
238,631 |
|
|
|
782,968 |
|
|
|
25,907,492 |
|
|
|
26,690,460 |
|
|
|
52,819 |
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
133,511 |
|
|
|
38,325 |
|
|
|
43,233 |
|
|
|
215,069 |
|
|
|
4,970,981 |
|
|
|
5,186,050 |
|
|
|
5,843 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
6,427,852 |
|
|
$ |
1,375,543 |
|
|
$ |
14,129,121 |
|
|
$ |
21,932,516 |
|
|
$ |
186,713,823 |
|
|
$ |
208,646,339 |
|
|
$ |
4,325,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30-59 Days
|
|
|
60-89 Days
|
|
|
90 Days or
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Loans 90 Days
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
Past Due
|
|
|
Past Due
|
|
|
Nonaccruing
|
|
|
Past Due
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
and Accruing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate
|
|
$ |
1,452,435 |
|
|
$ |
1,258,246 |
|
|
$ |
4,506,064 |
|
|
$ |
7,216,745 |
|
|
$ |
67,989,329 |
|
|
$ |
75,206,074 |
|
|
$ |
2,008,168 |
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
980,023 |
|
|
|
467,285 |
|
|
|
3,216,515 |
|
|
|
4,663,823 |
|
|
|
60,693,365 |
|
|
|
65,357,188 |
|
|
|
2,120,564 |
Other real estate
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,130,824 |
|
|
|
1,130,824 |
|
|
|
23,129,123 |
|
|
|
24,259,947 |
|
|
|
1,130,824 |
Construction and land development
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,180,150 |
|
|
|
2,180,150 |
|
|
|
11,223,615 |
|
|
|
13,403,765 |
|
|
|
1,022,686 |
Commercial loans
|
|
|
54,262 |
|
|
|
28,545 |
|
|
|
594,022 |
|
|
|
676,829 |
|
|
|
28,375,584 |
|
|
|
29,052,413 |
|
|
|
19,838 |
Consumer loans
|
|
|
122,969 |
|
|
|
25,878 |
|
|
|
66,563 |
|
|
|
215,410 |
|
|
|
5,373,420 |
|
|
|
5,588,830 |
|
|
|
66,563 |
Total
|
|
$ |
2,609,689 |
|
|
$ |
1,779,954 |
|
|
$ |
11,694,138 |
|
|
$ |
16,083,781 |
|
|
$ |
196,784,436 |
|
|
$ |
212,868,217 |
|
|
$ |
6,368,643 |
Loans on which the accrual of interest has been discontinued or reduced, and the interest that would have been accrued at March 31, 2011 and 2010, are as follows:
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate
|
|
$ |
2,756,901 |
|
|
$ |
2,497,896 |
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
3,819,872 |
|
|
|
1,095,951 |
|
Other real estate
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Construction and land development
|
|
|
3,077,610 |
|
|
|
1,157,464 |
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
185,813 |
|
|
|
574,184 |
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
37,390 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
9,877,586 |
|
|
$ |
5,325,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest not accrued on nonaccrual loans
|
|
$ |
591,191 |
|
|
$ |
644,566 |
|
As of March 31, 2011, the Bank had classified $5,486,715 of loans as troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”). Under a TDR, interest rates may be reduced to current market rates or principal reductions may be deferred for a set period of time. For each of the current TDRs, the customer is expected to pay the full principal balance owed.
Loan commitments are made to accommodate the financial needs of the Company’s customers. Letters of credit commit the Bank to make payments on behalf of customers when certain specified future events occur. These obligations are not recorded in the Company’s financial statements. The credit risks inherent in loan commitments and letters of credit are essentially the same as those involved in extending loans to customers, and these arrangements are subject to the Bank’s normal credit policies. The Bank’s exposure to credit loss in the event the customer does not satisfy the terms of these arrangements equals the notional amount of the obligation less the value of any collateral. The table below represents unfunded obligations at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Check loan lines of credit
|
|
$ |
487,622 |
|
|
$ |
468,621 |
|
Mortgage lines of credit
|
|
|
7,455,389 |
|
|
|
6,727,480 |
|
Other lines of credit
|
|
|
12,412,420 |
|
|
|
10,964,947 |
|
Undisbursed construction loan commitments
|
|
|
1,916,574 |
|
|
|
2,240,747 |
|
|
|
$ |
22,272,005 |
|
|
$ |
20,401,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standby letters of credit
|
|
$ |
2,877,909 |
|
|
$ |
3,016,824 |
|
Earnings (loss) per common share is derived by dividing net income (loss) available to holders of shares of common stock by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding of 779,512 for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
The Bank maintains a defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all employees of the Bank. Benefits are based on years of service and the employee’s highest average rate of earnings for five consecutive years during the final 10 full years before retirement. The Bank’s general funding policy is to contribute annually the maximum amount that can be deducted for income tax purposes, determined using the projected unit credit cost method. The assets of the plan are invested in various time deposits and held in trust as required by law.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, the Bank recognized net periodic costs for this plan of $75,844 and $76,342, respectively. The Bank contributed $34,088 and $67,571 respectively, to the plan during the first quarters of 2011 and 2010.
The Company operates two primary businesses: (i) Community Banking; and (ii) Insurance Products and Services. Through the Community Banking business, the Company provides services to consumers and small businesses on the upper Eastern Shore of Maryland through its seven branches. Community Banking activities include serving the deposit needs of small business and individual consumers by providing banking products and services to fit their needs. Loan products available to consumers include mortgage, home equity, automobile, marine, and installment loans and other secured and unsecured personal lines of credit. Small business lending includes commercial mortgages, real estate development loans, equipment and operating loans, as well as secured and unsecured lines of credit, accounts receivable financing arrangements, and merchant card services.
