UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

þ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to             

Commission file number 1-14760

RAIT FINANCIAL TRUST

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland	23-2919819
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)
2929 Arch Street, 17th Floor Philadelphia, PA	19104
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (215) 243-9000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class	Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common Shares of Beneficial Interest	New York Stock Exchange
7.75% Series A Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest	New York Stock Exchange
8.375% Series B Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest	New York Stock Exchange
8.875% Series C Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest	New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ¨    No  þ

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.    Yes  ¨    No  þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  þ    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Date File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  þ    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.    þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	þ
Non-accelerated filer	¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  þ

The aggregate market value of the common shares of the registrant held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based upon the closing price of such shares on June 30, 2011 of $2.10, was approximately $238,000,000.

As of February 21, 2012, 42,359,031 common shares of beneficial interest, par value $0.03 per share, of the registrant were outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the proxy statement for registrant’s 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page No.
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS			1
PART I			2
Item 1.	Business		2
Item 1A.	Risk Factors		11
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments		40
Item 2.	Properties		40
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings		40
Item 4.	Reserved		40
PART II			41
Item 5.	Market for Our Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities		41
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data		43
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		44
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		76
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data		78
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure		130
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures		130
Item 9B.	Other Information		130
PART III			131
Item 10.	Trustees, Executive Officers and Trust Governance		131
Item 11.	Executive Compensation		131
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters		131
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Trustee Independence		131
Item 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services		131
PART IV			132
Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules		132
SIGNATURES			133
EXHIBIT INDEX			134

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

The Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, encourages companies to disclose forward-looking information so that investors can better understand a company’s future prospects and make informed investment decisions. This report contains or incorporates by reference such “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or Exchange Act.

Words such as “anticipates,” “estimates,” “expects,” “projects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes” and words and terms of similar substance used in connection with any discussion of future operating or financial performance identify forward-looking statements. Unless we have indicated otherwise, or the context otherwise requires, references in this report to “RAIT,” “we,” “us,” and “our” or similar terms, are to RAIT Financial Trust and its subsidiaries.

We claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements provided in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be made directly in this report and they may also be incorporated by reference in this report to other documents filed with the SEC, and include, but are not limited to, statements about future financial and operating results and performance, statements about our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions with respect to future operations, products and services, and other statements that are not historical facts. These forward-looking statements are based upon the current beliefs and expectations of our management and are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are difficult to predict and generally beyond our control. In addition, these forward-looking statements are subject to assumptions with respect to future business strategies and decisions that are subject to change. Actual results may differ materially from the anticipated results discussed in these forward-looking statements.

The risk factors discussed and identified in item 1A of this report and in other of our public filings with the SEC, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the forward-looking statements. We caution you not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. Except to the extent required by applicable law or regulation, we undertake no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this filing or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

1

PART I

Item 1. Business

Our Company

We are a vertically integrated commercial real estate company with a commercial real estate focused platform capable of originating primarily commercial real estate loans, CMBS eligible loans, acquiring commercial real estate properties and investing in, managing, servicing and advising on commercial real estate-related assets. We offer a comprehensive set of debt financing options to the commercial real estate industry along with asset and property management services. We have recently expanded our platform to include sponsoring non-traded REITs. We also own and manage a portfolio of commercial real estate properties and manage real estate-related assets for third parties. We are a self-managed and self-advised Maryland real estate investment trust, or REIT, formed in August 1997, that commenced operations in January 1998.

Our investments, and the investments held by our sponsored non-traded REITs, consist primarily of the following asset classes:

• commercial real estate mortgages, mezzanine loans, CMBS eligible loans, other loans and preferred equity interests;

• investments in real estate or in entities that own commercial real estate; and

• investments in debt securities issued by real estate companies, including trust preferred securities, or TruPS, and subordinated debentures, mortgage-backed securities, including commercial mortgage-backed securities, or CMBS, unsecured REIT notes and other real estate-related debt.

Our revenue is generated primarily from:

• interest income from our investments;

• rental income from our owned real estate assets; and

• fee income generated from:

• originating, servicing and managing assets,

• advising sponsored companies, and

• dealer-manager services.

During 2011, we successfully met our debt reduction goals, increased our origination of commercial real estate loans, increased our investments in real estate and began two new business initiatives, (i) originating and selling CMBS eligible loans and (ii) sponsoring non-traded REITS, We generated positive operating income and adjusted funds from operations, or AFFO, throughout 2011 and resumed paying regular dividends on our common shares. Although we are reporting a net loss for the year caused primarily by non-cash changes in the fair market value of some of our investments, we believe we have positioned RAIT to take advantage of opportunities resulting from improved commercial real estate market fundamentals and sources of financing and by reducing our exposure to near-term debt obligations. For further discussion of our performance and these transactions, see Item 7—“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

Business Strategy

Our objective is to provide our shareholders with total returns over time. The core components of our business strategy are described in more detail below.

Provide commercial real estate financing. We provide a comprehensive set of debt financing options to the commercial real estate industry, including commercial mortgages, mezzanine loans, CMBS eligible loans, other

2

loans and preferred equity interests. See “Our Investment Portfolio- Commercial mortgages, mezzanine loans, other loans and preferred equity interests” below for a description of the investment portfolio resulting from this strategy.

Own commercial real estate. Our ownership of commercial real estate has grown recently as we have restructured loans in response to credit events to take control of properties where we believe we can continue to generate or enhance our risk-adjusted returns. During 2011, our efforts to stabilize these properties contributed to increased overall occupancy from 79.2% at December 31, 2010 to 83.6% at December 31, 2011. We continue to expand our internal multifamily property management capabilities through our subsidiary Jupiter Communities, LLC, or Jupiter Communities, and our internal office property management capabilities through our subsidiary CRP Commercial Services, LLC, or CRP Commercial Services.

Sponsoring Non-Traded REITs. We are sponsoring the initial public offering of a non-traded REIT, Independence Realty Trust, Inc., or IRT, to acquire a diversified portfolio of multifamily properties, and may seek to sponsor other companies to own commercial real estate. We are also sponsoring the initial public offering of a non-traded REIT, Independence Mortgage Trust, Inc., or IMT, to originate, acquire and manage a portfolio of commercial real estate loans, commercial mortgage-backed securities, or CMBS, and other commercial real estate-related securities, and may seek to sponsor other companies to engage in commercial real estate financing. We refer to IRT and IMT as our sponsored REITs and to all the companies we sponsor as the sponsored companies. See Item 7—“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations- Sponsored Companies” for further discussion of this strategy.

Manage our portfolio of debt securities issued by real estate companies. Included in our assets are debt securities issued by real estate companies. As noted above, we do not expect to originate new investments in this portfolio in order to focus on commercial real estate loans and properties. We continue to manage the debt securities remaining in our portfolio and earn senior management fees. See “Our Investment Portfolio- Investment in debt securities” below for a description of the investment portfolio resulting from this strategy.

Generate fee income. We manage a portfolio of real estate related assets. As of December 31, 2011, we had $3.5 billion of assets under management. Assets under management are comprised of our consolidated assets and assets we manage but do not consolidate. At December 31, 2011, we served as the collateral manager on five securitizations that are collateralized by U.S. commercial real estate investments, TruPS and various real-estate related debt securities. We use the term “securitizations” to refer to either the issuer of securitizations or the securitizations themselves, where the context makes the reference clear. We generate fee income from our asset management efforts, primarily from serving as collateral manager. With respect to our sponsored REITs and other sponsored companies, we plan to serve as their advisor regarding investments and earn advisory fees. We will serve as the dealer-manager of the offerings of our sponsored REITs and other sponsored companies, which we refer to collectively as the sponsored companies, and to earn fees in this role. We also service our U.S. commercial real estate investments. We are rated as a commercial mortgage primary servicer and special servicer by Standard & Poor’s and by Morningstar. We also provide property management services on multi-family, office and retail properties for our own account and for third parties through Jupiter Communities and CRP Commercial Services.

Financing Strategy

Investments in Loans and Debt Securities

Our strategy involves using multiple sources of short-term financing to acquire assets with the ultimate goal of financing these investments on a long-term, match-funded basis or selling these assets. Match funding enables us to match the interest rates and maturities of our assets with the interest rates and maturities of our financing, thereby reducing interest rate risk and funding risks in financing our portfolio on a long-term basis. We expect to use a variety of short-term funding sources, including warehouse facilities, repurchase agreements and bank credit facilities, until we obtain permanent long-term financing or a buyer for the asset. This includes using short term financing to originate CMBS eligible loans prior to their ultimate sale to CMBS securitizations. We

3

financed a majority of our commercial real estate loan portfolio through two non-recourse loan securitizations, RAIT CRE CDO I, Ltd., or RAIT I, and RAIT Preferred Funding II, Ltd., or RAIT II, which aggregate $1.85 billion of loan capacity. RAIT I and RAIT II are among the five securitizations referenced above where we serve as collateral manager. RAIT II has reinvestment rights that permit us to replace maturing loan collateral with new loans up through the fifth year anniversary in June 2012. See “Securitization Summary” below.

We financed most of our debt securities portfolio in a series of non-recourse debt securities securitizations which provided long-term, interest-only, match funded financing for the TruPS and subordinated debenture investments. As of December 31, 2011, we retained a controlling interest in two securitizations, Taberna Preferred Funding VIII, Ltd., or Taberna VIII, and Taberna Preferred Funding IX, Ltd., or Taberna IX, which are consolidated entities. See “Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Securitization Summary” below.

We may use derivative financial instruments to hedge all or a portion of the interest rate risk associated with our borrowings. REITs generally are able to enter into transactions to hedge indebtedness used to acquire real estate assets, provided that the total gross income from such hedges and other non-qualifying sources does not exceed 25% of the REIT’s total gross income.

Investments in Real Estate

We have financed our portfolio of investments in commercial real estate through secured mortgages held by either third party lenders or our commercial real estate securitizations. Upon conversion of commercial real estate loans to real estate investments, we generally keep the existing financing provided by RAIT I and RAIT II.

Our Investment Portfolio

Our consolidated investment portfolio is currently comprised of the following asset classes:

Commercial mortgages, mezzanine loans, other loans and preferred equity interests. We originate and own senior long-term mortgage loans, short-term bridge loans, subordinated, or “mezzanine,” financing and preferred equity interests. These assets are in most cases “non-recourse” or limited recourse loans secured by commercial real estate assets or real estate entities. This means that we look primarily to the assets securing the loan for repayment, subject to certain standard exceptions. We may from time to time acquire existing commercial real estate loans from third parties who have originated such loans, including banks, other institutional lenders or third-party investors. Where possible, we seek to maintain direct lending relationships with borrowers, as opposed to investing in loans controlled by third party lenders.

The tables below describe certain characteristics of our commercial mortgages, mezzanine loans, other loans and preferred equity interests as of December 31, 2011 (dollars in thousands):

	Book Value		Weighted- Average Coupon			Range of Maturities		Number of Loans
Commercial Real Estate (CRE) Loans
Commercial mortgages	$	571,071		6.3	%		Mar. 2012 to Dec. 2020		36
Mezzanine loans		307,698		8.9	%		Mar. 2012 to Nov. 2038		91
Preferred equity interests		64,450		9.5	%		May 2012 to Aug. 2025		22
Total CRE Loans		943,219		7.4	%				149
Other loans		54,193		4.5	%		Mar. 2012 to Oct. 2016		4
Total investments in loans	$	997,412		7.2	%				153

While we have limited capacity to originate new loans, we are focusing on this asset class as economic conditions improve and our lending capacity increases. During 2011, our portfolio of commercial real estate loans decreased as the amount of loan conversions and repayments exceeded our $104.1 million of new loan originations in 2011. As of December 31, 2011, we had $109.5 million of capacity for new loans within our existing financing securitizations and expect to deploy these funds in the first and second quarter of 2012.

4

The charts below describe the property types and the geographic breakdown of our commercial mortgages, mezzanine loans, other loans, and preferred equity interests as of December 31, 2011:

(a) Based on book value.

Investments in real estate. We invest in real estate properties, primarily multi-family properties, throughout the United States. The table below describes certain characteristics of our investments in real estate as of December 31, 2011 (dollars in thousands, except average effective rent):

	Investments in Real Estate		Average Physical Occupancy			Units/ Square Feet/ Acres		Number of Properties		Average Effective Rent (a)
										For the Year Ended December 31, 2011		For the Year Ended December 31, 2010
Multi-family real estate properties (b)	$	552,393		88.5	%		8,014		33	$	680	$	664
Office real estate properties (c)		225,059		69.2	%		1,786,860		10		19.41		17.75
Retail real estate properties (c)		67,799		68.0	%		1,358,257		3		9.08		9.39
Parcels of land		46,251		0	%		19.9		10		N/A		N/A
Total	$	891,502		83.6	%				56

(a) Based on properties owned as of December 31, 2011.

(b) Average effective rent is rent per unit per month.

(c) Average effective rent is rent per square foot per year.

5

The charts below describe the property types and the geographic breakdown of our investments in real estate as of December 31, 2011:

(a) Based on book value.

Investment in debt securities—TruPS and Subordinated Debentures. Historically, we provided REITs and real estate operating companies the ability to raise subordinated debt capital through TruPS and subordinated debentures. TruPS are long-term instruments, with maturities ranging from 5 to 30 years, which are priced based on short-term variable rates, such as the three-month London Inter-Bank Offered Rate, or LIBOR. TruPS are unsecured and generally contain minimal financial and operating covenants. We financed most of our debt securities portfolio in a series of non-recourse securitizations which provided long-dated, interest-only, match funded financing to the TruPS and subordinated debenture investments. As of December 31, 2011, we retained a controlling interest in two such securitizations—Taberna VIII and Taberna IX, which are consolidated entities. We present all of the collateral assets for the debt securities and the related non-recourse securitization financing obligations at fair value in our consolidated financial statements. During 2011, due to the credit performance of the underlying collateral, we received only our senior collateral management fees from these two securitizations. We do not expect to add investments in this asset category for the foreseeable future due to market conditions.

The table below describes our investment in TruPS and subordinated debentures as included in our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2011 (dollars in thousands):

						Issuer Statistics
Industry Sector	Estimated Fair Value		Weighted- Average Coupon			Weighted Average Ratio of Debt to Total Capitalization			Weighted Average Interest Coverage Ratio
Commercial Mortgage	$	103,622		1.5	%		81.8	%		2.2x
Office		137,222		7.5	%		62.2	%		1.6x
Residential Mortgage		45,458		2.7	%		82.2	%		1.8x
Specialty Finance		86,895		5.1	%		86.0	%		5.6x
Homebuilders		61,479		7.8	%		63.4	%		0.7x
Retail		74,716		4.1	%		62.2	%		3.1x
Hospitality		29,873		6.3	%		94.2	%		0.3x
Storage		25,334		8.0	%		66.1	%		3.7x
Total	$	564,599		4.6	%		73.0	%		2.5x

6

The chart below describes the equity capitalization of our investment in TruPS and subordinated debentures as included in our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2011:

(a) Based on the most recent information available to management as provided by our TruPS issuers or through public filings.

(b) Based on estimated fair value.

Investment in debt securities—Other Real Estate Related Debt Securities. We have invested, and expect to continue to invest, in CMBS, unsecured REIT notes and other real estate-related debt securities.

Unsecured REIT notes are publicly traded debentures issued by large publicly reporting REITs and other real estate companies. These debentures generally pay interest semi-annually.

CMBS generally are multi-class debt or pass-through certificates secured or backed by single loans or pools of mortgage loans on commercial real estate properties. Our CMBS investments may include loans and securities that are rated investment grade by one or more nationally-recognized rating agencies, as well as both unrated and non-investment grade loans and securities.

7

The table and the chart below describe certain characteristics of our real estate-related debt securities as of December 31, 2011 (dollars in thousands):

Investment Description	Estimated Fair Value		Weighted- Average Coupon			Weighted- Average Years to Maturity		Book Value
Unsecured REIT note receivables	$	30,066		6.7	%		5.1	$	30,000
CMBS receivables		35,117		5.6	%		31.7		86,443
Other securities		17,679		3.7	%		30.9		67,788
Total	$	82,862		5.0	%		27.3	$	184,231

(a) S&P Ratings as of December 31, 2011.

Certain REIT and Investment Company Act Limits On Our Strategies

REIT Limits

We conduct our operations to qualify as a REIT. We also conduct the operations of our subsidiary, Taberna Realty Finance Trust, or Taberna, the sponsored REITs and any REITs we may sponsor in the future, which we collectively refer to as the REIT affiliates, to each qualify as a REIT. For a discussion of the tax implications of our and the REIT affiliates’ REIT status to us and our shareholders, see “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations” contained in Exhibit 99.1 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. To qualify as a REIT, we and the REIT affiliates must continually satisfy various tests regarding sources of income, nature and diversification of assets, amounts distributed to shareholders and the ownership of common shares. In order to satisfy these tests, we and the REIT affiliates may be required to forgo investments that might otherwise be made. Accordingly, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our or the REIT affiliates’ investment performance. These requirements include the following:

• For each of ourselves and the REIT affiliates, at least 75% of total assets and 75% of gross income must be derived from qualifying real estate assets, whether or not such assets would otherwise represent our or the REIT affiliates’ best investment alternative. For example, since neither TruPS nor investments in the debt or equity of securitizations are qualifying real estate assets, to the extent that we

8

have historically invested in such assets, or may do so in the future, Taberna (and we, to the extent that we invest in such assets) must hold substantial investments in qualifying real estate assets, including mortgage loans and CMBS, which may have lower yields than such investments. Also, at least 95% of each of our and the REIT affiliates’ gross income in each taxable year, excluding gross income from prohibited transactions, must be derived from some combination of income that qualifies under the 75% gross income test described above, as well as other dividends, interest, and gain from the sale or disposition of shares or securities, which need not have any relation to real property.

• A REIT’s net income from prohibited transactions is subject to a 100% penalty tax. In general, prohibited transactions are sales or other dispositions of property, other than foreclosure property, but including any mortgage loans, held in inventory or primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business. The prohibited transaction tax may apply to any sale of assets to a securitization and to any sale of securitization securities, and therefore may limit our and the REIT affiliates’ ability to sell assets to or equity in securitizations and other assets.

• Overall, no more than 25% of the value of a REIT’s assets may consist of securities of one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries, or TRSs. Our TRSs that currently hold assets include: RAIT Jupiter Holdings, LLC (the holding company for our interest in Jupiter Communities), RAIT TRS, LLC (the holding company for advisors of our sponsored companies and Independence Securities), Taberna Capital Management, LLC (the collateral manager for Taberna VIII and Taberna IX), or TCM, and RAIT Funding LLC (the holding company for CRP Commercial Services, the entities that issued our junior subordinated notes, the entities party to our CMBS facilities referred to below, Taberna VIII, Taberna IX and their co-issuers). Our and the REIT affiliates’ ability to grow or expand the fee-generating businesses held in a TRSs, as well as the business of future TRSs we or the REIT affiliates may form, will be limited by our and the REIT affiliates’ need to meet this 25% test.

• The REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code limit our and the REIT affiliates’ ability to hedge mortgage-backed securities, preferred securities and related borrowings. Except to the extent provided by the regulations promulgated by the U.S. Treasury Department, or the Treasury regulations, any income from a hedging transaction we or the REIT affiliates enter into in the normal course of business primarily to manage risk of interest rate or price changes or currency fluctuations with respect to borrowings made or to be made, or ordinary obligations incurred or to be incurred, to acquire or carry real estate assets, which is clearly identified as specified in the Treasury regulations before the close of the day on which it was acquired, originated, or entered into, including gain from the sale or disposition of such a transaction, will not constitute gross income for purposes of the 95% gross income test (and will generally constitute non-qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test). To the extent that we or the REIT affiliates enter into other types of hedging transactions, the income from those transactions is likely to be treated as non- qualifying income for purposes of both of the gross income tests. As a result, we or the REIT affiliates might have to limit use of advantageous hedging techniques or implement those hedges through TRSs. This could increase the cost of our or the REIT affiliates’ hedging activities or expose it or us to greater risks associated with changes in interest rates than we or it would otherwise want to bear.

There are other risks arising out of our and the REIT affiliates’ need to comply with REIT requirements. See Item 1A—“Risk Factors-Tax Risks” below.

Investment Company Act Limits

We seek to conduct our operations so that we are not required to register as an investment company. Under Section 3(a)(1) of the Investment Company Act, a company is not deemed to be an “investment company” if:

• it neither is, nor holds itself out as being, engaged primarily, nor proposes to engage primarily, in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities; and

9

• it neither is engaged nor proposes to engage in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities and does not own or propose to acquire “investment securities” having a value exceeding 40% of the value of its total assets on an unconsolidated basis, which we refer to as the 40% test. “Investment securities” excludes U.S. government securities and securities of majority-owned subsidiaries that are not themselves investment companies and are not relying on the exception from the definition of investment company under Section 3(c)(1) or Section 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act.

We rely on the 40% test. Because we are a holding company that conducts our businesses through wholly-owned or majority-owned subsidiaries, the securities issued by our subsidiaries that are excepted from the definition of “investment company” under Section 3(c)(1) or Section 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act, together with any other investment securities we may own, may not have a combined value in excess of 40% of the value of our total assets on an unconsolidated basis. In fact, based on the relative value of our investment in Taberna, on the one hand, and our investment in RAIT Partnership, L.P., or RAIT Partnership, on the other hand, we can comply with the 40% test only if Taberna satisfies the 40% test on which it relies (or another exemption other than Section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7)) and RAIT Partnership complies with Section 3(c)(5)(C) or 3(c)(6), the exemptions upon which it relies (or another exemption other than Section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7)). This requirement limits the types of businesses in which we may engage through our subsidiaries.

None of RAIT, RAIT Partnership or Taberna has received a no-action letter from the SEC regarding whether it complies with the Investment Company Act or how its investment or financing strategies fit within the exclusions from regulation under the Investment Company Act that it is using. To the extent that the SEC provides more specific or different guidance regarding, for example, the treatment of assets as qualifying real estate assets or real estate-related assets, we may be required to adjust these investment and financing strategies accordingly. See Item 1A—“Risk Factors—Other Regulatory and Legal Risks of Our Business- Loss of our Investment Company Act exemption would affect us adversely.”

Competition

We are subject to significant competition in all aspects of our business. Existing industry participants and potential new entrants compete with us for the available supply of investments suitable for origination or acquisition, as well as for debt and equity capital. With respect to our sponsored companies, we compete with other sponsors of offerings by commercial real estate businesses for access to debt and equity capital. We compete with many third parties engaged in real estate finance and investment activities, including other REITs, specialty finance companies, savings and loan associations, banks, mortgage bankers, insurance companies, mutual funds, institutional investors, investment banking firms, lenders, governmental bodies and other entities. With respect to our investments in real estate, we face significant competition from other owners, operators and developers of properties, many of which own properties similar to ours in markets where we operate. Competition may increase, and other companies and funds with investment objectives similar to ours may be organized in the future. Some of these competitors have, or in the future may have, substantially greater financial resources than we do and generally may be able to accept more risk. They may also enjoy significant competitive advantages that result from, among other things, a lower cost of capital and enhanced operating efficiencies. In addition, competition may lead us to pay a greater portion of the origination fees that we expect to collect in our future origination activities to third-party investment banks and brokers that introduce borrowers to us in order to continue to generate new business from these sources.

Employees

As of February 21, 2012, we had 366 employees and believe our relationships with our employees to be good. None of our employees is covered by a collective bargaining agreement.

10

Available Information

We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. The public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The internet address of the SEC site is http://www.sec.gov. Our internet address is http://www.raitft.com. We make our SEC filings available free of charge on or through our internet website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. We are not incorporating by reference in this report any material from our website.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

This section describes material risks affecting our business.

Risks Related to Our Business

Adverse developments in the credit markets have had, and may continue to have, an adverse effect on our investments and our operating results, including reduced availability of financing to us and for refinancing to our borrowers, payment defaults and other credit risks in our investments, decreases in the fair value of our assets and decreases in the cash flow we receive from our investments.

Adverse developments in the credit markets have substantially reduced the availability of financing for many real estate sectors in which we and the companies we finance operate. This has reduced, and may continue to reduce, the amount of capital we have available to make new investments, contributing to the reduction of our assets under management, and the reduction of income and fees derived from our investments. These developments have adversely affected many real estate sectors in which the companies we finance operate, resulting in increasing credit risk relating to, and payment defaults in, our investments. This has reduced, and may continue to reduce, the revenue and cash flow we receive from our investments and the fair value of our investments and has resulted in, and may continue to cause, material asset impairment of these investments. Our response to these developments has required, and may continue to require, us to change our business strategy, including the types of investments we make, how we finance them and our dividend policies, from our historical approaches.

Our business requires a substantial amount of liquidity to fund investments, to pay expenses and to acquire and hold assets. As REITs, we must distribute at least 90% of REIT taxable income to our respective shareholders, determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gain, which substantially limits our ability to accumulate cash from our operations. Developments in the capital markets have substantially reduced the debt capital and equity capital available to us and has adversely affected our ability to make investments.

With respect to debt capital, we believe many of the types of financing arrangements we used historically will be available at reduced levels for the foreseeable future, including repurchase agreements and warehouse lines of credit for short term financing and securitizations for long term financing of our investments. Our continued use of secured bank financing will depend on our ability to negotiate renewals of our current line of credit when it matures and to obtain new secured bank financing on acceptable terms. We have historically issued debt securities to one or more institutional investors from time to time as market conditions permitted, particularly our trust preferred securities, or TruPS, and our 7.0% Convertible Senior Notes due 2031, or the 7.0% convertible senior notes. Our opportunities to issue additional debt may be limited for the foreseeable future.

With respect to equity capital, we believe the market for our common shares and preferred shares has contracted and may continue to be limited. We may not be able to obtain the amounts of capital on the terms we seek through issuances of our equity securities, which may cause dilution to current holders of our common shares.

11

We are seeking, and expect we will continue to seek, alternative financing arrangements in response to current market conditions, including joint venture and co-investment opportunities. We cannot assure you that we will be able to develop these financing sources on acceptable terms, or at all. We may need to obtain capital in smaller increments to attempt to match fund any investment we desire to make to the financing source to the extent economically feasible. Our rate of originating new assets may decline under alternative financing arrangements which may result in lower fee income and cash flow for distribution and a reduction in our assets under management.

The failure to secure financing on acceptable terms or in sufficient amounts has reduced, and may continue to reduce, our taxable income by limiting our ability to originate loans and other investments and reducing our fee income and increasing our financing expense. A reduction in our net taxable income could impair our liquidity and our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders. We cannot assure you that any, or sufficient, funding or capital will be available to us in the future on terms that are acceptable to us.

The price of our common shares and other securities historically has been volatile. This volatility may affect the price at which anyone holding our common shares or other securities could sell them, and the sale of substantial amounts of our common shares or such other securities could adversely affect the price of our common shares or such other securities.

The market price for our common shares has varied between a high of $10.56, split-adjusted, on February 28, 2011 and a low of $2.90 on October 4, 2011 in the twelve month period ending on February 21, 2012. This volatility may affect the price at which you could sell the common shares. Other securities we have issued have also had volatile market prices. The market prices of our securities are likely to continue to be volatile and the trading volume subject to significant fluctuations in response to market and other factors, including the other risk factors discussed in this report; variations in our quarterly operating results from our expectations or those of securities analysts or investors, downward revisions in securities analysts’ estimates, and announcement by us or our competitors of significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments.

Our reliance on significant amounts of debt to finance investments may require us to make significant balloon payments upon maturity, upon the exercise of any applicable put rights or otherwise, and an increased risk of loss, may reduce our return on investments, reduce our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders and possibly result in the foreclosure of any assets subject to secured financing.

We have historically incurred a significant amount of debt to finance our investments, which could compound losses and reduce our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders. Changes in market conditions have caused, and may continue to cause, availability of financing to decrease and the cost of financing to increase relative to the income that we can derive from investments, which has impaired, and may continue to impair, the returns we can achieve and our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders. Our debt service payments reduce the net income available for distributions to our shareholders. Most of our assets are pledged as collateral for borrowings. In addition, the assets of the securitizations that we consolidate collateralize the debt obligations of the securitizations and are not available to satisfy our other creditors. To the extent that we fail to meet debt service obligations, we risk the loss of some or all of our respective assets to foreclosure or sale to satisfy these debt obligations. Currently, our declaration of trust and bylaws do not impose any limitations on the extent to which we may leverage our respective assets.

We are subject to the risks normally associated with debt financing, including the risk that our cash flows will be insufficient to meet required principal and interest payments and the risk that we will be unable to refinance our indebtedness when it becomes due, or that the terms of such refinancing will not be as favorable as the terms of our indebtedness. Included in our debt instruments are provisions providing for the lump sum payment of significant amounts of principal, whether upon maturity, upon the exercise of any applicable put rights or otherwise, which we refer to as balloon payments. Most of our debt provides for balloon payments that are payable at maturity. If collateral underlying any secured credit facility we are party to defaults or otherwise fails to meet specified conditions, we may have to repay that facility to the extent it was secured by that

12

collateral. Our ability to make these payments when due will depend upon several factors, which may not be in our control. These factors include our liquidity or our ability to convert assets owned by us into liquidity on or prior to such put or maturity dates and the amount by which we have been able to reduce indebtedness prior to such put or maturity date though exchanges, refinancing, extensions, collateralization or other similar transactions (any of which transactions may also have the effect of reducing liquidity or liquid assets). Our ability to accomplish these goals will be affected by various factors existing at the relevant time, such as the state of the national and regional economies, local real estate conditions, available interest rate levels, the lease terms for and equity in any related collateral, our financial condition and the operating history of the collateral. If we are unable to pay, redeem, restructure, refinance, extend or otherwise enter into transactions to satisfy any of our debt, this could result in defaults under, and acceleration of, our debt and we may be required to sell assets in significant amounts and at times when market conditions are not favorable, which could result in our incurring significant losses.

We may seek to acquire, redeem, restructure, refinance or otherwise enter into transactions to satisfy our debt which may include any combination of material payments of cash, issuances of our debt and/or equity securities, sales or exchanges of our assets or other methods.

We are aware that our 7.0% convertible senior notes, collateralized debt obligation, or CDO, notes payable and other indebtedness are currently trading at discounts to their respective face amounts. In order to reduce future cash interest payments, as well as future principal amounts due upon any applicable put dates, at maturity or upon redemption, or to otherwise benefit RAIT, we may, from time to time, purchase such convertible senior notes, CDO notes payable or other indebtedness for cash, in exchange for our equity or debt securities, or for any combination of cash and our equity or debt securities, in each case in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, exchange offers and consent solicitations or otherwise. We will evaluate any such transactions in light of then-existing market conditions, contractual restrictions and other factors, taking into account our current liquidity and prospects for future access to capital. The amounts involved in any such transactions, individually or in the aggregate, may be material and may materially reduce our liquidity or reduce or eliminate our ability to convert assets into liquidity. Any material issuances of our equity securities may have a material dilutive effect on our current shareholders.

If our securitizations secured primarily by commercial real estate loans, RAIT I and RAIT II, were to fail to meet their performance tests, including over-collateralization requirements, our cash flow would be materially reduced.

The terms of the securitizations we have structured generally provide that the principal amount of assets must exceed the principal balance of the related securities issued by them by a certain amount, commonly referred to as “over-collateralization.” The securitization terms provide that, if delinquencies and/or losses exceed specified levels based on the analysis by the rating agencies (or any financial guaranty insurer) of the characteristics of the assets collateralizing the securities issued in the securitization, the required level of over-collateralization may be increased or may be prevented from decreasing as would otherwise be permitted if losses or delinquencies did not exceed those levels. In addition, a failure by a securitization to satisfy an over-collateralization test typically results in accelerated distributions to the holders of the senior debt securities issued by the securitization entity. Our equity holdings and, when we acquire debt interests in securitizations, our debt interests, and our subordinated management fees, if any, are subordinate in right of payment to the other classes of debt securities issued by the securitization entity. Other tests (based on delinquency levels or other criteria) may restrict our ability to receive cash distributions from assets collateralizing the securities issued by the securitization entity or our ability to effectively manage the assets held in the securitizations. We cannot assure you that any performance test will be satisfied.

We currently receive a substantial portion of our cash flow from RAIT I and RAIT II through our retained interests in these securitizations and management fees paid to us for managing these securitizations. If either or both of these securitizations were to fail to meet their respective over-collateralization or other tests, our cash flow would be materially reduced.

13

The reinvestment period for RAIT I has expired and the reinvestment period for RAIT II will expire in 2012.

RAIT I and RAIT II each included reinvestment periods that allowed us to reinvest principal repayments from collateral in eligible investments. The reinvestment period for RAIT I ended in November 2011 and the reinvestment period for RAIT II will end in June 2012. When these reinvestment periods expire, our ability to finance new assets within these securitizations is significantly reduced.

The failure of securitizations in which we hold retained interests collateralized primarily by investment in debt securities, Taberna VIII and Taberna IX, to meet their performance tests has reduced, and we expect will continue to reduce, the cash flow we receive from these securitizations.

Our remaining consolidated securitizations collateralized primarily by investment in debt securities, Taberna VIII and Taberna IX, have not passed some of their over-collateralization tests. As a consequence, distributions to senior debt have been accelerated, resulting in the cessation of distributions on the subordinated debt and equity we hold in these securitizations as well as our subordinated management fees from these securitizations. This has substantially reduced the cash flow we receive from these securitizations. Because we do not expect these securitizations will meet these tests for the foreseeable future, we expect that our cash flows from these transactions will remain limited to the senior management fees received from them for the foreseeable future.

We receive collateral management fees pursuant to collateral management agreements for services we provide as the collateral manager of RAIT I, RAIT II, Taberna Preferred Funding I, Ltd., or Taberna I, Taberna VIII and Taberna IX. If a collateral management agreement is terminated or if the securities serving as collateral for a securitization are prepaid or go into default, the collateral management fees will be reduced or eliminated.

We receive collateral management fees pursuant to collateral management agreements for acting as the collateral manager of RAIT I, RAIT II, Taberna I, Taberna VIII and Taberna IX. If all the notes issued by a securitization for which one of our subsidiaries acts as collateral manager are redeemed, or if the collateral management agreement is otherwise terminated, we will no longer receive collateral management fees from that subsidiary with respect to that securitization. In general, a collateral management agreement may be terminated both with and without cause at the direction of holders of a specified supermajority in principal amount of the notes issued by the securitization. Furthermore, such fees are based on the total amount of collateral held by the securitizations. If the securities serving as collateral for a securitization are prepaid or go into default, we will receive lower collateral management fees than expected or the collateral management fees may be eliminated.

In addition, collateral management agreements typically provide that if certain over-collateralization tests are failed, the collateral management agreement may be terminated by a vote of the security holders resulting in our loss of management fees from these securitizations.

If any of our securitizations fail to meet over-collateralization tests relevant to the securitization’s most senior existing debt, an event of default may occur. Upon an event of default, our ability to manage the securitization may be terminated and our ability to attempt to cure any defaults in the securitization would be limited, which would increase the likelihood of a reduction or elimination of cash flow and returns to us in those securitizations for an indefinite time.

Our investments in securitizations are exposed to greater uncertainty and risk of loss than investments in higher grade securities in these securitizations.

When we securitize assets such as commercial mortgage loans, mezzanine loans and TruPS, the various tranches of investment grade and non-investment grade debt obligations and equity securities have differing priorities and rights to the cash flows of the underlying assets being securitized. We structured our securitization transactions to enable us to place debt and equity securities with investors in the capital markets at various pricing levels based on the credit position created for each tranche of debt and equity securities. The higher rated

14

debt tranches have priority over the lower rated debt securities and the equity securities issued by the particular securitization entity with respect to payments of interest and principal using the cash flows from the collateral assets. The relative cost of capital increases as each tranche of capital becomes further subordinated, as does the associated risk of loss if cash flows from the assets are insufficient to repay fully interest and principal or pay dividends.

Since we own in many cases the “BBB,” “BB,” “B” and unrated debt and equity classes of securitizations, we are in a “first loss” position because the rights of the securities that we hold are subordinate in right of payment and in liquidation to the rights of higher rated debt securities issued by the securitization entities. Accordingly, we have incurred and may in the future incur significant losses when investing in these securities. In the event of default, we may not be able to recover all of our respective investments in these securities. In addition, we may experience significant losses if the underlying portfolio has been overvalued or if the values subsequently decline and, as a result, less collateral is available to satisfy interest, principal and dividend payments due on the related securities. The prices of lower credit quality securities are generally less sensitive to interest rate changes than higher rated investments, but are more sensitive to economic downturns or developments specific to a particular issuer. Current credit market conditions have caused a decline in the price of lower credit quality securities because the ability of obligors on the underlying assets to make principal, interest and dividend payments may be impaired. In addition, existing credit support in a number of the securitizations in which we have invested have been, and may in the future be, insufficient to protect us against loss of our investments in these securities. A number of the securitizations in which we have invested have suffered events of default or other events resulting in the termination for the foreseeable future of any distributions on the subordinated securities we hold.

Representations and warranties made by us in loan sales and securitizations may subject us to liability that could result in loan losses and could harm our operating results and, therefore distributions we make to our shareholders.

In connection with securitizations, we make representations and warranties regarding the assets transferred into securitization trusts. The trustee in the securitizations has recourse to us with respect to the breach of these representations and warranties. While we generally have recourse to loan originators for any such breaches, the originators may not be able to honor their obligations. We generally attempt to limit the potential remedies of the trustee to the potential remedies we have against the originators from whom we acquired the assets. However, in some cases, the remedies available to the trustee may be broader than those available to us against the originators of the assets and, in the event the trustee enforces its remedies against us, we may not always be able to enforce whatever remedies are available to us against the originators of the loans. Furthermore, if we discover, prior to the securitization of an asset, that there is any fraud or misrepresentation with respect to it and the originator fails to repurchase the asset, then we may not be able to sell the asset or may have to sell it at a discount.

Our financing arrangements contain covenants that restrict our operations, and any default under these arrangements would inhibit our ability to grow our business, increase revenue and pay distributions to our shareholders.

Our financing arrangements contain restrictions, covenants and events of default. Failure to meet or satisfy any of these covenants could result in an event of default under these agreements. These agreements may contain cross- default provisions so that an event of default under one agreement will trigger an event of default under other agreements. Defaults generally give our lenders the right to declare all amounts outstanding under their particular credit agreement to be immediately due and payable, and enforce their rights by foreclosing on or otherwise liquidating collateral pledged under these agreements.

These restrictions may interfere with our ability to obtain financing or to engage in other business activities. Furthermore, our default under any of our financing arrangements could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations and our ability to make distributions to our shareholders.

15

We operate in a highly competitive market which may harm our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.

Historically, we have been subject to significant competition in all of our business lines. We compete with many third parties engaged in finance and real estate investment activities, including other REITs, specialty finance companies, savings and loan associations, banks, mortgage bankers, insurance companies, mutual funds, institutional investors, investment banking firms and broker-dealers, property managers, investment advisors, lenders, governmental bodies and other entities. With respect to our sponsored companies, we compete with other sponsors of offerings by commercial real estate businesses for access to debt and equity capital. Some of these competitors have, or in the future may have, substantially greater financial resources than we do and generally may be able to accept more risk. As such, they have the ability to make larger loans and to reduce the risk of loss from any one loan by having a more diversified loan portfolio. They may also enjoy significant competitive advantages that result from, among other things, a lower cost of, and greater access to, capital and enhanced operating efficiencies. An increase in the general availability of funds to lenders, or a decrease in the amount of borrowing activity, may increase competition for making loans and may reduce obtainable yields or increase the credit risk inherent in the available loans.

Competition may limit the number of suitable investment opportunities offered to us. It may also result in higher prices, lower yields and a narrower spread of yields over our borrowing costs, making it more difficult for us to acquire new investments on attractive terms and reducing the fee income we realize from the origination, structuring and management of securitizations. It may also make it more difficult to obtain appreciation interests and increase the price, and thus reduce potential yields, on discounted loans we acquire. With respect to our sponsored companies, competition may make it harder for our sponsored companies to raise capital.

We face significant competition in our investments in real estate from other owners, operators and developers of properties, many of which own properties similar to ours in markets where we operate. Such competition may affect our ability to attract and retain tenants and reduce the rents we are able to charge. These competing properties may have vacancy rates higher than our properties, which may result in their owners being willing to rent space at lower rental rates than we would or providing greater tenant improvement allowances or other leasing concessions. This combination of circumstances could adversely affect our revenues and financial performance.

Loss of our management team or the ability to attract and retain key employees could harm our business.

The real estate finance business is very labor-intensive. We depend on our management team to manage our investments and attract customers for financing by, among other things, developing relationships with issuers, financial institutions and others. The market for skilled personnel is highly competitive and has historically experienced a high rate of turnover. Due to the nature of our business, we compete for qualified personnel not only with companies in our business, but also in other sectors of the financial services industry. Competition for qualified personnel may lead to increased hiring and retention costs. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to attract or retain qualified personnel at reasonable costs or at all. If we are unable to attract or retain a sufficient number of skilled personnel at manageable costs, it could impair our ability to manage our investments and execute our investment strategies successfully, thereby reducing our earnings.

Our board of trustees may change our policies without shareholder consent.

Our board of trustees determines our policies and, in particular, our investment policies. Our board of trustees may amend our policies or approve transactions that deviate from these policies without a vote of or notice to our shareholders. Policy changes could adversely affect the market price of our shares and our ability to make distributions. Our board of trustees cannot take any action to disqualify us as a REIT or to otherwise revoke our election to be taxed as a REIT without the approval of a majority of our outstanding voting shares.

16

Our organizational documents do not limit our ability to enter into new lines of business, and we may enter into new businesses, make future strategic investments or acquisitions or enter into joint ventures, each of which may result in additional risks and uncertainties in our business.

Our organizational documents do not limit us to our current business lines. Accordingly, we may pursue growth through strategic investments, acquisitions or joint ventures, which may include entering into new lines of business. In addition, we expect opportunities will arise to acquire other companies, including REITs, managers of investment products or originators of real estate debt. To the extent we make strategic investments or acquisitions, enter into joint ventures, or enter into a new line of business, we will face numerous risks and uncertainties, including risks associated with:

• the required investment of capital and other resources,

• the possibility that we have insufficient expertise to engage in such activities profitably or without incurring inappropriate amounts of risk,

• combining or integrating operational and management systems and controls and

• compliance with applicable regulatory requirements including those required under the Internal Revenue Code and the Investment Company Act.

Entry into certain lines of business may subject us to new laws and regulations with which we are not familiar, or from which we are currently exempt, and may lead to increased litigation and regulatory risk. If a new business generates insufficient revenue or if we are unable to efficiently manage our expanded operations, our results of operations will be adversely affected. In the case of joint ventures, we are subject to additional risks and uncertainties in that we may be dependent upon, and subject to liability, losses or reputation damage relating to, systems, controls and personnel that are not under our control.

We engage in transactions with related parties and our policies and procedures regarding these transactions may be insufficient to address any conflicts of interest that may arise.

Under our code of business conduct, we have established procedures regarding the review, approval and ratification of transactions which may give rise to a conflict of interest between us and any employee, officer, trustee, their immediate family members, other businesses under their control and other related persons. In the ordinary course of our business operations, we have ongoing relationships and have engaged in transactions with several related entities. These procedures may not be sufficient to address any conflicts of interest that may arise.

Our transactions with, and investments in, certain securitization vehicles may create perceived or actual conflicts of interest.

We have engaged in transactions with, and invested in, certain of the securitization vehicles under which we also serve as collateral manager, and may do so in the future. These transactions have included, and may include in the future, surrendering for cancellation notes we hold issued by these vehicles and exchanges of our or others’ securities with these vehicles for assets collateralizing these vehicles. In addition, we have previously, and may in the future, purchase investments in these vehicles that are senior or junior to, or have rights and interests different from or adverse to, other investors or credit support providers in the debt or other securities of such securitization vehicles. Such situations may create perceived or actual conflicts of interest between us and such other investors or credit support providers for such investors. Our interests in such transactions and investments may conflict with the interests of such other investors or credit support providers at the time of origination or in the event of a default or restructuring of a securitization vehicle or underlying assets.

Furthermore, if we are involved in structuring the securitization vehicles or such securitization vehicles are structured as our subsidiaries, then our managers may have conflicts between us and other entities managed by them that purchase debt or other securities in such securitization vehicles with regard to setting subordination levels, determining interest rates, pricing the securities, providing for divesting or deferring distributions that would otherwise be made to equity interests, or otherwise setting the amounts and priorities of distributions to the holders of debt and equity interests in the securitization vehicles.

17

Although we seek to make decisions with respect to our securitization vehicles in a manner that we believe is fair and consistent with the operative legal documents governing these vehicles, perceived or actual conflicts may create dissatisfaction among the other investors in such vehicles or litigation or regulatory enforcement actions. Appropriately dealing with conflicts of interest is complex and our reputation could be damaged if we fail to deal appropriately with one or more perceived or actual conflicts of interest. Regulatory scrutiny of, or litigation in connection with, such conflicts of interest could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and our ability to attract investors for future vehicles.

The organization and management of our sponsored REITs or any other investment vehicles we may manage may create conflicts of interest.

We are sponsoring the initial public offerings of two companies we intend to become non-traded REITs, IRT and IMT. We refer to IRT and IMT as our sponsored REITs. We expect the sponsored REITs will be managed by us and will not be listed on a major exchange. We may in the future sponsor and/or manage other REITs and other third party funds or other investment vehicles. The sponsored REITs, along with any new investment vehicles we may manage, will hold assets that we determine should be acquired by them and doing so may create conflicts of interest, including between investors in any sponsored REIT and any new investment vehicles and our shareholders, since many investment opportunities that are suitable for us may also be suitable for one or more of the sponsored REITs and other investment vehicles. Additionally, our management and other real estate and debt finance professionals may face conflicts of interest in allocating their time among RAIT and the sponsored REITs and any new investment vehicles. Although as a company we will seek to make these decisions in a manner that we believe is fair and consistent with the operative legal documents governing these investment vehicles, the transfer or allocation of these assets may give rise to investor dissatisfaction or litigation or regulatory enforcement actions. Appropriately dealing with conflicts of interest is complex and difficult and our reputation could be damaged if we fail to deal appropriately with one or more potential or actual conflicts of interest. Regulatory scrutiny of, or litigation in connection with, conflicts of interest would have a material adverse effect on our reputation which would materially adversely affect our business and our ability to attract investors for future vehicles.