Through the Insurance Products and Services business, the Company provides a full range of insurance products and services to businesses and consumers in the Company’s market areas. Products include property and casualty, life, marine, individual health and long-term care insurance.
Selected financial information by line of business is included in the following table:
For the three months ended
March 31, 2011
|
|
Community
banking
|
|
|
Insurance
products
and services
|
|
|
Intersegment
Transactions
|
|
|
Consolidated
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$ |
2,081,253 |
|
|
$ |
318 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
2,081,571 |
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
Net interest income after provision
|
|
|
581,253 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
581,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest revenue
|
|
|
288,417 |
|
|
|
375,915 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
664,332 |
|
Noninterest expense
|
|
|
1,585,507 |
|
|
|
220,383 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,805,890 |
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
(715,837 |
) |
|
|
155,850 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(559,987 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
(323,842 |
) |
|
|
61,475 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(262,367 |
) |
Net income
|
|
$ |
(391,995 |
) |
|
$ |
94,375 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
(297,620 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average assets
|
|
$ |
247,669,212 |
|
|
$ |
1,718,752 |
|
|
$ |
(756,434 |
) |
|
$ |
248,631,530 |
|
For the three months ended
March 31, 2010
|
|
Community
banking
|
|
|
Insurance
products
and services
|
|
|
Intersegment
Transactions
|
|
|
Consolidated
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$ |
2,344,762 |
|
|
$ |
391 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
2,345,153 |
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
475,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
475,000 |
|
Net interest income after provision
|
|
|
1,869,762 |
|
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,870,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest revenue
|
|
|
278,364 |
|
|
|
334,236 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
612,600 |
|
Noninterest expense
|
|
|
1,652,554 |
|
|
|
201,998 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,854,552 |
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
495,572 |
|
|
|
132,629 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
628,201 |
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
174,496 |
|
|
|
52,499 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
226,995 |
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
321,076 |
|
|
$ |
80,130 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
401,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average assets
|
|
$ |
251,003,285 |
|
|
$ |
1,780,331 |
|
|
$ |
(3,093,976 |
) |
|
$ |
249,689,640 |
|
The fair value of an asset or a liability is the price that would be received to sell that asset or paid to transfer that liability in an orderly transaction occurring in the principal market (or most advantageous market in the absence of a principal market) for such asset or liability. In estimating fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that are consistent with the market approach, the income approach and/or the cost approach. Such valuation techniques are consistently applied. Inputs to valuation techniques include the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. FASB ASC valuation techniques include the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or a liability. FASB ASC Topic 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs that gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy is as follows
|
•
|
Level 1 inputs — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.
|
|
•
|
Level 2 inputs — Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These might include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (such as interest rates. volatilities, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by market data by correlation or other means.
|
|
•
|
Level 3 inputs — Unobservable inputs for determining the fair values of assets or liabilities that reflect an entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities.
|
In general, fair value is based upon quoted market prices, where available. If such quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based upon internally developed models that primarily use, as inputs, observable market-based parameters. Valuation adjustments may be made to ensure that financial instruments are recorded at fair value. These adjustments may include amounts to reflect counterparty credit quality and the issuer’s creditworthiness, among other things, as well as unobservable parameters. Any such valuation adjustments are applied consistently over time. The Company’s valuation methodologies may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Although management believes the Company’s valuation methodologies are appropriate and consistent with those used by other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date. Furthermore, the reported fair value amounts have not been comprehensively revalued since the presentation dates, and, therefore, estimates of fair value after the balance sheet date may differ significantly from the amounts presented herein. Transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy are recognized on the actual date of the event or circumstance that caused the transfer, which generally coincides with the Company’s monthly and quarterly valuation process.
The Company measures securities available for sale at fair value on a recurring basis. The following table summarizes securities available for sale measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2011, segregated by the level of the valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value.
Available for Sale
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level 1 Inputs
|
|
|
Level 2 Inputs
|
|
|
Level 3 Inputs
|
|
U. S. Government Agency Securities
|
|
$ |
9,071,820 |
|
|
$ |
9,071,820 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
The Company’s foreclosed real estate is measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, which means that the assets are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of reduced property value). Foreclosed real estate measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis during the three months ended March 31, 2011 is reported at the fair value of the underlying collateral, assuming that the sale prices of the properties will be their current appraised values. Appraised values are estimated using Level 2 inputs based on observable market data and current property tax assessments. Foreclosed real estate measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the three months ended March 31, 2011 is as follows.
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level 1 Inputs
|
|
|
Level 2 Inputs
|
|
|
Level 3 Inputs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreclosed real estate
|
|
$ |
1,370,000 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
1,370,000 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
FASB ASC Topic 825 requires disclosure of the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities, including those financial assets and financial liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis or nonrecurring basis.
The Company does not measure the fair value of any of its other financial assets or liabilities on a recurring or nonrecurring basis. The fair value of financial instruments equals the carrying value of the instruments except as noted.
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
amount
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
amount
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$ |
16,571,994 |
|
|
$ |
16,571,994 |
|
|
$ |
10,378,485 |
|
|
$ |
10,378,485 |
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
1,016,000 |
|
|
|
1,016,000 |
|
|
|
1,016,000 |
|
|
|
1,016,000 |
|
Investment securities (total)
|
|
|
10,579,970 |
|
|
|
10,599,137 |
|
|
|
11,546,313 |
|
|
|
11,590,095 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank and CBB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Corp. stock
|
|
|
2,151,600 |
|
|
|
2,151,600 |
|
|
|
2,151,600 |
|
|
|
2,151,600 |
|
Loans, net
|
|
|
204,731,970 |
|
|
|
205,542,013 |
|
|
|
207,295,877 |
|
|
|
208,116,545 |
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
1,012,580 |
|
|
|
1,012,580 |
|
|
|
1,306,708 |
|
|
|
1,360,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits
|
|
$ |
38,556,516 |
|
|
$ |
38,556,516 |
|
|
$ |
35,219,753 |
|
|
$ |
35,219,753 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
157,160,800 |
|
|
|
160,656,581 |
|
|
|
154,420,977 |
|
|
|
157,626,964 |
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
2,179,654 |
|
|
|
2,179,654 |
|
|
|
2,754,321 |
|
|
|
2,754,321 |
|
Federal Home Loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank advances
|
|
|
22,000,000 |
|
|
|
23,329,464 |
|
|
|
24,000,000 |
|
|
|
25,230,768 |
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
303,301 |
|
|
|
303,301 |
|
|
|
414,758 |
|
|
|
414,758 |
|
The fair value of fixed-rate loans is estimated to be the present value of scheduled payments discounted using interest rates currently in effect. The fair value of variable-rate loans, including loans with a demand feature, is estimated to equal the carrying amount. The valuation of loans is adjusted for possible loan losses.
The fair value of interest-bearing checking, savings, and money market deposit accounts is equal to the carrying amount. The fair value of fixed-maturity time deposits and borrowings is estimated based on interest rates currently offered for deposits and borrowings of similar remaining maturities.
It is not practicable to estimate the fair value of outstanding loan commitments, unused lines of credit, and letters of credit.
10. Investment Securities
Investment securities are summarized as follows:
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
cost
|
|
|
gains
|
|
|
losses
|
|
|
value
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U. S. government agency
|
|
$ |
9,057,044 |
|
|
$ |
16,075 |
|
|
$ |
1,299 |
|
|
$ |
9,071,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U. S. government agency
|
|
$ |
1,503,092 |
|
|
$ |
19,083 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
1,522,175 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
5,058 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
5,136 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,508,150 |
|
|
$ |
19,167 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
1,527,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U. S. government agency
|
|
$ |
8,016,831 |
|
|
$ |
18,949 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
8,035,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U. S. government agency
|
|
$ |
3,505,278 |
|
|
$ |
43,757 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
3,549,035 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
5,255 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5,280 |
|
|
|
$ |
3,510,533 |
|
|
$ |
43,782 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
3,554,315 |
|
Contractual maturities and the amount of pledged securities are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
|
|
Available for sale
|
|
|
Held to maturity
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
cost
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
cost
|
|
|
value
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within one year
|
|
$ |
5,012,643 |
|
|
$ |
5,025,240 |
|
|
$ |
1,503,092 |
|
|
$ |
1,522,175 |
|
Over one to five years
|
|
|
4,044,401 |
|
|
|
4,046,580 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5,058 |
|
|
|
5,136 |
|
|
|
$ |
9,057,044 |
|
|
$ |
9,071,820 |
|
|
$ |
1,508,150 |
|
|
$ |
1,527,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pledged securities
|
|
$ |
2,362,611 |
|
|
$ |
2,367,625 |
|
|
$ |
319,910 |
|
|
$ |
321,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within one year
|
|
$ |
6,002,966 |
|
|
$ |
6,018,760 |
|
|
$ |
3,505,278 |
|
|
$ |
3,549,035 |
|
Over one to five years
|
|
|
2,013,865 |
|
|
|
2,017,020 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5,255 |
|
|
|
5,280 |
|
|
|
$ |
8,016,831 |
|
|
$ |
8,035,780 |
|
|
$ |
3,510,533 |
|
|
$ |
3,554,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pledged securities
|
|
$ |
633,593 |
|
|
$ |
637,127 |
|
|
$ |
2,530,378 |
|
|
$ |
2,562,778 |
|
Investments are pledged to secure the deposits of federal and local governments and as collateral for repurchase agreements.
11. Recent Accounting Standards
Recent accounting pronouncements approved by FASB that apply to the Company are discussed below. These pronouncements did not have, or, if not yet adopted, are not expected to have, a material impact on the financial statements of the Company.
ASU No. 2010-20, “Receivables (Topic 310) - Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses.” ASU 2010-20 requires entities to provide disclosures designed to facilitate financial statement users’ evaluation of (i) the nature of credit risk inherent in the entity’s portfolio of financing receivables, (ii) how that risk is analyzed and assessed in arriving at the allowance for credit losses and (iii) the changes and reasons for those changes in the allowance for credit losses. Disclosures must be disaggregated by portfolio segment, the level at which an entity develops and documents a systematic method for determining its allowance for credit losses, and class of financing receivable, which is generally a disaggregation of portfolio segment. The required disclosures include, among other things, a rollforward of the allowance for credit losses as well as information about modified, impaired, non-accrual and past due loans and credit quality indicators. ASU 2010-20 became effective for the Company’s financial statements as of December 31, 2010, as it relates to disclosures required as of the end of a reporting period. Disclosures that relate to activity during a reporting period became effective for the Company’s financial statements beginning on January 1, 2011. ASU 2011-01, “Receivables (Topic 310) - Deferral of the Effective Date of Disclosures about Troubled Debt Restructurings in Update No. 2010-20,” temporarily deferred the effective date for disclosures related to troubled debt restructurings to coincide with the effective date of the then proposed ASU 2011-02, “Receivables (Topic 310) - A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring,” which is further discussed below.