Our ability to raise capital and attract investors in our sponsored REITs is critical to their respective success and ability to grow and depends on our ability to attract a sales force in our subsidiary, Independence Securities, our affiliated licensed broker-dealer responsible for such capital raising.

The sponsored REITs will depend upon our ability to attract purchasers of equity interests, which will depend largely upon the efforts of the sales force in Independence Securities, our affiliated licensed broker-dealer responsible for such capital raising. Our ability to grow our sponsored REITs will depend on our ability to retain and motivate our sales force and other key personnel and to strategically recruit, retain and compensate new personnel. However, we may not be successful in our efforts to recruit, retain and motivate the required personnel as the market for qualified professionals is extremely competitive. If we do not retain an effective sales force, or our sales professionals join competitors or form competing companies, it could result in the loss of significant investment opportunities, which would have a material adverse impact on our sponsored REITs and any benefits we may obtain from our sponsored REITs.

We are exposed to loss if lenders under our repurchase agreements, warehouse facilities or other short-term lenders liquidate our portfolio. Moreover, assets acquired by us pursuant to our repurchase agreements, warehouse facilities or other short-term debt may not be suitable for refinancing though future securitization transactions, which may require us to seek more costly financing for these assets or to liquidate assets.

We have entered into repurchase agreements, and may in the future enter into other repurchase agreements, warehouse facilities or other debt with similar terms. Our lenders have the right under the our current repurchase agreement, and may have the right under such other debt, to liquidate assets acquired thereunder upon the

18

occurrence of certain events, such as an event of default. We are exposed to loss if the proceeds received by the lender upon any such liquidation are insufficient to satisfy our obligation to the lender. We are also subject to the risk that the assets subject to such repurchase agreements, warehouse facilities or other debt with similar terms might not be suitable for refinancing though future securitization transactions. If we were unable to refinance these assets though future securitization transactions, we might be required to seek more costly financing for theses assets or to liquidate assets.

We will lose money on our repurchase transactions if the counterparty to the transaction defaults on its obligation to resell the underlying security back to us at the end of the transaction term, or if the value of the underlying security has declined as of the end of the term or if we default on our obligations under the repurchase agreement.

When we engage in a repurchase transaction, we generally sell securities to the transaction counterparty and receive cash from the counterparty. The counterparty must resell the securities back to us at the end of the term of the transaction. Because the cash we receive from the counterparty when we initially sell the securities to the counterparty is less than the market value of those securities, if the counterparty defaults on its obligation to resell the securities back to us we will incur a loss on the transaction. We will also incur a loss if the value of the underlying securities has declined as of the end of the transaction term, as we will have to repurchase the securities for their initial value but would receive securities worth less than that amount. Any losses we incur on our repurchase transactions could reduce our earnings, and thus our cash available for distribution to our shareholders.

Our financing of our REIT qualifying assets with repurchase agreements and warehouse facilities could adversely affect our ability to qualify as a REIT.

We have entered into and intend to enter into, sale and repurchase agreements under which we nominally sell certain REIT qualifying assets to a counterparty and simultaneously enter into an agreement to repurchase the sold assets. We believe that we will be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as the owners of the assets that are the subject of any such agreement notwithstanding that we may transfer record ownership of the assets to the counterparty during the term of the agreement. It is possible, however, that the Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, could assert that we did not own the assets during the term of the sale and repurchase agreement, in which case our ability to qualify as a REIT would be adversely affected. If any of our REIT qualifying assets are subject to a repurchase agreement and are sold by the counterparty in connection with a margin call, the loss of those assets could impair our ability to qualify as a REIT. Accordingly, unlike other REITs, we may be subject to additional risk regarding our ability to qualify and maintain our qualification as a REIT.

If we deconsolidate any of RAIT I, RAIT II, Taberna VIII or Taberna IX or our sponsored companies, it may have a material effect on our financial statements.

Our consolidated financial statements reflect our accounts and the accounts of our majority-owned and/or controlled subsidiaries and of entities that are variable interest entities, or VIEs, where we have determined that we are the primary beneficiary of such entities in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 810, “Consolidation.” If we were to cease serving as the collateral manager for any of RAIT I, RAIT II, Taberna VIII or Taberna IX and/or if we determined that our retained interests in any such securitizations no longer made us its primary beneficiary that could affect our determination to consolidate such securitization. If we deconsolidate any of these securitizations for these or any other reasons, such deconsolidation would have a material effect on our financial statements, including a material reduction of our assets, liabilities, equity and income. Similarly, we expect that the securities offerings we are sponsoring for our sponsored companies will result in our holding minority interests in the sponsored companies. If we held minority interests, if we were to cease serving as the advisor for any sponsored company for any reason and/or if we determined that our retained interests in any such sponsored company no longer made us its primary beneficiary that could affect our determination to consolidate such sponsored company. We have

19

contributed a substantial amount of assets to IRT and may make similar transfers of our assets to other sponsored companies in the future and IRT and these other sponsored companies may acquire other assets and otherwise engage in significant activity while we consolidate them. If we deconsolidate IRT or any sponsored company that engaged in significant activity while we consolidated it for these or any other reasons, such deconsolidation may have a material effect on our financial statements, including a material reduction of our assets, liabilities, equity and income.

Quarterly results may fluctuate and may not be indicative of future quarterly performance.

Our quarterly operating results could fluctuate; therefore, you should not rely on past quarterly results to be indicative of our performance in future quarters. Factors that could cause quarterly operating results to fluctuate include, among others, variations in our investment origination volume, variations in the timing of repayments of debt financing, variations in the amount of time between our receipt of the proceeds of a securities offering and our investment of those proceeds in loans or real estate, market conditions that result in increased cost of funds, the degree to which we encounter competition in our markets, general economic conditions and other factors referred to elsewhere in this section.

Risks Related to Our Investments

Payment defaults and other credit risks in our investment portfolio have occurred, and may continue to occur, which has caused, and may continue to cause, adverse effects on our cash flow, net income and ability to make distributions.

Adverse developments in the credit markets have led to business contraction, liquidity issues and other problems for many of the companies we finance. As a result, payment defaults and other credit risks in our investment portfolio have occurred, and may continue to occur. To the extent such payment defaults and other credit risks occur, our cash flow, net income and ability to make distributions may be reduced.

Our portfolio of TruPS has been adversely affected by, and may continue to be adversely affected by, economic developments affecting the business sectors in which our borrowers operate, including homebuilders, residential mortgage providers, commercial mortgage providers, office, specialty finance, retail, hospitality and storage, resulting in a substantial reduction in their fair value which adversely affects our financial performance and a substantial decrease in the cash flow we receive from the securitizations holding TruPS. We cannot assure you that the fair value we reflect for any asset or liability in any particular reporting period will not change adversely in a subsequent reporting period.

We may need to increase our loan loss reserves against our portfolios of commercial real estate investments due to general business and economic conditions and increased credit and liquidity risks which would reduce our earnings. Our portfolio of commercial real estate investments has been adversely affected by, and may continue to be adversely affected by, economic developments affecting the business sectors in which our borrowers operate, including multi-family, office, and retail, including reductions in the value of commercial real estate generally and the reduced availability of refinancing for commercial real estate investments as they mature. We cannot assure you that the loan loss reserves we adopt in any particular reporting period will be sufficient or will not increase in a subsequent reporting period.

We may not realize gains or income from investments and have realized, and may continue to realize, losses from some of our investments.

We seek to generate both current income and capital appreciation. However, our investments may not appreciate in value and, in fact, a substantial portion of our investments have declined, and may continue to decline, in value. In addition, some of the financings that we originated and the loans and securities in which we invest have defaulted, and may continue to be in default on interest and/or principal payments. Accordingly, we

20

may not be able to realize gains or income from investments and may realize losses. Any gains that we do realize may not be sufficient to offset any other losses we experience. Any income that we realize may not be sufficient to offset our respective expenses.

Uninsured and underinsured losses may affect the value of, or our return from, our real estate.

Our properties, and the properties underlying our loans, have comprehensive insurance in amounts we believe are sufficient to permit the replacement of the properties in the event of a total loss, subject to applicable deductibles. There are, however, certain types of losses, such as earthquakes, floods, hurricanes and terrorism that may be uninsurable or not economically insurable. Also, inflation, changes in building codes and ordinances, environmental considerations and other factors might make it impractical to use insurance proceeds to replace a damaged or destroyed property. If any of these or similar events occurs, it may reduce our return from an affected property and the value of our investment.

Real estate with environmental problems may create liability for us.

The existence of hazardous or toxic substances on a property will adversely affect its value and our ability to sell or borrow against the property. Contamination of real estate by hazardous substances or toxic wastes not only may give rise to a lien on that property to assure payment of the cost of remediation, but also can result in liability to us as owner, operator or lender for that cost. Many environmental laws can impose liability whether we know of, or are responsible for, the contamination. In addition, if we arrange for the disposal of hazardous or toxic substances at another site, we may be liable for the costs of cleaning up and removing those substances from the site, even if we neither own nor operate the disposal site. Environmental laws may require us to incur substantial expenses, and may materially limit our use of our properties and our ability to make distributions to our shareholders. In addition, future or amended laws, or more stringent interpretations or enforcement policies with respect to existing environmental requirements, may increase our exposure to environmental liability.

Our investment portfolio may have material geographic, sector, property-type and sponsor concentrations.

We may have material geographic concentrations related to our investments in commercial real estate loans and properties. The REITs and real estate operating companies in whose securities we invest in may also have material geographic concentrations related to their investments in real estate, loans secured by real estate or other investments. We also have material concentrations in the property types that comprise our commercial loan portfolio and in the industry sectors that comprise our unsecured securities portfolio. We also have material concentrations in the sponsors of properties that comprise our commercial loan portfolio. Where we have any kind of concentration risk in our investments, an adverse development in that area of concentration could reduce the value of our investment and our return on that investment and, if the concentration affects a material amount of our investments, impair our ability to execute our investment strategies successfully, reduce our earnings and reduce our ability to make distributions.

Our due diligence efforts before making an investment may not identify all the risks related to that investment.

Before originating a loan or investment for, or making a loan to or investment in, an entity, we will assess the strength and skills of the entity’s management and other factors that we believe will determine the success of the loan or investment. In making the assessment and otherwise conducting customary due diligence, we expect to rely on available resources and, in some cases, an investigation by third parties. This process is particularly important and subjective with respect to newly organized entities because there may be little or no information publicly available about the entities. As a result, there can be no assurance that the due diligence processes we conduct will uncover all relevant facts or that any investment will be successful.

21

Our investments are relatively illiquid which may make it difficult for us to sell such investments if the need arises and any sales may be at a loss to us.

Our commercial real estate loans and our investments in real estate are relatively illiquid investments and we may be unable to vary our portfolio promptly in response to changing economic, financial and investment conditions or dispose of these assets quickly or at all in the event we need additional liquidity. We make and hold investments in securities issued by private companies and other illiquid investments. A portion of these investments may be subject to legal and other restrictions on resale or will otherwise be less liquid than publicly traded securities. The illiquidity of these investments may make it difficult for us to sell such investments if the need arises and may impair the value of these investments. Any sales of investments we make may result in our recognizing a loss on the sale.

Our subordinated real estate investments such as mezzanine loans and preferred equity interests in entities owning real estate involve increased risk of loss.

We invest in mezzanine loans and other forms of subordinated financing, such as investments consisting of preferred equity interests in entities owning real estate. Because of their subordinate position, these subordinated investments carry a greater credit risk than senior lien financing, including a substantially greater risk of non-payment. If a borrower defaults on our subordinated investment or on debt senior to us, our subordinated investment will be satisfied only after the senior debt is paid off, which may result in our being unable to recover the full amount, or any, of our investment. A decline in the real estate market could adversely affect the value of the property so that the aggregate outstanding balances of senior liens may exceed the value of the underlying property.

Where debt senior to our investment exists, the presence of inter-creditor arrangements may limit our ability to amend our loan documents, assign our loans, accept prepayments, exercise our remedies (through “standstill” periods) and control decisions made in bankruptcy proceedings relating to borrowers. Bankruptcy and borrower litigation can significantly increase the time needed for us to acquire underlying collateral in the event of a default, during which time the collateral may decline in value. In addition, there are significant costs and delays associated with the foreclosure process. In the event of a default on a senior loan, we may elect to make payments, if we have the right to do so, in order to prevent foreclosure on the senior loans. When we originate or acquire a subordinated investment, we may not have the right to service senior loans. The servicers of the senior loans are responsible to the holders of those loans, whose interests will likely not coincide with ours, particularly in the event of a default. Accordingly, the senior loans may not be serviced in a manner advantageous to us. It is also possible that, in some cases, a “due on sale” clause included in a senior mortgage, which accelerates the amount due under the senior mortgage in case of the sale of the property, may apply to the sale of the property if we foreclose, increasing our risk of loss.

We have loans that are not collateralized by recorded or perfected liens on the real estate underlying our loans. Some of the loans not collateralized by liens are secured instead by deeds-in-lieu of foreclosure, also known as “pocket deeds.” A deed-in-lieu of foreclosure is a deed executed in blank that the holder is entitled to record immediately upon a default in the loan. Loans that are not collateralized by recorded or perfected liens are subordinate not only to existing liens encumbering the underlying property, but also to future judgments or other liens that may arise as well as to the claims of general creditors of the borrower. Moreover, filing a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure with respect to these loans will usually constitute an event of default under any related senior debt. Any such default would require us to assume or pay off the senior debt in order to protect our investment. Furthermore, in a borrower’s bankruptcy, we will have materially fewer rights than secured creditors and, if our loan is secured by equity interests in the borrower, fewer rights than the borrower’s general creditors. Our rights also will be subordinate to the lien-like rights of the bankruptcy trustee. Moreover, enforcement of our loans against the underlying properties will involve a longer, more complex, and likely, more expensive legal process than enforcement of a mortgage loan. In addition, we may lose lien priority in many jurisdictions, to persons who supply labor and materials to a property. For these and other reasons, the total amount that we may recover from one of our investments may be less than the total amount of that investment or our cost of an acquisition of an investment.

22

Acquisitions of loans may involve increased risk of loss.

When we acquire existing loans, they are subject to general risks described in this section. When we acquire loans at a discount from both the outstanding balances of the loans and the appraised value of the properties underlying the loans, the loans typically are in default under the original loan terms or other requirements and are subject to forbearance agreements. A forbearance agreement typically requires a borrower to pay to the lender all revenue from a property after payment of the property’s operating expenses in return for the lender’s agreement to withhold exercising its rights under the loan documents. Acquiring loans at a discount involves a substantially higher degree of risk of non-collection than loans that conform to institutional underwriting criteria. We do not acquire a loan unless material steps have been taken toward resolving problems with the loan, or its underlying property.

Financing with high loan-to-value ratios may involve increased risk of loss.

A loan-to-value ratio is the ratio of the amount of our financing, plus the amount of any senior indebtedness, to the appraised value of the property underlying the loan. We expect to continue to hold loans with high loan-to-value ratios. By reducing the margin available to cover fluctuations in property value, a high loan-to-value ratio increases the risk that, upon default, the amount obtainable from the sale of the underlying property may be insufficient to repay the financing.

Preferred equity investments in REITs and real estate operating companies may involve a greater risk of loss than traditional debt financing and specific risks relating to particular issuers.

We have invested, and may continue to invest in preferred securities, other than TruPS, of REITs and real estate operating companies, depending upon our ability to finance such assets directly or indirectly in accordance with our financing strategy. Preferred equity investments involve a higher degree of risk than traditional debt financing due to a variety of factors, including that such investments are subordinate to debt and are not secured by property underlying the investment. Furthermore, should an issuer of preferred equity default on our investment, we would only be able to proceed against the issuer, and not the property owned by the issuer. In most cases, a preferred equity holder has no recourse against an issuer for a failure to pay stated dividends; rather, unpaid dividends typically accrue and the preferred shareholder maintains a liquidation preference in the event of a liquidation of the issuer of the preferred securities. An issuer may not have sufficient assets to satisfy any liquidation preference to which we may be entitled. As a result, we may not recover some or all of our investments in preferred equity securities.

The commercial mortgage loans in which we invest and the commercial mortgage loans underlying the CMBS in which we invest are subject to delinquency, foreclosure and loss, which could result in losses to us that may result in reduced earnings or losses and reduce our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders.

We hold substantial portfolios of commercial mortgage loans and CMBS which are secured by multi-family or other commercial property and are subject to risks of delinquency and foreclosure. The ability of a borrower to repay a non-recourse loan secured by an income-producing property typically depends primarily upon the successful operation of such property rather than upon the existence of independent income or assets of the borrower. If the net operating income of the property is reduced, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan may be impaired. Net operating income of an income-producing property can be affected by, among other things: tenant mix, success of tenant businesses, property management decisions, property location and condition, competition from comparable types of properties, changes in laws that increase operating expense or limit rents that may be charged, any need to address environmental contamination at the property, the occurrence of any uninsured casualty at the property, changes in national, regional or local economic conditions and/or specific industry segments, declines in regional or local real estate values, declines in regional or local rental or occupancy rates, increases in interest rates, real estate tax rates and other operating expenses, changes in governmental rules, regulations and fiscal policies, including environmental legislation, acts of God, terrorism, social unrest and civil disturbances.

23

In the event of any default under a commercial mortgage loan held directly by us, we will bear a risk of loss of principal to the extent of any deficiency between the value of the collateral and the principal and accrued interest of the mortgage loan, which could have a material adverse effect on our cash flow from operations. In the event of the bankruptcy of a commercial mortgage loan borrower, the mortgage loan to such borrower will be deemed to be secured only to the extent of the value of the underlying collateral at the time of bankruptcy (as determined by the bankruptcy court), and the lien securing the mortgage loan will be subject to the avoidance powers of the bankruptcy trustee or debtor-in-possession to the extent the lien is unenforceable under state law.

Foreclosure of a commercial mortgage loan can be an expensive and lengthy process, which could have a substantial negative effect on our anticipated return on the foreclosed mortgage loan. CMBS evidence interests in or are secured by a single commercial mortgage loan or a pool of commercial mortgage loans. Accordingly, the mortgage-backed securities in which we invest are subject to all of the risks of the underlying mortgage loans.

If we are unable to improve the performance of commercial real estate properties we take control of in connection with restructurings, workouts and foreclosures of investments, our financial performance may be adversely affected.

We have taken control of an increasing number of the properties underlying our commercial real estate investments in connection with restructurings, workouts and foreclosures of these investments. If we are unable to improve the performance of these properties from their performance under their prior owners, our cash flow may be adversely affected if the properties’ cash flow is insufficient to support payments due on any related debt. Any properties we consolidate may be required to be reflected at lower values on our financial statements.

We may need to make significant capital improvements to our properties in order to remain competitive.

Our investments in real estate may face competition from newer, more updated properties. In order to remain competitive, we may need to make significant capital improvements to these properties. In addition, in the event we need to re-lease a property, we may need to make significant tenant improvements, all of which will reduce our cash flow.

Lease expirations, lease defaults and lease terminations may adversely affect our revenue.

Lease expirations, lease defaults and lease terminations may result in reduced revenue from our real estate if the lease payments received from replacement tenants are less than the lease payments received from the expiring, defaulting or terminating tenants. In addition, lease defaults by one or more significant tenants, lease terminations by tenants following events causing significant damage to the property or takings by eminent domain, or the failure of tenants under expiring leases to elect to renew their leases, could cause us to experience long periods with reduced or no revenue from a property and to incur substantial capital expenditures in order to obtain replacement tenants. See Item 2-“Properties,” for a ten-year lease expiration schedule for our non-residential properties as of December 31, 2011.

Risks Relating to the Fair Value of Our Assets and Liabilities

A decline in the market value of our assets we finance pursuant to repurchase agreements or warehouse facilities may result in margin calls that may force us to sell assets under adverse market conditions.

Our current repurchase agreements allow, and we expect any warehouse facilities and repurchase agreements we enter into in the future to allow, our lender to make margin calls that would require us to make cash payments or deliver additional assets to our lender in the event that there is a decline in the market value of the assets that collateralize our repurchase agreements, warehouse facilities or similar debt or for other reasons. As a result, a decline in the market value of assets collateralizing any such debt may result in our lenders initiating margin calls and requiring a pledge of additional collateral or cash. Posting additional collateral or cash to support our borrowings would reduce our liquidity and limit our ability to leverage our assets, which could

24

adversely affect our business. As a result, we could be forced to sell some of our assets in order to maintain liquidity. Forced sales typically result in lower sales prices than do market sales made in the normal course of business. If our investments were liquidated at prices below the amortized cost basis of such investments, we would incur losses, which could result in a rapid deterioration of our financial condition.

A portion of our assets and liabilities are recorded at fair value as determined in good faith by our management and, as a result, there may be uncertainty as to the value of these investments.

We reflect certain investments in securities, certain CDO notes payable, certain derivative instruments and other assets and liabilities at fair value in our balance sheet, with all changes in fair value recorded in earnings. Most of these investments are securities or other assets that are not publicly traded. The fair value of securities and other investments that are not publicly traded may not be readily determinable. For further discussion of the fair value of our financial instruments, see Items 8—“Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 2: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—Fair Value of Financial Investments.” We value these investments quarterly at fair value. Because such valuations are inherently uncertain, may fluctuate over short periods of time and may be based on estimates, our determinations of fair value may differ materially from the values that would have been used if a ready market for these investments existed. If our determinations regarding the fair value of these investments are not realized, we could record a loss upon their disposal.

When we acquire properties through the foreclosure of commercial real estate loans, we may recognize losses if the fair value of the property internally determined upon such acquisition is less than the previous carrying amount of the foreclosed loan.

We periodically acquire properties through the foreclosure of commercial real estate loans. Upon acquisition, we value the real estate property and its related assets and liabilities. The fair values are determined based primarily upon discounted cash flow or capitalization rate models, the use of which requires critical assumptions including discount rates, capitalization rates, vacancy rates and growth rates based, in part, on the properties’ operating history and third party data. We may recognize losses if the fair value of the property internally determined upon acquisition is less than the previous carrying amount of the foreclosed loan.

The fair value of our assets that we record at their fair value under the fair value option may decline, which may have an adverse effect on our financial statements.

The fair value of our investments that we record on our financial statements at their fair value under FASB ASC Topic 825, may decline, which may have an adverse effect on our financial statements. These investments consist primarily of our portfolio of TruPS and subordinated debentures.

The fair value of our CDO notes payable issued by our consolidated securitizations, Taberna VIII and Taberna IX, has declined more significantly than the fair value of the assets collateralizing those securitizations and, if the fair value of the CDO notes payable increases to approximate that of the underlying assets or if the CDO notes payable are repaid at their par amount, that would materially reduce our earnings and shareholders’ equity.

Through December 31, 2011 the cumulative effect of the fair value adjustments recorded on each financial asset and liability selected for the fair value option resulted in a net increase in shareholders’ equity of $506.7 million, principally as a result of adjustments in the fair value of our CDO notes payable and other liabilities. This increase in shareholders’ equity may reverse through earnings as an unrealized loss in the future. For example, in the event our CDO notes payable were to recover some or all of their value sooner than any recovery of the value of the securities collateralizing them, the net difference in the respective recoveries could materially reduce earnings and our shareholders’ equity. Under current market conditions and the volatility in interest rates and the credit performance of our underlying collateral, we cannot assure you that there will not be further significant fluctuations in the fair value of our assets and liabilities, which could materially reduce earnings and our shareholders’ equity.

25

At December 31, 2011, our total investment in Taberna VIII and Taberna IX is approximately $320.0 million which represents both preferred equity and various levels of debt positions. Approximately 75% of the investments are in the form of TruPS and TruPS related receivables issued by commercial real estate companies. The typical TruPS instruments are unsecured borrowings with a 30 year maturity and a 5 year no-call provision that prevented prepayments. Beginning in 2012, the no-call provisions for TruPS collateralizing Taberna VIII and Taberna IX start to expire and the TruPS issuers will have the option to prepay these instruments. Given the historically low interest rate environment in comparison to when the collateral was originated 5 years ago, together with improving performance for some of these TruPS issuers, we expect some of the TruPS issuers will elect to prepay their TruPS. We expect to use any prepayments to repay the most senior tranches of the non-recourse CDO notes payable issued by Taberna VIII and Taberna IX in accordance with the terms of their respective indentures. We carry these CDO notes payable at their fair market value on our financial statements, which is currently lower than the amount due thereunder, and any negative difference between the amount paid and the carrying amount may result in incremental non-cash charges to our GAAP earnings.

Interest rate changes may reduce the value of our investments.

Changes in interest rates affect the market value of our investment portfolio. In general, the market value of a loan will change in inverse relation to an interest rate change where a loan has a fixed interest rate or only limited interest rate adjustments. Accordingly, in a period of rising interest rates, the market value of such a loan will decrease. Moreover, in a period of declining interest rates, real estate loans with rates that are fixed or variable only to a limited extent may have less value than other income-producing securities due to possible prepayments. Interest rate changes will also affect the return we obtain on new loans. In particular, during a period of declining rates, our reinvestment of loan repayments may be at lower rates than we obtained in prior investments or on the repaid loans. Also, increases in interest rates on debt we incur may not be reflected in increased rates of return on the investments funded through such debt, which would reduce our return on those investments. Accordingly, interest rate changes may materially affect the total return on our investment portfolio, which in turn will affect the amount available for distribution to shareholders.

The value of our investments depends on conditions beyond our control.

Our investments include loans secured directly or indirectly by real estate, interests in entities whose principal or sole assets are real estate or direct ownership of real estate. As a result, the value of these investments depends primarily upon the value of the real estate underlying these investments which is affected by numerous factors beyond our control including general and local economic conditions, neighborhood values, competitive overbuilding, weather, casualty losses, occupancy rates and other factors beyond our control. The value of this underlying real estate may also be affected by factors such as the costs of compliance with use, occupancy and similar regulations, potential or actual liabilities under applicable environmental laws, changes in interest rates and the availability of financing. Income from a property will be reduced if a significant number of tenants are unable to pay rent or if available space cannot be rented on favorable terms. Operating and other expenses of this underlying real estate, particularly significant expenses such as mortgage payments, insurance, real estate taxes and maintenance costs, generally do not decrease when income decreases and, even if revenue increases, operating and other expenses may increase faster than revenues.

Any investment may also be affected by a borrower’s failure to comply with the terms of our investment, its bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization or its properties becoming subject to foreclosure proceedings, all of which may require us to become involved in expensive and time-consuming litigation. Some of our investments defer some portion of our return to loan maturity or the mandatory redemption date. The borrower’s ability to satisfy these deferred obligations may depend upon its ability to obtain suitable refinancing or to otherwise raise a substantial amount of cash. These risks may be subject to the same considerations we describe in this “Risks Related to Our Investments” section.

26

Risks Relating to Our Use of Derivatives and Hedging Instruments

Our hedging transactions may not insulate us from interest rate risk, which could cause volatility in our earnings.

Subject to limits imposed by our desire to maintain our qualification as a REIT, we enter into hedging transactions to limit exposure to changes in interest rates. We are therefore exposed to risks associated with such transactions. We have entered into, and expect to continue to enter into, interest rate swap agreements. We may also use instruments such as forward contracts and interest rate caps, currency swaps, collars and floors to seek to hedge against fluctuations in the relative values of portfolio positions from changes in market interest rates. Hedging against a decline in the values of portfolio positions does not eliminate the possibility of fluctuations in the values of such positions or prevent losses if the values of such positions decline. However, such hedging can establish other positions designed to gain from those same developments, thereby offsetting the decline in the value of such portfolio positions. Such hedging transactions may also limit the opportunity for gain if the values of the portfolio positions should increase. Moreover, it may not be possible to hedge against an interest rate fluctuation that is so generally anticipated that we would not be able to enter into a hedging transaction at an acceptable price.

The success of hedging transactions undertaken by us will depend on our ability to structure and execute effective hedges for the assets we hold and, to a degree, on our ability to anticipate interest rate or currency value fluctuations, the expected life of our assets or other factors. Our failure to do so may result in poorer overall investment performance than if we had not engaged in such hedging transactions. In addition, the degree of correlation between price movements of the instruments used in a hedging strategy and price movements in the portfolio positions being hedged may vary. Moreover, for a variety of reasons, we may not establish a perfect correlation between such hedging instruments and the portfolio holdings being hedged. Any such imperfect correlation may prevent us from achieving the intended hedge and expose us to risk of loss.

Changes in fair value can be caused by changes in interest rates that are not fully hedged. To the extent that we fail to hedge fully against adverse fluctuations in interest rates, our earnings will be reduced or we could have losses.

While we use hedging to mitigate certain risks, our failure to completely insulate the portfolios from those risks may cause greater volatility in our earnings.

Hedging instruments often are not traded on regulated exchanges, guaranteed by an exchange or its clearing house, or regulated by any U.S. or foreign governmental authorities and involve risks of default by the hedging counterparty and illiquidity.

Subject to maintaining our qualification as a REIT, part of our investment strategy involves entering into puts and calls on securities or indices of securities, interest rate swaps, caps and collars, including options and forward contracts, and interest rate lock agreements, principally Treasury lock agreements, to seek to hedge against mismatches between the cash flows from our assets and the interest payments on our liabilities. Hedging instruments often are not traded on regulated exchanges, guaranteed by an exchange or its clearing house, or regulated by any U.S. or foreign governmental authorities. Consequently, there are no requirements with respect to record keeping, financial responsibility or segregation of customer funds and positions. Furthermore, the enforceability of agreements underlying derivative transactions may depend on compliance with applicable statutory and commodity and other regulatory requirements and, depending on the identity of the counterparty, applicable international requirements. Legislation was passed to create a clearing house for hedging instruments and require the posting of cash collateral based on the fair value of any hedging instruments. While regulatory agencies have not finalized the rules implementing this legislation, we believe that hedging instruments in-place prior to this legislation will not be impacted.

The business failure of a counterparty with whom we enter into a hedging transaction will most likely result in a default. Default by a party with whom we entered into a hedging transaction may result in the loss of

27

unrealized profits and force us to cover our resale commitments, if any, at the then current market price. Although generally we seek to reserve the right to terminate our hedging positions, we may not always be able to dispose of or close out a hedging position without the consent of the hedging counterparty, and we may not be able to enter into an offsetting contract in order to cover our risk. A liquid secondary market may not exist for hedging instruments purchased or sold, and we may have to maintain a position until exercise or expiration, which could result in losses.

In July 2010, the U.S. Congress enacted the Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, or the Dodd-Frank Act. The Dodd-Frank Act may impose significant requirements on hedging instruments we use. While the full impact of the Dodd-Frank Act cannot be assessed until implementing regulations are adopted, the Dodd-Frank Act’s requirements may have a significant effect on our use of hedging instruments, which may have an adverse effect on our business. For example, the regulatory requirements are likely to impose heightened margin requirements for future hedging transactions. Such margin requirements may result from a requirement for financial entities to centrally clear certain derivatives instruments. We and our affiliates occasionally post margin to secure our and their derivatives transactions at this time, so the impact of such a requirement largely depends on the magnitude of such requirements as set forth in to-be-finalized regulations.

Our ability to enter into hedging transactions at commercially reasonable rates may be limited by developments relating to the counterparties we used historically and economic and credit market conditions generally.

Most of the counterparties under our outstanding hedging instruments are affiliates of investment banks that have subsequently been acquired by other financial institutions. We cannot assure you that as our outstanding hedges reach their termination dates or as we seek to enter into new hedging transactions, that our historical counterparties or other institutions with acceptable credit ratings will enter into hedging transactions with us on commercially reasonable terms or at all. While most of our hedging instruments have termination dates in 2014 or later, we have hedges that will terminate in each year prior to 2014. If we cannot enter into interest rate hedges on commercially reasonable terms, our exposure to interest rate risk will increase. The risk of defaults by our counterparties may increase as the markets for hedging transactions shrink and become more volatile.

We may enter into hedging instruments that could expose us to unexpected losses in the future.

We may enter into hedging instruments that would require us to fund cash payments in the future under certain circumstances, for example, upon the early termination of the instrument caused by an event of default or other early termination event, or the decision by a counterparty to request margin securities it is contractually owed under the terms of the instrument. The amount due would be equal to the unrealized loss of the open positions with the counterparty and could also include other fees and charges. These losses will be reflected in our financial results of operations, and our ability to fund these obligations will depend on the liquidity of our assets and access to capital at the time, and the need to fund these obligations could adversely impact our financial condition.

We may enter into derivative contracts that could expose us to contingent liabilities in the future.

Part of our investment strategy involves entering into derivative contracts like the interest rate swaps we use to limit our exposure to interest rate movements. Most of our derivative contracts require us to fund cash payments upon the early termination of a derivative agreement caused by an event of default or other early termination event. The amount due would be equal to the unrealized loss of the open swap positions with the respective counterparty and could also include other fees and charges. In addition, some of these derivative arrangements require that we maintain specified percentages of cash collateral with the counterparty to fund potential liabilities under the derivative contract. We may have to make cash payments in order to maintain the required percentage of collateral with the counterparty. These economic losses would be reflected in our results of operations, and our ability to fund these obligations would depend on the liquidity of our respective assets and

28

access to capital at the time. The need to fund these obligations could adversely impact our financial condition. Our due diligence may not reveal all of an entity’s liabilities and may not reveal other weaknesses in the entity’s business.

Tax Risks

We and the REIT affiliates may fail to qualify as a REIT, and such failure to qualify would have significant adverse consequences on the value of our common shares. In addition, if we fail, or any REIT Affiliate fails, to qualify as a REIT, our respective dividends will not be deductible, and the entity will be subject to corporate-level tax on its net taxable income, which would reduce the cash available to make distributions.

We believe that we have been organized and operated in a manner that will allow us to qualify as a REIT. We have not requested, and do not plan to request, a ruling from the IRS that we and the REIT affiliates qualify as a REIT and any statements in our filings or the filings of the REIT affiliates with the SEC are not binding on the IRS or any court. Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex Internal Revenue Code provisions, for which there are only limited judicial and administrative interpretations. The determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control may also affect our abilities and those of the REIT affiliates to qualify as a REIT. In order to qualify as a REIT, we and the REIT affiliates must each satisfy a number of requirements, including requirements regarding the composition of our respective assets and sources of our respective gross income. Also, we must each make distributions to our respective shareholders aggregating annually at least 90% of our respective net taxable incomes, excluding net capital gains. In addition, our respective ability to satisfy the requirements to qualify as a REIT depends in part on the actions of third parties over which we have no control or limited influence, including in cases where we own an equity interest in an entity that is classified as a partnership or REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As an example, to the extent we invest in preferred equity securities of other REIT issuers, our qualification as a REIT will depend upon the continued qualification of such issuers as REITs under the Internal Revenue Code. Accordingly, unlike other REITs, we and the REIT affiliates may be subject to additional risk regarding our respective ability to qualify and maintain our respective qualification as a REIT. The reduction in our rate of originating new assets, operations and liquidity may adversely impact our and the REIT affiliates’ ability to meet REIT requirements and we and the REIT affiliates may be less able to make changes to our respective investment portfolios to adjust our respective REIT qualifying assets and income depending on our respective ability to deploy capital and maintain assets under management.

There can be no assurance that we and the REIT affiliates will be successful in operating in a manner that will allow us to each qualify as a REIT. Because we receive significant distributions from Taberna, and may in the future receive significant distributions from other of the REIT affiliates, the failure of one or more of such REIT affiliates to maintain its REIT status could cause us to lose our REIT status. In addition, legislation, new regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions may adversely affect our investors, our respective ability to qualify as a REIT or the desirability of an investment in a REIT relative to other investments.

If we or any of the REIT affiliates fail to qualify as a REIT or lose our respective qualification as a REIT at any time, we, or such REIT affiliate, would face serious tax consequences that would substantially reduce the funds available for distribution to our respective shareholders for each of the years involved because:

• we, or such REIT affiliate, would not be allowed a deduction for distributions to our respective shareholders in computing taxable income and would be subject to U.S. federal income tax at regular corporate rates;

• we, or such REIT affiliate, also could be subject to the U.S. federal alternative minimum tax and possibly increased state and local taxes; and

• unless statutory relief provisions apply, we, or such REIT affiliate, could not elect to be taxed as a REIT for four taxable years following the year of disqualification.

29

In addition, if we, or such REIT affiliate, fail to qualify as a REIT, such entity will not be required to make distributions to its shareholders, and all distributions to shareholders will be subject to tax as regular corporate dividends to the extent of current and accumulated earnings and profits.

Complying with REIT requirements may cause us to forgo otherwise attractive opportunities.

To qualify as a REIT, we and the REIT affiliates must each continually satisfy various tests regarding sources of income, nature and diversification of assets, amounts distributed to shareholders and the ownership of common shares. In order to satisfy these tests, we and the REIT affiliates may be required to forgo investments that might otherwise be made. Accordingly, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our and the REIT affiliates’ investment performance.

In particular, at least 75% of our and the REIT affiliates total assets at the end of each calendar quarter must each consist of real estate assets, government securities, and cash or cash items. For this purpose, “real estate assets” generally include interests in real property, such as land, buildings, leasehold interests in real property, stock of other entities that qualify as REITs, interests in mortgage loans secured by real property, investments in stock or debt instruments during the one-year period following the receipt of new capital and regular or residual interests in a real estate mortgage investment conduit, or REMIC. In addition, the amount of securities of a single issuer that we and each of the REIT affiliates hold must generally not exceed either 5% of the value of such issuer’s gross assets or 10% of the vote or value of such issuer’s outstanding securities.

Certain of the assets that we or the REIT affiliates hold or intend to hold, including TruPS and unsecured loans to REITs or other entities, will not be qualified real estate assets for the purposes of the REIT asset tests. In addition, although preferred equity securities of REITs (which would not include TruPS) should generally be treated as qualified real estate assets, this will require that (i) they are treated as equity for U.S. tax purposes, and (ii) their issuers maintain their qualification as REITs. CMBS should generally qualify as real estate assets. However, to the extent that we or the REIT affiliates own non-REMIC collateralized mortgage obligations or other debt instruments secured by mortgage loans (rather than by real property) or secured by non-real estate assets, or debt securities issued by corporations that are not secured by mortgages on real property, those securities will likely not be qualifying real estate assets for purposes of the REIT asset tests.

We and the REIT affiliates generally will be treated as the owner of any assets that collateralize a securitization transaction to the extent that we or such affiliates retain all of the equity of the securitization entity and do not make an election to treat such securitization entity as a TRS, as described in further detail below.

As noted above, in order to comply with the REIT asset tests and 75% gross income test, at least 75% of each of our respective total assets and 75% of gross income must be derived from qualifying real estate assets, whether or not such assets would otherwise represent our respective best investment alternative.

A REIT’s net income from prohibited transactions is subject to a 100% penalty tax. In general, prohibited transactions are sales or other dispositions of property, other than foreclosure property, but including any mortgage loans, held in inventory or primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business. The prohibited transaction tax may apply to any sale of assets to a securitization and to any sale of securitization securities, and therefore may limit our respective ability to sell assets to or equity in securitizations and other assets.

It may be possible to reduce the impact of the prohibited transaction tax and the holding of assets not qualifying as real estate assets for purposes of the REIT asset tests by conducting certain activities, holding non-qualifying REIT assets or engaging in securitization transactions through our TRSs, subject to certain limitations as described below. To the extent that we and the REIT affiliates engage in such activities through TRSs, the income associated with such activities may be subject to full U.S. federal corporate income tax.

30

Neither TruPS nor equity in corporate entities, such as issuers of securitizations that hold TruPS, will qualify as real estate assets for purposes of the REIT asset tests and the income generated by such investments generally will not qualify as real estate-related income for the REIT gross income tests. We and Taberna must continue to invest in qualifying real estate assets, such as mortgage loans and debt securities secured by real estate, to maintain its REIT qualification, and these assets typically generate less attractive returns than TruPS which could result in reduced returns to Taberna, and therefore to our shareholders.

Neither TruPS nor equity in corporate entities, such as issuers of securitizations, that hold TruPS will qualify as real estate assets for purposes of the REIT asset tests that Taberna must meet on a quarterly basis to maintain its qualification as a REIT. The income received from Taberna’s investments in TruPS or in corporate entities holding TruPS generally will not qualify as real estate-related income for purposes of the REIT gross income tests. If Taberna fails to make sufficient investments in qualifying real estate assets, Taberna will likely fail to maintain its REIT qualification, which could cause Taberna to be subject to significant taxes and RAIT to fail to maintain its REIT qualification and be subject to significant taxes. REIT qualifying investments typically are lower yielding than Taberna’s expected returns on TruPS. Accordingly, maintaining sufficient amounts of REIT qualifying investments could result in reduced returns to Taberna, and therefore to our shareholders.

Furthermore, if income inclusions from Taberna’s foreign TRSs which are securitizations, Taberna VIII and Taberna IX, are determined not to qualify for the REIT 95% gross income test, Taberna could fail to qualify as a REIT, or even if it did not fail to qualify as a REIT, Taberna could be subject to a penalty tax. In addition, Taberna would need to invest in sufficient qualifying assets, or sell some of its interests in Taberna VIII and Taberna IX to ensure that the income recognized by Taberna from Taberna VIII and Taberna IX does not exceed 5% of Taberna’s gross income. See “We or Taberna may lose our or its REIT qualification or be subject to a penalty tax if the Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, successfully challenges our or its characterization of income from Taberna VIII and Taberna IX.” Any reduction in Taberna’s net taxable income would have an adverse effect on its liquidity, and its ability to pay distributions to us.

Each of our and the REIT affiliates’ qualifications as a REIT and exemption from U.S. federal income tax with respect to certain assets may be dependent on the issuers of the REIT securities in which we invest maintaining their REIT qualification and the accuracy of legal opinions rendered to or statements made by the issuers of securities, including securitizations, in which we invest.

When purchasing securities issued by REITs, we and the REIT affiliates may each rely on opinions of counsel for the issuer of such securities, or statements made in related offering documents, for purposes of determining whether such issuer qualifies as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes and whether such securities represent debt or equity securities for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and therefore to what extent those securities constitute REIT real estate assets for purposes of the REIT asset tests and produce income which qualifies under the 75% REIT gross income test. In addition, when purchasing securitization equity, we and the REIT affiliates may each rely on opinions of counsel regarding the qualification of the securitization for exemption from U.S. corporate income tax. The inaccuracy of any such opinions or statements may adversely affect our or the REIT affiliates respective REIT qualification and/or result in significant corporate-level tax. In addition, if the issuer of any REIT equity securities in which we or the REIT affiliates invest were to fail to maintain its qualification as a REIT, the securities of such issuer held by us or such affiliate will fail to qualify as real estate assets for purposes of maintaining REIT qualification and the income generated by such securities will not represent qualifying income for purposes of the 75% REIT gross income test and therefore could cause us or such affiliate to fail to qualify as a REIT.

We or Taberna may lose our or its REIT qualification or be subject to a penalty tax if the Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, successfully challenges our or its characterization of income from Taberna VIII and Taberna IX.

We and Taberna are required to include in income, in certain cases, even without the receipt of actual distributions, earnings from foreign TRSs that are securitizations, Taberna VIII and Taberna IX, or other foreign corporations that are not qualified REIT subsidiaries. Taberna treats, and we intend to treat, certain of these

31

income inclusions as qualifying income for purposes of the 95% gross income test applicable to REITs but not for purposes of the REIT 75% gross income test. The provisions that set forth what income is qualifying income for purposes of the 95% gross income test provide that gross income derived from dividends, interest and certain other classes of passive income qualify for purposes of the 95% gross income test. Income inclusions from equity investments in Taberna VIII and Taberna IX are technically neither dividends nor any of the other enumerated categories of income specified in the 95% gross income test for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and there is no clear precedent with respect to the qualification of such income. However, based on advice of counsel, we and Taberna intend to treat such inclusions, to the extent distributed by Taberna VIII and Taberna IX in the year it was accrued, as qualifying income for purposes of the 95% gross income test. In 2011, the IRS issued a private letter ruling considering situations in which a REIT had to include income from foreign corporations. The IRS ruled that such income would qualify for the 95% gross income test. Since private letter rulings only protect the recipient of the letter, it is still possible that, because this income does not meet the literal requirements of the REIT provisions, the IRS might take the position that such income is not qualifying income. In the event that such income was determined not to qualify for the 95% gross income test, we or Taberna could fail to qualify as a REIT. Even if such income does not cause us or Taberna to fail to qualify as a REIT because of certain relief provisions, we or Taberna would be subject to a penalty tax with respect to such income because such income, together with other non-qualifying income earned by us or Taberna, has exceeded and will exceed 5% of its gross income. This penalty tax, if applicable, would be calculated by multiplying the amount by which our or Taberna’s non-qualifying income exceeds 5% of our or Taberna’s total gross income by a fraction intended to reflect our or Taberna’s profitability. In addition, if such income were determined not to qualify for the 95% gross income test, we or Taberna would need to invest in sufficient qualifying assets, or sell some interests in Taberna VIII and Taberna IX or other foreign corporations that are not qualified REIT subsidiaries to ensure that the income recognized by us or Taberna from Taberna VIII and Taberna IX or such other foreign corporations does not exceed 5% of our or Taberna’s gross income.

We have federal and state tax obligations.

Even if we qualify as REITs for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we will be required to pay U.S. federal, state and local taxes on income and property. In addition, our domestic TRSs are fully taxable corporations that will be subject to taxes on their income, and they may be limited in their ability to deduct interest payments made to us. We also will be subject to a 100% penalty tax on certain amounts if the economic arrangements among us and TRSs are not comparable to similar arrangements among unrelated parties or if we receive payments for inventory or property held for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business. We may be taxable at the highest corporate income tax rate on a portion of the income arising from a taxable mortgage pool that is allocable to shares held by “disqualified organizations.” In addition, under certain circumstances we could be subject to a penalty tax for failure to meet certain REIT requirements but nonetheless maintains its qualification as a REIT. For example, we may be required to pay a penalty tax with respect to income earned in connection with securitization equity in the event such income is determined not to be qualifying income for purposes of the REIT 95% gross income test but we are otherwise able to remain qualified as a REIT. To the extent that we or the TRSs are required to pay U.S. federal, state or local taxes, we will have less to distribute to shareholders.