ASU No. 2010-28, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) - When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts.” ASU 2010-28 modifies Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may exist such as if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. ASU 2010-28 became effective for the Company on January 1, 2011.
ASU No. 2011-02, “Receivables (Topic 310) - A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring.” ASU 2011-02 clarifies which loan modifications constitute TDRs and is intended to assist creditors in determining whether a modification of the terms of a receivable meets the criteria to be considered a TDR, both for purposes of recording an impairment loss and for disclosure of TDRs. In evaluating whether a restructuring constitutes a TDR, a creditor must separately conclude, under the guidance clarified by ASU 2011-02, that both of the following exist: (i) the restructuring constitutes a concession; and (ii) the debtor is experiencing financial difficulties. ASU 2011-02 will be effective for the Company on July 1, 2011, and applies retrospectively to restructurings occurring on or after January 1, 2011.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Peoples Bancorp, Inc. is a Maryland corporation and a financial holding company registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, located in Chestertown, Kent County, Maryland. The Company was incorporated on December 10, 1996 to serve as the holding company of The Peoples Bank (the “Bank”), a Maryland commercial bank, which it acquired on March 24, 1997. On January 2, 2007, the Company acquired Fleetwood, Athey, Macbeth & McCown, Inc. (the “Insurance Agency”).
The Bank was incorporated on April 13, 1910 and operates five branches located in Kent County, Maryland and two branches located in Queen Anne’s County, Maryland. The Bank offers a variety of services to satisfy the needs of consumers and small- to medium-sized businesses and professional enterprises. Most of the Bank’s deposit and loan customers are located in and derived from Kent County, northern Queen Anne’s County, and southern Cecil County, Maryland. This primary service area is located between the Chesapeake Bay and the western border of Delaware.
The Insurance Agency has roots dating back to the 1920s, when The Fleetwood-Kirby Agency was formed. In 1977, that agency was merged with several other well-respected insurances agencies to form Fleetwood, Athey, Macbeth & McCown, Inc. The Insurance Agency operates from one location in Kent County and provides a full range of insurance products to businesses and consumers. Product lines include property, casualty, life, marine, long-term care and health insurance.
Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, the terms “Company”, “we”, “us” and “our” in this report refer collectively to Peoples Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
Application of Critical Accounting Policies
The unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q. Application of these principles requires management to make estimates, assumptions, and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the unaudited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates, assumptions, and judgments are based on information available as of the date of the consolidated financial statements; accordingly, as this information changes, the unaudited consolidated financial statements could reflect different estimates, assumptions, and judgments. Certain policies inherently have a greater reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions, and judgments and as such have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than originally reported. Estimates, assumptions, and judgments are necessary when assets and liabilities are required to be recorded at fair value, when a decline in the value of an asset not carried on the consolidated financial statements at fair value warrants an impairment write-down or valuation reserve to be established, or when an asset or liability needs to be recorded contingent upon a future event. Carrying assets and liabilities at fair value inherently results in more financial statement volatility. The fair values and information used to record valuation adjustments for certain assets and liabilities are based either on quoted market prices or are provided by other third-party sources, when available.
The policies, along with the disclosures presented in the other financial statement notes and in this financial review, provide information on how significant assets and liabilities are valued in the financial statements and how those values are determined. Based on the valuation techniques used and the sensitivity of financial statement amounts to the methods, assumptions, and estimates underlying those amounts, management has identified the determination of the allowance for loan losses as the accounting area that requires the most subjective or complex judgments, and as such should be most subject to revision as new information becomes available.
The allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of probable loan losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Determining the amount of the allowance for loan losses is considered a critical accounting estimate because it requires significant judgment and the use of estimates related to the amount and timing of expected future cash flows on impaired loans, estimated losses on pools of homogeneous loans based on historical loss experience, and consideration of current economic trends and conditions, all of which may be susceptible to significant change. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination processes, periodically review our allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require us to make additional provisions for estimated loan losses based upon judgments different from those of management. The loan portfolio also represents the largest asset type on the balance sheet. Further information about the methodology used to determine the allowance for loan losses is discussed below under the heading “Loan Quality”.
The following discussion is designed to provide a better understanding of the financial position of the Company and should be read in conjunction with the interim Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included elsewhere in this report, and in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations set forth in the Annual Report of Peoples Bancorp, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Forward-Looking Information
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Readers of this quarterly report should be aware of the speculative nature of “forward-looking statements”. Statements that are not historical in nature, including the words “anticipate”, “estimate”, “should”, “expect”, “believe”, “intend”, and similar expressions, are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about (among other things) the industry and the markets in which we operate; they are not guarantees of future performance. Whether actual results will conform to expectations and predictions is subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties, including risks and uncertainties discussed in this report, general economic, market or business conditions; changes in interest rates, deposit flow, the cost of funds, and demand for loan products and financial services; changes in our competitive position or competitive actions by other companies; changes in the quality or composition of loan and investment portfolios; the ability to manage growth; changes in laws or regulations or policies of federal and state regulators and agencies; and other circumstances beyond our control. These and other risks are discussed in detail in the periodic reports that Peoples Bancorp, Inc. files with the Securities and Exchange Commission (see Item 1A of Part II of this report for further information). All of the forward-looking statements made in this report are qualified by these cautionary statements, and there can be no assurance that the actual results anticipated will be realized, or if substantially realized, will have the expected consequences on our business or operations. Except as required by applicable laws, we do not intend to publish updates or revisions of any forward-looking statements we make to reflect new information, future events or otherwise.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
General
For the three-month period ended March 31, 2011, the Company reported a net loss of $297,620 or $(0.38) per share, compared to net income of $401,256 or $0.51 per share for the same period of 2010, which represents a decrease of $698,876 or 174.17%. The Company’s change in earnings when comparing the first quarter of 2011 to the first quarter of 2010 was the direct result of a $1,025,000 increase in our provision for loan losses to $1,500,000 for the first quarter of 2011 from $475,000 for the first quarter of 2010. The increased provision was due primarily to the determination during the first quarter of 2011 that the Company would realize additional losses related to a significant borrower. The Insurance Agency’s year to date income increased $14,250 to $94,375 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011, compared to $80,130 for the same time period in 2010.