Failure to make required distributions would subject us to tax, which would reduce the ability to pay distributions to our shareholders.

In order to qualify as a REIT, we and the REIT affiliates must each distribute to our respective shareholders each calendar year at least 90% of our respective REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gain. To the extent that we and the REIT affiliates each satisfy the 90% distribution requirement, but distribute less than 100% of net taxable income, we or such affiliate will be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax. In addition, we or the REIT affiliates will incur a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the amount, if any, by which our respective distributions in any calendar year are less than the sum of:

• 85% of ordinary income for that year;

32

• 95% of capital gain net income for that year; and

• 100% undistributed taxable income from prior years.

We and the REIT affiliates each intend to distribute our respective net income to our respective shareholders in a manner intended to satisfy the 90% distribution requirement and to avoid both corporate income tax and the 4% nondeductible excise tax. There is no requirement that any TRS of ours or the REIT affiliates distribute their after-tax net income to us or the REIT affiliates and such TRSs may, to the extent consistent with maintaining our or the REIT affiliates’ qualification as a REIT, determine not to make any current distributions to us or the REIT affiliates. However, Taberna’s non-U.S. TRSs, Taberna VIII and Taberna IX, will generally be deemed to distribute their earnings to Taberna on an annual basis for U.S. federal income tax purposes, regardless of whether such TRSs actually distribute their earnings.

Our or the REIT affiliates’ respective taxable income may substantially exceed our or their respective net income as determined by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP, because, for example, expected capital losses will be deducted in determining our respective GAAP net income, but may not be deductible in computing our or their respective taxable income. GAAP net income may also be reduced to the extent we or the REIT affiliates have to “markdown” the value of our respective assets to reflect their current value. Prior to the sale of such assets, those mark-downs do not comparably reduce taxable income. In addition, we or the REIT affiliates may invest in assets including the equity of securitization entities that generate taxable income in excess of economic income or in advance of the corresponding cash flow from the assets. This taxable income may arise for us in the following ways:

• Repurchase of our debt at a discount, including our convertible senior notes or CDO notes payable, will generally result in our recognizing REIT taxable income in the form of cancellation of indebtedness income generally equal to the amount of the discount. Recent legislation permits the deferral of taxes coming about through debt buybacks at a discount in certain circumstances.

• Origination of loans with appreciation interests may be deemed to have original issue discount for federal income tax purposes. Original issue discount is generally equal to the difference between an obligation’s issue price and its stated redemption price at maturity. This “discount” must be recognized as income over the life of the loan even though the corresponding cash will not be received until maturity.

• Our or the REIT affiliates’ loan terms may provide for both an interest “pay” rate and “accrual” rate. When this occurs, we recognize interest based on the sum of the pay rate and the accrual rate, but only receive cash at the pay rate until maturity of the loan, at which time all accrued interest is due and payable.

• Our or the REIT affiliates’ loans or unconsolidated real estate may contain provisions whereby the benefit of any principal amortization of the underlying senior debt inures to us or the REIT affiliates. We or the REIT affiliates recognize this benefit as income as the amortization occurs, with no related cash receipts until repayment of our loan.

• Sales or other dispositions of investments in real estate, as well as significant modifications to loan terms may result in timing differences between income recognition and cash receipts.

Although some types of taxable income are excluded to the extent they exceed 5% of our net income in determining the 90% distribution requirement, we will incur corporate income tax and the 4% nondeductible excise tax with respect to any taxable income items if we do not distribute those items on an annual basis. As a result of the foregoing, we may generate less cash flow than taxable income in a particular year. In that event, we may be required to use cash reserves, incur debt, or liquidate non-cash assets at rates or times that we or it regard as unfavorable in order to satisfy the distribution requirement and to avoid U.S. federal corporate income tax and the 4% deductible excise tax in that year.

33

If our or Taberna’s securitizations are subject to U.S. federal income tax at the entity level, it would greatly reduce the amounts those entities would have available to distribute to us or Taberna and pay their creditors.

Taberna’s consolidated foreign securitization subsidiaries, Taberna VIII and Taberna IX, are organized as Cayman Islands companies, and we may own similar foreign securitization’s in the future. There is a specific exemption from U.S. federal income tax for non-U.S. corporations that restrict their activities in the United States to trading stock and securities (or any activity closely related thereto) for their own account whether such trading (or such other activity) is conducted by the corporation or its employees through a resident broker, commission agent, custodian or other agent. We and Taberna intend that the consolidated securitization subsidiaries and any other non-U.S. securitizations that are TRSs will rely on that exemption or otherwise operate in a manner so that they will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on their net income at the entity level. If the IRS were to succeed in challenging the tax treatment of our or Taberna’s securitizations, it could greatly reduce the amount that those securitizations would have available to distribute to their shareholders and to pay to their creditors. Any reduced distributions would reduce amounts available for distribution to our shareholders.

Our and the REIT affiliates’ ownership of and relationship with TRSs will be limited, and a failure to comply with the limits would jeopardize our and its REIT qualification and may result in the application of a 100% excise tax.

A REIT may own up to 100% of the stock of one or more TRSs. A TRS may hold assets and earn income that would not be qualifying assets or income if held or earned directly by a REIT. Both the subsidiary and the REIT must jointly elect to treat the subsidiary as a TRS. A corporation of which a TRS directly or indirectly owns more than 35% of the voting power or value of the stock will automatically be treated as a TRS. Overall, no more than 25% (20% for taxable years prior to 2009) of the value of a REIT’s assets may consist of stock or securities of one or more TRSs. In addition, the TRS rules limit the deductibility of interest paid or accrued by a TRS to its parent REIT to assure that the TRS is subject to an appropriate level of corporate taxation. The rules also impose a 100% excise tax on certain transactions between a TRS and its parent REIT that are not conducted on an arm’s-length basis.

Any domestic TRSs that we or the REIT affiliates own or that we or the REIT affiliates acquire in the future will pay U.S. federal, state and local income tax on their taxable income, and their after-tax net income will be available for distribution but will not be required to be distributed.

The value of the securities that we or the REIT affiliates hold in TRSs may not be subject to precise valuation. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we or the REIT affiliates will be able to comply with the 25% limitation discussed above or avoid application of the 100% excise tax discussed above.

Compliance with REIT requirements may limit our ability to hedge effectively.

The REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code limit our ability to hedge mortgage-backed securities, preferred securities and related borrowings. Except to the extent provided by the regulations promulgated by the U.S. Treasury Department, or the Treasury regulations, any income from a hedging transaction we enter into in the normal course of business primarily to manage risk of interest rate or price changes or currency fluctuations with respect to borrowings made or to be made, or ordinary obligations incurred or to be incurred, to acquire or carry real estate assets, which is clearly identified as specified in the Treasury regulations before the close of the day on which it was acquired, originated, or entered into, including gain from the sale or disposition of such a transaction, will not constitute gross income for purposes of the 95% gross income test (and will generally constitute non-qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test). To the extent that we enter into other types of hedging transactions, the income from those transactions is likely to be treated as non-qualifying income for purposes of both of the gross income tests. As a result, we might have to limit use of advantageous hedging techniques or implement those hedges through TRSs. This could increase the cost of our hedging activities or expose it or us to greater risks associated with changes in interest rates than we or it would otherwise want to bear.

34

We may be subject to adverse legislative or regulatory tax changes that could reduce the market price of our common shares.

At any time, the U.S. federal income tax laws or regulations governing REITs or the administrative interpretations of those laws or regulations may be amended. We cannot predict when or if any new U.S. federal income tax law, regulation or administrative interpretation, or any amendment to any existing U.S. federal income tax law, regulation or administrative interpretation, will be adopted, promulgated or become effective and any such law, regulation or interpretation may take effect retroactively. We could be adversely affected by any such change in, or any new, U.S. federal income tax law, regulation or administrative interpretation.

Fees we or our REIT affiliates receive will not be REIT qualifying income.

We and our REIT affiliates must satisfy two gross income tests annually to maintain qualification as a REIT. First, at least 75% of a REIT’s gross income for each taxable year must consist of defined types of income that derive, directly or indirectly, from investments relating to real property or mortgages on real property or temporary investment income. Qualifying income for purposes of that 75% gross income test generally includes:

• rents from real property,

• interest on debt secured by mortgages on real property or on interests in real property, and

• dividends or other distributions on and gain from the sale of shares in other REITs.

Second, in general, at least 95% of a REIT’s gross income for each taxable year must consist of income that is qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test, dividends, other types of interest, gain from the sale or disposition of stock or securities, income from certain interest rate hedging contracts, or any combination of the foregoing. Gross income from any origination fees we or our REIT affiliates obtain or from our sale of property that are held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business is excluded from both income tests.

Any origination fees we or our REIT affiliates receive will not be qualifying income for purposes of the 75% or 95% gross income tests applicable to REITs under the Internal Revenue Code. We typically receive, and our REIT affiliates may receive, initial payments, or “points,” from borrowers as commitment fees or additional interest. So long as the payment is for the use of money, rather than for other services provided by us or our REIT affiliates, we believe that this income should not be classified as non-qualifying origination fees. However, the Internal Revenue Service may seek to reclassify this income as origination fees instead of commitment fees or interest. If we cannot satisfy the Internal Revenue Code’s income tests as a result of a successful challenge of our classification of this income, we may not qualify as a REIT. Any fees for services, such as advisory fees or broker-dealer fees, received by us or our REIT affiliates will not qualify for either income test. Any such fees earned by a TRS of ours or of one of our REIT affiliates would not be subject to tax, and any distributions from TRSs would be qualifying income for purposes of the 95% gross income test but not for the 75% gross income test.

A portion of the dividends we distribute may be deemed a return of capital for federal income tax purposes.

The amount of dividends we distribute to our common and preferred shareholders in a given quarter may not correspond to our taxable income for such quarter. Consequently, a portion of the dividends we distribute may be deemed a return of capital for federal income tax purposes, and will not be taxable but will reduce shareholders’ basis in the underlying common or preferred shares.

Our ability to use TRSs, and consequently our ability to establish fee-generating businesses and invest in securitizations, will be limited by the election made by us to be taxed as a REIT, which may adversely affect returns to our shareholders.

Overall, no more than 25% of the value of a REIT’s assets may consist of securities of one or more TRSs. We and Taberna currently own, and we, Taberna and any other REIT affiliates may own in the future, interests in

35

additional TRSs. However, our ability to expand the fee-generating businesses of our and Taberna’s current TRSs and future TRSs we or our REIT affiliates may form, will be limited by our and our REIT affiliates need to meet this 25% test, which may adversely affect distributions we pay to our shareholders.

If Taberna fails to qualify as a REIT, then we also would very likely fail to qualify as a REIT and if any other significant REIT affiliate fails to qualify as a REIT, it would adversely affect our ability to qualify as a REIT .

Taberna is a REIT subject to all of the risks discussed above with respect to RAIT. If Taberna fails to qualify as a REIT, then we also would very likely fail to qualify as a REIT, because the income we receive from, and assets we hold through, Taberna make up a significant portion of our total income and assets and materially affect our ability to meet REIT qualification tests. The same is true with respect to other REIT affiliates if the income derived from such REIT affiliate becomes a significant part of our income.

Other Regulatory and Legal Risks of Our Business

Our reputation, business and operations could be adversely affected by regulatory compliance failures.

Potential regulatory action poses a significant risk to our reputation and thereby to our business. Our business is subject to extensive regulation in the United States and in the other countries in which our investment activities occur. We operate our business so as to comply with the Internal Revenue Code’s REIT rules and regulations and so as to remain exempt from registration as an investment company under the Investment Company Act. The SEC and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, or FINRA, oversee the activities of our broker-dealer subsidiary. In addition, we are subject to regulation under the Exchange Act, the Investment Advisers Act and various other statutes. A number of our investing activities, such as our lending business, are subject to regulation by various U.S. state regulators. Each of the regulatory bodies with jurisdiction over us has regulatory powers dealing with many aspects of our business, including the authority to grant, and in specific circumstances to cancel, permissions to carry on particular businesses. A failure to comply with the obligations imposed by any of the regulations binding on us or to maintain any of the licenses required to be maintained by us could result in investigations, sanctions and reputation damage.

Loss of our Investment Company Act exemption would affect us adversely.

We seek to conduct our operations so that we are not required to register as an investment company. Under Section 3(a)(1) of the Investment Company Act, a company is not deemed to be an “investment company” if:

• it neither is, nor holds itself out as being, engaged primarily, nor proposes to engage primarily, in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities; and

• it neither is engaged nor proposes to engage in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities and does not own or propose to acquire “investment securities” having a value exceeding 40% of the value of its total assets on an unconsolidated basis, which we refer to as the 40% test. “Investment securities” excludes U.S. government securities and securities of majority-owned subsidiaries that are not themselves investment companies and are not relying on the exception from the definition of investment company under Section 3(c)(1) or Section 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act.

We rely on the 40% test. Because we are a holding company that conducts our businesses through wholly-owned or majority-owned subsidiaries, the securities issued by our subsidiaries that are excepted from the definition of “investment company” under Section 3(c)(1) or Section 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act, together with any other investment securities we may own, may not have a combined value in excess of 40% of the value of our total assets on an unconsolidated basis. In fact, based on the relative value of our investment in Taberna, on the one hand, and our investment in RAIT Partnership, on the other hand, we can comply with the 40% test only if Taberna satisfies the 40% test on which it relies (or another exemption other than Section 3(c)(1)

36

or 3(c)(7)) and RAIT Partnership complies with Section 3(c)(5)(c) or 3(c)(6), the exemptions upon which it relies (or another exemption other than Section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7)). This requirement limits the types of businesses in which we may engage through our subsidiaries.

Because RAIT Partnership and the two wholly-owned subsidiaries through which we hold 100% of the partnership interests in RAIT Partnership—RAIT General, Inc. and RAIT Limited, Inc.—will not be relying on Section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) for their respective Investment Company Act exemptions, our investments in these securities will not constitute “investment securities” for purposes of the 40% test if RAIT Partnership is otherwise exempt from the Investment Company Act.

RAIT Partnership, our subsidiary that holds, directly and through wholly-owned or majority-owned subsidiaries, a substantial portion of our assets, intends to conduct its operations so that it is not required to register as an investment company in reliance on the exemption from Investment Company Act regulation provided under Section 3(c)(5)(c). RAIT Partnership may also from time to time rely on the exemption from Investment Company Act regulation provided under Section 3(c)(6).

Any entity relying on Section 3(c)(5)(C) for its Investment Company Act exemption must have at least 55% of its portfolio invested in qualifying assets (which in general must consist of mortgage loans, mortgage backed securities that represent the entire ownership in a pool of mortgage loans and other liens on and interests in real estate) and another 25% of its portfolio invested in other real estate-related assets. Based on no-action letters issued by the Staff of the SEC, we classify our investments in mortgage loans as qualifying assets, as long as the loans are “fully secured” by an interest in real estate. That is, if the loan-to-value ratio of the loan is equal to or less than 100%, then we consider the loan to be a qualifying asset. We do not consider loans with loan-to-value ratios in excess of 100% to be qualifying assets that come within the 55% basket, but only real estate-related assets that come within the 25% basket. Based on a no-action letter issued by the Staff of the SEC, we treat most of our mezzanine loans as qualifying assets because we usually obtain a first lien position on the entire ownership interest of a special purpose entity, or SPE, that owns only real property, or that owns the entire ownership interest in a second SPE that owns only real property, and otherwise comes within the conditions of the no-action letter, and we treat any remaining mezzanine loans as real estate-related assets that come within the 25% basket. The treatment of other investments as qualifying assets and real estate-related assets, including equity investments in subsidiaries, is based on the characteristics of the underlying asset, in the case of a directly held investment, or the characteristics of the assets of the subsidiary, in the case of equity investments in subsidiaries.

Any entity relying on Section 3(c)(6) for its Investment Company Act exemption must be primarily engaged, directly or through majority-owned subsidiaries, in one or more specified businesses, including a business described in Section 3(c)(5)(c), or in one or more of such businesses (from which not less than 25% of its gross income during its last fiscal year was derived), together with an additional business or businesses other than investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities.

Taberna, like RAIT, is a holding company that conducts its operations through subsidiaries. Accordingly, we intend to monitor Taberna’s holdings such that it will satisfy the 40% test. Similar to securities issued to us, the securities issued to Taberna by its subsidiaries that are excepted from the definition of “investment company” by Section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act, together with any other investment securities Taberna may own, may not have a combined value in excess of 40% of the value of its total assets on an unconsolidated basis. This requirement limits the types of businesses in which Taberna may engage through these subsidiaries.

We make the determination of whether an entity is a majority-owned subsidiary of RAIT, RAIT Partnership or Taberna. The Investment Company Act defines a majority-owned subsidiary of a person as a company 50% or more of the outstanding voting securities of which are owned by such person, or by another company which is a majority-owned subsidiary of such person. The Investment Company Act further defines voting securities as any security presently entitling its owner or holder to vote for the election of directors of a company. We treat

37

companies, including future securitization subsidiaries, in which we own at least a majority of the outstanding voting securities as majority-owned subsidiaries for purposes of the 40% test. Neither RAIT, RAIT Partnership nor Taberna has requested the SEC to approve our treatment of any company as a majority-owned subsidiary and the SEC has not done so. If the SEC were to disagree with our treatment of one or more companies, including securitizations, as majority-owned subsidiaries, we would need to adjust our respective investment strategies and invest our respective assets in order to continue to pass the 40% test. Any such adjustment in its investment strategy could have a material adverse effect on Taberna and us.

A majority of Taberna’s subsidiaries are limited by the provisions of the Investment Company Act and the rules and regulations promulgated under the Act with respect to the assets in which they can invest to avoid being regulated as an investment company. In particular, Taberna’s subsidiaries that are securitizations generally rely on Rule 3a-7, an exemption from the Investment Company Act provided for certain structured financing vehicles that pool income-producing assets and issue securities backed by those assets. Such structured financings may not engage in portfolio management practices resembling those employed by mutual funds. Accordingly, each Taberna securitization subsidiary that relies on Rule 3a-7 is subject to an indenture which contains specific guidelines and restrictions limiting the discretion of the securitization. The indenture prohibits the securitization from acquiring and disposing of assets primarily for the purpose of recognizing gains or decreasing losses resulting from market value changes. Certain sales and purchases of assets, such as dispositions of collateral that has gone into default or is at risk of imminent default, may be made so long as they do not violate the guidelines contained in each indenture and are not based primarily on changes in market value. The proceeds of permitted dispositions may be reinvested in collateral that is consistent with the credit profile of the securitization under specific and predetermined guidelines. In addition, absent obtaining further guidance from the SEC, substitutions of assets may not be made solely for the purpose of enhancing the investment returns of the holders of the equity securities issued by the securitization. As a result of these restrictions, Taberna’s securitization subsidiaries may suffer losses on their assets and Taberna may suffer losses on its investments in its securitization subsidiaries.

If the combined value of the investment securities issued to Taberna by its subsidiaries that are excepted by Section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act, together with any other investment securities Taberna may own, exceeds 40% of Taberna’s total assets on an unconsolidated basis, Taberna may be required either to substantially change the manner in which it conducts its operations or to rely on Section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) to avoid having to register as an investment company, either of which could have an adverse effect on Taberna and us. If Taberna were to rely on Section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7), then we would no longer comply with our own exemption from registration as an investment company.

None of RAIT, RAIT Partnership or Taberna has received a no-action letter from the SEC regarding whether it complies with the Investment Company Act or how its investment or financing strategies fit within the exclusions from regulation under the Investment Company Act that it is using. To the extent that the SEC provides more specific or different guidance regarding, for example, the treatment of assets as qualifying real estate assets or real estate-related assets, we may be required to adjust these investment and financing strategies accordingly. Any additional guidance from the SEC could provide additional flexibility to us and Taberna, or it could further inhibit the ability of Taberna and our combined company to pursue our respective investment and financing strategies which could have a material adverse effect on us. See Item 1-“Business-Certain REIT and Investment Company Act Limits On Our Strategies-Investment Company Act Limits.”

Our ownership limitation may restrict business combination opportunities.

To qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, no more than 50% in value of our outstanding capital shares may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals during the last half of each taxable year. To preserve our REIT qualification, our declaration of trust generally prohibits any person from owning more than 8.3% or, with respect to our original promoter, Resource America, Inc., 15%, of our outstanding common shares and provides that:

• A transfer that violates the limitation is void.

38

• A transferee gets no rights to the shares that violate the limitation.

• Shares acquired that violate the limitation transfer automatically to a trust whose trustee has all voting and other rights.

• Shares in the trust will be sold and the record holder will receive the net proceeds of the sale.

The ownership limitation may discourage a takeover or other transaction that our shareholders believe to be desirable.

Preferred shares may prevent change in control.

Our declaration of trust authorizes our board of trustees to issue preferred shares, to establish the preferences and rights of any preferred shares issued, to classify any unissued preferred shares and reclassify any previously classified but unissued preferred shares, without shareholder approval. The issuance of preferred shares could delay or prevent a change in control, apart from the ownership limitation, even if a majority of our shareholders want control to change.

Maryland anti-takeover statutes may restrict business combination opportunities.

As a Maryland REIT, we are subject to various provisions of Maryland law which impose restrictions and require that specified procedures be followed with respect to the acquisition of “control shares” representing at least ten percent of our aggregate voting power and certain takeover offers and business combinations, including, but not limited to, combinations with persons who own one-tenth or more of our outstanding shares. While we have elected to “opt out” of the control share acquisition statute, our board of trustees has the right to rescind the election at any time without notice to our shareholders.

If our subsidiaries that are registered investment advisers fail to comply with the Investment Advisers Act, this could have an adverse effect on our ability to manage securitizations.

Our subsidiaries, RAIT Partnership and TCM, are registered investment advisers under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, or the Investment Advisers Act, and, as such, are supervised by the SEC. We registered RAIT Partnership and TCM under the Investment Advisers Act so that they could manage increasing numbers of securitizations or otherwise provide advisory services. We expect to register additional affiliates of RAIT providing advisory services to our sponsored REITs and other public and private investment vehicles we sponsor in the future. The Investment Advisers Act requires registered investment advisers to comply with numerous obligations, including record-keeping requirements, operational procedures and disclosure obligations. Such subsidiaries may also be registered with various states and, thus, subject to the oversight and regulation by such states’ regulatory agencies. If we do not comply with these requirements, it could have an adverse effect on our ability to manage our securitizations and provide advisory services to our sponsored non-listed REITs and any private investment vehicles.

Our failure to maintain a broker-dealer license in the various jurisdictions in which we do business could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.

FINRA has granted our membership application for a broker-dealer license for our subsidiary, Independence Securities. We also are required to maintain licenses with state securities regulators. Failure to maintain Independence Securities’ licenses as a broker-dealer with FINRA and applicable state regulators would prevent it from serving as the dealer-manager for the securities offerings of our sponsored non-listed REITs and any private investment vehicles and earning related fees or engaging in trading and advisory services. In that event, we may need to engage a third-party broker-dealer to act as a dealer manager. If Independence Securities is unable to receive fees related to its dealer-manager services or engage in trading and advisory services, it would have less cash available for distribution to RAIT. In addition, any failure by Independence Securities to obtain a broker-dealer license in the various jurisdictions relevant to any securities offering by our sponsored non-listed REITs and any private investment vehicles could have a material adverse effect on such offerings and our ability to derive benefits from our sponsored non-listed REITs and any private investment vehicles.

39

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

For our investments in real estate, the leases for our multi-family properties are generally one-year or less and leases for our office and retail properties are operating leases. The following table represents a ten-year lease expiration schedule for our non-residential properties as of December 31, 2011.

Year of Lease Expiration (December 31,)	Number of Leases Expiring during the Year		Rentable Square Feet Subject to Expiring Leases		Final Annualized Rent under Expiring Leases (in 000’s) (a)		Final Annualized Rent per Square Foot under Expiring Leases		Percentage of Total Final Annualized Base Rent Under Expiring Leases			Cumulative Total
2012		174		511,337	$	7,378	$	14.43		22.6	%		22.6	%
2013		64		394,020		5,171		13.12		15.9	%		38.5	%
2014		57		140,269		2,213		15.78		6.8	%		45.3	%
2015		31		270,958		2,723		10.05		8.4	%		53.7	%
2016		25		93,844		1,677		17.87		5.1	%		58.8	%
2017		7		105,025		1,769		16.84		5.4	%		64.2	%
2018		3		62,581		1,179		18.84		3.6	%		67.8	%
2019		6		81,318		764		9.38		2.3	%		70.1	%
2020		6		26,605		547		20.55		1.7	%		71.8	%
2021		3		35,987		1,003		27.88		3.1	%		74.9	%
2022 and thereafter		4		438,237		8,198		18.71		25.1	%		100.0	%
Total		380		2,160,181	$	32,622	$	15.10		100.0	%

(a) “Final Annualized Rent” for each lease scheduled to expire represents the cash rental rates of the respective tenants for the final month prior to expiration multiplied by 12.

For a description of our investments in real estate, see Item 1—“Business—Our Investment Portfolio—Investments in real estate” and Item 8—“Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Schedule III.”

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

We are involved from time to time in litigation on various matters, including disputes with tenants of owned properties, disputes arising out of agreements to purchase or sell properties and disputes arising out of our loan portfolio. Given the nature of our business activities, these lawsuits are considered routine to the conduct of our business. The result of any particular lawsuit cannot be predicted, because of the very nature of litigation, the litigation process and its adversarial nature, and the jury system. We do not expect that the liabilities, if any, that may ultimately result from such routine legal actions will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 4. Reserved

40

PART II

Item 5. Market for Our Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Our common shares trade on the New York Stock Exchange, or the NYSE, under the symbol “RAS.” We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which we refer to as the Code, for our trustees, officers and employees intended to satisfy New York Stock Exchange listing standards and the definition of a “code of ethics” set forth in Item 406 of Regulation S-K. Any information relating to amendments to the Code or waivers of a provision of the Code required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 5.05 of Form 8-K will be disclosed through our website.

MARKET PRICE OF AND DIVIDENDS ON OUR COMMON SHARES

The following table shows the high and low reported sales prices per common share on the NYSE composite transactions reporting system and the quarterly cash dividends declared per common share for the periods indicated. For further discussion of our dividend policies, see Item 7—“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-REIT Taxable Income.” Past price performance is not necessarily indicative of likely future performance. Because the market price of our common shares will fluctuate, you are urged to obtain current market prices for our common shares.

On May 17, 2011, the board of trustees authorized a 1-for-3 reverse stock split of our common shares of beneficial interest, or the reverse stock split, that became effective on June 30, 2011, or the effective time. At the effective time, every three common shares issued and outstanding were automatically combined into one issued and outstanding new common share. The par value of new common shares changed to $0.03 per share after the reverse stock split from the par value of common shares prior to the reverse stock split of $0.01 per share. The reverse stock split reduced the number of common shares outstanding but did not change the number of authorized common shares. The reverse stock split did not affect our preferred shares of beneficial interest. All references in the following table to the prices and dividends declared for all periods presented have been adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split.

	Price Range of Common Shares				Dividends Declared
	High		Low
2010
First Quarter	$	6.99	$	3.03	$	0.00
Second Quarter		14.25		5.49		0.00
Third Quarter		7.02		3.90		0.00
Fourth Quarter		7.26		4.50		0.00
2011
First Quarter	$	11.34	$	6.57	$	0.09
Second Quarter		8.13		5.52		0.06
Third Quarter		7.31		3.12		0.06
Fourth Quarter		5.69		2.90		0.06
2012
First Quarter (through February 21, 2012)	$	6.28	$	4.70

As of February 21, 2012, there were 42,359,031 of our common shares outstanding held by 687 holders of record.

Our Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, or Series A Preferred Shares, are listed on the NYSE and traded under the symbol “RAS PrA.” The Series A Preferred Shares were issued in the first and second quarter of 2004. RAIT declared a dividend per share of $0.0625 on the Series A Preferred Shares for the first quarter of 2004, representing the pro ration of the specified quarterly dividend for the quarter for the period

41

during which the Series A Preferred Shares were outstanding in the quarter. In each subsequent quarter, RAIT has declared and paid the specified dividend per share of $0.484375. No dividends are currently in arrears on the Series A Preferred Shares.

Our Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, or Series B Preferred Shares, are listed on the NYSE and traded under the symbol “RAS PrB.” The Series B Preferred Shares were issued in the fourth quarter of 2004. RAIT declared a dividend per share of $0.4952957 on the Series B Preferred Shares for the fourth quarter of 2004 representing the pro ration of the specified dividend for the quarter for the period during which the Series B Preferred Shares were outstanding in the quarter. In each subsequent quarter, RAIT has declared and paid the specified dividend per share of $0.5234375. No dividends are currently in arrears on the Series B Preferred Shares.

Our Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, or Series C Preferred Shares, are listed on the NYSE and traded under the symbol “RAS PrC.” The Series C Preferred Shares were issued in the third quarter of 2007. RAIT declared a dividend per share of $0.523872 on the Series C Preferred Shares for the third quarter of 2007 representing the pro ration of the specified dividend for the quarter for the period during which the Series C Preferred Shares were outstanding in the quarter. In each subsequent quarter, RAIT has declared and paid the specified dividend per share of $0.5546875. No dividends are currently in arrears on the Series C Preferred Shares.

PERFORMANCE GRAPH

The following graph compares the index of the cumulative total shareholder return on our common shares for the measurement period commencing December 31, 2006 and ending December 31, 2011 with the cumulative total returns of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT) Mortgage REIT index, the NAREIT Equity index and the S&P 500 Index. The following graph assumes that each index was 100 on the initial day of the relevant measurement period and that all dividends were reinvested.

42

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The following selected financial data information should be read in conjunction with Item 7—“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and our consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto, included elsewhere herein (dollars in thousands, except share and per share data).

	As of and For the Years Ended December 31
	2011			2010			2009			2008			2007
Operating Data:
Interest income	$	132,351		$	153,955		$	381,979		$	691,287		$	893,212
Rental income		91,880			72,373			44,637			17,425			11,291
Total revenue		234,154			244,570			453,114			730,069			930,228
Interest expense		(89,649	)		(96,690	)		(261,824	)		(486,932	)		(699,892	)
Real estate operating expenses		(55,285	)		(51,276	)		(35,179	)		(13,135	)		(8,657	)
Provision for losses		(3,900	)		(38,307	)		(226,567	)		(162,783	)		(21,721	)
Asset impairments		0			0			(46,015	)		(67,052	)		(517,452	)
Total expenses		(219,697	)		(261,891	)		(640,055	)		(804,909	)		(1,385,251	)
Operating income (loss)		14,457			(17,321	)		(186,941	)		(74,840	)		(455,023	)
Change in fair value of financial instruments		(75,154	)		45,840			1,563			(552,437	)		0
Income (loss) from continuing operations		(38,457	)		110,590			(440,141	)		(617,130	)		(435,991	)
Net income (loss)		(37,710	)		110,913			(440,981	)		(619,185	)		(437,478	)
Net income (loss) allocable to common shares		(51,130	)		98,152			(441,203	)		(443,246	)		(379,588	)
Earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations
Basic	$	(1.35	)	$	3.38		$	(20.26	)	$	(20.88	)	$	(18.48	)
Diluted	$	(1.35	)	$	3.33		$	(20.26	)	$	(20.88	)	$	(18.48	)
Earnings (loss) per share:
Basic	$	(1.33	)	$	3.39		$	(20.30	)	$	(20.97	)	$	(18.54	)
Diluted	$	(1.33	)	$	3.34		$	(20.30	)	$	(20.97	)	$	(18.54	)
Balance Sheet Data:
Investments in mortgages and loans, net	$	950,281		$	1,149,419		$	1,380,957		$	5,468,064		$	6,378,050
Investments in real estate		891,502			839,192			737,060			346,396			114,168
Investments in securities		647,461			705,451			694,897			1,920,883			3,827,800
Total assets		2,902,604			2,993,432			3,094,976			8,151,450			11,057,580
Total indebtedness		1,748,274			1,838,177			2,077,123			6,102,890			10,040,925
Total liabilities		1,988,510			2,074,902			2,325,055			6,882,109			10,474,982
Total equity		914,094			918,530			769,921			1,269,341			582,598
Other Data:
Common shares outstanding, at period end (1)		41,289,566			35,300,190			24,806,866			21,614,190			20,339,410
Book value per share (1)	$	18.04		$	21.33		$	24.24		$	42.27		$	20.43
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred share dividends		0.0x	(2)		1.9x			0.0x	(2)		0.0x	(2)		0.0x	(2)
Dividends declared per share (1)	$	0.27		$	0.00		$	0.00		$	1.27		$	2.56

(1) Information presented for 2007 through 2010 have been adjusted to reflect the 1-for-3 reverse stock split in June 2011.

(2) The ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred share dividends for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2009, 2008 and 2007 is deficient by $52.1 million, $453.8 million, $630.8 million and $447.8 million, respectively.

43

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

We are a vertically integrated commercial real estate company with a commercial real estate focused platform capable of originating commercial real estate loans, CMBS eligible loans, acquiring commercial real estate properties and investing in, managing, servicing, trading and advising on commercial real estate-related assets. We offer a comprehensive set of debt financing options to the commercial real estate industry along with asset and property management services. We have recently expanded our platform to include sponsoring non-traded or REITs. We also own and manage a portfolio of commercial real estate properties and manage real estate-related assets for third parties. We are positioning RAIT for future growth in the area of its historical core competency, commercial real estate lending, while diversifying the revenue generated from our commercial real estate loans and properties and reducing or removing other non-core assets and activities.

In order to take advantage of market opportunities in the future, and to maximize shareholder value over time, we will continue to focus on:

• expanding RAIT’s commercial real estate revenue by investing in commercial real estate-related assets, managing and servicing investments for our own account or for others, and providing property management services;

• creating value through investing in our commercial real estate properties and implementing cost savings programs to help maximize property value over time;

• raising capital by accessing capital through the independent broker-dealer networks for the offerings of the sponsored REITs and other sponsored companies and generating fee income by advising the sponsored companies and broker-dealer activities;

• reducing our leverage while developing new financing sources; and

• managing our investment portfolios to reposition non-performing assets, increase our cash flows and ultimately recover the value of our assets over time.

During 2011, we successfully met our debt reduction goals, increased our origination of commercial real estate loans, increased our investments in real estate and began two new business initiatives: (i) originating CMBS eligible loans and (ii) sponsoring non-traded REITS. We generated positive operating income and adjusted funds from operations, or AFFO, throughout 2011 and resumed paying regular dividends on our common shares. Though we are reporting a net loss for the year caused primarily by non-cash changes in the fair market value of some of our investments, we believe we have positioned RAIT to take advantage of opportunities resulting from improved commercial real estate market fundamentals and sources of financing and by reducing our exposure to near-term debt obligations. We generated a net loss allocable to common shares of $51.1 million, or $1.33 per common share-diluted, during the year ended December 31, 2011. The primary items affecting our performance were the following:

• Change in fair value of financial instruments. For the year ended December 31, 2011, the net change in fair value of financial instruments decreased net income by $75.2 million. The primary driver of this decrease was our interest rate hedges that we record at fair value under FASB ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments”. During the year ended December 31, 2011, we experienced a general decline in interest rates across the interest rate curve which caused declines in the value of our interest rate hedges.

• Gains (losses) on debt extinguishments. During the year ended December 31, 2011, we repurchased $140.0 million of our 6.875% convertible senior notes and $23.7 million in aggregate principal amount of CDO notes payable issued by our RAIT I and RAIT II securitizations. The aggregate purchase price of these repurchases was $146.3 million. These transactions generated a gain on debt extinguishment of $15.0 million, including the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources—Capitalization” below for more information regarding these transactions.

44

During 2011, we continued to focus our efforts on enhancing our commercial real estate loan portfolio and our investments in real estate, which are our primary investment portfolios. Although economic conditions are improving, some of our borrowers within our commercial real estate loan portfolio are under financial stress. As a result, to enhance our commercial real estate portfolios, we consider whether or not it is beneficial to take direct ownership of the properties serving as collateral for our loans. During the year ended December 31, 2011, we converted six loans into direct ownership as we believed direct ownership would enhance our ultimate returns.

We are expanding our ability to benefit from positive developments in the commercial mortgage-backed securities, or CMBS markets. We believe there is growing demand from unaffiliated commercial mortgage-backed securitizations for commercial real estate loans which meet market standards for inclusion in securitizations. We completed the sale of $61.0 million of CMBS eligible loans into an unaffiliated CMBS securitization in October 2011 and recently entered into, in the aggregate, $250.0 million of CMBS warehouse facilities, which will be used to fund CMBS eligible loans we originate for sale into future CMBS securitizations.

We continue to explore opportunities arising from sponsoring non-traded REITs and similar vehicles due to our capacity to originate and manage commercial real estate-related assets. See “Sponsored Companies” below for a discussion of this strategy.

The following key statistics illustrate the transformation of our business since 2009 (dollars in thousands):

	For the Years Ended December 31
	2011			2010			2009
Financial Statistics:
Recourse debt maturing within 1-year (a)	$	1,856		$	41,489		$	24,390
Assets under management	$	3,517,684		$	3,835,230		$	10,125,678
Debt to equity		2.2x			2.3x			3.0x
Total revenue	$	234,154		$	244,570		$	453,114
Earnings per share, diluted	$	(1.33	)	$	3.34		$	(20.30	)
Common dividend declared (b)	$	0.27		$	0.00		$	0.00
Commercial Real Estate (“CRE”) Loan Portfolio (c):
Reported CRE Loans—unpaid principal	$	952,997		$	1,173,141		$	1,347,811
Non-accrual loans—unpaid principal	$	54,334		$	122,306		$	171,372
Non-accrual loans as a % of reported loans		5.7	%		10.4	%		12.7	%
Reserve for losses	$	40,565		$	61,731		$	86,609
Reserves as a % of non-accrual loans		74.7	%		50.5	%		50.5	%
Provision for losses	$	3,900		$	38,307		$	130,080
CRE Property Portfolio:
Reported investments in real estate	$	891,502		$	839,192		$	737,060
Number of properties owned		56			47			39
Multifamily units owned		8,014			8,311			6,967
Office square feet owned		1,786,860			1,632,978			1,324,368
Retail square feet owned		1,358,257			1,116,112			1,095,452
Average Physical Occupancy Data:
Multifamily		88.5	%		85.5	%		77.7	%
Office		69.2	%		67.8	%		48.2	%
Retail		68.0	%		58.8	%		58.0	%
Total		83.6	%		79.2	%		69.8	%

(a) Excludes $3.6 million of our 6.875% convertible senior notes that have a final maturity in April 2027 but are redeemable in full in April 2012. Includes any principal amortization on recourse debt that is required prior to the stated maturity.

45

(b) On January 10, 2011, we declared a 2010 annual cash dividend on our common shares of $0.09 per common share, split adjusted. The dividends were paid on January 31, 2011 to holders of record on January 21, 2011.

(c) CRE Loan Portfolio includes commercial mortgages, mezzanine loans, and preferred equity interests only and does not include other loans. See Note 3—“Investments in Loans” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information relating to all loans held by RAIT.

Trends That May Affect Our Business

The following trends may affect our business:

Credit, capital markets and liquidity risk. While there are signs of improvement from past years, we continue to see reduced availability of liquidity to finance assets similar to those in our investment portfolios which continues to impact our ability to finance new investments in our targeted asset classes. With respect to our borrowers, the market for financing sources, such as CMBS, for commercial real estate is constrained. This creates an increased risk of defaults upon the maturity of loans due to the lack of sources of refinancing.

Interest rate environment. Interest rates decreased dramatically in 2011 throughout the interest rate curve. This volatility impacted the value of our assets, liabilities and interest rate hedges. We use floating rate line of credit borrowings and long-term floating rate CDO notes payable to finance our investments. To the extent the amount of fixed-rate commercial loans are not directly offset by matching fixed-rate CDO notes payable, we utilize interest rate derivative contracts to convert our floating rate liabilities into fixed-rate liabilities, effectively match funding our assets with our liabilities. Continued volatility in interest rates may impact the value of our investments/financing arrangements and/or the interest income/expense generated by those investments/financings in the future.

Prepayment rates. Prepayment rates generally increase when interest rates fall and decrease when interest rates rise, but changes in prepayment rates are difficult to predict. Prepayment rates on our assets also may be affected by other factors, including, without limitation, conditions in the housing, real estate and financial markets, general economic conditions and the relative interest rates on adjustable-rate and fixed-rate loans. If interest rates begin to fall, triggering an increase in prepayment rates in our commercial loan portfolio and our net investment income may decrease. However, the lack of financing alternatives may cause loans to extend and provide an opportunity to increase the net investment income.

Commercial real estate improved performance. We are seeing signs of improvement in the commercial real estate markets. The multi-family, office and retail sectors of commercial real estate are experiencing increased occupancy levels and increased rents as compared to historic levels in several markets throughout the United States, including those where we are invested.

Critical Accounting Estimates and Policies

We consider the accounting policies discussed below to be critical to an understanding of how we report our financial condition and results of operations because their application places the most significant demands on the judgment of our management.

Our financial statements are prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Revenue Recognition for Interest Income. We recognize interest income from investments in commercial mortgages, mezzanine loans, and other securities on a yield to maturity basis. Upon the acquisition of a loan at a discount, we assess the portions of the discount that constitute accretable yields and non-accretable differences. The accretable yield represents the excess of our expected cash flows from the loan over the amount we paid for

46

the loan. That amount, the accretable yield, is accreted to interest income over the remaining life of the loan. Many of our commercial mortgages and mezzanine loans provide for the accrual of interest at specified rates which differ from current payment terms. Interest income is recognized on such loans at the accrual rate subject to management’s determination that accrued interest and outstanding principal are ultimately collectible.

For investments that we did not elect to record at fair value under FASB ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments”, origination fees and direct loan origination costs are deferred and amortized to net investment income, using the effective interest method, over the contractual life of the underlying loan security or loan, in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 310, “Receivables.”

For investments that we elected to record at fair value under FASB ASC Topic 825, origination fees and direct loan costs are recorded in income and are not deferred.

We recognize interest income from interests in certain securitized financial assets on an estimated effective yield to maturity basis. Management estimates the current yield on the amortized cost of the investment based on estimated cash flows after considering prepayment and credit loss experience.

Recognition of Rental Income. We generate rental income from tenant rent and other tenant-related activities at our consolidated real estate properties. For multi-family real estate properties, rental income is recorded when due from residents and recognized monthly as it is earned and realizable, under lease terms which are generally for periods of one year or less. For retail and office real estate properties, rental income is recognized on a straight-line basis from the later of the date of the commencement of the lease or the date of acquisition of the property subject to existing leases, which averages minimum rents over the terms of the leases. Leases also typically provide for tenant reimbursement of a portion of common area maintenance and other operating expenses to the extent that a tenant’s pro rata share of expenses exceeds a base year level set in the lease.

Recognition of Fees and other income. We generate fee and other income through our various subsidiaries by (a) providing ongoing asset management services to investment portfolios under cancelable management agreements, (b) providing or arranging to provide financing to our borrowers, (c) providing property management services to third parties, and (d) providing fixed income trading and advisory services to our customers. We recognize revenue for these activities when the fees are fixed or determinable, are evidenced by an arrangement, collection is reasonably assured and the services under the arrangement have been provided. While we may receive asset management fees when they are earned, we eliminate earned asset management fee income from securitizations while such securitizations are consolidated. During the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009, we received $5.2 million, $6.3 million, and $16.1 million, respectively, of earned asset management fees associated with consolidated securitizations, of which we eliminated $3.8 million, $2.8 million, and $7.0 million, respectively, of management fee income with consolidated securitizations.

Investments in Loans. We invest in commercial mortgages, mezzanine loans, debt securities and other loans. We account for our investments in commercial mortgages, mezzanine loans and other loans at amortized cost. The carrying value of these investments is adjusted for origination discounts/premiums, nonrefundable fees and direct costs for originating loans which are amortized into income on a level yield basis over the terms of the loans.

Allowance for Losses, Impaired Loans and Non-accrual Status. We maintain an allowance for losses on our investments in commercial mortgages, mezzanine loans and other loans. Management’s periodic evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance is based upon expected and inherent risks in the portfolio, the estimated value of underlying collateral, and current economic conditions. Management reviews loans for impairment and establishes specific reserves when a loss is probable and reasonably estimable under the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 310, “Receivables.” A loan is impaired when it is probable that we may not collect all principal and interest payments according to contractual terms. As part of the detailed loan review, we consider many factors about the specific loan, including payment history, asset performance, borrower’s financial capability and other characteristics. If any trends or characteristics indicate that it is probable that other loans, with similar

47

characteristics to those of impaired loans, have incurred a loss, we consider whether an allowance for loss is needed pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 450, “Contingencies.” Management evaluates loans for non-accrual status each reporting period. A loan is placed on non-accrual status when the loan payment deficiencies exceed 90 days. Payments received for non-accrual or impaired loans are applied to principal until the loan is removed from non-accrual status or no longer impaired. Past due interest is recognized on non-accrual loans when they are removed from non-accrual status and are making current interest payments. The allowance for losses is increased by charges to operations and decreased by charge-offs (net of recoveries). Management charges off loans when the investment is no longer realizable and legally discharged.

Investments in Real Estate. Investments in real estate are shown net of accumulated depreciation. We capitalize those costs that have been evaluated to improve the real property and depreciate those costs on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the asset. We depreciate real property using the following useful lives: buildings and improvements—30 to 40 years; furniture, fixtures, and equipment—5 to 10 years; and tenant improvements—shorter of the lease term or the life of the asset. Costs for ordinary maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred.

We acquire real estate assets either directly or through the conversion of our investments in loans into owned real estate. Acquisitions of real estate assets and any related intangible assets are recorded initially at fair value under FASB ASC Topic 805, “Business Combinations.” Fair value is determined by management based on market conditions and inputs at the time the asset is acquired. All expenses incurred to acquire a real estate asset are expensed as incurred.