Net Interest Income
The primary source of income for the Company is net interest income, which is the difference between revenue on interest-earning assets, such as investment securities and loans, and interest incurred on interest-bearing sources of funds, such as deposits and borrowings.
The key performance measure for net interest income is the “net margin on interest-earning assets”, or net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets. The Company’s net interest margin for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 was 3.90%, compared to 4.29% for the same period of 2010. The net margin may decline if competition increases, loan demand decreases, or the cost of funds rises faster than the return on loans and securities. The net margin may also be adversely impacted by a number of factors which cannot be predicted and are beyond our control.
Net interest income for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 was $2,081,571, which represents a decrease of $263,572 or 11.24% over net interest income for the same period of 2010. The primary contributor to this decrease was the reduction in interest-earning assets.
Interest revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2011 totaled $2,935,152, compared to $3,330,115 for the same period last year, representing a decrease of $394,963 or 11.86%. We experienced a $330,858 decrease in interest earned on loans as a direct result of nonaccrual loan balances increasing when compared to the first three months of 2010. Additionally, we realized a $66,757 decrease in income on U.S. Government Agency securities for the first three months of 2011 when compared to the same time period in 2010. The decrease in U. S. Government securities income was the direct result of the average balance decreasing $3,449,537 over the same period in 2010.
Interest expense for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 totaled $853,581, compared to $984,962 for the same period last year, representing an decrease of $131,381 or 13.34%. Deposits were $195,717,316 at March 31, 2011, compared to $189,640,730 at December 31, 2010 and $188,490,215 at March of 2010. The Company decreased its Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) borrowings during the first quarter of 2011 from $24,000,000 at December 31, 2010 to $22,000,000 at March 31, 2011. FHLB borrowings at March 31, 2010 were $26,000,000. As a result, interest expense on borrowed funds for the first quarter of 2011 dropped $64,018 when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010.
A table of the Company’s average balances, interest and yields follows.
|
|
For the Quarter Ended
|
|
|
For the Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
$ |
1,016,000 |
|
|
$ |
693 |
|
|
|
0.28 |
% |
|
$ |
2,323,879 |
|
|
$ |
696 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
% |
Interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
5,103 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
0.67 |
% |
|
|
49,293 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
% |
Investment securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U. S. government agency
|
|
|
11,218,568 |
|
|
|
44,114 |
|
|
|
1.59 |
% |
|
|
14,668,105 |
|
|
|
113,723 |
|
|
|
3.14 |
% |
FHLB of Atlanta &
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CBB Financial Corp.. Stock
|
|
|
2,151,600 |
|
|
|
4,489 |
|
|
|
0.85 |
% |
|
|
2,401,200 |
|
|
|
1,670 |
|
|
|
0.28 |
% |
|
|
|
13,370,168 |
|
|
|
48,603 |
|
|
|
1.47 |
% |
|
|
17,069,305 |
|
|
|
115,393 |
|
|
|
2.74 |
% |
Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand and time
|
|
|
27,124,118 |
|
|
|
390,616 |
|
|
|
5.84 |
% |
|
|
26,380,179 |
|
|
|
385,582 |
|
|
|
5.93 |
% |
Mortgage
|
|
|
177,737,461 |
|
|
|
2,443,258 |
|
|
|
5.57 |
% |
|
|
175,474,292 |
|
|
|
2,751,427 |
|
|
|
6.36 |
% |
Installment
|
|
|
5,405,876 |
|
|
|
86,175 |
|
|
|
6.46 |
% |
|
|
6,524,397 |
|
|
|
110,197 |
|
|
|
6.85 |
% |
Total loans
|
|
|
210,267,455 |
|
|
|
2,920,049 |
|
|
|
5.63 |
% |
|
|
208,378,868 |
|
|
|
3,247,206 |
|
|
|
6.32 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
4,828,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,895,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net of allowance
|
|
|
205,438,964 |
|
|
|
2,920,049 |
|
|
|
5.76 |
% |
|
|
205,482,990 |
|
|
|
3,247,206 |
|
|
|
6.41 |
% |
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
|
219,830,235 |
|
|
|
2,969,354 |
|
|
|
5.48 |
% |
|
|
224,925,467 |
|
|
|
3,363,300 |
|
|
|
6.06 |
% |
Non-interest-bearing cash
|
|
|
15,400,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,750,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment
|
|
|
6,365,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,523,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
7,035,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,490,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
248,631,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
249,689,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings and NOW deposits
|
|
$ |
46,626,954 |
|
|
$ |
17,037 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
% |
|
$ |
48,055,941 |
|
|
$ |
22,668 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
% |
Money market and supernow
|
|
|
10,849,151 |
|
|
|
7,306 |
|
|
|
0.27 |
% |
|
|
11,106,248 |
|
|
|
13,354 |
|
|
|
0.49 |
% |
Other time deposits
|
|
|
98,610,504 |
|
|
|
648,107 |
|
|
|
2.67 |
% |
|
|
95,239,534 |
|
|
|
703,791 |
|
|
|
3.00 |
% |
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
156,086,609 |
|
|
|
672,450 |
|
|
|
1.75 |
% |
|
|
154,401,723 |
|
|
|
739,813 |
|
|
|
1.94 |
% |
Borrowed funds
|
|
|
25,897,427 |
|
|
|
181,131 |
|
|
|
2.84 |
% |
|
|
28,738,342 |
|
|
|
245,149 |
|
|
|
3.46 |
% |
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
181,984,036 |
|
|
|
853,581 |
|
|
|
1.90 |
% |
|
|
183,140,065 |
|
|
|
984,962 |
|
|
|
2.18 |
% |
Noninterest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
37,316,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,216,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
219,300,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
218,356,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
1,993,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,493,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
27,336,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,839,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$ |
248,631,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
249,689,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.58 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.88 |
% |
Net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,324,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,378,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net margin on interest-earning assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.90 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.29 |
% |
Interest on tax-exempt loans and investments are reported on fully taxable equivalent basis (a non GAAP financial measure).