Management reviews our investments in real estate for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The review of recoverability is based on an estimate of the future undiscounted cash flows (excluding interest charges) expected to result from the long-lived asset’s use and eventual disposition. These cash flows consider factors such as expected future operating income, trends and prospects, as well as the effects of leasing demand, competition and other factors. If impairment exists due to the inability to recover the carrying value of a long-lived asset, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the property.

Investments in Securities. We account for our investments in securities under FASB ASC Topic 320, “Investments—Debt and Equity Securities”, and designate each investment security as a trading security, an available-for-sale security, or a held-to-maturity security based on our intent at the time of acquisition. Trading securities are recorded at their fair value each reporting period with fluctuations in fair value reported as a component of earnings. Available-for-sale securities are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value reported as a component of other comprehensive income (loss). We classify certain available-for-sale securities as trading securities when we elect to record them under the fair value option in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments.” See “Fair Value of Financial Instruments.” Upon the sale of an available-for-sale security, the realized gain or loss on the sale will be recorded as a component of earnings in the respective period. Held-to-maturity investments are carried at amortized cost at each reporting period.

We account for investments in securities where the transfer meets the criteria as a financing under FASB ASC Topic 860, “Transfers and Servicing”, at fair value. Our investments in security-related receivables represent securities that were transferred to issuers of collateralized debt obligations, or CDOs, in which the transferors maintained some level of continuing involvement. We use our judgment to determine whether an investment in securities has sustained an other-than-temporary decline in value. If management determines that an investment in securities has sustained an other-than-temporary decline in its value, the investment is written down to its fair value by a charge to earnings, and we establish a new cost basis for the investment. Our evaluation of an other-than-temporary decline is dependent on the specific facts and circumstances. Factors that we consider in determining whether an other-than-temporary decline in value has occurred include: the estimated fair value of the investment in relation to our cost basis; the financial condition of the related entity; and the intent and ability to retain the investment for a sufficient period of time to allow for recovery of the fair value of the investment.

48

We use our judgment to determine whether an investment in securities has sustained an other-than-temporary decline in value. If management determines that an investment in securities has sustained an other-than-temporary decline in its value, the investment is written down to its fair value by a charge to earnings, and we establish a new cost basis for the investment. Our evaluation of an other-than-temporary decline is dependent on the specific facts and circumstances. Factors that we consider in determining whether an other-than-temporary decline in value has occurred include: the estimated fair value of the investment in relation to our cost basis; the financial condition of the related entity; and the intent and ability to retain the investment for a sufficient period of time to allow for recovery of the fair value of the investment.

Transfers of Financial Assets. We account for transfers of financial assets under FASB ASC Topic 860, “Transfers and Servicing”, as either sales or financings. Transfers of financial assets that result in sales accounting are those in which (1) the transfer legally isolates the transferred assets from the transferor, (2) the transferee has the right to pledge or exchange the transferred assets and no condition both constrains the transferee’s right to pledge or exchange the assets and provides more than a trivial benefit to the transferor, and (3) the transferor does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets. If the transfer does not meet these criteria, the transfer is accounted for as a financing. Financial assets that are treated as sales are removed from our accounts with any realized gain (loss) reflected in earnings during the period of sale. Financial assets that are treated as financings are maintained on the balance sheet with proceeds received from the legal transfer reflected as securitized borrowings, or security-related receivables.

Derivative Instruments. We may use derivative financial instruments to hedge all or a portion of the interest rate risk associated with our borrowings. Certain of the techniques used to hedge exposure to interest rate fluctuations may also be used to protect against declines in the market value of assets that result from general trends in debt markets. The principal objective of such agreements is to minimize the risks and/or costs associated with our operating and financial structure as well as to hedge specific anticipated transactions.

In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging”, we measure each derivative instrument (including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts) at fair value and record such amounts in our consolidated balance sheet as either an asset or liability. For derivatives designated as fair value hedges, derivatives not designated as hedges, or for derivatives designated as cash flow hedges associated with debt for which we elected the fair value option under FASB ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments”, the changes in fair value of the derivative instrument are recorded in earnings. For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, the changes in the fair value of the effective portions of the derivative are reported in other comprehensive income. Changes in the ineffective portions of cash flow hedges are recognized in earnings.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments. In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Where available, fair value is based on observable market prices or parameters or derived from such prices or parameters. Where observable prices or inputs are not available, valuation models are applied. These valuation techniques involve management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the price transparency for the instruments or market and the instruments’ complexity for disclosure purposes. Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their value. Hierarchical levels, as defined in FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” and directly related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to fair valuations of these assets and liabilities, are as follows:

• Level 1: Valuations are based on unadjusted, quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date. The types of assets carried at level 1 fair value generally are equity securities listed in active markets. As such, valuations of these investments do not entail a significant degree of judgment.

49

• Level 2: Valuations are based on quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets or quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active or for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly.

Fair value assets and liabilities that are generally included in this category are unsecured REIT note receivables, commercial mortgage-backed securities, or CMBS, receivables and certain financial instruments classified as derivatives where the fair value is based on observable market inputs.

• Level 3: Inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls has been determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset. Generally, assets and liabilities carried at fair value and included in this category are trust preferred securities, or TruPS, and subordinated debentures, trust preferred obligations and CDO notes payable where observable market inputs do not exist.

The availability of observable inputs can vary depending on the financial asset or liability and is affected by a wide variety of factors, including, for example, the type of investment, whether the investment is new, whether the investment is traded on an active exchange or in the secondary market, and the current market condition. To the extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. Accordingly, the degree of judgment exercised by us in determining fair value is greatest for instruments categorized in level 3.

Fair value is a market-based measure considered from the perspective of a market participant who holds the asset or owes the liability rather than an entity-specific measure. Therefore, even when market assumptions are not readily available, our own assumptions are set to reflect those that management believes market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. We use prices and inputs that management believes are current as of the measurement date, including during periods of market dislocation. In periods of market dislocation, the observability of prices and inputs may be reduced for many instruments. This condition could cause an instrument to be transferred from Level 1 to Level 2 or Level 2 to Level 3.

Many financial instruments have bid and ask prices that can be observed in the marketplace. Bid prices reflect the highest price that we and others are willing to pay for an asset. Ask prices represent the lowest price that we and others are willing to accept for an asset. For financial instruments whose inputs are based on bid-ask prices, we do not require that fair value always be a predetermined point in the bid-ask range. Our policy is to allow for mid-market pricing and adjusting to the point within the bid-ask range that results in our best estimate of fair value.

Fair value for certain of our Level 3 financial instruments is derived using internal valuation models. These internal valuation models include discounted cash flow analyses developed by management using current interest rates, estimates of the term of the particular instrument, specific issuer information and other market data for securities without an active market. In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, the impact of our own credit spreads is also considered when measuring the fair value of financial assets or liabilities, including derivative contracts. Where appropriate, valuation adjustments are made to account for various factors, including bid-ask spreads, credit quality and market liquidity. These adjustments are applied on a consistent basis and are based on observable inputs where available. Management’s estimate of fair value requires significant management judgment and is subject to a high degree of variability based upon market conditions, the availability of specific issuer information and management’s assumptions.

For further discussion on fair value of our financial instruments, see “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. Note 8: Fair Value of Financial Instruments.”

50

Recent Accounting Pronouncements. On January 1, 2010, we adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-06, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements.” This accounting standard requires new disclosures for significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and 2 fair value measurements and a description of the reasons for the transfer. This accounting standard also updates existing disclosures by providing fair value measurement disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities and provides disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. For Level 3 fair value measurements, new disclosures will require entities to present information separately for purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements. These disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

On January 1, 2011, we adopted ASU No. 2010-29, “Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations.” This accounting standard requires that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. This accounting standard also expands the supplemental pro forma disclosures under FASB ASU Topic 805, “Business Combinations” to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. The adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In April 2011, the FASB issued accounting standards classified under FASB ASC Topic 310, “Receivables”. This accounting standard amends existing guidance to provide additional guidance on the determination of whether a creditor has granted a concession and whether a debtor is experiencing financial difficulties for purposes of determining whether a restructuring constitutes a troubled debt restructuring. This standard is effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after June 15, 2011, and should be applied retrospectively to the beginning of the annual period of adoption. The adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In April 2011, the FASB issued an accounting standard classified under FASB ASC Topic 860, “Transfers and Servicing”. This accounting standard amends existing guidance to improve the accounting for repurchase agreements and other agreements that both entitle and obligate a transferor to repurchase or redeem financial assets before their maturity. The transferor is deemed to have maintained effective control over the financial assets transferred (and thus must account for the transaction as a secured borrowing) if all of the following criteria are met: (a) the financial assets to be repurchased or redeemed are the same or substantially the same as those transferred, (b) the agreement is to repurchase or redeem them before maturity, at a fixed or determinable price, and (c) the agreement is entered into contemporaneously with, or in contemplation of, the transfer. This accounting standard is effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after December 15, 2011. Management is currently evaluating the impact that this standard may have on our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued an accounting standard classified under FASB ASC Topic 222, “Comprehensive Income”. This accounting standard amends existing guidance to improve the comparability, consistency, and transparency of financial reporting and to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income by requiring entities to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income in either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In addition, the entity is required to present on the face of the financial statements reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income in the statement(s) where the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income are presented. In December 2011, the FASB issued an accounting standard that deferred the new presentation requirements about reclassification adjustments. Both of these accounting standards are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods with those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. Management is currently evaluating the impact that these standards may have on our consolidated financial statements.

51

In December 2011, The FASB issued an accounting standard classified under FASB ASC Topic 360, “Property, Plant, and Equipment”. This accounting standard amends existing guidance to resolve the diversity in practice about whether the guidance for real estate sales applies to a parent that ceases to have a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary that is in substance real estate as a result of default on the subsidiary’s nonrecourse debt. This accounting standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods with those years, beginning on or after June 15, 2012. Management is currently evaluating the impact that these standards may have on our consolidated financial statements.

Assets Under Management

Assets under management, or AUM, is an operating measure representing the total assets that we own or are managing for third parties. While not all AUM generates fee income, it is an important operating measure to gauge our asset growth, volume of originations, size and scale of our operations and our performance. AUM includes our total investment portfolio and assets associated with unconsolidated securitizations for which we derive asset management fees.

The table below summarizes our AUM as of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands):

	AUM as of December 31, 2011		AUM as of December 31, 2010
Commercial real estate portfolio (1)	$	1,850,390	$	1,974,519
U.S. TruPS portfolio (2)		1,667,294		1,860,711
Total	$	3,517,684	$	3,835,230

(1) As of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, our commercial real estate portfolio was comprised of $0.9 billion and $1.1 billion of assets collateralizing RAIT I and RAIT II, $891.5 million and $839.2 million, respectively, of investments in real estate and $23.9 million and $30.4 million, respectively, of commercial mortgages, mezzanine loans and preferred equity interests that were not securitized.

(2) Our U.S. TruPS portfolio is comprised of assets collateralizing Taberna I, Taberna VIII, and Taberna IX, and includes TruPS and subordinated debentures, unsecured REIT note receivables, CMBS receivables, other securities, commercial mortgages and mezzanine loans.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Funds from Operations and Adjusted Funds from Operations

We believe that funds from operations, or FFO, and adjusted funds from operations, or AFFO, each of which are non-GAAP measures, are additional appropriate measures of the operating performance of a REIT and us in particular. We compute FFO in accordance with the standards established by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, as net income or loss allocated to common shares (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding real estate-related depreciation and amortization expense, gains or losses on sales of real estate and the cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles.

AFFO is a computation made by analysts and investors to measure a real estate company’s cash flow generated by operations. We calculate AFFO by adding to or subtracting from FFO: change in fair value of financial instruments; gains or losses on debt extinguishment; capital expenditures, net of any direct financing associated with those capital expenditures; straight-line rental effects; amortization of various deferred items and intangible assets; and share-based compensation.

Our calculation of AFFO differs from the methodology used for calculating AFFO by certain other REITs and, accordingly, our AFFO may not be comparable to AFFO reported by other REITs. Our management utilizes FFO and AFFO as measures of our operating performance, and believes they are also useful to investors, because

52

they facilitate an understanding of our operating performance after adjustment for certain non-cash items, such as real estate depreciation, share-based compensation and various other items required by GAAP that may not necessarily be indicative of current operating performance and that may not accurately compare our operating performance between periods. Furthermore, although FFO, AFFO and other supplemental performance measures are defined in various ways throughout the REIT industry, we also believe that FFO and AFFO may provide us and our investors with an additional useful measure to compare our financial performance to certain other REITs.

Neither FFO nor AFFO is equivalent to net income or cash generated from operating activities determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Furthermore, FFO and AFFO do not represent amounts available for management’s discretionary use because of needed capital replacement or expansion, debt service obligations or other commitments or uncertainties. Neither FFO nor AFFO should be considered as an alternative to net income as an indicator of our operating performance or as an alternative to cash flow from operating activities as a measure of our liquidity.

Set forth below is a reconciliation of FFO and AFFO to net income (loss) allocable to common shares for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009 (in thousands, except share information):

	For the Years Ended December 31
	2011			2010			2009
Funds From Operations:
Net income (loss) allocable to common shares	$	(51,130	)	$	98,152		$	(441,203	)
Adjustments:
Real estate depreciation and amortization		28,407			28,878			21,854
(Gains) losses on the sale of real estate		98			1,682			(858	)
Funds From Operations	$	(22,625	)	$	128,712		$	(420,207	)
Weighted-average shares—diluted		38,508,086			29,417,337			21,735,078
Adjusted Funds From Operations:
Funds From Operations	$	(22,625	)	$	128,712		$	(420,207	)
Adjustments:
Change in fair value of financial instruments		75,154			(45,840	)		(1,563	)
(Gains) losses on debt extinguishment		(15,001	)		(71,575	)		(115,869	)
Capital expenditures, net of direct financing		(1,868	)		(1,233	)		(994	)
Straight-line rental adjustments		(3,227	)		(72	)		149
Amortization of deferred items and intangible assets		3,823			(65	)		7,847
Share-based compensation		541			2,949			3,830
Adjusted Funds From Operations	$	36,797		$	12,876		$	(526,807	)
Weighted-average shares—diluted		38,508,086			29,417,337			21,735,078

53

REIT Taxable Income

To qualify as a REIT, we are required to make annual dividends to our shareholders in an amount at least equal to 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gains. In addition, to avoid certain U.S. federal excise taxes, we are required to make dividends to our shareholders in an amount at least equal to 90% of our REIT taxable income for each year. Because we expect to make dividends based on the foregoing requirements, and not based on our earnings computed in accordance with GAAP, we expect that our dividends may at times be more or less than our reported earnings as computed in accordance with GAAP.

Our board of trustees monitors RAIT’s REIT taxable income and all available net operating losses not utilized in prior years. In May 2011, our board reinstated our regular quarterly dividends on our common shares. Our board of trustees reserves the right to change its dividend policy at any time or from time to time in its sole discretion but expects to continue to declare dividends in at least the amount necessary to maintain RAIT’s REIT status.

Total taxable income and REIT taxable income are non-GAAP financial measurements, and do not purport to be an alternative to reported net income determined in accordance with GAAP as a measure of operating performance or to cash flows from operating activities determined in accordance with GAAP as a measure of liquidity. Our total taxable income represents the aggregate amount of taxable income generated by us and by our domestic and foreign TRSs. REIT taxable income is calculated under U.S. federal tax laws in a manner that, in certain respects, differs from the calculation of net income pursuant to GAAP. REIT taxable income excludes the undistributed taxable income of our domestic TRSs, which is not included in REIT taxable income until distributed to us. Subject to TRS value limitations, there is no requirement that our domestic TRSs distribute their earnings to us. REIT taxable income, however, generally includes the taxable income of our foreign TRSs because we will generally be required to recognize and report our taxable income on a current basis. Since we are structured as a REIT and the Internal Revenue Code requires that we distribute substantially all of our net taxable income in the form of dividends to our shareholders, we believe that presenting the information management uses to calculate REIT net taxable income is useful to investors in understanding the amount of the minimum dividends that we must make to our shareholders so as to comply with the rules set forth in the Internal Revenue Code. Because not all companies use identical calculations, this presentation of total taxable income and REIT taxable income may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures as determined and reported by other companies.

54

The table below reconciles the differences between reported net income (loss), total taxable income and estimated REIT taxable income for the three years ended December 31, 2011 (dollars in thousands):

	For the Years Ended December 31
	2011			2010			2009
Net income (loss), as reported	$	(37,710	)	$	110,913		$	(440,981	)
Add (deduct):
Provision for losses		3,900			38,307			226,567
Charge-offs on allowance for losses		(27,509	)		(47,787	)		(152,014	)
Domestic TRS book-to-total taxable income differences:
Income tax provision (benefit)		(538	)		1,602			(958	)
Stock compensation, forfeitures and other temporary tax differences		1,893			93			829
Capital losses not offsetting capital gains and other temporary tax differences		0			(7,938	)		0
Asset impairments		0			0			46,015
Capital losses not offsetting capital gains and other temporary tax differences		0			108			377,096
Change in fair value of financial instruments, net of noncontrolling interests (1)		75,154			(45,840	)		(23,822	)
Amortization of intangible assets		560			822			1,407
CDO investments aggregate book-to-taxable income differences (2)		(49,454	)		(50,768	)		(69,314	)
Accretion of (premiums) discounts		0			0			1,232
Other book to tax differences		(237	)		5,347			(2,520	)
Total taxable income (loss)		(33,941	)		4,859			(36,463	)
Taxable (income) loss attributable to domestic TRS entities		9,032			6,113			(4,051	)
Dividends paid by domestic TRS entities		45			14,000			5,013
Deductible preferred dividends		0			(13,641	)		0
Estimated REIT taxable income (loss) (3)	$	(24,864	)	$	11,331		$	(35,501	)

(1) Change in fair value of financial instruments is reported net of allocation to noncontrolling interests of $(22,259) for the year ended December 31, 2009.

(2) Amounts reflect the aggregate book-to-taxable income differences and are primarily comprised of (a) unrealized gains on interest rate hedges within CDO entities that Taberna consolidated, (b) amortization of original issue discounts and debt issuance costs and (c) differences in tax year-ends between Taberna and its CDO investments.

(3) As of December 31, 2011, RAIT has an estimated net operating loss carry-forward of approximately $52.7 million that may be used to offset its REIT taxable income in the future.

During 2011, our common shares were listed under two CUSIPs: CUSIP # 749227104 from January 1, 2011 through the effective date on June 30, 2011 of our 1-for-3 reverse stock split on our common shares and CUSIP # 749227609 from July 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011. The information provided for the dividend paid on January 31, 2011 has not been adjusted for the reverse stock split. For the year ended December 31, 2011, the tax classification of our dividends on common shares was as follows:

CUSIP #	Declaration Date		Record Date		Payment Date		Dividend Paid			Ordinary Income		Qualified Dividend		Return of Capital
749227104		1/10/2011		1/21/2011		1/31/2011	$	0.03	(a)	$	0.03	$	0.03	$	0.00
Total CUSIP # 749227104							$	0.03		$	0.03	$	0.03	$	0.00
749227609		5/17/2011		7/8/2011		7/29/2011	$	0.06		$	0.00	$	0.00	$	0.06
749227609		9/13/2011		10/7/2011		10/31/2011		0.06			0.00		0.00		0.06
Total CUSIP #749227609							$	0.12		$	0.00	$	0.00	$	0.12

(a) Included in the dividend paid on January 31, 2011, is a pass through of AMT preference items in the amount of $0.01 per share. The AMT preference item should be reported as an adjustment on your appropriate AMT tax form.

55

The preferred dividends that we paid in 2011 were classified as a return of capital.

For the year ended December 31, 2010, we declared a $0.09 per common share dividend, split adjusted, in 2011. For tax reporting purposes, this dividend will be taxable to common shareholders in 2011. The preferred dividends that we paid in 2010 were classified as an ordinary dividend, including a qualified dividend component, for those shareholders who held our preferred shares for the entire year.

For the year ended December 31, 2009, we did not pay any common dividends. For tax reporting purposes, the preferred dividends that we paid in 2010 were classified as 100% return of capital for those shareholders who held our preferred shares for the entire year.

Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 2011 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2010

Revenue

Interest income. Interest income decreased $21.6 million, or 14.0%, to $132.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $154.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. Generally, our interest income has declined, when compared to the year ended December 31, 2010, as a result of a decrease in our average investments in loans and securities. Our average investments in loans and securities declined from $2.0 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 to $1.5 billion during the year ended December 31, 2011. This decline was primarily caused by:

• principal repayments of $214.0 million on our investments in loans and $77.3 million from our investments in securities since December 31, 2010 and

• conversion of $115.1 million of loans to owned real estate since December 31, 2010,

This decline in our investments was offset by new investments totaling $104.1 million during 2011.

Furthermore, the reduction in interest income is also due to a decrease in the weighted-average interest rates on our investments in loans from 7.70% as of December 31, 2010 to 7.24% as of December 31, 2011. This is due to a broad decrease in interest rates during 2011 as well as prepayments from loans with higher interest rates during 2011.

Rental income. Rental income increased $19.5 million to $91.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $72.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. The increase is attributable to $6.5 million of rental income from 11 new properties acquired or consolidated since December 31, 2010, $6.6 million of additional rental income in 2011 from 13 properties acquired during the year ended December 31, 2010 which were present for all of 2011 and improved occupancy and rental rates in 2011 as compared to 2010.

Fee and other income. Fee and other income decreased $8.3 million, or 45.6%, to $9.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $18.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. Collateral management and restructuring fee income decreased $2.1 million and $2.2 million, respectively, due to the sale or delegation of our collateral management rights on eight Taberna securitizations during April 2010. Additionally, riskless trade and brokerage fee income decreased $1.5 million and property reimbursement and management fee income decreased $2.1 million primarily due to lower expenses at managed properties.

Expenses

Interest expense. Interest expense decreased $7.1 million, or 7.3%, to $89.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $96.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. The decrease is primarily attributable to repurchases of $140.0 million of our 6.875% convertible senior notes, $23.7 million of our CDO

56

notes payable and the repayment of $64 million of senior secured notes, offset by additional interest cost and discount amortization expense incurred for the issuance of new debt instruments since December 31, 2010. Additionally, we repaid $26.5 million of our secured credit facilities.

Real estate operating expense. Real estate operating expense increased $4.0 million to $55.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $51.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. The increase is attributable to $2.7 million of operating expenses from 11 new properties acquired or consolidated since December 31, 2010 and $1.3 million from 13 properties acquired during the year ended December 31, 2010 which were present for all of 2011.

Compensation expense. Compensation expense decreased $4.7 million, or 16.4%, to $24.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $28.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. This decrease was related to decreased salaries and benefits expenses of $1.0 million and reduced stock based compensation expense of $2.4 million as several awards were fully vested in 2010 and no corresponding awards were made in 2011.

General and administrative expense. General and administrative expense decreased $0.8 million, or 4.4%, to $17.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $18.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. Expenses for professional fees related to legal, tax, and audit services declined $1.4 million and insurance expenses decreased by $0.4 million. These decreases were offset by $0.9 million of acquisition expenses related to the acquisition and development of our non-traded public REIT, IRT.

Provision for losses. The provision for losses relates to our investments in our commercial mortgage loan portfolios. The provision for losses decreased by $34.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 to $3.9 million as compared to $38.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. The decrease is attributable to the improved performance of our commercial real estate loan portfolio during 2011 as compared to 2010. At December 31, 2011 we had $73.8 million of investment in loans on non-accrual, down from $143.2 million of investments in loans on non-accrual as of December 31, 2010. While we believe we have properly reserved for the probable losses in our portfolio, we continually monitor our portfolio for evidence of loss and accrue additional provisions for loan losses as circumstances or conditions change.

Depreciation and amortization expense. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $0.8 million to $29.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $28.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. This increase was primarily attributable to $1.5 million of depreciation expense relating to 11 new properties acquired or consolidated since December 31, 2010 and $0.6 million from 13 properties acquired or consolidated during the year ended December 31, 2010 present for a full year of operations. These increases were offset by a $1.3 million decrease due to the full amortization of certain corporate fixed assets as well as those at properties acquired or consolidated prior to January 1, 2010.

Interest and other income (expense)

Gains (Losses) on sale of assets. Gains on sale of assets were $6.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2011. The gains relate to $5.2 million from the sale of bonds and other investment securities, $2.9 million from the sale of certain loans to a securitization, and $0.2 million from a sold property. These gains were offset by losses of $1.9 million from the disposition of four loans from our consolidated CRE securitizations.

Gains on extinguishment of debt. Gains on extinguishment of debt during the year ended December 31, 2011 are attributable to the repurchase of $6.7 million principal amount of RAIT I and $17.0 million principal amount of RAIT II debt notes from the market for $7.8 million of cash. As a result of these repurchases we recorded gains on extinguishment of debt of $15.9 million. These gains were partially offset by repurchases of $140.0 million in aggregate principal amount of our 6.875% convertible senior notes due April 2027. The notes were repurchased for $138.6 million of cash. As a result of these repurchases, we recorded losses on extinguishment of debt of $0.9 million, including the write-off of associated deferred financing costs and debt discounts.

57

Change in fair value of financial instruments. The change in fair value of financial instruments pertains to the majority of our assets within our investments in securities and any related CDO notes payable and derivative instruments used to finance such assets. During the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the fair value adjustments we recorded were as follows (dollars in thousands):

Description	For the Year Ended December 31, 2011			For the Year Ended December 31, 2010
Change in fair value of trading securities and security-related receivables	$	19,281		$	111,873
Change in fair value of CDO notes payable, trust preferred obligations and other liabilities		(35,491	)		(26,882	)
Change in fair value of derivatives		(58,944	)		(39,151	)
Change in fair value of financial instruments	$	(75,154	)	$	45,840

Discontinued operations. Income from discontinued operations increased $0.4 million to $0.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. The increase is attributable to the timing of properties acquired, sold, or deconsolidated during the respective periods. Included in discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2011 is $0.7 million of net income from a sold property.

Year Ended December 31, 2010 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2009

Revenue

Interest income. Interest income decreased $228.0 million, or 59.7%, to $154.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 from $382.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. This net decrease was primarily attributable to decreases in interest income of: $80.9 million resulting from the disposition of the Taberna Preferred Funding III, Ltd., or Taberna III, Taberna Preferred Funding IV, Ltd., or Taberna IV, Taberna Preferred Funding VI, Ltd, or Taberna VI, and Taberna Preferred Funding VII, Ltd., or Taberna VII, securitizations in June 2009 and $106.5 million resulting from the disposition of the residential mortgage portfolio in July 2009. The remaining decrease primarily resulted from $141.2 million of commercial real estate loans that were converted to owned real estate since December 31, 2009, $348.9 million in total principal amount of investments on non-accrual status as of December 31, 2010 compared to $304.0 million as of December 31, 2009, and the reduction in short-term LIBOR of approximately 0.3% during the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the year ended December 31, 2009.

Rental income. Rental income increased $27.8 million to $72.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 from $44.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. This increase was primarily attributable to: (i) $7.5 million of rental income from 13 new properties, with direct real estate investments of $143.6 million, acquired or consolidated since December 31, 2009; (ii) $16.0 million in rental income from properties that were acquired in 2009 and present for a full year in 2010; and (iii) $4.2 million in rental income resulting from an increase in occupancy for properties present for a full year of operations in 2010.

Fee and other income. Fee and other income decreased $8.3 million, or 31.2%, to $18.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 from $26.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. We received $4.1 million and $3.5 million of fee income from our restructuring advisory and collateral management services, respectively, compared to $9.9 million and $9.1 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2009. This decrease of $11.3 million is primarily attributable to the sale or delegation of our collateral management rights and responsibilities relating to eight Taberna securitizations during April 2010. These decreases were offset by an increase of $1.7 million of property management fees and reimbursement income associated with our property management activities, $1.0 million of income from trading activities at RAIT Securities, LLC, and $0.3 million of other income.

58

Expenses

Interest expense. Interest expense decreased $165.1 million, or 63.1%, to $96.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 from $261.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. This net decrease was primarily attributable to decreases in interest expense of: $43.6 million resulting from the disposition of the Taberna III, Taberna IV, Taberna VI and Taberna VII securitizations in June 2009 and $98.6 million resulting from the disposition of the residential mortgage portfolio in July 2009. The remaining decrease is primarily attributable to repurchases of our convertible senior notes of $102.8 million and the effect on our floating rate indebtedness from the reduction in short-term LIBOR of approximately 0.3% during the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the year ended December 31, 2009.

Real estate operating expense. Real estate operating expense increased $16.1 million to $51.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 from $35.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. This increase was primarily attributable: (i) $4.5 million from 13 new properties, with direct real estate investments of $143.6 million, acquired or consolidated since December 31, 2009, (ii) $10.3 million from properties that were acquired in 2009 and present for a full-year in 2010 and (iii) $0.7 million from properties that were acquired prior to 2009 and present for a full year in 2010.

Compensation expense. Compensation expense increased $1.1 million, or 4.2%, to $28.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 from $27.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. This increase was primarily due to an increase in salary and bonus compensation costs of $2.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2010 associated with Jupiter Communities LLC. Jupiter Communities was acquired on May 1, 2009 and was present for a full-year in 2010. This increase was partially offset by lower salary, bonus and other compensation costs associated with our historical business activities.

General and administrative expense. General and administrative expense decreased $3.6 million, or 16.3%, to $18.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 from $21.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. This decrease is primarily due to a $1.8 million decrease in consulting and professional fees, a $0.7 million decrease in securitization related trustee and rating agency costs associated with the four Taberna securitizations that we deconsolidated in June 2009, and a $1.0 million decrease in rent expense.

Provision for losses. The provision for losses decreased by $188.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 to $38.3 million as compared to $226.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. This decrease was primarily attributable to $96.5 million of provision for losses related to our residential mortgage portfolio during the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2009. This portfolio of residential mortgages were sold in July 2009. The remaining decrease of $91.8 million is attributable to improved performance of our commercial real estate loan portfolio during 2010 as compared to 2009. At December 31, 2010, we had $122.3 million of commercial real estate loans on non-accrual, down from $171.4 million of commercial real estate non-accrual loans as of December 31, 2009. This reduction in non-accrual loans, combined with reduced 60-day or greater delinquencies in the commercial real estate loan portfolio year over year and improvements in commercial real estate fundamentals in 2010 reduced our provisions for loan losses during 2010. While we believe we have adequately reserved for the probable losses in our portfolio, we continually monitor our portfolio for evidence of loss and accrue additional provisions for loan losses as circumstances or conditions change.

Depreciation and amortization expense. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $7.6 million to $28.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 from $21.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. This increase was primarily attributable to 13 new properties, with direct real estate investments of $143.6 million, acquired or consolidated since December 31, 2009 as well as increased depreciation of capital expenditures since December 31, 2009 associated with our owned properties. These increases were offset by a decrease of $0.6 million from a reduction of intangible assets by $6.2 million associated with the sale of our collateral management rights in eight Taberna securitizations during April 2010.

59

Other Income (Expense)

Gains (losses) on sale of assets. Gains on sale of assets were $11.6 million during the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2010. The gains on sale of assets are primarily attributable to the sale or delegation of our collateral management rights and responsibilities relating to eight Taberna securitizations to an affiliate of certain funds managed by an affiliate of Fortress Investment Group LLC for $16.5 million. These securitizations were not consolidated by us and were comprised of Taberna Preferred Funding II, Ltd., or Taberna II, Taberna III, Taberna IV, Taberna Preferred Funding V, Ltd., or Taberna V, Taberna VI, Taberna VII, Taberna Europe CDO I, P.L.C., or Taberna Europe I, and Taberna Europe CDO II, P.L.C., or Taberna Europe II. This transaction generated a $7.9 million gain on sale of assets. In addition, we disposed of $11.4 million in total principal amount of unsecured REIT note receivables in our CRE securitizations and recorded a gain of $3.8 million. Losses on sales of assets were $376.8 million during the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2009. Losses on sale of assets are primarily attributable to the deconsolidation of the Taberna III, Taberna IV, Taberna VI and Taberna VII securitizations. On June 25, 2009, we sold all of our equity interests and a portion of our non-investment grade debt that we owned in these four securitizations and concluded that we were no longer the primary beneficiary of the securitizations and, therefore, we deconsolidated the securitizations in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 810, “Consolidation”. During the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2009, we sold all of our retained interests in our six residential mortgage securitizations and recorded losses on sales of assets of $61.8 million.

Gains on extinguishment of debt. Gains on extinguishment of debt during the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2010 are attributable to the repurchase of $102.8 million in aggregate principal amount of convertible senior notes and $55.0 million in aggregate principal amount of CDO notes payable. The aggregate debt was repurchased from the market for 18.9 million of our common shares, the issuance of a $22.0 million senior secured convertible note and $27.7 million of cash. As a result of these repurchases, we recorded gains on extinguishment of debt of $71.6 million.

Change in fair value of financial instruments. The change in fair value of financial instruments pertains to the majority of our assets within our investments in securities and any related CDO notes payable and derivative instruments used to finance such assets. During the twelve-month periods ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the fair value adjustments we recorded were as follows (dollars in thousands):

	For the Year Ended December 31
Description	2010			2009
Change in fair value of trading securities and security-related receivables	$	111,873		$	(158,273	)
Change in fair value of CDO notes payable, trust preferred obligations and other liabilities		(26,882	)		153,459
Change in fair value of derivatives		(39,151	)		6,377
Change in fair value of financial instruments	$	45,840		$	1,563

Income tax benefit (provision). We maintain several domestic and foreign TRS entities that are subject to U.S. federal, state and local income taxes and foreign taxes. For the year ended December 31, 2010, the total provision for income taxes was $1.6 million, an increase of $2.6 million from a benefit of $1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. This increase of $2.6 million is attributable to a $2.5 million provision we recorded in connection with the settlement of an IRS audit associated with our subsidiary TCM and certain transfer pricing deductions it made during 2006 through 2008. The settlement was reached in 2011 and was offset by the benefit of net operating losses generated by TCM during 2008. The settlement will require a net cash payment of approximately $0.3 million.

Discontinued operations. Income from discontinued operations increased $1.1 million to $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to a loss of $0.8 million for the twelve-month period ended

60

December 31, 2009 primarily due to the timing of properties acquired, sold or deconsolidated during the respective periods. Included in discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2010 are: (i) a loss of $2.9 million on a VIE that was deconsolidated in August 2010 offset by; (ii) a gain of $0.3 million on a property that was sold in March 2010; and (iii) a net gain of $1.0 million on two properties that were sold in December 2010.

Securitization Summary

Overview. We have used securitizations to match fund the interest rates and maturities of our assets with the interest rates and maturities of the related financing. This strategy has helped us reduce interest rate and funding risks on our portfolios for the long-term. A securitization is a structure in which multiple classes of debt and equity are issued by a special purpose entity to finance a portfolio of assets. Cash flow from the portfolio of assets is used to repay the securitization liabilities sequentially, in order of seniority. The most senior classes of debt typically have credit ratings of “AAA” through “BBB–” and therefore can be issued at yields that are lower than the average yield of the securities backing the securitization. The debt tranches are typically rated based on portfolio quality, diversification and structural subordination. The equity securities issued by the securitization are the “first loss” piece of the capital structure, but they are entitled to all residual amounts available for payment after the obligations to the debt holders have been satisfied. Unlike typical securitization structures, the underlying assets in our securitization pool may be sold or repaid, subject to certain limitations, without a corresponding pay-down of the securitization debt, provided the proceeds are reinvested in qualifying assets.

We manage five securitizations with varying amounts of retained or residual interests held by us. Four of these securitizations are consolidated in our financial statements as follows: RAIT I, RAIT II, Taberna VIII and Taberna IX. The assets and liabilities of RAIT I and RAIT II are presented at amortized cost in our consolidated financial statements. The assets and liabilities of Taberna VIII and Taberna IX are presented at fair value in our consolidated financial statements pursuant to the fair value option. We manage the fifth securitization, Taberna I, but do not consolidate it in our financial statements because we are not the primary beneficiary of the securitization.

Securitization Performance. Our securitizations contain interest coverage and overcollateralization triggers, or OC Triggers, that must be met in order for us to receive our subordinated management fees and our lower-rated debt or residual equity returns. If the interest coverage or OC triggers are not met in a given period, then the cash flows are redirected from lower rated tranches and used to repay the principal amounts to the senior tranches of CDO notes payable. These conditions and the re-direction of cash flow continue until the triggers are met by curing the underlying payment defaults, paying down the CDO notes payable or other actions permitted under the relevant securitization indenture.

As of the most recent payment information, the Taberna I, Taberna VIII and Taberna IX securitizations that we manage were not passing all of their required interest coverage or OC triggers and we received only senior asset management fees. While events of default do not currently exist in the securitizations that we manage, we are unable to predict with certainty which securitizations, in the future, will experience events of default or which, if any, remedies the appropriate note holders may seek to exercise in the future. All applicable interest coverage and OC triggers continue to be met for our two commercial real estate securitizations, RAIT I and RAIT II, and we continue to receive all of our management fees, interest and residual returns from these securitizations. During 2010, we reduced the amount of debt issued by our two commercial real estate securitizations, RAIT I and RAIT II, by cancelling $37.5 million in aggregate principal amount of non-recourse debt issued by those securitizations that we held.

A summary of the investments in our consolidated securitizations as of the most recent payment information is as follows (dollars in millions):

• RAIT I—RAIT I has $1.0 billion of total collateral, of which $19.0 million is defaulted. The current overcollateralization (O/C) test is passing at 127.4% with an O/C trigger of 116.2%. We currently own

61

$43.7 million of the securities that were originally rated investment grade and $200.0 million of the non-investment grade securities issued by this securitization. We are currently receiving all distributions required by the terms of our retained interests in this securitization and are receiving all of our collateral management fees. In October 2011, we pledged $43.7 million of the securities we own of RAIT I as collateral for a senior secured note we issued.

• RAIT II—RAIT II has $822.7 million of total collateral, of which $4.2 million is defaulted. The current O/C test is passing at 119.1% with an O/C trigger of 111.7%. We currently own $108.5 million of the securities that were originally rated investment grade and $140.7 million of the non-investment grade securities issued by this securitization. We are currently receiving all distributions required by the terms of our retained interests in this securitization and are receiving all of our collateral management fees. In October 2011, we pledged $104.0 million of the securities we own of RAIT II as collateral for a senior secured note we issued.

• Taberna VIII—Taberna VIII has $548.2 million of total collateral, of which $53.8 million is defaulted. The current overcollateralization (O/C) test is failing at 84.1% with an O/C trigger of 103.5%. We currently own $40.0 million of the securities that were originally rated investment grade and $93.0 million of the non-investment grade securities issued by this securitization. We do not expect to receive any distributions from this securitization other than our senior management fees for the foreseeable future.

• Taberna IX—Taberna IX has $595.4 million of total collateral, of which $127.5 million is defaulted. The current O/C test is failing at 72.0% with an O/C trigger of 105.4%. We currently own $89.0 million of the securities that were originally rated investment grade and $97.5 million of the non-investment grade securities issued by this securitization. We do not expect to receive any distributions from this securitization other than our senior management fees for the foreseeable future.

Generally, our investments in the subordinated notes and equity securities in our consolidated securitizations are subordinate in right of payment and in liquidation to the senior notes issued by the securitizations. We may also own common shares, or the non-economic residual interest, in certain of the entities above.

Sponsored Companies

We continue to explore opportunities arising from sponsoring non-traded REITs and similar vehicles due to our capacity to originate and manage commercial real estate-related assets. We believe non-traded REITs and similar vehicles offer new funding sources to raise equity capital through independent broker-dealer networks which will benefit RAIT primarily by expanding our ability to originate assets that will generate us fee income and returns on our retained interests in these sponsored companies. We expect to benefit from any sponsored company from compensation we would receive in its offering, from managing its operations and in the event of its liquidation and any distributions on, or appreciation of, equity or other securities we may retain in it. We expect that a portion of our new investment activities will be conducted on behalf of these sponsored companies. To date, RAIT has sponsored Independence Realty Trust, Inc. and Independence Mortgage Trust, Inc. discussed below.

Many investment opportunities that are suitable for us may also be suitable for IRT, IMT or other public and private investment programs which we and our affiliates may sponsor or advise in the future. We will determine the program for which we believe each opportunity is most suitable. In the event that an investment opportunity becomes available that is equally suitable for us or one or more other investment programs managed or advised by us or our affiliates, the investment opportunity will be offered to the program that has had the longest period of time elapse since it was offered and accepted an investment opportunity. If a subsequent event or development causes any such investment opportunity to be more appropriate for another program, we may offer the investment opportunity to another program. If a program rejects a proposed acquisition, the investment opportunity will be offered to another program and the program rejecting the investment opportunity will be treated for future allocations as if it had not made the investment and will maintain its position as the program that has had the longest period of time elapse since it was offered and accepted an investment opportunity.

62

Independence Realty Trust, Inc.

On January 20, 2011, we acquired a development stage, non-traded public REIT and subsequently changed its name to Independence Realty Trust, Inc. We paid approximately $2.5 million for IRT and certain of its affiliated entities. IRT is currently a subsidiary of RAIT.

We expect IRT to raise capital for investing in multi-family commercial real estate assets and sponsored its public offering of its common stock. IRT plans to offer a minimum of $2,500,000 and a maximum of $1,095,000,000 in shares of its common stock in its offering. These shares are being offered on a best efforts basis and we cannot assure you whether IRT will be able to raise capital in its offering and, if so, when and how much. No amounts have been raised in IRT’s offering as of the date of this filing. Any disclosure concerning IRT is neither an offer nor a solicitation to purchase securities issued by IRT. We incurred expenses on IRT’s behalf in connection with this offering. Our ability to be reimbursed for these expenses will depend on the terms and success of the offering.

Our subsidiaries serve as the dealer-manager, external advisor and property manager of IRT. We have contributed seven multifamily properties with an aggregate purchase price of $133.3 million to IRT in exchange for the assumption by IRT of indebtedness associated with those properties of $64.6 million, $51.1 million of limited partner interests in IRT’s operating partnership, and $17.6 million in cash. Because IRT is currently our wholly-owned subsidiary, all transactions between us and IRT are eliminated in consolidation.

Independence Mortgage Trust, Inc.

We formed IMT in October 2011. We expect IMT to raise capital to originate, acquire and manage a portfolio of commercial real estate loans, CMBS and other commercial real estate-related securities and sponsored its public offering of its common stock. IMT plans to offer a minimum of $2,000,000 and a maximum of $1,650,000,000 in shares of its common stock in its offering. These shares are being offered on a best efforts basis and we cannot assure you whether IMT will be able to raise capital in its offering and, if so, when and how much. No amounts have been raised in IMT’s offering as of the date of this filing. Any disclosure concerning IMT is neither an offer nor a solicitation to purchase securities issued by IMT. We incurred expenses on IMT’s behalf in connection with this offering. Our ability to be reimbursed for these expenses will depend on the terms and success of the offering. Our subsidiaries serve as the dealer-manager and external advisor of IMT.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity is a measure of our ability to meet potential cash requirements, including ongoing commitments to repay borrowings, fund and maintain investments, pay dividends and other general business needs. Due to current market conditions, the cash flow to us from a number of the securitizations we sponsored has been reduced or eliminated. We are seeking to expand our use of short term financing and secured lines of credit while developing other financing resources that will permit us to originate or acquire new investments to generate attractive returns while preserving our capital, such as loan participations and joint venture financing arrangements and opportunities to sell CMBS eligible loans to CMBS issuers.

RAIT I and RAIT II, our consolidated securitizations collateralized by U.S. commercial real estate loans, continue to perform and make distributions on our retained interests and pay us management fees. In addition, the restricted cash in RAIT II from repayment of underlying loans and other sources can be used until June 2012 to make new investments held by RAIT II, including future funding commitments of existing investments. Distributions on our retained interests in RAIT I and RAIT II are our primary source of cash from our operations. We continue to explore strategies to generate liquidity from our investments in real estate and our investments in debt securities as we seek to focus on our commercial real estate lending platform.

We believe our available cash and restricted cash balances, other financing arrangements, and cash flows from operations will be sufficient to fund our liquidity requirements for the next 12 months. Should our liquidity

63

needs exceed our available sources of liquidity, we believe that we could sell assets to raise additional cash. We may not be able to obtain additional financing when we desire to do so, or may not be able to obtain desired financing on terms and conditions acceptable to us. If we fail to obtain additional financing, our ability to maintain or grow our business will be constrained.

Our primary cash requirements are as follows:

• to make investments and fund the associated costs;

• to repay our indebtedness, including repurchasing or retiring our debt before it becomes due;

• to pay our expenses, including compensation to our employees;

• to pay U.S. federal, state, and local taxes of our TRSs; and

• to distribute a minimum of 90% of our REIT taxable income and to make investments in a manner that enables us to maintain our qualification as a REIT.

We intend to meet these liquidity requirements primarily through the following:

• the use of our cash and cash equivalent balances of $29.7 million as of December 31, 2011;

• cash generated from operating activities, including net investment income from our investment portfolio, and fee income generated by our commercial real estate platform;

• proceeds from the sales of assets;

• proceeds from future borrowings; and

• proceeds from future offerings of our common and preferred shares, and Dividend Reinvestment and Share Purchase Plan, or DRSPP.

Our restricted cash balance was $278.6 million as of December 31, 2011. We have $121.5 million of restricted cash in RAIT II available to invest in qualifying commercial loans as of December 31, 2011, subject to $12.0 million of future funding commitments, leaving $109.5 million available to lend. This $121.5 million of restricted cash is not available to RAIT’s creditors. As of December 31, 2011, $83.8 million of restricted cash was held by Taberna VIII and Taberna IX. The remaining balance of our restricted cash relates to escrows associated with loans to our borrowers for real estate taxes and insurance.