Provision for Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses was $1,500,000 for the first three months of 2011, compared to $475,000 for the same period of 2010. The increase in the provision was in response to the increase in net charge-offs and specific allocations for impaired loans. Additional information regarding risk elements in the loan portfolio, the provision for loan losses and management’s assessment of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is discussed below in the section entitled “Loan Quality”.
Noninterest Revenue
Noninterest revenue for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 totaled $664,332, which represents an increase of $51,732 or 8.44% over noninterest revenue for the same period of 2010. This increase resulted primarily from the $41,706 or 12.50% increase in Insurance Agency contingency income earned during the first quarter of 2011, from $333,608 for the first quarter of 2010 to $375,314 for the first quarter of 2011. Insurance Agency contingency income is based on sales of new policies to customers and claims against existing policies for the prior year. In addition, we experienced an increase in service charges on deposit accounts of $30,383 or 14.14% during the first quarter of 2011 when compared to the same period of 2010. These increases were offset by a net loss on the sale of foreclosed real estate of $17,352.
Noninterest Expense
The Company recorded noninterest expense of $1,805,890 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011, compared to $1,854,552 for the same period in 2010, a decrease of $48,662 or 2.62%. This decrease was mainly attributable to decreased salaries and employee benefits of $40,650.
Income Tax Expense
The Company’s effective tax benefit rate for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 was 46.9%, compared to an effective tax rate of 36.1% for the same period of 2010. The Company’s income tax benefit for the first quarter of 2011 was $262,367, compared to an income tax expense of $226,945 for the same period of 2010. Decreases in income before income tax during the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 contributed to the decrease in income tax expense when compared to the same period last year.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Overview
Total assets of the Company at March 31, 2011 were $248,646,826, compared to $245,792,415 at December 31, 2010, representing an increase of $2,854,411 or 1.16% from December 31, 2010.
Total liabilities at March 31, 2011 were $221,726,302, compared to $218,400,251 at December 31, 2010, representing an increase of $3,326,051 or 1.52%.
Stockholders’ equity was $26,920,524 as of March 31, 2011, compared to $27,392,164 as of December 31, 2010, representing a decrease of $471,640. The decrease was due to a net loss for the period totaling $297,620, a decrease in the unrealized gain on securities available for sale net of income taxes of $2,527 and dividends paid to stockholders of $171,493.
Return on average equity for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 was (4.42)%, compared to 5.64% for the same period of 2010. Return on average assets was (0.49)% for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, compared to 0.65% for the same period of 2010.
Composition of Loan Portfolio
At March 31, 2011, loans, net of unearned income, were $204,731,970, a decrease of $2,563,907 since December 31, 2010. Because loans are expected to produce higher yields than investment securities and other interest-earning assets, the absolute volume of loans and the volume as a percentage of total earning assets is an important determinant of net interest margin. Average loans, net of the allowance for loan losses, were $205,438,964 and $205,482,990 during the first quarters of 2011 and 2010, respectively, which constituted 93.45% and 91.36% of average interest-earning assets for the respective periods. For the quarter ended March 31, 2011, our average loan to deposit ratio was 106.22%, compared to 108.37% for the same period in 2010. The securities sold under repurchase agreements function like deposits, with the securities providing collateral in place of the FDIC insurance. Our ratio of average loans to deposits plus borrowed funds was 93.68% for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, compared to 94.10% for the same period of 2010. The Company extends credit primarily to customers located in and near the Maryland counties of Kent County, Queen Anne’s County, and Cecil County. There are no industry concentrations in our loan portfolio. A substantial portion of our loans are, however, secured by real estate, and the real estate market in the region, which is directly impacted by the local economy, will influence the performance of the Company’s portfolio and the value of the collateral securing the portfolio.
Loan Quality
The allowance for loan losses represents a reserve for potential losses in the loan portfolio. The adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is evaluated periodically based on a review of all significant loans, with a particular emphasis on non-accruing, past due, and other loans that management believes require attention. The determination of the reserve level rests upon management’s judgment about factors affecting loan quality and assumptions about the economy. Management believes that the allowance as of March 31, 2011 is adequate to cover possible losses in the loan portfolio identified as of that date; however, management’s judgment is based upon a number of assumptions about future events, which are believed to be reasonable, but which may not prove valid. Thus, there can be no assurance that charge-offs in future periods will not exceed the allowance for loan losses or that additional increases in the loan loss allowance will not be required.
For significant problem loans, management’s review consists of evaluation of the financial strengths of the borrowers and guarantors, the related collateral, and the effects of economic conditions. The overall evaluation of the adequacy of the total allowance for loan losses is based on an analysis of historical loan loss ratios, loan charge-offs, delinquency trends, and previous collection experience, along with an assessment of the effects of external economic conditions. The allowance may be increased to accommodate reserves for specific loans identified as substandard during management’s loan review. Net recoveries and/or decreases in loans may cause the allowance as a percentage of gross loans to exceed our target. Historically, our regulators have discouraged negative provisions, however, management would consider a negative provision if warranted.
The provision for loan losses is a charge to earnings in the current period to replenish the allowance and maintain it at a level management has determined to be adequate.
The allowance for loan losses decreased to $3,988,150 at March 31, 2011, from $5,656,788 at December 31, 2010. The provision for loan losses was $1,500,000 for the first three months of 2011, compared to $475,000 for the same period of 2010. The increase in the provision for loan losses in the first three months of 2011 when compared to the same period of 2010 was in response to the increase in net charge-offs, the results of our quarterly review of the adequacy of the factors discussed previously, and specific allocations for impaired loans. As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the allowance for loan losses compared to gross loans was 1.91% and 1.29%, respectively. As part of our loan review process, management has noted an increase in foreclosures and bankruptcies in the geographic areas where we operate. Additionally, the current nationwide recession has had a significant and adverse impact on real estate values and sales over the past 12 months. Consequently, we have closely reviewed our loan portfolio and applied sensitivity analyses to collateral values to ensure that we are adequately measuring potential future losses. Where necessary, we have obtained new appraisals on collateral. Specific allocations of the allowance have been provided in these instances where losses may occur.
The following table sets forth activity in the Company’s allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated:
Allowance for Loan Losses
|
|
Three months ended
March 31,
2011
|
|
|
Three months ended
March 31,
2010
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$ |
5,656,788 |
|
|
$ |
2,845,364 |
|
|
$ |
2,845,364 |
|
Loan losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
491,329 |
|
|
|
29,442 |
|
|
|
166,779 |
|
Mortgages
|
|
|
2,694,200 |
|
|
|
581,725 |
|
|
|
1,846,683 |
|
Consumer
|
|
|
9,586 |
|
|
|
11,839 |
|
|
|
104,791 |
|
Total loan losses
|
|
|
3,195,115 |
|
|
|
623,006 |
|
|
|
2.118,253 |
|
Recoveries on loans previously charged off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
820 |
|
|
|
2,660 |
|
Mortgages
|
|
|
1,576 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
374 |
|
Consumer
|
|
|
24,691 |
|
|
|
1,460 |
|
|
|
16,643 |
|
Total loan recoveries
|
|
|
26,477 |
|
|
|
2,280 |
|
|
|
19,677 |
|
Net loan losses
|
|
|
3,168,638 |
|
|
|
620,726 |
|
|
|
2,098,576 |
|
Provision for loan losses charged to expense
|
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
|
475,000 |
|
|
|
4,910,000 |
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$ |
3,988,150 |
|
|
$ |
2,699,638 |
|
|
$ |
5,656,788 |
|
Allowance for loan losses to loans outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At end of period
|
|
|
1.91 |
% |
|
|
1.29 |
% |
|
|
2.66 |
% |
Management believes it has identified and charged off all significant losses in the loan portfolio but there can be no assurance that additional losses will not occur in future periods. The ratio of the allowance for loan losses to loans outstanding has increased due to the economic conditions being felt in our market area.
As a result of management’s ongoing review of the loan portfolio, loans are classified as nonaccrual when it is not reasonable to expect collection of interest under the original terms. These loans are classified as nonaccrual even though the presence of collateral or the borrower’s financial strength may be sufficient to provide for ultimate repayment. Interest on nonaccrual loans is recognized only when received. A loan is generally placed in nonaccrual status when it becomes 90 days or more past due. When a loan is placed in nonaccrual status, all interest that had been accrued on the loan but remains unpaid is reversed and deducted from earnings as a reduction of reported interest income. No additional interest is accrued on the loan balance until the collection of both principal and interest becomes reasonably certain.
The Company had loans past due 90 days or more, including nonaccrual loans, of $14,129,121 and $11,694,139 at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. During the first three months of March the Company’s nonaccrual loans increased $4,552,091 or 85.48% from the level at December 31, 2010. This increase was due to the lack of economic recovery in the real estate market in our lending area. These loans are detailed below:
Risk Elements of Loan Portfolio
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Nonaccrual Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$ |
185,813 |
|
|
$ |
574,184 |
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
9,654,383 |
|
|
|
4,751,311 |
|
Consumer
|
|
|
37,390 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
9,877,586 |
|
|
|
5,325,495 |
|
Accruing Loans Past Due 90 Days or More
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
52,819 |
|
|
|
19,838 |
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
4,192,874 |
|
|
|
6,282,242 |
|
Consumer
|
|
|
5,843 |
|
|
|
66,563 |
|
|
|
|
4,251,535 |
|
|
|
6,368,643 |
|
|
|
$ |
14,129,121 |
|
|
$ |
11,694,138 |
|
Gross interest income of $296,701 for the first three months of 2011, $347,046 for fiscal year 2010 and $28,298 for the first three months of 2010 would have been recorded if nonaccrual loans had been current and performing in accordance with their original terms. Interest actually recorded on such loans was $8,145 for the first three months of 2011, $31,683 for fiscal year 2010 and $253 for the first three months of 2010.