During 2011, we have been focused on reducing our leverage and restructuring the terms of our debt. To date, we have completed the following transactions with respect to our outstanding indebtedness:

• We issued $115.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7.0% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2031, or the 7.0% convertible senior notes, in an underwritten public offering which included the full exercise of the overallotment option;

• We repaid, in full, our $15.7 million 10.0% senior secured note;

• We repaid, in full, a $16.2 million secured credit facility that was maturing in October 2011;

• We repaid, in full, our $43.0 million 12.5% senior secured note;

• We repurchased and retired $140.0 million of our 6.875% convertible senior notes, leaving $3.6 million outstanding as of December 31, 2011;

• We repurchased $23.7 million of our CDO notes payable issued by RAIT I and RAIT II securitizations;

64

• We amended our remaining secured credit facility repaying $9.0 million of the $19.5 million outstanding principal amount and amending the terms of the remaining $10.6 million balance to extend the maturity date from December 2011 to December 2016 and provide for the full amortization of that balance over that five year period. The amendment also reduced the interest rate from 4.5% to LIBOR plus 275 basis points;

• We refinanced $7.1 million of recourse first mortgage debt on owned real estate with non-recourse financing provided by our consolidated securitizations;

• In October 2011, we sold $60.9 million of CMBS eligible loans into a CMBS securitization and realized a $2.8 million gain on sale of assets;

• In October 2011, we issued $100.0 million of senior secured notes to Taberna VIII, a consolidated securitization, and received real estate related securities of equivalent value in exchange. The notes have a weighted-average coupon of 7.0% and a weighted-average maturity of 6.5 years; and

• As of December 31, 2011, we have $250.0 million of total capacity on two facilities for financing CMBS eligible loans.

We expect to continue to de-leverage in the future as capital availability and transaction terms provide attractive risk-adjusted returns.

Cash Flows

As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, we maintained cash and cash equivalents of $29.7 million and $27.2 million, respectively. Our cash and cash equivalents were generated from the following activities (dollars in thousands):

	For the Years Ended December 31
	2011			2010			2009
Cash flows from operating activities	$	(2,012	)	$	15,448		$	65,013
Cash flows from investing activities		93,886			62,898			253,004
Cash flows from financing activities		(89,384	)		(76,150	)		(320,446	)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		2,490			2,196			(2,429	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		27,230			25,034			27,463
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	29,720		$	27,230		$	25,034

Our principal source of net cash inflow historically has been our investing activities as loan repayments outpaced new investments in loans or real estate properties. The key drivers of increased cash inflows from our investing activities was our proceeds from loan repayments, asset sales, and dispositions of real estate totaling $359.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 as compared to $143.1 million for the same period in 2010. These increased cash inflows were partially offset by outflows for new investments of $104.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 as compared to $26.7 million for the same period in 2010.

Cash flow from operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2011, as compared to the same period in 2010, has decreased primarily due to an increase in other assets, including prepaid expenses for insurance and real estate taxes, as the size of our portfolio of real estate properties has grown.

The cash outflow from our financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2011 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2010 is primarily due to the repayment or repurchase of our outstanding debt and the increase in our dividends paid on common shares in 2011.

65

Capitalization

Debt Financing.

We maintain various forms of short-term and long-term financing arrangements. Generally, these financing agreements are collateralized by assets within securitizations.

The following table summarizes our total recourse and non-recourse indebtedness as of December 31, 2011:

Description	Unpaid Principal Balance		Carrying Amount		Weighted- Average Interest Rate			Contractual Maturity
Recourse indebtedness:
7.0% convertible senior notes (1)	$	115,000	$	107,868		7.0	%	Apr. 2031
6.875% convertible senior notes (2)		3,582		3,735		6.9	%	Apr. 2027
Secured credit facilities		9,954		9,954		3.2	%	Dec. 2016
Junior subordinated notes, at fair value (3)		38,052		22,450		5.2	%	Oct. 2015 to Mar. 2035
Junior subordinated notes, at amortized cost		25,100		25,100		7.7	%	Apr. 2037
Total recourse indebtedness (4)		191,688		169,107		6.5	%
Non-recourse indebtedness:
CDO notes payable, at amortized cost (5)(6)		1,320,904		1,320,904		0.7	%	2045 to 2046
CDO notes payable, at fair value (3)(5)(7)		1,104,084		122,506		1.1	%	2037 to 2038
Loans payable on real estate		135,757		135,757		5.6	%	Sept. 2015 to May 2021
Total non-recourse indebtedness		2,560,745		1,579,167		1.1	%
Total indebtedness	$	2,752,433	$	1,748,274		1.5	%

(1) Our 7.0% convertible senior notes are redeemable, at par at the option of the holder, in April 2016, April 2021, and April 2026.

(2) Our 6.875% convertible senior notes are redeemable, at par at the option of the holder, in April 2012, April 2017, and April 2022.

(3) Relates to liabilities which we elected to record at fair value under FASB ASC Topic 825.

(4) Excludes senior secured notes issued by us with an aggregate principal amount equal to $100.0 million which are eliminated in consolidation.

(5) Excludes CDO notes payable purchased by us which are eliminated in consolidation.

(6) Collateralized by $1.7 billion principal amount of commercial mortgages, mezzanine loans, other loans and preferred equity interests. These obligations were issued by separate legal entities and consequently the assets of the special purpose entities that collateralize these obligations are not available to our creditors.

(7) Collateralized by $1.2 billion principal amount of investments in securities and security-related receivables and loans, before fair value adjustments. The fair value of these investments as of December 31, 2011 was $855.3 million. These obligations were issued by separate legal entities and consequently the assets of the special purpose entities that collateralize these obligations are not available to our creditors.

66

The following table summarizes our total recourse and non-recourse indebtedness as of December 31, 2010:

Description	Unpaid Principal Balance		Carrying Amount		Weighted- Average Interest Rate			Contractual Maturity
Recourse indebtedness:
6.875% convertible senior notes (1)	$	143,613	$	143,474		6.9	%	Apr. 2027
Secured credit facilities		36,489		36,489		4.7	%	Oct. 2011 to Dec. 2011
Senior secured notes		63,950		63,950		11.7	%	Apr. 2014
Loans payable on real estate		19,922		19,922		5.5	%	Apr. 2012 to Sept. 2013
Junior subordinated notes, at fair value (2)		38,052		4,422		5.2	%	Oct. 2015 to Mar. 2035
Junior subordinated notes, at amortized cost		25,100		25,100		7.7	%	Apr. 2037
Total recourse indebtedness		327,126		293,357		7.4	%
Non-recourse indebtedness:
CDO notes payable, at amortized cost (3)(4)		1,341,750		1,341,750		0.7	%	2045 to 2046
CDO notes payable, at fair value (2)(3)(5)		1,147,112		148,072		0.9	%	2037 to 2038
Loans payable on real estate		54,998		54,998		6.0	%	Mar. 2011 to Aug. 2016
Total non-recourse indebtedness		2,543,860		1,544,820		0.9	%
Total indebtedness	$	2,870,986	$	1,838,177		1.6	%

(1) Our convertible senior notes are redeemable, at par at the option of the holder, in April 2012, April 2017, and April 2022.

(2) Relates to liabilities which we elected to record at fair value under FASB ASC Topic 825.

(3) Excludes CDO notes payable purchased by us which are eliminated in consolidation.

(4) Collateralized by $1.8 billion principal amount of commercial mortgages, mezzanine loans, other loans and preferred equity interests. These obligations were issued by separate legal entities and consequently the assets of the special purpose entities that collateralize these obligations are not available to our creditors.

(5) Collateralized by $1.3 billion principal amount of investments in securities and security-related receivables and loans, before fair value adjustments. The fair value of these investments as of December 31, 2010 was $870.1 million. These obligations were issued by separate legal entities and consequently the assets of the special purpose entities that collateralize these obligations are not available to our creditors.

Recourse indebtedness refers to indebtedness that is recourse to our general assets, including the loans payable on real estate that are guaranteed by us. Non-recourse indebtedness consists of indebtedness of consolidated VIEs (i.e. securitization vehicles) and loans payable on real estate which is recourse only to specific assets pledged as collateral to the lenders. The creditors of each consolidated VIE have no recourse to our general credit.

The current status or activity in our financing arrangements occurring as of or during the year ended December 31, 2011 is as follows:

Recourse Indebtedness

6.875% convertible senior notes. On April 18, 2007, we issued and sold in a private offering to qualified institutional buyers, $425 million aggregate principal amount of 6.875% convertible senior notes due 2027, or the 6.875% convertible senior notes. After deducting the initial purchaser’s discount and the estimated offering expenses, we received approximately $414.3 million of net proceeds. Interest on the convertible senior notes is paid semi-annually and the convertible senior notes mature on April 15, 2027.

67

Prior to April 20, 2012, the convertible senior notes are not redeemable at RAIT’s option, except to preserve RAIT’s status as a REIT. On or after April 20, 2012, RAIT may redeem all or a portion of the convertible senior notes at a redemption price equal to the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest (including additional interest), if any. Convertible senior note holders may require RAIT to repurchase all or a portion of the convertible senior notes for cash at a purchase price equal to the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest (including additional interest), if any, on the convertible senior notes on April 15, 2012, April 15, 2017, and April 15, 2022, or upon the occurrence of certain change in control transactions prior to April 20, 2012.

Prior to April 15, 2026, upon the occurrence of specified events, the convertible senior notes will be convertible at the option of the holder at an initial conversion rate of 28.6874 shares per $1,000 principal amount of convertible senior notes. The initial conversion price of $104.58 represents a 27.5% premium to the per share closing price of $82.02 on the date the offering was priced. Upon conversion of convertible senior notes by a holder, the holder will receive cash up to the principal amount of such convertible senior notes and, with respect to the remainder, if any, of the conversion value in excess of such principal amount, at the option of RAIT in cash or RAIT’s common shares. The initial conversion rate is subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. We include the convertible senior notes in earnings per share using the treasury stock method if the conversion value in excess of the par amount is considered in the money during the respective periods.

On January 1, 2009, we adopted accounting standards classified under FASB ASC Topic 470, “Debt”. Upon adoption, we recorded a retrospective discount on our issued and outstanding convertible senior notes of $2.0 million. This discount reflects the fair value of the embedded conversion option within the convertible debt instruments and was recorded as an increase to additional paid in capital. The fair value was calculated by discounting the cash flows required in the indenture relating to the convertible senior notes agreement by a discount rate that represents management’s estimate of our senior, unsecured, non-convertible debt borrowing rate at the time when the convertible senior notes were issued. The discount is being amortized to interest expense through April 15, 2012, the date at which holders of our convertible senior notes could require repayment. Upon adoption, all prior periods were restated to reflect the retroactive adoption of the standard and total discount amortization recorded through December 31, 2008 was $0.6 million.

During the year ended December 31, 2011, we repurchased $140.0 million in aggregate principal amount of our 6.875% Convertible Senior Notes due 2027 for an aggregate purchase price of $138.6 million. As a result of these transactions, we recorded losses on extinguishment of debt of $0.9 million, inclusive of deferred financing costs and unamortized discounts that were written off.

During the year ended December 31, 2010, we repurchased from the market, a total of $102.8 million in aggregate principal amount of convertible notes for a total consideration of $72.6 million. The purchase price consisted of $12.4 million in cash, the issuance of 6.3 million common shares, and the issuance of a $22.0 million senior secured note. See “Senior Secured Notes” below. As a result of these transactions, we recorded gains on extinguishment of debt of $30.0 million, inclusive of deferred financing costs and unamortized discounts that were written off.

During the year ended December 31, 2009, we repurchased from the market, a total of $103.1 million in aggregate principal amount of convertible notes for a total consideration of $54.5 million, including the issuance of a $43.0 million senior secured note. See “Senior Secured Note” below. During 2009, we also exchanged $34.0 million in aggregate principal amount of convertible notes for 2.7 million common shares and $3.1 million of cash, for total consideration of $14.0 million based on our closing stock price of $4.02 per share on December 29, 2009, the date our exchange offer was completed. As a result of these transactions, we recorded gains on extinguishment of debt of $64.9 million, inclusive of deferred financing costs and unamortized discounts that were written off.

7.0% convertible senior notes. On March 21, 2011, we issued and sold in a public offering $115.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 7.0% Convertible Senior Notes due 2031, or the 7.0% convertible senior notes.

68

After deducting the underwriting discount and the estimated offering costs, we received approximately $109.0 million of net proceeds. Interest on the 7.0% convertible senior notes is paid semi-annually and the 7.0% convertible senior notes mature on April 1, 2031.

Prior to April 5, 2016, the 7.0% convertible senior notes are not redeemable at our option, except to preserve RAIT’s status as a REIT. On or after April 5, 2016, we may redeem all or a portion of the 7.0% convertible senior notes at a redemption price equal to the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest. Holders of 7.0% convertible senior notes may require us to repurchase all or a portion of the 7.0% convertible senior notes at a purchase price equal to the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest on April 1, 2016, April 1, 2021, and April 1, 2026, or upon the occurrence of certain defined fundamental changes.

The 7.0% convertible senior notes are convertible at the option of the holder at a current conversion rate of 132.9506 common shares per $1,000 principal amount of 7.0% convertible senior notes (equivalent to a current conversion price of $7.52 per common share). Upon conversion of 7.0% convertible senior notes by a holder, the holder will receive cash, our common shares or a combination of cash and our common shares, at our election. We include the 7.0% convertible senior notes in earnings per share using the treasury stock method if the conversion value in excess of the par amount is considered in the money during the respective periods.

According to FASB ASC Topic 470, “Debt”, we recorded a discount on our issued and outstanding 7.0% convertible senior notes of $8.2 million. This discount reflects the fair value of the embedded conversion option within the 7.0% convertible senior notes and was recorded as an increase to additional paid in capital. The fair value was calculated by discounting the cash flows required in the indenture relating to the 7.0% convertible senior notes agreement by a discount rate that represents management’s estimate of our senior, unsecured, non-convertible debt borrowing rate at the time when the 7.0% convertible senior notes were issued. The discount will be amortized to interest expense through April 1, 2016, the date at which holders of our 7.0% convertible senior notes could require repayment.

Secured credit facilities. During the year ended December 31, 2011, we repaid, in full, a $16.2 million secured credit facility due to mature in October 2011.

As of December 31, 2011, we have $10.0 million outstanding under our remaining secured credit facility. During 2011, we renewed our remaining secured credit facility by repaying $9.0 million of the $19.5 million outstanding principal amount and amending the terms of the remaining $10.6 million balance to extend the maturity date from December 2011 to December 2016 and provide for the full amortization of that balance over that five year period. In addition, the interest rate on our secured credit facility was amended to be a floating interest rate of LIBOR plus 275 basis points.

Senior secured notes. On March 25, 2010, pursuant to a securities exchange agreement, we acquired from a note holder $47.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 6.875% convertible senior notes for a total consideration of $31.2 million. The purchase price consisted of (a) our issuance of a $22.0 million 10% senior secured convertible note, or the 10% senior secured convertible note, (b) our issuance of 0.5 million common shares, and (c) our payment of $6.0 million in cash. We also paid to the note holder $1.4 million of accrued and unpaid interest on the 6.875% convertible senior notes through March 25, 2010. The holder of the senior secured convertible note converted $1.1 million principal amount of the senior secured convertible note into 0.1 million common shares effective May 5, 2010.

During the year ended December 31, 2011, the holder of the 10.0% senior secured convertible note converted $5.3 million principal amount of the 10.0% senior note into 0.5 million common shares. On April 26, 2011, we prepaid the remaining $15.7 million principal amount of the 10.0% senior note.

On July 31, 2009, pursuant to a securities purchase agreement, we purchased from a note holder $98.3 million aggregate principal amount of our 6.875% convertible senior notes, for a purchase price of $53.0 million.

69

The purchase price consisted of (a) $43.0 million 12.5% senior secured note due 2014 issued by us, or the 12.5% senior secured note, and (b) $10.0 million in cash. We also paid to the note holder $2.0 million of accrued and unpaid interest on the 6.875% convertible senior notes through July 31, 2009.

During the year ended December 31, 2011, we prepaid, in full, our $43.0 million 12.5% Senior Secured Notes due to mature in April 2014.

On October 5, 2011, we entered into an exchange agreement with Taberna VIII pursuant to which we issued four senior secured notes, or the senior notes, with an aggregate principal amount equal to $100.0 million to Taberna VIII in exchange for a portfolio of real estate related debt securities, or the exchanged securities, held by Taberna VIII. Taberna VIII is a subsidiary of ours and, as a result, the senior secured notes are eliminated in consolidation. The senior notes and the exchanged securities were determined to have approximately equivalent fair market value at the time of the exchange.

The senior notes were issued pursuant to an indenture agreement dated October 5, 2011 which contains customary events of default, including those relating to nonpayment of principal or interest when due and defaults based upon events of bankruptcy and insolvency. The senior notes are each $25.0 million principal amount with a weighted average interest rate of 7.0% and have maturity dates ranging from April 2017 to April 2019. Interest is at a fixed rate and accrues from October 5, 2011 and will be payable quarterly in arrears on October 30, January 30, April 30 and July 30 of each year, beginning October 30, 2011. The senior notes are secured and are not convertible into equity securities of RAIT.

Junior subordinated notes, at fair value. On October 16, 2008, we issued $38.1 million principal amount of junior subordinated notes to a third party and received $15.5 million of net cash proceeds. Of the total amount of junior subordinated notes issued, $18.7 million has a fixed interest rate of 8.65% through March 30, 2015 with a floating rate of LIBOR plus 400 basis points thereafter and a maturity date of March 30, 2035. The remaining $19.4 million has a fixed interest rate of 9.64% and a maturity date of October 30, 2015. At issuance, we elected to record these junior subordinated notes at fair value under FASB ASC Topic 825, with all subsequent changes in fair value recorded in earnings.

On October 25, 2010, pursuant to a securities exchange agreement, we exchanged $18.7 million in aggregate principal amount of these junior subordinated notes with an interest rate of 8.7% for $18.7 million of junior subordinated notes with a reduced interest rate and provided $5.0 million of our convertible senior notes as collateral for the new junior subordinated notes. The new junior subordinated notes have a fixed rate of interest of 0.5% through March 30, 2015, thereafter with a floating rate of three-month LIBOR plus 400 basis points, with such floating rate not to exceed 7.0%. The maturity date remains the same at March 30, 2035. At issuance, we elected to record these junior subordinated notes at fair value under FASB ASC Topic 825, with all subsequent changes in fair value recorded in earnings.

As of December 31, 2010, we have $38.1 million unpaid principal associated with these junior subordinated notes. The fair value, or carrying amount, of this indebtedness was $22.5 million as of December 31, 2011.

Junior subordinated notes, at amortized cost. On February 12, 2007, we formed Taberna Funding Capital Trust I which issued $25.0 million of trust preferred securities to investors and $0.1 million of common securities to us. The combined proceeds were used by Taberna Funding Capital Trust I to purchase $25.1 million of junior subordinated notes issued by us. The junior subordinated notes are the sole assets of Taberna Funding Capital Trust I and mature on April 30, 2037, but are callable, at our option, on or after April 30, 2012. Interest on the junior subordinated notes is payable quarterly at a fixed rate of 7.69% through April 2012 and thereafter at a floating rate equal to three-month LIBOR plus 2.50%.

Loans payable on real estate. During the year ended December 31, 2011 we refinanced recourse financing consisting of a first mortgage of $12.5 million principal amount with a fixed rate of 5.8%, due in April 2012, that was associated with one of our owned real estate properties with non-recourse financing provided by a

70

consolidated securitization. In addition, we refinanced recourse financing consisting of a first mortgage of $7.1 million principal amount with a fixed rate of 5.0%, due in September 2013, that was associated with one of our owned real estate properties with non-recourse financing provided by a consolidated securitization.

CMBS Facilities. On October 27, 2011, we entered into a two year CMBS facility, or the $100.0 million CMBS facility, pursuant to which we may sell, and later repurchase, performing whole mortgage loans or senior interests in whole mortgage loans secured by first liens on stabilized commercial properties which meet current standards for inclusion in CMBS transactions. The aggregate principal amount available under the $100.0 million CMBS facility is $100.0 million and incurs interest at LIBOR plus 250 basis points. The purchase price paid for any asset purchased will be equal to 75% of the lesser of the market value (determined by the purchaser in its sole discretion, exercised in good faith) or par amount of such asset on the purchase date. The $100.0 million CMBS facility contains standard margin call provisions and financial covenants. No amounts were outstanding under the $100.0 million CMBS facility at December 31, 2011.

On November 23, 2011, we entered into a one year CMBS facility, or the $150.0 million CMBS facility, pursuant to which we may sell, and later repurchase, commercial mortgage loans secured by first liens on stabilized commercial properties which meet current standards for inclusion in CMBS transactions. The aggregate principal amount available under the $150.0 million CMBS facility is $150.0 million and incurs interest at LIBOR plus 250 basis points. The purchase price paid for any asset purchased is up to 75% of the lesser of the unpaid principal balance and the market value (determined by the purchaser in its sole discretion, exercised in good faith) of such purchased asset on the purchase date. The $150.0 million CMBS facility contains standard margin call provisions and financial covenants. No amounts were outstanding under the $150.0 million CMBS facility at December 31, 2011.

Non-Recourse Indebtedness

CDO notes payable, at amortized cost. CDO notes payable at amortized cost represent notes issued by consolidated CDO securitizations which are used to finance the acquisition of unsecured REIT notes, CMBS securities, commercial mortgages, mezzanine loans, and other loans in our commercial real estate portfolio. Generally, CDO notes payable are comprised of various classes of notes payable, with each class bearing interest at variable or fixed rates. Both RAIT I and RAIT II are meeting all of their overcollateralization, or OC, and interest coverage, or IC, trigger tests as of December 31, 2011.

During the year ended December 31, 2011, we repurchased, from the market, a total of $23.7 million in aggregate principal amount of CDO notes payable issued by RAIT I and RAIT II. The aggregate purchase price was $7.8 million and we recorded a gain on extinguishment of debt of $15.9 million.

During the year ended December 31, 2010, we repurchased, from the market, a total of $55.0 million in aggregate principal amount of CDO notes payable issued by RAIT I and RAIT II. The aggregate purchase price was $13.1 million and we recorded gains on extinguishment of debt of $42.0 million, inclusive of deferred financing costs that were written off.

During the year ended December 31, 2009, we repurchased, from the market, a total of $55.0 million in aggregate principal amount of CDO notes payable issued by RAIT I and RAIT II. The aggregate purchase price was $4.0 million and we recorded gains on extinguishment of debt of $51.0 million.

CDO notes payable, at fair value. As of January 1, 2008, we adopted the fair value option, which is now classified under FASB ASC Topic 825, and elected to record CDO notes payable at fair value. These CDO notes payable are collateralized by trading securities, security-related receivables and loans. At adoption, we decreased the carrying amount of these CDO notes payable by $1.5 billion to reflect these liabilities at fair value in our financial statements. The fair value of these CDO notes payable increased by $17.5 million and $39.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase was included in the change in fair value of financial instruments in our consolidated statements of operations as an expense.

71

Both Taberna VIII and Taberna IX are failing OC trigger tests which cause a change to the priority of payments to the debt and equity holders of the respective securitizations. Upon the failure of an OC test, the indenture of each securitization requires cash flows that would otherwise have been distributed to us as equity distributions, or in some cases interest payments on our retained CDO notes payable, be used to pay down sequentially the outstanding principal balance of the most senior note holders. The OC tests failures are due to defaulted collateral assets and credit risk securities. During the year ended December 31, 2011, $43.0 million of cash flows were re-directed from our retained interests in these securitizations and were used to repay the most senior holders of our CDO notes payable. In February 2012, Taberna VIII used $81.4 million of restricted cash to pay down its senior debt tranches to a current principal balance of $266.7 million from an original balance of $375.0 million. As a result of this transaction, we recorded $67.6 million as a change in fair value of financial instruments as the carrying amount of the $81.4 million principal repayment was $13.8 million.

Loans payable on real estate. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, we had $135.8 million and $74.9 million, respectively, of other indebtedness outstanding relating to loans payable on consolidated real estate and other loans. These loans are secured by specific consolidated real estate and commercial loans included in our consolidated balance sheet.

During the year ended December 31, 2011, we obtained seven first mortgages on our investments in real estate from third party lenders that have an aggregate principal balance of $81.5 million, mature between 2018 and 2021, and have a weighted average interest rate of 5.29%.

Equity Financing.

Preferred Shares

In 2004, we issued 2.8 million shares of our 7.75% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest, or Series A Preferred Shares, for net proceeds of $66.6 million. The Series A Preferred Shares accrue cumulative cash dividends at a rate of 7.75% per year of the $25.00 liquidation preference, equivalent to $1.9375 per year per share. Dividends are payable quarterly in arrears at the end of each March, June, September and December. The Series A Preferred Shares have no maturity date and we are not required to redeem the Series A Preferred Shares at any time. On or after March 19, 2009, we may, at our option, redeem the Series A Preferred Shares, in whole or part, at any time and from time to time, for cash at $25.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends, if any, to the redemption date.

In 2004, we issued 2.3 million shares of our 8.375% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest, or Series B Preferred Shares, for net proceeds of $54.4 million. The Series B Preferred Shares accrue cumulative cash dividends at a rate of 8.375% per year of the $25.00 liquidation preference, equivalent to $2.09375 per year per share. Dividends are payable quarterly in arrears at the end of each March, June, September and December. The Series B Preferred Shares have no maturity date and we are not required to redeem the Series B Preferred Shares at any time. On or after October 5, 2009, we may, at our option, redeem the Series B Preferred Shares, in whole or part, at any time and from time to time, for cash at $25.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends, if any, to the redemption date.

On July 5, 2007, we issued 1.6 million shares of our 8.875% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest, or the Series C Preferred Shares, in a public offering at an offering price of $25.00 per share. After offering costs, including the underwriters’ discount, and expenses of $1.7 million, we received $38.3 million of net proceeds. The Series C Preferred Shares accrue cumulative cash dividends at a rate of 8.875% per year of the $25.00 liquidation preference and are paid on a quarterly basis. The Series C Preferred Shares have no maturity date and we are not required to redeem the Series C Preferred Shares at any time. We may not redeem the Series C Preferred Shares before July 5, 2012, except for the special optional redemption to preserve our tax qualification as a REIT. On or after July 5, 2012, we may, at our option, redeem the Series C Preferred Shares, in whole or part, at any time and from time to time, for cash at $25.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends, if any, to the redemption date.

72

On January 25, 2011, May 17, 2011, July 26, 2011 and October 25, 2011 our board of trustees declared quarterly cash dividends of $0.484375 per share on our 7.75% Series A Preferred Shares, $0.5234375 per share on our 8.375% Series B Preferred Shares and $0.5546875 per share on our 8.875% Series C Preferred Shares. The dividends were paid on March 31, 2011, June 30, 2011, September 30, 2011 and January 3, 2012. The quarterly dividends totaled $13.6 million.

On January 24, 2012, our board of trustees declared a first quarter 2012 cash dividend of $0.484375 per share on our 7.75% Series A Preferred Shares, $0.5234375 per share on our 8.375% Series B Preferred Shares and $0.5546875 per share on our 8.875% Series C Preferred Shares. The dividends will be paid on April 2, 2012 to holders of record on March 1, 2012.

Common Shares

-Share Repurchases

On July 24, 2007, our board of trustees adopted a share repurchase plan that authorizes us to purchase up to $75.0 million of RAIT common shares. Under the plan, we may make purchases, from time to time, through open market or privately negotiated transactions. We have not repurchased any common shares under this plan as of December 31, 2011.

On January 25, 2011, the compensation committee of our board of trustees approved a cash payment to the board’s eight non-management trustees intended to constitute a portion of their respective 2011 annual non-management trustee compensation. The cash payment was subject to terms and conditions set forth in a letter agreement, or the letter agreement, between each of the non-management trustees and RAIT. The terms and conditions included a requirement that each trustee use a portion of the cash payment to purchase RAIT’s common shares in purchases that, individually and in the aggregate with all purchases made by all the other non-management trustees pursuant to their respective letter agreements, complied with Rule 10b-18 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The aggregate amount required to be used by all of the non-management trustees to purchase common shares was $0.2 million and was used to purchase 18,898 common shares, in the aggregate, in February 2011.

On January 24, 2012, the compensation committee of our board of trustees approved a cash payment to the board’s seven non-management trustees intended to constitute a portion of their respective 2012 annual non-management trustee compensation. The cash payment was subject to terms and conditions set forth in a letter agreement, or the letter agreement, between each of the non-management trustees and RAIT. The letter agreement documented the election of each trustee to use a portion of the cash payment to purchase RAIT’s common shares in purchases that, individually and in the aggregate with all purchases made by all the other non-management trustees pursuant to their respective letter agreements, complied with Rule 10b-18 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The aggregate amount required to be used by all of the non-management trustees to purchase common shares was $0.2 million and was used to purchase 36,750 common shares, in the aggregate, in February 2012.

-Dividends

On January 10, 2011, the board of trustees declared a $0.09 dividend on our common shares to holders of record as of January 21, 2011. The dividend was paid on January 31, 2011 and totaled $3.2 million.

On May 17, 2011, the board of trustees declared a $0.06 dividend on our common shares to holders of record as of July 8, 2011. The dividend was paid on July 29, 2011 and totaled $2.3 million.

On September 12, 2011, the board of trustees declared a $0.06 dividend on our common shares to holders of record as of October 7, 2011. The dividend was paid on October 31, 2011 and totaled $2.4 million.

On December 16, 2011, the board of trustees declared a $0.06 dividend on our common shares to holders of record as of January 9, 2012. The dividend was paid on January 31, 2012 and totaled $2.5 million and is included in other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

73

-Reverse Stock Split

On May 17, 2011, the board of trustees authorized a 1-for-3 reverse stock split of our common shares of beneficial interest that became effective on June 30, 2011, or the effective time. At the effective time, every three common shares issued and outstanding were automatically combined into one issued and outstanding new common share. The par value of new common shares changed to $0.03 per share after the reverse stock split from the par value of common shares prior to the reverse stock split of $0.01 per share. The reverse stock split reduced the number of common shares outstanding but did not change the number of authorized common shares. The reverse stock split did not affect our preferred shares of beneficial interest. All references in the accompanying financial statements to the number of common shares and earnings per share data for all periods presented have been adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split.

-Equity Compensation

On January 24, 2009, 19,020 phantom unit awards were redeemed for common shares. These phantom units were fully vested at the time of redemption.

On March 5, 2009, the compensation committee awarded 161,333 phantom units, valued at $0.3 million using our closing stock price of $1.50 per share, split adjusted, to various non-executive employees. The awards generally vest over three-year periods.

On June 25, 2009, the compensation committee awarded 66,667 phantom units, valued at $0.2 million using our closing stock price of $3.57, split adjusted, to two non-executive employees. The awards generally vest over four-year periods.

On January 26, 2010, the compensation committee awarded 500,000 phantom units, valued at $1.9 million using our closing stock price of $3.81, split adjusted, to our executive officers. Half of these awards vested immediately and the remainder vested on January 26, 2011. On January 26, 2010, the compensation committee awarded 166,667 phantom units, valued at $0.6 million using our closing stock price of $3.81, split adjusted, to our non-executive officer employees. These awards generally vest over three-year periods.

On January 24, 2012, the compensation committee awarded 2,172,000 stock appreciation rights, or SARs, valued at $6.1 million based on a Black-Scholes option pricing model at the date of grant, to our executive officers and non-executive officer employees. The SARs vest over a three-year period and may be exercised between the date of vesting and January 24, 2017, the expiration date of the SARs.

-Dividend Reinvestment and Share Purchase Plan (DRSPP)

We implemented an amended and restated dividend reinvestment and share purchase plan, or DRSPP, effective as of March 13, 2008, pursuant to which we registered and reserved for issuance 6,262,545 common shares. Effective October 28, 2011, we registered and reserved for issuance an additional 7,759,080 common shares for issuance under the DRSPP so that the aggregate number of common shares available for issuance under the DRSPP was 10,500,000 common shares. During the year ended December 31, 2011, we issued a total of 2,370,710 common shares pursuant to the DRSPP at a weighted-average price of $4.20 per share and we received $9.7 million of net proceeds. From January 1, 2012 through February 21, 2012, 919,391 common shares were issued pursuant to the DRSPP at a weighted-average price of $4.91 per share and we received $4.5 million of net proceeds. After reflecting the common shares issued through February 21, 2012, 8,368,191 common shares, in aggregate, remain available for issuance under the DRSPP.

-SEDA

On January 13, 2010, we entered into a standby equity distribution agreement, or the SEDA, with YA Global Master SPV Ltd., or YA Global, which is managed by Yorkville Advisors, LLC, whereby YA Global

74

agreed to purchase up to $50.0 million, or the commitment amount, worth of newly issued RAIT common shares upon notices given by us, subject to the terms and conditions of the SEDA. The number of common shares issued or issuable pursuant to the SEDA, in the aggregate, cannot exceed 4.2 million common shares. The SEDA terminated by its terms on January 13, 2012. During the year ended December 31, 2011, no common shares were issued pursuant to this arrangement.

-COD

On August 6, 2010, we entered into a Capital on Demand™ Sales Agreement, or the COD sales agreement, with JonesTrading Institutional Services LLC, or JonesTrading, pursuant to which we may issue and sell up to 5.8 million of our common shares from time to time through JonesTrading acting as agent and/or principal, subject to the terms and conditions of the COD sales agreement. During the year ended December 31, 2011, 2,815,528 common shares were issued pursuant to this arrangement at a weighted average price of $8.77 and we received $22.9 million of proceeds. As of December 31, 2011, the COD sales agreement had terminated by its terms as there were no common shares remaining available for issuance.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Commitments

As of December 31, 2011 we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements or commitments.

Contractual Commitments

The table below summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2011:

	Payment due by Period
	Total		Less Than 1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		More Than 5 Years
	(dollars in thousands)
Recourse indebtedness:
Secured credit facilities	$	9,954	$	1,856	$	4,008	$	4,090	$	0
Convertible senior notes (1)		118,582		0		0		0		118,582
Junior subordinated notes		63,152		0		0		19,381		43,771
Total recourse indebtedness		191,688		1,856		4,008		23,471		162,353
Non-recourse indebtedness:
Loans payable on real estate		135,722		1,285		3,296		55,294		75,847
Other indebtedness		35		35		0		0		0
CDO notes payable		2,424,988		0		0		0		2,424,988
Total non-recourse indebtedness		2,560,745		1,320		3,296		55,294		2,500,835
Total indebtedness		2,752,433		3,176		7,304		78,765		2,663,188
Interest payable (2)(3)		1,177,688		110,273		188,739		152,656		726,020
Operating lease obligations		30,851		2,251		4,575		2,916		21,109
Funding commitments to borrowers (4)		52,285		23,462		17,774		549		10,500
Total	$	4,013,257	$	139,162	$	218,392	$	234,886	$	3,420,817

(1) Our 6.875% convertible senior notes are redeemable, at par at the option of the holder, in April 2012, April 2017, and April 2022. Our 7.0% convertible senior notes are redeemable, at par at the option of the holder, in April 2016, April 2021, and April 2026.

(2) All variable-rate indebtedness assumes a 30-day LIBOR rate of 0.30% (the 30-day LIBOR rate at December 31, 2011).

(3) Interest payable is comprised of interest expense related to our indebtedness and the interest cost of the hedges associated with indebtedness. Interest payments related to recourse indebtedness are due by period as

75

follows: $12.5 million less than one year, $25.0 million one to three years, $24.3 million three to five years and $172.5 million more than five years. Interest payments related to non-recourse indebtedness are due by period as follows: $97.8 million less than one year, $163.7 million one to three years, $128.3 million three to five years and $553.5 million more than five years.

(4) Amounts represent the commitments we have made to fund borrowers in our existing lending arrangements as of December 31, 2011.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Our exposure to market risk results primarily from changes in the credit risks of our portfolio and changes in interest rates. We are exposed to credit risk and interest rate risk related to our investments in commercial and mezzanine loans, debt instruments and TruPS.

Credit Risk Management

Credit risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in a borrower’s ability to meet its financial obligations under agreed-upon terms. The degree of credit risk varies based on many factors including the concentration of the asset or transaction relative to our entire portfolio, the credit characteristics of the borrower, the contractual terms of a borrower’s agreements and the availability and quality of collateral.

Our senior management regularly evaluates and approves credit standards and oversees the credit risk management function related to our portfolio of investments. Our senior management’s responsibilities include ensuring the adequacy of our credit risk management infrastructure, overseeing credit risk management strategies and methodologies, monitoring conditions in real estate and other markets having an impact on our lending activities and evaluating and monitoring overall credit risk.

Credit Summary and Concentrations of Credit Risk

Our investment portfolios had the following key credit statistics as of December 31, 2011:

• Commercial real estate loans—We had 16 loans on non-accrual, with a carrying value of $54.3 million, or 5.7% of our commercial real estate loan portfolio. Our allowance for losses for our commercial loan portfolio was $40.6 million, or 74.8% of our non-accrual loans and pertained to 18 loans with an unpaid principal balance of $68.5 million.

• Investments in debt securities—We record our investments in debt securities at fair value in our consolidated financial statements. As of December 31, 2011, we had 18 debt securities on non-accrual, with a carrying amount of $6.7 million and an unpaid principal balance of $150.3 million, or 1.0% of our investments in debt securities, based on carrying value. The unpaid principal balance of our investments in debt securities is $0.9 billion, of which our non-accrual debt securities represents approximately 16.1%, based on unpaid principal.

In our normal course of business, we engage in lending activities with borrowers primarily throughout the United States. As of December 31, 2011, no single borrower or collateral issuer represented greater than 10% of our entire portfolio. The largest concentration by property type in our commercial and mezzanine portfolio was multi-family property, which made up approximately 31.8% of our commercial and mezzanine loan portfolio. The largest concentration by borrower type in our TruPS and subordinated debt portfolio was to issuers in the office market, which made up approximately 24.3% of our TruPS and subordinated debt portfolio. For further information on each of our portfolios, please refer to the portfolio summaries in Item 1—“Business”.

Interest Rate Risk Management

Interest rates may be affected by economic, geo-political, monetary and fiscal policy, market supply and demand and other factors generally outside our control, and such factors may be highly volatile. Our interest rate

76

risk sensitive assets and liabilities and financial derivatives will be typically held for long-term investment and not held for sale purposes. Historically, we have used securitizations to finance our investments to limit interest rate risk by matching the terms of our investment assets with the terms of our liabilities and, to the extent necessary, through the use of hedging instruments. We intend to reduce interest rate and funding risk, allowing us to focus on managing credit risk through our underwriting process and continual credit analysis.

We make investments that are either floating rate or fixed rate. Our floating rate investments will generally be priced at a fixed spread over an index such as LIBOR that re-prices either quarterly or every 30 days. Given the frequency of future price changes in our floating rate investments, changes in interest rates are not expected to have a material effect on the value of these investments. Increases or decreases in LIBOR will have a corresponding increase or decrease in our interest income and the match-funded interest expense, thereby reducing the net earnings impact on our overall portfolio. Our interest income is also protected from decreases in interest rates due to interest rate floors on our investments in commercial and mezzanine loans. In the event that long-term interest rates increase, the value of our fixed-rate investments would be diminished. We may consider hedging this risk in the future if the benefit outweighs the cost of the hedging strategy. Such changes in interest rates would not have a material effect on the income from these investments.

As of December 31, 2011, we use various interest rate swap agreements to hedge variable cash flows associated with CDO notes payable. These cash flow hedges have an aggregate notional value of $1.6 billion and are used to swap the variable cash flows associated with variable rate CDO notes payable into fixed-rate payments for five- and ten-year periods. As of December 31, 2011, the interest rate swaps had an aggregate liability fair value of $180.1 million. Changes in the fair value of the ineffective portions of interest rate swaps and interest rate swaps that were not designated as hedges under FASB ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging” are recorded in earnings.

The following table summarizes the interest income and interest expense for a 12-month period, and the change in the net fair value of our investments and indebtedness assuming an instantaneous increase or decrease of 100 basis points in the LIBOR interest rate curve, both adjusted for the effects of our interest rate hedging activities (dollars in thousands):

	Assets (Liabilities) Subject to Interest Rate Sensitivity (Par  Amount)			100 Basis Point Increase			100 Basis Point Decrease (a)
Interest income from variable-rate investments	$	811,409		$	8,114		$	(2,404	)
Interest expense from variable-rate indebtedness		(530,097	)		(5,301	)		1,571
Total interest income (expense) from variable-rate instruments	$	281,312		$	2,813		$	(833	)
Fair value of fixed-rate investments	$	1,143,636		$	(36,238	)	$	36,007
Fair value of fixed-rate indebtedness		(2,088,521	)		59,778			(60,565	)
Net fair value of fixed-rate instruments	$	(944,885	)	$	23,540		$	(24,558	)

(a) Assumes the LIBOR interest rate will not decrease below the quoted 30-day LIBOR rate of 0.30% at December 31, 2011.

We make investments that are denominated in U.S. dollars, or if made in another currency we may enter into currency swaps to convert the investment into a U.S. dollar equivalent. We may be unable to match the payment characteristics of the investment with the terms of the currency swap to fully eliminate all currency risk and such currency swaps may not be available on acceptable terms and conditions based upon a cost/benefit analysis.

77

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

RAIT FINANCIAL TRUST

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2011 Consolidated Financial Statements:
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	79
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2011 and 2010	81
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Years Ended December 31, 2011	82
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Three Years Ended December 31,  2011	83
Consolidated Statements of Equity for the Three Years Ended December 31, 2011	84
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Years Ended December 31, 2011	85
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	86
Supplemental Schedules:
Schedule II: Valuation and Qualifying Accounts	124
Schedule III: Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation	125
Schedule IV: Mortgage Loans on Real Estate and Mortgage Related Receivables	128

78

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Board of Trustees

RAIT Financial Trust

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of RAIT Financial Trust (a Maryland real estate investment trust) and subsidiaries (collectively RAIT Financial Trust or the Company) as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011. Our audits of the basic consolidated financial statements included the financial statement schedules listed in the index appearing under Item 8. These financial statements and financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of RAIT Financial Trust as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), RAIT Financial Trust’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and our report dated February 24, 2012 expressed an unqualified opinion.

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

February 24, 2012

79

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Board of Trustees

RAIT Financial Trust

We have audited RAIT Financial Trust (a Maryland real estate investment trust) and subsidiaries’ (collectively RAIT Financial Trust or the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). RAIT Financial Trust’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, RAIT Financial Trust maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by COSO.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of RAIT Financial Trust and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011 and our report dated February 24, 2012 expressed an unqualified opinion.