Loans are classified as impaired when the collection of contractual obligations, including principal and interest, is doubtful. Management believes it has identified all significant impaired loans as of March 31, 2011 and has made the appropriate change to the allowance for loan losses.
Deposits and Other Interest-Bearing Liabilities
Average interest-bearing deposits increased $1,684,886 or 1.09% to $156,086,609 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, from $154,401,723 for the same period of 2010. Average noninterest-bearing deposits increased $2,100,139 or 5.96% to $37,316,794 for the three months ended March 31, 2011, from $35,216,655 for the same period of 2010. Average total deposits have increased 2.00% or $3,785,025 to $193,403,403 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 from $189,618,378 for the same period of 2010. Borrowings, primarily from the FHLB, decreased to $22,000,000 from $24,000,000 at December 31, 2010, representing a decrease of 8.33%.
Deposits, particularly core deposits, have been our primary source of funding and have enabled us to meet both our short-term and long-term liquidity needs. Management anticipates that such deposits will grow and continue to be our primary source of funding for the foreseeable future. It should be noted, however, that investor confidence in alternatives to deposit accounts, which may pay yields that are higher than those paid on deposits, typically increases when the economy and stock markets perform well. Increased investor confidence in nondeposit investment products in future periods would likely have an adverse impact on our deposit growth. In addition, changes in governmental monetary policy, especially interest rates, may impact our ability to attract and retain deposits.
Short-Term Borrowings
The following table sets forth the Company’s position with respect to short-term borrowings at March 31, 2011 and December 31 2010.
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail Repurchase Agreements
|
|
|
2,179,654 |
|
|
|
.47 |
% |
|
|
2,754,321 |
|
|
|
1.76 |
% |
We may borrow up to approximately 30% of total assets from the FHLB of Atlanta through any combination of notes or line of credit advances. Both the notes payable and the line of credit are secured by a floating lien on our real estate mortgage loans. The Bank was required to purchase shares of capital stock in the FHLB of Atlanta as a condition to obtaining the line of credit.
We provide collateral of 105% of the repurchase agreement balances by pledging U.S. Government Agency securities.
The Bank has lines of credit of $13,650,000 in unsecured overnight federal funds and $5,000,000 in overnight federal funds with correspondent banks at March 31, 2011.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity describes our ability to meet financial obligations that arise out of the ordinary course of business. Liquidity is needed primarily to fund loans, meet depositor withdrawal requirements, and fund current and planned expenditures. The Company derives liquidity through increased customer deposits, maturities in the investment portfolio, loan repayments and income from earning assets. To the extent that deposits are not adequate to fund customer loan demand, liquidity needs can be met in the short-term funds markets through lines of credit totaling $18,650,000 from correspondent banks. The Bank is also a member of the FHLB of Atlanta, which provides another source of liquidity through a secured line of credit in the amount of $36,892,755 of which $22,000,000 has been advanced as of March 31, 2011. We also have the ability to borrow secured funds through the Federal Reserve’s Discount window as necessary.
Bank regulatory agencies have adopted various capital standards, including risk-based capital standards, that apply to financial institutions like the Company. The primary objectives of the risk-based capital framework are to provide a more consistent system for comparing capital positions of financial institutions and to take into account the different risks among financial institutions’ assets and off-balance sheet items.
Risk-based capital standards have been supplemented with requirements for a minimum Tier 1 capital to assets ratio (leverage ratio). In addition, regulatory agencies consider the published capital levels as minimum levels and may require a financial institution to maintain capital at higher levels. A comparison of the Company’s capital ratios as of March 31, 2011 to the minimum ratios required by federal banking regulators is presented below.
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
To be well
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Requirements
|
|
|
Capitalized
|
|
Total risk-based capital ratio
|
|
|
14.00 |
% |
|
|
8.00 |
% |
|
|
10.00 |
% |
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio
|
|
|
12.74 |
% |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
Tier 1 leverage ratio
|
|
|
10.31 |
% |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
5.00 |
% |
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
The Company is a “smaller reporting company” and is not required to include the information required by this Item.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that Peoples Bancorp, Inc. files under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, such as this quarterly report, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in those rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the President and Chief Executive Officer (the “CEO”), who also serves as the Chief Financial Officer (the “CFO”), to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
An evaluation of the effectiveness of these disclosure controls was carried out as of March 31, 2011 under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the CEO. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management, including the CEO, has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are, in fact, effective at the reasonable assurance level.
During the first quarter of 2011, there was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our control over financial reporting.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
None
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
The risks and uncertainties to which our Company’s financial condition and operations are subject are discussed in detail in Item 1A of Part I of the Annual Report of Peoples Bancorp, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. Management does not believe that any material changes in these risk factors have occurred since December 31, 2010.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
None
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
Not applicable.
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved).
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
Item 6. Exhibits.
The exhibits filed or furnished with this report are listed in the Exhibit Index that immediately follows the signatures, which Index is incorporated herein by reference.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
PEOPLES BANCORP, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 13, 2011
|
By:
|
/s/ Thomas G. Stevenson
|
|
|
|
Thomas G. Stevenson
|
|
|
President/Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
& Chief Financial Officer
|
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certifications of the CEO/CFO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)
|
32.1
|
|
Certifications of the CEO/ CFO pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith)
|