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

February 24, 2012

80

RAIT Financial Trust

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share information)

	As of December 31
	2011			2010
Assets
Investments in mortgages and loans, at amortized cost:
Commercial mortgages, mezzanine loans, other loans and preferred equity interests	$	996,363		$	1,219,110
Allowance for losses		(46,082	)		(69,691	)
Total investments in mortgages and loans		950,281			1,149,419
Investments in real estate		891,502			839,192
Investments in securities and security-related receivables, at fair value		647,461			705,451
Cash and cash equivalents		29,720			27,230
Restricted cash		278,607			179,019
Accrued interest receivable		39,455			37,138
Other assets		39,771			32,840
Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $11,613 and $9,943, respectively		23,178			19,954
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $2,337 and $1,777, respectively		2,629			3,189
Total assets	$	2,902,604		$	2,993,432
Liabilities and Equity
Indebtedness ($144,956 and $152,494 at fair value, respectively)	$	1,748,274		$	1,838,177
Accrued interest payable		22,541			19,925
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		20,825			25,089
Derivative liabilities		181,499			184,878
Deferred taxes, borrowers’ escrows and other liabilities		15,371			6,833
Total liabilities		1,988,510			2,074,902
Equity:
Shareholders’ equity:
Preferred shares, $0.01 par value per share, 25,000,000 shares authorized;
7.75% Series A cumulative redeemable preferred shares, liquidation preference $25.00 per share, 2,760,000 shares issued and outstanding		28			28
8.375% Series B cumulative redeemable preferred shares, liquidation preference $25.00 per share, 2,258,300 shares issued and outstanding		23			23
8.875% Series C cumulative redeemable preferred shares, liquidation preference $25.00 per share, 1,600,000 shares issued and outstanding		16			16
Common shares, $0.03 par value per share, 200,000,000 shares authorized, 41,289,566 and 35,300,190 issued and outstanding		1,236			1,060
Additional paid in capital		1,735,969			1,691,681
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		(118,294	)		(127,602	)
Retained earnings (deficit)		(708,671	)		(647,110	)
Total shareholders’ equity		910,307			918,096
Noncontrolling interests		3,787			434
Total equity		914,094			918,530
Total liabilities and equity	$	2,902,604		$	2,993,432

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

81

RAIT Financial Trust

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share information)

	For the Years Ended December 31
	2011			2010			2009
Revenue:
Interest income	$	132,351		$	153,955		$	381,979
Rental income		91,880			72,373			44,637
Fee and other income		9,923			18,242			26,498
Total revenue		234,154			244,570			453,114
Expenses:
Interest expense		89,649			96,690			261,824
Real estate operating expense		55,285			51,276			35,179
Compensation expense		23,993			28,732			27,578
General and administrative expense		17,380			18,232			21,770
Provision for losses		3,900			38,307			226,567
Asset impairments		0			0			46,015
Depreciation and amortization expense		29,490			28,654			21,122
Total expenses		219,697			261,891			640,055
Operating Income		14,457			(17,321	)		(186,941	)
Interest and other income (expense)		348			472			5,161
Gains (losses) on sale of assets		6,353			11,626			(376,751	)
Gains (losses) on extinguishment of debt		15,001			71,575			115,869
Change in fair value of financial instruments		(75,154	)		45,840			1,563
Income (loss) before taxes and discontinued operations		(38,995	)		112,192			(441,099	)
Income tax benefit (provision)		538			(1,602	)		958
Income (loss) from continuing operations		(38,457	)		110,590			(440,141	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations		747			323			(840	)
Net income (loss)		(37,710	)		110,913			(440,981	)
Income (loss) allocated to preferred shares		(13,649	)		(13,641	)		(13,641	)
Income (loss) allocated to noncontrolling interests		229			880			13,419
Net income (loss) allocable to common shares	$	(51,130	)	$	98,152		$	(441,203	)
Earnings (loss) per share—Basic:
Continuing operations	$	(1.35	)	$	3.38		$	(20.26	)
Discontinued operations		0.02			0.01			(0.04	)
Total earnings (loss) per share—Basic	$	(1.33	)	$	3.39		$	(20.30	)
Weighted-average shares outstanding—Basic		38,508,086			28,951,422			21,735,078
Earnings (loss) per share—Diluted:
Continuing operations	$	(1.35	)	$	3.33		$	(20.26	)
Discontinued operations		0.02			0.01			(0.04	)
Total earnings (loss) per share—Diluted	$	(1.33	)	$	3.34		$	(20.30	)
Weighted-average shares outstanding—Diluted		38,508,086			29,417,337			21,735,078
Dividends declared per common share	$	0.27		$	0.00		$	0.00

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

82

RAIT Financial Trust

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(Dollars in thousands)

	For the Years Ended December 31
	2011			2010			2009
Net income (loss)	$	(37,710	)	$	110,913		$	(440,981	)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Change in fair value of interest rate hedges		(33,682	)		(50,638	)		6,807
Reclassification adjustments associated with unrealized losses (gains) from interest rate hedges included in net income (loss)		(8	)		(46	)		470
Realized (gains) losses on interest rate hedges reclassified to earnings		42,820			46,111			45,476
Change in fair value of available-for-sale securities		178			(359	)		(12,095	)
Realized (gains) losses on available-for-sale securities reclassified to earnings		0			(3,697	)		44,275
Realized (gains) losses on sales of assets of VIEs		0			0			28,196
Total other comprehensive income (loss)		9,308			(8,629	)		113,129
Comprehensive income (loss) before allocation to noncontrolling interests		(28,402	)		102,284			(327,852	)
Allocation to noncontrolling interests		229			880			12,742
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(28,173	)	$	103,164		$	(315,110	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

83

RAIT Financial Trust

Consolidated Statements of Equity

(Dollars in thousands, except share information)

	Preferred Shares— Series A		Par Value Preferred Shares— Series A		Preferred Shares— Series B		Par Value Preferred Shares— Series B		Preferred Shares— Series C		Par Value Preferred Shares— Series C		Common Shares		Par Value Common Shares		Additional Paid In Capital			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Retained Earnings (Deficit)			Total Shareholders’ Equity			Noncontrolling Interests			Total Equity
Balance, January 1, 2009		2,760,000		28		2,258,300		23		1,600,000		16		21,588,627		648		1,613,853			(231,425	)		(304,059	)		1,079,084			190,257			1,269,341
Net loss		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0			0			(427,562	)		(427,562	)		(13,419	)		(440,981	)
Preferred dividends		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0			0			(13,641	)		(13,641	)		0			(13,641	)
Other comprehensive loss, net		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0			112,452			0			112,452			677			113,129
Stock compensation expense		0		0		0		0		0		0		71,395		2		3,716			0			0			3,718			0			3,718
Acquisition of noncontrolling interests		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0			0			0			0			433			433
Deconsolidation of VIEs		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0			0			0			0			(175,031	)		(175,031	)
Common shares issued, net		0		0		0		0		0		0		3,146,844		94		12,859			0			0			12,953			0			12,953
Balance, December 31, 2009		2,760,000	$	28		2,258,300	$	23		1,600,000	$	16		24,806,866	$	744	$	1,630,428		$	(118,973	)	$	(745,262	)	$	767,004		$	2,917		$	769,921
Net income		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0			0			111,793			111,793			(880	)		110,913
Preferred dividends		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0			0			(13,641	)		(13,641	)		0			(13,641	)
Other comprehensive loss, net		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0			(8,629	)		0			(8,629	)		0			(8,629	)
Stock compensation expense		0		0		0		0		0		0		41,957		1		2,856			0			0			2,857			0			2,857
Acquisition of noncontrolling interests		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		(332	)		0			0			(332	)		(1,603	)		(1,935	)
Common shares issued, net		0		0		0		0		0		0		10,451,367		315		58,729			0			0			59,044			0			59,044
Balance, December 31, 2010		2,760,000	$	28		2,258,300	$	23		1,600,000	$	16		35,300,190	$	1,060	$	1,691,681		$	(127,602	)	$	(647,110	)	$	918,096		$	434		$	918,530
Net income		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0			0			(37,481	)		(37,481	)		(229	)		(37,710	)
Preferred dividends		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0			0			(13,649	)		(13,649	)		0			(13,649	)
Common dividends declared		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0			0			(10,431	)		(10,431	)		0			(10,431	)
Other comprehensive loss, net		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0			9,308			0			9,308			0			9,308
Stock compensation expense		0		0		0		0		0		0		303,138		6		(502	)		0			0			(496	)		0			(496	)
Acquisition of noncontrolling interests		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0			0			0			0			3,582			3,582
Common shares issued, net		0		0		0		0		0		0		5,686,238		170		44,790			0			0			44,960			0			44,960
Balance, December 31, 2011		2,760,000	$	28		2,258,300	$	23		1,600,000	$	16		41,289,566	$	1,236	$	1,735,969		$	(118,294	)	$	(708,671	)	$	910,307		$	3,787		$	914,094

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

84

RAIT Financial Trust

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Dollars in thousands)

	For the Years Ended December 31
	2011			2010			2009
Operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	(37,710	)	$	110,913		$	(440,981	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash flow from operating activities:
Provision for losses		3,900			38,307			226,567
Share-based compensation expense		541			2,949			3,830
Depreciation and amortization		29,490			30,444			24,015
Amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discounts		5,139			2,888			10,801
Accretion of discounts on investments		(2,279	)		(3,984	)		(5,355	)
(Gains) losses on sale of assets		(6,353	)		(9,944	)		378,414
(Gains) losses on extinguishment of debt		(15,001	)		(71,575	)		(115,869	)
Change in fair value of financial instruments		75,154			(45,840	)		(1,563	)
Asset impairments		0			0			46,015
Other items		(8	)		(140	)		84
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accrued interest receivable		(2,645	)		(185	)		(245	)
Other assets		(1,607	)		8,485			(222	)
Accrued interest payable		(43,015	)		(43,062	)		(56,224	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(5,141	)		1,940			(1,219	)
Deferred taxes, borrowers’ escrows and other liabilities		(2,477	)		(5,748	)		(3,035	)
Cash flow from operating activities		(2,012	)		15,448			65,013
Investing activities:
Purchase and origination of securities for investment		0			0			(836	)
Proceeds from sales of other securities		82,600			23,338			948
Purchase and origination of loans for investment		(104,128	)		(26,691	)		(30,990	)
Principal repayments on loans		211,271			107,717			269,530
Investment in Jupiter Communities		0			0			(1,300	)
Proceeds from sale of residential mortgages		0			0			16,204
Investments in real estate		(25,450	)		(20,798	)		(11,929	)
Proceeds from dispositions of real estate		65,750			12,069			9,385
Acquisition of Independence Realty Trust, Inc. and associated entities		(2,578	)		0			0
Proceeds from sale of collateral management rights		0			14,105			0
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash and warehouse deposits		(133,579	)		(46,842	)		1,992
Cash flow from investing activities		93,886			62,898			253,004
Financing activities:
Repayments on repurchase agreements, secured credit facilities, and loans payable on real estate		(3,097	)		(18,706	)		(28,064	)
Proceeds from loans payable on real estate		37,400			0			0
Repayments on residential mortgage-backed securities		0			0			(223,335	)
Repayments and repurchase of CDO notes payable		(48,104	)		(50,683	)		(38,532	)
Proceeds from issuance of 7.0% convertible senior notes		115,000			0			0
Repayments and repurchase of 6.875% convertible senior notes		(198,345	)		(12,187	)		(28,988	)
Issuance (acquisition) of noncontrolling interests		3,582			(1,935	)		0
Payments for deferred costs		(8,560	)		(761	)		(839	)
Common share issuance, net of costs incurred		30,894			21,763			12,953
Dividends paid to preferred shares		(10,235	)		(13,641	)		(13,641	)
Dividends paid to common shares		(7,919	)		0			0
Cash flow from financing activities		(89,384	)		(76,150	)		(320,446	)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		2,490			2,196			(2,429	)
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period		27,230			25,034			27,463
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period	$	29,720		$	27,230		$	25,034
Supplemental cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest	$	36,473		$	44,839		$	248,226
Cash paid (refunds received) for taxes		31			(1,401	)		(975	)
Non-cash decrease in trust preferred obligations		0			0			(227,084	)
Non-cash increase in investments in real estate from the conversion of loans		124,743			123,087			416,751
Non-cash decrease in indebtedness from conversion to shares or debt extinguishments		(17,384	)		(32,934	)		(69,398	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

85

RAIT Financial Trust

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

As of December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

NOTE 1: THE COMPANY

RAIT Financial Trust invests in and manages a portfolio of real-estate related assets, including direct ownership of real estate properties, and provides a comprehensive set of debt financing options to the real estate industry. References to “RAIT”, “we”, “us”, and “our” refer to RAIT Financial Trust and its subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise requires. We conduct our business through our subsidiaries, RAIT Partnership, L.P. and Taberna Realty Finance Trust, or Taberna, as well as through their respective subsidiaries. RAIT is a self-managed and self-advised Maryland real estate investment trust, or REIT. Taberna is also a Maryland REIT.

We finance a substantial portion of our investments through borrowing and securitization strategies seeking to match the maturities and terms of our financings with the maturities and terms of those investments, and to mitigate interest rate risk through derivative instruments.

We are subject to significant competition in all aspects of our business. Existing industry participants and potential new entrants compete with us for the available supply of investments suitable for origination or acquisition, as well as for debt and equity capital. We compete with many third parties engaged in real estate finance and investment activities, including other REITs, specialty finance companies, savings and loan associations, banks, mortgage bankers, insurance companies, mutual funds, institutional investors, investment banking firms, lenders, governmental bodies and other entities.

NOTE 2: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

a. Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared by management in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly our consolidated financial position and consolidated results of operations, equity and cash flows are included.

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current period presentation. Previously, interest expense was included as part of net interest margin within total revenue. We have now classified interest expense as a component of expenses. Additionally, interest expense associated with third party financing provided on our owned real estate is included in interest expense whereas previously it was reflected within property operating expenses.

b. Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements reflect our accounts and the accounts of our majority-owned and/or controlled subsidiaries. We also consolidate entities that are variable interest entities, or VIEs, where we have determined that we are the primary beneficiary of such entities. The portions of these entities that we do not own are presented as noncontrolling interests as of the dates and for the periods presented in the consolidated financial statements. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Under Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 810, “Consolidation”, the determination of whether to consolidate a VIE is based on the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance together with either the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could be significant to the VIE. We define the power to direct

86

the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance as the ability to buy, sell, refinance, or recapitalize assets or entities, and solely control other material operating events or items of the respective entity. For our commercial mortgages, mezzanine loans, and preferred equity investments, certain rights we hold are protective in nature and would preclude us from having the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance. Assuming both criteria are met, we would be considered the primary beneficiary and would consolidate the VIE. We will continually assess our involvement with VIEs and consolidated the VIEs when we are the primary beneficiary. See Note 9 for additional disclosures pertaining to VIEs.

c. Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

d. Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash held in banks and highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less when purchased.

e. Restricted Cash

Restricted cash consists primarily of proceeds from the issuance of CDO notes payable by securitizations that are restricted for the purpose of funding additional investments in securities subsequent to the balance sheet date. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, we had $235,537 and $151,045, respectively, of restricted cash held by securitizations.

Restricted cash also includes tenant escrows and borrowers’ funds held by us to fund certain expenditures or to be released at our discretion upon the occurrence of certain pre-specified events, and to serve as additional collateral for borrowers’ loans. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, we had $20,995 and $25,166, respectively, of tenant escrows and borrowers’ funds.

f. Investments in Loans

We invest in commercial mortgages, mezzanine loans, debt securities and other loans. We account for our investments in commercial mortgages, mezzanine loans and other loans at amortized cost. The carrying value of these investments is adjusted for origination discounts/premiums, nonrefundable fees and direct costs for originating loans which are amortized into income on a level yield basis over the terms of the loans.

g. Allowance for Losses, Impaired Loans and Non-accrual Status

We maintain an allowance for losses on our investments in commercial mortgages, mezzanine loans and other loans. Management’s periodic evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance is based upon expected and inherent risks in the portfolio, the estimated value of underlying collateral, and current economic conditions. Management reviews loans for impairment and establishes specific reserves when a loss is probable and reasonably estimable under the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 310, “Receivables.” A loan is impaired when it is probable that we may not collect all principal and interest payments according to the contractual terms. As part of the detailed loan review, we consider many factors about the specific loan, including payment history, asset performance, borrower’s financial capability and other characteristics. If any trends or characteristics indicate that it is probable that other loans, with similar characteristics to those of impaired loans, have incurred a loss, we consider whether an allowance for loss is needed pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 450, “Contingencies.”

87

Management evaluates loans for non-accrual status each reporting period. A loan is placed on non-accrual status when the loan payment deficiencies exceed 90 days. Payments received for non-accrual or impaired loans are applied to principal until the loan is removed from non-accrual status or no longer impaired. Past due interest is recognized on non-accrual loans when they are removed from non-accrual status and are making current interest payments. The allowance for losses is increased by charges to operations and decreased by charge-offs (net of recoveries). Management charges off loans when the investment is no longer realizable and legally discharged.

h. Investments in Real Estate

Investments in real estate are shown net of accumulated depreciation. We capitalize those costs that have been evaluated to improve the real property and depreciate those costs on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the asset. We depreciate real property using the following useful lives: buildings and improvements – 30 to 40 years; furniture, fixtures, and equipment—5 to 10 years; and tenant improvements—shorter of the lease term or the life of the asset. Costs for ordinary maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred.

We acquire real estate assets either directly or through the conversion of our investments in loans into owned real estate. Acquisitions of real estate assets and any related intangible assets are recorded initially at fair value under FASB ASC Topic 805, “Business Combinations.” Fair value is determined by management based on market conditions and inputs at the time the asset is acquired. All expenses incurred to acquire a real estate asset are expensed as incurred.

Management reviews our investments in real estate for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The review of recoverability is based on an estimate of the future undiscounted cash flows (excluding interest charges) expected to result from the long-lived asset’s use and eventual disposition. These cash flows consider factors such as expected future operating income, trends and prospects, as well as the effects of leasing demand, competition and other factors. If impairment exists due to the inability to recover the carrying value of a long-lived asset, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the property.

i. Investments in Securities

We account for our investments in securities under FASB ASC Topic 320, “Investments—Debt and Equity Securities”, and designate each investment security as a trading security, an available-for-sale security, or a held-to-maturity security based on our intent at the time of acquisition. Trading securities are recorded at their fair value each reporting period with fluctuations in fair value reported as a component of earnings. Available-for-sale securities are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value reported as a component of other comprehensive income (loss). We classify certain available-for-sale securities as trading securities when we elect to record them under the fair value option in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments.” See “m. Fair Value of Financial Instruments.” Upon the sale of an available-for-sale security, the realized gain or loss on the sale will be recorded as a component of earnings in the respective period. Held-to-maturity investments are carried at amortized cost at each reporting period.

We account for investments in securities where the transfer meets the criteria as a financing under FASB ASC Topic 860, “Transfers and Servicing”, at fair value. Our investments in security-related receivables represent securities that were transferred to issuers of collateralized debt obligations, or CDOs, in which the transferors maintained some level of continuing involvement. We use our judgment to determine whether an investment in securities has sustained an other-than-temporary decline in value. If management determines that an investment in securities has sustained an other-than-temporary decline in its value, the investment is written down to its fair value by a charge to earnings, and we establish a new cost basis for the investment. Our evaluation of an other-than-temporary decline is dependent on the specific facts and circumstances. Factors that we consider in determining whether an other-than-temporary decline in value has occurred include: the estimated

88

fair value of the investment in relation to our cost basis; the financial condition of the related entity; and the intent and ability to retain the investment for a sufficient period of time to allow for recovery of the fair value of the investment.

j. Transfers of Financial Assets

We account for transfers of financial assets under FASB ASC Topic 860, “Transfers and Servicing”, as either sales or financings. Transfers of financial assets that result in sales accounting are those in which (1) the transfer legally isolates the transferred assets from the transferor, (2) the transferee has the right to pledge or exchange the transferred assets and no condition both constrains the transferee’s right to pledge or exchange the assets and provides more than a trivial benefit to the transferor, and (3) the transferor does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets. If the transfer does not meet these criteria, the transfer is accounted for as a financing. Financial assets that are treated as sales are removed from our accounts with any realized gain (loss) reflected in earnings during the period of sale. Financial assets that are treated as financings are maintained on the balance sheet with proceeds received from the legal transfer reflected as securitized borrowings, or security-related receivables.

k. Revenue Recognition

1) Interest income—We recognize interest income from investments in commercial mortgages, mezzanine loans, and other securities on a yield to maturity basis. Upon the acquisition of a loan at a discount, we assess the portions of the discount that constitute accretable yields and non-accretable differences. The accretable yield represents the excess of our expected cash flows from the loan over the amount we paid for the loan. That amount, the accretable yield, is accreted to interest income over the remaining life of the loan. Many of our commercial mortgages and mezzanine loans provide for the accrual of interest at specified rates which differ from current payment terms. Interest income is recognized on such loans at the accrual rate subject to management’s determination that accrued interest and outstanding principal are ultimately collectible.

For investments that we did not elect to record at fair value under FASB ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments”, origination fees and direct loan origination costs are deferred and amortized to net investment income, using the effective interest method, over the contractual life of the underlying loan security or loan, in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 310, “Receivables.”

For investments that we elected to record at fair value under FASB ASC Topic 825, origination fees and direct loan costs are recorded in income and are not deferred.

We recognize interest income from interests in certain securitized financial assets on an estimated effective yield to maturity basis. Management estimates the current yield on the amortized cost of the investment based on estimated cash flows after considering prepayment and credit loss experience.

2) Rental income—We generate rental income from tenant rent and other tenant-related activities at our consolidated real estate properties. For multi-family real estate properties, rental income is recorded when due from residents and recognized monthly as it is earned and realizable, under lease terms which are generally for periods of one year or less. For retail and office real estate properties, rental income is recognized on a straight-line basis from the later of the date of the commencement of the lease or the date of acquisition of the property subject to existing leases, which averages minimum rents over the terms of the leases. Leases also typically provide for tenant reimbursement of a portion of common area maintenance and other operating expenses to the extent that a tenant’s pro rata share of expenses exceeds a base year level set in the lease.

3) Fee and other income—We generate fee and other income through our various subsidiaries by (a) providing ongoing asset management services to investment portfolios under cancelable management agreements, (b) providing or arranging to provide financing to our borrowers,

89

(c) providing property management services to third parties, and (d) providing fixed income trading and advisory services to our customers. We recognize revenue for these activities when the fees are fixed or determinable, are evidenced by an arrangement, collection is reasonably assured and the services under the arrangement have been provided. While we may receive asset management fees when they are earned, we eliminate earned asset management fee income from securitizations while such securitizations are consolidated. During the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009, we received $5,200, $6,332, and $16,114, respectively, of earned asset management fees associated with consolidated securitizations, of which we eliminated $3,768, $2,805, and $7,011, respectively, of management fee income with consolidated securitizations.

l. Derivative Instruments

We may use derivative financial instruments to hedge all or a portion of the interest rate risk associated with our borrowings. Certain of the techniques used to hedge exposure to interest rate fluctuations may also be used to protect against declines in the market value of assets that result from general trends in debt markets. The principal objective of such agreements is to minimize the risks and/or costs associated with our operating and financial structure as well as to hedge specific anticipated transactions.

In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging”, we measure each derivative instrument (including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts) at fair value and record such amounts in our consolidated balance sheet as either an asset or liability. For derivatives designated as fair value hedges, derivatives not designated as hedges, or for derivatives designated as cash flow hedges associated with debt for which we elected the fair value option under FASB ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments”, the changes in fair value of the derivative instrument are recorded in earnings. For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, the changes in the fair value of the effective portions of the derivative are reported in other comprehensive income. Changes in the ineffective portions of cash flow hedges are recognized in earnings.

m. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Where available, fair value is based on observable market prices or parameters or derived from such prices or parameters. Where observable prices or inputs are not available, valuation models are applied. These valuation techniques involve management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the price transparency for the instruments or market and the instruments’ complexity for disclosure purposes. Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their value. Hierarchical levels, as defined in FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” and directly related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to fair valuations of these assets and liabilities, are as follows:

• Level 1: Valuations are based on unadjusted, quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date. The types of assets carried at level 1 fair value generally are equity securities listed in active markets. As such, valuations of these investments do not entail a significant degree of judgment.

• Level 2: Valuations are based on quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets or quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active or for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly.

Fair value assets and liabilities that are generally included in this category are unsecured REIT note receivables, commercial mortgage-backed securities, or CMBS, receivables and certain financial instruments classified as derivatives where the fair value is based on observable market inputs.

90

• Level 3: Inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls has been determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset. Generally, assets and liabilities carried at fair value and included in this category are trust preferred securities, or TruPS, and subordinated debentures, trust preferred obligations and CDO notes payable where observable market inputs do not exist.

The availability of observable inputs can vary depending on the financial asset or liability and is affected by a wide variety of factors, including, for example, the type of investment, whether the investment is new, whether the investment is traded on an active exchange or in the secondary market, and the current market condition. To the extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. Accordingly, the degree of judgment exercised by us in determining fair value is greatest for instruments categorized in level 3.

Fair value is a market-based measure considered from the perspective of a market participant who holds the asset or owes the liability rather than an entity-specific measure. Therefore, even when market assumptions are not readily available, our own assumptions are set to reflect those that management believes market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. We use prices and inputs that management believes are current as of the measurement date, including during periods of market dislocation. In periods of market dislocation, the observability of prices and inputs may be reduced for many instruments. This condition could cause an instrument to be transferred from Level 1 to Level 2 or Level 2 to Level 3.

Many financial instruments have bid and ask prices that can be observed in the marketplace. Bid prices reflect the highest price that we and others are willing to pay for an asset. Ask prices represent the lowest price that we and others are willing to accept for an asset. For financial instruments whose inputs are based on bid-ask prices, we do not require that fair value always be a predetermined point in the bid-ask range. Our policy is to allow for mid-market pricing and adjusting to the point within the bid-ask range that results in our best estimate of fair value.

Fair value for certain of our Level 3 financial instruments is derived using internal valuation models. These internal valuation models include discounted cash flow analyses developed by management using current interest rates, estimates of the term of the particular instrument, specific issuer information and other market data for securities without an active market. In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, the impact of our own credit spreads is also considered when measuring the fair value of financial assets or liabilities, including derivative contracts. Where appropriate, valuation adjustments are made to account for various factors, including bid-ask spreads, credit quality and market liquidity. These adjustments are applied on a consistent basis and are based on observable inputs where available. Management’s estimate of fair value requires significant management judgment and is subject to a high degree of variability based upon market conditions, the availability of specific issuer information and management’s assumptions.

n. Income Taxes

RAIT and Taberna have each elected to be taxed as a REIT and to comply with the related provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Internal Revenue Code. Accordingly, we generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax to the extent of our dividends to shareholders and as long as certain asset, income and share ownership tests are met. If we were to fail to meet these requirements, we would be subject to U.S. federal income tax, which could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and amounts

91

available for dividends to our shareholders. Management believes that all of the criteria to maintain RAIT’s and Taberna’s REIT qualification have been met for the applicable periods, but there can be no assurance that these criteria will continue to be met in subsequent periods.

We maintain various taxable REIT subsidiaries, or TRSs, which may be subject to U.S. federal, state and local income taxes and foreign taxes. Current and deferred taxes are provided on the portion of earnings (losses) recognized by us with respect to our interest in domestic TRSs. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed based on temporary differences between our GAAP consolidated financial statements and the federal and state income tax basis of assets and liabilities as of the consolidated balance sheet date. We evaluate the realizability of our deferred tax assets (e.g., net operating loss and capital loss carryforwards) and recognize a valuation allowance if, based on the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of our deferred tax assets will not be realized. When evaluating the realizability of our deferred tax assets, we consider estimates of expected future taxable income, existing and projected book/tax differences, tax planning strategies available, and the general and industry specific economic outlook. This realizability analysis is inherently subjective, as it requires management to forecast our business and general economic environment in future periods. Changes in estimate of deferred tax asset realizability, if any, are included in income tax expense on the consolidated statements of operations.

From time to time, our TRSs generate taxable income from intercompany transactions. The TRS entities generate taxable revenue from fees for services provided to securitizations. Some of these fees paid to the TRS entities are capitalized as deferred financing costs by the securitizations. Certain securitizations may be consolidated in our financial statements pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 810, “Consolidation.” In consolidation, these fees are eliminated when the securitization is included in the consolidated group. Nonetheless, all income taxes are accrued by the TRSs in the year in which the taxable revenue is received. These income taxes are not eliminated when the related revenue is eliminated in consolidation.

Certain TRS entities are domiciled in the Cayman Islands and, accordingly, taxable income generated by these entities may not be subject to local income taxation, but generally will be included in our taxable income on a current basis, whether or not distributed. Upon dividend of any previously included income, no incremental U.S. federal, state, or local income taxes would be payable by us.

The TRS entities may be subject to tax laws that are complex and potentially subject to different interpretations by the taxpayer and the relevant governmental taxing authorities. In establishing a provision for income tax expense, we must make judgments and interpretations about the application of these inherently complex tax laws. Actual income taxes paid may vary from estimates depending upon changes in income tax laws, actual results of operations, and the final audit of tax returns by taxing authorities. Tax assessments may arise several years after tax returns have been filed. We review the tax balances of our TRS entities quarterly and as new information becomes available, the balances are adjusted as appropriate.

o. Share-Based Compensation

We account for our share-based compensation in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, “Compensation-Stock Compensation.” We measure the cost of employee and trustee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award and record compensation expense over the related vesting period.

p. Deferred Financing Costs and Intangible Assets

Costs incurred in connection with debt financing are capitalized as deferred financing costs and charged to interest expense over the terms of the related debt agreements, under the effective interest method.

Intangible assets on our consolidated balance sheets represent identifiable intangible assets acquired in business acquisitions. We amortize identified intangible assets to expense over their estimated lives using the

92

straight-line method. We evaluate intangible assets for impairment as events and circumstances change, in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 360, “Property, Plant, and Equipment.” We expect to record amortization expense of intangible assets of $560 each fiscal year for the period from 2012 through 2015 and $388 for 2016.

q. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

On January 1, 2010, we adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-06, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements.” This accounting standard requires new disclosures for significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and 2 fair value measurements and a description of the reasons for the transfer. This accounting standard also updates existing disclosures by providing fair value measurement disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities and provides disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. For Level 3 fair value measurements, new disclosures will require entities to present information separately for purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements. These disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

On January 1, 2011, we adopted ASU No. 2010-29, “Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations.” This accounting standard requires that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. This accounting standard also expands the supplemental pro forma disclosures under FASB ASU Topic 805, “Business Combinations” to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. The adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In April 2011, the FASB issued accounting standards classified under FASB ASC Topic 310, “Receivables”. This accounting standard amends existing guidance to provide additional guidance on the determination of whether a creditor has granted a concession and whether a debtor is experiencing financial difficulties for purposes of determining whether a restructuring constitutes a troubled debt restructuring. This standard is effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after June 15, 2011, and should be applied retrospectively to the beginning of the annual period of adoption. The adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In April 2011, the FASB issued an accounting standard classified under FASB ASC Topic 860, “Transfers and Servicing”. This accounting standard amends existing guidance to improve the accounting for repurchase agreements and other agreements that both entitle and obligate a transferor to repurchase or redeem financial assets before their maturity. The transferor is deemed to have maintained effective control over the financial assets transferred (and thus must account for the transaction as a secured borrowing) if all of the following criteria are met: (a) the financial assets to be repurchased or redeemed are the same or substantially the same as those transferred, (b) the agreement is to repurchase or redeem them before maturity, at a fixed or determinable price, and (c) the agreement is entered into contemporaneously with, or in contemplation of, the transfer. This accounting standard is effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after December 15, 2011. Management is currently evaluating the impact that this standard may have on our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued an accounting standard classified under FASB ASC Topic 222, “Comprehensive Income”. This accounting standard amends existing guidance to improve the comparability, consistency, and transparency of financial reporting and to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income by requiring entities to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income in either a single continuous statement of

93

comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In addition, the entity is required to present on the face of the financial statements reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income in the statement(s) where the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income are presented. In December 2011, the FASB issued an accounting standard that deferred the new presentation requirements about reclassification adjustments. Both of these accounting standards are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods with those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. Management is currently evaluating the impact that these standards may have on our consolidated financial statements.

In December 2011, The FASB issued an accounting standard classified under FASB ASC Topic 360, “Property, Plant, and Equipment”. This accounting standard amends existing guidance to resolve the diversity in practice about whether the guidance for real estate sales applies to a parent that ceases to have a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary that is in substance real estate as a result of default on the subsidiary’s nonrecourse debt. This accounting standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods with those years, beginning on or after June 15, 2012. Management is currently evaluating the impact that these standards may have on our consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 3: INVESTMENTS IN LOANS

Investments in Commercial Mortgages, Mezzanine Loans, Other Loans and Preferred Equity Interests

The following table summarizes our investments in commercial mortgages, mezzanine loans, other loans and preferred equity interests as of December 31, 2011:

	Unpaid Principal Balance			Unamortized (Discounts) Premiums			Carrying Amount			Number of Loans		Weighted- Average Coupon (1)			Range of Maturity Dates
Commercial Real Estate (CRE) Loans
Commercial mortgages	$	574,982		$	(3,911	)	$	571,071			36		6.3	%		Mar. 2012 to Dec 2020
Mezzanine loans		312,453			(4,755	)		307,698			91		8.9	%		Mar. 2012 to Nov. 2038
Preferred equity interests		65,562			(1,112	)		64,450			22		9.5	%		May 2012 to Aug. 2025
Total CRE Loans		952,997			(9,778	)		943,219			149		7.4	%
Other loans		54,842			(649	)		54,193			4		4.5	%		Mar. 2012 to Oct. 2016
Total Loans		1,007,839			(10,427	)		997,412			153		7.2	%
Deferred fees		(1,049	)		0			(1,049	)
Total investments in loans	$	1,006,790		$	(10,427	)	$	996,363

(1) Weighted-average coupon is calculated on the unpaid principal amount of the underlying instruments which does not necessarily correspond to the carrying amount.

94

The following table summarizes our investments in commercial mortgages, mezzanine loans, other loans and preferred equity interests as of December 31, 2010:

	Unpaid Principal Balance			Unamortized (Discounts) Premiums			Carrying Amount			Number of Loans		Weighted- Average Coupon (1)			Range of Maturity Dates
Commercial Real Estate (CRE) Loans
Commercial mortgages	$	710,059		$	(1,827	)	$	708,232			43		6.7	%		Mar. 2011 to Dec. 2020
Mezzanine loans		381,218			(5,881	)		375,337			109		9.5	%		Mar. 2011 to Nov. 2038
Preferred equity interests		81,864			(1,183	)		80,681			22		9.8	%		Nov. 2011 to Aug. 2025
Total CRE Loans		1,173,141			(8,891	)		1,164,250			174		7.8	%
Other loans		57,420			(997	)		56,423			5		6.3	%		Mar. 2011 to Oct. 2016
Total Loans	$	1,230,561		$	(9,888	)	$	1,220,673			179		7.7	%
Deferred fees		(1,563	)		0			(1,563	)
Total investments in loans	$	1,228,998		$	(9,888	)	$	1,219,110

(1) Weighted-average coupon is calculated on the unpaid principal amount of the underlying instruments which does not necessarily correspond to the carrying amount.

During the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, we completed the conversion of six and nine commercial real estate loans with a carrying value of $142,102 and $141,235 to owned properties. During the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, we charged off $17,359 and $18,148, respectively, related to the conversion of commercial real estate loans to owned properties. See Note 5.

The following table summarizes the amounts past due of our commercial mortgages, mezzanine loans, other loans and preferred equity interests as of December 31, 2011 and 2010:

Delinquency Status	As of December 31, 2011		As of December 31, 2010
30 to 59 days	$	3,500	$	27,978
60 to 89 days		0		0
90 days or more		16,857		55,450
In foreclosure or bankruptcy proceedings		10,320		46,578
Total	$	30,677	$	130,006

As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, approximately $54,334 and $122,306, respectively, of our commercial real estate loans were on non-accrual status and had a weighted-average interest rate of 9.8% and 8.8%, respectively. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, approximately $19,501 and $20,908 of one other loan was on non-accrual status and had a weighted-average interest rate of 7.2%.

The following table sets forth the maturities of our investments in commercial mortgages, mezzanine loans, other loans and preferred equity interests by year:

2012	$	266,729
2013		75,726
2014		79,832
2015		118,847
2016		246,976
Thereafter		219,729
Total	$	1,007,839

95

Allowance For Losses And Impaired Loans

The following table provides a roll-forward of our allowance for losses for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009:

	For the Year Ended December 31, 2011								For the Year Ended December 31, 2010								For the Year Ended December 31, 2009
Type of Derivative	Commercial Mortgages, Mezzanine Loans and Other Loans			Residential Mortgages and Mortgage- Related Receivables		Total			Commercial Mortgages, Mezzanine Loans and Other Loans			Residential Mortgages and Mortgage- Related Receivables		Total			Commercial Mortgages, Mezzanine Loans and Other Loans			Residential Mortgages and Mortgage- Related Receivables			Total
Beginning balance	$	69,691		$	0	$	69,691		$	86,609		$	0	$	86,609		$	117,737		$	54,236		$	171,973
Provision		3,900			0		3,900			38,307			0		38,307			130,080			96,487			226,567
Charge-offs, net of recoveries		(27,509	)		0		(27,509	)		(55,225	)		0		(55,225	)		(161,208	)		(23,066	)		(184,274	)
Sale of residential mortgages and mortgage-related receivables		0			0		0			0			0		0			0			(127,657	)		(127,657	)
Ending balance	$	46,082		$	0	$	46,082		$	69,691		$	0	$	69,691		$	86,609		$	0		$	86,609

As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, we identified 19 and 27, respectively, commercial mortgages, mezzanine loans and other loans with unpaid principal balances of $87,977 and $157,746, respectively, as impaired.

The average unpaid principal balance of total impaired loans was $125,263, $176,484, and $207,042 during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively. We recorded interest income from impaired loans of $525, $3,383, and $3,203 for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively.

We have evaluated modifications to our commercial real estate loans to determine if the modification constitutes a troubled debt restructuring (TDR) under FASB ASC Topic 310, “Receivables”. During the year ended December 31, 2011, we have determined that a modification to one commercial real estate loan constituted a TDR as the borrower was experiencing financial difficulties and we, as the lender, granted a concession to the borrower by reducing the interest rate from 10.25% to 0.5%. The outstanding recorded investment was $7,799 both before and after the modification and has been an impaired loan throughout 2011. As of December 31, 2011, there were no TDRs that subsequently defaulted.

96

NOTE 4: INVESTMENTS IN SECURITIES

Our investments in securities and security-related receivables are accounted for at fair value. The following table summarizes our investments in securities as of December 31, 2011:

Investment Description	Amortized Cost		Net Fair Value Adjustments			Estimated Fair Value		Weighted Average Coupon (1)			Weighted Average Years to Maturity
Trading securities
TruPS and subordinated debentures	$	637,376	$	(155,640	)	$	481,736		4.3	%		22.6
Other securities		11,020		(11,020	)		0		4.6	%		40.9
Total trading securities		648,396		(166,660	)		481,736		4.3	%		22.9
Available-for-sale securities		3,600		(3,598	)		2		2.2	%		30.9
Security-related receivables
TruPS and subordinated debenture receivables		111,199		(28,336	)		82,863		6.5	%		11.0
Unsecured REIT note receivables		30,000		66			30,066		6.7	%		5.1
CMBS receivables (2)		86,443		(51,326	)		35,117		5.6	%		31.7
Other securities		53,168		(35,491	)		17,677		4.0	%		28.9
Total security-related receivables		280,810		(115,087	)		165,723		5.8	%		20.1
Total investments in securities	$	932,806	$	(285,345	)	$	647,461		4.7	%		22.2

(1) Weighted-average coupon is calculated on the unpaid principal amount of the underlying instruments which does not necessarily correspond to the carrying amount.

(2) CMBS receivables include securities with a fair value totaling $7,204 that are rated between “AAA” and “A-” by Standard & Poor’s, securities with a fair value totaling $21,414 that are rated between “BBB+” and “B-” by Standard & Poor’s, securities with a fair value totaling $5,517 that are rated “CCC” by Standard & Poor’s, and securities with a fair value totaling $982 that are rated “D” by Standard & Poor’s.

A substantial portion of our gross unrealized losses are greater than 12 months.

The following table summarizes our investments in securities as of December 31, 2010:

Investment Description	Amortized Cost		Net Fair Value Adjustments			Estimated Fair Value		Weighted Average Coupon (1)			Weighted Average Years to Maturity
Trading securities
TruPS	$	695,501	$	(241,028	)	$	454,473		5.1	%		23.8
Other securities		10,000		(10,000	)		0		4.8	%		41.9
Total trading securities		705,501		(251,028	)		454,473		5.1	%		24.0
Available-for-sale securities		3,600		(3,598	)		2		2.1	%		31.9
Security-related receivables
TruPS receivables		111,199		(28,112	)		83,087		6.9	%		12.0
Unsecured REIT note receivables		61,000		1,490			62,490		6.6	%		6.7
CMBS receivables (2)		158,868		(81,726	)		77,142		5.7	%		33.0
Other securities		105,477		(77,220	)		28,257		2.8	%		30.9
Total security-related receivables		436,544		(185,568	)		250,976		5.4	%		23.5
Total investments in securities	$	1,145,645	$	(440,194	)	$	705,451		5.1	%		23.9

(1) Weighted-average coupon is calculated on the unpaid principal amount of the underlying instruments which does not necessarily correspond to the carrying amount.

97

(2) CMBS receivables include securities with a fair value totaling $30,066 that are rated between “AAA” and “A-” by Standard & Poor’s, securities with a fair value totaling $40,086 that are rated between “BBB+” and “B-” by Standard & Poor’s, securities with a fair value totaling $6,805 that are rated “CCC” by Standard & Poor’s and securities with a fair value totaling $185 that are rated “D” by Standard & Poor’s.

A substantial portion of our gross unrealized losses is greater than 12 months.

TruPS included above as trading securities include (a) investments in TruPS issued by VIEs of which we are not the primary beneficiary and which we do not consolidate and (b) transfers of investments in TruPS securities to us that were accounted for as a sale pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 860, “Transfers and Servicing.”

The following table summarizes the non-accrual status of our investments in securities:

	As of December 31, 2011							As of December 31, 2010
	Principal /Par Amount on Non-accrual		Weighted Average Coupon			Fair Value		Principal /Par Amount on Non-accrual		Weighted Average Coupon			Fair Value
TruPS and TruPS receivables	$	83,557		1.9	%	$	5,766	$	133,682		4.1	%	$	5,581
Other securities		34,240		3.3	%		2		42,754		2.8	%		976
CMBS receivables		32,462		5.9	%		915		29,204		5.9	%		975

The assets of our consolidated CDOs collateralize the debt of such entities and are not available to our creditors. As of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, investment in securities of $748,575 and $806,700, respectively, in principal amount of TruPS and subordinated debentures, and $104,122 and $219,868, respectively, in principal amount of unsecured REIT note receivables and CMBS receivables, collateralized the consolidated CDO notes payable of such entities.

Asset Impairments

Management evaluates investments in securities for impairment as events and circumstances warrant and concluded that certain of these securities were other than temporarily impaired as management does not expect full recovery of our investment. Asset impairment expense of $46,015 was recorded for the year ended December 31, 2009 related to available-for-sale securities and was included in asset impairments in our consolidated statements of operations. This impairment reduced the amortized cost basis of these available-for-sale securities.

NOTE 5: INVESTMENTS IN REAL ESTATE

The table below summarizes our investments in real estate:

	As of December 31, 2011					As of December 31, 2010
	Book Value			Number of Properties		Book Value			Number of Properties
Multi-family real estate properties	$	591,915			33	$	602,183			33
Office real estate properties		251,303			10		219,567			9
Retail real estate properties		71,405			3		41,838			2
Parcels of land		46,251			10		22,208			3
Subtotal		960,874			56		885,796			47
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(69,372	)				(46,604	)
Investments in real estate	$	891,502				$	839,192

98

As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, our investments in real estate were comprised of land of $209,941 and $179,280, respectively, and buildings and improvements of $750,933 and $706,516, respectively.

As of December 31, 2011, our investments in real estate of $891,502 are financed through $135,722 of mortgages held by third parties and $796,177 of mortgages held by our RAIT I and RAIT II CDO securitizations. Together, along with commercial real estate loans held by RAIT I and RAIT II, these mortgages serve as collateral for the CDO notes payable issued by the RAIT I and RAIT II CDO securitizations. All intercompany balances and interest charges are eliminated in consolidation.

Acquisitions:

During the year ended December 31, 2011, we converted six loans with a carrying value of $142,102, relating to two multi-family properties, one office property, one retail property, and seven parcels of land, to owned real estate. Upon conversion, we recorded the 11 properties at fair value of $124,743. We previously held bridge or mezzanine loans with respect to these real estate properties.

The following table summarizes the aggregate estimated fair value of the assets and liabilities associated with the 11 properties acquired during the year ended December 31, 2011, on the respective date of each conversion, for the real estate accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 805.

Description	Estimated Fair Value
Assets acquired:
Investments in real estate	$	124,743
Cash and cash equivalents		437
Restricted cash		1,031
Other assets		352
Total assets acquired		126,563
Liabilities assumed:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		1,795
Other liabilities		532
Total liabilities assumed		2,327
Estimated fair value of net assets acquired	$	124,236

The following table summarizes the consideration transferred to acquire the real estate properties and the amounts of identified assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the respective conversion date:

Description	Estimated Fair Value
Fair value of consideration transferred:
Commercial real estate loans	$	124,743
Other considerations		(507	)
Total fair value of consideration transferred	$	124,236

During the year ended December 31, 2011, these investments contributed revenue of $6,501 and a net income allocable to common shares of $1,854. During the year ended December 31, 2011, we did not incur any third-party acquisition-related costs.

Our consolidated unaudited pro forma information, after including the acquisition of real estate properties, is presented below as if the acquisitions occurred on January 1, 2010 and 2011, respectively. These pro forma

99

results are not necessarily indicative of the results which actually would have occurred if the acquisition had occurred on the first day of the periods presented, nor does the pro forma financial information purport to represent the results of operations for future periods:

Description	For the Year Ended December 31, 2011			For the Year Ended December 31, 2010
Total revenue, as reported	$	234,154		$	244,570
Pro forma revenue		238,289			255,516
Net income (loss) allocable to common shares, as reported		(51,130	)		98,152
Pro forma net income (loss) allocable to common shares		(50,900	)		100,539

We have not yet completed the process of estimating the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Accordingly, our preliminary estimates and the allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed may change as we complete the process. In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 805, changes, if any, to the preliminary estimates and allocation will be reported in our financial statements retrospectively.

Dispositions:

During the year ended December 31, 2011, we sold two multi-family properties for a total purchase price of $67,550. We recorded losses on the sale of these assets of $171.

NOTE 6: INDEBTEDNESS

We maintain various forms of short-term and long-term financing arrangements. Generally, these financing agreements are collateralized by assets within securitizations.

The following table summarizes our total recourse and non-recourse indebtedness as of December 31, 2011:

Description	Unpaid Principal Balance		Carrying Amount		Weighted- Average Interest Rate			Contractual Maturity
Recourse indebtedness:
7.0% convertible senior notes (1)	$	115,000	$	107,868		7.0	%	Apr. 2031
6.875% convertible senior notes (2)		3,582		3,735		6.9	%	Apr. 2027
Secured credit facilities		9,954		9,954		3.2	%	Dec. 2016
Junior subordinated notes, at fair value (3)		38,052		22,450		5.2	%	Oct. 2015 to Mar. 2035
Junior subordinated notes, at amortized cost		25,100		25,100		7.7	%	Apr. 2037
Total recourse indebtedness (4)		191,688		169,107		6.5	%
Non-recourse indebtedness:
CDO notes payable, at amortized cost (5)(6)		1,320,904		1,320,904		0.7	%	2045 to 2046
CDO notes payable, at fair value (3)(5)(7)		1,104,084		122,506		1.1	%	2037 to 2038
Loans payable on real estate		135,757		135,757		5.6	%	Sept. 2015 to May 2021
Total non-recourse indebtedness		2,560,745		1,579,167		1.1	%
Total indebtedness	$	2,752,433	$	1,748,274		1.5	%

(1) Our 7.0% convertible senior notes are redeemable, at par at the option of the holder, in April 2016, April 2021, and April 2026.

100

(2) Our 6.875% convertible senior notes are redeemable, at par at the option of the holder, in April 2012, April 2017, and April 2022.

(3) Relates to liabilities which we elected to record at fair value under FASB ASC Topic 825.

(4) Excludes senior secured notes issued by us with an aggregate principal amount equal to $100,000 which are eliminated in consolidation.

(5) Excludes CDO notes payable purchased by us which are eliminated in consolidation.

(6) Collateralized by $1,669,207 principal amount of commercial mortgages, mezzanine loans, other loans and preferred equity interests. These obligations were issued by separate legal entities and consequently the assets of the special purpose entities that collateralize these obligations are not available to our creditors.

(7) Collateralized by $1,159,375 principal amount of investments in securities and security-related receivables and loans, before fair value adjustments. The fair value of these investments as of December 31, 2011 was $855,316. These obligations were issued by separate legal entities and consequently the assets of the special purpose entities that collateralize these obligations are not available to our creditors.

The following table summarizes our total recourse and non-recourse indebtedness as of December 31, 2010:

Description	Unpaid Principal Balance		Carrying Amount		Weighted- Average Interest Rate			Contractual Maturity
Recourse indebtedness:
6.875% convertible senior notes (1)	$	143,613	$	143,474		6.9	%	Apr. 2027
Secured credit facilities		36,489		36,489		4.7	%	Oct. 2011 to Dec. 2011
Senior secured notes		63,950		63,950		11.7	%	Apr. 2014
Loans payable on real estate		19,922		19,922		5.5	%	Apr. 2012 to Sept. 2013
Junior subordinated notes, at fair value (2)		38,052		4,422		5.2	%	Oct. 2015 to Mar. 2035
Junior subordinated notes, at amortized cost		25,100		25,100		7.7	%	Apr. 2037
Total recourse indebtedness		327,126		293,357		7.4	%
Non-recourse indebtedness:
CDO notes payable, at amortized cost (3)(4)		1,341,750		1,341,750		0.7	%	2045 to 2046
CDO notes payable, at fair value (2)(3)(5)		1,147,112		148,072		0.9	%	2037 to 2038
Loans payable on real estate		54,998		54,998		6.0	%	Mar. 2011 to Aug. 2016
Total non-recourse indebtedness		2,543,860		1,544,820		0.9	%
Total indebtedness	$	2,870,986	$	1,838,177		1.6	%

(1) Our convertible senior notes are redeemable, at par at the option of the holder, in April 2012, April 2017, and April 2022.

(2) Relates to liabilities which we elected to record at fair value under FASB ASC Topic 825.

(3) Excludes CDO notes payable purchased by us which are eliminated in consolidation.

(4) Collateralized by $1,771,643 principal amount of commercial mortgages, mezzanine loans, other loans and preferred equity interests. These obligations were issued by separate legal entities and consequently the assets of the special purpose entities that collateralize these obligations are not available to our creditors.

(5) Collateralized by $1,327,464 principal amount of investments in securities and security-related receivables and loans, before fair value adjustments. The fair value of these investments as of December 31, 2010 was $870,889. These obligations were issued by separate legal entities and consequently the assets of the special purpose entities that collateralize these obligations are not available to our creditors.

Recourse indebtedness refers to indebtedness that is recourse to our general assets, including the loans payable on real estate that are guaranteed by us. Non-recourse indebtedness consists of indebtedness of

101

consolidated VIEs (i.e. securitization vehicles) and loans payable on real estate which is recourse only to specific assets pledged as collateral to the lenders. The creditors of each consolidated VIE have no recourse to our general credit.

The current status or activity in our financing arrangements occurring as of or during the year ended December 31, 2011 is as follows:

Recourse Indebtedness

6.875% convertible senior notes. On April 18, 2007, we issued and sold in a private offering to qualified institutional buyers, $425,000 aggregate principal amount of 6.875% convertible senior notes due 2027, or the 6.875% convertible senior notes. After deducting the initial purchaser’s discount and the estimated offering expenses, we received approximately $414,250 of net proceeds. Interest on the convertible senior notes is paid semi-annually and the convertible senior notes mature on April 15, 2027.

Prior to April 20, 2012, the convertible senior notes are not redeemable at RAIT’s option, except to preserve RAIT’s status as a REIT. On or after April 20, 2012, RAIT may redeem all or a portion of the convertible senior notes at a redemption price equal to the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest (including additional interest), if any. Convertible senior note holders may require RAIT to repurchase all or a portion of the convertible senior notes for cash at a purchase price equal to the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest (including additional interest), if any, on the convertible senior notes on April 15, 2012, April 15, 2017, and April 15, 2022, or upon the occurrence of certain change in control transactions prior to April 20, 2012.

Prior to April 15, 2026, upon the occurrence of specified events, the convertible senior notes will be convertible at the option of the holder at an initial conversion rate of 28.6874 shares per $1,000 principal amount of convertible senior notes. The initial conversion price of $104.58 represents a 27.5% premium to the per share closing price of $82.02 on the date the offering was priced. Upon conversion of convertible senior notes by a holder, the holder will receive cash up to the principal amount of such convertible senior notes and, with respect to the remainder, if any, of the conversion value in excess of such principal amount, at the option of RAIT in cash or RAIT’s common shares. The initial conversion rate is subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. We include the convertible senior notes in earnings per share using the treasury stock method if the conversion value in excess of the par amount is considered in the money during the respective periods.

On January 1, 2009, we adopted accounting standards classified under FASB ASC Topic 470, “Debt”. Upon adoption, we recorded a retrospective discount on our issued and outstanding convertible senior notes of $1,996. This discount reflects the fair value of the embedded conversion option within the convertible debt instruments and was recorded as an increase to additional paid in capital. The fair value was calculated by discounting the cash flows required in the indenture relating to the convertible senior notes agreement by a discount rate that represents management’s estimate of our senior, unsecured, non-convertible debt borrowing rate at the time when the convertible senior notes were issued. The discount is being amortized to interest expense through April 15, 2012, the date at which holders of our convertible senior notes could require repayment. Upon adoption, all prior periods were restated to reflect the retroactive adoption of the standard and total discount amortization recorded through December 31, 2008 was $607.

During the year ended December 31, 2011, we repurchased $140,031 in aggregate principal amount of our 6.875% Convertible Senior Notes due 2027 for an aggregate purchase price of $138,576. As a result of these transactions, we recorded losses on extinguishment of debt of $928, inclusive of deferred financing costs and unamortized discounts that were written off.

During the year ended December 31, 2010, we repurchased from the market, a total of $102,750 in aggregate principal amount of convertible notes for a total consideration of $72,637. The purchase price consisted of $12,357 in cash, the issuance of 6,305,000 common shares, and the issuance of a $22,000 senior

102

secured note. See “Senior Secured Notes” below. As a result of these transactions, we recorded gains on extinguishment of debt of $29,974, inclusive of deferred financing costs and unamortized discounts that were written off.

During the year ended December 31, 2009, we repurchased from the market, a total of $103,085 in aggregate principal amount of convertible notes for a total consideration of $54,519, including the issuance of a $43,000 senior secured note. See “Senior Secured Note” below. During 2009, we also exchanged $34,000 in aggregate principal amount of convertible notes for 2,708,667 common shares and $3,111 of cash, for total consideration of $13,999 based on our closing stock price of $4.02 per share on December 29, 2009, the date our exchange offer was completed. As a result of these transactions, we recorded gains on extinguishment of debt of $64,898, inclusive of deferred financing costs and unamortized discounts that were written off.

7.0% convertible senior notes. On March 21, 2011, we issued and sold in a public offering $115,000 aggregate principal amount of our 7.0% Convertible Senior Notes due 2031, or the 7.0% convertible senior notes. After deducting the underwriting discount and the estimated offering costs, we received approximately $109,000 of net proceeds. Interest on the 7.0% convertible senior notes is paid semi-annually and the 7.0% convertible senior notes mature on April 1, 2031.

Prior to April 5, 2016, the 7.0% convertible senior notes are not redeemable at our option, except to preserve RAIT’s status as a REIT. On or after April 5, 2016, we may redeem all or a portion of the 7.0% convertible senior notes at a redemption price equal to the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest. Holders of 7.0% convertible senior notes may require us to repurchase all or a portion of the 7.0% convertible senior notes at a purchase price equal to the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest on April 1, 2016, April 1, 2021, and April 1, 2026, or upon the occurrence of certain defined fundamental changes.

The 7.0% convertible senior notes are convertible at the option of the holder at a current conversion rate of 132.9506 common shares per $1,000 principal amount of 7.0% convertible senior notes (equivalent to a current conversion price of $7.52 per common share). Upon conversion of 7.0% convertible senior notes by a holder, the holder will receive cash, our common shares or a combination of cash and our common shares, at our election. We include the 7.0% convertible senior notes in earnings per share using the treasury stock method if the conversion value in excess of the par amount is considered in the money during the respective periods.

According to FASB ASC Topic 470, “Debt”, we recorded a discount on our issued and outstanding 7.0% convertible senior notes of $8,228. This discount reflects the fair value of the embedded conversion option within the 7.0% convertible senior notes and was recorded as an increase to additional paid in capital. The fair value was calculated by discounting the cash flows required in the indenture relating to the 7.0% convertible senior notes agreement by a discount rate that represents management’s estimate of our senior, unsecured, non-convertible debt borrowing rate at the time when the 7.0% convertible senior notes were issued. The discount will be amortized to interest expense through April 1, 2016, the date at which holders of our 7.0% convertible senior notes could require repayment.

Secured credit facilities. During the year ended December 31, 2011, we repaid, in full, a $16,160 secured credit facility due to mature in October 2011.

As of December 31, 2011, we have $9,954 outstanding under our remaining secured credit facility. During 2011 we renewed our remaining secured credit facility by repaying $8,993 of the $19,547 outstanding principal amount and amending the terms of the remaining $10,554 balance to extend the maturity date from December 2011 to December 2016 and provide for the full amortization of that balance over that five year period. In addition, the interest rate on our secured credit facility was amended to be a floating interest rate of LIBOR plus 275 basis points.

Senior secured notes. On March 25, 2010, pursuant to a securities exchange agreement, we acquired from a note holder $47,000 aggregate principal amount of our 6.875% convertible senior notes for a total consideration

103

of $31,240. The purchase price consisted of (a) our issuance of a $22,000 10% senior secured convertible note, or the 10% senior secured convertible note, (b) our issuance of 500,000 common shares, and (c) our payment of $6,000 in cash. We also paid to the note holder $1,427 of accrued and unpaid interest on the 6.875% convertible senior notes through March 25, 2010. The holder of the senior secured convertible note converted $1,050 principal amount of the senior secured convertible note into 100,000 common shares effective May 5, 2010.

During the year ended December 31, 2011, the holder of the 10.0% senior secured convertible note converted $5,250 principal amount of the 10.0% senior note into 500,000 common shares. On April 26, 2011, we prepaid the remaining $15,700 principal amount of the 10.0% senior note.

On July 31, 2009, pursuant to a securities purchase agreement, we purchased from a note holder $98,280 aggregate principal amount of our 6.875% convertible senior notes, for a purchase price of $53,000. The purchase price consisted of (a) $43,000 12.5% senior secured note due 2014 issued by us, or the 12.5% senior secured note, and (b) $10,000 in cash. We also paid to the note holder $1,989 of accrued and unpaid interest on the 6.875% convertible senior notes through July 31, 2009.

During the year ended December 31, 2011, we prepaid, in full, our $43,000 12.5% Senior Secured Notes due to mature in April 2014.

On October 5, 2011, we entered into an exchange agreement with Taberna VIII pursuant to which we issued four senior secured notes, or the senior notes, with an aggregate principal amount equal to $100,000 to Taberna VIII in exchange for a portfolio of real estate related debt securities, or the exchanged securities, held by Taberna VIII. Taberna VIII is a subsidiary of ours and, as a result, the senior secured notes are eliminated in consolidation. The senior notes and the exchanged securities were determined to have approximately equivalent fair market value at the time of the exchange.

The senior notes were issued pursuant to an indenture agreement dated October 5, 2011 which contains customary events of default, including those relating to nonpayment of principal or interest when due and defaults based upon events of bankruptcy and insolvency. The senior notes are each $25,000 principal amount with a weighted average interest rate of 7.0% and have maturity dates ranging from April 2017 to April 2019. Interest is at a fixed rate and accrues from October 5, 2011 and will be payable quarterly in arrears on October 30, January 30, April 30 and July 30 of each year, beginning October 30, 2011. The senior notes are secured and are not convertible into equity securities of RAIT.

Junior subordinated notes, at fair value. On October 16, 2008, we issued $38,052 principal amount of junior subordinated notes to a third party and received $15,459 of net cash proceeds. Of the total amount of junior subordinated notes issued, $18,671 has a fixed interest rate of 8.65% through March 30, 2015 with a floating rate of LIBOR plus 400 basis points thereafter and a maturity date of March 30, 2035. The remaining $19,380 has a fixed interest rate of 9.64% and a maturity date of October 30, 2015. At issuance, we elected to record these junior subordinated notes at fair value under FASB ASC Topic 825, with all subsequent changes in fair value recorded in earnings.

On October 25, 2010, pursuant to a securities exchange agreement, we exchanged $18,671 in aggregate principal amount of these junior subordinated notes with an interest rate of 8.7% for $18,671 of junior subordinated notes with a reduced interest rate and provided $5,000 of our convertible senior notes as collateral for the new junior subordinated notes. The new junior subordinated notes have a fixed rate of interest of 0.5% through March 30, 2015, thereafter with a floating rate of three-month LIBOR plus 400 basis points, with such floating rate not to exceed 7.0%. The maturity date remains the same at March 30, 2035. At issuance, we elected to record these junior subordinated notes at fair value under FASB ASC Topic 825, with all subsequent changes in fair value recorded in earnings.

As of December 31, 2010, we have $38,052 unpaid principal associated with these junior subordinated notes. The fair value, or carrying amount, of this indebtedness was $22,450 as of December 31, 2011.

104

Junior subordinated notes, at amortized cost. On February 12, 2007, we formed Taberna Funding Capital Trust I which issued $25,000 of trust preferred securities to investors and $100 of common securities to us. The combined proceeds were used by Taberna Funding Capital Trust I to purchase $25,100 of junior subordinated notes issued by us. The junior subordinated notes are the sole assets of Taberna Funding Capital Trust I and mature on April 30, 2037, but are callable, at our option, on or after April 30, 2012. Interest on the junior subordinated notes is payable quarterly at a fixed rate of 7.69% through April 2012 and thereafter at a floating rate equal to three-month LIBOR plus 2.50%.

Loans payable on real estate. During the year ended December 31, 2011 we refinanced recourse financing consisting of a first mortgage of $12,500 principal amount with a fixed rate of 5.8%, due in April 2012, that was associated with one of our owned real estate properties with non-recourse financing provided by a consolidated securitization. In addition, we refinanced recourse financing consisting of a first mortgage of $7,113 principal amount with a fixed rate of 5.0%, due in September 2013, that was associated with one of our owned real estate properties with non-recourse financing provided by a consolidated securitization.

CMBS Facilities. On October 27, 2011, we entered into a two year CMBS facility, or the $100,000 CMBS facility, pursuant to which we may sell, and later repurchase, performing whole mortgage loans or senior interests in whole mortgage loans secured by first liens on stabilized commercial properties which meet current standards for inclusion in CMBS transactions. The aggregate principal amount available under the $100,000 CMBS facility is $100,000 and incurs interest at LIBOR plus 250 basis points. The purchase price paid for any asset purchased will be equal to 75% of the lesser of the market value (determined by the purchaser in its sole discretion, exercised in good faith) or par amount of such asset on the purchase date. The $100,000 CMBS facility contains standard margin call provisions and financial covenants. No amounts were outstanding under the $100,000 CMBS facility at December 31, 2011.

On November 23, 2011, we entered into a one year CMBS facility, or the $150,000 CMBS facility, pursuant to which we may sell, and later repurchase, commercial mortgage loans secured by first liens on stabilized commercial properties which meet current standards for inclusion in CMBS transactions. The aggregate principal amount available under the $150,000 CMBS facility is $150,000 and incurs interest at LIBOR plus 250 basis points. The purchase price paid for any asset purchased is up to 75% of the lesser of the unpaid principal balance and the market value (determined by the purchaser in its sole discretion, exercised in good faith) of such purchased asset on the purchase date. The $150,000 CMBS facility contains standard margin call provisions and financial covenants. No amounts were outstanding under the $150,000 CMBS facility at December 31, 2011.

Non-Recourse Indebtedness

CDO notes payable, at amortized cost. CDO notes payable at amortized cost represent notes issued by consolidated securitizations which are used to finance the acquisition of unsecured REIT notes, CMBS securities, commercial mortgages, mezzanine loans, and other loans in our commercial real estate portfolio. Generally, CDO notes payable are comprised of various classes of notes payable, with each class bearing interest at variable or fixed rates. Both RAIT I and RAIT II are meeting all of their overcollateralization, or OC, and interest coverage, or IC, trigger tests as of December 31, 2011.

During the year ended December 31, 2011, we repurchased, from the market, a total of $23,700 in aggregate principal amount of CDO notes payable issued by RAIT I and RAIT II. The aggregate purchase price was $7,771 and we recorded a gain on extinguishment of debt of $15,929.

During the year ended December 31, 2010, we repurchased, from the market, a total of $55,000 in aggregate principal amount of CDO notes payable issued by RAIT I and RAIT II. The aggregate purchase price was $13,081 and we recorded gains on extinguishment of debt of $41,961, inclusive of deferred financing costs that were written off.

105

During the year ended December 31, 2009, we repurchased, from the market, a total of $55,000 in aggregate principal amount of CDO notes payable issued by RAIT I and RAIT II. The aggregate purchase price was $4,029 and we recorded gains on extinguishment of debt of $50,971.

CDO notes payable, at fair value. As of January 1, 2008, we adopted the fair value option, which is now classified under FASB ASC Topic 825, and elected to record CDO notes payable at fair value. These CDO notes payable are collateralized by trading securities, security-related receivables and loans. At adoption, we decreased the carrying amount of these CDO notes payable by $1,520,616 to reflect these liabilities at fair value in our financial statements. The fair value of these CDO notes payable increased by $17,462 and $39,464 for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase was included in the change in fair value of financial instruments in our consolidated statements of operations as an expense.

Both Taberna VIII and Taberna IX are failing OC trigger tests which cause a change to the priority of payments to the debt and equity holders of the respective securitizations. Upon the failure of an OC test, the indenture of each securitization requires cash flows that would otherwise have been distributed to us as equity distributions, or in some cases interest payments on our retained CDO notes payable, be used to pay down sequentially the outstanding principal balance of the most senior note holders. The OC tests failures are due to defaulted collateral assets and credit risk securities. During the year ended December 31, 2011, $43,028 of cash flows were re-directed from our retained interests in these securitizations and were used to repay the most senior holders of our CDO notes payable. In February 2012, Taberna VIII used $81,420 of restricted cash to pay down its senior debt tranches to a current principal balance of $266,714 from an original balance of $375,000. As a result of this transaction, we recorded $67,579 as a change in fair value of financial instruments as the carrying amount of the $81,420 principal repayment was $13,841.

Loans payable on real estate. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, we had $135,757 and $74,876, respectively, of other indebtedness outstanding relating to loans payable on consolidated real estate and other loans. These loans are secured by specific consolidated real estate and commercial loans included in our consolidated balance sheet.

During the year ended December 31, 2011, we obtained seven first mortgages on our investments in real estate from third party lenders that have an aggregate principal balance of $81,500, mature between 2018 and 2021, and have a weighted average interest rate of 5.29%.

Maturity of Indebtedness

Generally, the majority of our indebtedness is payable in full upon the maturity or termination date of the underlying indebtedness. The following table displays the aggregate contractual maturities of our indebtedness by year:

2012	$	3,176
2013		3,484
2014		3,820
2015		42,072
2016		36,693
Thereafter (1)		2,663,188
Total	$	2,752,433

(1) Includes $3,582 of our 6.875% convertible senior notes which are redeemable, at par at the option of the holder, in April 2012, April 2017, and April 2022 and $115,000 of our 7.0% convertible senior notes which are redeemable, at par at the option of the holder in April 2016, April 2021, and April 2026.

106

NOTE 7: DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

We may use derivative financial instruments to hedge all or a portion of the interest rate risk associated with our borrowings. The principal objective of such arrangements is to minimize the risks and/or costs associated with our operating and financial structure as well as to hedge specific anticipated transactions. The counterparties to these contractual arrangements are major financial institutions with which we and our affiliates may also have other financial relationships. In the event of nonperformance by the counterparties, we are potentially exposed to credit loss. However, because of the high credit ratings of the counterparties, we do not anticipate that any of the counterparties will fail to meet their obligations.

Cash Flow Hedges

We have entered into various interest rate swap contracts to hedge interest rate exposure on floating rate indebtedness. We designate interest rate hedge agreements at inception and determine whether or not the interest rate hedge agreement is highly effective in offsetting interest rate fluctuations associated with the identified indebtedness. At designation, certain of these interest rate swaps had a fair value not equal to zero. However, we concluded, at designation, that these hedging arrangements were highly effective during their term using regression analysis and determined that the hypothetical derivative method would be used in measuring any ineffectiveness. At each reporting period, we update our regression analysis and, as of December 31, 2011, we concluded that these hedging arrangements were highly effective during their remaining term and used the hypothetical derivative method in measuring the ineffective portions of these hedging arrangements.

The following table summarizes the aggregate notional amount and estimated net fair value of our derivative instruments as of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

	As of December 31, 2011					As of December 31, 2010
	Notional		Fair Value			Notional		Fair Value
Cash flow hedges:
Interest rate swaps	$	1,570,787	$	(181,499	)	$	1,786,698	$	(184,878	)
Interest rate caps		36,000		1,360			36,000		1,496
Net fair value	$	1,606,787	$	(180,139	)	$	1,822,698	$	(183,382	)

In November 2011, an interest rate swap agreement that had a notional amount of $107,113 and strike rate of 5.25%, as of September 30, 2011 terminated in accordance with its terms. During 2012, interest rate swap agreements with a notional amount of $185,625 and a weighted average strike rate of 4.15% as of December 31, 2011, will terminate in accordance with their terms.

107

The following table summarizes the effect on income by derivative instrument type for the following periods:

	For the Year Ended December 31, 2011					For the Year Ended December 31, 2010					For the Year Ended December 31, 2009
Type of Derivative	Amounts Reclassified to Earnings for Effective Hedges— Gains (Losses)			Amounts Reclassified to Earnings for Hedge Ineffectiveness— Gains (Losses)		Amounts Reclassified to Earnings for Effective Hedges— Gains (Losses)			Amounts Reclassified to Earnings for Hedge Ineffectiveness— Gains (Losses)		Amounts Reclassified to Earnings for Effective Hedges— Gains (Losses)			Amounts Reclassified to Earnings for Hedge Ineffectiveness— Gains (Losses)
Interest rate swaps	$	(42,820	)	$	8	$	(46,111	)	$	46	$	(45,476	)	$	(449	)
Currency options		0			0		0			0		0			(21	)
Total	$	(42,820	)	$	8	$	(46,111	)	$	46	$	(45,476	)	$	(470	)

On January 1, 2008, we adopted the fair value option, which has been classified under FASB ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments”, for certain of our CDO notes payable. Upon the adoption of this standard, hedge accounting for any previously designated cash flow hedges associated with these CDO notes payable was discontinued and all changes in fair value of these cash flow hedges are recorded in earnings. As of December 31, 2011, the notional value associated with these cash flow hedges where hedge accounting was discontinued was $967,276 and had a liability balance with a fair value of $94,478. See Note 8: “Fair Value of Financial Instruments” for the changes in value of these hedges during the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010. The change in value of these hedges was recorded as a component of the change in fair value of financial instruments in our consolidated statement of operations.

Amounts reclassified to earnings associated with effective cash flow hedges are reported in investment interest expense and the fair value of these hedge agreements is included in other assets or derivative liabilities.

NOTE 8: FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

FASB ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments” requires disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value. The fair value of investments in mortgages and loans, investments in securities, trust preferred obligations, CDO notes payable, convertible senior notes, junior subordinated notes and derivative assets and liabilities is based on significant observable and unobservable inputs. The fair value of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, secured credit facilities, senior secured notes, loans payable on real estate and other indebtedness approximates cost due to the nature of these instruments.

108

The following table summarizes the carrying amount and the fair value of our financial instruments as of December 31, 2011:

Financial Instrument	Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value
Assets
Commercial mortgages, mezzanine loans and other loans	$	996,363	$	954,990
Investments in securities and security-related receivables		647,461		647,461
Cash and cash equivalents		29,720		29,720
Restricted cash		278,607		278,607
Derivative assets		1,360		1,360
Liabilities
Recourse indebtedness:
7.0% convertible senior notes		107,868		93,935
6.875% convertible senior notes		3,735		3,594
Secured credit facilities		9,954		9,954
Junior subordinated notes, at fair value		22,450		22,450
Junior subordinated notes, at amortized cost		25,100		14,809
Non-recourse indebtedness:
CDO notes payable, at amortized cost		1,320,904		703,611
CDO notes payable, at fair value		122,506		122,506
Loans payable on real estate		135,737		135,737
Derivative liabilities		181,499		181,499

Fair Value Measurements

The following tables summarize information about our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2011, and indicate the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized to determine such fair value:

Assets:	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) (a)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) (a)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) (a)		Balance as of December 31, 2011
Trading securities
TruPS	$	0	$	0	$	481,736	$	481,736
Other securities		0		0		0		0
Available-for-sale securities		0		2		0		2
Security-related receivables
TruPS receivables		0		0		82,863		82,863
Unsecured REIT note receivables		0		30,066		0		30,066
CMBS receivables		0		35,117		0		35,117
Other securities		0		17,677		0		17,677
Derivative assets		0		1,360		0		1,360
Total assets	$	0	$	84,222	$	564,599	$	648,821

109

Liabilities:	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) (a)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) (a)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) (a)		Balance as of December 31, 2011
Junior subordinated notes, at fair value	$	0	$	0	$	22,450	$	22,450
CDO notes payable, at fair value		0		0		122,506		122,506
Derivative liabilities		0		91,419		90,080		181,499
Total liabilities	$	0	$	91,419	$	235,036	$	326,455

(a) During the year ended December 31, 2011, there were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2.

The following tables summarize additional information about assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis for which we have utilized level 3 inputs to determine fair value for the year ended December 31, 2011:

Assets	Trading Securities—TruPS and Subordinated Debentures			Security-Related Receivables—TruPS and Subordinated Debenture Receivables			Total Level 3 Assets
Balance, as of December 31, 2010	$	454,473		$	83,087		$	537,560
Change in fair value of financial instruments		85,388			(224	)		85,164
Purchases		0			0			0
Sales		(58,125	)		0			(58,125	)
Balance, as of December 31, 2011	$	481,736		$	82,863		$	564,599

Liabilities	Derivative Liabilities		CDO Notes Payable, at Fair Value			Junior Subordinated Notes, at Fair Value		Total Level 3 Liabilities
Balance, as of December 31, 2010	$	87,632	$	148,072		$	4,422	$	240,126
Change in fair value of financial instruments		2,448		17,462			18,028		37,938
Purchases		0		0			0		0
Sales		0		0			0		0
Principal repayments		0		(43,028	)		0		(43,028	)
Balance, as of December 31, 2011	$	90,080	$	122,506		$	22,450	$	235,036

110

Change in Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following table summarizes realized and unrealized gains and losses on assets and liabilities for which we elected the fair value option within FASB ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments” as reported in change in fair value of financial instruments in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations:

Description	For the Year Ended December 31, 2011			For the Year Ended December 31, 2010			For the Year Ended December 31, 2009
Change in fair value of trading securities and security-related receivables	$	19,281		$	111,874		$	(158,273	)
Change in fair value of CDO notes payable and other liabilities		(35,491	)		(26,882	)		153,459
Change in fair value of derivatives		(58,944	)		(39,152	)		6,377
Change in fair value of financial instruments	$	(75,154	)	$	45,840		$	1,563

The changes in the fair value for the investment in securities, CDO notes payable, and other liabilities for which the fair value option was elected for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was primarily attributable to changes in instrument specific credit risks. The changes in the fair value of the CDO notes payable for which the fair value option was elected was due to repayments at par because of OC failures when the CDO notes have a fair value of less than par. The changes in the fair value of derivatives for which the fair value option was elected for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was mainly due to changes in interest rates.

NOTE 9: VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

On January 1, 2010, we adopted an accounting standard which provided guidance when to consolidate a VIE. Under the new standard, the determination of when to consolidate a VIE is based on the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance together with either the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could be significant to the VIE. Upon adoption, we evaluated our investments under this new consolidation standard and the following changes in previous consolidation conclusions were made:

• TruPS Investment and Obligations—Previously, we held implicit interests in trusts which issued TruPS. Under the previous consolidation guidance, we were considered to be primary beneficiaries of the trusts and reported their assets and liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet. RAIT does not meet both criteria to be the primary beneficiary of these entities as we do not have the power to direct the activities of the underlying trusts. Therefore, we deconsolidated these entities as of January 1, 2010 thereby reducing our assets and liabilities by $70,872.

• Investments in Real Estate—We identified two properties to be VIEs that we previously did not consolidate as we were not previously the primary beneficiary: Willow Grove and Cherry Hill. We evaluated our interests in these real estate properties and determined that we are the primary beneficiary. Upon consolidation of these properties on January 1, 2010, we increased our assets and liabilities by $20,931.

111

The following table presents the assets and liabilities of our consolidated VIEs as of each respective date. As of December 31, 2011, our consolidated VIEs were: Taberna VIII, Taberna IX, RAIT I, RAIT II, Willow Grove and Cherry Hill.

	As of December 31, 2011			As of December 31, 2010
Assets
Investments in mortgages and loans, at amortized cost:
Commercial mortgages, mezzanine loans, other loans and preferred equity interests	$	1,856,106		$	1,913,089
Allowance for losses		(36,210	)		(55,377	)
Total investments in mortgages and loans		1,819,896			1,857,712
Investments in real estate		20,910			21,054
Investments in securities and security-related receivables, at fair value		645,915			705,455
Cash and cash equivalents		201			73
Restricted cash		235,682			151,045
Accrued interest receivable		57,560			55,105
Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $10,995 and $8,608, respectively		15,378			17,999
Total assets	$	2,795,542		$	2,808,443
Liabilities and Equity
Indebtedness (including $122,506 and $148,072 at fair value, respectively)	$	1,682,487		$	1,707,352
Accrued interest payable		48,417			34,745
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		1,537			1,450
Derivative liabilities		181,499			184,878
Deferred taxes, borrowers’ escrows and other liabilities		4,570			3,814
Total liabilities		1,918,510			1,932,239
Equity:
Shareholders’ equity:
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		(114,186	)		(123,316	)
RAIT investment		31,004			103,862
Retained earnings (deficit)		960,214			895,658
Total shareholders’ equity		877,032			876,204
Total liabilities and equity	$	2,795,542		$	2,808,443

The assets of the VIEs can only be used to settle obligations of the VIEs and are not available to our creditors. Certain amounts included in the table above are eliminated upon consolidation with other our subsidiaries that maintain investments in the debt or equity securities issued by these entities. We do not have any contractual obligation to provide the VIEs listed above with any financial support. We have not and do not intend to provide financial support to these VIEs that we were not previously contractually required to provide.

112

NOTE 10: SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Preferred Shares

In 2004, we issued 2,760,000 shares of our 7.75% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest, or Series A Preferred Shares, for net proceeds of $66,600. The Series A Preferred Shares accrue cumulative cash dividends at a rate of 7.75% per year of the $25.00 liquidation preference, equivalent to $1.9375 per year per share. Dividends are payable quarterly in arrears at the end of each March, June, September and December. The Series A Preferred Shares have no maturity date and we are not required to redeem the Series A Preferred Shares at any time. On or after March 19, 2009, we may, at our option, redeem the Series A Preferred Shares, in whole or part, at any time and from time to time, for cash at $25.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends, if any, to the redemption date.

In 2004, we issued 2,258,300 shares of our 8.375% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest, or Series B Preferred Shares, for net proceeds of $54,400. The Series B Preferred Shares accrue cumulative cash dividends at a rate of 8.375% per year of the $25.00 liquidation preference, equivalent to $2.09375 per year per share. Dividends are payable quarterly in arrears at the end of each March, June, September and December. The Series B Preferred Shares have no maturity date and we are not required to redeem the Series B Preferred Shares at any time. On or after October 5, 2009, we may, at our option, redeem the Series B Preferred Shares, in whole or part, at any time and from time to time, for cash at $25.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends, if any, to the redemption date.

On July 5, 2007, we issued 1,600,000 shares of our 8.875% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest, or the Series C Preferred Shares, in a public offering at an offering price of $25.00 per share. After offering costs, including the underwriters’ discount, and expenses of $1,660, we received $38,340 of net proceeds. The Series C Preferred Shares accrue cumulative cash dividends at a rate of 8.875% per year of the $25.00 liquidation preference and are paid on a quarterly basis. The Series C Preferred Shares have no maturity date and we are not required to redeem the Series C Preferred Shares at any time. We may not redeem the Series C Preferred Shares before July 5, 2012, except for the special optional redemption to preserve our tax qualification as a REIT. On or after July 5, 2012, we may, at our option, redeem the Series C Preferred Shares, in whole or part, at any time and from time to time, for cash at $25.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends, if any, to the redemption date.

Common Shares

Reverse Stock Split:

On May 17, 2011, the board of trustees authorized a 1-for-3 reverse stock split of our common shares of beneficial interest that became effective on June 30, 2011, or the effective time. At the effective time, every three common shares issued and outstanding were automatically combined into one issued and outstanding new common share. The par value of new common shares changed to $0.03 per share after the reverse stock split from the par value of common shares prior to the reverse stock split of $0.01 per share. The reverse stock split reduced the number of common shares outstanding but did not change the number of authorized common shares. The reverse stock split did not affect our preferred shares of beneficial interest. All references in the accompanying financial statements to the number of common shares and earnings per share data for all periods presented have been adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split.

Share Repurchases:

On July 24, 2007, our board of trustees adopted a share repurchase plan that authorizes us to purchase up to $75,000 of RAIT common shares. Under the plan, we may make purchases, from time to time, through open market or privately negotiated transactions. We have not repurchased any common shares under this plan as of December 31, 2010.

113

On January 25, 2011, the compensation committee approved a cash payment to the board’s eight non-management trustees intended to constitute a portion of their respective 2011 annual non-management trustee compensation. The cash payment was subject to terms and conditions set forth in a letter agreement, or the letter agreement, between each of the non-management trustees and RAIT. The terms and conditions included a requirement that each trustee use a portion of the cash payment to purchase RAIT’s common shares in purchases that, individually and in the aggregate with all purchases made by all the other non-management trustees pursuant to their respective letter agreements, complied with Rule 10b-18 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The aggregate amount required to be used by all of the non-management trustees to purchase common shares is $210 and was used to purchase 18,898 common shares, in the aggregate, in February 2011.

On January 24, 2012, the compensation committee of our board of trustees approved a cash payment to the board’s seven non-management trustees intended to constitute a portion of their respective 2012 annual non-management trustee compensation. The cash payment was subject to terms and conditions set forth in a letter agreement, or the letter agreement, between each of the non-management trustees and RAIT. The letter agreement documented the election of each trustee to use a portion of the cash payment to purchase RAIT’s common shares in purchases that, individually and in the aggregate with all purchases made by all the other non-management trustees pursuant to their respective letter agreements, complied with Rule 10b-18 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The aggregate amount required to be used by all of the non-management trustees to purchase common shares was $210 and was used to purchase 36,750 common shares, in the aggregate, in February 2012.

Share Issuances:

Dividend reinvestment and share purchase plan (DRSPP). We implemented an amended and restated dividend reinvestment and share purchase plan, or DRSPP, effective as of March 13, 2008, pursuant to which we registered and reserved for issuance 6,262,545 common shares. Effective October 28, 2011, we registered and reserved for issuance an additional 7,759,080 common shares for issuance under the DRSPP so that the aggregate number of common shares available for issuance under the DRSPP was 10,500,000 common shares. During the year ended December 31, 2011, we issued a total of 2,370,710 common shares pursuant to the DRSPP at a weighted-average price of $4.20 per share and we received $9,714 of net proceeds. From January 1, 2012 through February 21, 2012, 919,391 common shares were issued pursuant to the DRSPP at a weighted-average price of $4.91 per share and we received $4,500 of net proceeds. After reflecting the common shares issued through February 21, 2012, 8,368,191 common shares, in aggregate, remain available for issuance under the DRSPP.

Standby Equity Distribution Agreement (SEDA). On January 13, 2010, we entered into a standby equity distribution agreement, or the SEDA, with YA Global Master SPV Ltd., or YA Global, which is managed by Yorkville Advisors, LLC, whereby YA Global agreed to purchase up to $50,000, or the commitment amount, worth of newly issued RAIT common shares upon notices given by us, subject to the terms and conditions of the SEDA. The number of common shares issued or issuable pursuant to the SEDA, in the aggregate, cannot exceed 4,166,667 common shares. The SEDA terminated by its terms on January 13, 2012. During the year ended December 31, 2011, no common shares were issued pursuant to this arrangement.

Capital on Demand™ Sales Agreement (COD). On August 6, 2010, we entered into a Capital on Demand™ Sales Agreement, or the COD sales agreement, with JonesTrading Institutional Services LLC, or JonesTrading, pursuant to which we may issue and sell up to 5,833,333 of our common shares from time to time through JonesTrading acting as agent and/or principal, subject to the terms and conditions of the COD sales agreement. During the year ended December 31, 2011, 2,815,528 common shares were issued pursuant to this arrangement at a weighted average price of $8.77 and we received $22,934 of proceeds. As of December 31, 2011, the COD sales agreement had terminated by its terms as there were no common shares remaining available for issuance.

114

Dividends

The following tables summarize the dividends we declared or paid during the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010:

	March 31, 2011		June 30, 2011		September 30, 2011		December 31, 2011		For the Year Ended December 31, 2011
Series A Preferred Shares
Date declared		1/25/11		5/17/11		7/26/11		10/25/11
Record date		3/1/11		6/1/11		9/1/11		12/1/11
Date paid		3/31/11		6/30/11		9/30/11		1/3/12
Total dividend amount	$	1,337	$	1,337	$	1,337	$	1,337	$	5,348
Series B Preferred Shares
Date declared		1/25/11		5/17/11		7/26/11		10/25/11
Record date		3/1/11		6/1/11		9/1/11		12/1/11
Date paid		3/31/11		6/30/11		9/30/11		1/3/12
Total dividend amount	$	1,182	$	1,182	$	1,182	$	1,182	$	4,728
Series C Preferred Shares
Date declared		1/25/11		5/17/11		7/26/11		10/25/11
Record date		3/1/11		6/1/11		9/1/11		12/1/11
Date paid		3/31/11		6/30/11		9/30/11		1/3/12
Total dividend amount	$	888	$	888	$	888	$	888	$	3,552
Common shares
Date declared		1/10/11		5/17/11		9/12/11		12/15/11
Record date		1/21/11		7/8/11		10/7/11		1/9/12
Date paid		1/31/11		7/29/11		10/31/11		1/31/12
Dividend per share	$	0.09	$	0.06	$	0.06	$	0.06	$	0.27
Total dividend declared	$	3,204	$	2,293	$	2,405	$	2,498	$	10,400

	March 31, 2010		June 30, 2010		September 30, 2010		December 31, 2010		For the Year Ended December 31, 2010
Series A Preferred Shares
Date declared		1/26/10		4/22/10		7/27/10		10/28/10
Record date		3/1/10		6/1/10		9/1/10		12/1/10
Date paid		3/31/10		6/30/10		9/30/10		12/31/10
Total dividend amount	$	1,337	$	1,337	$	1,337	$	1,337	$	5,348
Series B Preferred Shares
Date declared		1/26/10		4/22/10		7/27/10		10/28/10
Record date		3/1/10		6/1/10		9/1/10		12/1/10
Date paid		3/31/10		6/30/10		9/30/10		12/31/10
Total dividend amount	$	1,182	$	1,182	$	1,182	$	1,182	$	4,728
Series C Preferred Shares
Date declared		1/26/10		4/22/10		7/27/10		10/28/10
Record date		3/1/10		6/1/10		9/1/10		12/1/10
Date paid		3/31/10		6/30/10		9/30/10		12/31/10
Total dividend amount	$	888	$	888	$	888	$	888	$	3,552
Common shares
Date declared		N/A		N/A		N/A		N/A
Record date		N/A		N/A		N/A		N/A
Date paid		N/A		N/A		N/A		N/A
Dividend per share	$	0.00	$	0.00	$	0.00	$	0.00	$	0.00
Total dividend declared	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0

115

On January 24, 2012, our board of trustees declared a first quarter 2012 cash dividend of $0.484375 per share on our 7.75% Series A Preferred Shares, $0.5234375 per share on our 8.375% Series B Preferred Shares and $0.5546875 per share on our 8.875% Series C Preferred Shares. The dividends will be paid on April 2, 2012 to holders of record on March 1, 2012.

NOTE 11: STOCK BASED COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

We maintain the RAIT Financial Trust 2008 Incentive Award Plan (the “Incentive Award Plan”). The maximum aggregate number of common shares that may be issued pursuant to the Incentive Award Plan is 1,500,000. As of December 31, 2011, 246,549 common shares are available for issuance under this plan.

On January 24, 2009, 19,020 phantom unit awards were redeemed for common shares. These phantom units were fully vested at the time of redemption.

On March 5, 2009, the compensation committee awarded 161,333 phantom units, valued at $242 using our closing stock price of $1.50 on that date, to various non-executive employees. The awards generally vest over three-year periods.

On June 25, 2009, the compensation committee awarded 66,667 phantom units, valued at $238 using our closing stock price of $3.57 on that date, to two non-executive employees. The awards generally vest over four-year periods.

On January 26, 2010, the compensation committee awarded 500,000 phantom units, valued at $1,905 using our closing stock price of $3.81 on that date, to our executive officers. Half of these awards vested immediately and the remainder vested on January 26, 2011. On January 26, 2010, the compensation committee awarded 166,667 phantom units, valued at $635 using our closing stock price of $3.81 on that date, to our non-executive officer employees. These awards generally vest over three-year periods.

During the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, there were 340,649, 24,475, and 7,268, respectively, phantom units redeemed for common shares and 72,029, and 12,333 phantom units forfeited during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. There were no phantom units forfeited during the year ended December 31, 2011. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, there were 416,767 and 930,457, respectively, phantom units outstanding.

As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the deferred compensation cost relating to unvested awards was $181 and $723, respectively, relating to phantom units and restricted stock that had a weighted average remaining vesting period of 1.1 and 1.5 years, respectively.

On January 24, 2012, the compensation committee awarded 2,172,000 stock appreciation rights, or SARs, valued at $6,091 based on a Black-Scholes option pricing model at the date of grant, to our executive officers and non-executive officer employees. The SARs vest over a three-year period and may be exercised between the date of vesting and January 24, 2017, the expiration date of the SARs.

Stock Options

We have granted to our officers, trustees and employees options to acquire common shares. The vesting period is determined by the compensation committee and the option term is generally ten years after the date of grant. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, there were 116,800 and 168,800 options outstanding.

116

A summary of the options activity of the Incentive Award Plan is presented below.

	2011				2010				2009
	Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding, January 1,		168,800	$	22.50		168,800	$	22.50		178,800		$	21.84
Expired		52,000		21.87		0		0.00		(10,000	)		10.75
Exercised		0		0		0		0.00		0			0.00
Outstanding, December 31,		116,800	$	22.78		168,800	$	22.50		168,800		$	22.50
Options exercisable at December 31,		116,800				168,800				168,800

	Options Outstanding						Options Exercisable
Range of Exercise Prices	Number Outstanding at December 31, 2011		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Number Outstanding at December 31, 2010		Weighted Average Exercise Price
$13.65		0		0 years	$	0.00		7,000	$	13.65
$19.21 – 19.85		20,000		0.4 years		19.50		20,000		19.50
$21.81 – 26.40		96,800		1.7 years		23.46		141,800		23.36
		116,800		1.5 years	$	22.78		168,800	$	22.50

We did not grant options during the three years ended December 31, 2011.

During the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, we recorded compensation expense of $541, $2,949, and $3,830, respectively, associated with our stock based compensation.

Employee Benefits

401(k) Profit Sharing Plan

We maintain a 401(k) profit sharing plan (the RAIT 401(k) Plan) for the benefit of our eligible employees. The RAIT 401(k) Plan offers eligible employees the opportunity to make long-term investments on a regular basis through salary contributions, which are supplemented by our matching cash contributions and potential profit sharing payments. We provide a 4% cash match of the employee contributions and may pay an additional 2% of eligible compensation as discretionary cash profit sharing payments. Any matching contribution made by RAIT pursuant to the RAIT 401(k) Plan vests 33% per year of service.

During the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, we recorded $482, $424, and $296 of contributions which is included in compensation expense on the accompanying statement of operations.

117

NOTE 12: EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

The following table presents a reconciliation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share for the three years ended December 31, 2011:

	For the Years Ended December 31
	2011			2010			2009
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	(38,457	)	$	110,590		$	(440,141	)
Income allocated to preferred shares		(13,649	)		(13,641	)		(13,641	)
Income allocated to noncontrolling interests		229			880			13,419
Income (loss) from continuing operations allocable to common shares		(51,877	)		97,829			(440,363	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations		747			323			(840	)
Net income (loss) allocable to common shares	$	(51,130	)	$	98,152		$	(441,203	)
Weighted-average shares outstanding—Basic		38,508,086			28,951,422			21,735,078
Dilutive securities under the treasury stock method		0			465,916			0
Weighted-average shares outstanding—Diluted		38,508,086			29,417,337			21,735,078
Earnings (loss) per share—Basic:
Continuing operations	$	(1.35	)	$	3.38		$	(20.26	)
Discontinued operations		0.02			0.01			(0.04	)
Total earnings (loss) per share—Basic	$	(1.33	)	$	3.39		$	(20.30	)
Earnings (loss) per share—Diluted:
Continuing operations	$	(1.35	)	$	3.33		$	(20.26	)
Discontinued operations		0.02			0.01			(0.04	)
Total earnings (loss) per share—Diluted	$	(1.33	)	$	3.34		$	(20.30	)

For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, securities convertible into 219,558, 3,698,272, and 5,204,075 common shares, respectively, were excluded from the earnings (loss) per share computations because their effect would have been anti-dilutive.

NOTE 13: INCOME TAXES

RAIT and Taberna have elected to be taxed as REITs under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code. To maintain qualification as a REIT, we must meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute at least 90% of our ordinary taxable income to shareholders. We generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on taxable income that is distributed to our shareholders. If RAIT or Taberna fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will then be subject to U.S. federal income taxes on our taxable income at regular corporate rates, and we will not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes for four years following the year during which qualification is lost unless the Internal Revenue Service grants relief under certain statutory provisions. Such an event could materially adversely affect our net income and cash available for dividends to

118

shareholders. However, we believe that both RAIT and Taberna will be organized and operated in such a manner as to qualify for treatment as a REIT, and both intend to operate in the foreseeable future in a manner so that both will qualify as a REIT. We may be subject to certain state and local taxes.

Our TRS entities generate taxable revenue from fees for services provided to securitizations. Some of these fees paid to the TRS entities are capitalized as deferred costs by the securitizations. In consolidation, these fees are eliminated when the securitization is included in the consolidated group. Nonetheless, all income taxes are expensed and are paid by the TRSs in the year in which the revenue is received. These income taxes are not eliminated when the related revenue is eliminated in consolidation.

The components of the provision for income taxes as it relates to our taxable income from domestic TRSs during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 includes the effects of our performance of a portion of its TRS services in a foreign jurisdiction that does not incur income taxes.

Certain TRS entities are domiciled in the Cayman Islands and, accordingly, taxable income generated by these entities may not be subject to local income taxation, but generally will be included in our income on a current basis as SubPart F income, whether or not distributed. Upon distribution of any previously included SubPart F income by these entities, no incremental U.S. federal, state, or local income taxes would be payable by us. Accordingly, no provision for income taxes has been recorded for these foreign TRS entities for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009.

The components of the income tax benefit (provision) as it relates to our taxable income (loss) from domestic and foreign TRSs during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:

	For the Year Ended December 31, 2011
	Federal			State and Local			Foreign			Total
Current benefit (provision)	$	0		$	0		$	(57	)	$	(57	)
Deferred benefit (provision)		595			0			0			595
Income tax benefit (provision)	$	595		$	0		$	(57	)	$	538
	For the Year Ended December 31, 2010
	Federal			State and Local			Foreign			Total
Current benefit (provision)	$	(2,844	)	$	(10	)	$	(510	)	$	(3,364	)
Deferred benefit (provision)		2,143			162			(543	)		1,762
Income tax benefit (provision)	$	(701	)	$	152		$	(1,053	)	$	(1,602	)
	For the Year Ended December 31, 2009
	Federal			State and Local			Foreign			Total
Current benefit (provision)	$	1,085		$	0		$	(1,210	)	$	(125	)
Deferred benefit (provision)		450			58			575			1,083
Income tax benefit (provision)	$	1,535		$	58		$	(635	)	$	958

119

A reconciliation of the income tax benefit (provision) based upon the statutory tax rates to the effective rates is as follows for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009:

	For the Years Ended December 31
	2011			2010			2009
Federal statutory rate	$	3,762		$	22		$	436
State statutory, net of federal benefit		0			162			59
Change in valuation allowance		(2,899	)		(50	)		(1,879	)
Permanent items		(42	)		(53	)		(724	)
Foreign tax effects		(283	)		803			3,066
Transfer pricing adjustment (1)		0			(2,503	)		0
Other		0			17			0
Income tax benefit (provision)	$	538		$	(1,602	)	$	958

(1) In February 2011, management and the IRS settled tax examinations for 2006, 2007 and 2008 for a total cash payment of $296. These tax examinations related to certain transfer pricing adjustments for transactions between TCM and TCB during those years. While the total transfer pricing adjustment increased our tax expense by $2,503 during 2010, the net cash payment made to the IRS in February 2011 was $296, after utilization of net operating losses in these prior years.

Significant components of our deferred tax assets (liabilities), at our TRSs, are as follows as of December 31, 2011 and 2010:

Deferred tax assets (liabilities):	As of December 31, 2011			As of December 31, 2010
Net operating losses, at TRSs	$	20,744		$	12,156
Capital losses		662			662
Unrealized losses		12,023			12,023
Other		644			2,251
Total deferred tax assets		34,073			27,092
Valuation allowance		(29,970	)		(25,359	)
Net deferred tax assets	$	4,103		$	1,733
Accrued interest		(653	)		0
Other		(48	)		0
Deferred tax (liabilities)		(701	)		0
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)	$	3,402		$	1,733

As of December 31, 2011, we had $43,460 of federal net operating losses, $61,937 of state net operating losses, $4,849 of foreign net operating losses and $1,892 of capital losses. The federal net operating losses will begin to expire in 2028, the state net operating losses will begin to expire in 2017 and the foreign operating losses have an indefinite carryforward period. The capital losses will expire in 2012. We have concluded that it is more likely than not that $32,564 of federal net operating losses, $56,851 of state net operating losses, all of the foreign net operation losses and all of the capital losses will not be utilized during their respective carry forward periods; and as such, we have established a valuation allowance against these deferred tax assets.

The accounting guidance for income taxes clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes, and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The guidance also provides rules on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. We have no uncertain tax positions for the years ending December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009.

120

NOTE 14: RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

In the ordinary course of our business operations, we have ongoing relationships and have engaged in transactions with several related entities described below. All of these relationships and transactions were approved or ratified by our audit committee as being on terms comparable to those available on an arm’s-length basis from an unaffiliated third party or otherwise not creating a conflict of interest.

Scott F. Schaeffer is our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, and is a Trustee. Mr. Schaeffer’s spouse is a director of The Bancorp, Inc., or Bancorp, and she and Mr. Schaeffer own, in the aggregate, less than 1% of Bancorp’s outstanding common shares. Each transaction with Bancorp is described below:

a). Cash and Restricted Cash—We maintain checking and demand deposit accounts at Bancorp. As of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we had $515 and $72, respectively, of cash and cash equivalents and $447 and $985, respectively, of restricted cash on deposit at Bancorp. We did not receive any interest income from the Bancorp during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009. Restricted cash held at Bancorp relates to borrowers’ escrows for taxes, insurance and capital reserves. Any interest earned on these deposits enures to the benefit of the specific borrower and not to us.

b). Office Leases—We sublease a portion of our downtown Philadelphia office space from Bancorp under a lease agreement extending through August 2014 at an annual rental expense based upon the amount of square footage occupied. We have a sublease agreement with a third party for the remaining term of our sublease. Rent paid to Bancorp was $319, $304 and $300 for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Rent received for our sublease was $170 and $166 for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.

NOTE 15: ASSETS HELD FOR SALE AND DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

As of December 31, 2011, we did not have any properties designated as held for sale. As of December 31, 2010, we had one property designated as held for sale. The following table summarizes the consolidated balance sheet of the real estate properties classified as assets held for sale:

	As of December 31, 2010
Assets:
Investments in real estate	$	48,859
Cash and cash equivalents		386
Other assets		2,668
Deferred financing costs, net		0
Total assets held for sale	$	51,913
Liabilities:
Other indebtedness	$	0
Accrued interest payable		0
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		1,039
Other liabilities		699
Total liabilities related to assets held for sale (a)	$	1,738

(a) Liabilities related to assets held for sale excludes a $42,958 first mortgage held by RAIT II that is eliminated in our consolidated balance sheet.

121

For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, income (loss) from discontinued operations relates to four real estate properties designated as held for sale and three real estate properties sold or deconsolidated since January 1, 2008. The following table summarizes revenue and expense information for real estate properties classified as discontinued operations:

	For the Years Ended December 31
	2011			2010			2009
Rental income	$	2,072		$	9,688		$	9,471
Expenses:
Real estate operating expenses		1,205			5,895			6,695
General and administrative expense		1			0			19
Depreciation expense		0			1,790			2,893
Total expenses		1,206			7,685			9,607
Income (loss) before interest and other income		866			2,003			(136	)
Interest and other income		0			2			959
Income (loss) from discontinued operations		866			2,005			823
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations		(119	)		(1,682	)		(1,663	)
Total income (loss) from discontinued operations	$	747		$	323		$	(840	)

Discontinued operations have not been segregated in the consolidated statements of cash flows. Therefore, amounts for certain captions will not agree with respective data in the consolidated statements of operations.

NOTE 16: QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)

The following table summarizes our quarterly financial data which, in the opinion of management, reflects all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of our results of operations:

	For the Three-Month Periods Ended
	March 31		June 30			September 30			December 31
2011:
Total revenue	$	58,279	$	58,863		$	60,089		$	56,923
Change in fair value of financial instruments		5,611		(25,727	)		(34,997	)		(20,041	)
Net income (loss)		9,131		(16,751	)		(17,821	)		(12,269	)
Net income (loss) allocable to common shares		5,767		(20,098	)		(21,169	)		(15,630	)
Total earnings (loss) per share—Basic (a)	$	0.16	$	(0.53	)	$	(0.55	)	$	(0.39	)
Total earnings (loss) per share—Diluted (a)	$	0.16	$	(0.53	)	$	(0.55	)	$	(0.39	)
2010:
Total revenue	$	66,244	$	60,370		$	58,899		$	59,057
Change in fair value of financial instruments		16,437		4,446			14,237			10,720
Net income (loss)		34,453		25,376			18,248			32,836
Net income (loss) allocable to common shares		31,282		22,319			15,052			29,499
Total earnings (loss) per share—Basic (a)	$	1.25	$	0.83		$	0.50		$	0.88
Total earnings (loss) per share—Diluted (a)	$	1.24	$	0.81		$	0.49		$	0.86

(a) The summation of quarterly per share amounts do not equal the full year amounts.

122

NOTE 17: OTHER DISCLOSURES

Segments

We have identified one operating segment; accordingly we have determined that it has one reportable segment. As a group, our executive officers act as the Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”). The CODM reviews operating results to make decisions about all investments and resources and to assess performance for the entire company. Our portfolio consists of one reportable segment, investments in real estate through the mechanism of lending and/or ownership. The CODM manages and reviews our operations as one unit. Resources are allocated without regard to the underlying structure of any investment, but rather after evaluating such economic characteristics as returns on investment, leverage ratios, current portfolio mix, degrees of risk, income tax consequences and opportunities for growth. We have no single customer that accounts for 10% or more of revenue.

Commitments and Contingencies

Unfunded Loan Commitments

Certain of our commercial mortgages and mezzanine loan agreements contain provisions whereby we are required to advance additional funds to our borrowers for capital improvements and upon the achievement of certain property operating hurdles. As of December 31, 2011, our incremental loan commitments are $52,285, which will be funded from either restricted cash held on deposit or revolving debt capacity dedicated for these purposes.

Employment Agreements

We are party to employment agreements with certain executives that provide for compensation and certain other benefits. The agreements also provide for severance payments under certain circumstances.

Litigation

We are involved from time to time in litigation on various matters, including disputes with tenants of owned properties, disputes arising out of agreements to purchase or sell properties and disputes arising out of our loan portfolio. Given the nature of our business activities, these lawsuits are considered routine to the conduct of our business. The result of any particular lawsuit cannot be predicted, because of the very nature of litigation, the litigation process and its adversarial nature, and the jury system. We do not expect that the liabilities, if any, that may ultimately result from such routine legal actions will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Lease Obligations

We lease office space in Philadelphia, New York City, and other locations. The annual minimum rent due pursuant to the leases for each of the next five years and thereafter is estimated to be as follows as of December 31, 2011:

2012	$	2,251
2013		2,493
2014		2,082
2015		1,987
2016		929
Thereafter		21,109
Total	$	30,851

Rent expense was $2,601, $2,624, and $3,173 for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively, and has been included in general and administrative expense or property operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

123

RAIT Financial Trust

Schedule II

Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

For the Three Years Ended December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands)

	Balance, Beginning of Period		Additions (a)		Deductions (b)			Balance, End of Period
For the year ended December 31, 2011	$	69,691	$	3,900	$	(27,509	)	$	46,082
For the year ended December 31, 2010	$	86,609	$	38,307	$	(55,225	)	$	69,691
For the year ended December 31, 2009	$	171,973	$	226,567	$	(311,931	)	$	86,609

(a) For the year ended December 31, 2009, additions include $96,487 associated with our residential mortgage portfolio.

(b) For the year ended December 31, 2009, deductions include $150,723 associated with our residential mortgage portfolio.

124

RAIT Financial Trust

Schedule III

Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

As of December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands)

			Initial Cost						Cost of Improvements, net of Retirements								Gross Carrying Amount						Accumulated Depreciation- Building				Encumbrances (Unpaid Principal)				Year of Acquisition		Life of Depreciation
Property Name	Description	Location	Land			Building			Land				Building				Land (1)			Building (1)
Willow Grove	Land	Willow Grove, PA		$	307		$	0		$	0			$	0			$	307		$	0		$	0			$	0			2001		N/A
Cherry Hill	Land	Cherry Hill, NJ			307			0			0				0				307			0			0				0			2001		N/A
Reuss	Office	Milwaukee, WI			4,080			36,720			10				14,253				4,090			50,973			(13,052	)			(32,766	) (2)		2004		30
McDowell	Office	Scottsdale, AZ			9,803			55,523			5				4,143				9,808			59,666			(6,894	)			(71,158	) (2)		2007		30
Stonecrest	Multi-Family	Birmingham, AL			5,858			23,433			(31	)			(125	)			5,827			23,308			(2,654	)			(26,548	) (3)		2008		30
Crestmont (8)	Multi-Family	Marietta, GA			3,207			12,828			47				251				3,254			13,079			(1,440	)			(6,750	) (9)		2008		40
Copper Mill (8)	Multi-Family	Austin, TX			3,420			13,681			52				370				3,472			14,051			(1,548	)			(7,350	) (9)		2008		40
Cumberland (8)	Multi-Family	Smyrna, GA			3,194			12,776			(94	)			498				3,100			13,274			(1,454	)			(6,900	) (9)		2008		40
Heritage Trace (8)	Multi-Family	Newport News, VA			2,642			10,568			31				303				2,673			10,871			(1,192	)			(5,500	)(9)		2008		40
Mandalay Bay	Multi-Family	Austin, TX			5,363			21,453			98				552				5,461			22,005			(2,601	)			(28,242	) (6)		2008		30
Oyster Point	Multi-Family	Newport News, VA			3,920			15,680			47				287				3,967			15,967			(1,883	)			(16,980	) (2)		2008		30
Tuscany Bay	Multi-Family	Orlando, FL			7,002			28,009			121				711				7,123			28,720			(3,388	)			(29,721	) (2)		2008		30
Colonial Parc	Multi-Family	Little Rock, AR			910			3,639			0				651				910			4,290			(504	)			(9,172	) (2)		2009		30
Corey Landings	Land	St. Pete Beach, FL			21,595			0			0				0				21,595			0			0				0			2009		N/A
Sharpstown Mall	Retail	Houston, TX			6,737			26,948			(1	)			4,986				6,736			31,934			(2,963	)			(50,397	) (2)		2009		30
Belle Creek Apartments (8)	Multi-Family	Henderson, CO			1,890			7,562			0				216				1,890			7,778			(679	)			(10,575	) (2)		2009		40
Willows	Multi-Family	Las Vegas, NV			2,184			8,737			0				16				2,184			8,753			(827	)			(11,800	) (2)		2009		30
Regency Meadows	Multi-Family	Las Vegas, NV			1,875			7,499			0				210				1,875			7,709			(731	)			(10,189	) (2)		2009		30
Executive Center	Office	Milwaukee, WI			1,581			6,324			(51	)			1,025				1,530			7,349			(607	)			(9,989	) (2)		2009		30
Remington	Multi-Family	Tampa, FL			4,273			17,092			0				2,131				4,273			19,223			(1,899	)			(24,750	) (2)		2009		30
Desert Wind	Multi-Family	Phoenix, AZ			2,520			10,080			0				52				2,520			10,132			(903	)			(12,451	) (2)		2009		30
Eagle Ridge	Multi-Family	Colton, CA			3,198			12,792			0				418				3,198			13,210			(1,201	)			(16,986	) (2)		2009		30
Emerald Bay	Multi-Family	Las Vegas, NV			6,500			26,000			0				192				6,500			26,192			(2,335	)			(27,947	) (2)		2009		30
Grand Terrace	Multi-Family	Colton, CA			4,619			18,477			0				425				4,619			18,902			(1,664	)			(23,826	) (2)		2009		30
Las Vistas	Multi-Family	Phoenix, AZ			2,440			9,760			0				117				2,440			9,877			(881	)			(12,234	) (2)		2009		30
Penny Lane	Multi-Family	Mesa, AZ			1,540			6,160			0				90				1,540			6,250			(561	)			(9,495	) (2)		2009		30
Sandal Ridge	Multi-Family	Mesa, AZ			1,980			7,920			0				160				1,980			8,080			(732	)			(11,576	) (2)		2009		30
Long Beach Promenade	Office	Long Beach, CA			860			3,440			0				90				860			3,530			(276	)			(5,225	) (2)		2009		30
Murrells Retail Associates	Retail	Myrtle Beach, SC			0			2,500			0				7,802				0			10,302			(543	)			(28,585	) (2)		2009		30
Preserve @ Colony Lakes	Multi-Family	Stafford, TX			6,720			26,880			0				117				6,720			26,997			(2,033	)			(34,331	) (4)		2009		30
English Aire/Lafayette Landing	Multi-Family	Austin, TX			3,440			13,760			0				1,359				3,440			15,119			(1,336	)			(18,000	) (2)		2009		30
Tresa at Arrowheads (8)	Multi-Family	Phoenix, AZ			7,080			28,320			0				246				7,080			28,566			(1,922	)			(27,500	) (2)		2009		40

125

			Initial Cost						Cost of Improvements, net of Retirements							Gross Carrying Amount						Accumulated Depreciation- Building				Encumbrances (Unpaid Principal)				Year of Acquisition		Life of Depreciation
Property Name	Description	Location	Land			Building			Land				Building			Land (1)			Building (1)
Madison Park & Southgreen	Multi-Family	Indianapolis, IN			1,260			5,040			0				311			1,260			5,351			(392	)			(7,520	) (2)		2009		30
Mineral Business Center	Office	Denver, CO			1,940			7,760			0				157			1,940			7,917			(553	)			(11,177	) (2)		2009		30
1501 Yamato Road	Office	Boca Raton, FL			8,200			32,800			0				5,034			8,200			37,834			(2,639	)			(56,274	) (7)		2009		30
Blair Mill	Office	Willow Grove, PA			2,280			9,120			0				138			2,280			9,258			(623	)			(11,246	)(2)		2010		30
Pine Tree	Office	Cherry Hill, NJ			1,980			7,920			0				668			1,980			8,588			(573	)			(10,437	) (5)		2010		30
Ventura	Multi-Family	Gainesville, FL			1,913			7,650			0				307			1,913			7,957			(521	)			(8,486	) (2)		2010		30
Lexington	Multi-Family	Jackson, MS			3,168			12,672			0				172			3,168			12,726			(781	)			(18,276	) (2)		2010		30
Trails at Northpoint	Multi-Family	Jackson, MS			1,354			5,414			0				54			1,354			5,586			(379	)			(7,809	) (2)		2010		30
Silversmith	Multi-Family	Jacksonville, FL			1,048			4,191			0				321			1,048			4,512			(332	)			(9,515	) (2)		2010		30
Tiffany Square	Office	Colorado Springs, CO			2,400			9,600			996				2,062			3,396			11,662			(514	)			(14,864	) (2)		2010		30
Vista Lago	Multi-Family	Kendall, FL			0			10,500			0				93			0			10,593			(505	)			(14,972	) (2)		2010		30
Centrepoint (8)	Multi-Family	Tucson, AZ			5,620			22,480			0				240			5,620			22,720			(1,046	)			(17,600	) (9)		2010		40
Regency Manor	Multi-Family	Miami, FL			2,320			9,280			0				11			2,320			9,291			(361	)			(11,500	)(2)		2010		30
Four Resource Square	Office	Charlotte, NC			4,060			16,240			0				140			4,060			16,380			(512	)			(22,119	) (2)		2011		30
Somervale Apartments	Multi-Family	Miami Gardens, FL			5,420			21,680			0				37			5,420			21,717			(424	)			(31,868	) (2)		2011		30
Augusta Apartments	Multi-Family	Las Vegas, NV			6,180			24,720			0				62			6,180			24,782			(414	)			(35,000	) (2)		2011		30
South Plaza	Retail	Las Vegas, NV			4,480			17,920			0				32			4,480			17,952			(100	)			(22,594	) (2)		2011		30
Del Aire	Land	Daytona Beach, FL			1,188			0			(1	)			0			1,187			0			0				(1,455	) (2)		2011		30
Cardinal Motel	Land	Daytona Beach, FL			884			0			0				0			884			0			0				(1,083	) (2)		2011		30
Treasure Island Resort	Land	Daytona Beach, FL			6,230			0			0				0			6,230			0			0				(11,077	)(2)		2011		30
Sunny Shores Resort	Land	Daytona Beach, FL			3,379			0			0				0			3,379			0			0				(4,321	) (2)		2011		30
MGS Gift Shop	Land	Daytona Beach, FL			409			0			0				0			409			0			0				(520	) (2)		2011		30
Saxony Inn	Land	Daytona Beach, FL			1,653			0			1				0			1,654			0			0				(2,594	) (2)		2011		30
Beachcomber Beach Resort	Land	Daytona Beach, FL			10,300			0			0				0			10,300			0			0				(12,648	) (2)		2011		30
				$	208,711		$	699,548		$	1,230			$	51,385		$	209,941		$	750,933		$	(69,372	)		$	(931,899	)

(1) The aggregate cost basis for federal income tax purposes of our investments in real estate approximates the carrying amount at December 31, 2011.

(2) These encumbrances are held by our consolidated securitizations, RAIT I, RAIT II, Taberna VIII, or Taberna IX.

(3) Of these encumbrances, $19,423 is held by third parties and $7,125 is held by RAIT I.

(4) Of these encumbrances, $26,306 is held by third parties and $8,025 is held by RAIT I.

(5) Of these encumbrances, $8,853 is held by third parties and $1,584 is held by RAIT I.

(6) Of these encumbrances, $13,266 is held by third parties and $14,976 is held by Taberna IX and RAIT II.

(7) Of these encumbrances, $23,774 is held by third parties and $32,500 is held by RAIT I.

(8) During 2011, these properties were acquired by our subsidiary, Independence Realty Trust, Inc.

(9) These encumbrances are held entirely by third parties.

126

Investments in Real Estate	For the Year Ended December 31, 2011			For the Year Ended December 31, 2010
Balance, beginning of period	$	885,796		$	762,608
Additions during period:
Acquisitions		124,743			144,387
Improvements to land and building		20,682			12,469
Deductions during period:
Dispositions of real estate		(70,347	)		(20,080	)
Deconsolidation of real estate		0			(13,588	)
Balance, end of period:	$	960,874		$	885,796

Accumulated Depreciation	For the Year Ended December 31, 2011			For the Year Ended December 31, 2010
Balance, beginning of period	$	46,604		$	25,548
Depreciation expense		25,925			22,387
Dispositions of real estate		(3,157	)		(1,331	)
Balance, end of period:	$	69,372		$	46,604

127

RAIT Financial Trust

Schedule IV

Mortgage Loans on Real Estate

As of December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands)

(1) Summary of Commercial Mortgages, Mezzanine Loans, Other Loans and Preferred Equity Interests

Description of mortgages	Number of Loans		Interest Rate						Maturity Date				Principal				Carrying Amount of Mortgages
			Lowest			Highest			Earliest		Latest		Lowest		Highest
Commercial mortgages
Multi-family		12		5.0	%		7.8	%		3/1/12		12/31/20	$	4,000	$	28,617	$	199,535
Office		17		3.3	%		8.5	%		3/1/12		8/31/18		828		26,578		201,916
Retail		6		5.0	%		7.7	%		3/1/12		12/20/16		2,790		80,480		167,395
Other		1		6.0	%		6.0	%		7/30/14		7/30/14		2,225		2,225		2,225
Subtotal		36		3.3	%		8.5	%		3/1/12		12/31/20		828		80,480		571,071
Mezzanine loans
Multi-family		37		2.1	%		15.0	%		3/1/12		11/25/38		100		12,152		70,625
Office		32		2.7	%		12.5	%		3/1/12		1/17/21		247		25,558		140,214
Retail		15		0.5	%(b)		12.5	%		3/1/12		6/11/17		210		25,860		71,429
Other		7		3.7	%		12.5	%		3/1/12		8/31/21		549		16,222		25,430
Subtotal		91		0.5	%		15.0	%		3/1/12		11/25/38		100		25,860		307,698
Preferred equity interests
Multi-family		7		4.0	%		13.0	%		10/1/14		8/18/25		884		8,917		28,445
Office		12		0.0	%(c)		11.0	%		5/1/12		1/11/17		92		7,750		23,705
Retail		2		9.9	%		12.0	%		3/1/14		10/11/16		1,300		5,000		6,300
Other		1		14.0	%		14.0	%		9/4/21		09/4/21		6,000		6,000		6,000
Subtotal		22		0.0	%		14.0	%		5/1/12		8/18/25		92		8,917		64,450
Other loans
Multi-family		1		7.2	%		7.2	%		3/1/12		3/1/12		19,500		19,500		19,500
Office		2		2.7	%		3.3	%		3/1/12		10/30/16		204		20,138		20,863
Other		1		3.4	%		3.4	%		8/1/13		8/1/13		15,000		15,000		13,830
Subtotal		4		2.7	%		7.2	%		3/1/12		10/30/16		204		20,138		54,193
Total commercial mortgages, mezzanine loans, preferred equity interests and other loans		153		0.0	%		15.0	%		3/1/12		11/25/38	$	92	$	80,480	$	997,412

(a) The tax basis of the commercial mortgages, mezzanine loans, other loans and preferred equity interests approximates the carrying amount.

(b) Relates to a $7.8 million commercial real estate loan that was restructured in 2011 to reduce the interest rate from 10.25% to 0.5%.

(c) Relates to a $4.4 million equity investment where there is no contractual interest; however, we receive returns based on the performance of the underlying real estate property.

(d) Reconciliation of carrying amount of commercial mortgages, mezzanine loans, other loans and preferred equity interests:

	For the Year Ended December 31, 2011			For the Year Ended December 31, 2010
Balance, beginning of period	$	1,220,673		$	1,469,322
Additions during period:
Additional advances		104,131			31,284
Accretion of discount		1,753			3,606
Deductions during period:
Collections of principal		(214,049	)		(107,717	)
Conversion of loans to real estate owned property and charge-offs		(115,096	)		(175,822	)
Balance, end of period:	$	997,412		$	1,220,673

128

(a) Summary of Commercial Mortgages, Mezzanine Loans, Preferred Equity and Other Loans by Geographic Location:

Location by State	Number of Loans		Interest Rate						Principal				Total Carrying Amount of Mortgages (a)
			Lowest			Highest			Lowest		Highest
Various States		11		0.5	%(a)		12.5	%	$	204	$	80,480	$	226,245
Texas		29		3.7	%		14.5	%		350		25,860		209,360
California		13		0.0	%(b)		12.5	%		247		12,125		77,368
New York		9		3.3	%		12.5	%		804		26,578		63,522
Pennsylvania		12		5.0	%		15.0	%		175		27,993		60,016
Florida		6		4.1	%		12.0	%		881		25,558		57,133
Colorado		4		6.3	%		12.0	%		3,000		26,085		39,697
Minnesota		4		5.0	%		12.5	%		421		16,531		39,304
Massachusetts		3		5.2	%		12.0	%		990		18,500		34,565
North Carolina		2		2.1	%		7.0	%		4,471		28,617		33,124
Wisconsin		16		9.8	%		12.5	%		92		3,200		20,255
Illinois		3		6.8	%		12.5	%		210		13,000		16,805
Ohio		4		6.5	%		12.5	%		430		12,168		15,248
Tennessee		3		4.0	%		14.0	%		1,230		6,159		13,389
Arizona		3		5.0	%		7.0	%		100		8,409		12,509
New Jersey		5		5.0	%		12.5	%		550		4,813		11,284
Alabama		2		5.0	%		5.0	%		2,635		7,195		9,829
Oregon		1		7.0	%		7.0	%		9,500		9,500		9,500
Missouri		1		7.0	%		7.0	%		8,845		8,845		8,845
Connecticut		1		12.0	%		12.0	%		554		4,000		8,301
Georgia		3		11.0	%		12.5	%		393		4,220		6,784
Idaho		1		7.5	%		7.5	%		6,471		6,471		6,471
Maryland		4		6.1	%		14.5	%		338		2,500		5,868
Indiana		4		12.0	%		12.5	%		368		2,812		5,824
Michigan		2		12.0	%		12.5	%		625		1,300		1,925
Vermont		1		11.5	%		11.5	%		1,029		1,029		1,029
Mississippi		1		12.5	%		12.5	%		820		820		820
South Dakota		1		12.5	%		12.5	%		736		736		736
Delaware		1		12.5	%		12.5	%		670		670		670
Virginia		1		12.5	%		12.5	%		400		400		400
Louisiana		1		12.5	%		12.5	%		342		342		342
Kentucky		1		12.5	%		12.5	%		244		244		244
		153		0.0	%		15.0	%	$	92	$	80,480	$	997,412

(a) Relates to a $7.8 million commercial real estate loan that was restructured in 2011 to reduce the interest rate from 10.25% to 0.5%.

(b) Relates to a $4.4 million equity investment where there is no contractual interest, however, we receive returns based on the operating performance of the underlying real estate property.

129

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, our management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

Under the supervision of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer and with the participation of our disclosure committee, we have carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective at the reasonable assurance level.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework. Based on this assessment, management believes that, as of December 31, 2011, our internal control over financial reporting is effective.

Our independent registered public accounting firm has issued an attestation report on our internal control over financial reporting. This report is included as part of Item 8 in this annual report on Form 10-K.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the three months ended December 31, 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

130

PART III

Item 10. Trustees, Executive Officers and Trust Governance

The information required by this item will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement with respect to our 2012 annual meeting of shareholders to be filed on or before April 29, 2012, and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The information required by this item will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement with respect to our 2012 annual meeting of shareholders, and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters

The information required by this item will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement with respect to our 2012 annual meeting of shareholders, and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Trustee Independence

The information required by this item will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement with respect to our 2012 annual meeting of shareholders, and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

The information required by this item will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement with respect to our 2012 annual meeting of shareholders, and is incorporated herein by reference.

131

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

(a) Listed below are all financial statements, financial statement schedules, and exhibits filed as part of this 10-K and herein included.

(1) Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 Consolidated Financial Statements:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	79
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2011 and 2010	81
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Years Ended December 31, 2011	82
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Three Years Ended December 31, 2011	83
Consolidated Statements of Equity for the Three Years Ended December 31, 2011	84
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Years Ended December 31, 2011	85
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	86
Supplemental Schedules:
Schedule II: Valuation and Qualifying Accounts	124
Schedule III: Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation	125
Schedule IV: Mortgage Loans on Real Estate and Mortgage Related Receivables	128

All other schedules are not applicable or are omitted since either (i) the required information is not material or (ii) the information required is included in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.

(2) Exhibits

The Exhibits furnished as part of this annual report on Form 10-K are identified in the Exhibit Index immediately following the signature pages of this annual report. Such Exhibit Index is incorporated herein by reference.

132

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

RAIT FINANCIAL TRUST
By:	/s/    SCOTT F. SCHAEFFER
	Scott F. Schaeffer
	Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President

February 24, 2012

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

	Name	Capacity With RAIT Financial Trust	Date
By:	/s/    SCOTT F. SCHAEFFER         Scott F. Schaeffer	Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer)	February 24, 2012
By:	/s/    JACK E. SALMON         Jack E. Salmon	Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)	February 24, 2012
By:	/S/    JAMES J. SEBRA         James J. Sebra	Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)	February 24, 2012
By:	/s/    EDWARD S. BROWN         Edward S. Brown	Trustee	February 24, 2012
By:	/S/    FRANK A. FARNESI         Frank A. Farnesi	Trustee	February 24, 2012
By:	/s/    S. KRISTIN KIM         S. Kristin Kim	Trustee	February 24, 2012
By:	/S/    ARTHUR MAKADON         Arthur Makadon	Trustee	February 24, 2012
By:	/s/    JOHN F. QUIGLEY, III         John F. Quigley, III	Trustee	February 24, 2012
By:	/s/    JON C. SARKISIAN         Jon C. Sarkisian	Trustee	February 24, 2012
By:	/S/    MURRAY STEMPEL, III         Murray Stempel, III	Trustee	February 24, 2012

133

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit Number	Description of Documents
3.1	Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust. (1)
3.1.1	Articles of Amendment to Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust. (2)
3.1.2	Articles of Amendment to Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust. (3)
3.1.3	Certificate of Correction to the Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust. (4)
3.1.4	Articles of Amendment to Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust. (5)
3.1.5	Articles of Amendment to Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust. (6)
3.1.6	Articles Supplementary relating to the 7.75% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest (the “Series A Articles Supplementary”). (7)
3.1.7	Certificate of Correction to the Series A Articles Supplementary. (7)
3.1.8	Articles Supplementary relating to the 8.375% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest. (8)
3.1.9	Articles Supplementary relating to the 8.875% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest. (9)
3.2	By-laws (10).
4.1	Form of Certificate for Common Shares of Beneficial Interest. (6)
4.2	Form of Certificate for 7.75% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest. (11)
4.3	Form of Certificate for 8.375% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest. (8)
4.4	Form of Certificate for 8.875% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest. (9)
4.5	Indenture dated as of April 18, 2007 among RAIT Financial Trust (“RAIT”), as issuer, RAIT Partnership, L.P. and RAIT Asset Holdings, LLC, as guarantors, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee. (12)
4.6	Registration Rights Agreement dated as of April 18, 2007 between RAIT and Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc. (12)
4.7	Base Indenture dated as of March 21, 2011 between RAIT, as issuer, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association., as trustee. (13)
4.8	Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 21, 2011 between RAIT, as issuer, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association., as trustee. (13)
4.9	Indenture dated as of October 5, 2011 between RAIT and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as trustee. (14)
10.1	Form of Indemnification Agreement. (1)
10.2.1	Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of December 11, 2006 between RAIT and Betsy Z. Cohen. (5)
10.2.2	Amendment dated as of December 15, 2008 to Employment Agreement between RAIT and Betsy Z. Cohen. (15)

134

Exhibit Number	Description of Documents
10.3.1	RAIT Executive Pension Plan for Betsy Z. Cohen as amended and restated effective as of January 1, 2005. (5)
10.3.2	Letter Amendment dated as of December 15, 2008 to RAIT Executive Pension Plan for Betsy Z. Cohen. (15)
10.3.3	Termination Notice from Betsy Z. Cohen to RAIT Financial Trust dated as of November 4, 2010. (16)
10.3.4	Consulting Agreement between RAIT Financial Trust and Betsy Z. Cohen dated as of November 4, 2010. (16)
10.4.1	Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of December 11, 2006 between RAIT and Scott F. Schaeffer. (5)
10.4.2	Amendment dated as of December 15, 2008 to Employment Agreement between RAIT and Scott F. Schaeffer. (15)
10.4.3	Amendment dated as of February 22, 2009 to Employment Agreement between RAIT and Scott F. Schaeffer. (17)
10.4.4	Third Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of August 4, 2011 between RAIT and Scott F. Schaeffer. (18)
10.5.1	Employment Agreement dated as of June 8, 2006 by and between RAIT, Daniel G. Cohen and, as to Section 7.14 thereof, Taberna. (19)
10.5.2	Amendment dated as of December 15, 2008 to Employment Agreement between RAIT and Daniel G. Cohen. (15)
10.5.3	Letter of Separation dated as of February 22, 2009 between RAIT and Daniel G. Cohen. (17)
10.6.1	Employment Agreement dated as of June 8, 2006 by and between RAIT, Jack E. Salmon and, as to Section 7.14 thereof, Taberna. (19)
10.6.2	Amendment dated as of December 15, 2008 to Employment Agreement between RAIT and Jack E. Salmon. (15)
10.7.1	Employment Agreement dated as of June 8, 2006 by and between RAIT, Plamen Mitrikov and, as to Section 7.14 thereof, Taberna. (19)
10.7.2	Letter Agreement dated as of August 7, 2008 by and between RAIT and Plamen M. Mitrikov. (20)
10.7.3	Amendment dated as of December 15, 2008 to Employment Agreement between RAIT and Plamen Mitrikov. (15)
10.7.4	Separation Agreement dated as of July 15, 2011 between RAIT and Plamen Mitrikov. (18)
10.8.1	Employment Agreement dated as of June 8, 2006 by and between RAIT, Raphael Licht and, as to Section 7.14 thereof, Taberna. (19)
10.8.2	Amendment dated as of December 15, 2008 to Employment Agreement between RAIT and Raphael Licht. (21)
10.8.3	Amendment dated as of February 22, 2009 to Employment Agreement between RAIT and Raphael Licht. (17)
10.9.1	Employment Agreement dated as of May 22, 2007, by and between RAIT and James J. Sebra. (22)

135

Exhibit Number	Description of Documents
10.9.2	Amendment dated as of December 15, 2008 to Employment Agreement between RAIT and James J. Sebra. (21)
10.10.1	Employment Agreement dated as of February 5, 2008 by and between RAIT and Ken R. Frappier. (23)
10.10.2	Amendment dated as of December 15, 2008 to Employment Agreement between RAIT and Ken R. Frappier. (21)
10.10.3	First Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of August 4, 2011 between RAIT and Ken R. Frappier. (18)
10.11	RAIT Phantom Share Plan (As Amended and Restated, Effective July 20, 2004) (the “PSP”). (24)
10.12	RAIT Financial Trust 2008 Incentive Award Plan, as Amended and Restated May 20, 2008 (the “IAP”). (25)
10.13	IAP Form of 2008 Cash Award Program Agreement. (25)
10.14	IAP Form for Non-Employee Trustee Grants. (26)
10.15	PSP Form for Non-Employee Trustee Grants. (26)
10.16	PSP Form of Letter to Trustees regarding the redemption of Phantom Shares. (27)
10.17	PSP Form of Letter to Trustees regarding the redemption of Phantom Shares. (21)
10.18	IAP Form of Share Award Agreement with full vesting. (27)
10.19	IAP Form of Unit Award to Cover Grants to Section 16 Officers adopted January 24, 2006. (28)
10.20	IAP Form of Unit Award to Cover Grants to Certain Section 16 Officers granted October 24, 2006. (29)
10.21	IAP Form of Unit Award to Cover Grants to Section 16 Officers adopted January 24, 2007. (30)
10.22	IAP Form of Unit Award to Cover Grants to Non-Employee Trustees adopted July 19, 2005. (27)
10.23	Taberna 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (“Taberna EIP”). (5)
10.24	Taberna EIP Form of Restricted Share Award. (31)
10.25	Form of Forfeiture Letters dated December 7, 2007. (32)
10.26	Letter Amendment to Grants of Phantom Units to Executive Officers of RAIT under IAP. (15)
10.27	Letter Amendment to Grants of Phantom Units to Non-Management Trustees under IAP. (21)
10.28.1	Form of Letter Agreement between RAIT and each of its Non-Management Trustees dated March 2009. (33)
10.28.2	Form of Letter Agreement between RAIT and each of its Non-Management Trustees dated as of January 26, 2010. (34)
10.28.3	Form of Letter Agreement between RAIT and each of its Non-Management Trustees dated as of January 25, 2011. (35)
10.28.4	Form of Letter Agreement between RAIT and each of its Non-Management Trustees dated as of January 24, 2012. (36)
10.29.1	IAP Form of Unit Award to Cover Grants to Compensation Committee Officers adopted January 26, 2010. (37)

136

Exhibit Number	Description of Documents
10.29.2	IAP Form of Share Appreciation Rights Award Agreement adopted January 24, 2012. (36)
10.30	Consulting Agreement dated as of December 15, 2011 by and between Daniel Promislo and RAIT.*
10.31	Assignment of Lease dated December 11, 2006 between RAIT and Taberna Capital Management, LLC. (31)
10.32	Amendment No. 2 to lease dated as of November 1, 2005 between 450 Park LLC and Taberna. (31)
10.33	Sublease Agreement dated as of April 1, 2006 between Cohen Brothers, LLC and Taberna Capital Management, LLC. (31)
10.34	Notation of Guarantee by RAIT Partnership, L.P. and RAIT Asset Holdings, LLC as guarantors. (12)
10.35	Master Repurchase Agreement dated as of September 19, 2008, as amended and restated as of October 27, 2008, between Wilmington Trust Company, as agent for Cedric LLC, as buyer, and Taberna Loan Holdings I, LLC, as seller (the “TLHI Agreement”). (38)
10.36	Master Repurchase Agreement dated as of September 19, 2008 between Wilmington Trust Company, as agent for Cedric LLC, as buyer, and RAIT CRE Holdings, LLC, as seller (the “RAIT CRE Agreement”). (39)
10.37	Parent Guarantee dated as of September 19, 2008 made by RAIT and Taberna in favor of Wilmington Trust Company, as agent for Cedric LLC, relating to the TLHI Agreement. (39)
10.38	Parent Guarantee dated as of September 19, 2008 made by RAIT and Taberna in favor of Wilmington Trust Company, as agent for Cedric LLC relating to the RAIT CRE Agreement. (39)
10.39	Securities Purchase Agreement dated June 25, 2009 among Taberna Realty Finance Trust and Taberna Equity Funding, Ltd., as sellers, Dynamic Credit Partners, LLC, as purchaser, and its affiliate Dynamic Credit Management, LLC. (40)
10.40	Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of July 15, 2009 between RAIT’s subsidiary, Taberna Loan Holdings I, LLC, as seller, and AG Park Lane I Corp., as buyer. (41)
10.41	Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of July 31, 2009 between RAIT and Mr. Moses Marx. (42)
10.42	Senior Secured Note dated July 31, 2009 issued by RAIT, as payor, to Mr. Moses Marx, as payee. (42)
10.43	Standby Equity Distribution Agreement dated as of January 13, 2010 by and between YA Global Master SPV Ltd. and RAIT. (43)
10.44	Exchange Agreement dated as of March 25, 2010 between RAIT and United Equities Commodities Company. (44)
10.45	10.0% Senior Secured Convertible Note due 2014 dated as of March 25, 2010 issued by RAIT, as payor, to United Equities Commodities Company, as payee. (44)
10.46	Capital on Demand Sales Agreement dated as of August 6, 2010 between RAIT, RAIT Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership and JonesTrading Institutional Services LLC. (45)
10.47.1	Exchange Agreement dated as of October 5, 2011 by and among RAIT and Taberna Preferred Funding VIII, Ltd. (46)
10.47.2	6.75% Senior Secured Note No. 1 due 2017 dated as of October 5, 2011 made by RAIT, as payor, to Hare & Co., as nominee payee. (46)

137

Exhibit Number	Description of Documents
10.47.3	6.85% Senior Secured Note No. 2 due 2017 dated as of October 5, 2011 made by RAIT, as payor, to Hare & Co., as nominee payee. (46)
10.47.4	7.15% Senior Secured Note No. 3 due 2018 dated as of October 5, 2011 made by RAIT, as payor, to Hare & Co., as nominee payee. (46)
10.47.5	7.25% Senior Secured Note No. 4 due 2019 dated as of October 5, 2011 made by RAIT, as payor, to Hare & Co., as nominee payee. (46)
10.48.1	Master Repurchase Agreement dated as of October 27, 2011, by and among RAIT CMBS Conduit I, LLC and Citibank, N.A. (46)
10.48.2	Guaranty dated October 27, 2011 by RAIT, as guarantor, for the benefit of Citibank, N.A. (46)
10.49.1	Master Repurchase Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2011, among RAIT CMBS Conduit II, LLC and Barclays Bank PLC. (47)
10.49.2	Guaranty Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2011, of RAIT in favor of Barclays Bank PLC. (47)
12.1	Statements regarding computation of ratios as of December 31, 2011.*
21.1	List of Subsidiaries.*
23.1	Consent of Grant Thornton LLP.*
31.1	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification by the Chief Executive Officer of RAIT.*
31.2	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification by the Chief Financial Officer of RAIT.*
32.1	Section 1350 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer of RAIT.*
32.2	Section 1350 Certification by the Chief Financial Officer of RAIT.*
99.1	Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations.*
101	Pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T, the following financial information from RAIT’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2011 is formatted in XBRL interactive data files: (i) Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three years ended December 31, 2011; (ii) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2011 and 2010; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the three years ended December 31, 2011; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for three years ended December 31, 2011; and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The information in this exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability of that section and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing or document.*

* Filed herewith

(1) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (Registration No. 333-35077).

(2) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (Registration No. 333-53067).

(3) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Registration Statement on Form S-2 (Registration No. 333-55518).

(4) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period ended March 31, 2002 (File No. 1-14760).

(5) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on December 15, 2006 (File No. 1-14760).

(6) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on July, 1 2011 (File No. 1-14760).

(7) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on March 18, 2004 (File No. 1-14760).

138

(8) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on October 1, 2004 (File No. 1-14760).

(9) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 8-A as filed with the SEC on June 29, 2007 (File No. 1-14760).

(10) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on October 19, 2009 (File No. 1-14760).

(11) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on March 22, 2004 (File No. 1-14760).

(12) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on April 18, 2007 (File No. 1-14760).

(13) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on March 22, 2011 (File No. 1-14760).

(14) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011 (File No. 1-14760).

(15) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on December 19, 2008 (File No. 1-14760).

(16) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 (File No. 1-14760).

(17) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on February 23, 2009 (File No. 1-14760).

(18) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011 (File No. 1-14760).

(19) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on June 13, 2006 (File No. 1-14760).

(20) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on August 13, 2008 (File No. 1-14760).

(21) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (File No. 1-14760).

(22) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on May 24, 2007 (File No. 1-14760).

(23) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on February 11, 2008 (File No. 1-14760).

(24) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period ended June 30, 2004 (File No. 1-14760).

(25) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on May 27, 2008 (File No. 1-14760).

(26) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period ended September 30, 2004 (File No. 1-14760).

(27) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on July 25, 2005 (File No. 1-14760).

(28) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on January 27, 2006 (File No. 1-14760).

(29) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on October 30, 2006 (File No. 1-14760).

(30) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on January 25, 2007 (File No. 1-14760).

(31) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (File No. 1-14760).

(32) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (File No. 1-14760).

(33) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on March 12, 2009 (File No. 1-14760).

(34) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on January 29, 2010 (File No. 1-14760).

(35) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on January 28, 2011 (File No. 1-14760).

(36) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on January 26, 2012 (File No.1-14760).

(37) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on January 29, 2010 (File No. 1-14760).

139

(38) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on October 31, 2008 (File No. 1-14760).

(39) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on September 25, 2008 (File No. 1-14760).

(40) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on June 29, 2009 (File No. 1-14760).

(41) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on July 21, 2009 (File No. 1-14760).

(42) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on August 3, 2009 (File No. 1-14760).

(43) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on January 13, 2010 (File No. 1-14760).

(44) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on March 25, 2010 (File No. 1-14760).

(45) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 (File No. 1-14760).

(46) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011 (File No.1-14760).

(47) Incorporated by reference to RAIT’s Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on November 25, 2011 (File No.1-14760).

140